Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

Being in a relationship is not easy, more than half of all first marriages fail in this country. That statistic doesn't improve if you spend most of your time reading your favorite website and not tending to the needs of your family. Instead of asking me to help fix your relationship maybe you should try playing with your kids, talking to your wife, and not staring at a computer screen all day. You should realize that the help link doesn't provide help with your life. It's mostly for getting passwords and stuff. Below you'll find a collection of people that should have reached out to Dr. Phil and not Dr. Sam.

It seems to me that the simple fix for this guy is to make a new account and get the guts to tell his wife to stop calling work.

On Wed June 25, 2008 ********* wrote:
"Is it possible to take all of my account information and insert it into a new account? I ask because my wife has started to check on me through Slashdot while I'm at work. She doesn't think I am working if I post during the day. It has reached the point where she will call work if she sees that I have posted. My boss doesn't like it and I can't get her to stop. I'd hate to have to get my karma back up to where it is now or have my posts (which are very good mostly) not associated with a new account. I know I could just start posting anonymous coward but I have a problem with having what I write linked to the word coward. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you in advance."

On Sat July 7, 2007 ******** wrote:
"If I become someone's friend can I see everything they post even if they post anonymously? I think my wife is having an affair with one of your users. I have no direct proof but she doesn't talk to me when I get home like she used to, she doesn't seem interested in what I have to say or planning trips. Worst of all she gets upset at me when I try to touch her. I know she is very attracted to geek types (I can be a bit of a nerd) and she shuts off the screen when I come in. I thought at first she was talking to someone on a singles site or was looking at something inappropriate but when I made her show me one night it was Slashdot. I asked why she didn't want me to know she was looking at Slashdot and her excuse was ridiculous. I assume she's been talking to someone on your site and It would be a great help if you could let me know how to find out what she has been doing. I would be willing to get a subscription if you could help."

I think the obvious solution is that he should leave his wife and marry the first guy. That way there wouldn't be any question as to why anyone was reading Slashdot. They could live the rest of their lives commenting together. It's kind of romantic. Finally, we have a guy who should shut off his machine and play with his damn kids before they come home wearing black mascara and sporting a new face tattoo. His wife is right. They are a lot more fun when they are not telling you how you ruined their lives.

On Sun Jan 20, 2008 ****** wrote:
"I have 2 young kids and it would be great if you made a Slashdot kids section. Your readers are getting older and most are going to have kids soon if they don't already. I'm not sure if you have children but in case you don't let me tell you how hard it is to get anything done in your free-time that doesn't involve yelling at them and putting them in timeout. My wife is always complaining that the kids just want to play with me and that I should be grateful, when they get older they may want nothing to do with us. It would be awesome if I could plop them down in front of a computer next to me and look at kids stuff on Slashdot. That way we would be doing something together. Just a thought. I love the site but would really love it if I could use it to spend time with the kids."

206 comments

  1. Moving account info by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, I loathed moving accounts without being able to take my karma with me, but it's really not that bad. If you behave yourself, you should get that +1 bonus back pretty quickly.

    1. Re:Moving account info by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hell, you can game it and get max in less then a week.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Moving account info by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or he could just divorce his clearly mentally unbalanced and hostile wife, and thus solve that problem and many more.

    3. Re:Moving account info by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's that coveted low user number that I would worry about losing.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    4. Re:Moving account info by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

      The whole thing just makes me sad.

      --
      "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
    5. Re:Moving account info by JesseL · · Score: 2, Funny

      596213 is considered a low number now?

      Jeeze I feel old.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    6. Re:Moving account info by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Yeah, kids these days... But wait until a 4 digit UID replies. Then you can feel reinvigorated.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    7. Re:Moving account info by AntEater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may get your karma back after a little while but you'll never get your low UID back.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    8. Re:Moving account info by jacoby · · Score: 5, Funny

      You rang?

    9. Re:Moving account info by Jaffa · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK. I'll do my bit.

    10. Re:Moving account info by tgd · · Score: 1

      Kids these days ...

    11. Re:Moving account info by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      And that's why I love /.

      Thanks guys.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    12. Re:Moving account info by BKX · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn!!!

    13. Re:Moving account info by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1

      Im waiting for the 3 digiters to post... then I can feel really young again.

    14. Re:Moving account info by KGIII · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twitter? Is that you?

      *couldn't resist*

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    15. Re:Moving account info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New punctuation update "~" at the end of a line to indicate sarcasm. http://harns.blogspot.com/

      That's a great idea! ~

    16. Re:Moving account info by escher · · Score: 1

      I used to have an even lower UID before the Great UID Whateverthehellitwas of Wheneverthehellitwas.

    17. Re:Moving account info by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Are you kids on my lawn again?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    18. Re:Moving account info by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Well well... :P

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    19. Re:Moving account info by Baikala · · Score: 1

      I've never considered my account number as a low number. I've always regretted not having opened an account the first time posted on slashdot (~1998).
      Hell, I've not even noticed that there are seven digit account numbers now.

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    20. Re:Moving account info by n0vu5 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, didn't want him to know that she was using slashdot?? Not wanting him touching her?

    21. Re:Moving account info by narcberry · · Score: 1

      (pssst... I think he meant me)

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    22. Re:Moving account info by malkavian · · Score: 1

      Shh.. You just woke us all up!

  2. Woot, more disagree mail! by ultramk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since this thread will soon be filled with the tortured whining of socially stunted geeks who can't figure out how to set up their preferences to not display "idle" submissions, let me be the first to celebrate this week's episode of the best thing about /.

    Bring it, haters: I have karma to burn.

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    1. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have to say: I think asking slashdot for advice on raising kids is only slightly above asking 4chan.

    2. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree, and these emails have been the best yet. Not only were they interesting, but they were written by people that could form complete sentences. I will admit that I feel a little bad for the second guy. He's clearly got a serious problem. It's just funny that he would write the Slashdot editors for help tracking his wife.

      And honey, if you are reading this... I Love You.

    3. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by daremonai · · Score: 5, Funny

      I disagree; there are people on 4chan who are obviously very interested in children.

    4. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by jahudabudy · · Score: 5, Funny

      He said raising kids, not rearing kids.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    5. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parent's ask 4 chan 4 advisce on raising me. Im 32 dioes that make it worse or better?

    6. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The previous posts of this were terrible and very uninteresting, extremely BORING and pointless.

    7. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      While these emails have been of better quality than previous disagree mail posts, how do any of the current batch, you know... disagree? All three seem to be requests. Maybe they should just rename the entire section to "Feedback" or "Reader Mail".

    8. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rules 1 and 2, motherfucker

    9. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      fwiw, I'd rather have my kids experience their first goatse on slashdot than on 4chan

    10. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      I think it has to do with the fact that disagree rhymes with e (disagr-e-mail).

      OT: this episode was much more entertaining than the others, which were kind of poor.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    11. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And honey, if you are reading this... puffffff pufffffff puffffff pufffffff.

    12. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parents these days are so irresponsible, having the internet doing their parenting for them instead of letting them experience things for themselves first hand.

    13. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by dogeatery · · Score: 1

      I'll second this, they were the best Disagree Mails so far

      His wife sure did pick an odd place to meet guys ...

    14. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by narcberry · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The internet should have a giant fence with a giant sign that reads, "danger, do not cross".
      On one side would be the internet, on the other 4chan.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    15. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      And the anal retentive pedant award goes to....

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    16. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps if you actually understand what rules 1 & 2 say. Hint: the word "4chan" or even "*chan" is nowhere in them.

    17. Re:Woot, more disagree mail! by Brewskibrew · · Score: 1

      I love you too. Now get back to work.

      --
      For sale: Signature. One owner. Low miles. Always garaged. New punctuation, just installed!
  3. I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am sleeping with that guys wife.

    1. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who (on /.) isn't?

    2. Re:I admit it by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      I'm sleeping with each guy's wife.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That lying bitch!, She told me I was the only other bicycle in her hangar!

    4. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next up on the Slashdot poll.... who isn't sleeping with that guy's wife?

    5. Re:I admit it by Nathrael · · Score: 5, Funny

      CowboyNeal.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    6. Re:I admit it by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should sleep with the first guy's wife so she'll have something to fill her... uh... time, while her husband's at work and she's obviously bored stiff.

    7. Re:I admit it by NoName6272 · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Chuck Norris;

      he doesn't sleep, he waits.

      Also if she is a waitress then it is defiantly Chuck.

      Chuck Norris once ate three 72 oz. steaks in one hour. He spent the first 45 minutes having sex with his waitress.

      ~~
      NoName

      PS: And yes... I had to bring a Chuck Norris joke into this.

    8. Re:I admit it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i also, am sleeping with that guys wife. None of that disgusting missionary shit though, so no worries.

    9. Re:I admit it by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      What? You as well? That dirty slapper!

    10. Re:I admit it by jaguth · · Score: 0

      The Denver Broncos?

    11. Re:I admit it by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      I thought about it, but then suddenly thought up of those exact words and decided against poking around in such a cesspool of filth.

    12. Re:I admit it by Whiteox · · Score: 3, Funny

      I admire your moral stance. Hopefully others will follow your example and perhaps we can help these poor unfortunates to improve their relationship with their spouses through meaningful and insightful advice gleaned from the collective years of experience that makes the Slashdot community what it is.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    13. Re:I admit it by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if she will locate that email in the "sent" folder.

      This would be more entertaining if the full email header had been posted.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    14. Re:I admit it by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I have the solutions,

      1st Email: I suggest losing the wife, since she is just a burden.

      2nd Email: This book will be very handy http://danscomp.net/How-to-get-the-truth-out-of-anyone.pdf

      3rd Email: Keep your kids OFF Slashdot, we all appreciate it!

      Done!

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    15. Re:I admit it by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Sounds like that guy isn't sleeping with that guy's wife, for one...

    16. Re:I admit it by dptalia · · Score: 1

      Me - sorry, never got into the lesbian thing.... I AM sleeping with the first guy though! That's why his wife keeps checking on his posts at work!

      --
      Genius is one percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration, which is why engineers sometimes smell really bad.
    17. Re:I admit it by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

      Bill Clinton

      When asked he stated "I did not have sexual relations with that woman"

  4. Divorce Rates by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Being in a relationship is not easy, more than half of all first marriages fail in this country. That statistic doesn't improve if you spend most of your time reading your favorite website and not tending to the needs of your family."

    A coworker & I were discussing the alarming amount of people around us who are divorced. It's really crazy.

    We bagan betting which state would have the highest divorce rate ... probably New York or California I had thought. We decided to look up the annual divorce rates by state and were shocked to see that some states in the bible belt states are relatively high. One of our most cherished institutions indeed!

    We both had forgotten about Vegas! :)

    These numbers look really low because it's yearly ... but as the decay continues for--say Ohio with 4%--you have a group of 100 couples over ten years ending up (exponential decay formula) with 33 divorced couples Our conversation continued to speculate what the hell has changed. We were wondering if it had to do with the fact that the world is getting smaller. I come into contact with way more people today than 20 years ago. Do I find a suitable mate and then find a more suitable mate later? Is it ebbing morals? Is it growing equality of the sexes? Is divorce rewarded in some way? Most importantly, I thought, there is less of a social stigma associated with it. Most likely it's influenced by all of these things.

    Personally I think it's a shame but there's not a lot to be done about it.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Divorce Rates by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, I don't think this thread is about what you think it's about.

    2. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People get married too soon.
      Divorce is better then being in a miserable relationship all your life bacause of some social stigma.
      Not so say people should try to make it work, but that doesn't mean it will.
      Morals is a religious word, so if my ebbing morals you mean "Failure for a women to be the subservant bitch the bible says she's supposed to be" then yeah, ebbing morals. Fortunately it's not from ebbing ethics.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Divorce Rates by dedazo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The one about the guy who wants a "Slashdot for kids" is especially disturbing so he can "plop" his children in front of a computer and have them leave him alone is especially disturbing.

      I hope that's the exception rather than the rule for geeks who are starting to have families.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    4. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, I don't think this thread is about what you think it's about.

      So what is it supposed to be about then? The opening sentence of the summary talks about divorce ... the people sending in disagree mail are facing divorce.

    5. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sure it's the exception.
      Now I would love some sort of slashdot for kids just so my kids have their own avenue for geek news. Not to keep them busy, but to allow them to grow an interest.
      Unfortunately to do that would need a very agressive moderator enforcing strict rules.

      Oh, and when I say 'for kids' I mean kids under 13.
      While kids will get exposed to a lot of stuff, I prefer to protect my 8 year old from some of the crap that goes on in public forums.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Divorce Rates by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Divorce rates are misleading. The people most likely to get divorced are those who have been divorced before. Some people get married and divorced over and over while others stay married for life.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Divorce Rates by Otter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those numbers are divorces-per-1000-residents, not percent of marriages. Divorce per capita is largely a function of the marriage rate, which is why bible belt states are high.

    8. Re:Divorce Rates by brocktune · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Folks in the Bible Belt marry younger due to greater inhibitions about premarital sex. Then surprise, lots of married people in their mid 20s decide they made a bad life decision when they were 18-20.

    9. Re:Divorce Rates by Proteus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My personal theory is that since there's less social stigma against divorce now, people are more willing to actually get divorced when they realize they're not in a functional relationship. It used to be that people (especially women, due to their relative social status) would stay in an entirely unhappy marriage simply because being divorced was worse.

      I don't see what the big "concern" is over divorce rates anyhow, unless your brand of morality includes the idea that people shouldn't get divorced. From a pragmatic point of view, who cares?

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    10. Re:Divorce Rates by philspear · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shotgun marriages from knocking up governors' daughters is at least one thing that drives those divorce rates up.

    11. Re:Divorce Rates by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I prefer to protect my 8 year old from some of the crap that goes on in public forums."

      Yeah, those libertarians here creep me out on occasions.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    12. Re:Divorce Rates by philspear · · Score: 1

      Oh, and the gay marriages are probably driving divorce rates down in blue states too.

    13. Re:Divorce Rates by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The honest truth is, that people are lazy. It's easier to move on in a relationship to another fresh new relationship than to sit down with your mate and work things out. We have grown into an "all about me" society and this is the reason divorce rates are so high. Taking into account that it's more acceptable in society to leave someone these days as well. It's no wonder many relationships end in divorce.

      For the record my wife and I just celebrated our 13th wedding anniversary. She has been married once before first marriage lasted 13 days before annulment, I have not been married before.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    14. Re:Divorce Rates by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 1

      From a pragmatic point of view, who cares?

      Their kids probably care.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    15. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      While kids will get exposed to a lot of stuff, I prefer to protect my 8 year old from some of the crap that goes on in public forums.

      "Daddy, why doesn't my butt stretch out like that?"

    16. Re:Divorce Rates by Proteus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Their kids probably care.

      Yes, because the kids would be so much better off with parents who are unhappy, no longer in love, but lack the gonads to admit it and move on with their lives.

      Kids are better off having divorced parents than having married parents in an unstable relationship.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    17. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is divorce rewarded in some way?

      Yes. Not having to deal with her neuroses anymore is an amazing reward.

    18. Re:Divorce Rates by ahodgson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pesky libertarians. They should just move to a country where freedom is encouraged.

    19. Re:Divorce Rates by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I read this a long time ago:

      http://www.theonion.com/content/node/28589

      and found it funny, but after some reflection, thought maybe it was a contributing factor. People hate inconvenience.

    20. Re:Divorce Rates by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      I think it has more to do with living in smaller towns than religion. I live in a town with about 20-25k people in Ohio, I just turned 29 and all of my friends are married.

      I think being in smaller town there are less people to meet, and those you do know you see more often. I think the environment here is more conducive for people meeting and marrying at an earlier age.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    21. Re:Divorce Rates by beef+curtains · · Score: 1

      Kudos, whoever you are.

      You should've taken credit for this post, which made me laugh loud enough that the nosy guy in the next office popped his head in to say, "Whatcha laughing at?"

      --
      Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    22. Re:Divorce Rates by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Since when was "morals" restricted to religion? It's the distinction and perception between right and wrong - that's human nature!

    23. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Some Things I learned in a happy marriage (currently at 16+ years):

      1) DON'T have unrealistic expectations. If your significant other is a procrastinating slob who can't cook, assume this WILL NOT CHANGE! Therefore, if you can't put up with it now, you will not be able to put up with it later.

      2) DO tell your partner what you want or what you expect. It's called COMMUNICATION. If he/she doesn't know about something that really, really, really bothers you, they will not be able to change their behavior. This works conversely as well.

      3) DON'T be either extremely selfish, nor extremely giving. Both extremes are disorders. Both of you should strive for a balance of giving and taking.

      4) DON'T try to escape your problems by avoiding your partner. I see way too much of this in online games. If you are having trouble, but you do not talk to your partner, then the only side of the argument you hear will be your own and then the problems will become a self-fulfilling prophecy. (See Item 2!)

      5) DO create new memories together by having new experiences together. Visit new places, take up a new hobby, accomplish a joint project, etc. It will help you fall in love with them again.

      6) DO understand that a successful marriage is not based on how you behave together when things are going well, but how you behave together when things are going badly. If you join together in adversity, your chances are much better than if you turn on each other during adversity. I believe the commonly accepted terms are "loyalty" and "faithfulness".

      7) DO have similar goals and lifestyle expectations. The "champagne and caviar" guy should not marry the "beer and barbeque" girl.

      8) DON'T take your marriage vows with your fingers crossed behind your back. If you go into it with the attitude of "well, if it gets too hard, I can just divorce.", then you are less likely to put in the effort to improve yourself and your marriage.

      It would be nice if I could round out the list with a neat "Top 10", but this is what I could come up with based on observations of my own marriage and of friends' marriages.

      Anonymous "married" coward

    24. Re:Divorce Rates by iNaya · · Score: 1

      You mean to say gay people don't have relationship problems?? That's it, I'm getting a sex change. No more arguing.

      --
      The Unicode standard is over 20 years old. Why does Slashdot not support it?
    25. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like what you've said, and I'll add a few that look comic, but are true nonetheless.

      First, the non-comic one - talk with each other, and keep talking. Never forget that long (27+ years and still counting) the two of you really had the hots for each other.

      Cuddle naked. I'm not talking about sex, but neither am I precluding it. There are many studies talking about how important it is that children get hugged and other contact. Who said the need ever diminished? Did it, or did we "grow up" and stop, needlessly. Skin contact with your S.O. is really good, even without sex.

      If you're up against an unpleasant task, close the curtains, get naked, and do it together. I'm not kidding. At the very least, it offers giggles and a few needed moments of distraction. It also makes the time go faster, and the unpleasant task seems to get done more quickly.

    26. Re:Divorce Rates by operagost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would like to add that the bible does not demand that a woman be subservient to her husband. It does prescribe that she be subordinate, in that both partners have equal worth but the husband must accept responsibility for the marriage. The husband must respect his wife's emotions and intelligence, and make decisions while taking consideration of her feelings and input. Basically, he is what the perfect manager would be.

      To believers, this is akin to how the Son answers to the Father; but because they are one God (just like a man clings to his wife and they become one flesh in Genesis 1), the Son is not lesser than the Father: the Father is just in charge.

      This is just my humble interpretation; feel free to disagree.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    27. Re:Divorce Rates by xouumalperxe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gay couples probably have roughly as many problems as anyone else. But one can argue that if you're in a state that's very prejudiced against homosexuality, you're likelier to have closet cases marrying "straight", which is a recipe for a failed marriage.

    28. Re:Divorce Rates by bill_kress · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When my mom divorced my dad she had been the only one working for a long time, and had to take care of two kids while he pretty much drank.

      He couldn't even stay home and take care of us--when she asked him to do that he locked us in our room by tying a rope from the doorknob to something across the hall and went to "play golf". The only egress, a window, was too high to get out of.

      It wasn't like we were being tortured or anything, but we were a good deal better off without him.

      Yes, the kids care!

    29. Re:Divorce Rates by ultramk · · Score: 3, Informative

      It isn't laziness. The truth is that people change. Who you are and what you're willing to put up with is different at 35 (45, 55) than it is at 18.

      Sometimes a relationship can grow and adapt and weather the changes that come with the years, and sometimes it can't. The difference is that in my parent's generation, you just sucked it up and resigned yourself to being miserable for the rest of your life, no matter how often your husband was beating you up, how many affairs he had, and how much he treated you like shit after you gained a few pounds and he started drinking every night. You just sucked it up.

      Sometimes marrying someone is a terrible mistake that only becomes apparent years later. As a child of parents who hated each other's guts for pretty much my entire lifetime, couldn't hide it, and didn't get divorced until I turned 18, let me assure you that divorce when I was a little kid would have been far preferable to what I went through.

      Now I'm married, and I'm seven years into it. It isn't always easy, but I'm in it for the long haul. I will guarantee to you that if I ever start acting like my parents did for my entire childhood and adolescence, I will do something about it. Immediately. Life is way too short.

      --
      You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
    30. Re:Divorce Rates by Reckless+Visionary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, you act as if this is an unarguable point, and that only two options ever present themselves (misery/divorce). While I tend to agree with you in cases of abuse or other extremes, I think it's a leap to assume that all divorces are the result of irreconcilable misery. Some are a result of selfishness, lack of maturity, a degradation of the principle of keeping your word, etc. I think giving a free pass to parents who divorce because "they're unhappy" is a mistake. Successful marriages are neither a great coincidence, nor something that only worked for people born a long time ago, nor a result of a subjugation of women. They are a result of work, willingness to compromise, openness, and a mutual lifelong commitment to make yourself/her/himself a better person for the benefit of yourself, your partner, and possibly your child. Divorce can indicate that one or both partners just isn't willing to do that. Kids care about that.

      --
      I think I'll stop here.
    31. Re:Divorce Rates by nawcom · · Score: 1
      I disagree with the moral aspect of it - on whether it is morally correct to follow. Mainly because of many examples in the stories, along with the culture this was written in.

      http://hubpages.com/hub/Is_the_husband_the_Master_of_the_wife

      I swear everytime I hear comments about the bible by some christians they sound like some backup in a Robin Hood movie or something. Also notice the comments on the botttom - of wedded women understanding and agreeing that they enjoy and will continue to submissively honor their husband in the same way. As a man who will never become a servant of a myth, I would never follow the morals that it teaches when it comes to women. I find the belief that every human is equal, no matter what factors they have or don't have, and the holy bible disagrees with my, and many people's humanist philosophy.

    32. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, ethics is a determination between right and wrong
      Morals are a determination between good and evil.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Divorce Rates by catbertscousin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the domestic violence rates are statistically higher among same-sex marriages.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished. - Avon, Blake's 7
    34. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You might want o look a little closer at the bible.

      "encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored." Titus 2:4-5
      Ephesians 5:22-24
      " 22Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. 23For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. 24Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. "

      Cor I 11
        3Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man"

      Cor I 11
      "7A man ought not to cover his head,[b] since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man"

      Women should treat there husbands as there husband whould treat Christ I.E. Worship them.

      The bible is filled with examples telling women that the are beneath men.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    35. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If only they were for freedom.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Divorce Rates by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually I was thinking of Goatse, but libertarians are worse.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    37. Re:Divorce Rates by operagost · · Score: 1
      Being "subject" is not the same as being "subservient," as I have said.
      Also, you took both 1 Cor passages out of context. They are referring to the practice of covering (or not covering) one's head while in fellowship or prayer.

      Now I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. And every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head--it is just as though her head were shaved. If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut or shaved off, she should cover her head. A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man.

      By the way, that doesn't mean you should literally cut a woman's hair off because she didn't wear a hat in worship; it means she might as well have come in sporting a Sinead O'Connor look. None of this means that you're going to hell for committing a fashion faux pas, either.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    38. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In my experience, young people marry in bible belt states because they have excessive premarital sex, often with an excessive number of partners, and end up with a baby that they are told they must have and take care of. So they get married a few days before the baby is born.

      Sometimes the marriage lasts, sometimes it does not. I think studies that find that marriages of protestant religions, except for lutherans, have a higher divorce rate than atheist is a result of these shotgun weddings. The same is likely true for the divorce rate of red states, all higher than blue.

      Sometimes the couple get smart and stop making babies, and tries to make the marriage work, but not always. Like the couple who got his wife pregnant pretty regularly, until she died in childbirth. Then just left the kids with the state.

      Unlike fanatics like to believe, it is probably better to have responsible sex with reasonable partners until one finds someone who seems appropriate for the long term.

      The biggest issue is those that try to scare people into not having sex. Your partner may leave you because you are not as good as the previous partner. Your partner might cheat on you. Your partner will call you a slut. In the end, most people have active sex drives, and the scare tactics just make them want it more.

    39. Re:Divorce Rates by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I don't see Louisiana, Indiana, or Oklahoma on the list at your link. (When I saw that it added up to 48 I had to figure out which ones are missing.)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    40. Re:Divorce Rates by KGIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      23For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body.

        24Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing.

        25Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;

        26That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word,

        27That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.

        28So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself.

      Note verse 28. Cherry picking the Bible to get a desired response is generally a bad idea from any point of view but people really seem to like to do so.

      Over in Colossians we have it repeated.

        18Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as it is fit in the Lord.

        19Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them.

      It isn't that I'm a big fan of the whole biblical religions as a whole but in context there seem to be a lot of things in there that would make for a good clean living and good relationships as well as some humanitarian views that are important.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    41. Re:Divorce Rates by escher · · Score: 1

      Actually, the domestic violence rates are statistically higher among same-sex marriages.

      Citation?

    42. Re:Divorce Rates by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that all divorces are due to reasons that truly couldn't be overcome with therapy and plain hard work. Some kids are certainly better off with divorced parents than, say, abusive parents or even just unhappy parents. But people are also sometimes faster to get divorced these days when it's possible that they could work through it. Of course, no one can say which couples are which, but you definitely can't say that every child of divorced parents is better off.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    43. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "

      and were shocked to see that some states in the bible belt [wikipedia.org] states are relatively high. One of our most cherished institutions indeed!

      "

      I have to admit, I'm not all that surprised.

      I am a Christian myself, and have dated a number of girls, but Christian girls (and Christians in general) seem to create so many problems for themselves. I'm not sure why that is but...seriously. Do you need to always think so damn much about everything and analyze it 18 different ways to Sunday? Sometimes, things just happen. Sometimes, life just sucks. And, if I ever hear the excuse, "God just doesn't have me in that right place right now date someone," ever again, I may go crazy.

      Again, I must restate that I am a Christian. I think being a Christian is a wonderful thing. But, not everything in your life is a problem. Focus on the good and on the opportunities, too. God put those into your life for a reason.

    44. Re:Divorce Rates by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I would never follow the morals that it teaches when it comes to women-
      If I take that seriously, then it is a very politically correct viewpoint. A great ethical standpoint if you mean it to apply in these matters.
      If you read some more about the psychology of women and look to historical sources, you'll find that the 'teaching' as you put it is not against women, but accommodates them. That is a generalization, but the principal is there.
      My point being that there are other factors at work here. Some of them are explained in tantric sex where the woman wants to be aggressive, then submissive and subservient. In Hindu mythology, Krsna appeared before all women who had him as they each desired. After that, they became dutiful to their families.
      'Duty', aggression and submission - even subservience was looked at and even now is looked at as the choice of each individual woman in or out of a relationship. But it's the women who feel the need for a relationship much more than man. Another generalization I know, but bear with me. The physiognomy and biological purpose of Woman is to bear children. Understandably they have an innate desire to care for their children. The best way of doing that is to form a family unit with Man. Man however is not monogamous for long (another generalization).
      So the rules of monogamy explained in different ancient texts are principally founded on the creation, maintenance and continuance of humanity, Man and Woman having their own part based on their respective physiognomy and psychology.
      So the morality that you complain about has a purpose, to maintain the basic fundamental triad of Man, Woman and Child even though it may not suit Man for example.
      Every society has its specific rules, traditions and conventions, but they all point to the same thing: Man as the hunter, Woman as the gatherer. In times of abundance, this breaks down a little with some tribes of Australian Aborigines in certain areas, where the men hunt and eat for themselves. It's only if there is excess food that they give it to the women and children. In some cases, women also have to provide for themselves and their children. That culture has survived for many thousands of years without any biblical laws. Women aren't so subservient and for that they have to be much more responsible for themselves and their children.

      Now in politically correct speak, what you say is wonderful and I agree, but never make the assumption that all women for example don't want to be submissive or subservient or that all men want to be aggressive and polygamous.
      There are so many women out there who are suffering from this political correctness as they now feel that they can't be submissive, or feel it inappropriate to be a homemaker or dutiful wife when what they desire is exactly that. To each his own.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    45. Re:Divorce Rates by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I hear that Liberia is full of libertarians and lots of freedom!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    46. Re:Divorce Rates by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      I have to ask... What kind of unpleasant task can a couple do naked with the curtains closed?
      Is this like picking up dog poop? Or balancing checkbooks?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    47. Re:Divorce Rates by PPH · · Score: 1

      Better yet, get two.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    48. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Son, with enough practice, you can make your butt do anything you want it to. And don't let anyone tell you otherwise!"

    49. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fella, my grandfather got caught nailing the kids dressing gowns to the floor and going to the pub. Ahhh, those were the days :).

    50. Re:Divorce Rates by smilinggoat · · Score: 1

      I think too many people get married for the hell of it. I believe marriage to be a mostly obsolete tradition (along with religion, but that's for another thread).
       
      Marriage was more relevant when people's life expectancy was shorter. Not only would you most likely be dead by the time you were 40 you'd have a good chance of getting eaten by a bear early on, freeing up your significant other to go find someone else.
       
      Plus these days a couple doesn't have to have kids in order for their marriage to be socially considered legitimate. Many people are choosing not to breed, or at least reproduce at a lower frequency than days of yore.
       
      With so many options of different people to choose from today, not needing to have kids, and our lives so long, it seems as though marriage is not as necessary as it once was.

    51. Re:Divorce Rates by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can't multiply the average per year by the number of years and get the number of divorced people. You'll get an artificially high number, because of repeat divorces. The failure rate in second marriages is several times as high as for first marriages, and for third-plus it's basically 100% (less a few that end in death within a small number of years, before they have time to fail).

      In other words, the long-term *success* rate for marriages is much higher than the averages would seem to indicate, because once someone is in a successful marriage, they don't contribute to the average again and again and again. Fiftieth anniversaries are surprisingly common, and I've known several couples who made it past sixty-five.

      Also, marriages don't fail because being in a marriage isn't easy. That's true, but it's not why they fail. Marriages fail because too many people don't take marriage seriously in the first place. If your job and your hobby are more important to you than your spouse, you're in for a rocky relationship, and it's not right to blame this on "marriage is hard". Your priorities didn't *support* marriage. (This is also why the same people fail again and again.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    52. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure there is, don't get married and you can't get divorced. It's simple logic. Also we have garbage like Jerry Springer getting people all worked up and looking for a fight, I know girls who get married just to for the drama of the fighting and divorce. 20 yrs ago these people would have been happy making one guy miserable for the rest of his life but because he can now see what other people have done to improve their lives he is sending the psycho loose on the world again.

    53. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes anonymous coward is required!

    54. Re:Divorce Rates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one about the guy who wants a "Slashdot for kids" is especially disturbing so he can "plop" his children in front of a computer and have them leave him alone is especially disturbing.

      I hope that's the exception rather than the rule for geeks who are starting to have families.

      Yup, that's the exception. I'm sure most geeks love having kids as they then have an excuse to play with lego, build a trebuchet and turn up at home with 100 tubes of mentos and a pallet of diet coke. All in the name of education.

  5. How Do I Banish This Feed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Do I have to register an account in order to ignore all the Idle feeds, or can I just set cookies?

    1. Re:How Do I Banish This Feed? by Tauvix · · Score: 1

      You must register for an account.

    2. Re:How Do I Banish This Feed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying Idle is actually a subtle system of audience manipulation to urge us into registering. I had no idea Slashdot was so cunning...

  6. Tag: IDLEisDIGGforTACO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IDLEisDIGGforTACO

  7. She has time to call you at work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Christ. Tell her to stop calling and get back in the goddamn kitchen and make you a sandwich.

    1. Re:She has time to call you at work? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      He can't, he doesn't have sudo privileges.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:She has time to call you at work? by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1

      Wow, the moderators
      have no sense of humor
      today. That's funny right
      there, I don't care who
      you are.

      Damn this box!

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    3. Re:She has time to call you at work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mis-spelled sammich, moran.

  8. Tag it: setyourfuckingsettings by halivar · · Score: 1

    That way the whiners don't have to see idle.slashdot.org stories anymore.

    1. Re:Tag it: setyourfuckingsettings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But noooOooOoOOOooOOo! Then it shows up in RSS!!! Then we're FORCED to read it! Don't you understaaaaAaAAAaand? Come on, guys! It hurts our delicate psyches!

    2. Re:Tag it: setyourfuckingsettings by bheer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those complaining about having to see Idle stories in the RSS feed, use Yahoo Pipes (or write your own script, this is a geek site after all) and filter out any RSS item that contains "<slash:section>idle</slash:section>". Processing XML isn't exactly rocket science. Doing it using Yahoo Pipes is probably best, they'll host a synthesized feed for you that other Idle-haters can mooch off.

    3. Re:Tag it: setyourfuckingsettings by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I love to make Yahoo Pipes, but for some reason I never thought about doing that. You are awesome.

  9. hahaah by carn1fex · · Score: 1

    hilarious! When love turns sour the only friend myopic geeks can reach out to is slashdot.

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  10. Dear slashdot by geekoid · · Score: 1, Informative

    Please ban the iups the guy with the kids posts from. Maybe he will start playing with his kids out of sheer boredom.

    Hint:
    "that doesn't involve yelling at them and putting them in timeout"
    You are not doing it correcetly.
    A) You should be yelling at your kids.
    B) If you are yelling at them and then putting themin timeout, you are doing it wrong.

    Not to be surprised becasue most Americans don't seem to understand how to do timeuts.
    When done right, they are a great tools.
    I know becasue I was doing it wrong. When I realized I was frustrated and going nowhere, I talked to some professionals. Now we do it right and the temper tantrums have pretty much gone away. My kids are 8 and 10, so the occasional tantrum flairs up.

    You should never hit your kids. It is harmful and ultimately makes life worse.

    Please look into how the man you inventer time out implemented them. they work very well.

    Also, you should never count down, that just turns into a battle of the wills.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Dear slashdot by VoxMagis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey - hitting your kids is fine. Heck, I didn't turn out to bad!

      Shoot - gotta go - the prison guard says my weekly computer time is up.

      --
      -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
    2. Re:Dear slashdot by yukk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can understand with your kids being at that age why you still have the occasional tantrum. Kids are hard work. I get frustrated myself, but I give myself a little time and calm down.

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
    3. Re:Dear slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too obvious. Go back to Digg until you learn a bit of subtlety.

    4. Re:Dear slashdot by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After learning good techniques, I don't get nearly as frustrated as I used to, but yeah, some days.
      What I do when I get frustrated is stop doing what I am doing, and focus 100% on doing something with my kids. I don't get done what I was working on, but i'm not frustrated anymore. The odd time when I really can't stop what I am doing. I simply explain to my kids what I am doing, why it must be done right now and apologize for not having the time. They seem to understand that.
      Besides, in 6 years there not going to want to do anything with me, so I figure I should get it in while I can.

      Kids should be a joy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Dear slashdot by fyoder · · Score: 1

      "You should never hit your kids. It is harmful and ultimately makes life worse."

      Corporal punishment can be effective in behaviour modification if it is swift and consistent. Actual force applied should be low, because higher force doesn't lead to greater efficacy. If swift and certain isn't an option, then it shouldn't be applied, since it does have a down side in learning from example. Telling a child that they shouldn't hit while you're hitting them sends a mixed message.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    6. Re:Dear slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Please look into how the man you inventer time out implemented them. they work very well."

      What you say!!
      You have no chance to survive make your time.

    7. Re:Dear slashdot by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Lazlow: Alright let's go to line 8, hello caller, what's your name?
      Bob: Bob. Bob from Pine Creek.
      Lazlow: Hey, er...what's up, Bob from Pine Creek?
      Bob: Well, I been listening to your show, there's always people going on about problems in schools. Guns, people showing disrespect to teachers, drugs...schools are breeding grounds for crime, ain't they?
      Lazlow: Well I guess it seems that way.
      Bob: Well I got a reeeal simple solution. Shut 'em down. Shut down the schools and you shut down the problem. No more dead teachers, no more angry students.
      Lazlow: Well, but you don't think...
      Bob: No I don't, never! Now listen to me! It makes perfect sense! These days, they complain a lot, but you know what...they cost even more. I mean shoes, books, toys, even special tiny furry pets, that sort of crap. It's all about "me". "Me me me me!" Well not my Johnny. No sir! Uh-uh! I'm learnin' him the value of good hard work. Learnin' him good. At three, we taught him how to clean the bathroom, if he left so much as one hair on the soap it was off to bed with no dinner. You know what? He went to bed a-hungry only 20, maybe 30 times. He learned! Now, he brings his mother lunch in bed every day so that she can sleep in. Let me tell ya, everyone should have their kid serving up food. He even cooks for the whole family! These days he's getting too big to sweep chimneys, so now he's a paralegal at Rankin' and Ponzer! He's seven, and he's making Madge and me twenty-three thousand a year. And on weekends, he doesn't go to the mall, play soccer, read, or do any of that kind of stuff. No no. He works in the basement of a marketing company making photocopies all night. Hell, he goes to sleep during the day, that's another eight grand right there! So now, I'm buying me a fast-boat trailer, what do you say to that?
      Lazlow: Well it sounds kinda like...exploitation to me!
      Bob: Exploitation! Man, you bleeding hearts kill me! Johnny's mine! He's my kid! How can I exploit something I own? Exploitation, you sound like a communist! Kids in Russia, they don't work...that's why everything's so messed up over there! You have to wait one month for toilet paper! And their space station...it was made out of milk crates. I tell ya, we're conformed living it the American way! That, and the only thing more American is having folks work for ya!
      Lazlow: That sounds a little oppressive...and even despotic!
      Bob: Exactly Lazlow, you hit the nail on the head that time! He's my kid. I'm telling ya, just shut the schools down, make the kids work. That book stuff's all for sissies anyway.
      Lazlow: A..and doctors, and politicians, and lawyers and p...whatever, you know I can't even be bothered to argue with you, but I do feel sorry for your little Johnny the seven-year-old cook chimney-sweep paralegal photocopier because... his daddy's an idiot!! Let's take a quick break.

      Lazlow: Alright, we're back here on Chatterbox, the radio show that never gets old. I'm Lazlow, with open ears and a closed mind. Hello, you're on the air, what's your name?
      Caller: I wanted to talk about spanking!
      Lazlow: Oh God...not another one...!
      Caller: I say spanking kids is the only way to teach them right from wrong.
      Lazlow: So you think that teaching kids from an early age that violence is the solution to problems will make them valuable members of our society.
      Caller: Exactly! I knew you'd understand Lazlow! My daddy used to whoop tar out of me. He once hit me so hard my spleen fell out of my ear. Didn't do me no harm. Look at me now, I'm the best pest-control guy in east Portland. I've killed more rats, roaches and vermin that you can imagine, and I love it. This is such a great country, I wouldn't be where I am today if my daddy hadn't beat me senseless.
      Lazlow: Hehh...what are you talking about? Man, I'm starting to believe that guy about the fluoride in the drinking water! Listen...if there's any sane person left in Liberty City that can hear my voice, please, call the show right now, this is an SOS, going out across the city!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Dear slashdot by db32 · · Score: 1

      I must disagree on hitting the kids, but only slightly. If you are hitting them to hurt them you are doing it wrong. The biggest pain you should be causing them is their pride. It also has to be reserved for the most outrageous or immediate violations for it to have a real effect. When my 5yr old decides its ok to hurt the 2yr old because she annoyed him I come down on him like a flash and give him a solid crack on the butt and send him straight to the corner. His butt only stings for a minute, its his pride that suffers the most there. Most of the effect should be from the shock value.

      The 2 yr old typically gets the immediate end of things. Reaching for something that she shouldn't touch (easily damaged, dangerous, etc) and she will get a quick slap on the hand. She is a quick one and is frequently shocked into compliance without so much of a wimper and just a "holy crap, daddy smacked my hand!" facial expression. However, every now and then she gets that willful scowl and will do it again just to see what you will do.

      If it isn't something immediate or outrageous they pretty much get time in the corner. This usually comes from ignoring instruction, arguing about instruction, or just whining and then its to the corner until they are ready to try again. The 5yr old basically gets one warning glare before he winds up in the corner from me. My wife argues with him a bit more so she tends to have more troubles with him bickering back.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    9. Re:Dear Slashdot by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      "and move back to your parents house"

      You are assuming that he moved out of his parents house.

      "disappointment of her not being a C programmer"

      Mine finds it boring. She thinks the end-product is cool. However, she doesn't want to take the time to create the end-product. I'm not too concerned though. She currently has an active interest in physics and chemistry. She's also involved in Karate. I don't take it myself. However, I take her to the lessons and have never missed a tournament. She's very competitive.

      As for a kids section, I'm not really sure what they mean. Comment filtering? News of interest to technically inclined kids? Personally, if I find an article that I think my kids will find interesting, I'll show them the article and discuss it with them. There is nothing better than debating a topic of interest with your child. Just don't be surprised when they beat you.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    10. Re:Dear slashdot by yukk · · Score: 1

      I don't know how your original post got modded troll, but you're right. Trying to do something while the kids are bugging you doesn't work for anyone. Either pay attention to the kids or tell them you'll be with them when you can. By the way, I was kidding about the tantrums. I know what you actually meant.

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
    11. Re:Dear slashdot by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Oh, there *are* times when you need to yell at a kid, and/or stick them in a corner. But if that's the only way you know how to handle discipline, you're a few tools shy of a full workshop.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    12. Re:Dear slashdot by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you are hitting them to hurt them you are doing it wrong.

      I would say that applies to all forms of discipline. Whether we're talking about spanking or a lecture or grounding or corner time or whatever, the same principle applies: If you're doing it to be mean, you're doing it wrong. You're supposed to discipline your children *for their benefit*.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    13. Re:Dear slashdot by db32 · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. I think you have to be "mean" for the sake of being mean sometimes though. Mostly in just not letting them have their way all the time even if there is no specific reason other than "I said so" or occassionally "overreacting" for a relatively minor infraction. I loathe this sugar coated society where everyone gets a trophy, noone loses, etc. Part of being successful in life is learning how to lose gracefully and that life isn't always fair. That is a lesson that is much much harder to learn the older they get and tends to have stronger negative ramifications.

      To be honest I actually enjoy the little contests of wills sometimes. It ultimately teaches them a great deal. How to lose gracefully, how to deal with disappointment, how to pick their battles, how to stand their ground.

      We also don't tend to give much sympathy when they hurt themselves doing something we told them not to do. The 5yr old fell off an office chair standing up and making it swivel (warned more times than I can count about this). Slams into floor, starts howling because he smacked his knee. I just looked at him "That hurts alot doesnt it" (yes) "And have we told you to not do that?" (yes) "Do you think that is why we told you not to do that?" (yes) "Good! Learning has occurred, now get up, we have to go"

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    14. Re:Dear slashdot by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I think you have to be "mean" for the sake of being mean sometimes though. Mostly in just not
      > letting them have their way all the time even if there is no specific reason other than "I said so"

      On the one hand, you certainly do have to teach them that they can't always have everything that strikes their fancy, and sometimes that means just making an arbitrary decision that on this particular occasion they can't have the candy (or whatever) just because it's not good for them to always have everything they think they want. If that's what you mean by the above, then your point is absolutely valid. However, "mean for the sake of being mean" is *definitely* not the wording I would have chosen to express this concept.

      > or occassionally "overreacting" for a relatively minor infraction.

      I suppose that depends on how you define "overreacting". It would certainly be easy to take that too far. But I don't mean to imply either that you should always just let all "minor" infractions slide.

      > Part of being successful in life is learning how to lose gracefully and that life isn't always fair.

      I do agree here. Life is not fair, is not supposed to be fair. And if it were fair, you wouldn't like it.

      > We also don't tend to give much sympathy when they hurt themselves doing something we told them not to do.

      Heh. I'm not going to argue too much with that one, but I will note that you can't count on this necessarily happening with every behavior you think it will happen with. My parents and school teachers tried for neigh on two decades to get me to stop tipping back chairs. I'm pretty sure they thought I'd hurt myself at some point by this practice and learn my lesson, but so far I have never gotten hurt that way (well, not beyond falling off and giving some people a good laugh once or twice). On the other hand, I was never significantly punished for it, mostly just warned and fussed at (like I said, I'm pretty sure they thought I'd learn the lesson naturally by getting hurt). For some odd reason, I've never really left off doing it, either. (Yeah, I'm middle-aged and still tip back chairs, habitually, without even noticing I'm doing it. Really. My boss caught me doing it in my office chair just a couple of weeks ago. Fortunately I don't think she was significantly bother by it, though she probably wasn't too impressed with my good judgment either.)

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    15. Re:Dear slashdot by db32 · · Score: 1

      On your first point that is why I used the "mean" with quotes since you had initially mentioned being mean for the sake of being mean. I think we are just splitting hairs over terminoligy here. :)

      I learned an incredible lesson during basic training. The only real requirements for a drill instructor are being an NCO (which you can achieve by age 21-22 if you are a fast burner and come in early), and to have been to the training on how to be a drill instructor. So, we had a young twenty something inpiring shock, fear, and immediate obedience in guys as old as their early thirties. This was done almost entirely through voice, and occasionaly being made to do lots of pushups or other physical labor. They can't beat the shit out of you like the older days. It isn't just screaming or being loud either. You have to be loud, commanding, and out of nowhere like a thunderclap. So my "overreacting" is typically when I catch him starting to do something and just thunderclap out of nowhere. It is satisfying in a weird way to see the kid momentarily jump out of their skin and then correct themselves

      Well I figure if they manage to not hurt themselves then they are ok. Typically it is things like running in the house and so on. He tripped once and managed to split his forehead open on the corner, had to get stapled back shut (apparently they don't use stitches much anymore and the glue doesn't work with hair around, so he just got two little metal staple things). Holy shit does that lesson work well. Anytime he starts acting up running around, or whining about how something hurts we just have to remind him "Do you want to go get stapled again?". Puts the brakes on that behavior in a hurry.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  11. One, two and three by beldon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One-- You seriously need to grow a pair. Fast.

    Two and three-- Looks like the obvious train doesn't stop in their town.

    Seriously-- web usage is a perfect mirror of who we are inasmuch as it shows what's important to us. Don't blame the mirror for the image it shows because you don't like it. Fix the subject. Or (if you're into short-term solutions) get rid of the mirror. In the latter case, though, don't be surprised if what's in the mirror doesn't go away.

    Okay-- I'm into seriously over-extended metaphor mode. Time to stop.

  12. Dear Slashdot by Windows_NT · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have geat advice for the contributors to this article:
    1) quit being a bitch (mod -1 karma)
    2) You married the girl for a reason, if shes not satisfied with you, its YOUR FAULT!
    3) instead of whining that slashdot doesnt have a kids section, why dont you get off your ass and play with your kids!

    my baby girl is due in a month and i cant wait cuz i get to hang out with her, Although im ready for the disapointment of her not being a C programmer, i know ill have the chance to show her all the great things that life has to offer, hunting, fishing, mechanics, math, hating boys. ..
    Honestly, if you have a wife and child and you go home and play on your computer, maybe you should divorce her, get rid of the child, and move back to your parents house!

    --
    Go go Gadget Nailgun!
  13. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I predict the parent will be the most entertaining post in the discussion of this article. Idle is less than useless.

  14. Alrighty then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I ask because my wife has started to check on me through Slashdot while I'm at work. She doesn't think I am working if I post during the day. It has reached the point where she will call work if she sees that I have posted. My boss doesn't like it and I can't get her to stop. I'd hate to have to get my karma back up to where it is now or have my posts (which are very good mostly) not associated with a new account. I know I could just start posting anonymous coward but I have a problem with having what I write linked to the word coward.

    Where to start.

    1. Get off it! You're not working!
    2. Your karma sucks in real life!
    3. Your wife is right!
    4. Your boss doesn't like you wasting time on Slashdot either. It's not because of your wife!
    5. Dude, you have issues!
  15. This country? by tryfan · · Score: 1

    Which country is that? India? China? Indonesia?
    Oh, yeah, you're referring to Intercountry, right?

    1. Re:This country? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      The country the author is in - which would be easy for you to figure out if it weren't for that gigantic chip on your shoulder inhibiting your brain from proper function.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:This country? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      The *Inter*zone! Naked Lunch makes sense now!

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  16. Slashdot for cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    With the high divorce rate, I have given up on my wife and instead have cats. It would be great if you could add a section for cats. Sometimes my cat wants to play, but I want to read /., so she sits on my keyboard and meows at me. It would be awesome if I could plop her down in front of a computer, so we could be doing something together.

    Also, when I am at work she monitors me on slashdot. This is why I have to post AC. Sometimes she even responds. You know all the comments that seem like the poster couldn't type at all? That's her.

    1. Re:Slashdot for cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I CAN HAS KARMA?

    2. Re:Slashdot for cats? by cnoocy · · Score: 1

      Awesome.

      --
      This sig is not the Zahir. Lucky for you.
    3. Re:Slashdot for cats? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      meii feoooownd meeeew

      woewe;of soig sog si e

    4. Re:Slashdot for cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      '("RT (Â"'ytrhgds rrr meow

    5. Re:Slashdot for cats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean ponies... You'd like a slashdot section for OMG ponies!

  17. She calls you at work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has reached the point where she will call work if she sees that I have posted.
    You could start with syaing, "Iron my shirt Bitch" and go from there.

  18. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I usually enjoy the disagree mail because they tend to be funy. This last one today, though, is just very sad. Some people have no business having children. Makes me want to offer to go play with the guy's kids. Moron.

  19. Yawn by sexconker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Still a waste of space.

    1. Re:Yawn by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes you are~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Yawn by sexconker · · Score: 1

      no u

  20. Kids' Section by Kwesadilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    "On Sun Jan 20, 2008 ****** wrote: "I have 2 young kids and it would be great if you made a Slashdot kids section."

    "Slashdot Announces Idle Section"
    - CmdrTaco, Aug 14, 2008

    Ask, and you shall receive. Took a while, though. His wife probably took the kids and left already. Way to put family first, Slashdot.

    --
    This space reserved for administrative use.
  21. Tap it down good and... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 0

    Stare at the kids, play with my wife, and talk to my computer, and--

    [MARRIAGE FAIL]

    I know what I did wrong. I know what I did. I need to talk to the kids. That's it. Talk to my kids, stare at my wife, and play with the computer and--

    [MARRIAGE FAIL]

    Oh, I know what I did wrong. I know what I did. It's play with the kids. OK. Play with the kids, talk to my wife, and stare at the computer and--

    [walk in on brother having sex with my wife]

    Ah ha! So you're the reason why--

    [SHOTGUN TO FACE]

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Tap it down good and... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Clue: it's a classic Sylvester the Cat cartoon "The Slap-Happy Mouse" reference.

      You might not have gotten it as it gets cut for gun violence these days.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  22. Brainless wife? by Devir · · Score: 1

    In the first message. Can this guys wife really be that stupid? Her Husband's job is his income. If she gets him fired for being on Slashdot, it affects her as well. Once the Bills can't get paid, they start loosing things, cars and services and then where they live. Unless of course she's having an affair and just "needs" a reason to leave her Husband. being an unemployed bum is a great reason in the eyes of the court.

  23. Idleispants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly is that tag referring to? It's on every idle story and I havent been able to find it's origin?

    1. Re:Idleispants by svnt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a story that showed up around the time idle started: http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/08/27/2246235&from=rss

      He set his password to "Lloyds is pants." It's a British thing.

      Some whiner suggested to use it as a tag for all idle stories.

  24. No more tagging? by nsayer · · Score: 0, Troll

    Did the editors get tired of "pleasestop"? Way to kill the messenger.

  25. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My sphincter squeezes shut with superhuman strength, pinching your trolling cock right off your body

  26. Can't believe it by chord.wav · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1 - Didn't your wife told you not to post?!? Get back to work bitch! Just kidding. C'mon man, talk to her!

    2 - Why don't you ask her directly instead of trying to caught her in the act? You know, some relationships actually benefit from being honest to each other... some even are based on that!

    3 - You should have thought about that BEFORE having kids! Put your sh1t toghether, act like the father you are supposed to be and spend time with your kids. And you better enjoy it.

  27. Being a 35yo bachelor, and no closer to being married than I was 10 years ago, this story is depressing.

    I'm going to go spend time on weebls-stuff.com until my mood improves.

    --
    3. Profit!
    2. ???
    1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  28. No help needed... by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    "You should realize that the help link doesn't provide help with your life. It's mostly for getting passwords and stuff."

    I've never needed help forgetting passwords and stuff. I can do that on my own.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:No help needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mostly for getting passwords and stuff.

      Try reading that again... it didn't say anything about FORGETTING passwords.

    2. Re:No help needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh!

  29. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He IS a trolling cock, you insensitive clod! There IS no body.

  30. No Problems Now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read faster. Compliment the wife and boss in posts. Post short replies.

    Problems solved. You are free to play with the wife and kids.

  31. My views on the three by [cx] · · Score: 1

    Marriage is not for everyone, it's not supposed to be a natural step in everybody's life.

    If you want to have a relationship that works, make sure that you are willing to compromise a lot(sacrifice!) and have transparent discussions on any issue.

    You can blame computers, or slashdot, or any other kind of distraction, but the problem is the people involved in the relationship.

    The guy whose wife calls his work to check if he is posting on Slashdot sounds like an absolute train wreck of a person and probably needs to get a job of their own, or some kind of hobby that will stop them from constantly being involved in someone elses career. Callblock your home phone number if you have to, but it is very unprofessional to have repeated social calls to soothe the anxiety of a bored housewife.

    As for number two, if you can't confront your wife about it and ask them point blank why they are acting this way, and why they are so secretive about their actions in this "bliss of holy matrimony" perhaps you should just divorce her and find someone who is not poorly concealing an affair.

    And for number three, if you can't find an activity to do with your children that does not involve computers, maybe you should not have had kids. Raising children is more than bringing home a paycheck. Your wife is clearly trying to point this out to you and you are failing to meet the needs of your children. If they want to play with you, make the sacrifice of leaving your computer for an hour or two and go outside with them, it sounds like it will do you some good too.

    So looks like the end result is two divorces, and one bad father.

    Go Slashdot, Go!

    1. Re:My views on the three by daveywest · · Score: 1

      #3 should pick up a copy of Hello Kitty Island Adventure to play with the kids.

  32. Nerd psychology by AlpineR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought this batch of disagree mail was an interesting look into nerd psychology.

    #1) Terrible irony: you don't want to post as a "coward" but you appear afraid to stand up to your overbearing stalker wife. Or maybe you're not afraid and have stood up, but you're stuck with an unreasonable spouse.

    #2) Sorry dude, she hasn't been fooling around on Slashdot. She's fooling around alright, or at least looking at sites that she doesn't think you'll approve of. But you know how you leave an Excel window open all day so you can quickly hide Slashdot if your boss comes by? Well she opened a Slashdot window to hide what she was really doing.

    #3) Some people aren't meant to have kids, at least not yet. Unfortunately you have kids you don't want. And anyways, would having your kid reading kids.slashdot.com next to you really be any better than having them surf pbskids.org next to you?

    ALL) Not only do Slashdot readers have girlfriends, but they have wives and kids (you insensitive clod)!

    1. Re:Nerd psychology by afabbro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought this batch of disagree mail was an interesting look into nerd psychology.

      Indeed. By inventing these emails and composing them, samzenpus has shown us how he thinks of the typical Slashdot reader.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:Nerd psychology by NoName6272 · · Score: 1

      #3) Some people aren't meant to have kids, at least not yet. Unfortunately you have kids you don't want.

      This line made me think of the last frame Classhole.

      I'm currently in a programing course with the focus on being a video game programmer, 80% of my class acts like freshmen high school students in a study hall. 90% of my class are commuters from home. A theory we have going with the 20% that are not 'giggly' (if you can use that word to describe a 18+ male), is that they are so immature they would die if they had to live on their own. I'm pretty sure when they (if they ever) get around to having kids, they are going to be on /. disagree mail.

      ~~
      NoName

      PS: And no we have girls in the program just none in my class... yea am that unlucky.

    3. Re:Nerd psychology by Whiteox · · Score: 2, Funny

      80% of my class acts like freshmen high school students in a study hall.
      As the only mature student a while ago (doing an RPL course) I totally agree. It was so difficult to concentrate on coursework with a bunch of high-school rejects. Also it seems that even the older gals (especially) who found themselves 'back at school' after an absence of 20 years suddenly start acting like 15yr olds is not only funny and embarrassing, but I had to protect my 'virginity' for the 2nd time in my life! I've never met a bunch of hornier, desperate women! It's really difficult to concentrate on some kind of knotty problem with these women continually passing me, brushing against me, touching me inappropriately, making secretive lewd suggestions, passing me notes and hanging around my car at the end of the day! And they weren't 'bombshells' either! They seemed to have forgotten what they really looked like (some thin, some fat, some voluptuous - all around the 35 to 45 yr old), and by the end of the course they were wearing revealing clothes, lots of heavy makeup, younger style hairdos and so much perfume that the air was toxic around me! Then there came the jealousy and bitch-fighting. This was particularly bad. Can you imagine a reasonably attractive 40 year old wearing a see-through pink chiffon top with a black push-up bra, an almost mini-skirt and visible red frilly panties having a slanging and pushing match with 2 others in the cafeteria? She slipped and fell and me being chivalrous went and helped her up. That was a mistake.
      By the end of the course I was a total wreck. The high school rejects all failed - maybe one or 2 just passed, most of the women passed but it was 18 weeks of hell.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Nerd psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. would you find a straight male complaining that being surrounded by women who want him as being "hell".

  33. Not so sure by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not so sure it is laziness. Getting divorced is a hassle. Heck, getting *married* is a hassle. Neither is necessarily cheap either. There are probably lots of lazy people who drift from relationship to relationship but I am not convinced that they are responsible for the divorce rate.

    Rather, I think that people are deluded. They pumped full of bogus sitcom representations "marriage", they have unrealistic views about their own desirability and unrealistic expectations of others. As such, they fail to appreciate a perfectly serviceable relationship when they are in one. They constantly think that they can do better and they always believe that they *will* do better -- thus they get divorced and re-married.

  34. Seriously, check your priorities by The+Animal · · Score: 1

    The electronic world is completely fascinating to many of us, and unfortunately it can indeed interfere with real-life responsibilities and relationships. Tongue-in-cheek sarcasm aside, relationship problems due to neglect, sometimes regretfully due to computer time but certainly other hobbies and interests as well, is no laughing matter. Break away from the computer if your significant other is getting moody or "jealous" of your computer time. It is okay to limit your evening computer time to spend more with your family! If you kid is glued all day to the computer or game console, take him outside and introduce him to sunlight.

    Oh, and if your wife turns off the computer display when you walk into the room, yes there is a problem. Talk about it heart to heart. If that fails install a keylogger. Not that I would ever do such a thing myself ...

    1. Re:Seriously, check your priorities by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > If you kid is glued all day to the computer or game console,
      > take him outside and introduce him to sunlight.

      Hey, there's no need to go over the top and get *violent* with the kid. I mean, seriously, *sunlight*? What kind of person are you?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  35. Holy church by Krneki · · Score: 1

    I bet they would love a kid section too.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  36. re: Slashdot for Kids? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Actually, I can relate to that guy and his feelings ... even if perhaps, it wasn't worded as well as it could be.

    I'm divorced and have my kid full-time, so there's no other parent for her to go to, and there aren't even any kids in the neighborhood she can really count on playing with. (Most of them are only around every other weekend or so, since they're part of divorced families too.) Since she's an only child, I'm pretty much her only source of entertainment, when she's not playing by herself.

    It gets old QUICKLY.... and to retain my sanity, I have to try to encourage her to keep herself occupied with her own activities as much as possible. Sure, we do lots of stuff together. I even taught her how to play chess. (She's only 6 so she's not exactly good at it, but she knows all the basic rules of how the pieces move, which is a start!) But there are times when I'm on the computer and she wants to do the same thing, so she gets on the other one. Currently, her only web sites of interest are ones with Flash based games, like Playhouse Disney or Nick Jr. I wish somebody would offer another alternative to those, though. I don't like how in order to get any educational value from a site, it seems like you have to accept the commercial characters and branding they bundle with it.

  37. What about by unity100 · · Score: 1

    socially stunted geeks who can figure out how to set up their preferences to not display "idle" submissions, but doesnt do so and actually read those 'idle' submissions ?

  38. Wife? by REALMAN · · Score: 1

    Who needs a wife? I've got Karma :P

    --
    - A Frog in a pond utters an azure cry. -
  39. My Tin-Foil Hat Theory... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Pair bonding is pretty natural for humans. Marriage is a construct created by religion and borrowed by governments to keep producing new membership for religion or resupplying the labor force. Why do you think most religions look dimly on marriage between people of different religions, and have codified admonitions against divorce? Why do you think married couples get a tax break? Why do you think it has become only a relatively recent development that divorce is not fraught with all of the stigma it used to be, and that children born out of wedlock are no longer considered pariahs? It's all about control by means of incentive, social pressure, and religious admonition to continue the flow of warm bodies into the meat grinder to fill the needs of power.

  40. coward? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I have a problem with having what I write linked to the word coward" "but i don't want to confront my wife about this issue directly as that could be a big confrontation and i'm afraid to deal with that."

    truth hurts don't it?

  41. That slut is sleeping with the *men* of slashdot? by techess · · Score: 1

    She told me she only had eyes for the women of slashdot.... both of us.

    That's it I'm going over there and getting my Star Wars figures back. She better not have taken Yoda out of his package!

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
  42. Re:second post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hilarious

  43. HEY SAMZENPUS by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "Can't get her to stop" pretty much covers (not) having the guts to "tell her to stop". Do you read what you write? I can't imagine a lesser level of trying to get her to stop than telling her. I can imagine more, but not less. Do you think telling you not to make yourself look so oblivious will work, or do we need to try more drastic measures? At least let the disagree mail speak for itself. Your editorializing is backfiring.

    No this isn't flamebait. If it were I'd have said "your petty sniping while hiding behind the /. logo ought to get you bitchslapped" rather than "Your editorializing is backfiring."

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  44. Hey, while your at it by UrbanSim · · Score: 1

    Hey, while your at it ... can you start a dating service. I am a bit of a nerd ... I prefer a nerd to a "hot woman". Actually, there are allot more "hot women" (or woman trying to be hot) then there are people who are just comfortable with who they are. Nerds typically fit into the "I know it's not en vogue but it's how I like it." camp. However desirable it is find a nerdy chick, it is becoming more and more difficult to find one roaming the streets. So if you get a chance, a dating service for nerds could be a good thing. :)

  45. Last one... by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    Kinda sounds like a troll.

  46. He said what? by Sport89 · · Score: 1

    ...but I have a problem with having what I write linked to the word coward.

    Oh the irony!

    --
    Irony, it's like Goldy and Bronzy, only it's made of Iron. -Baldrick

  47. holy crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is wrong with these people?
    gessuss, the wife that checks slashdot for her husbands posts and then calls in to work? where do you find these women? and why would you marry one?

    and to the guy that wants a kids section, eff me. slashdot is slashdot. its a friggin website. who cares if you don't respond to replies immidiately? go play with your kids, and stop giving us nerds a bad name. christ. if your life is governed by a public forum website, you need to figure out what is really important to you.

    i think the scary thing is that these poeple are out there, with the power to vote, drive, and as prooven, re-produce.

  48. Re: Slashdot for Kids? by dedazo · · Score: 1

    I do not have kids of my own yet, but I've been very involved (thankfully) in seeing my sister raise two boys and a girl. And yet, I recognize that never involved enough to fully relate or appreciate what that is really like. But I have a pretty good idea. She jokes that it's all fun and games until you have to clean up a pool of vomit at three in the morning, and she's right. You sir have my unrelenting respect.

    I don't think you're doing anything wrong, on the contrary. And I don't think your situation is anything like the one referenced in that email. That guy just wanted his kid to stop bugging him so he could post to Slashdot.

    Keep up the good work, seriously. Your daughter is lucky to have you.

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo