Slashdot Mirror


Florence Nightingale, Statistical Graphics Pioneer

Science News has a fascinating look at an under-appreciated corner of the career of Florence Nightingale — as an innovator in the use of statistical graphics to argue for social change. Nightingale returned from the Crimean War a heroine in the eyes of the British citizenry, for the soldiers' lives she had saved. But she came to appreciate that the way to save far more lives was to reform attitudes in the military about sanitation. Under the tutelage of William Farr, who had just invented the field of medical statistics, she compiled overwhelming evidence (in the form of an 830-page report) of the need for change. "As impressive as her statistics were, Nightingale worried that Queen Victoria's eyes would glaze over as she scanned the tables. So Nightingale devised clever ways of presenting the information in charts. Statistics had been presented using graphics only a few times previously, and perhaps never to persuade people of the need for social change."

17 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. oh god by BigBadBus · · Score: 5, Informative

    For Christ's sake, spell her name right.

    1. Re:oh god by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is /., remember? You're asking far too much to expect the so-called editors to use a spelling checker. Which came first, /. or the toilet?

      (I'm just extra annoyed since I've been a professional technical editor and rewriter for some years. Now after the nameless morons get through playing their moderation games I'll probably be seriously pissed--but that's the primary reaction I ever have to /. these days. I'm convinced that /. is just another interesting idea run into the ground.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:oh god by xs650 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "(I'm just extra annoyed since I've been a professional technical editor and rewriter for some years. "

      It's only fair that you be extra annoyed. As a technical editor and rewriter for many years you have undoubtedly pissed off many people yourself.

  2. Prior art on Microsoft. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    So Nightingale devised clever ways of presenting the information in charts.

    So, in other words, she invented PowerPoint.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Prior art on Microsoft. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I never understood the name PowerPoint. Why would you name a presentation program "Electrical Outlet"???

      For the same reason we named our planet "Dirt" - self-esteem issues ...

    2. Re:Prior art on Microsoft. by bXTr · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the same reason we named our planet "Dirt"

      which, ironically, has 2/3 of its surface covered by water. I guess "Mud" would have been a better choice.

      --
      It's a very dark ride.
  3. Better graph by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I searched around for a more readable graph and found one here, at the bottom of the page.

  4. Thanks to her, I get it by Forrest+Kyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if it wasn't for Ms. Nightingale, I would never have understood the deleterious effect my cat was having on my homework performance, as it might never have been properly explained.

  5. Mod me down, but you know I'm right by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If she'd been a man presenting this, she'd have made the equivalent of surgeon general in her career. -_- No joke--Despite the blessing of Queen Victoria herself, she was denied a chairman position that oversaw general health affairs in the military. I doubt there's an academic statistics book currently in circulation that gives her any credit for this. Even this--a zine read by only a tiny, tiny fraction of the people who go to school every year and rely on her innovation. Hell, the entire field of field medicine was in disrepute at that time in history -- who needs medicine? Most nurses spent at least part of their time in the kitchen, which was viewed as more important. She made it important. It's been two centuries since then and she's still only a footnote. Today, graphical statistics are used in every trained discipline from engineering to medicine to management, but nobody knows this woman's name. They should -- they owe her a lot.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe; from the little I know she seemed very capable. But conversely, if she was a man nobody would feel the need to write an article about it.

      You're absolutely right, nobody would feel they had to. When a woman is acknowledged it's out of pity or some emotive source. When a man is acknowledged it's because of his (objective) accomplishments. Two hundred years and you've just underscored how very little things have changed. When people no longer have to go out of their way to find and honor the contributions of women, when their names simply added to the book without a second thought -- then we'll have progress.

      Thank you for showing us just how deeply sexism pervades our society, even amongst the most technical and literate of the population (like here, on slashdot).

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    2. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... even amongst the most technical and literate of the population (like here, on slashdot).

      Ah ha ... now there's where you went wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, all statistics books I've read that have a section on history mention her graphs, and Charles Joseph Minard's graph of Napoleons losses in Russia. Most people I've meet and discussed statistics with have heard this before, and I was taught it like the first week of class, so save me the bleeding heart rant about social injustice.

      So she didn't get to a high station because she was a woman in a society thats over 100 years dead, that really sucks for her, but only marginally relevant today.

    4. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by Xiroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I completely agree that she was not given the prestiege due her while she was alive, I think you underestimate her fame in the time since. There have been monuments erected in her honour, museums named after her, and books, television shows, and no fewer than 4 films about her, and I think she could reasonably accurate be described as a household name today (who hasn't at least heard the name?). Most of them concentrate on her contribution to our understanding of sanitation (in which she was truly revolutionary) and nursing, but I do not think that she could reasonably be described as lacking in recognition in the modern era.

    5. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the problems facing this country were government actions killing whole races then it would be relevant today, as it stands the Holocaust is marginally relevant today.

      If slavery existed in this country than abolitionism would be relevant today. It is not.

      The constitution is still relevant today because the issue of the rights and power of the government is still ongoing, the rights of slaves and Jews aren't. Battles fought, won, buried. womans lib is still hanging on.

      I understand history very well, and I stand by my statement. Womans lib has destroyed itself through success. It has become marginalized in todays society because there really isn't any systematic discrimination left for them to strike down. I'm sure you'll disagree with that statement, but I have stopped listening to fringe groups spout about their relevance years ago, be them Marxists, La Rouch, Gold-bugs, neo-cons or feminists. If your so big on womans lib go to Afghanistan where there are still battles to be fought. In the US all thats left is marginalized gripes about textbooks, maternity leave, sexual advertising, and pushing statistically dubious arguments about wage gaps.

    6. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You are talking about successors, not the parent issues now, Hard Labor for a crime is a far cry ethically from forced labor. Lessons are learned from past events, society moves on, the arguments from those past events are then marginally applicable, and are changed into something new, Thesis vs. anti-thesis creates a new synthesis, leading to new arguments about new issues. The arguments of VHS v. Beta are not applicable today even if the debate of blue ray and HDDVD were similar and drew a lot of lessons from it. Womans Lib has died down because there are not a lot of arguments to be won about equality of the sexes. There is still progress to be made but nothing like what has been made. Nightengale's patriarchal repression IS only marginally relevant seeing as she would be surgeon general in todays society.

      Consider this as my challenge to your statement: Go to work for the next week in female attire appropriate to your work environment and tell me how well that works for you.

      Why would I? I know what will happen and so do you, but it doesn't mean jack about systematic discrimination. The social mores that exist have more to do with Sexual Dimorphism and gender differences that even baboons exhibit. I will guarantee you they are supported just as strongly by women It is not patriarchal repression that makes dumb girls slaves to fashion, but the same force that also makes dumb men slaves to power tools and guns. You can rail against gender differences if you want, I've yet to hear a good argument though.

      Besides I look terrible in Heels :-p

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Dr. John Snow by mcubed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to take away from Nightingale's achievements, but the most groundbreaking and impactful innovation in graphical representation of disease vectors came from Dr. John Snow, who created a map of SoHo's (London) devastating 1854 cholera outbreak that convincingly made the case that cholera was water born and not the result of miasma. The medical establishment at the time largely dismissed Snow's findings, but the power of the graphical representation convinced the people it needed to in the end and Snow's theories were ultimately vindictated. Unfortunately, Snow didn't live long enough to see his ultimate triumph. Some speculate that his habit of experiementing on himself with ether and chlorophorm may have contributed to his early demise. (Snow was also a pioneering anathesiologist, and even assisted in the birth of Queen Victoria's eight and rather difficult childbirth.) All this is recounted in Steven Johnson's excellent book The Ghost Map (2006). He talks about Nightingale as well, though not about her charts and graphs. Nightingale was, at least through the 1850s a proponent of the eventually discreted miasma theory.

    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."