Slashdot Mirror


Project Turns GPS Phones Into Traffic Reporters

narramissic writes "Starting on Monday, researchers from Nokia and UC Berkeley will kick off the Mobile Millennium project. The researchers hope that thousands of volunteers will download a free Java program that figures out by their movement and location when they are driving, and then transmits that information to the project's servers, which then crunch it into a Bay Area traffic map. 'The whole concept here is that if everyone shares just a little bit of what they're seeing ... then everyone can benefit by seeing the conditions ahead of them,' said Quinn Jacobson, a research leader with Nokia in Palo Alto."

119 comments

  1. The privacy post by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm sure the data is anonymized, but how well? Will people be comfortable with having their phone track them? Anyone know? Didn't RTFA yet... ;)

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:The privacy post by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Until we arrive at an overtly panoptic government, I wouldn't mind volunteering for my data to be shared if it helps.

    2. Re:The privacy post by ZankerH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Until we arrive at an overtly panoptic government, I wouldn't mind volunteering for my data to be shared if it helps.

      I can certainly see this being used to help the traffic control police - aka revenue generator.

    3. Re:The privacy post by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If this became a big thing and my company maintained a toll road then I'd be looking for ways to create phantom "traffic jams" on alternative routes. This sounds like a trust based system.

    4. Re:The privacy post by wisty · · Score: 1

      Oh god, this could really be exploited. Just set up a horde of customized clients to "block" the route you want to take ... not that I would approve of such behavior

    5. Re:The privacy post by Dan541 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Forget privacy, who is going to pay for this wireless data?

      Why would someone sacrifice their battery life just for another to benefit.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    6. Re:The privacy post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's no problem. The idea is that you benefit from the information which emerges from the aggregated data. Kind of like other community projects, for example CDDB or Wikipedia. You feed a small piece of information into the system and get the service of the whole system back.

      The thing to watch out for is: Who owns the data? Are you really just jumpstarting a commercial enterprise which will later turn the free service into a product or serve your data back to you with ads, while you are forbidden to use the database for your own purposes?

    7. Re:The privacy post by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 2, Informative

      Newsflash: your phone ALREADY tracks you; it's an inherent part of cell phone technology. What matters is how this tracking data is used.

    8. Re:The privacy post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would someone sacrifice their battery life just for another to benefit.

      To leech off others to get real-time traffic data in return, especially if they add spoken directions to the program on smart-phones to allow people to avoid traffic jams if they are willing to spend that battery life while driving.

    9. Re:The privacy post by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 0

      No man is an island, entire of itself every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friends or of thine own were any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls it tolls for thee.

      Err, yeah. Perhaps because you would also benefit, by having access to the aggregated data as well?

    10. Re:The privacy post by geomobile · · Score: 1

      I think he was talking about the data traffic cost from the wireless operator. I don't see an operator in the consortium running the project. So, if you have a bad data plan, this will ruin your phone bill - Wikipedia or not.

    11. Re:The privacy post by cellurl · · Score: 2

      I completely agree. I also question slashdot's motives at promoting Nokia. Ok, here goes: I am promoting this: Its free now, but probably not later. I suck! http://www.wikispeedia.org/ Here's another item I am promoting. Its not free but useful. Slashdot won't cover it. http://www.gpscruise.com/ What do you think? -jim

    12. Re:The privacy post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only put the battery in my phone when I need to make or receive a call.

    13. Re:The privacy post by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Do you store it in your tinfoil hat when not in use?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:The privacy post by Ian-K · · Score: 1

      It's quite simple to track positions individually yet anonymously. It all depends on goodwill (and how much people want to spend on the GPRS traffic they donate to that system)

      Depends, though, if you live in england or not ;) (see today's post about UK wanting to snoop on all internet traffic)

      --
      I'm no longer fed up with MS Windows: I go rid of them :)
    15. Re:The privacy post by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      http://www.wikispeedia.org/ [wikispeedia.org] Here's another item I am promoting. Its not free but useful. Slashdot won't cover it. http://www.gpscruise.com/ [gpscruise.com] What do you think? -jim

      I look at the first and I think "um, okaaaay... what's the point? I can see speed limit signs for myself as I drive...". Alas, I can't look at the second because it redirects to a google doc, which my company's proxy blocks.

    16. Re:The privacy post by esampson · · Score: 1

      I would imagine it wouldn't be too difficult for the system to recognize that certain senders are giving bogus data, especially if this became a big thing. You have to do things like that because even honest users will occasionally send bad data, either because their GPS gets a bad fix or because their car breaks down. Once the system realizes someone is sending bad data it can keep an eye on them. If they continue to send lots and lots of bad data then it just stops paying attention to them altogether.

    17. Re:The privacy post by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      I figured people would just do this for kicks. Get a bunch of friends and create virtual traffic jams. I wonder how the system would handle that since a one lane backups do happen.

    18. Re:The privacy post by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      You're overthinking the problem. Just borrow a few drivers from California and you can have *real* traffic jams anywhere with little or no effort.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    19. Re:The privacy post by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Depending on where you live, I'm sure there are plenty of people with unlimited data plans. Google Maps probably isn't too friendly on my unlimited plan Blackberry (but then neither is Facebook or MidpSSH). I love getting real-time traffic info in Google Maps as well. I just wish it would route better (like Mapquest). Google needs to buy Mapquest, that would solve it ;-)

    20. Re:The privacy post by cellurl · · Score: 1

      I put it on a webpage below for you.
      http://www.gpscruise.com/press_release_to_general_public.html
      Hopefully that will let your proxy be happy. Let me know what you think! -jp

    21. Re:The privacy post by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Got it, thanks. It definitely makes more sense in this context :) Still, perhaps I've been driving in the wrong states, but I've never really had difficulty knowing the speed limit. If I rely on cruise control so much that I stop paying attention to things like speed limit signs... perhaps I should not be driving?

  2. Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by William+Ager · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The project seems interesting, and there does appear to be at least some consideration for keeping the data secure.

    However, I would think that the system would require widespread adoption in a particular area before it would even start to be useful, and considering that it will only run on the small percentage of phones that have GPS to begin with, and there isn't much incentive in the beginning for users to install the software, I'm not sure that such an idea will be viable for at least a few more years.

    1. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by ZankerH · · Score: 1

      It would also require that the large majority of the users/contributers to the system actually do so with good intentions and aren't trying to deliberately mislead the traffic behind them. That may be the case, but the article makes it sound like it's pretty easy for a single person to game the system.

    2. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by cornjones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would think that the system would require widespread adoption in a particular area before it would even start to be useful

      Not really. Initially, I would bet it is only extrapolating based on location and speed. I know somewhere like seattle (and I would be surprised if SF is much different) will have i high enough concentration of geeks w/ toys to bring back data on the major routes. If you have 1 data point on the I5 going at 15 MPH, you can guess that traffic sux. Given the volume of the people, a fairly low adoption rate will give data.

      More data points will always make the system better, of course.

      One of the big advantages to any of these traffic knowledge programs is that they benefit both people tapped in to the program and those not. For example, super tech guy A checks this program and sees that Road N is slammed today. He, or hopefully his software, will plan a new optimum route based on the traffic data. This removes tech guy A from the problematic traffic pattern. Luddite guy B, doesn't know any of this but his traffic pattern is eased b/c the group of people like tech guy A have avoided exacerbating the problem. As a side benefit, you have utilized your road infrastructure more completely. (recent research about limiting paths being more efficient notwithstanding)

    3. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by thedonger · · Score: 1

      If you have 1 data point on the I5 going at 15 MPH, you can guess that traffic sux.

      No, you don't. A valid sample size is crucial to reduce or eliminate outliers. In you case, the one guy with the GPS phone is on his donut spare coasting in the breakdown lane and you end up 20 minutes late to work because you took the back roads.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    4. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This type of data is also very useful if paired with the extensive data already being captured by the local DOT, and a company called Traffic.com, since bought by NavTeq, which was subsequently bought by...wait for it............... Nokia.

      Traffic/Nokia has sensors along all of the big highways in the top 30+ markets in the US. This takes a decent amount of $$ to install (and subsequently maintain), but it's already installed, up and running (hence the purchase by Navteq). If this "new" methodology proves worthwhile and usable, it can seriously augment/replace the build out necessary to cover an area. NOTE:(investors were asking traffic 5-6 years ago why you would install sensors if you could do this with a cell phone, good thing for them and their users they didn't listen/wait to use "free" resources).

      And finally, this allows for the coverage of secondary and tertiary roadways that you would NEVER spend the money to cover with the more "traditional" sensor (i.e. senor = pole, battery(ies), solar panel(s), acoustic sensor, wireless modem); an installation can cost upwards of 50k per SITE (especially if you have to shut a lane down).

      But that's why Nokia has sponsored it. IMHO

    5. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      No you don't.

      Being the only two people in the area who have the tech, you take the back roads which nobody else used, because they don't have the enabled tech to tell them to not use the interstate.

      You still get a clear journey.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    6. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      I would think that the system would require widespread adoption in a particular area before it would even start to be useful

      Not really. Initially, I would bet it is only extrapolating based on location and speed. I know somewhere like seattle (and I would be surprised if SF is much different) will have i high enough concentration of geeks w/ toys to bring back data on the major routes. If you have 1 data point on the I5 going at 15 MPH, you can guess that traffic sux. Given the volume of the people, a fairly low adoption rate will give data.

      More data points will always make the system better, of course.

      One of the big advantages to any of these traffic knowledge programs is that they benefit both people tapped in to the program and those not. For example, super tech guy A checks this program and sees that Road N is slammed today. He, or hopefully his software, will plan a new optimum route based on the traffic data. This removes tech guy A from the problematic traffic pattern. Luddite guy B, doesn't know any of this but his traffic pattern is eased b/c the group of people like tech guy A have avoided exacerbating the problem. As a side benefit, you have utilized your road infrastructure more completely. (recent research about limiting paths being more efficient notwithstanding)

      It would be interesting to see what sort of equilibrium is reached - if enough people use it and move off main roads; side roads start to slow while main roads improve. This could result in people returning to the main roads; resulting in the opposite and a move to side roads.

      It could result in some steady state level of use or a blinking Life equilibrium between two patterns.

      The algorithm would be interesting - they could through out the outliers before averaging to eliminate the stopped by the side of the road and cutting in and out drivers; or just report the mode for any length of road.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    7. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This system has been running in Russia and Ukraine for months, and working. When the Java app is open, you download info from the server and automatically upload you position (and your speed as move) to the server. so the give and take of info is built in, you connecting and using you automatically give info.

      and it works.

      re: privacy, well if you have a phone on you, you are, in almost all cases, traceable.

    8. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Traffic is traditionally modeled as a fluid, with all points assumed to be moving within a very small tolerance of some speed. When do you see someone NOT going within 10 of the speed limit who isn't an outlier? They are either parked on the road or blazing through traffic.

      While recent research has suggested that a gas-based model might give better predictive results, you shouldn't need that kind of fine granularity to be accurate in the near-term.

    9. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by Pervaricator+General · · Score: 1

      Traffic is modeled best as a fluid or gas in motion (I posted above, if a little less coherently). This type of equilibrium can be heard when your pipes creak in a large building as pressure equalizes.

      This will probably help in the short term by recommending quicker routes OFF the interstate (get off one exit earlier, for example). Long-term benefits will only be see by cities using this data to shape traffic: time lights (valves in a fluid or gas model), add bus express lines and carpool incentives, etc.

      It is, however, the ability to non-invasively gather data is the biggest boon from this program. Cities already spend thousands of dollars on traffic surveys (ever run over the double tubes on the road, seen someone at a stoplight with a clicker?), so this would (once widespread enough) save money for government.

      That being said, the worry of this distributed computing project turning into a financial boon with no remuneration to the people who provide the data, (or worse, the data being exploited for control), is a big downside to adoption.

    10. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      That won't work in downtowns: how do you identify which phone is walking or driving?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    11. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I know somewhere like seattle (and I would be surprised if SF is much different) will have i high enough concentration of geeks w/ toys to bring back data on the major routes. If you have 1 data point on the I5 going at 15 MPH, you can guess that traffic sux.

      Actually, there's many, many places along I-5 where you can get that singular data point - and be dead wrong. That is, the data point can actually be *adjacent* and traveling parallel to I-5[1] but the inaccuracy of GPS[2] can make it appear to be *on* I-5. You'll need more than one data point and a spread of time to have any level of accuracy.

      [1] On South Center Parkway adjacent to the 405 interchange, on portions of MLK Way, on a good chunk of Eastlake Way (near REI say...), to name just three of many places.

      [2] GPS isn't a magic wand, my high end handheld (a Garmin 60CSX) can often have errors of up to 50ft or more if reception or satellite configuration is poor. I doubt the GPS in a $99 cellphone inside a pocket inside a car comes even close to that level of performance.

    12. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Or some places where the interstate is raised, and there is a local road *UNDER* the interstate, with stop lights. If you only look at lat/long on the GPS, it would look like there are a bunch of cars stopped in the middle of the interstate. The altitude would have to be accurate to within about 15 feet to positively say which road you are on. (I think I-70 a bit east of I-25 in Denver is like this)

      Another issue, at least with my Garmin Venture CX GPS is signal reflections. I was on a mountain in CO at about 12,000 feet, and due to reflections my GPS thought I was bouncing all over the place, at one point saying I was at -1000 feet of altitude up to almost a mile away from where I actually was. That is with a dedicated GPS sitting on my shoulder, with no metal cage around me on an open hill side.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    13. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

      The walkers wait at intersections and then proceed at about 3-4 miles per hour. The drivers wait at intersections and then proceed at 35 until the next intersection.

      It's the bicycle messengers that will really mess up the stats.

    14. Re:Interesting, but only useful if widely adopted by 2short · · Score: 1


        You don't care about downtowns. Downtown is the start point or destination; you take the street that goes to your office. For traffic data, all you care about is major arteries.
        I do data analysis that needs good (average, not real-time) speed data for all the roads. It's very frustrating - nobody has it because almost nobody else cares.

  3. Yeah but Helicopter crashes are more entertaining by cavehobbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on. Don't they know the reason we all listen to the half-hour-out-of-date traffic reports from the helicopter reporters is the same as why we watch Nascar and Indy car races? The chances of a crash and the anticipation of mayhem are the whole idea. Not to mention the cheesy chopper sound track they add.

    This takes all that out of it. It guarantees a daily fender-bender on I-95 while drivers fiddle with the app. Whoop-de-doo.

    Well, maybe if they keep the chopper sound effects.

  4. Know what happened with Dash? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 3, Informative

    I of course wish them good luck. One of the last commercial attempts to do this, Dash Express, recently revealed it did no go as well as originally planned.

    1. Re:Know what happened with Dash? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Which brings up a great point. I really hope they have legal advice on this project because they are walking the thin line of IP here. I worked on a similar project around 1998-1999 for a large company and their IP was always precious to them. I've seen a few other commercial companies try also.

      So the moral of the story above - CYA.

  5. TomTom did it! by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    TomTom takes anonymized location information from mobile phone handsets in The Netherlands, and make traffic reports they call HD traffic.

    The handsets are not (necessarily) equipped with GPS chips, but their location is triangulated by the GSM network itself. The mobile network (Vodafone NL) supplies the information to TomTom, who then process it into traffic reports.

    They claim to cover 10 times more roadarea than conventional traffic detection that uses inductive loops embedded in the roads. (The conventional system is already quite extensive in The Netherlands, which is a small and densely populated country). I seem to recall TomTom also have some sort of patent.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:TomTom did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As it's been said, this system is already commercial in the Netherlands, and it will be rolled out with TomTom and SFR in france in 2009

    2. Re:TomTom did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that TomTom expects you to pay for this service, while a cellphone-only project could potentially be free to use, where your contribution pays for the data you recieve.

      (p2p traffic reporting?)

    3. Re:TomTom did it! by kitgerrits · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you can see the current HD Traffic status on their website for free.
      The reason you need to pay for HD traffic on your tomtom is because it includes a 24x7 GPRS connection.
      Mobile Data packages in NL tend to cost around â10 a month and so does HD traffic, surprise!
      The added advantage of HD Traffic is that it uses a modem built into your Tomtom, so you are free to use your mobile phone for other things.
      (unlike earlier versions of Tomtom Traffic).

      --
      "I was in love with a beautiful blonde once, dear. She drove me to drink. It's the one thing I am indebted to her for."
    4. Re:TomTom did it! by caluml · · Score: 1

      This is actually why I started my Location Tracking system a few years ago.
      Convince enough people to submit their data (pay them for it, per mile?) and then sell the aggregated data to people who wanted it. Road builders, government, people who want to know where congestion is.

    5. Re:TomTom did it! by CompMD · · Score: 1

      AGPS over cell phone networks is atrociously inaccurate and cannot be trusted for true position fixes.

    6. Re:TomTom did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AGPS over cell phone networks is atrociously inaccurate and cannot be trusted for true position fixes.

      As someone who works with GPS, I find the above statement just plain silly. There are no "true position fixes". All positioning techniques have errors and uncertainty. You just need to use a technique that's sufficient.

      I see no reason to think that AGPS isn't good enough for traffic monitoring. In my experience it's as good as CA code. According to my searches AGPS has an error of 4-50 m. Sure it wouldn't work for surveying the road, but that's not the goal here. I don't really care if there is a 10% error on velocity for traffic data.

      You'll actually have close to that much error with any GPS, since putting an antenna inside a car on a road is a horrible way to design a GPS survey.

    7. Re:TomTom did it! by joshuac · · Score: 1

      As navigation systems in the U.S. (at least in urban areas) have already passed the critical mass point, it seems a more intelligent way to do this would be to use the GPS info from the Nav system itself to record speed (or time between two intersections really) and just use the phone as a Bluetooth bridge to the Internet. Precise updates, no cell tower triangulation approximation needed. Triangulation from the towers is awesome use of already existing information though for sure and was probably a good solution to an initial Chicken or Egg problem.

      TomTom takes anonymized location information from mobile phone handsets in The Netherlands, and make traffic reports they call HD traffic.

      The handsets are not (necessarily) equipped with GPS chips, but their location is triangulated by the GSM network itself. The mobile network (Vodafone NL) supplies the information to TomTom, who then process it into traffic reports.

      They claim to cover 10 times more roadarea than conventional traffic detection that uses inductive loops embedded in the roads. (The conventional system is already quite extensive in The Netherlands, which is a small and densely populated country). I seem to recall TomTom also have some sort of patent.

  6. And what would happen if... by ngp · · Score: 4, Funny

    You and your 50 coworkers get to the office and forget to turn off that app? Massive non-existent traffic jam?

    1. Re:And what would happen if... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only in parking spaces 26-76, though.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:And what would happen if... by MarkovianChained · · Score: 1

      I'm more worried about my phone trying to direct me into following that "set of cars" that just whizzed by at 80+ MPH.... on a train track.

  7. Sharing by b0ttle · · Score: 1

    "The whole concept here is that if everyone shares just a little bit (...) then everyone can benefit"

    That would solve a lot of the world problems, not just traffic.

  8. Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by ashraya · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Bangalore, they tried to do this in a different way by looking at the number of cell phones that connect to various towers etc., without using GPS. Check out the links at http://btis.in/live.htm ashraya

    1. Re:Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where else could/would they do such a thing but in Bangladore ? Eh ?

    2. Re:Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      forget about Bangalore, all Belgium (market penetration 100+ %) is covered. Can't remember the link though.

    3. Re:Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by epot · · Score: 1

      In Belgium, at least one company does this with simple mobile phone signal, no additional software to download: http://www.be-mobile.be/ Example in a national newspaper: http://trafic.lesoir.be/?act=infotraf (only tick "Bouchon" if you only want to see traffic jams ; colours show mean speed of cars). Of course, nobody never sign anything about using their phone signal to something else than making and receiving phone calls. Providers just did it without the consumer consent. And nobody said anything. That's Belgium ...

    4. Re:Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      I'm working for the Operator that provides the data. We have strong customer privacy protection rules that are reminded to us on a regular basis. Be certain the data is anonymized, and cannot be trivially datamined to find back the customer information.

    5. Re:Has been done in Bangalore in a different way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is Bengaluru, you insensitive clod!

  9. Tom Tom HD by zoefff · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's already commercially available here in the Netherlands. Tomtom teamed up with vodaphone, which can locate their mobile phones location and speed (not necessarily GPS needed) . This is fed to tomtom, which displays it on your navigation system. More info here

  10. No UK support.. by Pvt_Ryan · · Score: 1

    Shame, would have been nice, if they used world maps.

  11. Stupid... by g0dsp33d · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's already a cell-phone based system. People with phones call local radio stations when there's a delay. Unfortunately it probably won't help much. If there were a good alternative, there probably wouldn't be traffic to begin with. I commute on 95 & PA turnpike, and if its closed, I'm pretty much screwed into a 3 times as long commute. Getting an instant update won't really do anything other than give me a few more minutes of misery through anticipation.

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
    1. Re:Stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing not every consumer is the same eh?

    2. Re:Stupid... by xonen · · Score: 1

      If there were a good alternative, there probably wouldn't be traffic to begin with.

      This alternative exists. Simply don't use a car, or if you can't, try not to use it daily. We all think we have the 'right' to drive car, our economy is based on it. I know how hard it is for an individual to make this choice between location of work and living and shopping and family visits, still, it's the only valid alternative. Anything else is deemed to fail sooner or later, or a theoretical solution, like perfect public transport.

      We should focus more on a solution where job and house are located very closely, where you can transport yourself using a bike or your feet.

      If you don't believe. Come to holland, you will see it is a problem that cannot be fixed by more roads and more technical solutions. Actually, we are even running out of space for more roads. Simply put: as soon as you fix it, it will attract even more traffic. Unfortunately no-one (or: no politican) wants to admit this.

      --
      A glitch a day keeps the bugs away.
  12. Who would be dumb enough to download this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    *considers existence of FaceBook*

    Nevermind.

    1. Re:Who would be dumb enough to download this? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      *considers existence of FaceBook*

      Nevermind.

      Then again, on Facebook you do get to choose what information you share about yourself. Might not be the case if you have an app posting info about you automagically...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    2. Re:Who would be dumb enough to download this? by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually I'm hoping Google adds this to Google Maps Mobile. Currently they use the commercial traffic services for data which means a delay of 15-30 minutes typically in getting notification about traffic jams, with realtime data from actual commuters they could provide MUCH better data. This would save me hundreds of hours per year. The government can already track you through the cellular network and Google would not turn the individual user data over to anyone else, so why wouldn't I participate?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  13. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NaviExpert does it in Poland since 2007.

  14. Java program - battery life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As opposed to the methods that other posters have already noted that rely on "how many connections to this cell tower", running some Java application on your phone is going to require a lot of battery usage isn't it? The "smart" part of the phone can't go to sleep can it?

    1. Re:Java program - battery life? by Soft+Cosmic+Rusk · · Score: 1

      Especially bad since GPS in itself uses loads of power. When I turn on the GPS on my Nokia N82 the battery is flat after just a couple of hours. Having to transmit data over 3G won't make it better.

    2. Re:Java program - battery life? by what+about · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with Java....

      Any running application is going to draw power, if it is indeed running

      I have Fring, a convergence application it is a pure Symbian application but I end up not using it because i drains the battery a lot

    3. Re:Java program - battery life? by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I drive with my phone plugged into a hands-free docking station or just a charger when in a rental. This app would encourage me to keep my phone topped off.

      On the other hand, battery drain would discourage its use on foot, bike, the bus or train. Too bad as it would be nice to time my arrival at a stop in sync with the approach of mass transit.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  15. In ex-Soviet Russia.... by dp_wiz · · Score: 0

    There already such service operating for years. Local search (initially. now... you know..) service engine providing users with downloadable map app which can optionally use device's GPS to submit data and view traffic density based on that.

  16. NaviExpert fanboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Poland we have commercial on-line navigation systems for phones (including BT communication with external GPS) that IMHO works extremally well. I bought 2 years subscription for about 100 USD (200 PLN).
    System consists of small java app with voice navigration and turn-by-turn guide on-screen with map preview including "autoroute view".
    Novelty that you by default switch ON community feature that sends back data gathered by system.

    Routes are created on server, based on average time to travel through a certain route, depending of time and day of the week.

  17. Re:Yeah but Helicopter crashes are more entertaini by thedonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think an even bigger issue with the immediately-out-of-date traffic report is that once the crash is cleared and the traffic at the front of the line starts moving they consider the problem resolved. They do not take into account the ripple effect sending echoing "shockwaves" of traffic stalls up and down the highway.

    --
    Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
  18. Round and Round and Round.... by GreatRedShark · · Score: 1

    hehehe... It might be kinda fun to take a phone on this system and go spin in circles for hours on a merry-go-round in a playground.
    I wonder what other mischief you get into with one of these?

    1. Re:Round and Round and Round.... by Q-Hack! · · Score: 1

      Well, seeing as how most civilian GPS units are only accurate to about 100 feet. And most playground Merry-Go-Rounds are no more than 20 feet across... The system would just see you as stopped in one place.

      albeit, maybe a bit dizzier.

      --
      Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  19. Locating cell phones... by Quantos · · Score: 1

    This could have a far better use. As the technology develops and power consumption drops it could be a benefit to 911 services. Currently the technology to aquire the location of a cell phone call to emergency numbers is crude or non-existent. If a caller is unable to talk but still has the wherewithall to call 911 he is unable to tell them where he is, with a system like this it would allow response personel to still find them.

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    1. Re:Locating cell phones... by DCstewieG · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Locating cell phones... by Quantos · · Score: 1

      In Canada the use is very unreliable, or non-existant.

      --
      Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
  20. Few spolsports will kill it all by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Ideas seems to be good on paper, but on reality it is going to go the way Citizen Band radio went. One dumb teen who thought he was a DJ would play his scratchy cassette player over the radio and knock everyone else within his broadcast radius. Something similar could happen to this method too.

    The data streams are anonymous and users voluntarily download and install a java program. Wow! What can go wrong?

    A few spoilsports will hack the java program to give misleading reports, multiple reports. Initially I don't see any benefit to the hackers. But the script kiddies do not think rationally. They do it anyway.

    Why can't the cell towers simply track the number of phones each tower is pinging? Then the net gain and net loss of number of phones, plotted over time, gives the direction of movement of the population of cell phones. That should be enough to give a good idea of the traffic. This would be a better way to find/predict traffic congestion than asking thousands of peoples to actively report their positions.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Few spolsports will kill it all by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      One dumb teen who thought he was a DJ would play his scratchy cassette player over the radio and knock everyone else within his broadcast radius.

      That's what straight pins shoved through the antenna feed coax and clipped flush with the sheathing are for. Especially if you insert them at a reflection point based on the wavelength.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:Few spolsports will kill it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't the cell towers simply track the number of phones each tower is pinging?

      What's in it for the carrier? They already have the capability; there just isn't anything monetarily motivating for them to follow through/dedicate resources.

      On top of that their are already 3rd party vendors on the carriers networks that are filling this gap.

  21. Data and text costs make more. by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Data and text costs make more.

  22. The trillions we spend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to buy, maintain, store, repair, accommodate, tolerate, elevate, patronize, spiritualize and idolize the automobile.

    It is truly America's heroin.

  23. Already done in US! by CompMD · · Score: 1

    Garmin and Navteq have had this out for a while...there is a radio receiver in some Garmin GPS units that receives traffic reports and will automatically create detour routes around traffic, accidents, or even construction.

    1. Re:Already done in US! by esampson · · Score: 1

      I believe that what's significant here is how the data is being generated.

      The current systems (Garmin and Navteq are just two examples) work, as you said, off traffic reports. This requires a certain infrastructure like roadway sensors or a way for a human agent to gather information about the road.

      In the system to be tested the data is automatically generated from the cell phones of drivers. This means no sensors need to be placed and no human agent needs to gather information.

    2. Re:Already done in US! by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      TomTom's HD Traffic system combines the standard (and spurious) traffic reports, roadway sensors, and other information with real-time data collected from cell phone towers, and it's continuously monitored 24/7 in the HD Traffic Control Center to filter out misinformation and prevent abuse.

      So not only would there be no point to hacking TomTom HD Traffic, but it would be very difficult to hack without resorting to all kinds of felonious, easily detected activities.

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  24. Tinfoil Hats by dhermann · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, guys, I'm sure Lucius Fox will destroy the computer that holds all the phone calls recorded by this app. He's just going to use it to find the bomb. And then track down the guys who planted the bomb. Might as well find Osama while he's at it. Plus he should do a quick check on who's talking about the Nation of Islam. Wait-- don't turn your phone off! Don't you need to "call" your girlfriend tonight?

  25. Re:they don't anonymize this stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 raving lunatic

    a warrant from a judge will allow homicide investigators access to your cellphone provider's accumulated data, including tower connections. omg, the humanity!

    this has nothing to to with the project being discussed

    this also has nothing to do with the feds and real-time tracking.

  26. Redundant ? by Sagara+Sozou · · Score: 1

    Commercial GPS devices have been making use of traffic message channels (TMCs) not long after they were introduced. This will provide similar information for low traffic streets, but does tht make it very useful?

    --
    Those poor bastards, they have us surrounded. Now we can fire at them in all directions!
  27. since what causes traffic jams is known... by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    from other studies, can we change this so we can figure out who the idiots
    causing most of the traffic jams are? It can just automatically mail them
    a ticket for being stupid?

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  28. Re:they don't anonymize this stuff by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    -1 raving lunatic

    a warrant from a judge will allow homicide investigators access to your cellphone provider's accumulated data, including tower connections. omg, the humanity!

    And Britain's anti-terror laws won't ever be used for purely economic reasons against another nation, say Iceland. And the Patriot Act will never be misapplied to things like copyright violation cases, etc etc. Nope, nobody will ever misuse a tool for something other than its stated purpose because that would be wrong!

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  29. Did u by drachenstern · · Score: 1

    Eh, what? Where did they promote Nokia? Because Nokia's part of the summary due to they are in the article?

    Enlighten me how they're promoting please...

    But on with the show. Cute network, cute device. What's the lifetime on the site you reckon? 5 years? Honest answer please.

    --
    2^3 * 31 * 647
  30. Traffic jam or accident? by BagOfSpotz · · Score: 1

    So now people will be watching their phone screens more than they already are, looking for traffic updates.

    "Hmmm... phone says traffic is slowing down ahe**WHAM!**"

    Rear end collision! Phone sends update of new stoppage in traffic.

  31. I Like the Idea but... by Selfunfocused · · Score: 1

    Is it the user's responsibility to turn it off when not in a car? Unless the system works absolutely in the background, I don't see it playing out that well. Testing this in the Bay Area, I foresee a lot of volunteers walking down the streets of San Francisco passively reporting as slow traffic (I assume the GPS isn't differentiating between the 5 foot gap from sidewalk to street). Not that I wouldn't find pedestrian foot traffic data interesting, but I'm doubting it's useful for Mobile Millennium purposes.

  32. Re: Battery life? by gillbates · · Score: 1

    While it's a little inconvenience, connecting a car charger goes a long way. If you've got an unlimited data plan, why wouldn't you use this?

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  33. Tinfoil Hat time by VindictivePantz · · Score: 1

    Take this concept a bit further. Let's say in 10 years, GPS is standard in enough vehicles on the road to make traffic status very accurate.

    Assuming that fossil fueled vehicles are still present, why couldn't a government entity track your road time/route, calculate a pollution or road usage tax based on your actual driving activities and the known MPG rating of your vehicle? One already has to register his/her vehicle (including, year, make and model) with the state. Coupling that with the MPG rating and your driving data could easily be translated to a usage/pollution tax. The government could sell it as an incentive for purchase more fuel efficient vehicles, thus reducing pollution, and/or encouraging greater use mass transit.

    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat time by deimtee · · Score: 1

      Why bother with that? Just tax the fuel the way they already do. The more you burn, the more you pay.
      Over here about 70% of the pump price is tax.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  34. possibly gaming the system? by skywiseguy · · Score: 1

    as a biker, i have to think that i and my fellow bikers would be reporting incorrect traffic data to the server since we are allowed to split the lanes in california. at this point there are probably not enough bikes on the road to make a serious dent in a normal use of the apps, but if all of us used it and very few cars did, would it not report incorrect traffic flow?

    1. Re:possibly gaming the system? by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      ... since we are allowed to split the lanes in california. at this point there are probably not enough bikes on the road to make a serious dent in a normal use of the apps,...

      Why does it seem like a bad idea to mention lane splitting and serious dent in the same post?

      Seriously though, lane splitting seems like suicide. How dangerous is it?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    2. Re:possibly gaming the system? by skywiseguy · · Score: 1

      it's as dangerous as the driver who does it. i won't do it if traffic is going faster than about 40 mph, but you see guys doing at at 90+ mph, and *that* is definitely suicide, imho

  35. Re:TomTom did it! - PacBell did it before them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you search the /. archives back some years, you'll see Pac Tel did the same thing in the bay area ages ago... they got towers, they got users phones, they can tell if they're moving or not.

  36. Re: Battery life? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    While it's a little inconvenience, connecting a car charger goes a long way. If you've got an unlimited data plan, why wouldn't you use this?

    Connecting to a car charger is also reputedly bad for battery longevity.

  37. Radar? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

    To really make this handy, they need to tie the phones into people's radar detectors and report that data as well.

    1. Re:Radar? by shot151 · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered about cop cars being tracked. Either via GPS or the appropriate police radio band. Wouldn't it be possible to do some sort of fox hunt for whatever frequency and approximate if you are close or not to a cop car. Assumption is that they are sending traffic over the radio.

  38. Interesting but... by subl33t · · Score: 1

    ... different cell carriers will have different rates for GPS usage. Up here in Canada, where monopolistic cell providers are screwing us, I can hear their bean-counters rubbing their hands and giggling in glee.

  39. TomTom does this for ages by Doctor+O · · Score: 1

    How is this news? AFAIK TomTom uses this technique for their traffic services for *ages*.

    --
    Who is General Failure and why is he reading my hard disk?
  40. Nokia's recycling ideas by samurai47 · · Score: 1

    It is going to be very inefficient tool for traffic monitoring, every expert in traffic knows that the traffic flow management requires much more than just monitoring cars. It is required to track speed, project accordeon effects, forecast congestion, etc. Video traffic monitoring deployed on highways in europe is closest to the real time traffic monitoring. The background of Nokia's project is again, catch the mobile users and trick them into generating more traffic for mobile operators. Are you really willing to pay the price? It was the same story with LifeBlog, upload constantly what you want and the rest as well. Some prefer Shozu, some Wavelog, some other Kablog, but how many really use LifeBlog? Stick to your GPS for navigation and forget uploading your position all the time...

  41. celebpoker by bob2008 · · Score: 1

    You don't get this opportunity often, but sometimes you can make a financial advantage just by registrating for a Multi Table Poker Tournament (MTT)! âoeHow is this possible?â you think? The answer is within the "overlays" given by guaranteed prizepools offered for some MTTs. An example: On Sunday the 02/11/2008 the â250.000 Guaranteed Tournament at CelebPoker had a â320 Buy-In. 613 players registered for this tournament. Now the calculation fun begins! First you have to divide the offered Prizemoney with the number of players who registered. In this example: â250,000 / 613 (players) = â407. This means that your ticket is worth than â407. As your ticket costs â320, you are automatically gaining the equivilent of an extra â87 to pay for your entry (â407-â320 = â87). Ok, you don't get the cash in the bank, but you do get it as an advantage for the buy-in as you have less players to compete for the prizepool with. You can easily calculate the number of players that turns a guaranteed tournament +-0 in added value if you divide the sum of guaranteed prizemoney with the Buy-In amount. In our example above it would be like this: 250.000 (â) / 320 (â) = 781. That shows that when the number of players is equal or higher than 781 there is no added money in the prizepool. Therefore you dont get this extra value (overlay) for your registration. When you keep this kind of calculation in mind you can make use this overlay to your advantage by paying attention to the CelebPoker-MTT-Lobby. Take these chances when you find these Overlays to pimp your bankroll! Good Luck!! http://celebpoker.com/news/index.php?id=310">http://celebpoker.com/news/

  42. Re:TomTom did it! [HD Traffic, IQ Routes] by SimHacker · · Score: 1

    TomTom's "HD Traffic" gets information on traffic speed from all drivers who have a Vodaphone cell phone in their car.

    It does not require each of those drivers to have TomTom devices. It does not require the cell phones to have GPS trackers. It does not require the cell phones to use air time or have unlimited data plans, or even have the ability to connect to the internet.

    [Disclosure: I work for TomTom. Whenever I go down to the lunch room, I walk by the HD traffic control center where they collect and distribute all the traffic information -- it has a glass wall like a fish tank with a big screen in front displaying the live traffic feeds.]

    The "chicken and egg" and "critical mass" problems are solved by combining traffic data from several different source, and getting a lot more data points than we would get if we only collected data from drivers who have a TomTom that's always connected to the internet with an unlimited data plan.

    The other question is how to TomTom users receive this real time traffic information. The TomTom devices that support HD traffic have their own cell phones with built-in SIM cards, whose cost is covered by the HD traffic subscription, so it can download traffic reports in real time. It does not require you to drain the batteries and increase the bill of your own cell phone. The TomTom device is usually plugged into the car charger.

    There's another feature called "IQ Routes" that enables TomTom to plan intelligent routes even when they're not connected to the internet, based on historical time sensitive information. Traffic on different roads has different speeds at different times of day and different weekdays, so IQ Routes measures that, and takes it into account when planning routes. Then HD traffic can add another layer of real time traffic information to make the routes even more accurate.

    TomTom devices (even if they're not connected to the internet live) can record the speed you drive along the roads you travel, and if you choose to opt in, they anonymize and upload that data when you hot-sync your device to your PC or Mac (using your computer's internet connection instead of requiring a wireless data plan). Then they download the aggregation of all other TomTom user's traffic speed information. So each time you hot-sync, you get fresh traffic data based on the latest measurements of many other TomTom users.

    All this data is also fed back into improving the maps, correcting mistakes, and tracking changes. Since the roads are always changing, you can get a discount by subscribing to map updates, to get fresh maps and points of interest updated regularly. We also offer traffic camera (speed trap) subscriptions, so the TomTom can warn you to slow down before you get speeding tickets.

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  43. Good reason to have a separate PND and cell phone. by SimHacker · · Score: 1

    The problem with using your cell phone as a personal navigation device, is that when the batteries run out quickly, you can't call for help. You're lost AND disconnected at the same time.

    TomTom's HD Traffic and IQ Routes (which I described in a message above) works well because it runs on a separate device that has its own dedicated cell phone and SIM card, which plugs into your car charger for power. Plus it has a big touch screen, a loud speaker, and a dashboard mount, which makes it much more safe to use hands free while driving. So you don't have to stop talking on your phone, use your phone's batteries, or use your phone's data plan, to download real time traffic updates.

    -Don

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  44. Prediction: by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    The system will show that traffic on Bart's above-grade lines to be heavy, but moving well.

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
  45. Re:TomTom did it! [HD Traffic, IQ Routes] by joshuac · · Score: 1

    It does not require each of those drivers to have TomTom devices. It does not require the cell phones to have GPS trackers. It does not require the cell phones to use air time or have unlimited data plans, or even have the ability to connect to the internet.

    Which was critical in the beginning when there weren't many Nav systems out there and wireless data service via cell phone wasn't a commodity.

    The "chicken and egg" and "critical mass" problems are solved by combining traffic data from several different source, and getting a lot more data points than we would get if we only collected data from drivers who have a TomTom that's always connected to the internet with an unlimited data plan.

    Sounds more like "were" solved; like I said before in the post you're responding to, this was probably a killer feature when there weren't many Nav systems out there.

    The other question is how to TomTom users receive this real time traffic information. The TomTom devices that support HD traffic have their own cell phones with built-in SIM cards, whose cost is covered by the HD traffic subscription, so it can download traffic reports in real time. It does not require you to drain the batteries and increase the bill of your own cell phone. The TomTom device is usually plugged into the car charger.

    That's great, although I think the number of mobile phone users with limited data plans are dwindling fast, besides, if they're paying for the dataplan on the TomTom embedded cell phone, why not just pay for that same data on their main phone instead? You're not streaming video; I doubt anyone would notice the battery loss from getting time between point info on the three most likely routes, nor transmitting the time it took to drive between two points; pretty low-bandwidth stuff.

    There's another feature called "IQ Routes" that enables TomTom to plan intelligent routes even when they're not connected to the internet, based on historical time sensitive information. Traffic on different roads has different speeds at different times of day and different weekdays, so IQ Routes measures that, and takes it into account when planning routes. Then HD traffic can add another layer of real time traffic information to make the routes even more accurate.

    TomTom devices (even if they're not connected to the internet live) can record the speed you drive along the roads you travel, and if you choose to opt in, they anonymize and upload that data when you hot-sync your device to your PC or Mac (using your computer's internet connection instead of requiring a wireless data plan). Then they download the aggregation of all other TomTom user's traffic speed information. So each time you hot-sync, you get fresh traffic data based on the latest measurements of many other TomTom users.

    Definitely another kick-ass, clever method of getting traffic info, which will probably outlive the former.

    I think the 1st method (triangulating cell signals to determine traffic speed/embedding a dedicated cell phone in the Nav unit for receiving data/etc.) has a limited future; great technology/strategy in the beginning with a low density of devices deployed (especially when you can take advantage of another device that _is_ widely deployed, even though you are getting less precise data), or when adequate cheap mobile bandwidth wasn't a given, however as time goes on it will just be a more complex and costly than necessary to get the job done. Convergence rather than duplication here is a no-brainer. If TomTom doesn't do it, one of your competitors will and will force the issue for you; they'll get rid of the embedded mobile phone and sell a smaller Nav unit for a higher profit margin.

    The 2nd method (currently store and forwarding the data when a user syncs their Nav unit to their PC, and the PC syncing to TomTom/more broadly stated as "let the GPS worry a

  46. Good idea, but not great. by ReedYoung · · Score: 1

    Why wasn't this in v1.0 of consumer GPS? It's not like collecting data from client devices to compute on the server, for use by the client community, is mind-boggling genius. It's kind of the reason for the client-server model in the first place. Don't get me wrong, I'm not panning the article, just suggesting this industry does not appear to be very competitive.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p
  47. TomTom HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the Netherlands the TomTom HD service works together with a mobile operator to track cell phones position changes along the highways and then calculates the congestion from it. Check out http://www.traphic.nl/ during rush hours (like 8:00 or 17:00, all GMT+1).