Slashdot Mirror


AMD Launches New Processor Socket Despite Poor Economy

arcticstoat writes to tell us that despite a poor economic climate, AMD is moving forward with a new processor socket launch, although they are trying to make it as upgrade-friendly as possible. "As you probably already know from the AM3 motherboards that have already been announced, AM3 is AMD's first foray into DDR3 memory support. As Phenom CPUs have integrated memory controllers, it's more accurate to say that it's the new range of Phenom II CPUs (see below) that are DDR3-compatible. However, the new DDR3-compatible Phenom II range is also compatible with DDR2 memory. As the new CPUs and the new AM3 socket are pin-compatible with the current AM2+ socket, you can put a new AM3-compatible CPU into an existing AM2+ motherboard. This means that you can upgrade your CPU now without needing to change your motherboard or buy pricey new DDR3 memory."

215 comments

  1. Good by Sangui · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Because DDR3 memory is so high latency it isn't even worth it. There's no speed increase.

    1. Re:Good by XanC · · Score: 5, Informative

      The latency is generally lower than DDR2, measured in wall-clock time. The advertised latency appears worse only because of the faster clock.

    2. Re:Good by aliquis · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's bullshit, CL in periods * period length = latency, and since they are clocked higher the latency will probably be around the same, I won't calculate it for you.

      And that latency is how long it takes before you actually start to read any bits, but as soon as you have started each bit will come faster from the higher clocked memory.

      If you don't get a speed increase it's because either of:
      1) Processor not fast enough to take benefit of additional bandwidth.
      2) Cache system smart enough to not take benefit of additional bandwidth.
      3) Application not using memory in a fashion where it will take benefit of additional bandwidth.

      Most likely the later one ..

      All higher end graphic cards come with faster memory, it may not be a huge deal always but it probably add some benefit, rather stupid if it didn't.

      AMD said they would skip DDR2 and go directly to DDR3 earlier because there was no benefit when actually in use but I guess they "had to" when Intel was using DDR2 just because people see the numbers and wonder why one is bigger than the other.
      Though first AM DDR2 chips vs 939 DDR chips showed no increase in speed in benchmarks.

      Anyway, DDR3 is faster than DDR2, will you notice it? I have no idea.

    3. Re:Good by aliquis · · Score: 0

      ... may I also add that the higher clocked DDR2 memories are (mostly?) all out of spec to, while I'd assume atleast some faster DDR3 memories are within specs, probably not the more expensive stuff from Corsair, OCZ and such.

    4. Re:Good by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The 3-fold clocking scheme will only really help on interleaved burst reads. The memory cells don't charge the output buffers any faster just because you clock them at a higher rate. This is why the nCLK latencies scale with the number of folds in DDR scheme. The only things that will make the cells charge faster are a) higher voltage or b) smaller process or c) a more conductive semiconductor chemistry that lowers resistances and increases currents on the wafer.

      If you can have 3 banks of DDR3 interleaved by 1 clock then you can probably see some significant gains on sequential (aka burst) reads. In real life, this doesn't happen very much, especially in a multithreaded environment where almost all s/w is written using high-level foundation classes with very little machine optimization.

    5. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wish I understood any of that :(

      Looks like I have some reading to do!

    6. Re:Good by anonobomber · · Score: 1

      One of the draws of DDR2 is that it is currently far cheaper per GB than for regular old DDR. DDR currently costs at least 2x as much as comparable DDR2.

    7. Re:Good by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And both are probably cheaper than regular S-DRAM, and cheaper than even older technologies, but so what?

  2. What's the point in wating for markets to turn by von_rick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your competitor has a better marketshare and also a better line of processors, it would be a suicide to not release a competitive product when the economy is staggering. Withholding the technology while waiting for the economy to improve can make the gap between them and Intel even wider.

    --

    Face your daemons!

    1. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by faloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention that the money has already been spent for R&D. Spending the money for R&D, then sitting on it because the time isn't perfect is, as you mentioned, the best way to increase the gap. And have the added bonus of being out cash on something that won't sell.

      --
      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
    2. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by hannson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What exactly is the gap between Intel and AMDs CPUs?
       
        (I'm not trolling or trying to start a flamewar, just curious)

    3. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by von_rick · · Score: 2, Informative
      Search engine to the rescue

      There's lot to consider when you decide which CPU to go for, and then there is their market performance.

      --

      Face your daemons!

    4. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by aliquis · · Score: 5, Informative

      AMD is competitive at the low and middle end as long as you don't overclock the middle end CPUs.
      (If you include the price of the motherboard and don't care about overclocking a low- or midrange AMD system will be cheaper.)

      AMD don't have as high end CPUs as Intel and the ones which are closest don't overclock as good or use as little power.

      Though then I'd say you shouldn't overclock anyway and AMD chipsets have used less power making the two when used in a complete system rather comparable.

      Also AMD used to have an advantage in memory bandwidth and when using multiple CPUs.

      Information may be slightly outdated but all of it is probably true, Intel may have catched up in memory bandwidth performance with their latest CPUs since they have put the memory controller within the CPU themself to.

    5. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by aliquis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For notebooks I have no idea how total system power usage looks, AMDs chipsets provide better integrated graphics than Intel do however. And I guess I would go for someone better though still crappy graphics when somewhat faster / more power efficient CPU (if Intel really is.)

      Afaik AMD don't have an alternative to Atom, I may be wrong though.

      Also Intel notebook with Nvidia chipset may compare better to AMD.

    6. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magrathea stopped making luxury planets.
      I think AMD would be wise to hold back on the luxury chips

    7. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by WEqR0lDRR6I · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is probably something not many people care about, but...It's a hell of a lot easier and cheaper to find an Athlon64 motherboard that supports(and actually does ECC) ECC memory. Think $50-$100 for an Athlon64 motherboard that does this, versus $200-$300+(original Asus Maximus Formula, Asus P5E WS Pro) for a Core 2 motherboard(has to have an X38 northbridge, unless you want to give up PCIe x16 with a server chipset). I don't think the currently released Core i7 processors with built-in memory controllers support ECC *at all*.

      (PS to trolls: Unbuffered ECC memory is only marginally more expensive than unbuffered non-ECC, though it usually has a small latency penalty. Registered/FB-DIMMs ECC on the other hand are Quite Expensive)

    8. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by corychristison · · Score: 1

      For notebooks I have no idea how total system power usage looks, AMDs chipsets provide better integrated graphics than Intel do however. And I guess I would go for someone better though still crappy graphics when somewhat faster / more power efficient CPU (if Intel really is.)

      In my experience Intel is dominating in the notebook business. I prefer AMD but the notebooks out there using them are either:
      1) based on Sempron (slowish but low powered)
      2) based on older X2 core (good performance but runs hot and sucks power)

      Afaik AMD don't have an alternative to Atom, I may be wrong though.

      AMD has the Geode LX and NX lines.
      Geode LX is very low powered and the highest clock speed (I've seen) is 566Mhz.
      Geode NX is targeted directly at the Atom. Although I have yet to see any of these out in the wild.
      I've only ever found a Geode in the wild clocked as high as 500Mhz (see the ALIX boards)

    9. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In addition the fact that it's cheaper for them to make this than the previous version as well, they have every reason to stay competitive.

      Who writes this "poor economy" crap?

      Many companies are doing just fine through this downturn, it's just a mental state of consumers that has changed, and probably not for the long run either as consumers tend to have about the memory of a goldfish when it comes to taking corrective action financially.

      We're just slowly deflating back to where we were before this hyperinflation the last few years has brought.

    10. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by subsolar2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      AMD has the Geode LX and NX lines.
      Geode LX is very low powered and the highest clock speed (I've seen) is 566Mhz.
      Geode NX is targeted directly at the Atom. Although I have yet to see any of these out in the wild.
      I've only ever found a Geode in the wild clocked as high as 500Mhz (see the ALIX boards)

      Actually the Geode is a dead end processor, AMD already has stated they are disconinuing it.

      AMD recently announced a new processor "Conesus" that is intended for netbooks and UMPC.
      http://gizmodo.com/5086703/amds-upcoming-conesus-netbook-chip-wont-stoop-to-mid-levels

    11. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by stuffman64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Core i7 940 -> $564.99 + about $250 for mobo = $800+
      Phenom II 940 -> $224 + about $150 for mobo = about $375

      Core i7 needs DDR3, Phenom II 940 runs DD2 (note that the 940 is an AM2+ part, not AM3 so it doesn't support DDR3). DDR3 is somewhere around 50% more expensive than DDR2 (though falling).

      For me, the fact that the i7 is only about 10-20% faster than the Phenom for more than twice the cost, it's simply not worth considering for me. Then again, I do most of my gaming on consoles.

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    12. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      For me, the fact that the i7 is only about 10-20% faster than the Phenom for more than twice the cost, it's simply not worth considering for me. Then again, I do most of my gaming on consoles

      Not to mention the fact most games bottleneck at the graphics card, and not the CPU. So that 10%-20% faster CPU isn't guaranteed to give you 10%-20% increase in FPS. Phenom II is definitely the way to go if you want the best gang for your buck, imo.

    13. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Radhruin · · Score: 1

      Actually, while Intel CPUs have very low power draw, the current crop of Intel chipsets are comparatively power hungry. When considering system power draw in its entirety, an AMD system will use less power.

    14. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by synaptik · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's just a mental state of consumers that has changed... We're just slowly deflating back to where we were before this hyperinflation the last few years has brought.

      I reserve the right to remind you that you said that.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    15. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's not actually true, AMD give realistic power draw estimates but real world testing has shown that the AMD parts now use less power. One must also take into account that AMD has been integrating a significant part of northbridge into the CPU die for some years now.

    16. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

      But then you lose the "I spent $X,000 on my superawesomeness gaming rig" pissing contests when you play those games online...

    17. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      It's not always about FPS gain. As a PC gamer I consider other aspects as well. For example, how well it can handle local hosting when I need to (for example L4D, where my PC can handle local hosting far far better than a good portion of the servers I've played on). Or how it handles processor intensive actions inside a game. Things along these lines are important too. Yeah, the GPU might be the bottleneck for FPS, but I don't expect my CPU to churn out graphics, I expect my CPU to do CPU specific tasks. Besides, if the GPU is doing horrible things to your frame rate, you probably want to think about investing in something greater.

    18. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Who writes this "poor economy" crap?

      When you're reading to pull your head out of the sand and stop ignoring facts... The Dept of Labor for one.

      --
      Stop Racism. Support the HUMAN Race.

    19. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, was looking at the Core i7 earlier today and noticed they are pricey.

      Think this is a better bang for the buck...

      Gigabyte GA-MA74GM-S2H $64.90
      AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+ Retail (Socket AM2) $59.99
      Rosewill R363-M-BK Micro ATX Black Ultra High Gloss Finished Computer Case with
      400W ATX $59.99
      CORSAIR XMS2 2GB (2 x 1GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2
        6400) $44.99
      BFG Tech BFGE98512GTE GeForce 9800 GT 512MB 256-bit GDDR3 PCI Express 2.0
      x16 $134.99

      Total: $364.86

      Missing: Hard Drive, DVD, WinXP

    20. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically Intel is giving AMD a righteous spanking when it comes to performance. Now that they have tossed Netburst for core(which while there wasn't anything wrong with Netburst speed wise they were space heaters) the performance has shot WAY up, which leaves AMD having to constantly lowball on price to make up the difference. After all, who wants to pay more for a slower chip?

      It actually reminds me of the old days /breaks out rocking chair/ when AMD and Cyrix were the "good enough" CPUs that you bought when you couldn't afford Intel. Problem is that unlike then when the difference could be several hundred dollars(Remember the Celeron 300a which would OC faster than the Pentium? Man those days were exciting to be into PCs) the difference between the AMD chips and the Intel chips are usually more like $20-50. So unless you already have an AMD motherboard why would you get the slower chips just to save $20?

      And I know that I will probably be flamed by the AMD fanboys for saying this, but in all my years working PC repair I just don't trust AMD chips. Now I don't know if they fixed it with Phenom, but we used to keep a bucket for dead chips in my old shop and it was nearly completely full of AMD chips, mostly Athlons. Compare that to the Intel chips where the two we had in the bucket was from a lightning strike and a blown circuit breaker. I have even gone into local businesses to do a service call and found the CPU fan so clogged with smoke and dust that it was obvious that it hadn't turned in years and the Intel chip just kept on humping, albeit running slower than it should. I have seen Intel chips take some horrible abuse and the AMD chips always seemed easier to blow. So for me at least there would have to be a considerable advantage in speed or price to make me switch to building AMD chips for my customers. The only exception is graphic artwork where my customers swear that AMD chips render faster than Intel for the types of graphics work that they do. And don't even get me started on Sempron. That slow ass POS makes the Celeron look like a quad core Xeon by comparison. They should be ashamed of selling that POS with the AMD label on it.

      But to answer your question AMD is getting spanked and thanks to buying ATI they are bleeding cash. They also don't have a product in the hottest market ATM(Netbooks) and they have never been big in the mobile space which seems to be the direction everyone is headed. I just hope they survive because Intel without competition equals crazy prices.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    21. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In addition to having competitive low-end and mid-range CPUs, AMD is the clear performance leader in virtualization applications.

    22. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, it's nice to see an appropriate level of pessimism. Judging from the last few times something like this happened to the economy it could take up to 15 years before growth and employment returns to "normal". Though our level of debt is much worse than at any time in history, so even that estimate might be too optimistic.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    23. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by lgw · · Score: 1

      Wow a politician carefully contructs a chart to show that politicians should have more power - never saw that coming! Sure, the data's from the Dept of labor, but interpretation is everything. Here in Silly Valley, for example, turnover is quite high (many job losses), but there are plenty of new jobs to move to. So far, it's nothing like the "laid off means at least 6 months looking" dot-bust days.

      Fearmongering only makes things worse. It's pathetic enough that we've spent over 1.5 trillion on unneeded bailouts and pork so far (yay, that's about $15,000 in debt per family) without giving the damned government more ammunition.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by tirefire · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your distrust of AMD chips is well-founded; some of the older chips didn't cope so well with a failed heatsink/fan: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hot-spot,365-6.html Modern AMD chips are fine, though. And why the Sempron bashing? My first PC was a cheapo $500 box I built for games. It had a $90 Sempron 64 that beat the pants off of the netburst Celerons out there in games like Doom 3, Far Cry, Half-Life 2, that kind of thing.

    25. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by wigle · · Score: 1

      I've heard the bang-for-your-buck argument in favor of Phenom II, but I don't think it holds up when you consider that an i7 (920) setup is only $300-$400 more, will last much longer than a Phenom II, and presently blows it out of the water in CPU-intensive tasks (especially when OC'd). When you spread that money over two or three years, in the long run its a better deal to just upgrade to the X58 chipset.

      --
      ::wigle::
    26. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by wigle · · Score: 0, Troll

      Missing: ability to play any recent games at more than 30 fps. The Phenom II destroys Athlon 64 X2, and i7 destroys Phenom II. Think about that.

      --
      ::wigle::
    27. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Starting now, there's going to be a lot less talking and a lot more killing."

      "Less smack, more thwack"

      I could come up with more ways to say it, but you get the point.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    28. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Just about ANYTHING will beat the pants off of a Celeron - Celerons are useless.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    29. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      Well, the present Core i7's have a TDP of 130 watts, while the Phenom II's listed in the article are only 95 watts. Some of the first Phenom II's are 125 watts.

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    30. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUTUREPROOFED!?!

    31. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by CajunArson · · Score: 1

      You are making a massive logic error that AMD's marketing department is very happy about right now: You simply took 2 model numbers and put them up against each other as being "equal". If you look at actual performance, the Phenom II 940 is about equivalent to a Core 2 Q9400... a MUCH cheaper CPU that can be used with MUCH cheaper motherboards and with cheaper DDR2 RAM. Plus, the Core 2 uses far less power, and is likely going to overclock much better than the Phenom. In fact, when Intel cut prices on the Q9400 AMD responded by matching the cuts on the Phenom II that had been out for less than 2 weeks... AMD knows damn well that the Q9400 is equivalent to it's top-end model, but intentionally chose to mimic the high-end Intel model numbers to confuse the sheeple.

      AMD's marketing department would like to thank you for your help.

      --
      AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
    32. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      Back 'in the day', Celerons were great budget builds, the 266 and 300a could easily run@450mhz on stock cooling, and with similar performance to the very spendy Pentium 2's. Of course this was what, 1998?

      Either way, I'm glad AMD is staying in the game. Without them we'd still be paying stupid money for even mid-level CPUs.

      Just about ANYTHING will beat the pants off of a Celeron - Celerons are useless.

    33. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by InvisiBill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An i7 920 will crush an X2 5200+ in CPU-intensive tasks. http://www.guru3d.com/article/intel-core-i7-920-and-965-review/15 shows a software-based rendering benchmark. The i7's are up in the 11's and 12's, while my X2 6000+ was in the 4's.

      The i7 system will definitely cost more, as there aren't really any budget X58 motherboards and the CPUs and DDR3 are still brand-new, top-of-the-line parts (and thus get a price premium). However, I just got an EVGA tri-SLI board, i7 920, and 6GB of DDR3-1866 for $570 + S&H. Yes, that's quite a bit more than your total, but your listed system is actually below my 18 month old system. In my eyes, it's really apples and oranges.

      If you can make use of the extra processing power, then I think $570 for an i7 system isn't all that outrageous compared to $260 for the board and CPU you listed, with 6GB of the listed DDR2. For comparison, I paid $575 for the core parts of that system 18 months ago - nF590 SLI board, X2 6000+, 2x1GB DDR2, and 8600GT video card.

      If the X2 is good enough for what you want to do though, that's a few hundred bucks you're saving. No sense in buying apples if oranges are acceptable.

    34. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Clanked · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have to account for how each company lists its TDP.
      Intel lists its TDP as average load usage, while AMD lists the max draw.

      So if each chip was listed at 90W, the AMD would actually use less power.

    35. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Spit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think a current i7 would compare to what you will buy for $300 in two years' time? In three years a laptop would be faster.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    36. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by this+great+guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Literally all socket AM2/AM2+ motherboards support unbuffered ECC memory, because the memory bus connects the memory slots directly to the CPU socket, therefore the CPU is the only thing dictating what type of memory is supported. And because all AM2/AM2+ Athlon processors support ECC memory, all AM2/AM2+ motherboards support ECC memory.

    37. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Sensible+Clod · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that. It doesn't surprise me, though, since Intel's chips have been power hogs for several years now (with the exception of the Pentium M).

      --

      The difference between spam and poop is that you don't have to dig through septic tanks looking for real food. -- Me
    38. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      It's nowhere near that rosy out there. I can name half a dozen Fortune 500 companies that we do business with who are freezing budgets, cutting suppliers, and putting lots of projects on hold. Which means that a lot of small companies out there are getting squeezed hard. There's a lot of fear in the boardrooms and it's trickling down quite nastily.

      We find out this week whether we're about to lose about 15-20% of our gross revenue for the year due to cutbacks.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    39. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      The big problem with the early Athlons was that they would not self-limit when their heatsink failed.

      But they fixed that issue at least 5 years ago (all of the Athlon64 parts are self-throttling and will not fry themselves).

      It's one of the few mis-steps that AMD made over the years.

      The primary reason that we switched to AMD was back when the Athlon64 chips were first released. At the time, 64bit future was hazy. Would it arrive next year? Three years? How soon would we need to have 64bit capable machines? Your choices back then were either Intel's Itanium - which was an absolute dog at running 32bit x86 code, or AMD Athlon64 - which ran 32bit x86 code like a champ and gave you the potential to switch to 64bit later.

      So we got the best of both worlds. Good 32bit x86 performance in the near term with future proofing so that we could run 64bit code later. We didn't have to wait around for Intel to release the Core 2 Duo line.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    40. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by cowbutt · · Score: 1

      The first clause of your sentence may be true, but it doesn't imply the second. I've had a happy multi-tuner MythTV/firewall/DHCP/Privoxy/DNS box running off a 1.7GHz Celeron for a couple of years, and it was a scratch machine for about four years before that. The availability of the Celeron allowed me to buy a board with a cheap good-enough CPU, rather than having to spend far more than necessary on the CPU. Eventually, when I wanted transcoding for DVD recording to go quicker, I picked up a used P4 2.53GHz from eBay for about 20 quid that just dropped in.

    41. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Cpu speed in relation to game performance stopped being relevant towards the end of 2007. Anything dual core with an 8600gt or better will happily play any modern game at 30fps with moderate visual settings at 1680x1050. The 9800 he included will run most any game at 45fps at 1080p. Call me when 120hz 1080p displays drop below $350 and we'll talk.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    42. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Oh, and if you still have the 1.7GHz you might want to look into a cheap mobo and SFF case. At that speed they make great multiformat DVD players for the bedroom. Add a wifi card and streaming video is yours! I built one out of an old SFF case and a 1.4GHz Cele with a cheapo cap card for remote control and my sis couldn't be happier with it.

      But I have to concur with you. I have literally built dozens of Celeron boxes, both for my customers and myself over the years and for the vast majority of what I have found my customers use PCs for (surfing the web, listening to music, bookkeeping, watching vids, etc) the Celeron works perfectly. I just added a new Foxconn motherboard for a dirt cheap $20 so I could use some old parts lying around to build my oldest boy a new machine after his old one finally died. The Celeron 3.06GHz that I had left from my upgrading my own box to a 3.6GHz P4 last year runs his games quite well.

      And the reason I rag the "Wimpy Sempy" as I call it is simple: My customers have never complained about performance out of the Celeron boxes, but on the other hand I have had several Sempron boxes traded in (including one for a Celeron) because they were unhappy with its performance. While the Duron was IMHO a great cheap chip the lack of cache in the Sempron just cuts it off at the knees IMHO. The Celeron, while I wouldn't try transcoding on it my customers are quite happy with them, and I am quite happy with how reliable they are. And like you said it is trivial to pick up a good P4 or Pentium D for cheap if they want a low cost upgrade path.

      While I don't know if they have truly fixed the "heat death" issue with AMD (has anybody seen a test where they unplug the fan?) after having so many Athlons in the shop die and take the motherboard with them I would just rather trust Intel. And with LGA775 there are a huge range of choices available so I can tailor performance/price to my customers needs. While I hope AMD stays in the game for the sake of competition and I have bought AMD during the P3 era for now I will just stick with old reliable Intel for the time being. For my customers as well as my family the price/performance ratio as well as the reliability of the Intel CPU simply can't be beat.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    43. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that 30 fps is terrible. No self-respecting gamer actually aims for 30 fps, so why would anyone aim to buy a PC that is 3 years outdated?

    44. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by wigle · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but you're ignoring the value you would get out of your original investment. That's three years you've had a good computer vs. three years with a subpar one. Besides, laptops aren't really what we're talking about, since they cannot fit a decent graphics card.

      --
      ::wigle::
    45. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last month, job loss was equivalent to putting the entire state of Maine on the Unemployment.

      Wakeup foo...

    46. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      That's sure a strange definition of "decent" you have there.

      Perhaps you meant "high end" or "top of the line" instead?

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
    47. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by wigle · · Score: 1

      *If you play video games.

      --
      ::wigle::
    48. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Agripa · · Score: 1

      It still requires BIOS support though as far as I know. Asus has been good about ECC support but Gigabyte leaves it out on the embedded graphics chipsets for some reason.

    49. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I just went this route with a Phenom II. The money I saved over an equivalent (and older technology) X38 Intel system paid for a fast hardware RAID controller.

    50. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Cornflake917 · · Score: 1

      1. $300-$400 is about a 50% increase of price over a decent Phenom II setup.

      2. The 920 i7 is only marginally better than the 940 PII, from the benchmarks I've seen.

      3. The i7 920 will not "last longer" than the P2. If a CPU becomes obsolete, a CPU that's 20% faster is most likely obsolete as well. 24 fps might be better than 20 fps, but it's not nearly enough for first person shooters.

      4. I don't do video encoding, image processing, or compile any large projects on my home computer, so I think I will rarely see the benefits.

      I'm just not convinced that spending an extra $400 will yield me any significant benefit. Although maybe I'm just not as rich as you.

    51. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      1. This is a budget box -- its not intended to run the latest games at 1600x1200 @ 4X FSAA.
      2. You DO understand that GPUs, not the CPUs are the bottleneck, but I guess you've never actually shipped any games.
      3. It depends on the game AND resolution. I actually picked up a netbook so I could play D2 on it. Even L4D runs fine on a 6600 GTS.

    52. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Guess the politicians are to blame for GM cutting 10,000 jobs too.

      Agreed on the pork barrels. Hell, the war on this non-physical thing called "Terror" was bad enough.

    53. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD already has stated they are disconinuing it.

      By "it" you mean development. Was hoping by the title they would be talking about the Neo, not a CPU that came out last month.

    54. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Missing: ... WinXP

      "I wouldn't say I've been /missing/ it, Bob"

    55. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by wigle · · Score: 1

      You DO understand that GPUs, not the CPUs are the bottleneck, but I guess you've never actually shipped any games.

      Depends completely on CPU/GPU setup. Try putting a HD 4870 card in an old X2 3800+ box, see how that goes. But I guess you've never shipped any games.

      --
      ::wigle::
    56. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      I got a "server error" from freakin GOOGLE, lol.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    57. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by DudemanX · · Score: 1

      And this is the problem with anecdotal evidence. It's pretty much 100% contrary to my 10 year experience building and support custom PC's for people. Well there may be SOME truth to your reliability concerns though the difference isn't large enough to have ever been a problem for me. If the ratio of failed AMD to Intel CPUs is 2:1 it's only because per year I'll see maybe 2 bad AMD chips and maybe one bad Intel chip. What are you doing to have all these chip failures? Unless the PSU decides to flip out and fry the whole system CPU's just don't fail for the most part. 99 out of 100 times it's just the motherboard and the CPU is fine(all numbers basically made up, but in my experience a CPU failure truely is a rare thing indeed without there being extreme environmental causes).

      If you think the Celeron was any kind of match for a Sempron then you truely are hitting the crack pipe though. Let's see... we have Netburst vs K8 architechtures in which the Athlon 64 was kicking the crap out of the P4. Now lets halve the caches of each chip and disable 64-bit support. Now we have a Sempron which still runs pretty darn well since it still has an on-die memory controller and is running on a really fast Hypertransport bus. The Celeron on the other hand can't cope as well with this cache loss though since it has to access memory over the FSB which was also crippled from 800Mhz to 533Mhz. This on an architecture like Netburst that was already STARVED for FSB and memory bandwidth and depended much more on it's larger L2 cache for performance.

      Duron and Sempron were great chips that performed very well for their prices and even overclocked well if you wanted. Celeron has never been worth buying since the 300A.

    58. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by MoldySpore · · Score: 0

      In all my time building AMD machines I have never once had a chip fail. Not once. And I've built hundreds of machines. The motherboards, memory, videocards, and hard drives die, but the processors keep on ticking. Meanwhile, I've had loads of P4's die from overheating time and time again. Working for the state, on a network supporting 5000 networked workstations, not a day went by when an Intel machine didn't overheat and toast the CPU. There were literally AT LEAST several every week. Meanwhile, every server room running Opertons or another form of AMD CPU kept on chugging, and those were in cramped server rooms.

      I still have an Athlon XP 2000+ running, 24/7 since the day I bought it back in 2002. That's 7 straight years of running. Stock cooling. Serves as my domain controller and stores some common access files for my personal network.

      While I am sure there are cases for both sides in terms of longevity, I can't overlook the fact that AMD CPU's continue to provide enough juice to run everything I do, and everything my customers do, for less than half the price of Intel chips. Call me a fanboy, it really doesn't matter. If Intel had chips as cheap as AMD that ran as fast for as long, I'd be all over it. Alas in price vs. performance and bang for the buck, AMD wins hands down in every category.

      Sure, if you want the biggest and baddest? Intel is obviously the way to go. Bragging rights? Go with Intel. But if you want to build a machine that costs less than $800 to build (thats with a 22" monitor and all the fixins) that can still run Crysis @ 30+ FPS, then you need to go AMD, it's pretty cut and dry IMO.

      --

      "I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."

    59. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by lgw · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the war in Iraq cost a *small* fraction of what was just spent on bailouts and pork.

      Companies fail all the time. That's how capitalism is supposed to work -- losers go under, while winnners grow -- as it's the only way bad management ever stops being in charge. Propping up GMs unsustainable business model certainly is the politicians fault, every bit as much as the airlines, or this recent DMCA/RIAA nonsense.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    60. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Look up the word "load-balancing" noob.

      I've shipped games on PC, PSX, PS2, Wii, and DS. Which platforms have you actually worked on?

    61. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by ergean · · Score: 1

      Man... you are posting exactly the same thing in every thread about AMD... it's always the bucket full of chips. From the socket A to socket 939 (I don't wha to remember 754... amd really shafted us with that socket - but they are almost forgiven with the AM2 - AM2+ and AM3) there is a huge difference. I can tell you that now I have more burned chips from Intel D series and none from AM2/939/754. Can't say the same about MB's. :(

    62. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      30fps is Good Enough for 95% of gamers, however 95% of gamers think 60fps is just barely acceptable. Go conduct your own double blind test and see if you and your friends can tell the difference between 30 and 45, and 60 fps. I bet you can't.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    63. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by MojoStan · · Score: 1

      AMDs chipsets provide better integrated graphics than Intel do however. And I guess I would go for someone better though still crappy graphics when somewhat faster / more power efficient CPU (if Intel really is.)

      Also Intel notebook with Nvidia chipset may compare better to AMD.

      Just to make things more clear, desktop Intel-CPU motherboards with NVIDIA's latest GeForce 9300/9400 chipsets (with integrated graphics) are also available.

      So if you want to use a Core 2 Duo/Quad and the best NVIDIA integrated graphics (with about half the 3D performance of a $35 discrete graphics card), then that option is also available.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    64. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps some extra data will clear up you confusion. You see while I do get the occasional home user the majority of my business comes from SOHO and SMB clients. Many of these clients keep their computers in much less than optimal working conditions( trucking companies, warehouses, etc) and the AMD chips just couldn't take the abuse. Maybe that is different with the new line, I don't know. But with many of my customers you are lucky if the fan is even running, much less actually cooling anything. With the AMD it didn't take long for a non running CPU fan to equal a dead board, whereas the Intel would keep right on running, albeit slower than they would with a running fan.

      And no, I don't use drugs. There are simply problems with Sempron CPUs, especially those that come from OEMs. While it is true that if you build it your self it is an okay chip( although for the office tasks my clients are using PCs for Celeron seems to work better) but you have no idea how many Sempron boxes I have had to throw in the trash for clients. Why? Because many of the budget OEMs will OC the hell out of a Sempy trying to get a little more performance(so they can charge more) and pair it with a really shitty budget fan. In my experience AMD chip+OC as high as it will go+ shitty cheapo fan= Dead AMD box. Customers would go out and buy these Sempron boxes thinking that if the Celeron I built them ran good then why shouldn't this? Because I don't use shitty fans and I NEVER OC a chip, period. And by the time they brought them to me to find out what was wrong it would be totally bricked.

      But as you can see it is all about knowing your market and your customers needs. If I was building budget gaming rigs I might think of a Sempy(but more likely would go with X2) but for the conditions that I know these machines are going to be subjected to and knowing which apps they are going to be running Intel simply makes the better choice. If they were doing graphics work or playing games then it would be a different story. You see, I don't really care which chips I use, I only care about giving the best value to the customer I can. And since there are builds of mine still doing their job after a decade of use I guess I am doing something right. I know my customers are quite happy with my work and often send their family and friends to me. So while AMD might be great for the market segment you are building for with my segment Intel just seems to be the best fit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    65. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

      In theory a BIOS can purposefully refuse to POST if it detects (via the SPD EEPROM) that the type of RAM is ECC, but I have never seen any BIOS do that. What exactly did you notice with Gigabyte motherboards ?

    66. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by aliquis · · Score: 1

      and AMD chipsets have used less power making the two when used in a complete system rather comparable.

      Sure I may not have been spot on but atleast I mention it ..

    67. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by cowbutt · · Score: 1

      The Celeron on the other hand can't cope as well with this cache loss though since it has to access memory over the FSB which was also crippled from 800Mhz to 533Mhz. This on an architecture like Netburst that was already STARVED for FSB and memory bandwidth and depended much more on it's larger L2 cache for performance.

      'Crippled' isn't really an appropriate word for the FSB on the Celeron, as it implies it's been reduced from the 'un-crippled' speed on the P4s on which it was based. In fact, Celerons are usually based upon older revisions of Intel's contemporaneous flagship consumer processors. P4s started off at 400MHz, and so did the Celeron. P4s get upgraded to 533MHz and later 800MHz, and so do Celerons eventually. The P4 2.40B with its 533MHz FSB was regarded as a reasonable buy at the time, so why would the same bus speed on a budget processor be regarded as 'crippled'? Only if you compare it with the leading-edge consumer processors, but that's not the Celeron's target market and would be like saying a Ford Mondeo is crippled because it's not a Ferrari.

      Duron and Sempron were great chips that performed very well for their prices and even overclocked well if you wanted. Celeron has never been worth buying since the 300A.

      Depends what your priorities are. I've never had much luck with stability/compatibility from AMD motherboards and their third party (SiS, VIA) chipsets, so I prefer using Asus or Gigabyte-designed Intel motherboards. That necessitates using an Intel CPU. If I need the performance, I'll whatever's in the price/performance sweet spot in their consumer range, if not, a Celeron will make it go until the decent stuff shows up on eBay or the pulls bin at a computer fair for £5-10. Similarly, if one has bought an early-model P4, then a new Celeron might even be a performance upgrade, and without buying a new motherboard (RAM, graphics card, case...)

    68. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Agripa · · Score: 1

      In theory a BIOS can purposefully refuse to POST if it detects (via the SPD EEPROM) that the type of RAM is ECC, but I have never seen any BIOS do that. What exactly did you notice with Gigabyte motherboards ?

      I have not actually seen a BIOS reject ECC RAM when it could otherwise be used but some vendors are understandably picky for reliability reasons.

      I have not tested any of the Gigabyte AM2+ motherboards but at least according to their documentation and other sources, they do not support ECC if they have on-board graphics which applies to the 780G and 790GX based motherboards. Their 770, 790X, and 790FX boards do support ECC but the later two come at a price premium compared to the 780G and 790GX versions. All of the equivalent Asus boards support ECC with or without embedded graphics so I bought one of those instead (M3A78-T) for my latest system as I had no need for the extra PCIe slots and so far it works like a charm. As I said in another post, the difference in money I spent compared to an equivalent Intel system bought a hardware RAID controller.

      Someone can correct me if I am wrong but I believe ECC support requires SMM (System Management Mode) firmware support from the BIOS. You could enable ECC later in the boot process but I suspect intercepting and handling an ECC generated machine check exception would be problematical.

    69. Re:What's the point in wating for markets to turn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chips you're talking about where the ones for the socket 754 where the models that predated AMD's cool and quiet thermal monitoring and cpu scaling. Yes, these would run full bore 24/7 and in the event of a dead fan or an improperly seated heatsink would cook themselves to death at temps over 210f/100c.

      Since socket 939 was released though all AMD cpus have thermal monitoring and enabled by default in the bios.

      As for 3rd party chipsets, SiS and VIA no longer make AMD chipsets since AMD bought ATI graphics(2005) who also made AMD chipsets, under AMD ownership they've improved the ATI chipsets and gpus. This gives them the advantage over Intel in actually offering a complete high end system all the way up through the high end workstation graphics of the FireGL line. This means that the ATI/AMD graphics on say a 790GX/Radeon 3300 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_700_chipset_series#790GX motherboard are going to be much better then the equivalent Intel chipset using their best IGP the GMA X4500HD http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_GMA#GMA_X4500

      If the locations in question are also so nasty to the comp that you can't get the fans to last, you should really look at building the machines fanless from the start. It's trivial to replace the heatsink on a low speced machine with a nice over sized fanless model like a scythe http://www.scythe-usa.com/product/cpu/038/scnj2000_detail.html ninja or something similar, especially of you get a case that has plenty of passive airflow. Just check out Silent PC Review http://www.silentpcreview.com/ for ons of info on how to pick a machine that needs no fans, you can even get fanless power supplies http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010320058+1233114180&Configurator=&Subcategory=58&description=&Ntk=&SpeTabStoreType=&srchInDesc= these days. If you really need to make sure the machine stays cool without fans look at getting something using a Zalman TNN series case http://www.zalman.co.kr/ENG/product/CategorySecond_Pic.asp?categoryname=Cases&categorySecond=CAS16 the case is designed to be the cooling for the entire machine, I know Voodoo PC, a high end builder that is owned by HP/Compaq used to sell several machines using those cases. The case used a set of heatpipes to transfer heat away from the chipset, cpu and gpu to the case body which was cut out of aluminum plates and finned to give it more surface area for convective cooling. Provided you didn't do anything stupid like put in the fastest parts you could find, overclocked them and placed it under a heat duct you'd be fine.

      Theres an easy way to fix your pc hostile environment problem and allow the client to get the performance from the machines they paid for. You just have to be willing to put forth the effort to figure out the solution, even if it means getting an exotic case like that, or doing it the easy way and getting big ass server cases like a cooolermaster(they make allot of cases where the entire front of the case is a metal screen, with a mesh filter behind it) http://www.coolermaster-usa.com/category.php?category_id=17 stacker series case, pulling the fans and installing some big honking fanless gear, no fans = no massive farm of dust bunnies living in the case.

      Alternatively, you could just install dust filters http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/fanfigu.html over the intake fans...

      Seriously, you do what for a living? If you're really in this line of work you should know this now and should have known this then.

  3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's one of the last liquids I'd use in a water block.

  4. strange by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This means that you can upgrade your CPU now without needing to change your motherboard or buy pricey new DDR3 memory.

    Other than starving CIS majors, who barely earn enough money from their university's computer lab to pay for Ramen Noodles, who does that? IT professionals would just buy all the hardware together because their time is worth more than their money, and everybody else just buys entire new computers. This could only appeal to a handful of small-budget kids.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:strange by mewshi_nya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or a lot of small-budget husbands :P

    2. Re:strange by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gamers. Sure, most would rather go out and buy a totally new box, but if someone just wanted to upgrade a CPU, AMD would let them do it. It may seem illogical for hardware vendors to target a small portion of the hardware buying community, but both AMD and Intel are trying their best to get the gamer's money.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Might AMD want to sell fewer different types of CPUs? They can stop selling all their AM2 CPUs sooner without issues from OEMs who perhaps transition slower, might want to continue using DDR2 due to cost or latency, etc.

    4. Re:strange by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually we bought drop in CPU upgrades for our Database server, when you have the time invested in the OS and application installs and QA time not to mention tons of ram it's a very cheap upgrade to just swap out CPU's if you are CPU limited. Spending $5K or so to get 40% better performance out of say $300K is sunk cost is a no brainer. Now that's on the Opteron side not the Phenom side, but again if you do a lot of transcoding it's probably cheaper to buy a new CPU then upgrade the whole rig.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:strange by Lord+Ender · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, I'm not married, but recently when I was at the computer store, I overheard this scrawny guy on the phone with his wife begging her for permission to get the 2G instead of the 1G RAM upgrade. His whiny, pathetic, groveling demeanor over a $20 difference in price, and his futile attempts to explain to her why 2G is better than 1G, made me absolutely want to vomit. I'm not married, but I vowed that day to either divorce or kill myself if I ever find myself to be such a pathetic, spineless loser.

      So my advice to the married chumps out there is to keep a separate bank account for discretionary purchases which your wives have neither control of nor access to. Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:strange by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of my cousin, he works in a computer store and his girlfriend wouldn't allow him to get a new computer because she thought he should spend the money on a trip for them (he was like 19 and she 18 so pretty pussy whipped.)
      Anyway, he kept the case, problem solved ;), or well, not the actual problem, be he found a workaround.

    7. Re:strange by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So my advice to the married chumps out there is to keep a separate bank account for discretionary purchases which your wives have neither control of nor access to. Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      Seconded. One of the best things you can do is establish the idea of a slush fund for both sides of the relationship; fighting over money is one of the more common reasons for divorce.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    8. Re:strange by Facegarden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So my advice to the married chumps out there is to keep a separate bank account for discretionary purchases which your wives have neither control of nor access to. Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      Or... marry someone who isn't a total shite and respects your interests.
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    9. Re:strange by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      Dude! Way to totally reverse priorities. Did it occur to you that maybe she's the one with the high-paying job, and all that groveling got him better hardware than he could have bought if his was the only income?

      Okay that probably wasn't the case, I'm just sayin', if I had to choose between self-respect and gadgets... "Honey, please?! I took out the trash last night and everything!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    10. Re:strange by WildStreet · · Score: 1

      Thank God for my ebay account, and their electronic statements. Coupled with a gmail account, and she is none the wiser. NO MAAM

    11. Re:strange by deraj123 · · Score: 1

      I'm just sayin', if I had to choose between self-respect and gadgets... "Honey, please?! I took out the trash last night and everything!"

      Well that's your decision. Just please have the decency to not do your groveling in public - it embarrasses the rest of us.

    12. Re:strange by dlevitan · · Score: 1

      Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      Dude! Way to totally reverse priorities. Did it occur to you that maybe she's the one with the high-paying job, and all that groveling got him better hardware than he could have bought if his was the only income?

      Should it matter? In my opinion, if you're married, then it doesn't matter who makes the money, you're in it together. By that reasoning, should a parent who stays home with the children not be able to buy anything at all since they don't earn anything? Granted, I think that any major purchase or decision should be made together, and a $1k purchase is usually considered major, but one person shouldn't be begging the other for anything. That kind of relationship is not sustainable and not healthy for anyone.

    13. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must date the wrong kind of women because not once have I ever known one that was very fiscally responsible. In fact, I would kind of like it because it would lower some of my own stress over trying to be responsible at all times.

      When I was married I did the separate accounts thing too. It's a very good idea. We each deposited our checks into our own accounts. Course it kind of sucked because I never saw one penny she made and she did not pay the bills. Still was better than her use my account for whatever she spent all that money on.

    14. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good boy!

      You have been well trained.

    15. Re:strange by onkelonkel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Works both ways. You come home with a new CPU & MOBO and install it in the old case when she's not looking; she sneaks a new pair of shoes into the closet and tells you she bought them last christmas on sale when she busts them out.

      Or, you can be adults, and maybe agree on an amount for discretionary spending that doesn't require the others approval.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    16. Re:strange by Cozminsky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Virtualization doesn't help your performance if you're already using all of a particular resource. It has overheads that mean you're getting less out of your hardware in terms of raw performance. The fact that you can put 5 boxes that would otherwise be sitting idle on the same hardware is what makes virtualization attractive.

    17. Re:strange by silanea · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly how does virtualisation magically add performance out of hot air? And exactly how does buying additional iron provide that same kind of performance increase per $ spent that the parent mentioned?

      Gosh, can we please have an automated -2 buzzword sucker whenever someone comes up with fancy terms where they just don't fit?

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    18. Re:strange by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      OT, but that's what me and my wife eventually came out to. We have our separate bank accounts so that we can make stupid purchases on our own and not worry the other spouse as much. I can't remember who said it, but the best fiscal advice for married people that I even heard was that both members need to have money that they're not accountable for to the other spouse.

    19. Re:strange by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should have been more clear.

      Virtualization allows you to swap out the underlying hardware without reconfiguring the server's OS.

      Granted, you still do need to set up a "host" operating system, although this tends to be a fairly trivial task.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    20. Re:strange by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Should it matter? In my opinion, if you're married, then it doesn't matter who makes the money, you're in it together. By that reasoning, should a parent who stays home with the children not be able to buy anything at all since they don't earn anything? Granted, I think that any major purchase or decision should be made together, and a $1k purchase is usually considered major, but one person shouldn't be begging the other for anything. That kind of relationship is not sustainable and not healthy for anyone.

      To get all serious in a moment for what was supposed to be a joke (gadgets before self-esteem, come on work with me here people), no matter how you think it should work ideally, marriage isn't that simple. The line between "not be able to buy anything" and "major purchase" is going to fluctuate based on who is bringing home more of the bacon. Or one spouse thinks "you're in it together" means "you have to ask for everything" regardless of who is getting paid, especially if one thinks of themselves as the financially responsible one. It may not be healthy, but many things in real relationships aren't healthy, but somehow a lot of them end up sustainable. That's why the married guy begging his wife to buy something, or to go fishing with the guys, and so on are sort of an archetype. Ideal? No. Real? You betcha.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:strange by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 0

      Seconded. One of the best things you can do is establish the idea of a slush fund for both sides of the relationship; marriage is one of the more common reasons for divorce.

      Fixed that for you. ;-)

      --
      When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
    22. Re:strange by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      His whiny, pathetic, groveling demeanor over a $20 difference in price, and his futile attempts to explain to her why 2G is better than 1G, made me absolutely want to vomit. I'm not married, but I vowed that day to either divorce or kill myself if I ever find myself to be such a pathetic, spineless loser.

      Hear hear!

      Listen spineless losers: only grovel for 4GB. 2GB isn't enough. If you grovel, do it for something worthwhile.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    23. Re:strange by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's still cheaper to buy $5k in processors than a new $40K+ server, and even with virtualization it's not like racking, configuring, and SAN and network connecting a server is free. Plus with per CPU licensed applications where you are performance constrained it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to lose some percentage of performance when a license upgrade is even more expensive than the time invested. I'm not saying everyone looking for better performance should run out today and buy a drop in CPU upgrade, but there has always been a market for such products because there are always situations where it makes economic sense to do so.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    24. Re:strange by sjames · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. If you have a nice machine that could go for another year in it's current role if it was just a bit faster, why not drop in the new CPU? Getting an all new machine will take up time as well moving the software and/or configs over.

      Next year when the budget is hopefully better, get a new system sans CPU, and move it over. Put the old one back in the old box and deploy somewhere less demanding.

    25. Re:strange by Namlak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you know the guy isn't a total loser who's run up $20,000 in credit card debt with all the things he "had to have", essentially forcing his wife to become the authority that keeps him in check? I know of at least three other guys in this situation, two of whom are on their way to their *second* bankruptcies.

    26. Re:strange by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      20 years ago, you'd be groveling over 64k vs. 32k.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    27. Re:strange by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Dude! Way to totally reverse priorities. Did it occur to you that maybe she's the one with the high-paying job,

      Irrelevant. Would she be groveling for permission to spend $20 extra on a nicer pair of shoes, if he had the high-paying job? No, if she's already buying the shoes, she'll write the check, or swipe the card, and tell you later -- easier to get forgiveness than permission.

      What's more, if it's a high-paying job, $20 is nothing.

      if I had to choose between self-respect and gadgets...

      Your choice.

      I would certainly choose self-respect over marriage, though.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    28. Re:strange by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Irrelevant. Would she be groveling for permission to spend $20 extra on a nicer pair of shoes, if he had the high-paying job?

      Ha! And you think those circumstances are the same?

      I would certainly choose self-respect over marriage, though.

      Yes that's pretty much the choice. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    29. Re:strange by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Listen spineless losers: only grovel for 4GB.

      Fuck that, if I'm groveling, it'll be for this beast.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    30. Re:strange by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm not married,

      Wow, really? by your response, I never would have guessed.

      Its your response, that repulses me. Life lived for oneself is not worth living. Not that I'm recommending suicide or Marriage for you. But seriously, don't make the purchase of 1 gig of freaking ram the definition of a life worth living. Gadgets suck compared to people.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    31. Re:strange by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      So my advice to the married chumps out there is to keep a separate bank account for discretionary purchases which your wives have neither control of nor access to. Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      Wow, I'm really lucky... last time my computer broke (it was 5 years old), she went with me to the Apple Store so we could use her student discount to get a new dual G5. That's now 4 years old... hmmmm...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:strange by Abreu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or... marry someone who isn't a total shite and respects your interests.
      -Taylor

      This.

      There's no way you are going to be able to successfully "hide" income from your partner.

      You need to be able to sit down and talk about priorities and expenses without it devolving into a shouting match or having one of the parties become an unhappy invertebrate...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    33. Re:strange by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Would she be groveling for permission to spend $20 extra on a nicer pair of shoes

      Nope, she'd say, "They were on sale." And that would be the end of it. If you buy a computer, make sure it is on sale and then brag about how much you "saved", not how much you spent.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    34. Re:strange by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      you think those circumstances are the same?

      Why not?

      Here's how that conversation could have gone:

      "I'm getting the 2 gig version. In fact, you know what? I'm getting the 4 gig version."
      "Honey, we can't..."
      "No, but I can."
      "That's it! You're sleeping on the couch!"
      "On the couch with my new laptop! Sounds good!"

      If she's going to divorce you over twenty fucking dollars, she is not worth it. That's when you say, "Your latte for the next week, or me. Choose."

      I know this will probably come off as advice on how to be an asshole. It's not -- you do want to be reasonable, you do want to listen to her needs. You want to be sensitive, and caring, and responsible. But that has to go both ways, or you end up with this situation.

      And believe it or not, that also goes both ways -- chances are, she was the one who wanted the commitment. That's even true when she's the one with the high-paying job. So, clearly, you have something she wants.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    35. Re:strange by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      But seriously, don't make the purchase of 1 gig of freaking ram the definition of a life worth living.

      No, it's the groveling. Let me put it in perspective:

      For you, it's a gig of RAM. For her, it's $20. Neither is worth fighting over -- but then, a modern computer with 2 gigs will most likely be quite a lot faster and more useful than one with 1 gig. If that matters to you, she should respect that.

      Let's suppose she's the one with a high-paying job. Probably fair to assume she drinks Starbucks. If you really don't have the $20, she can skip her latte for a few weeks. She doesn't even have to go off caffeine, just drink from the coffee machine for a few cents instead of a few dollars per cup.

      That's a week of bad coffee versus the useful lifetime of a computer, probably at least a year, that you'd have to put up with not enough RAM.

      Gadgets suck compared to people.

      Depends on the person. She married a geek, she knows gadgets matter to him, and she's not willing to spend $20 on one? That does not sound like a person I'd want as a friend, much less a wife.

      Am I suggesting divorce, in that situation? No. I'm suggesting you talk about it -- with professional help, if you need it, but if this is actually something you're fighting over, that relationship is in trouble.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    36. Re:strange by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      Uh cus she's a woman, something you either don't or don't want to understand.

      By the way, I was joking in my first post, the last one, and this one, but it's a joke based on reality. You think marriage is that simple, you just say "it should be this way" and it is? That's why you aren't. ;)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    37. Re:strange by sjames · · Score: 1

      How in the world does virtualization give you CPU cycles you didn't have before?

      Switching to clustering will cost well more than $5K.

    38. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His whiny, pathetic, groveling demeanor over a $20 difference in price, and his futile attempts to explain to her why 2G is better than 1G, made me absolutely want to vomit. I'm not married, but I vowed that day to either divorce or kill myself if I ever find myself to be such a pathetic, spineless loser.

      Meh.. I married a computer engineer. When I was ordering my Mac Pro I was wondering how much aftermarket RAM to get from Other World Computing. I was leaning towards 8GB.. she kind of scoffed and said "why don't you just order 16GB and get it over with?"

      Then again, we ordered her an Ultrasparc some years ago when they were new, and that ran us a small fortune as well.

    39. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have went up to the guy and gave him $20 for he could have gotten the ram. That is all. I hope I would do it. And when you do it make sure you smile because it is a beautiful day in the neighborhood. Know I hope you have a good one today.

    40. Re:strange by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      Gamers. Sure, most would rather go out and buy a totally new box, but if someone just wanted to upgrade a CPU, AMD would let them do it. It may seem illogical for hardware vendors to target a small portion of the hardware buying community, but both AMD and Intel are trying their best to get the gamer's money.

      Not illogical at all. Lower volume + higher margin has always been successful in any business segment. Apple Computer Corp, love em or hate em, has successfully implemented this strategy more than any other company, over a fairly long period of time.

      Companies who don't go after the high margin areas, no matter how small they may be, are leaving money on the table.

    41. Re:strange by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I'm an IT Professional, and though I don't get to do it quite so much as I did when I was a teenager, I still enjoy tinkering around with my hardware quite a bit. If it works out better to stagger upgrades then I'll do that (and half the time I'll upgrade some random part on my computer, or on the home network, just because I"m looking for something to do). The "it's not worth your time" argument only applies to things that you don't want to do in the first place. Indeed, I've found that the tinkering I did (and still do) at home tends to keep me a lot sharper than most of my coworkers. Many of them will state almost with pride how crappy their home computer is and how they never touch it, while simultaneously ridiculing "users" for their lack of skills who when the tally is in really aren't much worse off than the person who's making fun of them.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    42. Re:strange by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      First of all, what the hell are you doing on slashdot? Does your wife in fact make you grovel over every $20 purchase? Were you that guy at the Microcenter in Ohio begging, pleading into the cellphone for permission from your slavemaster to spend a pittance on something you would enjoy? You know, it is possible to go through life standing up, not on your knees.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    43. Re:strange by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Other than starving CIS majors, who barely earn enough money from their university's computer lab to pay for Ramen Noodles, who does that?

      People who read slashdot do.

    44. Re:strange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont respond or mod this up - i want it buried

      had a friend who let their uneducated spouse handle the household finances, this friend, despite earning well into 6figures lost their house and it was totally preventable (this is unrelated to the current houseing situation and the house was very very much affordable for them)

      now you didn't suggest this extreme but i would never, never give carte blanche to the whole enchillada - give your non-earning spouse a budget - pay bills automatically out of a separate account

      it matters who earns especially when both spouses are not on an "equal" playing field up their in the grey matter

    45. Re:strange by Anzya · · Score: 1

      Well I do actually. Partly because I prefer upgrading my computers in stages anyway but also because my wife is almost just as into computer (games) as I am. This means that whenever I do an upgrade all the prices are times two.

      I actually bought a am2+ motherboard with and older model cpu just to be able to save some SEK and later be able to upgrade to an am2+ or am3 cpu.

      Planing for the future while on a budget... :)

      --
      "This message was brought to you by Sarcasm and Troll Feeders United (or STFU, for you un-hip people)."
    46. Re:strange by cerberusss · · Score: 0, Troll

      Seconded. One of the best things you can do is establish the idea of a slush fund for both sides of the relationship

      I beg to differ.

      One of the best things you can do, is to communicate and agree with your girlfriend/wife. We always discuss any stuff costing more than $50.

      In the end, you're just fooling yourself with a slush fund. Do you really think that when you spend $300 on a gadget, this does not influence the mutual financial situation? Of course it does.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    47. Re:strange by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      keep a separate bank account for discretionary purchases which your wives have neither control of nor access to. Life without self-respect (and gadgets) is not worth living.

      So what you're saying is that when you tell the wife that you want to buy a gadget, and she tells you why it's not a good idea, then you lose your self-respect?

      Think about it. Why on earth would talking with your wife about a purchase lower your self-respect??

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    48. Re:strange by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      You think marriage is that simple, you just say "it should be this way" and it is?

      Nope. That's why I said:

      you do want to be reasonable, you do want to listen to her needs. You want to be sensitive, and caring, and responsible. But that has to go both ways...

      Not married, but I have been in relationships. Yes, it's difficult, I'm not trying to bring it down to a simple "It's going like this because I say so" ultimatum.

      But that is exactly what would happen if it got this bad. We're talking about a man begging his wife to spend $20. At minimum wage, that's maybe four hours of work, on something that will be used for years.

      No, I don't think it's that simple -- but it is pretty simple to see that something's wrong. Either they really do have serious financial issues (so WTF is he doing buying a new computer?) , or they have just as serious relationship issues.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    49. Re:strange by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      The way a married couple I know do it is:
      - Pool both incomes;
      - Pay fixed costs and reserve groceries;
      - Split up the remainder to private accounts, and fuck you if you try to tell me what to do with it.

      I don't know if they do an even split or an income-based split. But if he wants to spend his month's income on number 13 at a casino, he can. Over the long haul, I don't see another way to do it that isn't going to work out horribly.

    50. Re:strange by silanea · · Score: 1

      I full well understood what you meant, but it still just does not make any sense in light of what the comment you responded to says. You can swap out certain specific parts of the underlying hardware without any redeployment (I'd be careful with reconfiguration; if you put a "real" or virtual OS on a faster CPU or more RAM you might want to reconfigure scheduling, swapping etc. to get the most out of your upgrade. But you should not need to reinstall anything, that's of course right.). Besides, virtualisation is no silver bullet. There are other means to achieve the flexibility associated with it, and without the performance hit and management overhead. And in many situations you simply don't gain anything from virtualising. What I gathered from affidel's post makes me believe his is such a case. If you have a low number of machines, but those need enormous amounts of raw processing power, you're better off putting those directly on physical machines. Virtualisation allows you to saturate a machine's performance with many concurrent systems, but it does not by itself help with performance issues.

      Clustering, as you mentioned, comes to mind here, but it is not always feasible and indeed sensible.

      Sometimes you can only replace big iron with bigger iron. And AMD's pledge to compatibility helps here.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    51. Re:strange by aneurysm36 · · Score: 1

      why pool incomes first? we pool bills first, each pay half, and then each pocket the remainder of our own check. now theres NEVER any reason for her to complain about me buying gadgets, or for me to complain about her buying clothes or shoes. we have had ZERO arguments about money in 10 years.

      --
      ------ hi mom
    52. Re:strange by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Its possible to be married and to ... enjoy it. To work as partners. To have two minds become as one. To make decisions as one. It was dysfunctional behavior, but on both sides. If my wife doesn't think we need an extra gig of memory,then maybe we don't. Gadgets are not the most important things. Plus, in my day we made do with what we had. 640 k was enough. Hell, we were lucky we had that much. There is something to be said for loving what you have and using it to the greatest purpose possible.

      again the point is that the gig should be the end all. Maybe the wife was wrong in denying it, but I'd argue the husband was just as wrong for insisting on it.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    53. Re:strange by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You have my sympathies. It is possible to be married without being a pathetic, groveling loser, fighting over tiny amounts of money all the time. In fact, I would wager that your groveling-type marriage is more likely to end in divorce, due to money fights all the time.

      But best of luck to you, mate.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    54. Re:strange by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I think the original poster's intent was not that you HIDE the income from each other, but rather that you both agree that $X/month be allocated for each partner for discretionary income, in addition to the shared pool of money used for expenses and common needs/wants. You get to spend yours on computer purchases, video games, World of Warcraft, or beef jerky. She gets to spend hers on magazines, high quality dark chocolate, pedicures, or anything else that she wants but you see no "need" for. As long as you're both above-the-board about it, and have agreed to the concept ahead of time, I don't think that would cause much problems. When times get tougher and budgets tighten, you can both agree to limit your discretionary spending, as well.

      If I had $50/month to spend on toys, I would set some aside for my WoW subscription, save for one of those ARM netbooks that I hope will be available this spring, and save for computer purchases. (I don't have such an arrangement, but neither do I have (or want) a "shadow" bank account.)

    55. Re:strange by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Groveling to beg permission to buy something small (not major, small) shows your wife does not trust to you make minor decisions. It shows you have zero independence or self direction. I take it you are defending this because your wife makes you beg her permission for ever $20 you spend?

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    56. Re:strange by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that groveling shows some weird stuff going on. But that's not what I said. I just don't think you should lose self-respect when you discuss a purchase with your wife.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    57. Re:strange by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Sure it affects your mutual situation, but the point is that you head off the arguments about some random gadget by reserving money to each person for the purposes of screwing around on whatever you find interesting.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    58. Re:strange by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      OK sorry, non-native speaker. I looked up but still misunderstood 'slush fund'. A fund for play money, that's indeed a good idea.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  5. Doesn't matter. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I mean the economy in terms of releasing a product update. If the work is done & ready to go, it's too late to worry about the economy, just ship it. Not only that, product development cycles on these products are long enough that they need to continually invest in R&D regardless of the economy, by the time a just-started project is done, the economy will have rebounded and ready for new product.

    If the world is switching to DDR3, that probably means having a new socket. As such, AMD needs to introduce the new socket when they are ready to.

  6. Be fair by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

    Being fair to AMD, these processors/sockets do not just turn up in a week or so in a finished state - they go through multiple stages during months/years before we ever see them. So I doubt they planned on releasing this at an economic slump - it may have looked very unlikely such a slump would even occur when the project was launched.

    1. Re:Be fair by Dunbal · · Score: 0

      Being fair to the customer, his money does not just turn up in his bank account ready to be spent. He has to give a lot of time and consideration to shelling out money for yet another computer upgrade.

            Of course manufacturers love switching sockets, be it from ISA EISA to PCI to AGP back to PCI-Express etc etc etc. Don't get me started on memory, that has undergone countless socket evolutions. And CPU's. I remember back in the late 80's some company was advertising a motherboard that promised a "standard" CPU socket no matter what. Hah what a joke.

            Of course there is the fact that new sockets are supposed to bring better things. However I'm sure that sockets could be designed to be backwards compatible much more often than they really are - only the drive to maximize profit by getting you to junk all the other stuff that is made obsolete by your new motherboard seems to trump everything.

            I remember reading about what a huge impact the concept of interchangeable parts had on the industrial revolution. And at the beginning there for a while, it also applied to computers. But now the greedy "Intellectual Property" gods (hah, I credit them too much, they're mere lawyers) have pissed all over our wallets, demanding a new socket for every upgrade - obviously covered with reams of patents and copyrights. Guess who is paying for all of this?

            I remember way back when BASIC used line numbers, we used to be told to write code in increments of 10, in case you wanted to add more code between your lines in the future. I am positive you can engineer a socket that leaves plenty of room for the future. But why would you want to do that, if you can drain your customer's bank accounts? Well, look at where capitalism, corporate ownership of government and pure greed has gotten us today. Yeah, the economy is in great shape. Keep it up. /rant

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Be fair by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about what a huge impact the concept of interchangeable parts had on the industrial revolution. And at the beginning there for a while, it also applied to computers.

      It still does. Your PCI-E video card works in just about any computer that supports that socket.

      I am positive you can engineer a socket that leaves plenty of room for the future. But why would you want to do that, if you can drain your customer's bank accounts?

      Why would you do that? It'd be more expensive now, offer no advantages, and in three years, the new socket would be faster and come with updated IO choices.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Be fair by DavidR1991 · · Score: 1

      My comment was addressing the fact that this has turned up during an economic slump - I was not commenting on the validity or usefulness of the upgrade itself. My point was, AMD do not have magic crystal balls when they start their projects (like most chip makers) months or even years before launch - they probably did not foresee this new tech. turning up during a crunch.

    4. Re:Be fair by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      and in three years, the new socket would be faster and come with updated IO choices.

            That's arguable. We're quickly approaching performance limits, diminishing returns are starting to show up, and processors are only getting marginally faster. Now the trick is to play with the cache, and add cores to show a performance increase. I'm wondering in 3 years if we'll be able to justify upgrading at all. If that's the case, I expect new sockets galore and radical design changes just to artificially fuel demand in a saturated market, with the occasional rare leap in technology. Just like all the "new and improved" products you see at the supermarket, that really boast "new and improved packaging" to get your attention and hopefully your dollar.

            When I think of the tens of thousands of dollars I have spent on computers in my life-time because I'm a computer nerd and as a hobby I want to stay up to date - it really is impossible to justify this expense if I look at it in terms of increased productivity. It just isn't there. And I argue that soon (if not already) profit, not engineering, will be the main factor deciding if a board is updated and older sockets made obsolete. However economists will argue that there is a hidden economic cost to be paid by society as a whole, in terms of waste and inefficiency, when this happens. So Intel or AMD or whoever gets richer, and we're left to fill in the holes or deal with the garbage/wasted time.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Be fair by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      That's arguable. We're quickly approaching performance limits, diminishing returns are starting to show up, and processors are only getting marginally faster. Now the trick is to play with the cache, and add cores to show a performance increase.

      Guess what? Adding more cores usually needs more pins for IO. AMD did something smart and reserved some space for another HT link (apparently), which is what you've been complaining about them not doing, so I'm confused why you're unhappy. Why would they have added the HT stuff 2 years ago if noone was going to use them? What happens when it's time to go past 40 address lines? We get a new socket, that's what.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Be fair by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      so I'm confused why you're unhappy.

            I thought it was obvious, but I guess I'm not a very good communicator. I'm unhappy that new sockets are coming out all the time, and new chips are coming out all the time, but the performance increases are marginal. So instead of every succeeding product line being incredibly faster or in some other way advantageous, now the manufacturers are building horizontally, bringing out dozens of varieties of chip competing with themselves and their competitor, but with no single chip being much better than another.

            How many varieties of toilet paper are there in a supermarket? There's the really good one, and the really bad one, and all the in-betweens that are very similar. But the reason for all those varieties is marketing. The technology is the same or similar.

            Now we're seeing the same in chips and sockets. There are dozens of chips types and socket types, and not many stand out as superior to the previous ones. I've read that finally the i7 gives a moderate performance boost, but if you want it then be prepared to shell out for DDR3 memory. And I guarantee you that the moment you buy an i7 machine, Intel will change the socket AND there will be a new video card socket, so if you want to upgrade after that, look forward to junking part of your hardware.

            Of course no one is forcing me to buy this stuff, and the market obviously supports it. However I am sure there must be a more efficient way to move ahead with technology. But since computer chip makers run an oligopoly, we will never know. The free market is dead thanks to the Mega-corps.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Be fair by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I thought it was obvious, but I guess I'm not a very good communicator. I'm unhappy that new sockets are coming out all the time, and new chips are coming out all the time, but the performance increases are marginal.

      If the performance increases are marginal (they aren't), why do you care? Keep your PC 5 years and replace it. It won't matter what socket you've got.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  7. Excellent by Jethro · · Score: 1

    This is great. I'm hurting for a new desktop and was planning on getting an AM2 CPU.

    I still am, but knowing that the AM3 was just around the corner, waiting to knock all the AM2/AM2+ prices down has delayed my plans for a few weeks, and now there's finally an end in sight!

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  8. am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by amcdiarmid · · Score: 5, Informative

    You may be able to put a am3 processor in a am2+ motherboard, but the Register says that am2+ processor in a am3 motherboard will not work. (http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/02/09/review_cpu_amd_phenom_ii_am3/page2.html)

    To quote:
    "makes life horribly confusing as the Phenom X4 920 and 925 and the X4 940 and 945 will be identical apart from the processor socket. This means that there is the possibility that some poor so-and-so will buy an AM2+ CPU and an AM3 motherboard when ne'er the twain shall meet." ..
    careful what you buy out there

  9. Despite a poor economy? by Toonol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the sort of thing that gets us out of a poor economy.

    1. Re:Despite a poor economy? by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      And also due to poor economy, otherwise they wouldn't support cheaper DDR2.

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:Despite a poor economy? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Informative

      And also due to poor economy, otherwise they wouldn't support cheaper DDR2.

      I guarantee you they would.

      Even when the economy was good, there was a lot of downward pressure on the prices of computers. Mandating a switch to a more expensive memory tech before the market is ready is a sure way to have it backfire in your face *cough* RAMBUS *cough* Ugh that was some nasty phlegm.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Despite a poor economy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also don't recall any similar story on Slashdot when Intel released the Core i7, which requires a new socket type, complaining about the "poor economy".

      arcticstoat is obviously just some anti-AMD troll.

    4. Re:Despite a poor economy? by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, speaking of which I had to tell a poor sot today that it's not worth upgrading his memory because it uses Rambus. Heck, for the cost of adding 512 MB he could buy a whole new computer. If they'd used DDR from the start, he could probably be rockin' 1GB RAM now, and be good to go for at least a few more months.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    5. Re:Despite a poor economy? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Ha ha?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    6. Re:Despite a poor economy? by bezza · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Intel is known as one of the few corporates who actually ramp up R&D in a down cycle, with the hope of capturing market share on the way out.

      If you are interested there is a video of the CFO explaining their R&D philosophy on the Intel website.

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
  10. Not strange at all by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Other than starving CIS majors, who barely earn enough money from their university's computer lab to pay for Ramen Noodles, who does that? IT professionals would just buy all the hardware together because their time is worth more than their money, and everybody else just buys entire new computers. This could only appeal to a handful of small-budget kids.

    If you don't think in terms of upgrading the processor of the computer sitting on your desk, but instead think of HP updating the processor in their line of AM2-based computers, then you should be able to see that the appeal is basically universal. This way the OEMs can offer refreshed versions of their lines without having to incur the extra expense of DDR3. Obviously they will also make a DDR3 AM3-based line, but the DDR2-based line will be cheaper.

    Backward compatibility and in-place upgrades appeals to far more than a handful of poor hobbyists.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  11. Really a New Socket or Just Chipset?? by BigAssRat · · Score: 1

    So is the socket physically different or is it just the chipset that operates with the chip? It seems to me to be the latter. The AM3 chip can't have pins that the AM2+ has or it wouldn't fit in the socket. Or does the AM3 have fewer pins?

    Just sounds like a chipset upgrade to me.

    1. Re:Really a New Socket or Just Chipset?? by swiftx05 · · Score: 1

      From http://hothardware.com/printarticle.aspx?articleid=1273, the AM3 CPUs have 938 pins instead of 940 pins with AM2/AM2+ CPUs.

  12. expensive memory? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

    Seriously, unless you're building a DB server, memory hasn't been expensive for a while - 2G is $40-50. A new processor is $200+

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    1. Re:expensive memory? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      Exactly. 4GB of DDR3 on NewEgg right now it $99 (2-2GB sticks)

      Asus M4A79T DELUXE Socket AM3/ AMD 790FX/ Quad CrossFireX Motherboard is $219. So you can probably find a 'cheaper' AM2 board, but that's not a huge premium.

      AMD Phenom II X4 940 3.0GHz Black Edition Quad-core is about $225. So versus the 'old' Phenom 9950 which is about $160 that's not bad either.

      Still better than buying a prebuilt from BestBuy...

    2. Re:expensive memory? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Did you mean M3 ?
      i.e.
      ASUS M3A79-T Deluxe AM2+/AM2
      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131339

      Thx for the reccommendations though mate!

    3. Re:expensive memory? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      The board I was talking about is on sale at interproshop.com for $213.95
      http://www.interproshop.com/commerce/catalog/product.jsp;jsessionid=F8921F31A1A74F879D82942B80E8E9E9?product_id=12926&czuid=1234237999732

      This is the new socket AM3 board I believe and has DDR3 ram slots.

      So it looks to me like if you were building a new system, AM3 is already out and not really much more expensive to build a system with 4GB DDR3 w/ Phenom II.

    4. Re:expensive memory? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      It starts getting expensive though if you want to have more than 8GB in your computer. You either have to buy find 4GB sticks at that point ($$$) or a server-class board ($$$). It's actually kind of annoying - DDR2 is crazy cheap, but it starts to get difficult to use more than about 8GB of it, and really difficult to use more than 16GB.

  13. Inflationary summary? by TJ_Phazerhacki · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Not that I expect any different from /. most days, but who cares if its the middle of a recession? The R&D work on this has been in place for quite a while, and this is actually MORE attractive than an i7 platform right now because you don't need to move up to the new socket for the new chips - they are backwards compatible.

    "Despite a poor economic climate, farmers still harvest crops they planted last year...." - come on....

    --
    Physics is nothing like religion. If it was, we'd have an easier time trying to raise money!
    1. Re:Inflationary summary? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that even on a new build, AMD motherboards are by and large less expensive than Intel ones. I just bought a new AM2+/AM2 motherboard with an integrated ATI 3200 video card (780G chipset) including optical audio out for $85. It's in my media center now, plays HD video awesomely and as soon as ATI gets some H.264 acceleration it'll be even lower CPU usage.

  14. DDR3? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DDR is double-date-rate, right? It's been around for years now, why haven't we moved past double? Shouldn't we be on triple or quadruple data rate by now?

    1. Re:DDR3? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm aware, "double" data rate means that it can transfer data on the rising *and* falling edges of the square clock signal. That's why it hasn't gone higher than "double", I assume.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:DDR3? by giverson · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, the clock speed was too low for it to be competitive with the different forms of DDR. DDR simply scales better. And lets face it - DDR/2/3 has been more than adequate to keep CPUs fed with data.

      --

      Capitalism does not lead to corruption, lack of character does.
    3. Re:DDR3? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      DDR is data transferred on the rising and falling cycles. Triple data rate makes no sense with a sine wave signal. QDR on the other hand is alive and well

  15. Taxpayer funded infrastructure updates are coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is also getting a new bus! But it may not stop at everyone's socket. We also get new ponies.

  16. Re:am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    IIRC the AM3 has fewer pins and is able to plug into
    an AM2+ socket, but AM2+ chips can't plut into an AM3 socket. So, if you buy the wrong one you'll know as soon as you try to plug your AM2+ cpu into your AM3 motherboard...

  17. (The Colloquial) Moore's law is a cruel mistress by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

    Taking as gospel the non-technical* formulation of Moore's law: processing power doubles every 24 months, then delaying your product even a few weeks puts you behind the performance curve. A 2 week delay comes in at a manageable 1.3% but delay your product 8 weeks, and you are already 5.5% behind your competitor**. In a market with margins in the low single digits, that's the difference between profit and loss.

    Economy or not, you've got to release the product when the engineers say its ready or else it decays.

    * Please don't flame me about transistor densities at optimal cost -- I'm simplifying!
    ** Yes, processors come out in discrete updates, not continuous updates. I'm only right on average.

  18. Re:It's a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    And presumably all those auto industry and manufacturing workers getting fired were cheating when they took classes in high school right? The 500,000+ lost jobs outside the computing industry and major across-the-board corporate spending restriction measures, they're a myth too.

    It's not all about you.

  19. Re:It's a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    >92% of the population still has a job. think about that for a second. we are doing quite well. stop listening to the mass media idiots.

  20. Re:am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by Enleth · · Score: 1

    That's kind of logical - sure, some poor so-and-so could in fact get into some trouble this way, but there's absolutely nothing AMD could do to fix that, save for putting an appropriate notice on the box. I mean, AM3 motherboards will use DDR3 memory (which is different from DDR2 even in terms of physical dimensions and pinout, so you can't put a DDR2 module in a DDR3 slot), but AM2 processors can't talk to DDR3 memory because they were not designed to do that, and AMD can't magically fix all those AM2 processors that have been already made to be able to use DDR3. See the problem?

    --
    This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
  21. Re:It's a myth by Gerzel · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Uhm.... no.

    You are taking that an 8% unemployment rate equals the actual rate of those who are unemployed. It does not.

    First of all that figure does not include retired, children and those who for what ever reason are not interested at all in having a job.

    Then you'll wanna figure the people how are willing to work but don't have a job or don't have enough of a job(sorry flipping burgers does not feed a large family).

    If you take all the people who don't have a job but would like one you'll need to up that figure to at least one and a half to double or more of what it is now. (Note this is closer to how they measured in the Great Depression, though they also included all "eligible" workers and didn't include women.)

    If you add in all the people who are under-employed those who has part-time work that need full time and those who have a job but not enough of one(or two or three in many cases) to fit their needs then you are looking at a figure of at least double that of the reported unemployment rate.

    In short the percent of the population that has a job is closer to 60 than it is to 92.

  22. DDR3 not worth it by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    The early tests I've seen published indicate almost no improvement for DDR3 over DDR2 in an identical system. A bit lower latency is the only real improvement, and that's tiny. So what gives? How much should DDR3 improve over DDR2, except for the estimated 30% improvement in power requirements?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  23. Re:It's a myth by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And presumably all those auto industry and manufacturing workers getting fired were cheating when they took classes in high school right?

    No, they were busy getting drunk and ignoring the adults who told them they'd end up with shitty jobs later on in life if they didn't take school more seriously.

  24. Economy Schmoconomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I, for one, welcome our new DDR3 overlords. Every time they dump something new on the market, prices on their older product lines go down. I just bought a 9850 for $135. About $40 cheaper than late last year before the Phenom 2 line hit the streets. It's the fastest processor my motherboard officially supports and it cost less than the dual core it replaced.

    I always intentionally build my gaming rigs a notch or two below bleeding edge because it's so much cheaper. But, if "they" were to stop pushing the edge forward, where would I be?

    1. Re:Economy Schmoconomy. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      A new RAM format means the price of the old format declines a little, stagnates, then climbs up incessantly.
      http://www.dramexchange.com/

    2. Re:Economy Schmoconomy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time the old format starts climbing up again, there will be plenty of old "new format" gear to by at low prices. Anything that's not made anymore will eventually rise in price if the niche it fills doesn't shrink as rapidly as the supply that remains.

  25. Re:It's a myth by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    It also does not include anyone who is not eligible for unemployment, for any reason. (Such as being unemployed for longer than the unemployment period + extension.)

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  26. Actual processor speed by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    Except that actual processor speed went off Moore's curve a while back ... While transistor densities have gone up (mostly) according to schedule, actual processor speed has not.

    Your argument is good, and AFAIK processor makers use it to a certain extent, it's just that the percentages are a bit smaller.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Actual processor speed by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      What is your measure of processor speed? CPU makers seem to have run into a wall at < 4 GHz, so they are using the transistors to do multi-core instead. More and more apps are being deisgned with multi-core in mind, so computers are still getting faster.

    2. Re:Actual processor speed by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

      Benchmarks are pretty much the only reliable performance measure these days (e.g., SPEC CPU). Frequency is only part of the equation - best example these days is an Atom processor running at the same frequency as a Celeron and being 2-3x slower.

      Also, while the vast majority of server apps work well on multi-core, desktop apps aren't quite there yet.

      --

      The Raven

  27. Despite Poor Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why YOU are not in charge of anything!!!

  28. Re:It's a myth by Toonol · · Score: 1

    So, if we eliminate women from the tally, like during the great depression, will we have a -42% unemployment rate?

    That's a joke, but seriously, it's folly to equate today's unemployment to the great depression's. It's like comparing a windy day to a hurricane.

  29. Re:It's a myth by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

    (sorry flipping burgers does not feed a large family)

    Do people actually think it does?

    --
    "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  30. Re:It's a myth by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Funny

    doh! Hit the wrong button. Forgot to add the punchline about... unless they're bringing those burgers home. =P

    --
    "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
  31. Re:am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor fuckass can either RTFM before embarking on a system-building exercise, or if they fuck up they can exchange.

  32. Re:It's a myth by andy_t_roo · · Score: 1

    is the current problem the hurricane or the windy day?

  33. Re:It's a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes, nice one! Nothing pisses me off more than a menial laborer in my office who resents that I have a great job while he gets paid dick for doing some shitty boring job. Well fuck him. They spent their time screwing around, and as you say, getting drunk, and now they pay the price. In HS I busted my ass, even though my parents didn't tell me too. They would have preferred it if I was a plumber. Now they are astonished at how much I make.

  34. Re:am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by oneTheory · · Score: 1

    You make a very good point. Why should we expect literacy from consumers? Not to fret, the techs at Fry's will hold their hand.

  35. "despite" submitter's ignorance? by icepick72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TITLE: AMD Launches New Processor Socket **Despite Poor Economy**

    So we're not supposed to do anything because the economy is bad?! So let's never a thing again because we're ignorant of larger pictures and contexts and variableness in life. What kind of f***ed-up sh** IS THAT! Start tagging sentences with pessimistic endings and implying stuff because we're ignorant a**holes. Let's see ....

    Today I drove to work in the winter despite road salt runoff will affect the lake. I bought a new dog despite the existence of puppy mills. I washed my hands after peeing despite the fact antibacterial soap kills good germs. I sat on a wooden chair despite my ginger ass getting chapped.

    You know what ... I think the title actually had an effect on me despite the fact I found it totally ignorant. What do you think?

    1. Re:"despite" submitter's ignorance? by Almahtar · · Score: 1

      This is something that's always perplexed me. The only difference between a healthy economy and a depression is how fast money changes hands.

      But the slower things are, the more stingy people get. The more stingy people get the slower things are.

      It's an evil spiral. But if all (all, and that is key) people just decided to forget it all and loosen up the problem would dissolve. Journalism that sensationalizes a recession/depression is contributing to the problem. It's short term payoff (hey, it gets an audience for sure) but long term it hurts everyone including them.

    2. Re:"despite" submitter's ignorance? by icepick72 · · Score: 1

      That's an awesome insightful comment; in other words, couldn't agree more. If I had mod points you'd have them.

  36. Re:It's a myth by Meski · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Citation required

  37. Lame article reference, here's a real review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder when Slashdot will stop letting this customPC hacks in on the main
    page. It's just a fluff article. There are a number of real reviews of the
    actual product out there on the web as of today's launch.


    http://hothardware.com/Articles/AMD-Phenom-II-X3-720-BE-and-X4-810-AM3-Processors/

  38. Re:It's a myth by OAB_X · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it is not at 25%+ yet

  39. Re:am3 CPU in am2+ motherboard: OK Otherway.. no by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    Which is why "motherboard bundles" were invented. Go to some place like MWave.com, go to their motherboard bundle section. Pick a CPU, motherboard and RAM, then pay about $10 to have the vendor assemble and test it before shipping.

    For $10, I'm guaranteed that those 3 components will work together and won't be DoA. I don't have to keep up with the various socket types, or memory types, or figure out that socket X fits CPUs Q and W.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  40. Lots of cores by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Information may be slightly outdated but all of it is probably true, Intel may have catched up in memory bandwidth performance with their latest CPUs since they have put the memory controller within the CPU themself to.

    AMD's Hypertransport has interesting extensions to help cache coherency and currently scales very well with lots of cores and lots of physical CPUs.
    (Opteron can be used in motherboard with 4 or 8 slots).

    Intel's Quickpath is currently more a generation 1 interconnect. That's probably why they have only announced platforms with lots of cores and cpu packages only for later on.
    (The first CPUs announced, as far as I've read, are only to be used in 2 socket configurations).

    Thus if you want to run a server which needs a lot cores (a node in a cluster, or a server that has to answer lots of requests in parallel), it's currently better to go with an 8 socketed-opteron.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  41. my only issues with AMD releasing a new socket by dayton967 · · Score: 1
    It's the number of new sockets, that have been released, and manufacturing for all of these sockets must be a financial drain for the company, to maintain manufacturing for many different sockets, it might be wise to design 2, one for desktop/server platforms, and one for mobile.

    I will give them one positive push, the new AM3 processors are backwards compatible to the older AM2+ sockets, but this is what the AM2+ sockets were created for. But if they overdesign the socket with unused pins, they can grow for new features. But that is just me. Though I will give VIA one thumbs up the new NANO is pin compatible with the C7, but the problem with them, is that they are soldered on, so for us end users it's pointless.

  42. Re:It's a myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or people who quit their job of their own volition.

  43. Re:It's a myth by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    Maybe he just resents your obvious superiority complex.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  44. Re:It's a myth by wastedlife · · Score: 1

    Yes, because economic downturn on an international level is measured by how well you are doing. Anecdotal evidence is useless, moreso on this large of a scale.

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  45. magic 8 ball says... by ovu · · Score: 1

    'All signs point to yes'

  46. Re:It's a myth by mav12157541 · · Score: 1

    I think blue collar jobs do need respect though ... many of us here may be IT professionals but there is so much to be done on this planet ... roads do need paving, pretty well everything we use needs to be manufactured, and plumbing and wiring needs to be installed and maintained. Even the coffee you are served at the drive-thru on your way to the server room is made by someone working and paying their way through life. Absolutely someone ambitious to do more can get educated and get initiative to make it happen, but this comment is to note the hard-working crews that are losing their jobs. I'm sure many of the individuals were lazy or with poor direction, but certainly not all, and I don't even think it's the majority!