Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
beef+curtains
·
· Score: 4, Funny
I'm not sure how many electoral votes Azeroth has, but it could be a key battleground state.
I think that Azerothian voter turnout will be extremely low.
My predicted exit poll results:
- 55% Ignored the voting booths & farmed HKs instead
- 25% Didn't make it to the voting booths because they were AFK in the starting area
- 15% Made it to the voting booth, but instead of going in & voting, they jumped onto its roof and spammed/dance over & over
- 5% Were too busy repeatedly spamming/bg with "every sucks by me" and "just let them win" to even realize there was an election going on
-- Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
pwolf
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
you forget though, 90% of the American WoW player base are under the age of 14.. They can't vote anyway.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
nschubach
·
· Score: 3, Funny
12?
-- Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
Fluffeh
·
· Score: 1
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
DurendalMac
·
· Score: 1
Are you kidding? I'd be the guy zombie bombing. I can't tell you how many times I destroyed the Org bank, BMs, and AH.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
ucblockhead
·
· Score: 1
And the other 10% are chinese gold farmers.
--
The cake is a pie
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
Jim_Maryland
·
· Score: 1
Under the Achievement system (think located in World Events) they have a "Vote for Thrall" entry. When you do this, you gain rep with the Horde.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
elrous0
·
· Score: 1
Apparently not old enough to move out of their parents' basements.
-- SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
Malevolyn
·
· Score: 1
Thrall WOULD make a good president, after all.
--
Your ad here.
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
Artuir
·
· Score: 1
You know, we used to eek out wins in Alterac Valley with that 15%. I quit for a year and come back to everone/dancing.
Figures!
Re:Probably not worth a campaign stop
by
hairyfeet
·
· Score: 1
Thrall Schmall. All should vote/kneel before President Zod!
-- ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
No battleground state
by
KasperMeerts
·
· Score: 1
If Obama has 63% and McCain only 16%, then this is no battleground state. Obama would just own the place without any hiccups.
Also, I wonder why so little Priests voted on Obama and so little hunters on McCain? Is this because the number of people interviewed is way too low or is there any real causal relationship between your WoW character and your political affiliation. And why on Earth is there a HUGE difference between Alliance and Horde.
Can anybody shed any light on my questions?
-- As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
Re:No battleground state
by
reikoshea
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Everyone knows that the horde is full of left wing nut jobs, DUH!
-Level 70 Troll Rogue
Re:No battleground state
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
And why on Earth is there a HUGE difference between Alliance and Horde.
Because only assholes play alliance.
I kid! I kid!
Re:No battleground state
by
Scarletdown
·
· Score: 1
So, which side has the mavericks? (takes a drink).
Personally, I would write in a third party candidate: Lord Recluse.:)
-- This space unintentionally left blank.
Re:No battleground state
by
Xiroth
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
For the same reason that more people play Alliance than Horde - because the Horde are the 'bad guys', essentially. Republicans are reasonably accurately portrayed as seeing the world in a fairly black and white fashion - Americans and allies are good, opponents are bad, so help the good guys, smash the bad guys, call it a day and go home happy. Liberals, on the other hand, see things much more in terms of shades of grey - Americans and allies have a history of doing bad things at times, their opponents are frequently trying to do what they think is right and/or are just average people stuck in a bad situation (enemy soldiers, for example). A more realistic viewpoint, perhaps, but one that also frequently results in paralysis due to the lack of a truly good answer.
Bringing that back to the topic at hand, it's no real wonder that the Horde don't have a lot of Republicans, as how many people really want to be the bad guy? On the other hand, the liberals have much less of a problem playing as the Horde as they can see them with a more sympathetic eye (and, I think sometimes when feeling cynical, love being the underdog as it lets them bitch about being disadvantaged). Also, given that liberals likely play both Horde and Alliance, while Republicans would almost always go Alliance, it's no real wonder that there's more Alliance characters than Horde on most servers (although note that this is, of course, not the only mechanic in determining this - just a big one. And it does apply to players from other countries as well).
Actually it turns out to be becasue alliance has prettier toons. This is why they added the pretty blood elf. Actually, Blizzard has a lot of interesting demographics they monitor and check. I would love to be able to work with their player data and character data. There is a lot of data to carve up and a lot of suprising trends, from what I hear from me friends that work their.
-- The Kruger Dunning explains most post on/. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
The type of player that plays a game to be the good guy smashing the "bad guys" without a second thought is likely to be the guy who votes for a president who does the same. Other players who see that not all the apparent "bad guys" are actually "bad guys" but rather might be a normal person that is portrayed as a "bad guy" by someone else play horde - and are willing to vote for a person who doesn't just point at shoot at the first thing he doesn't understand.
Yep, a bunch of folks who spend all their free time on an online video fantasy world game are a perfect example of how the election will go in America. The rest of the population spends all their time in front of a video fantasy world. In other words, the electorate is a bunch of uninformed couch potatoes who are voting based on their perceived strengths in a candidate: nothing based on past records or current platforms.
Our country deserves everything we're going to get.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to take shit and wipe my ass with the Constitution and then vomit.
Because someone's past is always indicative of their future........
And because current platforms are always what the elected candidate ends up actually following......
I believe the old Slashdot saying applies here, slightly modified.
Welcome to America. You must be new here.
-- I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
where are the outtakes?
by
SeeSp0tRun
·
· Score: 1
I want to see the number of tries in stormwind where that one teenager couldn't get enough ganking on the naked Tauren warrior...
-- Something witty.
Re:where are the outtakes?
by
DarkProphet
·
· Score: 1
It was probably done on a private server.
-- What could possibly hurt the security of the American people more than giving our own government the ability to hide its
Straight Horde ticket
by
Nefarious+Wheel
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Hey, Thrall ain't perfect, but he's a warlord and he'll soon put an end to the war in Crossroads. He's exactly the sort of murderous bastard we need in troubled times like this. And have you seen the floating castle that just showed up outside Thunder Bluff? That's obviously the result of 8 years of failed Alliance rule. You want four more years of that?
-- Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
Re:Straight Horde ticket
by
flyingsquid
·
· Score: 1
Hey, Thrall ain't perfect, but he's a warlord and he'll soon put an end to the war in Crossroads. He's exactly the sort of murderous bastard we need in troubled times like this. And have you seen the floating castle that just showed up outside Thunder Bluff? That's obviously the result of 8 years of failed Alliance rule. You want four more years of that?
I just don't think I can vote for a green-skin for president. Plus, I keep hearing these rumors that Thrall is secretly a Muslim.
Re:Straight Horde ticket
by
acheron12
·
· Score: 1
My vote is for Leeroy because he doesn't get stuck in the gridlock of analysis that paralyzes our leaders. While they are discussing which of their special interests (tanks and healers) will get what earmarks, Leeroy is taking action.
non-citizen Kral_Blbec wrote:
"I'm a Republican because not everybody can be on welfare"
----
I'm with you brother! But I think there may have been some Republicans involved.
First it's $700 billion for mortgage giants and banks. Then its free low credit from the federal reserve.. Now look at what those sneaky Democrats plan to give to the poor and unproductive.
".. the administration is working to speed the distribution to automakers of $25 billion in factory retooling funds authorized by Congress last month, the official told Reuters."
SOURCE: Treasury not negotiating aid for GM merger
I believe the standard way to do solo gankings is as follows:
Spend an ungodly amount of time raiding and playing battlegrounds to get the best gear possible.
Enlist the help of your guildmates to further enhance your character.
Use any means possible to temporarily boost your character further (once again, guildmates are a great source of magical enhancements).
Go somewhere where there are few players from the other faction and that isn't a world PvP "hotspot" (so that they won't be ready to defend themselves.
Sneak up on the unsuspecting player and hit him/her as hard as you can, throw everything you've got at the poor bastard.
Repeat this until your temporary enhancements start to disappear.
Call in your guildmates to keep a constant corpse-camp for the next few hours, bonus points if you also station a few at the nearest graveyard (in case your victim attempts to resurrect there).
Yeah, there are way to many teenagers out there with too much time on their hands...
/Mikael
-- Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
Honest question:
by
blind+biker
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Is there a demografic less likely to vote, than WoW players?
-- "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Who needs to leave the house? I just voted using absentee ballot. No way I'm standing in line to vote.
It also gives me a chance to see who's on the ballot and do some research online to election posts I'm unfamiliar with. Overall I don't really pay much attention to politics or the media, so that's about as close to an informed decision as I can make.
-- i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
Just about anyone except Fandral Staghelm
by
SL+Baur
·
· Score: 1
I could never vote for a hordie, and I suppose a one-on-one election between Staghelm and an Orc would make for an interesting choice. The last time the hordies raided Darnassus and I was in the area, I went up to the top of the tower and danced on Staghelm's corpse. I'm not overly fond of the boy king of SW City, but I do not think Kings usually like to stand for elections.
Unless there is a Draenei running, I will probably sit this one out.
Re:Just about anyone except Fandral Staghelm
by
Eleed
·
· Score: 1
I agree with you. Draenei would make a great leader, imho
Nah, Ganking generally either means a group attack or someone attacking someone who is weaker and unprepared/unable to defend himself. Classic places where this takes place are "Ganklethorn Vale" and the Hillsbrad foothills since they both are contested zones and there are lots of little nooks and crannies to hide in (of course, there's always the classic "lvl 70 on epic mount chasing lower level playing on regular mount" game).
We can not let this alliance of fairies and unicorns continue to take our land and enslave our people. .
Vote Thrall 2008! .
For the horde!
Chuck Norris vs Murlocs
by
ZirbMonkey
·
· Score: 1
Not sure how trade chat discussions end up on other realms, but the voting will inevitably be narrowed down between Murlocs and Chuck Norris.
Chuck Norris would be the obvious best choice, however Murlocs would stay in the race and present a hard battle due to their sheer numbers and ability to throw spears through walls.
I overheard my mom talking about this the other day, when I took a 2-minute game break to come up from the basement and grab a ho-ho. She brought my dinner down to me (duh) so that was all I heard. Is there like an election or something? Meh.
-- This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
I would tend to agree with all of it.
My comments were just a satire on the previous posters comment about "all" registered Democrats favoring of welfare. I was just pointing out that the Republicans were now quite willing to give welfare to broke and unproductive economic entities.
I_Voter
A number of years ago, I typed out and published on the web, the following copyright expired article. Read it if you think that I oppose "democratic" government manipulation of the economy. It's been getting a lot of hits lately. It may be one of the earliest suggestions that lack of demand by consumers can cause or sustain an economic crisis. This humorous story published in 1897 is much earlier than John Maynard Keynes, and his "The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money" published in 1936.
The Parable of the Water-Tank
published by Edward Bellamy in 1897 http://www.geocities.com/stewjackmail/parable.html
Slashdot Mirror
I'm not sure how many electoral votes Azeroth has, but it could be a key battleground state.
I think that Azerothian voter turnout will be extremely low.
My predicted exit poll results: /dance over & over /bg with "every sucks by me" and "just let them win" to even realize there was an election going on
- 55% Ignored the voting booths & farmed HKs instead
- 25% Didn't make it to the voting booths because they were AFK in the starting area
- 15% Made it to the voting booth, but instead of going in & voting, they jumped onto its roof and spammed
- 5% Were too busy repeatedly spamming
Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
If Obama has 63% and McCain only 16%, then this is no battleground state. Obama would just own the place without any hiccups.
Also, I wonder why so little Priests voted on Obama and so little hunters on McCain? Is this because the number of people interviewed is way too low or is there any real causal relationship between your WoW character and your political affiliation.
And why on Earth is there a HUGE difference between Alliance and Horde.
Can anybody shed any light on my questions?
As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
Yep, a bunch of folks who spend all their free time on an online video fantasy world game are a perfect example of how the election will go in America. The rest of the population spends all their time in front of a video fantasy world. In other words, the electorate is a bunch of uninformed couch potatoes who are voting based on their perceived strengths in a candidate: nothing based on past records or current platforms.
Our country deserves everything we're going to get.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to take shit and wipe my ass with the Constitution and then vomit.
I want to see the number of tries in stormwind where that one teenager couldn't get enough ganking on the naked Tauren warrior...
Something witty.
Hey, Thrall ain't perfect, but he's a warlord and he'll soon put an end to the war in Crossroads. He's exactly the sort of murderous bastard we need in troubled times like this. And have you seen the floating castle that just showed up outside Thunder Bluff? That's obviously the result of 8 years of failed Alliance rule. You want four more years of that?
Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
Sad, but true. How do you expect them to pay the monthy fee if we dont let them get on welfare?!?! Its not like they have time to work.
reminds me of the bumper sticker I saw the other day.. "I'm a Republican because not everybody can be on welfare" I gotta get one of those.
LEEROY JENKINS!
How do you gank someone on your own? You're that guy with 20+ accounts playing your own party on your machines? :D
"I'm a Republican because not everybody can be on welfare"
----
I'm with you brother! But I think there may have been some Republicans involved.
First it's $700 billion for mortgage giants and banks. Then its free low credit from the federal reserve.. Now look at what those sneaky Democrats plan to give to the poor and unproductive.
".. the administration is working to speed the distribution to automakers of $25 billion in factory retooling funds authorized by Congress last month, the official told Reuters."
SOURCE:
Treasury not negotiating aid for GM merger
http://tinyurl.com/6qwx6n
I_Voter
New (Under Construction) Web Site:
Political Power in the U.S.
http://tinyurl.com/2sdtvk
I believe the standard way to do solo gankings is as follows:
Yeah, there are way to many teenagers out there with too much time on their hands...
/Mikael
Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
Is there a demografic less likely to vote, than WoW players?
"The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
Spawn more Democratic Overlords.
i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
I could never vote for a hordie, and I suppose a one-on-one election between Staghelm and an Orc would make for an interesting choice. The last time the hordies raided Darnassus and I was in the area, I went up to the top of the tower and danced on Staghelm's corpse. I'm not overly fond of the boy king of SW City, but I do not think Kings usually like to stand for elections.
Unless there is a Draenei running, I will probably sit this one out.
Is there a demographic less worthy to vote, than people who ride judgemental bandwagons?
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, watch it -- I'm huge!
Servers'll be down for half that day, plenty of time to go vote AND stock up on cheetos.
"Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
But doesn't gank mean "gang kill" or something?
The Lich King! Write in Cheney!
Nah, Ganking generally either means a group attack or someone attacking someone who is weaker and unprepared/unable to defend himself. Classic places where this takes place are "Ganklethorn Vale" and the Hillsbrad foothills since they both are contested zones and there are lots of little nooks and crannies to hide in (of course, there's always the classic "lvl 70 on epic mount chasing lower level playing on regular mount" game).
/Mikael
Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
We can not let this alliance of fairies and unicorns continue to take our land and enslave our people.
.
Vote Thrall 2008!
.
For the horde!
Not sure how trade chat discussions end up on other realms, but the voting will inevitably be narrowed down between Murlocs and Chuck Norris.
Chuck Norris would be the obvious best choice, however Murlocs would stay in the race and present a hard battle due to their sheer numbers and ability to throw spears through walls.
I overheard my mom talking about this the other day, when I took a 2-minute game break to come up from the basement and grab a ho-ho. She brought my dinner down to me (duh) so that was all I heard. Is there like an election or something? Meh.
This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
So it's even a wow-word and not general word?
In 1929, people lost everything because the banks went under.
Who employs people so they can take home a paycheck?
Where does the tax money come from?
What part of this don't you understand?
I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
I_Voter
A number of years ago, I typed out and published on the web, the following copyright expired article. Read it if you think that I oppose "democratic" government manipulation of the economy. It's been getting a lot of hits lately. It may be one of the earliest suggestions that lack of demand by consumers can cause or sustain an economic crisis. This humorous story published in 1897 is much earlier than John Maynard Keynes, and his "The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money" published in 1936.
The Parable of the Water-Tank
published by Edward Bellamy in 1897
http://www.geocities.com/stewjackmail/parable.html