Slashdot Mirror


Acer To Launch 3D Notebook In October?

An anonymous reader writes "Acer is planning to announce a 3D notebook computer by end of October. If Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's first manufacturer to do so. The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses. The 15.6-inch notebook features built-in software which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D and directly support 3D movies." Update: 06/08 23:18 GMT by T : According to the linked story, the no-glasses version is still in the works; the current iteration does still require special glasses.

135 comments

  1. Been done. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

    CSI already has these. I know because I saw it on TV. They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.

    1. Re:Been done. by argent · · Score: 1

      They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.

      They stole the technology from Blade Runner. Bastards.

    2. Re:Been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.

      I've never heard of a .5 megabyte resolution security camera. Could you please elaborate?

    3. Re:Been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were also able to get High Res photos out of a .5MB security camera and spin it around in 3D.

      I've never heard of a .5 megabyte resolution security camera. Could you please elaborate?

      No.

    4. Re:Been done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but let's be fair, that was the resolution for real life back then.

    5. Re:Been done. by dindi · · Score: 1

      I think you are referring to "which can convert regular 2D movies to 3D " .... I also kept wondering about that feature! Must be like one of the virtual surround sound devices that can take mono and turn it into a nice effect which makes you feel like sitting in a coke can...

    6. Re:Been done. by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, it is real - Sharp made them years ago - no glasses required, so if Acer indeed comes out with a 3D laptop then it'll be the world's second manufacturer to do so. Sharp even got to a second generation of them. Here's a link: http://www.physorg.com/news3296.html. It was so successful you can't buy them anymore. The problem was lack of content and you needed to hold you head in the hot-zone of 3D-ness. Even if Acer manages to release a decent 3D screen, and we start watching the latest 3D movies on it, I think they'll have a tough time overcoming the puppet theater effect on such a small screen. It's not such a problem in a huge cinema, but would be in this case.

    7. Re:Been done. by idigitallDotCom · · Score: 1

      Currently stereoscopic glasses are needed to view the 3D content. Stereoscopic glasses [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereoscopy] work by exposing a "left" image to the left eye and a "right" image to the right eye - so that the brain puts the two together and it appears 3D.

      How on earth is Acer planning to replace the stereoscopic glasses? Divide the screen in two and display the images in corresponding halves? Might be more possible if the images were replaced by interlaced panels with some sort of curved refractive screen sending the "left" and "right" images out at slight angles so that the right eye sees the right image and the left eye sees the left image. Of course that'd be highly specific to your head location, and if viewed at the wrong angle wont appear 3D. Maybe I'm just talking rubbish..

      I think it CAN be done.... I'd Love to see it!

      --
      blog.idigitall.com
    8. Re:Been done. by Eudial · · Score: 1

      Obligatory PHD Comics reference: If TV Science was more like REAL Science.

      --
      GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
    9. Re:Been done. by Monsieur_F · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Err, 3D without glasses has been done before and is still a hot topic these days.

      Look for "autostereoscopic" screens. (despite the name, actually more than 2 pictures are used to generate the 3D effect, more like 8 pictures)

      Sharp already commercialized a 3D laptop some years ago.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
  2. WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Itninja · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are all the other laptops on the market existing in only two dimensions? I am pretty sure all laptops are currently three dimensional.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a laptop that is travelling into the future at the rate of 1 s^2

    2. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      You must be in some strange orthogonal plane. 1 s^2 is a rate?. It doesn't hold up to scaling arguments. Try 1s/s.

    3. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That's 1 universal second per local second, I assume.
      Please people, label your units!

    4. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by sexconker · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesn't make it 4 dimensional.
      It has to span multiple points along the time axis to be dimensional in that regard.

    5. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I count no less than four dimensions on my laptop.

    6. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would love a 2 - dimensional laptop. I envision something like a sheet of paper that accepts input from my fingertips or from a stylus or from a virtual keyboard.

      Don't even worry about being able to fold it or roll it. If I can just slip it into a folder among sheets of regular paper.

      Yes, I know that a sheet of paper is still 3D, but I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now. I remember when I worked for a university as a director of computing and went out to Cupertino for a week. This is back when Apple was still interested in the educational market, so they took real good care of us, put us up in a nice bed and breakfast. But no hookers, damn it.

      Anyway, they had some spooky Apple hardware developer talk to us about the things they were planning and told us we'd definitely have electronic paper by "2001". I always thought that guy might have been on 'shrooms or something equally entheogenic. When I asked him about the Newton, he developed a slight, but noticeable eye-twitch. My guess is that today that very hardware developer is working at a Potbelly's sandwich shop after completing court-ordered rehab.

      Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this: Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper! Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    7. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I suppose one of those projected keyboards could be considered a two dimensional computer. Does a reflected image have a third dimension? Maybe just on the order of the wavelength of light used.

    8. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got something like that, except you can fold it and roll it as well... It's quite amazing stuff. You just use an "ink pen" and you "write" on it. It's quite a device.

    9. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      It has to span multiple points along the time axis to be dimensional in that regard

      And how do you know it doesn't? Prove it.

    10. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does span multiple points along the time axis...

      All points along this range at least: [ 0, 1, ..., N-1, N ]

      N being the current number of seconds since the laptop's creation...

      No?

    11. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      That comment is pretty two dimensional. Don't be so shallow.

      --
      .
    12. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the search function sucks.

    13. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is not that a laptop exists only at an instance, so every point in the space of the laptop travels also along the time axis.

    14. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by idigitallDotCom · · Score: 1

      I'm just thinking.... how would you plug a usb drive into a sheet of paper?

      --
      blog.idigitall.com
    15. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by justleavealonemmmkay · · Score: 1

      aguably 2D: the thickness of the laptop has no useful purpose, just because the keyboard is not in the same plane as the display does not qualify it as 3D. You could represent any useful point of the laptop using just two coordinates.

    16. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Anyway, if anybody from Apple is reading this: Stop fooling around with the fucking iPhones and get me my iPaper! Or ePaper, or whatever you want to call it.

      But, but... Surely you can get an iHooker from the AppStore with your iPhone... Or at least a hooker locator app. Wasn't that what you were originally complaining about ?

      See ? Apple *does* care !

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    17. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by cheftw · · Score: 1

      When I divide a second by a second I just get the number 1.

      YMMV though.

      --
      Always back up, never back down. ---- Think you're cool 'cos your uid is prime? Take mine, modulo the one digit integers
    18. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Hey, you've been giving your most valuable inputs to a sheet of paper ever since you were old enough to wipe your backside.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    19. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point: Time is relative, and a rate of time/time must be a rate of local time / some non-local time (or the reciprocal) to make any sense at all.

    20. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      I have a 1 dimensional laptop at home, but I keep losing it

    21. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      actually, a true 2 dimensional laptop wouldn't be able to be put in an envelope since it has no mass- only shape

    22. Re:WTH is a 3D Laptop??? by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I've been waiting for the electronic "paper" for like 15 years now.

      Well then you only got 5 more years to wait.

  3. "convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Bullshit.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by moon3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      and also converts 3D to 4D. Amazing!

    2. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Vuojo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly. These "3D" systems have been coming for decades and in the end they have been total crap. I believe when I see one with my own eyes.

    3. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I believe when I see one with my own eyes.

      Is that with or without the special glasses that this system "doesn't" include? ;)

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    4. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Joce640k · · Score: 0

      Why not? We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.

      The eye is only stereo. Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have seen a demo of realtime conversion - it actually works, but only about 80% good. Occasionally you'll see some problems. I saw a demo at NAB in April at Samsung's booth that blew my mind because it was actually that good, but it's still nothing compared to real stereoscopic capture. Basically it looks like a series of parallax planes, a step down from the real thing. But shockingly, it DOES work. My best guess is that it takes into account a variety of factors including haze and color, detail, dimensions and inference from motion.

      I consider it to be a gimmick that distracts from real 3D content. It's -very- clever, but it is no substitute for real stereoscopic content.

    6. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you serious?

    7. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe its a bit like those devices which claimed to convert mono sound to stereo.

    8. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by linebackn · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I believe when I see one with my own eyes.

      I second that. I'll believe it when I see it with my one good eye!

    9. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      It's probably like one of those posters where you stare really hard and the desktop suddenly pops out at you.~ I was never very good at those.

    10. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Why not?

      Because the information isn't there.

      > We already have software that converts stereo music to true surround sound.

      No we don't. The information isn't there.

      > Extracting parallax information and converting movies to 3D should be easy.

      The information isn't there. What next, software to convert a still picture to a 90 minute movie?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    11. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Aphoxema · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not "true" surround sound, it doesn't mystically divine information that isn't there anymore. That is, when you turn your head you don't hear what you would have heard if you've done so with the actual source, if applicable.

      So, no, it's impossible for them to have something that can guess to any believable sight what depth every part of an image it should be.

      I second that call on bullshit.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    12. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by skywire · · Score: 1

      Oh, but it is there. A movie is not a collection of independent still photos. The motion of objects relative to each other and to the camera between frames provides a wealth of depth information. By way of illustration, the next time you are a passenger in an automobile, cover one eye and observe the passing scenery, and you will notice that you are constructing a pretty good 3D model.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    13. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you took pains to make clear, you are using "surround sound" in an idiosyncratic way. The poster only slightly exaggerated in his claim of conversion of stereo to "true" surround sound. Many stereo recordings actually do contain enough information to give a convincing surround sound effect when processed through a surround processor that essentially subtracts the two channels and directs the difference to one or two rear speakers.

    14. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      But there is still vital information missing; you're only reproducing whatever the recording recorded from certain positions. It's impossible to assume new locations for the sounds and get an accurate position of the instruments.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    15. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      One of the key pieces in video compression is detecting motion vectors automatically from video. Once you have motion vectors, there are algorithms to turn sequences of motion vectors into 3D models. I've seen video with an automatically generated wireframe on it before, but I couldn't find the link.

      Small, 3D screens that don't require the use of glasses are already commercially available. I saw ads for 3D screen cellphones all the time on Japanese TV and on the train. I thought it was interesting, but not worth buying a new phone.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    16. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 1

      I played a "no glasses" arcade game back in 1991. No scan lines, flicker, or color bleed, just high def that puts my 43 incher to shame. Of course, it was in the PX at the Army Signal School. More geeks per square foot than anyplace else I've ever seen. Literally THOUSANDS, and not an English major to be seen!

      --
      When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
    17. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by cdhgee · · Score: 1

      The eye is only stereo

      When did eyes start processing sound as well as light?!? Or is this some sort of next-generation eye that will work with these glasses we won't need for the 3D laptops which don't yet exist?

    18. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Really, it doesn't include the glasses? So when do the glasses become available, because it is in a few years, then I already have a laptop that does this.

    19. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by cicuz · · Score: 1

      will it fukup my Memento playback?

    20. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's an animated movie, it was done in 3D anyway, so not removing the extra dimension is fairly trivial.

    21. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by anonymousbob22 · · Score: 1

      When did eyes start processing sound as well as light?!? Or is this some sort of next-generation eye that will work with these glasses we won't need for the 3D laptops which don't yet exist?

      I have synaesthesia, you insensitive clod!

    22. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think 3D is the new way of saying "not a MacBook Air"

    23. Re:"convert regular 2D movies to 3D" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made it quite clear the first time that you were talking about the lack of information that would enable the listener to have 360 degree freedom of movement, and of course I agree 100%. But the post you were responding to said nothing about that ability. They mentioned "surround sound", which is a term of art. Most forms of "Surround sound" require the listener to assume a certain position and orientation. I just wanted to make that clear, in defense of that poster.

  4. Finally, a laptop not from Flatland! by techmuse · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm glad that they are going to be shipping 3 dimensional laptops. Those 2 dimensional laptops that I've been using are really inconvenient. The screen and the keyboard are on the same plane, and you can't push the buttons at all, because that would require a third dimension. Even worse, my 2 dimensional laptop keeps falling through infinitely thin slots, and cut my arm off once when it fell perpendicularly to the floor while my arm was in the way. It might be 2D, but it has mass after all, so it has an infinitely sharp edge. Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25" thick at its thinnest point. That's nothing. My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!

    1. Re:Finally, a laptop not from Flatland! by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I would think that a 2D laptop would only slice through your arm in the same way that an XRay removes your skin and muscle to show bone. You have particles traveling through your body all the time. There's even particles that travel directly through the earth and don't interact with anything.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Finally, a laptop not from Flatland! by xouumalperxe · · Score: 1

      Apple made a big deal out of the Macbook Air being .25" thick at its thinnest point. That's nothing. My 2D laptop has 0 thickness!

      You got it all mixed up, silly. "Nothing" is your 0-thickness laptop. the Air is something, to the tune of .25".

  5. Hype by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.

    So basically they're just throwing a pair of shutter glasses into the box.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  6. Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in by bobstreo · · Score: 0

    3d

    I can barely stand staring at my 2d monitor all day.

    Will it stop working after a while so you can take a break like the Nintendo VR Boy?

    1. Re:Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Will the screen display 2D images without being out of focus or looking weird?

      Oh, that'll sell really well then.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in by sexconker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I rented the Virtual Boy when it came out, and played it all that (long, Thanksgiving) weekend. I do not recall it shutting off and making me take a break. I do remember there were warnings about taking a break, which I completely ignored.

      The VB was awesome. Too damned bad it was monochrome. The price (and weight) were just way too much at the time for them to go full color. And now that they already have the failure on record, there's no chance in hell they'll pursue a full color version anytime in the near future.

      While the system was a failure and most of the games were shitty, the visual effect was actually pretty fucking cool, and remains one of the best implementations of 3D I've seen. I never had any problems with headaches / eye strain / etc., either.

    3. Re:Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I never had any headaches from mine either and I'm prone to them. I think I still have one in a box somewhere. I don't see why they couldn't make one with dual LCDs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Cue Mind Numbing Headache and Eye Strain in by sexconker · · Score: 1

      It was just cost (and weight) prohibitive at the time to do anything more than they did.

      And today, they've gone with the DS. Can't get that touchscreen or the casual appeal with your face buried in some viewfinder.

  7. Summary grossly incorrect. by Itninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    "Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted."

    Suddenly, that 'most interesting thing' isn't that interesting at all.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    1. Re:Summary grossly incorrect. by lastomega7 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "A few technological obstacles..."
      All they have to do is get the whole 3D thing working.

    2. Re:Summary grossly incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even with glasses, it's still going to be useful. One word: pR0n!

    3. Re:Summary grossly incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Someone should mod this either funny or insightful

    4. Re:Summary grossly incorrect. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like the compression algorithm I was working on, that compresses anything to 1k, with a few technological obstacles. One of those being decompression.

  8. Inaccurate summary by Theaetetus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it requires no special glasses.

    Wow, that is interesting... oh, wait:

    Currently, users still need to wear stereoscopic glasses for the 3D to be effective, however, Acer is developing a model without the need for glasses, although it still has quiet a few technological obstacles to overcome, Kan noted.

    What's next? "The most interesting thing about Acer's machine is that it runs on a hyperdimensional fuel cell weighing only two ounces but able to supply power for six months on a single charge... (but not currently, and it has quite a few technological obstacles to overcome)."
    Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.

    1. Re:Inaccurate summary by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      but not such a good Slashdot story.

      Well, it will be good. Once they get some bugs worked out.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Inaccurate summary by CaseCrash · · Score: 0

      Wishful thinking makes for a good press release, but not such a good Slashdot story.

      Wishful thinking makes for every slashdot story

      --
      No, that link you posted to a web comic we've all seen a hundred times is not "obligatory."
  9. Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sharp produced a 3D laptop in early 2005.

    http://www.pcworld.com/article/115348/sharps_3d_notebook.html

    http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/22/042253

    with a no-glasses display, even. I saw one at a conference expo,
    it worked pretty well for molecular graphics/viz stuff. But they never
    caught on.

    1. Re:Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005 by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Fuck you. This is a slashdot article.
      Competence, precedence, and facts have no place here.

    2. Re:Sharp produced a 3D laptop in 2005 by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I knew Sharp had made the no-glasses 3D display LCD panel. Didn't know they'd made an integrated version. As I recall, they use an integrated lenticular lens sheet. Unfortunately for Sharp, they're completely and utterly clueless about how to find a tolerable price point. People might pay a premium for a native 3D display, but they sure as hell won't pay as much of a premium as Sharp asked. So they didn't sell.

      Worse, it's not hard to find out what lenticular lens sheets cost. They're the same things given away for free on cereal boxes for motion effects, and the same things used in promotional materials for motion and 3D effects. "Motion" Valentine's Day cards for children to distribute at school were available for a few dollars at Walmart. Meaning they're dirt cheap per square foot. For a corporation as large as Sharp, buying the extrusion machine capable of producing them at precisely the pitch they need should have been trivial, the PET plastic cost IS trivial, and so ultimately the price point they chose was absurd. They tried to play the "over price it so people think it's worth something" game and failed.

      A shame, really. Reviewers said the effect worked quite nicely, without any headache inducing effect whatsoever. A far cry from every glasses-based effect ever tried. Of course what they trade off for 3D is resolution, rather than framerate. There's always something...

      It's too bad "HD" flat-panel TVs have utterly destroyed the computer flat panel market. Manufacturers find it much more lucrative to crank out tons of crap-resolution TVs than to try to produce high resolution computer monitors anymore. If not for TVs, production processes might have pushed past the 30" widescreen at 2560x1600 resolution, getting us ready for built-in stereoscopic displays. Instead, average resolution has declined, crippling any idea to spend pixels for stereo.

  10. will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gm by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel gma card?

  11. CSI technicians... by denzacar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is there anything they can't do?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:CSI technicians... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Last I heard they still haven't been able to tighten up the graphics on level 3.

    2. Re:CSI technicians... by davester666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stopping David Caruso from doing his stupid pose in EVERY SINGLE SCENE?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:CSI technicians... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Act their way out of a paper bag?

      --
      The game.
    4. Re:CSI technicians... by bami · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes they did, They have these new fancy VB6 GUI's that can simultaneously track IP's and tighten up graphics.

  12. Sharp tech? by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'll be using sharp's many-year-old technology? 2 LCD panels, one high res, the other lower behind it with something like a lenticular lens so one eye see only one panel

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  13. Actius RD3D in 2004 by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Informative

    And you are talking about the second generation. The Actius RD3D was released a year earlier. So, this Acer is not the first 3D laptop in the sense that it exists in 3 dimensions, it is not the first 3D laptop in the sense of having a 3D capable display, maybe there is another usage of the term 3D?

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Actius RD3D in 2004 by Allicorn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Absolutely! "First ever" my foot!

      The Sharp Actius RD3D, which has been available for more than 5 years, has a spectacularly cool lenticular display that produces a pretty convincing and definitely bright & colorful illusion of 3D without the need for any accoutrements.

      Turns out it's not a great laptop in and of itself - pitiful battery life - too heavy - and a few users I've known just don't seem to "get" the 3d effect.

      Nonetheless - summary and TFA are completely wrong.

      Er... and as for software which converts movies into 3d on the fly... haha! Gag of the day right there.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
    2. Re:Actius RD3D in 2004 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a second gen of this laptop dead in a drawer in my desk at work. There were 4 programs that actually took advantage of the 3d, and of those, 1 worked for more than a couple of minutes. It's good for wow-factor, and getting higher-ups to throw money at your research, but useless otherwise...

    3. Re:Actius RD3D in 2004 by Sky+Cry · · Score: 1

      So, this Acer is not the first 3D laptop in the sense that it exists in 3 dimensions, it is not the first 3D laptop in the sense of having a 3D capable display, maybe there is another usage of the term 3D?

      New Acer DDD: the first laptop with 3 Ds!

  14. Re:will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel by Krneki · · Score: 1

    Considering it's an Acer, they will go for the cheap solution.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  15. Apple's marketing is better than Acer by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    Apple has spent the last few years getting people to think that switching from a 3D laptop to a 2D laptop is an upgrade. Now Acer thinks they can make non-thin cool again? Good luck with that.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  16. first 3d? then Actius RD3D from sharp was 0? by dracovolans · · Score: 1

    first portable computer with 3d screen was a device from sharp, and, whatever acer will say - they can be just at best second. And - yes.... 3d from sharp works without any glasses. what wrong is with this world? nvidia sells tehnology based on glasses and calls it "a new tehnology" - even if this kind of 3d is older than computers, and now acer comes with "first 3d laptop". they want to rewrite the history? or just sell the same sXXX one more time?

  17. Hmm... Possibly something like... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fotowoosh?

    Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies. Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Hmm... Possibly something like... by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Fotowoosh?

      lol, I love this snippet from that post:

      The 3D image is constructed in Virtual Reality Modeling Language (VRML) format, meaning you currently need a VRML reader to see it (future browsers will likely build this functionality in)

      Wow, apparently Arrington is completely unaware that VRML is a 15 year old spec that's been ignored by "future browsers" for over a decade because it's crap, and is practically unused.

      Just what "future browsers" need -- a bloated 3d presentation format that targets a problem that no one has, and is less capable than already supported technologies like flash and java applets.

    2. Re:Hmm... Possibly something like... by dkf · · Score: 1

      Highly unlikely that it could work in a way acceptable for viewing movies. Cardboard cutouts instead of actual 3D at best...

      Works great for movies with Roger Moore.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  18. Which one is the 3rd dimension? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lenght, Width and Smell. Those computers will stink. Alternatively the 3rd dimension could be time, and they rot (hey, biodegradable computers will be a very ecological solution, you can make a whole marketing campaign with that)

    Or could be some of the extended strings teory dimensions... it will be there, believe us, but you wont be able to perceive it.

  19. 3drealms no carrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't wait to run dnf on it! oh.. wait!

  20. Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses by Animaether · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay.. so on one hand, you've got...
    - red/green red/cyan red/blue
    - polarized
    - shutter
    - chromadepth
    - etc. ...glasses. Nobody likes these, because you have to wear them.

    On the other hand, you've got..
    - lenticular
    - uhm. nope, that's pretty much it. ...displays. Which most people don't like either, as you practically have to sit in a single spot to make it work well. There -are- displays where you can view from a few more angles (any 'tween' angles show ghosting), but always at a loss of (horizontal) resolution, as more and more images get displayed at the same time.

    This only counts -stereographic- 3D methods. So a bunch of panels behind eachother (medical imaging-look, and your laptop would be as thick as a printed encyclopedia..), or displays that track where your face is so as to show a different viewpoint (doesn't give depth cues except for the illusion when you move your head side to side like some sort of pigeon on drugs), don't count.

    Neither of the above 2 methods are very appealing, but if I had to take my pick, I'll take glasses *any* time. Combined with the head tracker, all the more awesome. Displays that don't take glasses simply aren't there yet for any extended use.

    ( See an older post of mine for various other '3d display' methods; though I'm sure wikipedia's got 'm all covered, too )

    1. Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Lenticular actually sounds pretty promising. When we're talking about a 15 inch screen, it's not really that useful to move your head around too much. Also, assuming you're gaming on it (the only serious application I see for 3D at the moment) your head's position is actually fairly fixed anyway, since one hand is on the keyboard.

      I'm not saying it's ideal (I'll certainly be sticking to my 25 in. desktop) but if I was in the mood to buy a gaming laptop, I might be inclined to do go with one that has 3D.

      Obviously the claim that it can change 2D movies into 3D ones is bunk, but it does raise the question for CG titles. They're already rendering the entire thing, it would seem rather silly for them not to render in 3D, since it would cost them almost nothing to do. Anyone know if Pixar has a stockpile of 3D footage of all their films? I don't see much reason they wouldn't, other than simply not thinking of it.

      Or is there a lot of rendering that goes on after they've fixed the shot?

    2. Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but keep in mind that the lenticular cover is typically permanent (if it's not, you have to *very carefully* re-align any time you put it back over the screen).. which means your resolution is cut in half at best (say, every even vertical column of pixels for the left eye, every odd vertical column for the right eye). And even if you don't move your head very much, go find a lenticular display or even just one of those little cards that came in cereal boxes or whatever.. the smallest movement can cause ghosting at best, or flipping at worst. What I mean by 'the smallest movement' is, roughly, half the distance between your eyes at the ideal distance (yes, every lenticular display also has an ideal distance). I'm sure you'll agree, that's not a lot of distance at all.

      =====

      2D Movies into 3D is partially bunk - see posts up above.

      =====

      CG Movies *can* be made in '3D' (stereoscopic) and *are* being made in 3D. See: Beowulf, Caroline, Up, etc. Speaking of Pixar... soon to come: Toy Story 1 (and 2, I think), re-done in 3D.

      Don't think it costs 'almost nothing', though.
          It effectively doubles your rendertime - at 8 hours to a day per frame for some scenes, that's something to cinsider (they probably have more than double the speed now that they did back then, but there ya go).
          But moreover, you have to plan your scenes much more carefully. You don't want thinks popping into screen for the left eye but not for the right eye. If you're doing any post-process compositing, all of your effects have to be composited into a 3D space, as any cheat of "eh, this looks about right" on a single 2D plate, when transferred to two 2D plates, can cause the effect to either float in front of where it should be, or sit behind it... both are very confusing for the brain to deal with (the latter more so).
          All this takes plenty of additional man-hours (artists, but even the tech guys who keep the farm up and running, for example). That's also partially why more and more 'CG' studios are trying to get things out of the rendering pipeline directly with as little need for post-compositing as possible. Color keying and such you can do on both plates at the same time without issue, of course.

    3. Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I always thought that LCD (uh.. displays...) would be a natural fit for polarized lenses. How hard would it be to stick an additional perpendicular layer and drive it in such a way as to have different levels at each pixel depending on the polarization angle?

      Sure, you couldn't do circular polarization, but that doesn't really help much anyway, as you really need to keep your head pretty level for it to work, anyway. Personally, I don't find wearing sunglasses to be all that bad of a proposition, for the benefit.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Glasses or Not: Both 'suck', so go with glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose I *could* use those 3-d glasses, except I'd have to take off my existing ones. You know, the ones I need in order to actually see. So it wouldn't matter if the glasses let me see 3d, because it'd be too frickin' blurry to matter.

  21. I wonder... by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

    Is this using Johnny Lee Chung's wii mote technology shown here?

    I have no idea how a movie would be encoded to enable this, and of course, as Johnny points out it's only good for one viewer at a time... PERFECT for laptops, not so much for general displays. And... IMHO it's not really full 3-D but a damn good trick.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's not.

      it'll be a lenticular display, to shine different images into each eye.

  22. Keep your glasses - autostereoscopic not there yet by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    Guys, you don't want an autostereoscopic display based on lenticular imaging - basically the same thing you see on cracker jack prizes. There is no autostereoscopic display that looks anywhere near as good as polarized glasses or shutter glasses at 120hz or above. (60hz per eye) the resolution and viewing angles are simply too poor.

    The current state of the art in personal 3D displays are LCD or plasma displays that have a polarizing layer on every other line, so you can view them with the nice, lightweight RealD style circularly polarized glasses - the same ones deployed with about 1,800 3D movie screens at the moment using the Sony XSRD digital cinema projectors. They look absolutely stunning. unfortunately for a 40" screen, it costs about $10,000. Hopefully they can get the manufacturing process down so that it is less expensive in the future. I imagine it is currently a very hands-on process of laying the strips down individually.

    There is enough vertical resolution in full HD (1080 lines) that it looks DAMN good. I could not tell that each eye was only looking at an image with 1/2 the vertical resolution. The human brain is -very good- at putting together stereoscopic vision to give you something more than what you are looking at.

    If they made a smaller version of the polarized LCD display that could fit on a laptop, it'd be a great thing for traveling demos.

  23. Re:Keep your glasses - autostereoscopic not there by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    A clarification - I meant to say that the same type of glasses are used with the digital cinema projectors, but the technology is different. The projectors project a full frame in each polarization simultaneously, whereas the home theater sized LCD flat panel displays show left and right eyes on every other vertical line simultaneously. With the projection system, each eye has a full resolution image, and on the LCD each eye sees 1/2 vertical resolution, which is not an issue on a smaller display.

  24. The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie... by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie is actually by taking advantage of camera motion.

    1. Detect camera motion
    2. Detect the direction
    3. Detect the velocity
    4. display frame t=N for one eye
    5. display frame t=+-x for the other eye, depending on 2, and x depending on 4.

    If you've got the movie Swordfish, you can apply this technique to the action sequence in the beginning where a camera orbits the scene. In fact, try here*:
    http://tinypic.com/player.php?v=2a6tw82&s=5

    It's in cross-eyed stereoscopic format, so just cross your eyes, focus, and enjoy the scene in stereoscopic 3D.

    It also shows (slightly) the pitfalls...
    1. If there's no camera motion, this doesn't work.
    2. If there's too much non-camera motion, this shows ghosting (as e.g. a person will be in place A at t=N, and place B at t=N+x)
    3. If there's any post effects, they will stick out like a sore thumb if they are not accurately composited in. In that video, for example, the explosion-y bits halfway in look like they're kind of floating at a place in the scene they shouldn't be. It doesn't show so much in the original (just watch either left/right alone), but it shows up easily once made stereoscopic 3d.

    It is a cute method, just not well-suited to any and all movies at all.

    Other methods that might be employed are detecting fog and using the fog as a depth cue, or parent poster's method; but that will take a more hefty processor (most of the above steps can easily be derived from e.g. an mpeg processor, which already does motion estimation).

    ( *original material copyright Village Roadshow Pictures, Silver Pictures, NPV Entertainment and Jonathan Krane Group and Warner Bros (distributor). Broadcast by SBS Broadcasting, a subsidiary of ProSiebenSat.1 Media AG. Used only to demonstrate a 2D to stereographic 3D conversion method, for educational purposes. )

    1. Re:The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie... by tixxit · · Score: 1

      They'll have to employ some tricks like that I think. I took a class on 3D vision that was focused on reconstructing 3D images from 2D. Usually, it requires 2+ images from different angles/locations, but the big step is pixel matching. That is not a fast process by any standard. We got graded based on how fast our implementation was. The fastest implementation in the class was just under 30 sec on a stereo (2) image that was 576x384 pixels large. That 30 seconds did not include the time required to match the feature points either. Even using information from previous frames and whatnot, I just can't see them getting it down to 1/30th of a second.

    2. Re:The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie... by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Well... you don't really need to have it down to 1/30th of a second unless you want real time 2D-3D conversion and playback.
      You could convert it to a 3D video for later viewing, but it would have to work faster than 15 minutes per a second of the movie (30 seconds mentioned above times 30 frames per second).

      The REAL problem in such a case would not be the length of time it took to "3D-ify" the movie.
      After all... faster processors and dedicated hardware would cut that down in time.

      Making a 3D copy of the movie would probably breach the copyright though.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      The demo works, but they implemented it VERY badly. The worst thing you can do to a stereoscopic image, let alone a video is to add distractions that cause your eyes to move. Those damn walls and window borders that flash across the camera at high speeds at close range completely destroy the effect.

    4. Re:The easiest way to get a stereo 3D movie... by Animaether · · Score: 1

      yup - that's why 3D live action movies are a ways off for now.. CG is easier (See another post of mine on that; it's still a lot of extra work); with live action you have to deal with physical cameras.. whether or not you can even place them in the spot you want, or whether that would place one camera halfway into a wall, etc.

  25. We already have that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The majority of 3D movies are such that you know that they're awful before you see them. No time-travel necessary.

    1. Re:We already have that. by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The majority of 3D movies are such that you know that they're awful before you see them. No time-travel necessary.

      But after you've seen them you really wish you could travel back in time.
      That's why 4D would be a breakthrough.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  26. We can finally put Angelina Jolie in 3D... by TheTrollToll · · Score: 1

    ... 3d that's my apartment number, I'll be waiting...

  27. I hope... by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope these notebooks come with three or four spare motherboards. Judging by their previous track record, that is what it takes to keep their notebooks running beyond the warranty.

    http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-0.html?forumID=101&threadID=243038&start=0
    http://www.techspot.com/vb/all/windows/t-71394-Acer-5101-keyboard-usb-and-touchpad-are-dead.html
    http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/51337-35-keyboard-mouse-work-vista-login-screen
    Google it, tons more...

    Seems Acer preferred playing their customers along until the warranty ran out, then charged them for a new motherboard (that didn't fix the problem in most cases) rather then admit they had a pattern failure.

    I don't care WHAT kind of product they have, from a purely moralistic point of view, I'll take my business elsewhere.

  28. Ehem by TheMightyFuzzball · · Score: 1

    When last I checked all laptops are in three dimensions, I wouldn't want a 2D laptop., it'd be hard to type...

  29. oh for the millioneth time.. by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    How do these fucking stories make it to main page ?
    Is there a bot net moderating slashdot firehouse, tagging all shitty stories as interesting , insightful and funny ?

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
  30. 3D notebooks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it mean they have started to use a CRT for the screen?

  31. Re:will it have a good video card or a cheap Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While Acers on average are "cheap", they do use better video cards sometimes:
    Aspire 8935 - ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
    Aspire 7730G - NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
    just a quick search, I'm sure there's more...

  32. Paradigm Shift by Scroatzilla · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is awesome. First, notebooks. Then, netbooks.

    Now, migrainebooks.

  33. Bundling by immakiku · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the article make it seem like Acer is merely bundling 3D software with their hardware. "Built-in software" really means nothing to me unless this is somehow part of the BIOS or it relies on special hardware they provide.

  34. ... and everything else in the universe by javaObject · · Score: 1

    Is it not our notebook and everything else in this universe are 3D?

  35. Sharp by Phylter · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago Sharp released a 15 inch 3d display and a notebook with the display built in. It wasn't the best but it was the first run of the technology. They even had a beautiful 19-inch 3d display that never made it to market, at least not in the US.

  36. aaaaanndd... by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    ... a 120Hz LCD screen (which I'd very much like).

    Or alternatively (and probably more likely), pixels with opposite polarisation are interleaved (horizontally or vertically), the included glasses are passive-polarised, and the "3D mode" is half the resolution of the 2D mode.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:aaaaanndd... by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      Or 2 LCDs stacked on top of one another like the iZ3D monitor, www.iz3d.com . However I would hate to lug a laptop with 2LCDs on it around.

  37. But... by hoytak · · Score: 1

    does the knob go up to 11D?

    --
    Does having a witty signature really indicate normality?
  38. OMFG by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    Jenna Jameson in full 3D glory! Prepare your Biff's sidekick 3D glasses. We are about to live interesting times.

    1. Re:OMFG by tech_fixer · · Score: 1

      Finally!!! I thought it was weird nobody had posted anything about viewing pr0n on this.

      Kudos to the moderators for doing a good job of keeping the place clean.

  39. Tailcoat riders still need "something" to ride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact that acer is even pushing 3d is indicative of the trend, is it not? ...for what tech can separate the masses from their money in this doldrum of 2d we find ourselves in? 3d, of course! ...but I doubt acer will be on the forefront of it -- just a tailcoat rider, as usual. Does this mean ubiquitous 3d is finally here and ready to be ridden? When we see an i3d laptop from Apple, we will know for sure =)

  40. On the third hand by killmenow · · Score: 1

    You just have to cross your eyes

    1. Re:On the third hand by Animaether · · Score: 1

      I'm a huge fan of that method, actually :) unfortunately it typically does mean loss of both half your horizontal -and- vertical resolution ( unless you shoot a portrait mode movie :) )

      I take some stereoscopic side-by-side photos from time to time, and cross-eye is definitely the best way to view them. However, some people seem to have problems with focusing right when they cross their eyes; their brain is too wired into thinking that whatever is at the point where your eyes' sightlines cross, must be what should be in focus.

  41. Not the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pretty sure this isn't the first 3d laptop available. I was at a trade show (IAAPA) about 5 years ago, and one of the exhibitors happened to have a laptop with a lenticular screen, running a 3d demo. If you positioned yourself in exactly the right position, then you would see the image in 3d. Now, I'm not saying that the 3d effect was really pronounced, or even good. And if you were off-center by even a little bit then it just looked bad. But the laptop existed, and I'm pretty sure it was available on the consumer market.

  42. All Acers are no-glasses laptops by m_frankie_h · · Score: 1

    That is, if you spill a glass of water (anywhere in the house), or just bring a glass (maybe even empty, but this has not been tested), the keyboard dies.

    Really, just try it. And then buy a real laptop.

  43. Anyone Else? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else hate 3-D? I don't understand why this 80's fad is back but it sucks. Almost as bad as a pet rock. I don't mean to troll but G. Lucas is behind this right now so you know it is a really bad idea.

  44. cheap wow gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weekends to peopleig2t mean that they can have a two-day wowgold4europe good rest. For exampleï¼OE people gameusd can go out to enjoy themselves or get meinwowgold together with relatives and friends to talk with each storeingame other or watch interesting video tapes with the speebie whole family.
    Everyone spends agamegold weekends in his ownmmofly way. Within two days,some people can relax themselves by listening to musicï¼OE reading novelsï¼OEor watchingogeworld films. Others perhaps are more active by playing basketballï¼OEwimming ormmorpgvip dancing. Different people have different gamesavor relaxations.
    I often spend weekends withoggsale my family or my friends. Sometimes my parents take me on a visit to their old friends. Sometimesgamersell I go to the library to study or borrow some books tommovirtex gain much knowledge. I also go to see various exhibition to broadenrpg trader my vision. An excursion to seashore or mountain resorts is my favorite way of spending weekends. Weekends are always enjoyable for me.
    igxe swagvault oforu wowgold-usa ignmax wowgoldlive brogame thsale GoldRockU brogame
      swagvault goldsoon oforu igxe thsale