Slashdot Mirror


2,100-Year-Old Antikythera Device Recreated In Working Form

coondoggie writes "A new working model of the mysterious 2,100-year-old astronomical calculator, dubbed the Antikythera Device, has been unveiled, incorporating the most recent discoveries announced two years ago by an international team of researchers. The new model was demonstrated by its creator, former museum curator Michael Wright, who had created an earlier model based on decades of study."

62 of 258 comments (clear)

  1. Poor guy should have asked around by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny
    I feel bad now, I could have saved him years of work -- I still have an original Antikythera 01 on my desk here at work.

    I keep asking my boss for a new machine, but apparently the quad-core boxes are reserved for managers with important work to do like using Powerpoint and surfing for softcore pornography.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Poor guy should have asked around by empesey · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're wasting your time. I picked mine up at the Antik Road Show.

    2. Re:Poor guy should have asked around by The_Rook · · Score: 2, Funny

      have you installed linux on it yet?

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    3. Re:Poor guy should have asked around by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Linux can run on any device that has a C compiler. It wouldn't surprise me if a machine designed by the ancient Greeks could compile C, because it's one of the ancient languages.

    4. Re:Poor guy should have asked around by bursch-X · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Greek actually used the programming language Gamma which was the predecessor of "C".

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    5. Re:Poor guy should have asked around by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I picked mine up at the Antik Road Show.

      All right, enough of these silly antiks.
           

  2. ,100-Year-Old Antikythera Device Recreated in Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm prokythera, you insensitive clod.

  3. Why so down? by elysiuan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surprised with all the negativity. Studying cryptic machines that change the way we view technology's historical progression and after years of work crafting a working replica hardly seems worthy of scorn.

    1. Re:Why so down? by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are just down because they didn't come up with it first.

      Plus people like to take pride that we are much more advanced then we were 2000 years ago.
      However after the burning of the Library of Alexandra it sent man kind 1000 years back in progress. The thousands of years after have been in general very tough for human survival only for the past 500 years or so have we caught up, but before that the concept of playing with gears and realizing that if you have a small one and a large one they move at different speeds was to academic and in general worthless as it didn't put food on the table.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Why so down? by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, there'll be a quake or duke nukem port soon enough.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    3. Re:Why so down? by devotedlhasa · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...but enough about COBOL...

    4. Re:Why so down? by kandela · · Score: 5, Funny

      First uttered by the Librarian of Alexandra 1000 years ago, "I'll back it up tomorrow."

      --
      Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
    5. Re:Why so down? by E++99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus people like to take pride that we are much more advanced then we were 2000 years ago.

      Or rather, they get defensive, worrying that we AREN'T more advanced than we were 2,000 years ago. We're definitely more advanced if we get to pick the definition of "advanced", but that's not saying much. My definition of "advanced" would rest more on public morality and virtue than on technology; as would, incidentally, all the Greek philosophers' from Pythagoras to Aristotle. I see the era of this device, around 500 BC -- an era that included not only Plato and Socrates and their followers in the West, but Confucius and Lao-Tzu and their followers in the East -- a pinnacle of civilization that we have yet to again match.

    6. Re:Why so down? by lee1026 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The same era where slavery was common? It will take a very creative moral system to claim that era was one of morality.

    7. Re:Why so down? by ljgshkg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, slavery already stopped long before 500BC in China. At that time, China has already gone through a few hundred years of war. The need of talents in all these countries and the fight between royal families and nobilities brought warriors/heros, philosophers, strategists, and scholars etc. into highest positions of governments, which will very soon end the era of feudalism in the "country", which later form a periodic country wide examination to select all levels of government officers.

      Well, it's actually not feudalism, but somewhat in between feudalism and a union of Chinese countires, as warlords were already fighting as if the "middle kingdom" (the "leading country" of the "union") didn't exist.

    8. Re:Why so down? by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Library of Alexandra was in essence a place you can go to find all the knowledge of the known world, allowing a place to go to seek knowledge in an environment that will let you do so.

      All true, and they also followed a somewhat "information wants to be free" philosophy. The Library of Alexandria reportedly had a policy that any ship that entered it's harbor was to surrender any texts or writings they had on board to the library for them to be copied by the scribes and added to the library before being returned to the ship of origin.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  4. i am afraid by sleepy_sanchez · · Score: 5, Funny

    and so starts the story of Sylar, the villain watchmaker.

  5. Antikythera by EdZ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank goodness we're prepared for when the sinister Kythera device is unearthed.

    1. Re:Antikythera by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Funny

      A Shrubbery?

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    2. Re:Antikythera by WoodenTable · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, I don't know. Some of the old Forum posts about it were pretty freaking hilarious.

  6. Re:Really? by 2short · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not that the mechanism is amazing by modern standards that is interesting. It's not not even that the mechanism must have been amazing by the standards of the time when it was manufatured. It's that the mechanism is amazing by the standards of at least 1000 years after it was apparently manufactured. Historians find stuff like that interesting; sorry you're not impressed.

  7. Failed Order by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's a good chance that it was a custom job made for Hipparchus, either for his lab or to impress the king.

    "Hi, this is Hipparchus. I placed a custom order for an Antikythera about 8 months ago."

    "Oh, we shipped that out. It looks like there was a problem with the delivery... Ah, here we go. The boat sank."

    "What? I've got to present that next week!"

    "I'm sorry, did you buy shipping insurance? It doesn't show here on the invoice that you paid for insurance."

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    1. Re:Failed Order by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 5, Funny

      I see you are a Dell customer...

    2. Re:Failed Order by CarpetShark · · Score: 2, Informative

      That sounds a lot like my experience ordering from Dell actually. I'll never forget that "world shortage of glass" line they gave me as an excuse for my monitors being delayed. They were flatpanels.

    3. Re:Failed Order by jcr · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'll never forget that "world shortage of glass" line they gave me as an excuse for my monitors being delayed. They were flatpanels.

      I don't think they were lying to you. I recall hearing about a fire a couple of years ago at some plant in Japan that specialized in glass for LCD substrates. It affected Samsung and Matsushita.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  8. Judging by the above coments... by nitsnipe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It looks like Digg has invaded slashdot. Anyways, The fact that 2 millennia ago some were able to make a calculator to predict eclipses is astounding, taking into consideration the religious beliefs and the gullibility of the masses on those times.

    1. Re:Judging by the above coments... by rts008 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...taking into consideration the religious beliefs and the gullibility of the masses on those times."

      And scientists today are still struggling up this same mountain.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    2. Re:Judging by the above coments... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, especially as it was those religious beliefs that allowed this device to be created in the first place, or did you miss the part about the Babylonian priests? Good God, can't you people get off your Anti-Religion Flaming Horse for one thread a day?

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    3. Re:Judging by the above coments... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, especially as it was those religious beliefs that allowed this device to be created in the first place, or did you miss the part about the Babylonian priests? Good God, can't you people get off your Anti-Religion Flaming Horse for one thread a day?

      Tell me more about the horse. That sounds awesome.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Judging by the above coments... by cromar · · Score: 2

      All in all, we're not. There are still a few problems. (Obviously!) However, the climate in Ancient Greece, Arabia, hell, even apparently Ancient Egypt wasn't so ridiculous as during the European Dark Ages, which is what I think you are generally referring to. This is probably the best time for Science in the history of Humanity. (IANA Historian.)

    5. Re:Judging by the above coments... by Leafheart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People seem to forget a lot that a lot of the most brilliant science developments for a long time was due mainly to religion. Go no far than all that astronomy, mathematics, physiology, trigonometry have to thanks the Arab Sufis and scientists of old. And all their motivation were base on spreading and understanding Islam.

      If you go further back you see for example the Maya Calendar, was that an Atheistic scientist who devised and created? No, it was probably a bunch of priest working with the paradigms of their religion.

      Today religion (mainly fundamentalist Catholicism and Islam) is one of the forces that drives us back in therms of knowledge. But that was not always true

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
  9. What putz tagged his !tech? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You do realize that technology existed prior to computers, do you not? How the heck is this not technology?

            Brett

  10. That's crazy talk! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I keep asking my boss for a new machine

    That's crazy talk. If you keep that up you'll soon be in charge of legacy systems. No, this is not a troll!

  11. Something of note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Kythera was the name of the island it was found near, thus anti-kythera means it was found off the coast of the island.

    It's what we call it, we have no idea what they would have called it.

  12. Is it on ThinkGeek yet? by erroneus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd love to get one of these for my shelf or desk somewhere. I wonder if someone would make these and sell them on ThinkGeek.com? Another good question might be whether or not someone has modelled the device in OpenGL? It would make a really cool screensaver!

  13. Re:How come... by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...when I go to Slashdot.org, I get Wired.com?

    Actually, worse. You get NetworkWorld... AGAIN.

    NetworkWorld's sock puppets are working overtime for Christmas. This is at least the 3rd story in 24 hours or so to make slashdot. Sad, desperate, or what? Mind you, if you've read any of their site you'll understand why they need to spam to get readers.

    This story was on the BBC months ago by the way.

  14. Tag: Stargate? by pcardno · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How did someone miss that opportunity? :-(

    --
    --- Band: Joey Ultra
  15. It's sad, not amazing by mangu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's that the mechanism is amazing by the standards of at least 1000 years after it was apparently manufactured

    The Greeks and Romans had some clever inventions. The sad part is that all the efforts they did at math and engineering came to a stop, and most of it got lost during the Middle Ages. If you travel through southern Europe, you'll see several engineering works, like the Pont du Gard, Coliseum, Arles amphitheatre, etc, which had no equal a thousand years after they were built.

    It's a bit frightening that any intellectual progress was stopped for a thousand years, and I wonder could it happen again?

    1. Re:It's sad, not amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even 8 years of George W Bush was not enough to completely halt mankind's intellectual advancement; I think your concern is unwarranted.

    2. Re:It's sad, not amazing by tick-tock-atona · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, much Greek and Roman knowledge was retained and built upon by the Islamic Empire during the Islamic Golden Age, from the 8th to the 16th century.

    3. Re:It's sad, not amazing by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative

      in the so called middle ages

      They were first called so in no derogative sense, "middle" here means between antiquity and the newest ages. The term "Middle Ages" got such a negative connotation exactly because of that extreme lack of progress that only an Anonymous Coward could possibly deny.

      Europe went into the dark ages barely able to smelt iron, and come out of it as a world beating civilisation[SIC] able to project its power across the globe

      Strictly speaking, no one in the world was able to cast iron before the 15th century. But that doesn't mean they couldn't make useful objects of steel and iron. You don't need to completely melt the metal, there are other ways to work it.

      There was more 'progress' during that 1000 years than during the entirety of the Roman Empire.

      BULLSHIT. The Middle Ages in Europe was a period of complete savagery. They couldn't even take a bath, the great aqueducts built by the Romans lay in ruins, to the point that a disease carried by fleas wiped out a half of the European population.

    4. Re:It's sad, not amazing by E++99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Note that some of ancient Greek technology has still not been equaled by all our industrial and scientific progress -- for example their bronzework. There is no machine and no person on the planet who could reproduce a Greek bronze helmet. We have no idea how they could have done it. Similarly, it is only in the last 100 years that our understanding of metallurgy has increased to the point where we can understand what's going on in the traditional process of Samurai sword making. But if that tradition hadn't been preserved, like the Greek bronzework tradition hasn't been, there's nothing in our knowledge base that would allow us to create a sword with the capabilities of those swords -- despite our knowledge of the metallurgical principles used.

    5. Re:It's sad, not amazing by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you travel through southern Europe, you'll see several engineering works, like the Pont du Gard, Coliseum, Arles amphitheatre, etc, which had no equal a thousand years after they were built.

      A WHOLE thousand years, eh?

      I think you need to take a detour to Egypt...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:It's sad, not amazing by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe some ancient lawmakers managed to extend copyrights and patents to 1000 years...

    7. Re:It's sad, not amazing by stdarg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoa, whoa, 16th century? Are you joking? First of all, they were already in decline by then. Second, isn't that a ridiculously long period of time for a *golden* age? I mean typically that phrase is reserved for a fairly short period of time where these is an extreme and unusual level of achievement, like the best part of a great ruler's reign. If it lasts for 800 years then it's not extreme OR unusual. I mean that's like almost 60% of their entire history... how can so much of it be considered golden? Isn't there like a top 5% period that would be much more appropriate?

      Sorry but my BS meter on PC insanity is going off the scale.

  16. Origins and uses by Whiteox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There was an article a few months ago about this that stated that the mechanism was used to calculate Olympiads.
    That was the first interpretation of the mechanism. Now the model shows that it was much more than that as it can predict eclipses and planetary positions.

    As for it not being a 'computer' I disagree. There are two forms of computers, analog and digital. An analog computer is basically a measuring device like a ruler or slide rule, thermometer and so on.
    The mechanism is definitely an analog computer.
    The Greeks were very good at building gadgets and even extremely large hydro-mechanical machines. Most of these constructions were used in temples to simulate thunder, automatic opening and closing doors, automated movement of objects (think Temple of Doom).
    Their skill was renown in the ancient world and the mechanism is a tribute to their ingenuity.
     

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  17. 3D lighting pictures of the Device by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This page is kind of fun, showing HP's technology where they light the mechanism from lots of angles and photograph them. (Needs Java).

  18. They weren't gullible THEN by mangu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    taking into consideration the religious beliefs and the gullibility of the masses on those times

    No, that gullibility part only came into effect some 500 years later, when someone convinced people that a woman could remain a virgin after giving birth to a child. This belief was formally adopted into Christian doctrine in the year 431 AD, which more or less marks the start of a thousand years when all intellectual progress in Europe stood still.

    1. Re:They weren't gullible THEN by Leafheart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ancient Greeks had much weirder stories.

      But none of it stopped them doing science.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
  19. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lame.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Not so amazing inventions. by mosb1000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In 2000 years, our space faring decedents may say the same thing about space travel. "They put this space capsule on the moon and these robots on mars, it's too bad that all that intellectual progress was reversed in the 1000 years to follow".

    But the technology we have today isn't really capable of space travel (look how expensive and impractical it is). These Greek and Roman inventions are the same. You can't really use that steam engine to do any work, and it is impractical to build those kind of structures with your hands or with animal power.

    Today's steam engines, and internal combustion engines, on the other hand, can really make building those kind of structures possible on a large scale.

    1. Re:Not so amazing inventions. by Petrushka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      These Greek and Roman inventions are the same. You can't really use that steam engine to do any work, and it is impractical to build those kind of structures with your hands or with animal power.

      That's true with respect to some of the more abstract tricks they discovered and couldn't find a use for -- the steam engine, as you mentioned, or parabolic mirrors -- but there are an awful lot of areas where the ancient Greeks and Romans did indeed make full practical use of technologies that were lost for more than a millennium afterwards. The GPP mentioned architecture and building technology, which is a biggie. There's also road layout, sewerage, military tactics, field medicine, firefighting technology, and a whole lot more. So it is reasonable to regard the Middle Ages as a reversal in many ways.

      However, the rot set in earlier than most people think. A lot of it gets blamed on the rise of religious sects and the destruction of the library at Alexandria, but I see those as symptoms more than causes. A few centuries earlier there were lots of important libraries. If that had still been the case when the Alexandrian library was finally destroyed -- whenever that was -- its destruction wouldn't have mattered nearly as much.

    2. Re:Not so amazing inventions. by the_womble · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You could also credit Christianity with the paving the way for science with the idea of a lawful universe - particularly given the number of devout Christians who contributed to science: Mendel, Newton, etc.

      Also Christianity does not teach that the material world does not matter. The afterlife is what matters, but what happens in this world determines what happens in the after life.

      Do you not think that the collapse of the Roman Empire and barbarian invasions might just have had something to do with the loss of knowledge?

      Who in Europe continued maintainning libraries and preserving knowledge through this period? The church, and monasteries in particular.

    3. Re:Not so amazing inventions. by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Funny

      But apart from the steam engine, parabolic mirrors, architecture and building technology, road layout, sewerage, military tactics, field medicine and firefighting technology what have the Romans and Greeks ever done for us?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Not so amazing inventions. by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So it is reasonable to regard the Middle Ages as a reversal in many ways.

      But if it weren't for the middle ages we wouldn't have Monty Python and the Holy Grail now.

  21. Re:Really? by E++99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not that the mechanism is amazing by modern standards that is interesting.

    I think it's pretty amazing by modern standards. If you watch the video, there's a "clock hand" for every visible planet. That wouldn't be so impressive if it were heleocentric... just a bunch of simple gears. But it's geocentric, which means that depending on the relative position to the earth, sometimes they're going forward and sometimes backwards, and sometimes standing still. And the position of the moon is not based on a circular orbit, but implements Hipparchus's complex epicycle algorithm for the lunar cycle. If there are more impressive modern mechanical designs, I don't know what they are.

  22. Re:RELIGON KILLS THE MOST PEOPLE by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 4, Informative

    Directly and indirectly, religon has been responsible for more people dying than any other cause EVER.

    I see this often, but it's just plain wrong.

    Secular leaders ushering in various forms of extreme socialism managed to surpass it in a single century, and general nationalism was far ahead of it anyway.

    It was true 5000 years ago. And it's still true today.

    Religion was the top killer 5000 years ago? I'd love to see your sources for that.

  23. Re:Look, I know you're trolling but... by mangu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Europe in general was in a period of declining agricultural output, and not surprisingly, was concerned primarily with feeding themselves first.

    A natural consequence of declining technology

    It withstood repeated invasions by Muslim conquerors on two fronts

    Nature abhors a vacuum. If you are seen as ignorant savages, other people will try to invade.

    Not to mention a few bouts with the Plague which killed about 1/3 of Europe

    A disease carried by fleas, a consequence of the abolition of the Roman habit of bathing. To take a bath one needs to undress, nakedness might lead to sex, and virginity equals holiness according to the Roman Catholic church.

    And in spite of the above, the Catholic Church started the University system

    You mean the same church that burned the library of Alexandria and flayed and burned alive the librarian on a Christian church altar? The same church that burned alive a man who dared to question the official scientific "truth"? The same church that forced one of the inventors of the scientific method to deny his own discoveries?

  24. Re:RELIGON KILLS THE MOST PEOPLE by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Face it, the only thing that can motivate people to mass-murder is an irrational, unjustified belief in some sort of bullshit worldview. ... The most monstrous crimes against humanity have invariably been inspired by unjustified belief. It is the propensity for people to ignorantly believe in religious or religion-analogous movements that is the problem

    And the only thing that can motivate them to stark rationalism is? I dont see where Atheism is the answer. If I read you right it is Faith itself and not religion that is the problem. So why not hate every faith based thing? Why chose religion for your ire?

    Face it, the only thing that can motivate people to mass-murder is an irrational, unjustified belief in some sort of bullshit worldview.

    True. And Atheism solves this how? Honestly Atheism is becoming one of them with every post like yours. Welcome Cog of the Machine. And you wind up with a religion flame, yet you encompase every *ism known with that. Anarchy is great until you have to live in it. Can you get a drink from the tap in your house? Does your Internet/phone/TV work? Thank the people that keep Anarchy at bay then.

    Sera

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  25. Why Rome Fell by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The death of the roman empire was certain before it was born. The whole empire survived on the labor of others. But by looting those other people, they were slowly destroying the source of their livelihood. They starved people to build the colosseum and their aquanauts and to supply their grand army. It was continued growth that sustained them, but once they had expanded as far as they could, the rot set in. It was only a matter of time before the barbarian hordes invaded, but Rome was long gone by that time.

    This is not unlike our financial market which is basically a ponzi scheme dependent on continued growth to guarantee returns and sustain many people's needlessly lavish lifestyles. Of course it will come crashing down! Do you really think it can grow forever? There are only so many people and so many resources on the earth, and we have nowhere else to go.

  26. Re:In that case.... by ideonode · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beowulf imagined a cluster of one of these!

  27. Re:RELIGON KILLS THE MOST PEOPLE by YttriumOxide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And the only thing that can motivate them to stark rationalism is? I dont see where Atheism is the answer. If I read you right it is Faith itself and not religion that is the problem. So why not hate every faith based thing? Why chose religion for your ire?

    Most people that consider themselves atheist ARE against all "faith based things" - it's just that religion is the most pervasive and damaging one in our society at present, and so is an important target. If religion were stamped out tomorrow, we would probably then be complaining primarily about horoscopes in the newspaper (they cause people to act irrationally and often to the detriment of the society around them, so while it's nowhere near as bad as religion, that would be next on my personal hit-list).

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan