Slashdot Mirror


Florence Nightingale, Statistical Graphics Pioneer

Science News has a fascinating look at an under-appreciated corner of the career of Florence Nightingale — as an innovator in the use of statistical graphics to argue for social change. Nightingale returned from the Crimean War a heroine in the eyes of the British citizenry, for the soldiers' lives she had saved. But she came to appreciate that the way to save far more lives was to reform attitudes in the military about sanitation. Under the tutelage of William Farr, who had just invented the field of medical statistics, she compiled overwhelming evidence (in the form of an 830-page report) of the need for change. "As impressive as her statistics were, Nightingale worried that Queen Victoria's eyes would glaze over as she scanned the tables. So Nightingale devised clever ways of presenting the information in charts. Statistics had been presented using graphics only a few times previously, and perhaps never to persuade people of the need for social change."

25 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. oh god by BigBadBus · · Score: 5, Informative

    For Christ's sake, spell her name right.

    1. Re:oh god by shanen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is /., remember? You're asking far too much to expect the so-called editors to use a spelling checker. Which came first, /. or the toilet?

      (I'm just extra annoyed since I've been a professional technical editor and rewriter for some years. Now after the nameless morons get through playing their moderation games I'll probably be seriously pissed--but that's the primary reaction I ever have to /. these days. I'm convinced that /. is just another interesting idea run into the ground.)

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:oh god by xs650 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "(I'm just extra annoyed since I've been a professional technical editor and rewriter for some years. "

      It's only fair that you be extra annoyed. As a technical editor and rewriter for many years you have undoubtedly pissed off many people yourself.

    3. Re:oh god by Garridan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not goth, you cad. She was Victorian!

  2. Prior art on Microsoft. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    So Nightingale devised clever ways of presenting the information in charts.

    So, in other words, she invented PowerPoint.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Prior art on Microsoft. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I never understood the name PowerPoint. Why would you name a presentation program "Electrical Outlet"???

      For the same reason we named our planet "Dirt" - self-esteem issues ...

    2. Re:Prior art on Microsoft. by bXTr · · Score: 5, Funny

      For the same reason we named our planet "Dirt"

      which, ironically, has 2/3 of its surface covered by water. I guess "Mud" would have been a better choice.

      --
      It's a very dark ride.
    3. Re:Prior art on Microsoft. by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The fault isn't the tool, the fault is education.

      I can hardly count the number of managers I've met who've claimed to be "visual thinkers". Without denying such a thing might exist, I've seldom seen any evidence of outstanding "visual reasoning" from such people.

      For example, I often use diagrams as an adjunct to my reasoning, and find that "visual thinkers" often have strong opinions about the aesthetic aspects of these diagrams. Seldom is the opinion about things in the diagram that carry semantic information: spatial, thematic or topological relationships for example. Furthermore, their aesthetic contributions aren't very aesthetically sophisticated, demonstrating of bad typography choices, cluttered compositions, insensitivity to color complementarity and value.

      I call their claims into doubt because I have known unusual individuals who could be described as visual thinkers. One was an architect who was nearly incomprehensible without a pencil in his hand, but wonderfully eloquent with one. None of these people ever claimed to be "visual thinkers", as if that were a loftier kind of cognition. I suspect that's because it is not how a "visual thinker" would conceive of or express the distinction between themselves and "normal".

      It is my opinion that the popularity of claiming to be a "visual thinker" stems from "visual reasoning" not being part of most people's education. An opinion justified as "visual thinking" is therefore unlikely to meet an informed challenge. Put most "visual thinkers" in front of a panel of artists or architects, and they will be reluctant to claim that label for themselves.

      I happen to think that computer based presentations are very useful communications tools, but you really have to start by having something worth saying.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  3. Better graph by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I searched around for a more readable graph and found one here, at the bottom of the page.

    1. Re:Better graph by xaxa · · Score: 3, Informative

      You could have read the page the post you're replying to links to:
      You and I are shown graphs every day. Some are honest; many are misleading. Nightingale could, for example, have scaled deaths according to the radius, instead of the area, of the segments. That would've strengthened her case. But it would've misled people, since area is what the eye sees.

  4. Thanks to her, I get it by Forrest+Kyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    So if it wasn't for Ms. Nightingale, I would never have understood the deleterious effect my cat was having on my homework performance, as it might never have been properly explained.

  5. Mod me down, but you know I'm right by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If she'd been a man presenting this, she'd have made the equivalent of surgeon general in her career. -_- No joke--Despite the blessing of Queen Victoria herself, she was denied a chairman position that oversaw general health affairs in the military. I doubt there's an academic statistics book currently in circulation that gives her any credit for this. Even this--a zine read by only a tiny, tiny fraction of the people who go to school every year and rely on her innovation. Hell, the entire field of field medicine was in disrepute at that time in history -- who needs medicine? Most nurses spent at least part of their time in the kitchen, which was viewed as more important. She made it important. It's been two centuries since then and she's still only a footnote. Today, graphical statistics are used in every trained discipline from engineering to medicine to management, but nobody knows this woman's name. They should -- they owe her a lot.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But conversely, if she was a man nobody would feel the need to write an article about it.

      Of course they would: great people are great people, and their accomplishments stand by themselves. The difference is, if she were a man, her (uh, his) sex wouldn't be worthy of note.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe; from the little I know she seemed very capable. But conversely, if she was a man nobody would feel the need to write an article about it.

      You're absolutely right, nobody would feel they had to. When a woman is acknowledged it's out of pity or some emotive source. When a man is acknowledged it's because of his (objective) accomplishments. Two hundred years and you've just underscored how very little things have changed. When people no longer have to go out of their way to find and honor the contributions of women, when their names simply added to the book without a second thought -- then we'll have progress.

      Thank you for showing us just how deeply sexism pervades our society, even amongst the most technical and literate of the population (like here, on slashdot).

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    3. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... even amongst the most technical and literate of the population (like here, on slashdot).

      Ah ha ... now there's where you went wrong.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, all statistics books I've read that have a section on history mention her graphs, and Charles Joseph Minard's graph of Napoleons losses in Russia. Most people I've meet and discussed statistics with have heard this before, and I was taught it like the first week of class, so save me the bleeding heart rant about social injustice.

      So she didn't get to a high station because she was a woman in a society thats over 100 years dead, that really sucks for her, but only marginally relevant today.

    5. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >She made it important. It's been two centuries since then and she's still only a footnote.

      I don't know about that. She was possibly one of only three important people in the history of medicine that I learned about when I was a child here in the UK. And my impression was that she was somewhat sainted (despite any lack of formal 'establishment' status); regarded as a genuine heroine to be lauded by all.

      (The others were Alexander Fleming and Louis Pasteur).

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    6. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by Xiroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I completely agree that she was not given the prestiege due her while she was alive, I think you underestimate her fame in the time since. There have been monuments erected in her honour, museums named after her, and books, television shows, and no fewer than 4 films about her, and I think she could reasonably accurate be described as a household name today (who hasn't at least heard the name?). Most of them concentrate on her contribution to our understanding of sanitation (in which she was truly revolutionary) and nursing, but I do not think that she could reasonably be described as lacking in recognition in the modern era.

    7. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If the problems facing this country were government actions killing whole races then it would be relevant today, as it stands the Holocaust is marginally relevant today.

      If slavery existed in this country than abolitionism would be relevant today. It is not.

      The constitution is still relevant today because the issue of the rights and power of the government is still ongoing, the rights of slaves and Jews aren't. Battles fought, won, buried. womans lib is still hanging on.

      I understand history very well, and I stand by my statement. Womans lib has destroyed itself through success. It has become marginalized in todays society because there really isn't any systematic discrimination left for them to strike down. I'm sure you'll disagree with that statement, but I have stopped listening to fringe groups spout about their relevance years ago, be them Marxists, La Rouch, Gold-bugs, neo-cons or feminists. If your so big on womans lib go to Afghanistan where there are still battles to be fought. In the US all thats left is marginalized gripes about textbooks, maternity leave, sexual advertising, and pushing statistically dubious arguments about wage gaps.

    8. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You are talking about successors, not the parent issues now, Hard Labor for a crime is a far cry ethically from forced labor. Lessons are learned from past events, society moves on, the arguments from those past events are then marginally applicable, and are changed into something new, Thesis vs. anti-thesis creates a new synthesis, leading to new arguments about new issues. The arguments of VHS v. Beta are not applicable today even if the debate of blue ray and HDDVD were similar and drew a lot of lessons from it. Womans Lib has died down because there are not a lot of arguments to be won about equality of the sexes. There is still progress to be made but nothing like what has been made. Nightengale's patriarchal repression IS only marginally relevant seeing as she would be surgeon general in todays society.

      Consider this as my challenge to your statement: Go to work for the next week in female attire appropriate to your work environment and tell me how well that works for you.

      Why would I? I know what will happen and so do you, but it doesn't mean jack about systematic discrimination. The social mores that exist have more to do with Sexual Dimorphism and gender differences that even baboons exhibit. I will guarantee you they are supported just as strongly by women It is not patriarchal repression that makes dumb girls slaves to fashion, but the same force that also makes dumb men slaves to power tools and guns. You can rail against gender differences if you want, I've yet to hear a good argument though.

      Besides I look terrible in Heels :-p

    9. Re:Mod me down, but you know I'm right by ErkDemon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yeah, there's a classic little book by Darrell Huff called "How To Lie With Statistics", and it credits FN with being a pioneer in the art of the misleading graph. :)

      FN wanted the Crimean statistics to look as horrifying as possible.

      The little Huff book is excellent, and very well known (and inexpensive!), so I think that most people who've read a bit about statistics probably already know the Florence Nightingale story.

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Credit? by Jeheto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nightingale didn't get the credit she deserved, but I don't think that credit is really what matters here. Yes, she did it, but shouldn't we look at the results rather than the person who caused them? I do not know much about Nightingale, but most people who choose to work in the medical field back then did it out of selflessness. You didn't become a doctor because you wanted glory, you became a doctor because you wanted to help people.

  8. From a bio of Nightingale by Lucy Parsons by influenza · · Score: 3, Interesting

    History is full of women who's contributions have been forgotten. Another one is Lucy Parsons. Her and her husband were anarchist labour leaders in Chicago where they helped organize the events known as the Haymarket Riots which gave the rest of the world May Day.

    The Chicago police called her "more dangerous than a thousand rioters" and she was a major influence on labor politics until she died in a house fire in 1942 that also consumed most of her many writings.

    In 1905 she wrote this piece for The Liberator, published October 22:

    FAMOUS WOMEN OF HISTORY: Florence Nightingale

    Amid the general consternation, the minister of war wrote a letter to Miss Nightingale, stating that he considered her the only person in Great Britain capable of bringing order out of confusion, and imploring her to organize and direct the reform of the military hospitals; and this letter was crossed by one from Miss Nightingale, volunteering to place her strength and ability at the service of her nation. Good trained nurses were almost unknown quantities in those days; yet, nothing daunted, Florence Nightingale sailed from England with thirty of the best nurses that she could muster within the week from her letter. In required a good deal of tact to overcome the prejudices and jealousies among the physicians and surgeons at the "womanly prominence" and the conciliate the general disapproval of medical and military officials. For these were the days when it was considered that "the proper place for the woman is at home."

    Overcoming professional jealousy, she set herself to the task of cleansing the Augean hospitals containing over 4,000 patients. These barrack hospitals at Scutari, which had been loaned to the British government by the Sultan of Turkey, were 100 feet above the Bosporus. The day before the arrival of the staff of nurses the wounded from Balaclava had been landed; packed in the overcrowded transports, their wounds had not been dressed for five days, and cholera and fever were reaping their fearful harvest. The poor men outside with cold and starvation were faring far better than the sufferers in the tainted wards of the disordered hospitals.

    -------------

    I got this out of "Lucy Parsons: Freedom, Equality and Solidarity".

    Off the top of my head, some other woman who have been mostly forgotten include Elizabeth Gurley Flynn (a co-founder of the ACLU), Ada Lovelace (perhaps earliest programmer), Hedy Lamarr (co-invented spread spectrum wireless communications years before it was technologically practical to implement, but better known for being a babe). How many people here know the name Rosalind Franklin? All of these women and many more excelled in male dominated fields.

  9. Dr. John Snow by mcubed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to take away from Nightingale's achievements, but the most groundbreaking and impactful innovation in graphical representation of disease vectors came from Dr. John Snow, who created a map of SoHo's (London) devastating 1854 cholera outbreak that convincingly made the case that cholera was water born and not the result of miasma. The medical establishment at the time largely dismissed Snow's findings, but the power of the graphical representation convinced the people it needed to in the end and Snow's theories were ultimately vindictated. Unfortunately, Snow didn't live long enough to see his ultimate triumph. Some speculate that his habit of experiementing on himself with ether and chlorophorm may have contributed to his early demise. (Snow was also a pioneering anathesiologist, and even assisted in the birth of Queen Victoria's eight and rather difficult childbirth.) All this is recounted in Steven Johnson's excellent book The Ghost Map (2006). He talks about Nightingale as well, though not about her charts and graphs. Nightingale was, at least through the 1850s a proponent of the eventually discreted miasma theory.

    --
    "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."