Slashdot Mirror


An Open Source Legal Breakthrough

jammag writes "Open source advocate Bruce Perens writes in Datamation about a major court victory for open source: 'An appeals court has erased most of the doubt around Open Source licensing, permanently, in a decision that was extremely favorable toward projects like GNU, Creative Commons, Wikipedia, and Linux.' The case, Jacobsen v. Katzer, revolved around free software coded by Bob Jacobsen that Katzer used in a proprietary application and then patented. When Katzer started sending invoices to Jacobsen (for what was essentially Jacobsen's own work), Jacobsen took the case to court and scored a victory that — for the first time — lays down a legal foundation for the protection of open source developers. The case hasn't generated as many headlines as it should."

14 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. I'm trusting the summary this time by ccguy · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the second link is the reason why.

    Same as going into a morgue usually is a good test for students considering a medical career, this link is a perfect test for lawyers wanna be's.

    1. Re:I'm trusting the summary this time by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

      For once, a programmer actually summarized a legal decision more or less accurately, it's quite surprising...

    2. Re:I'm trusting the summary this time by slimjim8094 · · Score: 2, Funny

      In this case, they're alleging that the other party spent about a million on his case. Perhaps a million isn't enough?

      How about ... ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS? </pinky>

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    3. Re:I'm trusting the summary this time by xouumalperxe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try seven.

  2. profit lost by Shinatosh · · Score: 5, Funny

    1, wait for some guy to code something cool
    2, In all .c and .h files do a "s/guys name/my name/g"
    3, relase as closed source application
    4, PROFIT!!

    Oh, wait... It does not work anymore?

    Well I hope all copying, greedy suckers will learn the lesson!

    Cheers

    --
    :)
    1. Re:profit lost by Steve+Baker · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what the bad guy in "Tron" did. As we learned from that movie, all you need to counter this is a printout of the original header with your name on it stating the bad guy stole it.

      The hard part of course is being digitized, joining the program resistance movement, fighting the Master Control Program and opening the data ports to the User to get that printout. That part is a real bitch.

  3. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by garett_spencley · · Score: 3, Funny

    "or dunked in a vat of whale spunk."

    That's what I get for slacking off on /. when I'm supposed to be working. Thanks :(

  4. Re:Should? by Millennium · · Score: 2, Funny

    And how many should it be generating?

    Face it- the US president manufactured a complete financial meltdown and two wars which will most likely last over ten years. There's also another presidential election, which may be the first federal election in over ten years which hasn't been rigged.

    You forgot to mention the part where Bush is a servant of the Anunnaki sent to keep the populace in control. How can you have a good conspiracy theory without EVIL ALIEN SERPENT PEOPLE ?

  5. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by jeffmeden · · Score: 4, Funny

    "or dunked in a vat of whale spunk."

    That's what I get for slacking off on /. when I'm supposed to be working. Thanks :(

    No *that's* what you get for choosing to work at Whale Spunk Wholesalers, Inc.

  6. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by Phrogman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey at least he most likely works in the IT department there, not in Production "shudder"...

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  7. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by halcyon1234 · · Score: 5, Funny

    dunked in a vat of whale spunk.

    According to the best research I can find in as much as I dared:

    1. A vat can have up to 3000L capacity
    2. A whale's average load is about 5 gallons, or ~19L
    3. That means about 158 "fun times" to fill the vat.
    4. Even though a whale can make waves multiple times per day, let's put a practical limit of 8 times.
    5. Thus, you'd need about 20 whales to achieve your vat in a day. (Assume you want fresh whale woohoo. Day old might be okay for the purposes of ickiness, but dunking might become difficult over time as it congeals)
    6. Given that you won't want to lose a single drop of the deep ocean geyser to the open waters, this'll be done on land, and manually since whales can't reach otherwise.

    That's a lot of Shamu Shucking! Not impossible, mind you, but challenging. You'll need a good team with strong muscles, good aim, and earplugs so they aren't driven mad by the cacophony of "ooOOOo" caused by the whalegasms. You'll also need to ensure that the whales are either sufficiently into this, or you have a good supply of whale porn on hand.

    And when you're done, if you haven't found some way to make enough money off this so you'll never have to work again, then you aren't trying hard enough.

  8. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think Production is bad, get a job on their QA team...

    --
    Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
  9. Sounds like a job for... by AltGrendel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mike Rowe!

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  10. Re:Wow a truly profane injustice defeated. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, that's it. You have won not only the thread, sir, but the entire Internet. Good try, everyone else. Let's clean up here and all go back to using fax machines. Would the last person to log off please shut down the servers and get the lights? Thanks.