Slashdot Mirror


Whither the 19th IOCCC?

dazedNconfuzed writes "Whatever happened to the 19th IOCCC? The opening thereof was announced over two years ago and the winners' names were posted, but the source code was never released — leaving the results of the 2006 contest unknown as we get well into 2009. Emails to questions@ioccc.org just bounce. Surely the quiet absence of a high point of geekdom becomes news at some point!"

124 comments

  1. they are still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    figuring out the entries

    1. Re:they are still... by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 2, Funny

      And may it ever be that way. I think the world should be spared of any more obfuscated code. :-)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  2. Find the winners and ask them for their code by Lorens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have their names, shouldn't be too difficult.

  3. It's just an extra layer of obfuscation by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    The code was so obfuscated, the people running the competition were actually driven completely mad and committed suicide. Now you need to be *extra* clever to have them receive your submission, and you have to be willing to kill yourself to see the results.

    1. Re:It's just an extra layer of obfuscation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      printf("Hastur, Hastur, Hastur");

    2. Re:It's just an extra layer of obfuscation by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Well, thats part of the story. The high level of obfuscation in the code actually prolonged the lives of those poor bastards, as when they did they beheld that all of the entries, when considered together and simplified to their pure essence, spelled out the true name of Shub-Niggurath, and the portal to the third realm of sub-Earth that opened when this name was spoken aloud showed them sights that drove them to the edge that exists between madness and the very heart of Hell itself.

      Be glad they haven't announced the winner, for when they do that code will open the final seal of the old one's prison, and those with wit left to comprehend their fates will long to be returned to the dust from which they were raised!

      Damn I've been reading too much Stross again.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
  4. Re:tahreey sltil... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2, Funny

    foiugtu rtihneg esnetir

  5. Or Underhanded C contest? by cras · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://underhanded.xcott.com/ doesn't mention anything about last year's winners and the contest ended almost 5 months ago.. The one time I bother sending a submission to these kind of contests and the contest appears to die :(

    1. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by certain+death · · Score: 1

      We will remember this and be watching you! Are you really the grim reaper of C Code in disguise?!?

      --
      "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    2. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you killed it! shame on you!!

    3. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one time I bother sending a submission to these kind of contests and the contest appears to die

      Apparently your entry was excellently obfuscated. It confused the entire contest.

    4. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, the year before it took them about 10 months to post results.

    5. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Xcott+Craver · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am the organizer of the UCC, and I apologize for the delay. We are normally pretty relaxed with our schedule, being academics; but this year I think more so, because the student who assists me with UCC is currently in deep hack mode on his own research project. I assure you, however, that we will have the results up within a month, or else we will lap the next contest!

    6. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job.

    7. Re:Or Underhanded C contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you created the ultimate OC entry: It ate its own contest! A powerful piece of meta- or perhaps metaphysical programming?

  6. There, I've saved you a Google search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the The International Obfuscated C Code Contest.

    1. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by 4D6963 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      OMGRU new here? Everybody knew that, now hand in your geek card ;-)

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by ketilwaa · · Score: 2

      No everybody didn't

    3. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Evrybody who is anybody. By definition, I think.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    4. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think by definition? Is that the definition of you specifically, or humanity in general?
      I can think of at least a couple of anybodys who did not know that, depending on the environment you ask, up to many million anybodys.

    5. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by socsoc · · Score: 1

      But who knows what OMGRU means?

    6. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Everybody worthy of carrying a geek card did.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    7. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by ketilwaa · · Score: 1

      Oh noes!! The geek-in-chief has labeled me a non geek! Oh, the horror!

    8. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by the+white+plague · · Score: 1

      Have you ever put YHBT YHL HTH HAND in an authorize header? Are you, or have you ever been, a regular at the scary devil monastery?

    9. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and secondarily, the International Olympic Committe for (Confusing) C Coding.

    10. Re:There, I've saved you a Google search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I though it was short hand for someone in the dark screaming Oh My, a GRU... obviously not finishing the sentence. Isn't it?

  7. Half-assed by PyroMosh · · Score: 1, Troll

    I had never heard of this. But a quick googling reveals lots of similar problems with past contests, such as not being able to organize in time to have contestants some years, etc.

    Sounds like it's a half-assed operation that's just not very well organized. Like 99% of Source Forge projects. People sign on, lose interest, and disappear. That's the nature of open source sometimes, you have to wade through lots of shit to get to the gems. (though I'd say the gems tend to make things worth it).

    Hardly what I would call a high point of anything. Seeing the source would be neat, but I wouldn't lose any sleep over this.

    1. Re:Half-assed by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the case of the IOCCC, you have to wade through shit to get to the good shit.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Half-assed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow.

    3. Re:Half-assed by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had never heard of this.

      Jebus... time to turn in your geek card. The IOCCC has been operating off and on since *1984*, ffs.

  8. they all win by lemur3 · · Score: 1

    Just taking part is a large enough honor!

    1. Re:they all win by SL+Baur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just taking part is a large enough honor!

      True, true and entertaining. I took part in one of the earliest IOCCCs. None of my 3 entries won anything, but at least I have bragging rights that I tried.

      1) A program that consisted of mostly all 0/O,1/l characters that converted binary to decimal/decimal to binary depending upon what name it was invoked with.

      2) A one liner that printed "Hello World!\n" with each character generated from a subprocess based on an obfuscated state table. That was apparently more obfuscated to the Pyramid kernel than to the reviewers - I got dinged at work when I ran the program right before mailing it off and a subprocess or two got disconnected and ran overnight and my project was billed CPU time. Oops!

      3) A curses/CPP hack that used as symbol and keyword names all of the different variant Unix and Unix-wannabe flavors of the time (they're all listed in one of lwall's vintage configure scripts, though I did not use that as a reference) and floated in characters from off-screen to reveal the message "System V - from now on, consider it standard"

      My favorite winner is the one that is the source that is portable to FORTRAN, /bin/sh and C.

      I wish I still had the rejection messages. Seems like it would make a good job interview item - "Hey, I can't win an obfuscated coding contest even when I *TRY*."

  9. slashdot front page- the new facebook? by drDugan · · Score: 4, Funny

    oh dear

    connection request: "kdawson would like to find you"

  10. Weird... this one too.... by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've also noticed that this fortune city personal hom page from 1999 is still under construction... Any one know when it might be done?

    1. Re:Weird... this one too.... by jrwr00 · · Score: 1

      Haha he has a link for The Zone... God that was a long time ago, anyone remember the game that they had on there called "Ants"

    2. Re:Weird... this one too.... by uofitorn · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the time of my posting the parent was modded +3 Informative. Clearly, there is not an ounce of humor left in any of the mod's rickety calcium deprived bones.

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    3. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Splab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Informative is quite a good modding in my opinion, had totally forgot about fortune city et. al.

      That brings back some memories.

    4. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that felt good to my brain.

    5. Re:Weird... this one too.... by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      That guy was 52 when he made that page. In Internet years, he is about 1000 by now, and has probably expired.

    6. Re:Weird... this one too.... by uofitorn · · Score: 1

      Touche. I hadn't thought about that.

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    7. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, try to sign that guys guest book. The captcha is fucking hardcore. Its like a badge of honour to be able to get through it, i can see like 20 letters in it with no explanation of wtf i'm supposed to put in.

    8. Re:Weird... this one too.... by OvermindDL1 · · Score: 1

      Heh, that was such a twist in style, so simple yet addicting. That has been so many years ago...

    9. Re:Weird... this one too.... by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      I miss Ants. I wish there was a place you could play it, if even just for the nostalgia.

    10. Re:Weird... this one too.... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      He should have made himself into a meme, then he will live on forever.

    11. Re:Weird... this one too.... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 0, Troll

      Informative is good. It lets us know that the particular web page is still under construction. I would have gone with +1 Interesting, though.

      (Sublime mods are just part of the fun on /. :-))

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    12. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Leafheart · · Score: 1

      Wow. Fortunecity. I suddenly feel very old.

      --
      --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    13. Re:Weird... this one too.... by nzodd · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Weird... this one too.... by neomunk · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is something I've had to tell many people many times, but I guess I'll continue doing it until it's common knowledge or the policy changes...

      Slashdot's Karmic system doesn't give any lasting Karma (beyond that posts score) for Funny moderations, so many times if people see something that's funny enough to earn Karma, and it's posted by someone who's logged in, they'll give it an Informative or Insightful. Try to keep that in mind if you meta-mod.

      I really think the policy of not giving Karma for Funny posts is worse then the problem they're trying to fix with it, if only because of the Karmic-Black-Hole that can be created by half the mods modding Funny, why the other half mod Troll or Flamebait. That allows moderation abusers to put a serious dent in a 'good' poster's Karma by way of sockpuppets or outright coordination (there is at least one site devoted to helping organize people to troll slashdot).

      But like I said the last time I posted about this, giving a funny post an Informative rating is a hack, an UGLY hack at that, but it's the best option available to the community due to a (bad, IMHO) decision from the slashdot admins.

    15. Re:Weird... this one too.... by fava · · Score: 1

      Did you notice the guestbook? There are a few entries from 1999/2000 but the bulk of them are from today. He probably has more traffic today than the last 10 years combined.

    16. Re:Weird... this one too.... by jrwr00 · · Score: 1

      Drop me a email, there is a place that i know of that still has a working lobby for it

    17. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Binestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The absolute best part is that the guestbook STILL WORKS.

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    18. Re:Weird... this one too.... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      He did. After giving up on his crappy hom[e]page, he discovered Linux, created his own webserver, became a technical genius, singlehandedly achieved the technological Singularity, and is now that orange box meme currently going around 4chan.

    19. Re:Weird... this one too.... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I'm an arrogant asshole with great karma on slashdot. The 'karma hole' you speak of isn't really an issue, because if it was, mine wouldn't be 'excellent'.

      People who's karma rating is going to be noticeably effected by 'Funny' posts which have some negative mods to them really didn't have that high of karma to begin with so you really aren't doing that much damage.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    20. Re:Weird... this one too.... by neomunk · · Score: 1

      I only started talking about this after I noticed a few reasonable and well-written posts modded at -1 Funny. It took me a minute to figure it out, but once I remembered that Funny doesn't give Karma, it seemed downright dirty.

      AFAIK, there is a cap to your Karma that cannot be crossed, so anyone, regardless of posting history, is vulnerable to the right troll (or trolls) beating them down to Bad Karma.

    21. Re:Weird... this one too.... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, you weren't joking.

      --
      No existe.
  11. Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Count+Fenring · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the entries involved processing through Nth-dimensional mathematic constructs. When the judges ran it, a quantum differential between our spacetime and that of certain elder influences was generated. A portal, luckily one-way, to the den of a million screaming chains was opened, and it swallowed all of the judges, who will be consumed for ten cycles of our universe expanding and contracting, and then spit out as the final weapon in the Old Ones' war on our reality.

    Or I've been reading too much Charles Stross

    1. Re:Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or I've been reading too much Charles Stross

      There ain't no such thing as too much Charles Stross!

    2. Re:Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Old Ones" are Lovecraft. I don't know who this Stross wannabe is.

    3. Re:Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not for the reasons you're thinking...

      "Oh no, we've lost another reader, the sleeper is stirring!"

    4. Re:Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Unless he's standing on your head.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    5. Re:Maybe it's just my tinfoil hat speaking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the judges ran it, a quantum differential between our spacetime and that of certain elder influences was generated.

      No fair! They affected the output by running it.

  12. winning entries by sdsykes_ss · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't have links to all the entries, but here is best of show: http://nanochess.110mb.com/emulator.html

    And here are my two winning entries: http://www.stephensykes.com/blog_perm.html?148

    Enjoy!

    1. Re:winning entries by sdsykes_ss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, and by the way you can watch an ultra low quality video of landon curt noll presenting the winners here: http://uk.video.yahoo.com/watch/1429732/4906539 - you won't be able to make out much of the source code though.

    2. Re:winning entries by eulernet · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the same site, Knight's tour solver. 19th IOCCC. Best Small Program

      http://nanochess.110mb.com/knight.html

    3. Re:winning entries by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      And here are my two winning entries

      Nice! The cube solver is indeed a work of art.

    4. Re:winning entries by david_thornley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to hang out some (in meatspace) with Merlyn Leroy, who won a good number of IOCCC prizes. (Not, in fact, his real name.)

      He seemed like such a nice, quiet guy in person. If I hadn't known, I wouldn't have suspected him of having such a twisted mind.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  13. News by jeroen94704 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny thing is, their latest news item (not carried by all mirrors) is from April 4, 2008, and reads:

    Added a two IOCCC web site mirrors [...] to support the upcomming source code release of winning entries for 2006.

    Surely, announcing the upcoming source code release a year and a half after the competition closes, and then NOT doing it is, in an obfuscated way, sweetly ironic.

    --
    He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
    1. Re:News by dargaud · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not like they plan on beating the Oscars in number of viewers when they release the source code. They can survive two hours of slashdotting without need for plenty of mirrors.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  14. Moved on? by sam_v1.35b · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Surely the quiet absence of a high point of geekdom becomes news at some point!

    Maybe too many geeks moved on to something else.

  15. The Real News by Idiomatick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real news is that a site so poorly run that they cannot release the winners code after years ... Did NOT get slashdotted. How is this even remotely possible.

    1. Re:The Real News by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real news is that a site so poorly run that they cannot release the winners code after years ... Did NOT get slashdotted. How is this even remotely possible.

      Obviously, this is because it's slashdot and we don't even try to RTFA any more. We're all so fucking smart we can just talk about it without doing any research.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The Real News by makomk · · Score: 1

      Because they're used to the odd slashdotting, so the site's spread across several mirrors to handle the load. It can cope with a horde of /.ers downloading the source tarballs - a few static pages is nothing.

    3. Re:The Real News by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Simplicity!

      Afaict most sites get slashdotted for one of three reasons

      1: Large downloads/images/videos
      2: Dynamic content that can't handle large numbers of identical requests efficianly.
      3: hosted on a home server or a REALLY shitty hosting plan

      If none of theese issues apply to your site the afaict you will probablly survive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  16. it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    AFAIK, after seeing all that messed-up code, they started using Python in 2006 and never looked back.

    1. Re:it was bound to happen by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am a IOCCC winner, and I can tell you this: winning the IOCCC landed me a job.

      You know why? Because someone who can spew out a short, interesting, and obfuscated C program and still comply with the IOCCC rules, which includes cross-platform compatibility and compliance with the K&R, demonstrates 3 things:

      - He knows C very well indeed,
      - He thinks outside the box, but within established rules,
      - He's willing to work long hours just to optimize and polish a small piece of code.

      This is valid for languages other than C; there's a reason why job interviews in the field of programming often include coding something, or solving a tricky piece of code. I know for a fact that many a prospective employer treats (or at least used to treat) the IOCCC as an excellent test of C proficiency.

      I

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:it was bound to happen by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Funny

      - He's willing to work long hours just to optimize and polish a small piece of code.

      This is valid for languages other than C; there's a reason why job interviews in the field of programming often include coding something, or solving a tricky piece of code. I know for a fact that many a prospective employer treats (or at least used to treat) the IOCCC as an excellent test of C proficiency.

      Interesting point, though time for code polishing is rarely granted IRL.

      Of course, if I were interviewing you, and you gave me a winning IOCCC entry as a code sample I'd do my utmost to have you hired on the spot based on general principles.

      Do you have a link to your winning entry?

    3. Re:it was bound to happen by A+Big+Gnu+Thrush · · Score: 1, Interesting

      We need an Obfuscated Flash contest. Like a Flash game that no one can figure out how to play or a Flash ad that you can't turn off or close. Something a little more 21st Century.

    4. Re:it was bound to happen by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link to your winning entry?

      I would link it but I'd rather not disclose my full name and address on /. :)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:it was bound to happen by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      There was an Obfuscated PostScript contest, but I think it's now dead.

    6. Re:it was bound to happen by Kyle_Katarn-(ISF) · · Score: 1

      We know exactly where you live: Hazzard County, GA. To further elaborate, you drive a Plymouth Fury at work, wear a gun, have a hound named Flash, and your middle name is Purvis.

    7. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that's AKA flash's entire market

    8. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you are willing to do it on a contest thousands see?

    9. Re:it was bound to happen by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      ---play or a Flash ad that you can't turn off or close

      The only way to win is not to play the game.

      --
    10. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. You're saying Boss Hogg knows C? Well dag nab it.

    11. Re:it was bound to happen by mpaulsen · · Score: 1
    12. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a IOCCC winner, and I can tell you this: winning the IOCCC landed me a job.

      You know why? Because someone who can spew out a short, interesting, and obfuscated C program and still comply with the IOCCC rules, which includes cross-platform compatibility and compliance with the K&R, demonstrates 3 things:

      - He knows C very well indeed,
      - He thinks outside the box, but within established rules,
      - He's willing to work long hours just to optimize and polish a small piece of code.

      This is valid for languages other than C; there's a reason why job interviews in the field of programming often include coding something, or solving a tricky piece of code. I know for a fact that many a prospective employer treats (or at least used to treat) the IOCCC as an excellent test of C proficiency.

      I

      On the other hand I have seen people who participate in the obfuscated C programming competition referred to as code terrorists.

      Obfuscated C code is exactly the kind of code you do not want to see in a professional environment (or really anywhere else).

    13. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, they probably prefer python now. I mean, all you need to do is to cleverly hide a tab in the middle of the code and you're done with the obfuscation :)

    14. Re:it was bound to happen by LanceUppercut · · Score: 1

      K&R is not defined well enough (and too buggy in the parts where it is actually defined) to justify a meaningfull application of the term "compliance" to it. "Compliance with K&R" is an oxymoron. Meaningful compliance begins from C89/90, but alas IOCCC does not require that. In fact, according to the official rules, IOCCC is not really IO[C]CC, but rather IO[GCC]CC. Not surprisingly, most IOCCC entries actually demonstrate a rather poor knowledge of C.

    15. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - He's willing to work long hours just to optimize and polish a small piece of code.

      In most companies this would probably be a negative point. They don't want perfect code since they don't get paid enough to make perfect code (unless they make space shuttle computer code or some such). They want code that's a balance between quality and time spent on it. Not to mention that the optimizations a company would want are very different than those you'd do for the IOCCC.

      This is valid for languages other than C; there's a reason why job interviews in the field of programming often include coding something, or solving a tricky piece of code.

      That's mostly to see if the person can program at all and exactly how well they can program, how else is the employer supposed to find this out? Resumes and code sample can be faked so trivially it's not even funny.

    16. Re:it was bound to happen by makomk · · Score: 1

      Actually, the official rules require entries to be written in ANSI C, which I think means C89/90. (The older IOCCC contests were probably K&R-based, though.)

    17. Re:it was bound to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obfuscated Postscript? Isn't that redundant?

    18. Re:it was bound to happen by try_anything · · Score: 1

      No kidding. These obfuscated C winners impress the hell out of me, but in real life, I have yet to meet anybody who can code that way who doesn't think everybody should code that way all the time.

    19. Re:it was bound to happen by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      My email address as shown is valid, so email it privately, if you wish. Never mind if that's too much invasion of privacy.

  17. Ended up in the codebase here at work by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know anything about the judging but I think I recognise all of the entries in the codebase at work.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  18. oblig bash by mevets · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe MS sued them for copyright infringement...

    1. Re:oblig bash by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe they're suing Microsoft for publishing it as the OOXML specification?

  19. Geek card :) by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My geek card is a digital certificate. You can just download a copy by yourself.

  20. Yes, it's your tinfoil hat speaking :) by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    ... and then spit out as the final weapon in the Old Ones' war on our reality.

    That's the Eternal Ones, you ignorant fool!

    All hail... I mean, think nothingness...

  21. IOCCC winner by troll8901 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Code or it didn't happen!

    1. Re:IOCCC winner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      #include
      main(){AD*(S_D)IK,A:DHJA(UD)HJL;)forKNXH(*DJA{PCN:H*APHXA({JXAOXN}[AX&A*YBC]UIAG&*ASAMbbH[OA]BS$uiAGSAjijionx &A^G&SH::NK:B,A&*XHGS^&W*WGB,HG)}

  22. Re:tahreey sltil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    foiugtu rtihneg esnetir

    Actually, she has a glandular problem, you insensitive clod!

  23. Meme by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    He should have made himself into a meme, then he will live on forever.

    It is our solemn duty to do it for him. How about:
    bobnefication [n.]: (of a web site) the act of being eternally under construction
    or
    Fly, bobne, fly! [interj.]: Doubtful reply to an announcement.
    or simply
    Welcome to my new Hompage which is still under construction.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...
    1. Re:Meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every slashdot article about missed release dates is getting tagged 'flybobnefly' from now on.

  24. maybe it's because landon just got married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and his wife gives him no time for silly geek contests :) . by looking at his pictures hosted on flickr it appears that he just got married some time in December 08.

  25. All the likely winners... by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 3, Funny

    are working on Perl 6.

  26. Hiding in plain sight by n2rjt · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the winning entry is so obfuscated that they haven't been able to find it.

  27. My favorite by hobbit · · Score: 1

    My favorite is this one:

    http://www.ioccc.org/1996/eldby.c

    But modern terminals are too fast for it :)

    --
    "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    1. Re:My favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      float s=1944,x[5],y[5],z[5],r[5],j,h,a,b,d,e,q;int i=33,c,l,f=1;int g(){return f=
      (f*6478+1)%65346;}m(){x[i]=g()-l;y[i]=(g()-l)/4;r[i]=g()>>4;}main(){char t[1948
      ]=" `MYmtw%FFlj%Jqig~%`jqig~Etsqnsj3stb",*p=t+3,*k="3tjlq9TX";l=s*20;while(i<s)
      p[i++]='\n'+5;for(i=0;i<5;i++)z[i]=(i?z[i-1]:0)+l/3+!m();while(1){for(q=0;q<2000000;q++){}for(c=33;c<s;
      c++){c+=!((c+1)%81);j=c/s-.5;h=c%81/40.0-1;p[c]=37;for(i=4;i+1;i--)if((b=(a=h*x
      [i]+j*y[i]+z[i])*a-(d=1+j*j+h*h)*(-r[i]*r[i]+x[i]*x[i]+y[i]*y[i]+z[i]*z[i]))>0)
      {for(e=b;e*e>b*1.01||e*e<b*.99;e-=.5*(e*e-b)/e);p[c]=k[(int)(8*e/d/r[i])];}}for
      (i=4;i+1;z[i]-=s/2,i--)z[i]=z[i]<0?l*2+!m():z[i];while(i<s)putchar(t[i++]-5);}}

      2000000 is smooth on my machine, but adjust as necessary. I have almost no clue how to program in C, so I'll just leave it at that.

  28. Golfing by leek · · Score: 1

    Maybe they're out playing Perl Golf.

  29. javascript killed ioccc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    satire is useless in a world gone insane

  30. One of the entries turned out to be Skynet by finnw · · Score: 1

    ...and the judges couldn't shut it down, and so had to create a temporal bubble around the lab to contain it. They're still trapped inside.

    --
    Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines Correct?
  31. C++0x by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Funny

    A first C++0x draft had appeared. IOCCC judges have looked at that, and realized that the whole exercise is now futile - since every C++ programmer can rapidly crank out unreadable code in RAD mode. Case in point: we all know that the following can be legal C++ (and C):

    --a***b++;

    However, C++0x brings its to new heights; for example, the following is a perfectly legal C++0x statement:

    [](){}();

    1. Re:C++0x by b0g0n · · Score: 1

      Anybody who can read that shit... deserves it.

    2. Re:C++0x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /* here's a legal use for --a***b++, but I no idea where [](){}() is legal */
      #include <stdio.h>
      main() {
          int a = 5, x = 7, y = 11, *arr[2] = { &x, &y }, **b = arr;
          printf ("%d\n", --a***b++); /* 4 * 7 = 28 */
          printf ("%d\n", --a***b++); /* 3 * 11 = 33 */
          return 0;
      }

  32. An Obfuscated Perl Contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you trying to make my maniacal laugh echo it's echo?

    How about writing code that takes-over its compiler? Sure, such would have embedded binary execution instructions in the text file, but who ever would know that what they were looking at in between the quotes of a simple printf was from the character charts of either ANSI or ASCII... It would compile, and upon first output will our beloved engraved printf meet with Weapon X the embedded Jesus Christ.

  33. One of the entries runs the site... by abridged · · Score: 1

    making it a #!@#$ to update

  34. Contacting the IOCCC Judges.... by SimonCooper · · Score: 1

    The IOCCC judges can be contacted by following these instructions. If you want to contribute your expertise or time to the IOCCC then please contact us.

  35. Here are some winning entries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can grab them from http://www.penston.com.br/ioccc2006.tgz

    I just fell out of the back of a truck...

  36. Chameleon code by galenlt · · Score: 1

    The winning entry was so well obfuscated that when the judges laid it aside, chameleon like, it blended right into the surface on which it had been placed. And they've been looking for it ever since.

  37. Here's one of the winning entries by zero.dot.one · · Score: 1