Slashdot Mirror


eBay Fakes Devalue the Craft of Tomb Robbing

James McP writes "According to an article on Archaeology, fake artifacts being sold on eBay have caused the bottom to drop out of the low-end artifact market. This outcome is exactly opposite to what archeologists feared would happen when eBay came on the scene. A side effect of more and more forgers getting in on the act has been a dramatic increase in high-quality fakes that can fool experts and illicit collectors alike, lowering the price for high-end artifacts as well. It's a lot less cost-effective to go tomb raiding than to make your own fakes, especially since selling fake artifacts isn't really illegal."

28 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. fake or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So wait. Are you telling me that Lara Croft's are fake?

    1. Re:fake or not? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well her guns are USP 9mm, and the variants of the USP are used by the German military. However, the extended barrels and weighted match are only used in competition shooting and never . . . oh you mean her other guns. Definitely fake.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  2. Not Illegal But Definitely Misleading by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a lot less cost-effective to go tomb raiding than to make your own fakes, especially since selling fake artifacts isn't really illegal.

    May not be illegal but certainly misrepresentation is a thorn in eBay's side.

    The auction depicted in the article reads "100% Guaranteed Authentic" and:

    Origin: North Coast Peru
    Culture: Moche
    Culture Date: 50 A.D. to 750 A.D. Approx.

    Notice how they said "culture date" and not actual date of the mask. The phrase "Pre-Columbian" is as misleading as "100% Guaranteed Authentic" and I think I would have a problem if I purchased this as it is a pretty misleading posting.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Not Illegal But Definitely Misleading by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "100% Authentic" is a classic example of a common advertising dodge. It's not a sentence, it's a meaningless fragment without an object, subject, or a verb. The implication is that you're saying that the object right there on the same page is 100% authentic, but they're not responsible for your misunderstanding.

      This is a particularly good example, because the sentence not only lacks an object, it also lacks the object that is supposed to be related to the object by the descriptor "authentic". Not only do we not know what is supposed to be authentic, but we don't what class of thing it's supposed supposed to be an authentic member of!

      So (unknown object) (is a) 100% Authentic (unknown thing). A perfectly meaningless sentence fragment. Caveat Emptor.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:Not Illegal But Definitely Misleading by fataugie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it's a 100% Authentic......reproduction

      --

      WTF? Over?

    3. Re:Not Illegal But Definitely Misleading by DerekLyons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a reason in the art world if a painting cannot be tracked through it's whole life it's first considered a fake.

      Except of course for all the paintings not discovered to be by someone considered important until years, decades, or centuries after the work was created. Something that's actually done fairly routinely.

    4. Re:Not Illegal But Definitely Misleading by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "100% Authentic" is a classic example of a common advertising dodge. It's not a sentence, it's a meaningless fragment without an object, subject, or a verb. The implication is that you're saying that the object right there on the same page is 100% authentic, but they're not responsible for your misunderstanding.

      "Fraud - (Law) An intentional perversion of truth for the purpose of obtaining some valuable thing or promise from another"

      To argue that it's a meaningless fragment somehow abdicates the seller from responsibility is absurd. English is a context-sensitive language. Read the description again:

      PRE-COLUMBIAN MOCHE GOLD WARRIOR DOUBLE STIRRUP VESSEL

      BIG MOCHE GOLD MASK WITH PECTORAL COPPER & GOLD 24K!!!!

      (15 % OF PURE GOLD)

      100% Guaranteed Authentic

      Pre-columbian is a time period. Authentic, in this context, means minimally that the object was constructed as described at or before that time period. If the seller had said, "0% Guaranteed", then perhaps there'd be some leeway to the point that the seller is unsure of what he's selling. So, it if turns out that said mask isn't really pre-columbian, it's very clear that a perversion of the truth is occured, that the seller was entirely irresponsible to call it 100% guaranteed authentic, that such actions indicate an intention to defraud, and they should prosecuted for fraud*. And if it is pre-columbina, nothing should happen.

      Your argument seems about as aburd as the idea that adding random periods in your sentences in contracts would magically abdicate both parties from responsibility within that contract. It is the "meeting of the minds" in contract and in contract-like situation (ie, interactions where there are socially-constructed and lawfully enforced transactions) that determines what, if any, remedy is available to parties for any failures to comply with the intention of the "contract". The only thing sellers of fake artifacts have going for them is, because their "meeting of the minds" is partially implicit, they have more leeway to argue that their intentions were honest.

      Language like "100% guaranteed" is clearly to designed as a means of conveying that a seller is forgoing various defenses should a complaint arise as they themselves have taken on the responsibility of claiming to actually know the truth and to be held accountable for that truth. If such language is infact meaningless, then the use of such language is clearly designed to try to fool people to trust and buy products they wouldn't otherwise by envoking the previous sentence's implications. It is little different than using a trademark one does not have a right/privilege to. All are attempts to manipulate money out of people without exchanging with them something of value.

      *Just because a person should be prosecuted for fraud doesn't mean they likely will. This would appear to be especially true over the internet, but I believe the truth is more that people in general have such low standards of expectations regardless of what is clearly promised that they don't pursue legal action against those that defraud them. Not wanting to be "overly litigious", a desire to not appear foolish for having believed another person's promises, courts generally already being rather busy, "Caveat Emptor", and the possibility of not being able to recoup one's losses anyways for "failing to follow common sense" all are barriers to remeding fraud.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
  3. I'm sure I'm not the only one who saw by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Funny

    "eBay Fakes Devalue Lara Croft of Tomb Raiding"

  4. Laura Croft: Ebay Raider by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow, who could have ever thought new technology could have beneficial side effects? That's just crazy.

    I'm glad to see this get press. Maybe some people will think twice about jumping on the alarmist "Must Fear Everything New" bandwagon.

    Then again, it double's their potential for attention-whoredom: make news talking up your baseless dire predictions, then make news with the shocking revelation that, not only did your predicts not come true, the opposite happened! Who could have seen this amazing twist ending!

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Laura Croft: Ebay Raider by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It reduces the profitablility of ransacking historic sites and graves that might otherwise be studied scientifically.

      Fuck collectors, they're 99% of the problem. And if it's good enough to fool a curator, then it's good enough to display in a museum. Not like the average schmuck walking through the museum is going to know the difference.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  5. Re:Disagree in part! by AvitarX · · Score: 5, Funny

    But it is not "really" illegal.

    Just as stealing $5.00 out of your girlfriends wallet may be illegal, but selling drugs to schoolchildren is "really illegal".

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  6. My fake auctions suffer by SnarfQuest · · Score: 4, Funny

    I sell fake artifacts for the fake ebay artifact auctions, and have noticed this. I used to get three times as much for my fake artifacts (with aged certificate of authenticy). Because of this, I now write "This Artifact is Fake, Hoser" in the appropriate runes on each one I produce. They still sell well, and noone has caught on yet.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  7. Re:Disagree in part! by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think what the summary was aiming for was that the sell of fake items in and of itself is not illegal. If they are honest about the origins (or write their summaries cleverly enough) then it's not illegal. Kind of like the market for forged coins; not illegal as long as your not selling them as the real thing.

    --
    Demented But Determined.
  8. Re:Weird anyway. by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Am I the only one that finds it a little odd that people are interested in purchasing items raided from tombs in the first place? O.o

    It's how most of the artifacts in museums around the world left their home countries. Also, go to the houses of some old money types in New York and you'll find a shocking amount of looted art. Some of the looted art eventually ends up going back to museums (like the Levy-White collection now trickling toward the Met, though Shelby White still has quite a collection that might astonish you at home).

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  9. Well, my Egyptian Mummy is authentic . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know, because he often rises from the dead in the middle of the night while I'm sleeping. He then proceeds to drink my beer, eat my chips and generally make a mess of the apartment.

    He seems to have a penchant for microwave burritos as well. I can't remember any references to burritos in the Bible's chapter of "Exodus."

    And he has been downloading porn on my computer, as well. Mummies seem to be into some weird kink. I'm kind of glad that I can't read Hieroglyphics . . . that's probably some nasty stuff that scholars have mistranslated.

    If he was not such a valuable archeological artifact, I probably would have tossed the bastard.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  10. Re:Disagree in part! by Volante3192 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What about authentic fakes?

  11. Failed oportunity by pavon · · Score: 4, Funny

    This headline totally should have been:
    eBay Fakes Lower Craft of Tomb Raiding.

  12. Same with fossils by smellsofbikes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My coworker is an amateur paleontologist. He has a reasonably serious collection that takes up most of his house, and does a lot of trading as well as collecting. He has a lot of stories about fakes.
    "Dominican Amber" is this beautiful, amazingly clear, amazingly inexpensive amber from the Dominican Republic. Except that when you do some research, it all comes through one company, who has filed patents on taking ground-up amber fragments and re-melting them under pressure into new-old amber.
    Likewise, there are some amazing specimens of fossil fish coming out of China, where their skins are fantastically preserved so you can easily see individual scales. Only, a lot of them are completely identical. They're not cast replicas, though: they took an original, cast or machined a negative in metal, then put pieces of slate on top of the negative and vibrated it until it has excavated a perfect copy into the slate -- so it's pure, natural, ancient rock with something that looks exactly like a fossil. In fact, it's pretty hard to tell the difference even for people who know fossils, unless they have a microscope and some time to inspect the edges where the fossil meets the rock.
    He said there are also loads of intricate fossils, stuff with lots of fine features (like the tentacles on squids) that have actually been broken off, and a talented fossil restorer has just cut a new one in the rock itself to make the fossil look complete.

    All of these, like the fake antiques, have made the real ones less expensive -- but at the same time, they make a market larger, because more people can afford to buy, and at some point that could make the demand rise sharply overall, even though the individual pieces cost less, still contributing to increased demand for originals.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  13. Re:Disagree in part! by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Funny

    What if you steal the drugs from your girlfriend's wallet and sell THAT to schoolchildren?

  14. Numismats by dargaud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Case in point: my father collects roman coins and is quite expert. Recently he bought a coin on eBay that appeared perfectly real. But then some time later the same coin was for sale again. He contacted the other buyer and they traded high-res pics: they were identical down to the same defects. He then started a private inquiry on the buyers which led him to some russian (what a surprise) groups that sell perfect fakes on the Internet to people who want to then sell them on eBay. They do mass quantities (in the thousands). They even guarantee them against several types of scientific tests (including fluorescence and mass spectrography) ! I have no idea how they can do that, unless they have access to a certain amount of 2000 year old copper and other metals.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:Numismats by joe+155 · · Score: 5, Informative

      as someone who owns a Roman coin I've looked into this (I've only got the one because my collection is primarily of hammered English silver coins). Silver which has been out of the ground and moulded for 2000 years or so takes on some certain characteristics which set it apart as being old, so you do actually need old coins to pull off convincing fakes. How they make money on it is in melting down (or at least heating up) the coins and then remoulding them into more expensive (i.e. rarer) coins. The roman coin I've got was a little over £20 (from a reputable dealer) because it is of an unpopular Emperor and was found with a lot of others - if you can re-hammer a £20 coin into a £200 coin you can see where the profit comes from

      What really bothers me about all this though is less the ripping people off (which is annoying, but so far I don't think I've been got - hint: buying only relatively inexpensive coins and insisting on knowing providence on more expensive ones helps) but more that these people are destroying the world's history to turn some quick money now (for the same reason I don't support irresponsible metal detector users - you need to report any important find!)

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Numismats by Imrik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Suppose you had to use another piece of art from the same period as the Mona Lisa to create your fake. Yes there would be another Mona Lisa to show off, but the piece you used would be destroyed forever.

  15. How about selling your GF to schoolkids for drugs? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why think so small?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  16. Re:Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My sister has lots of testicles. She's a veterinarian. Isn't it funny how most female veterinarians don't see any connection between their fascination with castration and their inability to keep a boyfriend for very long?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  17. Which they don't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are very careful to avoid actually saying that the items are artifacts.

    Anyway, what are you going to do, tell the police you bought an item you thought was illegal and it turned out it wasn't? Go ahead, cops deserve a laugh now and then. I am sure they will drop all the murder and rape cases and jump right on top of it. Just like cops jump on copy right infringement (note that the police doesn't, only prosecutors looking for a lucrative job after their public service).

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  18. Direct Modern Analog: Cracking DRM by maillemaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What we are seeing here is the archeological equivalent of cracking DRM.

    Once pieces can be reproduced indistinguishably from the real thing at cost X, the value of the real thing trends towards X.

    Archeology's DRM has been cracked.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Direct Modern Analog: Cracking DRM by Thaelon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      More accurately, and more abstractly, it's cracking the DRM on matter.

      Once you can replicate something perfectly right down to the molecular level, there is no longer any difference between the original and the duplicate, because there's

      Sure you could say that you know, because you made the replica, but if I take both pieces, hold them behind my back for a moment, shifting my arms, you've lost that.certainty too.

      Personally, I love seeing scarce goods copied perfectly and can't wait for this to happen to more things.

      The diamond industry comes to mind. DeBeers has been trying desperately to convince everyone that "diamonds are valuable", and now that we're getting good at making copies, they're changing their tune to be, "natural diamonds are valuable". Which basically just proves them to be shysters all along. There was really nothing special about them before, and there's even less now, but they're trying desperately to cling to their business model of convincing people that something is valuable, then holding monopolistic stockpiles of it and releasing just a trickle.

      --

      Question everything

  19. Not just artifacts. by Xest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The same has occured with the trade of endangered plant species to an extent.

    The illegal trade of endangered flora has let to the destruction or near destruction of many species. Ebay sales have allowed people to trade plants that were grown in private collections rather than habitat and due to the risk of illegal habitat smuggling of plants, people growing them in cultivation can undercut those selling plants taken illegally from habitat.

    This has allowed some highly endangered species to recover as the pressure from illegal smuggling has died away due to it not being worth the time for smugglers when mass growing at plant nurseries means they can be undercut to the point it's not even worth the smugglers driving to the habitat, let alone risking doing the smuggling itself.

    Ironically though, the international process designed to help protect endangered species - CITES - actually hampers this because it prevents international trade of endangered plants even if they were grown purely in private collections and never grown in habitat, whilst smugglers ignore such regulations anyway.

    As with this and as with artifacts there's a lot to be said about free trade of fakes, or in this case - privately and responsibly grown plants rather than restriction of it. It allows market forces to undercut costs of authentic specimens to the point where it's simply not worth smuggling from a monetary point of view. If more was done to support the trade of "fakes" rather than hamper it as per CITES I think decline of smuggling would actually help - it's better to prevent smuggling at the source and protect habitat than it is to try and catch it at the ports because again, smugglers will avoid the ports anyway.