Slashdot Mirror


"Spin Battery" Effect Discovered

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Miami and at the Universities of Tokyo and Tohoku, in Japan, have discovered a spin battery effect: the ability to store energy into the magnetic spin of a material and to later extract that energy as electricity, without a chemical reaction. The researchers have built an actual device to demonstrate the effect that has a diameter about that of a human hair. This is a potentially game-changing discovery that could affect battery and other technologies. Quoting: Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED..., the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles. The possibilities are endless, Barnes said.'"

28 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Cool. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds cool, but what they are not telling you is that it will stop working if you bring it south of the equator. :)

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but on the other hand, it provides limitless energy in Washington DC!

    2. Re:Cool. by MillenneumMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      NASCAR!!!

  2. Can't light an LED by Taibhsear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this due to the scale of the device/experiment or is it a limitation in the output that they can get it to generate so far?

    1. Re:Can't light an LED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well the device they've built has the diameter of a human hair it doesn't really matter (unless it's also really really long). Ten thousand in a battery the size of a AA would surely give off more energy than existing alkali or NiMH batteries of the same size.

    2. Re:Can't light an LED by BillOfThePecosKind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would think it would be a limitation of the test size. If it's like any other electrical device, we should be able to stack a WHOLE bunch of them in series to create larger voltages. I really hope this goes somewhere, a lot of what is holding us back from implementing more renewable energy sources is the fact that we have no efficient (cost efficient mostly) way of storing the energy.

    3. Re:Can't light an LED by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More importantly, you can stack several chemical batteries together for more power and the only issue you have to worry about is heat.

      Stack several magnetic based batteries together, are you going to have to worry about their fields interfering with each other? What if this is only a workable model when the battery IS the width of a human hair.

    4. Re:Can't light an LED by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Correct, just like a spiders web strand is stronger for its size than steel. I predict we will be building skyscrapers out of spider web about the same time as this new technology matures.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  3. Miles? by noundi · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles. The possibilities are endless, Barnes said.

    Awesome, I have yet to travel miles by car.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Miles? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED..., the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles.

      This is one of the least informative lines ever included in a tech summary.
      Any energy storing tech that's worth it's salt can potentially run a car for miles. It's a question of efficiency and cost. I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands if I want to, but that isn't a breakthrough in the field.
      And of course "miles" tells nothing. Powering a car 3-5 miles is next to worthless. If they said 10's of miles we would know this had the potential to replace current tech or at least come close. If they said 100's of miles we would be facing a revolutionary improvement.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    2. Re:Miles? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands"

      So you bought a Yugo too, eh?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Miles? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands if I want to

      I think there is some stimulus money available for you.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. yeah, if you believe the spin... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, yeah. We know how the spin works. But it works only in the PR side of things.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  5. Achem by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics. So you create a magnetic field, okay. Great. What's to prevent everything that's metallic in the area from moving around it, inducing current in it, and converting it into useless thermal energy? In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging? It might be good for a really high-capacity capacitor, but a battery? Batteries are long term.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Achem by Hordeking · · Score: 4, Informative

      Magnetic shielding?

      A Faraday cage?

      Faraday cages don't stop magnetic fields.

      Even if you do stop the magnetic field (it can be done, but not with a Faraday cage), your battery would be inducing regular and eddy currents in the shield, which will convert the magnetic field to useless thermal energy over time.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    2. Re:Achem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah you're right. I bet they totally never thought of that.

      When did "In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics" turn into some goddamn meme that gets pulled out when what you really mean is "I don't understand, can anyone please explain?"

      Because you're implying that these researchers are in some other house that doesn't obey the laws of physics, and that pointing this out is some revelation. Physicists from three institutions in two countries worked on this - are you really so stupid to think they don't know about thermodynamics? Really?

    3. Re:Achem by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging?

      A liberal coating of snake oil.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Achem by CecilPL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now Eddy's in currents too? I think I saw his couch float by back when he was in the space-time continuum.

    5. Re:Achem by Comboman · · Score: 4, Informative
      When did "In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics" turn into some goddamn meme

      Simpsons season 6, episode 21 ("The PTA Disbands").

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    6. Re:Achem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Informative


      In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.

      Like other posters pointed out: you likely don't know what thermodynamics even is. Hint: thermo has something to do with temperature. Thermodynamcs is about entropy and heat not about magnetic fields or electric fields.

      To your question:
      In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging?
      The battery does not discharge in the same way your hard drive is not losing its content just so. The magnetic fields in such a device are static that means they don't move, that means they don't induce anything to anything. However if you read the article (yes the linked article, you can read it, you know!!) you find that nanoscale areas are magnetized and that tunnel effects are involved. I guess that such small areas can "discharge" randomly vie tunnel effects (similar to radioactive decay).

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  6. CAUTION by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not open or crush battery. Severe risk of releasing a life-sucking vortex.

    Do not dispose in fire. Doing so could loose a storm of flaming vortices.

    Do not use this battery on carnival rides, while figure skating, or place in spinning clothes washer. Risk of severe gyroscopic reactions, which may lead to property damage, personal injury or death.

    1. Re:CAUTION by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do not taunt Magnetic Spin Battery.

      --
      Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    2. Re:CAUTION by Gerafix · · Score: 4, Funny
      You forgot:

      Do not look into spinning battery with remaining eye.

  7. Yeah, but.. by AndrewNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED...

    So you're telling me this thing is less powerful than a potato?

  8. The Nature pre-publication link by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's the pre-publication link in Nature .

    The electromotive force (e.m.f.) predicted by Faraday's law reflects the forces acting on the charge, â"e, of an electron moving through a device or circuit, and is proportional to the time derivative of the magnetic field. This conventional e.m.f. is usually absent for stationary circuits and static magnetic fields. There are also forces that act on the spin of an electron; it has been recently predicted that, for circuits that are in part composed of ferromagnetic materials, there arises an e.m.f. of spin origin even for a static magnetic field. This e.m.f. can be attributed to a time-varying magnetization of the host material, such as the motion of magnetic domains in a static magnetic field, and reflects the conversion of magnetic to electrical energy. Here we show that such an e.m.f. can indeed be induced by a static magnetic field in magnetic tunnel junctions containing zinc-blende-structured MnAs quantum nanomagnets. The observed e.m.f. operates on a timescale of approximately 10^2-10^3 seconds and results from the conversion of the magnetic energy of the superparamagnetic MnAs nanomagnets into electrical energy when these magnets undergo magnetic quantum tunnelling. As a consequence, a huge magnetoresistance of up to 100,000 per cent is observed for certain bias voltages. Our results strongly support the contention that, in magnetic nanostructures, Faraday's law of induction must be generalized to account for forces of purely spin origin. The huge magnetoresistance and e.m.f. may find potential applications in high sensitivity magnetic sensors, as well as in new active devices such as 'spin batteries'.

    Readers with subscriptions can see the whole paper.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:The Nature pre-publication link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ask and you shall receive...

      Electromotive force and huge magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions
      Pham Nam Hai1, Shinobu Ohya1,2, Masaaki Tanaka1,2, Stewart E. Barnes3,4 & Sadamichi Maekawa5,6

      Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
      Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi-shi 332-0012, Japan
      Physics Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124, USA
      TCM, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
      Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
      CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo 100-0075, Japan
      Correspondence to: Masaaki Tanaka1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.T. (Email: masaaki@ee.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

      The electromotive force (e.m.f.) predicted by Faraday's law reflects the forces acting on the charge, -e, of an electron moving through a device or circuit, and is proportional to the time derivative of the magnetic field. This conventional e.m.f. is usually absent for stationary circuits and static magnetic fields. There are also forces that act on the spin of an electron; it has been recently predicted1, 2 that, for circuits that are in part composed of ferromagnetic materials, there arises an e.m.f. of spin origin even for a static magnetic field. This e.m.f. can be attributed to a time-varying magnetization of the host material, such as the motion of magnetic domains in a static magnetic field, and reflects the conversion of magnetic to electrical energy. Here we show that such an e.m.f. can indeed be induced by a static magnetic field in magnetic tunnel junctions containing zinc-blende-structured MnAs quantum nanomagnets. The observed e.m.f. operates on a timescale of approximately 102-103 seconds and results from the conversion of the magnetic energy of the superparamagnetic MnAs nanomagnets into electrical energy when these magnets undergo magnetic quantum tunnelling. As a consequence, a huge magnetoresistance of up to 100,000 per cent is observed for certain bias voltages. Our results strongly support the contention that, in magnetic nanostructures, Faraday's law of induction must be generalized to account for forces of purely spin origin. The huge magnetoresistance and e.m.f. may find potential applications in high sensitivity magnetic sensors, as well as in new active devices such as 'spin batteries'.

      Three ingredients are important to the observation of a large spin-derived e.m.f. The first is an ensemble of superparamagnetic nanometre-sized magnets with a large spin S 200. Owing to a very large magnetic anisotropy, the magnetic moment is aligned along the z direction with a component Sz = S of the spin in this direction. A static magnetic field H = Hz splits these two ground states (with Sz = S) by an energy 2H = 2SgBH (where g is the g-factor and B is the Bohr magneton). It is this appreciable energy difference that drives the e.m.f. Second, these nanomagnets constitute an essential conductive path through our magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs), but have such a small capacitance C that the Coulomb energy U = e2/(2C) for adding or removing electrons exceeds the thermal energy kBT, effectively blocking sequential electrical conduction3. However, as is commonplace, there are spin-flip channels of many-body origin that conduct under this 'Coulomb blockade'. Third, for a temperature T = 3 K, an S 200 nanomagnet would not usually relax within our ten-minute timescale. However, the spin-flip channels mix Sz = -S with -S+1 and ultimately the two ground states Sz = S. With the conduction of a single electron, relaxation -S S occurs, the electron gains an energy 2SgBH, and for an ensemble this results in a steady current driven by an e.m.f. = 2SgBH/e.

      Normally an MTJ consists of metallic thin-film ferromagnetic electrodes and a thin tunnel barrier made of an insulator. The MTJs in this study are unique (Fig. 1a); they co

  9. You 'flywheel' people do realize.. by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That we're talking about _spin_ here, as in a property of subatomic particles corresponding to an 'intrinsic' angular momentum, not as in something that's physically 'spinning'. Electrons spin +1/2 or -1/2 and that's it. They can't stop. The energy here is being stored in the form of the _orientations_ of these spins, not the spin itself. What's keeping them that way is conservation of spin. Which is analogous to conservation of angular momentum. (Bound) Electrons can't change their spin state spontaneously. Which is why stuff which is magnetized stays that way for a long time. It's also the reason for phosphorescence. While I think what they've done here is undeniably pretty cool, in turning spin-state transitions into electricity directly, it's probably not going to create any real competition for conventional batteries, for fairly simple reasons. Batteries store electricity in the form of chemical redox states, which means adding/removing electrons from atoms/ions. The energy differences between spin states are typically an order of magnitude smaller than the energy difference between redox states.

  10. Link to actual paper by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bypassing the layers of blogs, here's the actual paper. But it costs $32 to read more than the abstract.

    This is an application of superparamagnetism. Paramagnetism is ordinarily a weak phenomenon, but there are some new materials for which this effect is much stronger.

    It's too early to tell if this is useful. Right now, it's in the category of "minor development in materials science overpromoted as a major breakthrough". It might turn out to have some relevance to MRI imaging or disk drives, both of which rely on fine-scale magnetic effects.