Slashdot Mirror


FTC Targets Massive Car Warranty Robocall Scheme

coondoggie writes "Robocalls are a scourge, and the Federal Trade Commission today took action against one outfit by asking a federal court to shut down companies that have been bombarding consumers with hundreds of millions of allegedly deceptive robocalls in an effort to sell vehicle service contracts. According to the FTC, the robocalls have prompted tens of thousands of complaints from consumers who are either on the Do Not Call Registry or asked not to be called. Five telephone numbers associated with the defendants have generated a total of 30,000 Do Not Call complaints. Consumers received the robocalls at home, work, and on their cell phones, sometimes several times in one day. Businesses, government offices and even 911 dispatchers also have been subjected to the calls, the FTC said." Reader powerlord points out that another such company, not named in the FTC filing, raised the ire of thousands of internet-goers, who struck back by rickrolling the company's voice mail and digging up personal information on the company's president.

361 comments

  1. How about.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:How about.... by bstreiff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

      These people are already blatantly ignoring the Do Not Call list. Why would they bother to give a legitimate caller ID string?

    2. Re:How about.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Because its a lot easier to convict them and a whole lot easier to find out what they are doing wrong and how to fix it. With a do not call list, its possible that they accidentally dialed the wrong number, didn't have an up to date version, etc. Then the mess that is the do not call list adds to the problem.

      A simple string would take all excuses away and make it simpler for the FTC to do its job.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:How about.... by pawstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... because the phone company would have to provide the legitimate string. Simple solution, make it illegal for phone companies to spoof caller id.

    4. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It gets worse than simply ignoring the Do Not Call list. You see, in order to be compliant with government regulations, legitimate marketing firms need to purchase an annual subscription to the DNC list. They then need to purge from their prospect list any number appearing in the DNC list.

      Unfortunately, the government sells this list to anyone who asks; thus, Russian telemarketing companies sometimes buy the DNC list as a source of pre-verified, valid phone numbers.

    5. Re:How about.... by Hyppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Caller ID can be spoofed by the end user. There are products out there that you can buy to do it, though the names escape me at the moment.

    6. Re:How about.... by sgladfelter · · Score: 1

      Personally, rather than create new laws to control this, I'd rather the telco's take care of it themselves.
      I'd love it if my carrier offered a premium service to block all robocalls or sales calls. I have to believe that they know exactly who and where these people are. Why it isn't already an option in my area, I have know idea.

    7. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet. Get some laws passed that allow the victim to hit #5 on their phone to charge the caller $5.00, then I'll be happy. If someone WANTS these calls, that's fine. Don't push #5. Most people don't want these calls and the victims should be able to instantly make these groups feel the pressure back in a big way.

      Groups like The American Teleservices Association (rebranded to remove "Telemarketing" from their name) and The Direct Marketing Association talk U.S. Congressmen into passing laws which enable annoying, invasive and often fraudulent activities from this lowlife "industry". It's an industry to the extent that people get paid to ring bells in my house but jeez - earn a living some other way. Annoying everyone over the phone [I believe] is not an "industry" as the lobbyist associations claim. If there was money in ringing your doorbell and hitting people with buckets of paint ten times a day, I'm sure there would be a lobbyist group for that, too. Oh wait... that's PETA.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    8. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Even better idea that would add no new stuff - just make it illegal to call people on the do not call list. And allow people the sue if they are called even once

    9. Re:How about.... by Mistlefoot · · Score: 1

      There are issues with these calls even if they are legitimate.

      I can look up Jim Smith in the phone book and assume he has a visa.

      "Hello, is this Jim Smith"
      "This is Jerry calling from Mastercard. We see recent unusual activity on your Mastercard and are concerned that you may be a victim of credit card fraud. We see 14 purchases in the past 24 hours totalling $2200"
      "I understand your concern Jim, that is why we are calling - please calm down sir. Unfortunately, due to privacy laws and to confirm whom I am speaking to before we put a hold on the card I will need to confirm your credit card number, expiry date and social security number"

      If any such call were made that didn't confirm caller identification there would be privacy concerns. If any such call where made and asked you for identifying information there would be privacy concerns.

    10. Re:How about.... by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      If someone WANTS these calls, that's fine. Don't push #5. Most people don't want these calls and the victims should be able to instantly make these groups feel the pressure back in a big way.

      The US cellphone system is as broken as SMTP (the cost of delivery lies on the recipient). If I had an option to charge US$ or block every call that I had not explicitly white listed, I would use it.

      Your first statement is so nice, I want to repeat it.

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet.

      Amen! Brother Slashdotter.

    11. Re:How about.... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NONE of those calls are legitimate. Credit card companies simply block the card and wait until the customer notices and calls them.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    12. Re:How about.... by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

      The problem here is that you need the cooperation of the phone companies and the police (not a criminal matter I know, but if they are motivated enough...) and government here. These agencies don't have much motivation for pissing off political donors.

      And your solution is just another excuse for phone companies to provide yet another billable service. The do-not-call list should instead be made effective instead of just being another political exploit to appease the masses.

    13. Re:How about.... by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. I get called once every few months by my visa card due to something that sets off their software. It hasn't been real identity theft yet, but they do call you before shutting off the card. Shutting off the card is done if they can't contact you.

      But yes, it's safest not to believe it when someone calls you. I always hang up and then call the number on the back of my card to make sure I'm talking to the CC company. The last few times I did that they forwarded my call directly to fraud without going through voicemail, despite just calling the general customer support number- they must have had the phone number on the card flagged.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    14. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      In most circumstances, you cannot spoof the caller id on the CPE side of the line. Since your having to use a major carrier to send your call through, the carrier will ignore the caller id information you provide and override it with the caller id information specified on your account (i.e. Business name or Given name).

    15. Re:How about.... by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      ...Because its a lot easier to convict them and a whole lot easier to find out what they are doing wrong and how to fix it. With a do not call list, its possible that they accidentally dialed the wrong number, didn't have an up to date version, etc. Then the mess that is the do not call list adds to the problem.

      A simple string would take all excuses away and make it simpler for the FTC to do its job.

      Your solution requires warrants. These are only easy to get if somebody accuses you of being a pedophile or a Muslim extremist or somebody who posts blogs that are critical of your local police department.

    16. Re:How about.... by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      credit card companies (banks) watch account habits and WILL call you if you do something weird. My manager got a call last year from his bank asking if he was in the USA. There was someone at an atm in hong kong in the process of trying to guess his pin number.

      They don't verify anything really, they just plain cancel the card and will send you a new one with a new number. There's no reason for them to verify you ARE who you are, they're more interested in verifying the OTHER guy ISN'T you and cutting it off ASAP. Since they have your number and you're agreeing with them there's a problem, they don't need any more incentive.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    17. Re:How about.... by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To elaborate on what the AC posted. The phone company knows who makes calls, but the end user doesn't. The phone company just doesn't care and won't respond to complaints unless they are forced to by the police or government. The police won't get involved unless they get complaints from the phone company. The government won't get involved unless...

      Notice a trend here? These have been my personal anecdotal experiences anyways.

    18. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      You are NOT new here, are you #19540? Tnx for the comment.

      It shouldn't take this long to figure out there's a pattern of abuse going on. Here's an alternate idea: let people dial something like #11 during a call which records the connection as an annoyance in a database. If a pattern of annoyance develops from a particular source, a red light lights on the FTC directors desk and he calls out the black helicopters.

      Nah... I'd rather have the $5.00.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    19. Re:How about.... by shentino · · Score: 1

      ...Kinda like spammers forging From: lines...

    20. Re:How about.... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      Caller ID is trivial to spoof. Your solution does not work.

    21. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your solution requires warrants.

      My solution requires air strikes.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    22. Re:How about.... by crywolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, I have gotten a similar call from the bank recently. Except that they called to confirm the last five transactions. They did not ask for any personal information. The transactions were read to me. Oh, and when they called, it was just a message with a number to call back, which when I looked it up, belonged to the bank.

      But yes, if they ask for any personal information, except perhaps for name to see if you are registered to the account, it is a scam.

      --
      CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
    23. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a call once from my card company about some unusual purchases. They asked if I had recently moved (I hadn't). I didn't trust the caller so I hung up and called the 800 number on the back of my card. The call was legit.

      I had to go to a bank to verify my identity before they would send me a new card.

    24. Re:How about.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I just got a call today that said "Car Warranty.." on the caller ID. I did not pick up.

    25. Re:How about.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

      Yeah! you hit 5, your bill is reduced by $5.00 and the caller's bill is increased by $10.00 the other $5.00 is for the phone company. You can hit 5 about once a second until the other guy hangs up.

    26. Re:How about.... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Visa used to call me about gas purchases... I didn't have a car, but I'd fill up friend's tanks occasionally. I'd get a call asking if this was something I had meant to do, and I'd say yes. Or I'd miss that call, and have to call them back when I couldn't use the card.

      They always just instantly re-instated the same card, since there was no fraud.

    27. Re:How about.... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. I get called once every few months by my visa card due to something that sets off their software. It hasn't been real identity theft yet, but they do call you before shutting off the card. Shutting off the card is done if they can't contact you.

      Your experience is limited. Banks can and do shut your card down and then call you. I've had it happen a number of times when I've made online purchases - large ones late at night and foreign ones (DVD orders for non-domestic DVDs). They block the transaction, then they shut you down for any new transactions and then 8 hours later they robo-call you to tell you they shut you down and that you should call them back.

      In the many cases where it has happened to me it has been excessively stupid because I use disposable credt card numbers which means I have to log into their website and generate the disposable number before I can make a transaction. So I've just authenticated with username/password before making the purchase. What's worse is that when you return their robo-call, they want to verify it is really you so they ask you stuff only you "should" know - like what were the last 3 purchases on your card, or where is your billing address -- all information readily available to anyone able to log into their website, which I just proved I could do by placing the order in the first place...

      So yeah, its a pet peeve of mine and I remember the many cases so well because they have all been so brain-dead stupid about how they handle the situation.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    28. Re:How about.... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Was that sarcasm? Because it is illegal, and you can sue, even if you're only called once.

    29. Re:How about.... by Toonol · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's close, but not strictly true. They are allowed to telemarket individuals with whom they have an established business relationship with, regardless of whether they're on the list or not. I believe that is defined as an order or a inquiry within the last 12 months. If they limit their calling to that subset, they do not need a DNC subscription.

    30. Re:How about.... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Funny

      While we're at it, let's require all thieves to leave their business card in the place of any item they steal. It would make it a lot easier to find them.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    31. Re:How about.... by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you're originating your calls through any of a number of VoIP providers that will let you put whatever you want for the CID information, and which the rest of the phone system will happily relay to the call's destination.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    32. Re:How about.... by stfvon007 · · Score: 1

      They are also faking their caller ID. Ive gotten calls from them that appear to from people other than who they say they are.

      --
      All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
    33. Re:How about.... by Drathos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guarantee that all the loophole groups (charities, political groups, etc.) do that. Before signing up for the DNC, I almost never got called by them. Now I get several calls a day from them. And that's in addition to the "dead line" calls I now get.

      --
      End of line..
    34. Re:How about.... by Yaur · · Score: 1

      Unless you have a PBX and trunk line to the PSTN in which case Caller ID spoofing is normal and generally accepted... this is why an 800 number shows up when you get a call from a legit call center instead of the number that call really originated from.

    35. Re:How about.... by lordofthechia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If this was coupled with the phone company appending the incoming Caller ID to your call record then it would be easy to enforce.

      Say you get a telemarketing call with a bogus caller ID, you simply request the phone company send you that information for that time and date and with that you can prove that the company was violating this law (since it would be a matter of record). They would have the originating phone number + the ID they used on a piece of paper you can then forward to the necessary parties.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    36. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was referring strictly to cold-target marketing (that is, contacting people who don't have a prior business relationship with the company). Hence my use of the word "prospect" in "prospect list" - as in, a list of prospective clients.

    37. Re:How about.... by lewko · · Score: 1

      While we're at it, let's require all thieves to leave their business card in the place of any item they steal.

      Simpsons already did it.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    38. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet. Get some laws passed that allow the victim to hit #5 on their phone to charge the caller $5.00, then I'll be happy. If someone WANTS these calls, that's fine. Don't push #5. Most people don't want these calls and the victims should be able to instantly make these groups feel the pressure back in a big way.

      A simpler solution that doesn't require new laws is to give the caller $5 worth of hearing damage. Hitting the phone on the desk should generate some nice loud transients.

    39. Re:How about.... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*

      more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

      It would be totally ineffective actually, and in some cases, technically infeasible or impossible. Nobody is being censored now anyways. It was never a 1st Amendment issue. That was bullshit from the beginning, and ultimately comes down to Free Speech versus Forced Listening. People get that confused quite often. Especially Spammers. They actually think they have right to put their shit in your inbox, and that is absolutely wrong. A position that has been held up in various legal courts in several different countries. The same logic applies to telemarketers.

      Your solution also relies upon accurate information being presented by U.S companies that may not even have the ability to provide it, and certainly no incentive to do so. It is not unusual, in fact quite normal, for U.S companies to contract out to outside call center firms for their dialing campaigns. In fact, in some cases, the U.S companies don't even have control over what numbers are called. They pay a premium to some companies that can find the numbers for them.

      Most of the call centers are outside the U.S for a reason. They merely contract with large VOIP providers to provide termination (outbound dialing) to U.S phone numbers. The call centers themselves are practically untouchable and are more resilient than mutant cockroaches.

      The way the fines work, AFAIK, is the FCC and Attorney Generals determine the U.S company that is benefiting from the telemarketing campaign financially and then go after them. They ignore the call centers, which is not surprising at all is it?

      Creating a law, which could be done either federally (FCC) or at the state level, requiring a Caller ID *NAME* is entirely impractical for two main reasons:

      * Caller ID Names can be sent by the call center, but there is no guarantee that the endpoint is either capable of using this information or passing the information along to their own customer/extension. There is not even a guarantee that all VOIP providers are capable of doing it, or even provide it in the first place. 100% of all call centers use VOIP, and that is something I am very comfortable claiming as a fact. It would be damn near impossible financially to do otherwise. The cost of a campaign using a call center connected by traditional lines would be cost prohibitive. Easily 8-10 times more expensive versus VOIP and would require Call Centers to be located in the U.S to my understanding.
      * Caller ID Names can also be determined by lookups in various call directories (called CNAMS) maintained by a number of different telecommunication providers and companies. However, there is no guarantee that any of that information is actually accurate, and to make this happen at all the endpoint is 100% responsible and the call centers have ZERO control over this. Not fair to make the call center liable for something outside of their control is it?

      Technically speaking, its not possible to guarantee any level of reliable service with respect to Caller ID Names. There is just so many different kinds of hardware/software/firmware and different telecoms involved, that quite frankly, it's a downright fucking miracle it works at all. I could go on for pages about the nightmare with AT&T (cellular) and their constant bullshit with DTMF tones.

      Assuming it is 100% possible (in a world with Elvis riding Unicorns), U.S companies would have no incentive to maintain the same name across multiple campaigns either. They don't want to be blocked. Both the "legitimate" and down-right scuzz-bucket companies. They would just create a string of different LLC's and distribute campaigns across them and then dispose of the LLC's. The cost of the LLC would be trivial compared to the total amount being spent on the campaign.

      ULTIMATELY, you

    40. Re:How about.... by t2000kw · · Score: 1

      That would work for *most* people, but not every one has caller ID. I didn't until last month when I switched to telephone service provided by the cable company. The telephone company charged too much for phone service to begin with, and add a few dollars for touch-tone (yes, I used pulse dial until last month), caller ID, call waiting, call forwarding, and other features. It was not uncommon for people to have a $50 telephone bill. I get all that for $25 per month ($20 for the first year). I also don't have a cell phone, but I would guess that caller ID is standard for them. So those who don't have caller ID would have to pay for that feature if they don't have it already in order for the caller ID screening idea to work. I received a call from some auto warranty place the night before the court injunction on those companies. The caller ID told me that. I waited a couple seconds then picked up the phone and said "hello." When I don't hear a response within about 1.5 seconds, I hang up, since that means that it's usually a telemarketer. I am on the federal DNC list but these people called anyway. I think that's what got them in trouble so quickly.

    41. Re:How about.... by Aldenissin · · Score: 1

      I like that solution.

      I also giggled when my Uncle told me he lets the caller go on for a moment before he interrupts "her" (and he doesn't really care if she is a he)and says, "I am sorry honey the only thing I am looking to buy is pussy, so if you are ready, go ahead and start.... now. If she doesn't start.. Oh cm'on honey I know you know how to do this.. I am waiting... talk dirty to me baby.

        Personally, if we all just pressed 1 and started talking dirty or cursing them enough it just might cause those people to quit. They know they are doing something unscrupulous, so I don't really care if I upset them and make them cry.

        On a side note, I DO work in an a call center, but it is inbound customer service. I have seen the abuse that customers can give, and how it DOES affect professionals. I have done outbound once, and never again. I would rather be on the streets.

      --
      Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
    42. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go ahead and try that. I have, and they won't. You would have to get the cops to go after that. I have heard something about telling the cops you are being harassed from a bogus number and filing a restraining order and that the cops can then go after the number from the phone company.

    43. Re:How about.... by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      At some point the call enters the regular phone company and at that point the entrant can be recorded. Make that entity responsible and follow the chain back. Whichever company allows an unverified caller id through is the legally responsible party.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    44. Re:How about.... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that will be a way to address the problem in the future, but that's not the way things work now. My original point stands - the grandparent poster said you can't spoof the CID info on the originating side, and that's simply not true. It's trivially easy to do with the right provider, and telemarketers do it all the time.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    45. Re:How about.... by WgT2 · · Score: 1

      Congress might be working on that already.... and they should.

    46. Re:How about.... by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet.

      I hate telemarketers, I hate robocallers, I think they should be illegal, but your statement falls flat on it's face because you HOOKED THE DAMN BELL UP TO THE REMOTE CONTROL AND LET REMOTE PEOPLE RING IT.

      Now lets be sensible about this.

    47. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      you HOOKED THE DAMN BELL UP TO THE REMOTE CONTROL

      Bells are a hazard of owning a phone but the operative word in the sentence is "unwanted" [bells].

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    48. Re:How about.... by noc007 · · Score: 1

      I'd say pretty much any PBX can do this. The Avaya PBX I administrate does this all day long and I'd imagine Asterisk could do it as well. IIRC it's the PBX that sends the CallerID and not the phone company; they just relay it.

      A good example of spoofing are toll free numbers. All the number is a soft-link or shortcut to the real number. In order to give out the toll free number instead, the PBX has to tell the phone company the CallerID is the toll free number and not the real number. This is by design and there are a number of legitimate uses for this, however these bastards are abusing it.

    49. Re:How about.... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Not always, my Bank will call me after the fact when they see something that might be suspicious. They *Only* call the number on the account, so there is little risk of anyone I don't know getting the call, as they would need to be in possession of my phone. Before they ask for any personal information from me they authenticate themselves by providing the password I gave them for that use when I got the card.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    50. Re:How about.... by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      In my experience, they do try to contact you before shutting it off. In my case, though, I'm usually traveling when the red flags go up, so I always miss their attempts to contact me.

    51. Re:How about.... by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      It gets worse than simply ignoring the Do Not Call list. You see, in order to be compliant with government regulations, legitimate marketing firms need to purchase an annual subscription to the DNC list. They then need to purge from their prospect list any number appearing in the DNC list.

      Unfortunately, the government sells this list to anyone who asks; thus, Russian telemarketing companies sometimes buy the DNC list as a source of pre-verified, valid phone numbers.

      Hmm, pre-verified, valid numbers...sounds sorta like the phonebook would have more than the DNC list...

      (Sorry, I know I'm being a smart ass, but, I just had to say it)

    52. Re:How about.... by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to play with SITs, must be fun. Back in the day (early 80s) I did record a SIT disconnected announcement on a Code-A-Phone as the outgoing message. Only those that knew to wait through two playings could leave a message. But back then I was an evil one making telemarketing machines by gluing C-64s to Code-A-Phones. (Wygant)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    53. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      No, you have a valid point. However, the DNC list is already provided in an easy-to-use database format. The phone book, as far as I am aware, is only provided as a hard copy. Good luck getting someone to enter all the numbers for you. (Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

    54. Re:How about.... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Even better idea that would add no new stuff - just make it illegal to call people on the do not call list. And allow people the sue if they are called even once.

      How about having a key combination which when dialled by the recipient will generate a report to law enforcement.

    55. Re:How about.... by mpe · · Score: 1

      I was referring strictly to cold-target marketing (that is, contacting people who don't have a prior business relationship with the company).

      Given that one of the people contacted didn't even have a car it sounds like what is going on is something akin to "phishing".

    56. Re:How about.... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet. Get some laws passed that allow the victim to hit #5 on their phone to charge the caller $5.00, then I'll be happy.

      Hopefully allowing it to be used several times in the call. Maybe also another option which will connect you to the phone of whoever is in charge of the company.

    57. Re:How about.... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Here's an alternate idea: let people dial something like #11 during a call which records the connection as an annoyance in a database. If a pattern of annoyance develops from a particular source, a red light lights on the FTC directors desk and he calls out the black helicopters.

      It might be more fun if the next time they they attempt to make a call no matter what they have dialled the call is connected to a terrorist reporting "hotline" and a random recorded terrorist threat played.

      Nah... I'd rather have the $5.00.

      You don't get it, the phone company does. More likely it's divided up between several phone companies...

    58. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, the phone company does.

      Someone else in this thread said charge the perps $10 and split $5 with the phone company. Everyone gets paid. I like it.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    59. Re:How about.... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      The tele-cloud providers commonly being used by modern call centers allow the admin to put any damn thing they want in the CID string for an outbound call flow.

      I know, b/c I was the Director of Ops for a call center. I often was the one who put the string in the call-flow setup.

    60. Re:How about.... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      You have a few interesting ideas there, but many of the tele-cloud call-center providers allow the CID string to be changed dynamically.... there is NO INCENTIVE for them to change this and no incentive for telecoms to provide blocking services as the tele-cloud providers pay the telecom charges and pass that on to the call-center, who passes that on to the campaign contractee...

      Typically the contractee has NO association with the call-center other than an agreement to provide the campaign as designed.... and I can tell you from personal experience as an ex-Director of Ops for a call-center that often dealt with the technical aspects those contractees, and their deceptive campaigns..... they lie... they misrepresent themselves, and they wave lots of cash in front of the call-center owner(s) as incentive to execute on their bullshit campaigns... They also kick down incentives to the agents who close a deal on one of these calls..... IF the poor girl on the line COULD close one of these bullshit deals....

      Sadly.... call-center managers wonder why they cant retain agents... gosh or even Directors very long..... and it's because no reasonable person wants to be subjected to legitimately hostile people for a significant percentage of their work day!!!

    61. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      We were sort of off-topic, talking about telemarketers in general rather than the car warranty scam that the FTC is taking out.

      I received several calls from this car warranty scammer. The message goes something like this:

      "This is your second and final warning that your car's warranty is about to expire. If you want to renew the warranty, press 1 to speak with a customer service agent."

      I pressed 1 on two separate occasions (deliberately, to figure out the source of the scam; note that my car is 1 month old and cannot possibly be out of warranty). The first time, someone answered but hung up before I could say anything. The second time nobody answered.

      I was one of the 30,000 people who reported the scam to the FCC; I noted on my report that I know of at least four cell phones that had received one or more calls from the scammer (remember, cold-calling a cell phone is illegal in the United States).

      So... I'm familiar with the scam in question, I was just being a bit more general in my comments regarding the Do Not Call registry.

    62. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Right... *that* could never be abused.

      *ring*
      You: "Hello?"
      Caller: "Hey, it's Steve"
      You: 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5

    63. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Caller ID is *not* standard for cell phones. It should be, but it's not.

      All cell phones do is tell you the incoming number, or "Withheld" if the number was blocked by the dialer (as with *69).

      (Obviously if the number is in your address book most cell phones will display the name you've entered, but that's completely independent of the Caller ID system.)

    64. Re:How about.... by mikechant · · Score: 1

      The phone book, as far as I am aware, is only provided as a hard copy.

      Assuming it was true that you couldn't get a copy of the phone book in a database:
      Get a fancy scanner with a suitable feeder, cut the spine off the directory, scan and ocr - should be reliable given the fixed format/fonts.

    65. Re:How about.... by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

      How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

      How about because they were spoofing their phone numbers to make it hard to trace them. These guys just didn't care about the law. They were flouting the DNC list, they were spoofing numbers they were robo calling. They weren't following the law and now their assets will be seized and they will go to jail, as they should.

      AG

      --
      Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
    66. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To solve this problem, you merely need to make it profitable for the telcos. For example you could design a simple AIN service that checks whether the number originates from a company on an individual's DNC list, and charge the company for the privilege of making the call. Allow users to add any number they want to their DNC list (which also will increase the opportunities for telco revenue).

    67. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      If you compare the cost of "buy the DNC list" with the cost of "buy a fancy scanner with a suitable feeder, scan and ocr the spineless phone book, and write software to take the OCR'd text and properly insert the data into a database", I'm guessing the first option turns out to be cheaper.

    68. Re:How about.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NONE of those calls are legitimate. Credit card companies simply block the card and wait until the customer notices and calls them.

      Baloney. When I've made an unusual, high-value purchase, the CC company has my home phone number tied to the card.

      They call and ask if I've recently made a purchase of that value. It's always been a legitimate purchase.

      I don't believe they even ask if it's on a card number "ending in 7777". At most, they ask if I'm the name on the card.

    69. Re:How about.... by eam · · Score: 1

      That's reasonable. Steve's an @sshole.

      Or are you talking about a different Steve?

    70. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of a time in high school when, while eating lunch with my friend Clint, the following occurred within a 20-second span:

      *Steve C walks by*
      Me: "Hey Steve."
      *Steve F walks by*
      Me: "Hey Steve."
      *Steve S walks by*
      Me: "Hey Steve."
      *Clint stares at me with an eyebrow raised*

      I half expected my uncle Steve to walk by next.

      I guess Steve was a poor choice for my example.

    71. Re:How about.... by pentalive · · Score: 1

      I suppose Steve will be having words with you when he gets his phone bill.

      Or it's a quick loan from DAD

      You "Ok Dad, call me back then..."
      Dad "Right Son."
      Ring Ring
      Dad "It's me calling you back.."
      You "Thanks dad , here goes " 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
      You "Thanks Dad, I'll get the $50 back to you in
                a few weeks."
      Dad "Sure, bye..."
       

  2. Hurray! by teridon · · Score: 1

    These bastards have been calling my place of work for months. I always hit 1 and wasted their time for a few minutes.

    --
    I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing. -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, that's great about the warranty and stuff, but what I really want to know is... what are you wearing?

    2. Re:Hurray! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I almost miss getting telemarketing calls. It was kinda fun to have someone that you can mess with and insult in most disgusting ways without feeling the least bit bad about it.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    3. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I almost miss getting telemarketing calls. It was kinda fun to have someone that you can mess with and insult in most disgusting ways without feeling the least bit bad about it.

      I used to hate people like you. I worked for a telemarketing company for a while. It was bad enough when I was on the phones and had to deal with you, what was even worse is being in QA/Mgmt and having to listen to the other reps deal with it and have to give negative reports because of their inability to do their job because of morons who couldn't simply ask to be removed.

    4. Re:Hurray! by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to hate people like you.

      I'm pretty sure that's the idea, yes.

    5. Re:Hurray! by dstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sucks to you. But hey, you have to expect that sort of thing when you take a job you know is immoral and unethical.

    6. Re:Hurray! by rebullandvodka · · Score: 1

      That is the most satisfying post I've read. Ever.

    7. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But hey, you have to expect that sort of thing when you take a job you know is immoral and unethical.

      What exactly makes the job immoral and unethical? I will admit that I myself have been annoyed by some in the industry who could care less about regulations, but the company I worked for did nothing to show either of these things. When I worked in QA, if I saw/heard anything even remotely questionable it was immediately reported to both my manager and the rep's supervisor. The problems rarely surfaced again after that. I really hate that people generalize an industry because of a few bad apples.

    8. Re:Hurray! by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      +1

      I suppose I should have asked the person I talked to what color of underwear she was wearing ...

    9. Re:Hurray! by Divebus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...and have to give negative reports because of their inability to do their job because of morons who couldn't simply ask to be removed.

      Poor baby. How's this for a negative report: you'll just put my name on a list for the next shell company and call me back. You've earned everyone's ire.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    10. Re:Hurray! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      What's immoral or unethical about selling by phone? You might as well say television advertisements are immoral and unethical. Or even door to door sales.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    11. Re:Hurray! by rebullandvodka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree immoral and unethical are not the best choice of words. Words that come to mind are despicable, ugly, vile, slimy, unworthy...

      By 'few bad apples' do you mean, 'overwhelming majority'?

    12. Re:Hurray! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 3, Funny

      I also really hate that people generalize ax murderers and baby rapists because of a few bad apples.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    13. Re:Hurray! by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Your story is a little different [on the positive side] from everyone's earned impression of telemarketers. It still smacks of trying to call armed robbery where nobody actually gets killed "ethical".

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    14. Re:Hurray! by Captian+Spazzz · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I don't give a s***.

      People like you call me and annoy the hell out of me all the time. You know what you do is skuzzy and unwanted and that 90% of the people you call isn't interested in the snake oil your selling.

      If your choose to be a sales moron then its your own damn fault.

    15. Re:Hurray! by Captian+Spazzz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fact that you call and harass me without my consent with no valid business reason. Because you harrass me at work when I am trying to do my job, because you waste my money for calling me and making me use up cell phone minutes waiting for your stupid rep to put me on your do not call list that I'd say a good 50% of your industry ignore or try to circumvent anyway.

      I don't NEED you to tell me what I want or need. If I need or want your product I will seek YOU out not the other way around if I have not contacted you before then leave me the frack alone!

      In reference to my previous post if you don't understand this and choose to work in that industry then you deserve what you get.

    16. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also been getting these calls at work.

      This past Monday however things went differently than normal.

      My part of the department I'm working in always meets on Monday mornings to coordinate what we are working on.

      We always meet in a conference room. Part way through, we hear a beeping sound.

      After some time, we realize that it was from the phone part of our teleconferencing setup (we've never gotten a call on the line unless it's pre-arranged).

      We answer it, and it was the car warranty robocall.

      We hang up, and a number of us comment about how we've been getting that robocall on our office lines.

      Anyway, it certainly interrupted our meeting. /state employee

    17. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to hate people like you. I worked for a telemarketing company for a while.

      And I still hate people like you.

      Unless you quit because you truly had a change of heart about the ethics of annoying people at random to try and sell them shit they don't need...

      To coin a phrase, "If you're straight, would you suck off a dude for a million bucks?" If the answer is "yes", we know what you are, and you're just haggling over price.

      Oh, and fuck you, and fuck everyone you worked with.

    18. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

       
      So you and the rest of the bottomfeeders in telemarketing call people who've never heard of you. These people have no desire to hear anything your sales pitch requires you to recite. You rattle on breathlessly to a stranger at the first "hello?" Your dialer scripts call at obscene hours of the day, multiple times until a live person answers. There's a chance your unwanted call interrupted some activity or meal, or drew the recipient's attention from something more important than your shameless peddling (meaning anything, in this case). You spoof your caller IDs. You don't comply with requests for calling list removal, nor do you give your physical location's telephone number or address out (fearful of retribution, maybe?) yet you have my god damned number, somehow, and who knows what else.

      And you have the fucking nerve to get angry when people flip you a taste of your own shit? Fuck you.

    19. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo. Fucking. Hoo. Your entire goddamn post misses the point entirely.

      When I worked in QA, if I saw/heard anything even remotely questionable...

      What, like your co-workers cold-calling people at home/work/commute who never asked for your help?

      ...it was immediately reported to both my manager and the rep's supervisor.

      Who gives a flying shit about the quality of the call after the fact, when the very call itself is an invasion of somebody's privacy? There aren't a *few* bad apples in the industry, it's the whole fucking bushel.

      Go cry moar, asshole. /rant

    20. Re:Hurray! by Captian+Spazzz · · Score: 1

      Except that "in theory" Television advertising pays for free over the air programming and helps lower the cost of cable programming

      Bugging me over my telephone does not lower the cost of my phone bill.

      I do think Door to Door sales is just as skuzzy. They respect my "No Solicitations" sign as much as the telemarketers respect the DNC list.

    21. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can turn a TV off, and place a No Solicitors sign. But for safety and personal convenience, it is difficult to turn off your phone.

      If you waste even a minutes time of 100 people to get a solitary sale, or, you distract 100 people at home during dinner, or, your trivial industry wastes a significant portion of humanities time on this planet responding to a ringing telephone, it is immoral and unethical on a societal grand scale.

    22. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in your right mind would you admit this?

    23. Re:Hurray! by unlametheweak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Telemarketer: Hi, would you be interested in switching over to TMI long distance service.
      Sienfeld: Gee, I can't talk right now. Why don't you give me your home number and I'll call you later.
      Telemarketer: Uh, I'm sorry we're not allowed to do that.
      Sienfeld: Oh, I guess you don't want people calling you at home.
      Telemarketer: No.
      Sienfeld: Well now you know how I feel.

    24. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Hey bud, is this number still good? - 360-577-5881

      Regardless, we should call at all odd hours of the day, just to make sure. You wouldn't mind, would you?

    25. Re:Hurray! by jasprov · · Score: 1

      Here, here!

      I'm glad to see my repeated reports to the FTC on both my cell and home phone lines may finally be addressed!

      I can count a handful of times I've audibly cursed upon realizing I answered yet another of their numbers before blocking it on my various phones.

    26. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 1

      Actually, I never worked for a company that did any cold-calling. We only called previous customers to see if, for one company They wanted to place a new order for the products they ordered before or, for another if products based on their previous purchases would be of interest to them.

    27. Re:Hurray! by DougReed · · Score: 1

      What exactly makes the job immoral and unethical?

      Well, for starters virtually none of these telemarketing calls is selling a legitimate product. Every one of them is some sort of scam trying to suck money out of the unsuspecting consumer.

      Immoral and unethical sounds like the perfect words to me.

    28. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 1

      I will decline to answer about the validity of the phone number. If that is what you think is the best use of your time, then I suppose that I can't do much to stop you. However, if such things were to become problematic I would be sure to let my phone company know the numbers to block. If this failed to work, I would contact the police.

    29. Re:Hurray! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You can't win here.

      I work in an inbound center they still bitched that they don't get their way immediately.

      Only on slashdot would working in a call center (inbound or outbound) be seen as comparable to being a baby rapist or axe murderer.

    30. Re:Hurray! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      It is funny that you write a rude and angry post but then self-censor the word shit.

    31. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What exactly makes the job immoral

      Every aspect of it that involves bothering vast numbers of people on their private time in their private space using services that they pay for and normally use for family conversations, work and emergencies.

      Or the general attitude the industry shows towards the worth of time of the people they pester, such as by using machines to call five people and hang up on four of them so that telemarketers don't have to waste their time waiting for people to answer.

    32. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But we're a reputable company (we swear!) with valuable goods and/or services you may/may not be interested in! How would you know our great deals unless we gave you a ring every now and again?

    33. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot would working in a call center (inbound or outbound) be seen as comparable to being a baby rapist or axe murderer.

      And only on slashdot would someone be moronic enough to equate an inbound call center with a telemarketer.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    34. Re:Hurray! by modecx · · Score: 1

      The day my television starts harassing me, pretending to be someone I give a shit about, and demanding my active attention is the day that motherfucker gets a 0.45" diameter hole or two plowed through it.

      The day that a steady stream of door to door salesmen start knocking on my front door (the way telemarketers used to call my phone) will be the day I'll find a pack of the most vicious rottweilers to ever roam the earth, and I'm gonna breed those dogs till they haven't got a fuck left in 'em--and then I'm gonna sell/rent their offspring out as salesmen repellent.

      That's the difference.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    35. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, nice find! Snookie has been revealed! OWNED! http://www.geocities.com/brandon_excell/ // Let this be a lesson, Brandon: don't post flames along with your unique email address, or you will incur the wrath of the internet!

    36. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The post you are responding to never accused you of cold calling.

      You need to understand that warm calling is so close to indistinguishable from cold calling that nobody really cares about the difference except for people like you who need a way to rationalize their actions and thus think it makes all the difference in the world.

      Just look online for all the people bitching about Omaha Steaks - you buy one thing from them and they are all over you. Someone sends you a gift through them and if the sender was stupid enough to give them your phone number, they are all over you too.

      Still don't believe me? Just consider how miserable your life would be if every single merchant you've ever done business with started warm-calling you. Repeatedly. You would have no time left for your own life.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    37. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Dude, you don't even need to be a reputable company -- the guy has invited everyone to call him:

      Telephone (if you are bored, give me a call, whether i know you or not):

      That page is loaded with stuff no one in their right mind would put up on a totally public web page.
      Talk about spectacularly poor judgement. I think there is something wrong with the guy.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    38. Re:Hurray! by rednip · · Score: 1

      I've seen the same calls, on my cell phone, both times I waited for the bastards. The first time I complained and got hung up on immediately, the second, I simply asked "what company is this", and was immediately disconnected. I couldn't be sure, but I could swear it was the same woman. Also, both times I filed with the FCC, I'm glad that it seemed to help (well sort of)

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    39. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I almost miss getting telemarketing calls. It was kinda fun to have someone that you can mess with and insult in most disgusting ways without feeling the least bit bad about it.

      I used to think like you but I've changed my mind. The economy is in the tank and many people are being forced to take jobs well below their qualifications. If the call is legitimate and the caller is polite, I try to consider what the situation would be like if it were reversed.

      And yes, just because you are on the DNC list doesn't mean you can't get telemarketing calls if it's from a business whom you have dealt with in the past and whom you have not specifically requested they not call.

    40. Re:Hurray! by rednip · · Score: 1
      Sure the vast majority of telemarketers are legit businesses looking for a way to reach out to consumers, but I don't want to spend my day telling random losers such as yourself that I don't want it. Just think if highway billboards dipped themselves in the middle of road, or if your TV just turned on by itself to show a commercial.

      It's a lousy way to make a living; unsolicited sales calls should always be illegal

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    41. Re:Hurray! by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      And only on slashdot would someone be moronic enough to equate an inbound call center with a telemarketer

      And only on slashdot would someone be moronic enough to think equating an inbound call center with a telemarketer is as bad as being a baby axe murder.

    42. Re:Hurray! by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Almost every time I've asked to be removed from a telemarketer's list, I get hung up on. I've had a few of the 'charity' callers tell me they aren't required to remove me and continue to try to push whatever crap they're trying to get my money for.

      I don't feel bad in the slightest about telemarketers getting abused by the people they bother. I almost feel bad for the charities that are wasting money on these assholes, but then I get over it because they hired these assholes.

      --
      End of line..
    43. Re:Hurray! by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      Won't someone think about the rottweilers?!

      Seriously though, sign me up for your rent-a-salesman-killer service!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    44. Re:Hurray! by SalaSSin · · Score: 1

      In my country, i was able to add (for free!) a small part to my cell phone contract that i can't be called be telemarketing firms (who have to use special numbers).

      Only once i got called by such a firm, i immediately hung up, called my phone company, and threatened them with breach of contract. Haven't received any such call ever after :-)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is indistinguishable from malice - Grey's Law
    45. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      And only on slashdot would someone be moronic enough to think equating an inbound call center with a telemarketer is as bad as being a baby axe murder.

      Really? I haven't seen it yet.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    46. Re:Hurray! by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      But don't you think that that is a defensive tactic?Make it inpossible to reach the guy in charge, and people will feel guilty about abusing the ones at the front. So what can you do? You don't want to give crap to some poor shlub trying to make a living. So just bend over and accept it. It goes for telemarketing calls and public transportation. You get a feeling of futility because whatever you take your anger out (telemarketer, subway bench), you're not getting to the ones responsible for your ire.

    47. Re:Hurray! by funkatron · · Score: 1

      I worked for a telemarketing company for a while.

      Congratulations. You just won a bestiality porn subscription. Enjoy

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    48. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I also really hate that people generalize ax
      > murderers and baby rapists because of a few bad
      > apples.

      My ax-murdering uncle is baby rapist, you insensitive clod!

    49. Re:Hurray! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      "I'm gonna breed those dogs till they haven't got a fuck left in 'em..." You're going to have an awful lot of cute, violently aggro puppies on your hands. Rotties aren't exactly known for their breeding restraint. Your cure might be worse than the solution here.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    50. Re:Hurray! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      Of course, now that I think about it, the sight of a large pack of man-eating Rottweilers copiously fornicating on your front lawn would work as a repellent. Not only would you no longer have a problem with said door-to-door salesmen, but you'd no longer have to worry about neighbors, bratty kids, visiting in-laws, or women in general! Yup, I think you'd be able to relax in peaceful, relaxing tranquility, serenaded only by the lovely sounds of unholy carnal hell constantly erupting on your lawn.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    51. Re:Hurray! by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      I'm on the DNC, and I swear, EVERY flippin' night RIGHT at dinnertime, the phone rings, with "blocked id" on the caller ID.. For the longest time, the wife would start to get up to go answer it, till I trained her not to...I wish my phone co. had the feature that some do, where you can configure your phone to not even ring for blocked id... But it doesnt..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    52. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's brandon's web page, mind you, he may use it to get information to spam you back with

      :
      So, about this time you are probably wondering who this psycho is running this page and why he calls himself Bob when his name is Brandon. Well, I will now give you some details about who I am and why you should give a crap.

      Title: Reverend

      Name: Brandon Allen Excell

      Born: October 8th, 1983 @ 4:20 AM in Kennewick General Hospital in Kennewick, WA

      Parents(Biological): Bruce Allen Excell and Jennie Lynn Crawford

      Hometown: Benton City, Washington

      Elementary School: Kiona-Benton City Elementary School

      Middle School/Jr. High: Kiona-Benton City Middle School

      High School: Kiona-Benton City High School

      College: Jamestown College (1 Semester)

      Siblings(full, half, step): Regina, David, Mike, Theresa, Kandy, Danny, Jason, Ron

      Significant other and relationship: Danielle "Dani" Marty

      Religious Preference: Wicca/Paganism

      Current Residence: Longview, WA with Dani

      Friends: RC, Jason, Josh, Becka, Kim, Candice, Miranda, Brendan, Seth, Joe, Jolene, L & L, Dustin, Kipp, Neil, Ken, Monty, Jessica, Alice, Vik, Rene'e, Bryan, Sarah, Sarah M. (Spleen), Mitch, Matthew. (others added as I realize I forgot them)

      Enemies: You, yes you.

      Hobbies: Painting, listening to music (almost anything), chatting online, sleeping, eating, playing games on my comp, poetry (write/read),fiction/non-fiction (write/read, all types),

      Turn-Ons: Dani, um, Dani, did i mention, Dani?

      Turn-Offs: people besides Dani

      Foods i like: spanish rice, pizza, popeye's chicken, rice, fruit (especially grapes and raspberries), ice cream, sherbet

      drinks i like: coke, sprite, dr. pepper, grapefruit juice, cranberry juice, vodka, tequila, orange juice, tea, smirnoff ice, bacardi silver, rum, cognac, brandy

      Movies I like: Jay & Silent Bob Collection, Monty Python Collection, Lord of The Rings 1 & 2, The Ring, Windtalkers, Interview with the Vampire, Queen of the Damned, Dracula 2000, John Carpenter's Vampires 1 & 2, From Dusk til Dawn 1 & 2, Bram Stoker's Dracula, Children of the Corn Series, Blade Trilogy Saving Private Ryan, Independence Day, MIB 1 & 2, Austin Powers Collection, Thundercats, Care Bears, TMNT 1-3, Mighty Morphin Power Rangers Part 1

      Books/Authors: Christopher Rice, Shakespeare, Poe, Dickens, Dickinson, Mick Farren, Piers Anthony, Elie Wiesel, H.P. Lovecraft, Aleister Crowley, Marquis De Sade, Silver RavenWolf, Ray Bradbury, Micheal Crichton

      If you would like to contact Bob (aka Brandon, aka Batman, aka eli, aka fez, aka The Way aka Bobert aka Doug) the following list is a variety of creative ways to do so and suggestions for what to do when each way is undertaken.

      Postal Mail (send a hate letter, death threat, a greeting card, etc.):
      Brandon Excell
      Email For Addy
      Longview, WA 98632

      brandon.excell@gmail.com

      Telephone (if you are bored, give me a call, whether i know you or not):
      360-577-5881

      Instant messengers (if my phone is busy, i am probably online somewhere):
      Yahoo! Messenger: brandon_excell
      MSN Messenger: baexcellnangel@msn.com
      ICQ: 102356267
      Google Talk: brandon.excell
      IF you would like others, just email me and ask.

      Oh yeah, if this is the people from Wal-Mart, I don't have the sign. We left it in an empty field. Oh yeah, and the pumpkins are in the James River somewhere. If it's the Pomeroy people, I don't have those either, they are also somewhere in the James River.

    53. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if such things were to become problematic I would be sure to let my phone company know the numbers to block. If this failed to work, I would contact the police.

      Funny, that's exactly how I think about telemarketers.

      Except that even if each telemarketer called me only once, blocking the numbers wouldn't have worked very well, because the same number would never call me wtice.

      And if a telemarketer called me repeatedly and I called the cops, they'd have been powerless because in the case of the auto warranty telemarketers, the caller-ID numbers were forged/bogus anyways.

      Which is precisely the point.

    54. Re:Hurray! by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      What exactly makes the job immoral and unethical? I will admit that I myself have been annoyed by some in the industry who could care less about regulations, but the company I worked for did nothing to show either of these things. When I worked in QA, if I saw/heard anything even remotely questionable it was immediately reported to both my manager and the rep's supervisor. The problems rarely surfaced again after that. I really hate that people generalize an industry because of a few bad apples.

      If your company was selling a legitimate product/service for a reasonable amount of money, it would not have to cold-call random people to do so. Build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door, as they say.

      But I'll bite, anyway. Go ahead: Name the company or companies and products you were representing, and the prices you offered to them. Let us hear about this useful product or service and the fair prices you were offering.

      The truth shall set you free. You say you don't work for them, anymore, so you have nothing to lose.

    55. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 1

      If your company was selling a legitimate product/service for a reasonable amount of money, it would not have to cold-call random people to do so.

      My company did not cold-call anyone, we only called former customers to either let them know about new products they might like or to see if they needed to reorder products they had ordered in the past.

      But I'll bite, anyway. Go ahead: Name the company or companies and products you were representing, and the prices you offered to them. Let us hear about this useful product or service and the fair prices you were offering.

      The truth shall set you free. You say you don't work for them, anymore, so you have nothing to lose.

      The companies I represented were Blue Stuff, Inc. and Time Life Music. For blue stuff, we sold a menthol-emu oil cream that could help people with various pains. I never used the product myself, but heard plenty of customers tell me how useful it was for them (I also took inbound sales calls for Blue Stuff.) On outbound calls we would offer various sizes of Blue Stuff at a discounted rate. The particular offers carried, and since it has been 4+ years since I left the company, and even longer since I worked that campaign, I can't recall the exact numbers.

      For Time-Life, we called people who had previously ordered either a music or video set (We saw their order history on our first page) to see if they were interested in other sets based on the type of music/video they had purchased before. The pricing was standard for TL. ~$130 for a box set, or ~$15-20 for individual volumes. People who ordered had a choice between the set or trying the discs one by one and keeping what they wanted.

    56. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 1

      I don't consider my post a flame, just a different point of view toward the subject (Telemarketing, not the warranty calls.) As for posting my e-mail address, I don't mind too much. The worst that will happen is my spam filter will be more busy than usual.

    57. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 0

      That page is loaded with stuff no one in their right mind would put up on a totally public web page. Talk about spectacularly poor judgement. I think there is something wrong with the guy.

      I am well aware of the privacy implications of posting that information on my website. However, until now, the only people who seemed to visit my website were people who already knew me personally. If I was worried about people finding that information, I wouldn't have posted, and also would not constantly include the web address of the page on message boards, forums, etc. However, I have not updated the page in 3 years, and some of those things have changed. I am not planning to update it again before Yahoo pulls the plug on geocities.

    58. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, you talked about how you worked as a telemarketer - making unsolicited phone calls, disturbing people at home, at work, where ever (like you guys gave a rats-ass, right?) - and then had the nerve to bitch about how we made your life difficult. Calling us morons for not extending to you the same courtesy you refused to extend to us sounds pretty flame-y to me.

    59. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 0

      The moron comment was specifically intended to people who felt the best way to spend their time on the phone with me or another agent was to harass them instead of a) Asking to be removed from the calling list or b)Asking to speak to a supervisor, so they could get the information they could use to make sure they were removed. And, yes, we gladly gave both our address (we were a contracted call center) and address of the company we were working for to those who asked. I am not disputing that there are bad companies in the telemarketing industry, I have dealt with plenty on my own phones. I am simply asking that people not treat every single one like they are the absolute scum of the earth because they need a job.

    60. Re:Hurray! by WTF+Chuck · · Score: 1

      They are far worse than ax murderers as their victims don't have to put up with their ilk more than once.

      --
      Note - Liberal use of <sarcasm> tags may or may not need to be applied.
    61. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I am well aware of the privacy implications of posting that information on my website. However, until now, the only people who seemed to visit my website were people who already knew me personally. If I was worried about people finding that information, I wouldn't have posted,

      That's the thing about privacy, once you give it away it is nearly impossible to get back. So just because you think you are "well aware of the privacy implications" doesn't mean you really are, you just haven't had a truly "educational experience" yet, like someone using that information to impersonate you to drain your bank account, or use it as a cover identity when they get arrested so that your record will show an arrest, not theirs.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    62. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm starting a service where I fling flaming bags of cowshit through windows at 3 AM. If I hit your house, just stick your head out of your broken window and state clearly that you would like to be removed. Of course, it may take 6 to 8 weeks to process your request, and more cowshit may be delivered during that time.

    63. Re:Hurray! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      In my call center that would get your number blocked.... our agents could flag a number for blocking... typically it was only used for inbound call campaigns.... but I did allow agents to flag hostile outbound callers which were recorded and later shared with the contractee.... in some cases to show that their campaign was FAIL! In a few cases I used tools the tele-cloud provided me to justify our termination of their campaign.... due to deceptive practices.... this was done on my initiative with two contracts that I later forced our fearless leader to terminate since I argued that we could be held liable for the client's malfeasance....

      That didn't make me very popular with the executive staff since I was essentially taking revenue away from the call center.... The rank and file agents cheered my name.... and morale on the main floor was drastically improved when said campaigns were terminated.

      Anyway.... I survived in that role for 18 months before I was ordered to resign....

    64. Re:Hurray! by modecx · · Score: 1

      Well, such a sight might attract canine contraceptive salesmen.

      Sigh. What have I started?!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    65. Re:Hurray! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that scammers will not remove your number from their robodialers just because you were rude to them...

    66. Re:Hurray! by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      , or if your TV just turned on by itself to show a commercial.

      I *really* hope Comcast and friends aren't reading this.

    67. Re:Hurray! by mathman47 · · Score: 1

      I agree, but remember, they are people too. Maybe some out of work Bank Executive - or a student trying to pay off his/her loan. I get my auto warranty call once a day, every day, whether I want it or not. I usually don't get creative with them as long as they're nice. The emails are a different matter. They spam me, I f**k with their minds.

      --
      "There are good ships, and there are wood ships, the ships that sail the sea. But the best ships are friendships, and ma
    68. Re:Hurray! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      If I had been dishonest about the return number.... then there is no valid return number.... but if someone made a big deal... I'd kick that up stairs.... because I had an agenda..... that agenda was NOT being party to a suck!

        There's no accounting for asshats....

    69. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what's interesting? I don't believe I've ever received a telemarketing call from a business I've dealt with in the past.

      On the other hand, I have gotten plenty from businesses pretending they have dealt with me in the past. It goes something like this:

      Them: Thank you for buying x product.
      Me: I didn't buy x product.
      Them: Really, then could we interest you in x product?

      I imagine that the reason for this is simple. All they have to do is say that it was a mistake, and they get away with it.

    70. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What exactly makes the job immoral and unethical?

      The fact that it's founded on disregarding laws governing its operation. When the DNC list started, the calls dropped. Then when the pricks in your chosen "industry" found that the FTC was shit for enforcement, you came back with a vengeance. I'm retired and can tell you I get plenty of your horseshit calls every day. Plus as many more from predictive dialers which ring, then hang up. How's that for openers?

      Add to that the fact that you bastards _know_ that you're wasting the time and resources of millions of unwilling, uncompensated people for each profitable response you get. You're the same kind of scum as those whose industrial effluents make waterways useless to millions of others, all so that they can make an externality of what would otherwise be a very costly means of waste disposal.

      When I worked in QA, if I saw/heard anything even remotely questionable it was immediately reported to both my manager and the rep's supervisor.

      And how exactly did this contribute to diminishing problems with "morons" like me abusing your lackeys, which was your claim?

      On occasion, when I've been rude to a telemarketing drone, I've received harassing return calls, including death threats. Like the fucking telco will even get involved in that kind of shit.

      In one case, I received repeated calls saying, "We know where you live". If my wife answered, they said, This is Kinky Sex, Inc. returning Mr Jones' call".

      And you expect me to believe your company is atypical. Fuck that shit. Until you cocks are firmly regulated (none of this "self-regulation crap), I'll continue to believe you all pee in the same pot.

      I really hate that people generalize an industry because of a few bad apples.

      Yep, it's like they say about lawyers -- a few bad apples give the other two percent a bad name.

      Hmmm, captcha = lynched -- prophetic?

    71. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to hate people like you.

      And when did you see the light and realize what a fucking bastard you were?

      I worked for a telemarketing company for a while. It was bad enough when I was on the phones and had to deal with you, what was even worse is being in QA/Mgmt and having to listen to the other reps deal with it and have to give negative reports

      Ooohhh -- negative reports -- typical prick management lingo. So, after being pimped out, you turned into a whoremaster yourself. Fuck you. It would do a world of good if there were something in the telemarketing environment that made you sterile so you'd never have any evil spawn to continue your meretricious ways.

      because of their inability to do their job because of morons who couldn't simply ask to be removed.

      Listen up, cocksucker -- you don't get to direct my life. For starters, you shitheads don't honor a request to be removed. Second, what the fuck makes your single-digit IQ brain think that you should be allowed to tell me what to do? I'm on the DNC list. What more do you want?

      So you call me anyway and tell me to hit 2 to be removed (talk about pissing into the wind). There is no fucking way I'll take direction from you -- you've already dissed me by calling in the first place.

      So I'll continue to hit 1, just so I can abuse mealy-mouthed fuckers like you who want respect, but are unwilling to extend it.

      How the fuck do sluts like you get to sleep at night?

    72. Re:Hurray! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      That is a sight I would pay a lot of money to see: canine contraceptive salesmen attempting to make it to your front door past hordes of copiously fornicating man-eating Rottweilers... (you started it, I finished it, we're both going to Hell now)

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    73. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telephone (if you are bored, give me a call, whether i know you or not): [geocities.com]

      Cheer up -- I recently heard geocities is going down, so no one will be able to read his crap rantings. It was said that users should pull down everything on geocities if they want to save it.

      Anyway, the shitepoke's name is Brandon -- wasn't that enough of a clue?

      And yes, that is one seriously pathetic, self-absorbed web page.

  3. I actually find those amusing. by blakedev · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whenever I'm having a bad day I can just wait for their call and keep yelling obscenities and laughing like a twelve-year-old. In fact yesterday morning I got one and greeted with "PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS lol."

    --
    QamuIs Heg qaq law' lorvIs yInqaq puS
    1. Re:I actually find those amusing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're going to regret that the next time a penis company comes a'calling and your mom opens that unexpected package for you.

    2. Re:I actually find those amusing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GJ.

    3. Re:I actually find those amusing. by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      Whenever I'm having a bad day I can just wait for their call and keep yelling obscenities and laughing like a twelve-year-old.
      In fact yesterday morning I got one and greeted with "PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS lol."

      Since when has "Penis" been an obscenity?

      Damn Puritan influence has people believing half their bodies are obscene.

    4. Re:I actually find those amusing. by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Since when has "Penis" been an obscenity?

      When you're 12 years old and post a Klingon sig.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    5. Re:I actually find those amusing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone should mod this parent down.

      I tried doing just as he suggested, and now my co-workers who sit near my cube won't eat lunch with me anymore.

    6. Re:I actually find those amusing. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of the episode of Stargate: SG-1 I watched this morning. It's the fourth- or third-to-last episode of season 10. Vala's dad had tickets to something "really hard to get tickets for", so when he disappeared, Teal'c took the tickets and went. When he entered, the room was a small movie theater completely filled with women.

      That particular scene was maybe 20 seconds long. I'm pretty sure the word "vagina" was repeated 15 times...

      Anyway, it's not necessary that "penis" or "vagina" be obscene; it's enough that they're words that make many people uncomfortable.

  4. At least 3 complaints from me... by Tmack · · Score: 5, Informative
    One for my personal Cell phone back in march, two for my business cell in march and april. The calls clearly violate FCC regs by being completely automated, no mention of the company name, calling numbers already on the DNC, etc. The first call I opted to talk to a rep, when he connected and mumbled the name of the company, I asked his name and the company name, and he hung up. Second call I told them I was on the DNC, that I was filing a complaint and to make sure I was on their DNC as well. Third call I told them they were in violation as I was already on both the national DNC and theirs, the rep again hung up on me.

    If you get one of these types of calls, just go Here: http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm and fill out the form. In a week or two you get the print copy mailed to you of your filing.

    Im glad they are acting on these @holes.

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Same here, on my cell phone for a vehicle that doesn't exist. So I reported it to the government via the website. I'm not positive, but I suspect it was the same outfit that's the article talks about.

    2. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      x2. I get alternating calls from these guys and a company that wants to help me lower my rates.

      That said, the best thing you can do is waste their time. It's like Groundhog day. Every time they call I get to try something different.

      Sure warranty my 1969 VW beetle. Click
      Oh I don't carry a credit card balance. Click.
      *FCC*. Click
      vs
      Oh my Gawd. I'm so glad you called. So yesterday I was out shopping and my credit card got declined. Have you ever had your credit card declined, trust me it sucks. So how much can you lower my rates. [Cut them off] So that's great. So when do you think that I can get this rate actually implemented. I'm planning on proposing to my girlfriend, do you have a girlfriend. I'm so in love, she's going to love her ring. I just put it on layaway with the last $500 on my Visa. You do lower the rates of Visa right? [cut them off]. So. Oh, you need my number. Damn it, my card is out in the car. Can you hold for ONE second. Please. [set phone down for 5 minutes]. Hey are you still there? Great. So my card number is, hey wait a minute. Are you sure this is safe. One of my friends, John, yeah he got his credit card stolen through his pants. Some guy had this magic reader that you just need to brush up against someone and it steals the credit card.

      See how long you can keep it going...
      -
      That said, Today I just left my cell phone at home. I came home to 5 missed calls.

      I've filed both companies with the FCC, but the calls keep coming. I can't wait for both of these to stop.

    3. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I finally realized that I could answer the phone "Phoenix Emergency..."
      Sometimes they try to argue, but never for more than a few seconds, that they have not dialed 911.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    4. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by unifyingtheory · · Score: 1

      I've been thinking about getting a whistle or maybe an air horn.

    5. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      If you get one of these types of calls, just go Here: http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm and fill out the form.
       
      And Canadians can go here:

      https://www.lnnte-dncl.gc.ca/plt-cmp-eng

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    6. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had 3 of these calls and not many more. You know why? I didn't say anything, I picked it up, heard the pre-recorded shit, and hung up.
      When you give a voice response, they know the number is good, and will continue to bomb it, and they will keep your number on a list and sell the list of other companies for profit.

      No one wants to bother with what may be a number used for dial in access when it comes to soliciting. Because there isn't someone to market to.. at least from their view ;)

    7. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Drathos · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter if you're on the DNC or not. It's flat out illegal for telemarketers to call your cell phone with autodialers and prerecorded messages thanks to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991.

      --
      End of line..
    8. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      and fill out the form.

      Fill out the form with what? the random fake caller ID?

    9. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      This is not a bad idea. I had a telemarketing job for a week (yes that's how long I lasted) - I was told they had special rates with the telephone company where the call started out cheap, but cost more and more as time goes on (the reverse of most customer telephones).

      Anything you can do to make the call go over a minute costs them huge.

    10. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      I can't even imagine how much money is spent on the mailings. If I fill the form out eletronically, wouldn't it make sense to also give a copy of it to me electronically? Via email maybe?

    11. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      What about in addition to the above, you give them false information? Would that expose you to any type of legal risk?

    12. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      and as a booster package to this statement i give you
      http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/get-cfr.cgi?TITLE=47&PART=64&SECTION=1200&TYPE=TEXT

      which is a direct link to the Government Printing Office DB for
      " TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION

                      CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED)

      PART 64_MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS--
      Table of Contents

          Subpart L_Restrictions on Telemarketing, Telephone Solicitation, and
                                                          Facsimile Advertising

      Sec. 64.1200 Delivery restrictions."

      or as its friends like to call it 47CFR64.1200

      what they should do is make the end business responsible for these calls (profit from these clowns get buried in elephant [redacted].

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    13. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you get one of these types of calls, just go Here: http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm and fill out the form. In a week or two you get the print copy mailed to you of your filing."

      Wrong. In a week or two you get a print copy of the notice saying there isn't enough information in your complaint. These companies are good at not giving you the information you need to make the complaint. The phone companies won't give you the real number (*57 call trace) unless there's a police report involved. Unless you get lucky and get connected to an inexperienced rep you can weasel some information out of, your complaint will be rejected as insufficient. I've had over a dozen ignored.

    14. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I just got a call from Financial Housing Assistance. I made it through Level 1 by lying through my teeth about being underwater in my house, who underwrote my loans, everything.

      And then I got a call back. I ignored it and let it go to voice mail...

      Lori Financial Housing Assistance
      904-502-1686

    15. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by scombs · · Score: 1

      I just waited for the representative to pick up, and told them I don't have a car. It might be a coincidence, but I haven't gotten a single call since, and that was three months ago.

    16. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I filed electronically and got a reply from the FCC both electronically and via snail-mail. I don't know why.

    17. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im glad they are acting on these @holes.

      Dreamer.

      They don't act on shit. It's documented they have over 250K complaints on the car warranty scam. They have over 100K complaints on the "carpet cleaning special" scam. It's even known what (Maryland) number the calls come from. None of these bastards have been touched.

      I repeat -- they don't act on shit. They're a huge fucking joke.

  5. Thank God. Now onto debt restructuring... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god for the FTC. "This is the second call..." ... Bullshit. Everyone I know has gotten this at work, on cell phone, etc.
    Now for the next aXXhole.. "hi, we were discussing your debts, and I can see that..." or whatever, go DIE...

  6. Same outfit, different MO by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a few months, I had the vehicle warranty scammers calling me on my PREPAID mobile phone. That's actually abated somewhat. Funny, because I don't live in the US much and I don't own a car.

    Now, I think the same group is calling with health insurance. Repeatedly.

    Oh, I've had a few calls from random "IT support" tell me that they're calling me about my recent computer problems.

    Someone needs to nail these guys to the wall.

    1. Re:Same outfit, different MO by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Redundant

      For a few months, I had the vehicle warranty scammers calling me on my PREPAID mobile phone. That's actually abated somewhat. Funny, because I don't live in the US much and I don't own a car.

      Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. They made my pre-paid phone a lot less useful.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  7. Oddly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I lived in Seattle for seven years and didn't have a problem with these types of calls, but as soon as I got a phone number here in San Francisco I get these car warranty calls. Now I almost never answer a call unless I recognize the number.

    A few months into living in Seattle I got a call from a phone company to my cell phone and I proudly informed them that unsolicited commercial calls to cell phones were subject to a fine in WA. I didn't push for their info, but let them off with a warning. After that I never had junk calls to that phone number. Recently I was looking for the relevant law and it seems I mixed it up with WA's anti-spam law -- where you get $100 for every unsolicited piece of spam you report.

    1. Re:Oddly enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there must be something state by state or something. I (living in WA) never got vehicle warranty/scam of the month. My mom (living in ID) got dozens a day.

  8. This is the second notification that the warranty. by alexfeig · · Score: 1

    I am *extremely* happy about this. I've been getting, on average, a call a week on my cell phone from these guys.

    Now if only Captain Jack would stop calling me... (anyone else get those ALL ABOARD cruise ones?)

  9. So they get shut down and... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A newly-registered corporation with a very similar name comes along and uses the same offices/machines/employees to carry on the work...?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:So they get shut down and... by dmomo · · Score: 1

      Oh. Good point. Everyone. Call it off. Don't bother. Kill Joy has just made a revelation.

    2. Re:So they get shut down and... by Pinckney · · Score: 1

      The FTC is asking the court for Temporary Restraining Orders that would halt the illegal practices while the cases proceed, impose an asset freeze on all the defendants, and put two of the corporate defendants under the control of court-appointed receivers. The agency also is seeking a permanent injunction that would force the defendants to give up their ill-gotten gains so they can be used for consumer redress.

      I doubt the resources for such a scheme are trivial. So yes, this could make it impossible for them to finance a brand new corporation doing exactly the same thing. Maybe some of the lawyers in the audience can tell me if the above actions actually matter.

    3. Re:So they get shut down and... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      The assets are pretty modest. Underpaid, out of work people whom you pay late or forget to pay at all: office space you lease and forget to pay for: a phone bill you pay once, and then ignore, and if you're really industrial you buy one of these (http://www.sandstorm.net/products/phonesweep/) to war dial your entire target area codes and cut down on wasting employee time with faxes, computers, or phones that don't answer. (They're fascinating devices: the best wardialers I've seen on the market.)

    4. Re:So they get shut down and... by TheReaperD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, they don't wait to get shut down, usually.

      I used to work for one of the top level (*cough*) product companies in this type of scam. I was too naive at the beginning of my employment to truly know what was happening. I learned really quick after the FTC paid a house call and quit the company. No charges were ever filed.

      In short, this is how the scam works: A company is selling suspect products, web pages, in my case (hey, it was the 1990s). The hire a shady parent telemarketing company who then sets up, or hires out, smaller boiler room telemarketing companies. These smaller companies are the ones actually placing the calls and rarely have much more than 50 employees. They sell the "product" and everybody takes a cut of the deal. The small companies are rotated out, as the parent post pointed out, with a similar company with the same office, equipment and employees under a new company name and official owner every 3-6 months. This is faster than the FTC and FCC can process complaint claims. When said government agencies question the upstream companies about the crooked deals, they point to the small boiler room company, now closed and with all it's paperwork destroyed, as the source of the criminal act and show the feds sham paperwork that states their "clearly legal guidelines that the rogue company clearly disregarded." Of course, everyone, at the managerial level, is in on the corrupt deal and are fully aware it's illegal. But, this shell game scam creates plausible deniability and prevents the government agencies from putting the top level companies out of business and their owners in jail.

      The owner of this "warranty" company in TFA sounds just like the boss at the company I used to work for and is likely just as guilty. The biggest problem is that this system works so well that you have to put some really suspect laws on the books to have any hope of going after the people really responsible as you can never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were having proxy companies commit a crime for them unless they make a serious mistake.

      On a slightly related note: Why do government agencies never talk to the likely underpaid and abused file clerk(s) when they investigate a company? Why do they only interview the managers? The managers usually have a well prepared set of lies for the feds and self motivation not sell out the company. The file clerk(s), even if they've been given the company lie, will likely be more than willing to sell out the managers, especially if immunity and a cut of the fine are offered, and will have the documentation, if there is any, to back up any claims they make. (Guess what my position was at the web company?)

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    5. Re:So they get shut down and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A newly-registered corporation with a very similar name comes along and uses the same offices/machines/employees to carry on the work...?

      Dust off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

      Seriously, I hope the FCC calls the FBI and says it's declaring it as a distributed denial-of-service attack on the telephone system. That makes it terrorism, and since we've already legalized torture, why not torture someone who actually deserves it? I say that anyone who worked for that company is fair game.

    6. Re:So they get shut down and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem is that this system works so well that you have to put some really suspect laws on the books to have any hope of going after the people really responsible as you can never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were having proxy companies commit a crime for them unless they make a serious mistake.

      As they use public utilities, how suspect would it be if the end-user (you or me) could contact our telephone provider and it was the provider's burden to

      a) answer your call
      b) block the last number from EVER calling you again
      c) refund per call costs or time out of service (say 2 minutes)

      Further, give the phone company the ability and authority to act on suspect accounts. As soon as the phone companies are not getting paid for this BS, they have incentive to stop it. Thousands of phone calls out from a center with hundreds of complaints in return.... hmmmmm?

      As is, it is like the post office and junk mail. They get paid to deliberate that crap so schemes to stop (form 1500, e.g.) are next to worthless. You can't opt out of unaddressed bulk mail. The government wants to bother you because you they get paid. The USPS gets its money and congress critters get donations.

      There are lots of solutions and they start by making sure the conduits of this filth don't profit too. The roaches, you may not stop them as they will move on to something else: door-to-door, windshield pamphlets, stuffing flyers everywhere. This will make their business model more expensive and less profitable. Not to mention you have increased risk the closer you get to my face.

    7. Re:So they get shut down and... by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's time to rethink the justice system.

      Innocent Until Proven Guilty = Only for living breathing human beings.
      Guilty Until Proven Innocent = Only for fictional corporate personhood.

      Make it more easy to go after the execs responsible for disregarding the laws and hold them responsible for the acts of the company they've signed off on. (IE. Sending their telemarketing to these suspect telemarketing companies for example).

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    8. Re:So they get shut down and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if the govies can't track down the "boiler-room" companies, why not just go apeshit and attack the ENTIRE chain of command.

      Guilt by association. That is probably cause in my book. At least with anyone who uses telemarketers.

    9. Re:So they get shut down and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just explained the business model for Adaptive Marketing? What surprises me is that one or two of their scammy sub-companies still runs TV ads... I still mute or change the channel when those ads run. Bleh!

      As for the phone, if anyone calls from a business named "Toll free call" - that's my cue to pickup and drop the reciever or not answer at all. (I guess it depends on how lazy I'm feeling and whether the phone ringer is annoying enough.) Usually most legit calls aren't afraid to have their business name on the number, and I'll actually answer those.

  10. Re:This is the second notification that the warran by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

    Is that the cruise guy with the foghorn sound? Not lately, but I got a bunch of them this winter. (I suppose that's a good time to try to sell cruises in Canuckistan)

    The "cardholder services" guys are my current scourge, at least 3 or 4 calls a week.

  11. Finally by Ogive17 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been getting calls on my cell phone and my work phone (many other people in my office have been getting calls too). Funny thing is I have a company car that is only a year old, I doubt the warranty is running out, especially since my company BUILT the car.

    I actually called the number back to figure out what the scam was, the guy on the other side asked me for my auto information. I told him that since he called me up, he should already know what my information is. Then the guy hung up on me.

    I hope there is a public lynching.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:Finally by bendodge · · Score: 1

      I told him that since he called me up, he should already know what my information is. Then the guy hung up on me.

      I had the exact same experience. How dumb do they expect people to be?

      --
      The government can't save you.
    2. Re:Finally by Gregory+Arenius · · Score: 1

      "Funny thing is I have a company car that is only a year old, I doubt the warranty is running out, especially since my company BUILT the car."

      You must not work for GM.

      Cheers, Greg

    3. Re:Finally by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      My signature tells the story.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    4. Re:Finally by barzok · · Score: 1

      I told him that since he called me up, he should already know what my information is. Then the guy hung up on me.

      I did that once, the guy asked me why I had to be difficult, I told him he was violating several laws and he hung up.

      They called back this week. He asked if I was interested in extending my warranty. I told him I was interested in what he was wearing. That completely stymied him. Then he hung up.

      Hell, if they're going to take up my time, I at least should get some entertainment out if it.

    5. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even own a car and i get this all the time. unbelieveable.

  12. Extend the warranty on our 20+ used cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work at a car dealership and I've gotten 3 of those calls just this week on the company phone. They don't seem to exclude anyone.

  13. About time by DarkTitan_X · · Score: 1
    I've been getting these assholes calling me every day for two weeks. I started getting creative with them and for some reason they're never clued in that I'm pulling their chain. Even though the guy on the phone hangs up on me, they call me back the next day.

    Stuff like this is my inspiration: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc9cFXOoZBM

    --
    ~Mike (Titan_X)
    1. Re:About time by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I gave them Todd Davis' social security number a few times.

    2. Re:About time by pleappleappleap · · Score: 1

      I wish there was a way to find out who is on the other end of the line. That way I could give their own social security number back to them.

  14. Please fuck them up by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And do it hard. You'll have every single person in Canada thanking you. You see, we, too, have a Do Not Call list. Highly publicized, and for a while, highly effective. Until the CRTC (it's like the FTC with a missing chromosome that drank lead paint as a child) decided to sell the list to anyone who would give them a piece of hard candy. This included every single spammer, scammer and fuckbot. A few months ago, everyone in Canada got barraged by these exact same calls. Our CRTC then said "durrr, well, they'se in the States, so we won't do anything about it beaver poutine Mulrouny."

    So the Do Not Call list became "Cheap list of verified numbers for people who can give you money but whose government can't arrest you."

    So as the title says, please, when you find them, make an example out of them. Call them terrorists. We'll agree then look the other way!

    1. Re:Please fuck them up by inject_hotmail.com · · Score: 1

      You see, what I don't understand is the logic of the guys. I mean, if it exists in the first place. They are business guys, and have to pay bums-in-seats or at least maintain electronics to call the DNC list. I know it's relatively cheap, but, playing the odds of some PHB handing their money over, wouldn't it be more likely that someone not on the big list would be more apt?

      If someone is savvy enough to be on the big list, wouldn't they already be predisposed to saying no to any product/service? So, take a phonebook, subtract the DNC list, and call the rest. At least you know the recipients won't be hostile...

      This just makes sense, and it's not hard to figure. I'm not accusing anyone of actually having a brain here, it's just, anyone in business should contact those people that haven't explicitly stated they don't want to be contacted.

      Life is only difficult when people make it difficult.

    2. Re:Please fuck them up by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      If someone is savvy enough to be on the big list, wouldn't they already be predisposed to saying no to any product/service? So, take a phonebook, subtract the DNC list, and call the rest. At least you know the recipients won't be hostile...

      A good point, but I can see the value of phoning the DNC list. A large portion of the list are savvy people who don't want to be phoned. But then there's also all those people's friends, families, or anyone they knew with a phone. Maybe they signed up Grandma because they knew she is easily manipulated. Heck, a whole bunch of people are on the list not because they know what it is, but because the news told them to do it (suggestible people).

      So it becomes a "minority shot in the dark" again. Some of the people on the DNC list are suckers. And as far as the list vs. the phone book goes, nearly every single number in the DNC list is a verified number (people signed themselves up), it is cheaper to buy than a spam list (citation needed, but I don't have the numbers on hand), and it's already in a machine-readible format.

      Maybe everyone should start heavily spamming the DNC list with fake numbers. But the damage is already done. The 99.99% pure list is out there, ready to be sold and resold.

    3. Re:Please fuck them up by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      That happened to the US's Do Not Call list as well, so it's not just Canada.

  15. Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Holy crap, the FTC did NOTHING until more than 30,000 complaints were received. You'd think the threshold would be a hell of a lot lower. Your tax money at work- thanks assholes.

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    1. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Workaphobia · · Score: 1

      Agreed. What the FUCK took them so long?

      --
      Evidently, the key to understanding recursion is to begin by understanding recursion. The rest is easy.
    2. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      And on top of that, they didn't do anything until a sitting Senator starting getting these calls. Evidently it's OK if the great unwashed get the ever living crap annoyed out of them, but how *dare* they call the elite with that crap.

    3. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by anagama · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Won't happen. Rather, we'll continue to have healthcare run by insurance companies, the only difference being that government will force everyone who pay taxes to cover the cost of covering everyone else. The result, massive government enforced subsidization of private enterprise, with trillions funneled into the pockets of politicians and insurance middlemen.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Until 30,000 people will get sick? That would be what, few hours? I can live with that.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    5. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I'm *not* advocating it, but I expect to hear some politicians getting shot over how they clusterfucked our tax system and debt.

      We trusted these maggots with our votes, and this is what we get. It's only a matter of time before it reaches critical mass. Judging from history, I'd say it's long over due.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    6. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Honestly, that doesn't bother me that much. The U.S. has more than 330MM people; 30,000 is less than 1% of 1% of that.

      What number do you feel is fine for acting on something this minor? 10,000? 1,000? 1% of 1% of 1%? If you have a hard number, how did you decide that? When the FTC director (or a relative) gets one of these calls himself?

      I'm sure a variety of groups could get 30,000 people together to do any number of things or file complains; anything from religious sects to lobby groups. I'd actually be worried if a government for this many people acted on such a small number for a case such as this.

      Remember, the FCC acted based on 500K responses to the "wardrobe malfunction" Superbowl fiasco. That's still less than 1%.

    7. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Ditto. That is the story I heard, Charles Schumer received a call and threw a hissy fit.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    8. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by OverZealous.com · · Score: 1

      I think it's simple.

      10 independent complaints about a robocaller within a 1 month span should be plenty to attack, and permanently revoke the right for a company to cold-call a person. Ever.

      That would make them think twice before calling someone.

      Personally, I don't give a flying **** whether that scares "legitimate" callers. I've had it with companies who are letting me know that my credit card/mortgage/car/whatever could be benefited from something that I DON'T WANT. There is NO legitimate reason to EVER use a robocaller. Period. This includes politicians, charities, or surveys.

      If my money/information/bank account number is so important to you, hire someone to call me, and make sure they are sitting on that phone, listening to the ringing, when I pick up. I think the same rules should apply to those auto-dialers where the person on the other end starts saying "Hello? Hello?" 30 seconds after I pick up.

    9. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you do have to factor in a few other considerations. First, the FCC complaints about content are almost always driven by one or more "family" groups that provide a form letter, address, etc. to a group of motivated people. How many people know who to complain to about Do Not Call violators? If a potential FCC violation occurs, many complainers have never even seen/heard the offending content, but are told by their group what the offense was and encouraged to write in anyway. There is no real equivalence with the Do Not Call list, as you must have been called for the offense to occur and for you to have something to complain about.

      I would argue that under these circumstances, even 1,000 complaints should be enough to start an investigation. Or really any significant level of activity; part of the reason violators get away with it is that it takes so long for them to get on the radar, and if they were discovered and fined ASAP it'd take the profit out of it.

    10. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by hrvatska · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it was the 30,000 complaints that prompted action or the one complaint from one of the most senior members of the US senate. The week before the FTC acted Senator Chuck Schumer of NY received one too many of these calls and started seeing what could be done about it. One pissed off senior senator carries more weight than 30,000 pissed off normal people. Maybe the FTC was going to act on this problem this week, but I can't help but think Schumer prompted them to act sooner than they would have.

    11. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it really sucks, but there you go. I guess one way to justify it is that New York State has a population of around 19M people. Since each state gets two Senators, you can imagine Schumer counting as 9.5M complaints.

    12. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea behind getting free/low-cost healthcare out there to people who can't afford the normal fees is that if they get checked out earlier, the costs of treatment (or outright prevention) will be lower than if they waited. So much lower, in fact, that it more than balances out the fact that someone else is paying for their healthplan to begin with.

      And that's just direct, easily measurable costs. What's the cost of an untimely death to a middle-age person who would otherwise be contributing to the GDP? If 25 people take a day off for the funeral? If 25 people spend a week at lower productivity because they're thinking more about the person who died than their work?

      Individually, society can carry the burden of last minute health care for the severely sick, but it's one of those things that is really dragging us down...sort of like the estimates that the gap between actual student performance and the expectations for their grade level results in annual losses greater than the amount the US economy has shrank during this entire financial mess.

    13. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think this is shocking? The FTC does *not* act on over 99% of complaints filed. I just wrote a paper on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

      Since 1978 the FTC has filed roughly 60 law suits; 2 last year. There were over 78,000 complains filed by consumers last year, (Cite: http://www.ftc.gov/os/2009/02/P094804fdcpareport.pdf, page 5). Of course, a majority of those complaints are likely bogus, but even still... Don't expect the government to Act until there is public pressure - funds are often spent elsewhere.

    14. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, the FTC did NOTHING until more than 30,000 complaints were received.

      No, it really only took ONE complaint to get the FTC working. The one complaint came from senator Charles Schumer last Sunday after one of the warranty companies made the serious mistake of calling his cell phone

    15. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Schumer throws a hissy fit about something every Sunday night. Right on schedule.

    16. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Out of 100 people that get these calls, how many do you think actually make a complaint? I'd probably guesstimate it at around 5, but that's strictly speculation based on nothing more than a gut feeling. So the number of affected people can be assumed to be significantly larger than 300k.

    17. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 1

      They aren't complaining about legal behavior, are they? These dirtbags are breaking the law.

      If it took 30,000 calls to the cops before they got off their butts and investigated a robbery, would that be appropriate?

      If they have 100 credible reports of an organization involved in lawbreaking, they should investigate. And they should get off their fat asses far quicker to save everyone the enormous time and trouble.

      --
      What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
    18. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by nizo · · Score: 1

      Luckily the primary goal of insurance companies is to make sure we get the best possible medical care, not squeeze every penny out of us that they can like every other for profit business out there.

    19. Re:Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

      When you consider that it only takes two or three fundy whackjobs complaining about nipples or language to get TV and radio shows fined, it looks even more disgusting.

  16. cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always take the call. Listen politely and tell them that yes, I do want to extend my car's warranty. They ask for my VIN and I say I have to go outside to get it.

    Then I put the call on hold and get back to work. They actually often call back and I take the call, telling them that I'm still looking for my registration.

    Then I put the call on hold and get back to work.

    You don't want to be abusive to the person making the call. I have a friend who had no other job options and worked for firms like that. Often these people are either just trying to make ends meet, or just need a mindless job so they can concentrate on college. (My friend later went on to get his PhD.)

    By doing this they person making the call can't even get in trouble, you are doing exactly what they are asking you to do, and clearly that can take a 1 minute or two. But this does cost the company money.

    1. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often these people are either just trying to make ends meet, or just need a mindless job

      sorta like a mugger or robber, huh? They're participating in a scam, thus they are scam artists. Also I find it highly dubious that "your friend" couldn't find ANY other work. More like he didn't like the other work he's qualified for (ie Mikey D's, cleaning toilets, etc etc).

    2. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have absolutely no sympathy for the people who are on the other end of the line. They sold their soul to the devil. They just as well make their money selling crack cocaine.

    3. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly! Wasting the company's time is the only way to get them to stop.

      I once got fed up with receiving these calls and decided to keep them on the line for as long as possible the next time they called. By the time I was done I had kept them on the line for almost half an hour and had asked them if their warranty would cover (each escalation question on my behalf separated by "|") damage to my engine | as a result of an accident | in which I was drinking and driving | that I thought was the fault of the other driver for driving a small car | that was an import | since I was driving a huge truck | and would need a lawyer | since I had argued with the cop | to the point that I shoved him | and shot him | with his own gun | and left the scene of the accident | and the shooting.

      I was pretty surprised they didn't hang up when I asked if their warranty would cover a lawyer for shooting a cop, but the guy did finally put me on hold to get a supervisor to answer my questions and that's when I hung up.

      My co-workers were cracking up and I've never gotten a warranty call again.

    4. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 1

      or maybe he fell into a hole filled with drugs in college. I was trying to be kind. He climbed out, not everyone is so lucky.

    5. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 1

      I just noticed your scare quotes around "friend." Yes, he was. It wasn't me. I waited tables in college for the first 2 summers then wrote code the third.

      Writing code paid better and was more fun. I almost didn't graduate because of that. I just wanted to drop out and get a job! Oh man, I cringe when I think about that now.

    6. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Doitroygsbre · · Score: 1

      I worked for a company that does billing calls and shut off service for MCI many years ago. I sympathize with people with phone jobs, I really do but more often than not the guy screaming about what my mother does for a living on the other end of the phone is a hell of a lot nicer than the boss. You learn to tune it out after a while, so go ahead and scream. Your solution is actually worse for the poor sap on the other end. Most phone based companies have a set "talk time" with different penalties for going over it. Even if you accomplish the goal (sell a timeshare, get a bill payment, whatever) you can be penalized for going over talk time. I had to sit through a power point presentation every time I went over my talk time. Good god, please, scream at me and hang up. Don't make me sit through that damned presentation again.

      --
      There in no religion higher than truth.
    7. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck your friend.

      He was making money by being an unethical piece of shit. I don't care what he was planning to do with it, he voluntarily took a job as an unethical piece of shit.

      Fuck him. And fuck you for pretending that I should respect him just because he thought that aiding and abetting a scam was an acceptable way to raise capital.

      I hope both of you are hit by a bus, and live.

    8. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 1

      Even though you are an anonymous coward, I would never wish that on you, or think such horrid thoughts. Have you considered anger management or something similar?

    9. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

      I had made the assumption that the company would not treat their employees unfairly, that an "over time" call that was arguably a legitimate call would be ok.

      Of course that is extremely naive of me.

    10. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      That is very similar to what I do when I get one of those automated calls. You know, "We are selling xxx, if you are interested leave your name and a number we can reach you at at the tone." I always used to get these calls at work. I would give an easily remembered name and my work number. Then when they called back, "Oh, I'm sorry, he just stepped out. He should be back in 15 minutes." I got one of them to call back 3 times.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    11. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did your buddy go back to the job after the PhD? Life ain't easy for post-docs either, you know.

    12. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have absolutely no sympathy for the people who are on the other end of the line. They sold their soul to the devil. They just as well make their money selling crack cocaine.

      Hey, whaddya got against the crack economy?

      Seriously, at least somebody wants what the crack dealer is selling, and at least some poor desperate middle-aged bastard wants the toothless BJ that the crack whore is selling.

      If a telemarketer had anything anyone wanted to buy, they'd be doing honest work with their mouth. Sucking dick for crack is honest work in comparison.

      (Yes, telemarketers, the people you harass really do hate you that much. I hope the FCC drives all of you out of business.)

    13. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You don't want to be abusive to the person making the call...

      F that. That's just a variant of the "just following orders..." excuse.

      Besides that, it's a horrible soul-sucking job with an incredibly high turnover rate, so the sooner someone drives that particular employee to quit, the better off they are.

    14. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Dude thats when you should really try to keep the guy on teh line as long as you can... The idiot phoning you is making minimum wage. The manager is probably making double that.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
    15. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the silliest thing I've heard. I own an autodialer and we do non-commercial work, non-cold call work. (mostly political notifications and surveys) I pay less than 1c/minute and sometimes significantly less, so this tactic probably costs you more electricity than it did them money.

      Whenever they call me, I make sure to answer it as well, but then I tell them that my autodialer has a much higher capacity than theirs, and that if they don't take me off the list I will open up 300 active channels to one phone number and kill their severs.
       
        That usually keeps them away for a while, but then they call a different number I own from a different number they own and I have to make threats all over again.

      Sigh...

      I finally got fed up enough to file a formal FCC complaint against them.

      One of our telco partners told me though that because of how many numbers he owns, that he was getting up to 12 calls a day. He told me:

      'I just bought a warranty from them. When the payment goes through I'm gonna file suit for breach of contract for not providing me with the warranty, trace the credit card transaction and then subpoena their bank and file suit directly. I'm too sick of their shit.'

      I suppose now he can just join the FCC class action suit....

    16. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry dude, my policy is still to waste a telemarketer's time in the most effective and entertaining ways available to me. If you then have to watch a powerpoint presentation I count that as a bonus because it's wasting even more of your company's resources.

      I don't buy the "no other jobs" defense either. I'm sure the guy who stole my bike last year would give the same excuse but I'm not going to give him a moral pass either.

    17. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you treat the assholes like assholes, maybe they'll fucking quit. "Needing the money" is abso-fucking-lutely not justification for this behavior.

    18. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You don't want to be abusive to the person making the call.

      Fuck that. Fuck them. Fuck your friend.

      I treat these people the same way that I would treat someone breaking into my home. As someone deserving of a bullet to the face.

    19. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting.

      I had made the assumption that the company would not treat their employees unfairly, that an "over time" call that was arguably a legitimate call would be ok.

      Of course that is extremely naive of me.

      And apparently even MORE effective than hanging up! It punishes the drone, raises expenses for the manager and increases their telecom costs if you aren't paying extra for the call.

      I'll definitely try that. I actually switched to an unlimited plan because of this crap.

    20. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll abuse the asshat who makes the call if I please; needing money may be a reason to take a shady telemarketing gig, but its not an excuse.

      Either the person on the other end of the phone knows they're being a prick by making unsolicited phone calls, and deserves to feel some of the anger and frustration they directly inspire, or they're ignorant, and some verbal abuse clues them in to exactly what they're being paid to do.

    21. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often these people are either just trying to make ends meet, or just need a mindless job so they can concentrate on college.

      Fuck that. This isn't typical "telemarketing," i.e., outsourced sales/support for legitimate companies. These people are breaking the law, selling nonexistent scam-warranties. They hang up the phone if you ask their name, or what company you work for. The people working the phones know exactly, 100% what they're doing and deserve to be jailed right alongside Mr. Tabb.

    22. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      That's kind of the point for me. I see to it that the person I waste the time of gets in as much trouble as possible so that they either:

      1. Get fired
      2. Quit
      3. Kill themselves
      4. Kill everyone in their office, then themselves

      Though that order is not necessarily the order of my preference.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    23. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      These people are a drain on the economy. They provide nothing of value, waste your time, waste their own lives. Think how much richer we all would be if they spent their time, for instance, making small rocks out of big rocks.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    24. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      When I took inbound calls for DirecTV, our raises were based on average call time and calls per hour, among other things. I had a better-than-average call time, but it would have been lower without the people who took five or six minutes to run downstairs to see if they were getting a signal in the basement yet. Sometimes I wondered if they forgot they were on the phone and started watching TV...

      Anyway, that's inbound, not outbound, but I'd assume raises (or at least not-getting-fired) would be based on the same thing in the outbound calling world.

    25. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to be abusive to the person making the call. I have a friend who had no other job options and worked for firms like that. Often these people are either just trying to make ends meet, or just need a mindless job so they can concentrate on college. (My friend later went on to get his PhD.)

      I used to think that way, but I got sick of the emotional blackmail -- "He's just a guy trying to make a living". If he were just trying to make a living running a meth lab, I'd have no problem slaying him in his tracks.

      The real villains are the bastards at the top. They're just using the callers as human shields. Personally, these shields are working the job voluntarily, so I have no problem abusing them. I honestly believe there are some jobs which have no moral right to exist.

      That said, I have no compunction about telling the caller that her boss can buttfuck himself with white-hot barbed wire or, if the boss is a woman, she can smash a beer bottle and hammer the shards up her cunt.

      If I'm lucky, I'll make them so sick they'll get the clue and quit.

  17. Vigilantism by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Connecticut's attorney general, Richard Blumenthal,[...] warns that consumers should "avoid breaking the law simply for revenge."

    When people feel that injustice has been done, then justice must either be provided or else the will make their own.

    Saying that vigilantism is always wrong or "against the law" is no use if no other alternative is provided to those with legitimate grievance. Unfortunately our legal systems have evolved, and continue to evolve, into artifices that deny their services to the ordinary person. The courts are a closed club, open only to those with inordinate amounts of money and influence.

    Faced with this growing reality, it shouldn't be surprising when people take matters into their own hands. The sad fact is that these web vigilantes didn't another more acceptable legal route because they knew full well how futile it would be. Little people often have to make their own justice nowadays.

    "The Internet is evolving, and is allowing for groups of people to do their own justice socially," says Mr. Silveira.

    And now they have the means to do it.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Vigilantism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words: Stand alone complex.

    2. Re:Vigilantism by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      When people feel that injustice has been done, then justice must either be provided or else the will make their own.

      Saying that vigilantism is always wrong or "against the law" is no use if no other alternative is provided to those with legitimate grievance.

      This is the most insightful truth I've read all day. If I hadn't already commented, I'd mod you up.

    3. Re:Vigilantism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying that vigilantism is always wrong or "against the law" is no use if no other alternative is provided to those with legitimate grievance.

      Exactly so! You for president!

      The old "Two wrongs don't make a right" canard is total bullshit. It's usually trotted out to perpetuate a wrong and is used by people to escape responsibility.

      While I may agree with it in principle (not always), I believe that it becomes totally invalid when it allows the underlying wrong to continue.

      If the law refuses to address the initial wrong, it has no goddamned moral right to prevent the aggrieved party from addressing it.

      It's like the bullshit laws preventing gun ownership -- that's the prerogative of the cops.

      When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away.

  18. Robocall Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My family (in Canada) gets somedays gets half a dozen robocalls a day. Sometimes we just don't answer the phone.

  19. Greetings, friends. by feepness · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield.

    Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away.

    1. Re:Greetings, friends. by dfm3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What state?

    2. Re:Greetings, friends. by pleappleappleap · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH!!

    3. Re:Greetings, friends. by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Those replies are BOTH lines from the Simpsons, you silly man.

      Nice 747 impression, though. ;^)

    4. Re:Greetings, friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. same thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's another about "lowering the interest rates on your account." Same scam, no info provided, etc. I really hate this BS. If you say hello twice, and nobody talks immediately, just hang up.

  21. I love the car warranty calls by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those calls are so much fun! When they call, I tell them that I want to renew the extended warranty on my 1974 Dodge Dart. And I don't take no for an answer. Everytime they say something about why they can't do that I reply as if they said yes. I keep asking them what the renewal fee is, and then "ok, so let's go ahead and renew the warranty on the '74 Dodge," etc. etc. Sometimes the calls go on for five or six minutes. It's exhilarating to actually get a telespammer to hang up on you!

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:I love the car warranty calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they care? Are they actually selling real warranties? If you're willing to send money then they're laughing all the way to the bank.

  22. bout fuckin time! by chucklebutte · · Score: 0

    these pricks would call me non stop i dont even own a car ive called the BBB and put myself on the no call list just for them and yet they still would call and harrass me fuck them!

  23. The old ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stoning people to death is barbaric. Stoning them only half to death on the other hand...

  24. Re:This is the second notification that the warran by alexfeig · · Score: 1

    That's the one!

  25. I tried to buy a warranty from these guys by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    for a 1963 Opel Kadett.

    I told them I was planning a trip across Botswana, and I wanted to make sure the vehicle was covered.

    Those bastards hung up on me.

    1. Re:I tried to buy a warranty from these guys by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      Did you tell them that it was named Oliver?

  26. This is why... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why I just cancelled my land line.

    Verizon has made money for years played the middle man in the arms race against invasive calls. They sell my name/number, then try to sell me *69, then sell them blocking, then try to sell me....

    Nuts to them.

    1. Re:This is why... by BriggsBU · · Score: 5, Informative

      Problem is that these guys are calling cell phone and such as well.

    2. Re:This is why... by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      They do it on my cell phone, too, both personal and business. The phone company makes money either way for these business calls: if they didn't make money, they'd be much more aggressive about interfering with these services. Unfortunately, it's like the US Post Office and Land's End catalogs: they're happy to waste your time to collect a slightly profitable, bulk business fee from a reliable customer.

    3. Re:This is why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Repeated calls over the past 2 months to my cell phone:
      • car war (501) 977-0960
      • car war (800) 219-7425
      • magazine (310) 448-6034
      • car war (818) 870-9191
      • Spanish contest (919) 355-9988
      • car war (402) 982-0489
      • car war (866) 244-3697
      • car war (702) 346-2420
      • car war (773) 728-8019
      • car war (806) 373-4311
      • Hooker (408) 469-5414
    4. Re:This is why... by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      Too bad I only get these calls on my cell phone...

      --
      snig
  27. Oh, I'm glad someone complained by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

    I got called on my *office* phone number over this.

    My conversation with them went something like this:

    Me: Who are you? (In the very gruff Steve voice)
    Them: Auto Warranty company.
    Me: Why are you calling me? (In a gruffer tone)
    Them: Because your car warranty is about to expire.
    Me: That's nice, but I don't own a car.
    Them: Um, er, does anyone else in your household own a car?
    Me: No and we don't live in the United States.
    Them: Um, er, we'll put you on our "Don't Call" list. (hangup)

    Of course the source number was caller-id blocked.

    A coworker of mine got a half-dozen of those calls.

  28. Why I'm not on Do Not Call by VValdo · · Score: 1

    So the Do Not Call list became "Cheap list of verified numbers for people who can give you money but whose government can't arrest you."

    I always figured it like this-- the Do Not Call list has certain exceptions-- political calls (of course), charities, and companies with whom you've done business (e.g., even though you cancel AT&T, they continue with the "please switch back" calls), non-profits, etc. There may be even more exceptions (like local businesses within 50 miles of your home, etc.) for your state's local DNC list.

    In other words, the way I see it, the Do Not Call list is a Call List for the exceptions. I don't want ANY of them- politicians or nonprofits included- calling me. I'd just prefer to stay unlisted and not have my # show up anywhere. This works pretty well except for the random-number generated robocalls who coudn't give a shit what your # is.

    Also, if it gets REALLY annoying, one might consider using a call router to intelligently route unknown callers through a phone tree or directly to voice mail.

    W

    --
    -------------------
    This is my SIG. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Why I'm not on Do Not Call by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      FWIW, Google Voice is essentially a poor man's call router. Totally free except for Google keeping a record of all your phone calls.
      I have never had a robo-call, or in fact any other unwanted call, get past the system and make my phone ring. Somedays I'll check the log of hang-ups and just smile.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    2. Re:Why I'm not on Do Not Call by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Also, if it gets REALLY annoying, one might consider using a call router [asterisk.org] to intelligently route unknown callers through a phone tree or directly to voice mail.

      I run my VoIP service at home through an Asterisk box. Best thing since sliced bread. Not only can you route unknown callers directly to voice mail, but you can also blackhole known telemarketing numbers (I pay per minute for my service, so why should I let them waste my money?), or if you're feeling a bit abusive, route them to some really, really rude recorded message just for them. :-)

      Also, you can configure the system to record any given inbound calls, with the appropriate notification given via the auto-attendant if needed. I suppose this might come in handy if one wanted to pursue the company responsible for the calls.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    3. Re:Why I'm not on Do Not Call by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'd do this myself, except we don't have a landline, only cell phones.

  29. could be worse... by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    i misread this as a "robocop" scheme, anticipating warranties to come with the ultimatum "you have 20 seconds to comply."

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  30. How about this? by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm in favor of the death penalty for making even ONE telemarketing call. Kill a few of them and maybe the others will get the message.

    Yes, this is a serious proposal. Anybody else with me?

    1. Re:How about this? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but I'm opposed to the death penalty. So you'll just have to accept that they will have a life sentence, with 8 hours of waterboarding every day.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:How about this? by what+about · · Score: 1

      Really, why killing them if you can milk them ?

      The real solution is to make them pay you !
      1) Telcos must always show the calling number
      2) There must be a do not call list and you are on it
      3) If a telemarket calls, you you receive (by law) a sum of 1000(on thousand) dollars from telemarketer.

      A pity that the telemarket problem will be solved before you get the money.

    3. Re:How about this? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be in favor of the death penalty for me to use it.
      <insert evil laugh here>

      But your idea may be effective given enough time and if we lock up the majority of them. If they're behind bars, they can't call. :)

    4. Re:How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Let's kill a couple broke students trying to make ends meet, we'll all feel better.

      Your disregard for human life sickens me.

      Also, fuck you.

    5. Re:How about this? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Obviously, your "broke students" pissed away their money before they took an ethics course.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:How about this? by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      Nobody is talking about killing the people who actually make the calls. I'm talking about the death penalty for the ones who hire them.

      Your disregard for my privacy sickens me. Break into my house and see what happens. I'll share my bullets with you . . . . if you can catch them.

  31. Canadians and Our Do Not Call List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As some of you may know, Canadians have our own Do Not Call List. However, these guys are using that very list to MAKE the calls. I've gotten repeated calls AFTER signing up on this list. What's a better source of verified phone number than a recently updated list of people who posted the number for the exact opposite reasons?

  32. i blame the phone companies by webdragon · · Score: 1

    I've received dozens of calls from the scumbag, both on my phone at work and on my cell. I really wish a phone company would offer the option to automatically reject unknown and blocked ID calls. personally i think the phone companies are in on it, i believe if they wanted to they could easily disable number spoofing.

  33. Telco Block by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    What I want is a *88 or something that I can dial after I hang up on these bozos. Then the telco will note that I have blocked this number. Then if enough people block a number the telco would block the number for all people who have opted into the bozo block service. I suspect that this would defeat most scammers who ignore do not call lists. It would also get around all the exceptions such as charities and politicians who think that nobody wants to block their calls as well.

  34. Finally! by luddite47 · · Score: 1

    Now it's "your final call"

    b*tches!

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be alarmed!

  35. Here's a good way to get rid of them.. by jfandre · · Score: 0

    When the machine calls saying you're warranty is about to expire, it usually says something like "press 3 to talk to a representative". Fine. Press 3. Then when the agent gets on the line the first thing they'll ask is what's the make and year of your car.. Just say 1983 Plymouth... They'll hang up on you and never bother you again.

  36. Home, business, and... SkypeIn by Shag · · Score: 1

    These guys have been leaving voicemail on my SkypeIn number. I guess my laptop's car warranty has expired.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  37. Piss off a Senator by DavidD_CA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone notice that this didn't become an issue for the FCC until a senator bitched?

    Apparently he (?) got quite a few of these calls at home too, and alerted someone at the FCC about it. It wasn't until then that FCC took action.

    --
    -David
    1. Re:Piss off a Senator by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Government of the people, by the elite, and for the elite...

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    2. Re:Piss off a Senator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone know some private congressional phone numbers?

      I'm hoping I can convince the telemarketers to call me back on the "other line" ...

  38. Mafia phone calls... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all those who think these calls are just made by some shmuck trying to get by, you should consider that most of these calls are fraudulent. They're just trying to get your credit card information so they can steal your identity. So I have zero sympathy for them. For that reason, I usually answer by giving them shit. Last time one of them called me, I answered by pretending to be in the mafia:

    "So, you want to give me insurance on my car?"
    "What kind of car do you drive, sir?"
    "A big one - for the bodies."
    "What kind, sir?"
    "Why don't we try and make a little business negotiation here, if you know what I mean?"
    "What do you have in mind, sir?"
    "Well, I had this... associate... and we had this little transaction going on, if you know what I mean. I need some place safe to stash this stack of money I got here on my desk for the time being."
    "Well, I've got some pockets."

    Seriously. That's how he responded. To which I said:

    "Well, if you could give me a address I'll see that one of my associates bring this money to you."

    And he gave me his address and phone number. After wards, I hung up and went to Google earth. He had given me the address of some mall/business park in Pennsylvania.

  39. Exactly. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The phone company should care, but does not. They get paid per usage and they simply do not care what the usage is.

    All the circuits are theirs - they know who every single line belongs to. They sure don't miss a beat when it's time to send out the bills, do they? This number made these calls, and here's your bill. They have this information in their database - it's necessary for billing. They're great at that part, aren't they?

    But they'll turn a blind eye when someone dials out from 111-222-3333 claiming to be 333-222-1111. No problems there sir, just so long as you pay your bill. Fucking jerks.

    The only reason someone would spoof their caller id is if they are up to no good. These fucking robodialers do exactly that because they know they're annoying people. They know it, or they'd be more up front about what they're doing. Listening to that smarmy asshole at Auto One trying to justify his business practices is disgusting. If you're so on the up-and-up, Mr. Tabb, then quit spoofing your outbound number, you jackass.

    And the phone company is their direct accomplice.

    Not difficult at all to have their system screen out spoofed calls:

    if(outbound_number!=customer_number)
    {
    disconnect_line();
    play(busy_tone);
    }

    There you go, I won't even charge a consulting fee.

    Now go do it, phone companies.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Exactly. by choco · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about the USA, but can say that this would be completely impractical in the UK.

      For various complex reasons, major users in the UK (like call centres) frequently buy their incoming telephony and outgoing telephony from completely different companies. It's not uncommon to have several companies providing each. The incoming numbers used may not even belong to the call centre. It is increasingly common for these to be allocated and routed dynamically in real time.

      (This is exactly the service my company provides - to known, legitimate customers).

      There's no way that the outgoing Telco is going to be able to unscramble or keep up with this.

      --
      AJB
    2. Re:Exactly. by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Don't play the busy tone (that's just too simple), play something like:

      "The number is no longer in use"

      "Hello! ... Hello? ... Hello? ... ... Hello? ... {click}".

      "You have called the department of wet jobs, please state your name, number and location so we can 'visit' you."

      "Enter your freecall code or this call costs $563 per minute plus expenses. The cost will be sent in a separate invoice."

      I suppose that you can come up with a lot of more or less evil variants on your answering machine.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason someone would spoof their caller id is if they are up to no good.

      That was... interesting statement.

      Now... Please, please don't tell me you support the right to be anonymous when surfing the internet. Or are against any laws that would make it illegal to give false name when someone asks.

    4. Re:Exactly. by hamburgler007 · · Score: 1

      One can take this argument and extend it to many other services. I hate telemarketers, but if you proposed something like this for ISPs, people here would be up in arms.

    5. Re:Exactly. by averner · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only reason someone would spoof their caller id is if they are up to no good.

      And the only reason someone would spoof their IP address on the internet is if they are up to no good, right?

      Who modded this guy up??

      --
      Member of the 7 Digit UID Club
    6. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a large number of totally legitiment (and common) reasons to "spoof" caller ID. Here are a few:

      Toll bypass. Say you have Office A in New York and Office B in Chicago. You have a data circuit between these two offices, and want to route all calls that are going to the Chicago area (not just to that office) over the data circuit, instead of paying the phone company lots of money for usage. So, you route the call from the New York office, over the dataline to the chicago office and out the carrier at the Chicago office, to the place your calling. One problem.. In that case you'll want the caller ID to show up as coming from the New York office, not the Chicago office. If you're not using the same carrier in both places (and even if you are), you'll need to "spoof" the caller id, so that the New York number shows, even though the call is originating from Chicago. This is an incredibly common thing to do for even medium sized businesses, and is one of the primary reasons VoIP is catching on so well.

      Next reason.. Toll free numbers. The carriers route you a DID that is say.. 212-555-1212.. When you call someone, you want the caller to call you back on your toll free number (or just identify you based on that toll free number.) So you'll need to "spoof" your caller id to be the toll free number..

      Remember, people frequently use many different carriers for different regions, and different services (local vs. long distance vs. toll free.)

      So, please, please.. think of the children before you make a blanket statement.

    7. Re:Exactly. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The phone company should care, but does not. They get paid per usage and they simply do not care what the usage is.

      They should care, as one of the compelling reasons to dump the landline and to get a cell phone is that there is a lot less junk calls (yes, I'm aware that the car warranty idiots hit cell phones too, but they are an exception). You would think that the phone company might care about booting abusive callers off their network to help them retain customers, but I guess not.

    8. Re:Exactly. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      As mentioned by others, there are legitimate reasons for the caller ID to show a number other than the originating number.

      For example, DirecTV (to use a company I've worked for as an example) would want 800-DIRECTV to show up on Caller ID rather than whatever the outbound number of their call center is - because outbound numbers at the call center don't take incoming calls, and that could cause confusion.

      A simple solution would be to require phone companies to prevent caller ID spoofing, as you describe, but allow legitimate companies to pay to register alternate numbers to show up on the caller ID; however, this puts a serious burden on phone companies to verify the legitimacy of applicants, and they probably wouldn't want to do it unless the price were sufficiently high. That price might be high enough to be a significant burden to smaller businesses.

    9. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way that the outgoing Telco is going to be able to unscramble or keep up with this.

      Bull-fucking-shit -- if the telco can bill the outgoing number, they can goddamned well provide that number to the police.

      Don't give me that "unscramble" shit -- if the government can require my ISP to keep adequate logs so they can identify a poster months down the line, they can fucking well require the same of the bastard telemarketers for calls made within the past week.

    10. Re:Exactly. by choco · · Score: 1

      Within the UK the phone system allows the caller to set the CLI arbitrarily.

      Because the outgoing Telco cannot know which CLIs are valid and which are not (because it handled by someone else, and is constantly changing) they have no means of imposing any useful rules.

      Yes. The Telco can tell the Police which CLIs were used for outgoing calls - but how does that help ?

      Are you seriously suggesting that the Police are going to contact all of the many hundreds of Telcos in the UK and say "did any of your customers send calls using this CLI ?"

      Even if they did, what happens when the CLI is something totally meaningless - and used by several different senders?

      I.E. What happens when the many tens of Telcos all say "yes" to the same same CLI ?

      As a Telco, we regularly get requests from the Police and other bodies regarding (incoming) numbers that we "own". (Using what is often known as the "RIP procedure). Thus far > 95% of these requests have been a dead end for the Police - because the CLI they are tracing is utterly fake.

      ------------------

      It is actually possible to trace individual calls by means of some of the other logs in SS7 independent of CLI. It is very slow and very laborious. AFAIK This method is only used in the most extreme of circumstances. Even then, there are still various ways it can fail.

      --
      AJB
    11. Re:Exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't work like that, dumbass. What if you have a couple of PRIs and you are making a ton of outbound calls, but you want your caller ID to always show your main number? All of your calls should get disconnected based on your awesome code?

  40. David Tabb is TRUE SCUM by erroneus · · Score: 1

    His history spells it out clearly enough. The article in which he gives an interview offers up ALL kinds of denial that he was aware of this that or the other and ended up paying a small fine for the practices of his contractors. As far as I can tell, he's still doing it and still paying the contractors. He is aware of what they are doing and has not stopped using their services. And his previous criminal business history suggests that he is an habitual offender who doesn't give a rat's ass about pissing people off to get money. He falls neatly into the same category as spammers and botnet operators. If you have followed my comments here on slashdot, you'd know what my prescribed sentence on all people of this type would be -- Death. The are incapable of reform and are far more harmful to society than most murderers and rapists.

    David Tabb? If you happen to be reading this? I am not alone in believing the world would be better off without you in it.

  41. Good comment. MOD PARENT UP. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MOD PARENT UP!

    First sensible comment. The state and federal governments have been doing NOTHING, for YEARS, about this scam. When I tried to report the scam, someone in the Oregon state government just laughed, happily telling me that the attorney general's office had gotten many, many complaints.

    During the years of the Bush administration, the government became extremely disfunctional, in my opinion.

  42. Re:This is the second notification that the warran by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1
    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  43. These guys only got caught now??? by timpdx · · Score: 1

    You can simply google "the warranty has expired on your car" and get message board complaints going back a few years now. Apparently tens of thousands of people complained. But when they finally rang Ted Schumer, during a Senate session, god forbid, action against these scammers actually happened. http://gothamist.com/2009/05/11/schumer_calls_for_investigation_int.php Why the *bleep* did it take this long for action? I am on the no call list, and I have gotten these calls constantly for 2 years now on my cell. They tend to come in clusters, many calls in a week or two then "quiet." These guys should be locked up in a cell for 10 years with ringing phone that cannot be picked up with the number posted daily on 4chan. Rot in hell.

  44. gadget manufacturing opportunity by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have often thought that someone needs to make a gizmo that you could install on your phone line that would automatically answer all incoming calls and say "Press *random number* to complete this call." If the random number is not pressed within ten seconds, or the wrong number is pressed, then the recipient's phones would never be allowed to ring.

    That should defeat robocalls.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    1. Re:gadget manufacturing opportunity by timpdx · · Score: 1

      Google Voice gets is well enough, proving the technology to defeat a "press # to complete this call" would be defeated in a matter of hours by phone spammers.

    2. Re:gadget manufacturing opportunity by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      yes, some kind of audio CAPTCHA voiced by inspector Clueso.

      --
      Nullius in verba
  45. So fucking annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was getting these calls every other day between December and January.. at home, on my cell phone, even at work.. never had luck getting those fuckers to stop calling me. Couple annoying and funny experiences with it..

    1. Numerous times that they called me I pressed #1 or whatever to talk to a rep , asked to be taken off the list and before I could finish what I was saying they immediately hung up on me.
    2. When they kept calling I just said fuck it and would give them random shit.. act like I'm an old or asian dude and keep repeating meaningless shit. I actually kept those fuckers on the phone for 10 minutes when they kept asking me to repeat everything 5 times.
    3. Another time I was telling them my name was "Hugh Jardon".. I spelled my last name out and asked the lady to read it back. Dumb bitch didn't even get it at first, then she hung up after realizing I made her look like a douche bag.
    4. My girlfriend got a call on her cell once and when she asked a rep "why do you keep calling me" the guy responded "why are you such a fucking bitch?" and hung up on her!

    I complained to FTC numerous times and I'm glad they are hopefully doing something about it.

  46. Re:First Post Rick Roll by stfvon007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ive actually rickrolled those guys calling about the warrenty thing (as well as making several complaints to the FCC about them). I would hit 1 to speak to someone when they called, and placed the phone next to a speaker with "never going to give you up" playing. (and those of you who say i should just tell them to remove me, i did, many times and they would just hang up on me and not remove me) Anyway i hope the government throws the book at them, or places them in stocks and let the public throw books at them.

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  47. Need Company ID Numbers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I've been bombarded by these warranty calls also, including on cell. Cook those bastards! What is needed is perhaps a kind of "company ID" that every sales call and printed ad must include by law. This makes it easier to track problem companies. The gov't tracks and ID's our asses up the wazoo, why not companies also?

  48. It is always... by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    the second warning that the warranty is about to expire. Even after dozens of calls to the same cell #. Can someone not increment a counter properly. These guys do math like excel.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:It is always... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      For me it was always the second and final warning.

  49. A cheer for the ages. by Torodung · · Score: 1

    Give me an "F!"

    Give me a "T!"

    Give me a "C!"

    What's that spell?

    FSCK TELEMARKETING CALLS.

  50. Good. Hope they put those fucks out of biz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but yeah, it will mean less entertainment. I read somewhere that if we all just blow 30 seconds of the TFM's time, it would be economically unfeasible for them to make the calls in the first place.

    Calls usually go like. /I get call. If I have time, I punch through to a telefuckingmarketer.

    tfm: So what is the make and model of your vehicle"
    me: 99 audi a4
    rfm: okay then....
    me: oh, wait, hold on a sec /me hits mute on cell phone, counts to 20
    me: sorry about that, I got another call
    TFM: Okay, so how many miles...
    me: oh wait, hold on a sec.... /me presses mute on cellphone /me counts to 20 and listens
    sometimes, I hear the TFM say stuff like 'this guy keeps putting me on hold, Imonna drop him.

    when I think the TFM is going to give up, I come back on and ask him to take me off his list, and I just wasted as much of his time as possible.

  51. So let me get this straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we'll continue to have healthcare run by insurance companies

    The FTC, a government agency, moves glacially slow in responding to this horrible practice that just about everyone on earth has been adversely affected by, and you think the solution - rather than the problem - is more government running our lives in areas like healthcare.

    Yeah, the FTC example is a model for good healthcare through government.

    1. Re:So let me get this straight by anagama · · Score: 1

      Pick up a book on reading comprehension and context. GP said healthcare will be bad if govt runs it. I pointed out that govt won't run it, govt will simply force taxpayers to subsidize the insurance industry and that politicians and salesmen (insurance industry) will thereby reap trillions. Obviously, I think the whole thing sucks. It's almost as bad as stealing my money to give it away to banks. Or to blow shit up in lands far away.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  52. Your friend is an ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a friend who had no other job options and worked for firms like that.

    Uh, bullshit. Go work at El Pollo Loco. No excuse. Your friend is a dick and should die in a fire for bothering people.

  53. Re:First Post Rick Roll by ccandreva · · Score: 1

    Why play something so pleasant ?

    I usually play the begining of "American Hair Band" by Tuff.

  54. Reddit already found a solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My solution requires an angry Reddit army:

    http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/8i1u7/want_the_phone_number_to_the_your_cars_warranty/

    Why go for the kill when you can just cause them the same anguish they've been causing you and your peers?

  55. Even though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Auto one IS a legitimate business,and even though they seem to be a victim here. My recent truck loan was handled by them they do deserve to be rickrolled they engage in high interest (21%)loans that are almost impossible to keep up with and they will call you mercilessly 24/7 if you are even one day late.

  56. Won't someone please... by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Funny

    as bad as being a baby axe murder

    think of the baby axes?!?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    1. Re:Won't someone please... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      You caught that :)

  57. Better ideas! by lordofthechia · · Score: 1

    Holy crap check out this thread (and load ALL the comments, it gets really good near the bottom):
    http://www.reddit.com/r/reddit.com/comments/8i1u7/want_the_phone_number_to_the_your_cars_warranty/

    Some readers over there got a hold of their phone numbers and were dissecting their automated phone system (figuring out all the extensions, unprotected inboxes, etc).

    Best Ideas from that thread:

    1. Put up billboard ads with their number with the following text:
    "If you give up when we hang up, you're not what we want. $120 per hour cash. (800) 499-5711"

    2. Put up personal ads in Craigslist with their number

    3. Call them to sell them home insurance

    4. Set a fax machine on autodial on them.

    5. Call and ask about the auto warranties, then put them on hold and play this:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3yiSb6s3AY

    6. Call them with one of the popular sound boards (try to get them to sell a warranty to Detective John Kimball).

    etc

    --
    Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
  58. SIT Status tone by tengu1sd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was getting way to many calls on my cell number. Rather than be frustrated, I downloaded the out of service tone and have it cued to quick playlist. When I get unrecognized calls now, I play the standard disconnect message. This has been way more effective than asking to be on the do not call list.

  59. FTC to Telemarketers: You been served. by kaptink · · Score: 1

    Looks like the FTC has finally got the ball rolling when it filed a suit on the 13th of May; http://www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0823263/090514voicetouchcmpt.pdf .. Interestingly tho this scam looks to have been going on for over a year now. Pretty slack for such a large and blatant operation.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who cannot, sue.
  60. Of course they are in on it by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    They get paid per call. And frankly that is good. Do you REALLY want a phone company that selects it customers? That outlaws certain kind of calls?

    Think for a second before you answer.

    Because if you say yes, then you say yes to block bittorrent and other undesirable protocols on the net, yes to ISP censorship, yes to ISP's cutting of filesharers without trial.

    So, yes, thank god the phone companies are in on this. I wouldn't have it any other way.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  61. Re:First Post Rick Roll by WaywardGeek · · Score: 1

    My wife totaled her car about 18 months ago. We still get weekly robo-calls saying it's our "last chance" to extend the warranty. Jail is too good for these goons.

    --
    Celebrate failure, and then learn from it - Nolan Bushnell
  62. they aren't just calling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have also received very "official" looking junk mail, pushing the same extended warranties.. we're guessing those are from the same scammers, as we got them soon after our phone lines (including cells and a text) were bombarded with calls from them.

    captcha: marketed

  63. My technique for irritation callers by asdf7890 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Play with them.

    If it is a fully automated call, don't hang up - just put down the phone and let the machine keep talking as long as it wants to. It costs them to call me not the other way around.

    If it is a real person, or it is one of those automated calls where you can get to a real person by pressing a button, play interested for a few seconds ("what a coincidence, I've my contract is up for renewal soon and I think I'm paying too much!") then ask if they mind you putting the phone down for a few seconds while you go take a pan off the boil in the kitchen. Then put the phone down and go off to do something else. Come back later and check your phone log to see how long the caller sat waiting for you at their cost. My record for this is 11-and-a-bit minutes.

    Or for more interactive fun and games, try play them at their own game: http://www.xs4all.nl/~egbg/counterscript.html

    I've actually been getting less nuisance calls since starting to play with them these ways, though that is probably just coincidence rather than causation.

    1. Re:My technique for irritation callers by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I haven't gotten a telemarketing call in a long time. I kind of miss them. They were fun. Even more fun for whoever happened to be around at the time. You get the strangest looks when you start saying crazy stuff into the phone.

  64. Telephone Whitelist by alohatiger · · Score: 1

    I don't pick up the phone (land line) unless I recognize the caller ID. Everybody else gets to talk to the machine.

    Actually, at this point I don't even get up to check the caller ID. All my friends and family know my mobile number.

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
  65. One thing that would help a lot here by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Would be if there was actually a way to find out who owns a toll-free number. These robocalling bastards usually call from toll-free numbers, or they leave toll-free numbers as callbacks, never identifying themselves by name (or ever being required to). Of course they tend to change their numbers often as well to make it even more difficult to figure out who they are.

    If there was something similar to WHOIS for toll-free numbers, this would help enormously. Instead, we currently have intentional obfuscation behind toll-free numbers. Numbers are sold by "Responsible Organizations" ("RespOrgs"), who know the identity of the company or person behind the number but have no obligation whatsoever to share that information with anyone.

    It is generally pretty simple to find out who owns a regular phone number; in the case of a land line the phone company will sometimes tell you that themselves (or you can at least find out who the carrier is). Why on earth do we make it nearly impossible to find the identity of the owner of a toll-free? It is almost like giving them a license to make unsolicited calls. If we could get timely and accurate information on the owners of toll-free numbers we could at least serve them with cease and desist letters and establish a paper trail to demonstrate their activities.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  66. Thank $deity by scarolan · · Score: 1

    These guys were calling me on my cell phone every single day for a while. Then mysteriously the calls just stopped. Thanks Internet hacktivists!

  67. Well, they do care. Caller ID isn't what they use by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    At my former company we got fed ANI *automatic number identification* which is a whole heap load different than what caller id is.

    We could not be spoofed, it just doesn't happen.

    No all caller id services are created equal. The fact that your local provider is more likely playing with it versus "evil long distance company". I guarantee that AT&T or whomever had it nationally past it on to the local. The local filtered it. What your getting as a spoof is probably some trick which passes through just to hit cid devices.

    Put it this way, the service we needed was to ID the exact place an employee called in from; this was to log them in at work on site for rent-a-cop stuff. We had all sorts of attempts to defraud the system. Caller id blocking didn't stop us - in fact that is a local only function and a joke. Think of it as a way to separate a fool from his money, kind of like what caller id you pay for is. We had people use business lines, cell, conference out of state, you name it they tried it

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  68. Oh noes, freedom! by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    You're comparing apples to Buicks, that's why.

    Caller ID spoof doesn't have a single chance of throwing the authorities off your trail. It doesn't enhance your freedom one single bit - the phone co still knows everything about the call. It'll show up on your bill. The only thing it does is show up on the target's caller ID, making it impossible for the screwed-over end user to call them back. That's it.

    Now if I'm wrong, and there is some far-reaching freedom destroying result from fixing caller ID, I'd like to hear it.

    Any takers?

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  69. Funny by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I think Auto One deserved the backlash. Plus, it was funny as hell that their voicemail system got r00ted and pwned. Plus, the owner of Auto One ain't no saint. He has had some run ins with the law. He fought the law but didn't win.

  70. Consider yourself lucky... by Jayfar · · Score: 1

    ...if you were only the recipient of these robocalls. For several days a few months ago I was the recipient of massive blowback from these calls. My number was one that a robocaller was programmed to spoof and I received dozens upon dozens of calls, some of them extremely angry. I finally ended up recording an explanatory message on my voice mail.

  71. Re: BAD comment. MOD PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    last i checked, the president has nothing to do with oregon state government function or disfunction.

  72. Re:First Post Rick Roll by WgT2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "-1 Offtoppic"

    Sour pusses: that was funny even though it did include 'first post'.

  73. Loss of Business by Kees+Van+Loo-Macklin · · Score: 1

    Also I feel it should be said that these calls cause a huge disruption in small businesses that have to deal with customer service. Since pretty much all businesses have land lines they get bombarded with robocalls all the time. And a lot of them cannot afford to have someone sit and watch a phone all day. So the people who are waiting on customers have to deal with the phone calls. If I am on the phone I am not helping a customer.

    --
    It's not what you know. It's not who you know. It's what you know about who you know.
  74. WOOHOO! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    I had been getting these calls half a dozen times a day. Which is really amusing since I don't have any sort of vehicle. (Unless they want to sell me a service contract for my mountain bike.)

    Of course, it dropped sharply four weeks after I added my number to the do not call list. But I'm glad to see that those fuckers are in for it now.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  75. My solution... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    About 4 times out of 5, when I get a call from a number I don't recognize, it's this. Being an otherwise docile and good-natured guy, I use it as an outlet to vent my frustrations and amuse those around me. One day during the beginning of a class, I asked permission to answer my phone 'cause I was getting a call from a number I didn't know. My professor knew me, so he allowed it. Sure enough, it was a robo-call, so in front of the entire class I screamed "Fuck off and DIE!" into the phone and then hung up. The looks I got were priceless.

    --
    This sig is false.
  76. Who to be angry at? by kent_eh · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    Auto One's Mr. Tabb says some unscrupulous marketing companies will buy underground lists of phone numbers and then call consumers even though they are on do-not-call lists. "If people have problems with these robo-calls or buying data, the focus of attack needs to be on these marketing companies, not on me," he says.

    No, the focus of the attack needs to be against those who are providing a profit motive for these scumbag marketing companies.
    And, Mr. Tabb, that is you.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  77. Judge Judy soundboard prank by careysb · · Score: 1

    For those of you who is want some thrills seeing someone else getting over on a telemarketer, you might enjoy this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2SXAcBOGBk You can do this yourself by Googling "judge judy soundboard"

  78. Re:First Post Rick Roll by nizo · · Score: 1

    ..places them in stocks and let the public throw books at them.

    Well, unless they plan on touring the country so we all get our chance, I propose the next best thing: installing several speaker phones in their cells that automatically pick up when people call, and then giving these numbers out to everyone who they have annoyed so we can call and let these bastards know how we feel.

  79. Re: BAD comment. MOD PARENT DOWN. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You missed the point.

  80. Re:First Post Rick Roll by WTF+Chuck · · Score: 1

    Can we say small air horn.

    --
    Note - Liberal use of <sarcasm> tags may or may not need to be applied.
  81. Re:This is the second notification that the warran by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

    They apparently haven't fined a single violater since the .ca DNC started, I'm not holding my breath for them to pwn a company based in the States.

  82. i've had these calls so many times by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    i can't count the number of these i've received. Sometimes i talk to the people just to yell at them.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  83. He (or she) most certinaly does by coryking · · Score: 1

    The president sets the tone of the government. His or her attitude gets projected all the way down the food chain. In the person at the top of the government thinks government sucks, why should anybody below care about their job either?

  84. Great! Woohoo! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    I receive on average 3 of these a day at WORK! Same old pitch, I don't know what makes them think I'd believe the 300th time instead of the first time. Well I hope one of my complaints helped get the FTC to do something. Hang the CEO, hang 'em high!

  85. Make it a game - waste their time! by hidden72 · · Score: 1

    My friends and I have a running game where we see how long we can keep them on the phone line. Play along, come up with funny objections, etc. The goal is to see how long you can keep them on the phone. I've only been able to get 20 minutes down - my wife's record is 26. Think of it as a honeypot - let them waste their time on opportunities that don't really exist.