Slashdot Mirror


Quebec Says 'Non' To English-Only Video Games

daveofdoom writes "The French-Canadian government of Quebec is saying 'non' to English-only video games if French versions are available. 'It's causing a lot of consternation among retailers and gamers alike, who fear the rules will lead to delays in video games arriving in the province, and may not accomplish what the law intends, which is to promote and protect the French language.' This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply stop creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

78 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Choice fodder! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. Let the French jokes AND Canadian jokes commence!

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Choice fodder! by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like its about time to surrender, eh?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Choice fodder! by Redlazer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that the rest of Canada, especially here in BC, have absolutely no patience, concern, or otherwise good will towards anyone who would consider them "Quebecois".

      Those responsible for creating the idea that we are in any way supportive of our irritating french neighbours, have been sacked.

      -The Canadians

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    3. Re:Choice fodder! by supernova_hq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here, here. As much as I love Quebec and their people (spent 2 weeks there and speak fluent french), nobody makes fun of the Quebecers more than the rest of us Canadians!

      Disclaimer: I love the Quebec people, it's their governing bodies and the asinine laws they pass that I can't stand. oh, yeah...Eh!

    4. Re:Choice fodder! by HybridJeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Canadian born in Quebec I would like to add a big fuck you to all the Quebecois language bigots who feel it should be their job to stomp all over the rights of Quebecers in the name of "protecting" their language. A language does not define a culture, people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

    5. Re:Choice fodder! by debile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a quebecer, I was so fed up with this crap that I moved to BC.

      Movies are better in their original language. I watch french movies in french and english movies in english.

      Same for books.

      Same for any technical profession where you have to talk to someone or learn cutting edge stuff not yet translated.

      The french language is beautiful but not that useful and people fail to recognize it.

    6. Re:Choice fodder! by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Funny

      people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

      (1) That should be "manner", not "manor". Unless, of course, you meant that we should be able to communicate in any elite house of our choice. If that is the case, I apologize.

      (2) If I ever meet you IRL, I will be sure to communicate only in gestures with ambiguous interpretations, because that is how I shall choose to communicate. :D

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    7. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a Canadian born in Quebec I would like to add a big fuck you to all the Quebecois language bigots who feel it should be their job to stomp all over the rights of Quebecers in the name of "protecting" their language. A language does not define a culture, people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

      Yet, nobody seems to mind when Americans bitch and whine about speaking Spanish in America and "protecting" the English language...

      Just sayin'

    8. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly that *is* French.

    9. Re:Choice fodder! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looks like its about time to surrender, eh?

      If, by "surrender", you mean label the Catalan version of the game as French, then I agree. Let them fight over the definition of a language (if they refer to Catalan as Spanish, they'll discover what a real fight is).
      Alternatively, just label the Spanish version as French. Then let them study the dialect of French spoken in rural parts of the Haute-Pyrenees departement of France (it's also intermediate between French and Spanish, but differing from Catalan). The inhabitants insist that it's French with no traces of Spanish.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    10. Re:Choice fodder! by Toonol · · Score: 3, Funny

      You need to learn better English. If I didn't allow for your evident unfamiliarity with the language, I'd think you were hugely and inappropriately over-reacting.

    11. Re:Choice fodder! by dryeo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why can't Americans accept that they couldn't beat the French-Canadians?
      FYI the last time they surrendered was something like 1759. They beat George Washington in 1754. They didn't surrender when you tried to force them to join your war of separation in 1775, once again beating Washington and burned down the White House in 1814 when you also tried to invade.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    12. Re:Choice fodder! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lalalalalalala... can't hear you!

      -The USA

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    13. Re:Choice fodder! by Mawen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that the rest of Canada, especially here in BC, have absolutely no patience, concern, or otherwise good will towards anyone who would consider them "Quebecois".

      -The Canadians

      Hey...! Speak for yourself. As an Albertan, I think Quebecois are important part of our country and that we all need to grow up and learn to get along, even if it means we westerners and other english canadians have to grow up first.

      Sure the federal politics and apparent provincial idiocy regarding language protection have been very annoying for a very long time, but I believe in our nation of Canada, and I do not want to throw my fellow Canadians under the bus (even if some of them would throw me as an Albertan under the bus -- although it seems people from other eastern provinces do it too.)

      Relations between french and english Canada seems to have always been difficult, but I don't think it is impossible. Hating each other and saying we wish Quebec would separate is not going to help. We don't need a big hole of alienated or separated people in the middle of our country.

      We are supposed to take pride in our identity as one that celebrates diversity, contrasted to the melting pot to the south. For one, it is nice to have people from Quebec here who enjoy culture and life in a way that we who are more conservative Albertans can appreciate.

      Maybe you are just trying to be funny, and let the world know that we non-Quebec canadians have quite a few differences with Quebec countrymen, but I have been concerned lately about the reckless hatred that seems to be growing among us.

          We are supposed to have an identity as a peace-keeping nation. We have so much peace in Canada to be thankful for. Let's not throw that away.

    14. Re:Choice fodder! by JustOK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At one point, a movie/tv show from Quebec, in French, was shown in France. They had to use sub-titles so that the people in France could understand it.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    15. Re:Choice fodder! by oliderid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well as a Frenchspeaking european, we simply love those cousins :-). It is a bit like watching an independent Gallic village right in the middle of the Roman Empire.

    16. Re:Choice fodder! by Koda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, language DOES help define culture within a society. Certain concepts simply do not exist or translate well in some languages. Here are two examples where there are translations, but the are imperfect; where something of the essence of the concept is truly "lost in translation":
      - "Liberty" does not have a perfect 1:1 translation in Russian.
      - "Personal space" does not have a perfect 1:1 translation in Japanese.

      If something cannot be expressed in language, it cannot be communicated between people, and it usually is not part of the culture.

      Sadly, the concept of being an a**hole to somebody that can't speak our native language seems to be shared by English and French speakers alike.

    17. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In 50 years or so, the English speaking people will say the same about Spanish-Only games. LOL

    18. Re:Choice fodder! by deraj123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, people do mind. My city (Nashville) recently held a special election with the attempt to mandate that our city government only do business (and provide services, with a few exceptions) in English. We minded a great deal and successfully voted the bigoted, short-sighted bill down.

    19. Re:Choice fodder! by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (2) If I ever meet you IRL, I will be sure to communicate only in gestures with ambiguous interpretations, because that is how I shall choose to communicate. :D

      As it happens, neither sign language nor hand-waving are forbidden by law, so you go right ahead and do so.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    20. Re:Choice fodder! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 2

      and burned down the White House in 1814 when you also tried to invade.

      That is very true... we burned down THE White House... but then they retaliated and burned down an entire city (York... now more-or-less Toronto).

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    21. Re:Choice fodder! by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here, here! I am an Ontarian married to a Quebecoise! And I speak 3 languages. We right now life in Switzerland with 4 languages.

        My point is that we in Canada need to get along!

      I for one would like to see more Alberta politics! Alberta is not Quebec, bat Alberta, BC, and even the Newfies need to be more present!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    22. Re:Choice fodder! by cvd6262 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And isn't WE taking "credit" for 1812 kind of like THEY taking credit for the Seven Years/French-Indian/War of the Conquest?

      I mean, Canada was no more itself in 1812 than the U.S. was in 1763.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    23. Re:Choice fodder! by jmv · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the main thing I have not yet understood between Canada and Quebec (I'm "Quebecois" but am neither independentist nor federalist):
      Canada: "you suck, we hate you"
      Quebec: "We'll leave you"
      Canada: "Please no, don't leave. We love you"
      Quebec: "Well, OK then"

    24. Re:Choice fodder! by Nimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also it's the belief that if Johnny Foreigner is going to come live here, he should learn to speak the language.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    25. Re:Choice fodder! by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Canada is a country and recognising Quebec as somehow special is what created this mess in the first place.

      Stuff like recognizing Quebec is precisely why Canada isn't the USA. Multiculturalism vs the Melting Pot and all that.

    26. Re:Choice fodder! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI quite a few Canadians fought in the US Civil War.

  2. Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Link on page to original article:
    http://www.thestar.com/article/611472

    Date on original article:
    Apr 01, 2009 04:30 AM

    Move along, nothing to see.

    1. Re:Sigh. by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. Because a nationally syndicated newspaper is going to play April Fool's jokes.

      Right. Nothing like that would ever happen.

      That being said, I wouldn't put this past the Quebecois.

    2. Re:Sigh. by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If this was an april fools day joke, they did a good job of making it subtle. This sort of thing is par for the course for the Quebec government. Mostly with these laws and media ownership/controls Quebec sovereigntists want to create a closed society where people don't feel an affinity with the country of Canada. Which is working over time, as Quebeckers more and more make that claim. I've heard many soverigntist youth make that statement. "Oh I don't feel Canadian I feel I am a Quebecois" or whatever. Well of course you do. Your mind belongs to your society in that way. They're certainly entitled to feel that way, but its intellectually dishonest I believe to manage a society this way, especially when society as a whole is becoming more global, Plus, its all words. The first Canadians were essentially Quebeckers. Quebeckers not associating themselves as Canadians just because of the existence of the rest of Canada is like Canadians not calling themselves North Americans, because American's "ruined the term". And also, theres really no point in trying to stave it off. I mean, Japan today isn't the same as Japan 100 years ago, but they're still a unique culture. Ah well, the best thing for Canada would be if they really did separate. Then we could actually stop giving them money, and appeasing them at every turn. Plus we could get rid of "official bilinguism" which doesn't really accomplish anything but keep qualified individuals from getting jobs. You need to speak English and French to get a government job, but in Quebec English is shunned. It's the hypocrisy of political correctness really. It really is a shame as most Canadians, myself included, generally like Quebec and are happy for them to speak french and be part of the social fabric. But when they bitch and moan over and over, it's just ridiculous.

  3. fixed... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

    "This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply arret creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

    there, fixed that for you.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
    1. Re:fixed... by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply arreter creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

      there fixed that for you

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
  4. Most of these rules are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most rules about French in Canada are ridiculous. Government officials need to be bilingual regardless of capability of doing a job, for example. Firing a native French speaker from government is almost impossible, regardless of how badly they do at their job. And if people in government has what is deemed an inadequate level of french, the government pays for one-on-one french lessons INSTEAD of for doing your job, and instead of for french classes with other people learning it or instead of for a government billet in a french-speaking area where you can learn the language through immersion. Do you have any idea what that costs that taxpayer? Or how stupid it is?

    Protecting cultural heritage is one thing, but this is even worse than political correctness run amuck, because it's groupthink feeding into this mentality that it's bigoted to be against these policies, even when they're ridiculously inefficient.

    To make matters worse, I don't believe the requirements are nearly as bilingual in the other direction.

    1. Re:Most of these rules are. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To make matters worse, I don't believe the requirements are nearly as bilingual in the other direction.

      No, why would they be? English wasn't the declining language in the 60's. Nobody finds it more convenient to teach their kids French rather than English.

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting. Except English culture and language doesn't need protection, it's doing quite fine on it's own

    2. Re:Most of these rules are. by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I do agree that some of the Quebec language laws are a bit over the top and end up having stupid results, I feel like I must correct and question assertions made in your post in the following paragraph:

      And if people in government has what is deemed an inadequate level of french, the government pays for one-on-one french lessons INSTEAD of for doing your job, and instead of for french classes with other people learning it or instead of for a government billet in a french-speaking area where you can learn the language through immersion.

      Living in Ottawa, I have several government working friends who have been provided with government funded French language education (and paid for doing so), and none of them have had the privilege of one-on-one lessons: they all attended group-based French language classes, and they were required to pass in order to continue on in their roles.

      I don't see how this is much different than your employer investing in job training, and I'm not opposed to it. Furthermore, the vast majority of this occurs in the Ottawa area, I'd suspect, and as most of the population here speaks French, you'd be hard pressed to find a much more immersive environment.

      If anyone here is interested, here's an article written up about Quebec and their language laws: The Language Laws of Quebec

    3. Re:Most of these rules are. by ultranova · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting.

      Every time I hear about protecting a culture I can't help but remember those displays in museums where they have dummies dressed as people of a bygone era, engaged in activities typical of such people. I fear that these "cultural protectionists" see people much like these dummies: not as people but as decorations, something to be kept in its place for their enjoyment.

      If a culture dies, all it really means is that no one chooses to adhere to it. Why should they be deprived of the freedom to choose? The world isn't a museum and people aren't wax dummies on display.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  5. Re:French and France by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the French language is so great, why does it need protection?

    because English people are physically incapable of chain smoking, drinking wine, being obnoxiously rude and highly insecure of their culture, all at the same time.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  6. Re:many questions by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't worry, many French Canadians think this protectionist stuff goes to far. While I can agree with multilingual signs and companies having multilingual staff. Video games and movies should be allowed to sell separate version in different language. Book do not have this restriction that I'm aware of.

  7. Ridiculous? by Bodrius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply stop creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction.

    Perhaps it is ridiculous, but not for that reason.

    Which game company would stop creating *French* localizations of their games and lose the market in *France* (and any other French-speaking language) in order to get their english version into the Quebec market?

    *That* would be ridiculous.

    The populations are off by an order of magnitude. The whole point is that a game company may not think it is worth localizing to French *just for Quebec* - but if they localize for French-speaking market, this forces the two versions to play on level fields.

    But if they're already localizing in French, why on earth would they kill their other markets just to prioritize this one? If Quebec per se had ever been a priority, they'd have been treating the French version on par with English from the beginning - which is what this rule tries (futilely) to force.

    There are a thousand reasons why this legislation may be wrong-headed and is unlikely to have any positive effect - but this is argument is, indeed, ridiculous.

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    1. Re:Ridiculous? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, Quebec French and the French spoken in France are separated by about 350 years of linguistic evolution.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
  8. Re:many questions by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Informative

    French culture and language was declining rapidly before the introduction of the language laws.

    There's an Anglophone upper class in Quebec, and immigrants from non-English countries come in and generally want to learn English. That doesn't bode well for French so laws were introduced to attempt to encourage Francophone Quebequois from becoming Anglophone.

    It's worked well enough that Latvia introduced similar laws to try to protect the Latvian language and culture from the massive influence of Russian after the Soviet Union fell apart

  9. English only with French available? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this make sense to anyone? If it is english only, then it would seem to me that french is unavailable by definition.

    1. Re:English only with French available? by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read it a third time. If a game company comes out with an English version of a game and then a French version later, the retailer can stock the English version while there's no French version, but once the French version comes out, they either have to buy French version copies or take the English version off the shelves.

      So it causes headaches, but not the ones you're thinking.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  10. Re:many questions by rob51 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are some answers for you about the demographics here (legislation bit is interesting).

    The Charter of the French Language is the law one people usually complain about (particularly when dealing with public signs). So, not a Luddite thing.

  11. Re:many questions by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Informative
    If there is a French version, it's illegal to stock only the English version. The problem appears to be twofold:

    First, if the game is scheduled to be released in both English and French, the stores have to wait until the French version is available. Retailers are worried that gamers will turn to imports if they can't get the hot new titles immediately after launch.

    Second, this presupposes that there is an equal demand for games in French, to demand for games in English. The language police can be right fucking bastards about enforcing this sort of thing, so retailers are worried about having to buy more stock than they can guarantee moving. Margins are already pretty thin, so that's a definite concern.

  12. Re:many questions by Feyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    im a french canadian, and if this law is true it only means i will not be buying any more games in local stores.

    french version of games are usually nearly close to unplayable due to being badly translated and even when they're properly translated there is inevitably some key concepts that simply don't exist and have to be adapted.

    plain and simple, it detracts from the game. nevermind the lumberjacks that refuse to speak english, i demand my games in their native language.

  13. EFIGS by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my experience as a game developer for nearly 10 years who has worked for a few companies, I can tell you that every game I've ever worked on has always had at least EFIGS (English, French, Italian, German, Spanish) localization (with a French North American SKU). I really don't see this as being much of an issue for most decent sized game publishers.

    The last part of game testing usually involves all sorts of fun localization issues and me winding up wishing every would just speak English after dealing with some weird Czech voice over bug or something. :) The Sims was probably the worst, I believe they did a localization for every language known to man.

  14. I'm ashamed by QuebecNerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...There are some days when I'm ashamed to live in the province of Québec; not many but they do exist and today is one of those days...

    For me, language is just a form of expression and has nothing to do with Nationality. Unfortunately, some of our leaders are so paranoid of being 'corrupted' by other cultures and loose their french 'identity' that they would go to any length to protect it. Most of them are too stupid to learn English and act like morons to hide their fears.

    The Loi 101 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loi_101) with dictates this behavior is often mis-interpreted and goes too far.

    A film is a form of art like music and is created in one and only one language. Subtitles can be put to help understand the dialogue but the original voice and emotions of the artist should be heard.

    I mean for years; Arnold Schwarzenegger's voice has been dubbed by a guy who sells washers and dryers and picks lottery numbers on TV here in Québec. Talk about a mood killer. Fuck you Corbeil... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Corbeil)

    Anyways, the same goes for music and to a lesser degree, to video games. Let the market regulate itself and let the game publisher decide if it is in their best interest to have a french version.

    To regulate that is to go too far and intervene in private business matters.

  15. Re:many questions by motek · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would start speculating on the luddite aspect (or on anything else) as soon, as the information is confirmed by a source more serious than an article dated April 1. I have checked local French language media (La Presse, Le Devoir and Radio-Canada) and found nothing.

    --
    I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
  16. Color Me Unsuprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in Alberta so my views are undoubtedly very biased, however Quebec has a knack for both shooting itself in the foot and whining.

    I'm not sure how much of our politics get into the news, but Quebec receives an incredible amount of money from the rest of Canada because of its desire to keep its dying language alive (Seriously, are any languages other than English going to be anything more than a curiosity in 100 years? I can assure you that french wont).

    Many years ago, Quebec had a strong and irrational separatist movement where they got the idea that they weren't sucking enough money out of our government (And even back then they were getting largest slice of the pie) and decided to vote to separate (It failed 49-51%).

    Frankly, if they had separated their economy would collapse, their health care and employment insurance would be gone, their pensions finished and they would likely be forced to crawl back to Canada in a few months. They have nothing aside from some god given right to make absurd demands.

    I admit it, I'm bitter. It feels like every year Quebec whines to parliament and grabs a pile of money from our province. I have nothing against being part of a country and support transfer payments to provinces that are less fortunate. I strongly believe in being a unified country but Quebec has an arrogance that never fails to anger me. They have the gall to consider themselves a separate part of Canada but won't hesitate to suck us dry.

    1. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by kklein · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seriously, are any languages other than English going to be anything more than a curiosity in 100 years?

      Wow... Wow. You are so wrong.

      Right now, depending on how you define language users, there are over 1 billion English users in the world. Only around 375 million of those are native speakers. The remaining are non-native speakers.

      Do you see what that means?

      What that means is that people are adopting English as a second language; not using it at home. In fact, a lot of the "outer circle" English-speaking countries (e.g. India, Malaysia, Nigeria, Singapore) principally use English as a lingua franca due to the linguistic complexity of their geographical area. African countries adopt English because it's better for business, and because picking any of the local languages could fan the flames of aeons-old tribal rivalries. The Indian subcontinent just has too many languages and dialects to bother with, so they use English for business.

      Nowhere are these people's first languages dying out.

      Furthermore, large countries of lingua franca English users, like India, tend to develop their own variety of English, resulting in there not being a single English in the world, but World Englishes, an important concept introduced by the noted Indian linguist Braj Kachru.

      A "World English" is a variety of English that is comprehensible and regular within a certain population For example, in Singapore, the verb "reply" is transitive, i.e. people say "I replied his email," with the noun phrase "his email" functioning as the object of the verb "reply." Inner circle English speakers use it only as an intransitive verb, necessitating a prepositional phrase: "I replied to his email." This usage cannot really be considered a mistake, because every user of this variety of English uses this word this way.

      Moreover, this idea of "one billion English speakers" really doesn't sit well with me. Pack up your things and take a long holiday sometime. Travel to a lot of different countries, and see how many people you can find who speak English. You'll find a lot more in Europe than elsewhere, but you might be surprised at how many people don't. I live in Japan, and despite English being a compulsory subject in jr. high and high school, finding anyone who speaks more than a couple horribly-pronounced words is pretty difficult. They just don't have an opportunity or need to use it most of the time, and classes are designed to get them to pass entrance tests, not actually speak or use the language (believe me--I've taught at every level of the Japanese education system--from first grade through university).

      Then there is the oft-cited statistic about China becoming the biggest English-speaking country in the world. I really have no idea what that is supposed to mean. They, too, have compulsory English education, but backpack around China for a month or so and you can probably count on one hand how many people you ran into who spoke English. Furthermore, China is never, ever, ever going to let Mandarin lapse for English. Never never never. When your country is named "The Central Nation" (i.e. "the center of the world"), you take your language and culture very seriously. Mao's revolution was largely to kick Western influence out of the country (Japan was considered Western--that was not a mistake by any means). However, after taking power, even he could not convince people to abandon the Chinese character system (hanzi) in favor of the Pinyin romanization system. People saw even this literacy-boosting move as a betrayal of their Chinese cultural identity. So there's another English language myth busted, I hope.

      Finally, let's look at that term I've been kicking around in this growing reply: Lingua Franca. ...The French language. Now, historically, it's a little more complex than that, but basically, a form of French used to be the trad

  17. Re:Come on y'all, speak American already by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heh, we'll let anyone speak English, any way they want. Make up new words, take words from other languages, whatever.

    Maybe that is one reason why English is "winning".

    I'm not able to come up with a car analogy to add to your post, I hope this will suffice:

    English seems to follow a Wikipedia format, where anyone can contribute anything, and thanks to it's flexibility and openness, it grows and adapts at an astonishing pace.

    French is more like a traditional Encyclopedia. All the prestige associated with it belongs to the past, and by the time a select few get around to updating it, those changes are already irrelevant.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  18. Made a start... by GrahamCox · · Score: 5, Funny

    toutes vos base sont appartiennent à nous

    1. Re:Made a start... by Narishma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just as "correct" as the English version.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  19. Re:many questions by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a fluent English speaker, I know exactly what you mean, but as a French French, well, there's few people whose English is good enough so that the original version becomes preferable to the French translation. Besides, that's games we're talking about, not Blackadder.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  20. Re:French and France by rve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget staying thin!

    To this day nobody knows how they can consume so much smoke, bread and wine and still be some of the thinnest people in the world!

    Preferring small portions of expensive food over affordable supersized meals

  21. Re:French and France by drewtheman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because we're in the middle of 300 millions people speaking English. It's not only a language, it's a culture. And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

  22. Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by mclc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, I really don't know where to start. Hi, my name is mclc, I am a French canadian and I feel guilty because of where I am born, and because of my native language, which is French, and because my ancestors were conquered in the Plaines d'Abraham. I play mostly in English, by the way. I watch movies in their original language too. Ho yeah, movies are also under this law. And you know what? I can watch movies in English if I want. I have a contact for that. It's a very dangerous black market to be. By law, watching a movie in English is like buying drugs and hiring a hitman, but worse.

    As some people said in a few comments, Quebec has a law to claim the right of French speaking people to be served, to work, live, dream and eat in French. Why you ask? BECAUSE YOU ARE 350 MILLIONS OF ENGLISH SPEAKING AMERICANS AND CANADIANS! Is that so hard to understand? Yeah, we lost a war, so what? We are 80% of French canadians in the province of Quebec. English speakers are protected by the federal laws saying that every service must be available in French and in English (this is applied in Quebec, New-Brunswick and Ontario, but mostly in Quebec as there is no other place in the country where you will really get service in both languages).

    Now, because you all like separatists scandals, I will disapoint you. It is not forbidden to sell an English game. Understood? Here's the catch that the evil French speaking aliens set up : you will be forbidden to sell the game in English if, and only if the game is made elsewhere in French. This means that if France (by the way, you just cannot get a game in English in France, by law) does not have the game until a few months, we in Quebec will have the English only version until then. When France (and Quebec) finally gets the game in French, well guess what? The two versions will be available! Bilingual like movies, or books, or every service offered by the Government of Quebec (unlike all other province). Thank yooooouuuuu bilingual country! Naturally, a lot of games are now localized, which means have more than one language in the same CD.

    Now, what do you do for us, Rest of Canada, except insulting every frog in Quebec? All I hear is the eternal speak white, only said differently (and usually some stuff about the English Canada who won the war). Live in the 21st century, people. Let us, minority in Canada, speak French as we let you, minority in Quebec speak English. We pass great laws that preserve French and does not affect English in any ways. We almost all know a little of English in Quebec, but hey, IT'S NOT OUR NATIVE LANGUAGE. You just cannot think as good in an other language than your own. For example, all this text was great in my head, and now I don't know where I'm going. But hey, just come in Quebec, speak English in any store and you will be gladly served. French people will switch to English automatically, speak an English sounding more like a wookie, but we will try. I think we deserve the same thing. And in our case, we are only 7 millions in a sea of 350 millions. It is for our protection.

    Je vous aime quand même.
    mclc

  23. Re:Good luck with that. by rve · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Language enclaves generally don't last very long.

    How about thousands of years? Almost every country in Europe has its own language. That can't last long, I'm sure they're all about to switch to English any day now.

  24. Not so much! by PIBM · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you had taken the time to read about this specific thing, you'd learn that not only is this old news (this was done in 2007!), but that the CANADIAN association of video game signed this bill.

    Also, any computer game has been subject to this exact bill since october 2007. The only difference is that now, console games are also covered.

    If you took the time to read the description, you'd have learned that distributor are mandated to offer the french version of a game provided that it already exists somewhere else.

    The bill specifies that any reseller can sell the english version as long as they also offer the french version if it exists. I'm a french quebecer and I kept buying english computer games without noticing anything.

    The only problem that I heard about caused by this bill so far has been with world of warcraft, for which the french version was originally built for playing on european servers, so you could not play with a friend who bought the english version...

      You might find this interesting:
    http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/francisation/consommateurs/secteur/jeux_video/jeuxvideo.html

    1. Re:Not so much! by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In France, such a mandate wouldn't be necessary. The only time you'll even see a game that isn't in French is if the publisher has never released a French version, and even then it's just as likely you'll never even see the game at all - it's a matter of both linguistic comfort (most French people are more comfortable in French, whereas many (although not all) Quebecois are comfortable in both French and English), and of linguistic pride - something that France and French people in general are very strong on (basically, even without a mandate, every video game shop in France would follow this rule anyway).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:Not so much! by Amateur+Slashdotter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the details. There is also a summary of the rights and duties for IT translated here:

      http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/english/infoguides/depliant_7_20050711.pdf

    3. Re:Not so much! by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider that in France there will probably be a different mandate forcing the use of French in video games soon.

      No, only the user manual,PEGI (ESRB) rating and epilepsy risk warning must absolutely be in French for the French market ( don't know for the belgium and swiss). But if you release a unlocalized game you will probably miss most of your potential consumer.
      Most of the super market will not sell unlocalized game to prevent any problems and potential refund. Only specialized story sell imported game.

    4. Re:Not so much! by SpiderClan · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have two replies to this. First, the Canadian association of video games is comprised of game developers. It is in no way representative of Canadians and they were responding to the Quebec government in the way that made the most financial sense to them.

      Second, I think the GP was slightly exaggerating, or doesn't know much beyond his small area of Canada. The problem isn't with those who consider themselves Quebecois, since that would be both unreasonable and, in many cases, hypocritical. The problem is with those who consider themselves Quebecois as opposed to Canadian, and don't believe/recognize that they can be both.

    5. Re:Not so much! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a game in Belgium, all the packaging was in Dutch. I figured since I can understand it (sort of) and it was in the bargain bin for only a few beers I'd give it a go.

      When I opened it it was trilingual - English, French & German.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. Re:Good luck with that. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about thousands of years? Almost every country in Europe has its own language. That can't last long, I'm sure they're all about to switch to English any day now.

    Firstly, the countries in Europe aren't enclaves -- none of them are completely surrounded by hundreds of miles of English speakers, as Quebec is.

    Secondly, they're switching to English anyway. As someone who has lived in Europe for the last six years I can say from my own anecdotal experience that the more the world gets connected, the more people speak English. (I predict that we'll end up in a world not too linguistically different from Firefly)

  26. Re:French and France by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was going to say, "we can do all of that!" But you ruined it.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  27. A mini-essay on cultural welfare by Argumentator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of taking a circumstantial approach as many do, trying to save the P.C. face while arguing about inefficiencies, heavy-handed approach, etc... I'll go straight to the heart of the issue -- WHY THE FUCK DO WE HAVE TO PROTECT FRENCH, or any other language for that matter? And even if you buy the argument that protecting the language == protecting the culture, I'm going to ask, why should culture be protected?

    The fundamental essence of all cultures is that they change over time. They are born, they are developed, and when the time comes, they die off or are absorbed into other cultures. From the beginning of human history that has been the case. None of our modern cultures have existed from the beginning of civilization -- they are all an amalgamated product of hundreds of independent cultures which have evolved and intertwined over time. Different cultures merge and split, traditions come and go, beliefs, values, ways of thinking and doing things, they all change over time. The very reason we evolve and progress as a civilization is that we accept the concept of changing culture. Language is part of that. Do you see any sizable part of the population arguing that we should go back to, say, ancient Greek, because Greece was the birthplace of western civilization and thus (obviously) we must protect and preserve its language? How about ancient Roman? What about the Medeival Frankish? Or the Beowulfian English?

    A culture is representative of a way of life that people who follow that culture observe. When the way of life changes, culture changes accordingly. If language is part of that culture, then the language will change accordingly too. If using a particular language is no longer representative of a way of life that the population follows (as is the case in the anglo-americanization of Quebec, for example), then that language is naturally fated to go from the dictionary books into the history books.

    But only recently we have a bunch of self-righteous moralizers that claim that "preserving" a culture is the right thing to do. In other ways, they wish to (forcefully) impose measures on a population and stop the natural course of progress and cultural evolution that the population decided to take, and hang on to something that cannot stay on its legs independently. And if that wasn't enough, they want to pay for this enforcement out of the public purse.

    This is a fundamentally and patently wrong approach. Cultures aren't supposed to be "preserved" in any context outside that of a museum. Cultures are supposed to represent the way of life undertaken by the followers of the culture. When a cultural element (in this case being the use of French) goes out of fashion, it should be let dying in dignity, not persistently preserved as a decaying corpse by the high-horse cultural necromancers. And certainly not being funded at public expense.

    Cultural attributes come and go. Don't entertain yourself with the delusion that the French language will be preserved henceforth and to eternity. It won't. English won't be either. Sooner or later everything changes, and it's absurd to even speculate what language will be used in a thousand years from now. It's just a matter of time. All the cultural welfarists accomplish is putting the dying body of a cultural attribute on extended life support, using our money to turn what should have been a dignifiend passing away into a long, painful, and quite pathetic freak show.

    Let the dying die in peace.

  28. Bunch of ingrates by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it wasn't for us, they would be saying, "Nein! Es ist verboten!"

    --
    What?
  29. Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by Improv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you accept that it is a valid thing for Quebec to promote and protect the French language, then the law makes a lot of sense. Just like mandating that restaurants provide both English and French on their menus, this helps prevent the English language from squeezing French out of usage.

    I've never had a strong opinion on whether it is a valid thing or not, but perhaps Americans can understand it better by considering how threatened people feel by rapid growth of the Spanish language in the Americas, and efforts to prevent/slow that.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  30. In the 24th century... by master_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...French is an ancient obscure language.

  31. Re:many questions by MouseR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I generally prefer original titles as well. Be it a movie or else.

    But if a game, intended for the whole family, isn't available in french, I just dont buy it because I can't expect my 10 and 11 year old kids to enjoy a title in a language they barely understand yet.

    But try making an american understand that. They dont even watch translated movies anyway. They prefer to remake them locally.

    I dont think this issue can be rationalized south of the border. So, expect lots of insidious comments in this thread about us french canadian.

  32. Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotypes by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    since the following statements are true:

    1. I know more than one person who has had a bad experience visiting Quebec.

    And I'm sure your momma burned the cookies at least once - does that suddenly make you claim that ALL cookies are evil? Lots of people have had bad experiences visiting every country, province or state, or city. Irrelevant. Totally irrelevant. Anecdotal evidence isn't data.

    1a. One such person had a negative view of ALL CANADIANS because of it.

    Gee, maybe the rest of the world should have a negative view of all Americans because of George Bush. Or all Japanese because of Sony DRM. Or all Germans because of Hitler. Or all Italians because of the Pope's retarded comments on condoms.

    If they generalize all Canadians because of it, they have a bigger problem ...

    2. I myself have had bad experiences with french people (being someone who does not frequently have problems with people)

    And you haven't had bad experiences with non-frech people? The part of your sentence in parenthesis says otherwise. So, why do you cut others slack, but not the french? Sounds like it's not just "your friend" who has problems with stereotyping people.

    3. They show no interest in being helpful, negotiable, or useful in any sort of political undertaking.

    Really? Despite the fact that for the majority of its' existence, the Prime Minister of Canada has been a French-Canadian? Are you test-driving Steve Job's RDF?

    4. They continue to take from the rest of Canada and give little in return.

    [citation needed] BTW, why not take a few shots at the Atlantic Provinces while you're at it ... or is it only Quebec that you bash because "they're french."

    5. Restriction the rights of non-french-people in "their" province.

    Check your history. Manitoba and Ontario did the same thing to their french minority. BC did the same thing to their asian minority. There's ignorance everywhere ... but, unlike *certain* other provinces, at no time did Quebec say that the english can't have their own government-funded schools.

    All they're asking is that stuff that's sold be available in both languages if possible. Something that any manufacturer, looking out for their own best interests, would want to do anyway, right? This just helps overcome a certain amount of corporate inertia (companies don't necessarily act in their own best long-term financial interest - just look at GM and Chrysler - so sometimes they need a bit of prodding).

    And for all the non-canadians looking in ... not all market regulation is "evil." How many other countries haven't had to bail out a single bank? For the record, we've had 2 small bank failures in the last 80 years - and none during the Great Depression. And for most of that time, the Prime Minister was french ...

    And for the record, no, I'm not french. I'm 100% english ... but my daughters are both, and that's about as "relevant" as skin colour or anything else; in other words, not at all. This whole thing is not an "english vs. french" thing, despite some old farts wanting to make it look like that. They need to move on. This is not the 20th century any more.

  33. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    And for the record, no, I'm not french. I'm 100% english

    A "pure virgin wool", eh? ;)

  34. Re:French and France by pete_norm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

    Wow.. I think you mean, we have everything in common with the rest of North America except our language. Thinking we are so unique is mostly arrogance, and nothing else.

  35. Thank God! by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can have the pleasure of reading Toutes votre base sont appartiennent à nous!

    --
    The cake is a pie
  36. Re:many questions by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If even the people who grew up speaking these languages aren't interested in them any more, shouldn't they be allowed to change? Isn't restricting a language from evolving going to restrict a culture from evolving?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  37. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

    A "pure virgin wool", eh? ;)

    I could never understand their holding "pure laine" as being so special ... after all ...

    Q: Where do you get virgin wool?
    A: Ugly sheep.