Slashdot Mirror


Fly An R/C Plane With an iPhone

An anonymous reader writes "Ever wished your iPhone could do more than just play some cool games? How about using it as a spread spectrum transmitter to fly your R/C Toys around, complete with using a Linksys router as a receiver?"

105 comments

  1. Oooh by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yes, it's nothing really more than a simple UI feeding pretty basic data to a WLAN router which actually controls the vehicle.

    But what have *you* done lately?

    1. Re:Oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But what have *you* done lately?

      Sat on my ass in my Mom's basement, eating cheetos & trolling slashdot.

      Oh - wait, that's not me - that's you!

    2. Re:Oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's nothing really more than a simple UI feeding pretty basic data to a WLAN router which actually controls the vehicle.

      I expect better things from you BadAnalogyGuy. Something along the lines of:

      complete with using a Linksys router as a receiver

      This is like claiming to be a racecar driver when all you do is drink beer in the stands and scream at your favorite driver to 'go faster'.

  2. Slashdotted already? by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Funny

    Was his server also running on an iPhone?

    1. Re:Slashdotted already? by Mr.+Roadkill · · Score: 1

      No, that's not it - the combination of the slashdot effect and people looking for naked pictures of his uncle's ex-wife was too much for his hosting account to bear.

  3. gahphone! by get+quad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upon hearing this news the FAA has now banned iPhones as a kneejerk reaction to potentially taking over commercial flights, especially if you also use said iPhone to herd pigs via the iLivestock app.

    --
    "To err is human, to mod Funny divine."
  4. Yeah that's cool! by Zapotek · · Score: 1

    Fatal error: Out of memory (allocated 7602176) (tried to allocate 4864 bytes) in /home/myaunt/public_html/wp-includes/pluggable.php on line 901

    Yeah that's very cool! I'm almoast jealous I don't have an iPhone...or a Linksys AP...or an R/C toy...

    1. Re:Yeah that's cool! by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      Oh nevermind...The website started to work now...

    2. Re:Yeah that's cool! by glowworm · · Score: 1

      No, it's down again Fatal error: Out of memory (allocated 8388608) (tried to allocate 4864 bytes) in /home/myaunt/public_html/wp-includes/kses.php(1005) : runtime-created function on line 1

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina
    3. Re:Yeah that's cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can use Google(cache). I learn it from a book.

    4. Re:Yeah that's cool! by samirbenabid · · Score: 1

      Fatal error: Out of memory (allocated 6291456) (tried to allocate 59 bytes) in /home/myaunt/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 481

  5. Presumambly... by LaZZaR · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since you have a linux computer on board, you could extend this beyond just real time control. Programmed flight paths? Use a smaller embedded linux computer and add extra gear, maybe cameras and GPS, you could do all sorts of cool stuff (although, now this is starting to sound like a military spy plane... expect a knock on the door from the FBI)

    --
    I lost me sig.
    1. Re:Presumambly... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Acually making your own UAV is actually fairly simple.

      http://diydrones.com/

      Using a arduino or a gumstix running linux for a super high power UAV has been happening in the robotics and RC aircraft arena for some time now.

      I guess doing what others have done but adding "with a iphone" is the new "on the internet".

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Presumambly... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      You'll probably want more than just GPS and cameras. You can get autopilot/hover stability systems for RC models for a reasonable price (under $5000) that will basically allow you to use the aircraft as a UAV. You can also get much cheaper systems (under $100) that will hold a heli in a stable hover by using the horizon as reference, but they won't keep the aircraft in the intended position as well as the more expensive options.

    3. Re:Presumambly... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You can't fly a helicopter with pre-recording input data. You need full autopilot. You need accelerometers, gyros, some sort of actual altitude sensor, and a GPS to correct the accelometer and gyro data for drift over time.

      Its easier for an airplane, but helicopters are inherently unstable and require constant input to adjust for their instability. Airplanes can fly themselves with only some mechanical governors and stabilizers in good weather, helicopters can never fly themselves without electronic input and corrections from external references.

      You can get by with prerecorded inputs controlling something on the ground. It doesn't work that way for an aircraft.

      That linksys router simply doesn't have the processing power to process all the required inputs and do the math needed to keep it in there air even if you provided it with the inputs. Theres likes of trig involved, far too much for the linksys to handle.

      I've been toying with an R/C auto pilot for a couple years now, and there are several existing auto pilot systems for R/C aircraft, only one of which to my knowledge is capable of any sort of useful preprogrammed flight. It was used to fly an R/C airplane across the Atlantic, and took several attempts to get lucky enough to complete the task.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Presumambly... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you're going to build a UAV that actually needs to hover it makes probably an order of magnitude more sense to build a quadrocopter, since they are so much more stable.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Presumambly... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      What makes you say that? Many of them have stabilization systems. But from a purely mechanical and aerodynamic point of view, I don't see how they would be so much more stable than a heli of equivalent size.

    6. Re:Presumambly... by yavrusinek · · Score: 0

      http://www.sinema9.com/ I guess doing what others have done but adding "sinema9" is the new "on the internet".

  6. who wudda thunk it by drfool · · Score: 1

    I had no idea R/C was considerred hip these days...

    1. Re:who wudda thunk it by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ever since battery technology made high performance, high fly time electrics possible, the indoor/outdoor electric RC genre has exploded.

      One of the people who revolutionized this market is a friend of mine who runs wildrc.com. He invented a very durable electric flyer called the IFO. It's made of kite materials - rip stop polyester and carbon fiber rods. Just in the time that the IFO has been in existence, the batteries and motors have evolved so that his original 5 minute flight time has increased to the point where you get bored before the batteries run out - 20 mins to 1/2 hour in some cases.

      Lots of people are experimenting with computer controlled flight, and on the high end you have companies like Aerovironment doing military UAVs and solar aircraft.

      I remember visiting hobby shops in the 1980s and wishing there were more electric RC airplanes and helicopters, there was maybe one at the time and it had a 4 minute flying time. Everything R/C was also ridiculously expensive, especially the radios.

      Now 20+ years later my wishes came true...

    2. Re:who wudda thunk it by rxmd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ever since battery technology made high performance, high fly time electrics possible, the indoor/outdoor electric RC genre has exploded.

      Nice Sony reference you've snuck in there! :)

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    3. Re:who wudda thunk it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, WiFi routers have been around for years.
      And if you're worries about expense, leave out the iPhone and get yourself one that won't cause your plane to crash if you receive a call or text.

  7. Model plane + php + girl by deltharius · · Score: 5, Funny

    I RTFA. The guy claims to fly model planes, code in php AND had a *girl* in his bed. While he was coding php?!? It was either his sister, or I call bullshit on the whole story.

    1. Re:Model plane + php + girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      we all know the girls really go after python programers. php is alright, if you like porking fat chicks.

    2. Re:Model plane + php + girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The girl could also be his iPhone controlled airship. I named mine after the faithful Santa Maria. She's in my bed right now while I finish my PHP cod.

    3. Re:Model plane + php + girl by W33B · · Score: 3, Funny

      fat chick alert

    4. Re:Model plane + php + girl by ComputerPhreak · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Model plane + php + girl by wisty · · Score: 1

      Python? Real girls go for perl programmers. And they have beards.

    6. Re:Model plane + php + girl by SpzToid · · Score: 4, Funny

      Listen, am I the first person to explain to you that Real girls do not have beards? Have a clue buddy.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    7. Re:Model plane + php + girl by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      The guy claims to fly model planes, code in php AND had a *girl* in his bed.

      Yes, but he was using a Mac, not running Linux ;p

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:Model plane + php + girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was either his sister

      That scenario sounds hot.

    9. Re:Model plane + php + girl by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Yes, but he was using a Mac, not running Linux ;p

      So he's gay, and the girl is just his sister or cousin.

    10. Re:Model plane + php + girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I RTFA. The guy claims to fly model planes, code in php AND had a *girl* in his bed. While he was coding php?!? It was either his sister, or I call bullshit on the whole story.

      Girls like PHP guys. They aren't particularly elegant or cunning but they certainly get the job done.

      Besides, I wouldn't put too much stock in this guys abilities, he did type rm *.php after all. Idiot.

    11. Re:Model plane + php + girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1? Come on, that's funny.

  8. I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Those of you that don't fly should know that even minor glitches can lead to the total loss of your plane. If you do it right - get a simulator, get some training with an instructor, learn to build planes correctly - you minimize your losses but exceedingly few r/c pilots have never lost a plane. (I've lost one in 4 years or so of flying but I don't fly anywhere near as much as I'd like). You can think about where you want to put your plane but you have to get to the point where you can instinctively move the controls to do any maneuver you think of in under a second. If you can't it's called getting "behind the plane" which is bad (ie your thinking and planning to move your plane needs to be ahead). It's not rocket science but it's probably comparable to learning to ride a bike or ski or surf for the first time only if you get it slightly wrong your plane is history.

    The last thing you want to do is risk your plane with an unreliable hack on the plane (or flight surfaces, or anything holding the plane together). It could cost you hundreds of bucks, days of work, and if your plane is gas powered or heavier than a few hundred grams it could hurt someone. (Fatalities are rare with smaller planes but not unheard of).

    Also depending on where you live controlling your r/c plane with a radio that isn't designed and certified for it might not be legal even though the part of the spectrum you're using may be free to use (eg. 2.4GHz).

    Frankly I haven't even gone to 2.4GHz. I know from having other devices on those frequencies that it's a noisy part of the spectrum. At the moment it's still quite new tech which is cool but I don't fully trust it yet for anything critical.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by timeOday · · Score: 4, Informative

      The last thing you want to do is risk your plane with an unreliable hack on the plane (or flight surfaces, or anything holding the plane together). It could cost you hundreds of bucks, days of work

      When learning to fly gliders, I did a LOT more flying once I ditched a balsa aircraft that had to be re-built after every "landing" in favor of a foam one that could take a lot of abuse.

    2. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Spliffster · · Score: 1

      I was flying R/C playes, helicopters and real planes nearly my whole life. I can second what you are saying.

      However, this is a really nice hack! I had a big smile on my face while watching this video. Hacks like these are the things which seperate the real techies from the kids ;)

    3. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are plenty of really small, toy-level RC aircraft around these days. The kind that are so small you can crash them and just keep flying. This iPhone control sounds fun for something like that. Anything bigger than that (such as the 450 he has) seems a bit risky.

      On the other hand, I've also pondered this idea for a while, and it looks like it works. The transmitters are often bigger than the heli itself at the small end and it would be neat to be able to replace the bulky thing with the iPhone, not to mention the nerd points for controlling an RC model with it.

      Wonder if there is enough bandwidth to also stream video to the iPhone, too.

    4. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get an EPP (Expanded Polyproperlyne) combat glider, i learned how to fly on those, i've taken them nose first into the ground fron ~1000 ft before and they sustained no major damage.
      combatwings.com has some

      -Si

    5. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Skater · · Score: 1

      I was in a hobby shop a couple years back looking for parts for an R/C car, and I heard the employees telling a customer about another guy that lost his R/C helicopter. I guess the pilot got distracted for a moment, and when he looked back to the helicopter, the helicopter was nowhere to be found. He was getting friends to help him look for it.

    6. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by iphayd · · Score: 1

      Learn to land.

    7. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of that explains why I like foamies better in some regards than "real" R/C planes. You can experiment however you want, and if it breaks (short of messing up the motor/electronics) you end up laughing. This is because the materials and fabrication are cheap. Also the worst hazard might result in nerfing somebody, but in rare instances someone might have had hair tangled or an eye poked out.

    8. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Guysmiley777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From experience, landing an R/C plane is a lot harder than landing a real light aircraft. You rely on your peripheral vision a LOT in a real plane, you don't get the same innate sense of sink rate when looking up at an R/C plane.

      --
      Coding with assembly is like playing with Legos. Coding an application in assembly is like building a car with Legos.
    9. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 1

      Frankly I haven't even gone to 2.4GHz. I know from having other devices on those frequencies that it's a noisy part of the spectrum. At the moment it's still quite new tech which is cool but I don't fully trust it yet for anything critical.

      Get real, this is 2009. Spread-spectrum RC radios have had quite a few years to mature, not to mention that it's simply a better modulation technique than FM. Check out the Spektrum DX7 or the new Futaba stuff. I fly my helicopter setups with a DX7. There are people in my town that fly $15,000 jets them. Oh, and a lot of RC aerial photography in the movies have used the technology for at least a decade now.

    10. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by iphayd · · Score: 1

      I've landed R/C planes on fences when I thought I was coming down the runway because humans don't have depth perception after 20 or so feet, and rely on visual cues that don't exist in the air. (I've since learned to check the shadow of the plane.) I've also rebuilt the plane and flown it again. I know how tough a R/C landing is, and restate my point above...

      Learn to land.

    11. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slope gliders and PSS planes. No engine fly for hours and they're screaming fast. Plus you can do combat, and alittle bit of dynamic soaring.
      Speed record for a glider dynamic soaring is almost 400miles per hour. check out the youtube videos for DS and combat.

      I prefer slope gliders. my favourite http://www.leadingedgegliders.com/eppGliders/index.php

    12. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      The same thing applies to flight sims--it's harder to make a sucessful landing in a sim than it is in a real small airplane, mainly because you can't turn your head and look out a side window.

      Back when I used to fly, I made hundreds of safe landings but I crash my computer sim one time out of five

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    13. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by syousef · · Score: 1

      I fly the full sized sims and you really want to watch sink rate, speed and front view. It's doable just with that. if you want to be able to turn your head on the sim and look left and right, check out a product called track ir (which tracks head movement so that a small movement left or right changes your visual view left or right - still different to the real thing because your eyeball stays fixed on the same screen) or get a multi screen setup going.

      Landing on a sim and landing in real life are unfortunately still 2 very different skills. You do get some idea of the real thing on a sim but without the training I'd never want to do it for real with my life at stake.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    14. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by syousef · · Score: 1

      The DX7 only hit the mainstream 3 or 4 years ago. The Futaba gear is even newer. That's about the same duration that these radios have been recommended for full range R/C as opposed to smaller electric. I don't like the way it works. The way I've seen it described they lock on to 2 frequencies - the second for redundancy - that are clear when you start then never change. So if you have both stuffed due to interference that's game over. That would still be better than a single channel if not for the fact that 2.4GHz is the most polluted frequency on the planet.

      No thanks. At least not yet. Possibly never.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    15. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by Neil+Jansen · · Score: 1

      I won't be changing your mind today... But, in practice the systems do work very well. The cool thing about spread-spectrum modulation is its insane ability to track through insane external interference (that's part of my job as a test engineer, to jam radios and see how they behave). And whereas FM uses one frequency per channel, 2.4 can stuff in thousands on the same frequency and still get decent SNR on each one. Spread-spectrum is in almost every way superior to FM. So some kid turns on a 72 MHz radio with your same frequency, and your plane falls out of the sky. That has never, ever happened with a DX7 or FASST system. As for the 2.4 GHz band being polluted, luckily everything on the band is low-power and hopefully you're out in the middle of a big field.

      Also, Futaba's FASST technology has been around for 15 years. Like I said, the pros have been using it long before the hobby guys got into it.

    16. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      If your sim lets you view from the control tower, try landing like that.

    17. Re:I'll stick to my r/c radio, thanks by syousef · · Score: 1

      I've seen people flying helis worth many thousands with them, so I do understand that they don't have a reputation for being terrible. It's still too new for me to be comfortable changing over all 4 of my receivers and my radio. (My 2 radios are JR by the way). Also I've heard of glitches on the newer systems. I haven't seen this first hand nor do I have a documented case.

      I'd certainly like redundancy on my radio and a second channel would be sweet but not on 2.4GHz thanks. Low power or not I don't like the idea of someone's home tele retransmitter or WIFI that's been boosted illegally being close enough to my plene to interfeer. At leaste at a club the only people with radio gear that'll iterfeer are other fliers who know the rules and consequences (unlike some kid mucking around with his WIFI at home).

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  9. Drive something with an iPhone? by rhathar · · Score: 2, Funny

    This seems Horribly familiar.

    --
    http://www.chaotickingdoms.com
    1. Re:Drive something with an iPhone? by adona1 · · Score: 1

      Indeed it does. The spread spectrum transmitter is my penis.

      --
      Between the falling angel and the rising ape
  10. Like the "DIY iPhone-Controlled R/C Car" story? by compumike · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Site seems slashdotted, but this might be similar to the DIY iPhone-Controlled R/C Car story from October -- links to this video tutorial about the project.

  11. big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grow up out of the iphone hysteria guys.
    last year i wrote a simple java app for my se w810i to control my rc truck connected with a bluetooth module. the only difference here is that its an airplane and an iphone.

  12. Why not turn it into a UAV? by Plazmid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not put the iphone on the helicopter and use it to control it. Use the accelerometer data to stabilize the helicopter, the wifi geolocation ability to figure out where it is(for the most part...), and the camera to avoid obstacles using some sort of optic flow algorithm. Maybe even use google maps imagery to figure out where it is even better.

    1. Re:Why not turn it into a UAV? by CompMD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because that stuff is really, really hard. I am an aerospace engineer and a pilot. Helicopter controls are HARD. GPS is great, but only accurate to a few feet at best, wifi RSSI measurement and triangulation is atrocious...how do you hover if you don't know where you are? You need a full 6DOF model of the helicopter, 3-axis magnetometers, 3-axis acclerometers, and Kalman filtering to assist with GPS. Photogrammetric navigation is also not trivial and is the stuff of graduate engineering research projects. For obstacle avoidance on a small helicopter UAV, sonar and lidar are what you need. Obstacle avoidance and automated landing are similarly difficult tasks. Use a gumstix or PC104 computer, it will do this kind of work, and be easier to program than an iphone.

    2. Re:Why not turn it into a UAV? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Probably because you can already add an extra two gyros to a heli for cyclic control (they already have a gyro for the tail rotor) which will do the job much better, cheaper, and easier than the same type of sensors in the iPhone. But all that would do is make the aircraft less twitchy. It will still "slide" out of control and the GPS is nowhere near accurate or fast enough to help out in that area. And then there's altitude control...

  13. Ever wished... by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ever wished that every tech website and commercial orgnisation didn't assume that you are an Apple drone with an iphone? I refer to the summary, which uses the phrase:

    your iPhone

    Hey! I have an iphone? I didn't know. Could you send it to me? Thanks!

    I have a perfectly good mobile phone which works well with platform independent software and includes accelerometers, touch sensitivity and other amazing innovations. Yet my phone and my custom are of no interest to the majority of tech websites or businesses.

    Similarly, it pisses me off that 90% of music docks are ipod-only, rather than being compatible with something crazy like a standard mini-jack.

    Cue moderation to -1000, mild criticism of something tangentially connected to Apple.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:Ever wished... by geekboy642 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Guess why your (not an i-)phone doesn't get featured on the front page of slashdot?
      YOU'RE NOT FLYING A FUCKING HELICOPTER WITH YOUR PHONE.

      --
      Just another "DOJ fascist authoritarian totalitarian bootlicker" -- Zeio
    2. Re:Ever wished... by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Guess why your (not an i-)phone doesn't get featured on the front page of slashdot?
      YOU'RE NOT FLYING A FUCKING HELICOPTER WITH YOUR PHONE.

      I was not complaining about the story. I was complaining about the implicit assertion that anyone reading it owns an iphone.

      Oh, and this.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    3. Re:Ever wished... by GF678 · · Score: 1

      It's peer pressure. We experience it when we're young and told to resist it, that resisting peer pressure would make us stronger, yet as adults it's fostered onto us by the tech community and media because if you don't own one, you're considered not "with it" for some reason.

      The allure of the shiney and the pressure to conform to the expected tech standard is pushed hard against all of us.

    4. Re:Ever wished... by maxume · · Score: 1

      You have very mild sensibilities.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was complaining about the implicit assertion that anyone reading it owns an iphone.

      We all make our choices - bitterly snipe about everyone else has all the fun, or jump in and see what's going on. The iPhone is proving itself to be more of a very slick handheld computer than a phone.

    6. Re:Ever wished... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Cue moderation to -1000, mild criticism of something tangentially connected to Apple.

      The reason that you should have been downmodded into oblivion is that nobody should care if you don't have an iPhone. Instead, a bunch of jealous mofos who can't afford one modded you up. I don't think you're in this category, mind you...

      If the article says "with your iPhone" and you don't own one, the article is not for you. See, it's not all about you...

      P.S. I don't have an iPhone, and I think they're stupid. But I think complaining about the tone of the headline is even more stupid.

      P.P.S. A megaphone is a really stupid weapon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Ever wished... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is proving itself to be more of a very slick handheld computer than a phone.

      Welcome at last to the 21st Century.

      The transition from phones to handheld computers that have the extra ability to be phones started years ago.

    8. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to economies of scale as expressed by user communities. You might also notice the following:
      * If you have an issue, typing it into google using any phrasing you want and hitting "I'm feeling lucky" might not instantly get you the scoop.
      * If you install the top free application in a given category for your phone, it might not work at all for what it's supposed to do. For example, a game might not even be fun.
      * If someone has realized they can save people in your position a lot of time and money with a mobile phone app, then they might just go with the hottest mobile app distribution method on the planet, which ain't exactly java applets from web sites. (hint: talking about the app store here).
      * No one will ask you how you like your phone, because they're considering buying one. Maybe for you the missed connections aren't worth anything, but for the rest of the human race they sure are.

      and so on, and so on. But no you're right -- just because a billion apps have been downloaded for a phone, how is that different from your mobile phone, which, like supports Java?

    9. Re:Ever wished... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      If someone has realized they can save people in your position a lot of time and money with a mobile phone app, then they might just go with the hottest mobile app distribution method on the planet, which ain't exactly java applets from web sites. (hint: talking about the app store here).

      Firstly I'm not sure how this relates to the OP (who said nothing about app stores or other means of distribution). But since you bring it up, plenty of phones have central points of download for applications (often operated by the network providers, for example). The difference is that you aren't forced to use them. And even if they also support native code, they don't shun common platform independent standards such as Java (honestly, any other platform that lacked basic things like Java would be ridiculed, yet for Apple, it's touted as an advantage).

      (I'm not sure how the rest of your points relate to his post either, to be honest?)

    10. Re:Ever wished... by paazin · · Score: 1

      Instead, a bunch of jealous mofos who can't afford one modded you up.

      Hardly.

      More likely it's people like me who simply don't care much for whatever happens to be the FOTM, instead only making purchases intelligently

    11. Re:Ever wished... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      Oddly, they do the same thing with every other product they talk about... your PC (no, I have a mac thanks); your volvo estate (no, I have a skoda thanks); your wall plug (no, I rent my flat, and own no wall plugs at all).

      Bottom line - you're being nothing more than a picky twat, specifically because this story was apple related.

      It may piss you off that 90% of music docks are iPod only, but then, 80% of music players are iPods, so it makes a decent amount of sense that manufacturers aim at them. This would be like me saying "it pisses me off that all GPSes are aimed at windows PCs"... it does, but the bottom line is that there's a reason they're like that - it's a bigger market than aiming them at macs.

      In fact, I would even have more of a case than you - there's only one or two extra OSes to aim at - mac os, and linux. On the other hand, when producing docks, you have to deal with hundreds of low-sales players, all with different shapes, all with ports in different places, etc.

      Stop whining and look at this as it is - something really cool, done with a neat bit of tech.

    12. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, you don't get it to do you. It doesn't matter whether there are central points of download. What matters is whether the 1 developer who realizes all the time and money they can save YOU specifically (and peopel in YOUR position) will write their app for the iPhone, or for your "common central points of download".

      My whole point about "economies of scale" with respect to user communities flew completely over your head (as you admitted).

      if you still dont get it why dont you get to apple's site, hit the iphone tab, and look through their app store. then you'll see what I'm talking about.

    13. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet so many of them still fail utterly....

    14. Re:Ever wished... by sanyacid · · Score: 1

      It's understandable you're so annoyed with all the buzz and news about iPhone. But surely you can do something about the situation. Why not contribute some news about what exciting stuff you do with your phone? If it's anything related to robotics/controlling your tech with your phone, I will be one to read it.
      Obviously this article is aimed at people who either own iPhone (hence the 'your iPhone') or people who are generally interested in this topic. I don't own iPhone (and I'm not planning to buy one), but I find the idea interesting. If it's not for you, what can you do? ;-)

      Regarding iPod docks I have to disagree (again, I don't own iPod either). You've got to understand that iPod is the probably the most popular mp3-player out there and with the special dock you can for example control the player remotely - something you cannot do if you only use standard mini-jack. Many people actually want that functionality, and that's not a very good reason to get pissed of. It's like getting pissed that most people listen to pop music and hence shops sell more pop instead of my preferred hard rock (I don't know if that's actually true, but I hope it gets the point across ;-)

    15. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think complaining about the tone of the headline is even more stupid.

      I think whining about someone complaining about the tone of the headline is the dumbest thing I've seen all day. Well, at least until I submit this comment.

    16. Re:Ever wished... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Why does writing apps for the Iphone save me money? And if you say "or for your "common central points of download".", then there's nothing special about the Iphone is there.

      if you still dont get it why dont you get to apple's site, hit the iphone tab, and look through their app store. then you'll see what I'm talking about.

      Yes, yet another app store, just like other phones/networks have.

      No, I don't get it. Because I have no idea what you're on about.

    17. Re:Ever wished... by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Oddly, they do the same thing with every other product they talk about... your PC (no, I have a mac thanks); your volvo estate (no, I have a skoda thanks); your wall plug (no, I rent my flat, and own no wall plugs at all).

      They do it on adverts, sure. I'd rather that Slashdot didn't turn into Slashvertisements - but sadly that does seem the way it's going with the endless Iphone stories...

    18. Re:Ever wished... by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      So, slashdot doing a story about some guy doing a cool thing with an RC plane, and a non-standard controller, where that non-standard controller just happens to be a very popular phone/media player/portable computer... That's a slashvertisement, yeh?

      Get over yourself. You may not like the iPhone. You may not like the company behind the iPhone. But that doesn't stop a story about "hey, you can do random cool shit with this device" being entirely legit.

    19. Re:Ever wished... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh my god you seriously need to read some economics. if nothing else just google 'economies of scale' (and 'network effect'* for good measure) and read the resulting Wikipedia articles. that should get you started.

      * network effect doesn't necessarily apply to iPhone

  14. IDLE IDLE IDLE! by MrMista_B · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Look. Slashdot, we need an intervention here.

    If we're gonna have a damn 'Idle' topic to begin with, then crap like this should be /kept/ there, and not allowed to spew out onto the main page.

    Alright?

    Alright.

  15. the phone is not controlling the plane directly by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

    there's an app that ssh's into a router and that is what's controlling the plane. it's as advertised, but the summary is wrong. the app makes the router control the plane.

    1. Re:the phone is not controlling the plane directly by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      sorry- should have read the first post from BadAnalogyGuy.

  16. DD-WRT Ethernet ports driving servos by D4C5CE · · Score: 1

    Finally, you may ask how the servos are being driven. Well, routers are used to send bits of information down a series of twisted pair wires usually. Guess what it takes to send packeted information? An IC that would work really well as a PWM! I did some haxoring around on this, and read what other nerds had done on the internet, and the next thin[g] you know I have a servo with a Cat5E plug on the end of it.

    Now you're talking. Schematics/code? Hope he'll share them (there's no better backup) before the next rm...

    I was distracted by some girl in my bed (Don't EVAR program PHP with a girl(s) in your bed!) and maybe a beer or six in my blood. [...] While girl was yammering in my ear I typed rm *.php instead of rm 8.php, and hit enter. [...] There were some major hurdles. While range testing one night, I received a call from a girl. She was pretty insistent on me going to a party or something. So now I had two huge problems, incoming calls would kill the link to the craft, and I had to figure out if I had any clean clothes without R/C Logos on them to wear out.

    Ludwig Catta, is that you?! ;-)

  17. Here's the text from the story. by wlowe84 · · Score: 2, Informative

    How to use an iPhone to Fly R/C Airplanes and Helicopters

    HOW I DID IT: I've had an iPhone for about a year now, and find it quite indispensable. It's handy in so many situations, and fits into a lot of nerdy stuff I do. However, it hasn't fit in perfectly to the main nerdy thing that I like to do: Fly radio control airplanes and helicopters. For that, I use a really high quality piece of hardware from a company called JR, a JR 9303 radio. It works great. However, one day it occurred to me, how cool would it be to use my iPhone to fly my RC stuff? The answer was "So cool" obviously. I tossed around the idea for a couple of months and ultimately gave up on it because the iPhone doesn't have a receiver I can put in the airplane to fly it with.

    So the idea sat untouched while I learned how to program stuff on the iPhone for other nerdy purposes. My roommate requested I make a chadwick balancer for him using the accelerometers. (For those who don't know, this is a device they use in real and model helicopters to find out if something is not balanced. Main blades, tail blades, shafts, gears etc...) While I was learning about the accelerometer functions in the iPhone, the idea pinged me again, and I thought, How cool would it be to fly an R/C model using the accelerometers inside the iPhone?! Alas, still no receiver.

    IMAC Season came and went, and so did indoor season. I was busy practicing for contests I knew I'd be beat at, and building planes I knew were way to good for me. =) Then, one fateful day, I deleted some PHP program I was working on by accident. This was a LOT of work, and I was exceptionally pissed off about it. I was distracted by some girl in my bed (Don't EVAR program PHP with a girl(s) in your bed!) and maybe a beer or six in my blood. I was writing a series of test programs for a SOAP interface, and had named one of them 8.php. (The more seasoned nerds among you can probably see where this is going). The program had turned into a complete disaster and was causing "internal server errors", and I wanted to delete it. While girl was yammering in my ear I typed rm *.php instead of rm 8.php, and hit enter. Deleting every php file in the folder. Hours of hard work gone into the void.

    The next day I went and bought a time capsule from Apple so this would never happen again. The side effect of this was that I had a Linksys 54 to play around with. I always had this grandiose idea of building a WIFI sniffer/jammer. I figured there may have been some people playing around with these routers. And gosh, was I right.

    The DD-WRT project is a group of people who have reverse engineered many popular brands of routers and have managed to load a small linux distribution. As soon as I saw that they had independent programs running, it hit me like a bolt of lightning: My planes and helis don't need a receiver if they are carrying around the server. If I could carry around the router on board, I could fly my stuff.

    So I started scheming. There were a lot of problems to be solved, and I am only just so nerdy. I made a list:

    1. How do I get the router to talk to the servos? How much current can ethernet handle?

    2. How do I control throttle with no stick?

    3. What is the latency going to be like from iPhone->Router->Program->Servo?

    4. What is the range of WiFi? Good enough for RC?

    5. Can I fly with the accelerometers? I'm a stick banger. BIG time. How does one add expo to this?

    6. Whose planes can I test this on? >=)

    So I had my basic idea down. iPhone joins the Linksys router network. It gets an IP address. Then, I open up my pilot program. The pilot program interfaces with the router via SSH (I couldn't think of a better way that has redundancy, and speed, and was already buily by someone else). The pilot program interprets what the iphone is doing, and outputs data to one of the ethernet ports of which there are conveniently 4. Rudder, Ailerons, Throttle, Elevator.

    Once I had

  18. The guys at hardcode.tv did it first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very cool but, it was done (an RC car - not heli) earlier with a IPhone, a Wii-mote, a Wii-fit board and some other stuff by the guys at hardcode.tv.

    Check out their cool demo: http://www.hardcode.tv/

  19. Driving car with cellphone/iphone already by Symnron · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. I see people driving cars with cellphones and iphones all the time. One hand on the phone, one on the cigarette, one on the coffee cup. That doesn't leave any for the steering wheel so they must be driving the car with the phone. Get Moose and Squirrel!

  20. This is pure BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Network RJ45 to PWM? No wonder he is not telling how he did it - impossible. And the phone call from this girl?? Sooo made up... Wishful thinking from a sad little Jewish boy.

  21. I'm not sure.. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    Fly An R/C Plane With an iPhone

    Why would I want to do that?

    Is it like scratching your balls with a ballpoint pen? Or flipping pancakes with a fork?

    How 'bout this: I'll go mow my lawn with a nail clipper instead.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  22. Confused by drinsilence · · Score: 2, Funny

    MyAuntIsHot or MyAuntIShot?

    1. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MyAuntIsHot or MyAuntIShot?

      His Aunt is Hot. Google "Nikki Ziering" ... Doesnt look like his blood aunt though so it's not terribly incestuous.

  23. New product idea for Apple by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

    to go with the military-version iPod Touch. An iPhone-controlled UAV, called the iDrone.

  24. But it's "...On The Iphone"! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. I think it's part of the marketing hype that Slashdot and others have fallen to where "On The IpHoNe" - or indeed, "On Your Iphone" makes it newsworthy.

    "Ever wished your iPhone could do more than just play some cool games? How about using a chat client instead of SMS?"

    "Ever wished your iPhone could do more than just play some cool games? How about using it to access a website, just like almost every other phone has been doing for years?"

    "Ever wished your iPhone could do more than just play some cool games? How about using it to speak into the microphone, and use it as a communication device to talk as if by magic with someone not even in the same room?"

    Similarly, it pisses me off that 90% of music docks are ipod-only

    Whilst there's no excuse for the lack of standardisation that Apple have encouraged, in this case at least you can't blame the manufacturers as the Ipod is the most popular device. But the Iphone? Sorry, despite the impression one might get from reading Slashdot, it's just one of many phones with much larger companies that have sold billions - and plenty of those phones have for years been doing the "new" things that are advertised, er, reported for the Iphone. That "Ipod" has become synonymous with "mp3 player" is understandable, in the same way it occurred for "Walkman", but trying to do it for the Iphone? That's just annoying.

  25. Other phones have had this for a while already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take something old, put "iPhone" on it, voila, news!

  26. From Google Cache by mrops · · Score: 1

    Youtube Video first: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=72V0n1GaMsw

    Text below from Google Cache.
    Iâ(TM)ve had an iPhone for about a year now, and find it quite indispensable. Itâ(TM)s handy in so many situations, and fits into a lot of nerdy stuff I do. However, it hasnâ(TM)t fit in perfectly to the main nerdy thing that I like to do: Fly radio control airplanes and helicopters. For that, I use a really high quality piece of jrp2915-250hardware from a company called JR, a JR 9303 radio. It works great. However, one day it occurred to me, how cool would it be to use my iPhone to fly my RC stuff? The answer was âoeSo coolâ obviously. I tossed around the idea for a couple of months and ultimately gave up on it because the iPhone doesnâ(TM)t have a receiver I can put in the airplane to fly it with.

    So the idea sat untouched while I learned how to program stuff on the iPhone for other nerdy purposes. My roommate requested I make a chadwick balancer for him using the accelerometers. (For those who donâ(TM)t know, this is a device they use in real and model helicopters to find out if something is not balanced. Main blades, tail blades, shafts, gears etcâ¦) While I was learning about the accelerometer functions in the iPhone, the idea pinged me again, and I thought, How cool would it be to fly an R/C model using the accelerometers inside the iPhone?! Alas, still no receiver.

    IMAC Season came and went, and so did indoor season. I was busy practicing for contests I knew Iâ(TM)d be beat at, and building planes I knew were way to good for me. =) Then, one fateful day, I deleted some PHP program I was working on by accident. This was a LOT of work, and I was exceptionally pissed off about it. I was distracted by some girl in my bed (Donâ(TM)t EVAR program PHP with a girl(s) in your bed!) and maybe a beer or six in my blood. I was writing a series of test programs for a SOAP interface, and had named one of them 8.php. (The more seasoned nerds among you can probably see where this is going). The program had turned into a complete disaster and was causing âoeinternal server errorsâ, and I wanted to delete it. While girl was yammering in my ear I typed rm *.php instead of rm 8.php, and hit enter. Deleting every php file in the folder. Hours of hard work gone into the void.

    The next day I went and bought a time capsule from Apple so this would never happen again. The side effect of this was that I had a Linksys 54 to play linksys routeraround with. I always had this grandiose idea of building a WIFI sniffer/jammer. I figured there may have been some people playing around with these routers. And gosh, was I right.

    The DD-WRT project is a group of people who have reverse engineered many popular brands of routers and have managed to load a small linux distribution. As soon as I saw that they had independent programs running, it hit me like a bolt of lightning: My planes and helis donâ(TM)t need a receiver if they are carrying around the server. If I could carry around the router on board, I could fly my stuff.

    So I started scheming. There were a lot of problems to be solved, and I am only just so nerdy. I made a list:

    1. How do I get the router to talk to the servos? How much current can ethernet handle?
    2. How do I control throttle with no stick?
    3. What is the latency going to be like from iPhone->Router->Program->Servo?
    4. What is the range of WiFi? Good enough for RC?
    5. Can I fly with the accelerometers? Iâ(TM)m a stick banger. BIG time. How does one add expo to this?
    6. Whose planes can I test this on? >=)

    So I had my basic idea down. iPhone joins the Linksys router network. It gets an IP address. Then, I open up my pilot program. The pilot program interfaces with the router via SSH (I couldnâ(T

  27. Lame story by Xoltri · · Score: 1

    He keeps talking about 'girls' in the story, for example that he had a girl in his bed, or he was flying his plane and a girl called him, but what he forgot to mention that the girl he is referring to is his mom, and the party he was invited to was Friday pizza night, with his mom.

    --
    -Xoltri
  28. receiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I have twistd personality after seeing that site; but word "receiver" brings to my eyes memory of my first visit to goatse :-/

  29. best source of livingroom sized rtf rc planes by MrSaxonite · · Score: 1

    www.plantraco.com they hail from canada, and you even get 10 pages of customs paperwork every time they ship ya a plane via fedex.. lol these people came up with a battery that has magnets on the connectors, to hold the battery to the reciever on the plane, truly made for us clumsy flyers! their best is the carbon butterfly! for outdoors, the UAV, or avonette are great.. but if you like you planes to have wheels for the challange of touch and go's anywhere you go, then the 'pocket plane' is what you are really after

  30. Friday's Hype story of the day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ok, it's got WiFi (DSSS).

    Just because it's an iPhone it's not newsworthy, nor ./ worthy. Even the photo-chopped controls image on the phone indicates FAIL.

    And of course it would work for 2 seconds until the iPhone drops connection since the WiFi has always been flaky on that (andother 3G phones) hardware. Also 2 moving access points is not a strength of DSSS WiFi. I believe the JR and R/C radios that use wifi are FHSS or better. Anyway he would have been better off using 2 iPhones and a 3G connection. Better yet, 2 openmoko devices, or even better, a iphone+sun spot. Even a G1 would have been a better phone choice (2 accelos, digi compass).

    The again, the article is so ridden with 'nerdy', l33t speak, and WRT that I kept thinking "script-kiddie on 4chan".

  31. Why? by redz77 · · Score: 1

    Now I'm not saying this app is useless, but why would anyone need to fly an RC play with their iphone? Don't the have remotes for that already?

    1. Re:Why? by fatalb7 · · Score: 1

      Easy: Because he can.

      And there probably are other guys trying to make phone calls with their remotes.