Slashdot Mirror


Looking To Spammers To Solve Hard AI Problems

An anonymous reader writes "With bots getting closer to beating text-based CAPTCHAs for good, New Scientist points out that when they do, OCR technology will at least have advanced. The article goes on to suggest that whatever kind of reverse Turing Test that comes next should be chosen to motivate spammers to solve other pressing AI problems, such as image recognition. Are there any other problems that criminal crowdsourcing could help with?"

55 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. It was supposed to happen. by plover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Advancing the state of the art in Optical Character Recognition was always intended to be a side-benefit of CAPTCHAs. It looks like that plan came through nicely.

    I have always figured CAPTCHAs would be a stopgap until other methods of authentication could easily be used, such as micro-payments or single signon solutions like OpenID. Unfortunately, those other methods haven't been adopted nearly as fast as the need. Perhaps if CAPTCHAs are declared "dead", site operators will feel more urgency to adopt these solutions.

    If CAPTCHAs do continue, I'd like the next problem to be facial recognition software. I'd love a package that could look at a picture and tag it "Nicholas and Andrea" or "Glen and Helene". Digital camera software everywhere could benefit from this technology. Not sure how you'd bake that into a CAPTCHA, but it's a good problem to solve.

    --
    John
    1. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Ilyakub · · Score: 4, Informative

      Facial recognition is not only pretty good, but is available in consumer applications. Google's Picasa does it quite well for your personal photos, and Face.com can go through your Facebook photos and quite accurately suggest tags.

    2. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Jurily · · Score: 2, Funny

      If CAPTCHAs do continue, I'd like the next problem to be facial recognition software. I'd love a package that could look at a picture and tag it "Nicholas and Andrea" or "Glen and Helene".

      Given the likeliness of Linux being the test platform, this will work for female genitalia first.

    3. Re:It was supposed to happen. by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's why we need a good micropayment consolidation service. It wouldn't be effective for a site owner to send out bills for $0.005, nor would it be a joy for me to authenticate a hundred different websites to decide whether or not to pay them. But as a consumer I'd be willing to let someone like Google Micropayments (Beta) run the whole show. They'd get different sites to sign up to get $0.005 per eyeball. I'd give them $50.00, and start surfing. As long as it's no harder than my checking the "Allow ( )1 / (o)10 / ( )100 micropayments to slashdot.org" button, I'd be willing to use it.

      --
      John
    4. Re:It was supposed to happen. by bmgoau · · Score: 2, Informative

      Picasa is a popular image management program that has supported facial recognition since last year: http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/02/picasa-refresh-brings-facial-recognition/

      I havnt used it, so im not sure how good it is.

    5. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hope the next scheme is easier for people with bad eyes. I often have to call the wife or one of my sons to solve a captcha puzzle. The black/white/grey are bad enough - when they combine colors, I'm freaking LOST!! If I'm home alone, I just give up after a couple failed attempts. Good thing my bank doesn't use this scheme, huh?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:It was supposed to happen. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But has it?

      Unfortunately, CAPTCHA is radically easier than actual OCR. When cracking a CAPTCHA, achieving a success rate of 5-10% is absolutely fine. Plus, when you submit your answer, you are told whether or not you got it right. With OCR, anything short of high 90's is pretty much useless, and the only feedback available is through manual human intervention, which scales poorly.

      Arguably, the only significant OCR advance has been RECAPTCHA, which is just a clever way of making humans do the hard stuff in a way that actually helps, rather than just using makework problems.

      It is certainly true that CAPTCHA cracking has advanced considerably, that just doesn't apply too neatly to real OCR problems.

    7. Re:It was supposed to happen. by digitalchinky · · Score: 4, Informative

      CAPTCHAs have been dead for a long time already. Please direct me to the spam software that can actually read and interpret these for me, because I have about an 80% failure rate. I'm human, the very thing that is supposed to be able to figure all this out. If I see a site asking me to type in some obscure word or number, I click elsewhere. It's just too much trouble.

      Spammers aren't using software to solve this problem anyway! Bold statement you might say? Maybe. Travel your backside to Asia, or, from the comfort of your own chair you could visit sites like sulit.com.ph (think craigs list wanna-be, it's that kind of thing) Every 3rd advert is asking for 'writers' that can log in to forums and post at least 3 or more messages before getting banned. How much does the lucky employee earn? About $200 USD and up per month. It's real money. So who is paying for this? People like the PHB in 1st world corporate wasteland, maybe your CEO thinking it's a good way to get more hits, maybe you. (No, not you personally) Evidently it works or the money wouldn't be flowing, and you wouldn't have 3000 people advertising this service each and every day.

    8. Re:It was supposed to happen. by dangitman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Micro payments are terrible ideas, first because it violates basic net neutrality principles...

      Methinks you have no idea what "net neutrality" actually means. What does paying to post on a forum have to do with net neutrality?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    9. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Ardrad · · Score: 2, Informative

      The new iPhoto '09 does a good job finding faces in clear pictures, and if you tell it where to look in fuzzy photos it learns and can find the face well there too. I have to agree facial recognition is making big steps forward. And no, it's not because I love my Apple that I mention this, it's because that's the latest facial recognition software I've used.

    10. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If CAPTCHAs do continue, I'd like the next problem to be facial recognition software. I'd love a package that could look at a picture and tag it "Nicholas and Andrea" or "Glen and Helene". Digital camera software everywhere could benefit from this technology. Not sure how you'd bake that into a CAPTCHA, but it's a good problem to solve.

      How about this: The user is presented with a short message that they have to mark as "Spam" or "Not Spam". If the spammers get really good at solving this problem, they've effectively written themselves out of a job. And if they can't do it, then they can't get new accounts.

      --
      We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
    11. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about a "hot or not" test? How good are computers at deciding if somebody is hot or not?

      (Yeah, it's a joke, I understand the statistical implications of multiple-choice Turing tests).

      --
      No sig today...
    12. Re:It was supposed to happen. by gd2shoe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I like it, but it has issues that may be hard to work out.

      (1) If they only needed to solve one (or any small number), then the spammer's auto system will only need to guess. Present the potential user with 3 of these and they'll get fed up. The spammer's system, on the other hand, will get 11% correct by guessing. That's enough for them to thwart the system.

      (2) It's really easy to get samples of spam. Any user who clicks the spam button has stated that it's not their mail. (Multiple users flagging the same message tell you it's practically certain to be spam) It's not a huge stretch to acquire or assume permission to use the message. Getting legitimate samples (of varieties of email) may be much harder.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    13. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the chans has "fapchas"; you have to identify various body parts by typing "tits", "vagoo", "dick", or "ass"

    14. Re:It was supposed to happen. by wisty · · Score: 2, Funny

      But that would mean that any self-important twat couldn't just freely post his own egotistical rantings online for everyone to see. I won't stand for it!

    15. Re:It was supposed to happen. by houghi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great idea to have just a button. No way that can ever be abused. Well, to be sure, perhaps still better find some way to see if you pressed that button or a computer. Perhaps a way of hard to read letters. Oh, wait. Back to the drawing board.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    16. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Captain+Hook · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about a "hot or not" test?

      since beauty seems to be largely evaluated on symmetry and ratios of various parts of the face and body relative to other parts and existing facial recognition systems already work by measuring distances and ratios between those points, I don't think that would be all that hard.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    17. Re:It was supposed to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually this exists: http://spamornot.org/

    18. Re:It was supposed to happen. by balkira · · Score: 2, Interesting

      CAPTCHA is not dead!

      we'll just move to 3d objet recognition instead of text.

      A plane a table a cup drawn in 3d is more intended to interpretative thinking.

      go write a function that takes the door drawing as input and throws out the word "door". Spammers will work for even more years.

      There you really start tackling AI. Not with OCR at all IMO

  2. SSSHHH!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't tell them that they're the ones that are actually being used! That spoils all the fun!

  3. True AI by not-my-real-name · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll just bet that this is what leads to "true" artificial intelligence (whatever that is). Soon, we'll have completely automated agents trying to convince other completely automated agents to purchase stuff to enhance bits of biology that they don't have.

    --
    un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    1. Re:True AI by KPU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a reasonably accurate description of the stock market.

    2. Re:True AI by zach297 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That brings up a good point. When AI is good enough to get past CAPTCHA it will hopefully be good enough to filter out the spam.

    3. Re:True AI by geekboy642 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you seen the markov chain generator posts? I haven't seen the markov chain generator posts? I could be one myself. Haven't you seen the markov chain generator posts? I could be one myself. Haven't you seen the markov chain generator posts? I haven't seen them from genuine posts. In point of fact, I haven't seen the markov chain generator posts? I could be one myself. Haven't you seen them from genuine posts. In point of fact, I can't tell them from genuine posts. In point of fact, I haven't seen the markov chain generator posts? I can't tell them from genuine posts. In point of fact, I could be one myself. Haven't you seen the markov chain generator posts? I can't tell them recently, and that disturbs me: they've gotten so good I could be one myself.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
  4. a possible idea by ecalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    several years ago 'neural nets' were the big thing and they were thinking that they could make them 'learn' and do useful things.

    i always thought that traffic control would be an interesting application. if a computer could look at video of an intersection (and streets leading to the intersection) and figure out where cars were and weren't, you could make traffic lights a lot less annoying.

    so our CAPTCHA might be a picture/video of cars and a request to count them?

    eric

    1. Re:a possible idea by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work on a traffic signal system in Australia. At one point we hosted an experimental system from (I think) the CSIRO which displayed the speed you would have to travel at get a green at the next intersection. The problem with that was that it gave really bad, but accurate advice, like travel at 12km/h or 80km/h. This is where the limit is 60. So they changed it to only display speeds below and close to the limit and then it was even more useless.

      The actual algorithms which determined the timing of the signals was hand assembled by traffic engineers in 12 bit PDP/11 machine code, so it was impossible to know exactly how it worked.

      Maybe that system was intelligent. It certainly had a lot of emergent properties.

    2. Re:a possible idea by dcollins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Certainly not a full-on AI problem, just parameterize the flow density and flow rate and define a decent model and cost function, and run it through an NLP solver.

      Except that it's really a discrete problem, with a solution that likely has sensitive dependence on initial conditions (i.e., chaotic), and would result in symptoms such as "bus bunching": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_bunching

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    3. Re:a possible idea by Samah · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    4. Re:a possible idea by dcollins · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmmm, if you smoothed out the data so that it was say, averaged over an hour, and force it to be continuous, could you get something going then.

      My point is that's about the worst assumption you can make.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    5. Re:a possible idea by jd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      *loads thoughts into blunderbus, scatters them over landscape*

      Seriously, we know the following from experimental science:
      a) Rats are capable of flying F-14s
      b) African Grey parrots are capable of basic grammar, understand attributes as distinct from objects, and comprehend zero.
      c) Crows can solve basic problems and manufacture their own tools

      These do not have significant development in the brain areas associated with processing data, but they DO have exceptionally well-developed brains for handling raw sensory information. Ergo, the virtualization is more important.

      Experience is important, yes, but studies in humans and animals suggests that experience is remembered as a simulation of past experience. Children, for example, listen when told not to do something, but don't act on it because they have nothing to link that instruction to. The instruction is only acted upon on subsequent events. Ergo, modeling is more critical to learning than direction.

      Senses are linked in ways that are not fully understood. It is believed that all babies have an extreme form of synaesthesia until the brain develops filters. Even then, though, senses are linked. Taste changes when you have a cold, because it is linked to scent, for example.

      Damage to key structures has an unpredictable effect. The cartoonist Scott Adams was able to redevelop speech, for example, by bypassing an area involving language. On the other hand, there was a case of a person whose ability to store new long-term memories was destroyed when brain surgery destroyed the critical component involved. It's unclear to me what efforts were made to bypass the area, if any, but clearly the function never restored itself.

      I don't think it accurate to call memory holographic. Although any given memory appears to be distributed across the memory regions as a whole, the brain's ability to be fooled by self-similar images seems closer to storing things in a manner more analogous to fractal compression than to an interference pattern. Interference works in time as well as space (a pulsed laser can generate interference patterns), but there is no analogy in memory - spacially-separated events do not get mapped to temporally-separated events.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  5. But will they share their code? by dameepster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Spammers are unlikely to share their results with the rest of the world. They're motivated by financial rewards, and there is absolutely no incentive to publicize their methodology in any format.

    Not only would the "good guys" learn from it -- and thus potentially defeat the spammers' discovery -- but other spammers would simply steal their work.

    1. Re:But will they share their code? by ceejayoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Spammers sell their code to other spammers all the time.

  6. how about... by inzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    using spammers to create AI which allows us to catch/ignore/prevent spamming?

    1. Re:how about... by Deanalator · · Score: 2

      "Before you can post on this webpage, which of the following messages is spam?"

  7. Busting captchas has not advanced anything... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2, Informative

    it has simply used existing OCR-type technology on a slightly (and I want to emphasize "slightly") different problem. Different character sets, if you will.

    1. Re:Busting captchas has not advanced anything... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would agree, if general-purpose captcha-beating software were available. But that isn't so. Each captcha system was beaten by custom code, individually written for that system. So in effect, it is not much different than adding a new font to existing OCR software.

    2. Re:Busting captchas has not advanced anything... by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would agree, if general-purpose captcha-beating software were available. But that isn't so. Each captcha system was beaten by custom code, individually written for that system. So in effect, it is not much different than adding a new font to existing OCR software.

      Most of them don't actually beat the captcha with a program. This is how it gets done.

      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
  8. Beat them with sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Replace captchas with pictures of hot/non-hot women.

    Simply ask "is this woman hot? [Yes]/[No]"

    Half of them will be so busy masturbating that they won't be cracking forms.

  9. Not exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not as optimistic as the New Scientist. Spammers need a really low success rate, as compared to OCR technology which needs a really high success rate.

  10. Capitalism at its best by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wherever there is greed, it can be harnessed to actually do some good. I love it!

    1. Re:Capitalism at its best by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wherever there is greed, it can be harnessed to actually do some good. I love it!

      I never thought I'd say this on slashdot, but you need to watch more super-hero movies.
             

  11. The CAPTCHA problem is an easy one. by iendedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All you have to do is put humans "in" the CAPTCHA interpretation logic, by way of a porn site. BOT -> PORN SITE -> SCRAPE REAL CAPTCHA AND PRESENT TO USER -> USER TYPES CAPTCHA TO SEE PORN -> BOT USES SOLUTION TO PASS REAL CAPTCHA

    Seems simple to me.

    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
  12. THe solution is simple. by Edward+Nardella · · Score: 2, Funny

    Security by obscurity could work no?

    --
    My sig doesn't address Anons, sigs aren't visible to them.
  13. Resiliant software by onyxruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You know, if legitimate software could ever learn how to make software as resilient as malware the world would be a better place. Modern malware is getting close to nuke proof. Delete registry keys, dll's, multiple self healing packages, msi source code, custom drivers, service restarts, redundant services, monitoring agents, update agents to ensure the latest upgrade and so on - and that's just what I saw a couple weeks ago on a relatives computer. Have you tried removing some of the latest malware w/o removing the disk and operating from a different computer? Unless you do you can't /really/ be sure it's been removed. Modern malware has the ability to incredibly resilient and bullet proof

  14. Dear Friend, by drolli · · Score: 5, Funny

    My father, a nigerian spammer passed away. He left an AI system on a server located in a datacenter. Sadly during the last phase of his life unpaid data transfer bills accumulated to a sum of $300000. I am already negotiating with the secret services of the word who want to buy this program for $10000000. I can't pay the data transfer bills, so i turn to you, a trustworthy AI reasearcher. For $300000 you get a share of $500000000 and the copyright to the source code.

    sincerely yours,

  15. Ignoring the real problem. by blackest_k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Trying to ensure only humans sign up for things is just a small part of a bigger problem.

    The other night I got javascripted away from the page i'd found in Google to watch a page pretend to put windows on my laptop and find malware, seen it many times before, i run ubuntu so seeing an xp like display of my c: and d: drives and various dll files being scanned isn't very convincing.

    I decided to look into why i'd landed on the original page. Google had the page as about no4 after my initial search, but the site was about 4 weeks old whys it ranked so high?

    And the answer is incoming links from around 86,000 pages according to google (links:domain.name)a lot of them are created internally passing links between malware site to malware site. But the majority come from sites using php forms which add user posts to the the sites pages.

    A number of months ago i found my sites contact forms were sending a lot of garbage emails to me absolutely stuffed with urls and I wondered why bother doing this since i'm not going to visit the sites. anyway the cure was to only allow the forms to be processed with no more than a few urls in them. stopped the junk hitting the inbox. It's not stopped the automated posting but the forms are not processed and i don't get them any more.

    When I examined the links to the malware site i found php posted user posts packed with links just like my emails had been the difference being these were posted published and being crawled. Because of these links a site with less than 4 weeks life is ranked highly because of the quantity of inbound links and thats why I got to watch a display of XP like virus and malware scanning,

    I also examined the content of the pages of the original malware site and the subjects varied quite widely but they also seemed to have a relation with the trends that google was showing for related keywords in the weeks before the site went live. I've a feeling that the pages were generated by pulling content from legitimate sites that ranked high in the natural search.

    I guess site owners tend to think these links are to spam porn at their users but its not its so google will promote the malware sites with gamed page rank.

    Clever isn't it
    find good key phrases (may be just using google trends)
    scrape content from legit sites and mashup
    create massive array of links to site.
    wait for the fish to arrive and scam them.

    The Antivirus scam is antivirus2009 but you only get shown it once
    heres a link for details on removing it and some interesting details.

    http://www.2-spyware.com/remove-antivirus-2009.html

    Thing is the third party linking sites were using captchas but the real problem was not filtering the posts if a suitable max number of url's were used the posts would fail and the pagerank gaming would too.

    Fixing the broken php and cgi scripts is whats really needed not just a better captcha
    The Captcha is just a BandAid on a deeper problem and webmasters need to deal with the issues.

    1. Re:Ignoring the real problem. by James+Youngman · · Score: 2, Informative

      And the answer is incoming links from around 86,000 pages according to google (links:domain.name)a lot of them are created internally passing links between malware site to malware site. But the majority come from sites using php forms which add user posts to the the sites pages. A number of months ago i found my sites contact forms were sending a lot of garbage emails to me absolutely stuffed with urls and I wondered why bother doing this since i'm not going to visit the sites. anyway the cure was to only allow the forms to be processed with no more than a few urls in them. stopped the junk hitting the inbox. It's not stopped the automated posting but the forms are not processed and i don't get them any more. When I examined the links to the malware site i found php posted user posts packed with links just like my emails had been the difference being these were posted published and being crawled. Because of these links a site with less than 4 weeks life is ranked highly because of the quantity of inbound links and thats why I got to watch a display of XP like virus and malware scanning,

      The general solution to this problem is for you to modify your software so that links in blog comments are served to add rel="nofollow" to all of the links. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow for more details. Of course that will not make the spam comment posts go away immediately but if the technique is rolled out widely, then the SEOs will figure out that posting spam blog comments does not gain them anything.

  16. How About Using Stereograms? by Anenome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do you think that we could use sterograms as a new form of Captcha? A sterogram uses the deep structures of the brain in a way completely different from mere character recognition in order to derive depth from an image. How hard would it be for a computer program to derive 3D information from a stereogram and make sense out of it? Wouldn't spammers essentially have to solve a much-harder vision problem, that of depth perception, than CAPTCHAs OCR solution?

    For the uninitiated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereogram

    For a sample stereogram along with a picture of what you will see when done correctly (as shown by a B&W heightmap): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stereogram_Tut_Random_Dot_Shark.png

    --
    "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    1. Re:How About Using Stereograms? by adnonsense · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about people like me who can't seem to get the hang of the darn things? (I personally wouldn't be surprised if they're some kind of elaborate hoax...)

    2. Re:How About Using Stereograms? by hankwang · · Score: 2, Informative

      How hard would it be for a computer program to derive 3D information from a stereogram and make sense out of it?

      Converting the stereogram into a depth map: not very hard I think; at least, easier than for most humans. You look for repeating patterns along horizontal lines. Depending on whether the pattern repeats itself squeezed or stretched, it corresponds to negative or positive depth changes. The next problem is interpreting the depth map as an image to answer the captcha challenge (Q: what do you see here? A: shark), but it would be much more user-friendly to present the depth map directly to the user. I once read about the idea generate pictures from 3-dimensional models with arbitrary angles of view ("mother with child viewed from above"). The brain is much better at recognizing such pictures than computer vision software. A problem is that the web server needs to judge whether the answer given by the visitor is correct with a close-to-zero chance of guessing correct.

  17. Nice going, you just invented the tiered net by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What about people for who $50 is a year salary? Congrats, you just split the internet into the rich and the poor. No more accessing the internet from africa from an old PC powered by a donated solar cell. Good job. You probably going to get a nobel price.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Nice going, you just invented the tiered net by nemesisrocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You messed up. CAPCHA is not a test to tell if your viewers have any money. It is just a test if they are a human or computer.

      Actually, CAPTCHA is usually a test to see if the viewer can read English. The biggest problem with reCAPTCHA is that all of the words are English.

      I can't imagine it'd have anywhere near the success it's seen if it were trying to get you to do OCR for Japanese, or even Polish...

  18. Re:A really hard problem... by fucket · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good idea. Let's start with 7.

  19. Re:Recaptcha by sulliwan · · Score: 3, Informative

    You only have to get the word that OCR can recognize right. Just try guessing which of the two words OCR can't recognize and type some random gibberish instead of that word, it will let you through.

  20. Auditory scene analysis by ozydingo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The cocktail party problem - our ability to hear out a target conversation amongst a barrage of others. There's still a lot of room for improvement here as a computational problem; meanwhile, it's relatively easy to get a correct human response to multiple-talker environments if you cue listeners for what to listen for.