Slashdot Mirror


"Smash Your Hard Drive" To Fight Identity Theft

Will Do This For Free writes "BBC News has a story about the only fireproof way of safeguarding your personal information when dumping your old computer: 'It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens. [...] The more thoroughly the better.' This sounds like so much fun that I almost feel like doing it right now. Let me press Submit Story first."

100 of 527 comments (clear)

  1. "The only fireproof way of safeguarding your data" by thetorpedodog · · Score: 5, Funny

    So...I don't want my data to somehow magically be restored when I throw an old hard disk into a fire? Where can I read more about this amazing data-recovery technology?

    --
    This sig is certified free of self-referential humour!
  2. Nuke it from space by Atriqus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
  3. I find a Magnet Works by s31523 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a heavy duty magnet that when placed on the top of the drive makes the drive completely useless.
    I doubt anyone could recover data from it, as it is surely scrambled.

    1. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have one of those, too. I keep mine on the side of my computer case.

    2. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, and every drive comes with two of them used for the voice coil actuator. Just be careful when handling them. I've had them both snap together and give me a blood blister.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:I find a Magnet Works by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NO! It does NOT make it completely useless. Someone with a scanning-tunneling microscope could still retrieve portions of your data! The thing that makes this article retarded isn't the difficulty of permanently destroying data, which is best done with intense heat (as in, burn the disk to the point it melts) but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection. Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something. Zero the disk or if you must, run a secure formatter, and put it on freecycle if it's too old to sell.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I find a Magnet Works by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong. There were several airlines that suffered complaints that laptops were failing on their planes. The table/trays were magnetic so they could be folded and stowed away. Turns out if you sit a laptop on top of a magnet, the hard drive soon fails.

    5. Re:I find a Magnet Works by dkf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something.

      "Can you guys recover my data?"
      "Yes we can!"

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    6. Re:I find a Magnet Works by bossanovalithium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So here's the definitive crash test results: http://tinyurl.com/6obkkn Looked like a lot of fun,and kinda proved that HD's are the tech version of the plasticbag - they are difficult to get deal with...

    7. Re:I find a Magnet Works by AntEater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're really want to have fun, you should take the magnet out of the drive. Those things area amazing. I had a co-worker who pulled the magnets out a whole slew of retired 5" hard drives. You could hang incredible amounts of weight from those things. Very easy to smash your fingers between them too. Just don't do it on your employer's time.

      oh yeah, you could use that magnet to wipe the platter while you've got the drive open.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    8. Re:I find a Magnet Works by conureman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TFA makes the point that for most of us, a wipe or a hammer job is adequate to deter the schmoogs. The web is full of various tests of redox reactions to destroy the platters, if your data is in a glowing puddle of molten aluminium, it's probably secure.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    9. Re:I find a Magnet Works by dword · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you work for a big company, chances are you are very interested in this article and it doesn't sound retarded at all. I was actually asked by one of my ex-employers for the best method to dispose of a hard-disk so that nobody could retrieve information from it, for good reasons.

    10. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I think that an unmodified hardware with a modified hardrive driver is able to retrieve data that was zeroed once with a good accuracy. The trick is to get the analogic value measured by the magnetic head instead of just 1 or 0. If you measure all zeroes as 0.001 and 0.100 values and ones as 0.9 and 0.999 values, it is not hard to guess what the previous value of each bit was.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    11. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should probably tell that to hard drive manufacturers. They could use that knowledge to store twice as much data on the disk.

    12. Re:I find a Magnet Works by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection. Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something.

      I agree completely. No one is going to bother with a few weeks of work taking apart the drive to get access to you're $371.39 bank account when they can spend 1 hour and simply find that the next disk in line is fully formatted and has all the information they need.

      The whole article is a little sensationalist and ridiculous to me. I'm surprised to see such shoddy reporting from the BBC.

    13. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 'previous value' of each bit is nonsense.

      For one thing, hard drives do not store data like that. They store a one when the data changes, and a zero when it's the same. So 11010011 would actually be written as written as 10111010.

      A quick thought will demonstrate that not knowing the value of any bit will render the entire rest of the byte unknown.

      More importantly, bytes start without a value. They are in indeterminate state, they are magnetized. They are essentially .5. They are then formatted, at the factory, by writing a 'zero' to them.

      Pretending that your idea worked (Which it doesn't.) every bit would read as a one. (Or, rather, every bit as a change bit, resulting in the data being 10101010.)

      However, your idea is dumb to start with, because, as the other reply points out, hard drives aren't storing 0 or 1. They're storing 0.0-0.3 and 0.7-1.0, because hard drive manufactures make them as dense as possible, to the point that when writing one bit, you can't help but slightly alter the bit ahead or behind it. The development of hard drives is a contest to produce less overlap when writing.

      Which means if you were to actually read the value of a bit, there would be a good chance it was 0.2 not because it 'used' to be a 1, which incidentally doesn't work that way, but because it has a 1 after it.

      This is actually somewhat of a simplification, because in actuality, at the base level, hard drives are 'analog'. The strength of write is not a square wave, or even a jigsaw wave. It is much smoother than that. It is like transmitting morse code using a slide whistle.

      I know there are lots of stupid urban myths about how hard drives work, but if there was a way to recover data from an overwritten hard drive, it would immediately get used to store more data on the drive.

      The only way to recover data from a zero'd hard drive is to look for remapped sectors.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    14. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, your knowledge is several decades out of date. Hard drives record a complex analog signal that is just at the limit of being readable and they use complex Viterbi PRML decoders to guess the data. It has to be at the densities we are at now.

    15. Re:I find a Magnet Works by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you understand how hard drives work. From the OS's point of view, storage is digital. That means you can not see the magnetism on the disk. The conversion of analog reading of a magnetic field to a digital value is internal to the disk. Then that data is sent out over the bus for the OS to process.

      It's really surprising to see a comment like this get moderated informative on slashdot.

    16. Re:I find a Magnet Works by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Data isn't encoded as absolute values on the drive; it's much more complex than that. Throw in error correction and it looks like noise, no matter what the data are.

  4. Or make it reusable... by Seakip18 · · Score: 5, Informative

    and just use dBan, Derrick's Boot and Nuke.

    Nothing beats an afternoon of watching dBan and a comfy chair. Beer or whisky optional.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:Or make it reusable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing beats an afternoon of watching dBan and a comfy chair. Beer or whisky optional.

      dBan sounds cool. So I put it on a disk and ran it. It really doesn't look that special. My computer won't turn on now.

  5. Kindness by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll have to excuse me. I'm need to go protect my ex-wife from identity theft.

    1. Re:Kindness by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll have to excuse me. I'm need to go protect my ex-wife from identity theft.

      So she uses ReiserFS?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
  6. Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 3, Informative

    This recommendation from Which? magazine has incensed me today. They're reported as saying "It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens.". There's no need to do this if you use disk wiping software, which is probably even better than a hammer; as the BBC article points out. Darik's Boot And Nuke is perfect for this. It's environmentally criminal to be suggesting the best way to wipe a disk is to smash it.

    Pete Boyd

    1. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem is that most people are way too stupid to understand how to use that, but they can understand smash.

      The funny part, 90% of those people that understand smash, will not smash it enough. I have recovered data from laptop hard drives that looked pretty smashed, but 45 minutes in my improvised clean room moving the platters to a different drive and I was able to read the contents.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      The funny part, 90% of those people that understand smash, will not smash it enough.

      Another 5% will enjoy it so much that they will do the same thing to their new computer, the TV and the next door neighbours car.

    3. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's really not that hard to transfer platters. and yes use an identical drive.

      a makeshift clean room is easy. run the shower in the bathroom for 15 minutes on the hottest setting and then shut it off and let the room cool down completely. the mist in the air will remove all dust as it falls to the ground. use a tyvek suit and cover your hair, face, hands and you're good to go.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  7. Cool method by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens."

    And I know of a great way to do that.

  8. An Alternative Approach... by blcamp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smash An Identity Thief.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
  9. My method by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fill mine with concrete and drop them in the ocean. Stuffed inside an informant, of course.
    Nobody will be getting more information from either one.
    I am intrigued by the clever use of a hammer in the video, I may have to modify my method slightly.

  10. Windows Vista by happy_place · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh I dunno. I've found Windows vista renders most hardware inoperable. At least this state of the art piece of pc I've had under my desk runs slower than ever, now that it's got the latest/greatest os on it. You could bore identity thieves to death with transparent windows and shiny icons.

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
  11. Re:saveguarding, eh? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
    what about using acid?

    It would certainly make smashing a hard drive to smithereens more interesting.

    I wouldn't recommend it though. The paranoia you'd need to decide smashing a hard drive was the best way of preserving your identity would likely make it a pretty harsh trip.

    Try crystal meth instead. The aggression and hyperactivity'd make be damn sure that HDD was properly smashed.

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  12. Just told my brother this by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    His PC died due to dust accumulation (fried mobo, dead power supply, fused RAM) and he asked me what to do with his system. I told him the only thing he needed to worry about was his HD. Told him to drill a few holes in the drive, use a blowtorch in those holes if he still had one (he used to work in home remodeling), smash the drive with a hammer and put it in a bag with his used cat litter (they have two cats).

    If someone is desperate enough to want the information on his drive, they're going to have to work for it.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Just told my brother this by thermian · · Score: 4, Funny

      His PC died due to dust accumulation (fried mobo, dead power supply, fused RAM) and he asked me what to do with his system. I told him the only thing he needed to worry about was his HD. Told him to drill a few holes in the drive, use a blowtorch in those holes if he still had one (he used to work in home remodeling), smash the drive with a hammer and put it in a bag with his used cat litter (they have two cats).

      If someone is desperate enough to want the information on his drive, they're going to have to work for it.

      Well that depends, what breed of cat?

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:Just told my brother this by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well that depends, what breed of cat?

      Civet of course - you then get to enjoy the coffee.

  13. Shredder by iCharles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I periodically contract with a company to dispose of old hardware for my company. The first time i talked to them, they mentioned they shredded old media. I assumed he meant floppies and tapes and the like. Given the nature of the material, it didn't seem that impressive, but certainly nice. When I got the estimate, I was a bit shocked--why was it so high? Then they explained--by "media," they meant hard drives. They sent me a PDF on the equipment. Hard drives are removed from machines, and placed on a conveyor belt. This fed the hard drive into the shredder. On the other end, bits of metal came out. I begged them to let me operate it--just for one or two drives. Damn lawyers!

    1. Re:Shredder by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  14. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by kcelery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Throwing into fire is not enough, the magnetic domain on the platter is still there for highly technical team to retrieve. You have to melt the hard disk into liquid and stir thoroughly.

  15. Article or Ontrack Promotional Video? by AngryNick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was nothing of substance in the video. The guy smashed his drive, Ontrack said it was smashed and couldn't be recovered...but then went on to say, "But we are really good at restoring water damaged drives!"

    The whole discussion is made pointless when Ontrack says, "Oh, we can't restore a zero'd drives either."

  16. Re:RBFH by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Funny

    RBFH - is that "Really Big F**king Hammer?"

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
  17. Re:saveguarding, eh? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And is the term "pissing contest" recognized in both?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  18. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by bytethese · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like my hard disk shaken, not stirred...

  19. Some ideas for destruction by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Revision3's Systm show had an episode that suggested some ways for destroying a hard drive yourself. They took the position that using a program like Boot'nNuke, which overwrites data 1-N times at your choosing, is sufficient to sanitize data without destroying the drive.

    If you want to go the nuclear option, they demonstrated some favorites: mangling the platters in a vice, dremel or hand grinder, propane or cutting torch, melting it in thermite, etc.

    A hospital I worked for once, when decommissioning old computers, would take the hard drive over to a drill press and put a couple holes through it. Nowadays I think they've bought a drive shredder.

  20. Re:Whats the problem with... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Put it this way ... if it could then your drive would have double the capacity.

    Drive makers aren't stupid.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_recovery#Recovering_overwritten_data

    --
    No sig today...
  21. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The platters don't have to be melted, they only need to be heated to the Curie point to loose all their information. Of course, that would still take a pretty hot fire.

  22. Re:RBFH by blackchiney · · Score: 5, Funny

    RBFH - is that "Really Big F**king Hammer?"

    Damn, I just bought a BFH to smash some walls. I wonder if I can upgrade with a serial number?

  23. Just wipe it once by GFree678 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really, there's no need to wipe it more than once unless you honestly think it will matter. At least these guys think so:

    http://16systems.com/zero

  24. Re:Whats the problem with... by mevets · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is possible to reread some data from a zeroed (or oned (sp?)) disk. Pretty obscure, but I think it is to do with the threshold values of zero and one. For example, writing a location in sequence with 1,1,0 will result in a measurable [ though below threshold ] difference than if it had been 1,0,0. Seagate and the like do their best to squeeze this to the absolute minimum, thus maximizing utilization of the magnetic disc. I suspect it is much harder to recover anything meaningful from a 1TB platter than from a 5MB platter.

    The other leak is with remapped sectors. Remapped sectors may contain live data, but have been switched out of use because they were unreliable. Flash has the same problem.

    dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda takes care of the first problem - if you more paranoid than that, you should probably stop whatever it is you are doing.

    You need a custom tool to access the remapped sectors.

  25. Re:saveguarding, eh? by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What about having it fully encripted at all times?

    If your computer is stolen it's quite hard to convince the thief to store it in an acid bath till it stops bubbling.

  26. Give the disk to my girlfriend . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . and tell her to put it in a safe place, and that you might need it later.

    It's gone forever.

    There is no chance that anyone will ever have access to that disk again.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  27. Re:In other news by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

    In other news: people still stupid. Has anyone here actually TRIED to get stuff back off a Guttmann wiped drive? Or even a DoD 7 wiped drive?

    My class in computer security had some time to kill and someone brought that up so the teacher said "Well, we've got a bunch of PCs from last upgrade waiting to be re-imaged and given away to students...let me see what I can score us!". He ended up getting us a half a dozen PCs set up in the back of the class with 2 HDDs set up in each so we could run plenty of different tests. We did everything from MSFT format to one pass to three pass to DoD 7 to Guttman. We researched and then used every piece of freeware and trialware that we could get our little hands on. Here is our findings:

    MSFT format is of course pointless, as everyone knows. 1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC. 3 pass was lower(0,1,random), somewhere in the 10-20% range, depending on the software used, but most of the "recovered" data was garbled beyond use, DoD-7 made it pretty much impossible, I think we got 2 .txt files and they were so garbled we couldn't decide if it had actually recovered ANYTHING, certainly nothing you could use, and finally Guttmann we got squat.

    So if someone were to spend the $$$$ to have the drive taken apart in a clean room and analyzed and you only used one or two pass of predictable patterns then yeah, I might see wanting to destroy. But I haven't seen anyone bragging about beating D0D-7 with what the average hacker would have access to, much less Guttmann. So frankly unless someone here has a citation I have to call bullshit. Frankly it makes me wonder if this kind of stuff isn't cooked up by the HDD manufacturers. I can just imagine them spinning this- "Before giving away that machine destroy the hard drive first!(so they'll have to buy a new one from us! Yay!)"

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  28. Re:Whats the problem with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on people! Zeroing a disk drive only removes half of your data. The other half is unchanged and still perfectly readable!

  29. My favourite method for 3.5" HDDs - the best imho by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - Take old drive.
    - Screw drive apart. (Might require Torx screwdriver or bit)
    - Take percision manufactured aluminum seperation washers and use them as keyrings, strap-loops or simular stuff.
    - Take drive platters and work over them with fine grained sandpaper.
    - Move head magnets over them a few times.
    - Work over them with even finer grain afterwards.
    - Dishwash platters and polish afterwards.
    - Dry and clean platters.
    - Precisely glue thick undied felt to one side of platter using cut-to-fit carpet tape.
    - Cut out platter shape and hole with a sharp knife.
    - Use and/or sell as avantgarde design coasters (10$ - 12$ a piece).
    - Bring the rest of the dives to recycling, seperating electronics from scrap metal first.

    No way anybody will recover any usefull data of a platter after this treatment. And the platter will look like in mint condition. And they make way cool coasters.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  30. DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Forge · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read years ago (and I'm sure it was made up) of a memo sent out to IT managers in the DOD (United States Department Of Defense). It went.
    To properly dispose of hard drives which may contain Top secret information is a 5 step process to be performed in the order specified and by competent engineers.

    1. Perform a triple overwrite security erase on the entire disk.
    2. Use a bulk degausser (AKA a powerful electro magnet).
    3. Crush the drive under a roller or tank tracks, whichever is more convenient.
    4. Melt the scrap into slag.
    5. Bury that Slag in a toxic waste dump to deter any attempts at data recovery.

    That's not exactly how it went but I think this is pretty close. Can anyone find the original?

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by penguinboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no original because that's not the spec.

      The real spec is DoD 5220.22-M, available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/522022m.htm.

    2. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by RandoX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      About a decade ago, our artillery unit did do "rollovers" on hard drives for the intel unit. The drives, although already drilled through, were stored in a safe and ecsorted by Military Police. After we ran them over, the pieces went back into the safe. After the drilling and crushing, the drives were to be put into a 55 gallon barrel (along with wood or paper), doused in fuel, and burnt for a minimum of 30 minutes.

    3. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by aliquis · · Score: 4, Funny

      .. and that's how the Pentium bug came into existence.

    4. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I very much doubt they do all those things.

      You're just jealous because you don't have a tank.

      Admit it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by idontgno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not all of those things, at least in my limited experience, but the last time I was involved with destruction of hard drives with special access classified data, it involved quadruple overwrite (random patterns, etc.), uncasing, very high energy degaussing, scouring off all recording medum with abrasives, and physically deforming the aluminum platters (folding the platters over into quarters and hammering flat). And that's before the media left our facility, bound for an unspecified "final destruction facility", where even more stuff was going to be done to it. I can barely imagine what that might have been; perhaps the final result would have been ingots of aluminum alloy and a box of dross (what was left of the magnetic layer, burned) stuffed into a secure storage facility until the declassification date had passed.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    6. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I crazy when I think that when one gets to the point where one is overwriting with random data 10+ times and degaussing afterwards, the chance of some enemy recovering your data is pretty much zero, and the money such a recovery would require would be enough to buy a hundred spies? No point in destroying your data to the point where only divine intervention could restore it when it is several orders of magnitude easier to steal the data before it is destroyed, right?

    7. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Having a tank would make technical support a lot more satisfying:

      C: "Hello, is this technical support?"
      M: "Yes. May I help you?"
      C: "There's a big black thing where my Internet Windower Vista should be"
      M: "Very well sir. Did you turn your computer on?"
      C: "....is that under the start menu?"

      *rumble rumble*.....BOOM!

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    8. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is incorrect and has been for a long time.

      See: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/index.html

    9. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by dwillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know of a facility that doesn't bother with the wipes or degausing, they just take the drives apart and sand the platters clean.

      Then they play with the magnents, figuring out ways to ruin each others credit cards from a distance.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    10. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by EvilBudMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those data recovery people are pretty savvy. They just recovered the 18 1/2 minute gap on the Nixon tapes. It is Nixon listening to Alice's Restaurant by Arlo Guthrie.

    11. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has anyone ever gone to Mars or brought peace to the middle east? Surely if this has been possible for a long time it must be possible for you to point to two or three reliable articles where someone has done this.

      'Freely available on Google' isn't anything like an equivalent set to 'possible', and things that are merely theoretical now may well be trivial a decade from now. Data that needs to stay secure for the long term can't depend on it being unrecoverable due to current technical limitations; that died with DES. I doubt it would be hard at all to lift data off a 30 year old drive; sure, credit card numbers from the 1970s aren't too useful now, but some things might be.

    12. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Has anyone ever gone to Mars or brought peace to the middle east? Surely if this has been possible for a long time it must be possible for you to point to two or three reliable articles where someone has done this.

      This Gutmann guy tells us how overwritten data could be recovered. Reading his paper makes one suspect this would all be very easy for one with access to scanning probe microscopy, and he suggests a scanning probe microscope could be built for as little as $1400. The paper has been 'in the wild' for over 10 years now. Why can't I find any articles wherein his techniques have been used to recover just a single sector that has been overwritten 5 times? By the looks of it such an experiment could be performed for relatively little money, and any university who would do such an experiment would gain much publicity. Either nobody has ever tried this very cheap and easy thing that would make that person very famous, or it is impossible.

      Which makes it, off course, completely different from going to Mars or bringing peace to the middle east. The former is extremely expensive, and nobody knows an acceptable way to solve the latter. Neither of these problems apply to the paper you mentioned, or so the writer suggests.

  31. Re:In other news by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hard drives are cheap. If you have any data that you absolutely don't want to get out...EVER...physical destruction is the 100% solution.

    And, in terms of practicality, running DoD-7 takes about 1000 times longer than whipping out the old Sledge-O-Matic. If you're retiring a few dozen computers, even that gets old, and you start looking for the thermite.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  32. Re:Whats the problem with... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

    Exactly! You have to XOR every bit! :)

  33. Re:In other news by D3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You are spot on and I would mod you up if I had points. I don't think the HDD manufacturers are behind this though. The simpler (and I think correct) reason is that older media used to be easier to recover data from. Newer hardware is different and the old methods do not apply. http://shsc.info/DataRecovery#titelanker5

    --
    Do really dense people warp space more than others?
  34. Re:saveguarding, eh? by qengho · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe it's called a "micturition tournament" in the UK.

  35. This message by Kludge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens. [...]

    This message brought to you by the Hard Drive Manufacturers Association.

  36. Re:In other news by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The problem is that modern hard drives do automatic defect mapping. The end result is that sometimes important data can be written to a sector, and then the drive will decide that sector is unreliable and map it out. That sector can no longer be accessed in any way. As a result you have a sector which contains data but cannot be wiped because the drive won't let you write there.

    Flash memory is even worse since it does write balancing between all cells to PREVENT a failure of a sector, rather than deciding a sector is on its way out and mapping around it then.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  37. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC.

    OK, I'm impressed. Would you care to explain in more detail how you did that? From your description, you used "every piece of freeware and trialware that we could get our little hands on". I haven't heard of any software solution that can recover overwritten data.

  38. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Retric · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heating a destroys the magnetic domain's long before it melts. As density increases the ability to do data recovery when things go bad keeps decreasing.

  39. Re:In other news by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well if you can't access it in any way, then why would it matter? Remember, what folks are afraid of is some hacker will get their CC numbers or some business will end up with a lawsuit because the hackers got everyone's social off their old machine. But I have yet to see anyone actually pull anything useful off without going clean room, which frankly is so crazy expensive that no hacker in his right mind would bother. And for the poster that said it would take too long? You do know there are free programs like this that can boot off CD and do the job for you, right? Hell I bet the FLOSS guys have a nice CD that you can stick in that is simple to script. Simply write a script, burn the disc, and then set the headless machine in the corner.

    And finally let us not forget that in this economic downturn that many machines being tossed by enterprise and SMBs as "junk" could be given a new lease on life and help those that have not been as fortunate as us. I repair and give away machines from businesses and you would be surprised what even a 400MHz P2 can do for those that have none. I have turned a 233MHz into a bookkeeping appliance for a little church who helps out families, the homeless, and migrant workers by installing Puppy Linux with OO.o and some simple Dbases set up. Once shown how the wife of the pastor makes her own databases using the wizard and uses them to track donations, make mailing lists, help with inventory, etc. I have given a 400MHz to a single mom who cried because she now had a way to help her kids with homework and thanks to that donation would have something nice to give her kids for Xmas, and I have set up a group of old 350-600MHz along with an old 700MHz donated server I was able to talk the school out of for a class project on networking for a shelter for battered women. They use them to teach office skills to the women to help them become self sustaining and the server reimages them and does backups on the ones we gave the office workers.

    So while the cost of a new HDD might not be a big deal for most of us, for them it could have hurt. I tell all of those that are nice enough to donate that I will DoD-7 wipe the HDD, which for the smaller drives in older machines really doesn't take long. And of course now that IDE drives are no longer being made they will probably end up more expensive which will make it even harder for somebody who doesn't have much to begin with to afford one. I figure it is better for the environment as well as my heart to take a little time and sit a PC in the corner and run DoD-7 than it is to just see it end up as more e-waste polluting our landfills. Don't you?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  40. Mod Parent up by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't heard of any software solution that can recover overwritten data.

    Likewise. Barring actually disassembling the drive, I think GP's post is bullshit.

    How can software get past the fact that the hard disk controller will be handing the OS all 0's?

  41. Perfect solution by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Put your hard drive in a sock, and toss it in the dryer with a matching sock. You have a 50% chance of it disappearing into an alternate universe, never to be seen again.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  42. No you don't. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Disassemble the drive and remove the platters. Take sandpaper and sand off the oxide. There's no way in hell any data will be recovered after that.

    Not everyone has access to a furnace hot anough to melt the whole thing.

    1. Re:No you don't. by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget to harvest the handy magnets if you bother to do it that way.

      Some hard disk platters are glass, so be careful!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:No you don't. by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I built a kiln out of a trash can, ceramic fiber mat, and some venturi propane burners made from 3/4" pipe. I've fired to Cone 4 (2124ÂF - 1162ÂC) in it. Cost about $200 to make. Would be cool to get a crucible and melt down a drive or two. I have some old scsi stuff from the 90's...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:No you don't. by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Funny

      hm. I can't find the surface area of a HDD platter, but let's say that 1/3 of the radius of the disk is unwritable in the center. Supposedly, you can get as much as 500GB on a single 3.5'' platter. Now lets say you sand it with 120 grit sandpaper, so that you could rip off a chunk the size of a 120 grit grain of sand....By my math (which could be miserable) one single flake could contain as much as 248k of data, all perfectly recoverable via electron microscope. That's a lot of text! God...this sound like one of those Microsoft job interview questions...

  43. Re:In other news by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Closet redneck that I am, I usually just make a big pile of wood, drives, old backup tapes, and add gasoline. You can pass the melting point of lead in a wood fire, easy.

    The waste is an issue though. I wouldn't want to eat out of the oven either, and I'm not too keen on breathing/cleaning up drive slag either.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  44. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by somersault · · Score: 3, Informative

    Whoosh!

    The point was that they said this is a "fireproof" way of restoring your data - which is basically saying that throwing the hard drive into a fire would somehow recover the data.

    Foolproof would have been a better word to use; as in "even a fool could protect their data using this method".

    --
    which is totally what she said
  45. Re:In other news by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I work in an industry where we DO worry about people taking drives to the clean room...

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  46. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Metasquares · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must cast it into the fires of Mount Doom! Only then will your data be safe!

  47. DoD sanitization by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depends on the value of the information. Are you willing to spend $500-$10000 on a professional recovery service, or is your information not worth that much? Can it be reconstructed through different means?

    The DoD has to worry about enemies getting ahold of the disk and sending it to a multi-million dollar clean-lab with stuff like electron microscopes and post-doc engineers to recover the information.

    Something properly classified 'Top Secret' is done so on the basis of it being possible for it to cause 'exceptionally grave damage'. IE lives lost, cities nuked, embarrasing the POTUS, etc...

    The reason you destroy the information in so many different ways is in case one of the ways fail. For example, degaussing is often possible in-house, but what if the degausser doesn't work well enough? On the other hand, sending it to a facility capable of smelting it down requires transporting it - an opportunity for it to be lost. So you degauss it first to make it harder to retrieve data in the facility, then send it to the smelter 'to make sure'.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  48. Re:In other news by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    microwave for a couple of minutes would do the trick?

    Unlikely. Your HDD has a metal case that would keep the microwaves from penetrating to the platters. If you were to put it in the microwave, you would likely get some sparking/smoking from the controller board, but the acutal platters likely wouldn't even get warm.

    But dont take my word for it, try it! Your work has a microwave, no? Or just watch this crappy video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRU7yEEgRaw

    --
    Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
  49. Re:This is overthinking. by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to do it really right, then use whatever handy utility you know of that claims to write over the whole drive. Just once. With zeroes.

    I'd quibble over that "With zeroes" part. The problem is that this overwrites each bit with the same value. On a lot of kinds of disks, this leaves behind a lot of disks that have two distinguishable value, which are easily read and interpreted as zeroes and ones, giving the previous data. The data-recovery people have equipment that can read the value of each "bit" to several decimal places, and overwriting tends to leave a portion of the previous magnetization. So instead of bits reading 1.00 and 0.00, they'll read 0.04 and 0.00, for example.

    This is why it's better to use software that overwrites with random values, and does it N times. This way, a string of bits that were all zeroes and ones come out with values like 0.93, 0.02, 0.04, 0.96, 1,.01, 0.08, 0.98, 1.02, 0,91, etc. Each of these is a sum of the last random value and N earlier nearly-erased values, and there's no way to pull out the original bits.

    Of course, this is mostly for when you want to reuse the disk or sell it. If you truly want to dispose of it, melting is probably better, and a lot simpler.

    Or, as others have suggested, install Vista on it. That has a good record of making the disk useless to everyone.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  50. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by ElBeano · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the informatin is "loosed", where does it run off to? Should we have some mechanism in place to catch it before it gets in the wrong hands?

  51. Shoot It by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Five shots from a .458 Winchester Magnum firing soft-points really wrecks a drive into smithereens. It's actually hard to find a spot on the platters that isn't either punched through or scratched to near-oblivion by tiny fragments bouncing around inside the thing. Really, they look almost sandblasted where not outright gone.

    And it is a lot of fun, too.

  52. DoD standard superceded by NIST's standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's no original because that's not the spec.

    The real spec is DoD 5220.22-M, available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/522022m.htm.

    The DoD standard has been superceded by NIST Special Publication 800-88:

    http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-88/NISTSP800-88_rev1.pdf
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_remanence

  53. Not cheap if computer is free by cwgmpls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hard drives are NOT cheap if your goal turn the computer around for use by someone with low income. I rebuild computers and give them away for free to people who need them. Spending even $20 to replace the hard drive would increase the cost of the computer enough to make it unusable for my purposes.

    Is it really possible to recover data from a disk that has been wiped with DBAN? I highly doubt it -- I've never heard of data being recovered after wiping with DBAN.

    If you want to be friendly to the environment and spread the availability of low-cost computing, don't destroy the disk, use DBAN instead.

    1. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice to see I am not the only one that does that. Makes you feel damned good to know that you made someone's life a little better and all it cost you was a little time and brain power, doesn't it?

      And as for the poster that talked about taking apart the platters to try to recover any remapped sectors as SOP, if these machines were headed straight to eBay you might have a point. As I'm sure you can chime in and back me up with cwgmpls, when you give away a machine like that to folks or these little charities that machine is NOT going to end up on eBay, ever. I have often run into folks whom I gave a machine to many years ago, and it is always the same. They will either use it until it literally is completely shot, or more often if they manage to get a hold of something else it gets passed on to a family member who doesn't have one. I have seen some of my rebuilds return to the shop for a repair and they have passed through 4,5,6 family members. Uncles, cousins, sisters and brothers,etc. Poor folks value something that works and will ALWAYS find someone that can use it if they can't.

      And finally allow me to say this: if your company is tossing machines PLEASE wipe and donate them. There are many folks hurting bad right now and barely surviving and those machines could really make someone's life better. it really doesn't take any time at all to ask around your neighborhood and find those in need. The local church, youth center, foodbanks, shelters for battered women, all of these places will be happy to point you toward those that could use them if they can't use them themselves. I have seen with my own eyes how much good these machines can do and how something we take for granted can really help those that have so little. Please, don't further poison our planet by taking running machines and throwing them in the trash. Just a little bit of time and effort can give these machines a new lease on life and make someone's life a little better. And at the end of the day you will know you have made life just a little easier, just a little nicer, just a little better for a fellow human being. Isn't that worth a little bit of your time?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, my work donates newer stuff to local school board but all they get is case/logic board/processor/powersupply. They pull ram/drives/video cards. Can also pick up older stuff at auction but it's sold by the pallet, usually for under $100.00. Got a load of old Mac stuff this way but had two nice G5's in there.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  54. How we declassified disks in the 1980s by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the 1980s and early 90s, when I was working as a tool for the military-industrial complex, I ran a VAX lab that processed classified information. I forget which DoD standard we followed (it was equivalent to Army 380-380), but I got to write our declassification processes and my successor at the job had the fun of implementing them. The basic choices were

    • Officially NSA-certified overwrite software (Didn't exist for our platform.)
    • NSA-certified Big Fscking Magnet (Not near *my* equipment, thank you.)
    • Dissolving the coating in acid (No thanks.)
    • Physical Destruction - Yeah!

    Our building had a machine shop in the basement, and my successor got to take apart the RM05 removable drives (which were about the size of a Tupperware cake carrier and had a dozen 14" platters), and have the machinists sandblast them for her. The canonical Sysadmin Wall Decoration in those days was to have a disk platter with some tracks scratched off it from a head crash; she had one that was clean down to the bare metal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  55. Re:In other news by gknoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well if you can't access it in any way, then why would it matter?

    The drive's firmware is what keeps track of where the "good" and "bad" sectors are on the drive. Presumably, if you took the platters out, and put them in a different drive, it would have no idea which were the good or bad sectors, and therefore WOULD let you read those sectors. No guarantees that what it reads was what was originally there, but I'd be surprised if it didn't let you read them.

  56. Re:Whats the problem with... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly! But I do it twice for additional protection.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  57. Re:In other news by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is it possible to write a utility that tells the drive to map ALL sectors as unreliable ? either as an alternative to thorough wiping or as a final step ? how hard is it to tell a hard drive that a sector that it mapped out is now reliable ?

  58. Re:In other news by citizenr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1 pass of zeroes we got around, but we got around 80% IIRC. 3 pass was lower(0,1,random), somewhere in the 10-20% range, depending on the software used, but most of the "recovered" data was garbled beyond use

    I call BS, how exactly were you able to recover OVERWRITTEN data with a software only solution?

    --
    Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
  59. Re:In other news by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Funny

    And thus hopefully an organisation who doesn't take your security procedures from BBC articles and 'Which?' magazine...