Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Causes Internal Family Strife
techmuse writes "Fresh from its ad featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld eating churros and discussing shoes, Microsoft has introduced a new advertisement in which the aging former CEO and comedian take up residence with a family, causing infighting and malicious plots by the family members. Although the ad does not mention Microsoft's operating system directly, it does mirror the real world experience of the company's products — appearing where not wanted, hard to remove, causing administration headaches, and finally being forced out in hopes of getting one's living space back."
A possible way to make this video funny would have been to have the family demand their monthly rent: $1,000,000.00 - each. Upon which, Gates and Seinfeld open their wallets and pay in cash or open their wallets and have nothing and just say we're broke can we pay next month.
I'm not sure that personifying Gates will appeal to the masses. I saw this ad with my 11-year old daughter, and the first thing out of her mouth was "Whoa! Bill Gates is OLD!!!"
It's hard to relate to someone when they are ancient (and you are young). Why do you think the Apple guy is young while the Vista guy is older in Apple's TV spots?
'Nuff said.
Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
It is obvious that these ads are about changing people's perception of Microsoft, from a big scary company to something that is personable, friendly and helpful. In that sense, they probably work really well.
However, is that what Microsoft really needs? To have a great business you have a great product and use marketing to shout about why it is great. Microsoft have a bad product (in Vista) and are trying to change the perception of the company with funny ads. It looks like a pretty crappy position to be in to me.
If you think of it as watching some new Seinfeld show (instead of a commercial), it makes more sense. I chuckled at a few parts, it seemed a little long as it went on without any real plot, but in the end I was entertained.
But very strange that it had no commercial breaks.
--
UNIX make better lovers.
Everyone I know who has seen it has laughed a lot and thought it was a great commercial. Also they find it interesting the lack of mention about MS.
Isn't that contradictory? Great commercial yet people have no clue what the hell is being marketed? Shouldn't a great commercial be entertaining and same time clearly pitch a product or message?
Not mentioning MS doesn't mean people don't know what's being marketed. This morning two of my coworkers were talking outside my office about what they think will be in the next MS commercial with what sounded like a lot of enthusiasm. We don't work in IT.
I think the Mac vs. PC ad campaign is annoying 80% of the time and amusing 20% of the time, and is overall boring as hell. My Mac-happy friend has to change the channel every time one comes on. When the Gates ad comes on, people seem to be turning up the volume and enjoying being baffled. Even if these ads accomplish nothing for MS, they're an interesting ride for the rest of us.
"I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
Why does this story not link to the original video at Microsoft's website? http://www.microsoft.com/windows/
Watch this like a 5 minute Seinfeld episode and not like a commercial and I think it's hilarious.
You would have no idea that it's a commercial about an OS.
I guess it's not really an ad for an Windows, but rather an ad for Microsoft in general. To clarify ads these days are rarely about the product. Really, the next time you're watching TV, watch all the ads carefully, and ask yourself regarding each one, "What does this tell me about the product?"
Established brands rarely tell you anything about the product unless they're introducing something new. For example, Coke commercials. They might have someone holding a coke bottle or maybe even taking a sip, but the commercial doesn't have any "information" about Coke. McDonald's is the same way. Unless they're introducing a new sandwich or something, they don't talk about the product. They just show someone holding the bag or taking a bite out of the sandwich. But you know what? Everyone who takes a bite of the Big Mac or a sip of that Coke have some things in common: They're happy and attractive and having fun!
Current advertising theory holds that there's no point in giving people information, because people don't make "rational decisions". They make their decisions based on emotional attachments. So what advertisers aim to do is to attach a positive emotion with a product on a subconscious level, so that when you think about that product, you feel good. That good feeling makes you more likely to buy that product.
The holy grail of advertising is to be a part of an entire subculture that's attractive and happy and cool, a subculture that people want to be a part of, and to have their product be synonymous with their product. They want to make you feel like you can't be a part of the culture that you belong to without owning that product. They want you to feel like you're not yourself without that product.
Now I don't know how successful these ads will be, but it's clear that they're trying to remake the Microsoft image. They're trying to construct the emotional response you feel when you think about Microsoft, because the current emotional response from a lot of people consists mainly of frustration. So instead, they're trying to make Gates, as the embodiment of Microsoft, come across as a quirky fun guy that you'd like to have around even if he is a little hapless. He may as well be saying, "Hey, I'm not perfect, but I'm kind of nice and fun and even helpful, so invite me into your home."
I found quite a few bits funny. Gates reading a bedtime story to the kid about polymorphism was pretty hilarious (from a Geek/Nerd stand point) "Does this story have monsters?" "Yes, but there's a firewall".
If you can't find the hidden message about "bringing people together", and how they talk about it near the end. It is an advertisement about the OS, but a more "off" way to market it, like MOST COMMERCIALS.
I didn't watch the other commercial, but I thought it was a nice -entertaining- way to spend 4 minutes of tv ads than other commercials.
Disclaimer: I am not god.
We may not be created equal
But we can be treated equal.
Where are my mod points when I need them, the parent is bang on target. The holy grail of marketing, at least according to the presently ascendant theory, is to market and sell a brand image and NOT the products associated with that brand. This is far more profitable, assuming that it can be accomplished, because good products come and go and they cost money to research, develop, and produce, but if I can sell you on the concept of a brand then you will buy almost anything, regardless of quality and especially in the short run, that is associated with that brand. The real value and the highest potential for profit are selling the brand, not the products. Now, obviously this does not always work and it doesn't work on everyone, particularly not on intelligent people who think for themselves, but it does work on Joe Sixpack and that is the majority of the non-niche markets. Microsoft is attempting to develop and expand their brand so that they can sell their products to an American public that is becoming increasingly ignorant about how technology actually works and concentrates mostly on what is cool or in style over functionality.
Bill Gates ... supporting software piracy the world around.
I be willing to bet a lot of piracy is done by insiders. In this case, Bill gave him some software ... hmm.
Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
You were one of those kids that pointed out Santa wasn't real, how ugly 'everyone' thought someones girlfriend was.
Seinfeld didn't become the #1 show in America because it was unfunny. Neither did Friends. However I didn't particularly like Friends, but I wouldn't say it was 'un funny' just 'not my type of humor.'
I'm sure there's a regularly scheduled showing of Ow My Balls you could enjoy.
Yeah, because TCP/IP, SMTP, and the Web are so valuable without an OS. Love 'em or hate 'em, Microsoft did connect billions by putting an OS on the desktop that made those technologies worth something to Joe Average.
Let's give credit where it is due. But only where it's due. Microsoft didn't invent the Internet. They didn't make the Internet possible nor did they even make it popular. And they didn't provide the only viable platform.
What they did do is provide one of the key components Compaq needed to start the Clone market and prime the pump for the commodity hardware market we enjoy today. It is possible someone else would have done it if it wasn't for Microsoft (CP/M was essentially the business model for DOS). But it wasn't someone else who did it - it was Microsoft.
But be careful how far you take that praise.
Microsoft should take lessons from other groups that have nothing rational to say in commercials:
1) It is offensive to operating systems that you called Aero "lipstick on a pig".
2) Apples are elite, because they work better and are easier to use
3) Steve Jobs is the biggest celebrity in the world.
4) Apple's come with Arabic language support; they're terrorists.
5) The 'Apple Tax' is higher than the 'Microsoft Tax'; they want to raise your taxes.
6) far more new lines of code written for Vista than OS X; Vista is the operating system of change.
Don't laugh, this stuff works.
I don't know whether to laugh or cry when i see mac ads, i mean people actually believe them
IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
no. The point is comedy. Its simply not funny to do what is expected... to pay and tip the delivery guy. And finally there is acknowledgment that people do not tip delivery guys. Not sure if you know, but delivery guys pay for the delivery with tips. So, its not really right to order an $8 delivery 7 miles from the restaurant then tip a dollar... delivery guy loses money on gas. Regardless of the amount for the food, tip should be minimum the price of a gallon of gas unless you live within a mile of the restaurant, in which case 10% will do.
The Admin and the Engineer
The funny thing is, something like that did happen. Tom Brokaw was interviewing Bill Gates in a small town in South Dakota (Watertown, I think), about something the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation was doing with small town libraries and the Internet. They conducted part of the interview in a coffee shop/cafe there. The interview ended, and they both left. A little while later, Brokaw realizes that his people didn't pay the cafe. Neither did Gates'. The world's richest man and perhaps the most famous person to come out of the state stiffed the cafe.