Slashdot Mirror


First Solar Eclipse Recorded From Moon

dazza101 writes "For the first time ever, we have witnessed a solar eclipse from the moon. On 10 February 2009 Japan's Kaguya lunar orbiter captured the sight of the Earth eclipsing the sun. The spacecraft also recorded this video showing the Earth surrounded by a glowing ring and briefly forming the classic diamond ring that often occurs during a solar eclipse, as seen from down here on Earth."

123 comments

  1. First post from the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see it.

    1. Re:First post from the moon by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Anyone else think that the ship should have been called Bishoujou Senshi Sera Moon? It is a Japanese spacecraft in lunar orbit, after all.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    2. Re:First post from the moon by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's already named after a legendary Moon princess. That story slightly predates Sailor Moon.

      BTW, if you're tempted to "Whoosh" because you were joking and thought your joke went over my head, don't. It didn't go over; it clunked into the ground well short of "humorous".

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:First post from the moon by MsGeek · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, I wasn't going to "whoosh" you. However, I will point out that you are a pedantic snob. End of line.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:First post from the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -5 "seriously uncool" to both of you for even knowing a single character name from "Sailor Moon". Ok, only -3 if you are a female under 20.

  2. That would be pretty cool... by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...if it actually were real.

  3. even better by jcgam69 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's even better than a solar eclipse as seen from earth because the earth's atmosphere diffracts light from the sun, causing a ring of light to appear around the planet. Very cool.

    1. Re:even better by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Except the image that at least I'm seeing looks like it was taken with a camera phone taped to the side of the lunar lander. Either that or eclipses on the moon look very pixelated.

      (I'm guessing they actually have higher quality photos, just thought it was a bit funny)

    2. Re:even better by Triela · · Score: 0

      It's even better than a solar eclipse as seen from earth because the earth's atmosphere diffracts light from the sun, causing a ring of light to appear around the planet. Very cool.

      Plus, you'd be on the MOON, man, ON THE MOON!

    3. Re:even better by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      It's even better than a solar eclipse as seen from earth because the earth's atmosphere diffracts light from the sun, causing a ring of light to appear around the planet. Very cool.

      The moon's craters and mountains cause the same effect in lunar solar eclipses, no?

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:even better by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is indeed one of the most amazing photos I have seen. Yeah, nebula are pretty, galaxies are neato and we all like those quirky things that radio telescopes find, but this is our planet. Somewhere on that black circle with the little white halo... somewhere on that is where I am. My house, my work, my friends. I might have been asleep when that was taken, I might have beer right here at work.

      And while I was doing all that, someone took a few amazing photos. Kudos to them!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    5. Re:even better by mrclisdue · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..I might have beer right here at work.

      Blimey. Eclipse or no eclipse, where I work, that's grounds for dismissal.

      Are you folks hiring?

      cheers,

    6. Re:even better by Bemopolis · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not diffraction. The irregular surface of the moon partially blocks the sunlight during a solar eclipse, producing an effect called Bailey's beads. The drama of this effect is helped considerably by the rough equivalence of the sun and moon's angular size as seen from Earth.
      By comparison, on the moon the Earth is approximately three times the angular size of the Sun, so the illumination of the rim only occurs because of atmospheric diffraction. This diffraction of sunlight is also responsible for the reddish light one sees during a lunar eclipse.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    7. Re:even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He's referring to something different. You are talking about the 'ring of diamond.' What he is talking would occur even if the earth's surface was smooth and the earth was large enough to fully occlude the sun.

    8. Re:even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I work, the company provides us with beer on Friday afternoons. It's not a small company either - over 9000 employees.

      And no silly limits like "2 each" either.

    9. Re:even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Slightly older, also showing an eclipse and the earth, but taken from the shadow of saturn is this Astronomy picture of the day.

    10. Re:even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello fellow Amazon employee.

    11. Re:even better by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Jeez, a beer or two at the end of the day's practically expected in my office. It's intended as a thank-you for those working a bit late. Very civil, I'm sure you'll agree.

      Unfortunately, we're making a whole lot of redundancies and they were announced today.

      It's purely a coincidence that the guy beside me was quietly tucking into a bottle of whisky over the course of the afternoon...

    12. Re:even better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I was waiting for the Heroes logo to appear.

    13. Re:even better by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      I might have beer right here at work.

      Actually, I believe it's called a Freudian slip.

      I might have been right here at work.

      There, fixed that for myself.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    14. Re:even better by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Holy moly, mod the parent here up, that picture is quite amazing!

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    15. Re:even better by Cantus · · Score: 1

      Ok, that was cringe-worthy.

    16. Re:even better by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Other than the fact that the size of the Earth appears as three times the size of the sun on the moon, I did know that. I mentioned that it was a similar effect, not the same cause. In Hebrew you could call the effect a "diamond ring" as the sun looks like a diamond and the moon completes the ring.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    17. Re:even better by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Yes, different cause, but same effect.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    18. Re:even better by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Dvorak user!

    19. Re:even better by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      I might have beer right here at work.

      I presume that was supposed to be 'been right here at work.' However, after the day I've had, a beer right here at work would be awesome right about now, can I come work with you?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  4. Hoax? by Leafheart · · Score: 1

    Why the hoax tag? There is no moon? Or have the tinfoil nutjobs awaken earlier today?

    --
    --- "When you gotta do something wrong. You gotta do it right. (Fighter)"
    1. Re:Hoax? by Metasquares · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's no moon...

    2. Re:Hoax? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Its either because some people still think we didn't land on the moon, some people were making fun of people who think we didn't land on the moon, or someone thinks that the images are photoshopped. Or just stills from "The Ring."

      My god... my phone just rang...

    3. Re:Hoax? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... it's the earth.

    4. Re:Hoax? by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      Why the hoax tag? There is no moon? Or have the tinfoil nutjobs awaken earlier today?

      Of course there is a moon... it's just that there isn't an earth.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    5. Re:Hoax? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Of course, there is no moon.

      The moon is a ridiculous liberal myth.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    6. Re:Hoax? by bugi · · Score: 3, Funny

      The hoax tag is for irony. This Japanese trip to the moon is real, in contrast to the 1969 USian trip that was faked.

    7. Re:Hoax? by viper34j · · Score: 1

      It's a space station!

    8. Re:Hoax? by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Funny

      No; it's a picture the sun, actually. I don't get the big deal about this stupid picture; there's a whole fuckin planet in the way!

    9. Re:Hoax? by tzot · · Score: 1

      The hoax tag is for irony. This Japanese trip to the moon is real, in contrast to the 1969 USian trip that was faked.

      Still, the American special FX were more realistic.

      --
      I speak England very best
    10. Re:Hoax? by spartacus_prime · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a schooner!

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    11. Re:Hoax? by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know what you mean. Earth blocking sun? Happens every night to me.

    12. Re:Hoax? by rk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ha ha, you dumb bastard. It's not a schooner, it's a SAILBOAT.

    13. Re:Hoax? by goncalo.lopes · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. Earth blocking sun? Happens every night to me.

      I live in the North Pole you insensitive clod!

  5. In related news by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 5, Funny

    The RIAA, on behalf of it's client Universal Media Studios, has issued a DMCA take down notice for the lunar orbiter's obvious infringement of the copyright of the opening credits to the television drama series Hereos.

    1. Re:In related news by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      New Godwin rule: all /. discussions inevitably end in the mention of DRM or the RIAA.

    2. Re:In related news by mackil · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I was about to suggest putting "Also sprach Zarathustra" to the video, but perhaps that would make matters worse.

    3. Re:In related news by Explodicle · · Score: 4, Funny

      the television drama series Hereos.

      Please don't correct him; Universal Media Studios has copyrighted the original word.

    4. Re:In related news by Gunnut1124 · · Score: 0

      It's not new, since RIAA and DRM and interchangeable with Nazis in most internet discussions.

      --
      America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
    5. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      End? It's only the beginning.

    6. Re:In related news by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh. I thought it was some kind of heroes-related Oreo. You know, like one side is Tracy, Daphne on the other, and I'm the stuffing!

      Okay I didn't think that's what he meant, I was thinking about the hero-sammich anyway.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:In related news by nschubach · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not just internet discussions...

      I would almost bet that you could find any newsprint from the WW2 era and replace Nazi with RIAA/MPAA, bomber/tank/troops with DRM and Jews with "hackers" and it would sort of make sense.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    8. Re:In related news by forand · · Score: 1

      Sadly they start with it not end.

    9. Re:In related news by tzjanii · · Score: 1

      Cue response taking offense at trivializing the Holocaust in three, two, one...

      --
      Slashdot is a pretty cool guy eh posts dupes and doesn't afraid of anything.
    10. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      finally more people realizing this is all Hollywood hubbub

    11. Re:In related news by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      I am outraged that you would trivialize the evil of DRM like this!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    12. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not just internet discussions...

      I would almost bet that you could find any newsprint from the WW2 era and replace Nazi with RIAA/MPAA, bomber/tank/troops with DRM and Jews with "hackers" and it would sort of make sense.

      "Medium's Appeal Ends

      "The hearing of the appeal of Mrs. Helen Duncan, the medium, against her conviction and sentence of nine months' imprisonment under the Witchcraft Act, 1785, concluded in the Court of Appeal yesterday.

      "Judgement will be given Monday week."

      Nope, I made all the replacements you asked and it doesn't make any sense at all.

    13. Re:In related news by bughunter · · Score: 1

      No, that would be Dogwin's Rule.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    14. Re:In related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a breakfast serial. Here O's. You eat them one at a time, of course.

    15. Re:In related news by eeyore · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...especially if your computer then doesn't let you back into the house.
      --
      E

  6. "Pudenda"?! 'scuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    FTFA: "A pudendal lunar eclipse is a phenomenon in which the Sun, Earth and Moon line up in tandem, hence the Moon is in the Earth's pudenda, or, when you look from the Moon, the Sun is partially covered by the Earth (partial eclipse.) During this phenomenon, the volume of sunlight to the Moon decreases, and the Moon's surface looks darker when you look at the Moon from the Earth. The KAGUYA, which circles around the Moon on its polar orbit, can witness this phenomenon only twice a year at most, thus it was very valuable to capture the moving images of the phenomenon from the KAGUYA."

    1. Re:"Pudenda"?! 'scuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camel toed eclipse anyone?

    2. Re:"Pudenda"?! 'scuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's PENUMBRA, at least in the version of the press release that I read. Get your mind out of the gutter.

    3. Re:"Pudenda"?! 'scuse me? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      And shortly after passing the pudenda, the Moon was then in the Earth's taint. The KAGUYA's cameras were turned off in order to avoid seeing what happened after that...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:"Pudenda"?! 'scuse me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get the antipodal sunlight just before the eclipse breaks. The earth is 4 time wider than the sun as seen from the moon. Why only antipodal if diffraction?

  7. (C)JAXA/NHK by Kushieda+Minorin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kono shashin wa JAXA to NHK goran no suponsaa no tei kyou de okurishimasu.

    1. Re:(C)JAXA/NHK by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's basically saying, in Japanese, that this picture was sponsored by JAXA (the Japanese space agency) and NHK (a Japanese television station). It's a joke.

      shashin = picture
      suponsaa = sponser
      okurishimasu = i'll send you, i'll forward to you

      This is the Japanese version of "brought to you by $SPONSORS" that any anime or Japanese television fan would recognize as they say it after the credits of nearly every show.

    2. Re:(C)JAXA/NHK by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      This is the Japanese version of "brought to you by $SPONSORS" that any anime or Japanese television fan would recognize as they say it after the credits of nearly every show.

      Assuming they're watching it in japan. I'm pretty sure when they bring shows over here they don't keep the ads. Which is a shame given that they're much wierder than the ones that we have over here.

    3. Re:(C)JAXA/NHK by aqk · · Score: 0

      In Japan all your satellites is belong to us!
      Izzat what he said?
      Wait- I think it really means "In US all your satellites is belong to JAPAN!"

      ..

  8. Terran Eclipse? by clintp · · Score: 4, Informative

    During a total solar eclipse (from the Earth's perspective), the ring of light around the moon is from the sun's photosphere showing around the edges of the moon.

    The ring around the earth in the solar eclipse (from the Moon's perspective) is from the light refracting from the atmosphere. I'd think the Earth's relative size would be far too large for an effect like Baily's Beads to be seen from the moon.

    Or am I missing something?

    --
    Get off my lawn.
    1. Re:Terran Eclipse? by mbone · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are correct. The Moon's angular size is close enough to the Sun's that some eclipses are annular (the Moon is too far away to cover the Sun). Even during a total eclipse, you can see the bright inner corona (not the photosphere - that's what makes it total).

      For lunar eclipses, the Earth will generally completely cover the Sun, inner corona and all. However, refraction through the Earth's atmosphere lights up the Lunar landscape, (i.e., the light of every Sun rise and Sun set going on everywhere on Earth). This light - the depth of the eclipse - has been used to infer global atmospheric conditions over historical time.

    2. Re:Terran Eclipse? by egghat · · Score: 1

      Hmm I still don't get it.

      Why is the picture completely black a the beginning. That sould be the state, where the sun is completely and in the middle behind the earth.

      Than we start beginning to see the sunlight through the atmosphere. This starts at the top and shortly after this forms about a half circle the sun "breaks through" but as it seems on the right, bottom side.

      Im puzzled. Does someone have a link to a good visualization/animation of this?

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
  9. Wonderful by joeyspqr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMHO video like that is all the justification we need for a space program. It would've better if there had been a someone there to see it with their eyes.

    --
    +1 fashionably cynical
    1. Re:Wonderful by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That would have been nasty. Sunlight unfiltered by the earth's atmosphere? You saw the way the light bloomed in the video. That would have made a mess of an astronaut's eyes. Well, and their face. :)

        (ya, ya, I know they have filtered shields on their helmets)

          And, we don't have the technology to dump that data back, so it would just have been his (or her) word "Oh, that was beautiful"

          Now, if they had done it with a better camera, I would have been more impressed. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Wonderful by nsayer · · Score: 1

      How do you figure that we humans are better off, collectively, that a dozen of us have walked on the moon?

      Now, before the flame fest begins, let me say that I do indeed agree that the space program has brought to mankind tremendous benefits in terms of knowledge and technology and on and on. That's not what I'm saying.

      Apart from the political statement, what was achieved by sending a human to the moon that we could not have achieved some other way?

      Neil Armstrong himself, is much better off. But there are more than 300,000,000 americans who are not Neil Armstrong. We're supposed to be satisfied with "You had to be there"?

  10. Pitch Dark by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    You were just eaten by a Grue.

    Also populated by space marines.

  11. Am I the only one by Triela · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...who watched the video and suddenly expected the USS Enterprise to appear from the center of the light?

    1. Re:Am I the only one by doti · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...who watched the video and suddenly had a flashback of the POV-Ray rendering window? (the first half of the video, that is)

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  12. Apollo 12 saw this first by mbone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apollo 12 went through a solar eclipse on the way back from the Moon, shortly after leaving Lunar Orbit.

    1. Re:Apollo 12 saw this first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you know what?

      I go through a solar eclipse every night! Can you imagine!!!1111!!!oneone

    2. Re:Apollo 12 saw this first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could tell if you're being sarcastic or just a moron...

    3. Re:Apollo 12 saw this first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say that as if one couldn't be both, sarcastic and a moron. Or was that - in true geek style - supposed to be a boolean algebra (i.e. inclusive) "or"?

    4. Re:Apollo 12 saw this first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just pick one. It doesn't really matter.

  13. Obligatory Pink Floyd Quote... by skinlayers · · Score: 1

    "There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact, its all dark. Its the sun that makes it light..."

  14. Conspiracies-R-Us... by geekmux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apollo 12 went through a solar eclipse on the way back from the Moon, shortly after leaving Lunar Orbit.

    Yeah, and we almost had it on video too, until some moron opened the emergency exit door on the lunar studio and ruined the whole shoot...

  15. POV changes, name doesn't. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This isn't a solar eclipse, this is a lunar eclipse.

    That's what it's called when the earth blocks the sunlight hitting the moon, which is what happened here.

    A solar eclipse is when the moon blocks the sunlight hitting the earth. (And would appear, from the moon, as a dark spot moving across the face of the earth.)

    Viewing it from the other place doesn't change the name of it. The names are not relative, they're legacy names that don't mean anything. (Otherwise a solar eclipse would be called an 'earth eclipse' or something.)

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    1. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Intron · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is a solar eclipse because the Sun is being obscured. In a lunar eclipse the Moon is being obscured. If you're on the moon there are no lunar eclipses.

      If things always have the same name regardless of where they are viewed, why can't I get to my home coputer by typing "localhost"?

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    2. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your logic doesn't really work. If the Earth obscuring sunlight from hitting the moon is a lunar eclipse regardless of where it's observed from...

      Wouldn't an eclipse where the moon blocks the sun be a, "Terran eclipse," regardless of where it's observed from? I mean, your system appears to be be, "That which receives less light is the eponym."

      For your logic to work, the only time a solar eclipse would be possible if it the sun got between the moon and the Earth.

      I think the fact that we have such a thing as solar eclipses in the first place disproves your theory. Eclipses are named for the object obscured to the viewer---whether that object is blocked or shadowed. It's whatever gets hidden.

      And that, of course, would be highly contingent on the observer.

    3. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (posted AC because i've already moderated in this discussion)

      You may be right; there was a lunar eclipse on Feb 9 2009 (see http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/OH/OH2009.html and other sources). In fact, TFM is headlined "...Earth at the Time of a Penumbral Lunar Eclipse...", so this is an error on the part of Slashdot.

      It makes sense to call it a solar eclipse, from the moon's POV, because it's the sun being eclipsed there. But thinking about it geometrically, I don't think there's a case where a solar-eclipse-from-the-moon occurs when there's not a lunar-eclipse-from-the-earth. Since the event can be observed from both places, it makes more sense to name it according to where most observers are.

    4. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      Actually, doesn't that make it a Terran eclipse, from the lunar point of view?

    5. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      What do we call the as-seen-from-the-moon side of a solar eclipse, and has it been photographed/filmed? AFAICT the angular diameters don't line up, so we should get a nice dark circle of moon shadow moving across the face of the earth. Hmm. Terrestrial transit?

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    6. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Partial Terran eclipse? I'm not straining my mind here as you can see.

    7. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      but the thing is they're all partial, so the term misleadingly implies that total terran eclipses exist

      i suppose if we ever get a serious off-planet population, we'll need a new terminology for eclipses that specifies at least two, and possibly all three, bodies involved (imagine all the transits you could see from a jovian moon colony)

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    8. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't an eclipse where the moon blocks the sun be a, "Terran eclipse," regardless of where it's observed from? I mean, your system appears to be be, "That which receives less light is the eponym."

      Well, yes, if we named things logically. We don't, or a 'solar eclipse' would be a 'Terran Eclipse' to start with. Even from earth.

      Arguing based on the names is like arguing that 'Postmodernism' is, by definition, impossible. Well, yes, if by 'modern' in that we actually meant 'present day'. However, what that's talking about is the style of art called 'Modernism', and Postmodernism is the style that came immediately after it.

      For your logic to work, the only time a solar eclipse would be possible if it the sun got between the moon and the Earth.

      No, that would be true if I was, in fact, asserting exactly the opposite of what I was asserting, that the names were logically related to what they were describing. They clearly aren't, hence the inability to change them around based on POV. There are no historical terms for describing things from the POV of someone on the moon, for obvious reasons.

      Just because something sounds like a scientific term doesn't mean we can just randomly use it as one, and 'solar eclipse' vs 'lunar eclipse' are not actually describing the same phenomenon with the sun and moon switched around. We don't actually have any term to describe 'the earth blocking your location from the sun' except 'night'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    9. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      In a lunar eclipse the Moon is being obscured.

      Um, no. The moon cannot be obscured from the earth. A lunar eclipse is when the earth blocks all sunlight from the moon.

      A lunar eclipse and a solar eclipse are not the same thing with the sun and moon flipped around, as people, including slashdot editors, seem to think.

      If things always have the same name regardless of where they are viewed,

      Nice strawman. I didn't say 'things' did, I said that these things did. Or, to put it more clearly, extrapolating the names we use on earth for these phenomenon to other locations is pretty stupid, considering the names we use on earth are pretty stupid.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Earth doesn't ever block sunlight from the moon, only to the moon.

    11. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      'blocks from' might have been a bit unclear. Although sane people might realize there's no such thing as 'sunlight from the moon', and I meant 'blocks all sunlight from reaching the moon', in the same way you'd say 'blocks the football player from the endzone'.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:POV changes, name doesn't. by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      Actually, doesn't that make it a Terran eclipse, from the lunar point of view?

      No, that would be a solar eclipse here on earth as viewed from the moon. You'd see the shadow of the moon crawling across the planet. (to match a lunar eclipse in nomenclature)

      This is a lunar eclipse (from the earth's point of view) as viewed from the moon, which makes it a solar eclipse from the point of view of the moon.

      There you go... clear as mud?

  16. Re:Ordinary by viper34j · · Score: 1

    Short answer: No, neither of those is correct. Long and poorly thought out answer: A typical full moon occurs once a month. When the moon is full, it is in a position that places the Earth between itself and the sun. The Earth is not directly between the Moon and Sun during a full moon obviously, because that would cause the Earth Eclipse of the Sun that we see in the video. But instead, it's orbit is offset by a given amount so that light travels past the Earth. Kinda hard to explain without a diagram, but if you could follow that then you'd see why the Earth's Eclipse of the Moon is not extremely common.

  17. Nice shot of the Big Dipper by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh wait, maybe that was dust on my monitor.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  18. How long... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    until the orbiter gives us some videos of the Apollo 11 landing site, footprints and all?

    The orbiter's on a polar orbit, right? So it should pass over it eventually.

  19. Needs more lensflare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think it looked like a bitmap drawing program from yesterdecade drawing a circle with dots?

  20. Obligatory Headline Quibble by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    First Solar Eclipse Recorded From Moon

    But wasn't the first solar eclipse a really long time ago?

    1. Re:Obligatory Headline Quibble by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      That's not a problem, they just moved the moon really far away to observe it.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:Obligatory Headline Quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a while for light to reach the moon.

  21. Save Versus Dork At -5. by saudadelinux · · Score: 1

    *rolls d20*
    4
    FAIL.
    This is amazingly cool footage. Hopefully they'll put the entire thing up.

    --
    I didn't think the house band in Hell would play this badly.
  22. You haven't seen this before?- NASA's Blue Marble by gblackwo · · Score: 1

    There are tons of high def pictures and video of these shots from NASA's blue marble project. The only slight difference is, the satellite isn't quite this far away, the photos however are way better.

  23. Fansubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fansubbers often leave them in. Not the advertising block of course, but the ad from the sponsor, which usually consists of a single image, overlaid on which the names or logos of the sponsors, to a background of the theme music of the series, while a usually female voice says something along the lines of what OP said. Or so I'm told.

    1. Re:Fansubs by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Okay, well then assuming either they watch it in japan, or get the fansubs and happen to speak japanese, because to a non-japanese speaker that's just going to sound like "blahblahblahblah." Speaking from experience, I do watch fansubs and only started remembering what they said when I started taking japanese.

      Another finding: the excuse for not doing your japanese homework "I'll just learn it by watching a lot of anime" is a whole lot more fun but absolutely does not work, at least for some people (sample size = 1).

    2. Re:Fansubs by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I contest that fact on a personal note. I know how to do all of the critical stuff in Japanese:

      1) Start fights
      2) End fights
      3) Hit on women
      4) Ask where the bathroom is
      5) Command words to transform into various magical girls

    3. Re:Fansubs by soupforare · · Score: 1

      5) Command words to transform into various magical girls

      So, uh, you doing anything tonight?

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    4. Re:Fansubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they were saying something about Christmas for a long time.

      bnlahblahbluhblah o' Christmas.

    5. Re:Fansubs by NexusJedi · · Score: 1

      An essay.

    6. Re:Fansubs by m50d · · Score: 1
      get the fansubs and happen to speak japanese, because to a non-japanese speaker that's just going to sound like "blahblahblahblah." Speaking from experience

      Your experience is not everything. I suspect that phrase is the first Japanese sentence many people learn (certainly was for me), simply because it's repeated, with exactly the same phrasing, so many times. You don't need to understand the language; any sound can be remembered after so many repetitions.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:Fansubs by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Trying to look for a girl to date, because I'm a guy. d:

      I grew up watching Sailor Moon, alright? Sailor Mercury was cute. haha

    8. Re:Fansubs by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Your experience is not everything.

      I didn't add enough qualifiers to that statement? I said "Speaking from experience... I... at least for some people... (sample size = 1)" What more do you want from me in terms of not overrepresenting my experience!?!

      I am trolling

      D'oh!

  24. The Eternal Sunset Point by Gorimek · · Score: 1

    Here's a tip for future space tourism operators:

    At some point in the permanent shadow behind the earth, you will see all the sunsets and sunrises on the planet at once, as a bright red ring. It should be an awesome sight, and is something no human has yet seen. The first travel operator who goes there will be able to charge a lot.

    I don't know how far out you'd have to be. From the pictures it looks like the Moon is too close.

    1. Re:The Eternal Sunset Point by niktesla · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an Arthur C. Clark short story "Transit of Earth" (I saw it in The Wind from the Sun http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wind_from_the_Sun)

      --
      I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
  25. HD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when was 480x270 "HDTV"?

  26. Stand by for Strauss and Monoliths by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    I have a sudden urge to play Also sprach Zarathustra.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  27. In before "Heroes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kring around the world...

    HeeeeEEEEEeeeeeeEEEEeeeeeeeEEEEEEeeeeee........

  28. Surveyor 3 by katakomb · · Score: 1

    Surveyor 3 recorded a fuzzy image of an eclipse from the lunar surface in 1967.

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2009/25feb_kaguyaeclipse.htm

  29. Commodore in Space by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    That movie starts out just like my TRS-80 graphics plots using parametric trig functions. I thot they stole my homework assignment from 1983 and was getting ready to hire a lawyer. Then I saw the bright glow of the sun popping thru, and thot "Nope, TRS no do that".
         

  30. Well now we know by jopsen · · Score: 1

    Well, now we know what man is suppose to do on the moon... :)

  31. It's a trap! by soupforare · · Score: 1

    I'm a guy. d:

    EVEN BETTER ;P

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?