Slashdot Mirror


"BlueTrack" Mouse More Advanced Than Laser, Optical

ThinSkin writes "Just when you thought laser and optical mice were enjoying their reign on mousepads worldwide, Microsoft has to come along and introduces their 'BlueTrack Technology,' a mouse tracking system that aims to work on virtually any terrain short of mirrored and reflective surfaces. ExtremeTech reviews the Explorer Mouse and Explorer Mini Mouse, both of which are powered by Microsoft's newest sensor, to see just how well this technology works. Testing on granite, carpet, marble, and other surfaces, the reviewers were impressed with the responsiveness of BlueTrack, but they also noted that laser mice were competitive on these surfaces as well. Even though the mice didn't get a recommendation from the reviewers (price being a major concern), they did admit that this BlueTrack is the best tracking system available today. MaximumPC has some pictures and a brief technical interview."

23 of 191 comments (clear)

  1. Yeah by funehmon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because we all use carpet padded desktops.

    1. Re:Yeah by BeNJ-GoS · · Score: 3, Informative

      most of us don't. but the article does explain where they encounter it and where the need came from...

    2. Re:Yeah by asCii88 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but finally I'll be able to play Crysis inside my sand castle!

    3. Re:Yeah by gadabyte · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i bought a razer mouse. not for the blue lights (the only reason i installed the razer driver was to turn the lights off), the gaming gimmick angle, or the razer name, but because it was the only mouse in either of the stores i went to that had the buttons i needed (5) and was actually comfortable in my hand and on my skin. i felt like a chump shelling out 40 bucks for a mouse, but after 2 years with it, i'm VERY glad that i did - especially when i use someone else's computer and their $17 mouse.

      without a comfortable, durable interface, a computer is pretty damn useless, imo.

      --
      the united states is a nation of laws; badly written and randomly enforced -- frank zappa
  2. Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and be done with it.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Last time I checked, accelerometer-based position tracking alone didn't work too well as speeds become offset more and more over time, that is as errors accumulate your cursor would start to move even when the mouse isn't moving. However I guess that coupled with a more traditional tracking to add more precision to quick movements, it could be a great thing!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have you tried using an accelerometer as a pointing device? I played with a £400 device with six-axis accelerometers and it didn't have enough precision to track a movement to the right and then a return to the same starting point as returning to its original position. The only reason the Wii controller is accurate is that it constantly recalibrates itself from the bar under the display. Attach a bowling ball to your mouse, put it on a frictionless surface, and then move it with an elastic band, and you'll get an idea of what an accelerometer-based pointing device built with current technology would feel like.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by Jethro · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Attach a bowling ball to your mouse, put it on a frictionless surface,
      > and then move it with an elastic band,

      I'll get right on that.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by brendank310 · · Score: 5, Funny

      They sell them at Home Depot between the perpetual motion machines, and the objects of mass m.

    5. Re:Oh just stick a 2-axis accellerometer inside by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, lets diss the puny little accelerometer then and replace it with a triple ring laser gyro. It'll be accurate to a couple of centimetres for every thousand or so kilometres that you push it on the table. For those unhappy about this level of inaccuracy you could also link it in with GPS and perhaps your own personal DGPRS beacon and so forth to keep the pointer where it damn well needs to be. :-)

  3. Mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:

    The Explorer Mouse uses a proprietary, Microsoft-designed complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) chip with advanced algorithms and pixel architecture for more precise tracking.

    Get it through your heads, fellows: Proprietary is not an advantage. Patented is not an advantage. Don't go crowing about it! Proprietary is what brought us Windows. Are we supposed to be impressed and go "ooh, more of that"?

  4. Just what we need... by dangitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    We got some hands-on time with this handsome wireless mouse and were impressed by its tracking accuracy, stylish design, and mesmerizing blue glow.

    Yeah, because we haven't got enough glowing gadgets. I'm not sure who considers "mesmerizing" as a positive aspect of consumer electronics. End the madness, people! Or are you too hypnotized by blue LEDs to move?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  5. Warning for incredible retarded web design by aliquis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The linked review is one of those pages there the article uses at most 15% of the space but still had to be split amount 6 pages or so.

  6. A solution without a problem by erroneus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is just another optical type of mouse. What we really need is an ACTUAL mouse that has been genetically modified with a USB cable for a tail that can transmit the information issued to its brain by the aggregate information provided by its belly hair as you push it across any surface. More advanced versions will do the same using mental telepathy to another mouse head that was severed and merged with a USB dongle.

  7. Re:All the buttons in the world by Speare · · Score: 4, Funny

    My pointing device has about 103 buttons in a very convenient layout. It did take a little while to get used to, but some schools even have classes on how to use it effectively. It's great, because with this pointing device, I can also enter new textual information, rather than pointing and grunting at the stuff that's already on the screen.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  8. Re:Didn't you break a rule? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, we all pretty much agree that Microsoft makes some decent hardware. If they'd stick to what they're good at then we'd all be happy with them. It's just when they try to get into markets where they have no competence, such as software, that people don't like them.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Re:seriously... by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhm...
    So you want to spend $120 a year on crap vs. $100 for something good?

    Now that makes a whole lot of sense..

  10. Trackball by envelope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use a trackball, it works well on any surface at all - sand, carpet, wood, jello, etc.

    --

    appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
  11. How about a trackball? by Fumus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I use my trackball (Logitech TrackMan Wheel) almost exclusively for everything except playing FPS games.
    It just fricking rocks. After fiddling around with sensitivity and getting used to in (one or two days) it's the best mouse I ever had.
    Never again will I run out of space or need to lift my hand and reposition the mouse.

    Of course people who use mice to draw stuff will be somewhat crippled by it, as I have a little more difficulty when using it in order to doodle something quick in paint, but what self-respecting artist uses a mouse as their main drawing interface?

  12. Just what we need...Nightlight. by Ostracus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Oh I don't know. I haven't needed a nightlight since I got into consumer electronics.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  13. As a Linux user by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can also say that I've always enjoyed Microsoft's mice, especially their Intellimouse Explorer, and will probably continue to do so.

    And this sounds like a nice step forward. But $100? I could get a secondary monitor for that price. Or enough ram to max out my 32-bit system. Or a new hard drive so I can raid my system. The list goes on. Also, I'd prefer to be rid of my mouse at this point. Unfortunately, hitting those slashdot preview/submit buttons is a pain in the ass without a mouse.

  14. Re:Anyone actually read the review? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the article suggests that the BlueTrack mouse only has around 800 dpi resolution/sensitivity. but considering that most laser mice have 2000-3200 dpi, BlueTrack doesn't seem more advanced than lasers. the only advantage i can see is that it works on more surfaces than laser mice can. but so do conventional optical mice, which can already go up to 1600 dpi.

    the Explorer Mouse is not very impressive or groundbreaking. i'd rather get a hi-res laser or optical mouse by Logitech at a lower price.

  15. I want one that works on mirrors--here's how by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Funny

    This continual failure of mouse makers to address mousing on mirrors annoys me. Hey, mouse makers, here's how you can address this.

    Originally, your mice were based on a rolling ball. The mouse felt the ball rolling, and figured out the movement. In human sense terms, your mice were based on touch.

    The current mice are based on sight. They look at the surface under the mouse and see the relative movement.

    The sense you should be looking at is smell.

    In the center of the bottom of the mouse, there should be an emitter that leaves a chemical trail on the mousing surface. The rest of the bottom of the mouse should be covered with odor sensors that can sense when they are near the chemical. By laying a pattern of odors, and sensing them as they move under the mouse's "noses", the mouse can determine position.

    Think ants and the chemical trails they leave to find their way around.

    Not only would this address the mirror problem, you could also use this technology to address a serious workplace health issue. You could make it so the tracking chemical has antibacterial properties. This would help keep shared computers sanitary during cold season, reducing sick days and boosting overall productivity.