Slashdot Mirror
Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope Now In Beta
An anonymous reader writes "To little fanfare and not much news coverage, Canonical released the beta of Ubuntu 9.04 'Jaunty Jackalope.' I tried it on a Dell Mini 9 using the Ubuntu Netbook Remix (UNR) and it's fabulous! Much better than the sad 'Dell Desktop' that it shipped with. Finally, someone has broken the 25+ year old too-many-open-windows-and-chaos desktop paradigm with UNR's task oriented layout, which is perfect for small netbook screen sizes."
That's why there's not much fanfare.
It's for people willing to experience a few issues, or a few bugs, to make the product which comes out with lots of fanfare more solid.
He tried to kill me with a forklift!
What the heck is a Jackalope?
I've been running it on my two EEE's for a long time. That interface is the bees knees for those things. That was distributed on the UbuntuEEE fork that later turned in to EasyPeasy. I'm really interested in trying out 9.04 though.
~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
Here are some screenshots for Alpha 6, but does anybody have screenshots of Beta?
Not that they will be all that different.
One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
You could look at http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/jaunty/beta to find out.
Or wait until Saint George's Day.
Note: This is a beta release. Do not install it on production machines. The final stable version will be released on April 23rd, 2009.
K.
a rabbit with antlers.
spinochet
Users of Intel video chipsets have reported performance regressions in Ubuntu 8.10 compared with previous releases. (252094) Although these performance issues have not been resolved by default in Ubuntu 9.04, a new experimental acceleration architecture option, DRI2/UXA, is available for Intel graphics users. Our testing has found this provides significant performance improvements for many users, but has also shown risk of severe stability problems, thus we are not yet providing to the general public. You can opt-in to enable this by running "sudo gedit /etc/X11/xorg.conf", and adding Option "AccelMethod" "UXA" to the Device section of your xorg.conf. Users wishing to maximize stability should stay with the standard default acceleration method, "EXA".
I thought they "fixed" the brown desktop theme? There are blue desktop screenshots but that's for KDE or some such.
moox. for a new generation.
what happens if *ubuntu becomes profitable? Most likely means that at least one major monopoly has been broken, and a number of truly competitive markets have been created.
I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
Now if only they'd get Pidgin or something to work with webcams for IMing. Still can't get it to work on aMSN or Mercury :/
I upgraded from Intrepid to Jaunty during Alpha 6, which at the time was using 2.6.29. I upgraded this morning, and it appears they have reverted to 2.6.28. I'm not sure why.
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Find out more here:
http://www.canonical.com/projects/ubuntu/unr
Selected quotes:
"Ubuntu Netbook Remix is optimised to run on a new category of affordable Internet-centric devices called netbooks. It includes a new consumer-friendly interface that allows users to quickly and easily get on-line and use their favourite applications. This interface is optimised for a retail sales environment."
Wonder what that last bit means? It flashes 'buy me now!!!! 50% discount!!!' on the screen?
"A remix is a 'respun' version of Ubuntu built for a specific purpose. Although Canonical has encouraged community projects to use this terminology for some time, this is the first time that Canonical has used it. We are using it to differentiate from an 'Edition' which we consider a complete version with daily builds suitable for the average user with no additional work beyond installing the CD."
"All of the initial Ubuntu Netbook remixes combine optimisations from the Moblin project for Intel® Atomâ processors and it is specially designed for netbooks. Intel and Canonical are working to create a new computing experience across a rapidly expanding category of portable devices."
Wintel is dead, long live Buntel?
Kubuntu with KDE 4.2.1 looks fabulous too! Just installed Kubuntu Beta and KDE is totally sweet in this release. There is even a native KDE4 Network Manager that looks great and works well.
The Plasma widgets remain a bit crashy and buggy - Comic Strip won't take the configure button off even after Strips are added, Moving widgets crashes Plasma etc.
But yeah, getting there. By KDE 4.3 release things ought to be totally rocking.
Try it out people - you won't be disappointed.
Ubuntu ships with an RDP client.
Anyone know of a remote desktop solution for Ubuntu that can connect to a Windows 2k or newer box?
Yes. Ubuntu. RDP works out of the box--I use it nearly daily. Applications->Internet->Terminal Server Client. There's also an panel applet front end if you'd prefer that--very handy if you have several Winboxes you need to connect to on a regular basis.
I installed this a month ago almost by painstakingly finding the i386 iso of Jaunty and installing the netbook remix stuff independently.
I've got a eee 900 with the 16GB SSDHD and let me tell you: this thing boots and runs quick! I've tried XP and the UNR Ibex version and the Jaunty build using ext4 filing system blows everything else out of the water with all variations of start-up times. There are problems, however, with certain aspects of the remix.
There is significant lag issues with the interface itself. I believe this may have something to do with the size of my swap partition, but thus far I've been too lazy to format or change anything since the partial upgrade a few days ago.
Its only the remix that reacts slow, everything else is fast, fast, fast! ext4 certainly adds something to boot times and it looks like this Ubuntu build will really be one, coupled with netbooks, that can somewhat pierce the Microsoft stronghold on the general public....eh, probably not.
"Ubuntu Netbook Remix is optimised to run on a new category of affordable Internet-centric devices called netbooks."
Not so much optimised, that the installer would allow me to see any buttons (such as "next", "back", "cancel" or whatever they may be, I can't see them!) on the 800x480 screen of the eeepc 701...
I managed to install it by pressing tab and enter blindly at appropriate times, though.
Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
Maybe this will be more use, then.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-9.04-beta
It wasn't really difficult for me to find it, starting from the page whose link I posted...
about three click and twelve seconds, all told.
And if that is still not good enough, then I suggest you go back to whatever you usually do when you don't get everything spoon-fed to you.
K.
Worst haiku ever.
I have problems with 8.10 on my somewhat ancient Dell Dimension 2100 - lots of problems with latency and task switching - and I've yet to get the kernel to build from source for it. (Given I've built Linux kernels since the 0.9 days, it's not from lack of experience.)
(The latest Fedora won't install on it at all. Hard lock-up when booting the GUI installer.)
Sure, you expect support to decay for older machines, but this is hardly a Viglen 386SX we're talking about (Pentium IV is still in-vogue), I've upgraded the RAM, hard drive, DVD drive, ethernet and sound card, so it's all well above what these distros expect as minimum hardware.
I'm considering 9.04 not because I'm particularly in need of new features, but because I can't get the existing features to work with the way the distro is built. If 9.04 doesn't improve, I'm giving up on other people's distros and patches, and building the whole damn thing from the vanilla sources from scratch.
It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
"Finally, someone has broken the 25+ year old too-many-open-windows-and-chaos desktop paradigm with UNR's task oriented layout."
Umm... tiling window managers have been around longer than non-tiling ones. You can blame apple for making windows overlappable. The 'task-oriented layout' is nothing new or innovative - see wmii, awesome, xmonad, dwm, etc. etc. (even fluxbox, with its 'tabs', actually) for examples of modern X11 window managers that offer similar functionality, plus much more...
Personally, I started using wmii a few months back and haven't looked back since.