Slashdot Mirror


Norfolk Police Officers To Be Tagged To Improve Response Times

Police in Norfolk, England already have tracking units, The Automatic Vehicle Location System, installed in their cars that allow a control room to track their exact locations. Later this year a similar system will be attached to individual police radios to allow controllers to monitor the position of every frontline officer. Combined with equipment that can pinpoint the locations of 999 callers, the system will allow the force to home in on "shouts" to within yards. The system also lets operators filter a map showing the location of its vehicles and constables to reveal only those with the skills needed for a specific incident, like the closest officer with silver bullets during a werewolf attack.

150 comments

  1. Werewolf by gringofrijolero · · Score: 2, Funny

    There wolf... There castle

    --
    Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    1. Re:Werewolf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT KNOCKERS!!!

  2. Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...assuming the officer can turn them off when he's indisposed, or off-duty.

    But, yeah. Anything that speeds up police response is nice.

    1. Re:Sounds good... by Quantos · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It would also keep officers safer.
      If an officer is injured and can't coherently give his location, they can still find him and give him the aid that might save his life. I just hope that they can make the system really damned secure so that a criminal can't break into the system and use it to target officers.
      I'd like to see this extended to fire fighters as well.

      --
      Some people are only alive because it's against the law for me to hunt them down and kill them.
    2. Re:Sounds good... by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

          At least here in America (and I assume everywhere) they're suppose to call in for everything they do. It helps to track them, in case something happens.

          If they're 10-6 McDonalds, either they're grabbing a bite to eat, or taking a shit.

          If they're 10-7, they just went off-duty.

          If they're 10-8, they just came back on duty.

          There are some confusing ones. 10-9 may mean "please repeat", but 10-99 may mean "officer taken hostage".

          Because of the inaccuracy of 10 codes (they mean different things in different places), they are suppose to be replaced by plain english phrases. 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina made it difficult for different departments to work together. What may be shots fired, victim needs medical attention, may mean routine traffic stop in another. If you're involved in a shooting, it'd be nice to get backup, rather than assume you're doing a route traffic stop.

          10 codes were great for short messages to avoid congestion of common frequencies (like from all cars to dispatch), but now most departments are trunked, and the radios are much clearer. Another reason is so the person you're standing in front of doesn't know what you're talking about. Say you were taken hostage in a bank robbery, where the silent alarm wasn't it. It'd be simple to tell the robber "I need to check in, so dispatch doesn't worry." "Dispatch, I'm 10-99 at First National Bank.", and make it sound like you're just cashing a check. Now you've not given away your real intent (HELP!) and the robber thinks all is clear for a while until the SWAT team shows up.

          Oh, did I digress? Sorry.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    3. Re:Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would also keep officers safer. If an officer is injured and can't coherently give his location, they can still find him and give him the aid that might save his life.

      I don't think that would have helped Alex Murphy that much.

    4. Re:Sounds good... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Assuming that the criminals don't know what the 10 codes mean, that is :)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Sounds good... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      call in is like so last century dude. Status changes tend to be computerised - you type in the 2 digit short-message code and press send, similar to texting in the '10' codes to the control centre.

    6. Re:Sounds good... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          Most criminals are stupid. At least the ones you hear about getting caught. The smart ones do it where not only don't they get caught, but the victims frequently don't even know it happened for quite a while. :)

          Daytime bank robbery must be one of the stupidest ones. Armed security guard. Customers in and out. Silent alarms. Video surveillance. Can you pick a worse target? Yet, people still do it.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Sounds good... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        Agreed, but I suspect it doesn't take a lot of intelligence to find out about and memorize something as basic as the 10codes. It's not like they differ that much between cities (I don't know for sure, but I don't imagine they do,as it would foul up communications something fierce).

        I would also point out that law enforcement officials aren't always noted for being the brightest clowns in the circus either. ;)

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  3. Real world learning from video games? by dov_0 · · Score: 1

    The only thing I can wonder though is, Why haven't they done this before? Also great for if you've got an officer down. Unless they take his radio that is...

    --
    sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    1. Re:Real world learning from video games? by zxnos · · Score: 4, Interesting

      couldnt this go horribly wrong?

      i know a guy who used to be a sniper and he said that he had to be extremely careful with communications devices for fear he could give up his position in the field. essentially the enemy could conceivably monitor for communications and determine general locations.

      granted local police and the military are different. yet, couldnt a troublemaker get a hold of this information and use it to their advantage?

      --
      always mosh clockwise
    2. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are talking about Norfolk here, you'd have to explain what a radio was first, not much chance of a tech-savvy miscreant!

    3. Re:Real world learning from video games? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I suppose so. OTH it sounds like a great aid to reducing response times. Once you know the location where a car is needed, dispatch can be immediate and automatic.

    4. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking about the general police force here. Not "swat" team activity or "special" forces.

    5. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      This goes both ways. :)
      Triangulate the signal (if you know the frequency), and you know where to flee. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    6. Re:Real world learning from video games? by hazem · · Score: 3, Interesting

      couldnt this go horribly wrong?

      i know a guy who used to be a sniper and he said that he had to be extremely careful with communications devices for fear he could give up his position in the field. essentially the enemy could conceivably monitor for communications and determine general locations.

      In the military, what you're describing is a problem for someone who's wanting to hide. It's under the category of "electronic warfare/signals intelligence". In that field, people are trained to scan the radio spectrum, isolate different entities communicating, try to figure out who/what they are, and find their location (essentially through triangulation).*

      For what you're describing, it wouldn't matter what communications devices the person is using because it's the transmission itself that is detected. It takes somewhat sophisticated equipment to do the radio location. One person doing it would have to be moving around to get multiple fixes (assuming they could isolate the police officer's transmissions they want) until they could get a location on the police officer. But since most police operate in the open it's probably easier to just look for the uniform. Additionally, most police carry and use radios anyway, so doing a radio fix on them would work even without the tech in the article.

      However, the tech in the article could be open to hacking where someone gains access to the system that aggregates all the data and locations. That's new and interesting, but doing that hacking would require sophisticated equipment of its own.

      * It's the psy-op guys who get to try and defeat these monitoring efforts by making fake broadcasts to appear to be a unit that's not there - fun stuff! Even one of the old original Battlestar Galactica series used something like this where Starbuck and Apollo make radio calls as if they were whole squadrons.

    7. Re:Real world learning from video games? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not really a good idea. While it would be conceivably fine for the officer to activate tracking and recording (combine digital video recording) prior to the officer engaging in activity that involves any form of aggressive contact with a citizen, whether physical or verbal. It is not really appropriate to turn the officer into an eight hour a day test lab for exposure to radiation.

      So while appropriate and useful in the collection of evidence for later use, it really needs to be limited, so minutes in the day rather than all day, and when the officer's exposure to radiation for the day exceeds maximum limits they go back to the station to conduct other activities, that don't require additional exposure to radiation ie. radio waves.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Renraku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He's right, but military and police are two totally different worlds.

      In 'The Field' the enemy is monitoring all kinds of communications. They have guards setup, probably scouts, sensors, etc.

      In the domestic world, criminals rarely monitor anything beyond the end of their nose. Only a small percentage of criminals would be able to use this information to their advantage. The rest will continue to commit crimes and be caught, possibly more efficiently due to the new system described in the article.

      The kinds of people who are listening to the police scanners or are willing to invest in the technology and skills required to use a system like this..well..the police don't often catch terrorists or smart criminals unless the criminals/terrorists seriously fuck up. Or confess.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    9. Re:Real world learning from video games? by torako · · Score: 1

      The police already uses radio and cell phones and that isn't a reason to worry about radiation. That won't change.

    10. Re:Real world learning from video games? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      ... unless the criminals/terrorists seriously fuck up. Or confess.

      I'm gonna go out on a limb here and call those two behaviors functionally equivalent.

    11. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course it could backfire. It's pretty much guaranteed to be abused. But as the rabid Slashdot crowd have proven with BitTorrent, just because something CAN be abused is no reason to hold back the technology. Even if 99% of its actual use is for illegal activity.

    12. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Ebirah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More to the point, this being Norfolk (right here, where I am), the job of tracking the entire county police force could be done by a single suitably-inclined human without computer assistance. (Someone with the right sort of Aspergers Syndrome, say.)

      For example, in the small hours of the morning, (I have been reliably informed by a serving member of the Norfolk Constabulary) there are precisely two officers on patrol.

      --
      It's never so bad that it can't get worse.
    13. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, in the small hours of the morning, (I have been reliably informed by a serving member of the Norfolk Constabulary) there are precisely two officers on patrol.

      And they are brother and father!

    14. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Police in the field have been transmitting via radio regularly for decades. If that's not a problem, this won't be.

    15. Re:Real world learning from video games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the enemy could conceivably monitor for communications and determine general locations.

      Any troublemaker with that kind of capability isn't wasting their time in Norfolk.

    16. Re:Real world learning from video games? by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the thing I don't get is... why is this news? We already do do this.

      999 calls are already pinpointed, either by EISEC address lookup, or mobile ellipse (unfortunately most mobiles don't give out the exact location, but it has to be inferred from mast/cell positions)

      Officer handsets already return vehicle-location co-ordinates (depending on the handset, of course), but all Airwave (the UK's emergency service 'radio' network) handsets provide this.

      As for 'officer emergency' issues, they have a red button on the handsets, press it, and it starts spamming out location packets and forces opens a channel to the control centre so an operator can hear everything that goes on.

      Disclaimer: I write control centre software, including that used at neighbouring Suffolk Constabulary.

    17. Re:Real world learning from video games? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Odds are that if the criminals are using this sort of technology to track, trap and ambush cops, you're going to want to call out SWAT or the Military anyway. Then it doesn't matter, it's criminals/terrorists with guns and IEDs vs. Strykers and guys who could have Apache's for backup.

      A bit extreme I suppose, but something like this could certainly provide objective evidence proving or absolving a cop of abuse of power. "No, Mr. Internal Affairs Guy, there's no way I was over there taking that bribe because my radio puts me over here getting a coffee."

    18. Re:Real world learning from video games? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      couldnt this go horribly wrong?

      i know a guy who used to be a sniper and he said that he had to be extremely careful with communications devices for fear he could give up his position in the field. essentially the enemy could conceivably monitor for communications and determine general locations.

      granted local police and the military are different. yet, couldnt a troublemaker get a hold of this information and use it to their advantage?

      I work at a police agency. Police scanners don't work any more around here. Do you know why? Because that's the main reason that they went digital. O.k. it let them get more channels in, but also its all encrypted so anyone with a scanner can't just listen to it. It's ironic that all of it is recorded and can be released by FOIA, but you've got to pay through the nose for that. You can't just sit at home listening to the ole police scanner any more. Our agency is way behind the curve in this stuff. We only got it because it's become something so trivial Motorola just hands it out now.

      In a military environment, I could see the opponent being able to detect EM transmissions to locate 'em. Do you think that the average SWAT sniper really needs to worry about that sort of threat? O.k. tech it would be possible, but it wouldn't be likely for them to ever run into. Most of the info transmitted would be utterly useless except through the vendor software solution that makes it all make some sort of sense. That is unless you are going against a HAM operator that can detect any EM transmissions. That guy might be able to locate your SWAT team, but come on what could he really do about it?

    19. Re:Real world learning from video games? by nicolastheadept · · Score: 1

      In the UK you can't listen in to police radio, unlike the US.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    20. Re:Real world learning from video games? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "can't"?

      Do you mean it's illegal, or do you mean it's impossible?

      Because if it's illegal, that hardly means it can't be done.

    21. Re:Real world learning from video games? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You of course miss the basic point, this represent continuous added exposure in 'ADDITION' to all the other sources of radiation. So all the background transmissions, added to additional interment personal transmissions and just to make it all the more interesting, add that to the EMR of all those power transmission lines. So everyone keeps adding 'ADDITIONAL' sources of exposure. So a bit of common sence before hand , rather than wringing your hands over future statistics where around 20% police officers of have tumours and 'duh' trying to find out why.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. At first, that glaring picture... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of what one of their patrol units looks like was nauseating but on second thought it's design looks quite functional. That's all I got.

    1. Re:At first, that glaring picture... by Bobby+Onions · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a met car, not a Norfolk car. Norfolk squad cars look like this: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2132/2279892412_ab358a0a60.jpg

  5. That's a myth.. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 5, Informative

    like the closest officer with silver bullets during a werewolf attack.

    Silver bullets don't actually hurt werewolves. The only way we'll defeat them is by eliminating their source of power - the moon!

    1. Re:That's a myth.. by Overkill+Nbuta · · Score: 1

      Silver bullets don't actually hurt werewolves. The only way we'll defeat them is by eliminating their source of power - the moon!

      Good luck finding a police officer that can get rid of the moon.

    2. Re:That's a myth.. by dmomo · · Score: 1

      >> their source of power - the moon!

      Well.. YAAH! Do we have to spell out every step? The only way to destroy the Moon is with a silver bullet.

      SO if you have a silver bullet, you can destroy a Werewolf. I don't see the issue here. It's called transitIVITY.

    3. Re:That's a myth.. by Daemonax · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's no moon! That's a werewolf power station!

    4. Re:That's a myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only way we'll defeat them is by eliminating their source of power - the moon!

      Shit, I thought it was the sun!

      Here I am, been working on the sun all these years, finally wipe out all the sun spots and what happens? It's the fucking moon.

      I hate you BikeHelmet.

    5. Re:That's a myth.. by TimSSG · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's no moon! That's a werewolf power station!

      I think it is an Solar Power Relay Satellite. Tim S

    6. Re:That's a myth.. by SpazmodeusG · · Score: 1

      Oh i'm sure some of them could block it out.

    7. Re:That's a myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure Kaguya Houraisan knows all about getting rid of the moon. /obscure?

    8. Re:That's a myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even so, this is England, so even if the officer had silver bullets, he/she wouldn't have the firearm to dispatch them!

    9. Re:That's a myth.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Damn those rabbits.

  6. Great by dmomo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hopefully this will bring some accountability. They can conceivable track the speed of police vehicles to make sure they are obeying traffic laws when not responding to an emergency. It can also be used to verify that an officer was where they were when they said they were there. Of course, this would only be affective if their friends back at the station weren't the ones monitoring.

    1. Re:Great by quenda · · Score: 1

      And finally it makes sense why their helmets look like radomes.

    2. Re:Great by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can conceivable track the speed of police vehicles to make sure they are obeying traffic laws when not responding to an emergency.

      Might not be a bad thing.

    3. Re:Great by torako · · Score: 1

      It would work like it does today: There are always two officers in a car, one to do something to your disadvantage, maybe illegal, and the other one to lie for him. It's not the way it's supposed to work, but just get into an accident with a police car and see what happens...

    4. Re:Great by mkbosmans · · Score: 1

      At least here in the Netherlands it is not required for the police to obey all traffic laws, even on normal patrol. It is perfectly legal for them to go over the speed limit if it is necessary for performing their duty.

    5. Re:Great by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Where I live (north Florida) there isn't room for second officer with the laptop, printer & video camera set up in the passenger seat.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:Great by dwpro · · Score: 2, Informative

      only be effective, affection has little to do with it.

      --
      Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
    7. Re:Great by ZygnuX · · Score: 1

      "was where they were when they said they were there"
      Say that 3 times fast!

    8. Re:Great by JCota · · Score: 0

      The system you are referring to is and AVL and they do precisely what you describe, the advantage of what the article is describing is more along the lines of know exactly where the officer is not the squad car. Where this is important is if the officer is down, or is in a fight for his life, it allows other officers to know his location and assist him in every way possible. Dallas Police is currently implementing a similar system into the radios with a red panic button, so the officer doesn't have to say anything just hit the button and you'll almost instantly hear sirens blazing for their location.

  7. Reports indcate... by locust · · Score: 3, Funny

    That the tracking system is turn based and isometric.

    1. Re:Reports indcate... by Itninja · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nice! I hope it's called XCOM: Terror from the streets.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    2. Re:Reports indcate... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah. More like "Syndicate: Surveillance". Complete with an advanced version of the persuadotron.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Reports indcate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Depressingly Realistic

  8. Can they be tazed as well? by symbolset · · Score: 1

    I think that frequent tazing would improve their response times faster, and more consistently. Slow cop! No donuDSXZTTT! Perhaps shock collars. That would be nice.

    There might be some trouble getting the union to go along.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
    1. Re:Can they be tazed as well? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I know that you are trying to be funny. But how is this suddenly right, just because they are cops? They are humans too. Sure, if you have the power, it's easy to misuse it. But at least we should be morally above this.

      Of course if a cop becomes a bad cop, I'm for instant tazing too. (Instant, because this helps strengthen the associatio.n) But as little as possible. Just enough so they learn not to do it again.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Can they be tazed as well? by mog007 · · Score: 1

      It's not like the tracking devices are going to be implanted subcutaneously, they're going to be embedded in the cop's radio. The only time the cop has his radio is when he's at work, and when he's at work, he's got no right to privacy.

      Also, they're government employees, they should be held to higher liability.

    3. Re:Can they be tazed as well? by McGiraf · · Score: 3, Funny

      "... They are humans too. ..." [citation needed]

    4. Re:Can they be tazed as well? by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Yeah!
      He has obviously not played much Duke Nukem!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  9. Sounds like a great plan by Fry-kun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm starting a pool on how soon devices that show you the nearest cops will be sold on eBay.
    Who needs radar detectors if you have a live map with all cops clearly marked??

    --
    Did you know that "FTW" ("for the win") is a direct translation of "Sieg Heil"?
    1. Re:Sounds like a great plan by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          When I was a kid, we joked about marking all the patrol cars with a beacon. :) If you were within say a mile or so, your receiver would start beeping. Say goodbye to speeding tickets.

          I suspect if they get widely deployed, they'll just send GPS coordinates encoded over the in-car data networks, rather than just being an easily trackable beacon.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    2. Re:Sounds like a great plan by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So? You just need to connect to the police server, over a grid of sattelites, trough a russian vpn tunnel, and get the password for the server via social engineering... It's almost too easy, Wayne!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Sounds like a great plan by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Oh, btw. You do not need to decrypt their network data at all. You just need to build two receivers for the correct frequency, mount them on the front and on the back of your car, and then triangulate the signal with your laptop or something like that. If you know the frequency, it should only be a matter of having some time and money.

      Or am I missing something?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Sounds like a great plan by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Triangulation using two receivers that are right next to each-other would be so inaccurate.

      Come to think of it, triangulation using two receivers is pretty inaccurate.

    5. Re:Sounds like a great plan by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

      It would be rather like a pacman game, you see the copper coming and run the other way. Although if the display is good enough and you can see if they are coloured red or orange you would know if you need to flee.

    6. Re:Sounds like a great plan by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Biangulation(?) can work really well provided the computer has been adequately trained.

      Your eyes for instance. You can judge how far away, and how much left or right, provided that you have previously witnessed the same, or similar object at that distance. Sonar, Radar and Lidar basically have only one eye.

    7. Re:Sounds like a great plan by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      doesn't need doing, theres some parts where the police entering an estate is notified to certain interested residents automatically

    8. Re:Sounds like a great plan by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      Negative 700 days -- search for "iPhone" -- then download Trapster.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    9. Re:Sounds like a great plan by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      what you need:

      1. ability to eavesdrop on digital communication traffic, including relay-mode from one handset through another to the base station.
      2. ability to decrypt IDEA or AES128 encrypted traffic
      3. ability to keep it quiet from the cops, and military (who also use TETRA communications).

      even if you get a handset, you'll still need to be part of the right keygroup

    10. Re:Sounds like a great plan by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you have a radio band receiver that is as directional as the eye, I bet you could make a lot of money with it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:Sounds like a great plan by RangerMatt · · Score: 1

      If it's an RF based system, not that hard. Take a laptop, add mapping software, plug a scanner into the line in, use a software radio modem (or a real radio modem) and just listen on the transmitting frequency. Most likely, you'll start hearing the different units with the AVL system sending an NMEA sentence to the controller. As long as it's not encrypted or sent through something like a cell network card, you can probably pick it up and find them, but there's a lot of variables in the mix as well. The system mentioned in the article sounds a lot like a system Motorola is pushing that uses a GPS-enabled remote speaker-mic to send location data. That would go over the systems control channel (seems like it's only available on digital trunk systems). That system would send each time they key the mic, on a timer basis, and when polled by dispatch.

      --
      Client's are happy, code is committed, pigs are on the tarmac and ready for flight.
    12. Re:Sounds like a great plan by daybot · · Score: 1

      I'm starting a pool on how soon devices that show you the nearest cops will be sold on eBay.
      Who needs radar detectors if you have a live map with all cops clearly marked??

      I'm already working on the iPhone app...

    13. Re:Sounds like a great plan by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      Ahh, you hit it first try. :) I did like your other response though. :)

      Most patrol cars that I've seen have not just a trunked radio, but they also have an onboard computer with a wireless network card. The one I had a chance to have a good look at years ago wasn't your regular cell network card. It used their own network on a frequency I hadn't seen used for anything else. Ahhh, your signal.

      Have a good look at the back of a patrol car next time you're stopped behind one in traffic. They usually have several antennas.

      So, isolate the frequencies used by your local law enforcement. More than likely the voice/trunk radio traffic will be bursty (only on when they're transmitting), but the data traffic will be constant. My guess would be, you'd be able to hear it even when they're out of range. I would suspect, just like cell phones, they broadcast trying to reconnect to the tower, even when the tower can't hear them.

      Ok, I just went looking. Florida uses a SLERS system, for inter-departmental communication, so any agency can respond to any area in Florida and be able to communicate with each other. It works on an "Encrypted digital 800Mhz" frequency.

      Apparently, DHS has gotten the FCC to reserve the 800Mhz band for "public safety". I was just skimming to see what parts of the band they're using. It appears there are 4 very definite ranges. I believe it's 2 for transmit from the towers, and two for transmit from the mobile units. I could be wrong though, and one pair could be car to base, and one pair for the microwave relays. In any case, if you can isolate the frequencies and warn when something is close, then you'd be notified. Like, have a HAM radio scanner with that frequency range locked in, and your squelch set to only hear things close by (say 1 mile). Any time a patrol got within 1 mile, you'd hear the encrypted traffic.

      If you got really fancy with it, it would be an excellent tracking system. Two diverse antennas would give you two possible locations. If you're using omnidirectional antennas, you'll just know when one gets close, and have a vague idea of about where they are. It would be where the blobs intersect, and you can base distance on received signal strength. It would give you two most likely points, and a decent size area of potential location (where the circles cross at that transmit power)

      With sweeping antennas, you could get two vectors. Now from each antenna, you could get a rough idea of distance, and the direction they're at. A car based one wouldn't be ideal, there isn't enough distance to put them off of. With two antennas, even 20 feet apart (assuming a land yacht), and a 4 degree beam width antenna, that still leaves plenty of room for error. If you could have three antennas at a good fixed distance (like say 0.5 miles apart), with a full sweep at 1 second, you'd get a good idea of where they are. the problem there then becomes altitude. You need your antennas to be fairly high to avoid physical obstacles (houses, trees, the neighbors SUV parked in front of your antenna), which means your beam width needs to be wider. Also, if you are in a hilly area, or want to pick up LEO aircraft (helicopters come to mind), looking at the ground at a distance doesn't work well. If you're a little too high, with a good shot at the distance, you may see them at a mile, but wouldn't know if they pulled up in front of your house, or 3 blocks over raiding your neighbors place growing pot (or a courtesy call. It happens).

      Even with frequency hopping, which I'm sure they use, if you picked up a 3 second burst of traffic on a single frequency, you'd be able to hear that on all receiving points, and identify the location, direction o

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:Sounds like a great plan by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      I don't, nor am I an expert, but wouldn't it work if you had a fixed receiver, and another one that rotates around it, then compare when, and what signals are received between the two? If they both receive the same signal at the same time, then you take the 90 degree angle from the line the two points make, and you have a direction.

      Would be largely be dependant on Hz, the lower the Hz the larger the orbit would have to be to increase accuracy, etc. And if the orbit was large enough, you should be able to measure the difference in signal strength between the two (when they are parallel to signal direction), and roughly estimate how far away it might be, especially if you impose a material that has X amount of absorption between the two antenna.

    15. Re:Sounds like a great plan by maxume · · Score: 1

      I also am not an expert, but I imagine that the speed of light combines with noise to make it very difficult to use a couple of feet of separation to deduce direction (even 10 feet means that you are working with a time difference of about 1 hundred millionth of a second).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:Sounds like a great plan by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      No, still triangulation. The third point is the point you are trying to find.

  10. Pfft by martin-boundary · · Score: 4, Funny

    They already tried the system in Australia, but it failed because most people didn't want to dial 666 even if their life depended on it.

    1. Re:Pfft by studpuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Here in the states, they've been very careful to describe emergency and non-emergency numbers as "nine-one-one" and "three-one-one". This way, no one is looking for the "eleven" key on their phones.

      --

      Brought to you by the same folks who created the "any" key

      --
      The last time I wrote code, it was Morse
    2. Re:Pfft by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Thats why everybody should use 000. It works upside down too.

    3. Re:Pfft by Caffiene+IV · · Score: 1

      * laughing * I actually do have an " any " key on my kbd... I installed it for my husband.

      --
      Sister - " I think 50cent should be president cause he's sooooo hot!" Me - " Please please don't ever vote."
    4. Re:Pfft by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      or 555 ... You can do it while blinded.

  11. Watching the watchers... by migla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hopefully also useful for letting people know who was clobbering them.

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  12. Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by studpuppy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wazza matter? They don't know how to use Google maps to pinpoint the closest Dunkin' Donuts and just start looking for cop there like everyone here in NJ does?

    --

    Yeah, I know it's a cliche. Actually, our local cops are at the diner, not the donut shop. But diners are a regional thing. Donut shops are pretty much worldwide.

    --
    The last time I wrote code, it was Morse
    1. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by Minupla · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I once went to serve a search warrant with the local RCMP (they needed a consultant who could tell them if they found what they were looking for - 3DES SNK'd password files not exactly being in their training) and they called me to tell me where to meet them prior to the raid -- at the Tim Horton's.

      I sat there planning a raid in the local Tim Horton's with them. It seemed surreal.

      Min

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    2. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      Better be careful there. If their tracking software tries to calculate the distance between vehicles there is potential for a divide by zero error in the vicinity of the donut shop.

    3. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Donut shops are pretty much worldwide.

      I think you've never left the USA...

      Try searching "Doughnut OR donut shop in Norwich" (Norwich being the only city in Norfolk).

    4. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Donut shops are pretty much worldwide.

      Yeah, they're common in every single country that participates in the World Series.

    5. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by willyg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Translation for those not familiar with Canada...

          s/Tim Horton\'s/Dunkin\' Donuts/

    6. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by CraftyJack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting. You were hidden in plain sight. A congregation of police cars at the Tim Horton's draws a lot of snarky comments, but not suspicion.

    7. Re:Insert Donut Shop Joke Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to tell you this, but hey didn't really need you for the technical consultancy. Holding a business meeting at Tim Hortons helped them with the expense report though...

  13. How long... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    ...'til it's used to check whether the police is actually doing their job instead of sitting in the donut shops (or whatever equivalent the police wastes time in the UK)?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  14. Team America World Police by justinlee37 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds like a job for Team America World Police

    1. Re:Team America World Police by ddusza · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hell Yeah!

      --
      Don't fear the penguins
  15. Not really new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, this is not really new. Most decent size police depts here in the US have GPS in the cars. Putting it in the radios is a good next-logical-step though. Sounds like a couple of new ideas, like the werewolf-silver-bullet idea. Cool, but it's not really anything revolutionary.

  16. Picking on werewolves by TechwoIf · · Score: 2, Funny

    *grumbles* What did we do to deserve this? --Techwolf

    1. Re:Picking on werewolves by petergriffinismyhero · · Score: 1

      The whole "preying on the innocent" thing comes to mind...

  17. order 66 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is coming .....

    (ducks for cover...)

  18. Car 54, Where Are You? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2, Funny

    This technology would destroy the plots of old TV shows like this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_54_where_are_you. Hollywood would condemn it.

    But we're all too young to have ever seen that TV show . . . aren't we?

    On the other hand Hollywood celebrities might like the technology if someone could build scanners that spot police cars. If you read http://www.tmz.com/, you would know that those wacky celebrities always manage to bump into a cop while buying drugs, soliciting teenage whores, beating their spouses, etc.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Car 54, Where Are You? by pod · · Score: 1

      Virtually all plots of 50s, 60s, 70s and 80s movies could be easily shortened to 5 minutes if you assume existence of cell phones and internet.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
  19. Goodhart's law strikes again by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Using the metric of 'how fast police get somewhere' to determine the quality of their service is asking for trouble. In fact, its asking for police to do shit like this: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7987832.stm

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    1. Re:Goodhart's law strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully it will keep them in check.

      Try the url for the article with the final outcome.
      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/7990188.stm

        A police officer has been found guilty of causing the death of a 16-year-old schoolgirl by dangerous driving.

      Pc John Dougal, 41, had accelerated to 94mph (151km/h) in a 30mph zone before he hit Hayley Adamson.

  20. I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a serving Metropolitan (London) police officer and I think this is a great idea.

    We've had tracking on our vehicles for a while now. It gives our supervisors/control room an accurate (as in, technology from 10 years ago accurate) image of our position. Apart from increasing efficiency when allocating calls based on distance and travel time, it's main use is for officer safety. If I push the little red button on my airwaves radio and, for whatever ever reason, I am unable to speak, the control room can dispatch units to my vehicles location.

    Foot chases and 'hail downs' can mean I'm a long distance from my vehicle, or if I'm in a anti police estate and not at the location of my last call officers will have trouble locating me. The individual radio locater will be able to prevent this, and increase my personal safety and the safety of my fellow officers.

    Of course, members of the public will only see this as a regulatory tool, because all officers hate their job and spend their time at Crispy Creme scoffing donuts. I don't think I've had a day shift so far when I'm not busting my ass for the full 12 hours; dealing with emotional/violent/mentally unstable people, dealing with legal problems and keeping up with a mountain of written work.

    1. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "because all officers hate their job and spend their time at Crispy Creme scoffing donuts."

      Hah! I guess you're being ironic, because the British police would love to have such a positive reputation. If anything they enjoy they're job too much. There're frequently over-zealous, confrontational and even thuggish. But that's what you get for working in a environment of zero-accountability.

    2. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Members of the public don't view the Met as spending their time at Crispy Creme scoffing donuts. That would be better than beating passers by to death and then lying their asses off afterwards.

    3. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've had a day shift so far when I'm not busting my ass for the full 12 hours; dealing with emotional/violent/mentally unstable people, dealing with legal problems and keeping up with a mountain of written work.

      Restepc! Just like being a /. editor.

    4. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by bradorsomething · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not all U.S. officers will welcome this, for various reasons. You Brits have taken a great deal more observation in stride over the years, while we Yanks have railed against it.

      When our tracking/automated dispatch system was installed on the ambulances, only a few people took serious exception to the system. Mainly it was because they were:
      a) sneaking the truck out of district and really didn't want dispatch to know where they were, or
      b) so invested in the district system that they didn't want to see it change.

      You'd assume that group "b" had the quieter districts, but that wasn't always true... some people just didn't want things to change because it meant changing their routine.

      When the system was in place, many of us frankly distrusted dispatch. We would be sent halfway across our districts to a call that passed 3 stations, and since we no longer called in our positions, we'd just have to assume that those 3 ambulances were somewhere else. We'd lost our mental map of all our units, and since (in the past) we'd often "volunteer" our position when we knew we the closest truck, we could only assume this was happening again, but where nobody could catch it. I would have invested much more heavily if I could see a map confirming positions in my unit. Not because I was lazy, but because we'd been a (useful) check on the system before, and we wanted that ability to assist from the field again.

    5. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Geminii · · Score: 1
      As a non-police ex-public servant, I was actually happy about being monitored during the 10+ years I was on the taxpayer dime.

      In the office, every access to restricted databases was logged. In some cases, every keystroke was logged. We had cameras in a lot of the back office rooms and I considered it a damn good thing, because it meant that if anything went down (we had a couple of members of the public have running fistfights through there on occasion, plus assorted other violence which ended up with police or ambulance services on the premises), there would be evidence.

      Not to mention that there was running evidence that I was actually doing my damn job instead of sitting around on my keister burning my own and everyone else's tax dollars.

    6. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you would have been better served by a display on your end? I wonder if there's consideration for that in any of the designs, it seems like a good idea.

    7. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by RangerMatt · · Score: 1

      (B) happens a lot in law enforcement as well. The idea of district/zone integrity has been so ingrained in command staff's head (read: beat in with a 9# hammer) that when you present them an option of using the nearest unit based on location instead of pretty lines on a map, they can't get it in their head. Also, I've seen times where the AVL gets turned off because the union decides that that data can be used for disciplinary actions.

      --
      Client's are happy, code is committed, pigs are on the tarmac and ready for flight.
    8. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a serving Metropolitan (London) police officer? Who eats donuts? And sometimes you're busting your ass? How do you cope not having learned the lingo? (I think it's called British English)

    9. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think I've had a day shift so far when I'm not [...] dealing with legal problems

      Um, isn't that your job, as a cop?

    10. Re:I, for one, welcome.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      It doesn't go far enough. I for one am tired of all this technology available and we don't do enough with it. All citizens should wear these devices, giving authorities the ability to track and find anyone as need be. Accessories could be an implanted alcohol monitoring device for problem drinkers. This could be implemented with tracking devices on cars. If some idiot is thinking about running away from the police, he could be tracked, or even better, the device could shut the car down. Maybe even a personal implanted Taser to take them out if they get too frisky. If they haven't done anything wrong, they shouldn't have anything to worry about.

      We could eliminate crime as we know it.....

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
  21. Police (finally) switch on AVL in their radios! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a non story. The TETRA radios that all emergency services personnel have in the UK all have ARL capabilities. What this REALLY means is that Airwave (the company that runs the TETRA system) is finally allowing this ARL to be emitted. In Norfolk. A rural county with not many TETRA radios in it. Not much control channel contention then.

    The REAL news will be when they (officially) switch it on for London. Then we will see whether the TETRA system can cope or not.

    BTW, you can't track the ARL as the SDSes that are being used are encrypted (as is the voice traffic).

    1. Re:Police (finally) switch on AVL in their radios! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      +1 Informative. Except the bit about not being able to track the ARL... since when has encryption been unbreakable?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  22. Norfolk cops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Upon reading the headline, I thought they were talking about Norfolk, VA cops and smiled, thinking of the lady-cops down there that I'd like to "tag".

    Missing_DC (too early to bother remembering the password for slashdot)

  23. Location issues currently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These upgrades to the Airwave (Tetra based radio/phone) termnials is clearly well overdue, as detecting the correct location is obviously a problem in this article.
    The police response car shown is from the Metropolitan Police (i.e. London, not Norfolk), and the Bedfordshire Police logo is from, er, Bedfordshire (again, not Norfolk!).
    On a serious note, the Airwave network which is now in use by all forces has the capability to carry GPS (and other data like this) over the network alongside the voice data, and most of the handheld terminals (radios) have the option to have a GPS module added. Most forces have been saying they will roll them out, but of course won't as it costs money, until other forces get it and put them to shame.

    An ex-UK-cop (who quit because I was disgusted with the current UK "terrorism" laws and other laws taking away our rights, and the way we as police were being asked to implement them).

    1. Re:Location issues currently by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This will be cool, when someone is able to crack the system, and be able to monitor the cops as a part of the general public.

      They could put this in with Google maps....which would be cool. You see a large group of cop 'dots' in a group, you know THAT is the spot to go for doughnuts.

      You see cop dots on the map along the highway...slow down or you'll get a ticket.

      If you're a criminal, well, that ones obvious.

      Interesting scenarios come to mind....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Location issues currently by Jurily · · Score: 1

      You see cop dots on the map along the highway...slow down or you'll get a ticket.

      If you're not looking at the road while speeding, you should get a ticket. I don't mind going fast if the road and weather conditions allow it, but at least pay attention.

    3. Re:Location issues currently by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "If you're not looking at the road while speeding, you should get a ticket. I don't mind going fast if the road and weather conditions allow it, but at least pay attention."

      I do pay attention.

      :)

      I do listen for the radar detector to go off....and of course, I keep up with road conditions with the old CB radio.

      Believe it or not, the CB works fantastic...these days, I know where the cops are WAY before the detector goes off about 98% of the time.

      Sometimes, old tech is hard to beat.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Location issues currently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like GTA?

    5. Re:Location issues currently by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      If you're a criminal, well, that ones obvious.

      And this is why a realtime public system would be irresponsible. You are giving criminals a great avoidance system while doing little more for the law-abiding public than what would be achieved by a similar system with at least a few hours' delay and a stored history so that you could play it back. Constant surveillance of private citizens is oppressive, but constant surveillance of public servants is an equalizer.

      I like the idea of a realtime system but the drawbacks far outweigh the advantages. I'm sure that the police would hate any sort of public system because they don't want to be tracked over their entire shift, even on the shitter. My response to that is...neither do we, and our shifts don't end.

  24. Only 999 callers? by InfiniteZero · · Score: 1

    That's not very scalable. :)

  25. Doughnut shop located at Norfolk HQ by Eclectik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Living in Norwich, I found it extremely amusing that the only Doughnut shop listed from the above search on googlemaps,is in, wait for it,Wymondham! For those not in the know, the Norfolk Constabulary HQ is in, yep, you guessed it - Wymondham!! http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=DoughnutORdonutshopinNorwich http://www.norfolk.police.uk/article.cfm?artID=6439&catID=729&bctrail=0

    1. Re:Doughnut shop located at Norfolk HQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living in Norwich, I found it extremely amusing that the only Doughnut shop listed from the above search on googlemaps,is in, wait for it,Wymondham!

      For those not in the know, the Norfolk Constabulary HQ is in, yep, you guessed it - Wymondham!!

      http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=DoughnutORdonutshopinNorwich

      http://www.norfolk.police.uk/article.cfm?artID=6439&catID=729&bctrail=0

      Except its not a doughnut shop, if you clicked on the link mentioned in the balloon on the google map for Dave Doughnut you will see Dave Doughnut does not sell doughnuts, he's actually a children's entertainer.

    2. Re:Doughnut shop located at Norfolk HQ by Rufty · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I'm in Norwich too. Never knew about that!

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  26. As others said, bit different by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am not sure exactly how the hell a police officer with reflective lettings driving a white with red and yellow (reflective again) markings and more bells and whistes then a carnival ride is supposed to be secret.

    Criminals aint' all that high tech. If criminals were smart, they wouldn't be criminals. Oh and if some criminals do come to rely on tracking patrols then they will be easy marks for arrest teams. nobody says that ALL cops will wear trackers. Patrol cops are a deterrent, if a criminals spots one and does not commit a crime because of it then the job is done. The best cop deters crime, not solve them.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:As others said, bit different by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      If criminals were smart, they wouldn't be criminals.

      Not so. Unsuccessful career criminals tend to be stupid. Successful ones tend to be intelligent... just like any other career requiring thought.

      Inability to make money legitimately is not the only motivation for a criminal career.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:As others said, bit different by jeepien · · Score: 1

      Inability to make money legitimately is not the only motivation for a criminal career.

      What then--fame?

    3. Re:As others said, bit different by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Typically it's the risk-reward balance, I think.

      Some crime is high-risk/high-reward... e.g., it's good for the lazy who could work an honest job, but don't want to. It's not stupidity, but laziness.

      Or it can be cultural... someone who has only been exposed to crime as a means of being wealthy would likely not be comfortable with a legit job, since it is so foreign to them.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  27. Rush by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fictional Australian police TV series "Rush" depicts technology like this, but takes it one step further: the officers wear video cameras on their tactical vests as well. Back at their headquarters the unit has an 'intelligence officer' (rather than a dispatcher) who monitors each vehicle and officer in real time, and provides support by coordinating responses and running inquiries on the various LE databases and the Internet.

  28. better identifications of locations by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One big problem faced around the world is actually identifying where something is. Addresses postcodes / zipcodes are not perfect they are quirky and arbitrary and worst of all usually require some form of license to use. Knowing the GPS Latitude and Longitude you can pinpoint anywhere on the planet. but they are hard to remember, if you know them at all.

    There are some systems available that can solve this some are patented or otherwise closed to free use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geohash is an open system which encodes a latitude and longitude to a base 32 number (which is just an alphanumeric string). The longer the String the more precise the location is.
    An unfortunate drawback is the length of the code is perhaps a little too long to remember easily and be useful.

      However a shorter code could be used based on look up tables. kind of similar to http://xkcd.com/426/ you could define an area by the bounding box its contained within. If your within the USA for example you wouldnt need to find the approximate location of the USA since thats already known the bounding area would be defined by a bounding box of the nearest whole degree or a smaller fraction that completely encloses the area of interest. If the USA was still too large an area you could define an area such as california defining the bounding box as the latitudes and longitudes that completely enclose California a Neighboring state would use a similar bounding box which would overlap to a certain extent but it doesnt really matter that a place could be enclosed in two or more bounding boxes since you would use the one defined for your state. probably there is no need to define the bounding box greater than .01 of a degree and generally 0.1 degrees would be close enough.

    This would then shorten the code to something most people can remember and keep it free since this concept is derived from the geohash algorithm I would expect it to be free to use by anyone who wishes to use it without payment.

       

    1. Re:better identifications of locations by destuxor · · Score: 1

      The grid-based system you're thinking of has already been implemented for years as UTM, MGRS, and new USNG.

      MGRS is used in many technologies familiar to ground troops, such as the PLGR, DAGR, and BFT.

      MGRS is used for land-navigation, as described in the Armys FM 3-25.26.

      MGRS coordinates are regularly used in common radio traffic, such as the MEDEVAC request, UXO/IED spot report, and call for fire.

      Many consumer GPS devices support MGRS.

    2. Re:better identifications of locations by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      i'm not thinking of a grid system as such but an improvement to gustavo's encoding of latitude and longitude into a single base 32 number.
      All my idea is that its a bit silly to have to refine from the planet each time you want to state a latitude and longitude.

      As a crude analogy if men are typically between 5 and 6 feet in height and you had to measure each one to be recorded by someone else it wouldnt be long before you went from saying 5 foot 7 inches to 6 inches 8, 5 , 6 foot 2 both the 5 foot and inches become redundant its nearly always 5 foot something although there are exceptions.

      I'm not suggesting an alternative to latitude and longitude just a simpler representation. A rule stating if its the usa then we know the limits for the usa and we don't need to say them any more. Obviously The smaller the known given the less you need to calculate and state. A small place such as Monaco might need only a 4 or 5 digit encoding to be at the same accuracy as a 7 digit code for the united states.

        All it really is is a simple way to give an address or other location without having to remember a 12 digit or longer sequence of numbers and with it being encoded latitudes and longitudes you don't need any bodys permission to use the code and you also don't need somebody to look it up for you since its pretty easy to locate a latitude and longitude on a mapping system such as google or your own gps.

    3. Re:better identifications of locations by destuxor · · Score: 1

      Ok now I understand what you're thinking.
      I suppose you could take an MGRS coordinate and chop off the starting digits for a local area, i.e. your town/city falls entirely within the RT56 100 km^2 grid square you could tell everyone working in the area that RT56 is assumed and that 777888 will be understood as RT57776888.
      The problem I can see with this approach is your in-house software and familiar reporting techniques will be alien to state and federal forces that may be called in during a disaster such as a hurricane, large riot, CBRNE event (Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High-yield Explosive), etc.
      I agree that latitudes and longitudes are difficult to use, and that's why they came up with MGRS. All my professional experience with land navigation and GPS is with MGRS and it really is an easy system to learn and use.

    4. Re:better identifications of locations by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      It's not such a big issue for the USA, but for other countries it really is you have to pay to get access to the data you need to convert postcodes to latitude and longitudes or go about collecting it manually, which is a huge task, some places don't even have any system in place.

      The likes of tomtom or opentomtom or openstreetmap could use this system for free and ordinary people could use it for sat navs.
      It can even be made into a barcode. since an area will share common digits within the higher digits it makes it quite easy to sort parcels and letters easily for deliveries and it can be clearly communicated.

      With things like google maps its possible to locate a place and derive the geohash online. Theres a bookmark you can create with your browser and you can go from a google map page to the bookmark and the coordinates of the centre of the map are translated to the geohash code. Off road its even more useful.

      But the drawbacks to the system as is, is the codes are too long to remember easily which means they will not be used as much as they could, it's easier than the latitude and longitude but still not as easy as a 7 digit code.

      TomTom for example already provide the ability to locate a place by latitude and longitude this is just an alternative entry method really. The existing map methods your familiar with are good provided you can get the reference from someone using the same system but I bet that you can fall back to latitude and longitude.
      The code to implement the encoding and decoding of a geohash is very simple and public with examples in several programing languages (not human simple but computer simple) and not only that every digit that gets passed across increases the accuracy of the location.

      Thanks for replying it helps me achieve my real goal of talking about this which is to ensure that it enters the public domain and no one can decide to close source the modified geohash. which might seem rather silly if it wasn't for the fact that things like a one click patent get approved.

      while your right its an alien system as of now, but then the original geohash is only a year old.

  29. Car 54 by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who looked at this article and though of this?

    Now we'll always know where Car 54 is.

    1. Re:Car 54 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from the car-54-I-know-exactly-where-you-are dept.

      Apparently not.

  30. Already in use for Fire and Police Unit Dispatch by CptByteMe · · Score: 1

    It has been about 8-9 years since I worked on coding and installing e911 dispatch systems for police and fire, but even then we were using GPS to recommend the closest fire unit of the type (Engine, Quint, Hazmat, etc) needed for the Incident (1 alarm, 2 alarm, etc) to automagically recommend to the dispatcher units to dispatch. It was pretty slick stuff, though a pain to calculate the distance between unit and incident location for each unit and that was using 'as a crow flies' reckoning. I'm sure newer technology is using mapping technology to figure out closest distance based on actual road travel. This jump in the technology is just an extension of what is already out there.

  31. GTA by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    Life is turning out to be more like GTA every day.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I need to go kill a hooker.

    1. Re:GTA by alexo · · Score: 1

      Life is turning out to be more like GTA every day.

      I live in the GTA you insensitive clod!

  32. So about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So about time. I heard numerous times how cops purposefully respond slowly to incidents to avoid work...

  33. What else is new? by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    In Portugal all cars will be tagged... :(

  34. Normal for Norfolk by Budenny · · Score: 1

    http://www.literarynorfolk.co.uk/normal_for_norfolk.htm

    That hent got no front wheels, that hent.

  35. Well, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most modern police walkie-talkies have gps in them now. All they have to do is activate it or get motorola to upgrade their units with a module. I'm actually working on an emergency operations console for our GIS and we can attach the AVL (vehicle GPS) to our radio system and see where everyone is. Pretty cool. Cool so long as they don't start tagging citizens with it.

  36. Already in use to a degree across America by tekshogun · · Score: 1

    I know that Greensboro, North Carolina and other police/public safety departments across the United States already use something like this. It may not be setup to filter down to specific officer skills but I am sure they could implement that (skills such as spanish speaking, woman officer for email body searches, etc). The system they use here is from the old OSSI USA, now SunGard Public Sector, software suite which includes a CAD. In this case, CAD is computer aided dispatch.