Slashdot Mirror


Palm Pre Reviewed

mlingojones writes "The Palm Pre doesn't come out until June 6th, but the Boy Genius Report not only got their hands on one but also posted a review of it. They liked webOS, but not the hardware (especially the keyboard). Overall, they feel that 'once people are able to play a real unit themselves, there will be more than a lot of happy Palm Pre customers.'" On the downside, this review says the keyboard is lousy.

144 comments

  1. vs iPhone by Norsefire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading the review and watching this video I'm disliking my iPhone even more. Mulitasking alone sets it above the iPhone; it's very frustrating having to close and reopen applications anytime you want to do something, however I frequently have iPhone apps crash due to memory shortage so I have to wonder how stable it is with multiple apps open. The keyboard does look like a deal breaker though, granted the iPhone's keyboard isn't perfect and even less so when the iPhone assumes you're a moron that can't type and "corrects" what you meant to type with a completely different word (if I wanted the word it suggested I should have to press what comes up to select it, not the other way round). I doubt it will be an "iPhone killer" though, not because it's an inferior product but because the iPhone already has a hugely established userbase.

    1. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yeah...you got it all figured out dumbass.

      "i don't even own a cellphone"....but yet you feel compelled to dismiss of the best mobile inovations in the last decade??

    2. Re:vs iPhone by goldaryn · · Score: 1

      > this video

      0:38: "It's got Linux at the heart of it's operating system"

      I don't know whether to be confused or happy, help!

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebOS

    3. Re:vs iPhone by Santana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Autocorrection can be disabled, you know.

      iPhone OS is Mac OS X core. I does multitask, right now.

      There's this random application crashing sometimes, certainly. I wonder how you get to know it's about lack of memory and not badly written code.

      Anyways, if you're going to throw away your iPhone, just let me know where.

      --
      The best way to predict the future is to invent it
    4. Re:vs iPhone by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      yes sometimes you need to be disconnected

      But you do have a computer and the internet. So unless you're sending smoke signals to the town at the base of the mountain to transcribe your /. post, how disconnected are you?

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    5. Re:vs iPhone by Jurily · · Score: 1, Informative

      i don't even own a cellphone

      I do: a £10 Nokia. The features it has? Phone calls and text messages. And I can type a message on it much faster than anyone on an iPhone.

    6. Re:vs iPhone by fishthegeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to wonder how stable it is with multiple apps open.

      My understanding is that the applications (initially anyway) are all CSS, HTML, and Javascript. The Pre isn't multi-tasking several apps, but running webkit in multiple threads. Stability shouldn't be a problem.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    7. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Really? I type 50 WPM at over 90% accuracy on my iPhone 3G. How about you give that a try on your sh***y Nokia.

    8. Re:vs iPhone by pHus10n · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can see your disconnect --- there's nowhere I know of in the US or Europe where the iPhone costs $800.

    9. Re:vs iPhone by sootman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... the iPhone's keyboard isn't perfect and even less so when the iPhone assumes you're a moron that can't type and "corrects" what you meant to type with a completely different word...

      Well, maybe your phone is right about you being a moron, because you can go to Settings -> General -> Keyboard and turn off auto-correction.

      Owning a BlackBerry (work) and an iPhone (mine) I infinitely prefer the iPhone's keyboard. (And before my iPhone I had two Nokias with physical QWERTY keyboards so I'm not just preferring the iPhone's because it was my first exposure to a full keyboard on a phone.) You can type faster and with a lighter touch since you don't have to physically press each key, and holding the phone with one hand and typing with that thumb is a whole lot easier. And whoever thought of putting keys in anything but a straight line (BlackBerry Curve 8830, Palm Pre, and the number pads on my old Nokias) should be shot.

      That said, I really hope Apple allows background apps soon, if for nothing other than Undercover. The Pre looks nice and they're doing some cool things but I won't be getting one since a) I don't have any worthwhile contacts in social sites that I need my phone to automagically gather and b) I don't need to carry around a calendar. Mainly, I'm happy that the Pre is out to give Apple some much-needed competition and force issues like MMS, video recording, background apps, etc.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:vs iPhone by The+Qube · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm an iPhone developer and memory crashes are all to do with badly written code. iPhone SDK has fantastic debugging capabilities that let you catch memory leaks and easily fix them - much better than any other mobile platform SDK I've ever worked with. The problem is ultimately that everyone wants to be an iPhone developer and make millions in the App Store after picking up a book and watching an online tutorial or two, without knowing a single thing about development outside of a web scripting language or two.
      Apple also used to be really strict about testing for this during the app approval process, but it looks like they relaxed the standards. Hmm, I wonder why... I've recently seen apps which crash after 3-4 minutes of use.
      By the way, check out my first app - for the cricket lovers around the world: Virtual Cricket for iPhone

      --

      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

    11. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What typing application did you use to come to that conclusion?

    12. Re:vs iPhone by Norsefire · · Score: 0, Troll

      Autocorrection can be disabled, you know.

      Autocorrection can't be disabled by default.

      iPhone OS is Mac OS X core. I does multitask, right now.

      Yes it multitasks, but not on GUI apps.

      There's this random application crashing sometimes, certainly. I wonder how you get to know it's about lack of memory and not badly written code.

      You can use apps to profile memory usage and whenever an app crashes for me it's because the available memory has dropped too low. Especially when it's Safari that crashed (normally with 2-3 pages open).

      Anyways, if you're going to throw away your iPhone, just let me know where.

      I would but I can't copy and paste the name of the place.

    13. Re:vs iPhone by The+Qube · · Score: 4, Informative

      > Autocorrection can't be disabled by default.

      Settings --> General --> Keyboard:
      Auto-Correction: OFF
      Auto-Capitalization: OFF

      > I would but I can't copy and paste the name of the place.

      Upgrade to 3.0 and you'll be able to.

      --

      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

    14. Re:vs iPhone by Norsefire · · Score: 1

      ... the iPhone's keyboard isn't perfect and even less so when the iPhone assumes you're a moron that can't type and "corrects" what you meant to type with a completely different word...

      Well, maybe your phone is right about you being a moron, because you can go to Settings -> General -> Keyboard and turn off auto-correction.

      Ah, so it is default now? You used to have to jailbreak it and use an app from Cydia to do it. See.

    15. Re:vs iPhone by piquadratCH · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Wikipedia article you quote says it has a Linux kernel (citing this interview as source), so what's the confusion?

    16. Re:vs iPhone by MBCook · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Wow. Clearly your qualified to comment, having never touched the device you are disparaging.

      I've got an iPhone. I love the thing. Lots of people own them because they are "the thing", but many of us actually made an informed choice. It works well, does what I need (occasional texting, works as a phone), syncs with my Mac, and has a fantastic UI. It's the first phone I've used that feels like the UI was actually designed instead of accumulated. The app store and all the great games and apps are just huge icing on the cake (I realize that exists to a small part in the WM space).

      For the $800 comment, do you have any idea what a top of the line blackberry costs without contract? It's about the same. Rumors have the Pre around that price too.

      As for the Pre, it's interesting. Multitasking seems like the killer 'app' for it, but I seriously worry about battery life and responsiveness. It seems like just trying to push computer conventions onto a phone. The iPhone idea makes more sense to me (although more memory for faster launching would certainly help).

      It's unfortunate that the thing feels cheap, especially considering how much you'll have to pay.

      The keyboard sounds like a killer bit. If you don't care about a physical keyboard, an iPhone seems like the way to go. If you want a physical keyboard, Blackberrys are clearly the gold standard. The G1 is worse than that, but it's not bad. The Pre sounds very unfortunate. If the keyboard is as bas as they say, it could be a major problem for sales. That is if the supposedly limited supply doesn't kill them.

      I know some people who might get one. I can't wait to play with one. It will be interesting to see how it does.

      I'm also surprised that the Javascript based applications (except for some "exclusive partners" who pay big $$$) isn't getting ragged on more. It was clear how much of a difference it made on the iPhone to get out of that. Even though they'll have all the features exposed through special JS stuff, I doubt it will work well for games.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    17. Re:vs iPhone by Facegarden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the iphone doesn't win on features, it wins on status symbolism ($800, really?), flashy advertising, and eye candy.

      disclaimer: i don't even own a cellphone (or a tv, yes sometimes you need to be disconnected) but i notice that this is definitely true with people i see around me all the time, and i can give specific examples if need be. there's a lot of keeping up the joneses involved here.

      Seriously, i hear a *lot* of people mention that the iphone is supposed to be some status symbol, but is that even really true? It certainly sounds good to say, but I have *never* met anyone with an iPhone that I thought had it because of some status thing - people certainly drink the kool-aid and think it's the best thing out there, but that still means they bought it because they thought it was genuinely good, even if they were uninformed.

      Maybe it's because I live in silicon valley, one freeway exit from Apple headquarters itself, and everyone around here owns an iPhone just because it's decent (even if it's not great, it's certainly alright) and people tend to be well off enough to have a smartphone of some kind. And so maybe it's how common it is that makes it not a status symbol here, but I've never seen it treated as such.

      Does it really seem like a status symbol somewhere?
      -Taylor

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    18. Re:vs iPhone by Norsefire · · Score: 1

      Yip, became possible in the most recent update. Guess I should read the release notes more.

    19. Re:vs iPhone by samkass · · Score: 1

      Mainly, I'm happy that the Pre is out to give Apple some much-needed competition and force issues like MMS, video recording, background apps, etc.

      Pre "force issues"? Those are all features that are widely reported to be part of the 3.0 release coming at the annual WWDC. I'm sure Apple is tracking the Pre closely, but the Pre is mostly winning on pre-announcement of features so far. In terms of what you can actually buy today, obviously the iPhone wins since the Pre doesn't actually exist yet. And when it's released, we'll have to compare it against the iPhone that will also be released about the same time.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    20. Re:vs iPhone by zullnero · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, my laptop is a desktop replacement and weighs a ton. It takes up most of a table at a coffee shop. I have a nearly 19 inch monitor on the thing.

      I use my smartphone for everywhere else. My laptop works great for when I go from home to work, but when I'm anywhere else, I'd rather not carry, or buy, a smaller laptop AND a cellphone. I prefer to use a smartphone for that exact purpose.

      The thing is, I agree with you. iPhones are purely for show. I can do a whole lot of the same things on my old Palm Treo that my friends can do with their iPhones. I can even take movies and copy and paste between apps on my phone that is older than theirs. Sure, it's not as pretty, but it works and the things I'd get out of an iPhone just don't make up for the things I'd lose if I switched to an iPhone.

      Which is why, of course, there's no question I'm getting a Pre. All that and it's built on Linux. I can't see how a /.'er could resist that. Even if the keyboard isn't perfect...then again, from the full sized pictures I've seen of the phone, I have to say that it's not such a deal breaker as Boy Genius says it is. Apparently he doesn't use his thumbs from the same position as I use mine when typing on the keyboard, it doesn't look like I'd have the same problem as he has with hitting the bottom half of the front plate.

    21. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the internet. Where any unqualified, uninformed, hypocritical fool can comment on stuff they know nothing about.

      Oh yeah, nice Livejournal page, Mr. Disconnected. By "nice", I mean awful.

    22. Re:vs iPhone by Mr_Silver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the iphone doesn't win on features, it wins on status symbolism ($800, really?), flashy advertising, and eye candy.

      Speaking as someone who has used and evaluated most Smartphones released in the past three years, whilst the iPhone is most definitely not perfect - it does a lot of things right, far more than the three points you quote above.

      In fact, it sounds like you haven't actually used an iPhone to be able to accurately comment about it.

      disclaimer: i don't even own a cellphone

      I rest my case. Why you got a +5 for guessing about something you freely admit you've never used and hence have no authority to comment on is beyond me.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    23. Re:vs iPhone by The+Qube · · Score: 1

      Yeah. It was impossible to write messages in different languages before that without everything being "corrected" to English.

      --

      "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

    24. Re:vs iPhone by Zapotek · · Score: 4, Funny

      disclaimer: i don't even own a cellphone (or a tv, yes sometimes you need to be disconnected)

      Mr Charles Pitts, is that you?

    25. Re:vs iPhone by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Pre uses webkit for HTML. A few months back, webkit added css animation (sort of like CoreAnimation). If the pre supports it, that would help with the games and other little animations.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    26. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A ten pound Nokia? Wow, that must be an antique.

    27. Re:vs iPhone by CaptSaltyJack · · Score: 1

      How you ever got modded insightful is beyond me, because you really have no idea what you're talking about. As an iPhone owner since the day it was released, and as a very tech savvy geek who is not swayed by flashy advertising and "status symbolism," I can tell you the iPhone suits my needs perfectly. For me, the App Store is probably the biggest thing I like about it. There's just an insane amount of software available for it: I can play all kinds of games on it, I can SSH into my home Linux box, as well as SFTP into it and grab files, I can email, surf, text, watch TV shows and movies. It really does everything I need it to.

      Now don't get me wrong, the exclusion of copy and paste for this long is simply inexcusable, and frankly it's absurd. I'm glad this summer they're finally adding that "feature" in with the new firmware update. The iPhone isn't perfect, and there are still a few things I could see being improved, but for the most part, it's the killer phone.

    28. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my understanding, Mojo (the name of the pre framework) will be released to all according to the Google IO keynote. The pre-release access is presumably provided to select partners - on launch, it'll be released to everyone. Even better, I believe there will be cross-platform support for development tools.

      Meaning outlay of costs for developers of iPhone: $99 dev kit + $500 for Mac Mini (unless you've already invested in the OSX ecosystem)
      Outlay of costs for developers of Pre: Seems like its $0 (unless they decide to charge for SDK as well). Still cheaper. And the emulator mentioned in the keynote means that you potentially don't even need a phone to develop & deploy a Pre app to customers.

    29. Re:vs iPhone by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Someone dissing people about status symbols, but can't stop mentioning he doesn't have a tv. And of course, sitting at your computer all day certainly proves you are disconnected??

      Your point about the iPhone, I agree 100%, until I actually went out and used one. They are great machines, worthy of praise. They have a lot of power, and it is very easy to get to that power, unlike phones like N95 which have a lot of power, but hide it under a dodgy menu system. What is the point of being able to do everything, if you make it a pain to try and actually do anything?

      And not many people actually pay $800 for it? Or have you never heard of mobile plans. Most people would have a mobile plan anyway.

    30. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I own an old cameraphone with something like a 0.3MP camera, and I agree with him fully.

      Some people just don't value themslves based on how good or expensive their cell phone is.

      I only use mine to send and receive calls, and it works pretty well.
      I'm holding out for something that isn't an expensive, locked-down piece of shit before I buy a new one.

      It might be a while.

    31. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You know you can change the input language, even on the fly.

    32. Re:vs iPhone by thule · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note that the reviewer is looking at a pre-production version of the phone. Some people have pointed out that the real production versions of the phone have a better keyboard and smoother sliding action. Note that people *are* saying that the keyboard is a lesser keyboard than the Treo's.

    33. Re:vs iPhone by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Application? Any geek worth their salt has properly calibrated fingertips and can count their words per minute them self.

    34. Re:vs iPhone by Miseph · · Score: 0

      Anywhere that's selling it without a 2-year service contract costing almost $100/month.

      In case you weren't aware, cell phones are often sold at an extremely subsidized price.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    35. Re:vs iPhone by alen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At $199/$299 the iphone is the same price as other cell phones with similar features. cheaper than a few and a bit more expensive than others. cell phone, ipod, email are all old features that everyone expects in a phone at that price.

      the killer features are the app store. there is literally an app for everything. if you're lost and need to find a gas station, the iphone will do it. there are even kids games and flash card apps on it to teach your kids to read. and it will work with Exchange Server to get your email as well.

      one device to rule them all. and so far only the Pre comes close to being a competitor.

    36. Re:vs iPhone by Alomex · · Score: 1

      For the $800 comment, do you have any idea what a top of the line blackberry costs without contract? It's about the same.

      Actually it is about $500 or 40% less. In my world, that's a big difference dude.

    37. Re:vs iPhone by Starayo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, fuck you too.

      I couldn't care less about the brand, which I hate, nor the advertising, which I don't watch. The reason I got my iPhone was the intuitive web browsing interface and the fact that it was the only goddamn web-enabled phone that wouldn't cost me $120 a month for something ridiculous like 5mb-50mb of data a month (this one's ~$52 a month for 500MB). Lousy country.

      And looking at the competition, I made the right choice. My dad's got a blackberry storm. How does it go? Looks like a fish, moves like a fish, steers like a cow. It's absolutely terrible.

      I would have liked an android phone but there weren't any available within the country until just recently and even then the plans are worse. I'm not made of money.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    38. Re:vs iPhone by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Okay, I have a Treo 700p, and I've used the 750 and numerous blackberry's. Anyone who liked the Treo or the blackberry isn't going to find this keyboard any worse, except maybe textural feel. The size is about the same, though the blackberry's are a bit wider.

      But not having a real keyboard was a dealbreaker for me and the iPhone.

      I have fat fingers and I can "feel" my way around the Treo keyboard, where my thumb does cover 4-5 buttons if I'm not careful. You can't "feel" your way around an on-the-screen keyboard.

    39. Re:vs iPhone by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the tethering. :-) Where wifi just isn't available. Lol.

    40. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >inovations

      Well, at least he hasn't missed out on one of the greatest innovations of the last century: The spell checker.

      You should look into it. Why, I've heard a rumor that some Web browsers even have such functionality built in now! Amazing.

    41. Re:vs iPhone by pizzach · · Score: 1

      You could read the release notes. Or you could try reading slashdot. ;-) Or probably almost any technical magazine for that matter.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    42. Re:vs iPhone by nuOpus · · Score: 1

      What? It isn't about how expensive the phone is. I love to have everything at my fingertips. I love the efficiency at which I get to my information. I bet your are using a broadband connection aren't you? Most people who started with modems thought that 56k was fast enough until you go broadband. Once that move happens, 56k is no longer good enough, it is downright painful.

      People who live in rural country areas who get around with bikes and walking may think cars are useless status symbols. I bet you own a car don't you? So .. you just purchased your vehicle as a status symbol?

    43. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading the review and watching this video I'm disliking my iPhone even more. Mulitasking alone sets it above the iPhone

      From that vid, it appears as though the Pre is an Android wannabe. There's nothing in that video that Android can't do, and several things that the T-1 does better (camera autofocus, and larger keyboard; possibly a a built-in GPS and compass as well... umm.. a camera without autofocus, in 2009?!?!?! What was Palm thinking?!?!)

    44. Re:vs iPhone by BikeHelmet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The iPhone is a very solid and well supported product.

      But it's by no means perfect, and it got a lot of stuff wrong. (As already pointed out, the app limit is annoying)

      And saying the iPhone is better than ____ isn't that impressive. Vista is better than Windows ME, but let me tell you, that comparison means nothing at all. :P The iPhone can still be bad at a specific thing while beating almost every other phone, because the other phones are absolutely atrocious at it.

      Hey, ever use a Nokia N95? That sure was fun. ;)

    45. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's not a status symbol in the sense of "oh look I'm rich enough to have an iPhone". More like it's "cool" to have an iPhone; makes you part of the in-crowd. This is even more true for the pre-Touch iPods, which aren't really all that different from other MP3 players -- although Apple's iTunes Music Store with DRM was a pretty smart marketing move.

      Is the iPhone a good phone? Yeah, it has a decent number of things going for it; plenty of flaws too but no worse than any other phone. Worth switching to AT&T for it? Debatable.

    46. Re:vs iPhone by Thomasje · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was impossible to write messages in different languages before that without everything being "corrected" to English.

      Go to Settings -> General -> Keyboard -> International Keyboards, and select all the languages that you use regularly. When you have more than one language selected, the pop-up keyboards will have a little "globe" icon to the left of the space bar, that lets you switch languages as you type. I use this to switch between English and Dutch and I find it's pretty convenient.
      (I use a 2nd generation iPod touch, but I'd expect the 1st gen, and the iPhones, to have the keyboard settings in the same place.)

    47. Re:vs iPhone by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure for some apps, having to re-open it is a real pain. But most of the apps I use most of the time are very fast. I'm glad Apple have gone the "no multitasking" route, as it has forced developers to make their applications load quickly. Yeah, for some apps, either due to poor developers or the nature of the app, no multitasking is a serious problem. But I hear there is a solution in the works, and I hope the solution is done in such a way that most apps will still load fast and only the apps that really need multitasking get it. I suspect this is how Apple will implement it.

      As for apps crashing, Safari did this once, but that's all for me. And given it is based on OS X, I see no reason why the underlying OS is at fault here, rather than the app itself. And as other people have pointed out, you can turn off auto-correction, and I suspect this is one area that will be improved in iPhone OS 3.0.

    48. Re:vs iPhone by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The lack of multitasking is what nearly killed Palm and gave way to Windows Mobile in first place. And it is the reason why so many people stay with Windows Mobile and shun iPhone - which pretty much works the same way as PalmOS used to work, just with more glitter and glamour (so much for apple innovation).

      The keyboard on that particular Palm device seems to be the same as the Treo keyboard.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    49. Re:vs iPhone by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      if you're lost and need to find a gas station, the iphone will do it.

      uhm, yes, this feature is called "points of interest" and is available on every navigation software for a decade already. navigation software was available for palm and windows mobile since 2002 at the very least.

      same goes for all other "killer apps" you mentioned.

      just how iphone is special now?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    50. Re:vs iPhone by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      At $199/$299 the iphone is the same price as other cell phones with similar features. cheaper than a few and a bit more expensive than others.

      Can you show me where can I buy those for that price, I would buy 5 of them.

      How does the subscription plan count in?

      Yeah, thought so.

      It is fucking pathetic how people can say with a straight face that the $phone costs $199/$299 and at the same time *completely* disregarding the fact about huge monthly payment which binds you for two fucking years.

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    51. Re:vs iPhone by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I used an HP Jornada 680 for a while. I was sitting at my desk at the campus when some guy passed me and indirectly muttered something to me about it being a such status symbol (in the negative way). My mind did a backflip. All along I thought I was just a geek with an interest in electronic gadgets. But in reality, I must have subconsciously bought this obscure device (how can it be a status symbol if nobody knows what it is?) to tell everyone how much better I am than they are.

      Of course, after a several months I dumped the PoS for a Palm Vx. The keyboard was great, but WinCE was horrible, the screen was bad in sunlight, and I learnt that a PDA is easily neglected, and therefore useless, if it doesn't comfortably fit in a pocket.

    52. Re:vs iPhone by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Over here in London I'd say that a top-of-the-line Blackberry is more of a status symbol than the iPhone.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    53. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who automatically translates sentences like "the iphone sdk is the best sdk i have ever worked with" into "the iphone sdk is the only sdk i have ever worked with"?

      > "By the way, check out my first app - for the cricket lovers around the world: Virtual Cricket for iPhone"

      Does it run on the palm pre or on Android?

    54. Re:vs iPhone by indiechild · · Score: 1

      There's always some people who think they're superior and claim people who buy Apple gadgets are rich, air-headed idiots who only want to look good. And then they call Apple users elitist snobs!

      I've never personally come across anyone who's bought a Mac or iPod/iPhone because of the supposed "cool" factor.

      People like waspleg seem to be unable to accept that the iPhone does have its upsides and its advantages over other devices. I'm perfectly happy to accept that the iPhone doesn't suit everyone and other phones will suit some users much better than the iPhone would.

    55. Re:vs iPhone by dwater · · Score: 1

      >> MMS, video recording, background apps,
      > Pre "force issues"? Those are all features that are widely reported to be part of the 3.0 release coming at the annual WWDC ...and they're standard features on almost all current phones, most notably Series40 and S60 which is the most ubiquitous phone OS at the moment.

      I can't see Apple ever admitting they're wrong about anything, but they very often do an about turn if the feel it necessary. I still feel like they think they know better than me, so I won't touch them with a barge pole. I have several pieces of Apple gear (started with a TiBook back in 2002, iirc), and I've never been able to feel like it's stuff *I* own; rather I'm just borrowing it from Apple - a licence for me to give them (more) money.

      --
      Max.
    56. Re:vs iPhone by dwater · · Score: 1

      Many Nokias are free with contract - even some of the best ones. Yes, they can send MMSes and record video, and have decent cameras - and with some you can (legally) download all the music you want for no extra charge, eg the hugely popular 5800 :

      "The Orange version also changes the price strategy and will be available for free as long as it's attached to a two-year Comes With Music cellular plan; these range from roughly 25 pounds ($37) per month"

      http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/05/13/nokia.5800.cwm.in.uk/

      --
      Max.
    57. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason I got my iPhone was the intuitive web browsing interface and the fact that it was the only goddamn web-enabled phone that wouldn't cost me $120 a month for something ridiculous like 5mb-50mb of data a month (this one's ~$52 a month for 500MB). Lousy country.

      ...

      I would have liked an android phone but there weren't any available within the country until just recently and even then the plans are worse. I'm not made of money.

      Mind telling us how you got such a low monthly rate at AT&T? I'm not made of money either and I would get an iPhone too if it only costs that much per month.

    58. Re:vs iPhone by Bught_42 · · Score: 1

      I believe he was taking the pound as a unit of weight, not cost.

      Also quite a lot of phones are free or cheap when signing your digital soul away for 2 years.

    59. Re:vs iPhone by Starayo · · Score: 1

      I'm in Australia. It's with Optus.

      If I had paid the ~$220 iPhone cost up front it'd only be about $39 a month, too.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    60. Re:vs iPhone by dwater · · Score: 1

      > I believe he was taking the pound as a unit of weight, not cost.

      Oh. People still use that measure? Wow. :p

      > Also quite a lot of phones are free or cheap when signing your digital soul away for 2 years.

      Yes, I think I mentioned that - it's the most usual way of obtaining a phone in the US, iinm, and pretty common in the UK too.

      I wonder if one these 'free with contract' phone is produced by Apple, or if the Palm Pre is free with contract?

      --
      Max.
    61. Re:vs iPhone by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Careful. I'm not sure exactly how, but I'm pretty sure you can get in trouble for walking in a different direction than the herd like that.

      My feelings on this: I have a Palm TX. I've had it since they were released, early 2006. it works perfectly, original battery last for 6+ hours of constant use. If Palm had released a version with a built in Cellular phone, iPhone's would have made no where near such a splash.
      Even today, a Palm TX with an integrated phone would have a better feature set that 99% of the currently existing smartphones.
      I wonder, can you use a bluetooth keyboard with a iPhone?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    62. Re:vs iPhone by darthflo · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Looking forward to all the hate I'll be getting for this, but:

      I own a Sony Ericsson Xperia. It does almost everything you'd get in an iPhone (calling, messaging, browsing the web, Google Maps, listening to music, watching movies, ...), a Pre (multitasking, slide-out keyboard, facebook integration), a "classic" Palm (all the PIM you'll ever need, bluetooth keyboards) or a G1 (running lots of apps from unsigned sources, if you tell it to) and more.

      It runs Windows mobile.

      Devices similar to it have been around quite a bit longer than first-generation iPhones. Just like most any palm, they've never been cool, though. So even if Palm would've gotten out a TX cell, it's extremely unprobable that this would've changed anything. They might've gotten a few percentage points out of RIM's market share. Maybe some of Microsoft's. But an Apple product's hype isn't based on features, or the price, or the design. It's marketing coupled with hordes of rabid fanboys.

    63. Re:vs iPhone by yodleboy · · Score: 1

      "Autocorrection can be disabled, you know. "

      some bright lad throws this out every time someone complains about the ass backwards predictive text on the iPhone. On every other phone I've ever owned (moto, nokia, palm, samsung, htc and a couple others) when you type, the suggested words are OPTIONS. In other words, it makes a SUGGESTION but if i don't explicitly pick one of the presented options, my text is entered AS I TYPED IT.

      Contrast that with my iPhone. You're typing along and it comes up with a suggestion. If i continue typing, the phone REPLACES WHAT I TYPED as if it knows better. I have to stop typing and tap the little X next to the suggestion to cancel it. Just seems very intrusive from a company know for a slick UI.

      yeah you can turn off the autocorrect, big whoop. I get a choice between a know it all phone and disabling useful functionality. Hey, Apple, thinking different just to be different isn't always smart.

      This is one of my biggest peeves with my iPhone.

    64. Re:vs iPhone by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Devices similar to it have been around quite a bit longer than first-generation iPhones. Just like most any palm, they've never been cool, though. So even if Palm would've gotten out a TX cell, it's extremely unprobable that this would've changed anything. They might've gotten a few percentage points out of RIM's market share. Maybe some of Microsoft's. But an Apple product's hype isn't based on features, or the price, or the design. It's marketing coupled with hordes of rabid fanboys.

      Much applause. Very well said.

    65. Re:vs iPhone by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      I've never personally come across anyone who's bought a Mac or iPod/iPhone because of the supposed "cool" factor.

      I certainly wouldn't expect people who buy stuff for the cool factor would either admit it or even are aware of it. But I bet if you spent some time talking to them about why they bought an iPhone, or any hot gadget for that matter, you could discern whether they bought the device for primarily practical reasons. I'd even go so far as to say in my unqualifed opinion, the most of the people who stood in-line for hours after the iPhone release where motivated by the cool factor.

      And I am not an iPhone hater. I think it is great technology and if they were weren't ATT exclusive and if Apple wasn't so draconian in locking the damn thing down, I might get one for myself. I find that fact that I have to jailbreak and violate the ToS appalling. Hell, I even tried to talk my sister into one because she would benefit from the ease of use and applications.

    66. Re:vs iPhone by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why not? Steve Jobs did.

    67. Re:vs iPhone by gander666 · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you mentioned Palm Treo. I had one. That phone sucked so bad, Satan would have returned it.

      What sucked? Well, about 10% of calls would pick up OK, but the other party wouldn't get any audio from you.
      About 20% of the time, about a minute into the call, it would just drop (could have been AT&T as the carrier, but my current iPhone is TONS more reliable)
      Typically once a day, I had to soft reset it (press the reset button).
      But the worst was that at least once a week, I had to yank the battery from it to get the damn thing to come back to life.

      I used to be a huge Palm fan, and loved my last palm PDA (the Tungsten), but the Treo is a festering pile of dung. Based on that I will not even glance at a Pre. The Palm brand has been sullied...

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    68. Re:vs iPhone by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Go by a college out of the Valley. here the local college is like Mac fricking heaven. And they ALL have the iPhone. You ask them what is great about a Mac or iPhone and all you get is the same marketspeak that was on the slides at the keynote. You ask them any real questions, like about the Mac UI or what makes it or the iPhone better than product x, and they just get this glazed over look and eventually you will hear "But it's an Apple! They are just better!"

      So yeah, maybe where you are at the are buying the iPhone for features or the Mac for UI. But where I am at I'm surrounded by college kids that are strictly trying to be hipper than thou. I also find it funny how the ones with the Macbook Air and the ones with the Macbook pro always seem snippy to each other. Having two separate expensive models just fucked up their whole day...he he he.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    69. Re:vs iPhone by MaxVT · · Score: 1

      I still have a foldable keyboard for my Palm IIIc. The Blackberries' keys are reset-button-sized compared to that.

      http://www.pdacortex.com/palm_portable_keyboard_review.htm

    70. Re:vs iPhone by qopax · · Score: 1

      From a quick google, the blackberry bold is available for $659 at best buy, while the iphone 3g 8gb and 16gb are available at AT&T stores for $599/$699.

      --
      I pwn this comment. "The Fine Print" says so.
    71. Re:vs iPhone by qopax · · Score: 1

      (Happily using my iphone's 3g connection on my laptop... but no, of course it sucks cause it's an apple =).

      --
      I pwn this comment. "The Fine Print" says so.
    72. Re:vs iPhone by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Are you tapping to explicitly ignore the suggestions? The iPhone should be learning words where you ignore suggestions, so it should be less of a problem the more you type.

    73. Re:vs iPhone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I can see your disconnect --- there's nowhere I know of in the US or Europe where the iPhone costs $800.

      iPhone 3G 16Gb costs ~$800 in Russia.

    74. Re:vs iPhone by pHus10n · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have known this had I not been stationed overseas, but in the United Kingdom I got an iPhone 3G contract for approx $47 a month. It included: 600 talk minutes 500 texts Unlimited data / internet The contract is for 18 months. While that supports Waspleg's point that it costs $800 (my figures show approx $846), it doesn't support your $100 a month. For me, $47 a month is quite reasonable for what is included. If I bought this hypothetical $800 iPhone without a contract, I would get none of the talk/text/internet time. So where's the subsidization again?

    75. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blackberry's menu system is just bad. My sprint 8330 had like 30 icons in the menu by dafault and who knows what they all are. But I added a today plus theme, the iphone one to be exact. It is so much better I have access to messages, browser, myspace, calender, slacker, viigo all on the home page. The only icons I have unhidden in the full menu are calculator, alarm, address book, options and bluetooth. Its like a whole different phone I can give it to people and most can actually figure it out

    76. Re:vs iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox suppposedly does, but it doesn't work for me. The documentation is shit, everything just says it's ther by default.

    77. Re:vs iPhone by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Free with contract? As in, not really free at all?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    78. Re:vs iPhone by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      i don't even own a cellphone

      Why you got a +5 for guessing about something you freely admit you've never used and hence have no authority to comment on is beyond me.

      I've never owned an aircraft carrier or even a battleship, but I know a fair bit about naval warfare.

      I guess quite a lot of experts on European history in the late 18th/early 19th century weren't Napoleon.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    79. Re:vs iPhone by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      but the Pre is mostly winning on pre-announcement of features so far

      Bad Palm.

      Pre "force issues"? Those are all features that are widely reported to be part of the 3.0 release coming at the annual WWDC.

      Good Apple.

      Can you smell your bias?

    80. Re:vs iPhone by dwater · · Score: 1

      Correct, just like pretty much anything else.

      --
      Max.
    81. Re:vs iPhone by paganizer · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? really? Apparently you are dead-on about the fanboys.
      OK. if you are talking about the Sony Ericsson Xperia X1, it came out in Oct. 2008; Palm TX was early 2006.
      The screen is bigger. well, it's over 2 years newer. Score +1 Xperia after it was released, but before that, score +infinity palm.
      it's got more RAM. But it runs windows, so how much of that can you actually use? score: indefinite
      It doesn't have a infrared port. this is not really a big deal. Score +0.1 palm
      It DOES have a decent camera; this IS a big deal. Score +1 Xperia
      it's got a faster processor. But once again, it's running windows. score +0.1 Xperia
      I don't really see much about the browser, but the Palm has Blazer and Opera. score +1 Xperia
      the Xperia has a FM radio. Ok. score +0.1 Xperia
      Since I was postulating a Palm TX with a phone, we can't really compare on that.
      I think there is a major strategic advantage with the palm running Palm OS as opposed to Windows Mobile, if for no other reason than for the tens of thousands of free Palm apps that are out there. But I'm biased, so I won't award points either way.
      oops, one more thing: Price. Xperia=lowest listed price $539 Palm (without phone, $299; with some cheap phone guts, add $50? that sound fair?) $350. Score +1 Palm.
      The results: Xperia pre 2008: 0 points. Palm TX Pre 2008: all the points. After Xperia release: 2.2 points Palm TX: 1.1 points.
      So, I will concede to you that the Xperia is better than my hypothetical Palm TX with Cellphone guts would be, here and now.
      Something I do take exception with: that Palms were never cool. Palms were cool as HELL as soon as the first one with a color screen that could run emulators was released; Palm just really sucked at advertising.
      And, in case you just aren't aware of what a Palm TX can do, here is what mine is set up for: VoiP using a bluetooth headset. Watching TV via Wifi using MobiTV. e-books, everything except .lit format. e-mail. SMS. Scummvm emu, emulation of any game console up to the PS2. Google Maps. AIM. ICQ. full ms-office compatibility. Java applets. Full media player, any format audio or video. the browsers (blazer & opera) suck, but they do work. iTunes integration. Comix reader. Quake, doom, freeciv, tons of other "mainstream" games. on mine, a full iPhone emulation shell that lets me make phone calls through my (hidden) cheap blutooth phone, mainly to freak people out.
      I got a Motorola Q in early 2007, and kept it up until mid 2008, so I'm pretty familiar with Windows Mobile; it doesn't suck. But if the Palm TX had released a version with an integrated phone in late 2005, I never would have bothered. Instead they came out with the Palm Treo, which as the success of the iPhone shows us, was overall a bad idea.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    82. Re:vs iPhone by paganizer · · Score: 1

      I had a contract in late 2006 that involved doing a presentation on suggested purchases for a [ahem] undisclosed branch of the u.s. government.
      Part of it involved providing a truly mobile office using the Palm TX; a video was made of a guy walking into a airplane bathroom with a small case, whipping out a TX (in a titanium case), a bluetooth keyboard, bluetooth headset, his cellphone (for the uplink via bluetooth), a 10" pentax pocketjet bluetooth printer, for some unknown reason a WiFi camera, and a couple of other weird Palm gadgets.
      The video was very popular, and I think Some Other Agency might have used it, but as for the original contract, it was a no-go. because the Palm TX did not have an easily changeable battery; which is something you would have really needed after about 1 hour with all that juice being sucked out via Bluetooth and WiFi. So palm lost out on a multimillion dollar contract. And I stayed retired.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    83. Re:vs iPhone by darthflo · · Score: 1

      Predictable as a swiss clockwork, that's how I likes me my fanboys.

      Anyhow, back to the topic at hand:

      The Xperia is newer than the TX, but there have been a few others similar to it before. Think HTC TyTn (II); the 8000 series Blackberries. Most of them lacked something or another, but they will at least predate the iPhone.

      The hardware is, in my opinion, great. I got mine a few days after release and, spending my time in the local army ever since, gave it constant abuse from day one. It hasn't complained.

      Performance-wise, it's the most responsive Windows Mobile device I've had the pleasure of using. Just that, no more but no less either. The display is sharper than any display I've seen before. 800 Pixels width packed in less than 7 cm, what's there to say?

      Software selection is great. After a few hours of messing around, it runs HTC's TouchFlo 3D (latest version) plus it's original Panel interface. The Browser (Opera Mobile, not Mini as I'm guessing you're running) is great. There's lots of apps available, many of them free and a lot of the others are worth their price.
       
       

      Something I do take exception with: that Palms were never cool.

      They weren't. The features you listed are cool to the crowd who reads slashdot, writes programs, manages networks and plays around with arduinos in their spare time. That's an entire demographic built right around not being cool.

      The cool I'm talking about is the one made up from opinions by people who mistake the intertubes for a big truck and are responsible for Yahoo being #2 and Slashdot being #2006 on Alexa; the kind of people who will install the Alexa toolbar. That kind of "cool"; the general public's; just doesn't involve "geeky".

    84. Re:vs iPhone by zizzo · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that the applications (initially anyway) are all CSS, HTML, and Javascript. The Pre isn't multi-tasking several apps, but running webkit in multiple threads. Stability shouldn't be a problem.

      You've clearly never done any multithreaded programming.

    85. Re:vs iPhone by fishthegeek · · Score: 1

      Clearly.

      --
      load "$",8,1
    86. Re:vs iPhone by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Maybe if I move to the UK, I'd consider an iPhone. Here in the US... the service costs closer to $100/month than $50/month.

      Interestingly, Boost Mobile (a prepaid division of Sprint Nextel operating mainly on the Nextel iDEN network) has recently started offering a $50/month unlimited everything plan here in the US. This is a shockingly low price point, especially given that pay as you go typically offers far inferior service:dollar. The point is, that if they can actually profit on $50/month for unlimited service, then even charging $75/month for such service makes for a substantial profit margin... more than enough to subsidize the cost of a phone.

      As for not getting the talk/text/internet service only paying $800, the idea is that in a non-monopolistic market you could purchase that service separately at a substantially lower rate (since there would be no need to charge for cell phone subsidies). Alas, this is not a perfect world, and as such you pretty much get hosed.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  2. summary... by sveard · · Score: 2, Informative

    The hardware is bad. The keyboard doubly so.

    1. Re:summary... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I didn't understand the review. They figure everyone is going to love the Pre but the device feels badly put together and cheap, the keyboard is crap, the screen (the best feature) is "almost as good" as an iPhone, the zoom (a pretty critical feature in a small screen browser) doesn't work well and there are no apps. The only positive thing they really had to say seemed to be that it's small. But then, that means the screen is small too.

    2. Re:summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agree. tried it out and it feels like crap.
      i have a samsung i8910 which completely blows away apple and everyone else. not impressed.

    3. Re:summary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the world of cell phones there's _always_ something about the device that doesn't measure up to expectations. It probably the reason why no cell phone has ever managed to achieve perfect review scores across the board. However one thing can be certain, a solid software platform gives this thing at least some promise, as the hardware can be improved fairly easily as opposed to taking an entirely new software direction after the fact.

    4. Re:summary... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget overpriced..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    5. Re:summary... by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      No, what they did was get their hands on a PRE-PRODUCTION model, and then start complaining about it as if it were the final product version, which by all accounts feels much improved. So in other words, they're full of shit, but wanted to be the first ones with a story out.

  3. Keyboards? by ViennaLen · · Score: 1
    Its keyboard may be lousy, but at least there's a physical keyboard.

    On another note, the Palm Pre has been very hyped up, especially by Engadget. It will be interesting to see how it'll hold up.

    1. Re:Keyboards? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What do you mean "at least there's a physical keyboard"? Are you talking about the iPhone? Because that's pretty much the only phone with a non-physical keyboard. Yeah the iPhone sucks but most people use better phones like Nokia N63 (and friends) or Blackberry.

    2. Re:Keyboards? by Andy+Somnifac · · Score: 1

      The Samsung Instinct has no hardware keyboard either. The on screen keyboard is horrible. Cramped, slow, I have to use the stylus that is included to type with any sort of reasonable accuracy. Personally, I've been looking forward to the Pre as a replacement for my Instinct. The Instinct STILL feels unfinished and clunky.

  4. Prepare to be blinded by Nazlfrag · · Score: 4, Funny

    Palm Pre on Sprint

    It's just... it's unspeakably horrific.

    1. Re:Prepare to be blinded by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about blinded, but damn that's super busy. Actually it's a pretty useless website that doesn't do anything but mumble some useless facts. They really should be shot for that.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    2. Re:Prepare to be blinded by markdavis · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Actually it's a pretty useless website that doesn't do anything but mumble some useless facts.

      Um, welcome to Marketing 101.
      And, apparently, the number one use for Flash on websites. It seems that [generally] the more Flash a site or page has, the more useless the content is likely to be to the user.

      For *useful* information about the Palm Pre, I suggest going to http://www.precentral.net/ They are a little hyper to post just about everything known to man about the Pre, but there is no lack of useful information (and very little Flash :) )

    3. Re:Prepare to be blinded by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Just run it using Adobe Flash 10 - it will just crash after 30 seconds or so. Not too bad.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Prepare to be blinded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Looks like the information overload is deliberate. Probably a bad message since the trend nowadays is towards making your life simpler, but it's not just a matter of amateur hour design.

    5. Re:Prepare to be blinded by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Looks like they are thinking along similar lines to the google wave thing. Its push rather than pull. Kind of like the control panel interfaces favoured by managers at my work place.

    6. Re:Prepare to be blinded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, it made KDE freeze.
      "pkill konqueror"

    7. Re:Prepare to be blinded by hwyhobo · · Score: 1

      I am not enamored with that website, but the whole point of it is multitasking. That's how they're trying to sell the Pre and distinguish it from competition. I doubt anyone actually expects you to follow any of the little widgets, just to be impressed by their sheer number.

      --
      End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
    8. Re:Prepare to be blinded by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      God the Flash of light! It burns like the sun of the desert full of Adobe houses!

  5. The keyboard by mikesd81 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On the downside, this review says the keyboard is lousy.

    Yup. I got that from the first time they mentioned it in the summary. But anyway. So I clicked on the link actually. And the review isn't really worth anything since they couldn't actually use the phone as, well, a phone. Looking at the picture of the keyboard, I have to agree that it would probably suck to use. And in my opinion that's a deal breaker. the buttons are really close together, but that's expected for such a narrow a phone. It probably should have had the keyboard come out to the side and use the phone in a landscape position. It's also quite apparent this guy is biased towards the Blackberry.

    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    1. Re:The keyboard by markdavis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suspect the keyboard is going to be extremely similar to the Treo line (it certainly looks like it).

      My long experience with Treo's is- yes, the keys are close together, but the keyboard really does work OK for thumb-entry. The Pre's version is nearly identical, just sunken (which might be a problem for some people). That said, I agree with you that it probably would have been better had it slid out the long side (landscape).

      There are plenty of reviews of the Pre. The one sited by Slashdot is probably one of the least useful.

    2. Re:The keyboard by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Pitty they don't actually compare it to another Palm keyboard. I know what the Treo 600 is like. If I hadn't decided to go with the iPhone, I'd be looking at the Pre and comparing it to the 600.

    3. Re:The keyboard by hal9000(jr) · · Score: 1

      I like my Treo 700P, but I hate the keyboard. The rounded buttons are hard to hit authoritatively. I find I have to use the edge of my thumb. I much prefer flatter or even cupped keys like the Blackbarry (earlier ones).

  6. Pre pre by slapout · · Score: 4, Funny

    So this is a Pre-Palm Pre review.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Pre pre by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Probably very pre for me. I have never owned a smart phone but this one has me interested because I have been a palm owner for a long time. Unfortunately the European version with GSM looks like being delayed several months, then it will be the end of this year when it turns up in Australia.

      By that time I will probably have bought a cheap Samsung android phone.

    2. Re:Pre pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its a Palm Pre preview. Say that 10 times at speed!

    3. Re:Pre pre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this is a Pre-Palm Pre review.

      Actually, this is a Pre-Palm Pre review preview.

  7. Not useful review by fermion · · Score: 1
    First, why no phone test. Did they not have a SIM card? Do they not have a mobile account?

    Second, the snipe a Palm at the end was not professional. Palm has produced serious hardware, the Palm V for instance. But to produce serious hardware someone needs to pay serious prices. One issue is that Palm is not longer a leader in innovation, and no longer goes after the market that will pay those prices. So, it is now down to commodity hardware, a tought fight to win.

    Third, who knows what the application store is going to do. Android already has many Apps. iPhone has many apps. Pre will have many apps. The problem is we know have three different platforms, so we in a compatibility hell hole where manufacturers are tying us into platforms. If the phone is the next major platform, we are in trouble.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Not useful review by NeuroKoan · · Score: 1

      Being CDMA only (for the time being) there are no SIM cards to swap. To activate the phone on Sprint's network (or any other CDMA network for that matter) they would have to take it into a store. That's probably why there wasn't a phone test yet.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    2. Re:Not useful review by markdavis · · Score: 1

      >To activate the phone on Sprint's network (or any other CDMA network for that matter) they would have to take it into a store.

      I don't believe that is correct at all. Sprint can and will activate their phones via the phone. You don't have to take it into a store.... they just need to know the ESN you read to them and then they give you a code. Done.

      Granted, I much prefer the GSM/SIM type concept, but Sprint and Verizon don't do that. In any case, it is probably a good betn there will be a GSM version of the Pre at some point.

  8. Actually it does win on features by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    the iphone doesn't win on features

    It wins on features hands down - the features people actually use.

    Just the other day I was asking to see someone's Storm, and asked where the browser was- they didn't even know! And after using it for a few minutes I could see why, there was hardly any point.

    The iPhone makes things usable that a lot of people would otherwise never use - and the same goes for apps, I think Apple probably has surpassed the old Palm V installed and use app count at this point.

    You can decry the iPhone as a creature of marketing all you like, but you're only deluding yourself and will never understand the real reason why anything succeeds or fails.

    That said the Pre looks like an excellent phone and I think will do very well. This is because they understand the iPhone is about building a great phone and not about marketing, and the Pre looks to go into the same space with a different take on it that I think can carry a large bit of the market.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Actually it does win on features by hey! · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can decry the iPhone as a creature of marketing all you like, but you're only deluding yourself and will never understand the real reason why anything succeeds or fails.

      The subtext usually is: people who disagree with me are stupid, in this case because they're marketing led sheep.

      People can be stupid about certain things. In my experience people are very bad at expressing what it is that they want. But they are very good at recognizing once it's in their hands. It's quite possible that Apple nefariously incites technological lust in potential buyers, but if somebody loves their iPhone (as many users I know do), it's probably because Apple did something right in its design. It might not be one of the kinds of things you can put on a bullet list of features, but only a fool would tell somebody who really liked a device they were using that they were a fool to do so, because there are other devices whose specs appear better. A thousand features are worthless if they are not well implemented individually, or convenient to use collectively.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Actually it does win on features by Alomex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It wins on features hands down - the features people actually use.

      Features like accessing your email, keeping a usable calendar of appointments or a decent battery life? I think not.

      The iPhone appeals to light status-concious users. It is all the rage in America, where the Apple brand has cult status among the fanbois, but is just another option in the lineup of smartphones everywhere else (Europe, Asia).

      Just the other day, I watched someone spend four minutes trying to finger browse to a web site in a manner that would have taken seconds with access to a decent keyboard and a trackball (read blackberry bold).

      Don't get me wrong. The iPhone is a decent option, but claiming it wins in options hand down is straight out fanboism.

    3. Re:Actually it does win on features by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Features like accessing your email

      Yes, because it's so easy to transfer in existing email accounts more people do so.

      There may be other mobile devices with better email support (Blackberry) but that does not mean they are more generally useful.

      keeping a usable calendar

      Yes, again better than most other platforms because integration with your computer calendar is good and mostly automatic when you first start using it...

      decent battery life

      Around as good as other smartphones.

      I think not.

      No, you didn't - the common Apple Hater condition. You didn't think beyond that narrow set of categories (those alone would obviously make Blackberry into an overall winner) into the many other ways the device is used.

      I say that larger feature lists do not mean more usability, so you come back with a narrow cherry-picked feature list and ignore all others. Again, it's the totality of the features that are used, not just one or two features, that make it the most useful device.

      Just the other day, I watched someone spend four minutes trying to finger browse to a web site in a manner that would have taken seconds with access to a decent keyboard and a trackball (read blackberry bold).

      What's amusing is that I read that other part and knew you were a blackberry person just from the tailored list you had picked. Again, it's the totality...

      And from personal use of the Storm I can say with absolute certainly that what you are saying about web browsing being any way better on the Bold is an absolute lie and you will go to the deepest level of whatever the equivalent of Hell is in your belief system if you manage to convince one poor soul to buy a Blackberry for browsing over an iPhone because of your words.

      Yes I disliked browsing on the Storm that much.

      What on earth were they trying to do with a browser that would take more than four SECONDS, much less four minutes? Between quick zooming and panning and input there's no way a trackball is faster at anything than using the Touch controls.

      Don't get me wrong. The iPhone is a decent option, but claiming it wins in options hand down is straight out fanboism.

      So is being selective about the feature set you are comparing.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. No GSM, no SIM by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    First, why no phone test. Did they not have a SIM card?

    They may have but the phone is not a GSM phone. You cannot use a SIM with it.

    Second, the snipe a Palm at the end was not professional. Palm has produced serious hardware, the Palm V for instance. But to produce serious hardware someone needs to pay serious prices. One issue is that Palm is not longer a leader in innovation, and no longer goes after the market that will pay those prices. So, it is now down to commodity hardware, a tought fight to win.

    I loved my Palm hardware of the past. But, I don't think going after the commodity market has to mean stuff that does have good ergonomics, just look at the Palm V... I guess keyboards are more complex to get right for cheap though. I reserve judgement until I do it myself.

    I think they've done a lot of things right though and they may even surpass Android use, though that will be tough with a lot on Android phones on the way.

    Third, who knows what the application store is going to do. Android already has many Apps. iPhone has many apps. Pre will have many apps. The problem is we know have three different platforms, so we in a compatibility hell hole where manufacturers are tying us into platforms.

    I don't mind this though because the platforms are actually pretty different. The Pre will have mostly web apps with extensions - that is to say, be heavily based around web technologies but make some use of the pre specific API's.

    Android will have a lot of apps that are tailored to a wide range of devices, and probably take good advantage of the freedom the platform offers.

    iPhone apps will leverage heavily the libraries to deliver a more touch oriented experience.

    I think there's room in the world for more than one platform, and I don't think it's all that bad you may have to write an app three different ways. I value taking full advantage of the device at hand over portability of a small application.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Bad keyboard? by eyecorporations · · Score: 1

    After using a Samsung SCH-u740 (they call it the Alias now I believe) for the past 2 years I'm sure I'll have no problems with the Pre keyboard, it actually looks quite roomy.

  11. Native... by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My understanding is that the applications (initially anyway) are all CSS, HTML, and Javascript.

    Most of them, but not all.
    Several developers have had special VIP access to build native applications.
    That includes Classic a compatibility layer to run old PalmOS 5 applications on Palm Pre.
    What isn't know if only a select few developers will be authorised to produce native apps, or if opensource developers will get to write native applications when needed (this will be interesting for a couple of resource intensive applications such as media players and emulators).

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  12. Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by carbona · · Score: 1

    A 6-month exclusivity on Sprint means many people won't purchase one right away. That's a shame since I think it fits the definition of a "smart phone" much closer than anything else out there right now, including the iPhone, which I happen to own. I don't have a problem with subsidized hardware in exchange for extending your contract, but why limit it to a single CDMA carrier?

    Palm needs to get the pre adopted in large numbers and at a quick pace, otherwise it might be left behind as a promising also-ran to the myriad of Apple, RIM, and Android phones that will be out by the time the pre makes it to other major carriers in the US and abroad.

    1. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by markdavis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > A 6-month exclusivity on Sprint means many people won't purchase one right away.
      > why limit it to a single CDMA carrier?

      Um... think about what you just said for a few minutes. The iPhone is *STILL* exclusive to AT&T. Didn't seem to kill the iPhone. The G1/Android is effectively exclusive to T-Mobile. There are lots of phones that are introduced to a single carrier for a while after launch. I am not saying I like this behavior- I think phones should be completely decoupled from carriers, completely (and without subsidies and contracts). But this is certainly nothing new or unusual. Sprint has always been Palm's greatest champion, so it is only logical they would work out a deal for exclusivity for a while (most people think it will be less than a year).

      Sprint needs Palm just as much as Palm needs Sprint- they are both "gambling" on each other. Hopefully they will both do well for taking the chance.

    2. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is *STILL* exclusive to AT&T. Didn't seem to kill the iPhone. The G1/Android is effectively exclusive to T-Mobile.

      I don't think it was the decision of being exclusive to a single carrier that troubled the GP about the Pre. I believe it was the carrier they decided to be exclusive with.

      Sprint is the Chrysler of wireless...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    3. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by markdavis · · Score: 1

      In most ways, Sprint is no worse than any other wireless carrier. They have a fast and reliable network with excellent coverage, great roaming agreements, and reasonable rates. But pretty bad customer service. But, then, I hear complaints about customer service from people using EVERY cell provider.

    4. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by webreaper · · Score: 1

      The G1/Android is effectively exclusive to T-Mobile

      Erm, no. The HTC Magic's been out on Voda for a while now (had mine for a couple of weeks). And there's other devices coming on other carriers, such as the Samsung i7500 which will probably be launched on O2. Remember, Android devices (well, device - the G1) have only been available for 6-8 months, so it's not surprising they're only on one carrier. Expect that to change a lot in the next 6 months. By the time Android hits 2 years I suspect there will be devices available on all carriers. And from my experience of the Magic so far, that's when Apple will finally have a serious competitor to the iPhone platform.

    5. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by markdavis · · Score: 1

      Unless I am mistaken, you just listed carriers that are not in the US.
      Whether by design or not, the G1 and Android is still single carrier in the USA (I admit that my postings are USA-centric).

      I suspect that by the time any other carrier in the USA has either the iphone or android, the Pre will also be available on other carriers.

    6. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by webreaper · · Score: 1
      You said it yourself. There are other people outside the US, you know.

      I think you'll find that Android will crop up on other carriers far more quickly than the Pre or iPhone, as OEMs build more Android devices. The reason the iPhone is on one carrier is down to a tie-in/contract between the carrier and the handset manufacturer (Apple), and since there will only be one of those (Apple) there's little scope for other carriers to pick up new devices.

      As for Pre, Palm will almost certainly have to remain a single-carrier device, as it'll be the only way they'll get enough support from the carrier to push the device.

      Android is a totally different kettle of fish - once the likes of Sony, LG and Samsung (et al) release their Android devices, you can be sure they'll be scattered across the various carriers - not least because those carriers will see it as the 'next best thing' to having the iPhone.

    7. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by markdavis · · Score: 1

      I do not agree that the Palm will "almost certainly have to remain a single carrier device". Palm smartphones have been available from several carriers for many years. From what I read on PreCentral.net, Verizon has already expressed interest in carrying the Pre.

      But Android does, indeed, have a wider possible appeal. It isn't tied to any particular hardware company (like Palm and Iphone are).

      In any case, it is nice having all these new, functional, flashy, Linux based phones surfacing, finally :)

    8. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      You said it yourself. There are other people outside the US, you know.

      Heh... people outside the US... yeah, sure, like where? Texas?

      As for Pre, Palm will almost certainly have to remain a single-carrier device, as it'll be the only way they'll get enough support from the carrier to push the device.

      On a serious note, does this work the same internationally as it does with the US carriers? (Phones with exclusivity deals, that work for one carrier but are disabled for other carriers?) This has always mystified me in the US; I'm wondering if it's the same in other places.

    9. Re:Carrier Exclusivity Might Kill It by webreaper · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's the same in Europe etc. Usually it's implemented by 'SIM-locking' the firmware of the phone so that, for example, a handset bought from Vodafone will only work with a Vodafone SIM inserted in it.

      Most carriers will, nowadays, unlock the device once the initial contract is completed so it can be used on other networks. Historically the devices have been SIM/carrier-locked simply to attempt to lock people into the network; when the carrier is so heavily subsidising devices, it makes sense for them to try and ensure the user remains on their network for the duration of the contract (hopefully running up large bills during that period, which is the profitable part for carriers). Even better, people tend to be lazy and not always get a brand new device when their contract exipires, and every month they remain on the original network is healthy profit for the carrier.

      It's really only with the event of the iPhone that carrier exclusivity has worked the other way - i.e., the carriers like O2 getting exclusivity of the device long-term to entice people to their network who wouldn't normally consider it (e.g., O2's coverage and particularly their 3G network was/is very poor in comparison to Vodafone's in the UK when the iPhone launched, but people were prepared to compromise to get the new device). Historically, 'exclusivity' offers with device/carrier tie-ins were usually either 'special editions' (e.g., special colour devices) or short-term (i.e., one carrier has a device exclusively for 6 months before all the others get it).

      My point above was merely that in order to get a big cash injection, Palm are likely to do some sort of iPhone-like deal to get a good up-front chunk of cash, rather than spreading themselves too thin across the carriers.

  13. Competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. I really am an Apple fanboy (thus this being typed on an iPhone), but it is great to see some healthy competition. Plus, I like to see the company that bought BE do well.

  14. IMAP and XMPP? by bucketoftruth · · Score: 1

    I still haven't heard anything about IMAP/SSL and XMPP/SSL support. How does the calendar sync? Please be iCal or CalDAV. I'm going to wait for an emulator to be released before buying this phone so I can at least verify they have adequate software for email and chat.

  15. It's One Explanation... by weston · · Score: 1

    Does it really seem like a status symbol somewhere?

    To some extent, yeah; they turn heads and elicit curiosity and attention. They certainly don't confer anything resembling actual status outside of certain circles, though, and I think it's really interesting that thousands regular slashdot readers suddenly think they're experts on things that confer status.

    My observation? This explanation comes from the kind of person who doesn't understand the iPhone's appeal. They've gone over and over the featureset of the iPhone relative to some other product they prefer, and conclude that because *they* prefer product X, anybody who doesn't *must* not be considering features or even utility at all. What other explanation is left for their choice? Some other factor... like appearance, fashionability, or social status associated with an item.

    This is, of course, complete bollocks, but it's a natural chain of thought for an otherwise intelligent person who just happens to have a fairly common mental handicap...

  16. stupid fanboi by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    the blackberry bold is available for $659 at best buy

    I'm sure it can't be got cheaper elsewhere. I mean, they call themselves "best buy" for a reason, right?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:stupid fanboi by qopax · · Score: 1

      Can we please be a bit more civil (in reference to your title) and less like nitpicky assholes? All I did was disprove the parent's point, which was that there's a huge difference in pricing.

      --
      I pwn this comment. "The Fine Print" says so.
  17. Re:Actually it does NOT win on features by magnus686 · · Score: 1

    I hope I dont get flamed for saying this, but... as a user of an unlocked Google G1. The iPhone does not win. If I am going to type an email, I pop out the keyboard. Sure I can use the virtual keyboard on the new 1.5 cupcake firmware, but it is so inefficient. Can you pull up a shell in the iPhone? Is the iPhone based on one of the most stable operating systems in the world (Linux)? Did Apple talk about releasing the CPU specs so that the components could be modded to improve usability see http://phandroid.com/2009/05/08/g1-specs-leak-could-mean-developer-hacking-heaven/ ? Does apple have multiple phones available see: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/27/google-expect-18-android-phones-by-years-end/ ? Sure, multiple manufactures are going to put android on their phones, but does Apple let people do is? Does Apple...? Does Apple...? Well, now you know I am an Android fanboy :) But seriously, The iPhone does not stack up against the Android platform. How does Apple expect programmers to take advantage of all the hardware if the operating system on the phone is not based off something that is opensource?

  18. Where is the link? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I want to see where I can buy those things for the price you are saying....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  19. Palm Pre review, another one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is another review of the Palm Pre:

    http://www.mobiletechreview.com/phones/Palm-Pre.htm

    Dan Hasse is pushing his nose up at Verizon now.