Slashdot Mirror


Google Terminates Six Services

Jonah Bomber writes with this excerpt from Information Week: "In addition to Google's announcements about the elimination of 100 recruiting positions and the shutdown of offices in Austin, Texas; Trondheim, Norway; and Lulea, Sweden, the company said it would close Dodgeball, Google Catalog Search, Google Mashup Editor, Google Notebook, and Jaiku. It also said it's discontinuing the ability to upload videos to Google Video. ... Jaiku, however, will live on as an open source project. Gundotra said that Google engineers have been porting the microblogging service to Google App Engine and that when the migration is completed, the company plans to make the code available under the Apache license."

195 comments

  1. Hmm by pugdk · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of the other ones, but Google Notebook have come in handy plenty of times.

    Sad that Google feel the need to close down these services, I mean... how much man power could it really cost just to keep them running?

    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can still use it! See http://googlenotebookblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/stopping-development-on-google-notebook.html "Starting next week, we plan to stop active development on Google Notebook. This means we'll no longer be adding features or offer Notebook for new users. But don't fret, we'll continue to maintain service for those of you who've already signed up."

    2. Re:Hmm by htnmmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was recently looking over Google's AdSense revenues and noticed that they were quite low.

      While their own site's earnings have been growing, the earnings of their AdSense publishers has leveled off.

      The cut they take from AdSense revenues has also gotten smaller and smaller. I was wondering if Google might abandon AdSense all together because of it.

      What's probably keeping AdSense alive is the $500 million they keep in the bank because of their net 60 payment terms and because people don't get paid until they reach $100.

      Half a billion dollar hit wouldn't look nice.

      Seems like they're working on improving the results in that area, but these other services just couldn't be monetized properly.

      It's nice though. If Google were to give every service online away for free, it would leave little room for other developers to grab a piece off the (shrinking?) pie.

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am still looking for a replacement. Who knows how long till they stop access completely.

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft OneNote. It isnt integrated in to the browser, but it stays in the tray and Win+N opens a new unfiled note, and Win+Shift+N open the last page you were on in filed.

    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not running MS-Windows, you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just offering a possible solution. If your choices prevent you from considering the offered solution, you're free to look for something different elsewhere.

    7. Re:Hmm by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      > Seems like they're working on improving the results in that area,
      > but these other services just couldn't be monetized properly.

      "Monetized"??? Monetization? Monetizing? To monetize? Monetizability?

      I presume that what you're saying is that Google isn't making a huge profit on those experiments.

    8. Re:Hmm by htnmmo · · Score: 1

      "Monetized"??? Monetization? Monetizing? To monetize? Monetizability?

      I presume that what you're saying is that Google isn't making a huge profit on those experiments.

      Yes, that's what I meant. In the future I'll try to refrain from terms that have only become popular in the past decade so as to not confuse you. Sound swell?

    9. Re:Hmm by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      How about avoiding all nonsense words, and not only "monetize"?

    10. Re:Hmm by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 2

      How about avoiding all nonsense words, and not only "monetize"?

      Nonsense? Oh, I get it. People should just dumb down, everywhere, like a new lowest common denominator applied to learning or reading? I have a constructive idea: Why don't you buy a fucking dictionary, and read it, rather than brag about your ignorance in public?

    11. Re:Hmm by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 0, Troll

      Are you American by any chance?

      "Monetize" is as ungrammatical a word as "action" when people use it as a verb, or "brown" when used as a verb - both common grammatical errors used by Americans.

      Perhaps it should be you who learns something about the English tongue.

    12. Re:Hmm by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      The problem with monetize is it has become one of those buzzword bingo words like "synergy" that marketing drones have latched onto and like to spout to make presentations sound better. While I personally don't have a problem with it, I can understand how those that have had to listen to marketing drones can get quite sick of buzzword bingo.

      Just as I'm sure that I'm not the only one who is sick of seeing M$ in discussions about Microsoft. Please stop, that joke was old when Win95 was popular. If you don't want to type the name please use MSFT which gets your point across without sounding like a troll. Hell most Windows users aren't old enough to even know where the whole "M$" thing came from so it REALLY sounds stupid to them.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    13. Re:Hmm by htnmmo · · Score: 1

      definition of monetize

      The term dates back to 1879 the usage has just been adapted but the underlying theme is the same. To convert into money.

      Now go back to your support line.

    14. Re:Hmm by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      > The term dates back to 1879 the usage has just been adapted
      > but the underlying theme is the same. To convert into money.

      You mean, like, to liquefy that asset?

      Why don't they just say "liquefy" instead of the ungrammatical use of "monetize"?

    15. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you stop confusing the lowest common denominator with the greatest common multiple?

    16. Re:Hmm by sindabearing · · Score: 1

      its a pity. skf bearings

    17. Re:Hmm by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Perhaps it should be you who learns something about the English tongue.

      What is this? The Dawn of the Dullards?

      Listen and listen good you atrociously dull limey cunt. Here's another definition of monetize. Instead of reading, your life is wrapped up in video games and Nintendo bullshit, right? Do they have basements over there, yet? Last time I was there you had be downtown to find a doorway over 4 feet tall. So while you were in the root cellar, or whatever, playing your Nintendo games and shit, guess what Nintendo was monetizing? Your useless, pointlees and pathetic fat fuck lifestyle. Bite that, Bitches

    18. Re:Hmm by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      Why don't you stop confusing the lowest common denominator with the greatest common multiple?

      Guess what, AC? Straight A's in math, and yeah, all the way up, Bitch. Kiss my ass cowboy. Oh and shove your acronym dictionary up your ass, too, sideways. You know, to get the maximum benefit.

    19. Re:Hmm by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      If you want to convert an asset into a liquid asset, I believe "liquidate" is the correct form, as oppose to liquefy. That aside, a liquid asset is not a monetized asset.

      Suppose you have a car. Liquidating the car would convert it into cash or other liquid asset--ie. you'd sell it. Monetizing the car means you've figured out how to make money using the car. You've turned a piece of equipment into a source of money. Maybe you deliver pizzas with it. This is sense 3 of the definition. You've retained the asset (the car in this case), but you've turned it into a money maker. It isn't money, but it's become a source of money./P>

      Compare to the phrase "make a mint off of (whatever)."

    20. Re:Hmm by Helldesk+Hound · · Score: 1

      > If you want to convert an asset into a liquid asset, I believe
      > "liquidate" is the correct form, as oppose to liquefy. That
      > aside, a liquid asset is not a monetized asset.

      A Liquid asset is... cash.

      He said that to "monetize" means to turn into money. To me that means to liquefy, or liquidate.

      > Suppose you have a car. Liquidating the car would convert it
      > into cash or other liquid asset--ie. you'd sell it. Monetizing
      > the car means you've figured out how to make money using the car

      So what you're saying is "monetizing" means "to make money".

      Why don't you just say "make money" so instead of using the ungrammatical nonsense word "monetize"?

    21. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a synergistic paradigm shift in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

  2. Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by Mathinker · · Score: 2, Funny

    I know about Evernote (from previous postings here), are there others which are worthwhile?

    A pity, as I had wanted to aggregate the exposure of personal info to Google....

    1. Re:Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 1

      UberNote isn't half bad. It doesn't maintain separate "notebooks" like gNotebook and Evernote do, but it does support tagging. It also does some cool importing from all kinds of services (including gNotebook), and you can send updates to it from AIM, an iPhone, and possibly others.

    2. Re:Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by darrylo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, I'm a big fan of Evernote, and so I strongly recommend that you check it out, While it's not identical to Google Notebook, the searching and offline capabilities are really nice. The Evernote folks are supposedly working on a Google Notebook to Evernote migration path.

      That said, if you don't like Evernote, I think the closest match to Google Notebook is Zoho Notebook, which is part of the Zoho online suite: http://notebook.zoho.com/ . It even has a Firefox plugin, although I've never used it.

      Also, if you're paranoid about your personal information, Microsoft's OneNote is a decent standalone note-taking program. I don't think there's any web access, but you should be able to access the same notebook files on multiple PCs, via online storage providers like DropBox or JungleDisk.

    3. Re:Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      not having used it but just went to look at it i can't say if this is a viable alternative. What about just using Google Docs?

    4. Re:Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The similarity between http://notebook.zoho.com/ and the usual Google login pages is strong enough to qualify as phishing...

    5. Re:Suggestions for alternative to Google Notebook? by hannson · · Score: 1

      You can sign in with your Google Account or Yahoo! Account. Personally I don't think a legitimate site imitating a UI design that has worked pretty well for Google should be considered phishing.

  3. Highlights one of the problems.. by onion2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This just highlights one of the negative aspects of using services out there on the net - if it's not running on your physical hardware it can be closed when the company decides it's not profitable to carry on with it. In the case of these services I doubt there's anyone relying on them to do business, but that definitely isn't the case for things that run in the various compute clouds, or small companies migrating to things like Google Docs, GMail or Google Calendar.

    I wouldn't run anything business critical on something I couldn't replace very easily.

    1. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't run anything business critical on something I couldn't replace very easily.

      Does that actually apply to any of the services you mentioned? GMail provides POP and IMAP access. Calendar exports to .ics, and syncs with various programs. And with Docs, you can quickly download your files as a ZIP full of HTML files.

      Indeed, it would be crazy to use any kind of service (paid or not) for something important and not make your own backups. But Google, at least in recent years, has done a pretty good job of allowing this.

    2. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by nicc777 · · Score: 1

      It would be nice to see actual numbers - like how many people used Notebook on a day to day bases. Somehow they must be able to justify the actions only if they know the true impact. I agree that from a business point of view it would not be wise to rely on these services, but how many individual users found these services useful? And for them to point out that we should rather ise Docs? No - I kinda liked my little FF plugin for taking quick notes. O well - I see at least we can still use notebook for some time to come.

      --
      Need an ISP in South Africa?
    3. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by rolfwind · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This just highlights one of the negative aspects of using services out there on the net - if it's not running on your physical hardware it can be closed when the company decides it's not profitable to carry on with it. In the case of these services I doubt there's anyone relying on them to do business, but that definitely isn't the case for things that run in the various compute clouds, or small companies migrating to things like Google Docs, GMail or Google Calendar.

      In the case of gmail and those apps, since it's out for domains that actually pay Google for the service - I suppose the risk isn't as severe at all and I would definitely recommend using Google to host school email (not all business for other reasons) as it can save a lot of money and provide much better end user experience.

      It's about calculated risk and perspective. The specific google services you mentioned are very low risk of being discontinued. The actual ones being discontinued had good reasons: Google Video was redundant with Google owning youtube. Google notebook seems redundant with Google Docs imo. I don't know enough about the others, but they are not in the same league as gmail, which probably is almost as important to google as is its search in some ways.

    4. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose the more accurate version of this is that there is always a risk in using 'free' services out there on the net. If you can't understand how a company is making money, there is probably a high risk of the company not being around forever. Twitter, Facebook, etc are all high-risk locations to store data.

    5. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Two rules of thumb. 1. Never have one of anything 2. Never install anything that cannot be reversed within reason.

    6. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      One interesting solution to this problem is Prophet - an open source distributed hosting solution.

      More info here: http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/07/oscon-day-2-prophet-your-path.html

    7. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't unique to 'services on the net'. Services -anywhere- are subject to this. Nothing has changed.

      What you really mean is 'software running on computers you don't control.'

      As as someone already pointed out, this is less of a problem for people who are paying for their service, rather than getting them for free.

      So what you really mean is 'software that you don't pay for, running on computers you don't control.'

      Why is it such a big surprise that it could go away?

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    8. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by spisska · · Score: 1

      This just highlights one of the negative aspects of using services out there on the net - if it's not running on your physical hardware it can be closed when the company decides it's not profitable to carry on with it.

      Sort of. It looks like these are all getting canned because they're not really used. This is a good thing. You don't want to be spending a lot of time and resources on products that are unused, half-baked, and for which there's no realistic plan. There is a lesson here for Redmond.

      It seems to me that while the specific products may be shutting down, the engineering and code is getting folded back into Google's more core products, like Apps. This is also a good thing.

      In the case of these services I doubt there's anyone relying on them to do business, but that definitely isn't the case for things that run in the various compute clouds, or small companies migrating to things like Google Docs, GMail or Google Calendar.

      Unless I'm mistaken, you can run Google Apps (Mail, Docs, Calendar, etc) on your own hardware with your own storage if you want. But the point is that at a certain complexity, it's easier and cheaper to have Google manage your mail infrastructure than to do it yourself. You can still keep a local archive, or even a local mirror.

      Yes, there are risks and drawbacks to any hosted service. But our Exchange system now is creaking under its own weight, fails to backup shockingly often, and is down more than 99.9% monthly SLA that Google Apps offers. Scaling up the Exchange server would require a significant cash outlay, and I'm not convinced it would be any cheaper over the lifetime of the system.

      I'm in operations, not IT, so it's not my decision to make. But I have got our IT manager looking into it, mainly by asking her this: When the mail goes down who do you want working on it -- a crew of geniuses in Mountain View or you and your intern?

    9. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by twilson94070 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just exported the contents of my google notebook to google docs. That oughta do it! :P

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
    10. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I would definitely recommend using Google to host school email (not all business for other reasons) as it can save a lot of money and provide much better end user experience."

      I would recommend against it, and I would be adamant about it. GMail's service is terrible; every few days, I get IMAP errors, usually along the lines of, "Cannot open mailbox," and occasionally a login failure (despite the fact that my username and password are stored and reused by my email client). School email can require the same level of reliability and availability as business email, at least at the college level: financial aid notices, graduate school applications, job applications, etc. Being unable to access your email can be a serious problem, and frankly, Google's service has not shown itself to be reliable enough for anything beyond irrelevant personal emails.

      There are free-as-in-beer email servers, even for very high volumes of mail, that any competent IT staff could maintain with minimal effort and better reliability than GMail. How much money do you think GMail would save? Is that amount of money actually worth the hassle of dealing with GMail?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    11. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cloud, The Cloud, The Cloud. What happens when the sky clears and it always does?

    12. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      No. It doesn't.
      At least the risk is about the same, as normal apps even GPL apps.

      The same thing happends with legacy apps, in many ways.
      You buy an app, you run it the company who produces the app goes out of business, your hardware upgrade make the software incompatible thus you will need to get a new application from someone else with a 50/50 shot of migrating your data. If if it was an open source app that stopped productions for most people who got this app to save money (sorry that is the real reason why people get GPL software not because of freedom as in speech but free as in beer) They are not going to try to make a port of the software for the new platform. They will get a new application, to do the work.

      Google has a lot of ways of downloading and backing up its data and you can save them in popular formats too (not necessarily the most geeky) So your risk is really not that much different you will just need to choose will the SaaS service outlast your hardware/software platoform or will your hardware/software platform outlast your SaaS solution.
      Also for SaaS solutions don't forget about competition. Remember back in the days when AOL started to loose its popularity, most competing ISP offered services to move all your AOL information to their services. I could see Microsoft offering a service to move all your Google Docs info into Office Live, and vice versa, this in some ways is better then having your app run into legacy status. As you have a quick method of moving your data across platforms. As for other professional SaaS just MAKE SURE YOUR CONTRACT HAS A POLICY THAT ALLOWS YOU GET ALL YOUR DATA IN A UNIVERSALLY READABLE FORMAT yes people can make contracts, and get what they want from them.

      I wouldn't run anything business critical on something I couldn't replace very easily.
      In theory it is a good idea however lets if you can look at it in a money perspective. You use Google Services for 5 years it saves $100,000 in expenses during those 5 years. It goes down you get your data (as you are smart enough to get your data as it is a feature it has, to give you your data) then you get a new service and you need to write an import method to put it back. Say it takes you 6 month (Usually a lot less) and you are getting 50k a year so it cost the company $40k (by adding in benefit costs) for you to import the data to the new service. So the company still saved $60,000 during those 5 years.
      For making smart business decisions you need to balance the value of the short terms savings, vs. worse case expense, try to find ways of minimizing your worse case.
      Lets say I read and believe every word of RMS so now SaaS is pure evil. So I went to using an Open Source LDAP, Open Office, and Email Server at my own location. Then we get a fire at our location, or our server crashed hard and our backup tapes we reused them one to many times, or things got so busy we didn't backup. You are in the same boat as the SaaS going out of business all your important data is gone. Chances are especially form a small company you will not have best practices for data management like google will have, thus it is more possible that you will loose all your data, or a good chunk of it much more often then it would for google, or the chance that the service will stop with no way to get your data out.

      In theory it is safer to have your data where you can control it. But in practice it is usually not true, because the theory expect you to be just as good as the other guys. But you normally have more to do then the other guys. At your shop you have a lot of responsibilities as a big SaaS shop there are people working just to make sure your data is safe.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    13. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by yashachan · · Score: 3, Informative

      So far as I can tell, gmail is more reliable than my university's email.

      Then again, these are the same guys who destroyed one of my professor's laptops when trying to install Visual Studio Pro.

    14. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by ArgumentBoy · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought. Anyone trying to offer these sorts of services has to begin by saying exactly what will happen if the company/service disappears. Users have to be guaranteed not just forewarning but some automatic backup and change in provider/service (just in case you're in Africa or someplace for a month when all your documents are scheduled to disappear). Actually Google would have been the perfect provider-of-last-resort...up until last week. Who guards the guards?

    15. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Funny

      To be fair, my university's IT staff is incompetent. They thought that it was a good idea to set up a firewall to block SSL access to POP3, leave open unencrypted POP3 access, and then actually ADVISE people who had problems with the VPN (which is another disaster born from their incompetence) to just use the unencrypted port. I reported this problem, then reported it again with an explanation of why it is a problem, and they have refused to fix it.

      In my original post, I should have emphasized that any competent IT staff could keep a mail server up and running.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    16. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by lukas84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But our Exchange system now is creaking under its own weight, fails to backup shockingly often, and is down more than 99.9% monthly SLA [google.com] that Google Apps offers. Scaling up the Exchange server would require a significant cash outlay, and I'm not convinced it would be any cheaper over the lifetime of the system.

      Let me guess, you're still running Exchange 2003?

    17. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by fermion · · Score: 1
      to me the issue is not he application, but the data. for instance long ago i used an app names eudora was used for mail, then it began to move to a new license model, and I moved away from it. This was not an issue because the data was on my machine, and it was in a known format. The same goes for my move to OO.org from MS.

      Certainly the use of such online applications should be used with the knowledge that that data may not be available. For video uploads, and one off notes, that is not a big deal. These services seem to be for data of minimal importance. But it is another warning to keep track of ones own data.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was exactly his point. It shouldn't be a surprise. But some people are idiots and do find it surprising.

    19. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by mrbooze · · Score: 1

      There are free-as-in-beer email servers, even for very high volumes of mail, that any competent IT staff could maintain with minimal effort and better reliability than GMail. How much money do you think GMail would save? Is that amount of money actually worth the hassle of dealing with GMail?

      According to a Forester report, they estimate that it costs on average $25.18 per month per user to provide email services in-house, compared to $8.47 for Gmail.

      Interestingly, most people couldn't actually guess what the real cost of providing email services in-house was, many guessing $2-11 per user.

      The upshot of Forester's analysis was that up to around 15,000 users, it could be substantially cheaper to outsource email as an infrastructure service.

      Admittedly, there can be a lot more to the calculations though. Depending on your business needs or industry, you could have regulatory or compliance requirements that might interfere with an outsourced solution if the vendor can't meet those requirements.

      The Forester report: http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,46302,00.html

      Arstechnica report on the report: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20090108-report-gmail-about-one-third-as-expensive-as-hosted-e-mail.html

    20. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      Google's SLA is pretty pointless though. Maximum of 15 days free service at the end of your term that you have to ask for yourself? You might as well not even bother saying they have an SLA. Companies that give money back per X minutes of downtime or allow early term cancellations have a higher incentive to provide better service. (Although this is strictly my personal opinion since I'd rather not give money back.)

      But you're right that you could get far cheaper and more reliable service by outsourcing your mail, especially if one is facing existing Exchange problems that require a forklift upgrade that could pay for decades of hosted mail service. Unless you're a really large org (university, fortune 500, etc.) there's little to no financial incentive to running your own mail server these days.

      Disclaimer: I run one such mail hosting service that caters to small shops.

      --
      this is my sig
    21. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 1

      I have 50 accounts for 20 or so users spread across 4 domains that use google apps for domains. Although google apps is not perfect, I have never once heard of the kind of issues you are describing. I would posit that the issue is your client.

      However, I agree that google apps is not appropriate for a large organization such as a school. It works for us because we are small enough that simply relying on individual email users to back up their gmail accounts once a week in case google should go bankrupt is more cost effective than anything else. The uptime that we have had from google apps is better than anything we can do in house for a similar price.

      --
      weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
    22. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by stickyc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Google notebook seems redundant with Google Docs imo.

      I disagree. As a Google Notebook user, I found it very fast and easy to access. The cost (in clicks) of getting into a Google doc and organizing said doc after is much higher than with Notebook, plus there was an integrated FF plugin that made it very useful for clipping pages.

      While Google's statement is "no new development", I think odds are that it will be shuttered completely within 24 months as other notebook services' (Evernote, Zoho) feature sets become compelling enough for existing GNotebook users to migrate, thus lessening the outcry when Google does pull the plug.

      I'm sad that they're closing it down, but if you've got to end a service, this is a good course of action.

    23. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by multisync · · Score: 1

      I think if you want that provider-of-last-resort, you need to be willing to pay for it. I'm sure with some scripting you could automate the process of regularly backing up your important data from these services to (hopefully multiple) online "failsafe" storage sites via scp or whatever. Having multiple, redundant back up sites guards against a catastrophe if they are far enough apart.

      As for online services that don't charge their users, I would say you use them at your own risk, and entrust the longevity of your data to the provider at your own peril.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    24. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It only highlights the problem of using FREE net services.

      If you pay for hosting ( or self host ) and host your own custom webapps, its not an issue.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    25. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used for my small business email server: 1) $8/mo hosting from multiple, well-rated hosting companies; 2) exchange server in our office; and 3) google apps. Google apps does give me some errors.. but less errors than I ever had with paid hosting or exchange.

      If your business can't afford a $3k/month + internet connection, IMHO I think Google apps is great.

    26. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by edmicman · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm mistaken, you can run Google Apps (Mail, Docs, Calendar, etc) on your own hardware with your own storage if you want.

      Do you have a reference for this? I was looking for a self-hosted Gmail solution for a long time, and such a thing didn't exist as far as I knew. I've *love* to be able to have the GMail interface, but control the hosting and storage myself. I thought the only "appliance" google made was their search appliance...

    27. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to get those IMAP errors more frequently than that.

      I use the built-in email app in my Nokia N95 to access my email. If I leave it connected all day, I'll usually find that it's had a connection error and stopped checking at some point. I can't remember the last time I didn't have to reconnect manually at least once.

      Of course, this is compounded by the stupid decision by Nokia engineers to not attempt to reconnect after a failure.

    28. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by yashachan · · Score: 2

      Competence in IT staff would be nice. Then they might also realize that a mail system running on the Linux servers they already have is cheaper than running Exchange.

      My school's IT staff also has problems with secure email access. When we were on Lotus, we had to use the Lotus Notes client or the web-based deal to get a secure connection (if we used something like Thunderbird, our password was sent in a plain text file). They haven't fixed that with Exchange, either; the only secure email access is through Outlook or Outlook Web Access. At least the web-based Lotus Notes wasn't crippled in Firefox/non-IE browser. :\

    29. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by RudeIota · · Score: 3, Informative

      It always works for me (free gmail service) with IMAP. I've had a couple of issues where I had to "unlock" my account with their captcha verification.

      Of course, when you PAY for the Google Apps service, 99.9% uptime is guaranteed and Gmail isn't 'beta' anymore...

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    30. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by The+Second+Horseman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      We're doing it for a fraction of that. Probably closer to $30 a year per person. That includes SAN storage, servers (with VMware ESX licenses), some share of our Novell licensing (it's GroupWise on SuSE Linux) a share of the backup cost and the minimal amount of staff time needed to keep it running. $25/month per user would be a massive chunk of our operating budget. Heck, I'd like to have $8.47 per user per month. Even adding things like anti-virus and spam filtering doesn't push us up to $8.47 per person per month.

      Our unplanned outage time approaches 0%, and planned is hours per year (this year, there was a little more - we moved all the mail from a Netware 6.5 cluster setup to virtualized SuSE Linux running on VMware).

      I'm not including the cost of Blackberry support. Partially because individual departments pay for them, rather than central IT.

      I see numbers like this, and it makes me wonder if 1) companies are just doing dumb, wasteful things or 2) Forrester, Gartner, whoever figure out how to come to a pre-determined conclusion.

    31. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From what they say about the report, I'd be concerned about bias ... not to mention the absurdity of the computed number. Probably, they are comparing it to things like Microsoft Exchange, which do much more than email.

      Arstechnica also indicates that they factored in the cost of "client software" for email services other than google. Somehow, web browsers are free, but nobody could ever use a free email client?

      Finally, they state that the biggest portion of the cost was "clearly archiving" ...

    32. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      So login with the web interface. I've _never_ had a problem with that, and I've been using it for around 6 years I believe and check in at the very least around 10 times a day. And if POP and IMAP don't always work (I've never had a problem with them either...but I don't usually use them), so what? You _do_ have a way to access it. Not all schools provide POP and IMAP as it is.

    33. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      "Although google apps is not perfect, I have never once heard of the kind of issues you are describing. I would posit that the issue is your client."

      The reason you are wrong to assume it is my client is that I use IMAP to check my work email and school email, and this problem ONLY happens with Google. I am not alone, either; in fact, it is documented that Google's IMAP implementation is poor:

      http://www.wired.com/software/webservices/news/2007/10/imap

      As recently as last night I was receiving an error about my "Sent Mail" folder not existing, despite it having been there a few hours earlier and the error was gone, as inexplicably as it came, this morning. I have also had this error occur with all my mail folders, which made checking my email impossible. As I said, I have never seen another IMAP implementation with these sorts of problems.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    34. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by canadian_in_beijing · · Score: 1

      School email needs: 1) Security (no eyeballs in the background screening and datamining personal information...which Google does) 2) Under no circumstance should school email have advertising in their email system...which Google does. Privacy and protection from corporate greed is essential in school email systems and under no circumstance would I ever recommend incorporating Gmail.

    35. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the minimal amount of staff time needed to keep it running."

      The discussion began with school. Your organization just happen to have highly competent staff with the time to keep this going flawlessly. That fine but recommending your situation as the default option is kind of like the Monty Python line "when a man attacks you with a banana, you just pull the lever and release the tiger". Most school won't have staff capable of doing this (and have considered the implied cost of maintaining the competent staff).

    36. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Nurgled · · Score: 3, Informative

      I gather from Google engineers that this issue is caused by the abuse throttling features of GMail. If there's a botnet hitting Google on your subnet, or if your access patterns seem suspicious (which for me seems to include accessing my account from home, work and phone all by IMAP, but as usual the Googler's couldn't be specific about what triggers it) then they'll block you out until you pass a CAPTCHA.

      It's pretty annoying since you can't exactly send spam over IMAP. I guess the underlying service is what does the checking, and it can't tell the difference between SMTP, IMAP, and calls from the Web UI.

    37. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by try_anything · · Score: 1

      I use Notebook, too, and I'm glad I can keep using it, but I think it is poorly designed for the most common usage. It was meant to be used to collect snippets of web pages, but it seems that isn't a very useful or popular thing to do, so people just use it for simple text notes.

      I bet they could replace it with a simple note-taking gadget for Gmail and make 90% of the Notebook users (including me) happier than they were before.

    38. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Krommenaas · · Score: 1

      You're assuming your experience with GMail is representative for everyone's. My own experience is that it *always* works 100% without any problems whatsoever and that it is much more user-friendly than the Outlook/Exchange email service provided by my employer (a big IT services company). I'll bet you that my impression of Gmail is more common than yours.

    39. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by winwar · · Score: 1

      "What you really mean is 'software running on computers you don't control.'"

      Of course, you can have very expensive software that you don't control on computers you do control that could be just as problematic.

      As others have said, it comes down to risk management. Unfortunately most companies often don't do it well.

    40. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by bcrowell · · Score: 1

      I would recommend against [using Google to host school email], and I would be adamant about it. [...] School email can require the same level of reliability and availability as business email, at least at the college level: financial aid notices, graduate school applications, job applications, etc.

      The real question is whether the school's self-managed email would attain that level of reliability. It's one thing if you're at MIT, another if you're at a community college like the one where I work, with understaffed IT.

      There are free-as-in-beer email servers, even for very high volumes of mail, that any competent IT staff could maintain with minimal effort and better reliability than GMail.

      Frankly, not all schools have a competent IT staff. They tend not to pay well, so they don't attract the best talent.

    41. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Simulant · · Score: 1

      ...every few days, I get IMAP errors, usually along the lines of, "Cannot open mailbox," and occasionally a login failure (despite the fact that my username and password are stored and reused by my email client).

      Same here. Must say however, that the web interface works rather consistently. Wish they'd fix the IMAP problems though.

    42. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      The situation could be worse for desktop apps. When a company stops caring about producing a desktop application, they typically just stop providing updates. Sooner or later, a critical vulnerability starts gaining popularity.

      With the company disbanded, you may get no patch, and no warning. Then, even if you do get the warning, if the application is already integrated into the work environment, it might get labeled as an "acceptable risk". One of the HUGE advantages I see in cloud computing is that the burden of maintaining patch level is pushed up a few notches.

    43. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same issue with my gmail account when accessing in Mail.app. Turns out you just need to select synchronize then select take online and it goes away. Seems to be an issue with mail.app and less with gmail service.

    44. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      That sounds like your client - I've never heard of this and have used google apps for most several mailboxes for quite a while.

      Occasionally it seems to have authentication problems, but hitting retry a couple of times fixes that. That's the extent of the problems.

    45. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by no1home · · Score: 1

      I'm curious: What OS do you and the parent poster use? At work, I have Win XP with Outlook and I get the IMAP errors throughout the day. At home, I run Ubuntu with Thunderbird and I don't get the IMAP errors (unless that's what is causing the strange, random closing of TB, but nothing in the logs about IMAP).

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    46. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      I'm running Kontact on Fedora 10, and Gmail is the only IMAP implementation to give me these problems. What bothers me the most is that there is no consistency in these errors -- sometimes people get them, sometimes they don't, sometimes there is an error every few hours, sometimes I go weeks with no errors.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    47. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by maxume · · Score: 1

      The trick with online services is to make sure that you know how to get your data out, and to do it on a regular basis.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    48. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Saysys · · Score: 1

      Unless you are the CIO then you probably have failed to take into account the cost of human labor. It costs a great deal more than simple salary to employ someone and a great deal more than just the 'techs' to run pay for a technical project.

    49. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT CLIENT ARE YOU USING? I use IMAP with gmail and windows mobile 6 and it syncs something like every 15 minutes! and ver 5 before that. in two years of this ive NEVER had an error!

    50. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      It doesn't exist. GP is making it up.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    51. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Even adding things like anti-virus and spam filtering doesn't push us up to $8.47 per person per month.

      Really? What about the time you spend maintaining all these systems? If your outage rates are really that low, then the people who do your infrastructure planning and administration are exceptionally good at their jobs. The time spent by such people is not free. I don't see personnel costs anyway in your calculations. And yet for most IT functions, they're the biggest single cost.

    52. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty annoying since you can't exactly send spam over IMAP.

      Total n00b question: why is that?

    53. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Sending email and receiving email are done by completely different protocols. IMAP lets you access your email folders on the mail server and edit/move/delete emails you have received, but if you're sending email you use SMTP.

      That's why when you're configuring your email client, there's different settings for incoming and outgoing mail.

      Now, you _could_ spam someone with IMAP, but you'd have to break their password and then save an email in their inbox for them to read. This would get around almost any server-side spam filter, but considering you'd have to break the password for every account you want to spam, it's not very feasible.

      Besides, you'd make more money selling the passwords for the accounts than you would spamming them :)

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
    54. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. As a Google Notebook user, I found it very fast and easy to access. The cost (in clicks) of getting into a Google doc and organizing said doc after is much higher than with Notebook...

      How so? I haven't used Notebook, but with Docs you go to docs.google.com then it's one click to open an existing document or two to make a new one.

    55. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Try it and you will quickly see.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    56. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by darjen · · Score: 1

      I've also been using google notebook because I'm tired of losing my bookmarks whenever I switch a computer or browser.

      However, if they do terminate it completely and take it offline, I'll just start using gmail and create a new label for all my bookmarks.

    57. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      Whatever your problem is, it is not Google. At least it works perfectly fine here and I never got problems about it. Maybe your connection is crappy, or your OS. Did you make some comparisons? Anyway, for private use I would recommend Gmail, it's quite a good service.

      As for business solutions, I would also prefer in house solutions. Not just because of the reliability. Also you get more control of the filtering. You have more configuration options. Less information leakage risks. Can set up your own server sided AV. And so on.. But that is kind of a different story.

    58. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by hendridm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tested hosting one of my domains e-mail on Google Apps for awhile, and I got similar errors as the parent. It got so frustrating I just transferred the mail to another IMAP host.

      It seems only to happen with accounts hosted by the free Google Apps (@mydomain.com). My Gmail account (@gmail.com) never experienced this problem. Still, it was a pretty lousy demonstration of their Apps services...

    59. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by no1home · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying. I read the link you provided earlier to a Wired story and found some good links therein as well. It is possible, then, that this is the issue with my Thunderbird on Ubuntu (closing randomly). I've updated my settings in accordance with Google's instructions and suggestions (http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=78892&ctx=sibling#) to see if this produces any benefit. Most of the settings I already use and one I don't want to use (and is not critical here), but we'll see. I'll update in a day or two.

      To pretend to be on topic for the actual posted article...

      Most of those services I either never heard of or don't use. That being the case, I wonder how many people actually do use them. Perhaps G thinks the number of users is too low to warrant continued support. Being a predominantly ad-supported enterprise, if a service doesn't have enough visitors to sell ad space, it gets axed. If it were heavily used, I doubt they'd cut it. Of course, the exceptions would be services that have a duplicate elsewhere in the company, such as Google Video vs. YouTube. YouTube is the bigger one by far, so it's easier to cut Google Video.

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    60. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      You probably haven't included the power, cooling, network, and floor space cost of wherever that gear lives. Both installation and on-going costs. Also, for the backup solution.

      Maybe you did, but the point is that the fully loaded cost would include a lot of hidden costs that you might take for granted.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    61. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by no1home · · Score: 1

      {update} As I expected, those minor changes suggested by Google did not help. Thunderbird on Ubuntu still closes randomly. Again, this might or might not be an issue with GMail's IMAP implementation, but with reports of issues being plentiful (and somewhat random, it seems), it very well could be. {/update}

      --
      I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

      Persecutors will be violated!
    62. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      It isn't free, but isn't it accounted for here?

      and the minimal amount of staff time needed to keep it running.

      If everything hums along nicely because it was configured properly up front, and the system is resilient to hardware failures (or maybe lucky and has avoided hardware failures?), and user demand is stable, then what maintenance is there really?

      It's not as if the IT guys have to continually tweak settings and options to keep the mail system from bubbling over. If the demand on the system is pretty stable, and the configuration is sane, then the maintenance mostly boils down to swapping out hardware components when they go ka-put. Making the up front investment with competent personnel is expensive (and perhaps that ought to be rolled in), but that's NRE. The recurring costs ought to be dominated by such mundane things as electricity bills and replacement hardware in that case.

    63. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Akzo · · Score: 1

      Despite the word BETA being in the logo.

      --
      Sig is for Signature, so you don't have to manually sign every post.
    64. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      your hardware upgrade make the software incompatible
      I can see this being a problem for software that interacts with specialist hardware but most software doesn't really care too much about the hardware.

      It may have problems with modern operating systems but vmware and similar products get arround that.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    65. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Where can you get a copy of VMWare that runs OpenVMS, how about PrimeOS.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    66. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Apologies for not reading the post more carefully. Still, I really don't think that most email infrastructures are that labor un-intensive. I mean jeez, $30 a user/year? But that's just my uneducated opinion, I don't have the figures to back it up.

    67. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by orkybash · · Score: 1

      Your problem is in assuming that schools have competent IT staffs. I've worked at an elementary school before, and let me tell you that the IT person there, while competent, was the only IT person there and was highly overworked. He just didn't have time to reliably maintain servers like an email server. I'm getting my masters at a relatively small department and the only department IT person can't even maintain a CVS server, so we need to use off-site version management.

      There are two things going on here. First, the schools place more emphasis on directly funding education than on making the behind-the-scenes stuff run smoothly - it just isn't viewed as being as important. The second thing is that smaller schools or departments don't necessarily have the resources to hire the best of the best even if they realized that a good IT professional can do a lot to serve the educational side.

      So yes, I'm in the "gmail" camp on this one.

    68. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even trust the web-based gmail to stay connected all day. I generally refresh the whole page when I want to check for mail, as I've often found it disconnected without telling me.

    69. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMAP is for reading your mail, not sending it. You use the same SMTP protocol for sending as you do when you get your mail through POP.

    70. Re:Highlights one of the problems.. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Ok so vmware only does PC on PC (which is still very usefull because it allows use of older PC operating systems that don't get on with modern PC hardware and/or need to be kept in a security sandbox)

      but there are emulators out there for other platforms, HP seem to reccomend charon-vax or charon-axp (depending on whether you need the VAX version or the alpha version) for running openvms on a PC. They don't seem to want to publish the price openly though which is generally a sign it will be expensive (they offer a "freeware" version for non-commercial use though).

      primeos on the other hand I couldn't find anything for (I couldn't every find a description of what primeos was capable of)

      The PC platform is incrediblly common though, if and when it does start to get phased out I strongly suspect the situation will be much more similar to the VMS one (supported through emulation) than to the primeos one (dissapeared into obscurity).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  4. Jaiku? Open source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, if they open source Jaiku does that mean they'd actually let people sign up for it? Nobody's been allowed into Jaiku since Google bought it.

  5. Export your data? by nicc777 · · Score: 1

    At least I can see Google Notebook allows you to export your data to Docs. But will everybody be so lucky with all the other little tit-bits of information lying around?

    --
    Need an ISP in South Africa?
  6. Uploads longer than 10:59? by tepples · · Score: 0

    It also said it's discontinuing the ability to upload videos to Google Video.

    And Google's other video upload service has a 10 minute and 59 second limit. Now where are longer videos without a distinct stopping point, such as a play-through of a video game level, supposed to get uploaded? Vimeo doesn't want gaming videos either.

    1. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe nobody cares about your gaming videos? And maybe it is because of junk like that they are closing it down?

    2. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy cheap webhosting, use Flowplayer (or similar), and assemble a simple website. Done and done, for about $10-15/mo for reasonably high traffic.

      I don't know how the web has gotten so centralized. Wikipedia, Google, YouTube...it's dangerous to rely on these and expect them to do everything. Carve out your own corner of the web, and create your own rules.

    3. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    4. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by EdZ · · Score: 1

      Documentaries too. Where else would you be able to find an easily accessible copy of Hyperland, for example, without it being split into several parts or requiring a full download?

    5. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by edumacator · · Score: 1

      Now where are longer videos without a distinct stopping point, such as a play-through of a video game level, supposed to get uploaded?

      I don't know if this is what they had in mind, but...http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/01/14/2126204

    6. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks but I'd rather just sign up to Google Apps and let them mess with the web details while I get on with my work.

    7. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know how the web has gotten so centralized.

      Its pretty obvious why it got centralized. End users never had the necessary upstream bandwidth, often weren't even allowed to run their own servers, didn't have machines up 24/7, didn't have the knowledge to build their own webpages, didn't want to spend money to rent their own servers, etc. Add to that, that centralized content specific servers provide much better search and user interface then a random collection of pages on the web and it becomes pretty obvious why the web is the way it is today.

    8. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vimeo doesn't want gaming videos either.

      Nobody wants gaming videos. Watching someone else play through a game is fucking boring. No-one cares that you completed level 17 of Mario 6: Luigi's Spectacles in under 3 minutes.

    9. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about... youtube?

    10. Re:Uploads longer than 10:59? by tepples · · Score: 1
      Anonymous Coward wrote:

      Watching someone else play through a game is fucking boring.

      Except possibly in two cases: A. if you're stuck on that level, or B. if you're just there to listen to the player snark back at the NPCs. My current sig link is apropos here.

  7. I guess its the economy.. by Arjun+G.+Menon · · Score: 0

    Hopefully things will get better soon...

  8. Obscure services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Much of the reason why Google became popular was because of its clean front page. Other search engines like Altavista made you load a pile of superfluous stuff when you just wanted to search. But this has come back to bite Google because unless you hunt them out, you'll never know most of Google's services even exist.

    1. Re:Obscure services by echucker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wish I had mod points for you - you're spot on. Can't use it if you don't know it's there.

    2. Re:Obscure services by Auraiken · · Score: 1

      I disagree for the most part, Google services are obscure but the people who want them can and probably will find them, especially if theyre useful. It works out in googles favour for the most part because they can see the real amount of popularity for the products and discontinue as theyre doing now before they waste too much time on it. If it was visible to more people who didnt actually want it you might lure in the few who didnt really know until they tried it but youd also have the people who will just download it once to check it out and leave it alone after that therefore messing with the real stats on usage.

      And it isn't like they don't have a page where it displays all the services...

      my 2 cents anyways.

    3. Re:Obscure services by CarpetShark · · Score: 3, Funny

      unless you hunt them out, you'll never know most of Google's services even exist.

      Indeed. And that's a big issue with some of their better services.

      For example, initially, I was really panicking as I read this headline, as I tend to rely on some google services a lot. Thankfully, re-reading showed that they're only cancelling "six" services, not their sex services.

    4. Re:Obscure services by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

      Have you bothered to look on the upper left side of the Google front page, where those services are clearly linked?

      Really, it's all there. Has it gotten to the point where we need huge flashing animated banners with sound for people to find out about services on a website?

      Simple links are enough for me, and vastly preferred.

    5. Re:Obscure services by Dionysus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google services are obscure but the people who want them can and probably will find them, especially if theyre useful.

      How do you look for something you don't even know exists?

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    6. Re:Obscure services by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Have you bothered to look on the upper left side of the Google front page, where those services are clearly linked?

      Really, it's all there.

      They aren't all there. Grandcentral is not listed there. And that's just the first one I thought to check for.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Obscure services by AndreR · · Score: 5, Funny

      How do you look for something you don't even know exists?

      You google it?

    8. Re:Obscure services by wik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Clearly this is a problem that can be fixed with appropriate AdWords

      --
      / \
      \ / ASCII ribbon campaign for peace
      x
      / \
    9. Re:Obscure services by ccguy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure google can _easily_ make sure you know about any service they think they can sell to you.

      Don't assume that just because you don't know about some specific google services they have a marketing problem.

    10. Re:Obscure services by superdana · · Score: 1

      Thank you, Meno. :-)

    11. Re:Obscure services by lord_sarpedon · · Score: 1

      "Did you mean ?"
      Woah! I didn't even know people could bend that way!

      Thank you Google Sex Search!

      --
      "Strangers have the best candy" -Me
    12. Re:Obscure services by zobier · · Score: 1

      Emergence.

      In the case of Google Movies, the service presented itself to me when I was performed a related search.

      I quite like Google Movies, I find it so much easier than navigating and comparing multiple buggy cinema franchise websites. Obviously to book online I still need to deal with the said sites but Google make it much easier to find out what's on when, where and they include results from independent operators. Also the meta data relating to popularity and aggregated reviews are useful.

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    13. Re:Obscure services by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Woah! I didn't even know people could bend that way!

      Thank you Google Sex Search!

      If you stop saying thankyou, and go around the other side of the screen, they'll bend you back upright.

    14. Re:Obscure services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  9. Google notebook! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use that! What am i going to use now? pastebin?

    1. Re:Google notebook! by beef3k · · Score: 1

      Zoho is mentioned as an alternative in quite a few places. Haven't tried it myself, but you might want to give it a go here.

  10. Its first recession. by jellomizer · · Score: 0

    And Google does the same as all the other companies do, lay off a bunch of people.
    I don't think we are going to see the same google after the recession is over.
    Employees knowing their jobs could be at risk may be more fearful of taking risks or speaking out. Plus feeling more like a necessary expense vs an asset that may not have reach full potential will hurt too.

    In hind site (tough I have always felt it) google should taken a more pragmatic view of hiring, not trying to make it a huge boom, like they did. Or find a simple way of automating who is a good fit or not, with a stupid online form asking all these crazy questions about you your political beliefs, open source projects etc... They should have stuck to the slower process of Cover letter and Resume, have people read them put them into the correct job bucket and have other people read them. Then call up the person and schedule an interview(s) It is a much slower process, But slow is sometimes a good thing. When google got where it is now they could have just did a hiring freeze and will be doing as well as it is now. Jerky boom and bust behavior is not a good business plan.
    I know google has been a great success but like most successes there is a large factor of luck, the right idea at the right time, at the right place with the right people.
    Chances are if Google started a year to early or to late it just may not have been successful. Many of the best business men are running companies that no one has heard of. They are making profit and they are making good money, when a recession hits they are sill making profit and good money. They may not be pinging radar, the CEO may not be the ultra charismatic leader, but just a pragmatic office manager of sorts. There are companies that have had triple digit growth have huge number of people working for them and never make it to the news.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Its first recession. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are companies that have had triple digit growth have huge number of people working for them and never make it to the news.

      Care to give some examples? I'd like to invest!

    2. Re:Its first recession. by ranok · · Score: 1

      Google *needs* a way to trim down the number of resumes it gets, unless it wants to hire 100s more HR folks. They have for each given semester or summer, a stack of resumes (after the automated sorting) about 10' tall (mind you, this is just for interns). Can you imagine sorting through a 1000 resumes a day just to keep up? I think Google knows data mining, and should use it to it's fullest potential!

      --
      (>'.')>
    3. Re:Its first recession. by ionix5891 · · Score: 4, Informative

      some more interesting reading today Why Google Employees Quit

    4. Re:Its first recession. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've seen it before and we've seen it again. Google has seen its bubble burst, and now it's crunch time. Good luck to them, provided that they try to live up to their motto of not being "evil". I'm rather suspicious of that, but better for Microsoft to have competition than little to none.

    5. Re:Its first recession. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      some more interesting reading today Why Google Employees Quit

      That's one view of what it is like to work at Google. Obviously by asking people who decided to quit, you are going to get a very unbalanced view of that. If you had asked any of the several thousands of Google employees who don't want to quit, what it is like to work there, you would have gotten a totally different answer. And why exactly do they talk about what the hiring process was like? Once they are through it and have gotten the job, why would the hiring process have anything to say in a decision about whether to quit again?

  11. Well if nobody's watching them by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 0

    then the bandwidth bill is close to 0. It's not like hard drives are expensive those days.

    1. Re:Well if nobody's watching them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not expensive if you are just buying one or two, but when you've got thousands of twits uploading their "uber cool" playing of some stupid video game, the expense per drive (which is still > 0) adds up.

      Really, how pathetic can you be to think someone cares?

  12. Alternatives for Google Notebook? by GraphiteCube · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have quite a number of bookmarks and notes stored in Google Notebook, I wonder if there are similar web-based services available on the net? Actually Google Notebook is very handy, especially when you are not using your computer and want to jot down some notes.

    1. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      delicious?

    2. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

      Actually Google Notebook is very handy, especially when you are not using your computer and want to jot down some notes.

      Maybe I'm missing something, but how exactly are you using Google Notebook without using a computer? Unless Google just released a spiral bound version that I'm not aware of?

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    3. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://notepad.yahoo.com/ and http://bookmarks.yahoo.com/

    4. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      I have a few of those. Nice little paper notebooks embossed with the Google logo, given away as promotional items. You can use them anywhere, no computer needed!

      But I believe that GraphiteCube was talking about when you're not using your own computer. That is, you're using someone else's, or a public terminal or something. But personally, I'd just send email to myself in that case. Or use my paper Google notebook. :-)

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    5. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by darrylo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually Google Notebook is very handy, especially when you are not using your computer and want to jot down some notes.

      If you have an iPhone, Evernote has an app that accesses your online Evernote database.

      I used to use Google notebook, which is still nice, but I've since switched to Evernote. I like Evernote because:

      • Searching is much faster.
      • Works offline.
      • Can sync offline databases between multiple PCs (and Macs!).
      • I can access the same database from any web browser (the data is mirrored on Evernote's servers, as well as your PCs and Macs).
      • Works on the iPhone (but data is stored on Evernote's servers, and not on the iPhone, unless you individually marks notes on the iPhone).
      • It's free for light to moderate usage (you get roughly 40MB of notes per month, free).
      • Because searching is fast, I'm now using it for bookmarks. I've migrated all of my del.icio.us bookmarks into it (along with descriptive web page fragments).
    6. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10144412-2.html?tag=TOCmoreStories.0

      This CNET article features Google Notebook replacements. Including in the comments one which will soon feature an importer.

      Please remember that you can continue to use it, and the new searchwiki which replaces it in some ways.

    7. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by Lunatrik · · Score: 2, Informative
    8. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by GraphiteCube · · Score: 1

      But I believe that GraphiteCube was talking about when you're not using your own computer. That is, you're using someone else's, or a public terminal or something. But personally, I'd just send email to myself in that case. Or use my paper Google notebook. :-)

      Thanks, that was what I meant.

    9. Re:Alternatives for Google Notebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zotero seems to to the same [http://zotero.org], although with local storage and without formatting of web content. On the bright side it does much more on other fronts.

  13. Really? by ommmmid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That simple? Really?

  14. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't you be mad at your school district for blocking youtube instead of google for shutting down a redundant video service?

    I just don't see the logic in your rant.

  15. Lame by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I enjoy this product and yeah I can still use it but why bother when it'll never improve and may disappear for me in the near future too?

    Google's biggest problem is they have something like Notebook that has real potential but they put zero effort into it and then it's no surprise it's not very popular.

    They should focus on search but they should start trying to build up more of a foothold in other areas because there's no guarantee they'll be the top dog forever.

    1. Re:Lame by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      If it took no effort, you should write one yourself and capitalize on it.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:Lame by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should.

      That said my point wasn't that it took no effort to create but creating something and them more or less letting it sit there to rot isn't a smart thing to do.

      Google doesn't promote some of its other services as much as it should. For instance what's the point of buying Orkut and then not promoting it? Unless the whole point was to kill it off for Blogger.

    3. Re:Lame by flooey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google doesn't promote some of its other services as much as it should. For instance what's the point of buying Orkut and then not promoting it? Unless the whole point was to kill it off for Blogger.

      Are you thinking of some other product? Orkut has been a Google service since the beginning, and is one of the top social networks in the world (though not in the United States).

    4. Re:Lame by rainhill · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, Orkut was developed as a "20% free time" project by a Google engineer named Orkut.

  16. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

    Surely you mean "asshats @ school", who've done a piss-poor and inconsistent job of blocking video sites. Blaming Google for someone else's sloppiness is silly.

  17. The cloud is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    How can we trust the "cloud" if it won't be there?

    1. Re:The cloud is BS by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't trust the cloud any more than you do your own hard drive.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  18. The Bubble Burst and Then Some! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It just happened... Why the stock price is at a all time low. Wow low stock price = less cash. Time to close doors to alot of sh_it! Oh well! Do not close the doors to search!

  19. Dear parliboy @ slashdot by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    Google doesn't care, they've already evaluated the costs, the benefits, done some analysis and then they probably took an afternoon siesta (it is the Google office, after all.) After juggling the proposals and attaching velcro to them and throwing them at walls to see which one sticks the best, they've determined Google Video is of greater cost than it is benefit. Or that envelope had better velcro. Who knows in this crazy messed up world anymore? However, Google still 3 you, and that's why Google Video will still be accessible. They're going to ween you off it by preventing future uploads, but you'll still be able to watch all those timeless classics.

    Enjoy.

    1. Re:Dear parliboy @ slashdot by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      Agh, the 3 needs to be <3.

  20. Holy karma whoring, Batman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodgeball_(service)
    Dodgeball: Social networking site built specifically for use on mobile phones. Users text their location to the service, which then notifies them of crushes, friends, friends' friends and interesting venues nearby.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Catalog_Search
    Search engine for over 6,600 print catalogs, which are acquired through Optical character recognition.

    http://code.google.com/intl/de-DE/gme/
    Google Mashup Editor is an AJAX development framework and a set of tools that enable developers to quickly and easily create simple web applications and mashups with Google services like Google Maps and Google Base. Google Mashup Editor is a great tool for grabbing information from feeds and letting users see and manipulate it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Mashup_Editor
    Google Mashup Editor is an online mashup creation service created by Google.
    Currently it is a limited test service and access is restricted to a small number of developers.
    It is a direct competition for Yahoo! Pipes and Microsoft Popfly.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Notebook
    Google Notebook is a free online application offered by Google that provides a simple way to save and organize clips of information when conducting research online. This personal browser tool permits a user to write notes, and to clip text, images, and links from pages during browsing. These are saved to an online "notebook" with sharing and collaboration features.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaiku
    Jaiku is a social networking, micro-blogging and lifestreaming service comparable to Twitter.[1] Jaiku was founded in February 2006 by Jyri Engeström[2] and Petteri Koponen from Finland[3] and launched in July of that year. It was purchased by Google on October 9, 2007.[4] Getting an account on the site requires an invite from an existing user. All users, including new ones, have an infinite number of invites.

    note that you can still signup for google notebook apparently, only developement has stopped

  21. Use REAL Open Source Cloud Computing... by onitzuka · · Score: 1
    Use REAL Open Source Cloud Computing...

    Run real Linux apps...

    Install it at home, too...

    Use Ulteo. Check it out for yourself.

  22. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    I teach at a school district where YouTube is blocked. If I want to look up something to show on the fly, Google video is an option; YouTube is not. Discontinuing uploads to Google Video means I use your services less, not more.

    The probable reason Google Video isn't blocked when YouTube is that few people use it. And also- as others have mentioned- that your school either forget to block or couldn't care about Google Video.

    BTW, you're a typical example of the Slashdotter tendency to say "I need this..." or "I'd buy something if (yadda yadda) therefore (whoever) should offer that service". You do realise that even if you mean what you say, this translates to a potential market of *one* person. Or on a good day a handful of students at Random High School, Buttfuck, Illinois?

    A similar but equally blinkered mistake Slashdotters make is assuming that their personal circumstances, obsessions and/or needs should hold more sway than they do in the market because they represent those of the population in general. Either because it hadn't occurred otherwise to them or because they think they *are* average when they're far from it.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  23. hopefully a lesson for google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that will teach them to not code for Opera.

  24. and more-so... by binaryseraph · · Score: 1

    They also are shutting down the Double click offices in Denver- that puts another 200 people out to pasture.

  25. Google needs to... by hyperz69 · · Score: 1

    Google needs to get some of their more POTENTIALLY profit making projects out of Beta or Pre-Beta stage. Like Grand Central. Infinitely useful but it has no adds, no pay anything, and has been in closed Beta since they bought it. I love the service, so why is google not turning it PLUS a number of other project that generate 0 revenue... into profit streams.

    Please note I am not saying turn it into a RAPE profit center, but like the way Googles Search or Gmail works... it could Generate SOMETHING to support itself rather then sending it to the glue factory ;)

    1. Re:Google needs to... by B5_geek · · Score: 1

      I have a couple of questions about Grand Central.

      The whole point is so that you don't have to tell everybody when your phone number changes and/or when you add new phone numbers to your collection (i.e. cell phone, pager, office, home, summer home, etc..) How does it handle if you travel a lot?

      e.g. If I setup a Michigan phone number (as my Grand Central number), and add a Florida cell phone; will I be charged long-distance fees to have my calls forwarded?

      Does it forward calls at all? or is it just a 'voice mail' system? How does the "call Contact" system work if you are sitting at your desk reading your email? Can you listen to your voice-mails via you PC (is it a .wav attachment?)

      Do you have an invites available? =)

      --
      "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    2. Re:Google needs to... by man_ls · · Score: 1

      It basically lets you establish hunt groups for all of your phone numbers. Call the GrandCentral number, and based on rules you set regarding caller and time of day, it will ring on some combination of the devices you specify -- mobile, land-line, and Gizmo SIP numbers.

      Whichever one you pick up first, is where the call gets connected to. You can press key combinations to start recording the call (it will play an announcement), transfer the call to one of your other extensions, add someone else from one of your other extensions to the call, etc. And you can listen in as voicemail is being left, and then it e-mails you an MP3 of it.

      Lots of neat features designed for reducing to 1, the number of different points of contact you have.

  26. Significant Phase in the Life of a company by MarkKnopfler · · Score: 1

    I think that the honeymoon is finally over. Google too, will now slowly leave behind the free lunch culture to the inevitable areas of concern --> bottom line and market valuation. The question remains as to whether it will be able to continue with the innovative and creative work culture despite financial concerns.

  27. SaaS by kimvette · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is why Software as a Service is never a good idea. You can have a ton of data stored on that service and it can be discontinued at any time. This is why when I do use Google Docs, I have the data backed up on our own site, and this is also why I won't use Microsoft Live! alternatives to Office.

    It is designed to create vendor lock-in. I do not trust the likes of Microsoft to provide a data export option should they decide the service is not working. Thankfully Google has at least up to now been honorable in providing the means to retrieve data even when products have ceased, and provided PLENTY of notice (we knew what, two years ago that Google Video was going to die?) when discontinuation of hosted services were planned.

    In light of this. F/OSS and "shared source" solutions you host yourself (or at least have FULL access to not only the data but also the code) is the best solution, and even proprietary/closed-source shrinkwrap software where you have both the software and the data in-house are the best solutions. Even closed-source software with craptivation, er, activation and per-use license verification schemes are vastly superior because should the vendor die, cracking the checks to continue your right of first sale to use the product can still be exercised in the very worst cases.

    In this case users are fortunate it's Google services because as stated above Google provides plenty of notice and the means to retrieve data - and in the case of some tools have even have open source so you can continue use of the service in your own hosted environment. Don't expect that to be the case with other SaaS solutions when they are terminated.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  28. Hosted Exchange? by Zerelli · · Score: 1

    Hosted Exchange costs $10 per month per mailbox or so and you get all the features of an Exchange server plus the virus loading.....err features of Outlook. It is pretty cheap and I was wondering why I do not hear about more people using this type of service?

    1. Re:Hosted Exchange? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

      Because $10 for 100 users is an unnecessary $12,000 per year, not including any other costs of local and remote administration, Outlook itself etc...?

      It's a drop in a bucket for most business with 100+ employees, but for a K-12 school with a technology budget of less than $20,000, it makes you think...

      --
      Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  29. Host-it-yourself alternative to Google Notebook? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    It's too bad that GNotebook is stopping development. I've seen the usual recommendations of Evernote as a replacement, but I don't want that. I want something complete web-based, and I'm on an Ubuntu desktop so as far as I know the Evernote desktop client won't work. I've heard that the web-based Evernote doesn't have as many features or something.

    What I think I really want is something that I can host myself. If I'm depending on a 3rd party to continue it's support, but they fall through, I'm stuck. I don't really want to sign up for *another* online service; it was nice having everything underneath the Google umbrella. Is there anything like Google Notebook out there that supports "web clipping" either by bookmarklet or Firefox extension, that I can install and run on my own php/mysql host? I've looked at some of the personal wikis, something like that might work, too. MediaWiki seems like overkill, though, and securing it so that only I can use it seems like a pain, too.

    Any ideas?

  30. Let me fix that for you... by NineNine · · Score: 1

    This just highlights one of the negative aspects of using free services out there on the net...

    If you're paying for a service, it's not going to get summarily canceled without adequate notice, a refund, etc. But of course, as with most things, you get what you pay for.

  31. Even if you pay, you are at risk of catastrophe... by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 1

    As as someone already pointed out, this is less of a problem for people who are paying for their service, rather than getting them for free.

    I really don't think this lessens the problem that much though. Just because you are paying doesn't mean the service will last. What you really have to depend on is whether a lot of OTHERS are paying as well. They don't care if they have a paying customer or two if the service overall isn't profitable. They'll still shut it down.

    And even if it is a profitable service, is the company as a whole profitable? Because you aren't protected from companies going belly up (which they might, if other services they offer are unprofitable enough). Sure, Google is probably not in danger at the moment, but even long companies with storied histories may go bankrupt and take even the services people pay for down with them. The current downturn ought to be evidence enough of that, as quite a few 100+ year old companies have suddenly died.

    And as another example of this, consider the big three automakers. I bought a car from Chrysler in January 2008, and a big part of our choice of car was that they were offering a lifetime powertrain warranty. That's a service they provide that obviously I (and a lot of others) pay for, and it's probably profitable (if they have the reliability they claim) since it sells more of their cars, but might that service get shut down on me? Might it get shut down on me even before a 3 year/36,000 mile warranty would have? It might if they go belly up.

    So that's at least one reason I would never put anything business critical in the cloud... no matter what you pay, and no matter how great your company is at business, if the other company isn't managing itself as well as your company is then you are just one economic downturn from losing all your data. And that should be pretty sobering to anyone.

    --
    Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
  32. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

    Anticipate the videos you might need and download them the night before. There are extensions to Firefox that will do this for you.

    That's what my wife does.

  33. Big news! by jammed · · Score: 1
    Isn't the big news that Jaiku will be open sourced and...

    With the open source Jaiku Engine project, organizations, groups and individuals will be able to roll-their-own microblogging services and deploy them on Google App Engine. The new Jaiku Engine will include support for OAuth, and we're excited about developers using this proven code as a starting point in creating a freely available and federated, open source microblogging platform.

    Twitter killer?

    1. Re:Big news! by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      Isn't the big news that Jaiku will be open sourced and...

      I don't really care about the source code of a web service. I don't think they will be able to start taking in contributions just like that (imagine the security implications).

      There still has to be a central place that actually runs the service, unless you want to set up your own microblogging servers inside your company's firewall.

      Regarding google notebook - news like this suck a little bit, since they underline the fact that not even google services are immune to termination. I picked google notebook since

      - I don't need to log in (I'm always logged in to gmail)

      - I thought it would be around for the long haul

      Perhaps exposing a "notes" oriented interface to google docs would be handy...

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    2. Re:Big news! by yelvington · · Score: 1

      There's been an open-source, federated alternative to Twitter for some time.

      http://identi.ca/
      http://laconi.ca/trac/

      Why would I want to use yet another Google service that might be discontinued at any time?

  34. Right to work by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I teach at a school district where YouTube is blocked.

    If you need YouTube to do your job, and your administrators decline to provide YouTube to instructors, are the private schools hiring? That's the beauty of America: you can choose to work for a different organization that provides the appropriate tools.

  35. Google services by ms1234 · · Score: 1

    Well, they were beta anyway so...

  36. Google video still works for hosted google account by f1vlad · · Score: 1

    Google Video still works for commercial hosted google accounts, i.e. video.google.com/a/www.YOURDOMAINHERE.com/#/Home

    I wish they merged youtube accounts with video.google accounts somehow or perhaps made that an option. I have too many videos in both and wish they were all in one place o_0

    --
    o_O
  37. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by pbhj · · Score: 1

    A similar but equally blinkered mistake Slashdotters make is assuming that their personal circumstances, obsessions and/or needs should hold more sway than they do in the market because they represent those of the population in general. Either because it hadn't occurred otherwise to them or because they think they *are* average when they're far from it.

    You'll be trying to tell us next that there are people no longer living in their parent's basement by the time they are 40.

    I don't buy it.

  38. Grand Central info by SpammersAreScum · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a GC user, let me take a stab at it.

    Calls to my GC number get forwarded to whatever combination of work, home, and cell numbers I want, based on the calling number (or group I've placed it in). You can designate up to 6 numbers to ring, but each has to have one of those 3 labels, or Gizmo. You can have specific calling numbers ring directly to voicemail or get a "not in service" message.

    I can also temporarily add another number to have calls forwarded to. There's no charge for long-distance forwarding.

    Voicemail can be listened to on the GC website, downloaded, or forwarded via email (as an MP3).

    I can place a call to any number in my GC contacts by clicking its Call button, which rings it as well as the designated phone at my end.

    Invites are apparently still turned off. Sorry.

  39. Republicans?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All right, who keeps tagging random Slashdot stories that have nothing to do with politics "democrats" or "republicans"?

  40. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by kasperd · · Score: 1

    Either because it hadn't occurred otherwise to them or because they think they *are* average when they're far from it.

    The average person does not exist. No matter which person you look at, that person will be far from the average in several aspects. (What those several aspects are will of course depend on which person you are looking at).

    --

    Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  41. Good for the Competition by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    This will be good for competitors. Take Google Catalog Search, for instance. When it first came out I thought it was a great idea. Then I went to look at it again last year, and some catalogs were more than 4 years old, when I had current ones sitting on my shelf.

    But who's going to launch a competing service when Google could easily get back to doing a good job? By closing down the projects, competitors will stand a chance of flourishing/getting funded, etc.

    So, good for Google for letting some of their weak projects go.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  42. Shame about Jaiku by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

    The only one of these I will miss is Jaiku - the world desperately needs a microblogging alternative run by someone more competent than the folks who run Twitter to become popular.

  43. Re:Dear asshats @ google: by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    The average person does not exist. No matter which person you look at, that person will be far from the average in several aspects.

    Thank you, Captain Obvious. Perhaps it would be too much like commonsense to assume that I knew that and meant "broadly average in the area of [whatever specific thing was under discussion]" but didn't want to waste time spelling it out?

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  44. It is the beginning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I pity the folk who've moved their core business services onto Google Apps.

    How long will it be before Google determines Google Apps as "unprofitable", and closes them down? Google has it's fist wrapped tightly around your gonads.

  45. Closed to new users? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    You do know that you post this to a discussion of how the service is not longer open for new users to

    > Try it

    so it will be hard for him to

    > quickly see.

    ??????