Slashdot Mirror


"Spin Battery" Effect Discovered

An anonymous reader writes "Researchers at the University of Miami and at the Universities of Tokyo and Tohoku, in Japan, have discovered a spin battery effect: the ability to store energy into the magnetic spin of a material and to later extract that energy as electricity, without a chemical reaction. The researchers have built an actual device to demonstrate the effect that has a diameter about that of a human hair. This is a potentially game-changing discovery that could affect battery and other technologies. Quoting: Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED..., the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles. The possibilities are endless, Barnes said.'"

56 of 234 comments (clear)

  1. Cool. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Funny

    This sounds cool, but what they are not telling you is that it will stop working if you bring it south of the equator. :)

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:Cool. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but on the other hand, it provides limitless energy in Washington DC!

    2. Re:Cool. by eric2hill · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you just have to take the battery out and flip it around. The poles reverse south of the equator.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
      LOADING...
      READY.
      RUN
    3. Re:Cool. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      I bet it will even work on the O'Rily Factor even though he says it wont.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:Cool. by MillenneumMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      NASCAR!!!

  2. Can't light an LED by Taibhsear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this due to the scale of the device/experiment or is it a limitation in the output that they can get it to generate so far?

    1. Re:Can't light an LED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well the device they've built has the diameter of a human hair it doesn't really matter (unless it's also really really long). Ten thousand in a battery the size of a AA would surely give off more energy than existing alkali or NiMH batteries of the same size.

    2. Re:Can't light an LED by BillOfThePecosKind · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I would think it would be a limitation of the test size. If it's like any other electrical device, we should be able to stack a WHOLE bunch of them in series to create larger voltages. I really hope this goes somewhere, a lot of what is holding us back from implementing more renewable energy sources is the fact that we have no efficient (cost efficient mostly) way of storing the energy.

    3. Re:Can't light an LED by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Interesting

      More importantly, you can stack several chemical batteries together for more power and the only issue you have to worry about is heat.

      Stack several magnetic based batteries together, are you going to have to worry about their fields interfering with each other? What if this is only a workable model when the battery IS the width of a human hair.

    4. Re:Can't light an LED by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      surely?

      How can you be sure when they didn't post anything about the energy density? (Maybe there is some info in the original article, but I don't have access to the journal.

    5. Re:Can't light an LED by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Correct, just like a spiders web strand is stronger for its size than steel. I predict we will be building skyscrapers out of spider web about the same time as this new technology matures.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    6. Re:Can't light an LED by Torontoman · · Score: 2, Funny

      And I imagine the recharge time would be quick.

      (I also am imagining a charger that looks like a miniature warp engine from the USS enterprise... pulsing along. COOL)

    7. Re:Can't light an LED by BillOfThePecosKind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmm, that is a very good point. Assuming those objects have a hysteresis curve like any non-permanent magnet you would have to be careful about how you put them together. Maybe there is a way they can "wind" the strands around a core to negate any potential field problems, kind of like how interleaving windings on an inductor can help with copper loss. All things considered, sounds like a fun experiment!

  3. Miles? by noundi · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles. The possibilities are endless, Barnes said.

    Awesome, I have yet to travel miles by car.

    --
    I am the lawn!
    1. Re:Miles? by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED..., the energy that might be stored in this way could potentially run a car for miles.

      This is one of the least informative lines ever included in a tech summary.
      Any energy storing tech that's worth it's salt can potentially run a car for miles. It's a question of efficiency and cost. I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands if I want to, but that isn't a breakthrough in the field.
      And of course "miles" tells nothing. Powering a car 3-5 miles is next to worthless. If they said 10's of miles we would know this had the potential to replace current tech or at least come close. If they said 100's of miles we would be facing a revolutionary improvement.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    2. Re:Miles? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands"

      So you bought a Yugo too, eh?

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Miles? by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can potentially power a car for miles with twisted up rubberbands if I want to

      I think there is some stimulus money available for you.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  4. yeah, if you believe the spin... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, yeah. We know how the spin works. But it works only in the PR side of things.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:yeah, if you believe the spin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think this actually solves the ancient gnome riddle:
      1. Create tiny stackable PR agent.
      2. Release photo of it's employer doing coke of a hookers ass.
      3. Harvest spin energy.
      4. Profit!

    2. Re:yeah, if you believe the spin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      2. Release photo of it's employer doing coke of a hookers ass.

      Hey jerry, get back to work. Also, I told you to get rid of that picture.

  5. Achem by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics. So you create a magnetic field, okay. Great. What's to prevent everything that's metallic in the area from moving around it, inducing current in it, and converting it into useless thermal energy? In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging? It might be good for a really high-capacity capacitor, but a battery? Batteries are long term.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Achem by Eternauta3k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is magic (a.k.a. science you shouldn't be hand-waving about)

      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    2. Re:Achem by Hordeking · · Score: 4, Informative

      Magnetic shielding?

      A Faraday cage?

      Faraday cages don't stop magnetic fields.

      Even if you do stop the magnetic field (it can be done, but not with a Faraday cage), your battery would be inducing regular and eddy currents in the shield, which will convert the magnetic field to useless thermal energy over time.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    3. Re:Achem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah you're right. I bet they totally never thought of that.

      When did "In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics" turn into some goddamn meme that gets pulled out when what you really mean is "I don't understand, can anyone please explain?"

      Because you're implying that these researchers are in some other house that doesn't obey the laws of physics, and that pointing this out is some revelation. Physicists from three institutions in two countries worked on this - are you really so stupid to think they don't know about thermodynamics? Really?

    4. Re:Achem by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging?

      A liberal coating of snake oil.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Achem by CecilPL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now Eddy's in currents too? I think I saw his couch float by back when he was in the space-time continuum.

    6. Re:Achem by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but what sort of time scale are we talking about? Even current batteries discharge themselves over time.

    7. Re:Achem by Comboman · · Score: 4, Informative
      When did "In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics" turn into some goddamn meme

      Simpsons season 6, episode 21 ("The PTA Disbands").

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    8. Re:Achem by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 2, Funny

      But when he threatened my life with a switchblade knife?!

    9. Re:Achem by davolfman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mu metal?

    10. Re:Achem by girlintraining · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because you're implying that these researchers are in some other house that doesn't obey the laws of physics, and that pointing this out is some revelation. Physicists from three institutions in two countries worked on this - are you really so stupid to think they don't know about thermodynamics? Really?

      There has been a lot of crap science put forward over the years -- that debacle with cold fusion being foremost in my mind. But research has been faked in every scientific field and in some cases hasn't been revealed for decades. Very smart people can make very elaborate ruses. I may not be a group of physicists from three institutions and in two countries, but I'm not an idiot either and I resent your implication that simply because I use an internet meme that cancels my original question. And of all the fields of science that have had faked research -- an awful lot of it has been over magnetism. Perpetual motion machines, in particular -- their inventors love using magnetism. So my skepticism is quite justified.

      You still haven't addressed the point of my post: Which is how does a device that stores an electrical charge (a battery) via magnetism not go dead based simply on inductive coupling with nearby metals?

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    11. Re:Achem by mbkennel · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Which is how does a device that stores an electrical charge (a battery) via magnetism not go dead based simply on inductive coupling with nearby metals?"

      Firstly, inductive coupling requires time dependent magnetic fields and probably realistically macroscopically reinforcing ones so that the field strength is appreciable at a distance.

      And then it could be locally thermodynamically stable, like opposing domains on a ferromagnetic surface, like a hard drive.

      Hard drives wont to spontaneously erase themselves to 'all zero' over human lifetimes.

      The global lowest energy state is "all spins pointing the same way".

    12. Re:Achem by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 4, Informative


      In THIS house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.

      Like other posters pointed out: you likely don't know what thermodynamics even is. Hint: thermo has something to do with temperature. Thermodynamcs is about entropy and heat not about magnetic fields or electric fields.

      To your question:
      In other words -- what's preventing the battery from discharging?
      The battery does not discharge in the same way your hard drive is not losing its content just so. The magnetic fields in such a device are static that means they don't move, that means they don't induce anything to anything. However if you read the article (yes the linked article, you can read it, you know!!) you find that nanoscale areas are magnetized and that tunnel effects are involved. I guess that such small areas can "discharge" randomly vie tunnel effects (similar to radioactive decay).

      angel'o'sphere

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:Achem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Magnetic spin != magnetic strength. This is like... storing energy in a photon's polarization, instead of as the photon itself.

  6. CAUTION by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not open or crush battery. Severe risk of releasing a life-sucking vortex.

    Do not dispose in fire. Doing so could loose a storm of flaming vortices.

    Do not use this battery on carnival rides, while figure skating, or place in spinning clothes washer. Risk of severe gyroscopic reactions, which may lead to property damage, personal injury or death.

    1. Re:CAUTION by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do not taunt Magnetic Spin Battery.

      --
      Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    2. Re:CAUTION by Gerafix · · Score: 4, Funny
      You forgot:

      Do not look into spinning battery with remaining eye.

  7. Battery Aging by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If this does prove to be useful for batteries, would it eliminate issues related to battery memory?

    It appears current rechargeable batteries "age" due to chemical reactions even if not used. Even more so due to repeated charge cycles.

    With no chemical reactions in play, does this mean people won't be forced to upgrade their phones simply because their battery is all but dead?

    1. Re:Battery Aging by aukset · · Score: 3, Funny

      like taking the batteries out of things, then losing them in the toilet, the cat, the microwave...

      I suddenly have an urge to put batteries in a cat...

      --
      No sig now
  8. I was hoping it was a spin isomer battery by rford · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I though someone had got the induced decay of Hf spin isomers to work.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induced_gamma_emission

    1300 megajoules per gram would be a good battery.

  9. Yeah, but.. by AndrewNeo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although the actual device... cannot even light up an LED...

    So you're telling me this thing is less powerful than a potato?

  10. Yep, whole lotta spin going on there... by macraig · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... and not all of it from the magnets themselves.

  11. Why An LED... by LEX+LETHAL · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least for the proof of concept stage, they might want to make a light source that consumes significantly less juice than an LED, and has a greater tolerance for fluctuation.

    From Wikipedia:

    "LEDs must be supplied with the voltage above the threshold and a current below the rating. This can involve series resistors or current-regulated power supplies." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Led#Disadvantages

    Using an LED as an example of what this tiny power souce can't power seems futile at this point.

    1. Re:Why An LED... by fatboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know of any common light sources that are more efficient than LEDs.

      I don't think you understand the meaning of that Wikipedia quote.

      The Voltage "above the threshold" means the voltage to cause the NP junction to conduct. In most diodes, that is .7 volts.

      The part about "a current below the rating", means that if you present enough voltage across the PN junction, as to reach the current limit of the PN junction, it will fail.

      --
      --fatboy
  12. The Nature pre-publication link by Scareduck · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here's the pre-publication link in Nature .

    The electromotive force (e.m.f.) predicted by Faraday's law reflects the forces acting on the charge, â"e, of an electron moving through a device or circuit, and is proportional to the time derivative of the magnetic field. This conventional e.m.f. is usually absent for stationary circuits and static magnetic fields. There are also forces that act on the spin of an electron; it has been recently predicted that, for circuits that are in part composed of ferromagnetic materials, there arises an e.m.f. of spin origin even for a static magnetic field. This e.m.f. can be attributed to a time-varying magnetization of the host material, such as the motion of magnetic domains in a static magnetic field, and reflects the conversion of magnetic to electrical energy. Here we show that such an e.m.f. can indeed be induced by a static magnetic field in magnetic tunnel junctions containing zinc-blende-structured MnAs quantum nanomagnets. The observed e.m.f. operates on a timescale of approximately 10^2-10^3 seconds and results from the conversion of the magnetic energy of the superparamagnetic MnAs nanomagnets into electrical energy when these magnets undergo magnetic quantum tunnelling. As a consequence, a huge magnetoresistance of up to 100,000 per cent is observed for certain bias voltages. Our results strongly support the contention that, in magnetic nanostructures, Faraday's law of induction must be generalized to account for forces of purely spin origin. The huge magnetoresistance and e.m.f. may find potential applications in high sensitivity magnetic sensors, as well as in new active devices such as 'spin batteries'.

    Readers with subscriptions can see the whole paper.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:The Nature pre-publication link by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

      Readers with subscriptions can also leak the whole paper.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:The Nature pre-publication link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ask and you shall receive...

      Electromotive force and huge magnetoresistance in magnetic tunnel junctions
      Pham Nam Hai1, Shinobu Ohya1,2, Masaaki Tanaka1,2, Stewart E. Barnes3,4 & Sadamichi Maekawa5,6

      Department of Electrical Engineering and Information Systems, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
      Japan Science and Technology Agency, 4-1-8 Honcho, Kawaguchi-shi 332-0012, Japan
      Physics Department, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33124, USA
      TCM, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
      Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8577, Japan
      CREST, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Tokyo 100-0075, Japan
      Correspondence to: Masaaki Tanaka1,2 Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.T. (Email: masaaki@ee.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp).

      The electromotive force (e.m.f.) predicted by Faraday's law reflects the forces acting on the charge, -e, of an electron moving through a device or circuit, and is proportional to the time derivative of the magnetic field. This conventional e.m.f. is usually absent for stationary circuits and static magnetic fields. There are also forces that act on the spin of an electron; it has been recently predicted1, 2 that, for circuits that are in part composed of ferromagnetic materials, there arises an e.m.f. of spin origin even for a static magnetic field. This e.m.f. can be attributed to a time-varying magnetization of the host material, such as the motion of magnetic domains in a static magnetic field, and reflects the conversion of magnetic to electrical energy. Here we show that such an e.m.f. can indeed be induced by a static magnetic field in magnetic tunnel junctions containing zinc-blende-structured MnAs quantum nanomagnets. The observed e.m.f. operates on a timescale of approximately 102-103 seconds and results from the conversion of the magnetic energy of the superparamagnetic MnAs nanomagnets into electrical energy when these magnets undergo magnetic quantum tunnelling. As a consequence, a huge magnetoresistance of up to 100,000 per cent is observed for certain bias voltages. Our results strongly support the contention that, in magnetic nanostructures, Faraday's law of induction must be generalized to account for forces of purely spin origin. The huge magnetoresistance and e.m.f. may find potential applications in high sensitivity magnetic sensors, as well as in new active devices such as 'spin batteries'.

      Three ingredients are important to the observation of a large spin-derived e.m.f. The first is an ensemble of superparamagnetic nanometre-sized magnets with a large spin S 200. Owing to a very large magnetic anisotropy, the magnetic moment is aligned along the z direction with a component Sz = S of the spin in this direction. A static magnetic field H = Hz splits these two ground states (with Sz = S) by an energy 2H = 2SgBH (where g is the g-factor and B is the Bohr magneton). It is this appreciable energy difference that drives the e.m.f. Second, these nanomagnets constitute an essential conductive path through our magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs), but have such a small capacitance C that the Coulomb energy U = e2/(2C) for adding or removing electrons exceeds the thermal energy kBT, effectively blocking sequential electrical conduction3. However, as is commonplace, there are spin-flip channels of many-body origin that conduct under this 'Coulomb blockade'. Third, for a temperature T = 3 K, an S 200 nanomagnet would not usually relax within our ten-minute timescale. However, the spin-flip channels mix Sz = -S with -S+1 and ultimately the two ground states Sz = S. With the conduction of a single electron, relaxation -S S occurs, the electron gains an energy 2SgBH, and for an ensemble this results in a steady current driven by an e.m.f. = 2SgBH/e.

      Normally an MTJ consists of metallic thin-film ferromagnetic electrodes and a thin tunnel barrier made of an insulator. The MTJs in this study are unique (Fig. 1a); they co

  13. news: SI units: the human hair diameter.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one welcome the new SI unit human hair diameter overlord.

  14. You 'flywheel' people do realize.. by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That we're talking about _spin_ here, as in a property of subatomic particles corresponding to an 'intrinsic' angular momentum, not as in something that's physically 'spinning'. Electrons spin +1/2 or -1/2 and that's it. They can't stop. The energy here is being stored in the form of the _orientations_ of these spins, not the spin itself. What's keeping them that way is conservation of spin. Which is analogous to conservation of angular momentum. (Bound) Electrons can't change their spin state spontaneously. Which is why stuff which is magnetized stays that way for a long time. It's also the reason for phosphorescence. While I think what they've done here is undeniably pretty cool, in turning spin-state transitions into electricity directly, it's probably not going to create any real competition for conventional batteries, for fairly simple reasons. Batteries store electricity in the form of chemical redox states, which means adding/removing electrons from atoms/ions. The energy differences between spin states are typically an order of magnitude smaller than the energy difference between redox states.

  15. Re:If you actually RTFA.. by Gat0r30y · · Score: 2, Informative

    moving parts in computers (and apparently can act as a replacement for the transistor).

    I don't think this is a replacement for the transistor, there certainly wasn't any indication that these can perform any logic operations. A replacement for your hard drive, which besides the fan (which you will probably still need), is the moving parts of your computer. It remains to be seen whether this process could be useful at scale. You need billions of these little things, along with some method for reading and writing to each unit. The HDD industry has been working for years (still in R&D phase) on spintronics to store data, and there is still a long way to go. But there is indeed great promise in it as well.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
  16. Static magnetic field? by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Spintronics is a little too far out of my ken (I was always more of a radiation physicist, where everything comes in nice little packages instead of fields), but if I'm reading the paper correctly, they're saying that they can apply a static magnetic field to one of these devices and then can measure a voltage drop across a resistor hooked up to the device. They can get a few millivolts from a 1.2 Tesla field, which persists for at least ten minutes but does decay in that time frame. When they remove the magnetic field, the voltage disappears.

    I guess my question is that if the field is static, where is the energy coming from that drives the current giving rise to the voltage? I'm also wondering how one regenerates the voltage after it discharges completely.

  17. Link to actual paper by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bypassing the layers of blogs, here's the actual paper. But it costs $32 to read more than the abstract.

    This is an application of superparamagnetism. Paramagnetism is ordinarily a weak phenomenon, but there are some new materials for which this effect is much stronger.

    It's too early to tell if this is useful. Right now, it's in the category of "minor development in materials science overpromoted as a major breakthrough". It might turn out to have some relevance to MRI imaging or disk drives, both of which rely on fine-scale magnetic effects.

  18. EMP by mrops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Article describes that nano-magnets apply a large magnetic field to "wound-up" the spin-battery.

    Having charged the hypothetical battery the article claims, the one that can run a car for miles. It is possible to discharge this battery near instantaneously, that should theoretically generate an EMP without a nuke. Something the military would be interested in.

    Off to patent my idea now.

    1. Re:EMP by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would make a very nasty 'oops' whilst fiddling with your car... 'oops I just fried every electronic device for 5 miles!'

  19. Should work with kilometres too! by PalmHair · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scientists think that with a few modifications the new technology could work with kilometres too, though it would still be recommended that the host country is a monarchy or at least a strongly-presidental republic.

    Other technical difficulties like the extremely strong gyroscopic effect should be overcome as well.

  20. Re:Miles? Car Batteries? You might want to check: by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (search on keyword "battery" if you don't want to read all the way through)

    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200904/chinese-innovation/3

    Some here may already have read about this, but it appears that China makes some very good batteries, mainly for the electronics industry. Now, it seems they had not long ago seen a company produce (ugly) electric cars, but batteries that rival the USA Big 3 (well, which of them's big anymore?) and even Tesla. Given that Tesla's demo/sports car ran over $100k, and despite their announced sedan:

    http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/17/tesla-whitestar-electric-sedan-to-debut-this-year/

    there is going to be some stiff global competition for such batteries, especially if what Chinese companies are working on can take off.

    To recap the recent Detroit Show:

    http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200901u/detroit-auto-show

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"