Slashdot Mirror


Illinois Declares Pluto a Planet

The Bad Astronomer writes "The legislators in Illinois, always on the lookout for more places to find voters, have passed a resolution declaring Pluto is a planet. I'm not sure what else can be said here, except that — besides overstepping their jurisdiction just a wee bit — they make a couple of scientific howlers in the resolution itself."

37 of 512 comments (clear)

  1. Pff this is ridiculous by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everybody knows Pluto is a dog.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the internet, nobody can tell if Pluto is a dog.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by tritonman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This just proves that fact that politicians are freaking idiots.

    3. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Consider the work they do and how much they manage to get paid for it. My definition of idiot doesn't quite capture that. "Idiot savant" comes closer.

    4. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by Eunuchswear · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is Pluto covered with graveyards that we don't know about or something?

      Way to expose your ignorance.

      Pluto is the fucking king of the underworld!

      If you want to vote the dead, he's the guy to see.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    5. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by xorsyst · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't joke, the Dog Star is a very sirius matter.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    6. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by AGMW · · Score: 4, Funny
      And in Illinois, he is on the right side of the door?

      I suspect that in Illinois, no one can hear you scream!

      Hey - that'd be awesome on a T-shirt!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    7. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by pleappleappleap · · Score: 4, Funny

      In further news, the State of Illinois passes a law regulating the value of pi to exactly 3.000.

    8. Re:Pff this is ridiculous by Enigma2175 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In further news, the State of Illinois passes a law regulating the value of pi to exactly 3.000.

      You realize that happened, right? Only it isn't 3.0, it's 3.2

      --

      Enigma

  2. This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot declares Illinois retarded

    1. Re:This just in by sumdumass · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, that isn't as scary as you think. The biblical reference your making can logically be concluded to 3.14 and not 3 exactly.

  3. Politicians wonder... by mc1138 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why no one trusts them to get things done anymore... We're in the biggest financial crisis in years and they spent the time to declare Pluto a planet. It means nothing, is non binding, and shows a huge disconnect between the political scene and the general populace.

    1. Re:Politicians wonder... by Notquitecajun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Frankly, the more time they spend doing silly crap like this, the less time the spend screwing something important up. It's too bad it wastes tax dollars to do it, though...

  4. I declare Illinois by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    and I declare Illinois a corn field.

  5. Too right! by Xest · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah. I vote that Illinois also changes the definition of a mile and shortens it so that their residents can get more miles to the gallon! I also vote that they cut the definition of an hour down to 30mins to shorten my working day.

    Consensus and standards be damned, they're just definitions!

    1. Re:Too right! by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they shorten the mile enough, they can also change the name to meter.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Too right! by value_added · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. I vote that Illinois also changes the definition of a mile and shortens it so that their residents can get more miles to the gallon! I also vote that they cut the definition of an hour down to 30mins to shorten my working day.

      LOL. Next time it'll be a someone saying a gigabtye is 1,000,000,000 bytes!

    3. Re:Too right! by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Isn't that how politicians do everything? No Child Left Behind tripled the amount of fresh veggies children were eating in cafeterias, by defining ketchup, relish, and French...sorry, FREEDOM fries as fresh vegetables, since they are all plant matter, and all WERE fresh before being cooked. Awesome work, children are eating healthier and they didn't even have to spend money on giving them different food than before! They also drastically reduced animal testing within the US by defining rodents and birds as non-animal vermin. For a grand finale, they redefined the poverty line, thus reducing the number of low income families! Then for an encore they changed the definition of what it means to be "unemployed" and drastically reduced unemployment! Truly amazing what you can to dramatically improve the country without doing anything other than changing the definitions of words!

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  6. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are now 8 planets in the UNIVERSE because they defined a planet as a body orbiting the sun. The definition sucks so I have no problem if states are defining a planet as something else than a small club of grey men(IAU).

    You can say that it's "just a definition", but I don't see where it's the place of a legislature to make scientific definitions to scientists. Legislatures supposedly have better things to do. If they don't, they should recess until that changes.

    The IAU definition of a planet is more extensive than that. Also, while I haven't read the IAU text, I doubt their definition means that there are only eight planets in the universe. The only thing I don't like about their definition is that their use of "dwarf" in "dwarf planet" basically means "not a planet", and I think that's inconsistent and improper use of the word.

  7. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well it depends on how you define SUN
    Our Sun is a star called Sol We call it the Sun because it is what we are in orbit around. If we were in orbit around an other star we would call that Star the Sun.

    The more formal defination of a Planet is the following.

    1. It Orbits around a Sun.
    2. Its shape is Spherical
    3. It is large enough to have or can attract and clear up other objects in its orbit.

    #3 is the problem with Pluto with its orbit crossing Neptune once the time gets right and Neptune gets to close it will just Suck up Pluto and not the other way around. So even it Pluto was the size of the earth if it was where Pluto is now it wouldn't be considered a planet.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Re:Yo mama is so fat... by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yo mama is so fat...Illinois declared her a planet
    Yo mama is so ugly, astronomers who look at her think they're looking at Jupiter's moon IO
    Yo mama is so old, her boyfriends CARBON-date her
    Yo mama is so old and fat, her stomach is actually fusing helium with neon to produce magnesium just before she turns into a neutron star!
    Yo mama is so ugly, that when computer scientists look at her, they are immediately reminded of Edsger Dijkstra's letter "Go To Statement Considered Harmful" because they don't want to "Go To" her.

    Ok, that last one got me severely beaten up on the playground when I was a kid, but the rest are funny and hardly trollish.

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
  9. In other news... by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Informative

    In other news, a giant robotic Neil deGrasse Tyson was seen bursting through the walls of the Illinois Capitol Building, saying, "Pluto is a Plutoid. You have 30 seconds to comply."

  10. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by Daimanta · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The IAU definition of a planet is more extensive than that."

    A celestial body that is (a) in orbit around the Sun, (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape, and (c) has cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  11. There is a good reason for this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If Pluto isn't a planet, it will cost a bunch of money to replace all the fifty year old science texts.

    If Pluto is a planet, they can keep using the fifty year old science texts.

    What, you think I'm kidding! You obviously aren't a teacher.

    1. Re:There is a good reason for this ... by hansamurai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But don't publishers try to sell "new editions" to the districts every six months, or is that only a college problem?

    2. Re:There is a good reason for this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's an easy solution to that, just use 100 year old science texts, Pluto won't be in them at all.

  12. If Illinois Says it's a Planet, It's a Planet by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't argue. There's already three astronomers at the bottom of Lake Michigan who "begged to differ."

    It's the Chicago way.

    1. Re:If Illinois Says it's a Planet, It's a Planet by compro01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's plutocrats that donate.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  13. They missed something. by Stoutlimb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The law is written thusly: "that as Pluto passes overhead through Illinois night skies, that it be reestablished with full planetary status"

    Because Illinois is a northerly state... does Pluto ever actually pass "overhead"? Ever? Pluto's orbital inclination to the sun is about 11 degrees at maximum. The latitude of Illinois is much higher than that, at about 36 degrees. So Pluto may never pass through their air space, even if the borders of Illinois are extended upwards to infinity.

    But since Pluto can never truly be "overhead", does that mean the law never actually goes into effect?

    Comments? Suggestions?

    1. Re:They missed something. by the_other_chewey · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because Illinois is a northerly state... does Pluto ever actually pass "overhead"? Ever?

      Yes.

      Pluto's orbital inclination to the sun is about 11 degrees at maximum. The latitude of Illinois is much higher than that, at about 36 degrees. So Pluto may never pass through their air space, even if the borders of Illinois are extended upwards to infinity.

      You are thinking about the inclination relative to the sun's equator - however, Pluto's orbital inclination to the Earth's plane is more than that: A bit over 17 degrees.
      Earth's own axis is tilted 23.5 degrees, and as there's no obvious integer resonance between their orbital periods, Pluto will at some time be visible overhead at as
      high as +/- ~40.5 degrees (17+23.5) - which is surprisingly close to Chicago's latitude of ~41 degrees. So either they got lucky, or someone actually thought about that.

      However, Pluto right now is at 17.5 degrees south, so it will never be in zenith north of 6 degrees north (23.5-17.5) or - very roughly - Panama. And due to Pluto's loooooong orbital period of
      about 250 Earth years, this will not change significantly for a very long time.

      On an unrelated note: WhyTF is slashdot eating my degree signs - and not allowing the ampersand HTML entity?

  14. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by FTWinston · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nice selective quoting there. You missed a bit: "states that in the Solar System a planet is" .. so this definition doesn't apply outside the solar system, it doesn't say that things outwith the solar system cannot be planets.

  15. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Neptune will never "suck up" Pluto. They are in a 3:2 mean motion resonance, so although their orbits cross, they will never collide.

    http://www.nineplanets.org/plutodyn.html
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbital_resonance

  16. Re:Yo mama is so fat... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You used Edsger Dijkstra references as a kid? I don't think it was the "Yo mama" insults that got you beat up on the playground!

  17. Tomorrow's Headline... by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    CHICAGO - Federal authorities have indicted several Illinios Senators on corruption charges after an undercover investigation. According to tapes released, Senators called a number of planetoids asking "what they could get" for the title of planet. Rod Blagojevich was unavailable for comment.

  18. Re:Before people say that Illinois is stupid by MartinSchou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with having Pluto being a regular planet not that you have nine planets, it's that you end up with a much larger number of planets as a lot of kuiper belt objects are better matches for planet status than Pluto.

    Pluto doesn't look like any of the other planets in other ways, such as having a 'moon' so big that its center of mass isn't inside itself. In fact Charon is 11% of Pluto's mass, and while the Moon (Luna) looks huge, its mass is only 1% of the Earth's.

    Just as interesting, Charon doesn't orbit Pluto, making it the only 'planet' with a non-orbiting satellite. Aditionally this satelitte has a mean distance that is less than 20 times Pluto's radius. To put that in perspective, that'd make the Moon orbit at 120,000 km - about a third that of its current orbit. And if we wanted to put it even more into perspective, the Moon would also have to grow significantly to something like 3 times its current size (haven't done the math). While that would be interesting from an astronomical point of view, I'm fairly certain we wouldn't enjoy the increased gravitational pull. If you think high tide is bad now, imagine what it'd be like if the ground itself moved up and down with the tides.

    We use definitions, like the word planet, to make things easier. If we can use one definition to describe the planets, and then have to go "oh, and it's okay if they don't lie in the same plane as everything else, as long as they're no more than 50 AU away from the Sun, and have a huge eccentric orbit compared to every other planet", then it doesn't really fit the same definition.

    In fact, just looking at orbital eccentricity it'd difficult to argue that Pluto (and Mercury) is in the same class as the other 7 planets. Mercury has a slight excuse since it's 100 times closer to the sun.

    But, to jump on your main point:
    "declaring that what everyone had said was a planet for the last 80 years is now not one"

    That's the thing about science. Science knows it doesn't know everything, otherwise it'd stop.

    What have we discovered/come to realise in the last 80 years, that we took for granted back then? How about asbestos not being good for you? Smoking not being good for you? That you could in fact go faster than the speed of sound? That DDT isn't the safest way to get rid of bugs?

    How about something a bit more down to earth? Like plate tectonics. I mean, if you were to go back in time to the 1930s, when Pluto was discovered, and told people that the earth's surface was made up of large slabs of rock, floating on an inner sea of molten rock, and that these massive plates moved, shifting continents around and that the Earth of today looks nothing like the earth of 100 million years ago, you'd either be comitted to mental 'care', or just outright laughed at.

    But, if you prefer sticking to your guns, defending something that we thought was correct 80 years ago, then why not do one better and defend astrology. That's even older.

  19. The Pluto Proposition by Povno · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pluto: "I'm being what?"

    Astrological society: "Demoted... you're being demoted."

    Pluto: "I don't understand... why?"

    Astrological society: "Honestly, your just not up to code, you know? Most planets have certain criteria they must follow, criteria that you just don't meet. You understand right?"

    Pluto: "I sure as hell do not!"

    Astrological society: "Well, it's like this... realistically... well, your an ice cube, basically and well... we mistook for a real planet. But we do apologize for the confusion."

    Pluto: "OMG. This is so embarrassing."

    Illinois: "It's okay Pluto we understand. Hey... how would like to be governor? Seriously, we have a spot open all the time? Tell you what, if you agree to govern us then we'll let you be a planet."

    Pluto: "Uhm... you do realize that in all reality, I am a giant ice cube right?"

    Illinois: "That is neither her nor there... look, when the time is right... it'll happen. You seem like a smart fellow, and together I think we can get a lot accomplished. Just remember though, when things go bad, you have to go back to being an ice cube. We don't need you parading your mistakes around for the whole galaxy to see like that last guy."

    --
    sudo apt-get lost
  20. Re:This is a resolution, not a law... by Electrawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With Blago, Burris, Todd Stroger's extreme Cook county sales taxes (Chicago for the rest of you), Sheriff Tom Dart suing craigslist...

    I'm embarrassed to live here. Passing a "Pluto is a planet" resolution is over the top for this legislature compared with all the other fun stuff going on. It furthers Illinois as a laughing stock, tarnishing the reputation of the state, it's people and businesses.

    That is reason enough to get my goat, straw that bropke the camels back per se and make some phone calls and try and remind my representatives to get the bleep on track.