Slashdot Mirror


Quebec Says 'Non' To English-Only Video Games

daveofdoom writes "The French-Canadian government of Quebec is saying 'non' to English-only video games if French versions are available. 'It's causing a lot of consternation among retailers and gamers alike, who fear the rules will lead to delays in video games arriving in the province, and may not accomplish what the law intends, which is to promote and protect the French language.' This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply stop creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

420 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Choice fodder! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. Let the French jokes AND Canadian jokes commence!

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Choice fodder! by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like its about time to surrender, eh?

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    2. Re:Choice fodder! by Redlazer · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that the rest of Canada, especially here in BC, have absolutely no patience, concern, or otherwise good will towards anyone who would consider them "Quebecois".

      Those responsible for creating the idea that we are in any way supportive of our irritating french neighbours, have been sacked.

      -The Canadians

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    3. Re:Choice fodder! by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      As another Canadian, I support the parent posts statement.

    4. Re:Choice fodder! by supernova_hq · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here, here. As much as I love Quebec and their people (spent 2 weeks there and speak fluent french), nobody makes fun of the Quebecers more than the rest of us Canadians!

      Disclaimer: I love the Quebec people, it's their governing bodies and the asinine laws they pass that I can't stand. oh, yeah...Eh!

    5. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone from Quebec. I cannot agree more.

      Quebec laws about french are about segregation and creating two class of citizens.

      To get my diploma, even if my native language is french, I had to go to an English school because my written french was not good enough.

      That's right, the language laws have forced me to learn English to get a job, because my french was not good enough. Logical as hell.

    6. Re:Choice fodder! by HybridJeff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Canadian born in Quebec I would like to add a big fuck you to all the Quebecois language bigots who feel it should be their job to stomp all over the rights of Quebecers in the name of "protecting" their language. A language does not define a culture, people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

    7. Re:Choice fodder! by debile · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a quebecer, I was so fed up with this crap that I moved to BC.

      Movies are better in their original language. I watch french movies in french and english movies in english.

      Same for books.

      Same for any technical profession where you have to talk to someone or learn cutting edge stuff not yet translated.

      The french language is beautiful but not that useful and people fail to recognize it.

    8. Re:Choice fodder! by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 5, Funny

      people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

      (1) That should be "manner", not "manor". Unless, of course, you meant that we should be able to communicate in any elite house of our choice. If that is the case, I apologize.

      (2) If I ever meet you IRL, I will be sure to communicate only in gestures with ambiguous interpretations, because that is how I shall choose to communicate. :D

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    9. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a Canadian born in Quebec I would like to add a big fuck you to all the Quebecois language bigots who feel it should be their job to stomp all over the rights of Quebecers in the name of "protecting" their language. A language does not define a culture, people should be allowed to communicate in any manor of their choosing.

      Yet, nobody seems to mind when Americans bitch and whine about speaking Spanish in America and "protecting" the English language...

      Just sayin'

    10. Re:Choice fodder! by telek83 · · Score: 1

      Oh please, cry me a river! I can speak fluently in 3 different languages, my native tongue is Russian, now I moved to Canada about 10 years ago, you cry because you had to learn English in an English speaking country... Do you have any idea of what you sound like? I came here not knowing a word of English and I didn't expect to find a job in Canada without English... Why should you expect any different? Get over it! If you love French so much move! You don't see me crying because I can't do my job is Russian or German... do you? like seriously, people like you need to grow up... ohhhh I can't do my job in ohh it's the end of the world.... seriously you sound like a fucktard!

    11. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quebec without french laws is still Quebec. Fantastic!

      Quebec is more than french. Don't let a language or job define you. Let Quebec evolve or it will die a slow, and painful death.

      A vibrant and living language is what matters. Many languages die. It's ok. c'est la vie.

      Death allows for the new to flourish. Otherwise, you are standing beside a nearly dead thing hoping it will live. I won't - it brings everything else to die with it. FTLOG! Be humane. come with us! We want you here, today! Not there, yesterday, forever.

      Nostalgia is a disease! Let it go.

    12. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly that *is* French.

    13. Re:Choice fodder! by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looks like its about time to surrender, eh?

      If, by "surrender", you mean label the Catalan version of the game as French, then I agree. Let them fight over the definition of a language (if they refer to Catalan as Spanish, they'll discover what a real fight is).
      Alternatively, just label the Spanish version as French. Then let them study the dialect of French spoken in rural parts of the Haute-Pyrenees departement of France (it's also intermediate between French and Spanish, but differing from Catalan). The inhabitants insist that it's French with no traces of Spanish.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    14. Re:Choice fodder! by Toonol · · Score: 3, Funny

      You need to learn better English. If I didn't allow for your evident unfamiliarity with the language, I'd think you were hugely and inappropriately over-reacting.

    15. Re:Choice fodder! by dryeo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why can't Americans accept that they couldn't beat the French-Canadians?
      FYI the last time they surrendered was something like 1759. They beat George Washington in 1754. They didn't surrender when you tried to force them to join your war of separation in 1775, once again beating Washington and burned down the White House in 1814 when you also tried to invade.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    16. Re:Choice fodder! by Mawen · · Score: 1

      Seems like overreacting to me too. The grandparent was pointing out the bizarre logic of how a francophone government trying to promote the french language in a francophone province (so as to not be overwhelmed by an english-dominated continent) had the reverse effect of forcing someone to learn english and to gain academic credentials in english.

    17. Re:Choice fodder! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Lalalalalalala... can't hear you!

      -The USA

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    18. Re:Choice fodder! by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      That was the most complicated history-salad that I've ever seen. You're really something special!

    19. Re:Choice fodder! by Mawen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that the rest of Canada, especially here in BC, have absolutely no patience, concern, or otherwise good will towards anyone who would consider them "Quebecois".

      -The Canadians

      Hey...! Speak for yourself. As an Albertan, I think Quebecois are important part of our country and that we all need to grow up and learn to get along, even if it means we westerners and other english canadians have to grow up first.

      Sure the federal politics and apparent provincial idiocy regarding language protection have been very annoying for a very long time, but I believe in our nation of Canada, and I do not want to throw my fellow Canadians under the bus (even if some of them would throw me as an Albertan under the bus -- although it seems people from other eastern provinces do it too.)

      Relations between french and english Canada seems to have always been difficult, but I don't think it is impossible. Hating each other and saying we wish Quebec would separate is not going to help. We don't need a big hole of alienated or separated people in the middle of our country.

      We are supposed to take pride in our identity as one that celebrates diversity, contrasted to the melting pot to the south. For one, it is nice to have people from Quebec here who enjoy culture and life in a way that we who are more conservative Albertans can appreciate.

      Maybe you are just trying to be funny, and let the world know that we non-Quebec canadians have quite a few differences with Quebec countrymen, but I have been concerned lately about the reckless hatred that seems to be growing among us.

          We are supposed to have an identity as a peace-keeping nation. We have so much peace in Canada to be thankful for. Let's not throw that away.

    20. Re:Choice fodder! by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      To get my diploma, even if my native language is french, I had to go to an English school because my written french was not good enough.

      That's right, the language laws have forced me to learn English to get a job, because my french was not good enough. Logical as hell.

      So in order to protect the French language, they forced you to use English.

      Does this indicate that the French language needed to be protected from your use of it?

    21. Re:Choice fodder! by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      But they so clearly do not respect OUR culture. They want no part of our culture - they do not identify themselves as Canadians - they do not consider themselves "French Canadians" (as it were), nor even Quebecois Canadian.

      They are, exclusively, from Quebec.

      This is not to say that EVERY person from Quebec is a douchebag, but certainly, since the following statements are true:

      1. I know more than one person who has had a bad experience visiting Quebec.
      1a. One such person had a negative view of ALL CANADIANS because of it.

      2. I myself have had bad experiences with french people (being someone who does not frequently have problems with people)

      3. They show no interest in being helpful, negotiable, or useful in any sort of political undertaking.

      4. They continue to take from the rest of Canada and give little in return.

      5. Restriction the rights of non-french-people in "their" province.

      And, while I certainly do apply hyperbole with a sprayer rather than a brush, (see?) the above is my basic decision towards a reasonable dislike of French Canadians.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    22. Re:Choice fodder! by Redlazer · · Score: 1

      Anytime anyone wants to "protect" one idea from another idea, the opposite is true.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    23. Re:Choice fodder! by Redlazer · · Score: 1

      Thats what Russian sounds like.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    24. Re:Choice fodder! by JustOK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At one point, a movie/tv show from Quebec, in French, was shown in France. They had to use sub-titles so that the people in France could understand it.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    25. Re:Choice fodder! by JustOK · · Score: 1

      just because they're some sort of enfant terrible doesn't mean we don't love 'em...except for poutine.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    26. Re:Choice fodder! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Yet, nobody seems to mind when Americans bitch and whine about speaking Spanish in America and "protecting" the English language...

      It's a slightly different issue. Very few are under the misguided notion that English itself is somehow dying, as it's established itself as a significant international language. I'd say the beef is more about the cost of providing government services in multiple languages more than anything.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    27. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Except mime, I think we can all agree that communicating via mime is silly and wrong.

    28. Re:Choice fodder! by oliderid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well as a Frenchspeaking european, we simply love those cousins :-). It is a bit like watching an independent Gallic village right in the middle of the Roman Empire.

    29. Re:Choice fodder! by Koda · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, language DOES help define culture within a society. Certain concepts simply do not exist or translate well in some languages. Here are two examples where there are translations, but the are imperfect; where something of the essence of the concept is truly "lost in translation":
      - "Liberty" does not have a perfect 1:1 translation in Russian.
      - "Personal space" does not have a perfect 1:1 translation in Japanese.

      If something cannot be expressed in language, it cannot be communicated between people, and it usually is not part of the culture.

      Sadly, the concept of being an a**hole to somebody that can't speak our native language seems to be shared by English and French speakers alike.

    30. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In 50 years or so, the English speaking people will say the same about Spanish-Only games. LOL

    31. Re:Choice fodder! by deraj123 · · Score: 1

      My father often told us growing up that he only passed his French class after making a solemn vow to the teacher that he would never attempt to speak the language again.

    32. Re:Choice fodder! by deraj123 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, people do mind. My city (Nashville) recently held a special election with the attempt to mandate that our city government only do business (and provide services, with a few exceptions) in English. We minded a great deal and successfully voted the bigoted, short-sighted bill down.

    33. Re:Choice fodder! by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      As a Quebecois I feel the need to say that your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries.

    34. Re:Choice fodder! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that

      You are a bigot. That was made very clear. You may now resume your hatred of "the other".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    35. Re:Choice fodder! by ultranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (2) If I ever meet you IRL, I will be sure to communicate only in gestures with ambiguous interpretations, because that is how I shall choose to communicate. :D

      As it happens, neither sign language nor hand-waving are forbidden by law, so you go right ahead and do so.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    36. Re:Choice fodder! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 2

      and burned down the White House in 1814 when you also tried to invade.

      That is very true... we burned down THE White House... but then they retaliated and burned down an entire city (York... now more-or-less Toronto).

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    37. Re:Choice fodder! by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      That only becomes in issue of French gets somehow wiped out in Canada. While, as you say, language evolves with culture to develop ways of expressing things that are important in that culture, now that the culture is already there, it isn't at risk of dying due to changes in language. In the "worst case" scenario of everyone in Quebec becoming unilingual anglophones, words would be created or held over from French to express the things that were important to the people there and not available in English.

    38. Re:Choice fodder! by SerpentMage · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here, here! I am an Ontarian married to a Quebecoise! And I speak 3 languages. We right now life in Switzerland with 4 languages.

        My point is that we in Canada need to get along!

      I for one would like to see more Alberta politics! Alberta is not Quebec, bat Alberta, BC, and even the Newfies need to be more present!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    39. Re:Choice fodder! by cvd6262 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And isn't WE taking "credit" for 1812 kind of like THEY taking credit for the Seven Years/French-Indian/War of the Conquest?

      I mean, Canada was no more itself in 1812 than the U.S. was in 1763.

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    40. Re:Choice fodder! by SpiderClan · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately for your point, but fortunately for everyone else, the "they" you refer to is a loud minority in Quebec. There may be regions where that portrayal is accurate, but it doesn't define the general population of the province.

      1 and 2. I have had bad experiences everywhere. It happens. There are dumb people in every province and city, and living on every block. Nothing you can do about it, but using it as the basis for generalization doesn't do anybody any good.

      3 and 4. That's the government, not the people there. The government has its own culture that seems to have pervaded all parties.

      5. The language laws are annoying, but they are very rarely a restriction of rights.

    41. Re:Choice fodder! by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I call BS!

      Every province has taken from other provinces at some point in history. Please study Canadian history. The idea behind the equalisation payments is to allow all of Canada to prosper.

        Btw the Quebecois are Canadians My wife's family has lived in Quebec for 350 years. Can you say the same?If you can't the STFU!

      Btw the trench are the first Europeans to live in North America (though Vikings) were there as well.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    42. Re:Choice fodder! by jmv · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is the main thing I have not yet understood between Canada and Quebec (I'm "Quebecois" but am neither independentist nor federalist):
      Canada: "you suck, we hate you"
      Quebec: "We'll leave you"
      Canada: "Please no, don't leave. We love you"
      Quebec: "Well, OK then"

    43. Re:Choice fodder! by simonbas · · Score: 1

      this is flamebait

    44. Re:Choice fodder! by gilbert644 · · Score: 1

      Except that no French-Canadian was involved in the burning of the White House. It was done by troops from the UK. The same troops that won the war.

    45. Re:Choice fodder! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They do?

    46. Re:Choice fodder! by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      It`s not like finding entertainment in the language of your choice is all that hard in Quebec. I've lived here for all but 5 years of my life, and I've never had any issues with finding a given book or catching a movie in the original English or French.

    47. Re:Choice fodder! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I love the Quebec people, it's their governing bodies and the asinine laws they pass that I can't stand.

      And yet they keep electing them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:Choice fodder! by OzoneLad · · Score: 1

      Quebecois, on the other hand, I've always found to have a holier-than-thou attitude, particularly where language is concerned and English is something akin to scum on the bottom of their shoe.

      Wow, you've spoken to all of us? Must have taken years.

      Sarcasm aside, there's a lot of people in Quebec that see learning English as opening up to the rest of Canada and the world. I've discovered a whole bunch of things by picking up English that I wouldn't have (or would have, but much later) by sticking with French alone.

    49. Re:Choice fodder! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's a little unfair. It's much more likely that he's drunk.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    50. Re:Choice fodder! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I would like to make it very, very clear that the rest of Canada, especially here in BC, have absolutely no patience, concern, or otherwise good will towards anyone who would consider them "Quebecois".

      As an Brit who has lived in Quebec for 20 years, my only response to BC is:
      Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelled of elderberries.
      *turns around*
      LANCEZ LA VACHE!

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    51. Re:Choice fodder! by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      Wow... You're saying you're too lazy to learn your native language correctly and that it is somehow the government's fault???

      Learning to write correctly in French is not that difficult for anyone that works a bit on it. The language law have nothing to do with you having to go to English school to get a degree. A bit of work would have gotten you a degree in French. I guess it's easier to blame the government though.

      And by the way, i'm a French Canadian that got a degree in a French University and that also went to English school to be bilingual. I guess it wasn't that difficult.

    52. Re:Choice fodder! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      croporations? That's cereals one year, beans the next, then one year resting?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    53. Re:Choice fodder! by Veggiesama · · Score: 1

      "Quebecers"?

    54. Re:Choice fodder! by Nimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also it's the belief that if Johnny Foreigner is going to come live here, he should learn to speak the language.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    55. Re:Choice fodder! by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Canada is a country and recognising Quebec as somehow special is what created this mess in the first place.

      Stuff like recognizing Quebec is precisely why Canada isn't the USA. Multiculturalism vs the Melting Pot and all that.

    56. Re:Choice fodder! by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      I'm not born in Quebec but I agree. Language bigots should just STFU.

      Easiest way would be for game publishers to just publish in English release then translate to French. I'm sure theres nothing in the law about not being able to translate the games after release.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    57. Re:Choice fodder! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To which it might be added that many if not most of us seem to feel that if you move someplace you should learn to speak the language. Most Americans don't seem to think that anywhere else is worth going (subjective) and even more only consider moving places where the local language is English. There's lots of those, thanks to the British. :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    58. Re:Choice fodder! by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Yes we do. Any restriction like this is unacceptable. People who whine about Spanish being spoken in the US or people who try to impose legislation against it are xenophobes. Sane people appropriately show contempt for them.

      In any event, there is the obligatory xkcd: http://xkcd.com/84/

    59. Re:Choice fodder! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is why Quebec needs to separate from the rest of Canada. I'm not a big fan of the French language (I prefer Germanic languages myself), but if the people in that province want to be different, they should be allowed to be separate and have their own rules. The current national, provincial, and state borders are obsolete, and need to be redrawn.

    60. Re:Choice fodder! by gemada · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian from Alberta, you do not speak for me so don't presume to do so. How many countries in the world have a place as cool and foreign as Quebec within their own countries?

      - The Canadians who are not gun-toting rednecks and who support Quebec as an integral part of Canada

    61. Re:Choice fodder! by Bragador · · Score: 1

      Except that Canada is not an english speaking country. It's officially bilingual.

    62. Re:Choice fodder! by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's called to an Langue d'Oc ... it's pretty interesting stuff if you're into that sort of thing.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    63. Re:Choice fodder! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Please send more magic potion, we're almost out. - Village chief.

    64. Re:Choice fodder! by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I'm bilingual - grew up in Montreal and Ottawa and am now living in BC. I left the East (despite being bilingual) because careers and some friendships are formed on the basis of being bilingual. I always find it strange - and I've done this on purpose 100's of times. Go to Quebec or Ottawa. Speak to someone in English first but you now speaks predominantly French - e.g. store owners, people in certain neighborhoods, government workers. When they respond in English (ability to speak aside), you are spoken down to, as though you're an idiot - just another one of them. Speak in French and you'd swear you are long time friends. The reverse is true with tourists asking for directions. I met a French couple in my building a few months back in BC - parents visiting their children. They had to question why anybody would leave the Quebecois (even though their kids did it) they were surprised that people would willingly leave.

      The Quebecois is a sense of fake cultural nationalism but really just enforces a strong sense of ego. Its intended to protect their culture but it ends up alienating those who are not part of it - or a 100% participant. A good part of my close family are Quebecois w/o any ability to speak English. So I'm not w/o observation of those whom I am close to (and observing their friends).

      With the language police - they are given far too much power and influence on the cultural, political and economic landscape in Quebec. And it does have a certain level of influence across Canada. Whatever role any level of Government wants to have in creating an ideal Quebecois/Canadian, it just feels phony to me. I just feel like a person living in Canada and not a Canadian. Looking at the US, they can at least overwhelmingly say "I'm a proud American".

    65. Re:Choice fodder! by ZenigataKeibu · · Score: 1

      As a quebecois who has met various people around the country, I fully support your comment and attitude. Funny that when people meet face to face, they tend to get along and realize we share the same values as Canadians. On the other end, politicians seems to enjoy spreading discord and negative stereotypes. It appears to be useful as a tool of distraction.... As for videogames in French: most gamers couldn't care less.

    66. Re:Choice fodder! by Simon+South · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. We'll be far too busy learning Mandarin for that.

    67. Re:Choice fodder! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As someone who believes that "good fences make good neighbors", I think it would be better if Quebec became a separate country. Smaller countries, as seen in Europe, seem to have far fewer problems with internal strife than large countries. As for having a "big hole" in the middle, that's easily solved: the provinces to the east of Quebec should also separate from Canada, and join with the US states of New Hampshire, Vermont, and Maine, and make a separate country. Similarly, British Columbia should separate, and join Oregon, Washington, part of Idaho, possibly northern California (north of the Bay Area), the Yukon Territory, and Alaska, and form a separate country called "Cascadia".

    68. Re:Choice fodder! by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI quite a few Canadians fought in the US Civil War.

    69. Re:Choice fodder! by kiltyj · · Score: 1

      Technically the US is not "officially" an English speaking country, either. We have no official language as a country (though many states do).

    70. Re:Choice fodder! by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      Canadians may have burned the White House's interior, but it's made of concrete so it still stood.

      Anyways Canada didn't become a sovereign nation until 1982. So hah. We win.

    71. Re:Choice fodder! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The thing is, Americans say that about people speaking Spanish, in states that were colonised by the Spanish!

    72. Re:Choice fodder! by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      Canada wasn't a country in 1814... so how could they burn down the White House?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    73. Re:Choice fodder! by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

    74. Re:Choice fodder! by Timex · · Score: 1

      How about Canada actually does something of its own that is worth mentioning?

      Because "Acting as the 'Arctic Shield' for the Continental United States against the Russians" just doesn't have the ring to it that any of the other claims has, that's why.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    75. Re:Choice fodder! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      And? We think that about people speaking exclusively Spanish or some other language further north, too. Lots of Hispanics working in the chicken plants here in southwest Missouri, for example, and when I hear them speak to one another in public, it's almost always in Spanish.

      I understand that it's not always possible to learn English before you come to live here, but you should make the effort to learn it regardless, and you especially shouldn't exclusively speak a foreign language to your children. That's not fair to them, and it will hurt their chances for work later on. If I chose to go live in Germany (for example), I would do my best to learn German and teach my children to speak and read/write it.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    76. Re:Choice fodder! by quibbler · · Score: 1

      English is the most sophisticated 'adaptive' language ever put together by humankind, the language is many times larger than german, the second-largest language, which is several times larger than french.*

      English doesn't need 'saving' as you put it, but America needs saving from the scourge of multilanguageitis that infects Quebec, much of Europe, and arguably killed the Roman Empire.

      English is the standard for every organization that needs to communicate across cultural boundaries (commerce, law, medicine, science, math, aviation, shipping). Americans push for English from our immigrants to help them become better Americans and thereby strengthen the country.

      Leave your superficial, liberal, USA-Hate at the door please.

      *'size of language' being defined here by many factors including raw vocabulary, homonyms, homophones, homographs, possible constructions, possible meaning subtleties, word order, prefixes, infixes, suffixes, tenses (and tense-subtitles ex: past pluperfect), etc., many of which don't even exist in other languages.

    77. Re:Choice fodder! by toriver · · Score: 1

      No, croporations are like "I shall now speak of the wheat, and all its glories visited upon us! etc."

    78. Re:Choice fodder! by oliderid · · Score: 1

      Well I can send a couple of Belgian beers, almost the same effect ;-)

    79. Re:Choice fodder! by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      That's why we need to keep mandatory Spanish out of the classroom!

    80. Re:Choice fodder! by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 1

      As much as "politically incorrect" this seems to some, the demand that foreigners intending to come with an intention of living in a nation learn that nation's language is quite reasonable.

      I cannot understand all those mis-guided Mother Hen types who insist that this will somehow damage the immigrants or destroy their "culture". The requirement is purely practical and in fact an absolute necessity for a functioning society. Otherwise all you are doing is promoting a ghetto mentality whereby all immigrants from a particular country concentrate in some area complete with their own commerce, governance and what-not, effectively forming a mini-nation within the target nation. And while not physically isolated, such mini-nations are in effect what a military would call a "beach-head" for these immigrant's original nations. It then takes generations, if ever, to get rid of them as no "melting" or "assimilation" occurs between the host country and these "beach-heads".

    81. Re:Choice fodder! by WiiVault · · Score: 1

      Why can't Americans accept that they couldn't beat the French-Canadians?

      Oh yeah silly us. We only sell you 90% of your arsenal.

    82. Re:Choice fodder! by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      The french language is beautiful but not that useful and people fail to recognize it.

      I think most people recognize that French is not as useful as English in North America. These laws are not because people think that French is such a useful language. These laws are made because without them, the companies that want to make money in Quebec don't bother respecting the native language of the majority. For games for example, some companies had already made a French version for Europe but wouldn't bother selling that version in Quebec because they deemed it too much trouble. I think it's a question of respect.

      In other regions of North America, this question doesn't come up because most people speak English and companies don't need incentives to appeal to the anglophone market. In Quebec, the same companies need a little more convincing. Most people that criticize the language laws in Quebec don't take that into account.

      I'm not saying that all the language laws in Quebec are good but that, in North America, only Quebec and the aboriginals have this kind of situation where people will try to sell their products without respecting the culture of the people they sell to.

    83. Re:Choice fodder! by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      Does this indicate that the French language needed to be protected from your use of it?

      Yes. It also indicates that the OP is an idiot.

      In Quebec, to get a University diploma, you need to pass a language skills exam. You can pass the exam in English or French. The OP was complaining that because he can't write well enough in his native language, he had to pass the exam in English.

    84. Re:Choice fodder! by agbinfo · · Score: 1

      But they so clearly do not respect OUR culture. They want no part of our culture - they do not identify themselves as Canadians - they do not consider themselves "French Canadians" (as it were), nor even Quebecois Canadian.

      They are, exclusively, from Quebec.

      First, the term "Canadien" was originally used to refer to people from Lower Canada. The term was "appropriated" by the rest of what is now Canada. Thought you'd like to know.

      Second, most Quebecois can name 5 to 10 non french artists. How many french artists can the average anglo-Canadian name? In a recent French interview with the Canadian Minister of Culture at the television show "Tout le monde en parle", it appears that it's not that many.

      This is not to say that EVERY person from Quebec is a douchebag, but certainly, since the following statements are true:

      1. I know more than one person who has had a bad experience visiting Quebec. 1a. One such person had a negative view of ALL CANADIANS because of it.

      So you have a racist friend who judges an entire country on one bad experience. Shows the kind of company you keep. I know several people who have come here for business and returned for a vacation. Guess we don't keep the same kind of company.

      2. I myself have had bad experiences with french people (being someone who does not frequently have problems with people)

      Guess what? I've also had bad experiences with french Quebecois. Also, with Italians, Jews, Portuguese, Chinese, Americans.

      What's your point exactly?

      3. They show no interest in being helpful, negotiable, or useful in any sort of political undertaking.

      With that kind of attitude, what do you expect? I thought you said you got along with most people!

      In any case, the history of multiple negotiations on the Constitution tend to demonstrate just the opposite.

      4. They continue to take from the rest of Canada and give little in return.

      Well, it seems that the last time we wanted to separate, the federal government decided that they would break the laws on how much can be spent during a referendum just to keep Quebec part of Canada. Maybe if your federal government stopped breaking our laws, we'd be a free nation and we wouldn't have to take so much and give so little back.

      5. Restricting (sic) the rights of non-french-people in "their" province.

      Which rights would these be?

      And, while I certainly do apply hyperbole with a sprayer rather than a brush, (see?) the above is my basic decision towards a reasonable dislike of French Canadians.

    85. Re:Choice fodder! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Quebecois are important part of our country and that we all need to grow up and learn to get along, even if it means we westerners and other english canadians have to grow up first.

      From what I've seen, no other Canadian province discriminates against French the way Quebec discriminates against English with its French-promoting laws. So it is not English Canadians who have to grow up first, not at all.

    86. Re:Choice fodder! by JasonKiddy · · Score: 1

      Or just an idiot.

    87. Re:Choice fodder! by rant64 · · Score: 1

      But they will succeed in January 2076. The proof is right there on the Internets!
      http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Timeline#2076

    88. Re:Choice fodder! by rant64 · · Score: 1

      But a mime never has to say he's sorry.

    89. Re:Choice fodder! by randito · · Score: 1

      Well they got you there too. These laws come from l'Office de la langue francaise. This same legal body defines the french language as spoken in quebec, tells us what is legally a word, and what is not a word.

    90. Re:Choice fodder! by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      Langue D'oil --> Langue D'oc is really a spectrum of dialects.

      --
      snig
    91. Re:Choice fodder! by Daina47 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for your point, but fortunately for everyone else, the "they" you refer to is a loud minority in Quebec. There may be regions where that portrayal is accurate, but it doesn't define the general population of the province.

      1 and 2. I have had bad experiences everywhere. It happens. There are dumb people in every province and city, and living on every block. Nothing you can do about it, but using it as the basis for generalization doesn't do anybody any good.

      3 and 4. That's the government, not the people there. The government has its own culture that seems to have pervaded all parties.

      5. The language laws are annoying, but they are very rarely a restriction of rights.

      Mon ami, You LIE when you say, "The language laws are annoying, but they are very rarely a restriction of rights." Non Francophone Quebecers have lost all the rights that the Rest of Canada has! To lose, language, culture, schools, institutions, media, the ability to make a living in English... IS A BIG DEAL. Our RIGHTS HAVE BEEN STOLEN AND WE DEMAND THEM BACK.

    92. Re:Choice fodder! by Daina47 · · Score: 1

      It seems to be very easy to paint all people with one brush. Perhaps a hell of a lot easier than taking the time to ask your local MP why she/he has done and said NOTHING about over 2 MILLION English speaking Quebeckers having their language, culture, ability to make a living and their RIGHTS removed? Why are you all so SILENT about this. Our voices and protests and cries for help.. have been totally ignored - by the Politicians (who've sold us down the river - to the Separatists - for votes.. and by YOU our FELLOW CANADIANS... who pretend we don't exist! Why don't you speak up? Why don't you tell your MP's they WILL NOT get your vote.. unless and until ALL Canadians have their RIGHTS. For God's sake and your sake Help us. Because believe me, if it can happen to us... it sure as hell can happen to you. Is this the kind of Canada you want?

  2. Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Link on page to original article:
    http://www.thestar.com/article/611472

    Date on original article:
    Apr 01, 2009 04:30 AM

    Move along, nothing to see.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      Right. Because a nationally syndicated newspaper is going to play April Fool's jokes.

    2. Re:Sigh. by Manatra · · Score: 1

      Nevermind the fact that Quebec has many laws like this for other industries.

    3. Re:Sigh. by motek · · Score: 1

      The Star is a joke every day of the year. Why April 1 should be any different?

      --
      I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
    4. Re:Sigh. by artor3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Right. Because a nationally syndicated newspaper is going to play April Fool's jokes.

      Right. Nothing like that would ever happen.

      That being said, I wouldn't put this past the Quebecois.

    5. Re:Sigh. by Reed+Solomon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If this was an april fools day joke, they did a good job of making it subtle. This sort of thing is par for the course for the Quebec government. Mostly with these laws and media ownership/controls Quebec sovereigntists want to create a closed society where people don't feel an affinity with the country of Canada. Which is working over time, as Quebeckers more and more make that claim. I've heard many soverigntist youth make that statement. "Oh I don't feel Canadian I feel I am a Quebecois" or whatever. Well of course you do. Your mind belongs to your society in that way. They're certainly entitled to feel that way, but its intellectually dishonest I believe to manage a society this way, especially when society as a whole is becoming more global, Plus, its all words. The first Canadians were essentially Quebeckers. Quebeckers not associating themselves as Canadians just because of the existence of the rest of Canada is like Canadians not calling themselves North Americans, because American's "ruined the term". And also, theres really no point in trying to stave it off. I mean, Japan today isn't the same as Japan 100 years ago, but they're still a unique culture. Ah well, the best thing for Canada would be if they really did separate. Then we could actually stop giving them money, and appeasing them at every turn. Plus we could get rid of "official bilinguism" which doesn't really accomplish anything but keep qualified individuals from getting jobs. You need to speak English and French to get a government job, but in Quebec English is shunned. It's the hypocrisy of political correctness really. It really is a shame as most Canadians, myself included, generally like Quebec and are happy for them to speak french and be part of the social fabric. But when they bitch and moan over and over, it's just ridiculous.

    6. Re:Sigh. by smchris · · Score: 1

      Sounds like poisson d'avril because good humor should have a referent, and wasn't there a push in Quebec a few years ago to try to make Chinese restaurants use French signs?

    7. Re:Sigh. by pipingguy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've lived off-and-on in Quebec for about 20 years, I like the place and go back there a few times a year. I speak French (badly) as a second language and I have a lot of family in the province.

      Culture is important, and the seperatistes seem to want to preserve their linguistic "purity", politics, history or somesuch, but it ain't gonna happen. Unilingual French youth in Quebec have discovered the internet and are exploring beyond the predetermined boundaries. If I were cynical I'd mention that keeping Quebec unilingual would be a nice way to keep the locals voting for single-issue politics and keeping the home boys down on the farm and ignorant of the rest of the world. Again, ain't gonna happen, the damn kids are too curious, good for them!

    8. Re:Sigh. by chromas · · Score: 1

      Serious news was their April Fools joke.

    9. Re:Sigh. by jabithew · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have mentioned it, but since we're talking about languages...

      It's monolingual, from the Greek. It goes with bilingual, from the Latin. If it were unilingual (Latin) then we would presumably say dualingual (Greek).

      Ah English. You make no sense, but I love you anyway.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    10. Re:Sigh. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      You bastard. All those times I modded you up, and now you criticize me!

      PS I love you too, but not in that Greek way you seem to be infatuated with.

      :)

    11. Re:Sigh. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't put this past the Quebecois.

      You wouldn't put it past them to make a law stating that products sold in their province be in the language of the province?

      No, neither would I.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:Sigh. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If I were cynical I'd mention that keeping Quebec unilingual would be a nice way to keep the locals voting for single-issue politics and keeping the home boys down on the farm and ignorant of the rest of the world. Again, ain't gonna happen, the damn kids are too curious, good for them!

      Yeah! Those damn kids, discovering their MANDATORY ENGLISH LANGUAGE CLASSES in elementary school! The clever little bastards.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:Sigh. by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Most of Quebec don't want to Canada to be split. But when some Canadians go nuts and get all pissy about decriminalizing pot or legalizing prostitution or drinking wine or beer in public and start burning Quebec flags, censoring radio stations, well, we'd rather split. Can you blame them?

      People from Quebec want to live in a Canada which reflects their culture and values just as much as those of the other provinces and of which they can be proud of.

      BTW: Official bilingualism works both ways. Speaking only French for example isn't going to get you a job if you need to serve English speaking citizens.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    14. Re:Sigh. by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      ...forgot to mention that Quebec is probably the most inclusive society out there. Go downtown Montreal and you'll see more diverse ethicity per habitant than any other city in North America.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    15. Re:Sigh. by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      I read my history. Quebec WAS Canada. Now, Canada is Canada, though you apparently don't understand what Canada is. We, as Canadians, have a minority government. Not we as Westerners or we as Albertans. Good idea, though, that the right to vote should be taken away based on your ill-informed ideas and prejudices.

    16. Re:Sigh. by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Did they make you sing the national anthem too? One guy I used to worked with was pretty pissed-off about that and pretty much let it define his younger years as a form of rebellion. As losers in a war, Quebec got some pretty decent terms, don't you think? Salut!

    17. Re:Sigh. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      and wasn't there a push in Quebec a few years ago to try to make Chinese restaurants use French signs?

      Since the Office de la langue francais didn't have any inspectors who can read "Chinese" (like there's just one language that all asians speak ... :-), the restaurants said that their signs were in french, using "Chinese letters."

      They bought it.

      I would have told them "Phoc Hiu", but that's because they're stupid enough to believe they can control the language of web sites, when telecommunications is a federal-only jurisdiction.

      I have no problem with doing i18n - I just, like most sane people, don't like being told I *have* to do it by some pinhead ...

    18. Re:Sigh. by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Yeah and the penalty for speaking English or showing an English sign is one night at Club Super Sexe in downtown Montreal. Oh the humanity! I was brought up in French and went to English schools in Quebec and wonder what the heck you're talking about. Feeling angry is the problem here. Relax, it's all good. Quebec girls are hot and that's all that counts in my books.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    19. Re:Sigh. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Quebec sovereigntists want to create a closed society where people don't feel an affinity with the country of Canada.

      We don't have any. We've been there 200 years (10,000 years for those -- many -- who have indian blood) before the "blokes", and we've been kept aside as an underclass until about 40 years ago when we said "enough is enough" and started to get some respect after blowing up some bombs (with the british, you can never have anything until you put a knife to their throats).

    20. Re:Sigh. by pete_norm · · Score: 1

      Actually there is a law in the province that force all commercial signs visible from outside to be at least 51% in French... It's a stupid law, voted by the Partie Quebecois a while ago. It's not really respected, especially in Montréal (chinatown in particular). With the Liberal party as the government, there is not really a language police and most people don't give a damn anyway at commercial signs. Sadly, i'm pretty sure that when the separatist come back to power (which is sure to happen in a 2 party system like we have), we'll hear about it a lot more.

    21. Re:Sigh. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      People from Quebec want to live in a Canada which reflects their culture and values

      Wrong. They want to be able to repress those with different cultures and values.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Sigh. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      But we kicked your froggy arses. You should be fucking grateful we didn't expel or exterminate you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Sigh. by Gerhardius · · Score: 1

      I don't think people really understand what the background is with the language issue. 50 years ago French speakers couldn't shop in their own language in may places: company stores hired Anglos only. Montreal was a great city if you spoke English, Yiddish or even Italian but for a Francophone it was a nightmare until the Quiet Revolution. The majority of the Province was Francophone, yet the economy was strictly managed by Anglos only and education was left to the Catholic Church in a deal designed to keep the population compliant. There were many Quebecois complicit in this, Duplessis being the primary criminal, but it is the Church and the Anglos who did the bulk of the work. What we are experiencing now is the tide of absurdity going the other way as the Government continues to expand the linguistic bigotry that Bill 101 gave us. My Grandmere would probably be happy that the battle now is about something as irrelevant as video games, shows how much things have changed.

    24. Re:Sigh. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      If you were outnumbered 1:45 as far as languages go in your own continent, maybe you would have a different point of view? Quebec is extremely isolated and always has been; despite the common history between the province and Canada, there have always been two very different cultures which can be symbolized as a language difference (IE one culture came from Britain, the other from France) and often actually revolve around said difference. Culture, for the most part, is transmitted through language. Hence, it is important for all nations to keep their language strong so their culture does not suffer from it. Your culture is your identity.

      I'll say this: I have no problem with Canadians. I personally know many Canadians and enjoy their presence, I like them just as I would any Quebecer. However, I take pride in my language, I take pride in my culture. I don't think that's such a problem, now is it? But if we do nothing, we will eventually lose this (due to international influence, due to laws and regulations, due to politics, whatever).

      Also, I'd suggest you check the news. Independendists haven't been elected in a little while, so any movement you might've noticed in recent years was made by the people, not the government.

    25. Re:Sigh. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      But we kicked your froggy arses. You should be fucking grateful we didn't expel or exterminate you.

      Oh really? How about the deportation of the acadians in 1755???

      But no, you could not have deported or exterminated us, because you were just a handful against 70 thousand, and I am not counting our indian allies who enabled that paltry 70 thousand french to keep two thirds of North-America...

    26. Re:Sigh. by Hells+Ranger · · Score: 1

      Sorry but you are wrong. What people from Quebec want is being able to live and experience their culture. Every culture vector is the corresponding language. Most Quebecer consider that other culture bring something new to their culture. Montreal is one of the biggest culture melting pot in North America.

      It may seem that Quebec people are closed on themselves if you read only the laws, but some of those rule are there to force lazy company. Also those laws where passed in reaction to the English-Canadian action in the past to try to destroy the French-Canadian culture.

      I remember.

    27. Re:Sigh. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Official bilingualism works both ways. Speaking only French for example isn't going to get you a job if you need to serve English speaking citizens.

      I still never understood that. If just one province out of many has a majority Francophone population, then just make French an official local government language there and be done with that; and let the rest of the country have their English. It's a pointless waste of resources to have state officials on all positions, down to the most minor clerk, know both languages when the chances of them ever meeting a non-English-speaking Quebecois are next to none. That's how most other countries with language minorities handle it - not by proclaiming both languages as nation-wide equals (well, alright - New Zealand does it for English/Maori, but 1) it doesn't have provinces, and 2) it's stupid because no-one out there speaks Maori but not English anyway, and even most Maori people don't speak their language...)

      National government would still have to be bilingual, of course, for it to remain fair.

    28. Re:Sigh. by BRUTICUS · · Score: 1

      Getting back on topic. Look at what this will to experience their culture brings them.....A LACK OF VIDEO GAMES. Among other things i'm sure. The stubbornness to just live life and enjoy life in the country you were born in is only hindering their lives.

      I was born in Canada. I don't agree with all its laws but that's the way it is. BC gets segregated from Eastern Canada byt the people and governemt. Do we try and separate? No. Quebec finds it easier to justify and blinds itself because they have a different language. Even though that same language is what CREATED Canada. Sorry, All the chinese in Vancouver aren't going to be forced to speak ONLY english and all the english speaking people in vancouver aren't going to be forced to speak only French. We live in a multicultural society. Deal with it. And stop trying to put a hole in the country your people helped build.

    29. Re:Sigh. by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I think you miss the point. If 20% of my clients speak English and 80% speak French (or vice-versa), I would hire bilingual staff. Don't call it "official-bilingualism," call it a good business practise. Obviously, if 1% were English, I would expect them to also speak French.

      In the Federal government, you only need to be bilingual in areas where the population to serve is English or French (like the nation's capital). You only need to be bilingual (and I don't mean fully fluent) if you have non-bilingual personnel or need to serve the public. This means that the minor clerk is fine with only English unless he needs to serve French speaking people.

      In any case, what's so hard about learning French? I picked-up Mandarin through a pod-cast. I think all kids in Canada should be thought both French and English until grade 13. That would solve the problem.

      Isn't it also funny how you can travel to Quebec and be served in English almost anywhere but try to go to St-Petersburg in Russia and see what how far you'll get with only English.

      I'm glad I can play GTA IV in French and English.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    30. Re:Sigh. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I think you miss the point. If 20% of my clients speak English and 80% speak French (or vice-versa), I would hire bilingual staff. Don't call it "official-bilingualism," call it a good business practise. Obviously, if 1% were English, I would expect them to also speak French.

      I don't have any problem whatsoever with businesses hiring as many French- and English-speaking staff as needed to serve what they deem their client base best. It's how this problem should be solved anywhere except the government institution. But, doesn't Quebec has these silly restrictions on use on English on signs and price tags, and can you really open a shop in Quebec where the salespeople don't speak French (assuming you'd want to?) - or is there a law against that, too?

      I'm not aware of such laws in the rest of Canada, at least. Here in Richmond there's plenty of Chinese, and some shops (particularly "traditional medicine" and tea ones) often don't even bother with English signs. And I'm fine with that - I understand that I'm just not their customer, and go to a place that can serve me.

      In the Federal government, you only need to be bilingual in areas where the population to serve is English or French (like the nation's capital). You only need to be bilingual (and I don't mean fully fluent) if you have non-bilingual personnel or need to serve the public. This means that the minor clerk is fine with only English unless he needs to serve French speaking people.

      But, French being one of the official government languages, doesn't that mean that any clerk, in any part of the country, who ever has to deal with people, has to know French under the theory that, one day, they may have to serve a non-bilingual French-speaking person?

      In any case, what's so hard about learning French? I picked-up Mandarin through a pod-cast.

      Learning languages is easier for some people, harder for others. I'm in the "easier" category myself, but I've seen how it can be for others.

      In any case, it's not about it being hard or easy. It's about it being mandatory or not.

      Isn't it also funny how you can travel to Quebec and be served in English almost anywhere but try to go to St-Petersburg in Russia and see what how far you'll get with only English.

      I should know, since I'm Russian. And you're absolutely correct there, but I don't see how this has any relevance to the topic of this thread. Russians don't bother to learn English because there are sufficiently many of them that people who deal with tourists in most tourist destinations learn to speak Russian instead; and a lot of surrounding countries still have plenty of people speaking Russian well enough to understand from Soviet and Warsaw Pact days. Most certainly, if, say Tatarstan tried to discriminate Russian on its territory - e.g. by mandating that Tatar text should be larger than Russian text on all public signs - there would be one hell of a shitstorm there.

      I'm glad I can play GTA IV in French and English.

      I'm glad you can do that, too. But how does mandating the shops to carry French versions help that? If there are truly that many people who want them, they'll be carried anyway in most shops. If, in practice, there are few people who want it in French even in Quebec, then why all the howling about "protecting the culture" - if most don't care about it anyway?

  3. many questions by saiha · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight, if there is a french version available then it is illegal to sell a non-french version? I've never been the Quebec but are their no foreign people who live there? People who may speak french but prefer to game in their own language?

    Anyway, do they limit books too or is this some luddite/anti-video game thing?

    1. Re:many questions by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry, many French Canadians think this protectionist stuff goes to far. While I can agree with multilingual signs and companies having multilingual staff. Video games and movies should be allowed to sell separate version in different language. Book do not have this restriction that I'm aware of.

    2. Re:many questions by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Informative

      French culture and language was declining rapidly before the introduction of the language laws.

      There's an Anglophone upper class in Quebec, and immigrants from non-English countries come in and generally want to learn English. That doesn't bode well for French so laws were introduced to attempt to encourage Francophone Quebequois from becoming Anglophone.

      It's worked well enough that Latvia introduced similar laws to try to protect the Latvian language and culture from the massive influence of Russian after the Soviet Union fell apart

    3. Re:many questions by rob51 · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are some answers for you about the demographics here (legislation bit is interesting).

      The Charter of the French Language is the law one people usually complain about (particularly when dealing with public signs). So, not a Luddite thing.

    4. Re:many questions by Bieeanda · · Score: 3, Informative
      If there is a French version, it's illegal to stock only the English version. The problem appears to be twofold:

      First, if the game is scheduled to be released in both English and French, the stores have to wait until the French version is available. Retailers are worried that gamers will turn to imports if they can't get the hot new titles immediately after launch.

      Second, this presupposes that there is an equal demand for games in French, to demand for games in English. The language police can be right fucking bastards about enforcing this sort of thing, so retailers are worried about having to buy more stock than they can guarantee moving. Margins are already pretty thin, so that's a definite concern.

    5. Re:many questions by Feyr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      im a french canadian, and if this law is true it only means i will not be buying any more games in local stores.

      french version of games are usually nearly close to unplayable due to being badly translated and even when they're properly translated there is inevitably some key concepts that simply don't exist and have to be adapted.

      plain and simple, it detracts from the game. nevermind the lumberjacks that refuse to speak english, i demand my games in their native language.

    6. Re:many questions by motek · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would start speculating on the luddite aspect (or on anything else) as soon, as the information is confirmed by a source more serious than an article dated April 1. I have checked local French language media (La Presse, Le Devoir and Radio-Canada) and found nothing.

      --
      I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
    7. Re:many questions by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      Quebec does have language laws.

      They do not allow businesses to have anything other than french as the dominant language on a sign, including regulations such as maxiumum ratio of size between the english and french that is on the sign.

      Their laws are, to me, horribly unconstitutional - sadly their higher population prevents the rest of us from simply sending them into the ocean (intermediary land notwithstanding).

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    8. Re:many questions by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a fluent English speaker, I know exactly what you mean, but as a French French, well, there's few people whose English is good enough so that the original version becomes preferable to the French translation. Besides, that's games we're talking about, not Blackadder.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:many questions by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Dude.. In Quebec, if you post a sign, there not only needs to be a french part, but it most be MORE prominent than any other language. If the french part of the same prominence (or god forbid less), you get sighted by the "language police". No joke, that's what they're called...

      With the new high capacity game disks (for most consoles at least), they simply need to include both languages on the disk.

    10. Re:many questions by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Quebec has a real "short man" complex going on. So understand that most of the French speakers in Canada are in that province. That isn't to say there are none in other provinces, but it is a vastly unequal distribution. Most provinces French is a severely minority language. You get over to the west coast, and it seems like almost nobody speaks it. Also, Quebecois is looked down on by the actual French. It is seen as an inferior dialect of French.

      Well this leads to a whole lot of silliness. Quebec has several times held a vote to leave Canada and become their own country, no idea how they think their economy would work buy hey. Also you find some "Francophones" who are really arrogant about language. They will speak ONLY in French, despite having fine English skills, and get mad if people won't respond in kind.

      So this is just more silliness along these lines. The idea again is to try and force French on people. They want that not only should everyone in Canada speak French, but that it should be their primary language. That it'll never happen doesn't seem to have occurred to them.

    11. Re:many questions by saiha · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I know that france has always had a hard stance towards language and it is interesting to see how that idea has propagated. I'm actually surprised how recent that legislation is, though if french was being replaced I can see why.

      Ease of communication between cultures is good, but there is a lot of culture tied up in the words/language that we use that would be a shame to lose.

    12. Re:many questions by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      "They want that not only should everyone in Canada speak French, but that it should be their primary language."

      WTF? where do you take this rubbish from? Quebec laws do not apply in other provinces.

    13. Re:many questions by saiha · · Score: 1

      As to the french / canadian-french thing, that was one of the most surprising things I saw in france. I went to paris and was shocked how the tram ticket people treated the canadian girl in our group who spoke french. One of the few times I as an american was treated better.

      Though I gotta say the french people, even in paris, who didn't speak english were actually very pleasant (I love hand motion communication when traveling).

    14. Re:many questions by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      I played BioShock in French because the voice acting was better in French. I played STALKER in English because, for that game, the English version was better. Personally, I choose the best work, not the "native" language.

    15. Re:many questions by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      Personally, I choose the best work, not the "native" language.

      how do you judge that without having already played through them in all languages?

      --
      TIAEAE!
    16. Re:many questions by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      Most of the time, the difference in quality is obvious. There is no need to play through the whole game.

    17. Re:many questions by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I did localization on a couple of games and it can be a nightmare when the publishers use translators who aren't gamers. There's a complete lack of comprehension of terminology and slang that quickly becomes evident as you navigate the menus or listen to dialog.
      Unless the publishers use translation companies that understand the field they work in then translations are going to suck.

    18. Re:many questions by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      If there is a French version, it's illegal to stock only the English version

      The wording of the rule needs to be changed to exactly what you just said. If a French version exists it should be stocked as well. And if the French version won't be out for 6 weeks, then it should be perfectly legal to only have the English version for 6 weeks. Asking them to wait for the French version to be released before selling the English verison is unreasonable.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    19. Re:many questions by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      And as a non-French and non-English living in a country where these days you can only get French or German games, I can tell you it still is a bad idea to buy the translated versions.

      Why? Because I learnt most of my English from video games in a time were all video games were English or you didn't get to play. So I sat there with a dictionary and played those games.

      Video games help people learning English, and by playing the translated version you stay in your cozy uni-lingual environment instead of reaching out. (Oh, and for the record: I have no particular talent for languages, but I am quintilingual. Why? Because I need ever friggin one of them every day! I can't simplpy learn a language when I don't need it.)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    20. Re:many questions by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      Localization is also difficult if context isn't properly provided. For instance, if localizing to an Asian language, it makes a huge different what the relative social status of two people speaking to each other are. They also tend to have a slightly larger memory footprint, simply due to the increased font size - an important consideration for console games. Other languages have their own quirks as well. Certain languages will tend to take up more room than the original English strings, such as German or Polish. Some languages will alter words (not just the pronouns) based on the gender of the speaker and/or who you're speaking to (fun if you can choose between male and female avatars, for instance). When recording dialogue, very often the translations must either be lip-synced to the original, or are at least time-constrained to the original language tracks.

      It's definitely a lot more challenging / costly to do high quality localization than most people realize.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    21. Re:many questions by MouseR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I generally prefer original titles as well. Be it a movie or else.

      But if a game, intended for the whole family, isn't available in french, I just dont buy it because I can't expect my 10 and 11 year old kids to enjoy a title in a language they barely understand yet.

      But try making an american understand that. They dont even watch translated movies anyway. They prefer to remake them locally.

      I dont think this issue can be rationalized south of the border. So, expect lots of insidious comments in this thread about us french canadian.

    22. Re:many questions by Destoo · · Score: 1

      I have no problem playing french version of Japanese, german or even French games!
      I the last few years, the only kind of localized games that were unplayable were shovelware.

      I think this law was passed to address the Scrabble game in particular. Ubisoft was making a version and Hasbro forbid them to distribute the game in North America.. So no french version of it for Quebec, up until that law was in effect.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    23. Re:many questions by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I wish you would Goggle the news. French is actually growing in Quebec. Surprised the heck out everybody actually.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    24. Re:many questions by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If even the people who grew up speaking these languages aren't interested in them any more, shouldn't they be allowed to change? Isn't restricting a language from evolving going to restrict a culture from evolving?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    25. Re:many questions by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      It is now, yes. I'd give the language laws some credit

    26. Re:many questions by RedK · · Score: 1

      Too bad your fantasies aren't reality. Quebecers don't want the rest of Canada to speak French. Even the most extermists of French Quebecers wouldn't give a damn if Canadians spoke Spanish or Greek or any other language. They mostly want out of Canada.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    27. Re:many questions by RedK · · Score: 1

      Nope, you misread. If a French version is available, it's not illegal to sell any other versions. You can still sell the English version of the game without any problems, as long as you stock both versions. I don't even see how this law is invasive in anyway. It just garantees that if a French version exists somewhere in the world, it has to be made available in Quebec.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    28. Re:many questions by Yakust · · Score: 1

      The games will still be playable in english. The only difference is that now, games that are translated in french for the european market will need to have that french version available in the province of Quebec (normally on the same game disk as the english version). Many game publishers were already doing this for many years.

    29. Re:many questions by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      All hail Super Mario and other Nintendo games in Japanese!!!! You do know Japanese, do you? Did you ever play Tetris with instructions in Russian?

    30. Re:many questions by Feyr · · Score: 1

      they will be playable, but it will not be possible to actually buy an english title in a local store.

      it means amazon and steam will be getting most of my, and others, business, and the local stores will be hurt for it.

    31. Re:many questions by MouseR · · Score: 1

      If you're referring to "french canadian" above, it's just a careless typo. Like a couple other typos in there (forgot the apostrophe on "dont").

    32. Re:many questions by FailedTheTuringTest · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, if there is a french version available then it is illegal to sell a non-french version?

      The thing is, it's probably not French vs non-French, it's French vs multilingual. Normally a company publishes either (1) a unilingual (probably English) version, or (2) a multilingual version with all available languages on the same CD/DVD for the customer to choose among at install time. But it's common to release a unilingual version first, then work on translation and release multilingual versions later. This law means that if a company does that, then when the multilingual version is available Quebec retailers must take any remaining copies of the English-only version off the shelves and sell the multilingual version instead. Or perhaps alongside the English version; the article isn't crystal clear about whether retailers are safe by simply selling both versions side-by-side.

    33. Re:many questions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It's worked well enough that Latvia introduced similar laws to try to protect the Latvian language and culture from the massive influence of Russian after the Soviet Union fell apart

      It's interesting that you mention Latvia in that context. It's widely considered the country with the largest discriminated minority population in Europe: only ~60% are Latvians, while Russians make ~30%. And yet Russian is not recognized on any way, on any government level, and is actively discriminated against. Latvia also has some interesting citizenship laws, such as "non-citizen passports" for all those resident Russian speakers (most of whom have been living there for many years, a lot having been born there), stripping them of many basic citizen rights. So much so that there were some European Court of Human Rights cases regarding that, and many comparisons to Nazi Germany.

      If that's the country and the nationalistic protective policies Quebec wants to (or does) imitate, well...

    34. Re:many questions by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Second, this presupposes that there is an equal demand for games in French, to demand for games in English. The language police can be right fucking bastards about enforcing this sort of thing, so retailers are worried about having to buy more stock than they can guarantee moving. Margins are already pretty thin, so that's a definite concern.

      If I understand TFA correctly, the law will basically prohibit the retailers to carry English version only, when there's also French version available; but it doesn't say anything about proportions. So the shop even could carry English boxes only, with a lone French box sitting somewhere on the shelf, and a few more in the storage to replace that one if it gets picked (which I doubt would be likely in such a shop anyway, language snobs being what they are).

    35. Re:many questions by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      The logic of protectionist bureaucracies goes against the common sense and market forces.

      Their logic: if we allow English-only sales for six weeks, then by the time the French version is out the bilingual players won't buy it, French sales will be down, which may make the company decide not localize future titles. Therefore, don't allow sales of the English one until both are available, then they'll be on a level playing field.

      Reality: Bilingual gamers will buy the English version from out-of-province, or pirate it. Local retail sales of BOTH English and French versions will be less than they could have been. Reduced sales may make company decide not to localize future titles.

      Lest you think such protectionist "logic" is limited to Quebec, the CRTC (Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission) mandates a percentage of Canadian-produced content on almost all national radio and television providers. Some in the Canadian arts community are demanding that the CRTC force Canadian content on internet sites like Youtube, and charge Canadian internet users for the privilege. Using some of the same arguments too, like "level playing field" between old and new media.

    36. Re:many questions by flibuste · · Score: 1

      I just dont buy it because I can't expect my 10 and 11 year old kids to enjoy a title in a language they barely understand yet.

      Since you are (also) living in Canada, which is a country with 2 official languages, your kids are assumed to learn english as well as french.
      Your point is totally moot and the bashing of US non-translated movies unwelcomed. Plus you have no excuse for not teaching your kids english.

      Signed by an immigrant whose 10-years old is a US citizen and speaks both languages fluently since she is forced to attend a french school in Quebec (which is good to some extent!).

  4. fixed... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

    "This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply arret creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

    there, fixed that for you.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
    1. Re:fixed... by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 2, Funny

      "This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply arreter creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

      there fixed that for you

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    2. Re:fixed... by l3ert · · Score: 1

      The parent might have being referring to the ridiculous replacing, in Quebec, some years ago, of all, perfectly functional, stop signs that read "Arret Stop" to signs that read "Arret".

      --
      per dolorem ad astra
    3. Re:fixed... by Bragador · · Score: 1

      Well it IS our language, so it's perfectly okay. Also, if you visit american indian villages, you'll see their stop sings are in innu.

    4. Re:fixed... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      That reminds me. The stupidest thing about Quebec is how the stop signs say "arret", part of the "no english signs" bullshit. Stop signs in France say "STOP". Those fascists are more concerned about pushing separatism than the safety of their own citizens. Like the roads aren't bad enough...

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    5. Re:fixed... by frenchbedroom · · Score: 1

      "This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply arrêter de creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction."

      there fixed that for you

  5. Most of these rules are. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Most rules about French in Canada are ridiculous. Government officials need to be bilingual regardless of capability of doing a job, for example. Firing a native French speaker from government is almost impossible, regardless of how badly they do at their job. And if people in government has what is deemed an inadequate level of french, the government pays for one-on-one french lessons INSTEAD of for doing your job, and instead of for french classes with other people learning it or instead of for a government billet in a french-speaking area where you can learn the language through immersion. Do you have any idea what that costs that taxpayer? Or how stupid it is?

    Protecting cultural heritage is one thing, but this is even worse than political correctness run amuck, because it's groupthink feeding into this mentality that it's bigoted to be against these policies, even when they're ridiculously inefficient.

    To make matters worse, I don't believe the requirements are nearly as bilingual in the other direction.

    1. Re:Most of these rules are. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To make matters worse, I don't believe the requirements are nearly as bilingual in the other direction.

      No, why would they be? English wasn't the declining language in the 60's. Nobody finds it more convenient to teach their kids French rather than English.

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting. Except English culture and language doesn't need protection, it's doing quite fine on it's own

    2. Re:Most of these rules are. by vorpal22 · · Score: 4, Informative

      While I do agree that some of the Quebec language laws are a bit over the top and end up having stupid results, I feel like I must correct and question assertions made in your post in the following paragraph:

      And if people in government has what is deemed an inadequate level of french, the government pays for one-on-one french lessons INSTEAD of for doing your job, and instead of for french classes with other people learning it or instead of for a government billet in a french-speaking area where you can learn the language through immersion.

      Living in Ottawa, I have several government working friends who have been provided with government funded French language education (and paid for doing so), and none of them have had the privilege of one-on-one lessons: they all attended group-based French language classes, and they were required to pass in order to continue on in their roles.

      I don't see how this is much different than your employer investing in job training, and I'm not opposed to it. Furthermore, the vast majority of this occurs in the Ottawa area, I'd suspect, and as most of the population here speaks French, you'd be hard pressed to find a much more immersive environment.

      If anyone here is interested, here's an article written up about Quebec and their language laws: The Language Laws of Quebec

    3. Re:Most of these rules are. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      And it is never bad to be able to speak one more language.

    4. Re:Most of these rules are. by c · · Score: 1

      > And if people in government has what is deemed an inadequate level of french,
      > the government pays for one-on-one french lessons INSTEAD of for doing your job

      The truly unfortunate part of this is that the people supposed to operate at the highest levels are also the most senior people. So those who are being trained are older (i.e. more difficult/expensive to train in a new language), within a few years of retirement and will never be retested, so they have no incentive to retain what they learned.

      Of course, once the money is blown training those folks, there's nothing left to train the people who would be in the pipeline to replace them and all hiring now requires that the person being hired already be at the level of the job (i.e. no being hired and then trained at the required level).

      The net effect, right now, is that we have a tremendous number of vacancies which cannot be permanently staffed solely because the language profile is so out-of-sync with the language skills of the general population, and it's only going to get worse; according to the demographics, approximately 20% of public service employees in certain hard-to-replace categories are within five years or retirement.

      The military went through this exact same situation in the 80's, until someone came to the realization that having 80% of your flag officers being from Quebec was maybe not an ideal situation when the topic of separation comes up.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    5. Re:Most of these rules are. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      To make matters worse, I don't believe the requirements are nearly as bilingual in the other direction.

      No, why would they be? English wasn't the declining language in the 60's. Nobody finds it more convenient to teach their kids French rather than English.

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting. Except English culture and language doesn't need protection, it's doing quite fine on it's own

      I dunno man, there might be a need for laws dictating the correct spelling of "colour" and other such aspect of language threatened by US hegemony ;-)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    6. Re:Most of these rules are. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea what that costs that taxpayer? Or how stupid it is?

      As someone who lives in Finland, which is similarly burdened by Swedish: yes, I do.

      Protecting cultural heritage is one thing, but this is even worse than political correctness run amuck, because it's groupthink feeding into this mentality that it's bigoted to be against these policies, even when they're ridiculously inefficient.

      It isn't about "cultural heritage", it's about some people wanting to have their way at every else's expense. After all, if you are natively a speaker of minority language, you are at a disadvantage towards people who speak the majority one; so force them to waste their time learning the minority one in school to drag them down and simultaneously force them to provide public services in the minority language for your benefit.

      Oh well, all the forced Swedish lessons and wasted tax money did was give me an undying hatred towards the language and the country, to the point where I simply refuse to speak it. I suspect it's no different in Canada with Frenchkarna.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:Most of these rules are. by ultranova · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting.

      Every time I hear about protecting a culture I can't help but remember those displays in museums where they have dummies dressed as people of a bygone era, engaged in activities typical of such people. I fear that these "cultural protectionists" see people much like these dummies: not as people but as decorations, something to be kept in its place for their enjoyment.

      If a culture dies, all it really means is that no one chooses to adhere to it. Why should they be deprived of the freedom to choose? The world isn't a museum and people aren't wax dummies on display.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    8. Re:Most of these rules are. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      How is it any different from Europeans worried about losing their local cultural expressions to the Muslim immigrants? Or Americans worried about the influx of Spanish speaking latinos (some of which may just be blind racism but some might be people wanting American culture to survive)

      People think their cultures are valuable. Quebec does something about it.

    9. Re:Most of these rules are. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      How is it any different from Europeans worried about losing their local cultural expressions to the Muslim immigrants?

      It's not a fear about losing our culture, it's fear about the evils of Islam. We don't need more honour killings, and really don't need more fatwas against cartoonists or writers.

      People think their cultures are valuable. Quebec does something about it.

      Language is not culture. A part of it, perhaps, but not all that important. It's the value system which defines a culture; a language is nothing more than a vehicle for communication.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:Most of these rules are. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      Culture and language are inseparable. Most Bilinguals agree that there are thoughts you can have in one language that you can't really have in the other. The ideas might be the same but the expression is not. Language is a huge part of culture

    11. Re:Most of these rules are. by Kojiro+Ganryu+Sasaki · · Score: 1

      And for people writing "would of" and "should of" instead of "would have" and "should have"... It's spreading like a disease.

    12. Re:Most of these rules are. by c · · Score: 1

      > they all attended group-based French language classes, and they
      > were required to pass in order to continue on in their roles.

      Anglophones can often attain a B level proficiency in group classes. C level, which is what is required by pretty much everyone at mid-to-senior management levels (even the ones working in the west), is practically unobtainable for an anglophone using only group classes. C in oral, in particular, usually requires months or years of one-on-one coaching (1000 hours of training seems to be typical).

      Every anglophone I know of who has been trained to C level has required mostly one-on-one instruction.

      > I don't see how this is much different than your employer investing in job training

      Existing practice goes waaaaaaaayyyyyy beyond job training, unless your idea of job training is roughly equivalent to paying for an MBA for every public service employee above mid-level management while accepting the business disruptions required to cover their positions while they're away getting the degree.

      c.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    13. Re:Most of these rules are. by qor · · Score: 1
      Aww, screw my mod points.

      I live in Quebec, and my American wife is actually paid by Emploi Quebec to take French classes, which is great. The area where we live is very much french (20 or so anglophones in a 32,000 people city), and it'll allow her to not only get on the job market faster, but to socialize with other people (friends, family, strangers) without my need to be there to translate. (That's a bad problem in some parts of the province, as a lot of ignorant people just say "We're in Quebec, speak French" and don't even bother trying -- probably one of the main reasons most anglophones have issues here)

      That said, I can't stand translations. Most movies and games either sound extremely cheesy, the quebecois accent is way over the top, or it's too much "France" French; same can be said with french productions translated in english.

      What I find sad is that they want to force that bad dubbing down our throats for the sake of the langue de Molière, whether we want it or not -- Never mind the fact that a lot of the words used here are borrowed or adapted from English anyways.

      Thank you, Gouvernement du Québec, for passing such laws that keep us, the lowly people, isolated from the rest of the world.

      --
      Coffee is the first ingredient for successful world domination.
    14. Re:Most of these rules are. by left00coaster · · Score: 1

      Sorry, are you wearing blinders? Most cultures don't disappear simply because "no one chooses to adhere to it." Most cultures are actively destroyed or consumed by larger, more aggressive cultures. English-only laws are but one of many examples to be seen in the USA. On the other hand, active preservation of languages and their related cultures can offer great value for a current dominant language and culture -- both inherently, and for some potentially unforeseen future crisis. (Or were you not aware that, If not for the Navajo 'Windtalkers', we might all be speaking German.)

    15. Re:Most of these rules are. by randito · · Score: 1

      Except that english is not doing well on it's own. In 1950 quebec city (800 000 people ) was 50 % english, now it is down to 2%. Similar stats for many smaller towns. Montreal (3.7 million people ) was 16 % english in the 1050s, it is down to about 8 % now and is not expected to survive this generation. Quebec has lost about 400 000 english speakers since the 1970s.

      I am a web developer from english canada ( BC ) that has been living here for 4 years. My website must be in french only because I am doing business in quebec. If I pass out a business card in english, i am subject to a $1400 fine. If I put an english sign on my balcony I will be forced to take it down by the police. Inspectors come into my work on a regular basis to check that my documentation is in french and to check that I have signed the appropriate documents to have my computer in english. My friends from the US are not allowed to send their kids to school in english. If I want to see a movie that is not available in french, it is only allowed to be played in one movie theater in the province for a maximum time period as a "film festival" exception to the language laws. Go rent it? All films must be approved by the goverments and have a sticker approving it, blockbuster is not allowed more than one copy. That is if the movie is available, trailers for english only movies are also illegal on TV. And that is just the law, never mind the attitudes of the people I have to deal with all the time. My first christmas dinner at my boyfriend's house was turned into a buffet because his brother refused to have his children sit next to an english person. I can rarely have a conversation in english in a bar in my neighbourhood ( the plateau ) without getting harassed.

      Before I moved here, I went to bilingual school in BC, and was proud to be bilingual. If I would have known what I know now, I would not have wasted my time learning about a language and culture that does not respect mine as equal.

    16. Re:Most of these rules are. by randito · · Score: 1

      A short video on the decline of english in quebec:

      http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/language_culture/clips/15097/

    17. Re:Most of these rules are. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      The whole idea behind the laws are that both cultures are intrinsically valuable and worth protecting

      What the hell is French culture? You're in Canada, there's one culture and it's called canadian culture, just like there's american culture one country south. It doesn't matter what language the culture uses - we don't distinguish our english (dominant) bits from the other stuff - it's all stuck together.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    18. Re:Most of these rules are. by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      just like there's american culture

      Really? There's you don't see any cultural difference between people from the Louisiana bayou, Texas, New York, and central California at all?

    19. Re:Most of these rules are. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      American culture is broad - you don't see us bemoaning the fact that only a small portion of our population speaks creole, do you?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    20. Re:Most of these rules are. by flibuste · · Score: 1
      In a discussion about culture, Canada and the like, I think as a non "U" user (despites the U from USA), you should check your facts twice.
      Once again, USA did NOT invent everything, particularly not transistors.

      Please give my "U"s back and re-centre that R.

    21. Re:Most of these rules are. by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Hum...NO. Please leave France alone. They have enough to do with their own stupid laws, like Hadopi.

  6. Re:French and France by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the French language is so great, why does it need protection?

    because English people are physically incapable of chain smoking, drinking wine, being obnoxiously rude and highly insecure of their culture, all at the same time.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  7. Ridiculous? by Bodrius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a ridiculous rule, as game companies can simply stop creating French versions of games to bypass the restriction.

    Perhaps it is ridiculous, but not for that reason.

    Which game company would stop creating *French* localizations of their games and lose the market in *France* (and any other French-speaking language) in order to get their english version into the Quebec market?

    *That* would be ridiculous.

    The populations are off by an order of magnitude. The whole point is that a game company may not think it is worth localizing to French *just for Quebec* - but if they localize for French-speaking market, this forces the two versions to play on level fields.

    But if they're already localizing in French, why on earth would they kill their other markets just to prioritize this one? If Quebec per se had ever been a priority, they'd have been treating the French version on par with English from the beginning - which is what this rule tries (futilely) to force.

    There are a thousand reasons why this legislation may be wrong-headed and is unlikely to have any positive effect - but this is argument is, indeed, ridiculous.

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    1. Re:Ridiculous? by Feyr · · Score: 1

      nevermind that a france translation is so hilarous it makes any game a joke to begin with. try and picture playing Medal of Honor but with the voices having a deep Southern accent, now try to keep a straight face while doing so.

    2. Re:Ridiculous? by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er, Quebec French and the French spoken in France are separated by about 350 years of linguistic evolution.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    3. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the inevitable seepage of Anglicisms/memes into Quebec French culture (which, I suppose, l'Office de la Langue Francais is trying to stem - bonne chance, mes amis). I've been told that the France French consider the Quebec French dialect to be "crude" and "yokel-like". Dunno if it's true. In my estimation (sorry, no double-blind surveys) French-speaking Quebecers associate more with Americans than they do with France. In this evaluation I'm ignoring Canada itself, since it's not a real country anyway.

    4. Re:Ridiculous? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      The "France French"? Y'all a-sayin' all Franchies speak alike? Dawg, that's jive.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Ridiculous? by johannesg · · Score: 1

      In Europe we customarily get everything a lot later and usually at much higher prices "because it needs to be localized first". Never mind that nobody ever supports my language (Dutch) and I am forced to play the English game anyway, I still have to wait and pay the higher European prices.

      So I would expect game releases in Quebec to be both later and much more expensive than they are now.

      As for France, don't expect any help. Between their new three-strikes law, and my script that automatically sends out infringement notices for every IP address in the country, I expect to be able to knock them off the internet somewhere in the middle of next week...

    6. Re:Ridiculous? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Yet from the info available the legislation makes no such distinction, and it seems the OLFC itself makes no attempt to establish Quebecois as a distinct dialect that needs its own localization/translation.

      When modern french addresses a market that is 10X bigger in France alone in raw population, and it covers the other francophone countries (and this legislation!)- the reality is forfeiting that market for the sake of Quebec is not going to be the priority for most game studios that have *any* international plans.

      And where that may not be the case and Quebec is the top target market on that language (e.g.: a local software shop) - then they'd already had good reasons to *not drop fr-CA* since that 7-million market is so important.

      I can see many bad decisions forced by this, but it is hard to see a shop *simply stop producing French-language versions* for the sake of releasing a bit earlier in Quebec - although I'd can see some shops stop producing *fr-CA* versions, which is probably not what was intended.

      If treating fr-CA as a first-release language changes their plans, companies that actually had fr-CA versions planned really have 3 choices:

      - Operate and release as normal, and distribute the games to Quebec a bit later - just like it happens for a *lot* of bigger markets than that for most games and software releases.
      - Stop making a fr-CA version, and concentrate resources on an 'fr' version that meets this requirement AND can be released to a bigger market at the same time as the english version.
      - Delay the release of your game to the market.
          This choice only makes any business sense if Quebec's 7 mil is your primary market - and any shop in this situation would have to look hard at the other two options and wonder if it is time to change that.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    7. Re:Ridiculous? by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, do you know what percentage of games actually have specific localizations for fr-CA? A market of 7 million may sound like a lot, but such a market size wouldn't seem to justify the expense of specific localization (unless it's a small game that can be easily localized), especially when you can cover a much broader market with a single international French version. The question is whether the difference in sales between producing a fr-CA version versus an international French version would be worth the added expense. I'm guessing the answer is probably "no", but that's just my supposition.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:Ridiculous? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Well, you could give the Quebecians the French PAL version, would be funny for console games with their region lock...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Ridiculous? by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      France : 65 millions of potential consumer
      France + Belgium + Swiss + ... : 70 millions of French speaking European
      Quebec : 7 millions

      Game maker will not stop to create French localizations for their games only to win the Quebec market.

      As a French French, i think the problem is more about the lame localizations often done specially for the French Canadian market, many game and movie have two French version, the cheat and quickly done Canadian one and a decent French European one. It's all about the delay between the American and the European release of game and movies.

    10. Re:Ridiculous? by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      French speaking candian are often really protective and strict about the use of Anglicisms unlike the French who use a lot of Anglicisms (and even build false Anglicism like "planning").
      The main different are that anglicisms come and go in the french french but often don't stay long and we don't have to fear about french extinction in france. That's another concern in quebec where they are suronded by English speaker.

      French-speaking Quebecers associate more with Americans than they do with France.

      They are north american people with a anglosaxon ( anglosphere ?) mindset, french are european with a latin mindset. We both speak french but that the only common point.

      that the France French consider the Quebec French dialect to be "crude" and "yokel-like"

      Quebec french insult sound particularly funny for french because most of them are religiously themed, when french insult are sexually themed (and most french aren't religious people). Quebec rapper like the "roi heenok" are an endless source of fun for french.

    11. Re:Ridiculous? by MouseR · · Score: 1

      As per TFA:

      In 1977, the Charter of the French Language, also known as Bill 101, defined French as the only official language of Quebec and framing fundamental language rights of all Quebecers. In 1997, this law was amended so that every product sold in Quebec must include packaging, instructions and warranty certificates in French. Since then, all computer software, including game software and operating systems, whether installed or uninstalled, must be available in French unless no French version exists. Video games publishers were given a six-year grace period to comply. Since 2003, video games are now available with French packaging/booklets/warranties.
      In 2007, the Quebec government finalized a deal with the Entertainment Software Association of Canada, to increase the number of video games available in French in Quebec. Activision Blizzard, Disney Interactive Studios, Electronic Arts, Microsoft Canada, Nintendo of Canada, Sony Computer Entertainment Canada, Take2 Interactive, THQ and Ubisoft Canada, who are all members of the Entertainment Software Association of Canada, agreed that they would be able to offer their next-generation games with French content before April 1, 2009, if such a version exists elsewhere in the world.
      After this deal was announced in 2007, the number of bilingual games raised significantly. For example, in 2007, only 17 percent of Xbox 360 games were available in French in Quebec. Today, half of the Xbox 360 library (about 190 titles out of 380) is available in French in Quebec. Almost every new AAA release is now bilingual or multilingual. Games that are only available in English, that don't exist in French, still can be sold in Quebec. Out of the thousand games released each year, almost every one of them made their way in Quebec. Retailers complaining about possible delays or higher pricing are not truthful.

      This is not newsworthy really.

    12. Re:Ridiculous? by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

      In Europe we customarily get everything a lot later and usually at much higher prices "because it needs to be localized first".

      Because they can charge them more and screw them with an 1$ = 1E conversion rate.

    13. Re:Ridiculous? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The whole point is that a game company may not think it is worth localizing to French *just for Quebec* - but if they localize for French-speaking market, this forces the two versions to play on level fields.

      Hi, I agree with your logic, but I have to point out something: You don't know what the word "localize" means.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    14. Re:Ridiculous? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the inevitable seepage of Anglicisms/memes into Quebec French culture

      In quebec, people say "magasiner", in France they say "shopping".
      Review your assumptions. Anglicism seepage is not limited to one continent.

      I've been told that the France French consider the Quebec French dialect to be "crude" and "yokel-like".

      Do you speak the Queen's English, or do you sound "crude" and "yokel-like" to natives of the old country?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Holy tabernac de calis! You seem to be right about the religion thing, 'hostee. Prost and well-wishes to you, goddamn it!

    16. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Anglicism seepage is indeed not limited to one continent, it just seems to me that trying to turn back the clock is silly. FYI, I'm half Acadian French, you know, that funny-sounding, hick-like accent that big town, sophisticated Quebecois find so "charming", amusing, quaint and backwards.

      As for your question (it's a good one) I don't really care and never even thought about it. Maybe the Brits, Scots and Irish *do* think I sound like a rube, who cares? I work with some Aussies and NZers and we joke about accents all the time.

    17. Re:Ridiculous? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      He was using the word in the 'francais Quebecois' sense.

    18. Re:Ridiculous? by jmv · · Score: 1

      And yet we in Quebec spell exactly the same way as in France. Can't say the same about UK English vs US English vs Canadian English vs Australian, ...

    19. Re:Ridiculous? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I don't really care and never even thought about it. Maybe the Brits, Scots and Irish *do* think I sound like a rube, who cares?

      You should apply the same level of caring (very little to none) towards how people in Paris think about how people in Québec sound.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    20. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Did I say I cared about that? Sorry if I gave you that impression, my point was that Quebec's "parent" country's language elite tends to consider it as a backwards child (linguistically). Maybe I have to provide a cite for that to you, since opinions based on observation apparently now need at least a Wikipedia entry or a bunch of hypertext links.

    21. Re:Ridiculous? by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      So is UK English and American English.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    22. Re:Ridiculous? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Do you speak the Queen's English, or do you sound "crude" and "yokel-like" to natives of the old country?

      In fact, most modern Brits would sound more ridiculous to their ancestors than many of us Americans would... at least, based purely on accent. In particular the way the letters "A" and "R" are now pronounced is much more true to the original in American English. On the other hand, based on the degree to which British and American English have already drifted apart I suspect that if you dropped a member of each culture into a room together without any prior cultural contact (I mean, some of us grew up watching PBS, right?) nobody would have much of an idea what anyone was saying for a long while.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Ridiculous? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Well, you could give the Quebecians the French PAL version

      Lawmakers could just demand (wait, doesn't that just mean "request"?) that console makers sell French consoles in Quebec; then the game would be compatible with the console. As for the console's compatibility with the TV: SDTV is allegedly dead, and component video, VGA, DVI, and HDMI make no distinction between NTSC color encoding and PAL color encoding.

    24. Re:Ridiculous? by RedK · · Score: 1

      If you knew anything about French vs Quebec history, you'd know why we don't really give a damn about what they think of us and why there is a language difference between our 2 countries (Hint, it has both to do with the French revolution and the Traite de Paris (1763)).

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    25. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm not a historian or native French-speaker, I just lived there for many years. Care to summarize the links you provided? To me, being able to speak French is an advantage for me and I genuinely like les Quebecois, my son is one! Cheers, Paul

    26. Re:Ridiculous? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Did I say I cared about that? Sorry if I gave you that impression, my point was that Quebec's "parent" country's language elite tends to consider it as a backwards child (linguistically). Maybe I have to provide a cite for that to you

      No need for a cite on that, I need a cite on why that matters and why you would bring it up.

      ESPECIALLY if you do not speak English in a manner befitting the most eloquent citizen of the kingdom from whence said language came. Since this state of being should provide you with all necessary insight into why an opinion of that kind would be inconsequential.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    27. Re:Ridiculous? by RedK · · Score: 1

      A quick summary : Before the French revolution, France was a monarchie. The language used in Nouvelle-France (now known as Canada), was that of the court. Instead of Français it was known as François. This is still the language used in Quebec, even though it evolved in its own way. In 1763, France ceded Nouvelle-France and all its territories in North America to buy peace with the England. This was a sour point for Quebecers at the time who were ready to continue fighting even after their lost at the Plains of Abraham. In 1774, France went through their revolution and at that point abandoned the court French as their language, opting to use the people's language. They evolved from their. You can understand how a colony of pissed off people didn't also make the switch and just stuck with what they knew best. Hence why Quebec doesn't give a damn about the Paris elite and why the languages are different.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    28. Re:Ridiculous? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Do you speak the Queen's English, or do you sound "crude" and "yokel-like" to natives of the old country?

      In fact, most modern Brits would sound more ridiculous to their ancestors than many of us Americans would... at least, based purely on accent. In particular the way the letters "A" and "R" are now pronounced is much more true to the original in American English.

      Same with French :)

      And then there's regional differences inside the countries themselves.

      The whole "the original country denigrates how the colonies talk" argument is bullshit, and that's the point I'm trying to get across.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    29. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Me like, talk. You write "from whence" and use words like "inconsequential". Bravo!

      No need for a cite on that, I need a cite on why that matters and why you would bring it up.

      Shouldn't that read: "that which is referred-to"? I hope you are done toying with me now.

    30. Re:Ridiculous? by Yakust · · Score: 1

      This is completely false. The difference in Quebec French and France French is much smaller than the difference in The Queen's Englsh and the American English.

    31. Re:Ridiculous? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Merci, mon ami.

    32. Re:Ridiculous? by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Funny you say that; while it is true the Quebec accent is often dissed by France French, the people there are actually in a large "Englishfest", in that they will start using English expressions out of context for no apparent reason. It's as if I said "Hey, sorry for being en retard!" as opposed to "Hey, sorry for being late!". Is there any point? No. But they still do it.

      In comparison, Quebec French has "Quebecismes", but those are as often inspired from English as they can be from other languages or even downright created for specific purposes. In recent years, official French has improved in Quebec while it appears to be degrading off in France. Oh and, have you EVER heard a French from France try speaking English? As a French Quebecer who speaks fluent English, I cringe every single time.

    33. Re:Ridiculous? by LethargicParasite · · Score: 1

      Over the past 400 years, the form of the language used in the Americas - especially in the United States - and that used in the United Kingdom and the British Islands have diverged in many ways, leading to the dialects now commonly referred to as American English and British English.

      - American and British English differences

      *shrugs* And yet I can still read Dawkins without trouble. I guess even 400 years doesn't do that much to a language. The internet doesn't hurt, either, for reasons too truistic to mention.

    34. Re:Ridiculous? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If it's a PC game, there's no region locking. Regardless, a French version is produced - they can probably argue successfully that it exists and is relatively simple to build a NTSC french version.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  8. English only with French available? by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this make sense to anyone? If it is english only, then it would seem to me that french is unavailable by definition.

    1. Re:English only with French available? by despisethesun · · Score: 1

      Read it again. Basically, retailers cannot stock only the English versions of games if there is also a French version available. If there is a French version, they have to either stock both, French alone, or none. The rule doesn't apply if there is no French version available. Since French versions of games tend to come out later than the English versions, this means those titles will have to be delayed in Quebec, forcing gamers to buy out of province and hurting retailers in Quebec for no good reason.

      --
      This poo is cold.
    2. Re:English only with French available? by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read it a third time. If a game company comes out with an English version of a game and then a French version later, the retailer can stock the English version while there's no French version, but once the French version comes out, they either have to buy French version copies or take the English version off the shelves.

      So it causes headaches, but not the ones you're thinking.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    3. Re:English only with French available? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Does this make sense to anyone? If it is english only, then it would seem to me that french is unavailable by definition.

      In-game is English only, instructions provided in both (they shrink wrap a cheap translated copy of the manual with the game box).

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  9. Good luck with that. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

    Language enclaves generally don't last very long.

    1. Re:Good luck with that. by rve · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Language enclaves generally don't last very long.

      How about thousands of years? Almost every country in Europe has its own language. That can't last long, I'm sure they're all about to switch to English any day now.

    2. Re:Good luck with that. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about thousands of years? Almost every country in Europe has its own language. That can't last long, I'm sure they're all about to switch to English any day now.

      Firstly, the countries in Europe aren't enclaves -- none of them are completely surrounded by hundreds of miles of English speakers, as Quebec is.

      Secondly, they're switching to English anyway. As someone who has lived in Europe for the last six years I can say from my own anecdotal experience that the more the world gets connected, the more people speak English. (I predict that we'll end up in a world not too linguistically different from Firefly)

    3. Re:Good luck with that. by rve · · Score: 1

      they're switching to English anyway. As someone who has lived in Europe for the last six years I can say from my own anecdotal experience that the more the world gets connected, the more people speak English. (I predict that we'll end up in a world not too linguistically different from Firefly)

      Just like the way they all switched to Latin before, which was the common language of higher education on the continent 200 years ago, or to Frankish, which was the lingua franca of 1000 years ago (the term is even derived from it), just like the way all of eastern Europe switched to Russian in the 20th century?

      You monolingual and monocultural thinking people can't seem to imagine that there has always been a difference between the language you speak at home and the language you speak to outsiders without everyone inevitably having to become the same.

      Besides, two thirds of the world's population lives in Asia now, a share that is growing every day without any sign of slowing down. The continued dominance of English culture is no more certain than the continued dominance of Greek culture was 2200 years ago.

    4. Re:Good luck with that. by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      Just like the way they all switched to Latin before, which was the common language of higher education on the continent 200 years ago, or to Frankish, which was the lingua franca of 1000 years ago (the term is even derived from it), just like the way all of eastern Europe switched to Russian in the 20th century? You monolingual and monocultural thinking people can't seem to imagine that there has always been a difference between the language you speak at home and the language you speak to outsiders without everyone inevitably having to become the same.

      I'm not arguing that languages don't change, I'm arguing that as a function increased time and increased interconnectedness the number of languages decrease.

      I don't think that's an unreasonable position. It has nothing to do with being 'monocultural' or 'monolingual'.

    5. Re:Good luck with that. by Amateur+Slashdotter · · Score: 1

      Sure glad I'm not living in Finland.

    6. Re:Good luck with that. by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think that the languages in Europe are all replaced by English.

      Almost everyone in (.i.e) Germany has English as their second language at school and at least half of the university graduates are able to talk (more or less) fluent in English. However, their main language of communication is German. Even if German ins picking up some English vocabulary. This will not change the people to native English speakers. And neither the state nor the TV program will switch to English. And in the Netherlands, they show most TV-series in English, but still the people are speaking Dutch as first language.

      Furthermore languages have always picked up vocabulary from other languages. The English language is no exception. Look at all these Latin and French words. And even some German words made it into English.

    7. Re:Good luck with that. by Bragador · · Score: 1

      Yes but speaking english is not seen as good. If you speak english to speak english, you look like an american. Look at India, they speak their own version of english. It is very bad to speak english with a "correct" accent there since it shows you want to "look good" and "impress" everyone. In other words, speaking correct english = you're a snob.

      If english is to rule the world, it will be a cheap version of the language and there will be an incredible number of accents and pronunciations used.

    8. Re:Good luck with that. by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. As someone who travelled in France, Germany, Italy, Hungary, Austria and many other places, I can tell you even the hotel staff couldn't say anything beyond "yes" and "no" in English.

      What you see are higher spheres talking their asses off. What you don't is that the populace, for the most part, doesn't give a rat's ass about it and keeps on speaking the language they have for centuries. Sure, more and more people learn English as a second language, but I haven't seen many completely turning over to English. Plus, the opposite also exists.

    9. Re:Good luck with that. by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      As a person that lives in the Baltic states and travels a lot between the 3 states, I can say that, unless the person I need to talk to is a total nationalistic nutjob or born after 1990, I communicate in Russian. Rarely do I need to turn to English.

    10. Re:Good luck with that. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      More people will be living in Africa by 2020 then Asia. And most every country in Africa speaks a language from the imperialist fucks who invaded back in the pre-Columbus days.

  10. Stupide by SemiOptimist · · Score: 1

    L'annonce m'a sidere D:

  11. EFIGS by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Informative

    In my experience as a game developer for nearly 10 years who has worked for a few companies, I can tell you that every game I've ever worked on has always had at least EFIGS (English, French, Italian, German, Spanish) localization (with a French North American SKU). I really don't see this as being much of an issue for most decent sized game publishers.

    The last part of game testing usually involves all sorts of fun localization issues and me winding up wishing every would just speak English after dealing with some weird Czech voice over bug or something. :) The Sims was probably the worst, I believe they did a localization for every language known to man.

    1. Re:EFIGS by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      Yeah, localizing Simlish must have been a bitch.

    2. Re:EFIGS by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it forces game retailers to stock games that they may not otherwise need to purchase, that they'll eventually need to sell at a loss if at all.

    3. Re:EFIGS by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      No, this is not a problem because all languages are in the same box.

    4. Re:EFIGS by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The last part of game testing usually involves all sorts of fun localization issues

      I drove developpers NUTS with my very large streams of Dutch-language bugs back in the day... the whole language seems to be a collection of portmanteaus, it kept going out of bounds in the dialogue.
      IIRC, the devs gave up and replaced everything with ideograms in the end :)

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  12. I'm ashamed by QuebecNerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...There are some days when I'm ashamed to live in the province of Québec; not many but they do exist and today is one of those days...

    For me, language is just a form of expression and has nothing to do with Nationality. Unfortunately, some of our leaders are so paranoid of being 'corrupted' by other cultures and loose their french 'identity' that they would go to any length to protect it. Most of them are too stupid to learn English and act like morons to hide their fears.

    The Loi 101 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loi_101) with dictates this behavior is often mis-interpreted and goes too far.

    A film is a form of art like music and is created in one and only one language. Subtitles can be put to help understand the dialogue but the original voice and emotions of the artist should be heard.

    I mean for years; Arnold Schwarzenegger's voice has been dubbed by a guy who sells washers and dryers and picks lottery numbers on TV here in Québec. Talk about a mood killer. Fuck you Corbeil... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yves_Corbeil)

    Anyways, the same goes for music and to a lesser degree, to video games. Let the market regulate itself and let the game publisher decide if it is in their best interest to have a french version.

    To regulate that is to go too far and intervene in private business matters.

    1. Re:I'm ashamed by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I've only seen one upside to dubbing so far: Star Trek Voyager Elite Force apparently didn't have the original cast doing the voices in the English version but the German version had the German voice actors of the TV show so it had the voices you'd know from TV.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:I'm ashamed by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      ...There are some days when I'm ashamed to live in the province of Québec;

      I'm also ashamed to live in a place that can't be spelled correctly on slashdot...

    3. Re:I'm ashamed by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      ...There are some days when I'm ashamed to live in the province of Québec;

      I'm also ashamed to live in a place that can't be spelled correctly on slashdot...

      If you pronounce it "Quackbeck" it all makes sense.

      /me ducks

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:I'm ashamed by RedK · · Score: 1

      Don't mistake a poster not knowing about about HTML Entities vs character encoding mismatches in your browser. If the poster submitted the é character as 8859-1 and you're trying to view it as a UTF-8 encoded page, stuff like that is bound to happen. That's not Slashdot's fault. That's why you use é to represent é.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    5. Re:I'm ashamed by RedK · · Score: 1

      And I'm ashamed my fellow Quebecers don't understand the law of their land. No one is forcing anyone to do anything here. If a French version exists, it needs to be available in Quebec. If no French version exists, it doesn't change a thing, that English game is going to be sitting on the shelves of your nearest EB Games or Future Shop.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    6. Re:I'm ashamed by Bragador · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, because of our language, we have our own cultural industry with our own star system. So we have access to a greater range of cultural products than those that can only understand english.

  13. Color Me Unsuprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I live in Alberta so my views are undoubtedly very biased, however Quebec has a knack for both shooting itself in the foot and whining.

    I'm not sure how much of our politics get into the news, but Quebec receives an incredible amount of money from the rest of Canada because of its desire to keep its dying language alive (Seriously, are any languages other than English going to be anything more than a curiosity in 100 years? I can assure you that french wont).

    Many years ago, Quebec had a strong and irrational separatist movement where they got the idea that they weren't sucking enough money out of our government (And even back then they were getting largest slice of the pie) and decided to vote to separate (It failed 49-51%).

    Frankly, if they had separated their economy would collapse, their health care and employment insurance would be gone, their pensions finished and they would likely be forced to crawl back to Canada in a few months. They have nothing aside from some god given right to make absurd demands.

    I admit it, I'm bitter. It feels like every year Quebec whines to parliament and grabs a pile of money from our province. I have nothing against being part of a country and support transfer payments to provinces that are less fortunate. I strongly believe in being a unified country but Quebec has an arrogance that never fails to anger me. They have the gall to consider themselves a separate part of Canada but won't hesitate to suck us dry.

    1. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by debile · · Score: 1

      Yeah Alberta you're so great. You have oil in your backyard and it gives you lots of money. Turns out we have water in ours. We'll see in 100 years if oil, if any is left and you didn't destroyed completely your environment is of any value. On the other side, you will be welcome to drink my water because we're a united country and even if we whine a lot, we do care of the rest of Canada (well... at leat 51% of its people!)

      btw I lived in Calgary half a year for work. I know the place and the people. While I admire some of your traits, others or just as dump as ours.

    2. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      Spanish ? Mandarin or Cantonese ?

      The best thing English has going for it right now is the amazing amount of content on the web, but that is being offset very quickly. The Spanish volume of www content is *huge* and growing very rapidly.

      French is irrelevant and making itself more so.

    3. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by kklein · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Seriously, are any languages other than English going to be anything more than a curiosity in 100 years?

      Wow... Wow. You are so wrong.

      Right now, depending on how you define language users, there are over 1 billion English users in the world. Only around 375 million of those are native speakers. The remaining are non-native speakers.

      Do you see what that means?

      What that means is that people are adopting English as a second language; not using it at home. In fact, a lot of the "outer circle" English-speaking countries (e.g. India, Malaysia, Nigeria, Singapore) principally use English as a lingua franca due to the linguistic complexity of their geographical area. African countries adopt English because it's better for business, and because picking any of the local languages could fan the flames of aeons-old tribal rivalries. The Indian subcontinent just has too many languages and dialects to bother with, so they use English for business.

      Nowhere are these people's first languages dying out.

      Furthermore, large countries of lingua franca English users, like India, tend to develop their own variety of English, resulting in there not being a single English in the world, but World Englishes, an important concept introduced by the noted Indian linguist Braj Kachru.

      A "World English" is a variety of English that is comprehensible and regular within a certain population For example, in Singapore, the verb "reply" is transitive, i.e. people say "I replied his email," with the noun phrase "his email" functioning as the object of the verb "reply." Inner circle English speakers use it only as an intransitive verb, necessitating a prepositional phrase: "I replied to his email." This usage cannot really be considered a mistake, because every user of this variety of English uses this word this way.

      Moreover, this idea of "one billion English speakers" really doesn't sit well with me. Pack up your things and take a long holiday sometime. Travel to a lot of different countries, and see how many people you can find who speak English. You'll find a lot more in Europe than elsewhere, but you might be surprised at how many people don't. I live in Japan, and despite English being a compulsory subject in jr. high and high school, finding anyone who speaks more than a couple horribly-pronounced words is pretty difficult. They just don't have an opportunity or need to use it most of the time, and classes are designed to get them to pass entrance tests, not actually speak or use the language (believe me--I've taught at every level of the Japanese education system--from first grade through university).

      Then there is the oft-cited statistic about China becoming the biggest English-speaking country in the world. I really have no idea what that is supposed to mean. They, too, have compulsory English education, but backpack around China for a month or so and you can probably count on one hand how many people you ran into who spoke English. Furthermore, China is never, ever, ever going to let Mandarin lapse for English. Never never never. When your country is named "The Central Nation" (i.e. "the center of the world"), you take your language and culture very seriously. Mao's revolution was largely to kick Western influence out of the country (Japan was considered Western--that was not a mistake by any means). However, after taking power, even he could not convince people to abandon the Chinese character system (hanzi) in favor of the Pinyin romanization system. People saw even this literacy-boosting move as a betrayal of their Chinese cultural identity. So there's another English language myth busted, I hope.

      Finally, let's look at that term I've been kicking around in this growing reply: Lingua Franca. ...The French language. Now, historically, it's a little more complex than that, but basically, a form of French used to be the trad

    4. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I have nothing against being part of a country and support transfer payments to provinces that are less fortunate. I strongly believe in being a unified country but Quebec has an arrogance that never fails to anger me. They have the gall to consider themselves a separate part of Canada but won't hesitate to suck us dry.

      "I have nothing against people of other races, but those niggers sure are lazy!"

      You can fool some people sometime, but you can't fool all the people all the time.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    5. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that you are receiving money from Alberta, so the issue isn't that they aren't willing to share, it's that having their taxes going to support ridiculous language laws while hearing the Quebec government whine for more is a bit irksome. Being called rednecks and bigots, hearing people complain the the PM actually acknowledges the existence of a Canada between BC and Ontario and other nonsense like that just makes it worse.

    6. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by simonbas · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say my view isnt't biased but here we go.

      The canadian constitution separates competence fields that are federal and provincial. Telecom, employment insurance to name a few, are federal. Healthcare, education and culture are provincial.

      Quebec isn't getting a larger part of the cake, it simply demands that, because it has two separate income tax systems, it gets back the money that it has overpaid because all other provinces have their income tax managed by the federal government. It's the provinces responsabilities to create their own specificities in their provincial government system. That's the way everyone is happy, with a strong, decentralised federal system that can adapt to local concerns.

      We don't have the same mentality everywhere in Canada. Regional differences occur (think about the difference between BC and Saskatchewan).

      However, I wouldn't agree that Quebec's economy would collapse after a secession (only angry canadians use the word separate, with it's negative connotation). Quebec's largest bank is owned by the people (Caisses Populaires Desjardins), as well as it's largest pension (Caisse de depot et de placement) fund, as it's largest investment fund (Fond de solidarite FTQ), as it's sole energy provider (Hydro-Quebec). Furthermore, Quebec healtcare is independant from the federal government, and healthcare insurance is free for everyone.

      And i'd like to remind you that the only reason you're paying perequation is that you've got tar sands and the US is willing to pay more for non-foreing oil. If wasn't for that, you'd be receiving from us.

    7. Re:Color Me Unsuprised by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, are any languages other than English going to be anything more than a curiosity in 100 years? I can assure you that french wont

      Once again demonstrating the spectacular ignorance of your average Albertan.

      Honestly, I've lived here all my life, and even I'm amazed at the superiority complex combined with remarkable xenophobia displayed by your average Albertan. Oh well, they don't call it Texas of the North for nothin'...

  14. France is the market for french games. by Jartan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's not like game companies that make french games are suddenly going to stop over laws in a province with a population of 8 million.

    The repercussions of this law seem tricky though. It sounds like multilingual versions have to be provided once a french version exists. Someone will have to pay for creating such versions since multilingual versions are uncommon in the industry. Most localization is paid for by local publishers.

    It's easy to say the law is silly but at the same time I know I'd give a lot to see game companies be forced to release multilingual japanese/english versions in the US.

    1. Re:France is the market for french games. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      multilingual versions are uncommon in the industry.

      You misspelled "in the U.S.A."... either that, or you know nothing of the industry.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:France is the market for french games. by Narishma · · Score: 1

      The majority of games released in Europe are multilingual, usually English, French, Spanish, German and Italian.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  15. Hey Quebec! by dark42 · · Score: 1

    Would you like some cheese with that whine?

  16. Re:All Your Base Belong To Us by artor3 · · Score: 1

    Tout votre le base est appartenir a nous?

  17. Re:Come on y'all, speak American already by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Heh, we'll let anyone speak English, any way they want. Make up new words, take words from other languages, whatever.

    Maybe that is one reason why English is "winning".

    I'm not able to come up with a car analogy to add to your post, I hope this will suffice:

    English seems to follow a Wikipedia format, where anyone can contribute anything, and thanks to it's flexibility and openness, it grows and adapts at an astonishing pace.

    French is more like a traditional Encyclopedia. All the prestige associated with it belongs to the past, and by the time a select few get around to updating it, those changes are already irrelevant.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  18. Made a start... by GrahamCox · · Score: 5, Funny

    toutes vos base sont appartiennent à nous

    1. Re:Made a start... by Narishma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just as "correct" as the English version.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
  19. Desperate measures by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Tabarnac, people less and less see the point of sticking to French when the rest of the continent ignores it royally! Maudis niaiseux d'anglophones! La la, let's get anal about forcing French everywhere, la!

    What you say, forcing French translations of every English word from stop signs to podcasting ("baladodiffusion", can you believe that shit?) didn't help much?! Calice! Let's bribe Celine Dion back here, she's our only hope of achieving a seeming of cultural relevance!!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Desperate measures by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      No actually I'm French, but thanks for playing, wannabe stalker. A hint, usually when people have @yahoo.fr in their e-mail address they're likely to be from France.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:Desperate measures by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Why would you think I'm upset, I'm just pointing out that they're upset, and si, español es mi tercera idioma, although I'm European and live in Europe so who cares.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    3. Re:Desperate measures by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Like podcasting is necessarily any better? Using a trademark (iPod) term combined with an English word as opposed to using a perfectly fine and dare I say self-explaining neologism on the basis that you think Quebec is overstepping? Who's in the wrong when I can't listen to France's TV without hearing an English word dropped in a French sentence every five minutes for no apparent reason (cringeworthy accent included, free!)?

    4. Re:Desperate measures by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The thing is that "baladodiffusion" sounds so gay and forced you just know no one in their right mind is going to want to say it. It's just ridiculous. And why do you care if the French drop English words every five minutes? The Anglophones drop French words every five minutes too, usually pronounced beyond recognition. The French say English words to sound cool in a "hip" way, the Anglophones say French words to sound educated and smart.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  20. no surprise here by agwis · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised about TFA but what I am surprised about is that anyone else in the world cares about this. This is just another stupid act by the 'language police' in Quebec to protect their *culture* and their *precious* language that us Canadians are used too dealing with on a regular basis. It's absolutely reverse discrimination because we'd never get away with pulling the opposite in the rest of Canada. Quebec gets away with it because they continuously threaten the rest of us with separation, spearheaded by the Bloc Quebecois if they don't get their way. The Bloc Quebecois is a federal political party whose sole ambition is to separate from Canada, and to add insult to injury they are supported by all of Canada's tax payers, for those that aren't aware. I've often wondered if anything similar to what we put up with here happens anywhere else on our wonderful planet. I suspect any such attempt elsewhere would be quelled fast and considered treason. Only in Canada eh, pity!

    Back to my original point, anyone that wants to do business in Quebec is already aware of these intricacies or at the very least, not shocked when they pop up. Canada is officially a bilingual country and IMHO does more than its share to accommodate francophone's. Go to Quebec though, and it's like you've already entered another country. Reciprocity is not a factor here! I've travelled extensively throughout Quebec and God forbid you don't have a basic grasp of the French language for even simple things like reading construction, hazard, detour, etc. signs on the highway...because you don't get it repeated in English for you (excluding possibly the Montreal area, but not always). Quebec in many parts is downright hostile to Anglophones, especially if you want to conduct any type of business there.

    I live in northern Ontario in a small community that is roughly 80% French. Here, they have it right. Signs are in both languages. If you speak English or French, you can get by fine and people are friendly no matter what language you are most comfortable in. There is no *protection* of one language over another here, and contrary to popular opinion, French is not dying out because of this.

    One other thing; I noticed a previous comment suggested that not supporting Quebec was also alienating France. I have a very limited French vocabulary and am not certain about this but I believe the French dialect between Quebec and France is quite different. Supporting one does not implicitly mean you are supporting the other as I'm sure there would still need to be quite a bit more translation.

    Obviously I can only speak for myself but I do believe my opinion is a popular one in Canada. I just wish Quebec would reign in their 'language police' and let the market dictate the feasibility of supporting French. If language and culture is so important for Quebecers, they can speak with their wallets.

    1. Re:no surprise here by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      I also find it funny that so many people in the rest of Canada and the US care about this. It's almost as if they felt insecure with the idea that some people might not be using English.

    2. Re:no surprise here by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It's absolutely reverse discrimination because we'd never get away with pulling the opposite in the rest of Canada.

      You see a lot of games only available in French in the rest of Canada?
      No? Didn't think so.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:no surprise here by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You see a lot of games only available in French in the rest of Canada? No? Didn't think so.

      That's a commercial decision, not government saying they can't. Big difference.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:no surprise here by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You see a lot of games only available in French in the rest of Canada?
      No? Didn't think so.

      That's a commercial decision, not government saying they can't. Big difference.

      No. U fail @ reading comprehension.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  21. Re:All Your Base Belong To Us by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Toute votre base sont appartiennent a nous! (and that ARE belong)

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  22. Re:It's an anti anglophone/allophone thing by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Tell Lou Dobbs.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  23. POsted about it earlier by Coffee4cr · · Score: 1

    http://www.4colorrebellion.com/archives/2009/04/03/quebec-legislation-prevents-sale-of-english-games/ I did a post about it earlier, and it's not as worst as the press make it seem

    1. Re:POsted about it earlier by RedK · · Score: 1

      Oh come on. The law has nothing to do with why KFC renamed to PFK in Quebec. That was a corporate decision in order get some brownie points with the French people of the province. Don't believe me ? Fine, try to find a Roi du Hambourgoie somewhere in the province ? Can't right, try looking it up under Burger King. That's right, there it is!

      The law is clear that if a name in another language than French is a trademark, that name can be used with no limitations at all.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  24. Re:French and France by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    Don't forget staying thin!

    To this day nobody knows how they can consume so much smoke, bread and wine and still be some of the thinnest people in the world!

  25. Re:Come on y'all, speak American already by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile Spanish continues to spread northward through North America, without any Government support at all. I wonder how long before English is battling Spanish in Quebec?

  26. I have a complaint about the new page layout by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Blue text on a black background is extremely hard to read. I get these with the comment title and score.

  27. Re:French and France by rve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't forget staying thin!

    To this day nobody knows how they can consume so much smoke, bread and wine and still be some of the thinnest people in the world!

    Preferring small portions of expensive food over affordable supersized meals

  28. Re:Welcome to Canada (eh!) by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    What the fuck do you mean by "savorous"? Is that a French word, Mr. Sangfroid?

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  29. Re:Vive les jeux en franÃais! by Meumeu · · Score: 1

    Et vive l'UTF8!

  30. Re:French and France by drewtheman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because we're in the middle of 300 millions people speaking English. It's not only a language, it's a culture. And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

  31. Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by mclc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, I really don't know where to start. Hi, my name is mclc, I am a French canadian and I feel guilty because of where I am born, and because of my native language, which is French, and because my ancestors were conquered in the Plaines d'Abraham. I play mostly in English, by the way. I watch movies in their original language too. Ho yeah, movies are also under this law. And you know what? I can watch movies in English if I want. I have a contact for that. It's a very dangerous black market to be. By law, watching a movie in English is like buying drugs and hiring a hitman, but worse.

    As some people said in a few comments, Quebec has a law to claim the right of French speaking people to be served, to work, live, dream and eat in French. Why you ask? BECAUSE YOU ARE 350 MILLIONS OF ENGLISH SPEAKING AMERICANS AND CANADIANS! Is that so hard to understand? Yeah, we lost a war, so what? We are 80% of French canadians in the province of Quebec. English speakers are protected by the federal laws saying that every service must be available in French and in English (this is applied in Quebec, New-Brunswick and Ontario, but mostly in Quebec as there is no other place in the country where you will really get service in both languages).

    Now, because you all like separatists scandals, I will disapoint you. It is not forbidden to sell an English game. Understood? Here's the catch that the evil French speaking aliens set up : you will be forbidden to sell the game in English if, and only if the game is made elsewhere in French. This means that if France (by the way, you just cannot get a game in English in France, by law) does not have the game until a few months, we in Quebec will have the English only version until then. When France (and Quebec) finally gets the game in French, well guess what? The two versions will be available! Bilingual like movies, or books, or every service offered by the Government of Quebec (unlike all other province). Thank yooooouuuuu bilingual country! Naturally, a lot of games are now localized, which means have more than one language in the same CD.

    Now, what do you do for us, Rest of Canada, except insulting every frog in Quebec? All I hear is the eternal speak white, only said differently (and usually some stuff about the English Canada who won the war). Live in the 21st century, people. Let us, minority in Canada, speak French as we let you, minority in Quebec speak English. We pass great laws that preserve French and does not affect English in any ways. We almost all know a little of English in Quebec, but hey, IT'S NOT OUR NATIVE LANGUAGE. You just cannot think as good in an other language than your own. For example, all this text was great in my head, and now I don't know where I'm going. But hey, just come in Quebec, speak English in any store and you will be gladly served. French people will switch to English automatically, speak an English sounding more like a wookie, but we will try. I think we deserve the same thing. And in our case, we are only 7 millions in a sea of 350 millions. It is for our protection.

    Je vous aime quand même.
    mclc

    1. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      We almost all know a little of English in Quebec, but hey, IT'S NOT OUR NATIVE LANGUAGE. You just cannot think as good in an other language than your own.

      Yeah, and? English isn't my original language either, but Canada doesn't provide any protection for my native tongue. Why should you bastards be any different? Why not protect Italian, German, Spanish, and Dari, while we're at it? Make sure that every federal employee speaks all 6 languages!

      If ANY language is going to be our "second language", it should be some Native American dialect. There's absolutely no reason for French to be an official language in Canada.

    2. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and? English isn't my original language either, but Canada doesn't provide any protection for my native tongue. Why should you bastards be any different? Why not protect Italian, German, Spanish, and Dari, while we're at it? Make sure that every federal employee speaks all 6 languages!

      Seriously, I don't live in Canada and even I can understand why it's different. There is not enough of you to be significant.

      If ANY language is going to be our "second language", it should be some Native American dialect.

      Is there that many "native Americans" in comparison to English and French speakers in Canada?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      So you're advocating mob-rule? Get enough people together, and you can force through whatever laws you like?

      Sorry, but that's not how western democracy is supposed to work. Otherwise, the US should be a Christian state, ruled by the Pope.

    4. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      So you're advocating mob-rule? Get enough people together, and you can force through whatever laws you like?

      That is generally how the world works, even minority wise. You can call it what you like, I'm not here to argue philosophy, only discuss the reality of the situation. It makes perfect sense.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      That is generally how the third world works, even minority wise.

      There you go, fixed that for ya.

    6. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      That is generally how the third world works, even minority wise.

      There you go, fixed that for ya.

      You can classify the entire world as the third world if you like, as I said, I'm not interested in arguing philosophy.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    7. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by lucm · · Score: 1

      > If ANY language is going to be our "second language", it should be some Native American dialect.

      Let's make a deal. Start paying tax on goods and services (since you don't have employment revenue anyway) and we will discuss your claims. Stop running guns and smuggling cigarettes, and we will discuss your claims. Stop taking people hostage by blocking bridges over phony local feuds that are actually money extortion operations, and we will discuss your claims. Stop ditching snowmobiles and pickup trucks in the wild when they are out of gas because you can get another vehicule free of charge (paid by MY tax dollars), and we will discuss your claims. Stop "losing" your dental implants on Friday night so you can spend the weekend in Quebec city free of charge (paid by MY tax dollars) while you wait to get a new free implant (paid by MY tax dollars) on Monday morning. Stop having those nightmarish statistics of 90%+ victims of incest and martial violence in some of your reservations and we will discuss your claims.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    8. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your time.. Look who you are talking to.

    9. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You can classify the entire world as the third world if you like, as I said, I'm not interested in arguing philosophy.

      Then why the hell did you respond? Your entire argument is a philosophical one.

    10. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by RedK · · Score: 1

      Found your own province, they you'll be able to vote any kind of laws you want. Until then, you are free to move elsewhere if you don't like it.

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    11. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      WTF?

      I'm not an indian, you moron.

    12. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Then why the hell did you respond? Your entire argument is a philosophical one.

      Actually, I believe the response I gave to be a accurate representation of reality, not a philosophical theory that does not correlate in the slightest to the way things are in reality.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    13. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe the response I gave to be a accurate representation of reality

      And you're wrong. The response you gave was, essentially, that society should make laws that favor a minority groups whose populations is P, while ignoring minority groups whose population is P. That's a value judgment - it's an opinion based on personal biases, not "an accurate representation of reality".

    14. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      And you're wrong. The response you gave was, essentially, that society should make laws that favor a minority groups whose populations is P, while ignoring minority groups whose population is P.

      Sorry, can't seem to find where I said anything like "society should make laws". Pretty sure I was remarking on the current state of things.

      it's an opinion based on personal biases

      Well, if you really want to go low level (since I don't see this issue occurring in my logic on a high level), everything is a opinion based upon personal biases. I don't understand how you cannot understand the difference between numbers. Such as a one person verses ten thousand persons minority and why the ten thousand persons minority would be more significant than a single person.

      Even minority wise, it's often the minority that has more people have a bigger sway on things, which was what my original point was and felt I explained it sufficiently already.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    15. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think you actually understand what your original point was, so I'm not sure how you expect me to parse it. Thanks for wasting my time. Bye.

    16. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Curtman · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no reason for French to be an official language in Canada.

      You aren't really that dumb are you? Or is this just one of those things that only a racist could state as fact and not see how ridiculous it is?

    17. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      lol. That's the first time I've seen French called a race :) Congratulations, you win the "stupides person on slashdot" award!

    18. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by Curtman · · Score: 1

      We covered this last topic.. There is only one race of humans. Every "other" race is just a figment of your warped mind.

    19. Re:Hi, I speak French and I am sorry. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      BECAUSE YOU ARE 350 MILLIONS OF ENGLISH SPEAKING AMERICANS AND CANADIANS!

      Well, there's also a billion English-speaking Indians out there, too. But guess what? They don't live in Quebec. It's still by and large a French-speaking majority there. If you really are a nation, you shouldn't need laws to force shops to sell products in French to you - you'll just boycott those which don't, and most will do what you want anyway.

      The only reason for such laws is when you feel insecure - when you know that a significant part of your French-speaking population doesn't mind English at all, and doesn't consider themselves Quebecois over Canadian... and then you want to force French down their throat, and keep them away from the tainting influence of English.

      I mean, how dare they sell English games to the kids when there is a French translation available! Why, those kids might even learn English good enough to understand there's life outside Quebec...

  32. Not so much! by PIBM · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you had taken the time to read about this specific thing, you'd learn that not only is this old news (this was done in 2007!), but that the CANADIAN association of video game signed this bill.

    Also, any computer game has been subject to this exact bill since october 2007. The only difference is that now, console games are also covered.

    If you took the time to read the description, you'd have learned that distributor are mandated to offer the french version of a game provided that it already exists somewhere else.

    The bill specifies that any reseller can sell the english version as long as they also offer the french version if it exists. I'm a french quebecer and I kept buying english computer games without noticing anything.

    The only problem that I heard about caused by this bill so far has been with world of warcraft, for which the french version was originally built for playing on european servers, so you could not play with a friend who bought the english version...

      You might find this interesting:
    http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/francisation/consommateurs/secteur/jeux_video/jeuxvideo.html

    1. Re:Not so much! by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Consider that in France there will probably be a different mandate forcing the use of French in video games soon.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Not so much! by YttriumOxide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In France, such a mandate wouldn't be necessary. The only time you'll even see a game that isn't in French is if the publisher has never released a French version, and even then it's just as likely you'll never even see the game at all - it's a matter of both linguistic comfort (most French people are more comfortable in French, whereas many (although not all) Quebecois are comfortable in both French and English), and of linguistic pride - something that France and French people in general are very strong on (basically, even without a mandate, every video game shop in France would follow this rule anyway).

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    3. Re:Not so much! by Amateur+Slashdotter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks for the details. There is also a summary of the rights and duties for IT translated here:

      http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/english/infoguides/depliant_7_20050711.pdf

    4. Re:Not so much! by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Consider that in France there will probably be a different mandate forcing the use of French in video games soon.

      No, only the user manual,PEGI (ESRB) rating and epilepsy risk warning must absolutely be in French for the French market ( don't know for the belgium and swiss). But if you release a unlocalized game you will probably miss most of your potential consumer.
      Most of the super market will not sell unlocalized game to prevent any problems and potential refund. Only specialized story sell imported game.

    5. Re:Not so much! by SpiderClan · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have two replies to this. First, the Canadian association of video games is comprised of game developers. It is in no way representative of Canadians and they were responding to the Quebec government in the way that made the most financial sense to them.

      Second, I think the GP was slightly exaggerating, or doesn't know much beyond his small area of Canada. The problem isn't with those who consider themselves Quebecois, since that would be both unreasonable and, in many cases, hypocritical. The problem is with those who consider themselves Quebecois as opposed to Canadian, and don't believe/recognize that they can be both.

    6. Re:Not so much! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      If you took the time to read the description, you'd have learned that distributor are mandated to offer the french version of a game provided that it already exists somewhere else.
      Presumably this means that given that the upstream developer plans to release in english first and other languages later the canadian distributer has a couple of choices.

      1: delay the release in quebec to wait for the french translation. This will piss off the gamers who want to get thier games quickly (much as it already pisses off a lot of european gamers). It will also hurt the retailers as many gamers may give up on them and order from the USA or other parts of canada.

      2: deal with a double release, once with the american version and again with a version that includes french. That french release will have to be made no later than any french release elsewhere in the world and all shops in quebec who have stock of the english release will have to buy it or be unable to sell thier english stock.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Not so much! by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I bought a game in Belgium, all the packaging was in Dutch. I figured since I can understand it (sort of) and it was in the bargain bin for only a few beers I'd give it a go.

      When I opened it it was trilingual - English, French & German.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Not so much! by PIBM · · Score: 1

      Actually, you only have to 'offer' the french version, it doesn't need to be in stock at all time. Your point 2 is moot, since there are a lot of quebecers who will only play the original language version provided they understand it. That includes english for a lot of us, and spanish / dutch for many too.

      Having them forced to sell the french version provided it exists is for the quebecers who aren't able to understand english (or whatever else) enough to enjoy the game. Those people will not even try buying the english version. For resellers, it's not hard to know how many of his average customer get the french version, and to plan accordingly.

      Then, for your point 1, we know that if we want the games fast, we might need to get the english version. So we just buy it here, because the resellers will not delay the game for that kind of reason.

      The delays we heard of (like that guitar game) were caused by another bill, where if you sell an english only version without a french one available, then your documentation & presentation must include a french translation.

      This is understandable, because sadly, a lot of quebecers still don't read english.

    9. Re:Not so much! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      When I opened it it was trilingual - English, French & German.

      I don't know about today so much (although I see lots of multilingual games) but that used to be SOP back in the Amiga days when most everything for the platform came from one of those three countries. The feeling went (AFAICT) that your audience was pretty small at best, so it's best to make sure that potential customers can play your game. A lot of sports games for various console systems have also been multilingual far beyond the official retail reach of the game system itself because they knew that people would import the console to play them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Not so much! by WiiVault · · Score: 1

      The only problem that I heard abooot caused by this bill so far has been with world of warcraft...

      There fixed that for ya. Cheers!

    11. Re:Not so much! by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      To say that "the rest of Canada agrees, so then everyone else does too" is insanity.

      It is extremely common for a public body to be coerced by the french into doing something they would not otherwise do - especially considering that Montreal is the second largest city in Canada.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
  33. Re:Short sighted by McGiraf · · Score: 1

    If I read you right, you're saying that foreign corporations profit are more important than culture?

    Of course if you are from the USA that's more like: our corporations profits is more important than foreign cultures, and that pretty much sums up the USA foreign policy.

  34. Re:Welcome to Canada (eh!) by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    Hey hey hey! I'm not bashin', I'm just askin'! I respect your bilingualism, and your hot strippers (thank you, Montreal).

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  35. Re:French and France by guyminuslife · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was going to say, "we can do all of that!" But you ruined it.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  36. Re:French and France by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Because we're in the middle of 300 millions people speaking English.

    It's not only a language, it's a culture.

    And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

    If you wan't to provide an equivalent example to English speaking Americans. Just ask how they feel about protecting the English language from Spanish influence rising from growing Mexican population in the south.

  37. Oh, you mean... by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    just like "African-Americans"?

  38. damn frogs!!! by atari_kid · · Score: 1

    I have the profound displeasure of living in Quebec, surrounded by frenchies, and I can say that they love shooting themselves in the foot. The most ironic thing about it, is that they are obsessed by conserving a language that they can't even use properly, most of them don't even understand the grammar, it's such an over-sophisticated and pretentious language that they spend a big part of the schooling just learning it and failing. And most never learn english, so they force to work low paying jobs because they can't work for companies that are international or national.

    --
    All technology emerges from the "supreme will" of man to become GOD!
    1. Re:damn frogs!!! by Bragador · · Score: 1

      And so why don't you simply leave for another part of Canada? I'm trying to convince my fellow quebecois that Canada is a useful alliance of provinces and I always stumble upon idiots like you on my way. No wonder they want to separate.

    2. Re:damn frogs!!! by atari_kid · · Score: 1

      Duuude, if you want to insult somebody, like calling him in an idiot, do it to his face like a man not on a forum behind a keyboard. Forums are for discussions, the streets are for insults...your choice???

      --
      All technology emerges from the "supreme will" of man to become GOD!
    3. Re:damn frogs!!! by atari_kid · · Score: 1

      Oh ya, to answer your valid question, I'm planning to move out of Quebec soon. But I do reserve the right to critize Quebec because I have spent many years here and I have contributed to the culture. The problem is not the language divide but the fact it's causing an imbalance of power within the province. And I believe that this cultural "war" between the french and english is manufactured by certain parties, like most "wars".

      --
      All technology emerges from the "supreme will" of man to become GOD!
  39. Re:More F'ing Quebec by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    The signs in Canada say "Stop" - and they mean "Stop" the signs in Quebec say "Arret" which means slow down.

  40. do they require French French or Quebec French? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Cause the Quebec French apparently don't think just localizing into French French is good enough.

    http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=d645a02a-9a24-4172-a92f-46cf1941cdb1

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:do they require French French or Quebec French? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      Per the info in both articles (the post, and your link), and the relevant text of the Charter, there doesn't seem to be any "official quebec french" designation - standard french will do.

      http://www.oqlf.gouv.qc.ca/english/charter/title1chapter7.html

      It seems that is on purpose - but wiki-facts should be taken with a grain of salt: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_qu%C3%A9b%C3%A9cois_de_la_langue_fran%C3%A7aise

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    2. Re:do they require French French or Quebec French? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Cause the Quebec French apparently don't think just localizing into French French is good enough.

      Open up a dictionary and go read up the definition of that word.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:do they require French French or Quebec French? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I don't get how the Quebecois French are managing to be such a bunch of pompous asses about this. Here in the UK, we look over at this thing called Hollywood. We have about the same period of language evolution difference from US English as the two Frenches do, and do we demand that all films get dubbed in the British English? Fuck no. The Quebecian dickheads say they couldn't understand the Parisian slang. Well how about LEARNING it, you fucking morons? Demanding that all Quebec films get dubbed in fucking Quebec, a tiny proportion of the market? Pompous idiots. I say, leave them filmless.

    4. Re:do they require French French or Quebec French? by Yakust · · Score: 1

      No movie from France has ever, that I know of, been dubbed for the Quebec market. It is the same language and only a few local expressions or street talk would require subtitles, but this is not necessary in most movies/tv shows.
      Why many people ask Hollywood to have a translation in Quebec for the Quebec market is that many Hollywood movies contain some amount of street talk and swearing which, when translated in France, sounds quite strange.

  41. A mini-essay on cultural welfare by Argumentator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Instead of taking a circumstantial approach as many do, trying to save the P.C. face while arguing about inefficiencies, heavy-handed approach, etc... I'll go straight to the heart of the issue -- WHY THE FUCK DO WE HAVE TO PROTECT FRENCH, or any other language for that matter? And even if you buy the argument that protecting the language == protecting the culture, I'm going to ask, why should culture be protected?

    The fundamental essence of all cultures is that they change over time. They are born, they are developed, and when the time comes, they die off or are absorbed into other cultures. From the beginning of human history that has been the case. None of our modern cultures have existed from the beginning of civilization -- they are all an amalgamated product of hundreds of independent cultures which have evolved and intertwined over time. Different cultures merge and split, traditions come and go, beliefs, values, ways of thinking and doing things, they all change over time. The very reason we evolve and progress as a civilization is that we accept the concept of changing culture. Language is part of that. Do you see any sizable part of the population arguing that we should go back to, say, ancient Greek, because Greece was the birthplace of western civilization and thus (obviously) we must protect and preserve its language? How about ancient Roman? What about the Medeival Frankish? Or the Beowulfian English?

    A culture is representative of a way of life that people who follow that culture observe. When the way of life changes, culture changes accordingly. If language is part of that culture, then the language will change accordingly too. If using a particular language is no longer representative of a way of life that the population follows (as is the case in the anglo-americanization of Quebec, for example), then that language is naturally fated to go from the dictionary books into the history books.

    But only recently we have a bunch of self-righteous moralizers that claim that "preserving" a culture is the right thing to do. In other ways, they wish to (forcefully) impose measures on a population and stop the natural course of progress and cultural evolution that the population decided to take, and hang on to something that cannot stay on its legs independently. And if that wasn't enough, they want to pay for this enforcement out of the public purse.

    This is a fundamentally and patently wrong approach. Cultures aren't supposed to be "preserved" in any context outside that of a museum. Cultures are supposed to represent the way of life undertaken by the followers of the culture. When a cultural element (in this case being the use of French) goes out of fashion, it should be let dying in dignity, not persistently preserved as a decaying corpse by the high-horse cultural necromancers. And certainly not being funded at public expense.

    Cultural attributes come and go. Don't entertain yourself with the delusion that the French language will be preserved henceforth and to eternity. It won't. English won't be either. Sooner or later everything changes, and it's absurd to even speculate what language will be used in a thousand years from now. It's just a matter of time. All the cultural welfarists accomplish is putting the dying body of a cultural attribute on extended life support, using our money to turn what should have been a dignifiend passing away into a long, painful, and quite pathetic freak show.

    Let the dying die in peace.

    1. Re:A mini-essay on cultural welfare by Argumentator · · Score: 1

      The US has no official language. English is used simply as a matter of convenience, since the majority of the population is (still) native English speakers, and even when they will no longer be, far more people will know English as either first or second language than any other language.

      Whatever language is in power should be the one most convenient to most people. If in certain parts of the US Spanish is the most understood language, then it should be the language of the government, yes.

    2. Re:A mini-essay on cultural welfare by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And even if you buy the argument that protecting the language == protecting the culture, I'm going to ask, why should culture be protected?

      I can answer that one.

      The culture should be protected when certain things we take for granted - like, ahh, freedom of speech and conscience - are part of said culture. Now I'd rather like to have those remain, and to that extent, I'd like Western culture protected where it exists (or at least where I live...). But that applies to the core values of the culture, not to superficial attributes such as language.

      Speaking of cultural changes - of course they happen, and I do not even mind that, but I'd rather have them happen at a more "natural" pace - slow enough to adapt and have an influence of myself, small as it may be. I don't think anyone can object to that kind of change. But there are other kinds, much more rapid - brought by conquest (like what happened to Japan in WW2), or mass migration. And those - yes, they are definitely threats to the culture they try to replace, so don't be surprised when carriers of that culture respond with hostility. Cultures as a whole struggle for their survival just as humans do.

  42. Ah the 101 laws... by Secret+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    ... fucking over Quebec citizens for many many *many* a year.

  43. Re:Come on y'all, speak American already by irockash · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... Mexican Crepe?

  44. Translation by rdnetto · · Score: 1

    all your base are belong to us

    --
    Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
  45. Bunch of ingrates by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it wasn't for us, they would be saying, "Nein! Es ist verboten!"

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Bunch of ingrates by lucm · · Score: 1

      Apparently you are not aware that Quebec is located in Canada, which is in North America, and was never invaded by Germany. Actually, the Canadian army, including many famous French-speaking Quebec regiments, was a crucial part of the D-Day operation. If at some point you get out of your basement and travel in Europe, you will see many sites dedicated to heroic Canadian soldiers who died fighting the Germans.

      Being under the impression that Americans alone freed France shows a lack of basic knowledge of history. Russian troops were very central in this operation, and were actually a key factor in the Allied victory.

      This being said, what is very, very sad, is that by saying *us* you take credit for something you personally never were part of, and feel "entitled" by the actions of, maybe, your grandfather. My guess is that your only fight for freedom so far has been to post illiterate comments on discussion forums and eat "freedom fries".

      One last point: maybe the Americans did help to liberate France, however you seem to forget that France was an important player in the American Revolutionary War. Next time you come across a street or a city called Lafayette, instead of just thinking about your next fix of fast food, ask yourself where this name is coming from.

      Now get a good history book, or wikipedia if you are too lazy to walk to the library, and read about things before you comment them.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    2. Re:Bunch of ingrates by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      So you admit it's your fault they're stuck with French?

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    3. Re:Bunch of ingrates by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Britain wasn't invaded by Germany either. But without US intervention, it might have been. Who knows where they'd have stopped?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Bunch of ingrates by lucm · · Score: 1

      > Britain wasn't invaded by Germany either. But without US intervention, it might have been. Who knows where they'd have stopped?

      Not US alone. Commonwealth countries (Australia, Canada, etc) did a pretty solid work.

      The real question is: if the Germans had not attacked USSR, who knows what would have happened... With all the troops on the Western front, Germany would have been much more powerful.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    5. Re:Bunch of ingrates by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      ...and read about things before you comment them.

      Vous devriez boire de moins de café

      --
      What?
  46. Not so ridiculous by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Which game company would stop creating *French* localizations of their games and lose the market in *France*

    It won't prevent them all but if you shrink the market size it will mean that less will. Plus what if they decide to make a French, but not Quebecois-French version - the differences are greater than between American and English. Will that satisfy the language laws? Even if it does suppose they decide not to make it available in North America would that mean the retailers were off the hook?

    Quebec has been a fantastic influence on Canada - it has continuously reminded the government that we are not a mono-culture. The sad irony of laws like this is that the cultural diversity that the rest of Canada enjoys and celebrates partly because of Quebec seems to be actively suppressed in Quebec itself.

  47. Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by Improv · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you accept that it is a valid thing for Quebec to promote and protect the French language, then the law makes a lot of sense. Just like mandating that restaurants provide both English and French on their menus, this helps prevent the English language from squeezing French out of usage.

    I've never had a strong opinion on whether it is a valid thing or not, but perhaps Americans can understand it better by considering how threatened people feel by rapid growth of the Spanish language in the Americas, and efforts to prevent/slow that.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    1. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If you accept that it is a valid thing for Quebec to promote and protect the French language, then the law makes a lot of sense. Just like mandating that restaurants provide both English and French on their menus, this helps prevent the English language from squeezing French out of usage.

      I've never had a strong opinion on whether it is a valid thing or not, but perhaps Americans can understand it better by considering how threatened people feel by rapid growth of the Spanish language in the Americas, and efforts to prevent/slow that.

      Except that in the US they want to forbid bilingual usage, not enforce it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by Improv · · Score: 1

      It's the same goal really (protecting English), we're just in a different stage of the language shift in the US. At some point perhaps there will be laws to mandate bilingualism when enough of the US comes to prefer Español.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    3. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you accept that it is a valid thing for Quebec to promote and protect the French language, then the law makes a lot of sense. Just like mandating that restaurants provide both English and French on their menus, this helps prevent the English language from squeezing French out of usage.

      I'd like a reverse law for posh restaurants in English-speaking countries.

    4. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by mog007 · · Score: 1

      While it varies in each state, at the Federal level, the United States has the same stance on official language as official religion. It's even covered in the same amendment.

      If a state tried to pass laws which forbade bilingual menus or FORCED bilingual menus, it wouldn't hold up in court because it's a violation of people's right to free speech.

    5. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, there is a difference between enforcing the availability of french titles, and enforcing the usage of them.

      As the FA says, the result will be that editors will no longer translate titles. This kind of shortsighted decisions are way too common in Quebec, even more when one has to deal with the Office de La Langue Francaise.

      My native tongue is french, yet I think this is just yet one more move from the dumb asses that sit in government offices here.

    6. Re:Pretty sensible, if you consider the goals by Improv · · Score: 1

      The policy will obviously provide a dual-pathed incentive - vendors can either treat French as a first-class language, or they can not release in Quebec (or France or large parts of Africa). In either case, they don't threaten the French-centric life present in Quebec, even though the first option is far superiour. Either they're really serious about not being pushed out by English and are willing to make some sacrifices, or they resign themselves to eventually losing the language.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  48. Re:Short sighted by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

    What are game companies going to do if they create a French only version?

    They can sell them like the companies that sell the English only versions in Quebec, no problems.

    The game may ship with a French translation otherwise it won't be released due to the fact that millions of English copies will be shipped back to the creators of the game.

    Why? If there is only a English version available, it's perfectly legal to sell it in Quebec. Only when you have a French version also available, do you have to also provide it the stores.

    I don't see the problem?

    --
    Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  49. Re:All Your Base Belong To Us by Werkhaus · · Score: 1

    Mon aeroglisseur est plein d'anguilles.

  50. It's not that bad a place by badzilla · · Score: 1

    I'm English so I speak slow stuttery French (England is about 20 miles from France.) I've been to Quebec a few times (ski-ing or on business) and whenever I try my French on the locals they tolerate me for a short time but then voluntarily switch to English just to speed things up.

    Crucially though I've run into plenty of people who honestly don't speak English at all. Usually this is at the financially poorer end of the scale like people who serve me in Wal-Mart. So it could be that protecting those people is the real intent of these weird laws even if it fails in practice.

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
  51. While I understand some of reasoning... by Derekloffin · · Score: 1

    It is still a stupid idea. People won't wait. Many will go across province to one of their neighbours and pick it up there. Others will turn to the likes of amazon.ca and such to just order it in. In general, it will just hurt Quebec retailers, and have no real impact on language.

    1. Re:While I understand some of reasoning... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      It is still a stupid idea. People won't wait. Many will go across province to one of their neighbours and pick it up there. Others will turn to the likes of amazon.ca and such to just order it in. In general, it will just hurt Quebec retailers, and have no real impact on language.

      You are probably right. People who don't need the French version won't wait for it to become available if there is a delay. The only way this would work is if the industry steps up and provides the dub at the same time as the original, as it is done with the movies.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  52. In the 24th century... by master_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...French is an ancient obscure language.

    1. Re:In the 24th century... by flibuste · · Score: 1

      Older actually. But true that it's much more obscure. Take it as english being a gross simplification of latin-based languages...

  53. Re:It won't fly by Amateur+Slashdotter · · Score: 1

    I'm a French from Quebec and I laughed at this one...

  54. Re:Why do you care ? by Amateur+Slashdotter · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the advice to our frustrated friends, but I must disagree on one topic:
    > But without our language law, French would only be a souvenir in Quebec.
    Economic and political changes in the last generations would have prevented the death of French in Quebec even without bill 101.
    But with all its difficulties, this law has given grounds to the affirmation of Quebecers as a Nation where French is predominant.

  55. Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    In Belgium we're having 3 major languages ; French and Dutch are the two most used in this country.

    While there are problems inbetween those two factions, the movie industry keeps making money on selling two types of DVD's to Belgians:
    (1) The French edition and
    (2) the English/Dutch/With all languages you can imagine except French!

    Causing a much more rift inbetween these two factions, because there is TOTALLY no support at all towards an universal translation; making it possible to watch such movie with TWO instead of buying two different DVD/TV and Surround sets..

    I've been writing about this at my blog (in English!)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    1. Re:Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      In Belgium we're having 3 major languages ; French and Dutch are the two most used in this country.

      While there are problems inbetween those two factions, the movie industry keeps making money on selling two types of DVD's to Belgians:
      (1) The French edition and
      (2) the English/Dutch/With all languages you can imagine except French!

      Whoa, that's unpleasant. What's the excuse given not to have one DVD with all languages?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      The excuse lies in the distribution market ; the French distribution market forbids other languages but French...

      Not really good for other countries to be pushed towards languistic problems! The problem is that it happens more and more with newer movies.
      There are almost no new movies anymore with French subtitles!

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    3. Re:Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The excuse lies in the distribution market ; the French distribution market forbids other languages but French...

      It does not; I don't know where you get your disinformation from.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    4. Re:Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

      This info comes directly from 2 videotheques in Antwerpen (Flemish part of Belgium) and one in Tournai (The French part of Belgium). If this is incorrect you're always welcome to correct me wherever needed to finally fix this problem for us Belgians forever.

      The French distribution market is using exclusive licensing which forbids those subtitles from being used on multi-language DVD's.

      I'm sure this doesn't apply to all movies, like for example "De Zaak Alzheimer" which is a pure Belgian production but STILL lacking French subtitles...

      --
      --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
    5. Re:Stupid idea or not, should be done to movies! by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      This info comes directly from 2 videotheques in Antwerpen (Flemish part of Belgium) and one in Tournai (The French part of Belgium). If this is incorrect you're always welcome to correct me wherever needed to finally fix this problem for us Belgians forever.

      The French distribution market is using exclusive licensing which forbids those subtitles from being used on multi-language DVD's.

      I'm sure this doesn't apply to all movies, like for example "De Zaak Alzheimer" which is a pure Belgian production but STILL lacking French subtitles...

      Oh, sorry, I totally spazed when I replied to your comment :(
      I actually thought I was replying to someone else's comment. Dang.

      Thanks for correcting me, I needed it!

      So, back on track: Ah, it's the French protectionist habit that's screwing over Belgians then. Sucks. That means it's not going to correct itself anytime in the foreseeable future. I was wondering if that was something internal to Belgium, but if it's because of a bigger country with a clear intent to keep going in that direction, you'll have to suffer through it.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  56. Re:French and France by rmav · · Score: 1

    Don't forget staying thin!

    To this day nobody knows how they can consume so much smoke, bread and wine and still be some of the thinnest people in the world!

    Preferring small portions of expensive food over affordable supersized meals

    And having an enjoyable sexual life instead of living in a sexually-obsessed puritan society that makes you feel guilt if you have fun. Intercourse is a great way of burning calories.

    Roberto

  57. Re:French and France by oliderid · · Score: 1

    I do pour (i=0 vers i=10,++i) { Imprimer "Je parle francais" } You insensible mangeur d'hamburger! ;-)

  58. Re:All Your Base Belong To Us by Beretta+Vexe · · Score: 1

    Toute votre base sont appartenir à nous

  59. English-only implies not French by acooks · · Score: 1

    "English, motherf*cker, do you speak it?" - Jules

    I can only hope that the author's French is better than his English.

  60. We are NOT all separatists ! by Valtor · · Score: 1

    Hey I was born and still live in Quebec.

    We are NOT all separatists ! It's only 30% of the Quebec population that's gone crazy about protecting the language.

    So please don't throw the baby with the bath water ;-)

    Valtor

    --
    "Sockets are the standard networking API, also useful for stopping your eyes from falling onto your cheeks" zeromq.org
  61. Re:Concordia res parvae crescunt by andr386 · · Score: 1

    I hate watching movies that were doubled in French ! Thus most of the time I go with the dutch version of the movie. The only probleme being that when I want to watch the movies with friends that don't understand english .... they'd better understand flemish (dutch), finish, arabic or swedish cauz' the dvd doesn't come with french subtitles. I am not going to decide who is my friend according to their english proficiency ! It's really a shame that in Belgium very few people can make key decissions that often tend to divide us more than unite us. Our national motto being "In our unity lies our strength" (or Unity Makes Strength) is defaced everyday by angry people and attention whores politicians. They now have the power in our country and our democratic system is now a complete joke. A few years ago, it was difficult to find a french-speaking belgian that had a bad feelings towards the Flemish. Nowadays politicians succeeded so well, that everybody has got a point of view. Reality doesn't matter on either side of the linguistic border. It's a country where its inner communities want to win over the other ones. There must be a winner and there must be a loser. But in the end we are all losing in this. It takes work and commitment to make a country and build unity. And it seems nobody wants to do that job.

  62. Re:French and France by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    If the French language is so great, why does it need protection?

    because English people are physically incapable of chain smoking, drinking wine, being obnoxiously rude and highly insecure of their culture, all at the same time.

    Since you're conflating Parisian stereotypes with American populations, I'll assume that you have bad teeth and you love the Queen with all your heart.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  63. Re:French and France by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    Where are mod points when you need them. Dutchmaan's post should get some.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  64. Re:It's an anti anglophone/allophone thing by Destoo · · Score: 1

    Don't confuse being racist and being xenophobe.
    Thinking you're superior because of your culture and heritage is racist.
    Being afraid of losing your roots because of outsiders is xenophobic.

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  65. Re:French and France by SpiderClan · · Score: 1

    Try not to let the PQ do your thinking for you.

  66. Per Wikipedia- by ph0rk · · Score: 1

    Quebec only has 7,750,504 people.

    Who cares? Globalization means not everyone gets their way.

    --
    semantics are everything!
  67. I'd like to point out. by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

    That for all it's faults, Montreal has really beautiful women there.

    Just an FYI.

  68. Local by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

    As an anglophone living in Quebec, I can say that while historically, some of the language laws did help improve a situation ripe with prejudice against French, in the last 25 or so years, the tides have turned and the laws are now oppressive, prejudice against English, and more importantly, counterproductive. It is clear that the intent of this law is to promote French language video games in Quebec. It is also obvious that this will fail.

    Punishing noncompliance will have an adverse effect on French video games. Let's see some incentive. Tax breaks or grants to companies that release in French at the same time as English. Money talks, bigotry walks.

  69. Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotypes by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    since the following statements are true:

    1. I know more than one person who has had a bad experience visiting Quebec.

    And I'm sure your momma burned the cookies at least once - does that suddenly make you claim that ALL cookies are evil? Lots of people have had bad experiences visiting every country, province or state, or city. Irrelevant. Totally irrelevant. Anecdotal evidence isn't data.

    1a. One such person had a negative view of ALL CANADIANS because of it.

    Gee, maybe the rest of the world should have a negative view of all Americans because of George Bush. Or all Japanese because of Sony DRM. Or all Germans because of Hitler. Or all Italians because of the Pope's retarded comments on condoms.

    If they generalize all Canadians because of it, they have a bigger problem ...

    2. I myself have had bad experiences with french people (being someone who does not frequently have problems with people)

    And you haven't had bad experiences with non-frech people? The part of your sentence in parenthesis says otherwise. So, why do you cut others slack, but not the french? Sounds like it's not just "your friend" who has problems with stereotyping people.

    3. They show no interest in being helpful, negotiable, or useful in any sort of political undertaking.

    Really? Despite the fact that for the majority of its' existence, the Prime Minister of Canada has been a French-Canadian? Are you test-driving Steve Job's RDF?

    4. They continue to take from the rest of Canada and give little in return.

    [citation needed] BTW, why not take a few shots at the Atlantic Provinces while you're at it ... or is it only Quebec that you bash because "they're french."

    5. Restriction the rights of non-french-people in "their" province.

    Check your history. Manitoba and Ontario did the same thing to their french minority. BC did the same thing to their asian minority. There's ignorance everywhere ... but, unlike *certain* other provinces, at no time did Quebec say that the english can't have their own government-funded schools.

    All they're asking is that stuff that's sold be available in both languages if possible. Something that any manufacturer, looking out for their own best interests, would want to do anyway, right? This just helps overcome a certain amount of corporate inertia (companies don't necessarily act in their own best long-term financial interest - just look at GM and Chrysler - so sometimes they need a bit of prodding).

    And for all the non-canadians looking in ... not all market regulation is "evil." How many other countries haven't had to bail out a single bank? For the record, we've had 2 small bank failures in the last 80 years - and none during the Great Depression. And for most of that time, the Prime Minister was french ...

    And for the record, no, I'm not french. I'm 100% english ... but my daughters are both, and that's about as "relevant" as skin colour or anything else; in other words, not at all. This whole thing is not an "english vs. french" thing, despite some old farts wanting to make it look like that. They need to move on. This is not the 20th century any more.

  70. Re:French and France by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I do pour (i=0 vers i=10,++i) { Imprimer "Je parle francais" } You insensible mangeur d'hamburger! ;-)

    It's "mangeur d'hot-dog" you insensitive clod!

    For the record, it literally translates as "hot-dog eater", and could be interpreted as meaning someone is low-class (they prefer hotdogs to real food) - though it also has a secondary meaning - a cocksucker. Maybe it's the latter usage that Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau meant when referring to Quebec Premier Robert Bourassa? There certainly was no love lost between them.

    For the record, there's no demand for programming in french. Back in the bad old days of interpreted BASIC, I wrote a program to replace the tokens in-memory so that people could program in french, and programs written in english would "automagically" have all the keywords in french. The french thought it was a cute trick, but with no practical use.

  71. Internationalisation & Over-reaction. by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    Although this may be a little extreme, I am not sure many Americans would be willing to play a game if it were only in German or Spanish. Certainly there are a good number that would be willing to put up with Japanese texts in imports which aren't available in a localised version, but this hardly represents the majority.

    Irrespective of what laws may be passed in Quebec, or elsewhere, I am already seeing a slow move to translate some of the more popular titles. Like films, it would appear that games companies recognise there is some value in allowing players to play in their own language.

    I think we just need to put all this in perspective, and take it cool. Its not as if they are saying that only titles in French can be sold.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  72. Re:French and France by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    because English people are physically incapable of chain smoking, drinking wine, being obnoxiously rude and highly insecure of their culture, all at the same time.

    I guess you've never been to Toronto.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  73. Re:Language defines Culture! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Language and only Language is what really defines Culture.

    Crap. The North of Belgium and the Netherlands speak the same language, but the culture is quite different. South Africa too, and they're even more different.

    Britain and the USA speak the same language (well, sort of) and the latter don't even have a culture!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  74. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    And for the record, no, I'm not french. I'm 100% english

    A "pure virgin wool", eh? ;)

  75. Language is a part of culture by xdancergirlx · · Score: 1

    First of all, as the update to the article says, this doesn't make it illegal to sell english versions of video games, only that if there is a french version available it must be sold along side of it. This does not lead to delays of games and will not make companies stop selling French versions. Actually, since 2007, the opposite has been true with most new titles having french options which broadens the game market, not shrinks it (ie. there are lots of people in quebec who don't speak english).

    Remember that the *only* official language in Quebec is French. Moreover, 80% of the population speaks French as their mother tongue, vs. 8% english.

    Finally, language is important part of culture. Language protection laws have been really successful in Quebec and are part of what makes it such an amazing place with a really vibrant, rich, cosmopolitan, and arts-rich province. If you live in Quebec and have seen the rest of Canada (I mean for more than your 3 or 4 year university degree), I think you will agree that Quebec is a unique and special place, due mostly to it's french background. Canada is so huge and has a huge amount of diversity, Vancouver, the BC. mountains, the praries, the badlands, Ontario, Quebec, the Maritimes, Northwest, Northeast, Canadian Sheild, the north praries... and many more, each distinct for different reasons.

    Why are all these anglophones so upset about a bill that promotes french culture in Quebec without affecting them nor preventing any gamers in Quebec from getting english games on the same schedule they would have without the law?

  76. This is a non-issue by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    For starters, if they speak French then it should be reasonable to get to play games in French.

    Secondly, why does this matter? It shouldn't really cost extra because games already have to be translated to French. If anything, give them the same version you give France. They're happy and the rest of Canada can have their game in English.

  77. Bilingual cover, english only game, GBA emulator by rotoblobule · · Score: 1
    This useless bashing on Quebec is sad and not what I expect on /. , although it is the norm in canadian english media (see http://www.thestar.com/article/611472 ).

    I live in Quebec, in french. Years ago I tried to buy Zelda on GBA for my kids (10 at the time). The packaging was bilingual, but the game was english only! How nice is that? The european version of Zelda was in 5 languages, including french of course. We ended up playing in french on an GBA emulator...

    Game distributors, for a tiny insignificant extra profit, are willing to force an entire nation where french is considered important to forget its culture. That's unacceptable. This deal only requires the distributor to be a little less lazy (and greedy) and put the french version, if one exists, on the shelves next to the english one. Is this "saying 'non' to english video games" ? hardly.

    By the way, all this french and Quebec bashing is what will make Quebec leave Canada sooner or later. Think about this before you bash.

  78. Re:French and France by pete_norm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

    Wow.. I think you mean, we have everything in common with the rest of North America except our language. Thinking we are so unique is mostly arrogance, and nothing else.

  79. Speak French? by UncleAndy · · Score: 1

    Some years ago in Montreal I went into a bank with a $20 bill looking for change (because the parking meters there don't take american quarters of course, even though ours take theirs - or used to).. The bank teller lady just looked at me like I was crazy, as if she couldn't figure out what I wanted.

    So I guess this doesn't surprise me much!

  80. Re:Bilingual cover, english only game, GBA emulato by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Game distributors, for a tiny insignificant extra profit, are willing to force an entire nation where french is considered important to forget its culture. That's unacceptable.

    Nope, it's capitalism.

    Not that they're actually forcing anyone to do anything; I wasn't aware that playing video games is legally mandated or a biological necessity.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Thank God! by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they can have the pleasure of reading Toutes votre base sont appartiennent à nous!

    --
    The cake is a pie
  82. Lots of European games are multilingual by Asmor · · Score: 1

    From my days as a Dreamcast pirate (yarrrr), I can tell you there were a good many European games which had English, French, German and maybe Spanish all on the same disc. I don't know if that's still the case, but if it is couldn't the companies just give Quebec the European versions (region reset to whichever region Canadia is, of course).

  83. Re:Games are sold via Regions by tepples · · Score: 1

    What are the lawmakers going to do when the PUBLISHERS simply refuse to sell the French version in Quebec?

    They're going to tell shopkeepers to tell their customers to mail-order games from Ontario.

  84. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

    A "pure virgin wool", eh? ;)

    I could never understand their holding "pure laine" as being so special ... after all ...

    Q: Where do you get virgin wool?
    A: Ugly sheep.

  85. Re:More F'ing Quebec by RedK · · Score: 1

    No, Arret means stop. Ralentir means to slow down.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  86. Re:More F'ing Quebec by Bragador · · Score: 1

    The more you impose your beliefs and way of life on someone, the more defensive and protective they become.

  87. Re:Bilingual cover, english only game, GBA emulato by Shados · · Score: 1

    I'm in Quebec, my first language is french too, and I can honestly say "screw people like you".

    Sticking laws all over the place to force a language thats only spoken by a minority of people on the damn continent (yeah its a lot of people, but its still a minority) is holding us back. The 101 law alone is keeping american companies from opening up shop here in many cases. Salaries half of what they are in other large cities and the government ponying it up to compensate is the only reason there's anything worthwhile in Montreal.

    But no, they have to keep it up and make it worse. If there's no fucking demand for french videogames (go to Walmart: they sell french videogames when available. They're all in the god damn BARGAIN BIN), then they just take room that could be used to sell more variety, or to lower cost of doing business and maybe lower prices (you know, to compensate of the fucking tax that is higher than the damn exchange rate half of the time).

    Protect french all you want, its a culture and its worth preserving. But not with laws that affect non-government entities!

  88. libre-échange by Fractal+Dice · · Score: 1

    Ce n'est pas du protectionnisme, c'est une langue différente.

  89. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    Stereotypes are not necessarily a bad thing. The key is that you need to be careful in where you draw the boundaries.

    And I'm sure your momma burned the cookies at least once - does that suddenly make you claim that ALL cookies are evil?

    Stupid comparison. No, that means that "momma" gets one strike on her cookie-making ability. If she screws up too many times, then her reputation as a cookie-maker becomes poor.

    Gee, maybe the rest of the world should have a negative view of all Americans because of George Bush.

    No, but speaking as an American, the rest of the world should realize that a majority of American citizens aren't very good at picking a leader, as it was proven in not one, but two elections. Of course, the other 49.99% who picked the other guy aren't very good either, since their pick wasn't so hot either.

    Or all Japanese because of Sony DRM.

    Another stupid comparison, like the cookie one. No, Sony's DRM means that everyone should view SONY with contempt, and never buy their products again. It has nothing to do with the Japanese as a nation, it's about one evil, multinational company run by people of different nationalities (isn't the CEO an American these days? I'm really not sure.)

    Or all Germans because of Hitler.

    Actually, there's not much wrong with having a poor view of WWII-era Germans, as evidenced by their choice of leadership. However, since the Germans who voted for Hitler in the 30s are probably all dead now, I think it's time to give up any animosity there. That's just like some dumb Americans who still refuse to buy anything Japanese because of WWII; all the people who supported Hirohito are either dead now, or at death's door. Even the oldest people actively running the country were probably children at that time, so they can't be faulted. And since Japan is now a republic just like the US and other western democracies, and its emperor is only a figurehead, the idea that modern Japanese society and government bears any resemblance to imperial WWII-era Japan is ridiculous and idiotic.

    All they're asking is that stuff that's sold be available in both languages if possible. Something that any manufacturer, looking out for their own best interests, would want to do anyway, right? This just helps overcome a certain amount of corporate inertia (companies don't necessarily act in their own best long-term financial interest - just look at GM and Chrysler - so sometimes they need a bit of prodding).

    I disagree. GM and Chrysler don't need any "prodding", they need to go under, and their parts can be sold off to the highest bidder. That's what's supposed to happen to companies that don't know how to run themselves. That "corporate inertia" you talk of? That's something that companies either need to figure out how to fix (perhaps by splitting up into smaller companies), or it needs to be their undoing, so that newer, younger, smaller companies can take over their market with better, cheaper products and service.

    Same goes for manufacturers not putting French on their products. If that causes them to lose French-speaking customers, then so be it. If they can be more profitable by leaving French off their labels, then more power to them. If it causes them to lose a lot of marketshare to a competitor that puts French on their labels, then that's the lesson they need to learn. Governmental intrusion doesn't help in this case. We in the USA are already seeing why the government shouldn't be getting involved with private companies; instead of helping the situation, all we end up doing is throwing billions of taxpayer dollars at horribly-run companies so they can give themselves lavish parties and giant bonuses, at taxpayer expense. IMO, the only main thing government needs to be doing with private companies is instituting regulations so that companies don't get too big, and competition exists and stays fair, and also consumer protections so that, for instance, people don't get poisoned by th

  90. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

    Pope's retarded comments on condoms

    FYI: The current Papa Ratzinger, a.k.a Pope Benedict the XVI, is as German as you can get 'em. You probably never heard with what horrible German accent he speaks...

  91. Don't blame Canada, blame Pierre Trudeau by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    You can blame Pierre Trudeau for this. In his drive to leave a legacy, he saddled Canadians with a terribly flawed constitution in 1982 that actually reduced our rights and freedoms. In particular, the biggest one of the "Mack-truck holes" in our protections is that any government can pass a law that violates the Constitution simply by including the word "notwithstanding" in its language. The Quebec language laws flagrantly violate the Canadian Charter of Freedoms and universal human rights, but they are legal because they say "notwithstanding". Thanks a bunch, Pierre.

  92. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    I could never understand their holding "pure laine" as being so special ...

    Ditto. This is supposed to mean racial purity, which is totally absurd when you talk about the most mixed-race people on Earth: for 10,000 years, France has been the final resting place of all european invasions. We have blood from all over the world, and when we came here, we added indian blood to our gene pool. So you cannot talk about racial purity in those conditions...

  93. The problem is short-term vision by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    I agree with you 100% that GM and Chrysler need to go under, for the overall good of the economy in the long term. Keeping them alive is like preventing all forest fires - eventually, you get so much deadwood that, instead of a more-or-less controlled burn and renewal, you get catastrophic disasters (is there any other kind of disaster? :-)

    Government intrusion, in the case of the language of packages, helps overcome a different problem - that of manufacturers or distributors who are pressured too much to look at this quarters' profits, instead of long-term growth. Now they actually *have* to do something that will help them in the long term, as it grows their market.

    Besides, the majority of the population of Quebec speaks, reads, and writes french ... what's so bad about including the extra language(s)? It's just a question of a new wrapper on the dvd case, a new instruction booklet, and some i18n work, much of which is probably already done, seeing as french is used in about 50 countries world-wide).

    ... and if the i18n stuff isn't done, all they have to do is the wrapper and the booklet - and that's been the case for years. So there really isn't much to see here. Tempest in a teapot - or should I say a storm in some poutine?

    Canada has had bilingual labeling for decades. As Prime Minister Trudeau said at the time when someone complained about french on a box of cornflakes, "If you don't like it, turn the bloody box around!"

    On a related note, Quebec does allow for importing of unilingual-labeled products in the event of an unforseeable shortage. This happened circa 1991 when the Hells Angels increased cocaine sales to the point where Preparation H was temporarily in short supply (coke-heads use it to "reduce swelling of sensitive tissues" - in the nose).

  94. Re:Nice way to generalize and perpetuate stereotyp by Bysshe · · Score: 1

    We know you're 100% English - otherwise your post would reek of cheese and Gauloises.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
  95. And yet... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Canada is a country and recognising Quebec as somehow special is what created this mess in the first place.

    Stuff like recognizing Quebec is precisely why Canada isn't the USA. Multiculturalism vs the Melting Pot and all that.

    But there are plenty of American politicians that prefer the US drop the whole "melting-pot" concept altogether, and adopt multiculturalism as official policy. I'd say we're damn close to doing that anyway. I haven't heard "melting pot" in awhile, but I hear Congressmen, journalists, intellectuals, etc, droning on about the value of multiculturalism all the time. Unfortunately, the US is becoming as Balkanized as Canada and much of Europe.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  96. An election to choose a language? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    How quaint! Most of the rest of the nation has simplified the process down to "He who can buy the most legislators, wins." It is very efficient.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  97. Re:French and France by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Preferring small portions of expensive food over affordable supersized meals

    What? You mean, they don't even have any Chinese in Quebec?

    Poor buggers...

  98. The word is mightier than politics ;) by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I'd like to ask you to send a comment on the blog too, since these reactions will be sent to the Ministers of Culture, together with the reaction of the public. As long as the public doesn't know, there won't be a change. It's as soon as the problem gets discussed and seen (in public), things could change ...

    How many Belgian people are confronted with this problem, only those who want to rent a movie with two languages. If we speak up we can change things too..
    If we stay silent it sure won't get noticed at all...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  99. Re:Language defines Culture! by VJ42 · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are examples when people speak the same language but belong to different cultures. However people who speak different languages always belong to different cultures. You picked up an excellent example yourself - North and South of Belgium...

    OTOH there are people who speak Welsh and Scots Galic that belong to the same culture as their English speaking neighbours...

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  100. edmsing by edmsing · · Score: 1

    What does it say about a language that has to be protected, that its on its way out of usage much like Latin...

  101. Re:French and France by QuietObserver · · Score: 1

    No joke. Despite having a predominantly common language, every state in the US has it's own unique set of cultures (I am not even remotely arrogant enough to assume any state, including Utah, my home state, has a single culture, in part because I've seen loads of evidence to the contrary). Each of the cultures I've been exposed to in Utah alone is unique, as are the many cultures I've encountered in other states. Despite this, however, very few of these cultures has attempted to isolate itself completely from the rest of the nation, or the world, and those that do are usually isolated cultures attempted to exist within a larger culture.

  102. I live in Quebec by flibuste · · Score: 1
    I live in Quebec and I am now just a little more annoyed than I was before reading the FA.

    Is this a smart move to get more video games into the hands of French speakers? Or, is it misguided, xenophobic protectionism? I'm going with the latter.

    "misguided protectionism" is the right term for that. Quebec Office de la langue Francaise has been trying to impose all sort of similar restrictions in the IT world: we are now supposedly forced to use FRENCH operating systems, even when you're a development shop for a US customer. It just doesn't make any sense.
    Add to it, in the case of games, translations usually suck. WoW in english is great and immersive, WoW in french looks and sounds uterly ridiculous.
    The trouble with Quebec gov is that they don't give people the choice. They impose it when no one wants it. It usually fails and costs us money.

  103. Re:French and France by flibuste · · Score: 1

    And I can assure you that we have not many points in common with the rest of the north america.

    Bash me at will if you'd like, but that's what 100% of Quebec natives would like to think and will tell you. Immigrants think Quebec is just a french version of north america.

    Culturaly, Quebec is just as american as any north-american region. Football, hockey, doughnuts, bad coffee, blockbuster movies, Texas/Chicago/Wherever ribs, huge SUVs and cars, the list is american-like items in Quebec's way of life is endless. Even the countryside look like New England. It is just *less* worse than Ontario.