Slashdot Mirror


Trojan Found At Torrent Sites Insists "Downloading Is Wrong"

NoisySplatter writes "Ernesto, founder of TorrentFreak, reports that a new trojan, 'Troj/Qhost-AC,' has been distributed on The Pirate Bay. The virus was disguised as a serial key generator, and the offending torrent has since been removed, but the source has not been identified. Troj/Qhost-AC makes changes to the user's hosts file that redirects The Pirate Bay, Suprbay, and Mininova to 127.0.0.1. In addition to making three popular torrent sites inaccessible, the virus also plays a sound file that says: 'downloading is wrong.' It looks like someone has finally stepped up to the plate to challenge Madonna for the title of 'Most Obnoxious Anti-Piracy Stunt.' Of course, this could just be the software industry's attempt at outdoing the RIAA and MPAA."

69 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There once was a man who could boast
    that due to his low latency host
    when blog posts went down,
    he was always around
    to sit down and type swiftly "FIRST POST"

    1. Re:Nice by ciderVisor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whatever you do
      Don't become a poet
      That was dreadful. For real.

      Worst. Haiku. Evah.

      --
      Squirrel!
    2. Re:Nice by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Worst. Haiku. Evah.
      You could have done this better?
      Then why didn't you?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Nice by Crizp · · Score: 2, Funny

      A haiku should have
      ref'rence to winter snow or
      some other season

    4. Re:Nice by Crizp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      naninaniyo
      anatanobakayo
      urusaiyo

      Sorry. I have no idea what I'm doing.

  2. Holy fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    127.0.0.1 turns out to be *my* private IP address. So everyone with that virus is connecting to my Internet. That would explain why my connection has been so slow lately. I sure hope they find the bastard who did this to me. I'll gladly add my own lawsuit to the pile.

    1. Re:Holy fuck by Chris+Daniel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you, by any chance, live in Tuttle, OK?

      --
      Don't blame me -- I voted for Roslin.
  3. Another possibility by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This could be the piracy groups themselves throwing this out there to stir up sentiment against the RIAA, MPAA, etc.

    Of course that's like adding a few cords of wood to the fires of HELL, but it is a possibility.

    P.S - This is not nearly as bad as the Sony Rootkit.

    1. Re:Another possibility by Firehed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a trojan - you have no idea what else it's doing. If all it does is screw with your HOSTS file and play a stupid audio track I agree, but it could be doing all sorts of other unknown fun stuff to your machine with the root access it has.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    2. Re:Another possibility by EdIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a trojan - you have no idea what else it's doing. If all it does is screw with your HOSTS file and play a stupid audio track I agree, but it could be doing all sorts of other unknown fun stuff to your machine with the root access it has.

      Actually you are factually incorrect. As you can see in the summary and article itself it is referred to as, "Troj/Qhost-AC" by Sophos. That would seem to indicate that at some level it has been reviewed by a Anti-Virus company and I believe they would have tried pretty hard to determine the full capabilities of this Trojan. One could even say it is highly likely.

      Even so, it may have been better for me to say, "This does not at first glance appear to be nearly as bad as the Sony Rootkit turned out to be".

      Let's also remember that the origins of this trojan virus are unknown at the moment while the Sony Rootkit has it's origins WELL DEFINED. Those origins being the Sony board members that have yet to receive prison terms for their actions. For those that think that is a little melodramatic, consider what kind of reception any other corporation or private citizen would have received for releasing the same type of rootkit onto the populace.

      If this does turn out to lead back to the feet of people working for the interests of Big Entertainment it will have been done for the same reasons the Sony Rootkit was put out. Their absolute and firm belief that YOU (the customer, citizen, etc.) have ZERO RIGHTS to any privacy or control over your own electronic equipment when their intellectual property is anywhere near it.

      The funny thing is that the only other people that seem to be able to act like that and get away with it are governments. So if you are not the government or Big Entertainment you go straight to Federal Pound Me In The Ass Prison when you do act like them. Isn't that just hilarious?

    3. Re:Another possibility by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wonder if the ever agenda driven Slashdot would get a little butt hurt if somebody took one of their open-source programs or Linux; they closed sourced it to make it proprietary and hosted it on a torrent website.

      What, like BSD network stack and Windows? I think the BSD people are happy that Microsoft chose to use good code.

      Jail time for a rootkit, geez and here I thought the RIAA might have been a little psycho.

      Yes, jail time for a rootkit. If it makes more sense, it's jail time for hundreds of thousands of rootkits, several hundred in low-security government computers.

  4. Expect the reverse by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A virus that instead plays "Downloading is right" and redirects the homepages of big software, music and movie companies to piratebay, mininova, etc...

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:Expect the reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Safety in numbers. The more people pirate stuff, the less chance you have of it being actually *you* that gets caught.

  5. Keygens by Metapsyborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's pretty crazy to be running keygens on your system. Every time I do it, I think to myself "what are these guys getting for all their hard work?" The same thing with cracked software - you run an installer yourself how could the cracker pass up that type opportunity? I just assume most of them infect your computer with some spyware and trojans.

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^) INFECTED
    (")")
    1. Re:Keygens by Anpheus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Virtual machines baby, boot it up, run the keylogger, run the install up to the point where it gives you whatever you need to install, and then reset the hard drive state.

    2. Re:Keygens by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      I rely on feedback from other downloaders on TPB. If the installer or keygen do bad things, many people will scream in comments. For popular torrents that are more than a month old, that catches malware pretty well. So far, I've no visible problem on my machine with this approach.

      I checked out your machine from here and it seems ok. A bit slow though, makes me wonder what everyone else is running on there.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:Keygens by GFree678 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Virtual machines baby, boot it up, run the keylogger, run the install up to the point where it gives you whatever you need to install, and then reset the hard drive state.

      That works. My tactic is also to write the serial that is produced by a keygen into a text file so that in a future install I don't have to re-run the keygen, I just copy/paste the data safely from the file. Doesn't work for the more advanced keys which are based off a unique hash of the system's architecture, but for every else the text file is perfect. Heck, sometimes a key or keys are listed by someone in the comments of the torrent so that you don't HAVE to use a keygen, which is nice.

    4. Re:Keygens by AngryBacon · · Score: 3, Funny

      The authors of Norton Anti-Virus did this already, but most people don't really notice.

    5. Re:Keygens by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good one, sir!

    6. Re:Keygens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is actually a very bad idea. Many default installs of Wine offer access to your entire filesystem (including your home directory). Wine is not a isolated environment like most VM's are. It lets you run Windows applications as native binaries, including viruses and trojans with many of their effects still intact. It is very possible to infect a Linux machine with malicious Windows binaries running in Wine.

      Personally I have never seen a real keygen that did anything other than it was suppose to. There are some flat out trojans like this article is talking about but I have never seen a working keygen that was malicious. With that said, there is always a first time. I would only run them in a VM and with networking disabled too. Wipe/reset the VM back to a known state afterwards of course.

    7. Re:Keygens by geekboy642 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.linux.com/articles/42031

      Infect? no. It would have to be a custom targeted virus. You're fine as long as you don't have that exact setup, and run random .exes in wine, and piss off some bored geek.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  6. Re:Running as admin is fun by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Informative

    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc>cacls hosts
    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(ID)F
                                                                                BUILTIN\Administrators:(ID)F
                                                                                BUILTIN\Users:(ID)R

    So only SYSTEM and Admin can write. On Vista with UAC enabled I can't write to it, even though I'm an Admin.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  7. Summary makes it sounds like a virus but it's not. by HumanEmulator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From everything I've read (the slashdot summary excluded) this isn't really a virus -- it's a straight trojan. That means you would have to be trying to download a serial key generator in order to get it on your system. (ie. It doesn't spread to you from other people's machines.)

    I'm all against nefarious software creeping onto my system, but this is like complaining that the guy you tried to buy drugs from turned out to be a cop.

  8. oops, downloaded this web page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..which of course according to the recording is wrong. Oh, I'm in the middle of downloading packets of data for TV since I'm using satellite TV, which is also wrong I guess. Where did I go so wrong in life.

  9. Please explain to me by mumblestheclown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like somebody to please explain to me why my company should not compile versions of our software for torrent that do horrible and terrible things to the downloaders' PCs after say, the third run. We have no duty of care nor contract with such downloaders and due to the nature of our software, it is 100% certain that those who download pirated versions will never become legitimate customers. Furthermore, because of the way our software is licensed and its data is accessed, we can be 100% sure that none of our legitimate users are using pirated versions. No really. I'd like you guys to tell me why not. it's something I've fantasized about. We'd even put noticed at the beginning of the software telling the user quite explicitly about the horrible things that the software would do, and we would not hold the users "hostage" to purchasing our software in any way. Of course, we could open ourselves up to retribution attacks, but, imagining for a moment if that was not an issue, i'd like to hear some opinions. As you can see by the responses here to this article, many slashdotters have abandoned even the pretense of soome pseudophilosophical justification for their piracy and are just concentrating on the technical tricks involved in being better pirates ("virtual machines, baby", etc.)

    1. Re:Please explain to me by MrMista_B · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, for one thing, it's illegal, immoral, and unethical. Fighting crime by being a criminal... well, you see where I'm going with that.

      Furthermore, do you want your company to get the reputation of a malware maker and distributor? That's not likely to increase your sales.

      Beyond even that, say, for example, someone repackages the malware you release as a 'linux-iso' or somesuch. Then you would be to blame for destroying the computers of innocent people.

      Y'know, based on this, if I were your boss, I'd fire you, because you're clearly lacking in ethical stability, and making threats such as you have marks you as a company liability. Hmm.

    2. Re:Please explain to me by Firehed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some Mac software developer claimed to do this a while ago on his small commercial product (a completely harmless dialog box saying something to the effect of "pirated key detected, erasing your hard drive"). He had to open-source the product - thereby completely killing its revenue stream - just to save face, and suffice to say a lot of people that remember the incident better than I avoid any software from this developer.

      I assure you, NOT all publicity is good publicity, despite sayings to the contrary.

      So go for it, but don't be surprised if it ends up completely killing the product. It sounds like you've got some sort of enterprisey product, and I guarantee that no sane company would even risk continuing to use your product (never mind getting any future business) if there was even the slightest risk of that happening.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    3. Re:Please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't see how that's illegal

      Fair enough.

      or unethical.

      Ah- he's retarded. Nevermind.

    4. Re:Please explain to me by rastilin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless your product is worth $10,000+ then you stand a solid chance of doing far more damage than you could possibly claim your product was worth. Not to mention people will rename and pass along your software to bystanders. Mind you I don't have any complaint as such, if they make the choice to avoid the law, then stepping into a claymore placed to catch thieves is part of the risk.

      I'm only saying that I doubt these people have thought through all the possible consequences of their actions. The reason the big software companies don't do this is that they have more to lose than they stand to gain.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    5. Re:Please explain to me by Craevenwulfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Sony Rootkit affected people who bought shit legally. Where's the fucking relevance?

    6. Re:Please explain to me by Tom9729 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because boobytrapping your software would be the equivalent of having a robot shoot the person on the other side of the register when the silent alarm was triggered.

      Works great, but once it's triggered it doesn't differentiate between customers and criminals.

      Say there's a bug in your software that causes it to format the customer's computer because it mistakenly thought they were a criminal. That's a big "oops".

    7. Re:Please explain to me by rxan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no way you would win this case, and nor should you. You deserve to lose everything if you think even for a second that you have rights over everybody elses data.

      I could say the exact same thing about software pirating.

    8. Re:Please explain to me by spathi-wa · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's OK to pull a gun on someone who is robbing your store only if local and state laws specifically say so.

      Downloading and using software without a valid license is not covered by laws that allow the licensed distributor to do anything to other people's data.

      Being other people's data, which the distributor or developer do not and cannot have any rights over, it is unlikely that any such law will be passed.

    9. Re:Please explain to me by GFree678 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if I were your boss, I'd fire you, because you're clearly lacking in ethical stability

      Lacking in ethical stability?

      At my place of work this would be cause for a promotion!

    10. Re:Please explain to me by drx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because the internet is not the USA?

    11. Re:Please explain to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, how're you finding life at Microsoft?

    12. Re:Please explain to me by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no contract or agreement whatsoever with those 'strangers', and furthermore given the warnings that i said we'd include in our material and the fact that the 'damage' we'd cause is purely virtual, that few judges would view our response as anything but justified. IANAL, but in the country where my country is based, there is a much less pussified view of the rights of criminals, especially here.

      What you are proposing is nothing more than crude vigilantism. I sincerely doubt your legal system - assuming you're not living in some backwards third-world hellhole - takes anything but an incredibly dim view of such behaviour.

      There are several big reasons why you would be crucified by the legal system in any remotely civilised country for your plan:

      * You have malicious intent. You are seeking revenge, not reparations or prevention.
      * It is a calculated and premeditated action.
      * It is disproportional. Stopping your software working is one thing. Nuking someone's entire computer (which could have all sorts of irreplaceable data from tax returns to family photos) is a different scenario entirely.

      Sure, if someone who _has_ pirated this sued you, you could sue them for copyright infringement, but the punishment for premeditated and malicious damage and destruction of property (likely criminal, not civil charges) are going to be - as they should be - far, far higher, so overall you'll lose. If it ever misfired and hit any legitimate customers, the resulting lawsuits would - justifiably - almost certainly put you out of business (and if they didn't the destruction of your reputation would finish the job).

    13. Re:Please explain to me by Draek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read some Atari games would detect they were cracked but play right up to the end. At the last minute final boss would, instead of fighting, give you a lecture about how piracy was killing the industry and then the game would exit.

      Funnily enough, piracy didn't kill the '80s videogame industry, it was Atari themselves who did it.

      The best possibility would to release false crack, i.e ones that let the program start but then fail in an irritating after it has been played for a long time, like hanging and corrupting saved games. Hell you could put some hard to find bugs back into the cracked version and rely on the fact that the cracking scene doesn't QA effectively.

      Except that since the videogame industry *also* doesn't do QA effectively, such an action would only reflect badly on the original developers with most comments on the torrent websites going along the lines of "thanks for this crack, too bad you wasted your effort on this buggy piece of shit though, could you do a decent game next please?". Definitely not good for PR.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  10. It's not just big companies that don't like piracy by synthesizerpatel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Synthmaker, a music DSP authoring utility which allows 'full version' owners to export VSTs (virtual instruments) which they can then redistribute / sell had an interesting post a couple months ago from one of the users talking about how a VST they had offered for something like $10 ended up being posted with a crack on usenet.

    Stuff like that happens all the time and directly affects the little guy even more than it does the big faceless corporations.

    So it's tough for me to think that any company would take the immense risk of doing something as stupid as distributing a virus, whereas a disgruntled independent developer with spare time and a personal axe to grind against piracy might not care as long as some homebrew justice gets metered out.

  11. Re:Summary makes it sounds like a virus but it's n by Warhawke · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're assuming that the keygen downloader does not have the authority (i.e. ownership) of the program in question. Apparently you've never accidentally tossed or misplaced a CD-key.

    So really it's more like the guy you were trying to buy medical marijuana from turned out to be the naggy guy behind the Above the Influence campaign.

  12. Re:Running as admin is fun by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc>cacls hosts
    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM:(ID)F
    BUILTIN\Administrators:(ID)F
    BUILTIN\Users:(ID)R

    Far out. I'll slap the next person who tells me Unix is hard to use, if that's Microsoft's idea of user-friendliness.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Re:Summary makes it sounds like a virus but it's n by evanbd · · Score: 4, Funny
  15. Re:Running as admin is fun by dov_0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Far out. I'll slap the next person who tells me Unix is hard to use, if that's Microsoft's idea of user-friendliness.

    From someone who runs a PC repair business, XP makes Unix look like childs play... Man it even makes doing a Gentoo install look easy.

    Give me a nice clean bash terminal any day.

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
  16. Just wait 'til... by CarpetShark · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just wait 'til you get a dumbass letter from the RIAA saying that the IP 127.0.0.1 has been identified as a computer uploading copyrighted material. Then the shit will really hit the fan ;)

    1. Re:Just wait 'til... by dmsuperman · · Score: 4, Funny

      They would get halfway through the trial before realizing they're sitting on both sides of the court. Incompetent jackasses -_-

      --
      :(){ :|:& };: Go!
    2. Re:Just wait 'til... by BlueStrat · · Score: 4, Funny

      They would get halfway through the trial before realizing they're sitting on both sides of the court. Incompetent jackasses -_-

      And how much do you want to bet they'd still try for a conviction or settlement? :D

      Cheers!

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
  17. Re:Summary makes it sounds like a virus but it's n by mqduck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm all against nefarious software creeping onto my system, but this is like complaining that the guy you tried to buy drugs from turned out to be a cop.

    What, you don't get pissed when that happens to you?

    --
    Property is theft.
  18. Re:It literally kills its own spreading method by scream+at+the+sky · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mod parent up. If you can't get to thepiratebay.org anymore, you're gonna reinstall your OS.

    <cynic>
    if you can't get to thepiratebay.org, where are you gonna get your OS from?
    </cynic>

    --
    I wish I was a neutron bomb, for once I could go off...
  19. Re:First? by kdemetter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well , the trojan has been removed , and i'm sure the user uploading has also been identified and banned.

    If it changes the hosts file , it's easy to identify, and remove.

    We get trojan and virus uploaders all the time, and they are removed at first sight, so this is nothing new, and nothing TPB can't handle.

  20. Interesting artistic action by drx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually i think this is an interesting action. As a communicative act, this trojan shows several things, e.g. that the internet stays an unstable place where everything is mostly determined by convention -- even with pirates -- AND that TPB is taking down torrents they don't like, despite being a stronghold of free speech. Of course "malicious software" is the argument here for removal of the torrent, but who defines what is malicious? In the end TPB caters to the needs of its community, by filtering "content" this community doesn't approve of.

    1. Re:Interesting artistic action by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the prerogative of people running a webpage. Detach yourself from the idea that "the internet" is a place without rules. It's not an anarchy, it's a collection of tiny dictatorships, with every server admin being a little dictator.

      The nice thing about the internet, compared to reality, is that you can simply walk away if you don't like the taste of said dictator and create your own little dictatorship.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Interesting artistic action by Kindaian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do believe that changing hosts file without consent is enough malicious... ;)

  21. Re:Running as admin is fun by calmofthestorm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well if you want to go there, most modern linux filesystems support ACLs as well, they're just not generally needed since programs only ask for root if they need it...

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  22. Re:Running as admin is fun by hvm2hvm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, in theory, the permission(security on the whole) system of NTFS + XP/Vista is better. It's more customizable and has a complete GUI interface. Still, it doesn't work nearly as well as is could. Many things aren't put in the right default permissions which makes a lot of stuff fail when not having admin privileges (I know I stopped using a limited user account when winamp didn't work well).

    Also, a more complex problem is that Windows users don't know about all that stuff and can't be bothered to learn something they think it doesn't help. Yes, now with the rapid expansion of Ubuntu and other distros too there are quite a few computer illiterates using Linux. It will be fun to see if Linux will still manage when(if) it will become the main OS and all the malware is directed to it.

    I guess we could say that the real problem would be that malware/viruses/trojans get created in the first place but then we would wind up in philosophical territory and many of you have probably stopped reading my post already.

    --
    ics
  23. rickbot by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

    Patches your flash player so that everything you look at on Youtube gets replaced by Mr. Astley's stellar performance.

  24. Here you go by temcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have said it yourself: "it is 100% certain that those who download pirated versions will never become legitimate customers." Ergo, the real damage (loss of profits) from those pirates incurred by you is exactly zero. On the other hand, you are going to inflict some real, very non-zero damage to these people by your hypothetical actions. Therefore these actions would be wrong even if we are to disregard all PR and legal reasons already cited by others here.

  25. OT thead by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 3, Funny

    Somewhat relevant quote from Clientcopia:

    In my previous life as a fed agent I was often asked to assist with some "undercover" sting operations all over the Northeast US. One of the most memorable was a op in northern Maine. I was to play the brother-in-law of our source whose co-worker had recently asked him if he knew of any good dealers of crack.

    Long story short, they brought me in to sell him crack. We met the "Client" as planned and you should have seen this kids eyes when I pulled out this giant bag of crack we had obtained from a previous bust. He looked like he was going to start crying, like he had just come to know Jesus or something... anyway he wanted to buy it all, every last gram of it, but he had only brought $150.00 bucks with him.

    I thought for a second and asked him if had his checkbook on him and he did. I asked him how much money he had in the bank, he told me and I told him he could just write me a check for the total. This kid didn't think twice about it and started writing the thing out. As he was writing he asked me all the usual questions, correct spelling of my name, confirmed the date, then stopped writing for a second, put his pen down, and I started to panic.

    He looked me straight in the eye and he stated that he always wrote down "the reason" in the little space provided in the lower left hand of checks for that purpose. Before I could even speak he picked his pen back up again and started writing, then folded the check in half and handed it to me. Before I handed him the crack I wanted to see what he wrote, so I unfolded the check and read aloud; "For Illegal Drugs", the second I read that out loud we could all hear very loud laughter coming from the room next door. You see I was wired and 6 agents were in the next room, hanging on every word. They knew they had alerted this guy and without delay came charging into the room to arrest him, but what a strange sight it was to see 6 armed feds tearing into a room, guns drawn and laughing so hard they really could not even speak in complete sentences...

  26. Darwin Award Nominee by Waxwing+Slain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can we have the name of the person who downloaded the "serial key generator" and found this trojan? What did it claim to generate a serial key for, Duke Nukem vs Predator 2?

  27. The parent is not a troll so mod up please. by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even though it was probbaly intended to be a troll, it is worthy of discussion.

    As a responsible software development shop, you should know that you absolutely do NOT want any version of your software floating around that attacks a users machine.

    All I need to hear is that your Application 2.1 will say, format a harddrive and delete all partitions... and I woould not touch it with a 10 foot pole.

    So. If you want to completely destry your customer base - go ahead and pull such a stunt.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  28. Re:Running as admin is fun by marcosdumay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Try to open regedit someday.

    Anyway, "easy to use" is jargon to "works like Windows" nowadays. So, obviously, Windows is "easy to use", you can't contest that.

  29. Downloading is wrong? by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Tell that to SourceForge.

    If these people are caught with ties to any industry the FTC needs to come down on them, hard.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  30. Re:It literally kills its own spreading method by Erikderzweite · · Score: 2, Funny

    This way we can finally drag the user kicking and screaming into the year of Linux on desktop! :)

  31. For the Japanese-impaired by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Informative

    What what!
    Your idiot! [yes, the possessive]
    You're annoying!

    1. Re:For the Japanese-impaired by pxlmusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      there once was a girl from nantucket...

      --
      "If for any reason you're not satisfied with our service, I hate you."
  32. Madonna has new strategy by fuliginous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Madonna has since adopted an even nastier tactic, that of producing such lousy crap no one will want to pirate it (specifically her most recent album!).

  33. Re:Summary makes it sounds like a virus but it's n by TheSpoom · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
  34. Thanks - didn't know about suprbay by Werrismys · · Score: 3, Informative

    well, I didn't.

    --
    'Once scientists, even the dim-witted social scientists, get muzzled, the Western Civilization is finished.' - oldhack
  35. Re:Running as admin is fun by techprophet · · Score: 2, Informative

    And then some parts of the APIs have no docs or at least not ones that tell what a function does.