Slashdot Mirror


Inside Factory China

blackbearnh writes "While China is attempting to pull its industry up out of mere manufacturing mode, for now the country is the production workhorse of the consumer electronics industry. Almost anything you pick up at a Best Buy first breathed life across the Pacific Ocean. But what is it like to shepherd a product through the design and production process? Andrew 'bunnie' Huang has done just that with the Chumby, a new Internet appliance. In an interview with O'Reilly Radar, he talks about the logistical and moral issues involved with manufacturing in China, as well as his take on the consumer's right to hack the hardware they purchase."

32 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. China's economy is going to retool itself.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Put yourself in the Chinese situation. If you had to work months and months and months to save up to buy something for yourself, would you buy the frivolous electronic gadgets you are manufacturing now, or would you work your tail off for something more rewarding like health care, better housing, national defense, or better quality food?

    The Chinese economy is undergoing changes to serve its own people now. Factories will be modified to produce goods the Chinese people want, rather than what we want. It won't happen over night, but it's a process that will continue as they shift away from being an export economy.

    1. Re:China's economy is going to retool itself.. by tritonman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you forgot that Japan also is famous for exporting smut videos of hot girls eating bugs and other disgusting things.

    2. Re:China's economy is going to retool itself.. by Jurily · · Score: 2, Insightful

      would you buy the frivolous electronic gadgets you are manufacturing now

      Hands up anyone who wants to buy something from any of their former workplaces. I sure as hell know I don't.

    3. Re:China's economy is going to retool itself.. by number17 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What China will keep is the ability to disallow full foreign ownership of its companies. The neocons want China to open up so that they can buy up all the companies and funnel the money out of the country. So far the leadership has not allowed that to happen and based on history (Opium Wars) they will not allow that to happen again.

    4. Re:China's economy is going to retool itself.. by Tybalt_Capulet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you ever seen WalMart: High Cost or another movie about Chinese factories? They would never be able to afford anything they make. They make nothing, and I say that almost literally. Half of what they make gets taken out of their pay for room and board at the factory. Whether they live in them or not. You can't negotiate work time. You have 12 hour days without breaks. The factories make US prisons look like they're a five star hotel. Not to mention the fact that they constantly recruit children in them. If you talk back not only will you get fired, you may also get killed with no repercussion to the company.

      --
      Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
  2. Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    Link to Chumby page Flash-infested, but interview with creator quite refreshing, for example:

    JT: There seems to be a running battle between the users of equipment and the manufacturers, be it jail-broken iPhones or hacked Xboxes. How much control do you think a manufacturer legitimately should be allowed to have over the use of their hardware?

    AH: Well, I think that a manufacturer, basically once the hardware leaves the factory, and someone's paid whatever the market price is for it, then the user owns it, right? So I mean you could take that piece of hardware, melt it down and use it for the component metals if you want, use it for a doorstop. You could use it for something completely other than the computer, that you had not imagined it to be used for. So the hardware itself is pretty much -- I kind of believe you buy it, you own it.

    1. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pff, he must be one of those communists. How can the free market and private property possibly survive if people are allowed to own what they buy?

    2. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He has it wrong. Unlocked communication devices are different, because they can cause additional costs/damage on the network they are connected to. This is the reason smartphone makers cripple their devices.

      If the cell phone network eventually becomes as robust *cough* as the Internet, then the need for unlocked devices will go away. But right now, there is a lot of "trust the client" built in to the way the cellular network operates.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He has it wrong. Unlocked communication devices are different, because they can cause additional costs/damage on the network they are connected to. This is the reason smartphone makers cripple their devices.

      How does that work? An unlocked communications device can simply be used on a different provider. That provider still has to provide you (see what I did there?) with the services in order for you to use them. A malfunctioning, locked device can cause communications problems - if the network is poorly designed. The same is true of a rogue device. You don't mean to tell me that the cellphone companies are trusting phones they have sold simply because they once held them, do you? Because somehow, I doubt that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think so. He specifically mentions(in the bit just after what is quoted above) the case of interaction with services. He never says that carriers are under any obligation to allow malicious activity on the network.

      Also, in many cases, particularly among the smarter smartphones and more complex devices(which are generally the ones people are most interested in modding), there is a substantial degree of separation between the cellular modem bit, and the processor running the OS(Hayes AT ain't dead yet). Lockdown of the communication side is often about FCC regulations or legitimate network concerns. Lockdown of the application side is all about squeezing more money for worse service.

    5. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by N1AK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pff, he must be one of those communists. How can the free market and private property possibly survive if people are allowed to own what they buy?

      No one is stopping people from buying things that conform to there required interpretation of 'freedom'. How would it be a free market if the government legislated to control how a company is allowed to build physical devices? Sadly, sometimes it is exactly because a market is free that people choose to make choices that we as individuals may wish they wouldn't.

    6. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by Bearhouse · · Score: 3, Informative

      He has it wrong. Unlocked communication devices are different, because they can cause additional costs/damage on the network they are connected to. This is the reason smartphone makers cripple their devices.

      If the cell phone network eventually becomes as robust *cough* as the Internet, then the need for unlocked devices will go away. But right now, there is a lot of "trust the client" built in to the way the cellular network operates.

      Me confused. Depends what you're meaning by 'communication device' and 'unlocked', definitions of which seem to vary during your post.

      IMHO existing GSM cell phone networks are *very* robust, (at least in Europe), and either nuke or tolerate 'unlocked' devices pretty well. Working upwards:

      1. You/service provider can (optionally) link your account/SIM to the device IMEI. Service providers can block devices at IMEI level, regardless of the SIM inserted. They don't like what your device is doing? It dies. See:

      http://www.babt.com/gsm-imei-number-allocation.asp

      2. If you clone a sim card, the network will block the account linked to the SIM as soon as you fire up two simultaneously, or just fry the 'defective' first one.

      3. Assuming you get your 'open' device working, then access to the network and its associated services is fairly tightly controlled, and is in any case linked to your ID and - more importantly - method of payment.

      4. Most devices are 'sold' @ less than list/cost price as part of a package deal. It's understandable that you can then only use them on the SP's net - they're 'locked'. Of course, options exist to 'unlock' them for use on any network, but again, your priviledges on that network will depend on your SIM, not the device.

      5. Finally, some devices - most notoriously the iPhone - are 'locked' as to what apps you can install on them. The ingenuous excuse offered by Apple is that 'this is to prevent damage to the device/network', which is, of course, complete bollocks. I own one of the most 'secure' GSMs around - a Blackberry - and it's quite happy to let me install 'unauthorised' apps...

      Locked clients are all to do with business models, not (unfortunately) robustness.

    7. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Informative

      The "crypto processor" is simply an ARM7 CPU, and the source code for the firmware running on it is available here

    8. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There has been a shift in corporate thinking over the last 20 years. They have slowly been moving from selling products, to licensing products. Companies worldwide have taken their cue from the software industry.

      DRM laden musics. Not for rental DVDs and videos. EULAs on video games. Proprietary printer cartridges. Cars that can only be fixed at licensed dealers. Homeowners associations. The list goes on.

      The sad reality is that many companies now think, or behave as if they do think, that once you buy their product they still have control and veto power over how, when, when and who can use it. This has been a huge shift in western industry, thirty years in the making. Its genesis can essentially be traced back to this letter. Once the idea of selling numbers to people, and retaining indefinite control over their use of that number, became firmly entrenched in the law, culture and mindset of our industry, it was much smaller step to apply that same principle to books, cars, nintendos and houses.

      I'm not sure where this will end, but I can guarantee you one thing. The myriad of artificial restrictions being placed on property in the western world are most certainly not being applied or enforced in developing countries.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    9. Re:Chumby homepage stinks, article OK by noidentity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure where this will end, but I can guarantee you one thing. The myriad of artificial restrictions being placed on property in the western world are most certainly not being applied or enforced in developing countries.

      It's just plain inefficient. Before, companies made products that were governed mainly by the "laws" of nature; they tried to offer as much as nature allowed. Now, companies are actively creating new laws and restrictions, which ultimately means the products aren't doing as much as they could do. Any country which avoids this idiotic situation will have an advantage.

  3. Bunny by LS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I met this guy at a Foo camp party in Beijing, and he gave a presentation on how he reverse engineers Nintendo Wiis. He uses some kind of custom chassis that connects to both sides of the Wii's motherboard and burns off the tops of chips to look at their structure through a microscope. Pretty impressive...

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Bunny by HungWeiLo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's pretty amazing.

      A friend of mine works in the MS DRM team. Their algorithm gets cracked within a couple days of release by some Eastern European (actually, they have no idea where) hacker. It's a pretty complex security algorithm that involves randomizing pointer locations and such. Nevertheless, it will take the team over a month to figure out how they broke it and to release a patch. Only then, the patch will be compromised within a few days.

      It just takes one person...

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  4. This is just a stupid arrangement by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's have China be a giant slave labor pool but then borrow trillions of dollars of them to cover our own increased social welfare costs. Let's face it, the whole concept of trade coming into balance with them is just impossible, will never happen, and the more we trade with them, the more bankrupt we will get. Anyone who seems to think otherwise, please let me know what year it will be that US and China trade will be in balance. What year is that going to be?

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:This is just a stupid arrangement by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Say the USA borrows trillions of dollars from China and after a while goes bankrupt and can't repay them.

      That seems more like a bigger problem for China than the USA.

      To paraphrase the saying, if I borrow 100K from the bank, it's my worry. If I borrow 1 trillion from the bank, it's the bank's worry.

      Worse for China - it's not like China can throw the USA into prison, or seize and liquidate the USA's assets.

      Anyway if the USA wants to, it can ask the Federal Reserve to wave its magic wand and create USD out of nowhere to pay China. After all the loans are in US Dollars ;).

      If "creating out of nowhere" lacks style, they could do it by "borrowing" from the Federal Reserve or whatever scheme they want to come up with. Not much difference.

      So why care if the trade is in balance or not?

      What you should care about is whether you get your cut of the dollars the US Government is going to print.

      And what the US Gov should care about is ensuring that trade and financing continues to be mainly done in US Dollars.

      --
    2. Re:This is just a stupid arrangement by MiniMike · · Score: 3, Funny

      Say the USA borrows trillions of dollars from China and after a while goes bankrupt and can't repay them.

      They would probably come and take all of our factories away. We'll really be screwed then...

    3. Re:This is just a stupid arrangement by Deosyne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Stop making all of our crap for us while retaining all of that massive production capability filled with experienced manufacturing personnel for servicing internal production and other countries of their choosing, I would guess. But in the meantime, they'll continue to increase our reliance on them while ensuring that they can completely obliterate our credit at any time that they choose simply by calling in their markers. Being suddenly cut off from the rest of the world probably sounds like a wonderful fantasy to many insular Americans, but we'll see how well that works out for a country that has relied on deficit spending and operated in a trade deficit for decades.

      The Chinese think long-term better than any other people on the planet. Last I heard, the general plan was to be the most powerful nation on Earth in 50 years. At the rate that we westerners are undermining our future for the sake of short-term bolstering, I'd say that the 50 year estimate is highly conservative.

    4. Re:This is just a stupid arrangement by icejai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say "you are fucked" because you (or rather, the U.S. government) depends on not only a) entities buying your treasury securities now, but also b) entities buying your treasury in the future. The first wave of baby boomers will be eligible for social security and medicare benefits in the next 16 to 24 months, there is no way in hell the U.S. will be able to fund these obligations in the state the U.S. economy is currently in. This means they'll have to borrow more money in the future.

      If the U.S. behaves like they're still top dog and enact policies that devalues all the money they owe to everybody else in the world, guess what, nobody's going to be in line to buy those treasuries when the U.S. needs to sell them the most.

      They'd be fucked even more because the U.S. simply has no manufacturing industry. Nobody in the U.S. would even be able to buy a single computer, television set, fax machine, cellphone, or even dog food because companies need to borrow money to buy from suppliers overseas. With savings rates in negative territory, there is no way in hell anybody would lend the U.S. any money whatsoever if they adopt this "it's my currency and I'll inflate it if I want to... you'll get screwed but not me" attitude.

      Right now, the U.S. has to convince the world to buy $800B of U.S. government debt. They can't even do *that*, which is why they're selling 30-year bonds to the Fed, because the Fed is the only entity willing to buy them. This action by the Fed *will* inflate the USD, because they simply create the money out of thin air. If China doesn't want to be made an ass by the people who owe them billions, they simply have to sell. The U.S. government will then have to convince the world to buy... not $800B of government debt... but $1.5 trillion. This action alone will *flood* the market with USD and push it down to unbelievable levels. Sure, the value of government debt will decrease because of the massive inflation, but *everything* in America will increase in price.

      Why? Because America doesn't make anything anymore. Everything needs to be imported, and importing means paying foreign suppliers in their own currency. So good luck convincing foreign suppliers to accept worthless USD as payment. Commodity prices will go through the roof because they're all price in USD and consumed everywhere else in the world.

      In summary, decreasing the purchasing power of the USD is *not* the solution to any of the U.S.'s current problems. Pissing off the largest debtor by inflating the currency may save you a couple hundred billion at first, but you'll pay it all back later (and then some) when you're forced import everything you need... at now-higher prices.

      And it's not just China. Do you think if a massive sell-off starts, central banks and investment institutions around the world will sit idly by and wait to be the last one holding depreciating bonds that nobody wants? No way. If you thought the price of oil dropped quickly, it'll be nothing compared to how quick and how far the USD will fall once the selling starts and traders begin short-selling treasuries and USD.

      I don't believe for a second that you're stupid, because you fully understand all the immediate implications.

      You just need to think ahead a couple steps more.

  5. As for chumby by squoozer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flying spaghetti monster and all his noodley appendages, just go and read a bloody book or talk to someone or do something other than sit there watching a non-stop stream of the same five websites.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  6. Moral issues? by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like the ones he just kind of hand-waves, by repeating 'Oh! It's so much better in the factories than it is outside, you know? And they've tried to fool me by bringing in good food on the days I'm there, you know. And the workers aren't going to tell me how shitty it really might be, because I don't really speak the language and they really don't want to lose their jobs... or get in shit with the mob like this rebuttal suggests might happen. You know.'

  7. Read the article... right? by fprintf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read the article, and the guy uses right, like and whatever an awful lot. I realize it was supposed to read like a conversation, but it was awfully annoying.

    It was also quite rambling. I would have loved more detail on the kinds of things he took apart as a kid, or some of the neat things he built with his 200 in 1 radio shack kit. These are the kinds of comments that inspire future hackers & product designers. But they spent very little time on what he had actually done.

    All in all not a bad article, and certainly fodder for additional reading into this guy. I will say that the Chumby is getting some interest in my office. Folks have latched onto it in a "Web 2.0" kind of way, using it as an emblem of what the future of commerce, not just ecommerce, will be in the future.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  8. Nifty article by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gem from the article: "...it's a little bit different in terms of its industrial design. It has a soft leather case and has electronics on the inside. So trying to explain something that the Chinese guys hadn't seen before..." where was teddy ruxpin manufactured again? (I don't honestly know, but it's still a hilarious sentence.)

    Now what is interesting about this guy (which applies to manufacturing jobs anywhere) is that he goes and sleeps in the dorm and eats the food. And he even talks about how sometimes they will try to fool him, et cetera. So what he's talking about is personal responsibility for corporate actions. It's not forced on you, although sometimes in China they will execute you for fraud if it's politically expedient...

    Here's a painful bit from the article:

    I can't actually walk through the toy section anymore because toy factories are awful. They're really -- that's where you get the worst labor conditions these days. And when I walk through a toy section, I can hear the machines cranking away in my head, driving out Tickle Me Elmos or whatever there is on the shelf. And it is kind of a little bit nerve-wracking to see all of that stuff on the shelf and see people just picking them up for $5.00 a piece and not knowing all the effort that went into building it. But that's sort of the consumer mentality in Americans as well.

    I would add that I can't walk through the toy section any more because the smell of offgassing plastic makes me want to puke. I'm not one of the super-sensitive types, or at least I'm not sensitive to everything. And I like toys, I'm not ashamed to admit that I still have a collection of 'em sprinkled around here and there collecting dust. When I start to reenact scenes from Spaceball with them, I'll start accepting snarky comments. Crap, I'll make a webapp for the purpose. I even just got a new LCD TV that my lady chased out of the living room until it stops stinking so badly. I don't think that has to do with inherent disgustingness of electronics so much as Sharp's failure to actually wash them after production to remove residues. I pick on them because I'm staring at their logo under my windows taskbar, but I've been noticing more and more of this as time has gone by, both from name-brands and crap-brands. (As in, when you get one as a present, you say crap. e.g. "Oh crap, it's a Coby." Maybe not out loud, depending on how polite you are.)

    Finally, NERD FACTOR NINE:

    Oh, yeah. The name. It comes from Monty Python and the Holy Grail where there's that rabbit with sharp, pointy teeth that everyone runs away from. It was given to me back in middle school because I used to play a lot of roll-playing fantasy-type games. My friends thought it was a hilarious name to give me. It was hilariously inappropriate. That was back in the day when this thing called Bulletin Boards was just coming up and I had to pick a name. So I picked the name then. It was actually Vorpal Bunnie and I had to shorten it to bunnie when I went to college because they didn't have enough characters for it. And back then, you just never thought that people would call you by your online handle. But it really stuck. And I've grown into it, so I like the name.

    Seriously, if you don't have a story like this about your nickname, are you really a geek? Definitely +10 geek cred points on that paragraph. Now if they can just lose the ballbag picture frame, maybe they'll have something.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Nifty article by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      And minus -10 geek cred points for the article writer...

      I don't know the author's intent, because my crystal ball is broken. Maybe I should get an all-seeing orb. But there is indeed a convention among gamers to refer to games which make overuse of dice as "roll" playing games, especially among arrogant pricks like me who would prefer to play Amber Diceless. (Now if I could just find a good game, perhaps via irc. I can summon the apparently obligatory disdain for the second series if necessary for entry...)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:I mean... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We tend to forget about such things here on slashdot, but actual publications have people called editors whose job it is to fix things like that. They omit all the redundant bullshit and provide you with something intended for people to read. Even in conversation such things are annoying, but not completely useless as only a small percentage of communication is actually verbal. Let's say that 50% of it was verbal, that would still give you an opportunity to hang an awful lot of meaning on those two words (how much mileage can you get out of two words in the English language? examine a short fiction contest to find out) in a conversation through posture, inflection, facial expression, and all the other cues that we have access to in such a situation. None of them apply here, so what we need here is some editing. The best thing about the internet is that anyone can share their opinion. The worst thing about the internet is that anyone can share their opinion.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. You can buy American flags Made in the USA.. by tjstork · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    This is my sig.
  11. There's just a lot of problems with that. by tjstork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if we could assume that by, itself, a scenario of long term debt and eventual bankruptcy would not have terrible consequences for the USA, losing our ability to manufacture for ourselves is corrosive to our society. A slave economy retards technological innovation, undermines scientific achievement and ultimately results in social stagnation. The Romans collapsed as they went more and more into a slave economy, and having an economic reliance on slaves also doomed the old African tribal states, the Muslim states, and then most recently even the old Confederacy. Why invest millions into building machinery, when you can just add more slaves to your mix without any real capital cost at all? In that sense, slavery and a destruction of worker's rights is not just evil, its stupid.

    --
    This is my sig.
  12. Re:next iPhone by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

    made out of lead and mercury

    Idiot. The iPhone is made out of elves and pixie dust.

    Get with the program, dude.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  13. Re:I mean... by jalefkowit · · Score: 3, Funny

    IRONY: A long, dense, unbroken paragraph about the importance of editing for readability.