Slashdot Mirror


Utah Senate, House Pass Jack Thompson's Game Sales Bill

Ars Technica reports that the Utah State Senate and House have both passed Jack Thompson's proposed legislation that would stiffen penalties for the sale of M-rated games to minors. Oddly, on its trip through the state legislature, amendments rendered it largely ineffective; retailers are in the clear if the employee who sold the game goes through a training program, or if the minor misrepresents his age. It's also possible that the bill could cause some retailers to simply take down their ESRB-related advertising. Thompson's statements about the bill put the focus on advertising, but discussion on the Utah Senate floor had a familiar ring, touching on the story of a Grand Theft Auto player who killed two policemen in 2003. The ESRB wrote an open letter in opposition of the bill, saying it could undo the efforts they've made to popularize their rating system. The bill's sponsors fired back, questioning the industry's overall commitment to ratings, and now it awaits only the governor's signature before becoming law.

200 comments

  1. why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    STILL listening to Jack Thompson? He's already been certified crazy, disbarred with extreme prejudice (out of a cannon, into the sun) and will probably never practice law ever again.

    Besides, we all know Jack Thompson died when Penny Arcade was honored by Washington.

    1. Re:why are people... by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, this is Utah.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To be fair, Republicans also listen to Rush Limbaugh. Whom do you think is a more crazy choice for them to listen?

    3. Re:why are people... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      This bill has been worked on for a while, starting well before he was disbarred.

    4. Re:why are people... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Funny

      To be fair, Republicans also listen to Rush Limbaugh. Whom do you think is a more crazy choice for them to listen?

      I honestly don't know that there is a correct answer to this question.

    5. Re:why are people... by besalope · · Score: 4, Funny

      Um, this is Utah.

      Yeah, silly AC thought the constituents of Utah were people.

    6. Re:why are people... by dbcad7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just keep in mind that crap sometimes spreads.. There was a time when you could smoke on the Greyhound bus.. that is until you entered the state of Utah.. look where we are at today.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    7. Re:why are people... by masterzora · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, now I can travel on that Greyhound bus next weekend without me having to worry about some idiot smoking and triggering my asthma. This bill may be total crap, but it's good to know that I have to thank Utah for something now.

      --
      Remember, open source is free as in speech, not free as in bear.
    8. Re:why are people... by dbcad7 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe it's safer for you to just stay at home bubble boy.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    9. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Maybe you should drop dead of lung cancer and not force the person next to you on the bus to suffer the same fate involuntarily. I bet you could do that, in fact, if you take your own advice and just smoke yourself silly there. No one's infringing on your right to smoke... we're barring you from making other people breathe in that noxious poison. I hope you're putting away three packs a day, as long as I'm nowhere near your foul breath.

    10. Re:why are people... by Ahnteis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Insightful?

      It's getting as bad as Digg around here.

      How about this: Politicians (UT or otherwise) are idiots who will do anything they *think* will make them popular. Right now fighting the evil scourge of video games is a popular choice.

      The fact that they're doing this all over the nation should teach us several things -- none of which is "Um, this is Utah."

    11. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got "Cancer"!

    12. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's safer for you to just stay at home bubble boy.

      Yeah, suck it up. Real men don't breathe.

    13. Re:why are people... by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Troll

      Um, this is Utah.

      Stop! Mormon time!

      But seriously Utah, stop it with the stupid laws.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    14. Re:why are people... by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it's safer for you to just stay at home bubble boy.

      Your right to smoke stops at the bubble boy's lungs.
      If you think you can force your poison into his body, maybe he'll think he can force his blade or bullet into yours. So be civil, because you won't like an escalation of violence. You really won't.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:why are people... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Yeah, while I love living in Utah, the lawmakers seem to fall too easily to the "think of the children" argument.

      On a side note, the recently discussed bill involving bars keeping records of patrons' drivers licenses passed, along with one stating that restaurants can no longer mix drinks in sight of the patrons.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    16. Re:why are people... by Dishevel · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wow.

      First. I do not smoke cigarettes.

      Second. In a small confined space I can see that smoking should be curtailed. Really though. A lot of place have laws now that you cant smoke outside. This is not about where someones rights end. This is truly about those who believe they are smarter than everyone else deciding what they think others should and should not be able to do.

      Third. Sir you show your true extreme left wing colors when you think that escalating from smoking in a bus to shooting someone is anywhere near the ability to even be mentioned.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    17. Re:why are people... by zoward · · Score: 1

      ...and when any given politician is re-running for office, their opponent will point out that they voted against keeping mature rated video games out of the hands of children. This will lose them votes - especially in a conservative state like Utah. Voting for it costs them no political capital. They probably already know that the law will be overturned anyway, and the state will pay legal fees to the EFF, but it's easier for them to let that happen than to try to explain their reasoning to the voting public. It sucks, but even to an otherwise sympathetic politician it's a Catch-22. This is why you're seeing state after state pass these inane unconstitutional video game laws - no one wants to be the one who didn't vote for it.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    18. Re:why are people... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Restaurants can no longer mix drinks in sight of the patrons? Does that apply to bars too? What's the fucking purpose of that?

    19. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful?

      It's getting as bad as Digg around here.

      How about this: Politicians (UT or otherwise) are idiots who will do anything they *think* will make them popular. Right now fighting the evil scourge of video games is a popular choice.

      The fact that they're doing this all over the nation should teach us several things -- none of which is "Um, this is Utah."

      You are absolutely correct. But we are speaking about Utah in specific, and there is a disproportionate quantity of stupid religious garbage legislation in Utah as opposed to other states. In Utah, to be in politics you are pretty much required to submit a quota of irrational, reactionary, emotion-based legislation on a regular basis, or the voting base will turn on you.
      Try living there sometime, it's crazy. The only sane people live on the Indian Reservations.

    20. Re:why are people... by Kristy+Selvaggi · · Score: 1

      It makes me sick to think about all the tax dollars this douche has wasted on his BS crusade! That's right Thompson...a GIRL just called YOU a DOUCHE!!

    21. Re:why are people... by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Second. In a small confined space I can see that smoking should be curtailed. Really though. A lot of place have laws now that you cant smoke outside.

      Unless he was talking about some kind of open-air bus, the law referred to here was about confined spaces.

      The fact that some other places might have mad laws about smoking outside is another matter. Nowhere did Scrameustache suggest that he was in favour of those laws, so his reasoning of it being about where people's rights end is entirely logical, and arguing against a ban on smoking outside is arguing with a straw man.

      Sir you show your true extreme left wing colors when you think that escalating from smoking in a bus to shooting someone is anywhere near the ability to even be mentioned.

      What on earth do economical views have to do with this?

      He was making an analogy. His analogy, though extreme, was perfectly sound, because the same argument about doing what you like to other people applies to both. Your analogy of comparing bans in buses to bans outside is not, because his reasoning about not harming others doesn't apply there.

    22. Re:why are people... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Informative

      Admittedly, I haven't read the actual legislation, just news reports' summary of it, so I am likely misinformed, but frankly, I don't get it either.

      Several justifications were presented, but none sound plausible to me. Supposedly, Concerned Citizens think that underage people are going to nick drinks from the bar (has that ever happened in the history of bars?) When I was underage, I just had a friend buy the drink for me and bring it to the table, or better yet, get a bottle from the liquor store and mix it at home.

      I heard that one supporter of the bill said something to the effect of "when I go out to eat, I don't want to see people drinking". I think these people should stick to fast food.

      There is also the classic "if kids see people drinking, they'll want to drink," which I'd respond to with "so fucking what?"

      I don't think the legislation applies to bars, as it is theoretically all people of legal drinking age there anyways. I also think that existing restaraunts all get grandfathered in, so they don't have to renovate to add a mixing back room.

      At any rate, it's Utah, and yes, there is definitely a weird culture here. I still like it here, but I wouldn't mind a few changes either.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    23. Re:why are people... by sunderland56 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's so that alcoholic drinks are not mixed within sight of minors. Because, of course, once you see a drink being mixed, you want one, even if you are eight years old. (No, I'm not making this up).

      As far as the video game bill goes... I predict a spike in video game sales in places like Colorado Springs (towns just over the border into another state - where non-Mormon residents of Utah go to buy booze, cigarettes, and a dose of sanity).

    24. Re:why are people... by mog007 · · Score: 1

      So the prohibitionists don't want to see people drinking when they go out to a restauraunt.

      I'd hope that vegans never get control of Utah's legislature, otherwise they'd have a meat section and a no-meat section.

    25. Re:why are people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never watched "V for Vendetta"? Jack Thompson in a idea, not a person, and we can no more kill the idea, than we can kill the children. Must think, not kill, or so Fallout 3 would like you to think...

    26. Re:why are people... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      A lot of place have laws now that you cant smoke outside. This is not about where someones rights end. This is truly about those who believe they are smarter than everyone else deciding what they think others should and should not be able to do.

      It's actually about ending tobacco smoking because of the impact it has on the health of the people in those jurisdictions. The goal is 0% smokers. The steps are incremental, but the goal is obvious.

      I think that's going too far (people should be able to enjoy a cigar now and then), but that's a natural consequences of things having gone too far in the other direction in the first place.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    27. Re:why are people... by beta21 · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful and funny?

    28. Re:why are people... by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Hey! I'm a people constituent (and gamer) in Utah you you insensitive clod.

  2. Jack Thompson by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't Jack Thompson die?

    1. Re:Jack Thompson by FroBugg · · Score: 5, Informative

      He was disbarred, which is sort of like dying for a lawyer. But he's still out there, sort of an undead lawyer now.

    2. Re:Jack Thompson by davester666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I always thought that you need to give up your soul and become undead to pass the bar.

      Being disbarred is kind of like being rejected by Satan...

      Note: IANAL :-0

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Jack Thompson by pushing-robot · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      He was disbarred, which is sort of like dying for a lawyer. But he's still out there, sort of an undead lawyer now.

      Oops. I guess that copy of Dead Rising I sent him was in poor taste.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    4. Re:Jack Thompson by Gerzel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Undead Lawyer == Politician?

    5. Re:Jack Thompson by beav007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      He was disbarred, which is sort of like dying for a lawyer. But he's still out there, sort of an undead lawyer now.

      He still might be able to get a job with Morcombe, Slant and Honeyplace...

    6. Re:Jack Thompson by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 5, Funny

      Undead Lawyer == Politician?

      No worse, lobbyest, you can vote out politicians.

    7. Re:Jack Thompson by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only medically and in areas in which "your heart stops beating" is considered "dead".

      --
      Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    8. Re:Jack Thompson by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What heart?

      Or is a stone as black as the pixel(s?) in Doom 3, and made of pure evil, now inside the definition for "heart" in Utah?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:Jack Thompson by spacefiddle · · Score: 1

      sort of an undead lawyer now

      Ach. Terry Pratchett should sue, but that might cause a rip in the space-time continuum.

    10. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Jack Thompson's case, it's more like Satan kicking him out because he was so evil that the regular devils felt he made them look (bad, um... good, um) wanting.

    11. Re:Jack Thompson by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Didn't Jack Thompson die?

      No, they shot him in the heart with a silver tipped wooden arrow that had been dipped in holy water, but it had no effect.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    12. Re:Jack Thompson by tftp · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't Jack Thompson die?

      It doesn't matter, Jack Thompson saves frequently.

    13. Re:Jack Thompson by DanielKerr · · Score: 5, Funny

      $ ps -A | grep "jack"
      4092 ? 00:27:00 jackd
      6248 ? 00:00:00 jackthompson
      $ kill -9 6248
      $ ps -A | grep "jack"
      4092 ? 00:27:00 jackd
      6248 ? 00:00:00 jackthompson

      :(

      --
      --Vector
    14. Re:Jack Thompson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but it is in La Mecca (Duck!)

    15. Re:Jack Thompson by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      He was disbarred, which is sort of like dying for a lawyer. But he's still out there, sort of an undead lawyer now.

      Thank you. I now have an image of Zombie Jack strolling about, arms reaching outward, holding a copy of GTA in one hand and a summons in the other, drooling "CLAAAIIIIIIIIIMMMMSSS...."

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    16. Re:Jack Thompson by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

      Is he singing "All we wanna do is ban your games"?

      I'm sorry JoCo... I had to.

    17. Re:Jack Thompson by sorak · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always thought that you need to give up your soul and become undead to pass the bar.

      Being disbarred is kind of like being rejected by Satan...

      Note: IANAL :-0

      Satan's HR: The thing about Jackie is that, at first, we thought he was evil. He was greedy, and slothful...He certainly went the extra mile, or didn't, whichever is good when your talking about sloth, well, that's what he did. And displaced anger, you betcha!

      But, over time, we began to notice something. When the other kids were knocking over the candy machine, he would just put up a sign that read "Please don't knock me over. And if you see someone trying to knock me over, please don't watch". When our executives were trying to find ways to air American Idol in place of the evening news, he was asking if they contestants could sing the severe weather warnings.

      Eventually, we realized, he isn't evil. He's just batshit crazy. And we are having none of that... If he wants to be batshit crazy, then he'll have to go to purgatory with the unbaptized babies and all the other crazies. So, we filled out a transfer request, and we're pretty sure he much happier there...Or not...Either way, it's not our problem.

    18. Re:Jack Thompson by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      Uhm just because he was disbarred doesn't mean his career is over. Lawyers become Judges which might be hard if you're not on the bar...not sure. Lawyers can become politicians, and he's already halfway there. Lawyers can become prostitutes and strippers, they don't have much shame and willing to sell themselves. I'm sure CEO positions are ripe too. There's so much opportunities for you once you sell your soul.

      I wonder...can lawyers work for a corporation in a lawyer capacity even without being on the local bar, if the corporation accepts them and understands he can't do certain official duties, and would need a lackey.

  3. Wow.... legislators in Utah by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    must be required to at least pass the 3rd grade?

    Even if one video game player killed a cop, that doesn't begin to make things equal to cops who kill with tasers, or cops who accidentally kill innocent civilians because they are too fucking ignorant to make sure they are doing the no-knock raid on the right house.

    More fairness in legislation! Yes, the Utah legislators are right on the money for this one. God forbid terrorist game players ever leave the grip of their game consoles.... fucking idiots

    1. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is no different than the war waged by the religious fanatics (and yes, folks, Utah is filled with them) against fantasy roleplaying games. They latched on to something of an urban myth surrounding James Dallas Egbert III. Religious fanaticism, ignorance and intense dishonesty go hand in hand with these types.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by British · · Score: 4, Funny

      How is some disillusioned kid thinking D&D is real any different than thinking someone can be crucified, rise from the dead & turn water into wine?

    3. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...someone can be crucified, rise from the dead & turn water into wine?

      Wait, what does David Blaine have to do with any of this?

    4. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Utah legislators are right on the money for this one. God forbid terrorist game players ever leave the grip of their game consoles.... fucking idiots
      I'm not fan of the Utah legislators, but where's the money to ban games?
      Seems like all the money would be from the game companies.

    5. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      What good is posting this here going to do? You're preaching to the choir. We all know that this is stupid; we also know that JT is a jackass. That doesn't stop the rest of the world from listening to and believing him; and it doesn't stop legislators from being clueless. (Along with the vast majority of people who find such notions credible)

      If you want to do something about it, set about educating your elected representatives (assuming you're in the US...). That's the only thing that can make a difference.

    6. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by nabsltd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They latched on to something of an urban myth surrounding James Dallas Egbert III.

      Egbert was pretty messed up long before fantasy roleplaying came along.

      Like many gamers, he was a very smart kid (he graduated high school at 14 or 15), and he really just wasn't ready for the real world. He was two years older than me, but 3-4 grades in front of me, so I didn't know him personally, but my parents knew his parents moderately well.

      The stories in the papers were pretty sensationalistic, because at the time, D&D was just really catching on, and (like you said) a lot of people wanted some ammo against it. Anybody who did any research would have known that he had been on thin ice for a long time, but nobody dug deeper and the lie the investigator told stood for years. Despite his book, nobody remembers the real story.

    7. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You don't like cops much do you?

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1157399&cid=27166995

      Isn't the point of the M rating that kids don't buy these titles anyways?

      This is just a repetitive law. Just like the hate crime laws passed to make hate crimes murder more illegal than regular murder. Or added laws about selling and distributing alcohol / tobacco to minors.

    8. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if one video game player killed a cop, that doesn't begin to make things equal to cops who kill with tasers, or cops who accidentally kill innocent civilians because they are too fucking ignorant to make sure they are doing the no-knock raid on the right house.

      The problem is clearly that the cops are playing violent video games, too.

    9. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I was hoping that someone would follow through with the obvious... thanks. We need to be regulating police officers off-time activities even tighter since they have open/easy access to weapons.

    10. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      God forbid terrorist game players ever leave the grip of their game consoles....

      Exactly why legislation like this should be shot down! If game players are driven from their consoles by puritans, we'll become terrorists! Clearly every house with a game console in it must be covertly replaced with a very deep crater, to ensure this terrorist threat never be allowed to materialise.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    11. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Myrcutio · · Score: 1

      Did you actually read the article? The bill that was passed only increased the penalties for selling M rated games to minors, and easily avoided penalties at that.

      They aren't forbidding anyone from buying the game (who can legally do so), they aren't making it any harder to buy the game (who can legally do so).

      In fact, this is the only part of game development that the legislature needs to be involved in, is the sale of it to minors. The biggest hole in Thompson's argument is that none of the kids who shot up their school should have been playing GTA, and the gaming industry repeatedly tells him "some games are not for kids!"

    12. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed :) Though I think part of the problem is that they think it's real - they want to ban it, because it really is learning about "evil" magic...

      No different to other kinds of censorship really - the ones who have most trouble telling the difference between fictional acts, and actual acts, are the ones who want the fictional acts banned.

    13. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Pac-Man said it best http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/1999/4/14/

    14. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's different because one has several thousand years of religious tradition behind it (not necessarily Christian or Jewish tradition, either) and the other has a thirty plus year history of overcharging sweaty virgins for books and oddly shaped dice.

      But hey, this is Slashdot, so why not try to earn some mod points by making a crack about Christianity?

    15. Re:Wow.... legislators in Utah by Aetrus · · Score: 1

      I don't get how he can be so intelligent and yet fail a suicide multiple times...I'm not trying to be heartless, but come on!

  4. The gist by Shin-LaC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From skimming a selection of the linked sources, the gist is that they're using a false advertising angle: if a retailer says "we won't sell M-rated games to children" (like most do), and then sells them anyway, they will be fined; however, if a retailer makes no such claim, they'll be unaffected. So the safest choice for a retailer is to simply drop their voluntary policy not to sell M-rated games to minors, to avoid liability in case they ever make a mistake.

    1. Re:The gist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      From skimming a selection of this post: Ass covering is the best policy.

    2. Re:The gist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      From skimming a selection of this post: Ass.

    3. Re:The gist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      From skimming a selection of this post:

    4. Re:The gist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Null reference exception.

    5. Re:The gist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

             

    6. Re:The gist by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      Mod up, this is definitely one of the most informative and insightful slashdot postings I've ever read.

    7. Re:The gist by gknoy · · Score: 1

      So ... if the store publically says, "We will sell M-rated games to ANYONE", they're in the clear? Interesting.

    8. Re:The gist by c4ffeine · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it didn't get anything wrong or flame anyone...

      --
      "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    9. Re:The gist by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      I see one big problem here - ALL of this will get shot down if a parent of an under 17 gamer buys an M-Rated game. That has always been the problem - If parents aren't aware, or in most cases DON'T CARE that the game is M Rated, then all of these laws are doomed to failure.

      But that really doesn't matter. This law will get sunk by the good old Constitution. That and the fact Jack A** Thompson is a certified nut job in 50 galaxies.

  5. GTA prevents cop kills by bugi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Only three GTA players have killed cops? GTA must make people less likely to kill cops. After all, think of all the killing of cops not associated with GTA players.

    Hmm, perhaps an occasional game of fake-blow-shit-up would make disaffected youths less likely to really-blow-shit-up? It is all about the kids, right?

    1. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, but what if those 3 players would not have otherwise killed cops?

      Catharsis is a myth; no research supports it. All we've ever learned from psychology research about violence is that it is largely a learned behavior. Kids will learn it mainly from family and friends but they also learn violence from strangers, TV, movies, music, and games. Now, violent media may not explain a lot of the variance in violent behaviors but it is completely naive to say that it does not have an affect. There are some people who can drink alcohol and never become alcoholic; there are others who try alcohol once and become alcoholic very quickly. It's the same with violence. Just because violent games may not generally lead to increased rates of violence in a society, does not mean that they don't for some people.

      I'm not calling for a censorship of violent games. I'm not even sure I like this legislation (I'd have to read the full bill to form a good opinion) and I'm certainly not in favor of a government doing the parenting that parents should do but kids don't need to be playing some of the games that they play.

    2. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by bugi · · Score: 1

      That's a slippery slope you're on (but kudos for all the qualifiers). Do I have this correct? Is the argument that because *some* people are inherently prone to addiction to X, nobody should have access to X? We (USians) tried that with alcohol and we're trying it with "drugs" -- now we're going into the same pit with games? Better be careful or that game of Operation might turn your kid into a sadist.

      Regarding those three, by your argument they would've killed somebody anyway. At least cops go in with eyes wide and take precautions. It's part of their job to risk their lives for the rest of us.

    3. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by spire3661 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Violence is a learned behavior? I cant think of a more natural action then violence. Really irritates me when people forget that humans are still animals, driven by the same urges as animals, with only sentience to quell it. When one animal kills another we ascribe no malice to it, but when a human does it all of a sudden its a crime against god....

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we've ever learned from psychology research about violence is that it is largely a learned behavior.

      Thank god for psychologists! Perhaps they should do a study to find non-learned behaviors. Humans don't even know how to wipe their asses or fuck without being taught. Unfortunately violent external stimuli can never be removed, because life is violent. The only proven method is to reduce the subject to impotence. Which is exactly the point of government regulations like this one.

      Crime rates fall, and the government is concerned with video games making children violent. The USA has a military hegemony, and the government is concerned about threats to the "homeland". Government creates laws whether they need to be created or not. Superfluous laws make us less free.

    5. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by atol+angengea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This troubles me. I can definitely deduce a sense of inverted logocentrism in your post. Human beings are not animals. Even "animals" are not animals - at least not in the sense you advocate. What you refer to (if I read your post correctly) is the paranoic human ecology. A radical separation of self from world, such that self *becomes* world.

      I think it important to stand against human/human crime on the very assertion you make in your original post.

      but when a human does it all of a sudden its a crime against god....

      As Martin Niemoller said "We must go on believing there is a god, even though we know there is none." And I think, given the horrors MN experienced in Nazi concentration camps, an intense focus on some thirteen-year-old playing GTA is silly.

    6. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, Slashdot is an English-only forum. In the future, please make sure to post in a language we can understand.

    7. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by atol+angengea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1) Tell me what you don't understand. I'll explicate, if you're polite.

      2) Yeah, I guess I could have just said "be nice," "make love, not war." They do make good sound-bites, don't they...? But were I do go about preaching like that I'd run the risk of being a hippie. I find the idea of humans killing other human beings under the auspices of "we are all animals, right?" completely irrational and utterly repugnant AND has nothing to do with neither "being nice" nor "making war."

      3) Please don't conflate yourself with the rest of humanity; in my opinion, it's highly paranoic and unbecoming. Just because you can't take the time to process my post does not necessitate the highly aliening comment:

      please make sure to post in a language we can understand.

      You are "we" now...? What incredible powers you must possess!!

      and 4) I'm going to write howsoever I choose. Bite me.

      Hope that's "English" enough for you.

    8. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Oops, "does not have an affect" should read "effect." Man, that's embarrassing!

    9. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Spit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We are as wired for violence as we are for sex. Natural hormones drive both agression and mating.

      --
      POKE 36879,8
    10. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by mpe · · Score: 1

      That's a slippery slope you're on (but kudos for all the qualifiers). Do I have this correct? Is the argument that because *some* people are inherently prone to addiction to X, nobody should have access to X? We (USians) tried that with alcohol and we're trying it with "drugs" -- now we're going into the same pit with games?

      A basic problem with drug prohibition is that the "cure" is worst that the "disease". Which is something which was never learned from alcohol prohibition. Though it's difficult to know how what might be similar between ingested drugs and games.

      Better be careful or that game of Operation might turn your kid into a sadist.

      Or Dungeons and Dragons might turn them into a Satanist...

    11. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Killing a fellow human is a learned behavior. Almost every single person has an innate resistance to killing someone. There's plenty of research to back this up.

      • Thousands of muskets filled to the muzzle with loads that were never fired.
      • A civil-war era study that calculated the accuracy of an Infantry Company: If all the troops were really trying to kill eachother, battles would have lasted minutes, not days.
      • Studies that found that in all wars UP till the Vietnam war, the vast majority of US soldiers IN COMBAT never fired thier weapons at the enemy.

      People can't just be "trained" to kill people: To get any real participation you have to "condition" them to do it. Conditioning, brain washing, pavlovian response (if that rings a bell), doesn't matter what you call it. The Army started using man-shaped pop-up targets. Thru repetitive "target up, breathe-relax-aim-squeeze, target down, reward" cycles we actually have the majority of the soldiers actually trying to kill the enemy.

      What all these goddamn nerds, in their haste to scream how video games don't make you violent, don't know is that some violent video games recreate that conditioning. It doesn't make people more violent, but some of your natural resistance to killing is reduced.

      Now /.ers, do me proud and cry how this isn't possible. "You talking about killing? Hmm? Y'all experts? Y'all know about killing?" -- SSG Barnes from Platoon.

    12. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Catharsis is a myth; no research supports it.

      Show me research that supports that catharsis is a myth.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Just joining Slashdot, and you're already overly defensive and taking things personally. You'll fit in well here.

      It was a joke, son. "Logocentrism" is a word I've never heard before your post, and I'm certain I'm not alone. Combine that with your seeming tendency to imitate academic writings, and you come off sounding similar to, but not quite common English.

      No harm meant, but you sure went out of your way to respond. I don't even have a worthwhile opinion on your post... yet you seem to think I was disagreeing. Or something.

      P.S. "Explicate"? It means "explain". Any time you would use a word that has a single-word definition, just use the definition, especially in a public forum.

    14. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever been raised by wolves, so to speak, and had this tested? Otherwise, you don't have a control group and cannot discount the possibility that it's civilization that conditions people to NOT kill, thus "training"/conditioning them to kill may well be a DEconditioning process (which tends to be a lot harder).

    15. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      why yes, I was raised by wolves.

      you make a good point. however, it makes sense that aversion to killing is a trait that best enabled the species to survive. like fight/flight/posture/submit, its probably just another innate behavior left over from millions of years of being selected for and against. people that easily killed each other would be less likely to be successful as a species.

    16. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      If we want to take a strong ethological/evolutionary perspective, we are wired for preservation of the self and our progeny. This does not necessarily include violence. We do have natural aggressive tendencies but aggression != violence. In any case, that's why I said violence is largely learned. Yes, we have natural tendencies towards aggression (and probably even violence) but violence is a social behavior (you can be violent towards yourself but that behavior is relatively rare) and is facilitated socially.

    17. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have included the caveat of aggressive or violent catharsis is a myth (or at least there is no good evidence that supports it). Catharsis can apply to broader "release" behaviors.

      First, catharsis was a term invented by psychodynamicists (like Freud), whose theories were not based on good research and generally have not been supported by any psychology research. They used the term to refer to built-up unconscious conflict between id and superego. So, catharsis was a term created to explain a psychological construct (i.e., unconscious conflict) that just has not been verified by any research.

      Further, if catharsis (of aggressive behaviors) was true, then research showing increases in aggressive feelings/behaviors after watching or participating in aggressive or violent behaviors would not be true.

      Here are some references (ask and ye shall receive): TRANSMISSION OF AGGRESSION THROUGH IMITATION OF AGGRESSIVE MODELS by Albert Bandura, Dorothea Ross, and Sheila A. Ross (1961) Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 575-582.

      Bushman, B.J. (2002). Does venting anger feed or extinguish the flame?

      Bohart, A.C. (1980). Toward a cognitive theory of catharsis. Psychotherapy: Theory Research & Practice, 17, 192-201.

      Jemmer, P. (2006). Abreaction - catharsis: Stirring dull roots with spring rain. European Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 7(1), 26-36.

      I hope this helps. :)

    18. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by bugi · · Score: 1

      Or Dungeons and Dragons might turn them into a Satanist...

      Well, if they'd just include the Judeo-Christian pantheon (and variants) in Deities&Demigods, we could properly simulate Crusades, witchhunts, etc. That'll turn them poor kids into heathens at least, if not outright satanists.

    19. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      First, catharsis was a term invented by psychodynamicists (like Freud), whose theories were not based on good research and generally have not been supported by any psychology research. They used the term to refer to built-up unconscious conflict between id and superego. So, catharsis was a term created to explain a psychological construct (i.e., unconscious conflict) that just has not been verified by any research.

      Aristotle defined catharsis as "purging of the spirit of morbid and base ideas or emotions by witnessing the playing out of such emotions or ideas on stage" (Aristotle, 2001, p. 1458).

      Further, if catharsis (of aggressive behaviors) was true, then research showing increases in aggressive feelings/behaviors after watching or participating in aggressive or violent behaviors would not be true.

      Thanks for the article titles, google a bit, found that citation up there here: http://primal-page.com/cathar.htm

      Apparently the biggest problem here is confusion over the meaning of catharsis.

      I have no structured research to give you, but I have anecdotes: Watching some good old ultraviolence, like Clockwork Orange, helps me when anger is taking over.
      But showing some clockwork orange to someone who doesn't have a big ball of anger and nowhere to throw it might have the opposite effect.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    20. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying that catharsis is an ancient belief. It was just re-popularized by the psychodynamic school of psychologists.

      Your last sentences illustrate the problem perfectly. We have anecdotal (and even research) evidence both ways (although the research tends to lean away from [violence] catharsis as real or beneficial). That actually gets back to the whole violence in video games or other media question. It may not lead to you personally being more violent or even more aggressive but it might affect someone else more strongly. The hard thing though is we can't ever say it has no effect on us. Who knows what years of playing violent games (or watching violent movies) does to us? We can't serve as a control group for ourselves (i.e., both watch and not watch violent games/movies over a number of years and then compare the number and levels of violent/aggressive acts). That's why I try to limit my exposure to violence. I play TF2 and other FPS games. I play Metal Gear Solid and watch violent shows but there are levels of violence (and attitudes towards violence). For example, Saving Private Ryan is very violent and very graphic but the violence is not glorified; whereas with movies like Saw or Friday the 13th, the violence is glorified. The same goes for games. GTA4 is all about senseless (glorifies violence) - there are a lot of games like that; TF2 is like that too.

      My first statement was a little strong (that catharsis is a myth) only because there isn't good research evidence to support it and I spend much of my time doing psychology research so I like good supporting evidence. :) As I wrote above, I just think we should be more careful consumers of violence, especially since we live in a country with many children growing up in single-parent homes, spending a lot of time largely unsupervised. Having a father in the home is correlated with less violent and anti-social or delinquent behaviors in the children. Many kids turn out just fine growing up in single-parent homes but many don't. Violent games and movies especially don't help when parents are not able to provide (for whatever reason) the good parenting kids need.

    21. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I would think that people that easily killed others would be more likely to be successful, whereas the ones that were easily killed by others would be less successful.

    22. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Go read 'On Killing' by Lt. Col (I think) Dave Grossman. I don't agree with all of his conclusions, but the research itself is fine.

      He points out that humans, like most other animals, have built-in, dare I say, rules about violence. Dominate/submit, posturing, all that sort of thing.

      Note, of course, that he never says humans aren't violent; just that, like in the animal kingdom, the violence is, by and large, not fatal.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    23. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      He points out that humans, like most other animals, have built-in, dare I say, rules about violence. Dominate/submit, posturing, all that sort of thing.

      Interesting, though that part isn't particularly insightful (on his part, not yours). Dominate weaker, submit to stronger, posture to make yourself seem stronger.

      The point about violence being non-fatal is interesting, though. Could be societal conditioning against submission keeps us fighting beyond the point we've already lost, rather than submitting to the alpha like a lot of other communal animals do.

      I wonder if the actual research on that would be in the psychological, sociological, or biological field...

    24. Re:GTA prevents cop kills by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      We have anecdotal (and even research) evidence both ways (although the research tends to lean away from [violence] catharsis as real or beneficial). That actually gets back to the whole violence in video games or other media question.

      Well, it's catharsis if you're already angry, and it lets you vent.
      It's something else if you're not already angry and it pumps you up.

      I don't think it's helping to say "see, they got pumped up, catharsis is a myth!"

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  6. Friggin' Utah. by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You couldn't pay me to live there. The funny thing is that I know some Mormons who feel the same way. I guess Utah Mormon is a bit of a different breed than Mormons from almost everywhere else. It must be the effect of any one group having a majority. They get to be assholes.

    1. Re:Friggin' Utah. by MacColossus · · Score: 1

      Pedophile.

    2. Re:Friggin' Utah. by DurendalMac · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meh, only in southern Utah.

      Then again, there be lotsa slutty Mormon girls who will do everything but vag...

    3. Re:Friggin' Utah. by Temujin_12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess Utah Mormon is a bit of a different breed than Mormons from almost everywhere else. It must be the effect of any one group having a majority.

      Interesting you should say that. As a Mormon who was born and raised in the Seattle area, spent 4 years living in Utah while going to school, and who has since moved back to the Seattle area to start my career, I have some of the same feelings.

      Just yesterday I was in the car with a good friend (also a Mormon who has lived in and out of Utah) and we came the similar conclusion that whenever you have a group that homogeneous, it is human tendency for certain "quirks" to emerge which do not necessarily reflect the identity of the group abroad. You could expect some of the same culturalisms to emerge (some good, some bad) for any other homogenous group.

      That said, I do differ from you in that I could see myself living there (though you would have to pay me to leave Seattle). After living there for a year or two, you learn to ignore the parts of the culture you don't like and embrace the ones that you do.

      --
      Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    4. Re:Friggin' Utah. by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 1

      "I guess Utah Mormon is a bit of a different breed than Mormons from almost everywhere else."

      Being Mormon, growing up outside of Utah, and having lived in 4 different states, including Utah, I can't wait until I can move back to Utah. Utah Mormons are no different than Mormons elsewhere - there are just more Mormons per capita so you end up with a few bad seeds, just like you do in every group of people. I've never met nicer people than I have in Utah.

      Utah certainly isn't for everyone, although the Salt Lake valley is now less than 50% Mormon; there are 49 other states and many other countries for you to choose to live in! Yay for choices. :)

    5. Re:Friggin' Utah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here! 3 out of 6 girls in my graduating class were Mormon.

    6. Re:Friggin' Utah. by AhtirTano · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you joking? The ridiculous nature of Utah Mormons has been known for decades. My parents, both born and raised Mormon from parents who were also born and raised Mormon, left Utah, precisely because they did not want their children raised around Utah Mormons. That was over 30 years ago, and nothing has changed on that front. While I have met some great people in Utah, nowhere have I met more hypocrites and Holier-Than-Thou @&#%$%@s.

    7. Re:Friggin' Utah. by IorDMUX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed.

      I am a Mormon (converted a few years back, in college) and have lived in Ohio and California, but never Utah. I've visited friends in the area and my wife has some extended family there, but I have to say that I can't stand the so-called "Mormon culture" that has sprung up in some areas.

      On issues of religion, we agree fully. As Latter-Day Saints (the actual name of members of the "Mormon" church), I would call them my brethren. But I most certainly don't get the Jello-eating, "oh-my-heck"-cursing, conservative-voting subculture that dominates the state.

      At its core, this Utah behavior is a culture/tradition set rather than a religion. For example: Though the Vatican is an enclave of Italy, Irish Catholics and Latino Catholics bear little cultural resemblance to their Italian brethren.

      The population of Utah is actually fairly small. Most Latter-Day Saints in the United States don't live in Utah, and most Latter-Day Saints in the world don't live in the United States. Please don't let Utah give us a bad name. :-)

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    8. Re:Friggin' Utah. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Holier-Than-Thou @&#%$%@s.

      I think there's a parse error in your Perl.

    9. Re:Friggin' Utah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here here!

      Where?! Where?!

    10. Re:Friggin' Utah. by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      Wow that sound you hear isn't the tornados in the midwest.

    11. Re:Friggin' Utah. by MacColossus · · Score: 1

      Nope. It's the whoosh sound of a dead pan joke going over your head.

    12. Re:Friggin' Utah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I have met some great people in Utah, nowhere have I met more hypocrites and Holier-Than-Thou @&#%$%@

      No carrier?

    13. Re:Friggin' Utah. by KiwiMike · · Score: 1

      Listen to all of you who are running down Utahns, Mormons or just "Utah Mormons" . . . everything you are accusing them of, you're showing yourselves to be. I'm a Mormon. I live in Utah. I wasn't born here. I chose to live here. Why? One of my neighbors, also a Mormon, was laid off in November. At Christmas, he was collecting clothing and toys for two non-Mormon families he didn't even know, who were in worse financial shape than he and his family of 7 were. After bringing it up in church virtually the entire congregation, including others who were laid off, brought money, clothing and gifts. I know what my so-called "Holier-Than-Thou @&#%$%@s." neighbors were doing last Christmas. What were you doing?

  7. Good use of public money by arekusu_ou · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I love how state after state try to pass this exact same bad law, only to have it shot down in the courts and they have to pay legal fines.
    Great to know they're doing something productive.

    1. Re:Good use of public money by CrashPoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While this law is thoroughly stupid, it isn't the same one that keeps getting shot down by the courts. The previous batch tried to outright forbid the sale of violent games to minors; this one only provides for penalties when you make such a sale when you publicly claim not to.

      This, of course, only means that it's toothless as well as being unconstitutional.

    2. Re:Good use of public money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it unconstitutional? Seems like a false advertising law to me.

  8. Training programs? by Dogun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Training programs' sound like a money-maker for the videogame censorship movement.

    1. Re:Training programs? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      So does 'stiffen penalties'.

  9. Come Again? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

    Utah Senate, House Pass Jack Thompson's Game Sales Bill

    Oddly, on its trip through the state legislature, amendments rendered it largely ineffective...

    So why do you still complain? They added amendments that make the things you fear not happen. I understand that you don't like Utah, but stop making stuff up just to bash them.

    1. Re:Come Again? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So passing a ridiculous bill but adding amendments to make it ineffective in addition to being ridiculous is a good thing? Good job Utah

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:Come Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      New Bill:
      Breathing bad.

      Amendment:
      LOL j/k, breathing is okey-dokey.

      Man hours spent drafting: 10,000-15,000

      Because that's what this is boiling down to, and you were just dumb enough to admit that you're perfectly fine with it on the intarwebs for all to see. Seriously, you're JUST FINE with how much time was wasted on this in lieu of, well, everything else?

    3. Re:Come Again? by LBArrettAnderson · · Score: 1

      No. Whoever wrote the summary believes that bills are only effective if he/she doesn't like the outcome (since the government is always out to get us!). Now that it has no negative consequences for the author, he/she says it's "ineffective," while that just isn't the case.

    4. Re:Come Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, then the ball's in your court. From what point of view is this law effective?

    5. Re:Come Again? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Okay, then the ball's in your court. From what point of view is this law effective?

      Jack Thompson. He'll use this to get PR millage and rail against his critics.

    6. Re:Come Again? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I'd like to pass a law permitting transcendental numbers to cross the border. You'd get so many interesting riders...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    7. Re:Come Again? by Walpurgiss · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It effectively makes it likely that retailers will completely stop advertising or using ESRB ratings, since it is the least costly way to ensure they never run afoul of the new legislation.

      Then the people ragging against video games can point out that retailers don't even follow the ESRB ratings, and claim that the self-regulation clearly is not working, and try to get even more harsh, government backed regulations in place to fully replace the ESRB.

      As far as the bills official intent, it seems pretty fail. But it has potential to encourage, and perhaps even achieve, the bills proponents' eventual goals.

    8. Re:Come Again? by dosun88888 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that a law is unenforceable doesn't mean that it should be there on the books just for shits and giggles.

    9. Re:Come Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever wrote the summary believes that bills are only effective if he/she doesn't like the outcome (since the government is always out to get us!)

      Straw man arguments are lies.

    10. Re:Come Again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transcendental numbers are a bad idea. I'll only support the bill if you're only letting them leave the state.

  10. Meh by MBraynard · · Score: 0, Troll
    Forget about throwing 'Jack Thompson's name on this. It simply applies the same standard to 'adult' rated games as it does for all other media that's on sale.

    What the bill is saying is that if a minor wants to buy an 'adult' rated game, they will have to go one step further than simply walking into a shop and buying it. Were I a parent, I wouldn't mind that the child would have to ask me to buy it for him rather than him having access to it directly himself.

    1. Re:Meh by eldepeche · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure a movie theater isn't legally liable if they let a 16-year-old into an R-rated movie, so this law would go above and beyond the protection that the ratings provide for other media.

    2. Re:Meh by Hybrid-brain · · Score: 1

      So the question then is this. Who cares??

      --
      Five words describe me on a normal day. two words describe me the rest of the time. can you guess?
  11. Jack Thompson is not dead yet :( by iYk6 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unfortunately, no. You are probably thinking of Jack Valenti, who died in 2007.

  12. Amendment 1 by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    1. Re:Amendment 1 by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your post was off topic. There is no First Amendment issue here.

    2. Re:Amendment 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. I thought this comment was right on, until I realized it was written by the author of the original post about the moderators (who knew the first amendment doesn't apply here)...

    3. Re:Amendment 1 by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      I'll be interested in hearing why the First Amendment suddenly does not apply to regulation of the press in Utah.

    4. Re:Amendment 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I do not agree with the bill, no game publisher's free speech is being restricted, no game company is being prosecuted by the government for the content of the games. The games are still able to be sold, and while not as damaging as cigarettes, alcohol, guns (yes, in most states you have to be 18 to jump through the hoops solo to get a gun), or porn, an average, voting citizen's access to the games are not restricted and the game company has not been silenced.

    5. Re:Amendment 1 by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I do not agree with the bill, no game publisher's free speech is being restricted, no game company is being prosecuted by the government for the content of the games. The games are still able to be sold, and while not as damaging as cigarettes, alcohol, guns (yes, in most states you have to be 18 to jump through the hoops solo to get a gun), or porn, an average, voting citizen's access to the games are not restricted and the game company has not been silenced.

      First Amendment law requires strict scrutiny. That means the government must, when regulating sales or distribution of material covered by the First Amendment, demonstrate that its proposed law has the minimum necessary effects required to accomplish its goals. Since the goal (regulating commercial press activity) is unconstitutional to begin with, there's no way the law can meet strict scrutiny.

      Seriously. Why do you think that, out of dozens of attempts to pass laws like this in various states, absolutely none of them have survived court challenges?

      A further question. The First Amendment puts a free press on an equal footing with the free exercise of religion. What do you think might happen if the Utah legislature attempted to dictate the terms under which Mormon literature and religious items could be sold?

    6. Re:Amendment 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-parody, false advertising is not protected by the First Amendment. This bill states that retailers can be fined if they sell M-rated games to minors while advertising that they don't do so.

      The bill has nothing to do with the publishers, and doesn't restrict retailers from selling M-rated games to minors, as long as they don't advertise the opposite.

      While I also don't think the bill should have been passed, it is not unconstitutional.

    7. Re:Amendment 1 by Myrcutio · · Score: 1

      Since the goal (regulating commercial press activity) is unconstitutional to begin with...

      So, you're saying false advertisement laws are unconstitutional...

      If you ever get elected, I can finally sell my cancer-curing-dirt-cheap-wonder-drug! Maybe i can even get Billy Mayes to put in a good word.

    8. Re:Amendment 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Non-parody, false advertising is not protected by the First Amendment. This bill states that retailers can be fined if they sell M-rated games to minors while advertising that they don't do so.

      I'm afraid the legal definition of "advertising" requires a specific claim about a product. A company can't be nailed for false advertising if it merely misrepresents an immaterial policy. Fraud, maybe, if there's money at stake and you really stretch things.

  13. Revenge! by b4upoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Picture the sales clerk saying OK kid! You must first misrepresent your age before I am allowed to sell you this game!

    1. Re: Revenge! by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Picture the sales clerk saying OK kid! You must first misrepresent your age before I am allowed to sell you this game!

      Bart: One "Itchy And Scratchy At It It Again", please.

      Big Tony: How old are you, kid? Keepin' in mind, of course, that I can legally sell you this game unless you are over 18. Think hard before you answer.

      Bart: (thinking) uummm, 23?

      Big Tony: Here you go, and have a nice day.

      (no I don't know why Big Tony would be selling the game)

  14. when can we show donkey porn in prime time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    im sick of the government censorship. i want to see raw, hard core donkey cock on my TV at 5pm, without judgement or interference from nanny dearest and big brother.

    murdering prostitutes in GTA is a good start, but im not really into that sick stuff. im into good old fashioned asiniphilia.

  15. Brainzzz by stox · · Score: 2, Funny

    As a zombie, he must be starving in Utah.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  16. Straw man? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop making stuff up just to bash them.

    I'm pretty sure that's all your post does. Where does the article summary "complain," or "bash" Utah?

  17. Madness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This. Is. Utaaaaaaaaaaah!!!

  18. The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 1

    First Utah gives us Orrin Hatch and the DMCA. Then see attempts to regulate keywords. Now this?

    Utah, could you just leave the union and maybe we can replace your star with American Samoa?

    1. Re:The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by DragonTHC · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'd even settle for guam or puerto rico.

      Seriously though I don't have a problem penalizing salesmen of M-Rated games to minors. That being said, I have a huge problem with anything Jack Thompson writes or proposes.

      I also have a huge problem with Utah. The whole state is lost. They don't deserve the protections of the constitution while they drag their fake religion into the statehouse.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Utah, could you just leave the union and maybe we can replace your star with American Samoa?

      Oh please. What happened the LAST time a state tried to leave the unio.... oh wait, I get it.

    3. Re:The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      fake religion

      What religion isn't?

    4. Re:The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by Hybrid-brain · · Score: 1

      Utah has Arches and Canyonlands National Parks though. However......That's the only thing they've got going for them that is good.

      --
      Five words describe me on a normal day. two words describe me the rest of the time. can you guess?
    5. Re:The biggest threat to digital freedom is Utah by Hybrid-brain · · Score: 1

      Well we could say something about Scientology.

      --
      Five words describe me on a normal day. two words describe me the rest of the time. can you guess?
  19. They should also make oxygen against the law by Kilz · · Score: 1

    The fact that 3 people who have killed police officers played violent video games results in this law? How about this.

    All cop killers have breathed oxygen.
    Therefore use of oxygen may lead to killing cops.
    So they should outlaw breathing oxygen,

    Starting in the Utah state house and senate.

    Im sure that it will be much more effective in stopping crime. :)

    --
    I trust Microsoft as far as I could comfortably spit a dead rat
    1. Re:They should also make oxygen against the law by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      If symptoms of a lack of oxygen are taken to include brain death, there is ample evidence they banned oxygen some considerable time ago.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  20. No, Congress MUST ban this deadly chemical, DHMO! by Doug52392 · · Score: 4, Funny
    The US has banned numerous chemicals due to their deadly effects, but one chemical is in EVERY PERSON'S HOME! It's called Dihydrogen Monoxide, and it poses a substantial threat to everyone!

    Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) is a colorless and odorless chemical compound, also referred to by some as Dihydrogen Oxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydronium Hydroxide, or simply Hydric acid. Its basis is the highly reactive hydroxyl radical, a species shown to mutate DNA, denature proteins, disrupt cell membranes, and chemically alter critical neurotransmitters. The atomic components of DHMO are found in a number of caustic, explosive and poisonous compounds such as Sulfuric Acid, Nitroglycerine and Ethyl Alcohol.

    Each year, Dihydrogen Monoxide is a known causative component in many thousands of deaths and is a major contributor to millions upon millions of dollars in damage to property and the environment. Some of the known perils of Dihydrogen Monoxide are:
    • Death due to accidental inhalation of DHMO, even in small quantities.
    • Prolonged exposure to solid DHMO causes severe tissue damage.
    • Excessive ingestion produces a number of unpleasant though not typically life-threatening side-effects.
    • DHMO is a major component of acid rain.
    • Gaseous DHMO can cause severe burns.
    • Contributes to soil erosion.
    • Leads to corrosion and oxidation of many metals.
    • Contamination of electrical systems often causes short-circuits.
    • Exposure decreases effectiveness of automobile brakes.
    • Found in biopsies of pre-cancerous tumors and lesions.
    • Given to vicious dogs involved in recent deadly attacks.
    • Often associated with killer cyclones in the U.S. Midwest and elsewhere, and in hurricanes including deadly storms in Florida, New Orleans and other areas of the southeastern U.S.
    • Thermal variations in DHMO are a suspected contributor to the El Nino weather effect.

    Not to mention the fact that DHMO can be connected to almost EVERY murder in the United States! All those people dead because someone was allowing this compound into his or her body.

    Just look at some of the uses this deadly chemical is used for:

    • as an industrial solvent and coolant,
    • in nuclear power plants,
    • by the U.S. Navy in the propulsion systems of some older vessels,
    • by elite athletes to improve performance,
    • in the production of Styrofoam,
    • in biological and chemical weapons manufacture,
    • in the development of genetically engineering crops and animals,
    • as a spray-on fire suppressant and retardant,
    • in so-called "family planning" or "reproductive health" clinics,
    • as a major ingredient in many home-brewed bombs,
    • as a byproduct of hydrocarbon combustion in furnaces and air conditioning compressor operation,
    • in cult rituals,
    • by the Church of Scientology on their members and their members' families (although surprisingly, many members recently have contacted DHMO.org to vehemently deny such use),
    • by both the KKK and the NAACP during rallies and marches,
    • by members of Congress who are under investigation for financial corruption and inappropriate IM behavior,
    • by the clientele at a number of bath houses in New York City and San Francisco,
    • historically, in Hitler's death camps in Nazi Germany, and in prisons in Turkey, Serbia, Croatia, Libya, Iraq and Iran,
    • in World War II prison camps in Japan, and in prisons in China, for various forms of torture,
    • during many recent religious and ethnic wars in the Middle East,
    • by many terrorist organizations including al Quaeda,
    • in community swimming pools to maintain chemical balance,
    • in day care centers, purportedly for sanitary purposes,
    • by software engineers, including those producing DICOM programmer APIs and other DICOM software tools,
    • by popular computer science professors,
    • by the semi-divine K
  21. "Death of Anti-Gaming crusader blamed on Games" by Doug52392 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jack Thompson must be alive, because I don't remember seeing anything on CNN about an anti-gaming crusader's death being blamed on video games, nor do I remember any recent Congressional hearings investigating weather or not Thompson's death was inspired by the Grand Theft Auto: IV mission where the player must kill an anti-gaming self-proclaimed "moral crusader" attorney, who states, just before the player must kill the man, that "Guns don't kill people. Video games do."

  22. WTF - One question by meerling · · Score: 1

    What kind of moron would allow legislation proposed by a possible psychotic who's ethics and actions are so out of bounds that he's been permanently disbarred from the profession of lawyer?!?!

    This question leaves itself open to some interesting answers...

    1. Re:WTF - One question by Myrimos · · Score: 1

      You might be unacquainted with our country, good sir. Let me put something into perspective.

      Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public. -- H. L. Mencken

      --
      Internet scofflaw
  23. I love the irony by Daimanta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    People on /. were laughing at this guy for getting disbarred and saying he's done but it turns out that Old Jack is pulling some strings at the political level and /. c.s. are still powerless to do anything.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  24. Good... by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the ESRB will lose its power in the industry and games will be able to flourish as movies did prior to their censorship by the MPAA. Putting a "18+" sticker on a game should be the responsibility of the game designers. Knowing if the game is appropriate for their children or not is a responsibility of the parent. Refusing to stock games with an 18+ sticker as a major retailer, however, only limits the already pretty limited (by technology and marketing) creative potential of game developers.

    Explaining to your child why an adult game or movie or program isn't for him or her is surprisingly easy to. "Its not that these games will hurt you or control you or that your not smart enough to understand the material within these games. Its simply that they weren't designed for you. Like watching C-SPAN or the history channel or reading a book on Nietzche instead of a comic book. If you want to play these games, watch some adult television and read some of these books first. Your not missing out on anything."

    9 times out of 10, that's the truth too. Honestly, I've enjoyed many "childrens" games just as much as "adult" games. Putting sexual, violent or otherwise inappropriate content into your game doesn't make it a better or worse game. Saying it does it like claiming science fiction settings are better than fantasy settings for roleplaying games...

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
    1. Re:Good... by Ashriel · · Score: 1

      Explaining to your child why an adult game or movie or program isn't for him or her is surprisingly easy to. "Its not that these games will hurt you or control you or that your not smart enough to understand the material within these games. Its simply that they weren't designed for you. Like watching C-SPAN or the history channel or reading a book on Nietzche instead of a comic book. If you want to play these games, watch some adult television and read some of these books first. Your not missing out on anything."

      But... I read Nietzsche as a child. I would've watched the history channel and C-SPAN if we had had cable. I read encyclopedias and the dictionary instead.

      Yeah, I know, I was a strange kid

  25. You're fighting the wrong battle by swilde23 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand the uproar over the fact that someone is attempting to enforce the restraints suggested by the ESRB. I suppose you might actually be upset that they are wasting tax dollars... but if that is the case, then say so. (The article seems to notice this, I'm just referring to the replies that I have read so far)

    If you have a problem with the idea that a game rated "Mature" might only be appropriate for someone "mature", then consider what the article actually says. The Utah legislature didn't make that call, they are just trying to enforce it.

    rtfa?

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    1. Re:You're fighting the wrong battle by internerdj · · Score: 1

      1) Well the bill in the article isn't about enforcing the mature rating but enforcing store policy if they so state that they will not sell Mature games to minors. This means that the stores have been given the incentive to not have that policy. This could mean not displaying the ratings because this might be construed by a judge as having a store policy making them liable for damages.
      2) In general laws like this violate free speech. The RIAA and MPAA for all their faults have fought long and hard to protect free speech in media. Typically laws regulating video games avoid music, TV, movies and books so they don't have to come under the guns of the RIAA and MPAA lawyers which we are all here familiar with. However, apart from the unconstitutionality of these laws sets a double standard for video games meaning the artists who create games are constrained tighter than the artists who make movies or music leading to tamer video games than movies or music. If I can go out and buy Cop Killer but not GTA: San Andreas, something is wrong with the law.
      3) Coming out of 2, since the game industry is becoming a behemoth, and therefore highly profit motivated the ratings if regulated will steer development even more than they do now. Games will lose their artistic integrity if their artistic content is mandated by an outside body.

    2. Re:You're fighting the wrong battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand the uproar over the fact that someone is attempting to enforce the restraints suggested by the ESRB.

      Because the ESRB does not need or deserve to have it's opinion backed by force of law.

      I suppose you might actually be upset that they are wasting tax dollars... but if that is the case, then say so. (The article seems to notice this, I'm just referring to the replies that I have read so far)

      It is a waste of tax dollars, but that's incidental.

      If you have a problem with the idea that a game rated "Mature" might only be appropriate for someone "mature", then consider what the article actually says. The Utah legislature didn't make that call, they are just trying to enforce it.

      The government doesn't have the right to enforce "that call".

  26. Utah... The land of "special underwear" by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    Its Utah what do you expect? They wear special underwear to protect them from the world and remain in touch with "god"

    Jack Thompson fits right in with those crazy fucks.

    1. Re:Utah... The land of "special underwear" by ludd1t3-2009 · · Score: 1

      First off it is God, notice the spelling you dumb ass meat bag. One has to wonder that you can even turn on your computer. Pull your head out of your ass, and enter the real world.

      The recent legislation does not come from the doctrine of the LDS Church. It is the result of stupid shit religious fundamentalism. And, that can be found in Utah, Southern California, Georgia, Colorado Springs, CO, pretty much anywhere in the United States. The middle east does not have a monopoly.

      Organizations like Focus on the Family, The Eagle Form, The Minute Men, John Birch Society, and other crazy ass conservative organizations are responsible for this type of legislation. Utah doesn't have a monopoly on shitty legislation, just look at Kansas (intelligent design), Texas (land of the patent troll), do I need to go on.

      This nation is messed up. Doubly so, because they let religious asses like you post to a forum. Your not that different from Jack Thompson and the "crazy fucks" who passed the bill in Utah, just on the opposite side.

  27. It's Utah... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    ... what do you expect? Rationality?

    1. Re:It's Utah... by Hybrid-brain · · Score: 1

      in a state filled with Mormons? aha.

      --
      Five words describe me on a normal day. two words describe me the rest of the time. can you guess?
  28. Agreed by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    I preferred the RSAC system, which actually required some thought.

  29. Entire Text of Bill (4 lines) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HB0353 Text, this bill adds lines 82-85.

    13-11a-3. Deceptive trade practices enumerated

    83 (u) (i) advertises that the person will not sell a good or service labeled with an age
    84 restriction or recommendation to a person under the age restriction or recommendation; and
    85 (ii) sells that good or service to a person under the age restriction or recommendation.

  30. I guess its true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the 1800s all the Morons moved to Utah"

  31. Psychological Research on Violence from Gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... why is this rating system apparently ignoring the progress of empirical research?

    Ferguson, Christopher J.; Rueda, Stephanie M.; Cruz, Amanda M.; Ferguson, Diana E.; Fritz, Stacey; Smith, Shawn M. (2008). Violent video games and aggression: Causal relationship or byproduct of family violence and intrinsic violence motivation? Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol 35(3), 311-332.

    Abstract:
    Two studies examined the relationship between exposure to violent video games and aggression or violence in the laboratory and in real life. Study 1 participants were either randomized or allowed to choose to play a violent or nonviolent game. Although males were more aggressive than females, neither randomized exposure to violent-video-game conditions nor previous real-life exposure to violent video games caused any differences in aggression. Study 2 examined correlations between trait aggression, violent criminal acts, and exposure to both violent games and family violence. Results indicated that trait aggression, family violence, and male gender were predictive of violent crime, but exposure to violent games was not. Structural equation modeling suggested that family violence and innate aggression as predictors of violent crime were a better fit to the data than was exposure to video game violence. These results question the common belief that violent-video-game exposure causes violent acts. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved)(from the journal abstract)

  32. Oh, come on, mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's not Interesting, that's Funny!

    For those moderators who don't get it, Morcombe, Slant and Honeyplace are a famous solicitor's office in Ankh-Morpork, on the Discworld; Morcombe and Honeyplace are vampires, and Slant's a zombie.

    1. Re:Oh, come on, mods by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Someone was just being nice and giving me karma. I lost karma last time I posted funnywise.

      And I'm glad someone got it...

  33. Great a new black by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, what a fantastic business opportunity. Black market games sales based on a pyramid distribution of minors selling to minors! And the best part is that the wholesale aspect is completely legal!
    Wuhu, I'll make millions!

  34. It's actually not that dangerous... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    Death due to accidental inhalation of DHMO, even in small quantities. [...] Prolonged exposure to solid DHMO causes severe tissue damage.

    Liquid DHMO, on the other hand, is safe at up to a concentration level (in human tissue) of at least two thirds.

    It also helps us flush toxins from our kidneys, it drives photosynthesis and can be applied to your crops to increase their growth. It also protects your internal stomach wall from being damaged by hydrochloric acid, and has various health benefits (be wary of excessive consumption, though: that may cause hyperfrequent urination).

    I think DHMO has benefits that outweigh the disadvantages, and its use should be allowed with governmental regulation.

    ;-)

  35. Training by chicago_scott · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Retailers are in the clear if the employee who sold the game goes through a training program."

    I wonder which politicians friend will be given the no-bid contract on administering the "training program"? Should bring in a nice fee... 50% of which can be funneled into back into a campaign fund.

  36. Too many links by asylumx · · Score: 1

    This is clearly off-topic, but the summary has way too many links. I find myself incredibly distracted while attempting to read it.

  37. Dissonance by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm having a hard time connecting the age-limit restriction and the death of two police officers. Is this to say that if a 35 year-old person were to shoot a police officer, we should restrict violent game sales to only those who are 36 or older? These phony imposed age-limits need to go and let parents decide what is best for our kids instead of the government. My kids (13 and 9) will have a harder time drumming up $50 for the game than they would buying it underage anyways.

  38. Firsthand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was up at the Utah capitol building (for entirely separate reasons) and had the opportunity to hear from both the Senate and House sponsors of this bill before it passed. It's funny here to read that it got watered down so that it was not effective - the bill was never intended to be punitive in nature. The intent was that the bill would just be a gentle nudge to game retailers who had voluntarily pledged not to sell mature games to minors. In other words it started out watered down by design

  39. Re:No, Congress MUST ban this deadly chemical, DHM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...isn't Dihydrogen Monoxide a fancy phrase for "water"?

  40. Utah Legislature by ludd1t3-2009 · · Score: 1

    The Utah legislature is driven by a well organized grass roots organization called The Eagle Form. Because the state legislature is not politically balanced (somewhere 80% Republican), there are no moderates. At times it seems as though elected representative are fighting to be more conservative than each other. So despite lack of collaborating evidence and being generally uninformed, a minority of ultra conservatives push the legislative agenda. Valuable time is wasted voting on issues such as this.

    The sad thing is, the control of the State legislature to regulate the purchase of video games is moving beyond their control. Online purchases and distribution are moving the ability to legislate issues like this into a gray area of law that isn't well defined.

  41. Do you drive a car? by WiiVault · · Score: 0, Troll

    I bike, get your fucking polluting car off the road you are hurting my health with your fumes!

    1. Re:Do you drive a car? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I bike, get your fucking polluting car off the road you are hurting my health with your fumes!

      You ride a bike inside the bus?
      Trolls do weird things.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  42. Learn to read. by WiiVault · · Score: 1

    No genius, I was referring to the argument you made about how your rights end at my lungs. Even the most efficient car produces far more pollution than the biggest nastiest cigar in the world. People like you just want to have a jihad against something you don't do, but are more than happy to destroy the health of others when it is something YOU do.

    1. Re:Learn to read. by Scrameustache · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No genius, I was referring to

      Look troll, I don't give a damn about what your stupid comment was referring to, DIAF.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Learn to read. by WiiVault · · Score: 1

      Fuck you- Why comment if you are not going to read? Is it too hard for the little shit brain on your head to understand that pollution is one and the same, be it from a cigarette or a car's exhaust? Take your own advice, /. would be better without you.

    3. Re:Learn to read. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Why comment if you are not going to read?

      Follow your own advice, asshole.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  43. Wow. by LostTokens · · Score: 1

    Wow. Jack Thompson hasn't been ripped to shreds by rabid wolves yet. How... strange. o_O