Nikon cameras do. There's an option to turn it on in the menus, but it's off by default. It even verifies the image in-camera, showing a symbol during image review if the image is authentic.
And at this point it's looking a lot more useful than the Canon version, but who knows if some less attention-grabbing person/group has broken it?
A pixel (currently) comprises a large surface with which to capture light. The way higher end cameras are going, there seems to be a fork between higher resolution (e.g. Nikon d3x or Canon 1ds-mkiii) and higher sensitivity (Nikon d3s or Canon 1d-mkiv). So yes, you can trade off pixel density for sensitivity, but in the end the per-area sensitivity would be the same.
The discrepancy here is did they figure out a way to make the sensitivity increase or just up the pixel density? It looks like (if you RTFA) they did make it a lot more sensitive, but who knows how much area the individual pixels will have to take up. The articles present the information as if both the resolution and sensitivity quantum leaps. Pun intended.
There seems to be a sensationalist mix-up with the two terms... is this technology going to bring about more sensitive pixels (i.e. higher ISO capabilities) or just more pixels on the sensor? or both?
I don't think the point is for denial of service. If all the nodes on the botnet send out requests that are indistinguishable from a command from the botnet controller it makes for a nice cloaking shield for the command center.
Looks like with the current trend of new 'universal aggregators' we'll soon need an aggregator aggregator. I think they planned for this though, with possible titles such as 'mozilla monsoon' and 'google tsunami.'
Yeah, the media is always accurate. We should revamp the entire judicial system to be run by the media. The correct ruling is always the most sensationalist. No need to make sure both sides of the case have equal voice.
It only needs to report its location accurately when it falls to the ground for retrieval purposes. Then perhaps the texts from the out-of-range altitudes would be saved on the phone as unsent messages?
MS: Ok so guys, you can only use 3 apps at a time on our new OS.
World: Well who would want to use that?
MS: Ok, we changed it back. Now it's even better than before!
Slashdot Mirror
Nikon cameras do. There's an option to turn it on in the menus, but it's off by default. It even verifies the image in-camera, showing a symbol during image review if the image is authentic. And at this point it's looking a lot more useful than the Canon version, but who knows if some less attention-grabbing person/group has broken it?
Only YOU can prevent forest fires and sat-phone bills.
Now with clickable hyperlink action! http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/cmxm0/proggit_if_you_decode_this_i_will_love_you/
The whole thing comes off as a compelling argument for HTML5, imo.
A pixel (currently) comprises a large surface with which to capture light. The way higher end cameras are going, there seems to be a fork between higher resolution (e.g. Nikon d3x or Canon 1ds-mkiii) and higher sensitivity (Nikon d3s or Canon 1d-mkiv). So yes, you can trade off pixel density for sensitivity, but in the end the per-area sensitivity would be the same.
The discrepancy here is did they figure out a way to make the sensitivity increase or just up the pixel density? It looks like (if you RTFA) they did make it a lot more sensitive, but who knows how much area the individual pixels will have to take up. The articles present the information as if both the resolution and sensitivity quantum leaps. Pun intended.
There seems to be a sensationalist mix-up with the two terms... is this technology going to bring about more sensitive pixels (i.e. higher ISO capabilities) or just more pixels on the sensor? or both?
Or if you have a bunch of hampsters around for whatever reason, all you'd have to do is train them to tweet failures/auto-shutdown everything.
I don't think the point is for denial of service. If all the nodes on the botnet send out requests that are indistinguishable from a command from the botnet controller it makes for a nice cloaking shield for the command center.
To format your hard drive, push this button. To cancel, push that same button, but with exactly 1.2 pounds of force.
I think I understand, but I also think a car analogy is in order.
4 Ready-to-Use usb 2.0 ports? That is pretty sick!
Oh. I see what you did there.
Perhaps laws would be enacted to encourage anyone successfully made immortal to become the first interstellar/farther-than-we've-been space travelers?
Because everyone has only one email. Especially /.ers.
Looks like with the current trend of new 'universal aggregators' we'll soon need an aggregator aggregator. I think they planned for this though, with possible titles such as 'mozilla monsoon' and 'google tsunami.'
Yeah, the media is always accurate. We should revamp the entire judicial system to be run by the media. The correct ruling is always the most sensationalist. No need to make sure both sides of the case have equal voice.
It only needs to report its location accurately when it falls to the ground for retrieval purposes. Then perhaps the texts from the out-of-range altitudes would be saved on the phone as unsent messages?
a ridiculously long password like: '>AFD,!21)£"($£$3La57~}{'
That's amazing. I've got the same password on my luggage!
Or just grow the cow tissue in an industrial-sized petri dish.
At what point are they no longer cows?
Now with extra clickability: https://developer.mozilla.org/devnews/index.php/2009/08/07/firefox-3-6-alpha-1-now-available-for-download/
There's already prior art for that...
:/
so it should be really easy to get.
Because there is no way an actual instrument would require a battery. No need for any kind of preamp.
[Citation Nee---
Er...
Shoot.
"A few technological obstacles..."
All they have to do is get the whole 3D thing working.
I don't get how it's "even more attractive"
MS: Ok so guys, you can only use 3 apps at a time on our new OS.
World: Well who would want to use that?
MS: Ok, we changed it back. Now it's even better than before!
Sigh.
Now where's my tin-foil tuque when I need it??