Slashdot Mirror


Skin-Based Display Screens From Nanotech Tattoos

destinyland writes "Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in New York is developing flexible nanotubes inserted under the skin to create a handheld display — inside your hand. They wirelessly receive data and display reminders and text messages, and the concept has also been broadened to suggest endlessly programmable digital tattoos, while Netherlands-based Royal Philips Electronics is also exploring the concept of the body as 'a platform for electronics and interactive skin technologies'." That middle link is quite old, but is still loaded with interesting links.

200 comments

  1. Allright!! by SalaSSin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally a way to change my tattoo every time i feel like it, and get rid of my gf's complaints that she doesn't want me to have more tattoos.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    1. Re:Allright!! by Starayo · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's typical, really. I just [i]got[/i] my first tattoo, and then they tell me about this.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:Allright!! by Starayo · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn you, bbcode.

      The one time I forget to preview...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Allright!! by asdir · · Score: 1

      Well, that's what previews are for.

    4. Re:Allright!! by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Finally a way to change my tattoo every time i feel like it, and get rid of my gf's complaints that she doesn't want me to have more tattoos.

      You have a tattoo of a buxom blonde overlaid on a heart with a scroll saying "Lucy"... wait, now it says "Cherry"... huh? She's now black haired and thinner and she's called Liza... dude I think you need to check your firmware.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    5. Re:Allright!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yes, bbcode is one of the most useless inventions. After all, it's just selected HTML tags written with different brackets. I cannot see the advantage of writing [i] instead of <i> (or even the usually more correct <em>)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Allright!! by AlecC · · Score: 5, Funny

      The possibilities for hacking other people's tattoos are frightening. You can hardly go around keeping a continuous watch on them, especially on your back. Imagine going to work at school labelled "Crack $5/bag".

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    7. Re:Allright!! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess it helps that you can just blindly reject everything in the original post that resembles html, and then only generate the html you explicitly allow from the BBCode. That way you're preventing some funky attacks. Of course, implementations might or might not produce further errors...

    8. Re:Allright!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Well, that's as easily done by just blindly replacing any < with &lt; and every > with &gt; (thus automatically disabling any HTML tags) and then handling sequences like &lt;i&gt; just like you would handle [i] with bbcode. As an additional advantage, such an implementation wouldn't just silently remove anything which remotely resembles an HTML tag, but just change that into an "inactive" text form which most likely was intended anyway.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:Allright!! by bugnuts · · Score: 4, Funny

      And then you make sure the tattoo display device renders the sanitized html correctly. (for all those n00bs who thought this went off-topic)

    10. Re:Allright!! by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      ob.goatse

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    11. Re:Allright!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I wonder if these palm electronic 'tatoos', could be federally mandated to look like a 'crystal', and change color every 7 years of your life. At 21, it could blink when you are on lastday, before you have to turn yourself in for sleep.

      Hmm....shoot, I'll be we could transform the DEA into a group called sandmen, you know, just in case you decided to 'run' and not turn yourself in for sleep.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Allright!! by supernova_hq · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, [ & ] can be hit with a single key, whereas < & > require the shit key to be hit as well.

      The one thing I hate about typing (especially when programming), is how many times I have to hit that god damn shit key. My left little finger starts to hurt a lot when I've been programming for a while.

    13. Re:Allright!! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, [ & ] can be hit with a single key, whereas require the shit key to be hit as well.

      Well, my keyboard doesn't have a shit key. I understand that you wouldn't want to touch that quite often. Maybe you should get one with a shift key instead. :-)

      BTW, I never understood what problems people have with pressing shift. I don't have any problems with it (not even when writing German, where there are a lot of upper case letters). OTOH, on German keyboards, the [ and ] characters are some of the hardest characters to type: You have to press, at the same time, the AltGr key (on US keyboards there's the right Alt key at that position) and the keys 8 resp. 9.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    14. Re:Allright!! by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, beware of hackers! Imagine going to work at school labelled "Crack $5/bag" with a goatse picture on the strategic hotspot!

    15. Re:Allright!! by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The possibilities for hacking other people's tattoos are frightening. You can hardly go around keeping a continuous watch on them, especially on your back. Imagine going to work at school labelled "Crack $5/bag".

      This reminds me of a book: The Diamond Age

      In it, a character describes how some people get their eyes cyber-ized so they can have HUDs and such for information, aiming etc.

      However one guy he knew had his HUD hacked so that it would always show him catfood commercials, even when his eyes were closed while he tried to sleep, and he couldn't get anyone to remove the code. It eventually drove him to suicide.

      This is the reason why the character used older-model goggles.

    16. Re:Allright!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's your biggest concern about changeable electronic tattoos... may I suggest wearing a shirt to work?

    17. Re:Allright!! by bFusion · · Score: 1

      Even better, if you ever get a NEW gf you can just reprogram the name tattooed on your back!

    18. Re:Allright!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or build a custom parser for the site input, like *REAL MEN DO* (and sensible women). It's not hard once you get the hang of it :)

    19. Re:Allright!! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Finally a way to change my tattoo every time i feel like it, and get rid of my gf's complaints that she doesn't want me to have more tattoos.

      Plus, when she starts bitching about the naked woman tattoo you can claim your wireless tattoo must have gotten hacked by someone and you have no control over what is being shown!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    20. Re:Allright!! by arcsimm · · Score: 2

      You were reminded of the Diamond Age, and didn't even stop to think about the Drummers? shifting programmable nanotattoos were one of their defining features

      Well, that and massive orgies leading to spontaneous combustion in the name of data analysis.

    21. Re:Allright!! by michaewlewis · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't even see the code anymore. I just see blonde, brunette, redhead........ err, italic, bold, & break.

    22. Re:Allright!! by weetabeex · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I have to press ALT Gr + 8/9 to use [ and ]. On the other hand, < requires only one key, while > requires the same key and SHIFT.

      I'd say they are both inconvinient; I'd rather use ~ and \, one for opening, other for closing, since that would really make sense given my keyboard, and I'd only have to press each key one time without any additional keys.

    23. Re:Allright!! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      I've always liked the idea of a tattoo, but the thing with a tattoo is that you always have to think "Oh sure I may think this is awesome now, but what will I think in twenty years?" I have yet to find a tattoo where I imagine twenty-years-senior-me isn't looking back on present-day me and shaking his head, sadly, as if ashamed to be the same person and saddled with their choices.

      You'd think this would be the answer. And hey, maybe it is, if there are very careful and deliberate controls. But as a general purpose display device that could as part of its function be a changeable tattoo? No way. You know how once you saw goatse, you could never un-see it, and now it's part of your psyche forever? Well the first time I see goatse on my body, it would permanently ruin my self image and I'd either turn into a self-mutilating head case, or simply blow my brains out. I'm not willing to risk it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:Allright!! by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      Meh, just install a hardware firewall next to it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    25. Re:Allright!! by Miseph · · Score: 2

      Seriously? It's just an anus, I can understand being shocked by it, but some people talk about goatse like it killed their puppy. You shouldn't have to "unsee' anything, just get over it.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    26. Re:Allright!! by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Even worse, Goatse.

      Imagine some dude on the beach with a fresh new digital back plate unwittingly displaying hello.jpg. *shudders*

      And god help the poor soul who has their animated ink hacked and is walking around displaying meat spin.

    27. Re:Allright!! by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Like you actually have a grlfrnd. Your on /, fr gds sake!

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    28. Re:Allright!! by anexkahn · · Score: 1

      now you can change the name on your tatoo every time your girlfriend changes :)

      --
      Curious about Storage and Virtualization? Check out
    29. Re:Allright!! by Joebert · · Score: 1

      Hey, my girlfriend READS Slashdot !



      The fact that I haven't met her yet is irrelevant.

      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    30. Re:Allright!! by SwishiestB0g · · Score: 1

      how about the old "kick me" or some goold old pr0n

    31. Re:Allright!! by gdaigle · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for someone to put my idea into practice for over 5 years: http://www.core77.com/challenge/memory/ I still favor topical application rather than subcutaneous, but that's just me. Rensselaer should step it up though with video, Skype accounts and Hulu.

    32. Re:Allright!! by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      maybe his "girlfriend" is tattooed onto his hand

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    33. Re:Allright!! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well. I press (in your layout in parentheses) Mod3-L (Caps-E) and Mod3-C (Caps-R), to get [ and ]. And I press Mod3-H (Caps-U) and Mod3-G (Caps-I) for < and >. So for me, it's pretty much the same. (I also have a second Mod3 key, where your QUERTY layout has the "toes" of the return key "foot". So I can use both hands.)

      Yeah. The NEO 2.0 layout really rules. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    34. Re:Allright!! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Oops. I meant QWERTY. I wrote it how it sounds in German...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    35. Re:Allright!! by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Um, I know this is ways past where a slashdotter can get to, but have you checked to see if she is actually a girl? Do you know how to tell? oh, yeh, pron.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  2. Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you thought fun with programmable road signs was something, wait 'til tatoo hacks become the new fad!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh the possibilities

      - Wash me
      - Kick me
      - Buy cheap v1agr4
      - ...
      - Profit!

    2. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by __NR_kill · · Score: 2, Funny

      This could actually bring a whole new meaning to STD.

    3. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by howman · · Score: 1

      I am so going to write a device driver virus for these things and call it Logan.

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    4. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by Martian_Kyo · · Score: 1

      Yes and shareware tattoos. Which will have shareware version only written across them once the trail period runs out.

    5. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I don't even want to know what DRM would be like for this kind of skinware...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by MindKata · · Score: 1

      "I am so going to write a device driver virus for these things and call it Logan."

      While you are writing the virus, others will be earning a fortune selling software and hardware upgrades to do things like...
      (A) Military Camouflage - Suitable for all terrian with optional real time Cameleon/Predator mode.
      (B) Medical sensors - Go to the doctors. They ask were does it hurt, and you point them to the bit thats flashing red!, then you bring up a full sensor and diagnostics display.
      (C) Sell advertising space - People can rent themselves out as advertising boards. Sponsered by Nike etc..
      (D) Allow people to buy themed artwork for going out etc..
      (E) Sell clothing with same technology in it. Full Predator mode suits! :)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    7. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by houghi · · Score: 1

      The v1agr/\ adds might be difficult to read the moment they might be most effective if they are in the palm of your hand. I mean , well, uh, you know.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by leprkhn · · Score: 1

      i think that ransomeware would the most profitable. i know that if someone changed all my ink to fleshtones i might slowly revert to normality. coughing up huge gouts of cash to keep it from happening seems an inevitability at that point.

    9. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by howman · · Score: 1

      Yes they will... but none of those will mark your palm with a glowing dot telling everyone you meet it is your time to pass.

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    10. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by Creepy · · Score: 1

      hmm... probably not much use for Military Camouflage except maybe the face and maybe hands since the majority of the body would be covered, and the face still would have issues (like beards).

      Medical sensors would have more military practicality - display heart rate and time, for instance. With some sort of touch sensitive display and a communicator (with an antennae built into the bone maybe) you could do all sorts of things.

      Cyberpunk books have had this sort of thing for as long as I remember. In a Cyberpunk 2020 (or maybe even 2019) campaign I ran in the early 1990s I added a bunch of tech like "TV tattoos," which were commonly used to watch TV on skin, but also popular with assassins in my game since they weren't mil-spec like cammo clothes (predator-like clothing) and those were added after reading a book with characters that had ever moving tattoos - I just elaborated a bit. If you could get the power down it may even be able to run on blood flow driving a generator for power, but I imagine full body tats would take quite a bit of juice.

      Best use, though - crib sheet for cheating on tests ;)

    11. Re:Ohhh... can you imagine the hack possibilities by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      "Dude" "Sweet"

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  3. Ray Bradbury will be delighted by kubitus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Illustrated Man coming alive!

    1. Re:Ray Bradbury will be delighted by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Camouflage for the skin. Couple it with a camera to get an idea of background textures.

      Incidently the audio on one of those pages was creeping me out. I'm sitting here listening to Neil Young and suddenly I get these creepy sound effects over the top. I had to hunt around through workspaces and tabs to find the source.

    2. Re:Ray Bradbury will be delighted by dominique_cimafranca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And here I was thinking Rorschach. :-D

  4. Camouflage by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Implant this under all exposed skin and a solider could have camouflage patterns turned on/off and changed for the terrain.

    1. Re:Camouflage by bronney · · Score: 1

      Just hope your enemy do not shoot your "cactus" for fun. Dude you've never been in a sniping position and got eaten alive by mosquitoes eh?

    2. Re:Camouflage by blargfellow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or the enemy sends you a virus, and you end up with a bullseye on your forehead.

    3. Re:Camouflage by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      What's the point in that? He'd either have to carry both desert and urban camo (for middle-east incursions at least), and swap half way through, or they'd have to be butt-naked all the time.

      If you think the latter is a good idea, I hear the Navy is also looking for recruits.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But he'd have to run around nakid....

    5. Re:Camouflage by bentcd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's the point in that? He'd either have to carry both desert and urban camo (for middle-east incursions at least), and swap half way through, or they'd have to be butt-naked all the time.

      If they can put this in skin they can probably put it in clothes too.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    6. Re:Camouflage by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Implant this under all exposed skin and a solider could have camouflage patterns turned on/off and changed for the terrain.

      I can only imagine the stories...

      "So there I was in the women's shower room..."

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    7. Re:Camouflage by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because in war it's such a bright idea to have much skin exposed?

      Sorry, some camouflage make-up applied to the parts of the face you can't hide seems like a lot simpler, cheaper, more reliable and simply superior in all other aspects.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:Camouflage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Except when you encounter a colorblind enemy, since most forms of camouflage look as visible as an elephant in the middle of the street for colorblind people, you need almost a perfect match in colors/texture to fool us.

    9. Re:Camouflage by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      Simpler and cheaper, yes. Inferior in every other way, also yes. Not least that some people break out when they put that shit on. Tattoos don't wipe off. Think before you leave a comment next time. P.S. The government has never been shy about spending taxpayer money on killing people.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Camouflage by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Philips has developed this as lumalive.

    11. Re:Camouflage by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Actually, you end up with a missile attracting target on your back end.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    12. Re:Camouflage by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that guy we painted bright red to give everyone else a fighting chance is gunna be your downfall!

      Sometimes, I really think I need to start the morning with a coffee instead of a quick troll'ing.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    13. Re:Camouflage by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Ironically, cammo makeup would probably be better for male soldiers since it can be matted over facial hair.

      For women I see a better use aside from cammo - instant apply make-up. Heck, you could go from airbrushed model to street hooker to troll (or even weird designs - basically whatever is needed to get that annoying guy to leave) with the tap of a built-in button. Still not sure about how tats react to acne, tho...

  5. This nice sounds nice by Norsefire · · Score: 4, Funny

    but most Geeks don't have a high pain threshold.

    1. Re:This nice sounds nice by Starayo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speak for yourself, I like chilli and cats and just got a tattoo without moving at all. :P

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    2. Re:This nice sounds nice by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      So true about cats. Some of them just don't get the concept of "kneading your lap is hurties".

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    3. Re:This nice sounds nice by supernova_hq · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude... If you fall asleep on my couch, the cat will extend her paw 2 1/2 feet in the air (over the arm rest), sink her claws into the back of your skull, and then pull them back out again.

      Scares the living shit out of you the first few times!

    4. Re:This nice sounds nice by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you joking? A tattoo hurts a lot less than regular high school beatings or unrequited love.

    5. Re:This nice sounds nice by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      See, this is exactly why I don't like cats.

    6. Re:This nice sounds nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or most requited love..

    7. Re:This nice sounds nice by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Well, I like cats ok, but am deathly allergic to them - I not only maxed the allergy scratch test scale at 18+, it overran several tests and the blotch went several inches over my shoulder, so I'm afraid I can't partake in that experiment, as I'd probably die before I could fall asleep on said couch - any volunteers?

      Zyrtec is my friend when I'm even around people that own cats, and that only provides some relief. I need all the people I associate with to buy some of them $1000 vat grown non-allergenic saliva cats.

    8. Re:This nice sounds nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call this "making biscuits" when the cat does this LOL

  6. well........ by tatermonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its only a matter of time before someone figures out how to get porn on it.

    1. Re:well........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would be the use of that if it's on the inside of your palm?

    2. Re:well........ by thannine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I don't know about you but I usually use only one hand...

    3. Re:well........ by Stratocastr · · Score: 0

      noob

      --
      Slashdot - I went there to fix their grammar that they're so bad at.
  7. Should we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without reading the article, should we assume this kind of technology can be used to help college student cheat on tests?

    1. Re:Should we... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Why not just store everything in your calculator?

      Its what the rest of us do

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    2. Re:Should we... by Bruce+McBruce · · Score: 1

      Examiners can take away your calculator, though. Besides, you could text message your friends during an exam and have their answers show up on your hands.

    3. Re:Should we... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      You'll probably have to wear gloves and long-sleeved clothes in tests. The test gloves and clothes will be supplied by the school so you cannot use some with built-in features.

      It gets interesting when they start to provide displays directly in your eyes (maybe even without any light, just directly activating retina cells).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Should we... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I envision some type of scanning device built into a pen or your palm that could be used to send information out faster.

      But Im not sure if I could trust my friends to get the answers correct.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    5. Re:Should we... by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      I could convince myself that tattooing my hand with a screen for data is a good idea, maybe. No one is getting near my eyes with something like that. While a continuous HUD might have its uses, vision is nice too. Worse that can happen to your hand is the thing dies and you have a permanent black square tattooed on your palm.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    6. Re:Should we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how do you explain a calculator during a history test?

    7. Re:Should we... by Glaz · · Score: 1

      Without reading the article, should we assume this kind of technology can be used to help college student cheat on tests?

      If you will always have access to something, is it cheating to make use of it? The philosophy behind no calculators on exams (or similar tools) is you might not have access to the tool later.

    8. Re:Should we... by Paperfairy · · Score: 1

      Hmm... if information is constantly available to us, what the hell do we need school for? Aside from teaching basics, I can't see a use.... this could put a lot of people out of business.

      --
      "Hell hath no fury like an Internet full of nerds scorned."
    9. Re:Should we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Even at high school level here in NZ, many programmable calculators are banned for the exams, and the allowable ones have to be cleared.

  8. A Cautionary Note by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If programmable digital tattoos catch on, it might be a good idea if the data feed in your "handheld display" was used to ensure that the name in your tattoo matches the name of the person you're with.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:A Cautionary Note by getuid() · · Score: 1

      "Hottie" does it... ;-)

  9. OCtattoos ! by Macka · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This reminds my of the futuristic OCtattoos (Organic Circuitry tattoos) that Peter Hamilton makes use of in his Commonwealth Saga stories.

    They're described in the Wiki as:

    OCTattoos (Organic Circuitry Tattoos) are also a major technological device. These are tattooed on the skin and resemble colourful, often metallic tattoos, and serve hundreds of purposes from transferring credits to serving as sensors. Their main function is to act as processors for other implants (which may function at reduced capacity if an OCTattoo is damaged).

    Would be really neat to have this in our lifetime.

    1. Re:OCtattoos ! by newcastlejon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just give me a shout when I can have a watch like Wu's.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    2. Re:OCtattoos ! by zrq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would be really neat to have this in our lifetime.

      Therin lies a problem ... the human lifetime as compared to the rate IT technology is changing. Whatever you got implanted today would be out of date within a year. You either have to continually upgrade (which would probably involve more surgery, because the latest implants would not be backwards compatible with yours), or you get stuck with the equivalent of a 800x600 display tattooed into your arm when everyone else has 1920x1200 HD and surround sound. In the age of iPhone and Android, nothing says 'old fart' like having a clunky old phone that doesn't have a camera or net access, but at least you can upgrade to a new model without involving surgery.

  10. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to hack my co-worker skin

  11. Hands-on by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where can I get some hands-on experience with this technology?

    1. Re:Hands-on by Mr.+Moose · · Score: 1

      Or is it On-hands experience???

  12. Re:Great for pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is there a way to mod the Redundant rating Redundant?

  13. I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want to earn some extra cash?

    Rent advertising space on my hands, belly and ass!

    1. Re:I can see it now by xorsyst · · Score: 1
      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
  14. K. W. Jeter predicted this years ago... by Altesse · · Score: 2, Interesting
  15. I've been wanting this for a... by Eric+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny

    wristwatch without the watch, for a long time now.

    1. Re:I've been wanting this for a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Um, like a bracelet?

    2. Re:I've been wanting this for a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've got two. They're called 'wrists'.

      Awesome tech.

    3. Re:I've been wanting this for a... by bughunter · · Score: 1

      You're modded funny, but I'm taking you seriously because I feel the same way.

      I've avoided tattoos my entire life not because I think they're ugly or unwise, but because a) they're permanent, and b) I can't think of anything important enough to imprint permanently on my skin. But a practical device like a chronograph, or a blood sugar monitor, would be more than sufficient to make me get one.

      And to the sister reply: Add some means to provide input, like a keyboard or numpad, and I'd be one of the first. Provided the processing core could be upgraded. (The last thing I'd want to do is be an early adopter with no path to upgrade.)

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  16. Futurama anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When are they adding sound to that thing?
    http://theinfosphere.org/Talking_Tattoo

  17. Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This cant be healthy.

    1. Re:Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by samurphy21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are many biologically neutral materials that are safely implanted into the body all the time. Titanium pins for repairing bones. Pacemakers. Composite plates for skull injuries. These are just medical examples. You get into the "body modification" crowd and you start seeing stainless steel, neobium, and nylon implants and piercings.

      I suspect that rejection or attack by white blood cells are not an insurmountable issue here, but I'm not a doctor.

    2. Re:Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Bone doesn't seem to mind at all. They do make mention of immune response, however.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    3. Re:Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by DerCed · · Score: 1

      Hip implants, pacemakers, piercings, screws, RFID chips (pets), etc.
      It's not like objects have never ever been placed underneath the skin :-)

    4. Re:Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suspect that rejection or attack by white blood cells are not an insurmountable issue here, but I'm not a doctor.

      I suspect that rejection or attack by your mother would be the issue here.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Immunse systems do not like foreign objects. by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      And, of course, the obvious foreign substance routinely permanently inserted into the body - tattoo ink.

  18. Just think.... by quarkoid · · Score: 1

    ...of the possibilities the porn industry could come up with.

    Hmmm. OK. On second thoughts, don't.

    1. Re:Just think.... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      of the possibilities the porn industry could come up with.

      So, you're going to project a naked body on a naked body?

      Or are you going to render certain acts on certain patches of skin to simulate the experience? But it would be only possible by brutally handled and have a sheet of this material inserted on that patch of skin. As I suspect, that part of the sheet should be flexible as well if you would want to try to simulate a certain experience..

      What lenghts teen nerds go to simulate a certain experience. Invest that effort in spacetravel of some sort and stop watching pornography and thinking of ways to come closer to the "real experience virtually". :)

      Although, nerd hornyness has brought alot of innovation. We should breed farms of horny nerds, and put "challenges" in front of their porn-consumption, like a certain cypher for access or a certain patternrecognition to be hacked. Worldhunger would be solved overnight and we would have instant singularity.

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  19. So how do I sign up? by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can be a very willing guinea pig, lab rat, et cetera. Just tell me where to sign!

    Yes, the prospect of long-term, irreparable skin damage is nothing next to the coolness of having the dermatological equivalent of animated GIFs. And I mean that sincerely.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:So how do I sign up? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Just wrap your 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th fingers in a tag and hold your hand up. Hilarity ensues. ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    2. Re:So how do I sign up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree enthusiastically, we have to beware of accidental goatse...

    3. Re:So how do I sign up? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder where that would be located.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
  20. and coming next by mrkuji · · Score: 1

    with these and that new speaker film.. can we have futurama tatoos that abuse you and others... imagine your shoulder telling you that you are a big fat loser... ahh technology

  21. Good luck at the airport by KlaymenDK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Good luck with that the next time you're at the security check at the airport. Pacemakers they know about, but with people getting withheld due to t-shirts with *images* of electronics, this thing is just asking for trouble.

    1. Re:Good luck at the airport by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Flamebait?!? Is there a TSA with mod points around here or something...?

    2. Re:Good luck at the airport by feitingen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good luck with that the next time you're at the security check at the airport. Pacemakers they know about, but with people getting withheld due to t-shirts with *images* of electronics, this thing is just asking for trouble.

      I was at the airport with one of those t-shirts with a working clock on it. I boarded with no problems, but as they were to take off, (i am not making this up) they announced: "Please turn off all mobile phones, laptops and t-shirts"

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Good luck at the airport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, set it to "sleeper" mode and walk right through. Just be sure to deactivate the forthcoming wireless social networking component, lest your tattoo greets your friend Jack automatically...

    4. Re:Good luck at the airport by Geminii · · Score: 1
      Better - T-shirts or skin which display neutral images during boarding, but which can shift to _anything_ for the duration of the flight.

      Presumably the response would be to simply add such clothing to the banned list, but I'm not sure what could be done about subdermal displays.

  22. I'll wait... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It all sounds cool...for a movie or a fad. The next thing you know you have to keep your virus defs up to date or your tatoo will be throwing up all kinds of unwanted pop-ups. If it can be 'reprogrammed,' that is just a freq that manipulates the nano devices, then it can be maliciously altered as well. I still don't understand the fascination with putting electronics in the body (medical reasons notwithstanding). And there is already an issue with people being tracked and watched. They tie the screen to your vitals and it will glow green if you are telling the truth or red if you are lying. It will tell folks your current medical status. _IF_ that is what you want.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    1. Re:I'll wait... by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I still don't understand the fascination with putting electronics in the body (medical reasons notwithstanding). And there is already an issue with people being tracked and watched."

      Not everyone is as paranoid about the government spying on them as you. Don't get me wrong, your paranoia helps the rest of us by keeping the government straight... But we don't also need to be paranoid for that to work.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:I'll wait... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's paranoia that I was trying to convey. I didn't limit by statement to Governments. Every time you use your credit card, your purchase is tracked and that information is used by advertising and manufactures. Yes, it does help producers to target consumers needs, but should it be so targeted?

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    3. Re:I'll wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tip my tinfoil hat to you, sir. Your paranoia surpasses even that of my own, the Anonymous Coward.

    4. Re:I'll wait... by Aqualung812 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? I've noticed I've seen fewer ads for things that I won't EVER buy for myself (Tampons, etc), and more for things I will buy (cycling gear, xbox games).
      Can you let me know what the problem is?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
  23. Hottie? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    Nobody bring up the movie!

    (Opps!)

    1. Re:Hottie? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Now that you've put the thought of that movie back in my head, I have to burn out my eyes with a soldering iron.

      Again.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  24. Perfect for... by Atari400 · · Score: 1

    palm flowers. Anyone fancy a run?

    --
    IBM doesn't play chess with the Universe.
  25. If this becomes mainstream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then somebody is going to try to put DRM on it. I'd love to see that court case...

  26. I think I read about this somewhere before... by galactic-ac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think I read about this somewhere before... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Diamond_Age

    1. Re:I think I read about this somewhere before... by cbrocious · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, too. Mediatrons are finally coming.

      --
      Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
    2. Re:I think I read about this somewhere before... by galactic-ac · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, too. Mediatrons are finally coming.

      And it's probably a good time to start avoiding Hong Kong and the South China Sea. :)

  27. Counter measure easy enough by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Don't network it, make it stand alone.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  28. Fairly old, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I STILL WANT ONE!

    There were also talks about just making a magnetic interface for other devices that could be strapped onto the arm to send health details and stuff like that.

    I'd rather wait a while on this one to be honest, the detail is low, as well as the color from what i remember.
    When they can make it run at least 100x100 screens with 8 bit color, then i'd be happy.
    Throw in a touch screen and brain interface for the processor and i'd never need another computer again.
    That's it, PCs are finished.

  29. Obligatory by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I can't wait until the tattoos on Amy's butt hear about this!"

    1. Re:Obligatory by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      Gold! I wonder how many will just WHOOOOSH that reference though.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  30. Pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think a girl could get this thing in her pussy? Render all sorts of colorful artworks on it during sex? Or what if tonight you are in for a bit of pink pussy? No problemo, just fire up the pussy tattoo.

    1. Re:Pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking "animated tramp stamp," but you sort of beat me to it.

    2. Re:Pussy by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Atomic Pink hair color will give the effect you're looking for without the risk of affecting the immune system.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  31. Police Documentation by KneelBeforeZod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hypothetically, if this were to become common. It'd force police to rethink how they document and identify distinguishing marks on the body. Or a gang member being some kind of double agent and switching inks from one gang to another. Its the stuff of scifi. Makes me think of The Illustrated Man of Ray Bradbury.

    1. Re:Police Documentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smart criminals wear those stick-on tattoos you get with bubblegum.

      Bitchin'

  32. Scott Westerfeld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that no one has mentioned Scott Westerfeld's Uglies series. The "Pretties" have these things.

    This is yet another case of life imitating science fiction.

  33. lasertag by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    as someone who went to MANY many birthday parties for 30 year olds at lazertag centers-

    it was 30 for renewal, not 21

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:lasertag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      21 in the book, 30 in the film.

    2. Re:lasertag by flink · · Score: 2, Informative

      The age was 21 in the novel, it was raised to 30 for the film to broaden its appeal or to make the portrayals by older actors more believable. I've heard both explanations.

    3. Re:lasertag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up.

    4. Re:lasertag by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "as someone who went to MANY many birthday parties for 30 year olds at lazertag centers- it was 30 for renewal, not 21"

      Not in the book....it was 21.

      I'd highly recommend the book..is a short read, but, quite a lot better than the movie. The way the 'gun' works in the book is so cool, and worth the read alone. Hehehe...you never want a 'homer' fired at you....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:lasertag by cool_story_bro · · Score: 1

      no

      --
      You must wait a little bit before using this resource; please try again later.
  34. What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ew! Also: Awesome. But I certainly would prefer a less invasive version, like, oh, something I can spray on. Even if I have to re-spray once a week or something, I'd prefer that to a permanent tattoo, no matter how changeable.

  35. Voice command? by Millennium · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they could figure out a voice-command interface to this, "Talk to the hand" could get a whole new meaning.

    1. Re:Voice command? by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to get a picture of a *facepalm* tattoo'd on my face. And my palm.

  36. Ni-Go-Zeero-Ichi by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 4, Funny

    One step closer to Ghost in the Shell's brain hacking becoming an everyday reality!

  37. The Beast by Porchroof · · Score: 1

    Now, I guess, the Beast can make his mark interactive. (For the ignorant, refer to The Revelation of St. John the Divine.)

    --
    Fata viam invenient.
    1. Re:The Beast by Seriousity · · Score: 1

      The fortune at the bottom of the page says, "In olden times sacrifices were made at the altar -- a practice which is still continued. -- Helen Rowland"
      This is going to be very interesting to see what the US Govt does with this technology.

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    2. Re:The Beast by Seriousity · · Score: 1

      And I would be more likely to call it John's Revelation of the Divine

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
  38. they tukk my ideeerrr by evolx10 · · Score: 1

    No but seriously i came up with this long long ago in my days of staring at stucco walls that were at the time very interesting. Mine were not super nanotubes though, just molecules that imitate those people in crowds that put big cards over their head to form a larger image.

    What happens when after a little practice/meditation the owner of these electronically responsive tattoos gains control of them! We could be like cuttlefish people. The possibilities are endless. Oh oh nano-repair tubes that you can actively control to quickly clot and temp repair lacerations, but otherwise chill in your dermis eating free radicals from the sun.

  39. Not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nano Skins" Show Promise as Flexible Electronic Devices -- Published March 1, 2006

  40. OT: Speeding by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry, about this, but your .sig just angers me:

    Exceeding the appropriate speed for conditions gets you killed.

    It doesn't, that's the problem. Modern cars are exceedingly good at protecting their drivers in head-on collisions. If you exceed the appropriate speed for conditions you will almost certainly not be killed. Someone else will be killed. Some pedestrian, or cyclist, innocently minding their own business and obeying all the rules of the road will be killed. Or someone turning out of a junction with plenty of time to not impede anyone driving a legal speed, whom you hit broadside on. They get killed. You don't.

    If seatbelts and airbags and crumple zones were banned, if every car had a rigid steel spike sticking out of the middle of the steering wheel, then speeding would become a self limiting problem; Darwin would take care of it for us. The problem with the 'safety' features on our cars is that they make the wrong person safe - the idiot behind the wheel, not the person he hits.

    Exceeding the appropriate speed for the conditions is not quite as bad a crime as premeditated murder... but the difference is small. And no-one is as good a driver as they think they are.

    --
    I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    1. Re:OT: Speeding by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If seatbelts and airbags and crumple zones were banned, if every car had a rigid steel spike sticking out of the middle of the steering wheel, then speeding would become a self limiting problem;

      No, then driving would become a self-limiting problem. Besides, people have actually died in car accidents because of something idiotic a bicyclist or even pedestrian did. The solution isn't to make cars more dangerous; that's stupid. The solution is to make getting a driver's license harder. A lot harder. However, the car companies were allowed to buy up the public transportation in the USA and now if you want to be a part of the rat race, you need a car. Calling it a privilege is a bit disingenuous.

      Exceeding the appropriate speed for the conditions is not quite as bad a crime as premeditated murder... but the difference is small. And no-one is as good a driver as they think they are.

      No, this is a stupid idea and it's even stupider to express it, because "the appropriate speed for the conditions" varies from person to person, vehicle to vehicle, and condition to condition. If a pinecone rolls down a hill out in front of you, the conditions have changed. You might argue that they haven't, that that pinecone was a probability-event for which you should have been prepared, and you would make a good point! But since there is no way to tell if an individual is exceeding the speed at which they can "safely" (another subjective statement, by the way) traverse a specific section of road, we must identify the crime when it's "too late".

      Our society has decided that it's worth the trade-off to have cars and put them in the hands of average people. That does occasionally go very, very wrong. However, physicians still kill more people by prescribing them the wrong drugs or combination of drugs than people manage to kill each other with cars. If I were going to be incensed about one of these things, it wouldn't be the cars. Instead, I got a big safe car (mass and crumple zones) and I stay in my fucking lane.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:OT: Speeding by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Thankyou. Your response to the second quote is exactly what I meant - if you lose control and crash (and it could reasonably considered to be your fault, things like "some guy running a red through a blind intersection and t-boning you" come under the category "shit happens and nothing will ever stop that") then by definition you were exceeding the appropriate speed for the conditions at the time. This speed seldom has much relation to the posted speed limits, and varies wildly with driver concentration, weather, traffic etc.

      (The first bit, I sort of agree with. The solution IMO is to make getting a driver's license a lot harder on actual driving skills, emergency reactions, car handling etc. What Australia has done in the past few years is implement a system where you have to do a series of tests in which you have to raise your pinky to the exact angle when you indicate, and you need exactly the right number of flashes of your indicator before you turn, or other inane details, but you can still pass it while not knowing what the hell to do in a "the sprinkler sprayed on the roundabout and now I'm sideways" situation. I never heard of anyone who's been injured in a parallel parking accident, but I've heard of plenty who've died due to not knowing what the f**k they were doing at speed.)

      The parent poster's attitude is in line with the bozos that run Australia's road safety department. They removed the section on "how to control your car if it slides" from the driver's handbook, with the justification that "if people know how to control a slide then they may drive more recklessly". Yeah, apparently it's more dangerous to know what you're doing. A quick drive on on Perth roads will quickly fix that misconception - being surrounded by incompetent morons at 80km/h (in a 100km/h zone, all weaving and none paying much attention) is *scary*.

      The comparison I use is that ~2000 people die each year on Australian roads. ~20,000 people die each year of smoking-related illness. If that policeman who's spending his whole life filing speeding tickets really wanted to save lives he should f**k off and become an anti-smoking campaigner. But road trauma is messy and dramatic while smokers hack up a lung and die, quietly and neatly, in homes and hospital beds. So they parade the 'mothers against motor vehicles' around and make an election issue of it.

      To pull this back on track - how cool would it be to have a car which streamed all its instrumentation directly your OC tattoos on the backs of your hands? :D Left could be your speedo, right is your rev gauge, or you can select what gauge to display by clenching a finger tighter for an instant. That'd be way cool. Sorry about the rant, as you can guess from its position in my sig this is one of my pet topics. :P

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  41. HHG2G did it! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    In one of the 5 books of the Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy, Arthur Dent's daugher, Random, had something like this implanted in her hand that gave her all sorts of information about the planet she was on.

    1. Re:HHG2G did it! by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      In one of the 5 books of the Hitchhiker's Guide trilogy,

      I want you to think long and hard about what you just said.

      --
    2. Re:HHG2G did it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, that's sort of the point of it... It's often referred to as "a trilogy in five parts". Hand in your geek card at the door for not knowing that.

    3. Re:HHG2G did it! by DrgnDancer · · Score: 3, Informative

      The author later called it "The Increasingly Misnamed Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Trilogy"

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  42. Add it up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight... porn on one palm, leaving the other hand free?

  43. Finally.... by Noxneo · · Score: 1

    I can have a graphic equalizer for my heart beats on my chest.

    1. Re:Finally.... by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      Imagine the horror if the monitor crashed -- A quite literal Blue Screen Of Death!

  44. But I'm NOT NAKED, officer... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    ...I'm wearing a full-body tattoo of clothing!

    As soon as the cop turns away, the tattoo can morph to a new form, perhaps au naturel but exaggerating one's finer points. Or try au naturel of the opposite sex, if you're wierd enough. That might spook the cop out completely - is it public nudity, a porn show, or performance art?

    But it's probably only old fat hirsute gargoyles who'd dare do this.

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  45. Cybernetic applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't let a normal tattoo artist near by skin, this is just that much more scary. For a lecture on our so-called health industry, see: lecture by Dr. Bill Deagle.

    P.S.
    Come back when you have a holographic girlfriend for me and maybe i'll show interest ;)

  46. Pop Quiz by keeegan · · Score: 0

    Frank: What's the answer to number 7? Todd looks at hand. Todd: Joseph Stalin. Frank: Woah! What is that? Todd: Wikipeidia.

  47. Cert tests by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now we'll have to be in a room that is insulated from RF so that our tattoos won't give us answers?

  48. Exams & Elephants by Mark1990 · · Score: 1

    I anticipate correlation between exam grades and nanotubes tattoos. If they ever make then colour we could use elephants as large portable televisions.

  49. Upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the hardware upgrades will be a real bitch!

  50. Cyber Hippies by KidPix · · Score: 1

    Oh crap, mood tattoos.

  51. I'm tired of hearing it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flexible displays, roll-up displays, I don't know how long I've been hearing such pie-in-the-sky, but I want to see some product!

    Now they suggest putting hopefully-sterilized and hopefully non-poisonous stuff inside people to have displays there, well, great.

    Call me in 20 years when we're closer. Meanwhile I'll be sorting through my deck of "planets just like Earth" in my flying car.

  52. But is it touch screen/skin? by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

    ..as most nerds know, it's not a real watch unless it's a calculator watch.

  53. Not even CLOSE to reality here by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Yes, they are thinking about possibly being able to, at some point in the future, have the theoretical ability to create smart tattoos.

    All they need to do is create an intelligent ink, that is bio-compatible, and that can be switched in color by some as-yet undeveloped method, along with some form of bio-compatible computer that could be implanted to control the ink, some bio-compatible means to connect the computer to the ink, some bio-compatible power source, and some way to interface to those components.

    But hey, they have a cool picture of what it might look like, so that's good enough for a Slashdot entry.

    OT: I have a really cool design for a transparent flying car that can fold up and fit into your pocket. I only have a couple of small issues to tackle, like a reactionless drive, a total-conversion power plant, and a magical^Wnanomaterial that can be rigid when it needs to be and yet can fold up very small, with almost no weight.

    But I have a render of what it might look like here:

    So, when do I get my front page article?

    Sarcasm aside: when can we actually get a bit of critical thinking before these wishful fantasies get posted?

  54. Hooray. by Sippan · · Score: 1

    Finally I can have BSOD all over my face. I also look forward to having this on my tombstone: "I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST DEAD PIXEL!"

    --
    Frog blast the vent core.
  55. Arms and legs filling landfills by wsanders · · Score: 1

    We currently have a problem with old displays and cellphones filling up landfills with toxic materials because these devices are obsolete after a year or two. Just wait until planned obsolescence hits the bionic world. Landfills full of arms, legs, heads, organs, and poor people in the rest of the world will be sewing on body parts discarded by rich wasteful Americans.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  56. Does anyone else see this as by twoears · · Score: 1

    the mark of the beast? If I were the inventor I'd want to wash my hands of it.

  57. Palm computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's your e-mail address? I'll put it on my Palm."

    Bwahahaha!

  58. Yes but you could hide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    among all the other bullseyes at the back of a firing range....oh wait.

  59. "inserted under the skin" by macraig · · Score: 1

    This doesn't bode well for people with skin-shedding fungal problems, does it?

  60. In related news: by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    ... they have also experiemented in implanting a digital tattoo in the palm of a persons hand flashing it red when they are sub-optimal in age... ... they have also done extensive research into selective breeding where an additional digital tattoo on the chest (Just below the neck) indicates which individuals are in your required breeding program...

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  61. e-Ink alternative by TomRC · · Score: 1

    While dynamically updatable tattoo displays are interesting for output, one could achieve 90% of the tattoo value using an eInk, and externally applying an electrostatic pattern gadget to "print" the tattoo pattern.

  62. I just solved the "????" by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    1) Buy shares in prosthetic teeth companies.
    2) Send out the "knock my teeth out" tattoo virus.
    3) Profit!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  63. I would flay myself if.. by donkawechico · · Score: 1

    Two weeks later: "Wait a second.... is that a dead pixel??"

  64. Ooh, can we say cloaking device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tattoo your whole body, and set a texture!

    Plus, we'd be able to go to prison, hide our tattoo, and play video games on our hands while nobody is looking.

    1. Re:Ooh, can we say cloaking device? by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 0

      "...Plus, we'd be ABLE to go to prison...". Oh my, just beat the shit out of your bosses head with your laptop...you'll be ABLE to go to real easy.

  65. Transformers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who remembers the transformers heat sensitive decals?

    This new technology could usher in a whole new world of double agents.

  66. Cuttlefish-ish. by Shard.Oglass666 · · Score: 0

    I'd like this in the form of nanobots, or an aerosolized inhaler with bio-engineered viruses that target the skins melenin. And I'd like it mind controlled, so I can put up what I want where I want when I want if I want.

  67. READ MY LIPS by DJStealth · · Score: 1

    I mean it.

    Read them.

  68. Indian/Blind Mans Bluff poker by StillNeedMoreCoffee · · Score: 1

    I am going to patent the use of the forehead tattoo screen Indian poker app. Well of course when you loose the big L appears.

  69. Mark of the Beast by mcdeath · · Score: 0

    Hmmm. Ok now this is creeping me out. RFID, Bluetooth, implantable displays & smartchips. What's next? Credit cards that can be implanted into your arm? Wave your hand to make purchases? Hello!? Any of this sound familiar?

  70. Wireless? by Geminii · · Score: 1
    I'm not really thrilled with the thought of stuff which can be updated remotely, especially remotely, quickly, and without any kind of manual lockout.

    Having to hold my hand on a flat plate for 10-30 seconds and then having to manually OK an update via some system which wasn't spoofable, interceptable, or complex enough to be digitally hacked would be a good start.

    Start by assuming commercial and public seating will try and 'update' your images or software, including in summer when clothes tend to be thinner and with less coverage, or at places near beaches. Go on to assume that doorknobs and sections of sidewalks will do the same. What should be in place to get around this?

    A non-overridable, non-blockable reset process requiring no external equipment should be mandatory. Then there are the issues of the lifespan of a given hardware installation, the difficulty and long-term medical effects of upgrading hardware, potential medical problems arising if the hardware is damaged (crushed, cut, splintered)...