Slashdot Mirror


"We're Linux" Finalists Announced

Last month, we mentioned the Linux Foundation's contest asking people to illustrate the idea "We're Linux"; Now, ruphus13 writes "Over 90 entries were received, and the finalists are now out. From the article, 'The contest was spawned from the idea that other software companies were paying millions of dollars to celebrities for endorsements, while Linux was promoted and shared by enthusiastic, passionate, actual users. Contestants were given a simple directive: tell the Linux Foundation what Linux is for you, why you use it, and why you'd encourage others to do the same. Humor and professional production quality weren't required — it just had to be genuine.' Details on the finalists can be found on the Linux Foundation Video site here."

133 comments

  1. Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Electrawn · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny

      On youtube... using FLASH? Isn't this some sort of abomination against FOSS and the Linux Ideals?

      A real "We're Linux" contest would have only released Ogg videos.

    2. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, you're thinking of the "We're GNU/Linux" contest. Easy mistake.

    3. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by extrasolar · · Score: 1

      I like them all except for the fourth one, "Challenges At The Office", it made me cringe.

      The first one is okay, "The Future is Open", except in the beginning the Windows screen is fine but the Linux screen is flickering.

      I like the second one, "The Origin...", but it might be a bit too abstract. Unless you already know what Linux is you're not going to know what the commercial is about. I think it is pretty cool, but some might find it too serious.

      And the last one, "Linux pub", is funny. That might be exactly what is needed. I can imagine a whole line of commercials with that guy in the penguin costume. Will need to be English for the United States though, otherwise you get the impression that Linux is a European thing.

    4. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but they wanted people to be able to watch the videos...

    5. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by extrasolar · · Score: 4, Informative

      See gnash. Flash is actually an open standard.

    6. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And FYI, even though their site is down, ALL the videos are hosted on YouTube (and just embedded).

      http://www.youtube.com/user/TheLinuxFoundation

    7. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      "The Future is Open" and "Linux pub" were my favorites.

      My only concern with "Linux pub" is that it made it seem like Linux is some kind of Windows-fixing program, or something to help you repair your computer. I like the overall concept, though, and the penguin is great. Well-written, decently acted.

      Both (but especially "The Future is Open") would need to be re-shot before use on TV, as they're a bit rough.

    8. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Erik+Soderstrom · · Score: 0

      ... "otherwise you get the impression that Linux is a European thing." Well... it is. And Asian, and African, and Australian, and American. Hell, it's even an Arctic thing.

    9. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Mozk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Could you link to the individual videos? It's hard to tell when they are all titled similarly.

      --
      No existe.
    10. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Znupi · · Score: 1

      I like them all except for the fourth one, "Challenges At The Office", it made me cringe.

      I found the "Challenges at the office" to be quite a good one. It was the only one from the nominees that explicitly showed that Linux will CUT YOUR BILLS TO THE GROUND. This is a very important aspect of Linux, especially in these times. I think I liked The Origin most, but yeah it's a bit too abstract for people who don't know what it's about.

    11. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by nschubach · · Score: 3, Informative

      A more direct route. ;)
      The Future is Open
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwNQPairZEM

      The Origin...
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1GYHQhqtbU

      Linux AD - What does it mean to be free?
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWEIQIv8zvY

      Challenges At The Office
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwmfyeHBFlM

      Linux pub (one video without subtitles, one with)
      English Subs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xceiMJSunIg
      No Subs: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=svaHnha-PXs

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    12. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like the Linux pub one, because I hate advertising something by putting your competitor in a bad light, rather than emphasizing your own "product".
      I hate the apple commercials, they sell me something that's better than a poor product rather than something great.
      I for one, like the one named "What does it mean to be free?".

    13. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

      ``Flash is actually an open standard.''

      A real open standard? As in, free for all to implement, without any encumberance?

      Also, I have never gotten Gnash to really work. Newer versions at least get to the point where they do something on YouTube, but they eat 100% CPU and I get nowhere near a usable framerate. Not to knock the hard work of the developers, but Flash is nowhere near a universally usable standard.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    14. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Flash is very much not an open standard by any reasonable meaning of the words.

      Have you not heard? Flash ain't done till gnash won't run. Gnash is reverse engineered from the bits on the wire. The little specs abobe has released are incomplete and only about very old versions.

      Even if Adobe were to fully specify flash and stop adding undocumented behavior, Flash video would not be Free and Open in the way that open source software is: Flash video depends on proprietary (controlled by a single group) patent encumbered codecs. The licensing of h264 is a billion dollar industry⦠it's not likely to suddenly become free anytime soon.

    15. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because offering two formats is too hard. Ya know?

    16. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I for one, like the one named "What does it mean to be free?".

      I agree, it's excellent. It doesn't try to be clever, but ends up being that anyway. And I can watch it several times without getting annoyed! Always a good feature of any commercial.
      About the others..

      • "Future.." is pretty good, perhaps a bit cheesy.
      • "Challenges.." needs better editing and acting
      • "The origins.." is creepy as hell, but pretty good. It would be excellent with a less shodan-like voice. Maybe that's just my own traumas speaking?
      • "linux pub" is pretty good as is.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    17. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO at those awful commercials and the huge egos in them and some of the overkill on the graphics
      IT was like a, let's talk shit on them in the most extrememly nerdy way that no one else could possible 'nark,nark,nark' to.

      Sorry you have to be fair, if you can bash the MS commercials and Jerry Seinfeld than this stuff is absolute uhh how do you say it 'crappy and uninnoviative.

      Linux - Free Hugs
      Windows - $10
      People are susceptable to things that scream FREE

      Anyone seen the latest Microsoft Ad where they go to FRY's electronics, pretty well directed.

    18. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can watch it several times without getting annoyed! Always a good feature of any commercial.

      Not an advertising executive, I see. There's a reason they purposefully make commercials annoying.

    19. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Oh boy... 1 and 2 are great (2 is somewhat weird). 3 is so-so. 4 and 5 are embarrassingly bad.

      If these are the best 5, we need a good agency. Desperately.

    20. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Commercials that are meant to build an image are never annoying.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    21. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear what your saying, but if a commercial sells the product, it can be as annoying it whats.

    22. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      The Origin...

      http://video.linuxfoundation.org/video/1262

      This one creeped me out. At first it was saying that Linux is like a virulent microbe. Then at various stages I was reminded of the Borg, and Kerrigan, Queen of the Zerg. The "it's everywhere" part reminded me of the red scare.

      I love using Linux, but this has me ready to install Win95 over it and hide in my house with the shades drawn and the lights off.

    23. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      If Flash were a decent media container, it could have more than one format, and I know that it does. I'm pretty sure it does avi and I know it does mp4. Can it contain Vorbis or Dirac though? Probably not Dirac since it's still so new, but I wouldn't be surprised if Vorbis support was there. Regardless, you're right in that it's not a very open specification, seems more like a closed moving target. I'm hoping that Firefox + Vorbis is the start of something good as far as internet standards go, and also the upcoming Dirac, Snow, and other truly open codecs.

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
    24. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1
      'Be Linux' is my favorite.

      http://video.linuxfoundation.org/video/1134

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    25. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you RMS downloading flash videos using telnet to youtube.com:80 or something?

      If you aren't you should know that Gnash doesn't work. It never has. It never will. Try swfdec and then I might believe you are using a free Flash implementation.

      It seems to me that you are just seeking justification for the proprietary Flash plugin you have ass-raped your system with.

      Next you will argue that Nvidia is okay because they release a blob for Linux and "Free"BSD.

    26. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      planned obsolescence ?

    27. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Have you actually managed to get those videos working in Gnash? I've got Gnash 0.8.4 on an openSuse system and they'll load but they won't play. It's not normally a major problem since most Flash is pointless, and I've had some videos working, but it seems like Gnash isn't up to the task on these ones.

    28. Re:Blog to a Blog to nowhere. by maroonhat · · Score: 1

      clearly its an Antarctic thing as well... he he penguins...

      --
      The more I learn about Windows the more I am surprised it runs at all
  2. I wonder what the winner will look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    5 foot tall, 120 lb, coke bottle glasses, acne ridden 30 year old maybe?

    Because that would be hilarious.

  3. Who is going to see these? by Recovering+Hater · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's my understanding that the winner won't be put on television in any way. How is this going to reach anyone besides people that are already interested in Linux? Point being- people that are *already* interested in Linux will probably try it anyway. This is just a feel good about ourselves project but I guess it's a fun one though.

    --
    My humor is probably your flamebait
    1. Re:Who is going to see these? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If any are particularly dorky, they may end up going viral like the Star Wars kid.

    2. Re:Who is going to see these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just a feel good about ourselves project

      That could apply to most OSS projects.

    3. Re:Who is going to see these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV?

      That's so 20th century.

      It'll be on YouTube!

      And what's crazy is, it just might work.

    4. Re:Who is going to see these? by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If any are particularly dorky, they may end up going viral like the Star Wars kid.

      Yes, but we don't want that.

    5. Re:Who is going to see these? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that the winner won't be put on television in any way.

      Perhaps some LUGs could pool some money together and get them played on cable. I hear cable advertising is cheap.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    6. Re:Who is going to see these? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you can get some semi-nude cheerleaders to appear in a Linux video, then I think your options are limited.

    7. Re:Who is going to see these? by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (Warning: Link is not really work-safe)

      They could borrow the unofficial Ubuntu Girls. >;)

    8. Re:Who is going to see these? by mrboyd · · Score: 1

      too bad "it just had to be genuine"... :)

    9. Re:Who is going to see these? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Who other than geeks knows about the Star Wars kid?

    10. Re:Who is going to see these? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Well, unless you can get some semi-nude cheerleaders to appear in a Linux video, then I think your options are limited.

      I don't think that will get more women to use Linux. I don't think dorky guys will either. We need something that has broad appeal.

      I think the kids in the Microsoft commercial had that.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    11. Re:Who is going to see these? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Now that's a logo I would like to get into! The cutey in the center could even sit on my lap.

      I second the vote for the unofficial Ubuntu Girls!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    12. Re:Who is going to see these? by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 1

      I like the one where the guy sings about 'doin' your mom'.

    13. Re:Who is going to see these? by firmamentalfalcon · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't necessarily give Linux a bad name, just as the Star Wars kid didn't give Star Wars a bad name.

      Also, when most of the world does not know a product, any publicity is good publicity. It is only when a product is well-known that you should start worrying about the bad publicity.

    14. Re:Who is going to see these? by LingNoi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There's only one thing I can say about that picture...

      "Go, team fart!"

    15. Re:Who is going to see these? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Linux, all about freedom, right?

      Yet here you are, saying "but we don't want that."

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  4. Over 90? by eln · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many is "over 90?" 91? 839,723,435? What?

    I can understand why people put "over 34,000,000" because the exact number might not be known or would take too long to say, but "over 90?" Really?

    1. Re:Over 90? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably had 90 serious entries and another 2,000 clips of goatse.

    2. Re:Over 90? by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      They wanted "over 9000" but unfortunately didn't come close to that number.

      Though I don't see what's wrong with saying "over 90." It implies somewhere greater than 90 and less than 100. If they said "exactly 94" then we would be arguing over why they said such a specific number in this context.

    3. Re:Over 90? by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      It's a typo. They forgot to add a couple of '0's.

    4. Re:Over 90? by cliffiecee · · Score: 1

      I've always assumed that saying 'over 90' translated to 'the most significant digit will always be a 9, even if rounding were taken into account.' In other words, the actual number is 91, 92, 93, or 94. If it were 95, 96, 97, 98, or 99, then the correct phrase would be 'almost 100.'

      Of course, this is assuming that the person who thought of saying 'over 90' is endeavoring to be accurate; of which case they could have simply said 'we got 94 entries.' This 'over 90' nonsense seems like an attempt to impress; but with a number so low it just ends up sounding pitiful.

    5. Re:Over 90? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand why people put "over 34,000,000" because the exact number might not be known or would take too long to say

      That's funny you say that because that is exactly how your mother replies when asked how many cocks she has had in her ass.

    6. Re:Over 90? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      He should have said, "We had tens of entries."

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Over 90? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      He should have said, "We had tens of entries."

      Nah, "We've had scores of entries"...

      Sounds better than "tens" or "dozens" 'cause people aren't as used to it...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    8. Re:Over 90? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      How many is "over 90?" 91? 839,723,435? What?

      People stopped caring about that issue at least 100 years ago.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:Over 90? by pmarini · · Score: 1

      given that the Linux share is, what, 99 bonzos and 1 bonzess, I'd say that 90% of them posting a video in the context is a darn good number...

      (yes, that was a joke)

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    10. Re:Over 90? by pmarini · · Score: 1

      or it could mean "at the time of writing, there were 90 (or 91) submissions but since the deadline is tomorrow there may be a few more and we need to finish this article now so we can't wait to have the final number, which could be well over 100... oops, I did it again" :-)

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
  5. connection timed out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what the fuck?!?! At least put your vids on a server with decent bandwidth.

    1. Re:connection timed out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's the point - "I am Linux" equates to "My server is down... again...". (At least that is what they are kind of saying by being down... again...).

  6. Slashdotted by AceJohnny · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slashdotted. Use Coral Cache.

    --
    Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
  7. Well done... by Quantos · · Score: 1

    I thought the videos were very well done.
    The only thing stopping me from going Linux are the games. We desperately need the game industry to start porting the games. I honestly believe that is the only thing really standing in the way.
    What are the odds that MS is somehow involved in that?

    --
    Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    1. Re:Well done... by internerdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm thinking that the bigger thing standing in the way of that is an open operating system. The fact that anything outside their code might be modified has ramifications for both anti-cheating measures and the bigger profitability hit: DRM. How happy do you think the publishers would be if someone worked around their "protections" by denying the DRM specific system level calls?

    2. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are the odds that none of you are willing to pay anything for software?

    3. Re:Well done... by Oh+no,+it's+Dixie · · Score: 1

      What are the odds that MS is somehow involved in that?

      If by involvement you mean a majority market share, the odds are very high.

    4. Re:Well done... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I don't see it as a desperate need. I like games, but am happy playing console games. And in one way, I appreciate console games even more -- they are cheaper and when you play against others, you can bet that they are using the same hardware configuration and that if they have any advantages, it's not the computer they are using.

    5. Re:Well done... by Quantos · · Score: 1

      I actually do pay for software, both commercial and shareware.
      As far as cheating goes in a game, is that really all that fun?

      --
      Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    6. Re:Well done... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      Console games are cheaper? In what alternate reality?

    7. Re:Well done... by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My problem is similar, namely specific software apps I depend on or really like. GOM, Photoshop, Vegas, Premiere, Indesign, etc.--all are non-negotiable. Most of them don't work under WINE, and their OSS equivalents are jokes. :-(

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Well done... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      Are there any DRM'd programs on Windows that haven't been cracked despite the closed nature of the platform? Any that are remotely popular, I mean.

      There are even ways around Steam's protection.

    9. Re:Well done... by internerdj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not denying that. What you are saying is that a game studio should go to their publisher and push for porting to another platform that has around 1% market share of desktop operating system. That platform is also an OS that makes it even easier to defeat DRM schemes. All of that because people work to crack software on a more difficult platform to crack?

    10. Re:Well done... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      If you mean that most game companies prefer DirectX to OpenGL or SDL for developing games and Microsoft developed DirectX (or bought someone who did and makes updates to it -- I don't recall), then yes, Microsoft plays a very big part in that.

      MS does some nasty things and I don't care for them as a company, but some credit for what they do right wouldn't kill you.

    11. Re:Well done... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      A game can generally be run inside a debugger or inside a virtualized Windows instance. DRM and anti-cheating measures might be part of the equation, but I'd bet that part is very small compared to the parts played by market share and DirectX.

    12. Re:Well done... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1, Funny

      The only thing stopping me from going Linux are the viruses. We desperately need the virus industry to start porting the viruses. I honestly believe that is the only thing really standing in the way.
      What are the odds that MS is somehow involved in that?

      I just want to feel like I'm a part of the botnet crowd! I wanna fit in!

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    13. Re:Well done... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      What you are saying is that a game studio should go to their publisher and push for porting to another platform that has around 1% market share of desktop operating system.

      Whoa now, I never said they should port games to Linux. I'd love it if they would, as it's the only thing I use Windows for and dual-booting sucks, but it's probably a poor business decision for most companies.

      I just said that there won't be any significant difference in the ease of piracy on either platform.

      That platform is also an OS that makes it even easier to defeat DRM schemes. All of that because people work to crack software on a more difficult platform to crack?

      I'm betting crack writers would still just released cracked binaries rather than something that modifies the OS to work around the DRM. I doubt the "scene" would handle a Linux game much differently from a Windows one. I therefore don't expect that Windows programs are, in effect, any more difficult to produce a crack for than Linux programs.

    14. Re:Well done... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      No joke. When I first asked for a Linux desktop one of the reasons given by the security team was that there were no virus scanners for Linux viruses.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    15. Re:Well done... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Just point out Clam AV to them. Hell, it's in most distro repositories.

      But at this point, AV scanners for *nix are about as useful as a boat anchor for an airplane, so there is a reason not many exist for *nix.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    16. Re:Well done... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      The console units... not the games themselves. I guess I should have been more clear.

    17. Re:Well done... by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Because if your doing it write, it doesn't take much work to port it. DRM is a lost cause, but anti-cheating tools ONLY work if you don't trust the operating system, if you want to make it hard to cheat on a game, you could require signed openGL stacks for the game to run, that stops 90% of the aimbots and wallhacks out there. Sure you lose out on Gentoo users and its not full proof but no anti cheat method ever is.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    18. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its not full proof

      I believe the phrase you're looking for is "foolproof".

    19. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check the man page of find:

        -type
            f file
            d dirictory
            v virus

      so just run a find -type v / nightly.

    20. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, i think he had it write to begin with o.O

      ~Landy

    21. Re:Well done... by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      Clam AV is not very good. But there are commercial AV products for linux. Sophos make a very good product, for example.

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    22. Re:Well done... by pmarini · · Score: 1

      why the heck would one need Microsoft to create/port games to Linux ?! (unless you think that Microsoft is an entertainment company and not a serious business... one second, need to wipe my tears...)
      anyway, things are going to change as there is this guy, you know, the artist formerly known as the creator of QuickTime, who came-up with this neat idea (yes, I'm overaged) that the games can run on a server farm and you simply need a broadband connection to play them (that is, receive the video output and send your controller input)...
      and unless he does it to resurrect Apple Mac share only, I can see how that's going to bring down console numbers and revitalise computer-based gaming... please insert quarter to play!

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    23. Re:Well done... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Cloud computing sounds like a great idea until you realize the scale and cost of the server farm needed and the crazy-insane bandwidth requirements. Maybe for simple games, but for anything even close to cutting edge, there is just no way.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    24. Re:Well done... by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      That depends. Locking people in with the likes of DRM is one way to profit from hardware. One that won't be easy to make people swallow.

      There are others. Consider the huge variety of hardware types that is in need of an OS. Because it's cheaper to use a generic CPU+RAM+storage solution and slap a customized OS on top then to customize dedicated hardware chips.

      What are the manufacturers going to use for an OS? Windows is not flexible enough, plus anybody who deals with Microsoft ends up regretting it more or less. Mac OS X is tightly controlled as to what hardware it ends up on. Linux is free, feature rich, extremely flexible and the licensing ensures there is a steady stream of improvements added which can't be hidden or taken away later.

      Sure, so it requires that you give up the old ways of treating software like potatoes. I think the potential benefits may still prevail.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    25. Re:Well done... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Well, it is fun. At least the fisrt time you do it, more yet if you're doing it with by a custom exploit. The fun evades quite fast, but when you have thousands of people sharing a server, you'll always have a few wanting to cheat, and those will disrupt things for everybody else.

      Now, anti-cheating technology simply does not work. One'd better design the game to not be cheatable or make cheating non-annoying. Both wold solve the problem and avoid the money sink that is protecting the game from the computer it is running on.

    26. Re:Well done... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      It is extremely usefull. ClamAV integrates with samba, MTAs, FTP servers, and proxies to make sure that the Windows machines that use the services provided by the Linux ones can't participate in a bot-net, either infecting or getting infected.

    27. Re:Well done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes airplanes carry supplies for ships.

      Hint: your Linux email server just might want to scan traffic bound for Windows clients _before_ they get infected.

    28. Re:Well done... by hmar · · Score: 1

      The only thing stopping me from going Linux are the viruses. We desperately need the virus industry to start porting the viruses. I just want to feel like I'm a part of the botnet crowd! I wanna fit in!

      I think that is one of my users...

    29. Re:Well done... by speedtux · · Score: 1

      Funny, that's exactly my problem with Windows and Macintosh: the software I want to run doesn't run on it, and the alternatives that run on those platforms are jokes.

  8. How embarassing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that seriously the best Linux users could do?

    They should have bought a Mac to produce those videos.

    Think different. Think better. Think Apple.

    1. Re:How embarassing. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      ...Think like Father Steve tells you to.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. Only going to hurt by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 0

    I can't watch these at work, but something tells me if these do go to mainstream tv and advertisements, it is only going to hurt Linux. They will probably either be too incredibly dorky for the "cool" Mac users, or go right over normal Windows users heads.

    If only they could come up with a really good spokesperson. I know, how about Jerry Seinfeld?

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  10. Finalists by electricbern · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only one can Win, but everyone can Linux.
    Sorry for the pun.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
    1. Re:Finalists by pmarini · · Score: 1

      how is Microsoft going to name their OSS alternative ? Minux !

      Microsoft Minux Windows is Win-Win situation... but you can still Linux around with Samba !

      (yes, this is pun re-intended, oops)

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
  11. Hm... by oldhack · · Score: 1

    This sounds bit like trying to dress up RMS as a Wall St. accountant.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  12. The Origin... by McNihil · · Score: 1

    although it is a bit creepy is by production value the one that is "best."

    My personal fav is "Linux pub" though, both funny and shrewd. They would have gotten extra points if they had a machine that went ping once Tux got in.

    1. Re:The Origin... by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      "Linux pub"...both funny and shrewd

      ...and *very* French :-)

    2. Re:The Origin... by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      ...and *very* French :-)

      Hahaha, so true.

      I liked the actors. I knew what was coming at the end, but the delivery of the "il n'y a pas" line still made me chuckle.

  13. Re:Over 90? == "Savings of up to 90%, and more!" by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Folks in advertisements on television say that all the time. It basically says, "do not believe what you are hearing," or "we will not be held legally responsible for this figure."

    So I guess those Linux Foundation Folks were trying to make a joke about 1970's Ronco UHF TV channel ads. Of course they got "much, much more" than 90. "And there's still more . . . if your order now . . . "

    I got it; didn't you?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  14. Get non-Linux geeks to vote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just watched all of the videos and read some comments about what do the videos say, what should be the message, etc.
    To avoid preaching to the choir, we (Linux fans) should get non-Linux users to watch the ads and vote for them. This way, the video that appeals to people with very little knowledge about Linux will be selected rather than the funniest from a geek perspective. So, get your GFs, SOs, etc. to vote... :-)

    1. Re:Get non-Linux geeks to vote by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Oh please no.

      If these are the top 5, I want no non-Linuxer to ever see all of them. #1 and #2, perhaps #3. We are in serious risk of a Songsmith situation.

  15. Awful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but these are all pretty bad. Honestly, I'm just glad none of these will be aired.

  16. poor links by Oldyeller89 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you are gonna submit a story, put the links to what you actually list as content. No one wants to dig around for the content. Thanks to first poster who gave good links.

  17. Re:Cat got your tongue? by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whao! "...filthey chutney ferret..." Damn. That made me almost breath my coffee! I'd tell you to keep up the good work, but who knows what you'd read into that?

  18. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... am looking forward to the "We are Wine" commercials.

  19. About "the future is open" video - thumbs down by Qwavel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "The future is open" video positions Linux in relation to Windows. I think it's time to move beyond this.

    There was time when some people saw Linux as a reaction to how bad and how evil Windows was.

    That was a long time ago. In the mean time Microsoft has become much less powerful, and Apple has shown us that there can be something even worse then MS (in terms of Linux values, that is).

    Linux is about freedom and community and [fill in the blank]. It is not just the anti-windows.

    I vote against "the future is open".

  20. Re:Cat got your tongue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's one of the best posts i've read in a long time. good job.

    cmdrdildo is a bitch and he sucks. linux is for fags. ubuntu is fagspeak for anal sex.

  21. o_O;;; by argent · · Score: 1

    You gotta be kidding.

    The only one that's on message is the rock-paper-scissors one, and it was still as crazy as a chocolate kettle.

  22. WTF is Linux? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you guys even realise that there's no such product as Linux? Saying "Get Linux" is like saying "Got Milk?", except that anyone knows where to get milk. Where does my mom buy that "Linux" thing? Or is she supposed to find out what Linux is and figure out which distro is good for her?

    Market an actual product for fuck's sake!

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:WTF is Linux? by skeeto · · Score: 1

      Where does my mom buy that "Linux" thing? Or is she supposed to find out what Linux is and figure out which distro is good for her?

      Not to mention if you do a Google search for "linux" the first result is the worthless linux.org domain squatter. The third result is an "under construction" page.

    2. Re:WTF is Linux? by The+Bubble · · Score: 1

      I disagree, though your analogy to the "Got Milk?" campaign is quite apt. The message is not "go buy Linux" but "Linux is good for you."

      Linux-based products have been on the marked for a while now, and are seeing a real surge in netbooks, but many, when faced with a system that comes with "Linux" or "Windows," make the choice simply out of a fear of the unknown. The customer hasn't ever hear of that Linux thing, but they've heard of Windows, so they'll go with that.

      This campaign is more of a PSA, intent on allaying that fear.

      Of course, IBM tried this before, and Linux has been widely successful in the server space, after all.

    3. Re:WTF is Linux? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      People know it's a "computer thingy", so they'd ask their tech-attuned relatives for advice, I would presume.
      In a business context, would the manager get the right picture form their MIS/IT guys?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    4. Re:WTF is Linux? by Peter+Harris · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Really? Wow. Super-awesome point-missing.

      I'll refrain from commenting on your mom. Everyone else meaner than me, reply below with your speculation about what 4D6963's mom gets or doesn't get!

      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
    5. Re:WTF is Linux? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Well, you could try and explain the point I missed instead of being a short-fused twat.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    6. Re:WTF is Linux? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Saying "Get Linux" is more like saying "Get an Automobile". There are tons of different types of automobiles out there from compact cars to sedans to luxury cars, sports cars, SUVs, crossovers, motorcycles, trucks, etc., from different manufacturers.

      The general public has no problem figuring out what an "automobile" is, and then figuring out which one is 'good' for them individually. Why should a computer operating system be any different?

      One of the main benefits of Linux is the freedom it provides. Freedom to use the distribution (make/model) of your choice. Freedom to use whatever packages (add-on accessories in a car) you want.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    7. Re:WTF is Linux? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Are you fucking kidding? Did you miss the very point I made? Automobile, milk, same thing, I already addressed that question, anywhere knows where to get those, no one know what is Linux or where to get it. In other words : people have no fucking clue what you're telling them to get.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    8. Re:WTF is Linux? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I do understand what you are saying. People don't even know what Linux is, but isn't that the point of advertising? These ads can tell people what Linux is. Granted, a lot of people probably don't even know what Windows is. They might know that there's this Windows XP or Windows Vista logo that comes up on their screen, but just know that it's what's running on their computer. We can tell them that there are many other alternatives out there if they are looking for a change.

      When the average consumer sees any product on TV that they never heard of before, but looks interesting, what can they do? Search for it. They can see if it's in their favorite brick and mortar store, or go online.

      People can't just walk into a store and buy that Linux thing they saw an ad for on TV. However, one can get Linux online. I'm not just talking about going to distrowatch or any of the distribution's websites. A search for "Linux" on walmart.com (hey a lot of non-tech savvy people shop at Walmart) returns a list of Linux books, several of which come with CDs or DVDs for Fedora or OpenSUSE or others.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    9. Re:WTF is Linux? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when the average consumer is looking to buy something online, do they search for it on a search engine, or in the 'search' box of their favorite store's website? There are plenty of 'Linux' search results on Walmart.com for various Linux books that have CDs and/or DVDs, some of which are for OpenSUSE or Fedora.

      My wife barely knows what Linux is, other than seeing me using that 'weird thing she knows nothing about', but when she shops online, she goes to specific store websites, generally not to google.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
    10. Re:WTF is Linux? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Well you seem tog et what I was trying to say, but ultimately the fact remains that it's not exactly very straightforward for anyone motivated to go from watching such a commercial to actually getting Linux running on their PC.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    11. Re:WTF is Linux? by skiman1979 · · Score: 1

      I received an email a while back about a Linux Test Drive website that seemed interesting. The site appears to be gone now (Linux Test Drive) but some information about it can be found here.

      It sounded like a pretty good idea anyway. Perhaps have a Linux commercial, like the Freedom one from the contest, and pop up a link to this testdrive site at the end so the person seeing the ad can get some help picking out a Linux that works for them.

      --
      Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  23. Re:Cat got your tongue? by Ontheotherhand · · Score: 1

    Well, I must admit I chuckled through the post myself, thanks for the heads up.(don't start) not really a troll, more perhaps offtopic? perhaps even educational. wish it wasnt anon, I'd look up more of his stuff.

  24. The office one by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    ...My vote's with the office one.

    It was a funny ad, but with substance, arguing some specific advantages of the product that it's trying to sell (reliability, low cost, active community).

    Ads without substance suck (although they're still effective in a tactical sense. :()
    * Funny ads without substance are good only for the humor value IMHO

    This appeals with a practical message, but uses humor to help drive the point. I like it.

    Furthermore, it would be accessible and relate-able for non-techies.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  25. Re:fag pr0n by hmar · · Score: 1

    how long have you used it?

  26. Winners announced by Umangme · · Score: 0

    The winners were announced on April 8th: http://video.linuxfoundation.org/contest/winners