Slashdot Mirror


Hungary, Tatarstan Latest To Go FOSS

christian.einfeldt writes "It seems as if almost every other week there is news of another government migration toward Free Open Source Software. Two of the most recent such moves come from Hungary and the tiny independent former Russian republic of Tatarstan. On April 2, the Hungarian government announced that it will be modifying its procurement rules to mandate that open source procurement funding match expenditures for proprietary software, according to Ferenc Baja, deputy minister for information technology. In Tatarstan, a Republic of 3.8 million inhabitants, the Deputy Minister of Education announced that by the end of this school year, all 2,400 educational institutions in Tatarstan will have completed a transition to GNU/Linux, following a successful pilot program it rolled out in 2008."

129 comments

  1. MMM FOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess they were hungry for FOSS.

    1. Re:MMM FOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the math. It checks out.

    2. Re:MMM FOSS by Mozk · · Score: 1

      I've honestly never seen this before, and it's one of the few trolls on here that I've actually laughed at. Nice work if it's original.

      --
      No existe.
    3. Re:MMM FOSS by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Self-reply:
      No, it's not.

      --
      No existe.
    4. Re:MMM FOSS by linhares · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Hungary, Steve Ballmer usually gets eggs.

    5. Re:MMM FOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean they're Hungary for chips with Tartars foss?

  2. There's a place called Tararstan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home of fish and chips.

    1. Re:There's a place called Tararstan? by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Home of fish and chips.

      No, it's Tatarstan. Home of candy and fizzy-drinks, where toothbrushes fear to tread.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:There's a place called Tararstan? by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Motto:"We put holes in teeth!"[/cavity goon]

      --
      The game.
  3. Equal spending but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt FOSS free? In other words, it won't make sense!

    1. Re:Equal spending but... by Alien+Being · · Score: 3, Funny

      It makes perfect sense. For every one million OpenOffice installations, a government department can buy zero copies of Microsoft.

    2. Re:Equal spending but... by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Isnt FOSS free?

      Not when you factor in that political decisions in Hungary only have one purpose: to steal as much as possible before the upcoming elections. Everyone knows they stand a snowball's chance in hell to get re-elected. "Gyurcsány takarodj!" (Gyurcsány GTFO) almost made it into the national anthem since 2006.

      At least they're not naming Microsoft directly anymore.

    3. Re:Equal spending but... by linhares · · Score: 1

      Here in Brazil there's all this hoopla from the Federal government concerning FOSS. At first I thought it was hypeware, but after seeing intalations of linux and firefox in random government spots, it seems real enough for me.

    4. Re:Equal spending but... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      political decisions in Hungary only have one purpose: to steal as much as possible before the upcoming elections.

      Less money spent on MS Office means more money for stealing. The ex-politicians spend lavishly, stimulating the economy.

  4. Doing the math... by Argumentator · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Mandate that open source procurement funding match expenditures for proprietary software"

    In other words, their expenditures for proprietary software must equal to $0.00?

    1. Re:Doing the math... by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't confuse open source with free.

      OSS could be free, but it could also cost money. Money for training, installation and updates.

      Red Hat, Novell/Suse Ubuntu, etc all have support packages programs available which government and education departments may want to utilize to help assure smooth and continued operation.

      But presuming the outlay for proprietary software would have similar requirements, you can see that for every copy of windows they could obtain an unlimited number of Linux desktop copies.

      This will might allow them spend their money on custom or specialized applications which just might happened to be proprietary.

      Meanwhile, the technical community that develops in that environment will have a whole different skill set than those that develop in the Microsoft mono culture.

      Western governments, still dependent on Microsoft are sandbagging themselves into a smaller and smaller dry-hole against the rising tide of Linux everywhere else in the world.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Doing the math... by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As in 'training' costs for open source software versus proprietary closed source licence fees, it also allows money to spent spent on customising open source software for specific long term applications versus throwing away money on 'temporary' software licence fees (the reality being they often last no longer than two years in actual use).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Doing the math... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This seems to happen in places where money, and especially foreign exchange are at a premium. A big advantage for the Tatarstan Ministry of Education is that they don't have to commit to lots of purchases in US dollars. Instead, as you point out, they can make their own engineers who will work for local currency, and educate their people at the same time.

    4. Re:Doing the math... by tftp · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tatarstan is part of Russian Federation, which means that they can hire programmers and IT people from anywhere in Russia, not just from its own, much smaller, population. UNIX (*BSD and Linux) is well known in Russia.

    5. Re:Doing the math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, No. Tartarstan is what happens when you don't brush your teeth. :p

    6. Re:Doing the math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This seems to happen in places where money, and especially foreign exchange are at a premium.

      I believe that money is at a premium in all educational institutions. The college where I teach CS is looking at an $X million budget cut and our department is set to lose 2 lecturers.

      But can we wean our people off MS? Can we heck as like.

    7. Re:Doing the math... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Tatarstan is a made up country bordering Elbonia and about 1000 kilometres to the east of Genovia and Latveria.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    8. Re:Doing the math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Females per 1000 males: 1,161

      Is that normal? Sounds like a good place to go on holiday..

      (if you like females :)

    9. Re:Doing the math... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Other way around. If you spend $20,000 on MS Office, you're allowed to spend up to $20,000 on OpenOffice. And presumably deposit the change in a convenient Swiss bank account.

    10. Re:Doing the math... by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "In other words, their expenditures for proprietary software must equal to $0.00?"

      I know you are trying to be fun here but then, you know not all operations allow for the commutative operation.

      They said "open source procurement funding match expenditures for proprietary software" not "propietary software procurement funding match expenditures for open source". So no: it doesn't mean expenditures for propietary software must equal to $0.00".

      In the other hand, it says "expenditures" not "expenditures from licensing". If you think installing 1000 copies of whatever doesn't involve expenditures you are not only not funny (no: your previous message, while attempting to it was not funny) but stupid too.

    11. Re:Doing the math... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in other news, Dirkdirkistan said they would also adopt FOSS, but only if it led to Mircosoft changing their sales policy to buy one get one free.

  5. Desktop Linux by derrida · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the way to the desktop. Through governments and big organizations.

    --
    nemesis. Home of an experimental fe code.
    1. Re:Desktop Linux by voss · · Score: 1

      It sounds weird but how do you think dos/windows got into homes? Its because its what the kids were using in schools.

    2. Re:Desktop Linux by ibbie · · Score: 1

      Er, you must've been lucky. My high school had old arse Apple IIe's (which was an upgrade from the Apple IIc they had, years prior, but still) when I had a nice, Win 3.11/DOS box at home.

      --
      The wise follow a damned path, for to know is to be forsaken.
    3. Re:Desktop Linux by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Um, no, no, no. Apple introduced dirt cheap computers into the education market so people would be familiar with them and end up buying them. On the other hand, DOS systems were already dirt cheap so businesses looking to field many computers would choose the DOS systems even though they (in some respects) were inferior to the Apple boxes. So between school and work most people chose to go with the cheap option they would be using for their professional lives which was DOS.

      Fast forward a few years and we still have the same thing (though, in many schools it is mixed Macs along with Windows boxes), businesses (save for publishing, photography and other arts places that almost always use Macs) still use Windows, not because its really better but because its cheaper (and some mission-critical apps may not work emulated in WINE on Linux), and people still choose Windows because its what their work uses and its cheap.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Desktop Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it worked for microsoft...

    5. Re:Desktop Linux by lukas84 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Windows isn't exactly cheap in a company environment, but it does require very little development resources compared to FOSS for most deployments.

      For a company, this means that you have less in-house development which means you can buy personnel on the market which is already proficient with the infrastructure you use, and that there is no need to develop software in-house.

      Especially for smaller companies, this pans out mostly okay. For larger companies, Linux may make sense as the cost of in-house development and Microsoft licensing may start to get on even footing.

      Apple certainly isn't aiming for corporate users - they do not offer any system management, monitoring tools, software deployment, policy enforcement, etc. Their server offerings are extremely few, and their server software is only designed for department use.

      I have no idea how Apple runs it's internal IT, bu then again they have an user base that constists largely of technically proficient people, and my suspection is that they probably just grant local admin rights to all their users - it would be interesting to read on "How Apple does IT".

    6. Re:Desktop Linux by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "Especially for smaller companies, this pans out mostly okay. For larger companies, Linux may make sense as the cost of in-house development and Microsoft licensing may start to get on even footing."

      But if the "larger company" happens to do things the way it is supposed to be (that is, allowing redistribution of their not strategical in-house development) which is quite expectable from a government organization, then you can have these customizations on smaller companies too, which then start to get on even footing regarding open source too.

      Instead of money going to some big pockets for doing nothing, it will go to local companies for doing things, and at a lower overall cost. A win-win proposition in my book.

    7. Re:Desktop Linux by maxume · · Score: 1

      The IIc was an update of the IIe, not the other way around (and they were on the market at roughly the same time, the big difference being that the IIc was smaller and more self contained).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Desktop Linux by westlake · · Score: 1
      That's the way to the desktop. Through governments and big organizations.

      The mandate from on high.

      I have wondered more than once how the geek keeps a straight face when he talks about the cathedral and the bazaar.

      It couldn't be made plainer that he is more comfortable dealing with the OCP exec and the party bureaucrat.

      So much more tractable than the countless users who chose Windows or OSX.

      The geek fancies himself as the rebel. The libertarian.

      He's not. He is the establishment.

      He wasn't born and bred in grandma's basement. He is a product of the *NIX back office.

      The geek might usefully remember how subversive of authority the MSDOS-WINDOWS PC really was.

      The antithesis of the thin client. The corporate lock-down.

      The ordinary user when confronted with the Geek and Linux doesn't back away quietly.

      He runs screaming from the room.

  6. Might just be a buzzword conglomeration... by samriel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Free Software != !cash software. They may have to pay like $10,000 for the source code for some big program, or to develop said program and OSS it.

  7. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the fools their tar tar sauce...

    1. Re:Hmmm by symbolic · · Score: 1

      It's better than the proprietary weak sauce which, of course, is a perfect complement to the a main dish of roasted lame. Frozen strawberry stupid for desert.

  8. it's called being delusional kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "every other week there is news of another government migration toward Free Open Source Software"

    yeah right.

    1. Re:it's called being delusional kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line was in the original. And while he is exaggerating, there has been a fair bit of such news lately.

    2. Re:it's called being delusional kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only because /. keep sposting dups and reruns containing some random bloggers opinion and rebranding it as "news"

    3. Re:it's called being delusional kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's a good thing. If enough BIG deployments take place (like, oh, I don't know, maybe an entire government), perhaps the Linux brain trust will throttle their stupid addiction to put shit in the kernel that's really cool and shiny but broken or essentially useless. Or just plain silliness, like Compiz. Wiggly windows: How many man hours did people waste on that? How about the early days of the CFS, or the 2.6.xx kernel that super-sucked.

      Calm down boys, you're gonna win. Don't be so antsy about it.

  9. Expect More of This by rossz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the world economic situation putting strains on government money, they will be forced to consider cheaper alternatives. OSS can be much cheaper, but its cost is not going to be zero. You have to consider training and support. Even so, substantial savings can be had by going the OSS route. Companies like Microsoft must be shaking in their boots. If OSS gets a decent foothold in government, it will cause an expansion in the private sector. Years from now when the economy improves, OSS will be firmly entrenched.

    Hopefully, financially responsibility in government will occur elsewhere as a result, but I'm not holding my breath.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:Expect More of This by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > OSS can be much cheaper, but its cost is not going to be zero. You have to consider training and support.

      On the other hand, we all know that children arrive from the womb conversant in the ways of Windows?

      You can't seriously think this requirement ONLY applies to opensource, can you?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Expect More of This by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but these governments already have computers, and they are switching to free-libre software. The fact that they are switching is where the training costs are incurred -- temporary, yes, but costs that must be overcome if free-libre software will gain a foothold.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Expect More of This by tftp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      OSS can be much cheaper, but its cost is not going to be zero.

      All countries make a big distinction between (a) importing foreign goods and (b) paying their own citizens in local currency. Countries sell only so much on international market, and so they can only buy an equivalent amount of goods[*]. Here not only you free a part of your foreign trade up for other necessities (like patented medical materials or instruments,) you also create jobs for your own citizens.

      [*] Does not apply to the USA, which is still living off of its credit card.

    4. Re:Expect More of This by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let me postulate this:

      MS awakes tomorrow, and jumps with both feet on the foss model.

      However, they also charge for support.

      Now, given MS existing penetration, could the *nix companies compete?

      MS has depth of support that few linux companies can approach.

      I indirectly worked for them briefly after the 95 launch as a support rep.

      I had a case escalated to the point where MS paid for the customer to ship their PC to Redmond so that the engineering department could comb through it to diagnose a low level driver that was flaky.

      The result was a hotfix that replaced the floppy driver used for Toshiba notebooks.

      The whole process took very little time - a couple of weeks.

      Sure, linux *can* respond as quickly, but as a rule it doesn't.

      Case in point - the glaring flaw in the glibc libraries of RH 6.2 that made it wholly unusable on multiprocessor servers because threads would start spawning and eating up resources until the system crashed.

      Yeah - it was that bad.

      Yeah - RH knew about it, and so did many developers in the community.

      No, no one ever did fix it iirc.

      It remained broken until 7.0 came out, and it had it's own serious flaws.

      So, can linux compete from a support standpoint?

    5. Re:Expect More of This by rossz · · Score: 1

      With our public schools teaching Windows and Microsoft Office as part of the standard curriculum, the training costs to business and government is vastly reduced. A whole generation is entering the workforce with a solid (cough) foundation in a very specific set of commercial software. When/If FOSS becomes the norm that would change, but in the mean time, a lot of people will need to be retrained.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    6. Re:Expect More of This by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      With our public schools teaching Windows and Microsoft Office as part of the standard curriculum...

      My experience (and that of my father's) does not match yours. Given your UID, I would imagine that my anecdotes are more recent than yours. :)
      I went to a rural high school in the very late 1990's. The only computer education I received from the State was a touch-typing course. My father is currently teaching in a suburban high school. The students in that school receive even less computer training that I did. The majority of their touch-typing class is devoted to internet browsing.

    7. Re:Expect More of This by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      My experience is the opposite, and is current. My son must turn in his reports in ms word format. That is what they use at their elementary school.

    8. Re:Expect More of This by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Have they stopped teaching handwriting in elementary school?

    9. Re:Expect More of This by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      No, they teach printing in grade 1, cursive in grade 2, and grades 3+ do their reports on the computer.

    10. Re:Expect More of This by rossz · · Score: 1

      My experience is based on what my stepdaughter took in school. I did make it a point to complain that the local schools were wasting money on commercial software when free alternatives were readily available. I also voiced my displeasure in them teaching to the advantage of one corporation. I told them they should be teaching skills that were more generally useful, not how to format paragraphs in Microsoft Word. Unfortunately, the woman with the title of "technology expert" at the grammar school barely knew how to turn the computers on. Just one of the many reasons why California schools are doing so poorly.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    11. Re:Expect More of This by msormune · · Score: 1

      The OP is not saying that, he's just saying OSS costs is not going to be zero...

    12. Re:Expect More of This by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      You mean like "Today Tatarstan, tomorrow a slightly larger Russian republic in Central Asia"?

    13. Re:Expect More of This by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "With the world economic situation putting strains on government money [...] substantial savings can be had by going the OSS route."

      What does this exactly mean? If some choice is really cheaper (like not cheaper in front costs but more expensive in the long run) do we allow government to overexpend if it happens to be a buoyant economy situation? If it's cheaper, it's cheaper, economic situation has nothing to do.

    14. Re:Expect More of This by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "So, can linux compete from a support standpoint?"

      I don't think that's the point. Not at least from Microsoft's point of view. Microsoft's point of view is "I'm top of the hill" so in any change to the 'statu quo' I'm facing ending worse than now, since there's no high up I can go. That's why Microsoft fights nail and theeth to open source: for them it can only mean a change for the worse.

      On the other hand, if this means Microsoft comes to compete on equal foot, quality and service-wise, with alternatives, instead of FUDing and using unethical and sometimes illegal practices, I for one would welcome our new microsoftian opensource-aware fair playing overlords.

    15. Re:Expect More of This by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "My son must turn in his reports in ms word format. That is what they use at their elementary school."

      Is he using Microsoft Word 2.0? For, you know, chances are that by the time your son is stablished on the job market current Word version will resemble today's much like Word 2.0 resembles to current.

      I never understood the (circular) argument. Companies choose Microsoft because that what was thought to our children ten years ago; and we must teach Microsoft to our children because that's what will use in ten years. Not specially when closed software earns their money by selling licenses so they are going to change their products even if only for the sake of it in order to sell new licenses. They may have a point if they used something like Emacs which not depending on selling licenses you can expect core functionallity to stay the same but, closed software?

    16. Re:Expect More of This by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      My experience is the opposite, and is current. My son must turn in his reports in ms word format. That is what they use at their elementary school.

      And other office suites can't read or write in MS compatible formats? Come on. We are all techs here. We know the score.

      Open Office, Abiword etc.. You will be hard pressed to find a word processor that doesn't have an option to save as a word compatible document. I just checked, and Abiword even has an OOXML save option. And unless reports of teaching standards are greatly underestimated, and teachers are without exception, power users all of a sudden, the teacher will not be using complex change tracking and embedding corrections and marking in the document before saving and handing it back.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    17. Re:Expect More of This by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't really care about MS' point of view.

      The aren't going to suddenly go open source, and I don't particularly desire that they do so.

      The point I was sneaking up on is that because of the way the open source arena has evolved, it has a distinct disadvantage in terms of support.

      So looking at this from the point of view of open source adopters, they are going to have support costs which aren't anywhere near trivial.

      As much as I'd like to move the company for which I manage IT into open source products, the support costs would be staggering.

      And lest I sound like a MS shill, let me also point out that the example I mentioned isn't likely to occur anymore unless we're talking very large corp customers or oem's.

      MS learned a long time ago that supporting a mass of the largely computer illiterate in the use of an OS is a huge resource sink, and they've done everything they could to move away from it.

      This is reflected in the way they've pushed oem licensing, with the responsibility for support pushed to the system builder, which really is as it should be.

    18. Re:Expect More of This by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "The point I was sneaking up on is that because of the way the open source arena has evolved, it has a distinct disadvantage in terms of support."

      It's only that's bullshit. It won't be neither "open source" nor "Linux" the one that will offer you corporate support. It will be Red Hat, HP, Canonical, IBM, etc. so you question shouldn't be "So, can linux compete from a support standpoint?" but "So, can [IBM|Red Hat|Canonical...] compete from a support standpoint with Microsoft?". Quite a different question with, maybe, quite a different answer.

      "So looking at this from the point of view of open source adopters, they are going to have support costs which aren't anywhere near trivial [...] As much as I'd like to move the company for which I manage IT into open source products, the support costs would be staggering."

      Not to say that wouldn't be the case for you, but it is still an unsubstantiated claim (I know in my company relative support costs for the Microsoft platform are higher than Linux'. See? I can produce anecdotae too). By the way, nobody is claiming that support costs are trivial but how well will stand up different alternatives.

      "MS learned a long time ago that supporting a mass of the largely computer illiterate in the use of an OS is a huge resource sink, and they've done everything they could to move away from it."

      So, your "will X be able to compete against Microsoft on corporate-grade support" becomes "since Microsoft doesn't give support to the computer illiterate mass at all"? By the way, that wasn't your previous claim. You based your previous claim on an example about Microsoft being able to offer corporate-grade support to a corporation (supposedly) at corporate rates (it might be the case "corporate rates" where off the equation since you was talking about a beta, but so that would be the case with other vendors too). Surprise! IBM or Red Hat are absolutly able to do the same for their supported Linux offers. And they do it.

      "This is reflected in the way they've pushed oem licensing, with the responsibility for support pushed to the system builder, which really is as it should be."

      Yeah, sure. On one hand this kind of "mixed responsibilites" does work on Linux-world. Red Hat on Dell, for instance, is kind of "join venture support" between Red Hat and Dell, as you say, as it should be. On the other hand, your previous post is an example or exactly the opposite behaviour. As you stated your problem with a Toshiba laptop ended with your machine being sent *to Microsoft* for a patch *from Microsoft* to be created *on Redmond* by *Microsoft engineers", so to what extent did the OEM builder (Toshiba, in this case) got involved except as a man-in-the-middle at best? And if Toshiba just acted as a man-in-the-middle, well, I think I can get better support if those middlemen just disappear, thanks.

    19. Re:Expect More of This by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That is what they use at their elementary school.

      And other office suites can't read or write in MS compatible formats? Come on. We are all techs here. We know the score.

      Open Office, Abiword etc.. You will be hard pressed to find a word processor that doesn't have an option to save as a word compatible document. I just checked, and Abiword even has an OOXML save option. And unless reports of teaching standards are greatly underestimated, and teachers are without exception, power users all of a sudden, the teacher will not be using complex change tracking and embedding corrections and marking in the document before saving and handing it back.

      So your suggesting that we should all use open software so that he can spend his time learning that instead of writing his report? Did you miss the part where I said that is what they use at school? He already knows ms word. Sometimes he has to bring his reports to/from school where he works on them. Sorry, but we did try OpenOffice already. It was a pain in the butt to be honest. Besides the issue of user interface and how you actually go about doing things being different, we had an import issue from a report he did at school and just needed to make a few final edits. OoO couldn't import it correctly, and I landed up having to open the report in a plain text editor, copying and pasting the text itself out of the file so that it could be editted at home. I spent a couple hours trying to import, correct, then ultimately just ripping the text out. That one incident alone, cost me more than twice the money than just buying the whole office suite, so I that's exactly what I did the next day. No more problems ever since. You can debate about it all you want about how great and open software suites are "just as good", and I tried. I can say first hand, they may be just as good, but the headaches and time wasted isn't worth it. The comparison isn't even close.

    20. Re:Expect More of This by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That logic is flawed because kids don't stop writing reports in the 3rd grade. They write them non-stop until they graduate. What he uses in his last year of school is likely what he'll use to write his resume. And what he'll be using in his first post-school job (Or perhaps while he's still in school). And at that time, he'll have years of experience working with that suite. It makes sense, doesn't it?

      $89 for the entire office suite? His books are many times more expensive and the other school supplies are many times that. I suppose if you expect your kids to be flipping burgers, and think knowing how to write documents, etc is useless for them...

    21. Re:Expect More of This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a non-issue as a variety of existing FOSS tools aptly produce MS Word compatible documents. What's more, I was able to open MS Word 2007 documents in OpenOffice writer long before the same functionality was available in Word 2003.

    22. Re:Expect More of This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that last comment was needlessly ad hominem, totally contrary to the reality of 'nix users' kids, and just plain stupid to boot.

  10. pebble in the puddle by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 2

    I'm reminded of a pebble dropped in a puddle. The initial splash causes ripples that lap the sides, wetting them enough so that flies settle to eat there. The pebble, meanwhile, lies there and is only seen again after all the life surrounding the puddle has erupted and moved on, after the baking sun is done its drying.

    So it is w/ Free Software in the United States.

    It's not bad being outside, it seems. Lighter and more free.

    1. Re:pebble in the puddle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WTF does that even mean?

    2. Re:pebble in the puddle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, WTF??? it the pebble OSS? are the flies Microsoft. I don't get it.

    3. Re:pebble in the puddle by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      It means that 10am-bedtime needs to sleep more?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    4. Re:pebble in the puddle by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

      I dunno, but that reminds me of the hamster in the ball, who was always sorta bored watching TV until finally his favourite star Bolt shows up at his doorstep, and he's all like woah, and Bolt is all like yep, and Mittens is all like wuuuuut, and we're all like haha.

      Sorry, thought I'd contribute to the randomness. ^^

      --
      Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
  11. Pentagon report (Eyes Only): by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Emergency civilian corporate aid black op authorised.
    Mission priority: Alpha.
    B-2 Stealth bomber carrying elite commando of Microsoft sales ninjas in orbital personnel deployment pods despatched from a private airport near Seattle.
    Destination, Tatarstan.
    Emergency use of ECHELON mind control sub system authorised by NSA.

  12. Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 4, Informative

    After some searching, I haven't actually found much more in the Hungarian news than was reported in TFA. So, I can't add many details.

    What I can say is that there is a fair chance that the coalition that rules Hungary today will not be in place six months from now. Secondly, Hungary needs immediate cost savings. It is not in any position to spend money now to save money later.

    This might be part of the motivation. Hungary's currency is in collapse, so it is much cheaper for the government to pay local developers in forints for software and systems than it is to pay Microsoft and Novell in dollars or euros.

    I'd love to know the internal machinations that went on here, but I suspect that someone took the opportunity of the fall of the forint and the foreign currency debt problem (an enormous problem) to push an open source agenda. Whether this will hold up, or whether MS will make a counter offer allowing the Hungarian government to pay cheaply in forints remains to be seen.

    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    1. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by domatic · · Score: 1

      I'd love to know the internal machinations that went on here, but I suspect that someone took the opportunity of the fall of the forint and the foreign currency debt problem (an enormous problem) to push an open source agenda. Whether this will hold up, or whether MS will make a counter offer allowing the Hungarian government to pay cheaply in forints remains to be seen.

      That at least is a MS getting a taste of it's own medicine. I rather like the idea of improving FOSS further and forcing MS to take that medicine as frequently as possible.

      Remember folks, a threat has to be credible to be taken seriously and it seems that MS is getting it more and more these days. Let's keep it up.

      Remember also Procurement Departments that even though MS is smiling and making reassuring noises now, they WILL try for bigger cash later when they think a change of administration or circumstance will allow them to beat it out of you. Threaten FOSS migrations again....and again...and again.... As I say, a taste of their own medicine.

    2. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      After some searching, I haven't actually found much more in the Hungarian news than was reported in TFA. So, I can't add many details.

      I've now found more on this (in Hungarian). My ability to read Hungarian is limited, but I do see that according to Gábor Bódi (whose government job title, I can't even begin to translate, but it is pretty high up) "this will be a trial year, with many possible outcomes of this initiative."

      If I am reading that article correctly (and it is very possible that I am not), while the proposal clearly talks about open source software (nyílt forráskód), much of the justification appears to be in protectionist language about supporting domestic markets and innovation.

      Less plausibly, it seems that it is talking about a plan to spend 12 thousand million Hungarian forints (54 million USD) on this. I cannot believe that I am reading that correctly. The current government is exceedingly unpopular because it has been trying and failing to push through austerity measures. I can't see that a country with a population of 10 million could be talking about spending that kind of money now. So let's just assume that I'm misreading that and hope someone who actually reads Hungarian comments on this.

      PS: I just discovered when typing in the above that slashdot doesn't do UTF-8. That sucks, but it's a good thing I only had to do acute accents instead of some real Hungarian specialties.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    3. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by cheoppy · · Score: 1

      You are reading that correctly, they plan to spend 12 billion (or thousand million) forints on that. By the way they plan to spend the same amount of money on MS and Novell softwares, which they already did in the previous years. I think it is not extraordinary in Hungary that they spend that much money, when the country has a financial problem, this country can be so weird sometimes.

    4. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      I'm not optimistic either about the sincerity of this attempt. The guy who made this statement might not be a minister from next Tuesday, when there'll be a new PM, who will reshuffle the government. I also hope that Hungary might have a snap election too. This reeks as if the minister was trying to look as if he did something neutral/good in the last few days he has.

      In any case, the language the minister used is a bit deceptive. Unfortunately after taking a close look at what he said, it seems the money can only be spent on _licences_. Training costs, etc. are explicitly excluded from funding (have to be covered by the given organizations themselves).

      If this gets followed through though, it is a step-up from the previous mindset of MS only that is highly prevalent in the hungarian government.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    5. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      Less plausibly, it seems that it is talking about a plan to spend 12 thousand million Hungarian forints (54 million USD) on this. I cannot believe that I am reading that correctly. ... So let's just assume that I'm misreading that and hope someone who actually reads Hungarian comments on this. </quote>

      Hungarian reading person here. As for your question:

      Yes, the number is right, it's about 54 million USD as maximal spending allocation for OSS - same amount as for MS and Novel - as it reads.

      Let's hope it is true.

    6. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Wodin · · Score: 1

      In any case, the language the minister used is a bit deceptive. Unfortunately after taking a close look at what he said, it seems the money can only be spent on _licences_.

      On the plus side, you can "buy" a hell of a lot of licenses for Open Source software with 12,000,000,000 florints!

      --
      -- Wodin
    7. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not more than a new trick from the Hungarian political elite and his maffia to steal money. In fact, the actual gouvernment has only one year left (maximum) and has to push to get it can. In Hungary, every gouvernment contract contain 2/3 part payed to politicens and 1/3 to the accomplishment.

    8. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your extremely informative post. (This is a hint to moderators).

      I'm not optimistic either about the sincerity of this attempt.

      Surely you are not suggesting that the Hungarian government would ever lie to voters. Such a thing would be unheard of. Though actually on that issue, when parties make promises to voters that they can't keep, I prefer the party that knows it's lying to the one that deludes itself into thinking it's telling the truth.

      The guy who made this statement might not be a minister from next Tuesday, when there'll be a new PM, who will reshuffle the government.

      Yes, the instability isn't just financial. I'm curious to see who the hell will actually be willing to take the job.

      I also hope that Hungary might have a snap election too.

      At the risk of getting further off-topic, I have mixed feelings about this. Hungary certainly needs a government with some degree of public support, and an election would elect people with that kind of legitimacy. But on the otherhand, from the populist and nationalist statements coming from those who are likely to win such an election, I think that they are the worst possible people to handle the crisis. As I said above, I prefer the liars who know a bit about economics to those who make the same promises and actually think that they can keep them.

      In any case, the language the minister used is a bit deceptive. Unfortunately after taking a close look at what he said, it seems the money can only be spent on licences. Training costs, etc. are explicitly excluded from funding (have to be covered by the given organizations themselves).

      Again, thanks for that. The whole thing just seemed so incoherent to me that I thought that I was misreading it. Now I understand that it is genuinely incoherent. I don't think that most slashdotters realize the extent to which Hungary is in deep shit. But let this be a small illustration of incompetence and murkiness (looks like someone is paying off someone else). And to make matters worse, in my opinion the current government is still better than the opposition.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    9. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by adpads · · Score: 1

      To the contrary! I feel optimistic about it. Take what he says at face value: this is one of the first acts of the new guy stepping up to lead Hungary, equivalent to Obama's closing of Guantanamo, and it's meant to send a message. And the language he uses is that the move is intended to "foster competition" in the marketplace, and to "encourage the growth of free thinking" (to render the second paragraph of the article Charles Dodgson posted above). It's beautiful talk coming from any government, no?

      Also, note that the budget concretely will be 12 billion Forint for "Microsoft/Novell" and the same amount for FOSS. Whether or not that's including Novell's OSS products, it's a nice fat wad of cash in Hungary, let me tell you - it will mean rivers of money for programmers in an open source community which is already strong, and it will strengthen interest in open source among Hungarian programming students, PC repair folks, power users, etc. I really can see it making a difference culturally.

    10. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      And to make matters worse, in my opinion the current government is still better than the opposition.

      Hungary has to be viewed in context of the past 25 or so years. I like to liken the situation to a nuclear explosion. The communist dictatorship part was the direct hit and the short term effects, but the more insidious parts are the long term effects, the radiation. Hungary became a democracy pro forma in 1990, but the mindset and thinking of the people didn't really change. They lived under a communist dictatorship for almost 50 years and that dictatorship mastered the ways of propaganda.

      Communists weren't banned from holding public office or persecuted for the crimes they did before 1990. What's more, they exchanged their waning political power for power over the economy by privatising lots of state property under very shifty circumstances. The first free government that followed the first free elections had it's support eroded in the period of 1990-94, since the media was still in the hands of the communists, coupled with the transitioning pains of switching the country over to a market based economy.

      The communists won the 1994 election with a 2/3rd majority, that carried the power to alter even the constitution. They went back to doing what they were doing before 1990, namely borrowed foreign money, introduced some austerity measures (Borkos-package) and generally did no structural reforms. That is how they lost the 1998 elections, despite their overwhelming media majority.

      The 1998-2002 period saw Hungary's first competent government in the past 50+ or more years and the first competent democratic government ever. During those 4 years, Hungary became a model country in Central/Eastern Europe, was in the first 3 countries from among those 10 waiting to join the EU. It was expected that Hungary introduces the euro in 2007 or in 2008. All the major economical indicators were strong. National dept, unemployment, budget deficit, inflation went down, GDP kept growing at a fast rate, etc.

      That right wing government narrowly lost the elections in 2002, due to the media being still controlled by the ex communists, the memory of their reign fading and them promising to deliver lots of pork. From there, the country's economy went downhill. GDP growth decreased, unemployment first started to stagnate and then increase again, national debt rapidly increased despite renewed interest in privatising state property, the budget deficit started to become larger and larger again. Things were starting to get bad, but not bad fast enough for the ex-communists to win the election of 2006 again.

      The speech you've linked to leaked shortly afterwards, from which the working methodology of the ex-communists is readily apparent. In their own words, they were "lieing night and day", "almost got broken trying to pretend we were governing", etc. From that moment on, the whole country has been in a state of moral and political crisis, for the past 3 years.

      There is the demographical fact, that a lot of pensioners who had the ways of the old dictatorship burned into them died and a new generation has reached adulthood, one that did not experience the old system. Old propaganda doesn't have the intended effect anymore. There are much more independent media organizations, civilian organizations, unions than they were 20 or even 10 years ago.

      Currently about 2/3rd of the total voting population wants a snap election and to force out the ex-communists from power. The government survived the past three years and ever stronger resentment by ignoring the people and on occasions using measures reminiscent from a dictatorship.

      The country was almost bankrupt even before the financial crisis hit and we are currently on the life support of the biggest IMF+EU loan that was granted.

      It is difficult to see this situation clearly from abroad. There are a couple of difficulties in getting a clear picture, since for one Hungary is a rela

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    11. Re:Hard to be optimistic about Hungary by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      I won't respond to all of your points, and I am certainly glad that you posted them so that others know the background. I lived in Hungary from 1988 through 1994, and I speak the language reasonably well. I've been a supporter of the SzDSz, but was never happy about how quickly they went to bed with the Socialists.

      I will say that in the run up to the last elections both sides were lying through their teeth about what kind of spending they could promise. The difference is that some on the left actually knew they were lying. When parties or candidates promise identical impossible things, I think it is better to support the liars than the delusional.

      I fully agree that as much as I dislike Fidesz, they are clearly the only party with substantial support. And so, there should be a snap election even though I won't be happy with the outcome. Protectionism and economic populism (and nationalism) is probably the worst possible response to the current situation, but Hungary also needs a government with real legitimacy and so I do grudgingly support elections at this time.

      As for nationalism and ethnic Hungarians in neighboring states, I'm very much aware of the situation. Every Hungarian I talked to, even the ultra-liberals, worked to communicate to me what it is like to lose 2/3 of your territory through through being totally elbaszott by the great powers at Trianon. Among my closest friends were Hungarians from Romania and Yugoslavia. I also travelled with and among Hungarians in Romania. But you know that current Hungarian nationalism isn't just about that. It's an anti-foreign/jewish sentiment, which is profoundly unhelpful.

      One thing that you might appreciate (or might not) is that during the early 1990s when I would encounter someone from either the Munkaspart (Stalinist) or MIEP (Fascist) parties campaigning, I would pretend to confuse the two. If you interchanged the phrases "Hungarian Proletariat and Peasants" with "True Hungarian Folk" from their pamphlets they're economic programs were identical. Even though I was obviously a foreigner (at least they didn't know I was a Jew) they loved trying to explain things to me. And got very frustrated when I couldn't see the difference between them and their arch rivals.

      What I saw for the elections where I was there was consistency of illiberality. Sometimes it was for the Right (1990) and sometimes for the Left (1993?). Things may have changed, but if you look at the voting patterns, it is not the the whole country moved left. The people who voted for the SzDSz during first elections didn't start voting for the MSzP, but continued to support the SzDSz. What happened was that people who had voted for the MDF switched to voting for the MSzP. I haven't been able to follow in such detail, but I suspect that they same is true today.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  13. Inch will get you a mile by smchris · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Hungary won't change many attitudes in the U.S.

    1. Re:Inch will get you a mile by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      Hungary won't change many attitudes in the U.S.

      Why would that matter?

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    2. Re:Inch will get you a mile by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Sure, Hungary might not, but there have been many, many, many countries that have switched to OSS. And whenever a few more do, then Red Hat, Novell, Sun and a ton of other US based companies in OSS can say, "Hey, we are based in the USA like MS is, and all these countries have switched to OSS and have saved X dollars, why not use a pilot program in X department and look at the cost savings" and then OSS will have a larger foothold in the USA.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  14. Geography lesson? by Oyjord · · Score: 1

    "...independent former Russian republic of Tatarstan..." Someone needs a basic lesson in geography and contemporary world politics.

    1. Re:Geography lesson? by Trepidity · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed. Perhaps they were confused by the common phrase "former Soviet Republic", which refers to entities that were formerly Soviet Socialist Republics (SSRs), but became independent around 1991, like Ukraine.

      Republics of Russia, though are subnational entities that are still part of Russia (pre-1991, part of the Russian SFSR). They are one of several kinds of top-level subnational divisions of Russia, others including Oblasts and Krais and so on. The Republics are those with a traditional non-Russian population, so have some autonomy in the areas of language use. But they're effectively what other countries call provinces or prefectures.

    2. Re:Geography lesson? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      The Republics are those with a traditional non-Russian population, so have some autonomy in the areas of language use. But they're effectively what other countries call provinces or prefectures.

      Except that this one declared independence (which is not uncommon) and Russia seemingly acknowledged it (which is unheard of):
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatarstan#Tatarstan_today

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    3. Re:Geography lesson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just read a bit further in the article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatarstan#Political_status

    4. Re:Geography lesson? by Riven.exe · · Score: 1
      In your link:

      Republic of Tatarstan is a federal subject of the Russian Federation

      What words of "federal subject" you don't understand? Term republic often cause confusion in the west, because Russian republic have more freedom than American states, have distinct ethnicity, but still is part of Russia. It's close with how Scotland have autonomous status in UK.

    5. Re:Geography lesson? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I don't live in the West.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:Geography lesson? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Yeah... Right....
      Tatars are so much integrated with Russia, that their independence is basically impossible. I consider myself Russian, although genetically I am tatar 50% and Russian 12.5%.

    7. Re:Geography lesson? by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      FYI: Sovereignty is NOT same as independence. They declared sovereignty. Let alone, their constitution states that they are a part of Russian Federation. And their status may change only with an agreement from both Russia and Tatarstan.

    8. Re:Geography lesson? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tatarstan has probably the most autonomy of all Russian regions and a special legal treatment but here is a more relevant part on political status:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatarstan#Political_status

      It's current president was appointed by the president of Russia and only approved by local parliament.

  15. FINALLY the year of desktop Linux in Tatarstan!! by jmcbain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well it's about time! We can rejoice, my FOSS brothers.

  16. Tatarstan is not former by petr999 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Tatarstan is the subject of Russian Federation and actually is the same way independent as any other one.
    More to say: sovereign independence of Tatarstan is the thing both impossible because it has no any outer state borders AND inevitably should lead to total destruction of Russia which is not the case to happen.
    As a fact, the "pilot education program" about FOSS is the Alt Linux disk set packaged with a book for schools, is performed in several regions of Russia, Tatarstan is simply among them.
    I even know someone in person from altlinux moscow based development team who is originally from Tatarstan.
    Hope this is a fix to correct the info.

    1. Re:Tatarstan is not former by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Tatarstan software frees YOU!

    2. Re:Tatarstan is not former by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Even the guy who submitted the summary didn't read his own link.

      For those that don't want to invest the twenty seconds necessary to read the above:

      *** Tatarstan is part of Russia. ***

    3. Re:Tatarstan is not former by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "More to say: sovereign independence of Tatarstan is the thing both impossible because it has no any outer state borders AND inevitably should lead to total destruction of Russia which is not the case to happen."

      THat's
      1) Off-topic
      2) Pile of bullshit

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  17. Subversion by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Linux is coming to you from 2 directions, the totally visible one that is your very government using/standarizing on it, and the subtle one that are cellphones and netbook bios.

    At this rate wont be surprised a lot if Windows 8 ends being a MS version of Wine running in top of linux.

  18. looks like... by Fissure_FS2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Tatarstan will get a lot of plaque from Microsoft for this move.

    (yes, I originally read it as "Tartarstan")

    --
    My life's goal is to get a score of +3!
  19. Re:See, we don't need free trade. by tftp · · Score: 1

    The argument that free trade betters humanity is just a lie [...] All you need is share to ideas.

    It's true that free sharing of ideas is a good thing. However "making your own" is not always the most cost-efficient thing to do. As matter of fact, it usually is NOT. Look at large transnational corporations. Do they make their own office furniture? Do they make their own computer hardware? Do they manufacture all pieces of the buildings that they are in? No, they don't - because it's cheaper to buy.

    Same applies to countries. If your country is small and poor, and if you need to outfit an office with 10 computers, do you want to start with a chip fabrication facility, then R&D house, then PCB manufacturing, then electronic assembly? That'd be a neat thing to have if that's what you have in mind for the country; but it will take decades, and billions of dollars in investment, and you need to have highly educated workforce also.

    That's why international trade is alive and well. Some goods are bought because they are simply unavailable in the destination country (usually raw materials, energy etc.) Other goods are bought because they are cheaper in other countries (like all the electronics in China.) Yet another category of goods is bought because it's too difficult (or takes too long) to make them at home (that applies to most weapons, except simplest, and to most aircraft, and to many medicines, and to many IP/core designs.)

    So, for example, if you are sick you have two options: (a) to buy a bottle of pills from a foreign manufacturer and be on your feet within a few weeks, or (b) to start your own medical research (needlessly duplicating already done research!) and hopefully within 5-10 years come up with a possible drug that may or may not heal you. Your choice. Most people I know would pick (a), and then if they are really into medical research they are free to invent some other drug for some other condition.

    Computer software is on the opposite side of the scale - easy to get into, easy to develop, easy to distribute. If you also have enough of educated people in the country then F/OSS software is the right thing to do. But note that F/OSS code is far more than mere "ideas" - it is a complete product which just happens to be free. Exchange of pure ideas across borders would require reimplementing those ideas within each country, and I don't see how it would help anyone. I can send you a complete set of JPEG screenshots of KDE, how long will it take you to recreate it all? And what is the chance that software compiled for Bolivian KDE will run under Paraguayan KDE? (Hint: WINE)

  20. At first glance... by Mr_2_718281828459045 · · Score: 1

    I thought this had to do with being hungry for tartar sauce.

  21. Independent republic of Texanistan by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Texas, Hawaii, and if you believe the rhetoric, Vermont and California were independent nations at one time.

    Alaska was once controlled by Russia.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  22. Singapore by AnonymityCowardily · · Score: 1

    The singapore armed forces went for open source office software about a year ago but you donÃt hear that on slashdot

  23. Yay Hungary! by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    Yay Hungary! My grandfather would be so proud. Many years ago he called me and said, "I hear there's an alternative to this Microsoft bull shit. Make it happen on my computer. Oh, and I just got my Hungarian keyboard in. Make that work too."

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  24. Option (c) by tjstork · · Score: 1

    You forgot option (c)

    (c) Examine the formulation of the pill that somebody else made, and make a copy

    That's the thing, is, that, all but the smallest countries actually have sufficient population to manufacture what they need. If anything, adopting protectionist measures encourages the development of automation to cope with labor shortages. The United States, for example, became an industrial power because of protectionist policies in the 19th century. Otherwise, she would have been blown out of the water by the United Kingdom, which was the world manufacturing leader in those days.

    I can send you a complete set of JPEG screenshots of KDE, how long will it take you to recreate it all?

    How many developers are -really- on KDE? That's the thing. Industrialization and parallel development can occur extremely rapidly in a country. Japan went from a feudal 16th century technology base to an industrial power in barely 50 years. Germany went from a middle european stomping ground for France to exceeding the UK in scarcely a fortnight. South Korea has industrialized extremely rapidly, and best of all, look at how far China has come in the last 30 years. All of those countries, even the USA, in its heyday, got their start by copying and then improving on someone else's inventions. The USA and Germany robbed the British. Japan robbed the USA and now China robs everyone. It's only the silly idea that an idea should entitle one to exclusive rights to resell it that holds countries back.

    --
    This is my sig.
  25. Re:See, we don't need free trade. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    what is the chance that software compiled for Bolivian KDE will run under Paraguayan KDE? (Hint: WINE)

    What is the relevance of that at all? If KDE apps can run under GNOME, and KDE3 apps can run under KDE4 (and vice versa), I seriously doubt Paraguayan KDE will have a problem with Bolivian KDE.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  26. Let me get this right... by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Russia - which used to be the bad guy - is adoptng Linux - which is the good guy - while the US - who is supposed to be the good guy - keeps hanging onto Microsoft - which are the bad guys?

    So who are we supposed to support if they ever go to war?

    PS: are they going to change the name of the capital of Tatarstan to Linuxgrad? And they could also have a Stallmangrad. Think of the tourism income from geeks...

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
    1. Re:Let me get this right... by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 1

      If we ever go to war with Russia, we support Russia. We support every other country in the world that is not the regime of united states.

    2. Re:Let me get this right... by petr999 · · Score: 1

      I can disclose a bit that it is normal practice to buy a FreeDOS or Linux license(s) for any company in Russia, even for state-owned like high schools, and still use ms-windows on a regular basis. So it's only a visibility of Linux wide-spreading in favor of cost cutting, which is simply the modern business paradigm with nothing related to reality's technical details.

  27. Please, get your facts right! by sipan · · Score: 1

    Please fix the factual error - Tatarstan is neither tiny (it is bigger then Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) or independent.

  28. And the reason... by dvh.tosomja · · Score: 1

    There is no such a thing as free klobasa!

  29. In Soviet Russia by unixhero · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the Tatarstan-window manager owns you!

  30. Anonymous Coward. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tatarstan is not _former_ republic of Russia, it is one of Russian states.

  31. Not tiny, not former, not independent by Noiser · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tatarstan is not tiny - it is one of the most populous and important regions of Russia. Its capital Kazan is one of the most important cities in Russia.

    Tatarstan is not independent - it is an autonomy within the Russian Federation.

    Tatarstan is not a former Russian republic - see above.

    1. Re:Not tiny, not former, not independent by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      Kazan was recently declared as Russias "third capital city", the first two being Moscow and St. Petersburg.

  32. independence ain't dependence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the tiny independent former Russian republic of Tatarstan"

    better fix that before you incur the Ruskie wrath (though you'd deserve it for your ignorance)

  33. I'm a PC, and I'm four and a half by tepples · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, we all know that children arrive from the womb conversant in the ways of Windows?

    No, but per Microsoft's latest TV commercials in the United States: "I'm a PC, and I'm four and a half." Children will be familiar with Windows after having used it to start PC games at home.

  34. Tiny independent Texas by FilatovEV · · Score: 1

    I hope the tiny independent republic of Texas, former state of the U.S., will make a good use of Linux-based systems in its national education.

  35. Tatarstan is part of Russia you ignorant clot! by pavelthesecond · · Score: 1

    the tiny independent former Russian republic of Tatarstan

    Last I checked it still was a republic inside the Russian Federation.

  36. Too much Xena? by ravster · · Score: 1

    Its okay, me too. :D

  37. Is this what Hungarian rotation really means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh... i meant notation .. er.. revolution
    er... forget it...

  38. Damn lies by lsatenstein · · Score: 0

    Microsoft only relies on American soil stats of operating systems use. So, Windows is always gaining over linux. World wide, Microsoft is losing ground to MAC, and to Linux.

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  39. A bit more about the plans in Hungary by kisg · · Score: 1
    I would like to clear up some misunderstandings about this news regarding Hungary.

    The news is not about spending about ~55 million USD on open source software.

    It is about including open source software into the centralized public procurement list.

    In Hungary all state / public departments have to follow strict public procurement procedures, to fight corruption and make sure that the taxes are spent on the best offer and not on the best lobbysts.

    So if you want to buy 5 PCs with software and support for a small public office or a public school, you have to release a tender and wait for a few months until the offers come in... etc.

    So, there is a fast-track method called the "centralized public procurement". In this case a central department releases a fairly large tender. The result of the tender is not the actual deal, but a framework contract with the winners and a "price list".

    Any state financed organization is allowed to choose products from these price lists without the need for executing their own tenders. The main idea is, that this way even the smallest schools can get a reduced price as if they were ordering 1000s of PCs. However, they will still have to pay the costs from their own budget. So there is no "money infusion" here.

    These tenders have a "framework sum" attached to them, which introduces an upper bound on the acquired products and services from the price list.

    In theory, this sounds like a great system. Now back to the reality. Usually the prices on these central, reduced price lists are about 30% higher than on the market. The tenders are usually won by large corporations. Small companies usually don't have a chance, or only as subcontractors of the large ones. (Using a chain of subcontractors is usually not the recipe for cheap services, at least not in Hungary...:) )

    So the news is about such a tender: the result will be a price list, that lists open source software and associated services. The framework sum will be ~55 million USD.

    To get a larger picture: at the same time a very similar tender will be released for Microsoft and Novell software. The framework sum for this tender will also be ~55 million USD.

    How does Novell get into the same tender with MS? Last year a similar tender was released, but exclusively for MS software: the tender included an explicit list ranging from Windows to mapping software. The framework sum was ~114 million USD.

    There was quite a bit of an outrage about monopoly and corruption, so the government released another tender, but now for Novell software. (The framework sum was probably around ~22 million USD, but I am not sure.) So MS and Novell have already their own price lists.

    There were many controversial contracts in the past, like exclusive Microsoft contracts in the public education ... etc. With these latest changes, I hope, that we will have a balanced scene, where the state departments can freely choose the best solutions for them, even with mixed setups, like running OpenOffice.org on Windows.

    This new "open source" tender has not yet been released, so we will have to see, if this is just a new price list for e.g. RedHat and other "commercial open source" offerings, or an altogether different construct. There is some hope for the later, because in one interview Gabor Bodi (a state official responsible for the tender) said that they want to give the small local companies the chance.

    We will see...

    Best Regards,
    Gergely

    PS: Shameless plug: I started a blog series on this topic on my blog, however the entries are currently only accessible in Hungarian.

  40. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tatarstan is "tiny independent former Russian republic" in the same sense as Texas is "tiny independent former US state"