Slashdot Mirror


Record-Breaking Model Rocket Launch Set For April 25

darkjohnson writes with this impressive excerpt from Rocketry Planet: "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet tall and it will be powered by a massive array of nine motors: eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor."

156 comments

  1. Takes me back by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Even though it makes this stuff look pretty simple in comparison, it still makes me want to dig out my old home made launcher and build a rocket.
     
    I remember as a teenager saving up for months to buy the Estes designer's kit. I set up a card table in my room where I designed and built quite a few rockets - nothing that used bigger than a D engine. I'll never forget the night I left a bottle of dope open on the table. Very bizarre dreams that night. Learned to keep the window open when I worked on stuff and to shut everything up when I was done.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Takes me back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Amazon:

      "Estes C6-5 Rocket Engine ... 5 used and new from $6.49..."

  2. So..... by cortesoft · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When exactly does a model rocket become just a rocket?

    1. Re:So..... by SputnikPanic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When the FAA and NASA know about it...

    2. Re:So..... by VonSkippy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When it's more then a glorified pop-bottle rocket.

      Which means it has to have active stabilization and a guidance package.

    3. Re:So..... by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The FAA probably already knows about this rocket. I've been to a few launches with a local rocketry club, and they always get FAA clearance. My understanding is that they have a permanent clearance for their launch site for the first few thousand feet, but when they're launching the high-power rockets, they get unlimited clearance, making the area essentially a no-fly zone for planes. (Although that clearly didn't stop the Predator drone that was hanging out above us one day.)

    4. Re:So..... by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sometime just before the government steps in and shuts down the whole project.

    5. Re:So..... by antispam_ben · · Score: 2, Funny

      When an antagonistic foreign power launches it. I get the feeling this guy is about to be declared an antagonistic foreign power.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
    6. Re:So..... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Upon first reading of the summary, I thought he was actually planning to fly in the rocket, and not just launch the rocket via remote control.

      Now that would be something for a YouTube video...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:So..... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      No definite size; but not being built to look exactly like a larger rocket probably helps.

    8. Re:So..... by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was talking with a friend about 5-10 years back and the FAA had recently pulled all approvals for model rocket launches. Being the resourceful group that model rocketeers are, they found some connections and got all set to launch from some Navy proving grounds. FAA got wind of that and got all huffy and said "no no no boys."

      And then the Navy got all huffy at the FAA, "You talking to me?"

      Must have been a fun few meetings!

    9. Re:So..... by gringofrijolero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, in theory the civilian FAA should have more authority over domestic airspace in peacetime. And until a formal declaration of war is in effect, we are at "peace". The FAA decides what airspace is restricted, not the military.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    10. Re:So..... by notthepainter · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not a pilot, nor a military person, but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_use_airspace may give some clues. Basically, as told to me the Navy had some airspace that was "theirs" and didn't take kindly to the FAA trying to tell them what they could do with it.

    11. Re:So..... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Well, that breaks down when the FAA tries to take over control of one of the Navy's designated area of operations. When that happens, the FAA will lose, and rightfully so.
      You can't have civilian flights in weapons testing ranges etc....

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    12. Re:So..... by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      when is is using active guidance and control. and some would say when is not using "ready made" motors. what he is launching is a glorified bottle rocket with an altimeter to tell it when to eject the chute. (just don't let him hear you or me say that)

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    13. Re:So..... by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      The FAA can cede authority, but I don't believe it's required to. Maybe I'm only working with theory here, but the government is a civilian one. And it is the the civilians who authorize how the military can act. We can't let them go around claiming it for themselves. Airspace is regulated by a civilian authority(FAA-DOT 14 CFR Part 73) Something the navy might not like, but has to accept. And it is a good idea to stay out of these areas. You have very little recourse if something bad happens.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    14. Re:So..... by abushga · · Score: 1

      H motor or larger. The vehicle described in parent is a scale model, not a model rocket.

    15. Re:So..... by gringofrijolero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No sir. The FAA sets those areas at the request of the military. If it came down to a real legal turf war, the FAA must have the ultimate authority. Otherwise we are under military rule. As far as I know the US is not...yet.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    16. Re:So..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You are only working with theory.

      The FAA has no authority over MILITARY AIR SPACE.

      You also seem to confuse "the parts of the government that regulate civilian activities" with "government representatives elected by civilians".

      The only ones that can tell the navy what to do in their airspace are the navy itself, and the President of the United States.

      And possibly Space Command.

    17. Re:So..... by Dantu · · Score: 1

      No sir. The FAA sets those areas at the request of the military. If it came down to a real legal turf war, the FAA must have the ultimate authority. Otherwise we are under military rule. As far as I know the US is not...yet.

      Seriously, all getting a bit dramatic isn't it?

      It seems pretty clear cut. You're right that the FAA sets those areas at the request of the military - however because they have been set aside the FAA doesn't have much say in the day-to-day goings-on. Sounds like a case of some minor bureaucrat not realizing that he should shut up when the big-boys (aka his boss and the military) already have an agreement in place.

    18. Re:So..... by deander2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it's a model rocket because it's a 1/10th scale replica of the saturn V.

    19. Re:So..... by Zordak · · Score: 1

      Too bad. We need some new darwin awards.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    20. Re:So..... by ozbird · · Score: 1

      When exactly does a model rocket become just a rocket?

      When in becomes airborne.

    21. Re:So..... by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      When it is an original design I suppose.

      The rocket it question here is "modeled" after a Saturn V rocket. Even bottle rockets are rockets. I think the word "model" in this context does not refer to the size, but more to the appearance.

    22. Re:So..... by danwesnor · · Score: 1

      Actually, they did what all good Americans do. They sued, and won.

    23. Re:So..... by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Exactly where do you draw the line between a pioneering hero and a darwin award contender? I'm guessing the line is pretty blurry.

      That said, I think I agree that sitting on top of a home made rocket would clearly be on the "Darwin Award" side of that line :)

    24. Re:So..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FAA probably already knows about this rocket. I've been to a few launches with a local rocketry club, and they always get FAA clearance. My understanding is that they have a permanent clearance for their launch site for the first few thousand feet, but when they're launching the high-power rockets, they get unlimited clearance, making the area essentially a no-fly zone for planes. (Although that clearly didn't stop the Predator drone that was hanging out above us one day.)

      This is incorrect. I am familiar with this club, as a matter of fact, I just got back from there.
      There is no standing waiver at this field. We get permission from the FAA each and every time we launch. We have a waiver up to 16,900 feet, only during a certain prespecified time frame.

      As far as the government knowing, they ATF has been a guest of our club and are familiar with our operations. We launch tiny rockets up to great big ones.

      Also, be advised that there are certain legal limits that we have to work within. We don't have the ability to just keep getting bigger and bigger. There is more to this than I can get in a quick post.

      Furthermore, the people at our field are varied. THis is not a drunkfest with a bunch of idiots, its a family friendly environment run by professionals. We launch once a month and it is open to the public. Come check us out.

    25. Re:So..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah... there are plenty of "real" rockets that are passively stabilized just like model rockets.

      Actually, defined by the FAA, Model rockets are up to 1500 grams liftoff mass, and 125 grams propellant mass, and 160ns single motor power up to 320ns total power.

      Above that, through the O power range (40960ns), is High Power as defined by NFPA, and Level 2 as defined by FAA, not to be confused by Level 2 as defined by NAR and TRA.

      After that is a completely different category, as defined by FAA.

      What somewhat muddies this launch is that it is not sanctioned by either NAR or TRA, but is completely within the purview of the local club, MDRA, which has its own insurance and procedures. The motors are either not commercial, or custom motors made by a commercial entity.

    26. Re:So..... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      I think when it's not made of balsa wood.

      This does indeed appear to be a model, as opposed to just a rocket :-)

    27. Re:So..... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 1


      Exactly where do you draw the line between a pioneering hero and a darwin award contender?

      I believe it's called the line of death.

    28. Re:So..... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, in theory the civilian FAA should have more authority over domestic airspace in peacetime.

      In theory the FAA is managing the airspace in the interests of the populace, and that includes model rocket launches. See what I did there?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    29. Re:So..... by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The FAA has no authority over MILITARY AIR SPACE.

      The FAA has absolute authority over all domestic airspace. Period. Special-Use Areas are only designated for the awareness of civilian pilots... so they know they may be flying in the presence of military jets and to avoid the area if possible. Special-Use Areas are also often subject to advisory times where there will be excessive activity, or dangerous training procedures that require a buffer zone, during which the FAA (not the Navy) will close the airspace to non-emergency civilian aircraft.

      Now, that's not all to say that the FAA use their absolute authority to be dicks to the military. The Navy still pretty much gets to do what they want in their SUAs and MOAs, and the FAA will still probably release a NOTAM about a model rocket launch and whatnot if the Navy tells them to..... but if the FAA wanted to be dicks and disallow it, they very well could.

    30. Re:So..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as it gets guidance and active stabilization, (i.e. movable control surfaces on the fins), the BATFE and FBI get interested, and it is game over - you have gone from "model rocketry" to "threat to national defense."

      I can legally build scale models of some military missiles, but they must not have movable flaps on the wings or vectorable thrust (also, they must not have an explosive payload... rats!).

  3. TopGear's SpaceShuttle/Car Rocket is Cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJdrlWR-yFM

  4. I think this dude has crossed a line by netruner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The German V2 rockets were only 46 feet in length - although they were much heavier.

    What I'm trying to say is this dude's rocket ain't no model - he's launching a real rocket.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    1. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is he German and does the rocket's flight path point towards London?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's Von Braun's law. The geekier a conversation about rocketry gets, the more likely that the participants will adopt fake German accents and compare their huge rockets.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      Wenn ist das Nunstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

      --
      Ramen
    4. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      *thud*

    5. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      The V2 was FULL of fuel and was designed to withstand high speed flight.

      Not to knock this guys accomplishment, but he has built a large, mostly hollow, scale model rocket with model rocket motors at the bottom. It will not break the that mach barrier or attain more than a few thousands of feet in height. It also has no guidance system.

      Not a 'real' rocket.

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    6. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'm trying to say is this dude's rocket ain't no model - he's launching a real rocket.

      You seem to be confused about what the term model rocket means. Of course it's a rocket. Bottle rockets are real rockets. Of course, it's also a model. It looks like a Saturn V. In fact it's modeled after one. It's a real rocket and real model of another real rocket. That's what's commonly known as a model rocket.

    7. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Actually in the vernacular of the profession, Rockets are unguided vehicles when unmanned like the Honest John, Guided vehicle are called missiles like the Hawk Missile, a manned vehicle is always called a rocket without regard to guidance.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:I think this dude has crossed a line by Somegeek · · Score: 1

      OK, so the V2 is a missile, point taken.

      Where is the line between a missile and a sounding rocket?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
  5. broken summary by mjensen · · Score: 3, Informative

    "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet tall and it will be powered by a massive array of nine motors: eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor."

    1. Re:broken summary by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Informative

      eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor

      So that's a 90-microsecond array?
      (They mean Ns - yes, case matters with physical units...)

    2. Re:broken summary by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Meh, make that 181 microseconds. Forgot the "eight".

    3. Re:broken summary by SECProto · · Score: 0

      just being a bit pedantic, but the abbreviation "ns" is actually correct for nanosecond. see for reference http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nano-

    4. Re:broken summary by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Being a bit pedantic here myself, but the abbreviation "ns" is NOT correct for newton-seconds

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    5. Re:broken summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean 800 mHz means 800 milliHertz (about .8 cycles per second)? Noooooo! So many times I've seen people talk about slow machines like this! You mean they just got it wrong? How about 800 mhz (short for 800 milli hazard, since the German physicist Heinrich Hertz spelled his last name with ....a capital H). Say it ain't so Sparky! I just always assumed they knew 1 mm was 1 millimetre (about the thickness of a dime) and 1 Mm was 1 megametre (about 621.37 miles). Damn!

    6. Re:broken summary by julesh · · Score: 1

      eight 13,000ns N-Class motors and a 77,000ns P-Class motor

      So that's a 90-microsecond array?

      Actually, I'd say it's probably something like a 20-microsecond array. If something in rocketry is measured in seconds, it's usually a specific impulse, whose actual dimension is (force.time)/mass: for measurement the force is measured in units of "force required to balance gravity for a specific mass" causing it to cancel with the mass leaving only a time. From the fact that mass^-1 is a factor you can see that the impulses don't simply add together, but instead average out.

      Of course, you're right that the actual unit being quoted was Ns, but the point is worth making that specific impulse is a more relevant unit anyway. What use is Ns if we don't know how heavy the damned thing is?

    7. Re:broken summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newton Seconds, yes it should be 'Ns'

  6. Surprised they let him by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not joking here, i'm surprised the government has not stepped in and stopped him.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Surprised they let him by yodleboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "they can have my rocket when they pry it from my cold, dead hands"
      "when rockets are outlawed, only outlaws will have rockets"
      weak, i know. it's a boring rainy day...

    2. Re:Surprised they let him by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Informative

      The BATF tried to stop all amateur rocketry beyond the toy size but they lost the lawsuit. A Federal judge ruled that solid rocket fuel of the type used by these rockets is not an explosive.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:Surprised they let him by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Right, but if you get TOO big i bet it would not qualify as amateur anymore and would step in.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:Surprised they let him by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      The BATF tried to stop all amateur rocketry beyond the toy size but they lost the lawsuit.

      Why did they? Although with a name like that... Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, they sound like a unpleasant group of killjoys. Or is it a suggestion for a shopping list?

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Surprised they let him by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Really?!?

      Good lord, just another example of the terrified, pushover nation we've turned in to.

      I was just talking to a friend about how I got a slap on the wrist as a kid for making a draino "bomb". At the time we thought it was out of control that anyone even cared, where kids used to blow off far more explosive fireworks and never get in trouble.

      Nowadays it seems like I got away with murder. Today the so-called department of homeland security or the bureau of alcohol, tobacco and firearms would ship my ass off to Guantanamo.

    6. Re:Surprised they let him by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      It's because there are still some who recognize that innovation doesn't necessarily come from the belly of gigantic corporations...that it used to come from hobbyists in their garage before the US government started regulating everything to death.

    7. Re:Surprised they let him by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Why did they?

      Because it is in their nature to grab for power and "terrorism" provided an excuse.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    8. Re:Surprised they let him by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Good lord, just another example of the terrified, pushover nation we've turned in to.

      Um, I thought I wrote that they lost the lawsuit. Of *course* they made a try at a power grab. Why would you expect anything else?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    9. Re:Surprised they let him by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In order to justify it's existance and grow, a government bureau must continuously find new excuses to add layers of regulatory bureaucracy and new things to regulate. They were far far more interested in throwing their weight around and making people kiss their ass than they were in any sort of safety or public well-being.

      The fact that the rocket engine cores cannot be made to explode even intentionally was irrelevant to them. A regulatory agency saw a group of people who they weren't directly regulating. The group was small enough to not create an inconveniently noisy public protest but large enough to stroke their collective ego.

    10. Re:Surprised they let him by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Ahhh!

      So its a big "Fuck You!" to the BATF.

      Record breaking, even.

      This puts this story in a whole new light. Let the countdown begin.

    11. Re:Surprised they let him by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      with a name like that... Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, they sound like a unpleasant group of killjoys.

      More like a caterer in Texas.

      rj

    12. Re:Surprised they let him by rossifer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, with a maximum altitude under 5000 feet, this guy's not going for performance, he's just putting a scale model up in the air high enough to say it flew. High performance means high propellant mass fractions (where up to 90% of the launch weight is propellant) and almost certainly multiple stages. This rocket has an 18% propellant fraction and is single stage. It will look very cool coming off the launchpad and that's all it needs to do.

      The government gets interested when you start heading for 50,000 feet, 100,000 feet, or higher. The other thing the government gets interested about is guidance systems on rockets. If it's a self-stabilizing rocket that goes up and down with no guidance system, just follow the FAA rules to make sure there are no aircraft in your flight envelope and the government doesn't really care.

    13. Re:Surprised they let him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also tend to care when you start adding that magic "payload" component.

    14. Re:Surprised they let him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not joking here, i'm surprised the government has not stepped in and stopped him.

      I'm surprised they haven't outlawed people programming their gps units while driving in traffic. They are killing people, just like the phone drunks.

      The FAA is behind it, and since it takes hours to prepare it will become obvious why they are a bad choice for the bad guys.

    15. Re:Surprised they let him by budgenator · · Score: 1

      They weren't as worried about the rocket motors being used as an explosive as they were of the motors being used in a delivery vehicle for a warhead.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  7. The Astronaut Farmer... by deft · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of this not amazing, but fun for kids movie about a guy that built the full size thing in his backyard.

    Funny, the alarmist guy here sounds like some of the government types int he movie :)
    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1203785&cid=27628631

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  8. Kind of like being... by StarManta.Mini · · Score: 4, Funny

    .....the world's tallest midget?

  9. strap in by mikey177 · · Score: 1

    I think he should take it further and build a seat in the thing so when he hits the top he can skydive the rest of the way and if the rocket fails will be a huge mistake on his part

  10. This is amazing by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's great that regular folk can do these things One thing though - I wonder just how bi

    1. Re:This is amazing by 4D6963 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's great that regular folk can do these things One thing though - I wonder just how bi

      Something about your comment se

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    2. Re:This is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf?? You guys didn't even say candlejack, what happenened to y...

    3. Re:This is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look out!
      It's Candleja

  11. Uh-oh! by Ironchew · · Score: 2, Funny

    it will stand over 36 fe*END OF CARRIER*

    Little did Timothy know the true purpose of the rocket and its payload. ::evil laughter in the distance::

  12. communications by wjh31 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    honest, its just a communications satellite

    1. Re:communications by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would be ironic, if this thing performed better than North Korea's "communications" rocket. Of course, then North Korean agents would start scrounging the US for model rocket engines, for their next attempt:

      "Hello, Estes http://www.estesrockets.com/rocketengines.php? We would like to buy a lot of engines. Yes, it will be a VERY big model rocket."

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    2. Re:communications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an Il pod because it plays:
      "The song of general Kim Il Sung" and
      "The song of general Kim Jong Il"

  13. going, going, going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's slashdotted!

  14. Model? by iateyourcookies · · Score: 1

    At 1600 pounds and 36 feet when does a model rocket become just a rocket?

    1. Re:Model? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      At 1600 pounds and 36 feet when does a model rocket become just a rocket?

      When it achieves orbit around Uranus?

      Picture of the model, since the site is slow http://www.rocketryplanet.com/images/content/2829/1.jpg

    2. Re:Model? by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      The only reason I can think of that this is being called a model rocket, is that it is using engines of the same basic design as modern model rockets. If this was being launched by more traditional rocket fuels then due it the size and weight it would surely be a full fledged rocket.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    3. Re:Model? by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      These guys always scale things down. When are we going to see them scale up? I wanna see a 720 foot tall rocket.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    4. Re:Model? by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      When it has a non-aesthetic purpose?

    5. Re:Model? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Well, that and the fact it's a 1:10 scale model of the Saturn V.

    6. Re:Model? by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      True, but consider that one can have a 1:1 scale model of a rocket. In that case the difference between it being a rocket vs a model is usually that the model is not functional.

      Would you call a functional 1:1.1111 (9:10) scale Saturn V a rocket or a model? I'd call it a rocket, myself.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  15. In other news... by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Funny

    "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the smallest full-scale rocket in history. The rocket will weigh over 1,600 pounds, it will stand over 36 feet..."

    1. Re:In other news... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      "On April 25, 2009, history will be made. At Higgs Farm in Price, Maryland, Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the smallest full-scale rocket in history. The rocket will weigh less than 1,700 pounds, it will stand under 37 feet..."

      As described by a reporter worth his salt...

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  16. Model rocket? Riiiight.... by PPH · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...Kim Jong-il.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. this is still a model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really think this is a model anymore...

  18. The first model rocket with enough energy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...need to prove the existence of the Higgs Farm. Some have theorized that all vegetables gain their mass from the Higgs field. Now we may finally know.

  19. Model Rocket by Jared555 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I thought model rockets were just when you were following a kit and/or exact instructions..... I would think this would just fall under amateur rocketry....

    From wikipedia:

    A model rocket is a small rocket capable of being launched by anybody, to generally low altitudes (usually to around 100-500 m (300-1500 ft) for a 30 g (1 oz.) model) and recovered by a variety of means.

    According to the National Association of Rocketry, (NAR) Safety Code[1], model rockets are constructed of paper, wood, plastic and other lightweight materials.

  20. Site Slashdotted by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    How does one add tags, or is that for ubergurus only? This site has crashed and burned. I got database errors, the first page for a moment, and then:
    This site is temporarily unavailable.
    Please notify the System Administrator

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
    1. Re:Site Slashdotted by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      This site has crashed and burned.

      A bad Omen before a launch.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  21. Implications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am overjoyed that this man will enter the record books. Just out of curi

  22. Sounds a bit small... by Vulch · · Score: 1

    How does it compare to the Top Gear Reliant Robin Shuttle? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b4WzWFKQ20

  23. A "model" rocket? by sphealey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a hard time seeing how something larger and more powerful than most of Goddard's devices can be called a "model". Amateur-built, sure. But not a "model".

    sPh

    1. Re:A "model" rocket? by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing I would say that goes against your point is that this is a 1/10th scale model of a Saturn V. That's enough in my mind to call it a model.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:A "model" rocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amateur model-scale rocket?

    3. Re:A "model" rocket? by pz · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a hard time seeing how something larger and more powerful than most of Goddard's devices can be called a "model". Amateur-built, sure. But not a "model".

      sPh

      Did you bother to click to the article? It's a model of a Saturn V. A real Saturn V is ten times taller. So, yes, it's a 1:10 scale model of a frelling HUGE rocket, and is therefore quite large on an absolute scale, but it is still a model.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:A "model" rocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see an "amateur" build a 2:1 scale model. ;)

    5. Re:A "model" rocket? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      but it is still a model.

      Shhh!

  24. Not a model rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, the definition of a "model rocket" is pretty clear, and this isn't one.

    Otherwise, this is just a rocket built by a private party. Nothing wrong with that as long as the appropriate rules and regulations are followed.

  25. You guys haven't seen anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, check out http://www.balls18.com. The biggest HPR launch in the world with a FAA waiver to fly to 100k feet.

    Unfortunately, that thing won't go super high. It's a heavy rocket. I wouldn't want it to land anywhere near me.

    1. Re:You guys haven't seen anything by FlyingGuy · · Score: 1

      The Balls rocket shoots are quite an event.

      --
      Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
  26. High Powered Model Rocketry by wdhowellsr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is not a new process just the biggest yet. There have been FAA clearance to 50k feet out west. The difference between a NASA or Military Rocket and a Model Rocket is one costs billions of dollars and has fail rate of thirty percent. A model rocket cost less than fifty thousand and has a fail rate of fifty percent.

    William D Howell Sr.

    1. Re:High Powered Model Rocketry by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      There's also that other distinguishing factor where one goes into outer space and one reaches an altitude achieved by cessnas.

    2. Re:High Powered Model Rocketry by nerph · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, NASA should save billions of dollars and just buy 2 model rockets - drop their fail rate down to 25%.

    3. Re:High Powered Model Rocketry by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      If I recall, the major defining difference is that amateur/model rockets can not have a guidance system.

    4. Re:High Powered Model Rocketry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also that other distinguishing factor where one goes into outer space and one reaches an altitude achieved by cessnas.

      Since when can a`Cessna fly to 50,000 feet??

  27. Rocketry Planet: site temporarily offline by mtinman · · Score: 0

    Rocketry Planet, the originating site of this story, appears to be temporarily offline due to a database problem. Me thinks this may be a perfect example of the "Slashdot Effect"...

    1. Re:Rocketry Planet: site temporarily offline by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter. Tell me more of this so-called "Slashdot Effect".

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  28. Don't count your chickens by svnt · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was waiting for an editorial comment to the effect of "knock on wood."

    He could very easily become the person who exploded the largest model rocket before it left the launch pad.

    1. Re:Don't count your chickens by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Steve Eves will enter the history books as the person who flew the largest model rocket in history.

      . . . or . . .

      He could very easily become the person who exploded the largest model rocket before it left the launch pad.

      Sounds like a win/win to me . . . how does he lose?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  29. Navy Vs FAA Cagematch by sjbe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, that breaks down when the FAA tries to take over control of one of the Navy's designated area of operations.

    Right, because the Navy has weapons and the FAA doesn't. I'll put my money on the Navy in that fight.

    1. Re:Navy Vs FAA Cagematch by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0

      Well, the navy has a boss. The boss of that boss is the president. If the FAA tells the president "that crazy guy at the navy breaks the law and threatens to kill us". the president can kick their ass with all he has. Like some big red button for example.
      I put my money on the FAA.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Navy Vs FAA Cagematch by UnknowingFool · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And so does the guy at the FAA. While the FAA has jurisdiction over the granting of the airspace, I don't see that they will win in a dispute especially if the Navy is still using those proving grounds. The guy at the FAA who insists that they modelers not launch has one option to force the Navy not to let them launch: revoke the Navy's privileges. Now that's going to be a bureaucratic mess with all sorts of paperwork and battles. When their bosses step in and see what the dispute here's what they are going to hear.

      Navy guy: The FAA is revoking our license to the proving grounds.
      Navy boss: On what grounds?
      FAA guy: The Navy is allowing prohibited actions on the grounds. We have the right to revoke. I have initiated the proper paperwork to revoke.
      FAA boss: What prohibited actions are being allowed?
      FAA guy: They are launching model rockets there.
      FAA boss: So let me get this straight. You have initiated a move that involves at least 6 months of meetings and paperwork. And gotten us into a turf war with the Navy because you don't like them launching model rockets from their site. Gentleman, I thank the Navy for its time. This matter will be resolved here very shortly.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  30. The Top Gear Reliant Shuttle was bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At launch:

    11.2 Meters tall (36 feet)
    Lift off mass: over 1400kg

    Translation: 37.4 feet tall, 3075lb

    The Biggest, most powerful none commercial rocket ever.

  31. Steve, excerrent job opportunities in North Korea! by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 1, Funny

    Great stuff for the resume if you're looking to explore the burgeoning rocketry market in North Korea.

  32. Top Gear Space Shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Maybe the biggest in the US, but Top Gear launched a model space shuttle with a car on it a few years ago....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b4WzWFKQ20

    1. Re:Top Gear Space Shuttle by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Top Gear Space Shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hey, silly person, don't you know that it only counts as the biggest if the USAians do it? Nothing outside the USA matters, after all.

    3. Re:Top Gear Space Shuttle by mpthompson · · Score: 1

      OK, that was pretty damn cool. It came "this close" to working. Too bad they didn't try again.

      The Mythbusters have nothing on these guys.

  33. Top Gear by garlicbready · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm reminded of the TopGear episode
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_b4WzWFKQ20

    where they launch a Reliant Robin (old 3 wheel car) as a re-usable space shuttle on the back of one of these things
    I wonder how the size compares?

    1. Re:Top Gear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Top Gear rocket was both larger and heavier.

  34. Inquiring minds want to know... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    You say it's a model rocket. But can you tell me what it really is?

    Regards Kim Jong Il

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  35. North Korea? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Is this a copy of the North Korea rocket, or is it even more powerful?

    Which one made it the highest? (not what was reported by N Korea, but actual height reached)

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:North Korea? by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      The North Korea rocket traveled 1200 miles over Japan before crashing into the ocean. I don't actually know what the altitude reached was.

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  36. Short lived motors by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    13 and 77 microseconds? Talk about quick.

  37. There's more info here, too by brianc · · Score: 1
    --


    SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
  38. How can this be a model rocket? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    http://www.nar.org/NARmrsc.html

    Extrapolating from their table of engine sizes, the "site dimensions" would need to be 68 miles across.

    The "escape" clause for rockets of more than one pound seems like a recent addition. Was that there when I was a kid?

  39. It's a good thing... by TooMad · · Score: 1

    Steve Eves sounds like a nice wholesome 'American' name. If that much bomb making material were purchased by someone with the last name of say Ali or, I don't know, Megahed then they wouldn't have made it out the door of the hobbyshop before being arrested for being a terrorist. But, we would possibly be PC about it and never used the T word in the actual arrest.

    1. Re:It's a good thing... by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The sanctioning organization for model rocketry is called Tripoli, so named because its founder sold a collection of Libyan coins to get the incorporation money. That caused a bit of a flap during the troubles with Khaddafi, but they managed to straighten it out.

      rj

  40. Google for "MudRock" by FlyingGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every year they launch from BLM land on the Blackrock dessert. On two days the have FAA clearance to 100,000' MSL

    Last year the highest rocket hit 31,000' MSL and hit just pver mach 3. The motor had a burn time of just a little under 4 seconds.

    And yes the FAA issues NOTAM's ( Notice to airman ) with the appropriate lat and long for the launch area.

    --
    Hey KID! Yeah you, get the fuck off my lawn!
    1. Re:Google for "MudRock" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except there's a general aviation airport 9.2 nautical miles away from this launch site, and no NOTAM was issued. Fortunately no one else was in the airspace--this guy could/should be in big trouble.

  41. Newton seconds not nanoseconds by butlerm · · Score: 1

    The abbreviation is the summary is wrong. The correct unit is "Newton seconds" or "Ns", not "ns". Newton-seconds are a measure of impulse, i.e. the average thrust generated times the duration of the motor burn.

    Of course the peak thrust matters too, if it is not greater than the weight of the rocket, the rocket won't lift off of the ground. Any net upward acceleration will only occur during the period the rocket is pointed up and the motor thrust is greater than the weight. Of course the rocket will keep moving upward for a considerable period after the net upward acceleration has stopped. A typical projectile (i.e. a non rocket) experiences net downward acceleration (due to gravity) during its entire flight.

    1. Re:Newton seconds not nanoseconds by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      What about a non-typical projectile? Do non-typical projectiles somehow avoid gravity during some point of their flight? Can you cite some peer-reviewed sources to substantiate this ridiculous inference of yours? :p

      (yes, that was sarcasm)

    2. Re:Newton seconds not nanoseconds by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      That's where correct use of units comes in. I was convinced the author meant "Newtons", plural, as in "lbs", for thrust only. But mostly I thought (s)he didn't have a clue if they didn't know their middle school physics so I didn't bother to read on.

    3. Re:Newton seconds not nanoseconds by butlerm · · Score: 1

      Re-read the sentence. The key word is "net".

  42. Hire him by tuxgeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe N. Korea should hire him
    Considering their most recent attempt was a grand botch-o-lito

    --
    "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    1. Re:Hire him by lxs · · Score: 1

      Don't be brainwashed by your capitalist pig-dog propaganda. In fact the rocket started its warp drive shortly after takeoff, converted those imperialist Greys to glorious socialism, and founded the Peoples Republic of Zeta Reticuli.

  43. FAA Rocketry Rules by dtmos · · Score: 4, Informative

    The US Federal Aviation Administration rules relevant to unmanned rocketry are in CFR Title 14, 101.21 to 101.27. In 101.22 one finds the definitions of "Model Rocket", "High-Power Rocket", and "Advanced High-Power Rocket" relevant in the United States:

    101.22 Definitions.
    The following definitions apply to this subpart:

    (a) Class 1--Model Rocket means an amateur rocket that:
            (1) Uses no more than 125 grams (4.4 ounces) of propellant;
            (2) Uses a slow-burning propellant;
            (3) Is made of paper, wood, or breakable plastic;
            (4) Contains no substantial metal parts; and
            (5) Weighs no more than 1,500 grams (53 ounces), including the propellant.

    (b) Class 2--High-Power Rocket means an amateur rocket other than a model rocket that is propelled by a motor or motors having a combined total impulse of 40,960 Newton-seconds (9,208 pound-seconds) or less.

    (c) Class 3--Advanced High-Power Rocket means an amateur rocket other than a model rocket or high-power rocket.

    [Doc. No. FAA-2007-27390, 73 FR 73781, Dec. 4, 2008]

    So according to this taxonomy, Mr. Eves' rocket is an advanced high-power rocket, and is not a model rocket.

  44. More traditional fuels? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

    The propellant formulations (Ammonium Perchlorate Composite Propellant--APCP) used for high power model rockets are essentially the same as the one used in the solid rocket boosters that lift the Space Shuttle.

    Granted, model rockets don't use LOX. LH2 or hypergolics, but some of us are playing around with hybrids like Rutan used on SpaceShipOne.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  45. Wow. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    That sure is some type o' dong.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  46. Cg/Cp (or mass over ass) by danwesnor · · Score: 1

    I dunno, the Saturn V required guidance to remain stable. I hope he's done his math, or he could end up X-winging it.

    1. Re:Cg/Cp (or mass over ass) by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about that, as well. Every scale model Saturn V I have seen that flew well had fins that were quite a bit larger than scale, often made of clear plastic so as not to be as obtrusive.

      Without active guidance/gimballed engines, the fins are the only thing keeping the rocket flying straight once it clears the launch rail. To develop enough restoring force, they are going to have to be bigger than true scale.

      Stable or not, it's gonna be an exciting flight no matter what! :) Anyone know how far spectators are going to be from the pad?

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  47. Oh, yeh. by actionbastard · · Score: 2, Funny

    There will be a KABOOM!

    --
    Sig this!
  48. Anyone have info on a LOX model rocket? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been wanting to create a true liquid-fueled model rocket - kerosene and LOX - just like Goddard's - since I was 8 years old.

    There is very, very little info on the net about this. There's a few pamphlets from the 70s, but they all use compressed O2, not LOX.

    Any info would be appreciated, because I've decided that *this* will be my mid-life crisis project.

    1. Re:Anyone have info on a LOX model rocket? by pngwen · · Score: 1

      I would strongly advise against the attempt unless you are well skilled in the handling of LOX. Kerosene + LOX is known among aerospace engineers as the "Devil's Brew." Sure you get a good thrust to weight ratio, but you can also get massive conflagration in small packages.

      The trickiest problem is in controlling the burn so you don't destroy your combustion chamber. In a solid fuel rocket, if you burn through, you end up with anomalous thrust and perhaps an uneven burning fuel stack. With a liquid rocket, you end up with a huge fireball.

      That being said, if you do want to do it still, get very very good at handling pressurized gases. You'll want certifications in that, possibly certifications in welding and extensive training in mechanical engineering. Good luck!

      --
      I am the penguin that codes in the night.
  49. a "model"!!! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    Surely it gets to a point where it is no longer a "model".

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  50. If the Rocket Designer starts to run, you run.. by cboslin · · Score: 1

    Quite a few years back I heard some funny and interesting stories about a guy, I think it might have been this David Adair guy in the link below. Anyway, David was a child prodigy and amateur rocket enthusiast and at the age of 11 he was launching larger and larger rockets. He built a rocket that went from the East Coast to Area 51.

    If the story is to be believed and this part is nothing that outrageous so why not, The first time he launched a large rocket it set off warnings, people thought some enemy power was shooting at us. Well after that he was asked to notify people so that they knew and they could verify the airspace was clear of airplanes.

    It is interesting that in a simpler time, they would not have prevented him from launching and of course it did not hurt to have neighbors that were in the military and government vouching for you either. At least that is the story.

    The people that would gather to watch him launch, knew that if he took off running that they should probably be running too.

    Not sure if this story is the same one or not, there is so much disinformation around military and experimental aircraft. But figured most would find it entertaining regardless.

    At least this one is relatively similar to the story I heard.

    I really like this excerpt about no visible light source:

    The most interesting thing about this to me still is how well lit the underground area was. There were no shadows, anywhere. And there were no light fixtures, anywhere. I was wondering how they generated that much light. It didn't look like the walls were glowing, or the floor or the ceiling. But every square inch of this place was lit, and yet there was no visible source of light.

    I will not even go into about whether UFOs are terrestrial or extra terrestrial. As with Religion, Politics and a few other subjects, everyone believes whatever they believe and if someone else challenges those beliefs, rather than having an interesting conversation (my typical and preferred reaction) people tend to get upset. So no point in anyone going there, that was NOT my intent with this post..

    Why can we not agree to disagree when necessary and let it stop there.

  51. Guidance systems on rockets by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I remember several years ago reading an article on the web where some guys were building a model rocket with an optical tracking and guidance system. They were essentially building an optically guided surface to air missile.

    I have not been able to find that article since.

    I wonder what happened to it and their project?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Guidance systems on rockets by rytier · · Score: 1

      Maybe they found out that optical tracking of clouds doesn't work reliably ;-) Or they got a late-night visit of sorts...

      --
      --- Naive inside, foolish outside...:)
  52. Model rockets are real rockets. by argent · · Score: 1

    Calling this a "model rocket" brings up images of kids in an open field clipping leads to chicken-bone igniters.

    OK, this is a "model" because its shell is a scale model of a Saturn V, but calling it a "model rocket" is like calling "stock" styled drag racers "model cars" just because they have a fiberglass model of a street car bolted to their frame.