Slashdot Mirror


FTC Targets Massive Car Warranty Robocall Scheme

coondoggie writes "Robocalls are a scourge, and the Federal Trade Commission today took action against one outfit by asking a federal court to shut down companies that have been bombarding consumers with hundreds of millions of allegedly deceptive robocalls in an effort to sell vehicle service contracts. According to the FTC, the robocalls have prompted tens of thousands of complaints from consumers who are either on the Do Not Call Registry or asked not to be called. Five telephone numbers associated with the defendants have generated a total of 30,000 Do Not Call complaints. Consumers received the robocalls at home, work, and on their cell phones, sometimes several times in one day. Businesses, government offices and even 911 dispatchers also have been subjected to the calls, the FTC said." Reader powerlord points out that another such company, not named in the FTC filing, raised the ire of thousands of internet-goers, who struck back by rickrolling the company's voice mail and digging up personal information on the company's president.

63 of 361 comments (clear)

  1. How about.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:How about.... by bstreiff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about making it so all telemarketers have to register a certain caller ID that say would be (C)*insert name of company here*, then it would be trivial to block all corporate calls. Thus making it easy to have a caller ID filter to purchase to block all telemarketer calls. This would be a lot easier than the do not call list, more effective and wouldn't censor anyone.

      These people are already blatantly ignoring the Do Not Call list. Why would they bother to give a legitimate caller ID string?

    2. Re:How about.... by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...Because its a lot easier to convict them and a whole lot easier to find out what they are doing wrong and how to fix it. With a do not call list, its possible that they accidentally dialed the wrong number, didn't have an up to date version, etc. Then the mess that is the do not call list adds to the problem.

      A simple string would take all excuses away and make it simpler for the FTC to do its job.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    3. Re:How about.... by pawstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... because the phone company would have to provide the legitimate string. Simple solution, make it illegal for phone companies to spoof caller id.

    4. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It gets worse than simply ignoring the Do Not Call list. You see, in order to be compliant with government regulations, legitimate marketing firms need to purchase an annual subscription to the DNC list. They then need to purge from their prospect list any number appearing in the DNC list.

      Unfortunately, the government sells this list to anyone who asks; thus, Russian telemarketing companies sometimes buy the DNC list as a source of pre-verified, valid phone numbers.

    5. Re:How about.... by Hyppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Caller ID can be spoofed by the end user. There are products out there that you can buy to do it, though the names escape me at the moment.

    6. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Anything which makes unwanted bells go off in my house by remote control is an invasion of my peace and quiet. Get some laws passed that allow the victim to hit #5 on their phone to charge the caller $5.00, then I'll be happy. If someone WANTS these calls, that's fine. Don't push #5. Most people don't want these calls and the victims should be able to instantly make these groups feel the pressure back in a big way.

      Groups like The American Teleservices Association (rebranded to remove "Telemarketing" from their name) and The Direct Marketing Association talk U.S. Congressmen into passing laws which enable annoying, invasive and often fraudulent activities from this lowlife "industry". It's an industry to the extent that people get paid to ring bells in my house but jeez - earn a living some other way. Annoying everyone over the phone [I believe] is not an "industry" as the lobbyist associations claim. If there was money in ringing your doorbell and hitting people with buckets of paint ten times a day, I'm sure there would be a lobbyist group for that, too. Oh wait... that's PETA.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    7. Re:How about.... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NONE of those calls are legitimate. Credit card companies simply block the card and wait until the customer notices and calls them.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    8. Re:How about.... by AuMatar · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. I get called once every few months by my visa card due to something that sets off their software. It hasn't been real identity theft yet, but they do call you before shutting off the card. Shutting off the card is done if they can't contact you.

      But yes, it's safest not to believe it when someone calls you. I always hang up and then call the number on the back of my card to make sure I'm talking to the CC company. The last few times I did that they forwarded my call directly to fraud without going through voicemail, despite just calling the general customer support number- they must have had the phone number on the card flagged.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    9. Re:How about.... by v1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      credit card companies (banks) watch account habits and WILL call you if you do something weird. My manager got a call last year from his bank asking if he was in the USA. There was someone at an atm in hong kong in the process of trying to guess his pin number.

      They don't verify anything really, they just plain cancel the card and will send you a new one with a new number. There's no reason for them to verify you ARE who you are, they're more interested in verifying the OTHER guy ISN'T you and cutting it off ASAP. Since they have your number and you're agreeing with them there's a problem, they don't need any more incentive.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    10. Re:How about.... by unlametheweak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To elaborate on what the AC posted. The phone company knows who makes calls, but the end user doesn't. The phone company just doesn't care and won't respond to complaints unless they are forced to by the police or government. The police won't get involved unless they get complaints from the phone company. The government won't get involved unless...

      Notice a trend here? These have been my personal anecdotal experiences anyways.

    11. Re:How about.... by Divebus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Your solution requires warrants.

      My solution requires air strikes.

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    12. Re:How about.... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong. I get called once every few months by my visa card due to something that sets off their software. It hasn't been real identity theft yet, but they do call you before shutting off the card. Shutting off the card is done if they can't contact you.

      Your experience is limited. Banks can and do shut your card down and then call you. I've had it happen a number of times when I've made online purchases - large ones late at night and foreign ones (DVD orders for non-domestic DVDs). They block the transaction, then they shut you down for any new transactions and then 8 hours later they robo-call you to tell you they shut you down and that you should call them back.

      In the many cases where it has happened to me it has been excessively stupid because I use disposable credt card numbers which means I have to log into their website and generate the disposable number before I can make a transaction. So I've just authenticated with username/password before making the purchase. What's worse is that when you return their robo-call, they want to verify it is really you so they ask you stuff only you "should" know - like what were the last 3 purchases on your card, or where is your billing address -- all information readily available to anyone able to log into their website, which I just proved I could do by placing the order in the first place...

      So yeah, its a pet peeve of mine and I remember the many cases so well because they have all been so brain-dead stupid about how they handle the situation.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    13. Re:How about.... by Toonol · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's close, but not strictly true. They are allowed to telemarket individuals with whom they have an established business relationship with, regardless of whether they're on the list or not. I believe that is defined as an order or a inquiry within the last 12 months. If they limit their calling to that subset, they do not need a DNC subscription.

    14. Re:How about.... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Funny

      While we're at it, let's require all thieves to leave their business card in the place of any item they steal. It would make it a lot easier to find them.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    15. Re:How about.... by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unless you're originating your calls through any of a number of VoIP providers that will let you put whatever you want for the CID information, and which the rest of the phone system will happily relay to the call's destination.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:How about.... by Drathos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I guarantee that all the loophole groups (charities, political groups, etc.) do that. Before signing up for the DNC, I almost never got called by them. Now I get several calls a day from them. And that's in addition to the "dead line" calls I now get.

      --
      End of line..
    17. Re:How about.... by lordofthechia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If this was coupled with the phone company appending the incoming Caller ID to your call record then it would be easy to enforce.

      Say you get a telemarketing call with a bogus caller ID, you simply request the phone company send you that information for that time and date and with that you can prove that the company was violating this law (since it would be a matter of record). They would have the originating phone number + the ID they used on a piece of paper you can then forward to the necessary parties.

      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    18. Re:How about.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was referring strictly to cold-target marketing (that is, contacting people who don't have a prior business relationship with the company). Hence my use of the word "prospect" in "prospect list" - as in, a list of prospective clients.

  2. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, that's great about the warranty and stuff, but what I really want to know is... what are you wearing?

  3. I actually find those amusing. by blakedev · · Score: 3, Funny

    Whenever I'm having a bad day I can just wait for their call and keep yelling obscenities and laughing like a twelve-year-old. In fact yesterday morning I got one and greeted with "PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS PENIS lol."

    --
    QamuIs Heg qaq law' lorvIs yInqaq puS
  4. At least 3 complaints from me... by Tmack · · Score: 5, Informative
    One for my personal Cell phone back in march, two for my business cell in march and april. The calls clearly violate FCC regs by being completely automated, no mention of the company name, calling numbers already on the DNC, etc. The first call I opted to talk to a rep, when he connected and mumbled the name of the company, I asked his name and the company name, and he hung up. Second call I told them I was on the DNC, that I was filing a complaint and to make sure I was on their DNC as well. Third call I told them they were in violation as I was already on both the national DNC and theirs, the rep again hung up on me.

    If you get one of these types of calls, just go Here: http://esupport.fcc.gov/complaints.htm and fill out the form. In a week or two you get the print copy mailed to you of your filing.

    Im glad they are acting on these @holes.

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:At least 3 complaints from me... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      x2. I get alternating calls from these guys and a company that wants to help me lower my rates.

      That said, the best thing you can do is waste their time. It's like Groundhog day. Every time they call I get to try something different.

      Sure warranty my 1969 VW beetle. Click
      Oh I don't carry a credit card balance. Click.
      *FCC*. Click
      vs
      Oh my Gawd. I'm so glad you called. So yesterday I was out shopping and my credit card got declined. Have you ever had your credit card declined, trust me it sucks. So how much can you lower my rates. [Cut them off] So that's great. So when do you think that I can get this rate actually implemented. I'm planning on proposing to my girlfriend, do you have a girlfriend. I'm so in love, she's going to love her ring. I just put it on layaway with the last $500 on my Visa. You do lower the rates of Visa right? [cut them off]. So. Oh, you need my number. Damn it, my card is out in the car. Can you hold for ONE second. Please. [set phone down for 5 minutes]. Hey are you still there? Great. So my card number is, hey wait a minute. Are you sure this is safe. One of my friends, John, yeah he got his credit card stolen through his pants. Some guy had this magic reader that you just need to brush up against someone and it steals the credit card.

      See how long you can keep it going...
      -
      That said, Today I just left my cell phone at home. I came home to 5 missed calls.

      I've filed both companies with the FCC, but the calls keep coming. I can't wait for both of these to stop.

  5. Same outfit, different MO by Weedhopper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a few months, I had the vehicle warranty scammers calling me on my PREPAID mobile phone. That's actually abated somewhat. Funny, because I don't live in the US much and I don't own a car.

    Now, I think the same group is calling with health insurance. Repeatedly.

    Oh, I've had a few calls from random "IT support" tell me that they're calling me about my recent computer problems.

    Someone needs to nail these guys to the wall.

  6. So they get shut down and... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A newly-registered corporation with a very similar name comes along and uses the same offices/machines/employees to carry on the work...?

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:So they get shut down and... by TheReaperD · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, they don't wait to get shut down, usually.

      I used to work for one of the top level (*cough*) product companies in this type of scam. I was too naive at the beginning of my employment to truly know what was happening. I learned really quick after the FTC paid a house call and quit the company. No charges were ever filed.

      In short, this is how the scam works: A company is selling suspect products, web pages, in my case (hey, it was the 1990s). The hire a shady parent telemarketing company who then sets up, or hires out, smaller boiler room telemarketing companies. These smaller companies are the ones actually placing the calls and rarely have much more than 50 employees. They sell the "product" and everybody takes a cut of the deal. The small companies are rotated out, as the parent post pointed out, with a similar company with the same office, equipment and employees under a new company name and official owner every 3-6 months. This is faster than the FTC and FCC can process complaint claims. When said government agencies question the upstream companies about the crooked deals, they point to the small boiler room company, now closed and with all it's paperwork destroyed, as the source of the criminal act and show the feds sham paperwork that states their "clearly legal guidelines that the rogue company clearly disregarded." Of course, everyone, at the managerial level, is in on the corrupt deal and are fully aware it's illegal. But, this shell game scam creates plausible deniability and prevents the government agencies from putting the top level companies out of business and their owners in jail.

      The owner of this "warranty" company in TFA sounds just like the boss at the company I used to work for and is likely just as guilty. The biggest problem is that this system works so well that you have to put some really suspect laws on the books to have any hope of going after the people really responsible as you can never prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they were having proxy companies commit a crime for them unless they make a serious mistake.

      On a slightly related note: Why do government agencies never talk to the likely underpaid and abused file clerk(s) when they investigate a company? Why do they only interview the managers? The managers usually have a well prepared set of lies for the feds and self motivation not sell out the company. The file clerk(s), even if they've been given the company lie, will likely be more than willing to sell out the managers, especially if immunity and a cut of the fine are offered, and will have the documentation, if there is any, to back up any claims they make. (Guess what my position was at the web company?)

      --
      "Be particularly skeptical when presented with evidence confirming what you already believe." -
    2. Re:So they get shut down and... by Tuoqui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's time to rethink the justice system.

      Innocent Until Proven Guilty = Only for living breathing human beings.
      Guilty Until Proven Innocent = Only for fictional corporate personhood.

      Make it more easy to go after the execs responsible for disregarding the laws and hold them responsible for the acts of the company they've signed off on. (IE. Sending their telemarketing to these suspect telemarketing companies for example).

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  7. Re:Hurray! by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I almost miss getting telemarketing calls. It was kinda fun to have someone that you can mess with and insult in most disgusting ways without feeling the least bit bad about it.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  8. Finally by Ogive17 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been getting calls on my cell phone and my work phone (many other people in my office have been getting calls too). Funny thing is I have a company car that is only a year old, I doubt the warranty is running out, especially since my company BUILT the car.

    I actually called the number back to figure out what the scam was, the guy on the other side asked me for my auto information. I told him that since he called me up, he should already know what my information is. Then the guy hung up on me.

    I hope there is a public lynching.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  9. Please fuck them up by halcyon1234 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    And do it hard. You'll have every single person in Canada thanking you. You see, we, too, have a Do Not Call list. Highly publicized, and for a while, highly effective. Until the CRTC (it's like the FTC with a missing chromosome that drank lead paint as a child) decided to sell the list to anyone who would give them a piece of hard candy. This included every single spammer, scammer and fuckbot. A few months ago, everyone in Canada got barraged by these exact same calls. Our CRTC then said "durrr, well, they'se in the States, so we won't do anything about it beaver poutine Mulrouny."

    So the Do Not Call list became "Cheap list of verified numbers for people who can give you money but whose government can't arrest you."

    So as the title says, please, when you find them, make an example out of them. Call them terrorists. We'll agree then look the other way!

  10. Wow, it only took 30,000 complaints... by jenkin+sear · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Holy crap, the FTC did NOTHING until more than 30,000 complaints were received. You'd think the threshold would be a hell of a lot lower. Your tax money at work- thanks assholes.

    --
    What a strange bird is the pelican, his beak can hold more than his belly can.
  11. cost THEM money, here's how by notthepainter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always take the call. Listen politely and tell them that yes, I do want to extend my car's warranty. They ask for my VIN and I say I have to go outside to get it.

    Then I put the call on hold and get back to work. They actually often call back and I take the call, telling them that I'm still looking for my registration.

    Then I put the call on hold and get back to work.

    You don't want to be abusive to the person making the call. I have a friend who had no other job options and worked for firms like that. Often these people are either just trying to make ends meet, or just need a mindless job so they can concentrate on college. (My friend later went on to get his PhD.)

    By doing this they person making the call can't even get in trouble, you are doing exactly what they are asking you to do, and clearly that can take a 1 minute or two. But this does cost the company money.

    1. Re:cost THEM money, here's how by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry dude, my policy is still to waste a telemarketer's time in the most effective and entertaining ways available to me. If you then have to watch a powerpoint presentation I count that as a bonus because it's wasting even more of your company's resources.

      I don't buy the "no other jobs" defense either. I'm sure the guy who stole my bike last year would give the same excuse but I'm not going to give him a moral pass either.

  12. Re:About time by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Funny

    I gave them Todd Davis' social security number a few times.

  13. Vigilantism by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Connecticut's attorney general, Richard Blumenthal,[...] warns that consumers should "avoid breaking the law simply for revenge."

    When people feel that injustice has been done, then justice must either be provided or else the will make their own.

    Saying that vigilantism is always wrong or "against the law" is no use if no other alternative is provided to those with legitimate grievance. Unfortunately our legal systems have evolved, and continue to evolve, into artifices that deny their services to the ordinary person. The courts are a closed club, open only to those with inordinate amounts of money and influence.

    Faced with this growing reality, it shouldn't be surprising when people take matters into their own hands. The sad fact is that these web vigilantes didn't another more acceptable legal route because they knew full well how futile it would be. Little people often have to make their own justice nowadays.

    "The Internet is evolving, and is allowing for groups of people to do their own justice socially," says Mr. Silveira.

    And now they have the means to do it.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  14. Greetings, friends. by feepness · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield.

    Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away.

    1. Re:Greetings, friends. by dfm3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What state?

  15. Re:Hurray! by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I used to hate people like you.

    I'm pretty sure that's the idea, yes.

  16. I love the car warranty calls by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those calls are so much fun! When they call, I tell them that I want to renew the extended warranty on my 1974 Dodge Dart. And I don't take no for an answer. Everytime they say something about why they can't do that I reply as if they said yes. I keep asking them what the renewal fee is, and then "ok, so let's go ahead and renew the warranty on the '74 Dodge," etc. etc. Sometimes the calls go on for five or six minutes. It's exhilarating to actually get a telespammer to hang up on you!

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  17. Re:Hurray! by dstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sucks to you. But hey, you have to expect that sort of thing when you take a job you know is immoral and unethical.

  18. I tried to buy a warranty from these guys by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    for a 1963 Opel Kadett.

    I told them I was planning a trip across Botswana, and I wanted to make sure the vehicle was covered.

    Those bastards hung up on me.

  19. This is why... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why I just cancelled my land line.

    Verizon has made money for years played the middle man in the arms race against invasive calls. They sell my name/number, then try to sell me *69, then sell them blocking, then try to sell me....

    Nuts to them.

    1. Re:This is why... by BriggsBU · · Score: 5, Informative

      Problem is that these guys are calling cell phone and such as well.

  20. could be worse... by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    i misread this as a "robocop" scheme, anticipating warranties to come with the ultimatum "you have 20 seconds to comply."

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  21. Re:Hurray! by brandon.excell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But hey, you have to expect that sort of thing when you take a job you know is immoral and unethical.

    What exactly makes the job immoral and unethical? I will admit that I myself have been annoyed by some in the industry who could care less about regulations, but the company I worked for did nothing to show either of these things. When I worked in QA, if I saw/heard anything even remotely questionable it was immediately reported to both my manager and the rep's supervisor. The problems rarely surfaced again after that. I really hate that people generalize an industry because of a few bad apples.

  22. Re:Hurray! by Divebus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...and have to give negative reports because of their inability to do their job because of morons who couldn't simply ask to be removed.

    Poor baby. How's this for a negative report: you'll just put my name on a list for the next shell company and call me back. You've earned everyone's ire.

    --

    Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
  23. How about this? by reboot246 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm in favor of the death penalty for making even ONE telemarketing call. Kill a few of them and maybe the others will get the message.

    Yes, this is a serious proposal. Anybody else with me?

  24. Re:Hurray! by rebullandvodka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I agree immoral and unethical are not the best choice of words. Words that come to mind are despicable, ugly, vile, slimy, unworthy...

    By 'few bad apples' do you mean, 'overwhelming majority'?

  25. Re:Hurray! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 3, Funny

    I also really hate that people generalize ax murderers and baby rapists because of a few bad apples.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  26. Re:Hurray! by Captian+Spazzz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that you call and harass me without my consent with no valid business reason. Because you harrass me at work when I am trying to do my job, because you waste my money for calling me and making me use up cell phone minutes waiting for your stupid rep to put me on your do not call list that I'd say a good 50% of your industry ignore or try to circumvent anyway.

    I don't NEED you to tell me what I want or need. If I need or want your product I will seek YOU out not the other way around if I have not contacted you before then leave me the frack alone!

    In reference to my previous post if you don't understand this and choose to work in that industry then you deserve what you get.

  27. Re:Hurray! by unlametheweak · · Score: 4, Funny

    Telemarketer: Hi, would you be interested in switching over to TMI long distance service.
    Sienfeld: Gee, I can't talk right now. Why don't you give me your home number and I'll call you later.
    Telemarketer: Uh, I'm sorry we're not allowed to do that.
    Sienfeld: Oh, I guess you don't want people calling you at home.
    Telemarketer: No.
    Sienfeld: Well now you know how I feel.

  28. Re:Hurray! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What exactly makes the job immoral

    Every aspect of it that involves bothering vast numbers of people on their private time in their private space using services that they pay for and normally use for family conversations, work and emergencies.

    Or the general attitude the industry shows towards the worth of time of the people they pester, such as by using machines to call five people and hang up on four of them so that telemarketers don't have to waste their time waiting for people to answer.

  29. Piss off a Senator by DavidD_CA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone notice that this didn't become an issue for the FCC until a senator bitched?

    Apparently he (?) got quite a few of these calls at home too, and alerted someone at the FCC about it. It wasn't until then that FCC took action.

    --
    -David
  30. Exactly. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The phone company should care, but does not. They get paid per usage and they simply do not care what the usage is.

    All the circuits are theirs - they know who every single line belongs to. They sure don't miss a beat when it's time to send out the bills, do they? This number made these calls, and here's your bill. They have this information in their database - it's necessary for billing. They're great at that part, aren't they?

    But they'll turn a blind eye when someone dials out from 111-222-3333 claiming to be 333-222-1111. No problems there sir, just so long as you pay your bill. Fucking jerks.

    The only reason someone would spoof their caller id is if they are up to no good. These fucking robodialers do exactly that because they know they're annoying people. They know it, or they'd be more up front about what they're doing. Listening to that smarmy asshole at Auto One trying to justify his business practices is disgusting. If you're so on the up-and-up, Mr. Tabb, then quit spoofing your outbound number, you jackass.

    And the phone company is their direct accomplice.

    Not difficult at all to have their system screen out spoofed calls:

    if(outbound_number!=customer_number)
    {
    disconnect_line();
    play(busy_tone);
    }

    There you go, I won't even charge a consulting fee.

    Now go do it, phone companies.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Exactly. by choco · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about the USA, but can say that this would be completely impractical in the UK.

      For various complex reasons, major users in the UK (like call centres) frequently buy their incoming telephony and outgoing telephony from completely different companies. It's not uncommon to have several companies providing each. The incoming numbers used may not even belong to the call centre. It is increasingly common for these to be allocated and routed dynamically in real time.

      (This is exactly the service my company provides - to known, legitimate customers).

      There's no way that the outgoing Telco is going to be able to unscramble or keep up with this.

      --
      AJB
  31. Good comment. MOD PARENT UP. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MOD PARENT UP!

    First sensible comment. The state and federal governments have been doing NOTHING, for YEARS, about this scam. When I tried to report the scam, someone in the Oregon state government just laughed, happily telling me that the attorney general's office had gotten many, many complaints.

    During the years of the Bush administration, the government became extremely disfunctional, in my opinion.

  32. Re:Hurray! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The post you are responding to never accused you of cold calling.

    You need to understand that warm calling is so close to indistinguishable from cold calling that nobody really cares about the difference except for people like you who need a way to rationalize their actions and thus think it makes all the difference in the world.

    Just look online for all the people bitching about Omaha Steaks - you buy one thing from them and they are all over you. Someone sends you a gift through them and if the sender was stupid enough to give them your phone number, they are all over you too.

    Still don't believe me? Just consider how miserable your life would be if every single merchant you've ever done business with started warm-calling you. Repeatedly. You would have no time left for your own life.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  33. gadget manufacturing opportunity by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have often thought that someone needs to make a gizmo that you could install on your phone line that would automatically answer all incoming calls and say "Press *random number* to complete this call." If the random number is not pressed within ten seconds, or the wrong number is pressed, then the recipient's phones would never be allowed to ring.

    That should defeat robocalls.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  34. Re:First Post Rick Roll by stfvon007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ive actually rickrolled those guys calling about the warrenty thing (as well as making several complaints to the FCC about them). I would hit 1 to speak to someone when they called, and placed the phone next to a speaker with "never going to give you up" playing. (and those of you who say i should just tell them to remove me, i did, many times and they would just hang up on me and not remove me) Anyway i hope the government throws the book at them, or places them in stocks and let the public throw books at them.

    --
    All misspellings and grammatical errors in the above post are intentional and part of my artistic expression.
  35. Won't someone please... by Chmcginn · · Score: 2, Funny

    as bad as being a baby axe murder

    think of the baby axes?!?

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  36. SIT Status tone by tengu1sd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was getting way to many calls on my cell number. Rather than be frustrated, I downloaded the out of service tone and have it cued to quick playlist. When I get unrecognized calls now, I play the standard disconnect message. This has been way more effective than asking to be on the do not call list.

  37. My technique for irritation callers by asdf7890 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Play with them.

    If it is a fully automated call, don't hang up - just put down the phone and let the machine keep talking as long as it wants to. It costs them to call me not the other way around.

    If it is a real person, or it is one of those automated calls where you can get to a real person by pressing a button, play interested for a few seconds ("what a coincidence, I've my contract is up for renewal soon and I think I'm paying too much!") then ask if they mind you putting the phone down for a few seconds while you go take a pan off the boil in the kitchen. Then put the phone down and go off to do something else. Come back later and check your phone log to see how long the caller sat waiting for you at their cost. My record for this is 11-and-a-bit minutes.

    Or for more interactive fun and games, try play them at their own game: http://www.xs4all.nl/~egbg/counterscript.html

    I've actually been getting less nuisance calls since starting to play with them these ways, though that is probably just coincidence rather than causation.

  38. Well, they do care. Caller ID isn't what they use by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Informative

    At my former company we got fed ANI *automatic number identification* which is a whole heap load different than what caller id is.

    We could not be spoofed, it just doesn't happen.

    No all caller id services are created equal. The fact that your local provider is more likely playing with it versus "evil long distance company". I guarantee that AT&T or whomever had it nationally past it on to the local. The local filtered it. What your getting as a spoof is probably some trick which passes through just to hit cid devices.

    Put it this way, the service we needed was to ID the exact place an employee called in from; this was to log them in at work on site for rent-a-cop stuff. We had all sorts of attempts to defraud the system. Caller id blocking didn't stop us - in fact that is a local only function and a joke. Think of it as a way to separate a fool from his money, kind of like what caller id you pay for is. We had people use business lines, cell, conference out of state, you name it they tried it

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.