Slashdot Mirror


Twitter, Flickr, Hotmail, Others Blocked In China

An anonymous reader writes "Two days ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square 'incident,' several high profile Internet sites have been blocked in mainland China. These include Twitter.com, Flickr.com, Live.com, and Bing.com. While Internet blocks are common enough in mainland China, blocking such high-profile sites is unusual. In addition, blog reports suggest even state-owned television broadcasts are suffering multiple instances of muting lasting several seconds (again, not unusual for some foreign stations broadcast over cable, but unusual for local state-owned media) suggesting state security, online or through other technology, has tightened significantly, perhaps in anticipation or discovery of protest plans."

151 comments

  1. Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sounds a lot like Facebook being blocked during the elections in Iran. I wonder if banning sites just long enough to restrict the flow of ideas for the season will become more popular/acceptable than perma-bans?

    "Oops, I can't access social sites today ... must be a "democratic" election coming up!"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yup. There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do? Not to mention every app just mentioned can easily be run on most china phones, so it's not like people have to be in net cafes in China to do said activities.

    2. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by rob1980 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do?

      Keep the mainstream folks who don't know what a proxy is (let alone how to use one) in check. For the rest, if they become an issue they'll just be labeled enemies of the state or whatever and dealt with accordingly.

    3. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by poetmatt · · Score: 0

      sadly true and agreed as a concept however how many people are really in the category of not knowing what a proxy is? China is an extremely tech savvy/tech friendly company, so wouldn't it be the minority who don't know what a proxy is? I could be completely wrong, just inquiring/rhetorically.

    4. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *country

    5. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except by not blocking them regularly they make it just a minor annoyance for most people. Unless they can't get to it everyday they won't bother to seek out a proxy solution.

      it's genius, really.

    6. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The majority in China don't even have computers.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by patro · · Score: 0

      Yup. There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do?

      This is only a half-hearted attempt, so they can say they prevent the flow of dangerous ideas. The real thing keeping people in check is their standard of living. In recent years lots of people have a better life in China. Especially people in cities. According to reports young Chinese don't really care about Tiananmen, because they can buy stuff which makes them happy.

      The easiest way to control people is turning them into consumers. A consumer don't really care about anything until he can consume what he wants. It's a great way to keep people from thinking.

      For those who haven't noticed: the same thing is happening in the West

    8. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is only a half-hearted attempt, so they can say they prevent the flow of dangerous ideas. The real thing keeping people in check is their standard of living. In recent years lots of people have a better life in China. Especially people in cities. According to reports young Chinese don't really care about Tiananmen, because they can buy stuff which makes them happy.

      The easiest way to control people is turning them into consumers. A consumer don't really care about anything until he can consume what he wants. It's a great way to keep people from thinking.

      For those who haven't noticed: the same thing is happening in the West

      I disagree. The rise of the middle class (ie, the class of consumers) is an important part of every modern democracy. I think the Chinese that don't really care about Tiananmen recognize the corruption of the communist party, but also value the stability (is any government more stable than an oligarchy?) the party brings. As China continues to develop, the rising middle class will focus more and more on political issues while the economic pressures on them lessen. We see the same thing in the US... once the economy goes, its hard to get people to care about Gay Marriage.

    9. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by koiransuklaa · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to reports young Chinese don't really care about Tiananmen, because they can buy stuff which makes them happy.

      Well, I've understood some young chinese don't even know that anything happened on June 4th and many others only know the cleaned up version: a small group of extremists tried to bring about civil unrest and the armed forces stopped these illegal activities with the least amount of violence possible. Why would anyone (consumer or not) object to that?

    10. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Right, because they didn't think to do any blocking on the back hauls that feed phone networks, nor do they have any way to track those users since you know, theres no way they can figure out who used a particular cell phone or anything. Its not like they were smart enough to do the filtering on the connections that leave the country, they just did it at each individual ISP cause that would be way easier to implement and maintain.

      You just found an awesome loophole.

      Not.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by vampire_baozi · · Score: 1

      Like parent said, if people are going to organize protests, things like QQ and text messaging are far more conducive, and much harder to monitor. See cell-phone text messaging in the anti-Japanese protests from a few years back; text messaging was the dominant form of organization, and while it can be censored, it is much harder to get a handle on it without disrupting services and inconveniencing millions of people.

    12. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by danking · · Score: 1

      For those who haven't noticed: the same thing is happening in the West

      For those who haven't noticed the same thing has happened in the West

      Fixed that for ya

    13. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      That is why the net cafe business model is so popular in China, for 5 Chinese yen, you can use a computer for an hour, much less than spending 10k Chinese yen and buy a computer yourself. The net cafe also has superior network connections. With that said, i think most Chinese people do have access to computers and the internet. if accessibility is your main concern, then you don't have to worry.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    14. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the 700 million (or whatever, some huge number, the numbers I am seeing are all over the place) rural Chinese. This poll indicates that less than 10% of them had access to a computer (in 2005), leaving more than 600 million people without:

      http://www.gallup.com/poll/14776/Internet-Use-Behind-The-Great-Firewall-China.aspx

      No doubt those numbers are changing rapidly, but the numbers involved mean than any change reflects an enormous effort and is only going to proceed so fast. These numbers corroborate the enormous wealth gap, and they didn't even bother to list rural computer ownership (but then, they are even older):

      http://www.chinability.com/Durables.htm

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I think China is China and so long as they have a communist government such actions are not surprising at all. I'm in fact surprised how opened it became over the last few decades. Maybe with the global economic downturn the Chinese government is looking after its people and reconsidering the value of all this "openness."

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    16. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. There are plenty of proxies out there too, so what exactly is this going to do? Not to mention every app just mentioned can easily be run on most china phones, so it's not like people have to be in net cafes in China to do said activities.

      Keep in mind pretty much all the data leaves China through government controlled firewalls.
      It's more likely the Chinese government is more interested in the aggregate data than what individual users are up to.

      However:

      1. Anyone using a known proxy is a suspicious person. Arrest.
      2. Anyone using any encrypted sessions to sites NOT on the approved whitelist is a suspicious person. Arrest.
      3. Anyone who gets flagged by the Sandvine cluster's DPI is a suspicious person. Flag for closer scrutiny.

      And it can go on from there. Remember, in a country like China, simply trying to hide what you are doing can be evidence of guilt to the authorities.

      If a bunch of students try to organize a protest (probably would use Twitter, etc.) then even if every student can hide their ID from the filters (not likely), the government is still going to have a pretty good idea that something is going down, and more than likely know where and roughly when. And that's just by watching the general trend of how the data is flowing and doing a little sniffing on the packets. They have plenty of time to go after specific people later.

    17. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      ...many others only know the cleaned up version: a small group of extremists tried to bring about civil unrest and the armed forces stopped these illegal activities with the least amount of violence possible.

      few people would realize how exactly, 100% true that statement is.
      While I was living in Korea, i befriended a large number of Chinese ex-pats (who all spoke surprisingly good English), and one night after a few drinks, the topic of Tienanmen came up. they were curious why Westerners were so interested in 'a bunch of bad students that protested'.

      At first it was an argument, "oh, they would never do that, thats just your media twisting the story" then I pulled up youtube and showed them the footage.
      they all sat there in silence for hours, watching as many of these clips as we could find, shocked, and infuriated. One of them went on some Chinese message boards, and posted the links to these videos, and wrote about what happened, so her friends and family would see the true story.
      when they checked those forums the next day, their posts had been deleted, and their accounts suspended.
      scary stuff.

      but its 20 years ago. most of those in power at the time would be retired by now. why not come clean and throw some positive spin on the story: 'they did this, they lied to you, we came out and told the truth, because we are a good government"?

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    18. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of people use open proxies in China. The state just blocks the proxy as it finds out about them. They don't really seem to be that bothered.

    19. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      Like i said in my earlier post, those figures you stated are INVALID because of REUSABILITY due to net cafe. Just because you don't OWN a computer doesn't equate to don't have ACCESS to one. The way you put it is the same as saying people who rent should be counted as homeless. That doesn't make any sense. Even in the sources you provided, accessibility is at 24% overall, not the 10% as you posted. And on top of that, in rural area, it is at 8% accessibility. The figures stated are in 2005, and it's 2009 already. Obviously you didn't bother to read what you cited as source, and should be punished in the name of the moon! *pose*

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    20. Re:Like Facebook in Iran During Elections by maxume · · Score: 1

      What? I wasn't trying to attack China, sorry you took it that way.

      Anyway, 25% having access certainly doesn't do much to establish that most Chinese people have access to a computer (unless you use a highly entertaining definition of 'most'). I imagine that the numbers have increased markedly since my links were published, but I still don't find it unreasonable to assume that more than 50% of Chinese people have limited access to a computer and that an even greater percentage have not bothered to use one, even if they do have (potential) access.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  2. Retaliation by siloko · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it, I'm going to block China

    1. Re:Retaliation by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's it, I'm going to block China

      I don't know if you're joking or not but if you're not here you go (and other formats)!

      Here's a brief explanation on how to do it in Apache with Russian and Nigerian IP ranges also. You may be tempted to do what many other people are already doing but remember that language barrier aside, you're blocking your website from 1/6th of the Earth's population.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:Retaliation by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Makes sense - the amount of intrusion attempts and spam coming from Chinese servers may make it worth it.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:Retaliation by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      back when I ran my own port25 mailserver, I DID block china. every damned bit of it. every netblock I could find. and even ones I discovered.

      discovered? yes, when I got spam (my username base was very tiny and so any dictionary attack was a clear 'hello' from a spam ip addr) I would file that netblock away and block the whole thing. if I felt really mean that day, I'd increase the netblock by a bit to include more and more ;)

      soon I got a nice listing of all the overseas spam ip blocks. I mapped out all of china, this way; along with other asian countries that sent me non-ascii spam (like, I'd be able to read that stuff anyway).

      so yes, I did block china. I didn't care one bit, either. one chance - you blow it - you get blocked.

      enough of this shit from china. not once have I ever had a REAL email from .cn. not once.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:Retaliation by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      I don't manage my own iron anymore, but in my host's spamasssassin config I block everything from *.cn, *.ua, *.hk, *.kz, and *.ru...my control panel UI only allows 5 custom blocks, but those seem to be by far the most offensive TLDs.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    5. Re:Retaliation by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      1/6th of the population which are probably not part of your intended audience anyways. So in the end, probably a great idea so long as it's done on a site by site basis and not on an aggregate basis like a whole country blocking another whole country.

    6. Re:Retaliation by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      You may be tempted to do what many other people are already doing but remember that language barrier aside, you're blocking your website from 1/6th of the Earth's population.

      How many people in China actually have reasonable access to the Internet? Not a large percentage I'd say given the vast economics gulf that exists between the "top" few levels of the society and the rest. Saying that blocking China is blocking a billion people is daft for that reason alone.

      Also, how many people in China will care? I know the original comment was in jest but your response didn't seem to be, but I really don't see what interest my current sites would hold for your average "Internet capable" resident of China and that is before considering any language barrier, so I'd not be blocking anybody who cares about the content (but may be blocking many hack attempts, though contrary to what some sites seem to see my logs suggest that I get a lot more from elsewhere than I do from China). Though you could put that the other way: what would blocking them achieve given that none of them are likely to care anyway?!

      Anyway: if you want to ban China from your site for what-ever reason, I don't recommend going through the hassle of setting up IP block lists that your firewall/server will have to work to enforce and that you will need to work on to test and keep up-to-date. Instead simply mention the events of 20 years ago in a certain square and China will do all the work of restricting access to your services for you!

  3. More widespread? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am in the UK but currently experiencing disruption to some HTTPS sites. I wonder there is something more widespread going on?

    1. Re:More widespread? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's just your government 1984'ing your ISP. Don't worry about it.

    2. Re:More widespread? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry, I'll shut that trojan down. I thought you weren't home.

    3. Re:More widespread? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably just the government testing out a man in the middle attack, to increase the effectiveness of their electronic snooping.

  4. and nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish the US would block Twitter too.

    1. Re:and nothing of value was lost by gnick · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about blocking Twitter, but my faith in humanity would take a big step up if it went under because everyone decided to ignore it.

      In fact, I'm so frustrated over the matter that I'm going to go blog about it on my MySpace and Facebook profiles!

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    2. Re:and nothing of value was lost by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      Twitter, like any communications medium, is what you make of it. You could start a blog and write about nothing other than the cute things your cat did today, you could write about topics of earth-shattering importance, or your blog could fall somewhere in the middle. You could Twitter about nothing other than the inane details of your life (cue link to the Penny Arcade strip) or you could use Twitter to connect to and keep in touch with a group of people online. E-mail, web pages, television, etc. They can all be used for the inane and valueless or for the interesting and full-of-meaning.

      In addition, what is value-less and what is full-of-meaning can vary from person to person. You might think that your post comparing the captaining styles of "Classic Kirk" vs Picard vs "New Movie Kirk" is great, but others might find it to be a fluff piece written by a fan with nothing better to do. Someone else might write a post detailing the pros and cons of a new fashion trend and, while they might think it is a valuable thing you share, you might find it meaningless. One person's trash is another person's treasure.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    3. Re:and nothing of value was lost by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      In a country like China, where everybody has mobile phones but not everyone has computers, a service like Twitter can be immensely useful in helping the free-flow of information. For me, Twitter is a way for me to let friends and family know what I'm up to while I'm living halfway around the world from them, and it's a handy way to keep up with breaking news, but not having it isn't a big deal, I've got plenty of other sources of information. For my friends in China, losing Twitter is losing an important connection to the outside world.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    4. Re:and nothing of value was lost by causality · · Score: 0, Troll

      witter, like any communications medium, is what you make of it.

      Twitter isn't a communications medium. The Web is the communications medium. Twitter just prepackages it for you, and you can have any color you want so long as that color is black (i.e. like the first cars).

      You could start a blog and write about nothing other than the cute things your cat did today, you could write about topics of earth-shattering importance, or your blog could fall somewhere in the middle. You could Twitter about nothing other than the inane details of your life (cue link to the Penny Arcade strip) or you could use Twitter to connect to and keep in touch with a group of people online. E-mail, web pages, television, etc. They can all be used for the inane and valueless or for the interesting and full-of-meaning.

      You can do all of that without Twitter. Again you are describing the Web. Twitter just provides a one-size-fits-all way to go about it. That, and only that, is what some people dislike about it.

      The rest of your post is more of the "all things are equal and just a matter of taste, even if they're not" that someone chimes in and rewrites in one form or another anytime there is any sort of discussion where someone actually stands up and says "no, I think this sucks." It's cute and all but it's not terribly productive. It is just a way of saying "people have different preferences" and since we knew that already, it doesn't really contribute anything. What it does do is make you look like a nice person who just wants to get along, which is cool, but nice people don't have to be so atrociously bland; they can have opinions too.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:and nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Fred should take priority over Twitter

    6. Re:and nothing of value was lost by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In case you haven't been following it, Brent Spiner is telling a short story through his Twitter account, one sentence at a time. (Or so says my wife; I don't use those newfangled interwebs 2.0 things.)

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:and nothing of value was lost by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Twitter isn't a communications medium. The Web is the communications medium. Twitter just prepackages it for you, and you can have any color you want so long as that color is black (i.e. like the first cars).

      By that reasoning, this Slashdot discussion isn't a communications medium either. For that matter, the Web isn't actually a communications medium, since it is built upon The Internet in general. In addition, Twitter encompasses more than just the Web. Some people (like myself) tweet using a desktop client, some tweet using Twitter.com, but many tweet (and get tweets) using text messages from cell phones. This means you can select the client/tool that you prefer to use (car color in your analogy).

      You can do all of that without Twitter. Again you are describing the Web. Twitter just provides a one-size-fits-all way to go about it. That, and only that, is what some people dislike about it.

      It is hardly one-size-fits-all. Sure, they provide the service (complete with service limitations like 140 characters), but you can choose the client/tool you use, you can choose whose tweets you read, you can choose what you use it for (company announcements/PR, talking with friends, etc). Just because another method of communicating is similar to previously developed methods doesn't discount the new method as useless?

      To use China as the example, were Twitter allowed in China, people could potentially tweet information from breaking events to people inside of and outside of China. This could serve to let people outside of China know if another Tienanmen Square was happening in real-time and it could be used to prevent the Chinese government from being able to cover up the new Tienanmen Square incident from their own populace. Add in services like TwitPic and you can get real-time information and photos from breaking events.

      Most times, I've found that people who are criticizing Twitter don't do so because of something intrinsic about the service, but because they never used it and only know about it from stereotypes. The stereotypical Twitter user is someone who posts little snippets of their life that no one else is interested in. Don't get me wrong, there are plenty of those people, but it's quite easy to filter them out. Just don't follow them (or, if a useful Twitter user becomes an inane one, unfollow them). There are actually plenty of people posting on Twitter that provide interesting information/news. Some examples are donttrythis (Adam from Mythbusters), grantimahara, BadAstronomer, GregGrunberg (from Heroes), wendilynnmakeup (makeup artist on Heroes), and others. (I listed the famous ones or ones with famous connections, but there are plenty of non-famous people I follow also.) If the poster has used Twitter and decided it's not for him, fine. If he's never used Twitter at all and has decided that it's worthless because he's heard that it's worthless, that just annoys me.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  5. Internet blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While Internet blocks in mainland China, blocking such high profile sites is unusual" seems rather incomprehensible. Maybe it was an attempt at In Soviet Russia...

    1. Re:Internet blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "While Internet blocks in mainland China, blocking such high profile sites is unusual" seems rather incomprehensible. Maybe it was an attempt at In Soviet Russia...

      nah, it's just more proof that the so-called "editors" don't even read over their god damned material before they post it to a high-traffic site. shit like that is why I don't subscribe. soon as they show they give a rat's ass, which they can show by either doing some proofreading once in a while, or no longer calling themselves editors, then i might show i am willing to pay money.

  6. People must notice the block. by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it draw more attention to it when these sites are blocked. The imagination usually fills a vacuum with a bigger more damning picture than reality. If they did nothing it would likely be ignored.

    1. Re:People must notice the block. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well for twitter they just redirect to a fail whale and no one will notice.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:People must notice the block. by SchizoStatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But alas remember this is the instant information age now. A few days after the anniversary no one will care about it and move onto the next funny video on youtube of cats stuck in a bag.

      --
      https://www.speakservers.com/
    3. Re:People must notice the block. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but theres two things that they would mostly think. Either A) Stupid computer, why won't you work or B) Well, I guess Twitter is down.

      People, especially computer illiterate people are more apt to believe that their ISP sucks, the sites down or they need to upgrade their computer rather then their malevolent communist overlords are trying to block them.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:People must notice the block. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and move onto the next funny video on youtube...

      Until they block youtube

    5. Re:People must notice the block. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Informative

      They assume the government knows best and it's for their own good, for the most part.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    6. Re:People must notice the block. by siloko · · Score: 0, Troll

      remember this is the instant information age now . . .

      I suppose by that you mean "don't give a fuck about anyone else but myself" age.

    7. Re:People must notice the block. by causality · · Score: 1

      remember this is the instant information age now . . .

      I suppose by that you mean "don't give a fuck about anyone else but myself" age.

      A lot of times they don't do a very good job of looking out for their own interests either.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:People must notice the block. by rynthetyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Youtube is already blocked

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    9. Re:People must notice the block. by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it draw more attention to it when these sites are blocked.

      You're right! Since when is Bing.com a high-profile website that someone will notice if it's blocked? Microsoft PR strikes again! ;P

    10. Re:People must notice the block. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the hell is this modded troll and the stupid comment he replied to modded up? this guy's post is the truth.

  7. Psychics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two days ahead of the Tiananmen Square 'incident'

    Glad we can reliably see into the future now ;)

    1. Re:Psychics? by twidarkling · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, there are multiple editorial failures in this summary. And in honour of the story being about China, I vote that the punishment be summary excecution!

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    2. Re:Psychics? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering how the Chinese had the foresight to block Twitter back in 1989.

  8. What are we doing? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships? Why do we continue to support reigimes of tyrrany?

    Oh yeah, because they make shit on the cheap and we're a nation of greedy slobs with a humane streak which lasts up until that $5 is taken from your pay cheque to buy your "morality token" for the month.

    Flamebait or not, if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:What are we doing? by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because if no one buys Chinese products the people magically become not oppressed? Just look at the Cuban embargo, didn't do a stupid thing to strike down communism in fact by isolating themselves they haven't been exposed to non-communist ideas.

      All that would happen if we embargoed China is that the people who live in oppression now will live in oppression while starving.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:What are we doing? by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships? Why do we continue to support reigimes of tyrrany? Oh yeah, because they make shit on the cheap and we're a nation of greedy slobs with a humane streak which lasts up until that $5 is taken from your pay cheque to buy your "morality token" for the month. Flamebait or not, if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

      There's things which are "Flamebait" because they're blatantly false and often deliberate distortions of reality.

      Then there's things which are "Flamebait" because they're completely true and people can't accept that due to a number of character flaws and other shortcomings that render them unable to call things what they are or otherwise to deal with reality. The funny thing is, people get a lot more pissy and upset about this one, and try much harder to shut it down or to shout it down (like the pleasant individuals who can avoid inflicting their personal problems on others that they are) than the first category.

      Which one this is should be an exericise to the reader.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:What are we doing? by sesshomaru · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Apparently, after the bankruptcy, GM will be making cars in China...

      I'm not really looking forward to that, I'm not sure why the government decided to waste all our taxpayer money on GM if they knew they were just planning to send most of the jobs to China. But I guess some extremely rich people won't lose as much money as they were going to originally, which makes me feel just swell.

      I guess the people in charge of this, like our car czar, figured that that was what people were concerned about, that some well-heeled bondholders would have to take a haircut. Otherwise, it's kind of baffling from a political standpoint.

      Except in the "after we retire from politics we'll all be rich, rich, rich! And what are you going to do about it, vote Republican, mwahahahaha!"

      --
      "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
    4. Re:What are we doing? by gnick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression.

      Yeah, but where do you think we get the $$ to buy that Chinese crap? Take a look at our national debt and the debt-holders. We're buying Chinese crap using $$ borrowed from the Chinese. It's a very dysfunctional, but symbiotic, relationship. Look up codependency. And our financial overlords (with whom I do not necessarily agree) seem to think that we need to keep buying this crap to sustain our culture.

      The only solution I see is a huge culture change (but that's terribly difficult to effect - If you can figure it out, please do.)

      Back on-topic, this sucks. I've got a lot of respect for the Chinese people, but their government is miserable. And they seem to be too big and disconnected to really shake things up. Events like Tiananmen Square make big news and show the world that they're trying, but don't really seems to affect the way things run day-to-day. I'd love to drop some pamphlets instructing citizens on methods for proxying out through the great Chinese firewall...

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    5. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.

      you could have fooled me

    6. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thay already make cars in China. They sell a shitload of Buick minivans over there.

      If GM were smart (Yeah, I know - Crazy talk.), they would have exited the US 10 years ago.

    7. Re:What are we doing? by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Starving? No. I think china has enough man power to sustain itself...

    8. Re:What are we doing? by jcr · · Score: 0

      Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships?

      We aren't. We're buying products made by businesses in China, which are not the government of China.

      Embargoes strengthen criminal regimes. Trade reduces their power.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:What are we doing? by Weezul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nobody will starve. In fact, drastically slowing Chinas economic expansion will prevent them from causing starvation in other poorer countries like Bangladesh & India. Well, the U.S. doesn't have the moral standing for such action, but it'd definitely help poorer people if China slows down.

      Actually, slapping a 100% "trade rebalancing" tariff on Chinese products may be quite sound & legal; well there is a WTO framework for ensuring that your trade is balanced. But most countries first just want to stop China's currency manipulation. Of course, China can likely still fight these actions by tariffing U.S. goods, dumping dollars, etc. But I don't think those are such major problems really.

      I'd be more worried that such drastic action shows weakness, leading to long term loss of confidence in the dollar. To avoid that, you need some political cover like : a lunatic like Ron Paul gets elected, China invades Taiwan, etc.

      Oh, yeah, embargoes are alway bad, you want trade balance through tariffs, and natural currency revaluations.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    10. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually just because people from outside of world buying things from China that makes the difference from korean

    11. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you never buy anything from china....

    12. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the fucking computer you're typing on is manufactured in China. Just like the clothes on your back and the fork you used to shovel lunch into your mouth today. Get over yourself.

    13. Re:What are we doing? by Walles · · Score: 1

      Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships?

      s/fascist/communist/

      --
      Installed the Bubblemon yet?
    14. Re:What are we doing? by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      SEP field, duh.

      Its somebody else's problem, not mine, makes it easy for my mind to just ignore or not care.

      On that note, you're free to go to China and fight for their rights rather than sitting in your nice comfy chair (which was probably made in China) using your nice computer (which certainly has parts made in China) and wearing cloths made in china.

      But you won't. You'll continue to sit in your chair and use your computer to trumpet how evil this is and how everyone is supporting those evil bastards and you'll continue to not actually do shit about it yourself other than doing anything.

      And thats good, cause your premise is flawed. Stop buying products from China and their lives won't get better, they'll get worse. Those Chinese workers are working because IT MAKES THEIR LIVES BETTER than the alternative. If they want change, they can bring it about. People did start revolutions before the Internet you know, even in China.

      Get off your political high horse and do something useful or stop your bitching. Yes you have the right to free speech, no that doesn't mean anything you say is actually useful or that anyone else wants to hear it or will act on it. Actions speak far louder than words, and your actions tell us you don't actually give a damn, you just want to pretend you do and make everything you're an activist. You aren't, you're just a loud mouth.

      The world will always have people with better lives than someone else. Thats the way the animal kingdom works. Always has, always will, its just life and nothing you can say or do will actually change it. Good luck finding support to help you out on it too.

      Why should I risk my neck for someone who doesn't want to risk their own to better their lives? Who are you to judge WHO has a better life or who would be happy if things changed. You have no idea what those individual people want in their lives, no clue what so ever. You just think yours is better and they should be like you. Maybe they don't want all the bullshit you have in your life. Maybe they really don't give a fuck about twitter? Stop thinking you know other peoples plights and what they want, you have no idea what those people want and there is nothing you can do that will make their lives better for sure. You think you should be able to go 'help' them with a 'better life' and let them suffer through a revolution while you sit in your Chinese made chair using your Chinese made PC to write smug dairy entries in your blog about how great you are to the rest of the worlds plight.

      You people always make me laugh, you always know how to make it better for someone else that you know nothing about. Do you have any idea how much your battle cry sounds like those used to describe the 'rightness' of the Crusades?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    15. Re:What are we doing? by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      Starving? No. I think china has enough man power to sustain itself...

      You're assuming that Chinese leadership gives a damn about the peasants. They don't. They never have.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    16. Re:What are we doing? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      I buy Chinese productions every damn day and I buy them a lot, because I am a Chinese and I live in China. By your argument I support oppression, which I don't, by means of making myself heard whenever possible.

      It's just the market at work -- we buy cheap shit (or put it in another way, we are reasonable enough to keep our demands satisfied with the least expensive goods available). IMHO it sounds pretty un-American to base one's marketing decisions upon ideological matters like this -- indeed it's so un-American that I have a compelling reason to call you a terrorist and report your comments to the NSA ;) </sarcasm>

      You either like it or not, but it's how things turn out to be working. I can understand your strong feeling about an oppressive regime; I just don't think one's economy decision could by any means be an indicator of moral integrity.

      BTW I don't care that much about English grammar/spellings 'coz I'm not a native speaker. Honestly I'm not very fluent in it. If you find any grammatical errors in my posts, it means I just didn't bother checking, and that you can mod me down if you like.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    17. Re:What are we doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But thats not difficult!

    18. Re:What are we doing? by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We aren't. We're buying products made by businesses in China, which are not the government of China.

      Except when the businesses are owned by the Chinese military or party apparatchiks. Then it gets blurry.

      --
      September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  9. Unintended consequences by harmonise · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect that this will have unintended consequences like a Streisand effect. Some people who might not think about the Tiananmen Square incident might wonder why they can't get to certain sites. They'll ask a friend about it who will respond "Maybe because it's the anniversary of the Tiananmen Square incident." The listener's memory will be refreshed and the chance of people forgetting about Tiananmen Square and the date the incident occurred will be lessened.

    --
    Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    1. Re:Unintended consequences by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In 2006, the American PBS program "Frontline" broadcast a segment filmed at Peking University, many of whose students participated in the 1989 protests. Four students were shown a picture of the Tank Man, but none of them could identify what was happening in the photo. Some responded that it was a military parade, or an artwork.

      From Wikipedia, but still illustrates the point, young people in China don't know much about the Tienanmen Square incident unless they get it from hearsay or from people abroad. How often does the Kent State incident come up in day to day conversation for you? Would you even know about it if you weren't taught about it in a Modern US History class? How many Americans would look at you confused if you started talking about an incident where the US military shot and killed unarmed US civilians?

    2. Re:Unintended consequences by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Well another stark difference is that in China no one gets a song about Tienanmen up on the Top 40 charts either. Sure it's not popular now but I didn't learn about Kent State in a history class, I heard about in that song Ohio by Crosby, Stills and Nash and then read about it later.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:Unintended consequences by kohaku · · Score: 3, Informative

      There were 13 casualties in the Kent State shootings, 4 of which were fatal. The Tiananmen square numbers are (officially) 241 deaths, which is probably far smaller than the real number (There have been reports of up to 2400 deaths). I think it's disingenuous to compare Tiananmen and Kent State. Perhaps 9/11 would be a closer analogue? In any case, there was lots of media created about Kent State, and it _IS_ taught in schools.

    4. Re:Unintended consequences by chuck · · Score: 1

      I think it's disingenuous to compare Tiananmen and Kent State. Perhaps 9/11 would be a closer analogue?

      Only if you're completely missing the point, and trying to use the word "disingenuous" to sound smart.

      They were both a government killing their own protesting citizens. How could you miss that? 9/11 isn't analogous to Tiananmen at all!

    5. Re:Unintended consequences by kohaku · · Score: 1

      (...) trying to use the word "disingenuous" to sound smart.

      I'm sorry you took it that way. I used the word "disingenuous" because I think the GGP is misrepresenting the magnitude of the Kent State shootings in comparison to Tiananmen: People are less likely to remember Kent State simply because of the smaller human cost. Just to reinforce, I am talking about impact and not necessarily political motivation.

  10. Seriously. by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    Freedom of expression on the net is a very dangerous thing. If you don't tighly rein in and control social websites, your population starts getting the impression that they don't need a benevolent communist overlord to tighly rein in and control them. We can't have that now, can we?

  11. Is this done manually or automated? by fprintf · · Score: 1

    Is this blocking/unblocking done manually or is it based on an automated set of rules? I suppose it might be a state secret how the blocking actually works, but I picture a few people sitting in a room updating some configuration files that says "block the following IP address or domain names". Is that how it works?

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    1. Re:Is this done manually or automated? by machine321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Configuration files? This is China, where labor is cheap. They have people manually inspect every request as it goes past the firewall.

  12. Communism... by vigmeister · · Score: 0

    God help us! Now their productivity will double and everything will become cheaper as China takes over the world!

    One a more serious note, I'd think that in a communist framework, it would be reasonable to restrict sites that drain significant amounts of time from your life. The Chinese govt. simply thinks that the benefits are outweighed by the drop in productivity due to social networking sites.

    Although I am against censorship, this is a cultural thing. I can imagine how shocked people in some societies would be to find out that pornography is covered by free speech in the USA.

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:Communism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "in a communist framework"

      Except that the situation in China has nothing to do with communism.
      Communism = stateless, classless society - see the Communist Manifesto.

      "Although I am against censorship, this is a cultural thing."

      It's a cultural thing only among politicians/big business, not among (Chineese) people.

  13. unusual, maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surprising.. no.

  14. Editors, please! by curmudgeous · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Two days ahead of the Tiananmen Square 'incident'...

    So, slashdot is predicting incidents now? Or should that read, "Two days ahead of the anniversary of..."?

    Yes, I'm picking nits, but the overall quality of journalism seems to be declining on a daily basis. Despite what some here may think, accuracy IS important.

    1. Re:Editors, please! by happy_place · · Score: 1

      With all the bannings perhaps it will spark an social uprising. After all, how can you live life without Twitter?

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    2. Re:Editors, please! by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm picking nits, but the overall quality of journalism seems to be declining on a daily basis. Despite what some here may think, accuracy IS important.

      And quite frankly, this website is part of new media, and the creators/owners/editors are not trained journalists (if any are, someone please correct me). What's most disgusting is the tripe generated by so many local television newscasters, people who we used to expect brought some kind of journalistic integrity, a reasonable command of their native language, and could avoid the kind of writing that makes us slap our foreheads. Yes, it's true, many tv newscasters in my area probably hate me for my emails.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    3. Re:Editors, please! by Rick+Bentley · · Score: 0
      actually, the summary is good, your post isn't (unless the summary has been changed)

      "Two days ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square 'incident,"

      .
      "anniversary" IS included in the summary, you edited it out in your false quote above. "Incident" is also in quotes, drawing question to the word.

      I'll take new stream media over the old any day.

      --
      My favorite quote doesn't fit into 120 characters. Now no one will like me.
    4. Re:Editors, please! by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      I was going to say something about kdawson, but I guess I can't just yet....

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    5. Re:Editors, please! by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      The part in quotes in my post was a direct copy and paste from the summary as it originally appeared. The editors have corrected it since I posted my comment.

    6. Re:Editors, please! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      the overall quality of journalism seems to be declining on a daily basis

      Re-he-he-ealy!? So you're suggesting that the quality was higher at some point in the past? I must have missed that day. :)

      Of course, the summary appears to have been corrected (assuming it was wrong in the first place, which isn't much of a stretch); that's is actually pretty impressive for this site. Slashdot has links to fascinating things at times, but it's always been an overgrown teenage nerd blog, despite the fact that the founders are no longer technically teenagers. On the few occasions when they've actually been forced to address the quality of the "editing", they've shown a sort of misplaced pride in their incompetence, somehow feeling that the misspelling and misreporting adds more of a geeky feel to the place (something that many geeky people, including me, find highly offensive). So, Slashdot's a mixed bag, makes me grit my teeth and pound my head on occasion, but continues to have enough entertainment value that I keep coming back despite the constant, on-going embarrassing gaffes. BUT! I've been here for mumble years, and I've seen no evidence that it's getting worse, on a daily, weekly or yearly basis. It's always been this bad, dude. Just face it: like me, this is an embarrassing guilty pleasure, and you're never going away. :)

    7. Re:Editors, please! by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      I was speaking of journalism in general, the original summary for this story just gave me an excuse to lash out. Most news sites these days seem to have trimmed editorial staff to the bone and are employing semi-professional writers in general. I usually just roll my eyes, huff and move on, but in this case it pushed me over the edge.

    8. Re:Editors, please! by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      A couple people on here have suggested I was in error when I flamed the original posting so I went digging for the original summary. Here it is verbatim:

      An anonymous reader writes "Two days ahead of the Tiananmen Square 'incident' several high profile Internet sites have been blocked in mainland China, these include Twitter.com, Flickr.com, Live.com, and Bing.com. While Internet blocks in mainland China, blocking such high profile sites is unusual. In addition, blog reports suggest even state-owned television broadcasts are suffering multiple instances of muting lasting several seconds (again, not unusual for some foreign stations broadcast over cable, but unusual for local state-owned media) suggesting state security, online or through other technology, has tightened significantly, perhaps in anticipation or discovery of protest plans."

      and link is here: http://yro.slashdot.org/firehose.pl?id=4715073&op=view

  15. Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please block twitter here in the US too.

  16. The Ministry of Silly Names by someyob · · Score: 1

    has decided China doesn't need any stinking imperialist silly names.

  17. you're right and wrong by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why are we buying the products of these fascist dictatorships?

    Part of the answer to your first question is also availability. There are some markets where the Chinese goods have such a lock on production that it is nearly impossible to not buy something made in China.

    Sure, you can buy a Chinese made widget for less than an American made widget almost without exception. However, there are times when no amount of money will buy a non-Chinese widget because no such item exists.

    Furthermore, your statement

    products of these fascist dictatoriships

    Is itself an absurd over-simplification of the situation. Just because a product is made in China does not mean it inherently supports the Chinese government. Sure, taxes are (generally) paid but your $.99 widget almost certainly profits a greedy western capitalist much more than the Chinese government.

    if you buy Chinese goods, you support oppression

    Not always true. As I said, there are times that you don't have a choice in the matter. Sometimes the only way to purchase the item you need for whatever task is at hand is to purchase a Chinese made version of it. If you don't believe me then take a look through the tool section of your favorite home improvement / hardware / discount / general merchandise store. There are some items that if you need them today, you have no choice but to buy Chinese - and if your choice is to buy Chinese or allow your basement to flood with water, I have a suspicion on which way you will likely choose.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:you're right and wrong by causality · · Score: 1

      Not always true. As I said, there are times that you don't have a choice in the matter. Sometimes the only way to purchase the item you need for whatever task is at hand is to purchase a Chinese made version of it. If you don't believe me then take a look through the tool section of your favorite home improvement / hardware / discount / general merchandise store. There are some items that if you need them today, you have no choice but to buy Chinese - and if your choice is to buy Chinese or allow your basement to flood with water, I have a suspicion on which way you will likely choose.

      There was a time when that wasn't true at all, when the USA was significantly more self-sufficient than it is today (please understand the difference between "totally self-sufficient in every way" and "more self-sufficient than today"). It took some time, several generations, for it to become this way. It isn't going to instantly change back because it didn't instantly change in the first place. No, it took a long string of decisions, most of which could probably be described as "favoring short term gain over long term viability." I'm betting that there are a lot of potential expressions of "globalism" and that "competing with someone overseas who will work for near-slave wages" is only one of them.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:you're right and wrong by peragrin · · Score: 1

      If you want a positive spin on outsourcing think of it this way.

      We decided instead of using up our limited resources we would concentrate on using up china's first. Steel,copper,even oil. We are using up the world's resources shipping them here and eventually storing them in easy to access locations(landfills). So whenthe time comes that we need more resources wehave already hogged the important ones, and stored them for future generations.

      So I say buy from china. All your resources belong to us!

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:you're right and wrong by causality · · Score: 1

      If you want a positive spin on outsourcing think of it this way.

      We decided instead of using up our limited resources we would concentrate on using up china's first. Steel,copper,even oil. We are using up the world's resources shipping them here and eventually storing them in easy to access locations(landfills). So whenthe time comes that we need more resources wehave already hogged the important ones, and stored them for future generations.

      So I say buy from china. All your resources belong to us!

      I don't know about China specifically, but historically we used to do that by importing raw materials and producing the goods here, which meant we had a fairly strong manufacturing component to our economy. What has changed is that now we seem to favor importing finished goods, because the manufacturing is the part where we'd have to compete with people overseas who will work for near-slave wages. So, I don't quite disagree with you in principle, though I think the implementation of that principle is important too.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  18. Blogspot has been blocked for 2 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My folks are over there for a year and haven't been able to post on their blog the last 2 weeks. I think they said that YouTube has been blocked since March.

    1. Re:Blogspot has been blocked for 2 weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I'll just post it here for them.

      "Today we went to see a 2000 year old log that Confucius pissed on! The Chinese people are so nice! I can't believe they would poison our children and pets. Tomorrow we're going to watch some people get thrown out of their houses so they can build a fingernail clipper factory. LOL"

  19. Bad Logic by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    "We" are not buying products from "fascist dictatorships". Regular businessmen -- Americans, Canadians, Japanese, Germans, etc. -- are buying products from (and selling products to) regular Chinese businessmen. They're not buying from the Chinese state, and they generally don't care what any of this world's authoritarian regimes -- whether Obama's, Jintao's, or someone else's -- are up to so long as they can make an honest living.

    It's highly disingenuous of you to suggest that the Cantonese factories my clients hire to make their products have anything to do with the shmucks in Beijing who are banning Flickr. People are individuals and ought to be treated as such.

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    1. Re:Bad Logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are thousands and thousands of factories run by the PLA or by a direct proxy front man corporation.

      And you know that. Funny you don't mention that. Maybe yours isn't,(how about your official chinese partner, you need one to be in business there, something else you failed to mention) but you know it goes on and a lot of bribery and corruption exists.

      The same political gang that killed tens of millions of their own people is STILL IN CHARGE.

      It is NO DIFFERENT from if the nazis were still in charge in Germany. Totalitarian genocidal murderers. Now they are just richer than 20 years ago.Richer and mnore powerful. I guess anything goes as long as you profit, right?

      So yes, it is totally legitimate to paint with a broad brush once it comes to mainland China. We should have never normalized trade relations without an exact, carved in stone, due date by, quid pro quo and them loosening the reins and giving their people real freedom. There's still no freedom of speech, freedom of political expression outside of their one party rule, no real freedom of religion, nothing. Opening up trade to them hasn't resulted in one more iota of real freedom now than they had 20 years ago. And they seek to keep their people brainwashed forever, even to the point of censoring what is common knowledge in the rest of the world. So we made the planets largest military dictatorship richer, and near destroyed the US middle class by selling off our manufacturing infrastructure for pennies on the dollar.

  20. Gmail's still OK by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    As many have pointed out on TFA, Gmail is still OK for the moment and it can be set to collect your Hotmail.

    1. Re:Gmail's still OK by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the Hotmail block is just an extension of the Live/Bing block, which is itself an extension of the YouTube block.

      China doesn't care about free email clients, just YouTube.

  21. writing about nothing? by airdrummer · · Score: 1

    doesn't seinfeld have a patent on that or something?

    1. Re:writing about nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your sake, you'd better hope not.

  22. Not High Profile in China.... by vampire_baozi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, almost no Chinese use those sites. Twitter doesn't even have a Chinese language version, and has barely begun to grow in China (though it may, there are already several Chinese clonewares out). Nobody ANYWHERE in the world uses Bing, and the Chinese use QQ, Sohu, Xinlang, or other IM/Portal/Blogging services instead of Live/Blogspot. Flickr is the only one Chinese might even notice, and there are plenty of alternatives.

    The only Chinese that use these (now blocked) services are educated, and probably have decent English, and know how to get around these blocks. The vast majority of Chinese users use other websites, or have alternatives. The contrversial stuff has always been hosted on non-Chinese websites for obvious reasons, and people who want to see it are well aware of how to get around the blocks.

    Far more telling was the 7 hours of downtime Xiaonei went through yesterday for maintanence. They've already been shutting down certain Xiaonei groups and blocking users for doing political stuff, I wonder if the maintanence included any updates to help with censorship?

    1. Re:Not High Profile in China.... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Shrug, if I lived there I would probably thank them for blocking such wastes of time. I doubt any intelligent person actually would be upset if Twitter disappeared or Facebook or MySpace or livejournal or blogspot, take your pick.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:Not High Profile in China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think this is necessarily a one-sided effort to hide information from the Chinese people though. Those sites are popular in the rest of the democratic world and would certainly be used by people in the anniversary celebrations. By shutting down these sites for a week or whatever, it cuts down on the reporting of these events to people *outside* China. If they can force everything through the corporate journalists, they can exert a lot more control over what gets reported.

  23. Good thing the olympics made them promise! by CannonballHead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Probably "off topic," but it's interesting that they promised quite a bit in order to be allowed to have the Olympics. Makes me wonder about other promises. Makes me glad to live in the US. :)

    1. Re:Good thing the olympics made them promise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes me glad to live in the US. :)

      LOL

    2. Re:Good thing the olympics made them promise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly, I feel a lot less opressed in China. When I come back to the USA, I suddenly feel like I'm entering a police state. When I'm in China, they don't seem to take too much seriously, as long as you aren't causing a scene. Heck, I even saw someone take a crocodile dundee style knife through airport security. The screeners just snickered and waved it through.

      They may be a lot more restricted about certain subjects, but it just doesn't come across that way. Foreigners need to also keep in mind, that in chinese culture, embarassing the government is sometimes taken as an insult to China, and even as an insult to your own family (which is considered very offensive).

      China in reality is one step from anarchy. People generally do what they feel like, and disregard the police. There are some things you can't do, but in general, people ignore the law, whether there are police present or not. As long as nothing really bad is happening, the police do not generally get involved. My favorite time was when two schoolgirls were beating the crap out of each other and ripping each other's clothes off. There was a crowd standing around watching, including a policeman, but he didn't step in since nobody seriously got hurt, and apparently he thought it was as entertaining as everyone else.

  24. do u know why Amazon invented 1-click thingy by Type-E · · Score: 1

    The fact is people are lazy, if they can't get to it on first attempt, they might just stop. The goal is not to stop all the internet users, but if it blocks a few, they have reached their goals. Same deal as iPhone firmware updates, ps2 revision updates, wii updates, psp firmware updates, they know there are still hackers, but the goal is make their life hard.

  25. But but but... by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

    ... I thought they were the interweb socialism?

  26. Don't Worry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Party probably just doesn't want the people to hear what the rest of the world thinks about what ( US government bonds ) their money is invested in. Geitner has the Party line.

  27. a nusiance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politics aside, the blocks being imposed are somewhat irritating to those who live and work here (I do). For example, blogspot.com has been blocked for the last few days. I have memory of other examples of say, all wordpress sites seeming to become inaccessible. We don't use proxies at work, so it means being unable to share news with all colleagues who don't have their own proxy setup. As a topical example, that puts the google keynote out the window. You'd be surprised how much business related knowledge ends up getting blocked. Most irritating is the 'google sin bin'. Try and use a cached link, and google is blocked from your IP address for around 5 minutes. For a company with a shared proxy server, that gets old, very quickly.

    Of course, there is a big commercial incentive to keep the blocks coming. Effectively it provides protectionist support for the Chinese alternatives on the internet[1]. That part I find more concerning, I think. If people here wanted to bypass the great firewall to read no blocked information, they can do so - I get the impression most people aren't really so interested in doing so though. The commercial aspects, however, would seem more sustainable.

    [1] http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2006/05/12/a_new_form_of_protectionism

    1. Re:a nusiance by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      There's a Firefox extension "CustomizeGoogle" that could be used to work around the Google Cache nuisance. Check the extension preferences and select something like "rewrite cache links", restart FF and you are done.

      Well, I'm assuming you are able to use Firefox and reconfigure your user profile at work...

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  28. In other news... by Becausegodhasmademe · · Score: 1

    In a completely unrelated incident, a report published today claims to observe an 80% rise in productivity of Chinese office workers. Here's Jill with the weather.

  29. most college students dont care about Tiananmen by peter303 · · Score: 1

    It isnt in the Chinese history books and frowned upon talking about. Now there are good jobs, the internet (censored) and pop culture, to occupy students. These werent really around in China 20 years ago.

    Not so much different in the USA. A couple weeks ago was the 40th anniversary the USA Tianamen- Kent State- when the US military shot college rioters dead. It was barely mentioned in the news and most young people hadnt heard of it.

    Both incidents have iconic images: The civilian blocking the row of tanks; the hippie girl putting a flower in the barrel of the soldier's gun.

    1. Re:most college students dont care about Tiananmen by joggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, there are some significant differences between those two instances:

      1) I can google 'kent state' and quickly find the relevant wikipedia article from work without risk of reprisal (unless my boss sees me goofing off...) even though I'm using a public, static IP address that could easily be tracked to my computer (at least it could be easily tracked if I was going through the great firewall of China). I'd love to see someone in China be able to google 'Tianamen' and be able to click on the wikipedia article from their job with as much ease and lack of danger as I can here in the US.
      2) Just to get a taste of the difference between cultures, on the wikipedia article for the Kent State shootings the photographer received the biggest prize in journalism for the photo he took of the shooting (the same year the picture was taken, not years after the fact). It's impossible to imagine a Chinese photographer receiving a prestigious Chinese award back in 1989 for publishing a photo of Tianamen Square.
      3) The day after the Kent State shootings (were 4 died and 9 were injured) there was a nationwide protest by millions of students that effectively closed a number of universities. After the initial shooting no further deaths and certainly no executions occurred. After Tienamen Square, captured workers were quickly executed although students were not.
      4) The scale of the Kent State shootings is dwarfed by the Tienaman Square event. The official Chinese estimate of deaths in Tienamen Square was 241 dead with over 7000 injured (other estimates are in the thousands but because everything was handled very secretly by the Chinese government it is impossible for anyone to know for sure). As previously mentioned, Kent State was 4 dead with 9 injured. Also, nobody disappeared in Kent State. Whatever happened to that guy that stood in front of the tank? The last thing anyone ever saw was him being dragged away by the police. It is believed he was executed because the government was never able to produce him to quite the international criticism it was receiving.
      5) Tienamen Square involved the state's army. The Kent State incident involved Ohio's National Guard which is a rather different force. It would be unheard of to use the federal army to suppress a riot or for any civil purpose. The local national guard is a very different force, used to help with natural disasters and, in rare cases, to help with crowd control in riots. One big difference is the national guard doesn't have tanks...
      6) Coverage of Kent State was not suppressed in the American news at the time nor afterward. It still is unacceptable to talk about Tienamen Square on TV or newspapers in China except with great care and few words.

  30. BT throttles entire Internet worldwide by David+Gerard · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    GRASS MUD HORSE, Tiananmen, Tuesday (NNN) — BT, Britain's biggest broadband supplier, has thoughtfully averted complete congestion of the Internet by throttling all use of the Internet on its cheapest broadband package.

    Customers on the I Can't Believe It's Eight Megabits package have all Internet data flow cut off entirely under its "fair use" clause during "peak periods," defined as being between the hours of 12:00 midnight and 11:59pm. "However," said a customer service telephone voice menu, "the connection itself runs at the full eight megabits. That we guarantee absolutely."

    BT has recently sold the technology to China, where it was put into operation toda, blocking Twitter, Blogger, Microsoft Bob Hope and the live webcam of the coffee pot at Cambridge University. "We will not put up with the drop in productivity social networking sites cause," said a spokesrivercrab. "After the terrible onslaught of blue screens at the Olympics, we will stop at nothing to protect patriotic citizens from the influence of Microsoft. And they love us for it. Just find one who doesn't!"

    "Besides," said the BT phone menu, "we're still better than Virgin. A high bar to aim for, I know. You get so much better fail whales over a phone line than a cable."

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
    1. Re:BT throttles entire Internet worldwide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This spam thing not working out for you lately, huh?

  31. Selective Memories by VShael · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, we all think it's terrible that the majority of the youth in China don't even know about the Tianamen Square "incident"

    But within America itself, how many of you know of, or recognise the following incidents?

    1) US Government (ATF/FBI) burns to death 76 people in their homes, and the FBI lies about it for six years, when it finally comes clean. No one is ever held accountable.

    2) 4 plain-clothed officers shoot an unarmed man standing in his doorway. They shoot a total of 41 times. He is hit 19 times. After the officers are convicted, the court orders them re-tried, and the second time around they are all acquitted.

    3) Unarmed students at an anti-war protest, are shot at by the National Guard. 4 die, 9 are injured. Again, no accountability. No convictions.

    1. Re:Selective Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The youths in china do know about the Tianamen Square incident, but its considered taboo to talk about it publicly. It's referred to as the '1989 revolution'. People think it was unfortunate, but little more than a failed attempt at revolution. What they are not aware of, is how publicly it is talked about outside their country.

    2. Re:Selective Memories by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      I think it's fascinating that you've been moderated "redundant" -- I wonder what went through that person's mind?

      Is criticism of one's government now unpatriotic?

    3. Re:Selective Memories by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But within America itself, how many of you know of, or recognise the following incidents?

      1) US Government (ATF/FBI) burns to death 76 people in their homes, and the FBI lies about it for six years, when it finally comes clean. No one is ever held accountable.

      2) 4 plain-clothed officers shoot an unarmed man standing in his doorway. They shoot a total of 41 times. He is hit 19 times. After the officers are convicted, the court orders them re-tried, and the second time around they are all acquitted.

      3) Unarmed students at an anti-war protest, are shot at by the National Guard. 4 die, 9 are injured. Again, no accountability. No convictions.

      Um, all three incidents were front page stories on the news (i.e. not suppressed) and the last one has been covered in every American history class I've ever taken.

    4. Re:Selective Memories by VShael · · Score: 1

      Well then the history you've learned is very different from the history I've learned.

      For one thing, how can a 6 year admitted cover-up, be headline news when the incident happened?

      Still, if you say that you were taught these 3 incidents in school, I'm impressed. I know quite a few people (not long out of school) who couldn't identify the incidents from the information provided.

    5. Re:Selective Memories by VShael · · Score: 1

      I wonder what went through that person's mind?

      I'd hazard a guess that it was something along the lines of "Why do you hate America?" (c) Fox 2009.

    6. Re:Selective Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from the UK and I'm afraid I don't know about any of these. Anybody mind flipping to the back of the book and copying out the answers for me?

    7. Re:Selective Memories by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first one is about the Wako Siege, which even all the more informed people here in the Netherlands will remember. It was interesting reading up on it again. I can remember browsing the few US news channels for it when the news was fresh. IMHO, the only reason to leave this little piece of information out was to obscure the fact that people actually do know about this incident. Also, blandly claiming that the lives of these people were all taken by the FBI is taking it way too far.

      For me that's enough of a troll to not look at the others.

    8. Re:Selective Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your point being? I never heard of these incidents. However, I doubt this page was ever blocked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege

    9. Re:Selective Memories by geekymachoman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      4) US Government attack they own country on 9/11 to induce fear and to get approval of citizens to attack other country's, so that they can conquest, steal, build pipelines from caspian sea, kill hundreds of innocent children by cluster bombs, drop off humanitarian packets together with mentioned bombs, which looks exactly alike, so they can blow up in "parts" little hungry children.

      Bush is not convicted of anything, of one murder... he commited thousands of murders, genocide... Obama, war on terror ? Yeah, right. You gotta be stupider then George Bush to believe that shit. Now you have war in afghanistan. The same politics is continuing. Your entire government should be publicly hanged for the horrors and masacres they commited, and YOU people, are so ignorant of these things, that you say ohh.. great, im an american, stupid communists and shit, i live in a land of FREEDOM. You still believe that ? Ok, think about that again every half year. It's measurable - how much "freedom" you have, and it's going downhill. Just thought on censorship and repression in your country. Every few days there's a news here about that.

      You started exchanging your freedom for false sense of security after 9/11, that was the point of it. For you to give away your freedom and your opinions, and to let "them sort it out".

      Look at what your Government do:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods

      This is not a flamebait, but these fucking bastards that are shitting on other country's all the time and regimes, and thinking that they are free and that they live in "democracy" and stupid ignorant facts like that, are going on my nerves already, and someone needs to say this, cuz cnn certainly won't, and neither are any of you, because you are so bullshitted that you can't (apparently) see whats in front of your nose anymore.

    10. Re:Selective Memories by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      For one thing, how can a 6 year admitted cover-up, be headline news when the incident happened?

      Ok, I actually agree that Waco should get more attention, although I see it as more of a coverup of government ineptitude than anything else.

      Still, if you say that you were taught these 3 incidents in school, I'm impressed. I know quite a few people (not long out of school) who couldn't identify the incidents from the information provided.

      Sure, if you describe them in an obtuse fashion nobody will have a clue what you're talking about, just like how many people wouldn't immediately get that a man "nailed to a tree for saying how great it would be to be nice to people for a change" is referring to Jesus. However, if you just say "Waco" or "Kent State" everybody will know what you're talking about, and many (especially in NYC) will know what you're referring to with the "Sean Bell shooting in New York."

    11. Re:Selective Memories by VShael · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was a reference to Amadou Diallo.

  32. that's unfair by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    My kitty update posts are the most popular on my blog, sometimes even garnering a comment!

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  33. Naah, you Capitalist dogs never understand us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always feared that someday /. may end up victim of our censorship too.
    But of course I paean the omnipotent Party, Sir!

    Cowardly Yours
    Lt. Anonymous

  34. ... and nothing of value was lost by teneighty · · Score: 1

    ... and nothing of value was lost.

    (Ok I was only talking about Hotmail and Twitter, but if we had to lose Flickr in order to get rid of Twitter, well, I don't know about you, but I would be tempted!)

  35. So Rorry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You BING em back now....

  36. no surprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "blocked in China" what else is new

  37. Red Guards by ardle · · Score: 1

    Now there are good jobs, the internet (censored) and pop culture, to occupy students. These werent really around in China 20 years ago.

    It's not that surprising that the Chinese government is not in favour of youth movements - and in favour of pop culture, to the extent that they allow it.
    Crude summary: The Cultural Revolution was a strategy implemented by Mao Zedong, with the help of his wife Jiang Qing to get his career back on track. The Red Guards were recruited from students (I wonder if he got the idea from news reports from the US?) and went around the place with a little red book of Mao quotes. Eventually, Mao had to send in the regular army to help disband the Red Guards. Then he implemented a forced dispersal of "intellectuals" (read "students") to rural areas for the following 10 years or so (to make it harder for them to congregate/communicate).

  38. Incident - Massacre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is everyone calling what happened in Tienanmen Square an 'incident'? It was a MASSACRE!

  39. Unusual?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blocking such high-profile sites is unusual.

    You must be new here. Blocking of high-profile sites happens *all* the time - wikipedia, youtube, blogspot, flickr, bbc - the list goes on and on and on, and has been happening in China since the Internet has been available.

  40. The evil, evil Chinese... by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Censure is a bad thing, and stupid too - but I think one has to try to be a little bit more nuanced than simply condemning them for being Chinese and Communists.

    Looking back at the last few decades, I think it is clear that the Chinese government are working towards an ever more open society; but it would be madness just letting go and changing everything overnight. There is a significant part of the population that are against that openness, and whether we or the Chinese government like it or not, it takes a long time to change society. After all, it took us several generations in Europe to go from feudal monarchy to modern democracy, and clever as the Chinese may be, they are not going to be able to make that change overnight. And seeing how they have gone from a closed society to what they are now in about 30 years (~a generation), it should probably take at least 10 years more.

    Just look at what happened in Iraq: Saddam Hussein was a fairly standard dictator and as foul as they come, but society worked. Then the Americans came and ripped out the bad bits, but couldn't replace them with anything - and we all know the horrors and the chaos that followed. Democracy and freedom is something you have to learn; any society has to learn to handle it responsibly, because freedom without responsibility is just chaos.