Slashdot Mirror


The Finns Who Invented the Graphical Browser

waderoush writes "If you thought Mosaic was the first graphical Web browser, think again. In their first major interview, three of the four Finnish software engineers behind Erwise — a point-and-click graphical Web browser for the X Window system — describe the creation of their program in 1991-1992, a full year before Marc Andreessen's Mosaic (which, of course, evolved into Netscape). Kim Nyberg, Kari Sydänmaanlakka, and Teemu Rantanen, with their fellow Helsinki University of Technology student Kati Borgers (nee Suominen), gave Erwise features such as text searching and the ability to load multiple Web pages that wouldn't be seen in other browsers until much later. The three engineers, who today work for the architectural software firm Tekla, say they never commercialized the project because there was no financing — Finland was in a deep recession at the time and lacked a strong venture capital or angel investing market. Otherwise, the Web revolution might have begun a year earlier."

148 comments

  1. Correction. by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first web browser of all was WorldWideWeb.app, and it was a NeXTSTEP program. It was graphical from the beginning.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Correction. by mzemina · · Score: 1

      I agree with jcr - I used NeXT computers in the early 90's. The proof is what Tim Berner-Lee had to say on the first link that jcr supplied.

    2. Re:Correction. by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Informative
      This page seems to supply the key point that's missing from the linked article:

      Erwise was a popular web browser in the early days of the World Wide Web. At the time of its release in April 1992, one month prior to ViolaWWW, it was the world's first web browser with a graphical user interface for non-NeXT computers.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Correction. by pergamon · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Maybe they'd have the record for the second one, though.

    4. Re:Correction. by Cruxus · · Score: 1

      Yes, this much is well known. It looks like in the About... box for Erwise they even call it "WorldWideWeb / browser / for the X Window System". They obviously modeled after WorldWideWeb/Nexus for the NeXTStep.

      --
      On vit, on code et puis on meurt.
    5. Re:Correction. by lastchance_000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, you're saying that it was the first browser, except for the first one. Got it.

    6. Re:Correction. by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good post.

      What do you call other Hypertext/clickable graphics interfaces like Q-Link (1985) and ANSI (circa 1987)? Is the only key difference between them and a web browser that they were limited to Phoneline connections & not internet connections?

      Aside -

      What to see what BBSing in the late 80s/early 90s was like? Then click here for a demo - the only difference is that our speeds were about one-tenth as fast (1k or 2k modem) - http://www.flashterm.com/

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, the headline is inflammatory. These Finns didn't invent the web browser. GUI or otherwise.

    8. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the only difference is that our speeds were about one-tenth as fast (1k or 2k modem)

      Since you refer to modem speeds as "1k or 2k" then I suspect you weren't really part of that era.

    9. Re:Correction. by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      WorldWideWeb.app was the first written for NeXt (and first one, period). Erwise was was the first one written for Unix. And Cello (or Mosaic?) was the first one written for Windows. You can try and parse it all you like, but you'll still have to give an American at least some of the credit. Sorry to spoil the pissing contest.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Correction. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      110 baud - skipped that one
      300 baud - acoustic coupler, for phones they don't make anymore.
      2400 - no more phone cups!
      9600 - almost too fast to read (still 80x25 char screens)
      14.4K, maybe 28.8K... I forget. Went to cable around then and never looked back.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    11. Re:Correction. by retchdog · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I had a 300bps non-acoustic coupler modem. It plugged into the cartridge slot of my C=64. There was a 1200bps, but we couldn't afford it. 2400bps was the stuff of legend and I think (?) the absolute limit of the C=64 serial port was 9600. How could it be so fast?! ;-)

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    12. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey C64 geek, stop tying up the phone lines! What if there's an emergency or something!? I don't care if it's 300 baud, type your A-Team fan fiction faster!!!!

    13. Re:Correction. by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Hayes Pocket 2400 baud inline modem, FTW!

    14. Re:Correction. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      >>>Since you refer to modem speeds as "1k or 2k" then I suspect you weren't really part of that era.

      Dear AC: It's called rounding. I chose to round to 1k and 2k instead of saying 1.2k and 2.4k to keep my post easy to understand for readers. Clear? Good. Also if you still have doubts I was part of the era, look at my name. (Hint- Commodore=64 was an 80s computer which used 300, 1200, and 2400 baud modems. Yes I was there.)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    15. Re:Correction. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>9600 - almost too fast to read (still 80x25 char screens)

      Wow you read fast! At the time most magazines referred to 300 bit/s modems as "reading speed". I could read slightly faster than that, but not as fast as 1200 which zipped across at about one line per 2 seconds. I couldn't keep up.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    16. Re:Correction. by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      P.S.

      >>>14.4K, maybe 28.8K... I forget. Went to cable around then and never looked back

      Lucky dude. I was using dialup modems right up to 2007, when they finally installed DSL for $15 a month. I could have gone with cable as early as 1997, but the $120 cost was outrageous. Even now I think $50 a month is too high, and I wish Comcast would offer a lower price tier.

      If anybody cares (and they probably don't) the official V. standards are:

      300 bit/s 300 baud
      1200 bit/s 600 baud
      2400 bit/s 600 baud or 1200 baud
      4800 bit/s 1200 baud
      9600 bit/s 2400 baud

      14400 bit/s 2400 baud
      28800 bit/s 3200 baud
      33600 bit/s 3429 baud
      56000 bit/s (digital) 8000 baud

      With compression most of those modems could get more than 3 times their true speed (i.e. 56000 acted like 150,000+). I've owned all of those except the 300 and 4800 modems. I don't know anyone who had 4800. It's interesting how most of the speed increase came from, not increasing baud, but new modulation methods that could better tolerate the noise.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    17. Re:Correction. by IMightB · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get off my Lawn!

      I had to whistle into the phone in my day....

      Actually my first was a 300baud with accoustic coupler....

    18. Re:Correction. by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Heheh, I didn't contribute much apart from an excited and barely-coherent review of "Platoon" (which is an awesome game on the C=64 by the way). Mostly I downloaded SID tunes and crappy free-/shareware games.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    19. Re:Correction. by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I know this is off topic, but I figured you might have some insight on this. I remember years ago a friend of mine was at my house and was shocked how "slow" my 2400 bit/s modem was on my 386 compared to his 300 bit/s modem on his C64. I've always wondered if this was true or him just trying to overstate his C64. I never had a modem on my C64 so I really had nothing to compare. I also wonder if it had to do with complexity of BBS software and/or ANSI art between the late 80s vs the early 90s. Any thoughts on this?

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    20. Re:Correction. by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      This all really reaks of "holy shit, people could build a GUI in 1990?" FWIW... it's not the web it's browsing, but apple beat them on the concept by 4 years.

    21. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ha! I've compiled firefox from sources, and it's the firs browser ever released for the computer with cpuid ABE12323FD6554 (AMD)

    22. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dough Englebert beat apple by two decades. Please keep your Apple Fanboyism in check. KTHX.

    23. Re:Correction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about 1200/75?

    24. Re:Correction. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Holy cow! From that screenshot Tim Berners-Lee was apparently also working on a complete rip-off of WindowMaker!

    25. Re:Correction. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any reason why a 2400 speed modem on an 80386 would be slower than a 300 speed on a 6502 Commodore. I suspect your friend was exaggerating, because 300 is very, very slow and I doubt your 2400 modem was running slower than that.

      I upgraded from a 1200 C=64 to a 2400 Amiga (68000), and as you would expect, it was twice as fast.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    26. Re:Correction. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, it sounds like the definition of "first" as popularised by Apple :) ("First GUI! ... except for the first", "First 64-bit PC! ... except for the first").

    27. Re:Correction. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      And then there also were the great Trailblazers, 19200K !
      Asymetric though, can't remember what the downlink speed was. We used those between UUCP nodes back in 2400 days.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  2. Re:I Invented by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    (citation needed)

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  3. Ideas worth a cent a docen. by Tei · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ideas = shit.

    You can have a good idea. Who cares? everyone have good ideas. Worth nothing. If you can implement something, that is something, but still not enough. It takes much more to win.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

    1. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly right. The ones who capitalize and profit are hardly ever the same ones that originally come up with the ideas that drive the industry. In fact, the visionaries who come up with truly revolutionary ideas often have to sacrifice wealth in order to see their ideas succeed. In financial terms, ideas are liabilities.

    2. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No the problem is that there is a difference between a problem-solver and a visionary.

      A problem-solver comes up with a solution to a specific problem. The genesis of Cello, for example, was one guy saying to himself "I need a windows-based program that can access legal sites in html" and then solving the problem.

      But it takes a visionary to realize when a solution has a much great potential. It was Marc Andreessen (and guys like him) who came along and said "You know, a Windows based browser could have a general appeal beyond just some specialized applications. We could actually sell this thing and start a revolution."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having ideas. It's like pissing in an ocean of piss.

    4. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A problem-solver comes up with a solution to a specific problem. The genesis of Cello, for example, was one guy saying to himself "I need a windows-based program that can access legal sites in html" and then solving the problem.

      Which is not to say Tom Bruce, author of Cello, wasn't ALSO a visionary; the Legal Information Institute he founded in the early days of the web (thus creating the need for his web browser for lawyers' Win3.1 PCs in the first place) is perhaps the foremost reference site on the Constitution of the United States and related issues, and it didn't come to be that way by chance.

      Andreesen's vision happened to involve making a pile of money; Bruce's did not.

    5. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Microsoft Internet Explorer, the browser that currently dominates by a large margin? What great visionary gift did its creator bring to the table?

    6. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The vision to become the dominant OS maker many years earlier, of course.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Ideas worth a cent a docen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Ideas worth a cent a docen

      How many ideas in a docen?

  4. ha ha by LurkingOnSlashdot · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you thought Erwise was the first graphical Web browser, think again.

  5. Hypercard by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why not just say Hypercard was the first graphical browser?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Hypercard by Calsar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it wasn't. The first hypertext system was the Hypertext Editing System created in 1967. The first graphical browser with point and click interface was the NLS system which was part of the Augment project created in 1968 by Doug Engelbart. There weren't any point and click inteface before then because he also created the mouse as part of that project.

    2. Re:Hypercard by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Because the article specifically says WEB browser?

      Hypercard has got to be one of the first ever implementations of the "hypertext" concept, though. Not applicable to this article, alas.

    3. Re:Hypercard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh what about Sketchpad? Or SAGE?

    4. Re:Hypercard by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hypercard has got to be one of the first ever implementations of the "hypertext" concept, though.

      Not even close. HyperCard was originally released with System Software 6 in 1987. Douglas Engelbart demonstrated a working hypertext system almost twenty years earlier, in 1968.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:Hypercard by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Hypercard has got to be one of the first ever implementations of the "hypertext" concept, though.

      Not even close. HyperCard was originally released with System Software 6 in 1987. Douglas Engelbart demonstrated a working hypertext system almost twenty years earlier, in 1968.
      --

      The myth ain't busted 'till Savage and Hyneman blow something up.

      Since Savage and Hyneman haven't blown anything up yet, I think that the myth still stands.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
  6. Explains... by tulcod · · Score: 1

    Explains why the guys didn't start any lawsuits yet.

  7. Re:?tsop tsrif by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ?täsoopiyauo tsauyriifäää

    I'm sorry, this is a story about Finns. Corrected that for you.

  8. About the same time as Amiga Guide by McNihil · · Score: 1

    Common... a graphical "gopher" was just a natural step. Hardly news worthy.

  9. Ah, the lack of history. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, first of all, Douglas Engelbart, for one, demonstrated a live audio video system over a network, and it had a graphical interface--this was in the 1960s, that is, long before this silly, narrow application of ideas anyway.

    End this silly credit hogging nation wanking, like if we're making new religions. Let's not make it into one. Move on. There was never anything to see anyway..

  10. Nothing at CERN? by olddotter · · Score: 1

    Since HTTP was thought up at CERN, did they not have a browser? Or was it just text based?

    1. Re:Nothing at CERN? by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They used WorldWideWeb.app which is for NeXT.

  11. Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Informative

    Eric Bina wrote just as much code as Andressen. And Andressen later had help from several other UI students.

    Also, nobody thinks Mosaic was the first. If anything, the card these Finns trump is Tim Bruce, who wrote Cello.

    This is worse than Bill Gates inventing the personal computer, when all he did was steal CP/M. Let's do a little better at getting history correct.

    1. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Beaten hollow by first browser written by Tim Berners-Lee
          It was the First Browser
          the First Graphical Browser
          the first HTML Editor
          the First Multi window Browser

      The only claim I can see here is Non-NeXT or maybe tabbed .... (NeXT did windows not tabs)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Cue some European chiming in about how a European programmer did it earlier and better than Thomas Bruce too, in...3...2...1...

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    3. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]Cue some European chiming in about how a European programmer did it earlier and better than Thomas Bruce too, in...3...2...1...[/quote]

      Don't worry they didn't. RIP was first. RIP scripts were an extension to the PC BBS system at that time that let you use a special RIP graphics terminal. This let bbs have actual graphics menus and games *with* mouse support. It supported an icon system and everything.

    4. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun rises in the East so us Europeans were before you and the , oh wait! Alaska. Could Sarah Palin have invented the Web Browser?

    5. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by deKernel · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is worse than Bill Gates inventing the personal computer, when all he did was steal CP/M. Let's do a little better at getting history correct.

      No offense, but Bill Gates did not steal CP/M. He had the smarts and vision to purchase a product called 86-DOS when other people thought that home computers would be nothing but toys.

      Now I say this as someone who is typically critical of shear number of flaws in Windows and the BILLIONS of dollars spent to develop that ship-wreck. You might not like his products, but you can't argue with his early business savvy.

    6. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by westlake · · Score: 1
      This is worse than Bill Gates inventing the personal computer, when all he did was steal CP/M. Let's do a little better at getting history correct.

      Fair enough.

      But Microsoft was there in the beginning, with the Altair.

      In the eight-bit era, MBASIC was the glue that held dozens of incompatible systems together.

      By 1980 Microsoft was offering a full range of languages for the micro - and poised to move into other markets.

      As for CP/M:

      Microsoft promised to deliver a serviceable OS in time for the projected launch of the IBM PC.

      That it would be based on someone's home-brewed 16-bit "mod" of CP/M was more or less a given.

      Microsoft was prepared to - quickly - negotiate a non-exclusive deal that would keep the retail price below 50 bucks.

      This wasn't the kind of talk IBM was hearing from Digital Research.

      The MSDOS PC was a singularly versatile platform - an office workhorse that found its way into the home and to the shop room floor.

    7. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cue Ensign Chekov chiming in about how a Russian programmer did it earlier and better than ANYONE, in ...3....2...1..

    8. Re:Whoa! Andressen != MOSAIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [quote]The sun rises in the East so us Europeans were before you and the , oh wait![/quote]

      Don't be dumb. You're assumption that I'm not from any part of Europe may actually be false. Truth hurts doesn't it?

  12. Opera Was First! by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Despite the company and browser not existing at the time, I can confidently say that Opera had all these features before Erwise. There will be naysayers, of course.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:Opera Was First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the sort-of-parent-company was founded in 1855.

  13. Interesting... by motang · · Score: 1

    Wow and we all though it was Mosaic!

  14. When an American is credited with an invention by elrous0 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why is it that, everytime someone credits an American with something, some European must immediately chime in with "Oh no, Ludwig Von Whogivesashit did it first!" Even my black nationalist friend (who insists that the black man invented almost everything), cuts us evil white Americans SOME slack.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What bugs me to some extent on this note, even though you were modded down (Which a good 50% of the time here is a pack of pricks just causing trouble)?

      Is that folks from other nations may "hate on us", but, they fail to realize something: THIS NATION IS COMPOSED OF THEIR NATIONALS WHO MIGRATED HERE, thus, i.e.? We ARE they also.

      Now - I can understand disliking the U.S.A. in some of its governmental policies (especially the BUSH administration, thank God they are gone now), but, not its people as a whole.

      I've been called all kinds of racial slurs in my time, because of my bloodline, & realize it's crap: There are GOOD people of all types, and BAD people of all types, & good & bad? Just points of view.

      APK

    2. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been abroad very much, but in my few travels I have never experienced any of this "hate". I'm starting to suspect that it does not exist. Just as we supposedly hate the French ("Freedom Fries" anyone?) the anti-American sentiment may be the product of media and government posturing.

    3. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been abroad plenty, and the only place I have experienced the "hate" is on discussion boards. It's sort of similar to the way I almost never hear anyone shouting "First!" during a normal day.

    4. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      It's rare, but exists. My theory is that 99% of people in most groups are nice, but the 1% give that group a bad reputation. Rather than paint a whole group with a reputation, I've just decide that 1% of people are jerks no matter where you go.

      In a decade of traveling internationally, the only 2 examples of hated towards Americans I can recall:

      1) Nearly got my ass kicked by some old drunk guy for saying hi to a girl in a pub in Sydney (not hitting on her, saying hi). From his foul mouthed commentary, he didn't seem to like Americans and decided it was time to take one out. Eventually he chilled out and everyone else in Australia I ever met was cool.

      2) Despite smooth flying, the pilot never turned of the seatbelt sign on a flight from Paris to Atlanta on Air France. After being stuck in our seats for almost 4 hours, the girl next to me was having some serious bladder issues. In serious pain and begging the flight attendant to let her go to the bathroom. After listening to a short commentary from the attendant on how despicable Americans are, he finally let her go.

      So my 1% is rounded up.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    5. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by egomaniac · · Score: 1

      I was in Russia recently, and while the vast majority of Russians were extremely nice to me, some random guy on the subway cussed me the fuck out.

      I was just standing there minding my own business and idly chatting with a coworker when this guy just starts laying into me. I don't speak Russian so I have no idea what he was actually saying, but it's not hard to tell when somebody is saying something extremely unpleasant to you even if you don't speak the language. Plus there were liberal sprinklings of "Americano" and mock spitting. I was half expecting him to throw a punch.

      So yes, most people most places are pretty nice, but I've run into more than one asshole who hates me for no other reason than my nationality.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    6. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Oh, but not anymore/there were often differences between the population that stayed and the one that emigrated (nevermind an argument "the mix is more than sum of its parts", it's hard to quantify it in any way...).

      Actually, often those very differences were the reason for migration.

      Which in some cases ended up quite good for the US, for example immigration of people that on one hand were excluded from success (because in the past more than now success didn't depend on you, much more on the social role in which you were placed), which didn't neccesarilly change after migrating...but on the other they were quite motivated/etc. (even now changing continents is quite a big deal...). Heck, one of the reasons Poland is now so messed up is that intellectuals who weren't forcibly moved to Syberia in XIX/beginning of XX century or simply later killed by Soviets & Nazis...emigrated, also to US.

      Though...there's still some fallout you have from those differences/reasons for migration...most notably, I think, because large part of it was religiously motivated. Now, granted, in many cases we would brand those who emmigrated as closer to us on moral/etc. terms, but the truth is...basically EVERY religious group from back then could be described today as religious nutjobs. For some reason (easier isolation of such groups from external influence?) "nutjob" views largery survived in the US, while Europe, thankfully, menaged to get rid of them, largery... (though not completely; using previous example - they're still, unfortunatelly, prevailing in Poland; but it's worth to note that they're much less extreme and out of touch with reality than those among immigrant Poles in US - when interacting with them, I have the impression I'm talking to my grandparents, in regards to moral views/politics/etc.)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's not really about individuals.

      It's more what people think about your country as a whole in comparison to what they were thinking 10 of 15 years ago - back then you were the model everybody loved and aspired to, with a lot of power throughout the world but putting that power in a good use.

      Now, often, you're just an overwight bully.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Russia is a special case though...not only they never forgot their aspirations for beeing the most powerfull superpower, don't forget that even for a second.

      But also...it was largery you, Americans, who beat them at that aspiration. Not only that, you also caused a major setback. And that's just on a "national pride" level...also don't forget for a second that many Russians think they were better of during USSR era (and in many cases that's quite correct, nevermind typical nostalgia for the times when one was young)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is true, why shouldn't it be pointed out?

    10. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      For the thousandth time, the idea that the U.S. was founded by a bunch of religious wackjobs looking to establish a "City on a Hill" is a myth. This was ONLY true of the New England colonies. The middle and southern colonies (you know, little settlements like Jamestown, New York, Philadelphia, etc.) were secular settlements populated by settlers interested in economic, not religious, opportunity. This makes the whole "and they've somehow survived to this day" argument even more laughable--because the former New England colonies are today some of the most secular and liberal areas of the country, whereas the former secular southern colonies have become some of the most religiously conservative (this has to do with historical movements like the Great Awakening, the north/south church schisms of the Civil War, and the Restorationist movement, etc. that took place LONG after the U.S. was founded).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'm just glad no one has ever rickrolled me in real life either.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:When an American is credited with an invention by sznupi · · Score: 1

      You missed one important part of my post, when I said that back then practically EVERY social group would be described by us as religious wackjobs - so in the case of US that includes not only New England of the past, but also those "secular" settlements. They were secular only to the degree that was possible back then, in both Europe and US, but...from our point of view, still nutjobs.

      And you can't really argue with me that this didn't survive in the US to a much greater degree then in general Europe - I feel the pain too, I see it every day, living in one of the few countries that, especially in this regard, don't fit into EU at all. Actually you even mention unfortunate events that allowed it to survive in the US (yeah, in different parts...so?), I might look into them out of curiosity when time allows.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  15. whatever... by The+Mayor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To tell you the truth, I had never heard of Erwise until today. A have a few questions about Erwise:
    - Did it support graphics other that XBM?
    - Did it render HTML, or some other markup language?

    I did some consulting for a company called HyperMedia Corporation in 1991-92. As part of that work, I watched closely the development of HTML, NCSA Mosaic, and the lot. HMC's markup language was proprietary and binary. The first thing that struck me about HTML was the ease of editing--you didn't need a dedicated editor. Then, I remember seeing early builds of NCSA's browser (to become Mosaic) when they first added, IIRC, gif support. I remember being absolutely floored with the ability to create attractive content in only a few minutes. My first thought after seeing it was, "I need to find a new job!" Sure enough, within a few months HMC was out of business.

    The end result is that there were many factors that led to the success of NCSA Mosaic and Netscape. First, Mosaic ran on platforms other than the X Window System, so it was more accessible. Second, it was among the first to support usable graphics (i.e. not XBM), at least on an accessible platform (Emacs' browser & WorldWideWeb.app had early image support, too, but both were on platforms that had very narrow distribution possibilities). Third, it used standard HTML.

    Erwise might have had all of these, with the one caveat that it supported only Unix/X Window System. Hard to say from this article. However, I think it's a little simplistic to say that funding was the only thing holding these guys back from Netscape-like success.

    --
    --Be human.
    1. Re:whatever... by The+Mayor · · Score: 1

      OK, just realized the article has 3 pages :-). Looks like it did render HTML. The rest still holds.

      --
      --Be human.
  16. Mosaic -- Netscape? by elecmahm · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure NCSA's Mosaic "evolved" into "Internet Explorer". Netscape's rendering engine was developed separately, wasn't it?

    1. Re:Mosaic -- Netscape? by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure NCSA's Mosaic "evolved" into "Internet Explorer".

      Not really, at least not directly. Check this:

      Spyglass licensed the technology and trademarks from NCSA for producing their own web browser but never used any of the NCSA Mosaic source code. Microsoft licensed Spyglass Mosaic in 1995 for US$2 million, modified it, and renamed it Internet Explorer. After a later auditing dispute, Microsoft paid Spyglass $8 million. The 1995 user guide The HTML Sourcebook: The Complete Guide to HTML, specifically states in a section called Coming Attractions, that Explorer "will be based on the Mosaic program" (p. 331). Versions of Internet Explorer before version 7 stated "Based on NCSA Mosaic" in the About box. Internet Explorer 7 was audited by Microsoft to ensure that it contained no Mosaic code, and thus no longer credits Spyglass or Mosaic.

    2. Re:Mosaic -- Netscape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      little question do the initial releases of netscape navigator and internet explorer all had NCSA MOSAIC as parent (nn directly and ie via spyglass' enhanced version) ?

  17. Real men use gopher... by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Real men use gopher... by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      And WAIS. Real Men use Gopher and WAIS. And Archie. Real Men use Gopher and WAIS and Archie. And the Spanish Inquisition.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:Real men use gopher... by rytier · · Score: 1
      --
      --- Naive inside, foolish outside...:)
    3. Re:Real men use gopher... by cheros · · Score: 1

      and 'talk'.., and in general shell accounts.

      IMHO, XWindows was only invented to get more command lines on one screen...

      --
      Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    4. Re:Real men use gopher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually miss the days when one could browse the web in a terminal without any pain. Links/lynx etc, just don't cut it for most html pages.

      I don't need any flashy, ajaxy content. I want to browse the information in a way so that the information is the main thing.

    5. Re:Real men use gopher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XWindows was only invented...

      It's called the X Window System, not "XWindows".

    6. Re:Real men use gopher... by AaxelB · · Score: 1

      And the Spanish Inquisition.

      Huh, I didn't expect that.

  18. So... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who are they suing?

    1. Re:So... by larjon · · Score: 1

      Who are they suing?

      Now, now, these are Finns we're talking about.

      They just clench their fists in their pockets, mumble something about "perkele, saatana", have a sip of Koskenkorva and move on...

      --
      $> cd /pub
      $> more beer
  19. Re:I Invented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ni!

  20. Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WorldWideWeb 1.0 had a windowed, point-and-click UI, so it would be "graphical" compared to, say, Lynx.

    The real title of "first graphical browser" goes to whichever application first displayed inline graphics on a page. I'm not sure exactly which one this was...NCSA Mosaic often gets credit for this, but the feature was also added to later versions of ViolaWWW and WorldWideWeb.

    Inline graphics were a major factor in the success of the Web over existing internet hypertext systems like Gopher.

    1. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by Dishevel · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gopher RULED!

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    2. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The real title of "first graphical browser" goes to whichever application first displayed inline graphics on a page.

      That would be the browser that invented the <img> tag.

      Mosaic.

    3. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by carlzum · · Score: 1

      I remember using Mosaic as Gopher client, which I used more than the WWW in my early college days. Other browsers may have supported the protocol, but by the time I starting using Netscape, Gopher's time had passed.

    4. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be the NextSTEP based browser - the first one by Tim.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WorldWideWeb_screenshot.gif

      Talk about poorly informed revisionist history.

      Can't someone fix this post. It's inaccurate as hell.

    5. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WorldWideWeb was updated to support the img tag after Mosaic introduced it. Dumbass.

    6. Re:Depends on what you mean by "Graphical" by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Gopher RULED!

      Because with Gopher you could use Veronica !
      (which sounds a bit better than "Google" IMO)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  21. Graphical BBS Terminal Client by monk · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else remember Roboterm? It was a graphical BBS terminal client (which would show downloaded graphics when talking to a roboterm board). Neat but proprietary:

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    1. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I still have an installable copy of RoboFX.

    2. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      Yes, I ran a Roboterm BBS for a few years, it was miles ahead of regular text/ANSI graphics based BBS software, although it did require a proprietary client (that you could download for free of course) and that turned some people off.

      Its funny that I hadn't ever thought of Roboterm as a precursor to HTML in any way. It was a very clever system and really easily configured etc.

      Sadly, when the WWW emerged, the BBS died a slow death, but something was lost then as well. BBSes created a sense of community that is missing in a web environment.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    3. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is this software not presented in a VM for the WWW user to experience? That would be cool . . .

    4. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. There used to be different areas where people could discuss a certain topic. They even had the ability to use creative user names instead of their real names! I wish we still had that...

    5. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think his "community" included the physical realm. BBS users often lived near each other and met each other in real life. Online fora today don't often offer this unless they're very large, because the user base is typically spread out over a large geographical area. Small, geographically concentrated online communities were the main province of the BBS.

    6. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by silent_artichoke · · Score: 1

      I know, I was just being an ass. I used to live in a small town between a couple larger towns. It was a local call for them to call me, but long distance for them to call each other. I ran a pretty active WWIV board for a few years there. The location made it perfect for bringing users in those towns together.

    7. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      Any chance of maybe having a look at that? I'd love to get something like that running.

    8. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      When someone logs into my website, I don't hear the modem fire off, with the distinctive sound of a successful handshake, hear my wife groan as I get out of bed to go see who was logging in. Nor can I interrupt their browsing to chat with them directly.

      Yes, I can make a website that lets me know when someone has loaded a page, and I can even venture to say I could make a chat box that appears and lets me chat with them given some time playing with AJAX and php, but its not the same thing, nor does it have the same atmosphere.

      As well the other guy who was saying I knew the people in real life was partially true as well. Also the internet wasn't generally available, and BBSes provided a means of communicating world wide on a relatively massive basis with things like Fidonet etc. It was a kind of a special community in that regard, whereas everyone and their dog uses the web these days.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    9. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by monk · · Score: 1

      I ran a Telegard (and later Renegade) board, but I enjoyed visiting the Roboterm boards in town. I really miss the sound of that modem connect sometimes.

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
    10. Re:Graphical BBS Terminal Client by monk · · Score: 1

      There's a link for binaries at the same site as the review. I haven't tried them, but it's a place to start.

      --
      [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  22. Re:?tsop tsrif by Jonah+Bomber · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What is it with the Finns inventing ubiquitous computer software?

  23. The Slashdot story is misleading... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thank you for saying that. The Slashdot story is misleading, as often happens. The story says "... a full year before Marc Andreessen's Mosaic...". But there were huge discussions of Hypertext long before that. It was clear that Hypertext would be implemented anywhere it could be used. What those who wrote the first internet browsers did was implement an old idea for the internet.

    Flashterm makes me laugh.

    1. Re:The Slashdot story is misleading... by Anthony_Cargile · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hypertext even goes back to the sixties, where I've seen machines from that era utilize a primitive form of hypertext, even going so far as using a lightpen in conjunction with hypertext on a screen for somewhat graphically highlighting text, before the personal computer was even thought of. So yes, hypertext goes waaay back.

    2. Re:The Slashdot story is misleading... by DavidApi · · Score: 1

      Yes, Hypertext was not new in 1993 or even 1991-1992. Hypercard had pretty much the same function set as a web browser (except of course, the network aspect). And before that, other software "knew" about

    3. Re:The Slashdot story is misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not so much the story is misleading as much as it is the guy kdawson, he seems to be very resentful towards the U.S. and constantly inserts revisionist history towards America.

      His articles are constantly a little subliminal snide remark

  24. +1, Sad by XanC · · Score: 1

    n/t

  25. YES NO ONE SAW THIS COMING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never mind that way back when a farmer named Filo Farnsworth, the real inventor of television envisioned the use of a glass screen for viewing content.

    Then like some bolt of inspiration from the sky the need to have some sort of graphical interface was "invented" out of sheer genius since no one EVER foresaw the need to view any content within this glass bubble and on the screen in any other way that the way ALL content is viewed today be it TV or PC or Cell etc.

          I mean it wasn't obvious at all

  26. Lemmke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Whoever was the conduit, Berners-Leeâ(TM)s request attracted the attention of the Finnsâ(TM) instructor, Ari Lemmke, who suggested the group start to work on it or âoesomething Linux-related.â They chose the browser."

    Article fails to mention that their instructor, Ari Lemmke named Linux

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ari_Lemmke

  27. Re:Ninne Labs was first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately, the stock for Ninnle labs tanked after it was found that everyone who ever supported it was a douchebag, and liked to spam forums about their products. Shortly thereafter, the company folded, leaving only a bunch of fanboys to talk about the good ol days.

  28. Info files and man pages by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The venerable Unix info files and even man pages also do the same thing. Web browsers was a logical improvement of existing ideas. It was not evolutionary, not revolutionary.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Info files and man pages by dkf · · Score: 1

      The venerable Unix info files and even man pages also do the same thing. Web browsers was a logical improvement of existing ideas. It was not evolutionary, not revolutionary.

      Sometimes, the evolutionary is revolutionary. What happens is that a small advance leads to a phase change; things go from being obscure to being world-beating. It's happened before, it will happen again.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  29. Simple Reason by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    They didn't get credit because they never Finnished it.

    -1 Slur

  30. Re:I Invented by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    How dare you, saying NI to an old woman?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  31. Re:Ninnle Labs was first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh no! You're sadly mistaken!

    Ninnle Labs is still very much a going concern. Haven't you tried the new Ninnle Office yet?

  32. Yup, the money bias. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And the thing is, Andreesen's vision wasn't particularly novel or innovative; everything he thought up was already out there, read the other posts in this thread. The world without him would be almost exactly the same; Andreesen might as well not have existed at all. The only difference between him and your next door neighbour is that he took something and had good enough PR to tie his nametag to it. And his case isn't unique. The more I learn from history the more I see that most of the names you come by belong to persons who played a part, often forced by the circumstances, that might as well have been played by someone else. It smacks of hero worship and I don't care much for it.

  33. Prior art to rip down current copywrong by n0tWorthy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can any of this prior art be used to tear apart the existing thousands of software copyrights that have been issued to MS, Sun, IBM, ...? It may not have been commercialized or even copyrighted but if it existed before the Copyright trolls got to it then maybe some of this mess can be undone.

    --
    "Be kind, for everyone you meet is facing a great battle." - Philo of Alexandria -
  34. WWW might have begun a year earlier? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or if they tried to profit off it, might have never happened at all.

    The openness of the early days is why we have it today.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  35. My First Graphical User Interface by tlinget · · Score: 1

    I created one back in May of 1967. I used Crayola Crayons (tm) and several sheets of paper. My mom published them up on the fridge.

  36. It was the first COMPLETE web browser.. by raehl · · Score: 1

    The moment they started working on it they were Finnish...ed.

    I'll be here all week.

  37. IE: Alfa and Omega by dblackshell · · Score: 1

    to be noted that the "true" history of graphical web browsers started (and will end) with IE...

    "Internet Explorer: what page do you want to rape today?"

    --
    $god = null;
    if($god) echo 'I believe!';
  38. I've seen "auditing" before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd put no more credibility in Microsoft's audit of IE than in SCO's audit of Linux.

  39. Lost opportunity by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    > Otherwise, the Web revolution might have begun a year earlier.

    OMG! You mean I could have been using myspace a year earlier and I'd have twice as many friends by now?! We could have had lolcats twelve months earlier and my application in the lolcat programming language would already be finished?! It's like a year of my life has been stolen. Who do I sue?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  40. IE6 by Samah · · Score: 1
    From the "About" box in IE6:

    Based on NCSA Mosaic. NCSA Mosaic(TM); was developed at the National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Distributed under a licensing agreement with Spyglass, Inc. Contains security software licensed from RSA Data Security Inc. Portions of this software are based in part on the work of the Independent JPEG Group. Multimedia software components, including Indeo(R); video, Indeo(R) audio, and Web Design Effects are provided by Intel Corp. Unix version contains software licensed from Mainsoft Corporation. Copyright (c) 1998-1999 Mainsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Mainsoft is a trademark of Mainsoft Corporation. Warning: This computer program is protected by copyright law and international treaties. Unauthorized reproduction or distribution of this program, or any portion of it, may result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.

    Seems Netscape is not the only one?

    --
    Homonyms are fun!
    You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    1. Re:IE6 by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Somewhat, according to WP:

      The Internet Explorer project was started in the summer of 1994 by Thomas Reardon and subsequently led by Benjamin Slivka, leveraging source code from Spyglass, Inc. Mosaic, an early commercial web browser with formal ties to the pioneering NCSA Mosaic browser. In late 1994, Microsoft licensed Spyglass Mosaic for a quarterly fee plus a percentage of Microsoft's non-Windows revenues for the software. Although bearing a name similar to NCSA Mosaic, Spyglass Mosaic had used the NCSA Mosaic source code sparingly.

      What MS did to Spyglass sort of epitomizes their assholery.

    2. Re:IE6 by Samah · · Score: 1

      Ah thank you for that. Mod parent informative please.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  41. Finnish Depression?!? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Being sad is no excuse for not taking over the world.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  42. Doug Engelbart invented hypertext. by master_p · · Score: 1

    Here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douglas_Engelbart

    He also invented the mouse, the GUI, and ARPANET.

    1. Re:Doug Engelbart invented hypertext. by antime · · Score: 1

      Douglas Engelbart did not invent hypertext. Vannevar Bush thought up Memex in 1945, and even Ted Nelson's Project Xanadu was started in 1960. There may well be even earlier examples, but those are two well-known ones that precede Engelbart. He also didn't invent GUIs, that honour at least currently goes to Ivan Sutherland who made Sketchpad in 1963.

      AFAIK he also wasn't directly involved in the development of ARPANET, though the first host was running in the Stanford Research Institute's Augmentation Research Center, which he headed.

      I don't want to diminish Engelbart's achievements or influence, but credit where credit's due.

  43. Re:Was written in Finnish by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

    Finnish a human language? Next thing you'll be saying we're humans...

  44. Graphic vs. Graphical by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    [OffTopic]

    These words are different parts of speech, right?
    "This is a graph (noun)."
    "This is a graphic (adjective) representation"

    i'm not sure graphical is a word at all. It doesn't parse to anything meaningful unless you go to graphically. "We are representing this information graphically (adverb, in a graphic way).

    There's no such thing as a graphical, so there couldn't be a graphical designer. Why would it be a graphical interface, and not a graphic interface?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  45. What times are these..? etc by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

    Roger, is that you?

  46. Some sort of a generator you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some sort of a generator you have - to catch old articles for recycling? //arl (Ari Lemmke)

  47. www olisi voinut alkaa vuotta aikaisemmin ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tai jos he olisivat yrittÃneet tienata sillÃ, se ei vÃlttÃmÃttà olisi tapahtunut lainkaan.
    Alkuaikojen avoimuus on syy siihen mità meillà on tÃnÃÃn.

    There, corrected it into real Finnish from the American-Finnish you used.. Although it seems slashdot doesn't support the letter for a with dots correctly (but still almost right) ;)