Slashdot Mirror


Sheriff Sues Craiglist For Prostitution Ads

Amerika writes "Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation,' according to Cook County, Illinois Sheriff Thomas Dart. He has announced that he's filing a lawsuit against the popular classifieds site. Craigslist says it's determined to prevent criminal activity." NewYorkCountryLawyer adds a link to the 28-page complaint (PDF), which "alleges that Craigslist maintains 21 classifications of sex-for-hire, coded as 'w4m,' 'm4m,' 'm4w,' etc." and that it has facilitated child prostitution and kidnapping and human trafficking.

140 of 695 comments (clear)

  1. w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like this game

    1. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by TheRedSeven · · Score: 5, Funny

      2g1c

    2. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by pohl · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think it's hermaphrodites for Menage-a-trois

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    3. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Obfuscant · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think it's hermaphrodites for Menage-a-trois

      That would be '2in143'.

    4. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 2

      10g1c?

    5. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Orbijx · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is NOT Sparta.

      * Disregard if you are reading this from a location named 'Sparta'.

      --
      One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.
    6. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know a couple of girls who can lick that up for you...

    7. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by auLucifer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why stop at 1c? And oblig http://xkcd.com/467/

      --
      If I was witty I'd put something funny here but, as it stands, I am not and have just wasted seconds of your life
    8. Re:w4w, h4m, p2p, y2k, ... by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2g1c

      If you really want to mess with your head, locate 1g1c. I frikkin tops goatse. I'm still mad at my co-worker for that one...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  2. Prostitution? by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last week I ordered a hit out on a professor through craigslist. Sure the interface was ugly but service was delivered on time so I really shouldn't be complaining.

    1. Re:Prostitution? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure the interface was ugly

      Ah, so Craiglist's hopped on the Web 2.0 bandwagon finally?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Prostitution? by greg1104 · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you think that interface is ugly, you should see the hookers.

    3. Re:Prostitution? by davidphogan74 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I found my stolen car on there, and had the local Fox affiliate cover it, so I shouldn't complaining.

      No BS, check the link from my homepage if you don't want to believe it.

      Go CraigsList!

    4. Re:Prostitution? by nametaken · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only on /. could you find people who think Craigslist looks BETTER than the Web 2.0 look. ;)

  3. former state governor seeking stupid sheriff - g4s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is Illinois again I see we are talking about, after all. Maybe the sheriff in question is just upset because he can't get a cut of the local "action" if it's all happens online...

  4. dating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    uh oh, this is definitely going to hurt my dating game...

    1. Re:dating by DustyShadow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yea. That's called marriage.

  5. Ok, he's a hero (sometimes) by Slumdog · · Score: 5, Interesting
    CNN did a piece on him, suing mortgage companies who were evicting homeowners: http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-109261

    Sheriff Dart has taken a stance against mortgage companies that are evicting renter's from homes that property owners are allowing to go into eviction. Sheriff Dart says, "Too many renters are being evicted for landlords' problems".

  6. Prostitution is not illegal... by EWAdams · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... where I live. So the Cook County Sheriff can lump it if he doesn't like it.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... where I live. So the Cook County Sheriff can lump it if he doesn't like it.

      And this has exactly what to do with him going after crime in his jurisdiction?

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    2. Re:Prostitution is not illegal... by nametaken · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's just grouchy since the Blues Brothers slipped through his fingers.

      Them, and those damned Illinois Nazis. I hate Illinois Nazis.

  7. Prostitutes? by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you mean to say all those fine women I took out on dates from craigslist were hookers! I guess that would explain the black eye and lack of memory the next morning after I refused to let her "borrow" some money.

    1. Re:Prostitutes? by JCSoRocks · · Score: 4, Funny

      That and the countless STDs.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    2. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services. Just because there's no sex doesn't mean that a service isn't erotic. Massages, BDSM (doesn't require sex), and Kama Sutra classes are some of the more frequent offerings on there.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    3. Re:Prostitutes? by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just want someone to bake erotic cakes in the nude.

    4. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's the kind of stuff you mostly find on there. There are of course some more questionable postings, but mostly they're innocent stuff like private party strippers.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    5. Re:Prostitutes? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      What's the point of erotic services without sex? That's like going to a restaurant just to smell the food.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yet people flock to strip clubs to watch women dance and take off their clothes. Erotic Services with no sex are quite common.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    7. Re:Prostitutes? by geobeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      So the Cook County Sheriff is upset that people are getting f**ked by lawyers?

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    8. Re:Prostitutes? by Ecuador · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yep, the rest of us here have only two... STDIN, STDOUT...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    9. Re:Prostitutes? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Funny

      And for when we're feeling adventurous and little dirty, we have STDERR. :-)

    10. Re:Prostitutes? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's more referring to the erotic services section, which are actually mostly legitimate legal services.

      Not in any erotic services section of any US city that I've visited. Universally, the majority of the ads are for illegal services.
       
       

      Just because there's no sex doesn't mean that a service isn't erotic. Massages, BDSM (doesn't require sex), and Kama Sutra classes are some of the more frequent offerings on there.

      Which city is this?

    11. Re:Prostitutes? by jamstar7 · · Score: 2, Funny
      You know what they call the guy who has everything, don't you?

      An incurable romantic.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    12. Re:Prostitutes? by DrLang21 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think the majority of people going to strip clubs are going for more than the show? Regardless of whether or not illegal activities are going on behind closed doors, there's certainly plenty of people who just want a peep show.

      Besides... no matter what anybody tells you... there's no sex in the champagne room.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    13. Re:Prostitutes? by Migraineman · · Score: 5, Funny

      BDSM (doesn't require sex)
      You should tip more, it gets better.


      ... shouldn't it get worse?

    14. Re:Prostitutes? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 5, Informative

      The stereotype annoys me too. I go to the clubs, and I'm personal friends with a quite a few dancers, and I've dated dancers. These girls aren't whores, and I've seen idiot customers make that mistake on many occasions. If you want to mistreat and mishandle the girls, it's not the bouncers you need to worry about. They're only going to toss you out on your ass; it's that dancer looking at you with the "fuck me" eyes, sexy smile, and the steel posted stilettos -- cause she's the one who's going to show you what she learned in kickboxing.

      Sex doesn't happen in the champagne/VIP room. And the expenses for getting back into the room *is* for house fee + champagne + whatever the girl charges for her time. It's a risky proposition for the club owners and workers to have sex on the premise. Not only that, it ruins the girls' legitimate hustle, and so it's not tolerated. A good customer can spend nearly a grand or more on a favorite girl. A $200 sex act by another girl risks that. Now, there are some clubs there sex happens on-premise. In my experience they have always been "one-on-one clubs" which aren't strip clubs in the traditional sense; or real dives -- the kinds of places where the two drink minimum comes with a free STD and you might get stabbed and robbed by one of the hookers working the crowd. Are there exceptions? Of course, but I've gone through more clubs than the typical slashdotter has linux distributions.

      And of course, there are some dancers who do "extras" but they take that business outside the club for the reasons I gave before. Strip clubs sell fantasy, and for most sensible people, fantasy is enough. Incidentally, I know more business school and law school grads who have done "extras" to make it at their workplace than dancers who have. And my former dancer girlfriend is an amazing woman with a better moral compass than most people I've met.

  8. Here we go again by meist3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another dipshit that doesn't know how infrastructure is supposed to work and what the internet is. Child prostitution ... according to American law that would include 20 y/o with 11 months and three weeks on the clock right?

    When did this idea emerge that you can sue a infrastructure for what is happening on it? This concept is new to me and doesn't make any sense. Next they'll be suing the newspapers for ads that enable people to engage in casual sex. About time someone did something about this.

    1. Re:Here we go again by meist3r · · Score: 3, Informative
      Little aftertought, after reading the ars technica update I believe this is about money.

      The Cook County Sheriff's Department is asking a federal judge to close the Erotic Services section of Craigslist, as well as reimburse the department $100,000 it has cost to pursue Craigslist-related prostitution investigations over the past year,

      Someone needs some bail-out money reaal fast. Too bad the hookers and pimps didn't pay their protection money and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business.

    2. Re:Here we go again by JCSoRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone needs some bail-out money reaal fast. Too bad the hookers and pimps didn't pay their protection money and now you've got to sue the interwebz for ruining your business.

      Sounds about right. It's as if chat forums, bulletin boards, and even the regular classifieds in the newspaper hadn't been used for this purpose for *years*.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:Here we go again by UncleWilly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its as if Ebay had a specific areas for weed, cocaine, and heroin.

      Ahh, I found my new Happy Thought ;)

    4. Re:Here we go again by sorak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Little aftertought, after reading the ars technica update I believe this is about money.

      The Cook County Sheriff's Department is asking a federal judge to close the Erotic Services section of Craigslist, as well as reimburse the department $100,000 it has cost to pursue Craigslist-related prostitution investigations over the past year,

      Umm...Shouldn't the police force be paying craigslist? Craigslist didn't create the prostitution. They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

    5. Re:Here we go again by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They stuck it all in one spot. The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      Mod parent up.

      Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.
      New school: Login in to www.craiglisst.com from the comfort of the squad room, set up a date, make arrest. Rinse, repeat.

      That douchebag Sheriff should be thanking them for making it much easier for him.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    6. Re:Here we go again by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      This guy is an arrogant, sanctimonious prick posturing for the religious right

      Oh, and you were doing so well, too. Chicago is one of the most leftist cities in the country. Sorry, but the religious right are far outweighed by all the lefties there. Ever notice how often the Mayor of Chicago has been a Democrat?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:Here we go again by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 2, Informative

      "The agreement called for the Web site to implement a phone verification system for listings that required ad posters to provide a real telephone number that would be called before the ad went public. Craigslist also imposed listing fees, requiring a credit card, for ads in the section. The proceeds were to be donated to charity. Dart called the fees "dirty money" and said the move was a "publicity stunt" that had little practical effect because pimps use stolen credit cards or post ads in free sections."

      What exactly is Craigslist supposed to do about this? You'd think it was actually makeing life easier for the cops. If someone uses a stolen credit card to list their ad that should be a pretty big flag for the cops to set up a sting for that ad. If something very illegal wasn't going on they wouldn't have used a stolen card for the ad. I really don't see what more Craigslist is supposed to do other than shut down a service which is used legitimately a majority of the time. Its not the job of Craigslist to enforce the law!

      Cheers,
      Greg

      P.S. On a side note I don't know how Craigslist is going to continue to stay in business and not start charging for more listings they way they're always getting sued. I'd like to know what percentage of their costs are legal bills. I bet its way over half.

    8. Re:Here we go again by rwyoder · · Score: 2, Funny

      The only way they could have helped the cops more is if they placed a big red arrow that says "hooker" over the prostitute's heads.

      That feature will be in the next rev of Google Streetview.

    9. Re:Here we go again by Feanturi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Craigslist isn't just a truck you can dump a bunch of hookers on.

    10. Re:Here we go again by neBelcnU · · Score: 3, Informative

      I am SO sorry, clearly you've not been there (Chicago & its Metro area) in the last 2 decades.
      1) Wheaton, a burb, is a college town. An evangelical college town. It is one of the scariest places I've ever seen.
      2) Naperville, a burb, is the largest city in Illinois, physically gigantic, but obviously diffuse. It is almost universally conservative.

      You are correct about the mayor, but the distribution of conservative vs. liberal is sadly quite strong the wrong way. The election outcomes tend to depend on who gets out the vote, which depends on so much more than machines, fraud or money. Trust me, the random guy you meet on the street? Don't bet he's a liberal anything, much less a Democrat.

      I do not necessarily defend the GP's position, I think the sheriff's motivations are more simplistic, probably self-aggrandizement. But counting on Chicago, Cook County, or the entire metropolitan area as "liberal" is a huge mistake, and one made by liberal politicians at their peril.

    11. Re:Here we go again by unitron · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation,

      'Old school: Go undercover/hit the streets to round up prostitutes.

      Yeah, you'd think they wouldn't bother going after Craigslist after the failure of their earlier lawsuit against street corners.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    12. Re:Here we go again by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      Launching tomorrow: weedBay!
      Or whenever I get around to it...

  9. I honestly did not know this. by Forge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thanks to this sheriff, those of us seeking prostitutes or running brothels know that Craig's list is the place to be.

    "Thank you sheriff for helping improve my business. Keeping all the young ladies on staff as busy as they can physically manage is great for business, especially in these tough economic times.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  10. All consentual sexual relationships are... by kannibul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All consentual sexual relationships are a form of prostitution when you get to the basics of it...be it money, food, protection...

    What about the wife that won't have sex with her husband until he does some chore?

    Isn't that prostitution?

    1. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    2. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by antibryce · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've been chasing that mythical chore for years. It doesn't exist, it's just a trap to get you to do all the yardwork.

    3. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not all, but many are, yes. It's a double standard in our society that bugs me. Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      I agree. Imagine if you just dropped 150 bucks on a hooker and she says, "Na, I've got a headache.".

    4. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK, but paying her cash for sex isn't. Go figure.

      Well I don't think either is reasonable, but maybe that's just me.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    5. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chirs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Expecting your date to put out because you bought her a nice dinner is OK..."

      Do you really think that this is a "standard" in society? I'd like to think it isn't.

    6. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Where I live, prostitution is a normal, regulated service industry.

    7. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Funny

      The solution is to check couples for marriage certificates at the entrance of the restaurants.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    8. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Expecting men to pay for dinner and not get anything in return isn't reasonable either. Split the check and you avoid this whole issue.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess. You don't get laid much.

    10. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good lord, no. You "expect" as in anticipate, not require, your date to "put out" because that is frequently the end result of a romantic evening with someone you've been romantically involved with for some time, and the date in question qualifies and the mood is right. Anything else and you're just a pig. Which is, in a way, a social standard or stereotype, but a negative one, not OK.

      Though I guess before I sound too high and mighty, I did laugh my ass off at the Family Guy spoof of the DeBeers silhouette ads with the implied bj and the tag line "Diamonds: She'll pretty much have to." Yes, we men buy things for women with the hope that it'll get us laid. But to "expect" in the sense you meant where it's equivalent to prostitution? No.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    11. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you get is a pleasant evening out with a lady. If "reasonable" to you means that you will receive sexual recompense for your outlay of dinner expense, then maybe you should just skip the dinner and buy a prostitute. They are imminently reasonable in that sense.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant? Is that the point? No. If she expects me to pay, I expect something more than just conversation in return. I can have pleasant conversation with friends who don't ask me to pick up the tab.

      The point is that equality requires a change in social customs. Right now, the social customs are designed for a woman being unable to get income for herself. But since that's not the case anymore, they are outdated.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    13. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What you get is a pleasant evening out with a lady.

      You act like girls don't want to have sex. Do you know how badly most of them would love to skip the phony dinner and go straight to bed... but guys like you make them feel ashamed so they need stupid rituals to validate the affair.

      Then you deprive them of any excitement by paying for dinner without strings attached, still on the thesis that she doesn't want cock, and shouldn't.

      Then you wonder why she went home with "that guy"... really she was only too happy to make some "gentleman" pay for her meal, and then ditch him for what was truly on her mind.

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    14. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I have to pay the lady to have her be pleasant?

      Actually, the reason you pay a hooker is so she'll go away in an hour.

    15. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by tabrnaker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Not going so good with the ladies eh?

      Perhaps if you start viewing woman as, you know, humans, and not masturbatory tools, you'll fare better. You might even realize that sex isn't the best thing they can provide you.

    16. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by metlin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, that's why I start with the drinks. Buy a few shots of cheap tequila, and you're groovy.

    17. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Where do you eat dinner? McDonalds? Is a special night out Taco Bill?

      When I go out to dinner, the average bill for a two-up is $100 or so.

    18. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by mqduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I think most consensual sexual relationships are the result of people liking sex.

      --
      Property is theft.
    19. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Informative

      These. Now crawl back into your cardboard box. 3 stars? Please, only if they're Michelin stars.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    20. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You act like girls don't want to have sex.

      No, I'm acting like expecting that you are trading dinner for sex is chauvinistic.

      If she's into it, go for it. If she's not, acting like you got jipped means you're an asshole and should go hire a prostitute if you want an explicit barter.

      If there are "strings attached" then you think you're hiring a hooker. The absence of strings does not mean the absence of sex. What the fuck is wrong with people around here?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    21. Re:All consentual sexual relationships are... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Though most prostitutes that aren't complete crack ho skanks with AIDS (i.e. the kind of girl you'd ask out on a normal date) cost more than dinner at the fucking Olive Garden

      I think if you give serious consideration to all costs involved and run the numbers, you'll find that prostitutes compare favorably with traditional relationships in terms of cost.

      Try keeping track of it sometime, how much you spend on a girl before she'll have sex with you. And compare that with the cost of an attractive prostitute ($150-$250).

      Even funnier is if you keep track of it over time. My wife and I have what I consider to be a healthy sex life, but if I had to add up everything being in the relationship cost me (including kids) and divide that by the number of times we have had sex, the result would definitely suggest that hiring prostitutes instead of getting married would have been a sound financial decision.

      Remember, if it flies, floats, or fornicates, rent, don't buy. It's cheaper in the long run.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  11. Not Craiglist's fault by Zerth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just because he found his wife in the w4mmmm section doesn't mean he can get all sue-happy:)

    1. Re:Not Craiglist's fault by bennomatic · · Score: 5, Funny

      One more 'm', and that would have been funny.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  12. Just in: Sheriff sues computer maker by justcauseisjustthat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Sheriff sues computer maker based on that they enable people to search Craiglist for prostitutes.

  13. Streets Department by booch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they should probably go after the Streets Department first. Prostitutes have been using the streets to solicit prostitution for centuries. And I'm almost certain that there are more prostitutes using streets than using Craigslist.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    1. Re:Streets Department by EvanED · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, to be fair, streets department rarely designate streets as the place to go if you want sex.

  14. ByHisLogic by shareme · · Score: 2, Informative

    By his logic we should be able to sue his ass for past abuse of prisoners by his own sheriff department right? Oh BTW Cook county has had in its past the worst corruption record of any county Sheriff in the nation

    --
    Fred Grott(aka shareme) http://mobilebytes.wordpress.com
  15. You think the Sheriff would love Craigslist... by jwhitener · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After all, it nicely lists all the sex providers for him to go after.

    Of course, that would be a lot of work for him. So I can understand his desire to secure society by making the location of sex providers obscure ;)

  16. Not a source by 77Punker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Prostitutes exist with or without Craigslist; it is not a "source" and it does not create prostitutes. They'd be out walking the street if Craigslist didn't give them somewhere safe to advertise. I'd much rather keep them on the web than on my sidewalk.

  17. when did singles sites become... by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when did singles sites become the target of prostitution crack-downs? just because craigslist has a "personals" section means that it is solely for prostitution? does this mean that _everyone_ on there is soliciting or seeking prostitution?

    there is clearly a double standard toward craigslist and every other way to meet new members of the opposite (or same) gender. whether this is a double standard or not is irrelevant, this must be stopped; these pathetic knee-jerk "omg protect teh chrilden!1!!" is making me sick, it's everywhere

    1. Re:when did singles sites become... by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Informative

      The erotic services section in Craigslist is very clearly geared towards prostitution. Almost every ad offers "full service" and sets out rates as "donations." The photos are usually of nude or scantily clad women. The services they offer are usually vernacular for specific sex acts. The vast majority of the ads there are for prostitution or reviews of prostitutes.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:when did singles sites become... by inviolet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The erotic services section in Craigslist is very clearly geared towards prostitution. Almost every ad offers "full service" and sets out rates as "donations." The photos are usually of nude or scantily clad women. The services they offer are usually vernacular for specific sex acts. The vast majority of the ads there are for prostitution or reviews of prostitutes.

      Indeed. The Sheriff is correct that craigslist is carrying ads that any reasonable person would conclude are for prostitution. For sure.

      The question is, what are the Sheriff's real motivations? Law-enforcement crackdowns on prostitution are spotty at best, so why this, why now?

      The primary motivation against prostitution comes from females, who loathe it like all businesspeople loathe competition. These days success in business comes easiest to those who seize the law to ban their competition, and women-in-general have done exactly this.

      To put it another way: the presence of legal prostitutes will increase what your female partner is willing to do in bed.

      Given this, all male attacks on prostitution must be some attempt to curry favor with females. Or they've got a bad case of the Jesus.

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
  18. Standing? by QuoteMstr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As this is a civil case, doesn't one need standing to file a suit? As I understand it, that means that the individual bringing the suit has to ask for a remedy the court can provide, which would be redress of damage. Party A can't sue B for what B did to C because A was not harmed, and therefore has no standing. In what way has craigslist damaged the sherrif, and what damages is he asking the court to redress, exactly?

    1. Re:Standing? by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if you've been following the Chris Brown/Rhianna situation (both are popular R&B singers). Chris Brown allegedly beat Rhianna to an unconscious pulp. Actually, there's no "allegedly" about it as he did in fact do it. The response on sites like MTV.com have been by and large, pro Chris Brown, with many people (surprisingly women) saying that Rhianna deserved to get beaten up. She "asked for it", she wouldn't get out of his car, she "gave him an STD" (of which there is not even anecdotal evidence of this). MTV was so stunned and saddened by the response that the network commissioned a documentary to address domestic violence. It's really only been in the last 20 years that we've acknowledged women's issues like domestic violence and sex work.

      The reality is that in the US, women don't amount to much. They have to be protected from themselves. Their worth as human beings is tied directly to their virginity and their ability to birth sons; so much of our morality laws were designed to reign in attempts by women to control their sexuality.

      Wow, that sounded very feminist of me. Ending my rant now. :D

  19. A sheriff filing suit? by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If he's doing this in his official capacity, then he's way out of line. This is for the states' attorney to handle, not the sheriff's office.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  20. He didn't sue the mortgage banks by sirwired · · Score: 5, Informative

    He didn't sue the mortgage banks, he instead refused to execute eviction notices for renters that were paying rent on time.

    SirWired

    1. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      he instead refused to execute eviction notices for renters that were paying rent on time.

      Remind me what the branches of government are again?

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces? Nice lie by omission, but just because the tenant is paying rent on time doesn't mean the owner/landlord is paying the mortgage.

      Those are two entirely separate legal contracts.

      Not that I'm unsympathetic to the tenants, they should get some form of protection (even if it's just a delay until they find somewhere else) or maybe just garnish the rent direct to the bank.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He said some renters were paying their rent on time and weren't receiving proper notice of the evictions.

      He also said mortgage companies routinely failed to do something they were supposed to: identify a building's occupants before asking for an eviction.

      ...

      Banks must prove that they informed tenants of a 120-day grace period, which state law grants to allow tenants to find new housing before moving out.

      source. Not that the con talking heads bothered to mention any of these trifling little legal issues back when they proclaimed that this was some kind of activism and socialism and satanism and whatever else they could throw at it.

      The bank must follow the law, and the law states the residents of a non-owner occupied property must be notified in advance, which the poor, poor banks just couldn't be bothered to do.

      They were apparently too busy licking the boots of the fed chairman for cash to think "Hmm... renter in good standing making monthly payments, owner in bad standing not making monthly payments. Maybe we should offer them the house in exchange for them continuing to pay. The worst that could happen is they say no and move out." But that would require working for their money and if there's anything we've learned in this crash, its that the leadership of our institutions are deathly afraid of work and deserve money to fall upon them from the federal government.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the checks and balances lies in the fact that "executives" (this effectively includes sheriffs) can decline to execute. This is unusual, as there will often be political consequences, in the form of lost elections, recall efforts, or in some circumstances, impeachment, but civil or criminal consequences are exceedingly rare and apply only in certain extraordinary cases.

      And even if there are non-political consequences in a given case, you're still relying on executives to enforce those consequences.

      In the end, governments (and for that matter, business, military, or any other large organization) function because most of the time, in most of the cases, the people involved will carry out "lawful orders" even if they disagree with them. Sometimes you reach a breaking point where someone isn't willing to do that. What happens then depends on many factors, but public opinion is a often a big one.

    4. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by publiclurker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From what I remember, the banks were not performing due diligence to make sure that the foreclosed houses were not owner occupied. If a house is occupied by a renter, there are additional steps that need to be followed. The banks did not do this, as that would require them to actually do their jobs.

    5. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Walpurgiss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Instead of letting the renters do that, or even working a deal with non leasing home owners who are behind, for months leading up to the crash almost one in every five radio commercials I heard in DeKalb IL were about people getting awesome deals on repossessed homes, with super low monthly rates.

      But if those low rates were offered to the old occupants, I bet they would not have had to move out...

      Even from a greed standpoint, that kind of crap didn't seem to make sense to me. Wouldn't it have been cheaper to cut the original owners the deal, instead of repossessing and reselling at the lower monthly rates? And paying for advertising about the low rates? /boggle

    6. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Again, you're relying on the target of the writ to comply, or on the ability and (again), willingness of someone else to enforce his compliance. And again, usually this works. Sometimes it doesn't. The law is not magical, it relies on the general assent and cooperation of people, and sometimes, people don't assent and cooperate.

      If the sheriff refuses to evict a tenant, and mass public opinion is behind him, who exactly do you expect to *make* him evict the tenant?

    7. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Informative

      If the sheriff refuses to evict a tenant, and mass public opinion is behind him, who exactly do you expect to *make* him evict the tenant?

      In extreme cases, the national guard. That's how the federal government forced communities in the south to integrate their schools over the popular opposition of the locals.

    8. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Informative

      they should get some form of protection

      They do. State law gives them 120 days advance notice, which brings us to

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      That was the law he was enforcing, since the banks weren't giving the advance notice. When the banks agreed to do it right, he agreed to resume evictions.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    9. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by NNKK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, extreme cases. Refusing to evict a rent-paying tenant because a bank wants to let a house sit empty and unsold in a rapidly-shrinking economy is not such a case.

      Even if Federal interests were implicated, the Posse Comitatus and Insurrection Acts place severe restrictions on the ability of the President to use military forces (including federalized national guard units) for law enforcement. There essentially has to be an insurrection or disturbance of sufficient severity that the state cannot enforce order. Eisenhower got away with it in 1957 because the Governor of Georgia tried to use Georgia's national guard to violate the Fourteenth Amendment, giving a pretty good argument for insurrection.

      When Governor George Wallace tried to block enrollment of black students at the University of Alabama in 1963, there was no national guard involved, and the DoJ sent a Deputy Attorney General and US Marshals.

      Now, they could try using US Marshals for eviction without hitting the Posse Comitatus Act, but even then, the federal government's jurisdiction would be murky at best, particularly if there is no bankruptcy case involved. Eviction proceedings and real property rights are primarily a state matter. One could reasonably argue that the bank's Fifth Amendment rights against property being taken are being infringed, but they are receiving compensation in the form of rent, making the applicability of the Takings Clause arguable (the court would have to decide that it doesn't meet the requirement of "just compensation").

      The best argument is probably due process -- the bank isn't really getting any. But, until the bank exhausts state remedies (that is, state courts and higher law enforcement have all declined to intervene), federal courts and the President would be unlikely to involve themselves.

    10. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by jackchance · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when does he have the right to pick and choose which laws he enforces?

      Are you kidding me? He is just following the example set by the rest of the law enforcement agencies in the US.

      The US (especially over the last 8 years) loves to make things illegal that a huge % of the population does and then they use selective enforcement to exercise their prejudiced, corrupt agendas.

      Need some examples:

      Picking on LGBTs
      Selective enforcement of marijuana laws (over other drugs)
      Selective enforcement of drug laws in black/latino communities
      The DMCA

      --
      1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 377 610 987 1597 2584 4181 6765
    11. Re:He didn't sue the mortgage banks by Nimey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not the National Guard. Nominally the Guard is controlled by the state's governor. ISTR that elements of the Army's 101st Airborne Division were called in to settle at least one integration dispute in the South.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  21. Read the Complaint by dwm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wish more of the authors of these smug, dismissive comments would read the complaint.

    It makes a compelling case that the primary use of the "erotic services" section of Craigslist is prostitution, both the "consenting adults" variety and the quite non-consenting child sex slavery variety. It also cites specific cases where Craigslist was used to facilitate the abuse of child sex slaves. Is anyone here concerned with that, and that Craigslist is profiting from that traffic?

    Note that the sheriff isn't trying to shut down Craigslist; his office sent 5 letters to Craigslist asking them to better police the "erotic services" section or shut it down. According to the complaint, Craigslist refused. It would seem that the owners of Craigslist value their profits more than the lives of the children whose exploitation they benefit from.

    How often has the phrase "Think of the children" been bandied about on Slashdot with a wink and a sneer? Well, here's a case where there are actual, real, hurting children to think about. How many of you are brave enough to challenge the groupthink around here and do that? Where is the outrage that Craigslist is profiting from human traffic? Some of you need to turn in your liberal credentials at the door.

    1. Re:Read the Complaint by RancidPickle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have an issue with your line that Craigslist is profiting by this. Last I checked, not only was Craigslist free, but there are no ads.

      Why not sue magazines that have classified ads geared towards erotic services? I'd bet there are "erotic services" advertised in most major newspapers or local rags.

      I'd think that the police looking at Craigslist ads has done more for locating abused kids forced into prostitution than their "normal" investigations.

      --
      "First things first, but not necessarily in that order."
      - Doctor Who
    2. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I read the complaint and the allegations of increased revenue from the erotic services section are unsubstantiated. There is no evidence that directly links the visits to that particular section of craigslist to any other.

      Reading the complaint, you could be forgiven that craigslist is popular because of the erotic services. Isn't it just possible that girls choose to use that venue because craigslist itself is popular?

      By way of interest, in cities where prostitution is legal, those particular boards on craigslist are almost empty. Wonder why. Maybe the Sherrif's department could provide advice to the AG that in order to turn down the illegal prostitution, it should be legalised.

      So show me that craigslist is profiting from human traffic or is that claim just as airy as some of those in the complaint?

      Human trafficking and child abuse will exist with or without craigslist. Do you think the children on the streets in various Asian countries use craigslist to advertise themselves? I think not.

      But as another poster put it, through everyone (or almost everyone) using craigslist, it puts it in a place where the police can easily monitor it. Shut it down and it'll scatter to the four corners of the web - well until someone comes up with another site to fill in. The problem (child abuse) won't go away but the ability for law enforcement to easily catch it will.

      How about we solve this problem with chilren by addressing the problem at its source (in the home) rather than just try to treat the affects that show up elsewhere?

      Note that craigslist doesn't directly profit from advertisements, as do many other web sites, when people visit. Instead it charges people money to post in the erotic services section and has promised to donate that money to help address the problems that you are so concerned about. You could say they're taxing the adults to help the children.

    3. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hear the spectre of child prostitution ads being raised many times in this thread.

      cite one example. I peruse my local craigslist on occasion, and have even used the erotic services section quite a few times. I've never seen any child prostitution ads in there.

      If they're so prevalent, there must be some posted today? something in cache somewhere? an actual ad someone could link to and say "look, a child prostitution ad! take it off!"

      Unless I see some evidence, I'm inclined to think that the children are not as prevalent on craigslist as some would like us to think, and it's just a moral panic excuse to shut down a business run by adults, and only adults.

    4. Re:Read the Complaint by Walkingshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you have some kind of evidence of child abuse (be it sexual or otherwise), then you have a prosecution. Congratulations, where does shutting down a section of craigslist come into this? Oh, you have no evidence of this actually happening, no actually damaged or hurt children? Then you're just another scare monger trying to stop the bleeding by covering it with a curtain.

      If you really want to think of the children, maybe you ought to take all this evidence you have of child abuse to a DA's office and see if you can get the ball rolling there.

      An intelligent person would want this stuff on craigslist, where it is all made into a nice easy searchable electronic database that can be easily monitored, logged, and used in court with a minimum of fuss. It looks to me like this sherrif simply doesn't understand the technology and his lawyers told him he might be able to make a quick buck suing craigslist.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    5. Re:Read the Complaint by feyhunde · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would seem that the owners of Craigslist value their profits more than the lives of the children whose exploitation they benefit from.

      Craigslist is pretty non-commercial. They do charge 5 bucks on the erotic services site for all of craigslist to keep down the amount of illegal content, but all of that is donated to charity. There's only a total of 24 people who work for craigslist, with all of the money that keeps it up coming from broker ads in a couple of metro areas (Bay Area, NYC, Chicago)

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    6. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      So this and the responses are not entirely correct. Craigslist has taken a number of measure over the past few months to crack down on this. They ban more sexual keywords now so that if you use these your ad will not post. They then required a phone number to confirm ads placed in this section. Now they actually require a credit card and charge you $5 to post.

      So in an effort to crack down or at the very least be able to track these individuals they implemented a method that does give them some profit, though I believe they donate some or all of this to abused womans causes.

      This is not going to stop prostitution at all. Its either gonnna be here or in the streets.

      Being an avid fan of the internet and erotic services I wish this sherrif would go find some crimes with victims.

      Thanks and have a Happy Ending!

    7. Re:Read the Complaint by binarybum · · Score: 2, Funny

      In some fantasy universe where people also want crack houses left alone in order to provide a supply of dealers to bust, and bars to serve up alcohol in drive through windows in order to create more drunks on the road. In this fantasy universe 'intelligent' people don't care about the victims, they just want criminals to bust.

      Hey, wait a second... that's not a fantasy universe, that's Wyoming.

      --
      ôó
    8. Re:Read the Complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an issue with your line that Craigslist is profiting by this. Last I checked, not only was Craigslist free, but there are no ads.

      Erotic Services is not free -- you need a credit card to post and it costs a little bit of $$. This was enacted at the request of state AG's, not to make money.

      AFAICT CL doesn't WANT this kind of stuff, but if they remove the section, the hooker ads move to another section and ruin that other section.

    9. Re:Read the Complaint by binarybum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly - I'd wager that a decent percentage of the slashdot audience has probably at least browsed these ads before - nerds that wouldn't pick up chicks on the street are a huge target for this kind of business model - but be warned - you'd have to be crazy to respond to these ads. A large percentage of them are probably honeypots posted by authorities, and the government has full backdoor access to everything that goes through craigslist (thank you patriot act) including email addresses. I'd love to know the ratio of arrests to actual successful prostitution related business transactions through craigslist - I bet it's greater than one. Also, let's not forget that nearly every major city has a newspaper with an erotic personals section - this sort of thing is nothing new.

      --
      ôó
    10. Re:Read the Complaint by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there have been numerous cases of underage prostitutes, willing and otherwise, on Craigslist.

      Do you have any data to back this claim?

    11. Re:Read the Complaint by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you seriously claiming that Wyoming is real?

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
  22. It's who asked out whom by tekrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The person that does the asking out to dinner pays.
    After all, the other party was gracious enough to accept.

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:It's who asked out whom by WNight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's totally fair.

      But you're right, there is an expectation. And it's not wrong. If you sit around and wait to be asked you're going to be asked by people with their own goals in mind. If someone tries to woo you and you want that behavior to continue (expensive meals, etc) then you need to consider what they're looking for.

      It's pretty much like joining the host in whatever activity they have planned. You aren't required to play cards, or join their orgy, but they probably aren't going to invite you back if you didn't fit in.

  23. Re:Suing the telcos next? by bennomatic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a lot of precedent on this. I think the term for a telco in this context is a "clear channel" provider or something like that. Basically, they do not provide any sort of editorial or policing on their traffic. If you pay your bill and there's no legal reason to block a given call, you can make the call.

    I don't know how CraigsList is edited, but if there is any staff dedicating any time whatsoever--even seconds per month--to editing community messages, then they move from being "clear channel" providers to "publishers" or some such, and they are responsible for content.

    --
    The CB App. What's your 20?
  24. I read that as... by bagboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sheriff Uses Craiglist For Prostitution Ads

  25. If craigslist supplies prostitutes by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

    If craigslist supplies prostitutes, then the socket in my wall is a power station.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  26. Re:In other countries... by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... adults with imaginary friends are given free psychiatric help.

    In the US, we give them political power.

    OK, I'll bite.

    What are you talking about? This is a story about a lawsuit. A strange lawsuit that seems to be trying to enforce criminal statutes on a tort-like theory of public nuisance. It likely won't go anywhere, since it's hard from the complaint to even make out who the aggrieved party is supposed to be. (Is the Sheriff himself harmed in some way by Craigslist's practices? I think he'll have to show that if he wants an injunction. Otherwise, if he thinks something cognizably criminal is going on he could maybe investigate and prosecute. Which he can't, so this whole thing is largely symbolic.)

    Now you come in babbling about political power for imaginary friends. I guess it's OK, though, as there seem to be enough like-minded schizophrenics to get you modded insightful. Perhaps you could move overseas, and avail yourself of some of those marvelous free services...

  27. Re:Suing the telcos next? by lordkuri · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the term for a telco in this context is a "clear channel" provider or something like that.

    The term you're looking for is Common Carrier

  28. I'm no Psychiatrist, but I play one on the Intar.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The parent is alluding to the Sheriff in TFO having a deranged mental state by using a common reference, identifying with people who aren't physically present. Indeed, hallucination is a common symptom of many psychological maladies.

    User number 970820 also makes a joke using the familiar, and frequently employed motif, whereby individuals in a place of power are ridiculed by making a potentially credible complaint that the opposing party is irreparably stricken with a condition which renders them unfit to hold such power, attempting to display their behavior as evidence beyond reproach.

    Happy to help.

  29. Re:In other countries... by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is the Sheriff himself harmed in some way by Craigslist's practices? I think he'll have to show that if he wants an injunction....... Which he can't, so this whole thing is largely symbolic.

    I don't know about that.....maybe his wife keeps showing up in the w4m category....

    --
    "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  30. Re:In other countries... by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Informative

    My guess, is the AC is referring to religious people when he says "people with imaginary friends", the imaginary friend indicating god.

    The AC probably jumped to the conclusion that the sheriff was on a crusade based on religious temperament.

    All in all, it was pretty easy to follow to me, if not necessarily well founded. Jumping to bad conclusions isn't really an indicator of schizophrenia, I'd think more along the lines of mania / bipolar disorder.

  31. Stupid intelligence by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Insightful

        He's stupid.

        Most people in an investigative field would BEG for lists like this.

        The posting gives probable cause. They can wire tap the numbers, and get the phone history. The secondary numbers that call common numbers give even more escorts, or escort services/pimps. Third level cross reference would then likely give him a good number of the working girls in the area, and regular clients. All of this would be legal.

        Many law enforcement agencies are using these ads to DO the busts. They'll set up a wired hotel room, and have the girls meet them there. They'll also have officers pose as the escorts, and do the same to the Johns.

        They're being spoon fed fairly reliable information. The exception would be postings by angry ex-boyfriends/husbands, who post their ex-SO picture and phone numbers. Those would be easily filtered once the phone records were given a good look over.

        I don't know what idiot thought about filing a complaint against Craigslist. They should be THANKING them. Spend a couple months gathering intelligence, and then spend a weekend on widespread busts. They'd get a significant number in the process, and the rest would be scared out of business. Any remaining ones that decided to continue marketing this way would be continued easy fish to catch.

        Do your job, and you've solved the problem. Cutting out an advertising source just pushes that element that you want to arrest into other fringe areas that you probably don't know about yet. Doing it right would get the vice squad brownie points from all over the place, and an increased budget. Just bitching about the advertising medium gets you nothing but a budget wasted on court costs.

        Stupid people.

       

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Stupid intelligence by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I've known some too, on a friendly, not professional basis. It's an interesting business to learn about, but not the safest out there.

      I believe the terminology varies by area, as do some of the terms. In the end it's all the same. Guy is lonely, and wants to spend time with a pretty girl. Guy leaves some money in a conspicuous place. Adult things happen. Guy leaves happy. Girl leaves happy and a little richer.

      My apologies, as I'm used to referencing proper professionals (versus street walkers) as escorts. No offense is intended.

      Myself, I see no problem with it. I don't believe it should be against the law.

      When I was in Toronto, I was in for a bit of a culture shock when I talked to some people there. Massage parlors, incall, outcall, and even "full service" strip clubs are perfectly acceptable. Toronto does not allow "street walkers". The general idea is, it's going to happen, like it or not. Be courteous. Anything that happens in the privacy of your [home|hotel|etc] between two consenting adults is exactly that.

      I was addressing it from the law enforcement side. The majority of areas in the US have laws against it, and those are enforced. If they want to enforce it, there are much easier ways to enforce it, than to shut down one of the easiest places to make a visible statement. So you've picked up all the obvious street walkers, so they don't walk the streets. The next most visible is Craigslist, or any of many numerous print advertisements that list providers of these services. There will always be some web site that carries advertisements. Hell, searching Google is the most obvious.

      **WARNING** Links NSFW! I'm writing most of this for those who are completely naive. Hey, lots of people don't know the business. I just happen to talk to a lot of people, and escorts have been some of them.

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chicago+escort

      or even searching for the full deal

      http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=chicago+escort+gfe

      Sorry, there are only over 300,000 pages for the "GirlFriend Experience" in Chicago.

      Ok, so there are about 350 postings today on http://chicago.craigslist.org/ers, and anyone who has a clue knows a decent percentage of these are duplicates, fake pictures (wrong girl shows up) or trouble (thug comes, takes your money, and laughs on the way out the door). Some are legit.

      If they legalized it, a lot of the problems would go away. Right now, if a thug instead of the shown pretty girl shows up and robs you, you can't do much about it. Try calling the police and say "I was trying to pay for an escort, but some guy came and robbed me instead!". That's a spontaneous confession, and enough to land you in jail at least for the night. Talk about adding insult to injury. If it's perfectly legal, the same phone call would get the cops to your door, and hopefully get your money back and land the thug in jail. There is a whole list of other reasons that it should be legalized, that's only one minor example.

      As I've been told many times before, it doesn't matter if it's an escort, a girlfriend, or a wife, you're always paying for sex. At least with an escort, you know the terms of what you're paying for. You will pay $x for $y hours. When the night is done, she'll leave (or you'll leave, depending on who's place it is), and you won't ever have to talk to her again unless you want to. With a girlfriend, you'll buy dinner, flowers, pay for movies, whatever, and then sex in the end isn't guaranteed. And once you're married, the guarantee is that you'll pay for the rest of your life, and sex may happen occasionally if you're lucky. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  32. Re:In other countries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    nah, she keeps showing up in w4mm.

  33. Regulate and tax it by evilkasper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have always found it highly questionable that something one can give away for free should be illegal to sell.. (free is relative; everyone pays for it somehow) If they regulated it (and taxed the hell out of it) it would do away with some thugs who want to be big time pimps, and through health regulations it could help reduce the spread of STD's. Just to go ahead and answer the inevitable, no it will not fix everything and there will always be those that operate outside of an established/legal system.

    1. Re:Regulate and tax it by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Interesting that many of your same arguments would work for the legalization of pot.

      I wish there was some chance we could get more of a libertarian govt in the US....go back to more strict reading of the constitution, and less govt. intrusions of adult lives.

      While I'm at it...I guess I'll also wish for a pony.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Regulate and tax it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prostitution has to be regulated to preserve the value of sex offered by amatuers in relationships. If sex is to be used as a reward when your partner does as you wish, then it makes sense to try and outlaw any other way your partner could have sex without your permission.

      Maybe I'm a little cynical though...

    3. Re:Regulate and tax it by Hordeking · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the government will provide one as part of it's next Economic Stimulus bill. Write your congressman today!

      No good. The PETA people will somehow try to declare horses to be free-persons, and make it illegal to ride them without their consent.

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    4. Re:Regulate and tax it by Saysys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Giving it away for free should not be legal. Sexual relations outside of the covenant of marge should be as illegal as prostitution. Eliminating the life that is formed after a sperm hits an embryo should not be legal except in self defense.

      Once you understand the fundamental end-game then the intermediary steps of not funding embryonic-stemcell research and being against prostitution come from.

    5. Re:Regulate and tax it by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

      What good is a pony if you cannot ride her?

      The same can be said for prostitutes.

      Aaaaaand we come full circle. So to speak.

    6. Re:Regulate and tax it by Dahamma · · Score: 4, Funny

      Giving it away for free should not be legal. Sexual relations outside of the covenant of marge should be as illegal as prostitution.

      Who is this "marge" and how can I get inside her covenant?

    7. Re:Regulate and tax it by park3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because even though impairment tests may be relatively new, alcohol regulations rely heavily on them. The standard has been set by these tests, so things are different now than they were during prohibition. So I don't consider the comparison to prohibition a valid argument.

  34. Re:The Biggest Prostitute: +1, Informative by fooslacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really your defense for Socialism is "better than Bush"? Wow, I need to be king then because I'm freaking awesome compared to Bush. I hate the economic stuff going on and yes it is a creeping form of Socialism and yes I think that's bad for us unless we want to be a middle of the pack also ran country like the rest of the socialist countries in the west. I also hated the intrusive creeping government surveillance and oppression under Bush and think it was bad unless we want to be a totalitarian moralist police state. Why can't I hate both parties when they do something wackadoo?

  35. Re:Prostitutes, meet the Yakuza by Rick+Genter · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh, the Yakuza?

    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  36. Re:In other countries... by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or more likely, he has ruined her for men so she shows up in wfw. Er, not that I ever view that section. Uh, I think I will take the fifth now.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  37. Dart is a dunce by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Craigslist is 'the single largest source of prostitution in the nation'
    No, whores are the single largest source of prostitution! craigslist.com list is just their most popular advertising medium. Did people stop smoking cigarettes when they stop advertising? Take away online venues for finding customers, and whores will go back to propositioning Johns on the street. Personally, I'd rather they just advertise online, where only the people that are looking for sex-for-hire have to deal with them.
    True story: I was in Manhattan on business, walking down the street in broad daylight, when this woman in a business suit approached me and asked "Do you have the time?" I of course immediately looked at my watch, whereupon she remarked "That's not what I meant!" Call me a nerd, but no, I can't tell an office worker from a prostitute... at least not until they ask for money.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  38. Re:former state governor seeking stupid sheriff - by mysticgoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It has been several decades since I lived in Chicago. One of the duties of the Cook County Sheriff back then was to create an "organized crime" diversion whenever things were getting a little too hot for any of the fair-haired boys of the Democratic political machine in that city and state. This looks very similar.

    My guess is that this will go away as the hoo-hoo-rah over Senator Burris' lies about his relationship with the ex-Governor Blagojevich fade into obscurity. (Burris was seated in the US Senate after testifying that he had no contacts with Blagojevich's people and had not been involved in raising money for Blagojevich after he sought be appointed Senator, but he has since recanted on both points when confronted with evidence that he had in fact been doing both.) There was a move to have a special election to replace Burris in the Illinois legislature; I understand that died earlier today.

  39. So... Kinko by UnixUnix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let me attempt to assist authorities in prosecuting such heinous crime.

    I was at a Kinko's store happily surfing when a girl next to me asked for help. I duly assisted her in setting up her Craigslist "erotic services" ad. [She offered me her business too but I pointed out to her her ad: her hourly rate was higher than what I make consulting. That gave me a graceful way to bow out)

    Presently, after a few minutes of exposure, her ad generated responses. The entire room was treated to her loudly intoning "Yes! Yes! (Fsck) me! I love it in my (Ascii)..." Half the people in the room came to their feet, red-faced, while the other half...oh, we were stretched back in our seats laughing our heads off.

    There you have it. Guilty as charged.

  40. Exhibit E by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I refer to page 10 in the PDF:

    The complete postings, with nude images, are attached as Exhibit E).

    Where's "Exhibit E"? I demand that the PDF includes Exhibit E!

  41. Re:In other countries... by Ashriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The AC probably jumped to the conclusion that the sheriff was on a crusade based on religious temperament.

    All in all, it was pretty easy to follow to me, if not necessarily well founded.

    It's not really an improper conclusion. Show me one non-theist that believes prostitution is improper, and I'll show you a closet theist.

    Only those who believe in some imaginary divine morality have an issue with folks selling sexual services.

  42. Re:In other countries... by attackc0de · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, no one is really being hurt by this.

    Heck, if prostitution moves entirely online, it'll be a good thing. The "bad image" caused by streetwalkers and such will go away, since the actual "marketing" of services happens invisibly online, and those involved can meet up in private.

    It'll make law enforcement easier. It's far easier to track someone online that in real life, at least in the US it is.

    --
    For a nice date: call strftime(3C)