Slashdot Mirror


MTV Launches Music Video Site

An anonymous reader writes "MTV Music has just launched a website where they offer over 16,000 music videos — like YouTube, but with fewer notices and DMCA takedowns. They've also set up development tools for third parties to incorporate the content into their own creations. Users creating accounts at the site face other challenges, however, such as the six separate agreements and privacy statements that must be accepted via a single checkbox. Thankfully, at the time of writing the MTV Music website was making this process easier on its Firefox 3 visitors by automatically checking the accept box whenever any agreement is viewed."

192 comments

  1. Enjoy it while it lasts by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Funny

    In about 8 months, they'll have nothing but Real World, and you'll have to go to www.mtvmusic2.com if you want to actually see music videos.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    1. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Spazztastic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In about 8 months, they'll have nothing but Real World, and you'll have to go to www.mtvmusic2.com if you want to actually see music videos.

      Quoted for truth.

      Why is this shit on /.? Is this really stuff that matters? You can find a good number of music videos on Youtube, Break, Liveleak, and many others. Probably more then you can find on MTV's website, and with less advertisements. Will MTV go with their usual BS like on TRL and have a screaming girl saying why they love Justin Timberlake and why it should be #1 for the day?

      I ask again, why was this considered "Stuff that matters?"

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I heard they had to form a committee to research what exactly music videos are and whether they are relevant to the company's core business.

    3. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by pla · · Score: 1

      Why is this shit on /.? Is this really stuff that matters? You can find a good number of music videos on Youtube, Break, Liveleak, and many others.

      Because unlike 99% of videos on YouTube, MTV has offered them legally. And most likely, they've encoded them correctly rather than as stuttering captures from a 3rd-gen VHS copy-from-broadcast.

      Hey, I'll agree with you completely that I don't the "legal" distinction doesn't matter from a practical standpoint, but why would anyone prefer the illegal versions (given comparable or better quality)?

    4. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Informative

      A good number of record companies have started releasing videos on Youtube. I can't cite this information because it's blocked at work, however they have many accounts created specifically by Universal Records, paramount, etc.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    5. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      It won't be night and day though. About 4 months down the line they'll throw in the occasional episode of Remote Control. That will entice us to want more. They'll also tone down our appreciation for the music videos by playing MTV Jams for a month or two. That's when they'll throw the bag of crap in our face and give us nothing but the Real World, Road Rules, the Real World/Road Rules Challenge, the Real Road Rules World Rules, and Road Rules Real World Rules Road World Challenge 6.

    6. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by HungryHobo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I take it Real World / Road Rules are like big brother over here. "big brother season 3065 now with even more fucked up people!"

      But unfortunatly this site isn't available to people in europe and I can't be assed going through a proxy.

      Fucking regional distribution. I'll stick with piracy since at least the pirate sites treat me the same whether I'm a fucking red blooded american or not.

    7. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Also, you can probably link these and they'll still be there three months later, unlike videos on Youtube.

    8. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Or you'll find the screened rips of the MTV Videos on youtube itself.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    9. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      Screw the music videos.

      Give me Liquid Television back!

      Aeon Flux and The Maxx, too, while you're at it.

    10. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

      warner and umg are the only companies that have licensed their music to youtube. which is why they're the only ones on youtube legally (and in any decent quality).

      mtvmusic contains videos from all the labels, and you may have noticed, no ads.

    11. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by diqmay · · Score: 1

      I don't the "legal" distinction

      accidentally what?

    12. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Rune69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard they had to form a committee to research what exactly music videos are and whether they are relevant to the company's core business.

      It's actually worse than that. They paid a consultant $2 million so that he could, after months of research, tell them that their core business should be music television.

      And no, I am not joking. I was in the meeting, trying not to piss myself laughing.

      --

      When faced with a problem, many web developers say "I know, I'll use JavaScript!".
      Now they have two problems.
    13. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Obviously you should consider becoming a red blooded American. We invented the atomic bomb and freedom fries. All the jerk Europeans seem to have invented are Communism, Fascism, and a social welfare net to provide adequate health coverage for all of its people.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    14. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly wondering whether it's you or reality that is so hilarious here. If the latter, I would hope that coffee a-plenty was spat upon the nearest conference table when that finding was delivered.

      (If the former, then congrats on one of the best-crafted one-sentence tales I've seen in a long time...)

    15. Re:Enjoy it while it lasts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you'll find the screened rips of the MTV Videos on youtube itself.

      ...

      [These will] still be there three months later, unlike videos on Youtube.

      Also, you forgot the part where YouTube videos look like ass.

  2. Music video site? by Chriscypher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how long until they subvert the channel to only broadcast crappy reality shows.

    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
    1. Re:Music video site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though I'm just an AC, I don't think this parent should be redundant- post times from this and the first post were very close, almost concurrent.

      That being said- it's very sad that a station originally known for its music has to have a separate entity for its first purpose...
      Music Television Music.
      Kind of like the Rio Grande River, eh?

    2. Re:Music video site? by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder how long until they subvert the channel to only broadcast crappy reality shows.

      It's even worse already. All they are broadcasting at the moment is:

      Internal Server Error - Read
      The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

      Reference #3.934519d4.1225292456.1d7561c4

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Music video site? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Music Television Music.
      Kind of like the Rio Grande River, eh?

      I don't want to be redundant sounding redundant, but it is well known that the "Rio Grande River" phrase is a classic of the Department of Redundancy Department.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  3. So that's where all the music went... by thomsomc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess they finally had to move ALL of the music videos off the air and onto a new website. I was wondering where they were going to actually show music videos...now I know.

  4. Neither music nor television by hoto0301 · · Score: 3, Funny

    mtvmusic2.com will soon be dominated by jackass and some other useless bullshit that will destroy any remaining dignity the internet may have once had

    1. Re:Neither music nor television by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Funny

      huh sorry i missed that i just farted?

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    2. Re:Neither music nor television by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Says you:

      will destroy any remaining dignity the internet may have once had

      Says DNA:

      There is another theory which states that this has already happened.

      Says I:
      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1011281&cid=25553165

    3. Re:Neither music nor television by db32 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Whoa whoa whoa...say what you will about MTV and their hordes of Real World style bullshit shows, but Jackass is awesome.

      1. They act like idiots. They know they act like idiots. They go over the top acting like idiots. Idiot watching is amazing so long as the idiots are safely corraled and can be observed from a safe distance. Even before Jackass, think back to all the videos emailed around and such...almost all of the videos were of people doing something monumentally stupid, all viewed from the safety of your PC. Idiots are only a problem when they run free.
      2. It causes other idiots to run free! This is education at its finest. These morons severly injure themselves trying to pull Jackass style stunts not understanding that the Jackass crew is "professionals" (a bit of a stretch of the term, but they aren't just doing ameture dumbass shit, they have crews on hand to handle things). You can tell a kid not to jump off a roof onto a fence wearing roller skates...but you can be sure that he will fully understand why after he does it once and will probably never do anything even remotely as stupid again.
      3. The hilarious disclaimer at the beginning of the episode to absolve themselves for the legal liability of reason 2.

      Now, to address the internet having dignity. That was gone a LONG LONG time ago if it ever even existed. Goatse, tubgirl, GNAA, geocities, myspace, twitter, facebook, etc...nevermind that the majority of the internet is porn or other sex related pills, pumps, and so on. Why you are worried about MTV having any impact on the dignity of the internet is beyond me.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    4. Re:Neither music nor television by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: That's twitter, not Twitter. Subtle yet very important difference.

    5. Re:Neither music nor television by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      I always preferred Lameass myself.

  5. Does this mean..? by Burning1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that they can stop wasting our time with those stupid music videos on their TV channel, and get back to their reality TV roots...?

  6. US only by JohnstonDJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was thinking this was going to be really cool. If it was of a higher resolution than youtube, and all neatly organized it would be awesome. However It gets major negative points from me, as on the three video files I tried all i got was a "Copyrights prevent us from playing this file outside the U.S." Back to youtube for me.

    1. Re:US only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works just fine here in Europe (Belgium).

      Can it be that some videos are restricted

    2. Re:US only by JohnstonDJ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looking around it seems to be that. About half the video files are copyright restricted. I know it falls under different copyright laws, but the files I am attempted to watch on the website I have viewed on New Zealands version of MTV. Damn having broadcast rights, but not streaming rights.

    3. Re:US only by whoisrich · · Score: 2, Informative

      Urgh, im in the UK, and I tried the top 4 most viewed, and all were not available outside the U.S.

    4. Re:US only by clickclickdrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Urgh, im in the UK, and I tried the top 4 most viewed, and all were not available outside the U.S.
      probably a blessing - be happy about it.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    5. Re:US only by MikeDirnt69 · · Score: 1

      Same happens with www.pandora.com. So sad, I have to keep going with the illegal downloads.

      --
      Am I eval()? - http://www.monst3r.com.br
    6. Re:US only by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      Same here in Canada.
      I even tried some Canadian bands, just for fun. Still "not viewable from outside the USA".
      But on their "sign up" page, you can select from the standard list of every country in the world as your location.
      Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    7. Re:US only by ErkDemon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Only about half? (!!?)

      As an exercise, I've just gone back and tried about twenty or thirty major MTV-friendly videos from major MTV-type artists and current chart singles (US and UK), and I haven't gotten a single one to play.

      Zero success rate. They all have the "US-only" copyright notice.

      This is bad. It has National Security implications. How are we supposed to convince the Aggrieved Iranian Youth to drop hardcore Islamic values and embrace the West, if we don't let them see the purty videos with wimmin-in-bikinis jumping up and down? They're just going to be even more aggrieved, and the people who win are going to be the repressive local governments who wanted to block all this material anyway.

      MTV is supposed to be the international shopfront for The American Dream. It's sometimes partly credited for the destruction fo the Berlin Wall (glum East-Berliners had illegal MTV cable wired under the Wall, and thought the West was all conspicuous consumption and pink cadillacs).

      How're you gonna export US aspirational fantasies to other cultures if you set up an info-wall that stops outsiders from being able to see in?

      "Hearts and Minds", people! Ya can't corrupt the youth of North Korea and Afghanistan with Decadent Western Values if you don't show them the goodies! Leave a vacuum, and, gawd, they're just gonna develop their own cultural material.

      The US has lost so much influence around the world in the last eight years in so many areas, popular entertainment is perhaps is last major niche where it can claim world dominance. Of those, TV and movies and music are the three "broadcastables". Pull the plug on world access to MTV, and you're losing a major component of the infowars where the US has technical superiority -- music tends to be cheap to produce, music videos tend to be expensive.

    8. Re:US only by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 1

      What about jango.com? I'm not sure sure if it will work outside the US either but it's worth a shot. It's about on par with pandora.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    9. Re:US only by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I'm in the United States and so far, two of the five artists I tried just aren't there. But they're on YouTube.

    10. Re:US only by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I am in the UK, and I tried my favorite African artists, and they were not there either. Its back to t'tube for me.

      FYI...
      Mahlathini and the Mahotella Queens
      Papa Wemba
      Guillaume Tell
      Osadebe
      The Oriental Brothers
      Ebenezer Obey
      etc ...

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    11. Re:US only by ceka · · Score: 1

      It works in the Netherlands. I tried random 20, including the top 5.

    12. Re:US only by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Where is the HD-quality music video/movie trailer site? I would think that kind of thing would be huge right now.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  7. Give me the box by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great, now mtv has another way to brainwash kids into thinking this emo crap is music. I also hate how some of my favorite bands are pigeonholed as a certain type of music because if they ever have a hit song it has to be just the right amount of pop. I miss the box music network. They seemed to have a great rotation and mix of music, at least in my area.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
    1. Re:Give me the box by Inner_Child · · Score: 1

      I think I vaguely remember The Box. Call a 900 number to request a song by number? I think it came in on UHF 45 here, and only when the conditions were right, so not very often.

      --
      Today is red jello day - all workers must eat all of their red jello. Failure to comply will result in five demerits.
  8. Only thing that will matter to me is by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    Can I use a plug in to download the selected video or not.

    Something is up on Youtube recently as I am randomly getting junk FLV when downloading videos where a week or two ago all the videos I downloaded were viewable "offline"

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Only thing that will matter to me is by lxs · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened to me. Upgrading VLC to the latest version seemed to fix it. Apparently, it wasn't a junk FLV, just a newer encoding.

    2. Re:Only thing that will matter to me is by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Informative

      The new encoding isn't junk. It's MP4. Try changing the extension.

      --
      The game.
    3. Re:Only thing that will matter to me is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that MP4 isn't junk?!?

  9. Proper music goes in the ears... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...not the eyes.

    Yes, by all means show me a concert of some proper musicians playing live to an audience, or show me some historic footage of a band in a documentary.

    But please don't show me pretty "mini-movies" that do nothing more than try to distract me from realising how crap the underlying music actually is.

    MTV have done for music what pork fat has done for cardiac health.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Spazztastic · · Score: 5, Funny

      MTV have done for music what pork fat has done for cardiac health.

      "MTV is to Music as KFC is to Chicken"
      -Lewis Black

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Apologies... with acknowledgement to the very wonderful and very funny Mr Lewis Black.

      The "in the ears.. in the eyes" comments are also stolen from him as well.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    3. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      By and large, I would agree that "the underlying... music..." is largely crap, but there are exceptions. Back when MTV was about music and music videos, there was a regular supply of genuinely artistic work in the video genre. Check out Billy Joel's "Pressure" and "We Didn't Start The Fire" videos for two fine examples. Yes, most of the MTV music video library is dreck (Madonna video's anyone?) but I for one, am grateful that the gems can now be plucked from that pile. I do wish that they'd do something about the audio quality though.

    4. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by mdm-adph · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody's showing you anything. If you don't want to watch, don't go to the site or turn on the channel. Jeez.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    5. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yerrrr ... get of my lawn

    6. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Loibisch · · Score: 1

      You are a moron if you don't realize, that there are music clips out there that can easily count as art. Nobody in their right mind watches music videos because they want to listen to music. They watch music videos to be entertained.

    7. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by log1385 · · Score: 1

      Don't discredit music videos simply because they are often abused. Like any other art form, videos can be crap and they can be beautiful or intelligent. Yes, most music videos are stupid commercial spots for cheap music, but there are some real gems out there. Lots of scenes from Pink Floyd's The Wall film are powerful music videos.

      --
      Seek and ye shall find.
    8. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Xian97 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. With the advent of MTV, music became more about looks than actual talent.

    9. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or do like my roommate does and sign up with Netflix to watch music videos on DVD! C'mon rent something man!! Like No Country For Old Men ferchrissake! He can't even tell Eddie Murphy from Denzel...

    10. Re:Proper music goes in the ears... by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 0

      I heard a rumour...

  10. Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by TheSunborn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it me, or is the music quality really really bad?

    It almost sound like they encoded the music as 96Kbit/sec mp3 and then added noise.

    1. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Jamu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Luxury. Outside the US it's 0Kbit/sec and we have to add our own noise.

      --
      Who ordered that?
    2. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by TheSunborn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Example: Try to listen to Tori Amos Winter
      http://www.mtvmusic.com/video/?id=47577
      And then compare to the youtube
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnboUbOGDOM

      The Mtv version got a really bad 'noice' in the background in the beginning of the song.
      Or maybe it's just a problem with their player and Linux.

    3. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

      You are lucky. I get nothing but a "blank" video.

      Not ready for prime time.

    4. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Is it me, or is the music quality really really bad?

      I thought that was a given. After all, we're talking about MTV....

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    5. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by TheSunborn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dam, I did not know that Denmark had been accepted as a new state in USA. Now I only have a few days to find out which president candidate to vote for.

      Why was I not informed before.

    6. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was I not informed before.

      Perhaps you are black?

    7. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Dutch_Cap · · Score: 1

      You are lucky, my firefox crashes.

    8. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by eln · · Score: 1

      is the music quality really really bad?

      Yes, but that's not really the site's fault, that's just how music sounds these days.

    9. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so grab a .flac from BTmusic and replace audio stream using VirtualDub..

    10. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, now that you're part of us, stop hogging all the good weed.

    11. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      Is it me, or is the music quality really really bad?

      It almost sound like they encoded the music as 96Kbit/sec mp3 and then added noise.

      It's not you. The audio quality blows. Not surprising, I guess. I mean, it's not like they're episodes of "Real Life" or something important.

    12. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have it easy. when I was a lad we had -1 kb/s. we had to carry our own music videos to the server by hand, one hour before we logged on, and when we got back our administrator would beat us to death....

    13. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Boawk · · Score: 1

      I did not know that Denmark had been accepted as a new state in USA
      Norway has already been annexed. It was only a matter of time before Denmark followed.

    14. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by simp · · Score: 1

      The youtube version seems to cut out all frequencies above 8KHz. MTV doesn't but then their encoder probably is so bad that you will end up with noise instead of actual sound.

      The original song on the CD also is pretty noisy.

    15. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      You have good weed available closer to you.

      Take a flight to Acapulco, ask your Taxi driver for Acapulco Gold*

      *(although I hear it is now available in CancÃn, Puerto Vallarta, Manzanillo, Los Cabos, Mexico City, etc.)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    16. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      guess we were added when we joined the war ;)

    17. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not bad, atrocious. I recently digitized all of my dad's old reel-to-reel tapes from before I was born. They sounded better than this.

      I've got most of the commercial Tori releases, they sound nothing like that. 100% MTV's fault all the way.

    18. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by Aehgts · · Score: 1

      Example: Try to listen to Tori Amos Winter
      http://www.mtvmusic.com/video/?id=47577
      And then compare to the youtube
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnboUbOGDOM

      The Mtv version got a really bad 'noice' in the background in the beginning of the song.
      Or maybe it's just a problem with their player and Linux.

      I hear the marked difference in the audio quality between the two also, so it is not just you.

      Of course it may not be MTV after all: as nocsript shows:

      Temporarily allow http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:uma:video:mtvmusic.com:47577#!flashvars%23franchise=FakeFranchise&autoPlay=true

      "franchise=FakeFranchise" ... really?

      --
      "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research, would it?" - Albert Einstein
    19. Re:Is it me, or is the music quality really bad? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      we have to add our own noise.

      Most of what passes for music in the US is indistinguishable from noise anyways. If you just add noise to ambient sound, you're saving money versus paying for "music".

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  11. Limited Functionality by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

    From what I see, compared to yesterday, looks like they are cutting back on comments, rating and logging in to keep streaming the videos. They must be seeing quite a bit of traffic.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Limited Functionality by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      looks like they are cutting back on comments, rating and logging in to keep streaming the videos. They must be seeing quite a bit of traffic.

      That, or they saw what happened to YouTube.

  12. Lucky default? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thankfully, at the time of writing the MTV Music website was making this process easier on its Firefox 3 visitors by automatically checking the accept box whenever any agreement is viewed.

    I sure as hell hope this is ironic. It's my vague recollection that there are laws (or court findings) against the default behavior being entering into a contract.

    In US contract law, there has to be a meeting of the minds for a contract to be formed. That is, both parties have to believe they agree on what the contract says.
    (Source: female lawyer from the defcon media archives; can't remember exactly who though)

    When you click next without having read the contract, have the minds met? If the checkbox is on by default, you implicitly say you do, but did you mean to do that?

    In any case, if it's not illegal, it's something that smells wrong.

    Consider this: when you install Debian or Ubuntu, you're asked whether you want to install popularity-contest, a program that reports anonymous usage data [which packages are installed, when have they last been used].

    I trust the Debian project and Canonical to not misuse that data, and to aggregate enough of it such that usage patterns which could identify individuals with high probability are lost in the aggregation process.

    But it's still the right thing for Debian and Ubuntu not installing popularity-contest unless the user explicitly wants to.

    -- Jonas K

    1. Re:Lucky default? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

      Consider this: when you install Debian or Ubuntu, you're asked whether you want to install popularity-contest, a program that reports anonymous usage data [which packages are installed, when have they last been used].

      I've always thought popularity-contest is the dumbest application you could install. Don't agree? Here's my fictional top 3 as told by popularity-contest:

      1. popularity-contest
      2. linux-kernel-image
      3. xorg

      Genius.

    2. Re:Lucky default? by jomegat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Oh yes, thankfully they check that box for me. I was at a drug store this summer trying to get some Sudafed, but in order to do that, I was presented with an electronic notice telling me how I could go jail if I told lies about my intended use of the product (or some such rot - thanks meth-heads!). As I was reading the notice, they clerk "thankfully" grabbed the pen and checked the "Yes, I read this and understand it" box "for" me before I had even finished the first sentence. I was astounded. She got all huffy when I insisted she start all over, because I wanted to read all the fine print before agreeing to anything.

      MTV's approach is not that much different.

      --

      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

    3. Re:Lucky default? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Here's my fictional top 3 as told by popularity-contest

      As a debian developer for many years I can assure you it is primarily used to split install media. The top quintile of popularity goes on the first DVD, the bottom quintile goes on the last, fifth DVD. If you are too poor to afford all the DVDs (or CDs), just start burning disks starting with disk #1, until you run out of cash for disks, and you'll probably end up having what you need on the disks you could afford.

      Another entertainment is to use it to justify dropping unmaintained packages, by the same type of person that enjoys deleting other peoples wikipedia pages. If only 50 people use it according to popcon, and none of them can be bothered to become the official maintainer, then suggest deleting it, because deleting other peoples work and enjoyment is fun and its easier to get away with when few people notice.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Lucky default? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      You should have grabbed your closest contract law book and dropped it on her foot. Those suckers are heavy too.

    5. Re:Lucky default? by jomegat · · Score: 1

      I bet they are! But the nearest one was probably not within a ten minute drive. IMHO, such a brazen act does much to delegitimize such contracts. Now you can all claim that the clerk swiped the pen from YOU and signed the agreement before you had a chance to read it, but you were in such a hurry for your meds that you decided to risk it. Honest your honor! I had no idea!

      --

      In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

    6. Re:Lucky default? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Here's my fictional top 3 as told by popularity-contest: [obvious packages]

      Are you saying that only the top three matter? That's absurd. If you don't, aren't putting forth any arguments for your position.

  13. ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's what a quick look on the site says:

    Top Rated:
    <img/>
    Never Gonna Give You Up
    By Rick Astley

    ffs, /.

    1. Re:ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by vdgmr1213 · · Score: 1

      You might be modded funny, but for those who visited the site, they would find it more informative than anything. It sure didn't take long for that to reach to the top.

    2. Re:ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Laugh all you want, but he's probably making more money now than he ever has in his life. He doesn't even need the food stamps anymore.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Top Rated:
      Never Gonna Give You Up
      By Rick Astley

      It's obvious MTV realized that if they wanted to compete with YouTube, they had to have the most popular music video of all time on there, or they just couldn't compete.

      On a more serious note, did anyone else notice that their flash player looks almost exactly like Hulu's? I wonder if there is some licensing agreement with Hulu behind the scenes?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by Goaway · · Score: 1

      You think Slashdot has anything to do with that?

      Sorry to break it to you, but the days when Slashdot did anything to affect things on the larger net are long since past.

    5. Re:ffs, Rick-Rolled already? by Riot.ATL · · Score: 1

      I should have seen that coming a mile away ...

  14. History repeats itself, backwards, sort of. by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    MTV started out as a music video channel, which eventually took them to create MTV2, a channel of deranged muppets, guys getting kicked in the nuts and all sorts of contents created by and intended for brain-damaged idiots. They would have eventually created this as well, except that Youtube already fills this niche.

  15. Wow, 16000 tracks by Njovich · · Score: 1

    That's nearly a quarter of my mp3 collection!

    More seriously, the interface seems nice but the quality of the audio and video is similar to youtube and the non-English-language music offering is not too good. What is the point here really?

  16. Thanks! by GuloGulo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought proper music was live bands? Oh, then it was wax cylinders I think. Isn't it vinyl these days, with CDs being the product of the anti-christ?

    It's a good thing we have people like you to tell us what proper music is.

    --
    "The government grants you rights, not the other way around."-- beav007. Yes, these people really exist...
  17. Maybe MTV can do for the web... by Subm · · Score: 1

    Maybe MTV can do for the web what it did for television...

    "Abbreviation for Music Television. (More like Reality Television, amirite?) This name was chosen ironically after MTV's most hated enemy, music...

    Since its inception no more than 99 years ago, MTV has attempted to systematically exterminate music, and to date, they have been reasonably successful in this regard. Some argue that the key to their victory was their outright refusal to have music videos played on their channel, or even to acknowledge the existence of music in any way (as evidenced by the various award shows they host every year).

    Responsible for the successful careers of such shit bands and artists as 50 Cent, Good Charlotte, Blink 182, My Chemical Romance, Lil' Jon, Coldplay and James Blunt. Indeed, rumor has it that MTV's official policies require them to have one of the aforementioned on screen at all times. But obviously they should never actually play any of their songs. That would be severely damaging to their popularity."

    1. Re:Maybe MTV can do for the web... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I read two sentences of that, and then I thought, "Geez, this is horribly written and tries way too hard to be funny, it must be copied from Encyclopedia Dramatica", and whaddya know, it turns out it was.

  18. Convenient? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just getting old (I am 25 after all), but who wants to sit at their computer at watch music videos?

    Let's see, you got sub-TV video quality levels, you don't have the convenience of a playlist, and you don't have the slick and trendy host who's "hip, rad, and down with it"* to tell you which songs you should want to buy.

    * I'm convinced that's what the kids say these days.

    1. Re:Convenient? by cashman73 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe I'm just getting old (I am 25 after all), but who wants to sit at their computer at watch music videos?

      Ever hear of S-Video out on your graphics card? Many computers have them these days.

      As for the quality, yeah, it's probably about on par with Youtube, though some are better, since they're converted from the original recording and not some fan's degraded VHS tape from the 1980s. Searching for a song on MTV's site is still a lot better than Youtube, though, since you generally get the song without having to sift through all the other crap on Youtube,...

  19. Not available outside US! by TheVidiot · · Score: 1

    I need a geo-proxy of some kind.... any ideas? Thanks

  20. Which videos? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Which videos?

    I just clicked on couple of the videos from the front page and they work (Money For Nothing, Never Gonna Give You Up, Under Pressure, Touch Of Grey, Welcome to the Jungle).
    But boy does the sound on the Under Pressure suck.
    Apparently MTV forgot what that M stands for cause video runs and looks just fine. Better than most youtube videos I've seen.

    On a side note, comments like this make me feel old. And I'm not even 30 yet. XD

    Someone commenting on Under Pressure by Queen an David Bowie:

    dawimp523 10.29.08 02:11AM
    I never saw this video until now! I've seen their live performance, but never the actual video! It's really weird, but in a good way! It seems like a bunch of random clips but it somehow fits the song! That was pretty ballsy for Queen and Bowie not to be in the video. But anyway, thank you MTV Music, for showing obscure videos that we might have missed or haven't seen in a long time!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Which videos? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, Under Pressure. Truly an archaic and unknown obscurity.

      I truly fear for the next generation (And I'm only 22. Sigh.)

    2. Re:Which videos? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      did you just rickroll yourself?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Which videos? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they'll never show Faust or Bonzo Dog will they? It's just middle of the road crap.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    4. Re:Which videos? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Middle of the road crap is all that's profitable. The long tail theory didn't survive contact with Joe Downloader.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Which videos? by edmicman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't "Under Pressure" that song Queen ripped off from Vanilla Ice?

    6. Re:Which videos? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. The long tail theory is very welcoming for me, as we get flooded with middle of the road in everything, the saturation makes us want something different.
      For example: Bonzo Dog created some fine music and were involved with the Beatles, Monty Python etc.
      So if you're a Beatles fan or a Monty Python fan, then eventually you get drawn to Bonzo Dog. Then you get to appreciate them for what they were.
      Faust is the complete antithesis of 'middle of the road'. When you get jaded with tin pan alley, you want to clear your head with some avant garde.

      But the main point should be that the internet should (and does) provide an extensive and far-reaching library of almost everything. Getting access to the library is difficult and not intuitive. There are laws, copyright, technological limitations and search restrictions that prevent most people from finding and experiencing something 'different'.
      In the end, everybody should have access or (as my imagination can stretch) even local copies of everything available.
      That's what the 'promise of the future' is. I've seen it in promotional Apple material in the 90's, in Sci-Fi (Star Trek original is a good example), where computers can almost instantly provide any information that's needed.
      How close is MTV to that promised future? How close will they be in 10 years time?

      lol Can you envision this?

      Spock: Captain? I believe that the first 4 bars of a late 20th century musical group called 'The B52's' rendition of Rock Lobster contain the sequence we need to re-align the phaser array.

      Capt Kirk: Uhura, contact Star fleet and get them to send us the first 4 bars of Rock Lobster by the B52s.

      Uhura: Captain? They want to know if you want to pay by credit card or Paypal.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    7. Re:Which videos? by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

      Uhura: Captain? They want to know if you want to pay by credit card or Paypal.

      Captain: (Searches uniform) Ehrm I seem to have left my wallet at home. THis thing doesn't even have pockets! Spock?

      (Spock nerve pinches the first red-shirted guy on deck, gets that guy's credit card and hands it to Kirk)

      Captain (to Spock): Did you just nerve pinch that guy...

      Spock: I believe the proper term is 'identity theft', Captain.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    8. Re:Which videos? by Inda · · Score: 3, Funny

      All right stop, collaborate and listen
      Ice is back with my brand new invention

      You are going sing this in your head all day long.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:Which videos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate you so very much right now.

    10. Re:Which videos? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Did you get the part about the long tail theory being wrong, at least as far as its 20/80 split goes?

      As the numbers come in, it turns out that even consumers (I use the word carefully here) on all-you-can-eat subscriptions never touch over 90% of the content on offer, and when they do touch the other 10%, it's very rarely. The long tail is there, but it's very, very thin indeed, and has little monetary value beyond marketing the total size of the content offering.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:Which videos? by Abreu · · Score: 1

      V to the A, N, I, double L, A, I, C, E...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  21. No international market, huh? by GBC · · Score: 1

    Incredibly enough, there are some music fans that actually live outside the US. Obviously MTV doesn't think we are a large demographic given this message: "Copyright restricts us from playing this video outside the U.S."

    Just another reason they are irrelevant - sad really, given I used to love MTV growing up (then again, that was way back when the M stood for music).

    1. Re:No international market, huh? by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      Maybe their policy is that everyone outside the US ought to be getting their pop videos off BitTorrent.

      Sigh. They go out of their way to make sure that a great swathe of potential law-abiding customers can't get their product by any legitimate means - they basically slam the door in these customers faces and say, we're refusing to sell to you -- and then they act surprised when some of those unsuccessful customers slink off and find alternative, less legal ways of getting hold of the content.

  22. Firefox 3 on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've just tried to watch "Nothing else matters" by Metallica and Firefox crashed. I use Flashblock, so while the page loads, as you click through the Flashblock DIV, the whole thing goes down the Swanee. It did this twice in a row in exactly the same way.

    1. Re:Firefox 3 on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've just tried to watch "Nothing else matters" by Metallica...

      <adamsavage>Well there's your problem.</adamsavage>

  23. USA Only? by ErkDemon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    COPYRIGHTS RESTRICT US
    FROM PLAYING THIS VIDEO
    OUTSIDE THE U.S.

    So this site will shortly be eliminating pretty much all the competing sources of music videos on the web, but nobody outside the US is going to be able to watch it?

    Geographical firewalls on websites are a really bad idea. They're anti-www, anti free trade, and they Piss People Off. They make large chunks of the world population feel discriminated against, and resentful against the company or industry or country that's stopping them from being able to watch or read what other people can watch and read.

    They also make it more difficult to complain about other country-specific blocks, like China blocking its own population from being able to access certain external political sites. The more companies do this, the more frustrating the web will become.

    1. Re:USA Only? by Bryansix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ya, tell that to the BBC. Jackasses, the lot of em'.

  24. It's still some corporation that thinks they know. by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's still some corporation that thinks they know what it is I want to see.. right off the bat I tried...
    1. XTC
    2. Wall of Voodoo
    3. Human League


    Granted these are niche bands...nothing on any of these.

    When MTV gets around to allowing users to upload videos and then replacing them with their own pristine copies, I'll be impressed. Maybe they should have tried THAT model.

  25. allmusic.com by pretygrrl · · Score: 2, Informative

    allmusic.com has a huge selection of videos, im guessing legally, as they are a huge site thats been around forever.
    i haven't had it happen where I looked for a video and not found it there.
    i bet they got more selection now than mtv will in 2 yrs.

    --
    Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
    1. Re:allmusic.com by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
      I just had a peek at allmusic.com, and they don't seem to be so good at "popular" pop.

      Their search engine seems to be able to find precisely two videos by Madonna, and three by the "Britney" person. Nothing by Michael Jackson. Maybe that's how their users like it, but they don't exactly seem to be aiming for MTV's market.

    2. Re:allmusic.com by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

      I just had a peek at allmusic.com, and they don't seem to be so good at "popular" pop.

      Their search engine seems to be able to find precisely two videos by Madonna

      Dear sir. Did you misspell madonna? If you access her allmusic.com page (admittedly, this is difficult due to how slooooow their site is) there will be many many many videos. In fact, can't think of any that aren't on there.

      --
      Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
    3. Re:allmusic.com by pretygrrl · · Score: 1

      Here is the full list of the videos links available via madonna's page on allmusic.com * American Life * American Pie * Beautiful Stranger * Bedtime Story * Die Another Day * Don't Cry for Me Argentina * Don't Tell Me * Express Yourself * Frozen * Hollywood * Hung Up * I Want You * I'll Remember * Jump * Justify My Love * Love Don't Live Here Anymore * Love Profusion * Music * Oh Father * Rain * Ray of Light * Ray of Light * Secret * Sorry * Take a Bow * This Used to Be My Playground * Vogue * What It Feels Like for a Girl * You Must Love Me * You'll See

      --
      Contemplate the marvel that is existence, and rejoice that you are able to do so.
  26. MTV does music now? by Khelder · · Score: 1

    So MTV is branching out into music, huh? Interesting.

    "After 16 years, MTV has finally completed its deevolution into the shiny things network."
                          -The Onion

  27. How did they do it? by initcrash · · Score: 1

    When i click on any Video on this site Firefox crashes. (youtube works)

  28. Why by Chutulu · · Score: 2, Informative

    the fuck is a band like Morbid Angel stuffed in a "Rock" category? And no Burzum or Bathory videos? This suxs.

    1. Re:Why by thunrida · · Score: 1

      Yes, ffs, how can they put pop music under rock. But seriously, it's so much stuff missing it's useless unless. Searching dissection gives me some black rappers (or at least that is what they look like), Cactus search retunrs some gay looking guys and Uriah Heep returns nothing - which is good considering previous hits. Useless, if you dont' listen to Kelly Family.

    2. Re:Why by Alzheimers · · Score: 1

      the fuck is a band like Morbid Angel stuffed in a "Rock" category? And no Burzum or Bathory videos? This suxs

      And thus, MTV has successfully brought the Beavis and Butthead experience to the internet.

    3. Re:Why by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      Because MTV only cares about demographics, and the average viewer of MTV would not be searching under Black Metal, Death Metal, or Doom Metal. Would I love to see videos by Woods of Belial, Deathspell Omega, Judas Iscariot, and Nargaroth? Hell Yes. Would MTV ever show them, if such videos even exist? Nope.

      MTV Europe, on the other hand, apparently shows videos by bands like Burzum, Bathory, and Immortal. Go figure.

  29. Music videos? by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    People still watch music videos?

  30. Well, for those of us not in the US this fails by kcbanner · · Score: 1

    I can't view most of the videos do to copyright issues. Well, looks like they wasted their time with this.

    --
    Obligatory blog plug: http://www.caseybanner.ca/
  31. Obscured videos by implowry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I stopped watching all MTV channels when they decided to show half the actual video. When they do show videos they are 75% obscured by 5 not so invisible station identification emblems. Like I can't figure out what station I'm watching.

    Do I dare mention the enormous banners that either pop on screen or just stay there, telling you how you should watch the video you're trying to watch. I think I hate all of those things even more than Lewis Black does.

    I'm sure that watching the videos on the computer in miniature resolution and poor audio quality with popups all over the place causing more epileptic seizures than the video itself is capable of, will be a pleasurable experience.

    1. Re:Obscured videos by British · · Score: 1

      They had a program called AMP in the mid-90s. Great show. Lots of interesting videos. About a year into the show, they went from playing full-length videos to "samples" of the videos for some bizarre reason. They screwed up a perfectly good show.

    2. Re:Obscured videos by CarneAzada · · Score: 0

      Ahahaha, like that TRL bullshit show.

  32. Slashdot material?? by kingsteve612 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't think this is really slashdot material. do any /.ers really watch mtv? i rarely watch TV, let alone MTV.

  33. The USA Wide Web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is the URL WWW.etc when I can't play things outside the USA?

  34. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there you've got...
    1.) A british band
    2.) A band no one's heard of from the 80s
    3.) A british band no one's heard of from the 80s

    And you expected MTV (both decidedly not british and not in the 80s) to field music videos of these guys on their new website? *raises eyebrow*

  35. Disappointing by JoeWalsh · · Score: 1

    No 'Men Without Hats,' crashes Firefox on Mac OS X, lame.

    1. Re:Disappointing by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess in your case, you *can't* dance if you want to.

  36. Censorship by Fireye · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was perusing this yesterday, and came across the Weird Al video "Don't Download This Song". One line in the original song goes:
    o/~ Like Morpheus or Grokster or Limewire or KaZaA o/~

    But the version on the new MTV site goes:
    o/~ Like *beep* or *beep* or *beep* or *beep* o/~

    Does anyone know if it was aired on MTV/VH1 this way, or is this unique to the web version?

    MTV: http://www.mtvmusic.com/video/?id=108884
    Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz-grdpKVqg

    1. Re:Censorship by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

      this has to do with the version the label wants you see c.v. the version weird al originally made.

    2. Re:Censorship by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's the "music" station being their usually bizarre douchy selves. They probably bleeped it out because such information might be bad for the children. Kind of like how they blur our Al flipping the bird in Amish Paradise-- or, hell, even how they bleep out the word "Cocaine" in the "Jesus of Suburbia" video. Because goodness forbid a nice, young child hears an awful, horrible word. Not on a family friendly station!

    3. Re:Censorship by wombert · · Score: 1

      Umm, I thought the blurring in Amish Paradise is part of the original video. Al tries to keep everything PG-13.

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    4. Re:Censorship by wombert · · Score: 1

      You used to be able to see the video - and download the song! - from dontdownloadthissong.com. Sadly, it looks like that site's been retired and I don't know if you can still get the MP3 from Weird Al's site. But, he had no problems giving it away for free as a way of advertising his last album.

      --
      Did I say overlords? I meant protectors.
    5. Re:Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know if it was aired on MTV/VH1 this way, or is this unique to the web version?

      Here's a question, MTV must have a licence to have this video available on the 'net. Do they also have a licence to create a derivative work, which is what I think the "bleeped" version is?

  37. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hello

  38. For those who don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes

    from wikipedia

    Real World

    The narration given over the opening title sequence by the seven housemates states some variation of the following:
    âoe This is the true story... of seven strangers... picked to live in a house...work together and have their lives taped... to find out what happens... when people stop being polite... and start getting real...The Real World.

    Road Rules

    Road Rules, MTV's second reality show, debuted on July 19, 1995. The series followed six strangers between the ages of 18 and 24 (five strangers in the first four seasons) after stripping them of their money and putting them on an RV traveling from location to location only guided by a set of clues and a mission to complete at each location. It was nominated for an Emmy Award in 2001.

  39. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by eulernet · · Score: 1

    Come on, all these groups are more than 30 years old.
    I'm also a fan of Human League, and it's a group from 1977 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_League

    I remember a vague video from them at that time, but all these groups were not known from their clips. From 1980, the only video I remember was from a group named Aha.

    Argh, I'm feeling old now !

  40. Is this different than the VH1 Classic site? by Yesfan001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At http://www.vh1classic.com/browse/video/17278/featured-playlists/index.jhtml, you can play lots of videos.

    These have been available on the VH1 Classic site for quite some time now, I believe.

    Since MTV and VH1/VH1 Classic share the same corporate parent, maybe they've just now added the VH1 Classic video content to MTV's site.

    Pete

  41. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thinking the same, but searching for Dream Theater, far from a mainstream band, gave me more video's than expected.

    And their "country of origin tracker" has some hickups. I could watch the video's fine, but a friend of mine could not (both from the Netherlands).

  42. MTV Video site by RonMcMahon · · Score: 1

    Funny how I can *see* a picture from the video, but to actually string them together in a stream is somehow a violation of copyright here in Canada, so MTV blocks my ability to view ANY content on this site, except, of course a picture from a portion of the video. Canada has copyright laws. We share a Free Trade Agreement in commerce with the United States. We also share a similar common-law-based law code, and we even view American television networks on our cable TV, yet somehow streaming video and audio over the Internet is an absolute no-no due to copyright laws? I think not. Viewing a video over the Internet is no more an infraction (if one actually exists) than for me to view an American television network signal over the air (in some Canadian border communities) or via satellite or cable transmission. If someone actually has the knowledge of what portion of American or Canadian law is being infringed via an Internet-based signal, I'd welcome the information...

  43. Does it work outside the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in the UK and every video I click on tells me this video isn't available outside the USA. At least youtube undertsand that the rest of the world exist!

  44. The quality sucks! by UncleMantis · · Score: 0

    I have seen better full screen video quality on free porn sites. The audio is not bad but you can tell they are ripping from their old unused betamax tapes.

    MTV you are just too late. Sorry. I torrent my videos like everyone else.

    --
    Uncle Mantis
  45. Strange music listings by twl1973 · · Score: 1

    I did a search on U2 and it seems it has some of the older, some of the newer, and missing some as well. It's random what they have or don't have.

  46. Nice to see by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

    MTV getting out of the Television business, and back into the music business.

    As to the Firefox drivel, nice to know click through EULA's are not evil, eh?

    --Toll_Free

  47. They can just sue out their competition! by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised they're doing this - they know people watch Viacom owned TV shows on YouTube, so here's a breakdown of their plans:

    1. Launch a laggy, Web 2.0 music video site, covered with banner ads and siezure enducing Flash ads, with the same concepts as YouTube
    2. Sue every video sharing site to remove every Viacom owned media file from said sites
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!?

    Give it a few months and there will be nothing on that site except MTV's classic "Reality" shows, half of which are copies of previous reality shows with 1 thing changed. I'm just wondering how long it's going to take for them to drop the "M" from "MTV"...

  48. Are they edited? by writermike · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... at 38 my memory is not what it used to be. I seem to recall however, that in Joan Jett's version of Crimson and Clover, she pulled open a robe to reveal herself in a bikini. While I found the video, I didn't see that scene. Was it in "Touch?"

    P.S. Yeah, I'm kinda hard up at the moment.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
  49. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by daeley · · Score: 1

    They play all three of those bands' videos on VH1 Classic's 120 Minutes show and others, so it's not like they don't have them lying around.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  50. Of all the quasi reality shows I want by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    No it's not Real World or Road Rules or Jackass or Cribs. I want 'Pimp My Car' because you guessed it...I want them to Pimp My Car!

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  51. So that's just music videos then? by Atari400 · · Score: 1
    I go to youtube because it has all sorts of video, not just music video. It works with my browser. It works in my country.

    I don't go to MTV because....

    --
    IBM doesn't play chess with the Universe.
  52. maybe just maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they'll show some sifl and olly!

    MTV is still pretty lame no matter what it does now.

  53. I found your problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Example: Try to listen to Tori Amos Winter

    There. that's the problem.

    Get back to us after your testicles drop.

    1. Re:I found your problem. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      (internet high five)

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    2. Re:I found your problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't mod up childish insults. This isn't 4chan.

  54. okay, allmusic.com DOES have lots of videos by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ah, found the problem.

    The specific "music videos" search engine link on allmusic.com is a bit screwy. If you click "Music Videos", use "Madonna" as a search term, and then click on the provided "Madonna" artist link, allmusic.com only calls up two videos, "Die Another Day", and "Human Nature".

    OTH, if you don't click the videos link, and you just do a general artist search, the provided "Madonna" link calls up thirty Madonna videos rather than two (and eighteen Britney videos rather than three).

    It's me. I have a talent for going straight to the one link on a site or the one function on a program that that doesn't work properly. :)

  55. Shut up and relax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can all go back to youtube and watch the monkey pissing in his mouth to polish techno if you like.

  56. Any competition is good by aceofspades1217 · · Score: 1

    Any competition is good. Just look at how fancast and hulu have changed up the whole tv game. Since these are legal and now you will have a place to find all of these music videos. A lot of music videos aren't on youtube because they have been taken down and a lot of them ...especially the ones which are a little older are horrible quality.

    So cheers now lets go back to bashing corporations like usual. :P

  57. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dump the zero, get with the HERO!

  58. It's about time... by CarneAzada · · Score: 0

    MTV actually started broadcasting music videos again.

  59. Actually.. by RulerOf · · Score: 4, Funny

    The people behind MTV Music's web presence filmed a short video detailing their goals with the site, and outlined how they'll separate the Music videos from other MTV content to help establish a more defined web presence. I found it worthwhile.

    http://www.mtvmusic.com/video/?id=55086

    --
    Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
  60. Rick Ashtley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know how long this site has been live but its got Rick Ashtley at the highest rated video spot, and close to the top spot in most viewed. It seems MTV can't avoid the Rick Roll.

  61. DOESN'T WORK IN CANADA by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1

    fuckers. Long live youtube.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  62. If Google were sneaky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google would use the development tools and integrate the new content into...Youtube!!

  63. Velocity and mass of the Internet help once again! by MilesAttacca · · Score: 1

    My school put up a filter lately that's locked out nearly any proxy, so we can't bypass the blocks on last.fm and Pandora. Looks like I just found my next music provider to work to in networking and Java. :)

    Think about it: The Internet is so massive that as one organization blocks one service, one or ten more spring up. Blocks are futile; hopefully they'll learn someday. Discretion is what we should be teaching the children.

    --
    98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
  64. Pitchfork TV by bogjobber · · Score: 1

    If you want to look at what MTV should be, head on over to Pitchfork TV. Good music, lots of which you've never heard of, live performances, interviews, basically everything MTV used to be. *Somebody* out there still thinks they can make money playing good music.

  65. Music videos on a music video website?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who woulda thunk it?

  66. How long? by residieu · · Score: 1

    It won't be long before the music videos are taken down and replaced with The Real World and Road Rules.

  67. What they really need now.... by idiotnot · · Score: 1

    Is episodes of Beavis and Butthead with the music videos.

  68. Missing commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe its just me, but all the crap vids on MTV aren't even watchable without Beavis' and Butthead's commentary...

  69. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Wall of Voodoo's "Mexican Radio" was a very popular video in the early days of MTV. I don't actually know any of their other songs, more's the pity, but that one got a lot of airtime.

  70. I want my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Youtube.

  71. Quilty is so LOW..... by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

    The quality of the video's is so low grain who would want to watch these? I am disappointed.

  72. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

    Even Billy Idol is MIA. As are OMD, most of Adam Ant, and a lot of others.

  73. sdf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, how redundant.

    Music Television music *dot* com

  74. its a trap! by FunkyELF · · Score: 1

    probably too late for anyone to see this post, but does anyone else notice the little re, green, and blue things flashing very quickly all over any video on that site? Possibly so that if anyone ever finds a way to rip the videos off there they'll be able to tie it back to a particular IP.

  75. And just like youtube by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The technical quality sucks.

    Oh well.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  76. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    well considering how much they played "Don't you want me baby" and the fact that its still on the radio and that MTV back in the day played a lot of british synthpop, I am kind of surprised it isn't there.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  77. Re:It's still some corporation that thinks they kn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe they should have tried THAT model."

    Or maybe you should try the model that involves reading and common sense... then you might have understood that the site is in beta form, and not all videos have been uploaded yet.

  78. Bitch about anything, don't you. by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    You people can bitch about anything can't you? If I gave you five bucks would you bitch that five bucks won't even buy a burger anymore?

    It's free music videos! Shut up and watch them!

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  79. MTV Arabia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, if youâ(TM)re particularly clever, here is the techy information (geek)â¦

    Satellite: Nilesat 101 (7 degrees West)
    Transponder: 14
    Down frequency 11.977GHz
    Polarisation: Vertical
    FEC: 5/6
    Symbol rate: 27500

    Satellite: Arabsat BADR24 (26 degrees East)
    Transponder: 24
    Down frequency: 12169 GHz
    Polarisation: Vertical
    FEC: 3/4
    Symbol rate: 27500