Slashdot Mirror


AMD Employee Charged With Stealing Intel Secrets

IWonderWhatICanPutInThisFieldWithoutBeingDeleted writes "A man who once worked for Intel and then jumped ship to join AMD has been accused of stealing his erstwhile employer's chip secrets. Federal detectives allege they discovered 19 CAD designs and more than 100 pages of confidential Intel documentation."

212 comments

  1. Ironically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    this substantiates allegations made here which were widely mocked at the time.

  2. Unfortunately by bugeaterr · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was the design of the Pentium Pro's floating point processor.

    1. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I check out that processor but it doesn't sound like its something big but still. He shouldn't have taken the information.

      whoooosh! Right over your head.

    2. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Whoosh...

    3. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly, the only way amd could compete with intel was to fix it's fpu problems
      since the cirix chips.. seems fate has caught up with amd, if they sync the docs to
      amd overcoming the fpu probelm, that's a match.. amd is finished if this is true.

    4. Re:Unfortunately by operagost · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Pentium P54 had the FP bug, not the PPro. Your geek card has been revoked.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Unfortunately by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      No, it was the plans for the Skynet Terminator CPU.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    6. Re:Unfortunately by Sadsfae · · Score: 1

      It was the design of the Pentium Pro's floating point processor.

      Well, the article does state he did it out curiosity.

      --
      Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    7. Re:Unfortunately by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Pentium P54 had the FP bug, not the PPro. Your geek card has been revoked.

      I think he is referring to the Pentium Pro's notoriously poor 16-bit performance, which religated it to Windows NT workstations as it was little better than a standard Pentium when running 16-bit operating systems; i.e., Windows 95.

  3. Zomg... by RulerOf · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Industries still compete the "old fashioned" way.

    News at 11.

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    1. Re:Zomg... by Prefader · · Score: 3, Informative

      This has nothing to do with AMD competing with Intel. It appears that AMD didn't use the documents, and the employee made the copies on his own, "out of curiosity".

    2. Re:Zomg... by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Post-RTFA, of course.

      Still though, this kind of stuff is one of those things that, as a business, where the ability to compete directly affects your bottom line, I have to imagine that many people/companies in this situation would be differently inclined in the event that use of such information would never be leaked. Something that could stay with the one person who has the capability to use it to his advantage, or amongst the inner circles of a board room.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    3. Re:Zomg... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know if I buy his rationalization, but I do believe it's plausible. Our employers know the price of their designs, but usually not the value of it. I love to look at all the designs my company does and learn from them, it's how I design better systems for us. That whole learning from the mistakes of others thing. I fear the shockwave that may come out of this is more technology companies segmenting designs and locking them down to "eyes only". I see it happening from time to time, and it's terrible, particularly for quality.

      Retaining said designs after my present employment, while illegal, I think is morally gray. Using them, or planning to use them for the new employer, particularly in the hopes to "get ahead" is absolutely immoral. I don't know how AMD is, but I suspect they are petrified of anything coming out of Intel that isn't in wetware. That's a surefire way to get your ass fired, at least where I work.

      If he wanted to impress his new employer, he'd study the designs, find their strength and flaws, and help them build a better processor. That's vicious, competitive and absolutely legal and moral. Anyone who has ever worked with Intel (in particular, not that they are alone) knows what they make isn't exactly the pristine icon of perfection wall street likes to believe. They NEED a competitor to out innovate them, not someone to copy their junk verbatim.

    4. Re:Zomg... by Baton+Rogue · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Isn't this why people get hired away from companies to go work for competitors? They want that person's knowledge of how their competition's products are built, so they can make a better product. It just seems that the guy they happened to hire did more than just bring his internal-working knowledge, and brought actual documentation.

  4. ... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The irony is that his new employer (AMD) would never touch the stolen info with a 10-foot pole. The company I work with (also in the IT sector but not hardware) has very, very clear policies around competitive information. They know just how badly it would go for them if they made use of stolen information brought in by a new (or even existing) employee.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    1. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      "AMD" wouldn't touch it but it's quite possible lower level employees would look at it to gain valuable insights. Sure they wouldn't directly clone a design but just seeing how it's done can be invaluable.

    2. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by RulerOf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      (AMD) would never touch the stolen info with a 10-foot pole.

      Even if they couldn't directly plagiarize the information to enhance their current architecture (I understand there are a lot of very fundamental differences between them), it would be valuable to AMD if they could determine, for example, how fast Intel's next gen chip is going to be in order to make a product that would be able to compete better, even if it meant sacrificing margins.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    3. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Geek-tan · · Score: 1

      Said person could possibly suggest things familiar to Intel, marking them as his own.

    4. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The irony is that his new employer (AMD) would never touch the stolen info with a 10-foot pole.

      It's not unlike the disgruntled Coca-Cola employees who took the Coke Zero formula to Pepsi. Pepsi wouldn't touch it with Dr. Pepper's 10-foot pole. They turned the disgruntled employees into the appropriate authorities, notified Coke and sent the formula back without breaking the seal.

      Duh. The legal hassles alone aren't worth it.

    5. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And generally they want to promote a culture of honesty and integrity. If Pepsi employees think it's okay to steal from Coke, they'll think it's okay to steal from Pepsi.

      Certain political radicals would claim that capitalism is inherently dishonest and corrupt. Although there is plenty of that, they would be amazed at the degree of integrity required to run a successful business.

    6. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by amilo100 · · Score: 0

      Coke Zero does not really have a formula - it is just a bunch of Aspartame (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspartame_controversy).

      Coke Zero (at least in my country) tastes exactly the same as Pepsi Max - same ingredients.

      I am not sure that secrets such as this counts for anything, because the ingredients are known and it is trivial to determine the quantities.

    7. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      That and it's not the formula, it's the brand name. Pepsi would gain nothing from selling a pop that tastes like Coca Cola, because people would just continue to buy Coca Cola.

      If I want a Pepsi, I buy them. Coke, I buy them. (I'm one of those weird people that drinks both.)

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    8. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Otter · · Score: 1

      They'd have to be out of their minds to do that either. Pani is (allegedly) an idiot if he thought he could score points with this.

    9. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by vslashg · · Score: 1

      I am not sure that secrets such as this counts for anything, because the ingredients are known and it is trivial to determine the quantities.

      Yeah, the big mystery of "natural flavors" on the ingredients lists is just how much natural flavors to use.

    10. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by networkconsultant · · Score: 1

      Stolen Practices are a whole different ball of wax.

    11. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The irony is that his new employer (AMD) would never touch the stolen info with a 10-foot pole. The company I work with (also in the IT sector but not hardware) has very, very clear policies around competitive information. They know just how badly it would go for them if they made use of stolen information brought in by a new (or even existing) employee.

      Only a complete and utter moron would come in with a stack of papers stolen from a competitor, I'd have him locked out of every system and escorted out the door before he could steal anything from our company. The problem is more if he's coming up with many great ideas, great analysis and great solutions - either you've scored one of those brilliant employees that drive a department or even division or he's using inside information, but there's no easy way to tell which. Or more likely, to suspect but just turn a blind eye and play completely surprised if shit hits the fan. I don't think the manager would go to legal unless it's so blatant he's sure the shit will hit the fan here and people would question why he didn't see the signs. As for legal, is that any surprise? Any lawyer that gave any other legal advice would probably be fired, disbarred and in jail.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by operagost · · Score: 1

      Pepsi Max contains ginseng, while Coke Zero does not. Both products also contain acesulfame potassium in addition to the aspartame. Also, can you tell me what the "natural and artificial flavors" are?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    13. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by eebra82 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      [..] it would be valuable to AMD if they could determine, for example, how fast Intel's next gen chip is going to be in order to make a product that would be able to compete better, even if it meant sacrificing margins.

      Help me explain your theory here. What you are suggesting is that AMD is working at less than full capacity because they don't know what Intel is prepping in the future? These two companies are bittersweet rivals and knowing that your opponent's product will be 200% faster than the previous one is not going to make AMD's scientists think harder.

      Ignorance is bliss, I guess.

    14. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      everybody knows the secret ingredient is lavender. what amuses me are the adverts that claim the ingredients for coke have never changed, despite the fact it used to contain coke.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    15. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they do something similar to what Compaq did with IBM's BIOS? Have one group look at the info, then make some notes and passing those notes to another team?

    16. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Markspark · · Score: 1

      which could be done relatively easily with a GC-MS and some internal standard..

      --
      i find your lack of faith in science disturbing!
    17. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by shaitand · · Score: 0

      Both AMD are decades ahead of what they are releasing. While both are researching and developing as fast as they can, its to develop products that will come far down the road. The stuff coming in the next few years is all about being faster than what the other guy is releasing.

    18. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very simple example, but I thought it was fair. It will not make you think harder, but you will at least know where the competition is in their development process. Any inside info like this could be an advantage.

      *I am not condoning the theft, just helping to emphasize the original poster's point.

    19. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me explain further, the reason they both do this is because they want to maximize the profits on the research and development they have already done.

      You release just enough technology to be the top contender now so that you reserve as much technology as possible to sell later. The longer you can profit on any given technology without releasing more the better.

    20. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      If I want a Pepsi, I buy them. Coke, I buy them. (I'm one of those weird people that drinks both.)

      It's not weird to drink both; what's weird is drinking both while actually caring about the difference. I, for example, don't care: I just drink whichever happens to be cheaper at the moment.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    21. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      But, but... Was *Pepsi's* reason for not breaking the seal because of the expected legal hassle, or because they had tried Coke Zero and found it... less than tasty?

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    22. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure that secrets such as this counts for anything, because the ingredients are known and it is trivial to determine the quantities.

      They may have the ingredient list, but it could still be difficult to reverse engineer the order in which they are combined, and "cooked". Your competition's design team might have enough industry knowledge to figure it out, but I would keep every advantage I have.

    23. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by HungryHobo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Kinda surprises me that we don't see more leaked info from anon disgruntled employees.
      Would I be correct in in assuming that once something has reached the public that it loses it's "trade secret" status and can be used by anyone.
      they'd have to be careful of watermarks etc though.

    24. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      ah fubar..undoing incorrect moderation.
      *shrug* who knew that "s" came before "t" in the alphabet?

    25. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Although there is plenty of that, they would be amazed at the degree of integrity required to run a successful business.

      Just... wow. You must either be a business owner/executive, or still put your teeth under the pillow for a quarter.

    26. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by anss123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's not weird to drink both; what's weird is drinking both while actually caring about the difference. I, for example, don't care: I just drink whichever happens to be cheaper at the moment.

      There is a difference?

    27. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I can only assume that you are very young or haven't spent much time in business. You appear to have drunk the cool-aid that Hollywood and others have prepared about what free enterprize is truly about.

      The basic formula is this: Low integrity loses you both customers and employees. That's not to say that you can't make a profit doing this, but it's the more difficult route.

      And no, I'm not an owner or executive.

    28. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by amilo100 · · Score: 1

      âoePepsi Max contains ginseng, while Coke Zero does not. âoe

      Coke Zero was introduced recently in my country so I only drank Coke 0 and Pepsi Max a few times. As for ginseng, I doubt that it produces a great difference in taste.

      âoeAlso, can you tell me what the "natural and artificial flavors" are? âoe I am not a chemist, but here it goes: My father while working as an analythical chemist used things such as Mass-spectrography to determine unknown substances (mostly arms related). Is there any reason that GC-MS can not be used to analyse Coke (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gas_chromatography-mass_spectrometry#Food.2C_Beverage_and_Perfume_Analysis)?

    29. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Developing a CPU takes around 4-6 years from start to first samples. This is anywhere from 3-5 generations of Moore's law. You need to guess very early on the transistor budget available to be able to make the chip affordable. If you delay the release, you get a bit more design time and a more transistors for the same cost. If AMD know now that Intel's next-generation architecture will have certain performance characteristics, then they might decide that it's worth delaying their next design a bit and rolling out a version with a few features that previously they'd thought they'd have to cut. Alternatively, it might be better for them to bring their new architecture forward and sacrifice a few features to fit it on to a smaller die.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    30. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The basic formula is this: Low integrity loses you both customers and employees. That's not to say that you can't make a profit doing this, but it's the more difficult route.

      Sadly, not true. Low integrity makes you a short-term profit, and selects for e kind of executive who moves to a new company before it's apparent that is company has no future.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    31. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by veganboyjosh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your comment makes me wonder what would happen if the employee from TFA would have posted the secrets to wikileaks or similar...

    32. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The basic formula is this: Low integrity loses you both customers and employees. That's not to say that you can't make a profit doing this, but it's the more difficult route.

      Ahh, there's your flawed premise. "Low/Lack of integrity" doesn't lose you anything. What loses customers and employees is getting caught.

      If you can go long enough without getting caught (as sibling said, to change companies, for example), being a scumbag can be incredibly profitable.

    33. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. In the short run, dishonesty and deceit pays.

    34. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by TGZubby · · Score: 1

      Yes... one has a blue can, and the other is red.

    35. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      It's quite hard not to get caught. The work force is, um, well seasoned these days. They are not naive - they've seen the tricks and deceptions and know what to look for. They can smell duplicity at a hundred paces.

      I'm not saying that lack of integrity doesn't exist, or that it can't be profitable. I am saying that it's the exception, not the rule.

      And that jives very well with what I see at work every day.

    36. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate to burst your bubble,
      But neither company is "decades" ahead.
      Both are roughly 4-5 years ahead on transistor design, less so on architecture. Based on what I do know of business, if they were decades ahead on a product they would get it to market ASAP, not sit on it.

      Any time you see a tech company "sitting" on something for a trade show, it's because they are still trying to get it to work as close to flawlessly as possible, not because they are hoarding technology.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    37. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Coke Zero probably does not have anything ground-breaking in its list of ingredients but that doesn't mean that Coke Zero can't protect the proportions. Can someone by trial and error replicate the taste of Coke Zero? They would probably come close. But there's a huge difference between someone stealing the formula for Coke Zero and someone approximating it.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    38. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      "As for ginseng, I doubt that it produces a great difference in taste." ... "I am not a chemist"

      apparently you are not a cook either, lol

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
    39. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I read, Pepsi never got near the documents. One of the Coke employees sent a message to Pepsi using Coke official letterhead. Pepsi went to the FBI. Through an undercover agent, the FBI paid $10,000 for 14 pages of confidential Coca-Cola memos. Then the FBI paid for other documentation and even a product sample of an unreleased product. Pepsi never actually handled any Coca-Cola materials.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    40. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I dug some more. Pepsi immediately notified Coca-Cola of the letter. Coca-Cola contacted the FBI.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    41. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by koalapeck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they have the same policies in Formula 1, look at the debacle between McLaren-Mercedes and Ferrari last year.

      As much as companies certainly have these policies, that doesn't mean they're always 100% honest about enforcing them.

    42. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by v1 · · Score: 1

      Direct plagiarism isn't necessary or even a good idea. By looking at plans or seeing insider documentation they could get all sorts of use without leaving any easily traceable path. Might look at the schematics and say oh.. I wonder why they're doing that, we wouldn't have noticed this even if we'd have taken it apart, they're going to great lengths to make sure xxx happens. Oh wait, I wonder that solves this lingering problem we've had for years, that they've never had a problem with. Call up R&D I have an idea for a new approach to deal with a nagging issue...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    43. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by factor-h · · Score: 1
      The question is: Did he worked alone?

      Because there are 2 considertions:

      1 - Did AMD knew?

      2 - Did Intel sent him?

      3 - Why is not the person in question sued?

      There are many ways to commit crimes and the best is using the legal system. Recent History has proven that. So much care must be taken.

    44. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You give the average working shmoe a lot of credit. That's a lot of evolution in just 6 years(Worldcom, June 2002). They got caught.

      Hell, nowadays, getting caught doesn't even matter so much, as long as you have your army of lawyers pervert the law enough to justify you.

      I don't think it's coincidence that most of the most successful/lucrative industries are the least integral (Law, Insurance, Entertainment, Politics, Oil).

    45. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      (I'm a true addict)

    46. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It's an inspiring example of honor amongst thieves.

    47. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes, proportions of acid and sugar are different in each.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    48. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      To back that up, just last year a couple of Coke employees got caught trying to sell trade secrets about some new products to Pepsi.

      Who contacted the authorities? Pepsi.

    49. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      Pepsi is sweeter, and Coke has a bit more of a.. bite? chemical taste? whatever?

      Yeah, just drink whatever's cheaper.

      Remarkably, you can tell more a difference between what is supposedly the same 'flavor' (Root Beer) between MUG, A&W, and Barq's..

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    50. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      And that is EXACTLY why the telecommunications infrastructure in Australia and the USA is bunk.

      Monopolistic entities like AT&T and, in our case, Telstra (formerly Telecom), have sat on their hands for decades. With demand for broadband now growing exponentially, the copper wires simply can not deliver.

      This is where startup competitors should have a field day installing state-of-the-art fibre networks, and poaching the customer base, but those same overlords simply wield their considerable influence with the government to block such initiatives.

    51. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your "th" key seems to be broken - please see the IT department.

    52. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be legally safer to hire the former DEC designers from whom Intel stole the Alpha technologies for the Pentium itself, since that is much of the foundation of the Pentium designs ever since? Or do you think they've gotten too old? Quite a few of them were extremely upset when DEC failed to properly press its lawsuits against Intel for the theft. Between that theft, and the theft of VMS technologies by David Cutler for Windows NT, the Wintel architecture became powerful enough to challenge DEC's leadership, and DEC eventually got sold off to HP, then to Intel.

    53. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno.

      Intel's Woodcrest chip seemed to come out way ahead of schedule. It was 2x faster than the previous Intel Xeon, and used 1/2 the power. It seemed to come out of nowhere in response to the appearance at the time that AMD was surpassing Intel.

    54. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont see why that analogy applies. things like food products can not be patented (obviously not copyrighted or trademarked either). food products (like drinks) are purely at the most legally speaking tradesecrets. its why they are so secretive about it all because anyone CAN take it and make their own.
      while something like a cpu or some other form of tech is patented. if it wasnt patented and its still just a trade secret than its fair game. ...
      though industrial espionage is illegal, so that form is against the law. but to figure out on your own is ok. ..
      heck you can pick up a cookbook and sell the food in it and no one can do anything..
      at least im correct about all of this iirc.

    55. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Intel knew they were losing the performance curve long before AMD passed them. Woodcrest was the response, yes. It's development started in parallel with attempts at making netburst faster (as a mitigating strategy IIRC b/c while netburst was built for speed, their R&D dept was having trouble getting said speed from Si transistors) and when they came out with it, it was after quite some time in R&D.
      Remember, the architecture of the CPU is one part of the equation, and also IIRC Woodcrest uses a lot of the previous proc's arch, built with a new transistor and some other front-end tweaks to lower power. It wasn't a radical design change, it was a radical implementation change (cheaper and faster than wholesale re-design).
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    56. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rahvin112 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A good example of this is Costco. A company run by a founder, a man who believes strongly in limiting profits to retain consumers. A man that believes in no restriction returns, even food. A man that believes a well paid employee is a happy and helpful employee. I see the difference every single time I go to Costco. You have a pleasant helpful staff, unlike stores like walmart where you are lucky to find anyone. You have customers like myself who don't worry too much about the prices because I know I'm not paying more than 10% above Costco's cost and spend in excess of 5 figures a year there. Wall Street loves to hound him in the quarterly calls about raising prices or membership fees to increase returns, his response is that raising prices is a seductive path to slow growth.

      The short term growth model wall street has developed over the past 20-30 years doesn't mean all companies are like that. In fact find the companies that aren't and invest in them, because their long term growth will surpass any short term profit seeker by leaps and bounds. Costco alone is making serious returns that exceed market average because the CEO doesn't follow the path to easy profit which destroy long term growth. Invest in those companies now and sell them when the short term profit CEO eventually gets hired and you will retire early, I guarantee it.

    57. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by szundi · · Score: 1

      Sure, he can use this infos to have "bright ideas" and become a senior staff there. :)

    58. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize how many companies screw employees just as long and as hard as they can, knowing that if they get caught the class-action suit will cost less than following the rules?

      My ex employer screwed over 2000 employees out of hundreds of thousands of hours of overtime and when they were finally sued, they "made bad investments" and the company was snapped up by the creditors - who happened to be the upstream supplier.

      Golden parachutes, no lawsuit, they're laughing all the way to the bank and I'm watching "Falling Down" over and over and over...

    59. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely the reality is that the employee will simply fudge, claim that works as his own in order to seek bonuses, promotions etc. without actually having to do work or even being all that capable of doing it. Likely that particular fellow also borrowed his fellow workmates work to claim as his own whilst at Intel. I once worked with a person like that, all the problems he created where your fault and all the solutions you provided where his and he did bring in some documentation that he claimed as his own which latter proved to be all from his previous employer. Now the catch is what do you don with the fellow, prison seems rather pointless as the work is protected by copyrights and in reality that harm he 'would' have caused to AMD is far greater to any 'perceived' harm caused to intel.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    60. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Maverynthia · · Score: 1

      It's not integrity, it's lawsuit. If they broke the seal COke can claim anything Pepsi made was a ripoff of that formula. Same way with AMD, Intel would aim all cannons on them and fire.

    61. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by neumayr · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help any company very much to release a product using their latest technology when noone can afford it.
      So they don't, and wait for certain components to become cheaper, or come up with cheaper ways to achieve the same.

      Unless of course they're desperate for a piece of the market - then they might gamble and sell at a loss.
      At least that's what I think the GP meant.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    62. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by squizzar · · Score: 1

      There are a huge number of companies out there that are not floated on the stock markets, and are privately owned by one or more people. These people are usually the founders and head honchos of that organisation. It is for these people that honesty and integrity is paramount since they have a stronger attachment to the company, and they have some of their own personal reputation staked in it.

      Some people build their businesses through hard work and immense sacrifice, and there are probably a lot more smaller businesses like this than there are large corporate entities.

    63. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      You go to jail if you get caught. Someone disclosed DirecTV's newest encryption protocol used to protect its content, and got arrested by the FBI for his efforts.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    64. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Correct. Soft drink and food ocmpanies rely on trade secret protection. However, violating a trade secret is just as illegal as violating a patent.

    65. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by rumblin'rabbit · · Score: 1

      Actually I do give the average Shmoe a lot of credit.

      And if you think there's no integrity in the oil industry then you've never worked in it. Oil doesn't find and extract itself. It takes massive skill and chutzpah to do what they do. I have a lot of respect for the oil industry.

    66. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Lerc · · Score: 1

      even if it meant sacrificing margins.

      I think they tried that already.

      --
      -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
    67. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by cthulhu11 · · Score: 0

      Agreed. When I worked for AMD, during the long-running legal battle with Intel and the K5 simulations, the company was *very* careful about exposure to Intel IP.

    68. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. In the short run, dishonesty and deceit pays.

      Exactly. And capitalism - or at least capitalism-as-we-know-it, based around large publicly-traded corporations - selects for the short run; it's all about how the stock price will do next quarter.

      Is some sort of capitalism with a long-term outlook possible? Perhaps, in theory. Of course, in theory, Marxism works pretty good too.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    69. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do. Too bad you're AC, your anecdote fits my point perfectly.

    70. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by Seraphim1982 · · Score: 1

      Remarkably, you can tell more a difference between what is supposedly the same 'flavor' (Root Beer) between MUG, A&W, and Barq's..
      "Root Beer" isn't a flavor any more then "Beer" is a flavor. About the only requirement to be root beer is to have sasafrass flavoring. Everything else is up to the manufacturer.

      For example: Last I checked Barq's was the only root beer on your list to contain caffeine.

    71. Re:... and AMD wouldn't even touch the info by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't drink Barq's because I have to avoid caffiene. It does have more of a 'bite'/sharp flavor to it, whereas MUG is more of a sweet one, and A&W has a more creamy texture to it.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
  5. AMD and Intel? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Toyota and Ferrari?

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:AMD and Intel? by blindd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Toyota and Ferrari?

      Which would you buy?

    2. Re:AMD and Intel? by superskippy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Do you mean McLaren and Ferrari, or do I not understand this post?

    3. Re:AMD and Intel? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      No, more like Toyota and Nissan.

    4. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Replace 'nigger' with anything else, and this is a perfectly fine story. Ass.

    5. Re:AMD and Intel? by blindd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm replying to myself here, but seriously, I'd sooner buy a twin-turbo Toyota Supra (even if it requires a little work on my part) before buying a Ferrari. I have an idea of what GP was trying to get at here, but I don't know that comparing motor companies had the intended (and likely abrasive toward AMD) effect. Perhaps comparing specific models would have though. ^_^ That said, I have no problems with having second best for far less, so AMD is a good option to me, personally (especially with Video cards).

    6. Re:AMD and Intel? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Based on sales counts, I'd say AMD is Ferrari in that example.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:AMD and Intel? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Toyota engineers were found guilty of stealing industrial secrets from the Ferrari F1 team. Not so off-topic, nor alegory for AMD and Intel respectively. Just a similar situation.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    8. Re:AMD and Intel? by computerman413 · · Score: 1

      Actually, both are true, and this is probably more similar to the Toyota-Ferrari situation a few years ago. A couple of Ferrari-turned-Toyota engineers took some Ferrari IP with them, and were arrested for it. I don't think the data was on the scale of what the Ferrari guy leaked to the McLaren guy last year.

    9. Re:AMD and Intel? by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Toyota engineers were found guilty of stealing industrial secrets from the Ferrari F1 team.

      I don't get it. Toyota drivers don't have to compensate for small penises like Ferrari drivers.

    10. Re:AMD and Intel? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      'Zactly.

      Any one else notice that this story was submitted by Putin?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:AMD and Intel? by krakelohm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Keep telling yourself that.

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    12. Re:AMD and Intel? by Sique · · Score: 1

      AMD sponsors the Ferrari Formula-1 racing team, but I doubt Intel is sponsoring the Toyota team.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    13. Re:AMD and Intel? by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      compensate for small penises like Ferrari drivers

      A friend of mine owned a Porsche for several years. Now and then he used to get some friendly (and sometimes not-so-friendly) ribbing about how guys who drive a Porsche are "compensating" for something else.

      His response was "even if you're right, my Porsche never says no, and it always puts a smile on my face. And if I want to I can drive it five, six, or ten times a day."

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    14. Re:AMD and Intel? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Wow, is Porsche really that reliable now?

      My friend had a Porsche, and it said "no" plenty of times.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    15. Re:AMD and Intel? by hashax · · Score: 1

      what?! Toyota as well? As far as I know, Mclaren was found guilty of stealing ferrari secrets. Of all the places, the mclaren guy went to photocopy the files in a shop whose owner was (groan) a Ferrari fan.

    16. Re:AMD and Intel? by martinw89 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have no idea about anything regarding Toyota and Ferrari. I can tell you, however, that McLaren and Ferrari were involved in a huge scandal just this past year. This was a big deal.

    17. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. That's great.

    18. Re:AMD and Intel? by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      If you're going to steal sensitive files, it's better to shell out for a scanner and scan them on your own.

    19. Re:AMD and Intel? by operagost · · Score: 1

      That's because Toyota drivers are eunuchs.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    20. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oyota drivers don't have to compensate for small penises like Ferrari drivers.

      The Prius-buying ones do. Penis is penis, whether it's red or green.

    21. Re:AMD and Intel? by dotfile · · Score: 3, Funny

      My Porsche owning friend takes an entirely different kind of ribbing. You know the difference between a Porsche and a porcupine?


      The porcupine has the pricks on the outside.


      Yeah, OK, mod me off-topic now. I can take it.

    22. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are japanese, they do have to compensate.

    23. Re:AMD and Intel? by koalapeck · · Score: 1

      Definitely McLaren-Mercedes. Can't expect too many nerds to have their facts straight on the sporting world.

    24. Re:AMD and Intel? by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 1
      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    25. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW... don't you mean McLaren and Ferrari?

    26. Re:AMD and Intel? by giuda · · Score: 1

      AMD sponsors the Ferrari Formula-1 racing team, but I doubt Intel is sponsoring the Toyota team.

      Intel sponsor(ed?) BMW

    27. Re:AMD and Intel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That was McLaren and Ferrari.

      Sorry, couldn't resist. Someone was wrong on the internet!

    28. Re:AMD and Intel? by RaceProUK · · Score: 1

      I think you mean McLaren and Ferrari. AFAIK, Toyota have never been suspected of stealing info from Ferrari.

      --
      No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
  6. Surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, not really.

  7. Eh? by Khemisty · · Score: 1

    Pani's alleged motive: to impress his new employer, say the Feds. They added that there is no evidence that AMD condoned or was even aware of Pani's alleged actions, which the FBI said the engineer admitted to during a interview in late July.

    Wait, so does this mean he was going to pass off intel's technology as his own - which he would undoubtedly be caught out on - or is AMD lying about this? It's not like he was only hired a week ago. I'm just wondering how he could impress his new employer without actually giving anything away.

  8. couldn't help it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He took the "Intel Inside" campaign too far.

    1. Re:couldn't help it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He took the "Intel Inside" campaign too far.

      Or was it "Idiot Outside"??

  9. Alleged motive: to impress his new employer by rickkas7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Poaching the dumb employees from your competitor is probably not the most sound business plan, either.

    1. Re:Alleged motive: to impress his new employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I doubt "dumb" or "thief" was on his resumee.

    2. Re:Alleged motive: to impress his new employer by Sobrique · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damnit, that's where I've been going wrong!

    3. Re:Alleged motive: to impress his new employer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Pani's alleged motive: to impress his new employer" ... because it would impress me to have a potential new hire admit he stole proprietary information from his prior employer...

      I'd thank him, and not make an offer - because he's pretty much admitted if you hire him and he leaves your company, he'll take *your* proprietary information with him too!! LOL

    4. Re:Alleged motive: to impress his new employer by DriedClexler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interestingly, General Motors has done the opposite: paid their best employees to work for someone else.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  10. Usefulness? by AscianBound · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really have to wonder how significant the information that Intel could get out of these documents is. It seems to me that a few CAD designs and some "confidential" documentation wouldn't be enough to actually give AMD an edge in the market. Even if this information did include Intel "secrets" would they really be things that AMD could implement?

    The guy says he copied of the documents "out of curiosity", which doesn't actually strike me as that implausible. I know I have copies of software packages being licensed for $500,000+ to my previous employer. It's not like I'm going to try to use it to make a profit, I just find it interesting stuff and want to be able to keep it.

    1. Re:Usefulness? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      something that's labeled "confidential" or "top secret" will always pique people's curiosity. i remember when i was in high school or junior high my dad brought home some confidential Intel schematics that he was working with. they were just drawings of a CPU cooling unit or fan funnel or something. it was of no use to me, and i really didn't understand what i was looking at, but the fact that it was marked as confidential and watermarked to identify leaked documents just made it that much more tantalizing. so naturally i scanned all of the schematics and posted them up on my blog with the watermarks and document numbers blurred out.

      probably wasn't the smartest thing to do. but there certainly wasn't any malicious intention behind it. i really just wanted to show off to my friends.

    2. Re:Usefulness? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I know I have copies of software packages being licensed for $500,000+ to my previous employer.

      Yeah, but where do you keep these copies? Are they just on your home PC, or did you take them with you to your new job and show them off to your new boss?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Usefulness? by AscianBound · · Score: 1

      I know I have copies of software packages being licensed for $500,000+ to my previous employer.

      Yeah, but where do you keep these copies? Are they just on your home PC, or did you take them with you to your new job and show them off to your new boss?

      The article says nothing about him actually doing that. It's what the Feds are claiming. The article only says: "Pani's alleged motive: to impress his new employer, say the Feds. They added that there is no evidence that AMD condoned or was even aware of Pani's alleged actions, which the FBI said the engineer admitted to during a interview in late July."

  11. On the plus side... by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

    He obviously won't be getting a job anywhere else in the industry again. No one's going to hire a guy that's going to steal your IP when he leaves.

    --
    You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    1. Re:On the plus side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We all steal IP when we leave. Most of us do it in our heads however.

    2. Re:On the plus side... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh holy spagetti monster, every IT person and CS person absolutely rapes the IP when they leave.

      In my boxes that I used to clean out my desk is at least 30 confidential documents that were packed there by the moving company, (I got to keep my desk! that was cool!) and I know I have copies of all the code I wrote when I was there as well as all the SQL queries I wrote.

      I have yet to meet someone that says, "I just left company X, no I don't have anything from my old job..." or " I cant fix that, I fixed that at company Y and they own the IP to that fix."

      All of you rape and pillage IP when you leave. Accidentally or on purpose, you do it. Being a moron and trying to SELL that or taking it with malicious intent? that is the kicker. if he had it because that is how his desk was packed up for him then it's not his fault, nor is he liable for anything.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:On the plus side... by Bovius · · Score: 1

      I have yet to meet someone that says, "I just left company X, no I don't have anything from my old job..." or " I cant fix that, I fixed that at company Y and they own the IP to that fix."

      All of you rape and pillage IP when you leave. Accidentally or on purpose, you do it.

      Now hold on a second. I think you're including too much under the intellectual property / trade secrets umbrella. There are plenty of concepts and methods in most tech fields that are far too general to be considered a competetive threat if other people get their hands on them. If I learned to write SQL at my current company, that doesn't mean I can't write queries for anyone else, ever, nor would showing someone else a query I wrote for the company necessarily be a breach of IP, assuming I changed table/column names sufficiently to hide proprietary business models.

      And no, I haven't shown other companies code I've written in my current or previous jobs. There's almost always an alternative way to demonstrate your abilities.

    4. Re:On the plus side... by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      don't worry, once we gain a better understanding of human neurology i'm sure there will be devices designed specifically for wiping ex-employees' memories to protect a company's IP and trade secrets.

      it may even prove useful for resolving sexual harassment charges brought against the CEO.

    5. Re:On the plus side... by networkconsultant · · Score: 4, Funny

      During the course of my career I've signed enough Non-Disclosure agreements that it's illegal for me to think; Anecdotes often result in law suits.

    6. Re:On the plus side... by tlhIngan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh holy spagetti monster, every IT person and CS person absolutely rapes the IP when they leave.

      In my boxes that I used to clean out my desk is at least 30 confidential documents that were packed there by the moving company, (I got to keep my desk! that was cool!) and I know I have copies of all the code I wrote when I was there as well as all the SQL queries I wrote.

      I have yet to meet someone that says, "I just left company X, no I don't have anything from my old job..." or " I cant fix that, I fixed that at company Y and they own the IP to that fix."

      All of you rape and pillage IP when you leave. Accidentally or on purpose, you do it. Being a moron and trying to SELL that or taking it with malicious intent? that is the kicker. if he had it because that is how his desk was packed up for him then it's not his fault, nor is he liable for anything.

      Except, in this case, he joined AMD while still employed at Intel. He joined AMD June 2. He gave Intel his resignation JUne 11 (and used vacation instead of working through the 2 weeks). Thus he was under the employment of both companies (who we all know are competitors) for a period of time. This goes beyond innocent "rape and pillage" of IP. At least that's part of your cleanup of your stuff, which you do before you start employment at your new employer. And anything you take is covered under NDA or other confidentiality agreeement. But this guy could not only have taken stuff from Intel and gave them to AMD, he could've (unlikely, but possible) taken stuff from AMD given them to Intel, too, and done it quite surreptitiously.

      AMD would have to fire this guy because this would "taint" him, and by association, AMD, who then might have to battle Intel in some lawsuit alleging they used some of those designs in their next processor. AMD might not have, but because this guy has been working at both companies, it's very hard to tell, and AMD really has to do some house cleaning on anything this guy touched to make sure it's clean, and even then, it's hard to tell (the irony is, they can't tell if they're using that stolen IP without knowing what the stolen IP is...

    7. Re:On the plus side... by Reality+Master+201 · · Score: 1

      I have yet to meet someone that says, "I just left company X, no I don't have anything from my old job..." or " I cant fix that, I fixed that at company Y and they own the IP to that fix."

      Really? Cause if I were being asked that by a new employer, that's exactly what I'd say. It would very likely be a lie, but I wouldn't cop to it because 1) it might make them paranoid about me, and 2) they paid me for my skills, not for stealing shit from elsewhere.

      Most of the code I have from previous workplaces is completely useless, too. Some of it's just too old to be useful (though they're some very well written FoxPro for Unix apps), most of it just doesn't fit my current job and will be useless when I get a new one, and a few choice bits are so astoundingly shitty, I just keep around to amuse myself periodically (KenM, I'm talking about your evil abortion).

    8. Re:On the plus side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many companies shaft the employee out of vacation time when you give your notice. So taking a job and then taking your vacation time and then quitting after you take your vacation time is very common.

      Corperations and HR departments do their best to shaft employees leaving.

    9. Re:On the plus side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope AMD is not planning to release a 6-core processor soon.

    10. Re:On the plus side... by shuz · · Score: 1

      I find that as I've moved jobs my skill set has improved enough that I can reproduce work from a previous position in a fraction of the time. There is no need to keep scripts, processes, proprietary information etc. Also most businesses have a distinct way of doing things that would complicate a different business. That is why most business to business applications and processes are full of problems.

      --
      There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
    11. Re:On the plus side... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I've certainly shown code I've written for other companies. That's because it was under a GPL copyright. That's one of the besst ways to demonstrate competence, publicly and where other people can pick it apart and look for bugs.

    12. Re:On the plus side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the course of my career I've signed enough Non-Disclosure agreements that it's illegal for me to think; Anecdotes often result in law suits.

      I'm sorry, we now have to sue you for disclosing your non-disclosure agreement. Have a nice day.

    13. Re:On the plus side... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you mind sending us your head back for IP removal please? We have to protect our assets.

      Sincerely,

      Your ex-boss

  12. intels suxors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    he had the plans for Intel's newest chip, codenamed "Titanic"

    1. Re:intels suxors by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      *Golf clap*

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  13. and you think all that poaching Google do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you think all that poaching Google do, especially from MS and other top tech firms, is purely for the "talent"? At a peer-driven firm, you don't need to make plagiarism official policy, you just create an environment of "trust" where that sort of thing'll get talked about at lunchtime and you're sorted.

  14. Re:Let him go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot.

  15. Dual-Core similarity by ilovesymbian · · Score: 1

    Ah, thats why we have AMD's X2 and Intel's Dual-Core which are *so* similar.

  16. Oh No! by yttrstein · · Score: 2, Funny

    NINTEEN Computer Aided Design Designs? We should have never approved that New Technology Technology.

    1. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel should have secured their proprietary material with PIN numbers.

    2. Re:Oh No! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're trying to be funny, but "CAD designs" isn't redundant. The two instances of the word "design" refer to different definitions of the word (design = plan, vs design = process of making a design), so they aren't redundant.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Redundancy is the same thing.

    4. Re:Oh No! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Informative

      *cough*Computer aided DRAFTING*cough*. Drafting is "process of drawing", while design tells me... well, it is a finished design. Fully qualified, "CAD design" becomes "Computer aided process of drawing design".

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    5. Re:Oh No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computer Aided Drafting Design. Get it right, fool.

    6. Re:Oh No! by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      I know you're trying to be helpful, but the boys at Microsoft gave the same reason for "NT Technology" not being redundant.

      But rest easy, dear reader. The comedy isn't in the redundancy, it's in the repetition.

    7. Re:Oh No! by afidel · · Score: 1

      No, CAD stands for Computer Aided Design and CAM stands for Computer Aided Manufacturing. It's been that way since forever. Out of 3 pages of Google results for define:CAD only one definition agrees with you on drafting.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  17. Intel Pull a Ferrari? by segedunum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So Intel pull a Ferrari and take a leaf out of spygate?

    http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/formulaone/article.html?in_article_id=65980&in_page_id=58

  18. Jaguar and Ferrari by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    LeMans and Rheims, 1950-1960.

    BTW - if you ar egoing to do car analogies people, THOSE are cars!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  19. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    CAD = Computer-aided design

    CAD designs = Computer-aided design designs

  20. Curious... by Veetox · · Score: 1

    Pani (Alleged Thief) may have been involved in partial involvement in the design, and therefore wanted to keep a record of the end product of his work. Of course, he told authorities it was because he was "curious".

  21. The part you missed... by gentimjs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What isnt mentioned is that he took the goods from intel because the guys at AMD needed a laugh!

    *ducks*

    1. Re:The part you missed... by networkconsultant · · Score: 1

      mandatory Monty reference: No really that net burst architecture was fine when I sold it to you....
      Sir it has left the land of the living, turned it's toes up to the daises...

  22. His resume by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt "dumb" or "thief" was on his resumee.

    No it was this:

    • Leveraged competitor's technology in projects.
    • Saved employer millions of dollars in R&D costs
    • Discovered new and improved technologies for employer that was later found in competitor's products.
  23. Re:Let him go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Obvious paid M$ shill.

  24. Pay attention to the article by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's an amazing thing done by HP in the article. It seems their advertising department contacted Gerry Anderson about providing digital supermarionation effects for their online ads. You can see what can only be described as one of the Thunderbirds plugging energy-efficient desktops.

  25. Coke Cola and Pepsi by Khemisty · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Here's another case that's fairly similar. An employee at one of Coke Cola's offices tried selling the recipe to Pepsi, except Pepsi informed Coke of what had happened.

    1. Re:Coke Cola and Pepsi by hpa · · Score: 1

      AMD has had a fair number of people trying to sell them Intel trade secrets over the years (at least one who made a video tape of his workstation screen.) They have consistently responded by contacting the police, and at least once cooperated with a police sting operation for the intended "drop".

  26. Old News by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Didn't this come out days ago?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Old News by anup_at_mac · · Score: 0

      Didn't this come out days ago?

      You must be new here.

  27. crimes like this will have to become legal soon by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sad thing is that such laws are only respected in countries like the US and UK.

    Soon countries like China will be able to have much better technologies because they can take the best from all sides and create a super product. Even if the US and UK forbid the importation of such products, companies in the US and UK would be at a disadvantage selling inferior product to other countries.

    Patents and copyrights will prove to be our downfall since they no longer encourage progress but prevent it.

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    1. Re:crimes like this will have to become legal soon by billcopc · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the Chinese know exactly what Americans like. That's why everyone at Yankee Stadium is chugging Wasabi Cola :P

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:crimes like this will have to become legal soon by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Taste great! Love green color and spicy wasabi taste! Thank wonderful Communist Party for providing Wasabi Cola! You love Wasabi Cola and Wasabi Cola love you back (long time)!

    3. Re:crimes like this will have to become legal soon by treeves · · Score: 1

      Who knew? Apparently, Americans like Chinese products with Japanese names.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:crimes like this will have to become legal soon by Jorgandar · · Score: 1

      Right... So let me get this straight. Say i'm the best scientist in the world and have this REALLY cool idea for efficient renewable energy. It's been proven in my lab. Do i:

      A) Take it to china, where the government steals it from me, says "thanks, now get back to work" OR
      B) Take it to the US, patent it, start a company, and make boat loads of $$.

      Which do you do?

      Patents are great in moderation. The key is moderation.

    5. Re:crimes like this will have to become legal soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have 1 HELL of a point, well said & well thought out (long-term)... IF I wasn't an "A/C" here, I'd "mod you up" (I don't have 'mod points' as an A/C iirc is why)

      APK

  28. It doesn't matter for me. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm married. My wife keeps my penis in a mason jar under the sink. It only comes out when she wants it.

    1. Re:It doesn't matter for me. by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      So its been in that jar awhile then...

    2. Re:It doesn't matter for me. by laughing_badger · · Score: 1

      BitterOldGUy ... Hmmm ... No shit!

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  29. IWonderWhatICanPutInThisFieldWithoutBeingDeleted by rob1980 · · Score: 0, Troll

    IWonderWhatICanStealFromMyPreviousEmployerWithoutBeingCaught?

  30. oops by darrenkopp · · Score: 1

    doesn't matter, no one can help amd now (except for intel chip designs, of course... oh perfect!)

  31. One thing that has always irked me... by gillbates · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is that I frequently have ideas at home. And write them down. And later use them at work.

    Would the discovery of these documents in my home constitute evidence of "stealing trade secrets" in the eyes of my employer? If I decided to leave my current employer and work for the competition, would those hobby projects of mine be a liability?

    I'm just curious, because I do quite a bit of independent development, and from time to time, it becomes valuable at work.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:One thing that has always irked me... by stickytar · · Score: 1

      Depends on your contract with work. If you are truly "working" on the clock when you are at home (e.g., dabbling in some work whilst inventing things) then it could be construed as company intellectual property. Clean lines. Make them.

      --
      believing the big bang requires a certain amount of supernatural faith
    2. Re:One thing that has always irked me... by faloi · · Score: 3, Informative

      It depends on your contract. Some employers have, essentially, an "all your ideas are belong to us" type clause. Anything you work on, on or off the clock, is their property. At one company I worked for, even if it was something that wasn't related to the industry, you submitted it to their lawyers and applied for leave to pursue it on your own if the company wasn't interested. Essentially, they give you your IP back.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    3. Re:One thing that has always irked me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that I frequently have ideas at home. And write them down. And later use them at work.

      Ah - if you have an IP clause in your contract, the IP of anything you dream up anywhere while you're still employed by them is owned by your employer. This even covers IP stuff you had been working on for years before you joined and finalised the day you started.

  32. Such a foolish crime... by east+coast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do people think that they're going to pass this along and not get caught by some method?

    Hell, after the Coca Cola incident I would be fearful of having my new employer even know I have such information, let alone use it in some manner.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  33. This is bad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..very bad. I hope AMD doesn't catch too much shit for this guys actions.

  34. 100 pages aint so bad by cryptor3 · · Score: 1

    For an engineering document. Could just be one PDF spec document for a small processor, or maybe an instruction set manual.

    19 CAD designs? Do they mean 19 full chip designs or just 19 verilog source files?

    I'd be curious to know how big this thing really is. I bet that I could have that amount of cruft lying around somewhere from one of my previous jobs.

  35. This gives NEW meaning to . . . by JamJam · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . to Intel gathering ;)

  36. 2 lessons here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Never take your work home with you (his home was raided)
    2) Encryption is your friend

  37. IP and experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the posts bring up a good point here. If I gain insights into some architecture I can experience into what the usual problems are, what to expect and also how to solve them. So now if I jopin a competitor I cannot use that experience to design something related? Where is the line drawn between IP theft and experience? Does it mean that every company can forbid an employee from joining its competitor?

    1. Re:IP and experience by TigerNut · · Score: 1
      Most non-compete clauses in an employee contract are invalidated by right-to-work legislation currently enforced by most states and provinces in North America. However, if I was moving from company A to it's fierce rival Z across town, and wanted to avoid any appearance of impropriety, I would take care to purge my home office and computers of any company A documents, test data, email, and pre-production (i.e. not commercially available) product. If that negatively impacts the benefit I can have for company Z, then that's too bad - they also have to understand the optics of the situation.

      If I was going from company A to new company Z and had to design a similar product, then I'd use my experience to first create the required proof-of-concept prototype, only using such materials and other tools that are available to company Z. The fact that I'd done something similar before is where my experience would pay off... not in being able to conjure up a design out of thin air and then to have to explain its workings without the benefit of any background data.

      --

      Less is more.

    2. Re:IP and experience by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Invalidated or not, fighting it in court is extremely painful for an individual employee. The result is that an employee who joins a thoroughly lawyer equipped firm, such as Microsoft or Intel, has protection from prosecution unavailable to small companies or individual developers creating a start-up company. Cases of this kind of lawyer protected theft include the VMS technologies 'leveraged' by the former DEC developer, David Cutler, to create Windows NT.

  38. What if it's more sinister? by Chaset · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Intel pays some guy under the table to "quit" and go work for AMD... oh, and take this envelope with you, hint hint nudge nudge.

    Instant competition torpedo.

    --
    -- "This world is a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who feel."
  39. misleading title? Old news? by poached · · Score: 1

    This title makes it sound like AMD had an involvement with industrial espionage in this case when really, AMD had no idea that the said person had stolen secrets. Intel noticed weird access logs, then contacted the FBI and now the guy's passport has been revoked, his job at AMD and Intel terminated. He is going to a Federal PMITA prison for sure.

  40. Look on the bright side by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least we now know AMD is hiring again!

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
  41. In the Pharmaceutical Industry... by Il128 · · Score: 1

    This type of behavior is required and expected.

    How many Viagra's are there now? Five?

    How many Statins are there now? Six?

    How many SRIs are there now? Six?

    Sorry, couldn't resist the irony of this being a Federal Gubment thing and the FDA is the Feds.

    --
    Thanks to eating disorders most chicks are reasonably good looking these days.
    1. Re:In the Pharmaceutical Industry... by afidel · · Score: 1

      Those aren't trade secrets, they are patents and the other companies have found ways to use the same pathways without violating the original patent. That's how patents are supposed to work, you are supposed to get a limited monopoly on your idea.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  42. And yet... by PRMan · · Score: 1

    People marry people who cheated on their former spouse all the time...

    The same principle applies.

    --
    Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  43. Philip K. Dick - Paycheck by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    The only way not to steal IP from a previous employer is to have your brain erased.

    Forget the stupid Ben Afflek movie, read the Philip K. Dick short story "Paycheck."

  44. The oft-unspoken yet universal rule is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cannot take anything written, on paper or in electronic form, from a previous employer to a new one.

    If you take it with you home on a USB stick you accidentally left in your empty coffee mug, this is not considered a crisis. Companies will not typically demand an audit of your USB activity for the last five years, or raid your house. You must however not breathe a word about any such written, hardform material to your new employer.

    What you CAN do, and in many cases is EXPECTED to, is to bring things IN YOUR HEAD. This isn't industry espionage, it's cross-pollination and best-of-breed implementation. Obviously so long as your competitor does not hold patents that are being breached, your new employer will be very interested to hear about what they are doing. This applies at least within the financial sector.

    In effect:

    Things in memory good

    Things on paper extremely bad and will ruin your life

  45. Correction... by Jorophose · · Score: 4, Funny

    P53.989484848488889999999 according to Intel.

  46. Re:Let him go by BPPG · · Score: 1

    But it won't be free... It's not like AMD is going to publicly disclose what they stole from Intel...

    --
    What's the value of information that you don't know?
  47. Sounds like... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    the Ferrari and McLaren fiasco that occurred in 2006 (maybe 2005) and was the focus of an article in Wired last year I believe. A guy who had been a mechanic during his entire career at Ferrari thought he would get a promotion when a senior engineer decided to leave. Someone else got the job from another department so the guy left to work for McLaren. Through various other events the guy was eventually convinced to acquire trade secrets of Ferrari F1 cars. Word quickly spread through the rank and file at McLaren what was acquired but the CEO denied it and was unaware of it initially. McLaren later had to forfeit their points for that racing year.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  48. moderators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey moderators, why are the two above comments marked insightful? The story is about computer chips, not sports cars. Maybe you meant offtopic?

  49. There's nothing to gain from Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless AMD wants to go backwards in technology to front side bus and scotch taped quad-core.

  50. Too bad for Intel by ReedYoung · · Score: 1

    ... AMD didn't copy their off-chip memory controller.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p