Slashdot Mirror


Flying Car Flies From London To Africa

krou writes "It may not be exactly what people have envisioned or tried over the years, such as the flying car in Bladerunner, or the previously reported Terrafugia Transition, but the BBC is reporting that a flying car (creatively dubbed the Skycar, but different from this Skycar) has flown from London across into Africa. They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan with a canopy that is capable of flying a car."

148 comments

  1. Congestion charge by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does it have to pay the London congestion charge?

    1. Re:Congestion charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      First Post!

      there, fixed that for you!

    2. Re:Congestion charge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not after it leaves Lambeth.

  2. And they called it... by timpintsch · · Score: 0

    A car in Spanish skies from the continent that brought you the jet powered man!

  3. Flying car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minus the car.

  4. Confusing Wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan with a canopy that is capable of flying a car."

    WTF?

    1. Re:Confusing Wording by TheCycoONE · · Score: 3, Informative

      The design of the fan and canopy, which is capable of flying a car, is based on a smaller fan and canopy which was capable of allowing a person to 'fly'.

    2. Re:Confusing Wording by Intron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks. I looked at "flying a man into a bigger fan" and thought that sounded really messy.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    3. Re:Confusing Wording by Dmala · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm also having difficult envisioning how one flies across into Africa. "Into Africa" suggests a less than perfect landing, "across Africa" implies a much longer trip. I'm not sure how you do both.

    4. Re:Confusing Wording by daveatneowindotnet · · Score: 1

      And then you have the slashdot headline which sounds like the setup for a 4chan joke. Flying Car It flies from London to Africa

    5. Re:Confusing Wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yo dawg, we heard you like flying with fans, so we put a fan inside a bigger fan so that you can fly a man into a bigger fan with a canopy that is capable of flying a car.

    6. Re:Confusing Wording by geobeck · · Score: 1

      I'm also having difficult envisioning how one flies across into Africa.

      Since it flew from London to Africa, I'm assuming it flew across Europe to Africa. I guess the author didn't think that little land mass in the way was worth mentioning.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    7. Re:Confusing Wording by Lifyre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So he flew across what France and maybe some of Spain? It's not like it was someplace important...

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    8. Re:Confusing Wording by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Aaaaaaugh!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Confusing Wording by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Summary is wrong. they flew it IN Africa and was made in England.

    10. Re:Confusing Wording by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      I think they were talking about Soviet Africa

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    11. Re:Confusing Wording by KrimZon · · Score: 1

      Do they have a decal of a fan with a decal of a fan on it? And do they have it right on their fan?

    12. Re:Confusing Wording by Intron · · Score: 1

      A man, a plan, a canopy, a fan, Panama!

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    13. Re:Confusing Wording by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I need to go home. I read this and thought you were saying something regarding 'fans' and 'fecal'.

      And she /. meme now has different emphasis: "Where is MY flying car?"

  5. do not want by SoupGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

    "They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan."

    I'd rather have a flying car that doesn't fly me into ANY sized fan, thankyouverymuch.

    --
    What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    1. Re:do not want by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      "General played him on the turntable, and he went wing, zoom, into the fan and got shmushed!" -- Amanda, Stephen King's Cat's Eye

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. sounds painful and messy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan with a canopy that is capable of flying a car".

  7. Pure genius by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    This thing is awesome. Watch the video, it actually frikin' flies.

    1. Re:Pure genius by macraig · · Score: 1

      I can't watch the video: none of the BBC video content comes through in my Firefox browser, even with a full bypass for NoScript. I get sick and tired of having to disable all sorts of protections for the sake of such proprietary crap, so instead I'll do without... at least until somebody "rips" it to something open source enough that I can watch it. I'd even settle for YouTube (ugh).

    2. Re:Pure genius by onefriedrice · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't know what to tell you, buddy. Plays fine for me using Flash in Firefox. x86_64, even.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    3. Re:Pure genius by macraig · · Score: 1

      It's not a Flash issue, since I can play other Flash content. It's specifically the BBC that causes a problem. I don't know what bit of privacy or security I'd have to relinquish to make it work, but I just won't do it.

      Found it: if I disable Adblock Plus the BBC player works. Screw that!

    4. Re:Pure genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't watch the video: none of the BBC video content comes through in my Firefox browser, even with a full bypass for NoScript. I get sick and tired of having to disable all sorts of protections for the sake of such proprietary crap, so instead I'll do without... at least until somebody "rips" it to something open source enough that I can watch it. I'd even settle for YouTube (ugh).

      I also have my browser all blocked off with NoScript, Adblock Plus, Flash Block, and white-listed cookies. I too had a frustrating time trying to get BBC videos to work. But even with NoScript and Flash Block disabled and cookies enabled, it still wasn't working.

      Surprisingly the culprit was Adblock Plus. Apparently the BBC videos have to load an ad clip at the beginning before playing the video.

      So for a BBC video I do a quick middle click on the ABP stop sign icon in my status bar to temporarily turn off ABP. Then as soon as the video starts playing I can reclick the ABP icon to turn it back on and the video continues working.

    5. Re:Pure genius by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      I can see it perfectly fine with Adblock Plus.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    6. Re:Pure genius by macraig · · Score: 1

      Do you use Element Hiding Helper also?

    7. Re:Pure genius by macraig · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just narrowed it down to ABP a few minutes ago, but I have a strong aversion to having to swallow even that small amount of castor oil to get to the video.

    8. Re:Pure genius by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Remember UK and non-UK people see different pages (no ads in the UK). I have ABP running, and it's fine, but I'm in the UK anyway.

    9. Re:Pure genius by Ashriel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running Firefox with NoScript and Adblock Plus - didn't have to disable Adblock Plus to see the video, but I did have to manually reload the page after allowing it under NoScript in order to load the video.

    10. Re:Pure genius by macraig · · Score: 1

      I guess I need to emigrate to the UK to be ad-free, then? o_O

    11. Re:Pure genius by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      and aint new. Guys have been flying things like that around here in michigan for decades.

      Most parasails are attached to a "car" that the driver and passenger sit in.

      This is a very slight modification by someone that has the tools to do it.

      There is absolutely nothing special about it. Call me when he flies a 725i that has all the luggage for a weekend trip and family of 4 in it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  8. SkyBuggy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's more of a Skybuggy than a skycar.

  9. Very old news! by VincenzoRomano · · Score: 1

    I remember that flying car flying from London, close to King's Cross!
    And it was a Ford Anglia, not a Terrafugia Whatever!

    --
    Maybe Computers will never be as intelligent as Humans.
    For sure they won't ever become so stupid. [VR-1988]
    1. Re:Very old news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nymphadora Tonks (Natalia Tena) is so amazingly pretty! She's also talented in composing+singing.

  10. Actually... by CompMD · · Score: 5, Informative

    The vehicle flying to Africa is more a proof-of-concept than anything else, a fully functioning engineering prototype. The actual flying car model is slated to be released next year and is supposed to be a real car.

    Disclaimer: I work for one of their sponsors.

    1. Re:Actually... by mrcaseyj · · Score: 1

      Can you tell us:
      Can you take off by yourself or do you have to have your copilot hold the parafoil off the ground?
      Can you take off in a moderate cross wind or must you always be able to drive straight up wind to prevent the sail blowing off to the side?
      Is there a big problem with sail wear and tear from being blown around on the ground?

    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. You got your dune buggy in my powered parafoil!
      2. You got your powered parafoil in my dune buggy!
      3. I know, lets drive it across Europe from London to Gibraltar! Ok!
      4. Fly from Gibraltar to Morocco with powered parafoil.
      5. ????
      6. Profit!!!

    3. Re:Actually... by CompMD · · Score: 1

      I wish I knew the answers to your questions. When I did hardcore aerospace R&D at a past job, I had a serious flying car project with one consulting client that I worked on. That flying car is still under construction, but a mockup has been displayed at a few major auto shows. Anyone else's projects naturally really interest me.

      All I know about this team is that we loaned them a whole bunch of equipment.

  11. Oh my... by gzipped_tar · · Score: 5, Funny

    But is it an European or an African flying car?

    --
    Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    1. Re:Oh my... by Keith_Beef · · Score: 5, Funny

      And what is its unladen weight?

    2. Re:Oh my... by Daimanta · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know! waarrrgghhhh

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    3. Re:Oh my... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And does it have storage room for coconuts?

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    4. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes

    5. Re:Oh my... by jimbudncl · · Score: 1

      More to the point, can it juggle my coconuts while in-flight?

    6. Re:Oh my... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      And does it have storage room for coconuts?

      Judging from the photos a roll of duct tape will work here...

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unladen? Any relation to Bin Laden?

    8. Re:Oh my... by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      What a bunch of geeks. You really need to get laden.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    9. Re:Oh my... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's his niece - pursuing a singing career in New York. Or was it London?

  12. Misuse of terminology... by rHBa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Parajet might be the name of the company but they modified a paramotor, not a 'parajet'(it's propeller driven, not a jet engine) and rather than a parachute (as mentioned in the BBC article) I think they mean paraglider (it is designed to fly or glide, not to fall after all).

  13. It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's all the hubub about? It's simply a paraglider that has been made large enough to carry a payload larger than a man (a car in this case). That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home. *shrug*

    1. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just consider the implications of this amazing NEW technology. Cars are just the beginning, we can finally give penguins the gift of flight as well!

    2. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I suspect attaching a paraglider to a car-driven fan and attaching a blimp to a camper are both patentable inventions. I suggest you rush to your nearest patent office and apply for a patent on your "flying home" idea before somebody else does. Be sure to cite "The Wizard of Oz" and Up as prior art!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Where can I get a blimp that's connected to a camper? That sounds like a good idea.

    4. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      That sounds kind of cool. You could fold up a large non rigid blimp onto the roof of the camper and have several tanks of helium to inflate it to take off. Granted the Helium would neet to be at some rediculous pressure but I think it could work.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    5. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by glassware · · Score: 1

      I imagine the "hubub" is because it works.

    6. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for the idea!

    7. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you liquefy a gas, it stops being compressible.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Why would you not call it a flying home?

      No seriously.

      After all, there is a car, its flying, why is it not a flying car? Is it because it doesn't use jet engines or something? If one tossed wings on the car would you say, oh hey that's not a flying car, why its a plane just look at those wings.

      Flying campers would be kinda nice, keeps them off the roads, and hey there's even a car that you can tow behind your flying home.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    9. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem. A paraglider/car is awesome. A camper/blimp would be beyond awesome.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    10. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home.

      Well, he has, hasn't he? At least if it flies, he has.

    11. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home.

      Or like saying someone who builds a house on top of a floatation hull has made a "houseboat".

    12. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by ncohafmuta · · Score: 0

      but then since both are flying, wouldn't you have to hyphenate it, like married women do?

      A flying 'blimp-camper'.

      And while it is cool, i don't believe this is really an earth-shattering discovery. Matter of fact, I've been traveling in flying tubes for quite some time now.
      And more so, the cabin below an airship is already called a car, so don't we already have a flying car?
      And what is a car really...? :-)

    13. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Funny

      we can finally give penguins the gift of flight

      Or Pigs

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    14. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by blueZ3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duke Nukem Forever, here we come!

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    15. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a car which can fly. What more do you need to qualify it as a flying car?

    16. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by camwyn · · Score: 1

      Liquids are compressible, just much less so than gases...less enough that it would be inefficient on an energy vs. space saved comparison anyway.

    17. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do they pack up the paragliger when it wants to be just a regular car? How do you deploy it? Can you do it without stopping? do you jsut have to get it to some speed, and then hit a button and the thing unfolds and takes you up? a winch pulls it in when you want to pack it up?

      Where is more information about this car?

    18. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by zbharucha · · Score: 1

      Too late. Pink Floyd's already done the flying pig thing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink_Floyd_pigs#Animals).

    19. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When we're talking about these sorts of orders of magnitude difference, it's effectively incompressible. Hydrodynamics don't bother taking compressibility into account, for example.

      I wouldn't want a pressure vessel at millions of atmospheres in MY camper.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by superyooser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home.

      That might be a good idea for getting mobile homes out of the way of tornadoes.

    21. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home.

      I bet the tornadoes are going to just love having their favorite food being delivered to them.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    22. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Edward James Olmos and some origami unicorns.

    23. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by initialE · · Score: 1

      You want to give pigs to penguins? Mods, this is clearly offtopic.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    24. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by cpicon92 · · Score: 0

      I patented that blimp idea, pay up!

    25. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO!!!

    26. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we can finally give penguins the gift of flight as well!

      You mean you hadn't heard?
      Penguins can already fly...

    27. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you give a penguin a pig?

    28. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by davolfman · · Score: 1

      That's because they have.

    29. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, maybe this will be the year or Linux on the des.... Oh, wait.

    30. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parachute+wheels=flying car

      Who knew?! Quick call the patent office!

      Or maybe it's just a Powered Parachute with enough engine to spin the wheels too.

      "Flying car" this is not.

    31. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by corbettw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or you could wait until the tornado's on top of you to have your flying home. Pretty sure that would work.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    32. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Or to just take those tornados for a ride to Oz...

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    33. Re:It's just a simple paraglider...so what? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > we can finally give penguins the gift of flight as well!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trebuchet

  14. African or European? by Subm · · Score: 1

    What was its unladen flight air-speed velocity?

    (Both during the European and African legs).

  15. Wild Kingdom... by flyneye · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lol, this is a swampboat like they did "Wild Kingdom", Everglades shows with. Someone seems to have ran it up the backside of a dune buggy.
          With the cab to act as a soundboard the pilot should be deaf before he crashes.But, we don't intervene, because this is natural selection and interference could change the future of these fascinating creatures.Here on the African plane, a cleanup crew of jackals then vultures will soon return whatever didn't burn to nature.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    1. Re:Wild Kingdom... by chaim79 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually this is a Powered Paraglider attached to a 4-wheeled cart that can be certified as a 'car'.

      This isn't really a 'new' thing as the carts used by powered paragliders have been getting more and more complex each year I see them, now they are complex enough to qualify as a car.

      That being said, this is awesome!

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
  16. I bless the Flying Cars down in Africa by Triela · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was all ready to criticize something called a Skycar for looking too much like a mini-plane, but lo and behold, it sure does look like a car, so much so that I couldn't believe it flew even a hundred feet without plummeting from the sky, that is, until I saw the parachute contraption and wasn't quite as impressed, a thought with which I decided to conclude this run-on sentence.

  17. wouldnt that hurt? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  18. Too slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it looks like it would be fun for recreational purposes, I don't think it would make very good flying transportation. Not to mention the trouble maintaining that chute is going to be.

  19. It looks *real* by RyanFenton · · Score: 1

    Most of the "skycars" we've seen have looked like trade show demo vehicles - fancy, but fragile - suitable as rich toys, but not as workhorses.

    This one looks practical - and it looks more than another ultralight, it looks like something that could be serviceable and mass marketable, while still being functional and durable.

    But whether any of that is true, we'll have to see from independent testing. One thing I'd like to see is how it actually handles a landing without power, after an engine failure, with its parachute. Also, how it would handle the inevitable weight stresses real world use would apply, despite warnings.

    Fascinating project in any case.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:It looks *real* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, and you would need a lot of space for them, because of that huge paraglider thing. And what about stoping and waiting for green light? No way.
      So it's not as practical as you say.

  20. FAKE by hurfy · · Score: 1, Funny

    The guy actually flew using his hair to Africa ;)

    and Skybuggy might be more apt...

    1. Re:FAKE by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Yes.. the hair was singularly amazing.. and airfoil shaped!

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    2. Re:FAKE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not flying, it's falling.. with style!

  21. Spokesman has nice hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forget flying car, I want to be able to regrow a head of hair like that guy.

  22. Say what you want about Moller International... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

    ...but at least *their* Skycar isn't slashdotted...

  23. From the article: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ..."and after rigorous testing will travel from London across the Sahara to Tombouctou for the maiden voyage in Spring 2009."

    Hasn't happened yet.

  24. Two things in life you cannot avoid: by Simian+Road · · Score: 1

    Death and Taxes...

    1. Re:Two things in life you cannot avoid: by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I'm a head in a jar. Now, if I can just get past this stupid jar tax...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  25. Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    The concept looks cool.Just driving it in traffic would be a show stopper. The fact page on this aircraft/car doesn't show certain things, like "Take Off Distance", Red Line, Yellow Line, Stall, Octane stuff, and um, the ceiling at 15K? With an open Cock Pit? The car looks like a Tube Frame Sand Buggy, nice. I didn't know that Rotax had a automotive transmission for their power plants, interesting. I also have a couple questions like, "IFR Capable?" Or is this just only a "VFR" kind of car? I didn't see the word "Experimental" on side of car; why? The "why" reason could be a very cool price worthy answer.

    1. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Oshkosh native...bring it on...We'll see you this summer. Notice we already have the terrafugia and the jetpack coming. Admit it. You're all jealous.

    2. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by Atticka · · Score: 1

      Well, their website has some of this info posted

      From:
      http://www.skycarexpedition.com/about_skycar.php

      In "fly mode" the car will have:

      a take-off speed of 60 kmph
      a top speed of 110 kmph
      a range of 300 km.
      a cruising altitude of 2000 - 3000 ft
      a maximum altitude of 15,000 ft.

      In "road mode" the car will have:

      independent 4 wheel suspension
      rear wheel drive
      acceleration from 0-100 kmph in 4.5 seconds
      a top speed of 180 kmph
      a range of 400 km.

      --
      No sig here...
    3. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      I also have a couple questions like, "IFR Capable?" Or is this just only a "VFR" kind of car?

      While not strictly necessary for IFR, deicing gear for the wing is a bit problematic. I sure wouldn't want to fly it through any clouds.

      Anyway, given the car's capabilities, it doesn't need to follow roads. ;-)

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by Rudisaurus · · Score: 1

      Actually, Parajet's home page indicates that:

      - it'll take off in less than 200m from a field or airstrip
      - it can't stall or dive (no pitch control), so stall speed is effectively 0 km/h
      - from the characteristics of the type of flying training they're offering (here), we can conclude that it's probably only VFR-capable

      --
      licet differant, aequabitur
    5. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by iogan · · Score: 1

      The concept looks cool.Just driving it in traffic would be a show stopper. The fact page on this aircraft/car doesn't show certain things, like "Take Off Distance", Red Line, Yellow Line, Stall, Octane stuff, and um, the ceiling at 15K? With an open Cock Pit? The car looks like a Tube Frame Sand Buggy, nice. I didn't know that Rotax had a automotive transmission for their power plants, interesting. I also have a couple questions like, "IFR Capable?" Or is this just only a "VFR" kind of car? I didn't see the word "Experimental" on side of car; why? The "why" reason could be a very cool price worthy answer.

      We don't have to put experimental on the side of EAA type aircraft in Europe (don't know about Africa, but I suspect a similar situation). All we need is a plaque somewhere in the cockpit. Experimental craft and IFR don't really mix here though, can you fly IFR in experimental aircraft in the US? Then again, at least in certain countries you wouldn't even need to do that for something like this. Depending on empty weight etc, it could well be a microlight/ultralight. Don't really see what the big deal is about this though, seen plenty of similar in the past. I think the flyke is cooler, actually. (http://www.freshbreezeusa.com/flyke.htm)

    6. Re:Request Vector for Oshkosh Approach? by wjsteele · · Score: 1

      Experimental craft and IFR don't really mix here though, can you fly IFR in experimental aircraft in the US?

      Yes, we sure can. As long as the aircraft (and pilot) is properly equipped and checked out, then IFR operations are allowed.

      However, with this type of vehicle, you don't need IFR... if the weather gets bad, just land and drive through it. (Heck, it would even be good for avoiding strong head winds.)

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
  26. You may also like... by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 1

    The SkyCar site's news page is still up for the moment:

    http://www.skycarexpedition.com/news.php

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  27. i'm all for progress, but... by vtolturbo · · Score: 1

    as someone who was heavily involved in collegiate competition similar to this effort, i have to say that this achievement seems like something that could be done by any college team with suitable funding and motivation. the science for controlling a powered paraglider is decades old, so this doesn't strike me as a breakthrough. what would impress me is some sort of system for mechanically deploying the lifting surface, like the top of a convertible car. without such an innovation, this vehicle would never be able to go anywhere near an urban center, given the power lines and other obstacles it would certainly encounter. to me, this represents a small, but measurable step toward an affordable flight-capable commercial vehicle for the average consumer. still, there remain many unanswered questions.

  28. Not sure about other places but the US has... by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Death, Taxes and Death Taxes.

    1. Re:Not sure about other places but the US has... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not if your net worth is below something like $5,000,000. Those poor multi-millionaires!

    2. Re:Not sure about other places but the US has... by alexj33 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Does it turn into Wonderbug if you honk its horn? Looks kinda like Schlepcar.

    3. Re:Not sure about other places but the US has... by MC+Negro · · Score: 1

      Not if your net worth is below something like $5,000,000. Those poor multi-millionaires!

      So because they're worth a certain amount of money, it's okay to plunder the estate state of the deceased?

      What a peculiar outlook. Not necessarily a wrong outlook - it just strikes me as odd to see the "us vs. them" mentality justified because those "poor multi-millionaires" are somehow less deserving to pass their worldly gains to their children with less taxation than those who are worth less.

      I don't really get it, but then I suppose that doesn't really matter.

      --
      "You and your third dimension."
    4. Re:Not sure about other places but the US has... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      The idea is that they're free to pass on most of it, but the kids ought not to be set up for life and for generations to come. That's how hereditary aristocracies come about, and in this country I think we've decided that those are bad. I have nothing against parents leaving a nest egg for their descendants.

  29. A common misconception that pigs can't fly. by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    Given sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:A common misconception that pigs can't fly. by Chabo · · Score: 1

      It's just a little airborne, it's still good, it's still good!

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    2. Re:A common misconception that pigs can't fly. by tomcode · · Score: 1

      They don't really fly, so much as plummet. That one, he's their leader.

      --
      f u cn rd ths u cn gt a gd jb n cmptr prgmng
  30. In other news ... by janwedekind · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... engineers have managed to build a diving car by strapping a weight to a sand buggy. The diving car is expected to reach the bottom of the Mariana Trench later this evening.

  31. Flying Car Flies From London To Africa ??? by 3ryon · · Score: 1

    Ok...did it fly to Morocco (impressive), or South Africa (really, really impressive)? Africa isn't a country Ms Palin.

    1. Re:Flying Car Flies From London To Africa ??? by 10Neon · · Score: 1

      They're working on Timbuktu, Mali.

      --
      The Guide is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
  32. Up by lennier · · Score: 1

    "That's like saying someone who connects a blimp to a camper has invented a flying home."

    I'd buy one of those!

    Airstream meets Gulfstream.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  33. Here's the explanation by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    "Into Africa" suggests a less than perfect landing, "across Africa" implies a much longer trip. I'm not sure how you do both.

    Doing both is simple - the fan chopped him up and spread his remains into and across Africa. That also explains the 'less than perfect' landing!

    TFA: "They modified a parajet fan that can fly a man into a bigger fan"

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  34. Pictures... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or it didn't happen

  35. What will they invent next? by owlstead · · Score: 1

    Strapping a buggy to a rocket and fly it to the moon?

    Oh, wait...

  36. Just around the corner - yeah right by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

    Yeah, flying cars and fusion, just around the corner. I am 53 and have been reading about some flying car or other my whole life, longer if you count the old Popular Mechanics magazines from the 40's and 50's I found in my grandad's attic. It's a stupid friggin concept anyway. The worst thing that could ever happen is that someone develops a "practical" flying car. I can barely cross the street now, if I have to add "look up" to my "look left, look right" algorithm I think I'll just stay in my compound. When are people going to accept the fact that personal internal combustion engines are unsustainable from both an environmental and practical POV? Please note that the "cheap" (no it isn't) gas that we are using now is a product of the recession.

    1. Re:Just around the corner - yeah right by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

      Shorter version: Get off my lawn!

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    2. Re:Just around the corner - yeah right by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      Ha ha funny! Seriously! If they are in one of these dang infernal machines you betcha sonny. I am not against progress, I love tech and toys, but just happen to think these things are silly and impractical. Now, get off my lawn!

  37. Safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens in this thing if the engine conks out? Since it's a paraglider, doesn't it need forward motion to maintain the airfoil shape?

    1. Re:Safety? by gary_7vn · · Score: 1

      The key word here is "glider". All your questions will be answered if you visit their site.

  38. Yamaha R1 Motorcycle Engine by ModemRat · · Score: 0

    According to the video below they have a Yamaha R1 motorcycle engine in that thing. Very cool, where's my flying motorcycle?!
    http://www.skycarexpedition.com/the_expedition.php

  39. Yea right... by Sepiraph · · Score: 1

    I'll believe it when we have a flying car! ... OH WAIT

  40. Bigger news than you think by btempleton · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is brilliant because it's simple. People have dreamed and worked on flying cars for ages. And failed. They could not figure a way around the trade-offs. Make it too much like a plane and it's hard to get the wings away for driving.

    With a cloth wing, this is mainly a car, but if you come to something you can't drive across, or want to fly over, and the weather is good, you can fly over it.

    It is not the car that takes off from your house like Moller or the Jetsons, nor a plane that only goes to airports. I think it's a very clever compromise. No reason for it to cost 50,000 pounds though, and soon it probably won't.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  41. I say, don't you need a license to do that? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Heck, I know what it's supposed to say, but even after staring at it, it refuses to refrain from sounding like a Monty Python sketch.

    -FL

  42. a.k.a by garphik · · Score: 1
    Flying car a.k.a. Aeroplane a.k.a aircraft.

    If this news came while Wright brothers were in progress of making their aircraft, that would have been amazing.

    1. Re:a.k.a by garphik · · Score: 1

      Seriously, where is the creativity here? Look for new things. Air / Water / Land transports are old now, there are more interesting unexplored areas - time travel, teleportation ? etc

  43. Nothing new here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a variation on the powered parachute that has been around for quite some time.

    http://www.buckeyeaviation.com/

  44. Wow! Looks like a wonderful way to die! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    No, seriously. That actually looks like a LOT of fun!

    Buuuuuut, it also looks like a suicide machine. --I mean, ultralights are dangerous enough, but this one looks fantastically dangerous. Fixed wing aircraft still get to keep their wings in a strong wind.

    But then, while pondering this 2003 U.S. Paragliding Accident Summary, (1 per 500 paragliders died in 2003) I was struck by the notion that, yeah, there are going to be some accidents, --that's the nature of tying yourself to a kite and jumping off a mountain-- BUT, this time the pilot is actually sitting inside a pretty awesome roll cage. And anyway, I bet there's at least one person dumber than me among those 499 other guys.

    Sign me up!

    -FL

  45. Whatever! by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    Don't want to piss on anyone's parade but it's just a Dune Buggy with a fan and a parasail. Nothing new or futuristic, sooner or later somebody was going to glue those 3 items together.

    1. Re:Whatever! by spikej · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes, it's not the high speed elegant solution. But it seems to actually work, and at speeds that are reasonably close to driving (over twisty roads or where a direct route is an advantage) and faster over water than an amphib. It also seems to have the kind of flight characteristics a non-pilot could deal with. Rock on.

  46. Nice title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we all know Africa is a small town...
    It could have traveled 1000km or 10000km.

  47. Hoverboards and Flying Cars by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    It seems that there's a fine line between Funny, Flamebait, and Insightful. By 'death taxes', are you referring to deferred capital taxes?

    I, for one, have been waiting for hoverboards and flying cars (Back to the Future) for a loooooooong time. Opps, I've given you my security answer, haven't I?

  48. Joke funniness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think too far ahead. It's better to state the joke in a simplier form.

    I like the joke though. :)

  49. Wonderful, and Practical by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Lots of negative commentary here about the concept... but whatever.

    Honestly, I can see this being incredibly useful. There are areas in Africa specifically that are almost completely inaccessible, or very hard to access easily for medical or personnel reasons. Something like this I can see being extremely useful (and probably cheaper than an helicopter) because you can take off from any reasonably flat area, land within a mile or so of your destination and then drive to your destination.

    This concept takes a lot of the problems out of the equation that are involved in light aircraft (no ground transportation at your destination, needs at least a partially finished runway) or an helicopter (expensive to buy and maintain, pilot training is extremely expensive, sand in the engine is a BAD THING!). This thing could be used in these environments to improve the lot of those people.

    I don't see this as being really designed for the Western world, we have great roads and cars designed for that... but we are not "the world"... we are just a small part of it that sometimes thinks we are all there is.

    I love this concept... I can see so many practical uses for it... but hell, I'd love to fly one myself. :)