Slashdot Mirror


PC's Waste Heat Could Add To Processing Power

Urchin writes to tell us that physicists working in a new field called "phononics" claim that waste heat from a processor could actually be used to add to its power. "Crunching data coded using photons — photonic computing — is one example, and in 2007 researchers built the first workable optical transistor. But now the idea of computing using heat flow is gaining popularity among applied physicists. Heat travels through solid materials by means of phonons — ripples of vibration passing through a series of atoms. Those ripples can be used to send and store data in digital form: one temperature is read as 0 or 'off' while a second, higher temperature is interpreted as 1 or 'on.' Provided that the thermal memory is well insulated, it can keep its temperature — and data — intact for a long time."

134 comments

  1. Nice, but... by samriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I might not entirely understand this, it sounds like this is a whole lot of work for not much result. What happens if you get temperatures that are precisely inbetween 0 and 1 values? What effect does the processor's fan and/or heatsink have on said values? Why bother?

    1. Re:Nice, but... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Most of the time it's a threshold. So if it's, say, 50*C or above, it's a 1. Anything below that is a 0. They do a very similar thing with off/on states for memory and such. It's a threshold, not a completely discrete value.

    2. Re:Nice, but... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      What happens if you get temperatures that are precisely inbetween 0 and 1 values?

      I'd assume the thing that happens on an electrical signal path when you get a voltage that's precisely inbetween 0 and 1...

    3. Re:Nice, but... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Didn't read TFA but it could be a hysteresis kind of thing which is thought of as a boundary region rather than a single threshold. Or, like a Schmitt Trigger in electronics, an upper and a lower threshold to eliminate jittery triggering.

      If you have a noisy, fluctuating signal then it makes sense to output a 1 when the upper threshold is crossed, and to output a 0 when the lower threshold is crossed.

    4. Re:Nice, but... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      Then it fails the cyclic redundancy check and has be be ...reheated I guess.

    5. Re:Nice, but... by hdon · · Score: 1

      Didn't read TFA but it could be a hysteresis [wikipedia.org] kind of thing which is thought of as a boundary region rather than a single threshold.

      If you have a noisy, fluctuating signal then it makes sense to output a 1 when the upper threshold is crossed, and to output a 0 when the lower threshold is crossed.

      You mean 0 when the threshold is crossed one way, and 1 when crossed the opposite way?

    6. Re:Nice, but... by eltaco · · Score: 1

      so what happens on an electrical signal path? the data is declared corrupt? assumed 1? rounded up/down?

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    7. Re:Nice, but... by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      No, not at all.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    8. Re:Nice, but... by quantumplacet · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'm not sure, but i'll let you know as soon as i finish cutting this electron in half.

    9. Re:Nice, but... by Metasquares · · Score: 1

      No, you have two thresholds. The region in between them is indeterminate, while the region above the upper threshold is 1 and the one below the lower threshold is 0. The distance between the two could be determined based on the signal-to-noise ratio.

      At least, I'm pretty sure that's what the GP was getting at.

    10. Re:Nice, but... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Oh, neat. Which quark are you keeping then?

    11. Re:Nice, but... by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Ooops, good going with confusing electrons and protons...

  2. Marge.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Change the channel.

  3. CPU Turbo by pak9rabid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Interesting...kind of like a turbocharger for a CPU.

    1. Re:CPU Turbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like there will be a new market for all of those 386 boxes with the turbo button.

    2. Re:CPU Turbo by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now we'll start seeing VTEC and Type-R badges too...

    3. Re:CPU Turbo by Cowmonaut · · Score: 1

      FYI, VTEC isn't really the same as a turbo charger. While it does give you more power when you need it, the real benefit is making the ride smoother at higher speeds by lowering the RPMs needed to maintain the speed. See here for a short video on it.

    4. Re:CPU Turbo by DittoBox · · Score: 5, Funny

      With such memorable phrases as:

      "See these stickers? They make my computer go faster!"

      "With this giant wing on the back of my front-wheel drive computer I get the down force I need to go fast"

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    5. Re:CPU Turbo by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Lowering the RPM to maintain the speed? You know, changing up a gear has that effect, right?

      I don't see how adjusting the lift profile of the valves can affect RPM vs Speed...

    6. Re:CPU Turbo by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      FYI, VTEC isn't really the same as a turbo charger.

      The people to whom he's alluding don't care.

    7. Re:CPU Turbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VTEC motors ultimately push the usable powerband further up the tach not down.

      Hence the acronym:
      H old
      O n,
      N ot
      D ne
      A ccelerating
         

    8. Re:CPU Turbo by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Informative

      VTEC stands for Variable Valve Timing and Electronic Lift Control. It allows the engine to adjust the valve timing in real time to provide additional power at higher RPMs. It essentially allows low displacement engines to expand their powerband at very high RPMs.

      It does absolutely nothing for ride quality and can be employed at any road speed, provided the transmission allows the engine to operate within the RPM required for VTEC to operate.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    9. Re:CPU Turbo by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Caption to the caption:

      "Look out! Here comes an s!"

    10. Re:CPU Turbo by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      I think my VTEC just kicked in... (Gah now I've got Japan Break Industries stuck in my head.)

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    11. Re:CPU Turbo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, You might want to watch that video a few more times. It creates more power at a given RPM than it otherwise would given a static lobe profile.

  4. Obligary Simpsons Quote. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lisa, In this house we obey the laws of thermal dynamics!

    That said. It may save some power converting loss head back again making it more efficient.
    But they way that most people use computers I don't know if there is a benefit. We rarely run at full CPU Heat kicking.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Obligary Simpsons Quote. by kwabbles · · Score: 1

      We rarely run at full CPU Heat kicking.

      That's the 2nd time I've heard that this month.

      --
      Just disrupt the deflector shield with a tachyon burst.
    2. Re:Obligary Simpsons Quote. by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 1

      It's precisely the users who run at full CPU heat that need the extra cpu power.

  5. Hot new computing techniques! by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder how long before this is used for something bad? Does this possibly mean that the sun, inhabited by an alien life form, has turned off the one's and zero's in an effort to relay the message GTFO!

    FTFA:

    Casati says practical physicists must rise to the challenge set by the theorists. Yet even if they can, phononic computing is unlikely to threaten electronics because phonons travel a lot slower than electrons. Li imagines that the two technologies will work together, in hybrid devices that perform some computation using waste heat.

    I bet there are better ways to use this than PC computing

    1. Re:Hot new computing techniques! by Rayeth · · Score: 1

      There are easily better applications, but you'd be surprised how much uses "PC Computing" these days.

      How about enabling automatic de-icing systems on planes without needing pilot intervention. Or using the engine exhaust heat to tune your car's performance?

      All of these use computers and are totally valid applications of TFA. So I hope they develop these devices if only for use in other computing fields.

    2. Re:Hot new computing techniques! by morcego · · Score: 1

      I bet there are better ways to use this than PC computing

      Not only that. Since this phononics computing has absolutely no advantage over conventional (electronic) computing, the amount of time and money wasted is ... well ... a waste.

      There are several viable options here, and I bet most, if not all, are already under study and development:
      - Improving the efficiency (less power waste due to Joule effect )
      - Converting this back into electricity (yes, it is not very efficient, but it is better than wasting)
      - Using the heat generated by a datacenter to heat another part of a building (yes, the whole clean room issue comes into play etc)

      and many other ideas. All of them, as far as I can tell from FTA, more efficient.

      --
      morcego
  6. Hooked on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm hooked on phononics. And quit making fun of my stuttutter!

  7. Hmm by ZwJGR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Provided that the thermal memory is well insulated", that basically means putting it on a different piece of silicon/on something else entirely, which kind of defeats the object as I see it.

    While I haven't looked at this in great detail, it strikes me that achieving anything near useful density is going to very difficult due to entropy, and the simple fact that putting very small volumes at slightly different temperatures right next to each others quickly leads to a relatively uniform temperature distribution.

    This sounds somewhat improbable/unfeasible to me...

    --
    There is no psychiatrist in the world like a puppy licking your face - Ben Williams
    1. Re:Hmm by evanbd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Quick, someone tell the physicits! I'm sure they forgot all about this. Good thing we have /. to check their work.

    2. Re:Hmm by morcego · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just because the math works, doesn't mean it is viable to implement.

      As TFA say, the theorists just came up with the idea and some of the math, and pretty much left to the practical physicists to find a way to implement it.

      Next, how to use your farts, produced while using a computer (wasted right now), to increase its power.

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:Hmm by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Next, how to use your farts, produced while using a computer (wasted right now), to increase its power.

      Ummm....my system is overclocked right now.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    4. Re:Hmm by hdon · · Score: 0

      "Provided that the thermal memory is well insulated", that basically means putting it on a different piece of silicon/on something else entirely, which kind of defeats the object as I see it.

      To interface a phononic computational device with a traditional electronic device without leaking heat, you could use something like an optoisolator, though obviously it might not be preferable to use an electric photo element.

      While I haven't looked at this in great detail, it strikes me that achieving anything near useful density is going to very difficult due to entropy, and the simple fact that putting very small volumes at slightly different temperatures right next to each others quickly leads to a relatively uniform temperature distribution.

      From the article:

      It exploits the fact that some materials can only exchange heat when they are at similar temperatures.

      This sounds somewhat improbable/unfeasible to me...

      You're probably right, it probably is infeasible. But then again, a lot of good things do start out that way.

    5. Re:Hmm by tyrione · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No offense, but physicists always leave it to engineers to come up with a viable solution.

    6. Re:Hmm by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Next, how to use your farts, produced while using a computer (wasted right now), to increase its power.

      I'm channelling mine to Washington. Each fart produces more brainpower than Capitol Hill produces in a week.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:Hmm by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Quick, someone tell the physicits! I'm sure they forgot all about this.

      More like someone tell the journalists (the people who actually WROTE this article). It happens all the time that a scientist says something offhand like "and you could use this for processing power", and a journalist misinterprets this to mean that it's both feasible, and commercially viable.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:Hmm by davolfman · · Score: 1

      I'd assume it would have to operate at pretty high frequencies constantly being refreshed or not at all.

    9. Re:Hmm by initialE · · Score: 1

      "practical physicists" - didn't they use to call them engineers?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    10. Re:Hmm by DenmarkLessy · · Score: 1

      i think the whole point is to put the heat that is already coming off the processor to good use. How does having a separate chip/device defeat the purpose? look at all the cooling technology on a processor alone...why would you force heat back onto the processor instead of a separate chip?? And i took "Provided that the thermal memory is well insulated" to mean that each unit of volume is separate from the others and insulated from them. if each unit is thermally separate then the heat won't diffuse between them. And even if this process is not as efficient as computing with photons, heat is always doing to be a by product here, so i don't see why it shouldn't be put to use. the point isn't to replace transistor computing, but to augment it...

  8. Good Luck With That! by loose+electron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This, IMHO is an academic concept at best. State definition by thermal state has been done in research before but it is slow, and trying to collect the waste energy in the form of heat and re-use it as the byproduct in another state machine sounds a bit questionable.

    Mechanical computers are viable as well, but not too terribly practical.

    --
    www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    1. Re:Good Luck With That! by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Mechanical computers are viable as well, but not too terribly practical.

      As proved in 1991.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:Good Luck With That! by samriel · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    3. Re:Good Luck With That! by g4b · · Score: 1

      now you made my abacus sad.

    4. Re:Good Luck With That! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Mechanical computers are viable as well, but not too terribly practical.

      That's largely a question of scale, isn't it?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Good Luck With That! by loose+electron · · Score: 1

      In theory - if you can use a medium to create a NAND gate, then anything and everything needed to create a computer can be defined from that. Again "in theory" is the important catch phrase. You can do that using relays, transistors, vacuum tubes, thermal storage, mechanical logic, and water valves. All have been demonstrated. The practical realization of a big scale machine is another issue.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
  9. AC's Waste Methane Could Heat AC's House by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    news and beano at 11

  10. bogonics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bogonics

  11. Yawn by Gorobei · · Score: 1

    Yes, temperature gradients are a form of information, but get real guys: they are the bottom of food chain of useful computing tech. A real computer dumps heat as a side-effect of doing useful work - its more efficient to try to recover the heat as energy than to directly use it to compute. Sure, if you have a steam locomotive, it makes sense to add secondary and even tertiary energy-extractors to increase locomotion, but that is a special case: the locomotive is isolated and has big energy needs - this is not the case for computers.

    1. Re:Yawn by causality · · Score: 1

      Yes, temperature gradients are a form of information, but get real guys: they are the bottom of food chain of useful computing tech. A real computer dumps heat as a side-effect of doing useful work - its more efficient to try to recover the heat as energy than to directly use it to compute. Sure, if you have a steam locomotive, it makes sense to add secondary and even tertiary energy-extractors to increase locomotion, but that is a special case: the locomotive is isolated and has big energy needs - this is not the case for computers.

      I like your idea about trying to recover the heat. The only serious proposals I've heard involved using it to heat the building in which the machines are stored during cold weather. I'm a bit surprised that I haven't heard of anyone using something like a Sterling engine (maybe these could be miniaturized?) to try and do useful work with the waste heat, in much the same way that electric cars can use regenerative braking to minimize wasted energy. Or perhaps there could be a device like a solar panel that operates with lower-wavelength (i.e. infrared) photons. For laptops this might help with battery life.

      I really doubt I'm the first person to think of this so there must be difficulties involved that either make this impossible or prevent it from being economical. I don't know much about Sterling engines, solar panels, or thermodynamics (as you can probably tell) but I'd appreciate if someone who understands these things could comment.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Yawn by Gorobei · · Score: 2, Informative

      At one of our compute farms, we actually pipe the waste heat into a local town as a low-cost house-heating solution (think steam-pipes, but lower quality energy.) It works there because even 100 degree hot air is nice to have when the outside temp is 0f.

    3. Re:Yawn by cparker15 · · Score: 1

      Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --
      Have you driven a fnord... lately?

      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.

    4. Re:Yawn by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      The only serious proposals I've heard involved using it to heat the building in which the machines are stored during cold weather.

      Doesn't this naturally happen just by running the machines in the building?

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    5. Re:Yawn by causality · · Score: 1

      The only serious proposals I've heard involved using it to heat the building in which the machines are stored during cold weather.

      Doesn't this naturally happen just by running the machines in the building?

      To some degree, yes. I think those proposals had more to do with collecting the heat and integrating it into the central heating system of the building. In other words, it may be more of a problem of efficient distribution (maybe only one room or a few rooms have lots of computers and you want to heat all of the building, for example). I'm using a lot of words like "I think" and "it may" because I'm honestly rather ignorant about these systems, but I believe that's the gist of it.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  12. Steampunk by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

    I have this picture in my head of a water-cooled PC that gets so hot that the water turns to steam, which runs a turbine, which helps power the PC.

    Hugely inefficient, but sooooo cool to have a Steam-Powered PC.

    1. Re:Steampunk by samriel · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I have this picture in my head of a water-cooled PC that gets so hot that the water turns to steam, which runs a turbine, which helps power the PC. Hugely inefficient, but sooooo cool to have a Steam-Powered PC.

      Lisa, in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

      PerpetualPC?

    2. Re:Steampunk by A.+B3ttik · · Score: 1

      You could easily have the waste heat from the PC run a Turbine... it just wouldn't be nearly enough to power the _entire_ PC. A few watts here and there would _help_, just not very much.

    3. Re:Steampunk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So then you go to the Steam website, take a picture and send it to Valve.

    4. Re:Steampunk by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Maybe it would generate enough to power the case fans?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    5. Re:Steampunk by samriel · · Score: 1

      Thus cooling the liquid, reducing the amount of steam, reducing the power to the fans. It's a vicious cycle.

      Also, fans in a water-cooled system?

    6. Re:Steampunk by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, fans in a water-cooled system?

      Yes, fans in a water-cooled system. You need fans on the radiators to extract the waste heat from the water. You can do it passively but that's massively inefficient. There are really two reasons to go with water cooling on a PC. You can do it to give yourself a bit more overhead in the overclocking department (since you can move a bit more heat using water and massive radiators, versus a individual heatsinks and fans), or you can do it for a silent system in which case you often need to under-clock the system and rely on convection either to cool the radiator, to circulate the water, or both. My gaming system is water cooled and overclocked and has 8 120mm fans, 6 on the radiators and 2 on the front intake grill (one of the radiators is setup as an intake as well, so it's actually 5 intakes, 3 exhaust).

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    7. Re:Steampunk by Chabo · · Score: 1

      Besides what orclevegame said, there's also the fact that you need cooling for things other than the CPU, GPU, and chipset, assuming you get water cooling blocks for all three of those components. Hard drives, for instance, also like to have airflow.

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
  13. reminds me of xbox red ring of death by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

    heat to a certain point, the joint points melt, connecting two neighboring leads, and congratulations, you have a short... hooray for phononics transistor!

    --
    Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    1. Re:reminds me of xbox red ring of death by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I think they call that a thermistor (minus the melty bit)

    2. Re:reminds me of xbox red ring of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. A thermistor uses temperature to switch electricity. You need something the uses temperature to switch the flow of heat.

    3. Re:reminds me of xbox red ring of death by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Hey, an old TV I had used that kind of systen as a fuse. One of the solders to one of the resistors in the sound curcuit were of a low-melting alloy. The resistor were forced down into it, so when the solder melted due to excess load, the resistor would spring up, breaking the curcuit, and removing the sound. You had to get out your soldering iron to get the sound back. And turn it down a bit, if you wanted to watch the rest of the show with sound...

  14. phonons? by prgrmr · · Score: 1

    Who ordered that? And where do they fit in the standard model?

    1. Re:phonons? by MarkusQ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who ordered that? And where do they fit in the standard model?

      Phonons are just a very weird state of photons, for suitably high values of "very weird"--they propagate by the dipole interactions of the substrate, and are thus at the bottom an EM phenomena. But that isn't a very useful way to look at them (about as useful as saying that sound in air involves oscillatory motion of masses and thus could be considered a source of gravity waves).

      Rather than asking "how do they fit into the standard model?" it makes more sense to ask "how tight is the analogy between phonons in a lattice and photons in a vacuum?" and "where does the analogy break down?" Note also that the analogy is pretty good in places (the governing equations are identical) so the concept is more useful than you think.

      --MarkusQ

      P.S. IANALP -- I am not a licensed physicist; I am not your physicist, and this is not physical advice. If you have questions about the laws of nature you should conduct experiments, not rely on the advice of people you meet on the internet.

  15. Tooooooo slooooow. by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Phonons travel at the speed of sound in their medium, which is 100,000 times slower than the speed of electrical signals or light. If you've got a phononic circuit running at a Ghz clock rate, signals can only travel a few microns. This size limit severely restricts the number of individual components you can have in your circuit.

    Go light, or go home.

    1. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by durrr · · Score: 1

      For those who missed it; the overall utility of something is seldomly measured only in the FPS it achives in crysis.

      The utility of phononic circuits stretches into areas where most electric circuits would not thrive. being able to process information with the only requirement being a temperture gradient would be quite handy for many occasions, considering you usually have the body-surroundings temperature gradient availible.

      Even ignoring any direct applications we're likely to see within a few decades we should not laugh and dismiss exotic means of computation as they are a step on the way towards computers that not only do information processing but also mass processing.

      And don't tell me you wouldn't just love torrenting brand new cars when they pop up on your favourite outlet, despite threats from the future CIAA.

    2. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phononic != Phonic

    3. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by fyoder · · Score: 1

      The utility of phononic circuits stretches into areas where most electric circuits would not thrive.

      For example, Hell, where things have all eternity to happen.

      "Satan, my laptop is taking forever to boot!"

      "Yes, and by the time it's finished, Windows will insist on telling you that all the thousand icons on your desktop are stale and should be deleted! And there will be a ton of updates that have to downloaded and installed! Bwah ha ha ha ha!"

      Much like those rare occasions when I fire up Windows in a virtual machine. You know they use Windows in Hell.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    4. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by wdef · · Score: 1

      The speed of transmission between two synapsed neurons in the human brain is about 1mS. But 1mS is a really long time compared to eg nanosecond instruction seek times in RAM. Yet look what the human brain can get up to, even owned by the average Slashdotter. As Durr says, it's not solely about speed.

    5. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Plus I'd think it would be very sensitive to thermal noise or excessive heat.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Tooooooo slooooow. by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      +4 Interesting

  16. Or... by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    Just use the heat to create more electricity to increase the efficiency. Thermal Acoustic Piezo Energy Conversion

    1. Re:Or... by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I've often wondered why we don't do this.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  17. Talk about slow.... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Talk about slow... matter has this undesireable property of "thermal inertia". Your basic thermal wire is going to have a hard time making very many transitions per second. We're talking centihertz.

    They'll have to speed up Vista by a factor of several gazillion to run well on this CPU.

    1. Re:Talk about slow.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Thermal inertia? Inertia is the tendency for the position of an object to keep changing at the same rate, unless an outside force is applied. Would thermal inertia then be the tendency for the temperature of an object to keep changing at the same rate, unless an outside force is applied?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Talk about slow.... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      Replace /position/ with /velocity/ and the principle applies.

    3. Re:Talk about slow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've always wanted to do this...
      Let me google that for you

    4. Re:Talk about slow.... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So:

      Inertia is the tendency for the velocity of an object to keep changing at the same rate, unless an outside force is applied.

      I don't think that's correct.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Talk about slow.... by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      no but it does make for an interesting daydream. Just think how fast I could get my car going if it followed the new and improved version of the first law of motion!

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
  18. You Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Lisa, In this house we obey the laws of thermal dynamics!

    Yeah, except nothing proposed here would contradict the laws of thermodynamics (not thermal dynamics, by the way). You and your joke failed. So sorry.

    1. Re:You Fail by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You and your sense of humor failed. So sorry.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    2. Re:You Fail by ardle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You not only read it but also commented on it. It can't have been much of a failure. Next time try making your actions line up with your words.

      You not only read it but also commented on it. It can't have been much of a failure. Next time try making your actions line up with your words.

      You not only read it but also commented on it. It can't have been much of a failure. Next time try making your actions line up with your words.

      You not only read it but also commented on it. It can't have been much of a failure. Next time try making your actions line up with your words.

      You not only read it but also commented on it. It can't have been much of a failure. Next time try making your actions line up with your words.

      The words line up quite nicely. Thanks, Slashcode!

    3. Re:You Fail by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Because I read it and commented on it, that makes it funny? Double fail.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  19. Matrioshka Brains by argent · · Score: 1

    This is how the outer layers of a Matrioshka Brain would work, perhaps?

  20. Thinking mountains by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    So conceivably, you could have patterns of heat moving through a large mountain, or a lake, or a large gas field in space, constituting a conscious intelligence.... hrm.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Thinking mountains by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Well, if we keep finding new ways to encode information and to engage in computation, it's conceivable that someday, everything in the universe could be used for computing. Essentially, every last bit of matter and energy will be part of a Beowulf cluster. ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:Thinking mountains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's also conceivable that one day we discover that everything in the universe is already being used for computing. That Brownian motion is just a side effect of the computations happening at every point in the universe.

    3. Re:Thinking mountains by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1

      Well, if we keep finding new ways to encode information and to engage in computation, it's conceivable that someday, everything in the universe could be used for computing.

      And we can use it to answer The Last Question.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
  21. And in related news... by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    AMD stock jumped suddenly today.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  22. I'm buying stock in Thermos by SoundGuyNoise · · Score: 1

    Thermos porn...I can't wait!

    --
    You never expect irony, do you?
    Want to be a professional wrestler? Visit www.iyfwrestling.com
    @iyfwrestling
  23. Dude by relguj9 · · Score: 1

    What if the universe is just binary code.

  24. Overlooking The Obvious... by GearheadX · · Score: 2, Funny

    The net gain in computing power would be negative, simply because everyone knows that heat causes computrons to decay into bogons, resulting in an overall loss of processing power.

  25. Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a joke, isn't in?

    1. Re:Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't call me Shirley.

  26. WTF? by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    I didn't realize PC's produced dung, let alone that this dung produced much heat! I've seen my PC goto shit, though.

    1. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10 SHIT
      20 GOTO SHIT

      RUN

    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad I disabled my BASIC interpreter before going on Slashdot.

  27. Imaging the tech support nightmares. by kiehlster · · Score: 1

    Caller: Hi, my computer keeps getting these blue screens.
    Tech: Have you recently installed new software or hardware?
    Caller: No, it just randomly started getting blue screens.
    Tech: Have you had any power outages lately?
    Caller: No, everything has been fine up until now.
    Tech: Have you tried turning it off and on again?
    Caller: Yes, I even turned off my printer and my heat lamp and speakers and all the other stuff plugged in here.
    Tech: Sir, I'd recommend you turn off all the lights in your room while you use your computer. Remember, your skin must be perfectly pale as to guarantee that your computer is not being exposed to any external light or heat.

  28. I've got a better idea by beef+curtains · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I understand this properly (and it's not 100% guaranteed that I do), this sounds like an excessively complicated solution that would yield relatively little benefit. The "sandwich" idea from TFA sounds especially counterproductive, if external power is required to keep the hot side hit & the cold side cold.

    Instead of trying to harness waste heat to eke out a fraction of a percent of extra processing power, here's an idea: how about sucking that waste heat into a small insulated pipe with a low-voltage van, and running that pipe down to my feet? It's very cold near the floor of my apartment, and some warm air aimed at my tootsies would be greatly appreciated while I use my computer.

    Maybe this pipe could have a little door I could close in the summer, when the additional warmth would be less welcome.

    --
    Just once I'd like someone to call me 'Sir' without adding 'You're making a scene.'
    1. Re:I've got a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Could just put your PC under your desk...

  29. interfacing with the future of computing? by hAckz0r · · Score: 1

    I hope they are not too worried about interfacing to either quantum http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_computing, photonic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photonic_computer, or spintronic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spintronics circuits. The thermal 1's and 0's would cause immediate decoherence in the other computational circuits, and they have much more potential bandwidth than any thermal type circuit will ever have. Quantum computers will beat the pants off of any thermal flow logic, providing that the problem at hand permits it. The spintronics or photonic solutions would not create all that heat in the first place so there would be no point to adding the "extra" thermal circuits. Just what is it actually solving? This sounds like a solution that is looking for a 'future problem' to solve, because it likely won't be a real tangible product before the others technologies already are, and even then it won't beat out it's competition in raw performance.

  30. would be interesting by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seems like a solid state thermocouple might be easier to use. I'd like to see some sort of heat pipe from the case to one, then use that output to power the screen (maybe not the main one but a smaller backup little screen??). I have no idea of the state of the art there though or what sort of useful electricity you might get from one. I have seen a kerosene lantern from Russia that uses a thermocouple to scavenge waste heat from the kero burning to provide power for a table radio.

  31. Watch out for that hyper resonance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as they don't mess with the seventh phonon there should be no problem. But if they end up creating a hyper resonance...end of the world, man.

    (Will anybody get this reference?)

  32. Waste heat? What waste heat? by chaeron · · Score: 1

    In the winter time (and where I am, it's damned cold out during the winter...snow banks are over my head right now), I have to shut off the heat vent in my office.

    The heat thrown my all the machines in here, one main dev box, 1 laptop and 3 small appliance servers, plus all the peripherals keep the office nicely heated all winter.

    So...what waste heat...I use mine, thanks!

    --
    .....Andrzej

    Chaeron Corporation
  33. Helpme Physicists/Circuit engineers by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

    Why does a CPU emit heat when X instructions are made? Is there a reason, or perhaps a physical law that requires X quanta of heat per Information instruction?

    I read elsewhere that the waste heat is the result of doing irreversible math on the CPU, and the thrown away information convert to heat. And I saw people working on CPUs that are reversible, which could recover the energy back out of them (minus negligible running costs).

    Is that just pie in the sky academic research, or a viable path for CPUs to eventually go?

    --
    1. Re:Helpme Physicists/Circuit engineers by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why does a CPU emit heat when X instructions are made? Is there a reason, or perhaps a physical law that requires X quanta of heat per Information instruction?

      A computation is a process in which we take a memory area that may be in any randomly-chosen state, and reconfigure it to be in one specific state, corresponding to the return value of our computation.

      This is a local reduction in entropy - reconfiguring that memory area into a single state out of the many possible. That means work has to be done, and there has to be an increase in the entropy of the Universe at large that at least exceeds the decrease in entropy in the memory chip. And that means heat.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Helpme Physicists/Circuit engineers by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      At the lowest possible level, we're talking about electrons moving around. Every time you do an instruction, a bunch of electrons have to move from one place to another. On the way, they inevitably bump into things. Whenever that happens, you lose a bit of energy as heat. That's what the oh-so-common equation, P=(I^2)R means. The I is the current (moving electrons), the R is the resistance (things electrons bump into), and the P is the power (energy per second that you lose as heat).

      As for what you read about (ir)reversible math, that does contribute as well. Consider a single bit of a register, where a zero is represented as 0V, and a one is represented as 1V. If that bit contains a 0, and I want to make it a 1, I need to pull out a bunch of electrons. If I am going to move the 0 that used to be there someplace else, then I could, theoretically, move the electrons there. In that case, the only loss would come from the very short distance that those electrons move. But if I am just getting rid of the 0, those electrons go to the 1V supply, and get sent back to the power supply and all the way back to the power company*. That's a longer distance, so there's going to be more loss. But even if all the math was reversible (i.e. no bits were ever overwritten, only shuffled around) there would still be loss. That's a purely theoretical system anyway - no one actually shuffles their bits around like that.

      Hopefully that answers your question.

      * Note, what I said here isn't actually true. The electron would never make it back to the power company, and is unlikely to even leave the chip -- electrons don't move that fast. But a current would be set up that goes all the way back to the power company, and a bunch of electrons along the path would move a little bit, like a sub-atomic conga line, so the loss of power is the same.

  34. Re:VTEC by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be fair, VTEC does allow for a milder cam profile at lower rpms, while allowing for a much more aggressive cam profile for additional horsepower at higher rpms. Maybe that's what the OP was getting at.

  35. Seasonal by rossdee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its winter. There is no such thing as 'waste heat'. Every watt emitted by a computer is a watt that doesn't have to be emitted by the heater.

    1. Re:Seasonal by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Its winter.

      The southern hemisphere says hi! We're still in the middle of an intense heatwave where the temperature inside is 304.5K.

    2. Re:Seasonal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The heat may not go to waste, but its an expensive way of producing heat... (although the electrical power is converted to heat w/ 100% efficiency). Thats why people heat their homes with gas instead of incandescent light bulbs.

    3. Re:Seasonal by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      304 kelvin = 87.53 degrees Fahrenheit
      304 kelvin = 30.85 degrees Celsius
      That's "intense heatwave"?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    4. Re:Seasonal by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      I said that was the inside temperature. Outside was more in the range of 42-47 degrees C.

    5. Re:Seasonal by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I never realized that inside temperature directly related to outside temperature.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    6. Re:Seasonal by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      You must have air conditioning. :)

  36. Gas powered? by GottliebPins · · Score: 1

    So how long until we have fart powered computers? This fart is really strong so it's a "one". That fart, not so bad, it's a "zero". Of course you have to keep each fart insulated well so they last a long time.

  37. Lets see... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ...phononics proposes transmitting data as heat (thermal 'waves', whatever). So the heat generated by losses in various circuits on the chip would be noise to the data phonons we want.

    This is analogous to signal to noise problems in electronic systems. And the solution in the electronic world, reducing the noise, means that we've got to be even more concerned about reducing the heat due to losses in a phononic chip.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  38. Processor Toast by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    one temperature is read as 0 or "off" while a second, higher temperature is interpreted as 1 or "on". Provided that the thermal memory is well insulated, it can keep its temperature - and data - intact for a long time."

    He he, I know how to melt your processor: 11111111111111111...
         

  39. Mood Ring Clothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heat from our body could activate led's in clothing. We could be a walking strobe light, forget auras!

  40. Did I miss somthing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it April,1? ;-)

  41. Another use for heat in computing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can use it to break crypto!

    http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/002

  42. just add water... by shadoelord · · Score: 1

    and you'll have vapourware!

    --
    this is my sig, there are many like it, but this one is mine.
  43. Heat to Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Alternatively, you could just attach a Stirling engine to your heatsink and generate some lovely electricity instead.

  44. Hat tip by Jay+L · · Score: 1

    I just want to acknowledge and validate your Arch Deluxe reference.