This is the difference between a Cult, and a religion.
A Cult tells you some of the information, promising the full scoop later on; doing a form of Bait and Switch. A Religion, tells you all that it believes up front, and if you don't like it, well thats the religion, I guess you don't like that religion.
I would have much less of a problem with the Cult of Scientology if it did not do the bait and switch, and deceptive tactics.
like what? Vim?
(Don't get me wrong I love vim, but it doesn't have the formatting I need.)
Emacs?
KATE?!!
Unfortunately I think Openoffice is our front runner, unless you/.'ers can point me elsewhere.
It has to be disassembled to ship! Why would you ever want it to self-assemble?
The minority of the parts are like the support bars and the heater head. You can't print something out of a nozzle that melts at the same temperature that the printing material does.
now what I wanna know is how they radiocarbon dated it without killing the bugger. Or did they just "assume" its 120,000 years old? I mean this could just be another Coelacanth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth incident.
Oh sure it's just one now and it's a big event, but give it 30 years and we'll find that there's a modern population growing specifically under the lid of jam jars.
Boxes, bread, gold, beads and religious jewelry are significantly less weird than "pantsu".
I'm sorry, but no matter what religion you are, it's probably less weird than the Mormons. Unless you're a Scientologist.
Even THEY don't have magical underpants!!
Summa Theologica.
http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1002.htm
I believe I win here, this document has been evidence for the faith for 800 years.
Although, protestants don't use any of the old church documents, and thusly could not defend their faith; Catholics on the other hand have both evidence and reasonable proof for our theory.
Slashdot Mirror
Seriously, didn't want him to know that she was using slashdot?? Not wanting him touching her?
no
This is the difference between a Cult, and a religion. A Cult tells you some of the information, promising the full scoop later on; doing a form of Bait and Switch. A Religion, tells you all that it believes up front, and if you don't like it, well thats the religion, I guess you don't like that religion. I would have much less of a problem with the Cult of Scientology if it did not do the bait and switch, and deceptive tactics.
Oh sure you think this is bad, just wait till the anal probing.
like what? Vim? (Don't get me wrong I love vim, but it doesn't have the formatting I need.) Emacs? KATE?!! Unfortunately I think Openoffice is our front runner, unless you /.'ers can point me elsewhere.
That post got a 5 for interesting!?!?!!
It has to be disassembled to ship! Why would you ever want it to self-assemble? The minority of the parts are like the support bars and the heater head. You can't print something out of a nozzle that melts at the same temperature that the printing material does.
now what I wanna know is how they radiocarbon dated it without killing the bugger. Or did they just "assume" its 120,000 years old? I mean this could just be another Coelacanth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coelacanth incident. Oh sure it's just one now and it's a big event, but give it 30 years and we'll find that there's a modern population growing specifically under the lid of jam jars.
Boxes, bread, gold, beads and religious jewelry are significantly less weird than "pantsu". I'm sorry, but no matter what religion you are, it's probably less weird than the Mormons. Unless you're a Scientologist. Even THEY don't have magical underpants!!
Bread is everywhere, Eastern Rite Catholics use leavened bread, where as Roman Rite guys use the crackery kind.
Summa Theologica. http://www.newadvent.org/summa/1002.htm I believe I win here, this document has been evidence for the faith for 800 years. Although, protestants don't use any of the old church documents, and thusly could not defend their faith; Catholics on the other hand have both evidence and reasonable proof for our theory.
Prove your science to a Relativist. I believe you will quickly learn that Natural Sciences have no effect on philosophy.
Sorry guys but .. it's not life till it can die. I commend this guys efforts, awesome stuff but.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life -- this is life.