Slashdot Mirror


Major League Baseball Dumps Silverlight For Flash

christian.einfeldt writes "This week, Major League Baseball will open without Microsoft's Silverlight at the plate, according to Bob Bowman, CEO of Major League Baseball Advanced Media, which handles much of the back-end operations for MLB and several other leagues and sporting events. The change was decided on last year but was set to be rolled out this spring. Among the causes of MLB's disillusionment with Silverlight were technical glitches users experienced, including needing administrator privileges to install the plugin (often impossible in workplaces). Baseball's opening day last year was plagued by Silverlight instability, with many users unable to log on and others unable to watch games. Adobe Flash already exists on 99% of user machines, said Bowman, and Adobe is 'committed to the customer experience in video with the Flash Player.' MLBAM's decision to dump Silverlight is particularly problematic for Microsoft's effort to compete with Adobe, due to the fact that MLBAM handles much of the back-end operations for CBS' Webcasts of the NCAA Basketball Tournament and this year will do the encoding for the 2009 Masters golf tournament."

69 of 388 comments (clear)

  1. Why make the leap in the first place? by XorNand · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish the article would have explained why MLB went with Silverlight in the first place. What kind of arm-twisting (or hooker-and-blow-providing) could MS have possibly done to convince a company to take such a major financial gamble? For the most part, Silverlight is largely unproven tech and--to add insult to injury--proprietary. Can someone explain the appeal?

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by LWATCDR · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can guess why.
      1. Microsoft probably offered a bunch of technical help.
      2. Silverlight has a much better programing model the Flash. I have not looked at Flex yet but Flash is nasty.
      3. Probably thought that they would get better performance out of it.

      Flash is in this case is the Devil that we know. Silverlight is the Devil we don't so Flash will probably win this fight.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Romancer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Depends on who it needed to appeal to.

      If it's management, it only needs to work in the demo and be new and shiny.

      If it's the IT dept it only needs to be stable and easily managed. Oh, and do the job.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    3. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by tpgp · · Score: 4, Informative

      -to add insult to injury--proprietary.

      Flash is no less proprietary.

      --
      My pics.
    4. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh really?!? Please post a link to the Sliverlight video file format specification. Here is the one for Flash:

      http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flv/

      Go ahead, surprise me ...

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    5. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by grahamd0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Silverlight has a much better programing model the Flash. I have not looked at Flex yet but Flash is nasty.

      Sure, the Flash IDE is a toy, the timeline is only useful for simple animation, and Actionscript 1 and 2 are crap, but Flash isn't bad at all if you're working on a pure code-based Actionscript 3 project.

    6. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish the article would have explained why MLB went with Silverlight in the first place

      There was a mixup and they thought they were going with the Fleshlight.

    7. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by owlnation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, that's a good question. I suspect that MS offered a lot to get them to use it. MLB.TV was the only reason I installed silverlight. I suspect I am not alone. If MLB offered a choice between the two I'd never have installed it. I've yet to come across another site where it's necessary. Now I can safely uninstall it, and most likely never need it again. I had endless problems with it -- especially on my Mac. Silverlight simply did not work well.

      The new flash player for MLB.TV this year is a vast improvement on their previous efforts. There's still a few bugs in it, but for the most part it's better.

      That said, Flash needs a competitor. It seriously needs one. It's astonishing that it's had so much market share for so long.

    8. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Silverlight FAQ

      Silverlight supports what users ask it to support.

      Oh, and a link to one of the formats it supports

      WMV file format

      pwnd

    9. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by joocemann · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wish the article would have explained why MLB went with Silverlight in the first place. What kind of arm-twisting (or hooker-and-blow-providing) could MS have possibly done to convince a company to take such a major financial gamble? For the most part, Silverlight is largely unproven tech and--to add insult to injury--proprietary. Can someone explain the appeal?

      Also, most people don't have or use or even WANT to use Silverlight.

    10. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    11. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I interviewed with them a few years ago.

      MLB.com had all their video in WMV and a pre-exisitng Windows Media Server infrastructure, because they were very concerned about rights management.

      Because they were a big Flash shop, they had to do a lot of mixing and matching Flash and JS to work with Windows Media player.

      When Silverlight came out, it looked like it would be an all-in-one deal that would let them retain their existing video infrastructure and clips, and be able to better utilize them inside the RIA's they build.

      They gave it a shot because it cost them almost nothing, MLB.com is rolling in dough and gets free stuff all the time because they're high profile.

    12. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by pherthyl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >> Flash is no less proprietary.

      Technically true, but still less of an issue than Silverlight. Silverlight is proprietary and owned by the company with a near monopoly on consumer operating systems. Adobe is proprietary but they have no reason to prefer one platform over another (aside from marketshare of course), and so are very unlikely to sabotage other platforms at any point in the future.

      On the other hand, it might be very beneficial for Microsoft to sabotage other platforms (and they already are, just by not even offering an _official_ linux player).

    13. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Flash is in this case is the Devil that we know. Silverlight is the Devil we don't so Flash will probably win this fight.

      Not true anymore. Apparently, Silverlight is now the Devil that MLBAM has gotten to know, and they decided they hated him so much that they went back to the other devil they already know, Flash.

      A high-profile reverse-course like this has got to be really bad news for MS. You'd think that, in trying to unseat Flash, they would have spent a little more effort making sure everything worked just right so that people wouldn't try it out and hate it, and go right back to what they were using before. Pissing off your early (and high-profile) adopters is NOT a good way to run a business and build marketshare.

    14. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe because Adobe refused to port Flash 8, 9, or 10 to any platform other than Windows and Mac OS?

      What in the world are you talking about??? I currently have Flash 10 installed and I'm using Linux. And yes it is officially supported, on the other hand Moonlight, the OSS Slilverlight implementation which is the only way to get it to work on Linux really has no backing from MS and is behind the official Siliverlight plugin.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    15. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Thousand · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about you take a second to know you're talking about before you talk about it?

      Flash Player support for h.264 and The Gnash OSS Flash Player

      Face it, Flash isn't as evil as you want it to be. And Microsoft has a hell of a way to go to catch up.

    16. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are there any decent free platforms for developing for Flash using actionscript? For a hobbyist like me I can't afford to plunk the change down for their IDE.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    17. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, most people don't have or use or even WANT to use Silverlight.

      And you have come to that conclusion based on exhaustive research of the preferences and use-patterns of all the people who are currently wearing your underwear.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by RedK · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Except right now, it only supports WMV, WMA and MP3. That's pretty far from your assertion that it supports what the user wants. From your FAQ :

      Windows Media Audio and Video 7,8,9 (WMA, WMAPro, WMV/VC-1), as well as MP3 audio. Microsoft has announced support for H.264/MPEG AVC and AAC playback in a future version of Silverlight coming in early 2009. We will explore the need for additional formats and codecs based on customer feedback and market need over time. Our philosophy around media formats support is "choice". It is important to note that Silverlight is a format-agnostic RIA environment that should support any media format that users require. The addition of native H.264/AAC video and audio decode inside of Silverlight is all about providing choice to customers.

      So basically, either you have to ask Microsoft to support it or maybe write support yourself, which you'll probably then have to distribute to everyone. Yeah, way to be open...

      --
      "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
      Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
    19. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      because they were very concerned about rights management.

      Considering they threaten to sue anyone who uses the term "World Series", that doesn't surprise me.

      Every time I hear some poor minimum-wage sports radio announcer have to use the term "The Fall Classic" when he really means the Series, I spit on Major League Baseball.

      Next, they'll want me to call White Sox Park "US Cellular Field" instead of the canonical "Comiskey Field".

      Which reminds me, has anybody else noticed the amazing discipline that McDonalds has forced sportscasters to exercise now that All-Americans have become "McDonalds All-Americans".

      During every broadcast I watched of the NCAA tourney, whenever there was mention of the top high-school players, it was always "McDonalds All-Americans" and nobody even choked on it once.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by grahamd0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I like FlashDevelop, but it's windows only.

    21. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by bondsbw · · Score: 5, Funny

      So basically, either you have to ask Microsoft to support it or maybe write support yourself, which you'll probably then have to distribute to everyone. Yeah, way to be open...

      Oh, that's ENTIRELY WRONG of them!!! I can't imagine what would have happened if, say, Linux had been created with such ideals...

      So basically, either you have to ask Linus to support it or maybe write support yourself, which you'll probably then have to distribute to everyone. Yeah, way to be open...

      Wow... I'm glad that never happened.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    22. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True points, but Flash on Linux from Adobe is less 'open' than Silverlight from Microsoft. Did you happen to notice that Adobe used what they had opened and jumped through some licensing hoops to get you their 'proprietary' Flash player?

      Microsoft has considered doing the same, but it would involve either opening up the Vista API to open source, or make them shove together a fully closed solution with less functionality.

      Microsoft turning Silverlight over t Mono and the Moonlight project is a win win, as Microsoft doesn't have to open their precious 'IP' that is non-Silverlight related from the Vista APIs, and yet it gives users a full open source solution.

      If you want to support open source, Silverlight is your donkey to bet on, if you want Adobe semi-open solutions, keep using Flash and be happy.

      I can remember when people were in love with Apple for opening up Darwin and the OS X kernel as required for the BSD and MACH licensing, but when it came to OS X and the 'Apple' portions, people realized the opening of Darwin was to get the rights to the code and also 'use' the community and repackage everything back under the upper levels of OS X and a sue happy Apple.

      Adobe didn't make their Linux Flash player to be 'good' to the Linux community, they made it to regain control of the Linux community that was going the way of the open 'Flash' players that Adobe had no control over. And apparently their 'play' to win the Linux users worked, as you are an example of a Flash fan happily installing a non-open Flash player that has full Adobe control.

      - MS has virtually no control over moonlight, and also seems pretty good about providing the mono team with what they need to replicate both Silverlight and other .NET features.

    23. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by nschubach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Agreed. I used Flashdevelop professionally and it's far better than most IDEs I've come across including Sepy. Sepy is nice, but it's aging poorly. Hopefully, FD will get the supposed Mono/Linux client in the back lot of the forum working soonish.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    24. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by dudpixel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Silverlight has a much better programing model the Flash. I have not looked at Flex yet but Flash is nasty.

      Sure, the Flash IDE is a toy, the timeline is only useful for simple animation, and Actionscript 1 and 2 are crap, but Flash isn't bad at all if you're working on a pure code-based Actionscript 3 project.

      I agree with this. Having used flex/actionscript3 recently it is very easy to learn/use, even on linux - and worked great. Admittedly I was only doing a simple game but as a programmer I was impressed at how easy it was to get up and running.

      Find a good text editor that does syntax highlighting for actionscript (even as2 highlighting will work ok) and just use the console-based compiler for generating the swf files.

      I never liked flash before - and I'm still not a fan of websites coded entirely in flash, but I'm starting to become a fan of flash programming and the web apps it can potentially produce :)

      I did look at silverlight but the linux plugin (moonlight) is a long way from compatibility with the windows one (2 versions behind!), and also I saw the term ".NET" and decided I'd see what flash was like these days...and I'm glad I did. :) The flex SDK (including flex/actionscript compiler) is free so you can develop flash on linux/mac/windows and its free. This is a huge plus for me.

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    25. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by gullevek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well sorry to hear that Mr.iPhone user ;)

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    26. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by miguel · · Score: 4, Informative

      The current Silverlight 3 preview release supports in addition to the proprietary codecs a pluggable framework for developers that wish to do so to use their own codecs.

      As part of the Moonlight effort we now have implemented Vorbis, Theora and ADPCM and have a partial implementation of Dirac almost ready to use.

      Our codecs work in both Silverlight 3 and our open source Moonlight implementation.

    27. Re:Why make the leap in the first place? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you have come to that conclusion based on exhaustive research of the preferences and use-patterns of all the people who are currently wearing your underwear.

      "joocemann" is the CEO of Fruit Of The Loom.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  2. That's like saying by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Major League Baseball Dumps Pact with Demons for Pact with the Devil."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:That's like saying by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um, sure, they are both proprietary, but Flash is much less so. For example, Flash has a 100% supported plugin for Linux and Mac whereas Silverlight doesn't (well, might have an official Mac port, but not Linux), both are 100% compatible with the Windows version, plus Flash has support on some things that Silverlight support will be impossible such as on the Nintendo Wii's Opera browser, and Flash lite for mobile devices. Flash also has a work in progress OSS implementation called Gnash.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  3. Sliverlight was an idiotic decision anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nearly all front end developers know javascript, and are therefore quite capable of flash programming. Silverlight has low market penetration and nobody wants to use it because it's widely seen as the latest in a long series of failed attempts to Microsoftize the web.

  4. Re:MSFT Icon is stale. by kv9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is off topic, but Slashdot's MSFT icon is stale.

    I agree. I think the new icon should be a flying chair.

  5. Yow! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 2, Funny

    That image is almost NSFW!

  6. Better the Devil You Know by weston · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... as they say.

    As industry devils go, Flash has fairly low levels of evil. It's proven, it fills a niche, it works, and while it's not wide open, it's not exactly locked shut either.

    1. Re:Better the Devil You Know by Phase+Shifter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >

      As industry devils go, Flash has fairly low levels of evil. It's proven, it fills a niche, it works, and while it's not wide open, it's not exactly locked shut either.

      ...For small values of "works."

      Anyone else having problems with "You muct have flash 9 or greater" messages using the non-IE version of the flash plugin?

      If I still have to use Microsoft's browser to get Flash to work, then it's no better than Silverlight.

  7. has anyone seen high quality flv? by dingDaShan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MLB could benefit from the high resolution available. Has anyone watched the March Madness on Demand from Cbs.sportsline.com? The quality was amazing... much better than any flash video that I have watched. It seems that Flash is way behind in terms of video. Youtube is NOT good quality. Cbs.sportsline.com's video scaled down or up based on the available bandwidth and was an excellent viewing experience. Of course, I am not factoring in the business aspects, but the quality of silverlight's video can be high. further reading http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/61563

    1. Re:has anyone seen high quality flv? by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Informative

      A Core 2 Duo ain't all that impressive, youngster...

    2. Re:has anyone seen high quality flv? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It should be plenty fine to play a fucking video.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  8. Microsoft releases Silverlight 2.0, nobody cares by David+Gerard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft today announced the release of version 2.0 of its world-beating Silverlight multimedia platform for the Web. As a replacement for Adobe's Flash, it is widely considered utterly superfluous and of no interest to anyone who could be found.

    "We have a fabulous selection of content partners for Silverlight," announced Microsoft marketer Scott Guthrie on his blog today. "NBC for the Olympics, which delivered millions of new users to BitTorrent. The Democrat National Committee, which is fine because those Linux users are all Ron Paul weirdos anyway. It comes with rich frameworks, rich controls, rich networking support, a rich base class library, rich media support, oh God kill me now. My options are underwater, my resume's a car crash, Google won't call me back. My life is an exercise in futility. I'm the walking dead, man. The walking dead."

    Silverlight was created by Microsoft to leverage its desktop monopoly on Windows, to work off the tremendous sales and popularity of Vista. Flash is present on a pathetic 96% of all computers connected to the Internet, whereas Silverlight downloads are into the triple figures.

    "But it's got DRM!" cried Guthrie. "Netflix loved it! And web developers love us too, after all we did for them with IE 6. Wait, come back! We'll put porn on it! Free porn!"

    Similar Microsoft initiatives include its XPS replacement for Adobe PDF, its HD Photo replacement for JPEG photographs and its earlier Liquid Motion attempt to replace Flash. Also, that CD-ROM format Vista defaults to which no other computers can read.

    In a Microsoft internal security sweep, Guthrie's own desktop was found to still be running Windows XP.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  9. HTML 5? by RonGHolmes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm still surprised companies aren't jumping on the HTML 5 bandwagon. Eschew flash and plug-ins for native web browser applications and video. http://280slides.com/ is a great example of what can be done. The ObjectiveJ they're developing is truly amazing - and it's all browser native. Even IE 8 works. I hate to say it, but Apple are right for once - get rid of flash and other plug-in based user interfaces and get back to basics. Share your JavaScript frameworks, use local storage and more - embrace HTML 5.

    1. Re:HTML 5? by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The whole point of using flash for video is to 1) prevent viewers from skipping over ads, and 2) prevent viewers from saving the streaming video to disk. If you allow native web browser applications, then what is to prevent users from substituting their own native application which violates points 1 and 2?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:HTML 5? by RonGHolmes · · Score: 2, Informative

      I suppose, but then people can get the streams anyway. Flash just encapsulates the video stream. It's easy enough to get it. Javascript can obfuscate the source of data too if you have the right frameworks. Javascript really can do everything flash can, including loading compiled bytecode.

    3. Re:HTML 5? by artor3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, you can save in PowerPoint 2007's format. Or in the old-style PowerPoint format. Or in ODF format. Or as a PDF.

      What exactly are you complaining about?

    4. Re:HTML 5? by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Informative

      you must be new here, or have a short memory

      http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/03/31/0039238.shtml
      http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/03/31/200201.shtml
      http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/04/20/2112208.shtml
      http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/08/05/02/0049225.shtml

      http://www.itpro.co.uk/605142/ms-ooxml-a-format-without-a-future
      http://www.itpro.co.uk/605496/iso-rejects-anti-microsoft-office-open-standards-appeal

      "The International Standards Organisation has rejected appeals from four countries to deny Microsoft's Office Open XML backing as an international standard.

      OOXML won approval from the ISO in April, following a controversial fast-track review process which was plagued with claims of voting irregularities, and accusations of technical flaws in the standard itself."

      page 2 of the last link is a hoot as well http://www.itpro.co.uk/605142/ms-ooxml-a-format-without-a-future/2

      "ISO ratification was achieved at considerable cost. The reputation of the ISO was compromised, as was that of Microsoft. ISO ratification was achieved amid widespread allegations of misbehaviour and undue political influence, which was noted by the likes of the European Commission. Neelie Kroes, the EU Commissioner, recently said: "If voting in the standard-setting context is influenced less by the technical merits of the technology but rather by side agreements, inducements, package deals, reciprocal agreements, or commercial pressure ... then these risk falling foul of the competition rules."

      The process has also adversely affected the work of the ISO. Martin Bryan, a senior ISO/IEC Convenor, who reported that the fast-tracking of OOXML "has made it almost impossible to continue with our work within ISO. The influx of P members whose only interest is the fast-tracking of ECMA 376 (OOXML) as ISO 29500 has led to the failure of a number of key ballots."

      "More than one commentator was reminded of the famous remark by Tom Lehrer, mathematics lecturer and sixties satirist, who said that "satire became obsolete the day that Henry Kissinger was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.""

      Do I need say any more

  10. Re:work by WindowlessView · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why are people trying to watch MLB on their work computers in the first place?

    Have you ever watched or listened to a baseball game? It's been the chosen background noise of America since the 1930s. It's not like a lot happens that is going to disrupt your work.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
  11. Re:work by peragrin · · Score: 2

    because I live within 300 miles of the stadium and as such i am in the blackout zone. They figure they can black out all of NY state in both audio and video if your within 300 miles you should go to the game.

    I like to stream the audio. Narrow bandwidth even though we have high speed. The audio quality is as good as the radio, and if it is teams that everyone wants to listen to, we use one of the short range FM transmitters to the shop radios.

    Radio and tv blackout zones are a true evil. especially in an age when the teams in question make billions.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  12. Re:MSFT Icon is stale. by castorvx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since you're being off-topic, I'll make the situation worse and ask a question that has been plaguing me for a while now.

    Is referring to companies by their stock symbol some new trend, or do people who frequently do that actually trade stocks a significant amount and have a reason to feel more comfortable with "MSFT" than "Microsoft"?

    Is it just shorter?

  13. Free Flex Builder for Unemployed Developers by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you spent all day reading Slashdot, you would know this already: --grin-- Free Flex Builder for Unemployed Developers.

  14. Misleading Article... Not 100% Flash by Eyah....TIMMY · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes everyone has flash, but what they don't tell you is that you'll also need the Swarmcast NexDef browser plug-in.
    Check out the not so great review of the flash/nexdef experience: MLB Support Forums

    Oh and if you want to also understand this from Microsoft's perspective: Miscosoft SL Team Blog
    The CBS March Madness HQ streaming was SilverLight and was a huge success.

    --

    It is not enough to have a good mind. The main thing is to use it well. - Rene Descartes (1637)
  15. Failures of tech. companies are often social. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You'd think that ... they [Microsoft] would have spent a little more effort making sure everything worked just right..."

    I agree with everything you said.

    It's interesting that the failures of technological companies are often social failures, not fundamentally technological failures.

    What theories do you have about why Microsoft allowed the failure to happen? Has Microsoft become unable to function? Or, is Microsoft accustomed to its virtual monopoly causing people to accept Microsoft software no matter how buggy? Or, what?

    1. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What theories do you have about why Microsoft allowed the failure to happen?

      Judging by some of Microsoft's recent bad moves, such as the bewildering array of Vista versions, re-working of the Office UI for Office 2007, the enormous bloat they added to it and so on, I'm beginning to believe that the programmers and developers no longer control development. It's beginning to look like MS is being controlled by marketdroids who not only have no clue what their customers want, they have no desire to gain one. It's a shame, really, they used to be able to produce good products that people actually wanted.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Funny

      What theories do you have about why Microsoft allowed the failure to happen? Has Microsoft become unable to function?

      It goes to the top. Until the board comes to its senses and gets rid of Ballmer, Microsoft is going to continue its slow, steady slouch toward... ... well, toward a lucrative government bailout.

    3. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. As far as I'm concerned, any failure in any company can be blamed on those at the top. They're the ones who have the ultimate power to change things (even if they didn't cause them, and were hired on later), and they're the ones that are paid ridiculous sums of money for their supposed talent. If they're so skilled and talented, they should be able to manage their company so that it performs well.

      Of course, a lot of a company's problems can be blamed on its structure, corporate culture, etc., but again, these are things that upper management has the power to look into and change, by drastic means if necessary.

      Personally, I think that large companies have a big disadvantage in that the left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing, and that they're so large it's too hard for them to change quickly and adapt, and there's too much infighting. It would probably be better if many very large companies split up into smaller companies. MS should have long, long ago split up into separate OS and app companies. Instead, they've squandered enormous sums of money on failed or unprofitable ventures like Zune, Xbox, MSN, etc., which could have been returned to shareholders instead.

    4. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to add that you can see examples of how a company's upper management totally influences the way it does things. For instance, MS is always doing a sloppy job on stuff, and has really horrible marketing (e.g., the MSN butterflies) that people make fun of. Their upper management hasn't changed substantially in several decades now. Apple, OTOH, always is really anal about little details like their packaging, making sure their user experience is just the way they want it, etc., and this has always been attributed to Steve Jobs (they sure weren't like that under Sculley). (For the record, I'm no Apple fanboy, as I'm a Linux fan instead, but I do appreciate Apple's dedication to quality products and styling, even if it's not exactly my own taste. Just like I'd never buy a Rolls-Royce even if I was a billionaire, though I can appreciate their styling, and I can appreciate good country music like Johnny Cash even though I don't really like country music.)

      But it's not going to change until the board throws Ballmer out and puts someone better in his place. But with the way large corporations work, that's not likely to happen, unless MS starts having really serious financial problems. Some shareholders are upset and complaining (although that makes me wonder why they still own stock), but it's not enough to force a change.

    5. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by JohnBailey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's beginning to look like MS is being controlled by marketdroids who not only have no clue what their customers want, they have no desire to gain one. It's a shame, really, they used to be able to produce good products that people actually wanted.

      Don't forget Uncle Fester is a salesman. And he is also the big boss. Bill Gates, for all his megalomaniac tendencies, was at least technically literate. So he could provide a steering influence to the company on technical grounds rather than purely make money to finance the next version which makes more money to pay for the next version. Selling a technological product requires the people making the decisions to be technical people. Nothing wrong with profits, so long as profits are not the only consideration.

      Or to use the beloved car analogy.. When the colour and appearance of a car is the most important aspect for the company, the car is going to eventually be crap if they ignore the trivial things like the engine and the steering. Which is why a Ferarri doesn't just look good, and a Toyota doesn't just run well.

      Question is... What happens to Microsoft if the WOW doesn't start with 7?

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    6. Re:Failures of tech. companies are often social. by DuckDodgers · · Score: 2

      I agree with every criticism you wrote except Office 2007. After a few weeks, I found it far more intuitive to use and productive than any previous version of Office.

      I think it's a fair criticism of Microsoft that they often rearrange GUIs and document command line alternatives poorly solely for the purpose of selling training and tech support. But the Office 2007 UI redesign, for at least some tasks, seems to be a case (exception?) where they did it for the right reason - to make it better.

  16. MLB.com longtime paying customer by Mondak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this is year 9 or so for me as a paying customer of mlb.com. I will say that Microsoft did a decent job for them a few years back when they switched from Realplayer the Windows Media Player. Maybe the relationship and history of performing had something do to with getting Silverlight in the first place. A few posters have suggested that it was arm twisting / bribes etc. that got Silverlight in the door, but so often it is the same way as anyone buys anything. Microsoft told them they would perform just like they have in the past. They did not. Kudos to mlb.com for not being afraid to go with what gives their users a consistent experience instead of going with the status quo. The new player is fast and stable so far with one day under my belt. I don't really like the way they present the information, but I am used to running the Yahoo gameday for the stats while I listen to the game in mlb.com anyway so I can live with that.

  17. A more accurate analogy: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "I understand [my puppy] someday might grow up to bite me."

    Bad analogy. This is the correct analogy:

    "My puppy has bitten me severely several times and I understand when he is larger the bites may be even worse."

    Haven't you heard of "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish"? Here are 6,780 links.

  18. Re:Worst part of the Mac OS X by count_schemula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Adobe and Apple are in some sort of weird cold war. They stick it to each other in sly ways.

  19. Netflix you listening!!! by ScaredOfTheMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I pray to the gods of streaming video make Netflix follow suit! I refuse to install Silverlight on my machine, in fact I click on the view now button, just to get the 'install player' message in the hopes someone is watching how many abandoned sessions there are!

    I am willing to miss out on part of my netflix service because because of their awful choice of player. If Hulu and now the MLB can stream full length movies with flash, so can you! And I watch more movies on Hulu because of that!

    1. Re:Netflix you listening!!! by aaron.axvig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I pray to the gods of streaming video that Netflix doesn't follow suit! I hate running flash on my machine, it is such a performance dog. In fact, I and millions of other people regularly click on the view now button, and are rewarded with a stellar viewing experience that is capable of streaming high-quality videos (not that other products aren't capable of such)!

      Many millions are able to really enjoy their full netflix service because of their common sense in recognizing that it is OK to install Silverlight on their computers. It does not have a separate updater always running (Flash does) but rather uses the one that comes with Windows. It works in multiple browsers on multiple platforms. If Hulu and the MLB can stream full length movies with Silverlight, I recommend to all of my friends to join in the party! And we all watch more movies on whichever service we want because we aren't fools that don't install Silverlight because of some personal bias against Microsoft!!

  20. Screw Flash by techsoldaten · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really don't care what technology they use, just make it work.

    Today, the audio of the first 2 innings of the Red Sox game were replaced with a high pitching whining noise. Opening day and all I could do is turn off the sound.

    M

  21. Re:MSFT Icon is stale. by nschubach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A chimp on a flying chair.

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  22. It's the bottom of the ninth by actionbastard · · Score: 4, Funny

    And 0 and 2 to Ballmer.
    MLB is up one zip on that last homerun by Adobe Flash.
    "Bud" Selig goes into his windup...and Ballmer gives it tremendous jolt!
    It's going, going, and it's gone!
    Right off the 'Microsoft will give MLB all the assistance it needs in the way of servers, tech support, and donated Windows Server 2008 licenses in every MLB stadium across the country if you'll install Silverlight' sign in center field!
    The crowd is going wild!
    They're pouring onto the field!
    They've got Selig down and there cramming Ubuntu Server DVDs down his throat!
    And wait...they're after Ballmer now hurling chairs...but he seems to be holding them off with free copies of...Yes! Windows XP!
    I've never seen anything like this in all my years in Baseball.
    This is truly a sad, sad, day.
    This is Bob Uecker signing off.
    Next, 'Silverlight' returns to MLB after the All Star break 2009. Right after these messages.

    --
    Sig this!
  23. It's very obvious by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Flash, savior of the Universe.
    Flash, It will save everyone of us
    Flash It's a miracle
    Flash, King of the impossible

    I mean, duh.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. It's the install base by symbolset · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They were counting on the massive market share of Vista to put it over.

    Oops.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  25. Pay service? by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's too bad that MLB charges money for this service. Considering the number of ads that naturally fit into a baseball game broadcast, it should still be profitable to broadcast it for free. This works well for TV stations which broadcast baseball games, and it's also been very successful for the web broadcasts of the NCAA basketball tournament in recent years.

    Of course, it's not free because the MLB won't pass up this (or any) chance to make money. Never mind the fact that the game broadcasts themselves are also ads, since the fans often buy merchandise and tickets.

    I would love to see the day come when virtually any sporting event is broadcast online for free. The economics seem to add up. Because of the importance of a live broadcast, and the frequency of breaks in the action, ads actually make sense as a way to pay for sports broadcasts. I don't often tolerate ads for any other sort of video.

  26. Re:Why bother with either? by iamnobody2 · · Score: 2

    Because you can watch any game you want, which is especially good if you're a fan of a team you don't live nearby. The games on tv at any given place are only a fraction of the available games. Most places have most of the games for the nearest team on a channel, then a few various games throughout the week. If you live far away from your team, you're likely to never see them, especially if they're not the evil empire. Also with mlb.tv premium you can watch several games at once, have dvr functionality, watch the game with any announcers, including radio announcers, etc etc. It's a service for serious baseball fans, but one that is wanted.

    --
    nobody's perfect
  27. Open source moonlight? by pallmall1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our codecs work in both Silverlight 3 and our open source Moonlight implementation.

    You mean that "open source" Moonlight that you are leaving full of Microsoft patent timebombs -- Microsoft patent infected code that is being incorporated into Moonlight under the guise of being open because of the Novell Microsoft agreement? The "open source" moonlight that is only safe on Novell's (MS) linux?

    Take a walk back to Redmond with that "our open source moonlight" bullshit.

    --
    3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.