Slashdot Mirror


Windows 7 Will Be Free For a Year

Barence writes "Microsoft is effectively giving away Windows 7 free for a year with the launch of the Release Candidate. The Release Candidate is now available to MSDN and TechNet subscribers, and will go on unlimited, general release on 5 May. The software will not expire until 1 June 2010, giving testers more than a year's free access to Windows 7. 'It's available to as many people who see fit to use it, although we wouldn't recommend it to just your average user,' John Curran, director of the Windows Client Group told PC Pro. 'We'd very strongly encourage anyone on the beta to move to the Release Candidate.'"

20 of 528 comments (clear)

  1. Good idea by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds like a good idea to me! Can't think of anything wrong with it, but I trust someone will come up with something.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Good idea by just_another_sean · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OK, I'll bite.

      This reminds of what Bill G. said about people illegally using Windows in China. MS would rather give you the first hit free
      so you get hooked. When you come crawling back for more to feed your habit then they'll charge you for it.

      Sorry but MS has violated the publics trust so many times I just can't ever see anything good in their marketing attempts.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    2. Re:Good idea by frozentier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, to me it sounds more like confidence than desperation. They are expecting people to go out and pay for it AFTER using it for a year and deciding if they like it or not. Quite the opposite of going out and buying a new OS, then you're S.O.L. if you don't like it, and you've wasted $100+.

    3. Re:Good idea by ionix5891 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Windows a gateway drug?

    4. Re:Good idea by DaleGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't need people to buy their OS. It's not like they have much of a choice anyway.

      What they really need is to get people to stop replacing it with an older version, and to stop trying to get the older one on their new hardware.

    5. Re:Good idea by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, to me it sounds more like confidence than desperation. They are expecting people to go out and pay for it AFTER using it for a year and deciding if they like it or not. Quite the opposite of going out and buying a new OS, then you're S.O.L. if you don't like it, and you've wasted $100+.

      Its about getting developers to decide that the platform is worth developing software for. If developers decide due to low market penetration that Windows 7 is as appealing to write for as Mac OS9, the money train will end and Microsoft will most likely fail as a company.

      Personally, I don't consider them to be particularly relevant anymore. The exciting new technology doesn't come from Microsoft anymore, and hasn't in years...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:Good idea by Nick+Fel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think they're going to win any extra sales directly. The type of people who install Release Candidates are the type of people who will always have the latest operating system anyway. More likely they're just sweetening the deal to increase the number of bloggers out there building up hype.

    7. Re:Good idea by Danse · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I don't consider them to be particularly relevant anymore. The exciting new technology doesn't come from Microsoft anymore, and hasn't in years...

      Yeah, but it's kind of hard to consider having ~90% of the market to be irrelevant. They may not be the hip new thing, but they're definitely relevant to most people.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    8. Re:Good idea by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only thing is, I've had Vista on a testing machine since its first public beta, just so I can track the progress they're making with it. I put the first public beta of Windows 7 on my laptop and used it for a while. Both are... fine.

      But then I had a problem with my laptop and so I wiped it out and reinstalled Windows XP. You know what? I didn't have any problems in downgrading. What I mean is, there wasn't anything after downgrading where I said, "Shoot, I wish I could do this, but XP doesn't have that functionality, so I need to upgrade again." At least not so far.

      If Microsoft wants me to pay for an upgrade, they're going to have to show me something more than what I've seen so far.

    9. Re:Good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Once you have the knowledge, running Linux on servers is really no different than anything else.

      I also tend to think overall it is less work.

      But like anything different, you just have to take the time to learn it. And when you do, it's really easy to configure and maintain.

      I would bet that you started with Windows and so did all your incremental learning on Windows. Then, in switching to Linux, or taking on Linux boxes, you had a lot to learn.

      I would argue that if you started with Linux and did all of your incremental learning on Linux, then taking on running a Windows server would seem just as much work to come up to speed.

  2. Re:Fascinating by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It sounds like you don't like the idea. It's good that you're not forced to take them up on it.

    Unsuccessful troll is unsuccessful.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  3. Free with "minor" caveats by Ralish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Microsoft is effectively giving away Windows 7 free for a year with the launch of the Release Candidate.

    It's only free if you don't value bug fixes, security updates, product support and potentially all manner of issues installing software that will be released for Windows 7 RTM on a pre-release version no-one will have done significant product testing on and won't care to help you with if you run into problems.

    Keeping all this in mind, and the fact this is pre-release development code, it's not hard to see why this release is free. I do find it odd that it's got such a generous expiration date, but approaching this as a free (time-limited) lunch is probably a fairly bad idea for all the reasons above.

    If you like it, but don't want to pay for it, just pirate it. You'll be better off, and so may many others when they don't have to worry about your compromised box congesting their network, because it was exploited by a flaw MS has no intention of fixing in pre-release code.

  4. Re:Fishing by iamhigh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Weed isn't addicting in the physical sense that you are probably referring to. I have stopped for years when necessary with no trouble. The drug you are looking for is crack/meth/coke.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  5. Death to Pirates? by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Windows a gateway drug?

    No it's more of a Dell drug.

    This is actually a wonderful idea for them. it lowers the barrier for the transition. Even companies can push their costs forward in time.

    But i'm thinking of all the pirates in asia. The street vendors with virus laden bootlegs will be competing against free. this will hurt their market. Then a year later what will the chinese consumer do? He could go out an buy a bootleg and re-install his system or he could buy a keycode and continue with his current system state. in many cases the idea of re-installing a system would be daunting enough to suddenly make the key code seem cheap.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  6. Competing with themselves. by camperdave · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft isn't concerned about "hooking" people. They accomplished that decades ago. Microsoft's problem is that people are hooked on XP. They spent a whackload of money on Vista, and nobody went for it. (By nobody, I mean corporations. Everybody who bought a new machine was forced to get it, but even then many switched back to XP.) Now, they've spent another whackload of money on Win7, and they want corporations to buy it. They want people to move off of the XP platform. This free windows is the bait to get them to switch.

    Frankly, I don't know if it'll work. Windows XP works fine. It's an operating system. All it has to do is run applications and manage resources. It does that well enough for most people and corporations, so why switch?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  7. Re:Fascinating by cabjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're just scared to death that no one will upgrade, just like with Vista. They probably hope that if enough people are trying for free at home, they'll want it at work and on their next computer. Then they might be able to finally sunset XP.

  8. Re:no thanks! by recoiledsnake · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That sounds like your own mistake. XP install allows you to format only one partition. You must have messed up by not choosing the proper options during the install.

    --
    This space for rent.
  9. Re:Ballmer's strategy by tero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it's more likely that this is Ballmer's strategy against his own failings with Vista.

    They're in desperate need of getting people off XP - it's starting to show it's age from marketing point of view and I'm sure MS would like to move to a new technological platform as well.

    It's also nice to see they've really looked at things that went wrong with Vista launch - I don't think they really can afford to bomb Windows 7 launch.

  10. Re:Ballmer's strategy by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or Microsoft accurately recognizes that a vast majority of their revenue is from OEM bundles and is willing to take an extremely small hit from a million or so computer geeks who know how to download, burn and install a product they'll have to reinstall in 12 months.

    Either you stop using it and wouldn't have payed them anyway, or you buy it and they get your money eventually anyway. Either way they lose no money.

  11. Re:M$ giving windows away?! by gtirloni · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are not giving Windows 7 for free. /. can't seem to write decent titles.

    --
    none