Slashdot Mirror


Frank Herbert's Moisture Traps May Be a Reality

Omomyid writes "In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune,' Frank Herbert envisioned the Fremen collecting water from the air via moisture traps and dew collectors. Science Daily reprints a press release from the Fraunhofer Institute in Stuttgart, where scientists working with colleagues from Logos Innovationen have developed a closed-loop and self-sustaining method, no external power required, for teasing the humidity out of desert air and into potable water."

226 comments

  1. And this is news how? by chaboud · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Boy Scouts, years ago, we learned that an easy way to pull moisture from air was to bury (nearly to the brim) a mug in the ground. Moisture would condense on the inside of the mug in the morning and run down the side (because the ground would be colder than the air).

    Leaves, etc.

    Using natural temperature fluctuations and gravity hardly seems like a hard trick to figure out.

    That said, I haven't read the article yet. Perhaps there are giant worms involved.

    1. Re:And this is news how? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difference is that this can work throughout the sunlit hours, even in the absence of thermal fluctuations. Please RTFA before dismissing it.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:And this is news how? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't use condensation from the air. It exposes a hygroscopic fluid to the air, then removes the water through distillation.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    3. Re:And this is news how? by rackserverdeals · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm glad that people are focusing on answers for people in underprivileged parts of the world, but it's not some sort of magical discovery.

      You must have read the wrong article. They never claimed it was magic.

      P.S. Claiming you haven't read the article doesn't absolve you if you make a mistake.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    4. Re:And this is news how? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you want to get enough water to live out of that mug, I'd suggest you dig a pit, put the mug in the bottom of it, pile any vegetation you can get around the edges, piss in it for good measure, then secure your ground sheet over the top with rocks and use a pebble to make it slanted towards the middle. Actually produces quite a lot of water, you might want to use a cooking pot instead.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    5. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Actually that's what the scoutmaster told you. What really happened is that I came by while you were still sleeping and pissed in your mug.

    6. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_well_(condenser)

    7. Re:And this is news how? by rachit · · Score: 4, Informative

      Note to those who may want to try this at home: piss in the *vegetation*, not the mug...

    8. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there's the Australian chap who has done this with a simple, windmill-powered condenser.

    9. Re:And this is news how? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note to those who may want to try this at home: piss in the *vegetation*, not the mug...

      Stop that. I'm planting seeds for the Darwin awards.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *rofl*

    11. Re:And this is news how? by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm no expert but a thing to be aware of, it won't produce pure water. It will produce other liquids/chemicals that condense at vaguely similar temperatures that happen to be vapour in there.

      If you haven't been eating or drinking anything terribly bad, using pee shouldn't be too bad, but be a bit selective with the vegetation - skip it if it's got the usual "Nature's warning colours" all over it, or smells funny.

      Various other alcohols (including nasty ones) have boiling points not far below that of water.

      --
    12. Re:And this is news how? by chaboud · · Score: 1

      You must have read the wrong article. They never claimed it was magic.

      You must have read the wrong article. They claimed it was "found." Solar hydroscopic water extraction dates back to at least the '90's. You seized on the wrong word. "Magic" could have been "fantabulous" or "wang-wagging" and my statement would still stand.

      P.S. Claiming you haven't read the article doesn't absolve you if you make a mistake.

      Having read the article doesn't mean that you have analyzed it effectively.

      I mean, really, I was making a light-hearted joke and the half-grokking slashdot attack-dogs got all uppity over it. It's a good thing that people are looking to improve living standards globally, but this is not a discovery or major step forward. It's an elegant application of ongoing work. It's a good thing, but it's not a game-changer.

    13. Re:And this is news how? by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is classic Boy Scout 101 RTFM!

      --
      I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    14. Re:And this is news how? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes been done in South America for some time
      http://www.oas.org/dsd/publications/Unit/oea59e/ch12.htm
      "Fog harvesting has been investigated for more than thirty years and has been implemented successfully in the mountainous
      coastal areas of Chile (see case study in Part C, Chapter 5),
      Ecuador, Mexico, and Peru."

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    15. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P.S. Claiming you haven't read the article doesn't absolve you if you make a mistake.

      You must be new here.

    16. Re:And this is news how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Driving something with renewable (solar) energy in the dessert is, uh, obvious.

      You are referring to fusion surprise with custard
      or blackforrest solar cell cake ?

    17. Re:And this is news how? by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      Solar hydroscopic water extraction dates back to at least the '90's.

      Yeah, stupid scientists working on solving a problem that's already been solved and people in these climates are only milking this "we don't have clean water" deal to get their less than a cup of coffee a day money from us. I mean a solar powered optical device that can view below the surface of water should have solved all these problems. Or did you mean hygroscopic?

      I mean, really, I was making a light-hearted joke

      If a joke falls in the forest and nobody laughs was it really a joke?

      Don't be one of those guys that is wrong and then winds up looking even more foolish trying to prove that he wasn't THAT wrong. Or start a collection to buy a whole lot of cups and take your troop out to the desert and start generating the water for people to drink and grow crops because the world isn't getting any bigger and while the number of people living on it is.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    18. Re:And this is news how? by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Yep, hygroscopic, though it takes a serious amount of effort to get my hands to type "hy" without "d" to follow.

      Look, you can get all holier-than-thou and... wait.. what? Slashdot? Yeah.

      Of course I was wrong about the article originally (I said I hadn't read it, so odds are), but the tone and text of the article leads one to believe that the researchers in question have discovered something new. What they are doing is phenomenally important, but it's not a new discovery. Scary how, after making this point a few times, it's still not sticking with you.

      The Model T wasn't a new discovery either, but Ford instituted a manufacturing practice that made it far more accessible. Things can be important to humanity without being new discoveries. You can continue to ignore the point if you like, but that will just make this thread even more unreadable on mobile devices.

      You may want to change your name to Malthus with the "number of people" doom and gloom, but you don't need a big hand-waving global-food-supply panic argument to get behind atmospheric water extraction. You just need people who are born in arid climates

    19. Re:And this is news how? by tzot · · Score: 1

      Yep, hygroscopic, though it takes a serious amount of effort to get my hands to type "hy" without "d" to follow.

      I imagine hydenas that would laugh hydsterically at your effort to avoid "d". In the meanwhile, I fantasize driving in an imaginary Hydunday hydbrid car trying to make things more hydgienic for the environment whose hydmen we are constantly raping praising hydmns about our technological progress ignoring hydpe about the planet fighting back. I could go on, but yes, "d" is hard to avoid.
      On a more serious side-note, you can always blame the ancient Greeks for not making it easier for later generations combining "hydor" (water) with "hygron" (liquid).

      --
      I speak England very best
    20. Re:And this is news how? by Bazer · · Score: 1

      Various other alcohols (including nasty ones) have boiling points not far below that of water.

      I don't see the problem... oh wait.

  2. Still suits next? by icebike · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you extract moisture from already very dry are do you not create a dead zone down wind?

    There is life everywhere in the desert, most of which is tuned to live on very little water, but all of which need water from some source occasionally.

    Pushing humans into these areas where the only source of water is minimally moist seems rather pointless and ill advised.

    Would it work on mars?

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Still suits next? by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Practically speaking, I doubt these traps could extract enough moisture from the air to have any effect on the humidity more than a few meters from the device. Even in huge numbers, the amount of air that comes in contact with one is negligible compared to the volume of air over the desert (the devices are on a roughly 2D plane, the atmosphere is 3D). Since the water would likely be used in the immediate vicinity (this doesn't look efficient enough to actually allow the export of water), whether it is used for crops or people, it will be added back into the local water cycle soon enough. At worst it will create minor, artificial oases. Remember, this air eventually passes over bodies of water which are more than capable of replenishing any moisture lost.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:Still suits next? by msobkow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think they'll be down to the level of a still suit for quite a few years yet. Equipment like the urine/water recycling system on the space station or the article's desert "dehumidifier" are bulky.

      Plus we just don't have any real economic incentive for creating still suits -- we don't have a lot of people who want to live in the deep deserts.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    3. Re:Still suits next? by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you know why it's illegal to collect rainwater in a barrel in Utah and Colorado?

      If there is only a gallon of water in the air over an acre of land, removing a quart does in fact change the balance of things.

    4. Re:Still suits next? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It certainly would reduce the amount of humidity downwind. Luckily, downwind is where some poor bastard who isn't you lives. Handy, isn't it?

      (In a less "caricature of a Fremen libertarian" vein, I imagine that this sort of tech, on a large scale, could indeed have unpleasant effects for those downwind of it. Looking at the stark difference in climate of otherwise similar regions, one in front of the big mountain range that blocks moist air, and the other behind it, is pretty much geography 101 stuff, the effects are that unsubtle.)

    5. Re:Still suits next? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Informative

      Last I checked, there were millions of people in Phoenix, Las Vegas, etc..

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Still suits next? by Bester · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From a quick googling it seems that the reason that water tanks are illegal in the above states is not to do with affecting the local environment but more to do with the fact that it 'deprives' downstream users of their share.

      I get the feel from the articles that downstream providers are farmers and not parched wildlife.

      Charles

    7. Re:Still suits next? by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you're off by a few orders of magnitude.

      According to http://www.nationalatlas.gov, the driest parts of Colorado get about 7" of rain annually (average rainfall is about 15"). that comes to 190,080 gallons per acre and would provide the total (drinking, washing, etc.) annual water usage (approximately 100 gallons per day per person, according to the US geological survey) of 5 people.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    8. Re:Still suits next? by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's illegal because their water rights are based on a first come (excluding Indians) basis. Conventional wisdom (since disproven) was that collecting rainwater prevented it from going to it's rightful owners. More recent scientific studies have demonstrated that only 3% of rainwater ends up in the waterways.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    9. Re:Still suits next? by somenickname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems like if you are able to collect a quart of rainwater in a reasonably sized, "barrel", then there is a lot more than a gallon of water in the air over that acre.

    10. Re:Still suits next? by jandoedel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only a gallon of water over an acre of land? I doubt it. I'm not really used to the Imperial System, but I'll try my best to do the calculation in it. 1 acre = "how much a man with an ox can manage in 1 day" 1 gallon = "1 eights of a bushel" 1 bushel = "the volume of a pile of wheat which weighs 64 tower pounds" 1 tower pound = "5400 troy grains" 1 troy grain = "64.79891 milligrams" 1 quart = "a quarter of a gallon" density of wheat = 950 000 karat / hogshead average humidity in Colorado = 40% assume a humidity of 40%, and you get about 40 gallons of water in the furlong of air over an acre of land. A quart doesn't really seem to make that much of a difference.

    11. Re:Still suits next? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Find a building without A/C and get back to us.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    12. Re:Still suits next? by jandoedel · · Score: 5, Funny

      (forgot the line breaks)

      Only a gallon of water over an acre of land? I doubt it.

      I'm not really used to the Imperial System, but I'll try my best to do the calculation in it.
      1 acre = "how much a man with an ox can manage in 1 day"
      1 gallon = "1 eights of a bushel"
      1 bushel = "the volume of a pile of wheat which weighs 64 tower pounds"
      1 tower pound = "5400 troy grains"
      1 troy grain = "64.79891 milligrams"
      1 quart = "a quarter of a gallon"
      density of wheat = 950 000 karat / hogshead
      average humidity in Colorado = 40%

      assume a humidity of 40%, and you get about 40 gallons of water in the furlong of air over an acre of land. A quart doesn't really seem to make that much of a difference.

    13. Re:Still suits next? by Lifyre · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude.

      Wow.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    14. Re:Still suits next? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Actually, if the article's right and people could start using the Negev as a water source, I can think of several million people with a real economic incentive to use these things.

    15. Re:Still suits next? by xous · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points for this.

    16. Re:Still suits next? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      How about mining? I'm sure there is a lot of interesting stuff lying under the desert sands.

      There are plenty of reasons for people wanting to live in the desert. If only because the rest of the world is getting quite full.

    17. Re:Still suits next? by ls671 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Humidity is calculated in relative terms, 100% humidity at 0C in less than 100% humidity at 38C in term of the absolute amount of water contained in the air.

      How could you have come up with the exact answer while missing the "average temperature in Colorado" parameter ? ;-))

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    18. Re:Still suits next? by bogjobber · · Score: 1

      All but the most barren deserts on this planet usually have a replenishing water supply somewhere. A pump, a cistern, and some plastic bottles is much easier to maintain (not to mention more comfortable) than a still suit will ever be.

    19. Re:Still suits next? by Idaho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you know why it's illegal to collect rainwater in a barrel in Utah and Colorado?

      Because it is hard to tax the collection of rainwater?

      Maybe I'm too cynical but I just cannot honestly imagine that this has anything to do with any actual environmental concern.

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    20. Re:Still suits next? by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      i just assumed it was 'pretty warm' in Colorado, and used that in my calculation.

    21. Re:Still suits next? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Nah, just taxes everybody for rain on cloudy days and for solar energy on days where you can see the sun.

    22. Re:Still suits next? by giorgist · · Score: 1

      This is awesome ... you got credited 5:funny twice for the same joke !!!

    23. Re:Still suits next? by handsomepete · · Score: 1

      How could you go through all that and then not define furlong??? Your credibility is totally shot now!

    24. Re:Still suits next? by jandoedel · · Score: 1

      An acre is an area that is one furlong long and one chain (22 yards) wide.
      So a furlong is obviously the length you get by dividing an acre by 1 chain. 1 chain = 100 links and a link is 7.92 inches So you're right, i made a mistake. A furlong is actually twice as long as i thought it was. So you need to double the result above: => about 80 gallons of water in the furlong of air over an acre of land for a humidity of 40%.

    25. Re:Still suits next? by jbengt · · Score: 1
      According to the psychrometric chart, at 80F and 30% RH there is about 0.0067 lbs of water vapor per lb of dry air and about 13.7 cu ft per pound of air. That's about 0.0005 lbs of water per cu ft of air or about 0.00006 gallons of water per cubic foot of air. (Air at 92F and 20%RH or 65F and 50%RH are at roughly the same absolute moisture content.)
      But there are 43,560 square feet per acre. If you figure on only the first 10 feet of air above the acre, there are more than 25 gallons of water for each acre. In reality, there are thousands of feet of air above each acre containing moisture and many conditions where the absolute humidity is higher.
      Still, like anything, if done on a big enough scale or for a large enough population, there could be a problem of depleting the water in the air downwind.

      (aren't US standards of weights and measures fun?)

    26. Re:Still suits next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone living in Colorado, I believe that you're overstating the average humidity. It's probably somewhere closer to 20-25%. So your derived quantity of water should be something more along the lines of 4.234 pettapints per cubic femtofurlong.

    27. Re:Still suits next? by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Do you know why it's illegal to collect rainwater in a barrel in Utah and Colorado?

      And in the City of Denver it is illegal for a horseless carriage (i.e. an automobile) to enter the town after dark unless a man walks twenty paces in front of it swinging a lantern to warn others of its approach. Seriously, there are many anachronistic laws on the state books which are rarely if ever enforced. I doubt that they are going to bust individual citizens for collecting and storing rainwater for personal use, that would be silly and make Colorado and Utah the laughing stock of other states.

    28. Re:Still suits next? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You are being too cynical. It ahs to do with the preceived water loss by not letting it into the run off.

      It's been shown to not ahve the same effect that thought it has.
      You go to look at the history of the thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Still suits next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quart doesn't really seem to make that much of a difference.

      Thanks for the breakdown.

      It reminds me of the old story of the guy who filled out his income tax return in Roman numerals. It was said that he received a personal note thanking him for the pleasant diversion by the IRS guy who reviewed the return

  3. Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..now if they can create the stillsuite I can sit at my computer and drink my own urine without having to get up and get a glass of water.

    Awesome series, btw.

    1. Re:Awesome by cob666 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to be moving for the still suit to work.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    2. Re:Awesome by longhairedgnome · · Score: 0

      touchE

      --
      GENERATION O98346: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig and remove a random number from the generation. T
    3. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How ironic

  4. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really? Is that how they do it?
    Amazing what you can carry on the back of a Camel.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  5. Will these scientists ever learn? by levicivita · · Score: 5, Funny
    How do they expect to keep such large structures safe from worms? I guess this is a typical melange bull market phenomenon. As soon as the price of spice jumps past $70 these people start building unsustainable castles in the sand. I for one will continue diligently keeping urinating into my stillsuit with the water recycling conservatively set on 'maximum.'

    Walk without rythm, fellow travelers.

    1. Re:Will these scientists ever learn? by motherpusbucket · · Score: 1

      Where do you hook the stillsuit for pissing and shitting? Inquiring minds want to know.

      --
      "You can't really dust for vomit" --Nigel Tufnel
    2. Re:Will these scientists ever learn? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      They'll buy droids from the jawas, like the Star Wars moisture farms all have. Duh.

    3. Re:Will these scientists ever learn? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I'd guess the usual places.

    4. Re:Will these scientists ever learn? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I for one will continue diligently keeping urinating into my stillsuit with the water recycling conservatively set on 'maximum.'

      "Set on Maximum"? Huh. You obviously have one of those city-dweller stillsuits. That's a bodybag in the desert.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Will these scientists ever learn? by Celeste+R · · Score: 1

      Real stillsuits don't have a setting, either they work or they don't work.

      Did you get that doodad by fraternizing with the enema? really.

      Friend or enema? There is no difference to the Fremen.

      --
      There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
  6. Learned this in summer camp by Feanturi · · Score: 1

    When I was 12 they taught us how to make a moisture trap with a can and some cellophane. Granted we weren't in a desert, but I am surprised if this "new" development surprises anybody.

    1. Re:Learned this in summer camp by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When I was 12 they taught us how to make a moisture trap with a can and some cellophane. Granted we weren't in a desert, but I am surprised if this "new" development surprises anybody.

      Clearly, this is on a larger scale and far more impressive than what you did when you were 12.

      Seriously, just because you did something which is conceptually similar, doesn't mean that this isn't an advance. Conceptually, flight hasn't changed since the Wright Brothers. Practically, it obviously has.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Learned this in summer camp by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Fine. One wonders when areas of Africa and the Middle East, where water rights are a big political football, will see large-scale water generation facilities.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:Learned this in summer camp by Dunavant · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if this takes off they'll have more water to grow grass on a pitch and play real football instead of the political kind.

  7. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Itninja · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hell with the 'white', when 'man' discovers it it's important. Mankind pat itself on the back whenever they figure out how to do something (no matter how poorly) that nature figured out a long time ago. I often think of going back in time and telling the Arabi who invented the magnetic compass - 'hey you know salmon have these in their brain at birth'. He'd be all like "! "

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  8. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Itninja · · Score: 1

    Aww.../. stripped out my Arabic script. Why are you such ascii-ists /.?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  9. I have no need for this article by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    What I really need is a droid that understands the binary language of moisture vaporators.

    1. Re:I have no need for this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's amazing how many articles pass through this forum to which this is a perfectly appropriate response.

    2. Re:I have no need for this article by ulysses38 · · Score: 1

      If someone could invent so-called "binary load lifters," the future would be NOW.

      --
      my sig is an honor student
    3. Re:I have no need for this article by daath93 · · Score: 1

      They have binary load lifters. Load on ground, load lifted from ground.

      Now the first person to invent a walking battery charger that stumbles around spouting "gonk", now THAT would be something...

    4. Re:I have no need for this article by Celeste+R · · Score: 1

      These are not the droids you are looking for.

      Move on.

      --
      There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
  10. Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Daily reprints a press release from the Fraunhofer Institute in Stuttgart.

    So in a decade when these are ubiquitous and most of the world is a desert, suddenly the Fraunhofer Institute will announce they had a patent on this and anyone drinking the water will have to pay licensing fees.

    Great, just... great.

    1. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Daily reprints a press release from the Fraunhofer Institute in Stuttgart.

      So in a decade when these are ubiquitous and most of the world is a desert, suddenly the Fraunhofer Institute will announce they had a patent on this and anyone drinking the water will have to pay licensing fees.

      Great, just... great.

      What about all those sanctions on the use of technology in the Dune universe? There was a company with a monopoly on interstellar transport. There were also injunctions against information technology.

    2. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Big_Monkey_Bird · · Score: 1

      C.H.O.A.M. is only one letter away from CHOAD.

    3. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The monopoly on interstellar transport was because only the Spacing Guild could do it safely due to their special abilities, but it wasn't enforced.
        The ban against machines similar to the human mind was based on a war against thinking machines. There was no general ban against technology.

    4. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So in a decade when these are ubiquitous and most of the world is a desert, suddenly the Fraunhofer Institute will announce they had a patent on this and anyone drinking the water will have to pay licensing fees.

      I don't think that desert-dwelling nomads today care much (or, indeed, are even aware of) the Fraunhofer Institute and the patents it hold. If, in a decaede, most of the world will indeed become a desert, I doubt anyone would care by that time. In fact, I doubt the institute would still exist...

    5. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the monopoly was because Norma Cenva and her mate Aurillious Venport figured the mathematics and put up the money to build the Heighliners in the 1st place, and when the Titans and Thinking Machines were defeated at the Battle of Corrin, due mostly to the new technology they had patents on, they were granted in perpetuity a monopoly on that PARTICULAR style of interstellar travel. Since it was the most efficient form of travel, not to mention the fastest, the other, normal space travel kind of fell into disuse.

    6. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by PitaBred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like the plot of Tank Girl

    7. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Celeste+R · · Score: 1

      Or they could just take the technology to Mars, and have a worldwide monopoly ready-made.

      --
      There are no perfect answers, only the right questions. More questions at http://foresightandhindsight.blogspot.com/
    8. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Lundse · · Score: 1

      Actually, in Frank Herberts Dune, it is quite obvious that the Guild monopoly is enforced through simple secrecy. Nobody knows exactly how a navigator looks, or how their prescience works.
      Personally, I would rather extrapolate from that and assume the Guild refuses to deal with planets which are trying to break their monopoly, build heighliners, train/evolve navigators, etc.
      Or, you could take the word of two hacks who cannot seperate the Dune and Terminator universes...

      --
      IAIFARSIJDPOOTV - I Am In Fact A Reality Star; I Just Don't Play One On TV
    9. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the kangaroos, Tank Girl is one of the best movies EVER!

    10. Re:Bet the Fremen didn't have to deal with patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in a decade when these are ubiquitous and most of the world is a desert, suddenly the Fraunhofer Institute will announce they had a patent on this and anyone drinking the water will have to pay licensing fees. [wikipedia.org]

      Not a problem -- have them send me their CEO and I'll piss it all back down his neck. That should cover licensing fees if I don't otherwise charge them anything.

      Hah! captcha = armpit.

  11. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by GryMor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can you give citations for dessert dwellers using brine solutions and vacuum chambers to pull water out of the air in the absence of any material with a temperature below the due point? I won't hold you to the 'thousands of years' part. Last I checked, dessert dwellers didn't do so well with salt water until recently, and then, only industrial scale desalinization projects. If they were using this method, it seems like they should have hit on desalinization a very long time ago.

    Or did you not RTFA and thus think it was the trivial survival technique using condensation and gravity during night time hours?

    --
    Realities just a bunch of bits.
  12. Skywalker's Uncle? by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    Isn't this what Luke Skywalker's uncle did for a living? I thought it was a given that you could condense water out of thin air.... My refrigerator does this all the time.

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:Skywalker's Uncle? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

      The trick in TFA is pulling water out of the air without keeping parts of your apparatus below the dew point, which takes a fair bit of energy. There are still some active parts, looks like mostly pumps, and some solar heating; but no refrigeration is required.

      If you have massive energy to throw at the problem, it is trivial(like a great many problems), solving it with relatively little energy is the real trick.

    2. Re:Skywalker's Uncle? by ginbot462 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was wondering who else would remember that. The best line is when uncle Owen says: "But harvest time is when I need you the most." Harvest time? On a moisture farm? Not sure how that works ... Is it during the "rainy" season when the humidity is .1 as opposed to 0.01.

      Will Luke ever get those power converters? ... the world may never know.

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    3. Re:Skywalker's Uncle? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The party line(quite possibly made up after the fact to justify that rather silly line) is that, in the drier areas, the vaporators are too far apart to be economically connected by pipes, so each one has its own tank. From time to time, the farmer has to go around collecting the tanks' contents and bringing them back to their central pit/home thing.

    4. Re:Skywalker's Uncle? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Obviously, Energy isn't a concern in the Star Wars universe.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Skywalker's Uncle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, nature cannot be 'tricked'. You can never extract energy from where there's not enough. Certain atoms with high atomic number are able to produce energy because it was put there billions of years ago by gravity, inside a star that later became a nova, thus seeding the universe with these heavy atoms. When speaking about science don't say 'trick'.

  13. So how do you pronounce 'potable' anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered. Sure, I could go check a dictionary but then I'd have to figure out the funny symbols.

    1. Re:So how do you pronounce 'potable' anyway? by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Informative

      Po - Ta - Ble

      Here. It even says it for you.

    2. Re:So how do you pronounce 'potable' anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      o like oat or boat. (p)oat-uh-bull !

    3. Re:So how do you pronounce 'potable' anyway? by liamoshan · · Score: 1

      Po - Ta - Ble

      Here. It even says it for you.

      What's potable, preciouss?

  14. In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by John+Hasler · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please. Dune is fantasy, not science fiction.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please. Dune is fantasy, not science fiction.

      Well its not Ringworld, but then its not The Lord of the Rings either. Its between the two. Fantasy readers would probably say it is SF. SF readers would say the opposite.

    2. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Niven toyed with the idea of genetic (RNA at least) memory too, before he grew out of it.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wanna say that to my crysknife, punk?

    4. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Given the state of scientific knowledge in 1965 (when dune was published) it's a lot harder SF than some people seem to realise.
      Herbert did some serious background research for Dune IMO.

      Sure bits of it seem *now* to us as absurd as Doc Smith's diesel-engined spacecraft, but in 1965, 12 years after the discover of DNA, 17 years after the initial formalisation of classical information theory, when computers were still mostly small-room-sized, the idea the genetic code could pass down memories wasn't all that outlandish a hypothesis - in fact it seemed pretty reasonable. If you were writing now you'd probably come up with people being genetically engineered to add informational appendicies to germ line DNA rather than the ability being built-in by evolution, but there's nothing impossible about it. And if you pay attention to the books, you'll note that being able to "see the future" doesn't work in a naive way either, it's clearly been modelled on "quantum collapse" and "many fingered time" that any passing 1960s physicists would have talked the ear off Herbert about.

      And with very powerful figures *right now* calling for the Death of the Internet, is a ban on computing devices really that outlandish? Sure, the chances of them winning are slim in practice, but still.

    5. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IMO, the dividing line is the amount of hand-waving you do. Like how to survive in the desert:

      Hard fantasy: "I cast a spell of protection from elements"
      Soft fantasy: "The quantronic radiation on this planet..."
      Soft SF: "I'll put on my stillsuit"
      Hard SF: Even more science?

      I sometimes get the impression that SF defines themselves too narrow because SF is still supposed to tell a story which is what should engage you, it's not a discovery show on what science could be like 100 years from now. Of course, if science has no real place at all it's really a space opera but it doesn't have to be primarily a science story as long as the storyline is interrelated with the science.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      There are fantasy elements, though they're framed (at least in the later books) in a sort of pseudo-scientific sense. But the ecological aspects of Dune, well those are based on a lot sounder principles. This was Herbert's particular area of expertise, and he put a considerable amount of effort into developing the ecology and climate of Arrakis, and the Fremen technology, while certainly more advanced than ours, isn't so advanced that I wouldn't be surprised if it were possible within a few decades.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Niven didn't grow out of the Protector crapola. I love Neutron Star and a lot of the other early Known Universe stories, but the Protectors-are-human-ancestors-from-another-planet theme sounded moronic even forty years ago.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There was a lovely old story by Issac Asimov - can't remember the name, sorry, and any search of his work will be a long walk - that told of the author of Genesis trying to write about the Big Bang in terms of particle physics. His son chastised him over the amount of writing materials that would take. At the end of the dialogue it was oversimplified to "(sigh) In the beginning..."

      Fantasy is a good way to simplify scientific concepts, provided the fantasy actually tracks the science. If there's no believability, it doesn't make a very good story.

      The line between SF and Fantasy has always been a little blurry (nowhere near as blurry as in Chalker's "Masters of Flux and Anchor" series which was a brilliant expansion on Clarke's Law, and a very good read if you can ignore the implicit mysogny in most of his works).

      I've worried that Clarke's Law is taken as transitive by some (thank The Pasta for predictable and reproduceable results). I've also thought that we're on a trend to realisation of C.P.Snow's great cultural divide between the knowledge "haves" and "have-nots". I see this among friends who firmly believe that technology comes from observing certain rituals, rather than scientific advancement and engineering process. They're very Cargo Cult and not a little bit frightening.

      The truly frightening thing is I have difficulty explaining the difference to them. The gulf is almost too deep to cross now.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    9. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Please. Dune is fantasy, not science fiction.

      The fact that Dune describes a feudal society does not make it fantasy.

    10. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by scotch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, that's your biggest grip? The protector idea rocks compared to breed-for-lucky shit.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    11. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      you call that a crysknife, mate? THIS is a crysknife.

    12. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by thoglette · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Air France Flight 447?

      See the .sig

      --
      -- Butlerian Jihad NOW!
    13. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's a spoon.

    14. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    15. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      The fact that Dune describes a feudal society does not make it fantasy.

      No-one said it did. Your comment makes no sense. If you mean because it describes a feudal society then it isn't fantasy then you are wrong.
      It's a feudal society in an imaginary universe, where they inhabit imaginary planets, with imaginary mystic powers, with imaginary creatures roaming the desert. Science fiction is usually described as a story taking place in a believable setting with only the science extrapolated beyond current levels. Fantasy has no such constraints. I suppose you would regard Harry Potter as Sci-Fi then, after all schools are real !

    16. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was a lovely old story by Issac Asimov - can't remember the name, sorry, and any search of his work will be a long walk - that told of the author of Genesis trying to write about the Big Bang in terms of particle physics. His son chastised him over the amount of writing materials that would take. At the end of the dialogue it was oversimplified to "(sigh) In the beginning..."

      The name of this short story (2 pages is "How It Happened" 1978, published in "The Winds of Change and Other Stories."

    17. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Actually, my biggest gripe against Niven is the last two Ringworld books, and in particular the last one, because it was just the most gawdawful unreadable crap I've ever seen from a major author in any genre. It really seems to be true that once writers hit a certain age, they're gifts seem to fade.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    18. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      When I was taking a lot of composition/creative writing classes, we spent a few hashing out the differences between fiction, science fiction, and fantasy (as several of our teachers said they didn't accept "genre" submissions, by which they meant "science fiction and fantasy", and we were disputing what those meant.)

      What we came up with was:
      Fiction is an author's view of how people interact with and are changed by current society.
      Science fiction is an author's view of how people interact and are changed by a society that could be reasonably predicted to evolve from our current society.
      Fantasy is the author's view on how people interact and are changed by a society that is similar to ours but operates with different natural laws than ours.

      As such, we came to the conclusion that in many ways science fiction is the most powerful fiction writing, because it's a warning.
      Later I came across a Stanislaw Lem quote, that says, in essence: if all memory of literature were lost, the first thing people would start writing would be science fiction because it warns us of the consequences of where we're going.

      Some of the greatest current fiction writing is science fiction, called "speculative fiction" to make it sound more acceptable.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    19. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Shooter28 · · Score: 1

      Now Dune would be a good MMO universe, imo.
      It could work a great starcraft type RTS as well.

    20. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could work a great starcraft type RTS as well.

      I dunno whether you're just joking around or just genuinely unaware of RTShistory.

      Dune II wasn't quite the first RTS game ever, but one of the most influential - RTS games weren't called RTS games until Dune II marketing used the term.

      Essentially, Starcraft is a Dune game descendant.

    21. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by geekoid · · Score: 1

      o, it's Sci-Fi

      Seriously, it is. Name a Sci-Fi work without a 'Fantasy' technology in it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I've only got 1 thing to say "Maud'Dib"!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The corollary to Clarke's law.

      For those who don't understand any science its ALL magic.

    24. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      And I believe Pratchett's corollary, wasn't it? "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced".

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    25. Re:In the seminal science fiction book 'Dune by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      The universe isn't imaginary- it is supposed to be this one, only long after humans left and "forgot" Earth. All planets in sci fi are imaginary, unless they're the 8 or so that we know about today. All aliens are imaginary creatures, and there are lots of aliens in sci fi.

      All of the mystic powers seem outlandish today, but we've got to put the book in context. It was written in the early 60's, only a decade or so since DNA's role in heredity had been proven. Back then, the concept of "genetic memory" was actually pretty credible. Even the "seeing the future" device, which is pretty difficult to swallow, had a fairly firm grounding in early quantum theory, and would have found quite a few reputable supporters in the science community of the time, if only as a distantly unlikely possibility.

      Just because it seems daft now, it doesn't mean it wasn't science. Science fiction in the 40's and 50's used to talk about Mars as anything from an inhabitable desert to a lush jungle planet teeming with life. It wasn't until the 60's that this was properly debunked, and now it seems ridiculous. But to them at the time, it seemed like proper science.

  15. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [citation needed]

  16. Similar story using different tech posted in 2000 by jdb2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was a story posted about fog capture for drinking water -- "fog nets" -- back in 2000 :

    Fog Collection As Sustainable Water Source

    jdb2

  17. Obligatory Perry Bible Fellowship by Cookie3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    >dessert dwellers

    Dessert, eh?

    http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF145-Nunez.jpg

    --
    present day... present time... hahahaha...
    1. Re:Obligatory Perry Bible Fellowship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... Clearly he's referring to the Dessert Planet of Arruckus

  18. I'm on Padishah Emperor Shaddam's side by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Frank Herbert's Moisture Traps May Be a Reality

    No Kidding. The Jihad is a reality too.

    1. Re:I'm on Padishah Emperor Shaddam's side by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Mawt al-kafir! I will cut you down for Muad'dib!!!

    2. Re:I'm on Padishah Emperor Shaddam's side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Meh...It's just a bunch of vapourware.

  19. We'll be needing this soon enough by Dasher42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here in California our snow packs are dwindling year after year, which means our valleys are likely to revert to their natural desert climate. That's where a full third of our nation's food comes from. We might want to consider some windtraps, not growing rice in a desert, or maybe borrow some Australian expertise to do something cool.

    1. Re:We'll be needing this soon enough by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "That's where a full third of our nation's food comes from. "

      That does not necessarily mean that it should come from there forever. Just as the Rust Belt de-industrialized over decades, California could reduce the amount it farms. The employees can go back to Mexico and the owners can invest in something (or someplace) different.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:We'll be needing this soon enough by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      When we finally raze detroit to the ground we'll have acres and acres of prime farming land just minutes away from the largest source of fresh water on the continent.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:We'll be needing this soon enough by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that soil is still fit to grow food in? I'd rather bet on global warming thawing some permafrost.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:We'll be needing this soon enough by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting we nuke detroit from orbit or what? The soil in my back yard here in east (urban) dallas is terrible yet its yielding plenty of green peppers, jalapenos, and I have some cantelope and watermelon developing on the vine. Soil is soil and for the most part crops don't transfer heavy metals, etc into the consumed food product which is about the only worry you'd have in this situation.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  20. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by NoPantsJim · · Score: 3, Informative

    hey, at least he used the right form of "desert".

    Pardon me while I watch my karma burn.

  21. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thanks for clearing that up. I thought you meant he would suddenly notice Solid Snake sneaking around his desalinization plant.

  22. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dessert dwellers?

    I didn't know people could live inside cakes and bowls of ice cream.

  23. only if you extract a lot by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    I don't think this will be used on a large enough scale to seriously affect the environment

    1. Re:only if you extract a lot by ls671 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmm... I suspect that has been said about technologies that after a while ended up being used on a large enough scale to affect the environment.

      Note that I am not saying that this specific technology would end up being used on a large enough scale. I am just reminding history.

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  24. active vs passive by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The problem with this design is it requires electricity, which means expensive solar cells and periodic maintenance to clean them off.

    The moisture traps mentioned in Dune already do exist, and are entirely passive. You need an underground chamber with a few vents in the sides, and vent in the top with a chimney. The air rises in the chimney creating a constant flow of air into the chamber, and moisture condenses due to the cooler conditions in the chamber than outside.

    1. Re:active vs passive by demosthesneeze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A system based on these principles wouldn't require energy in the form of electricity, despite the mention of photovoltaic cells. The energy needed to lift the brine to the collectors can be provided by the dilute solution leaving the collectors headed for the underground distillation section. More mass leaves the collectors than enters them, compensating for some energy lost to friction. Given the effects of the salinity of the solution and the availability of solar energy for heat, I don't think the vacuum mentioned would need to play a major role in the distillation phase. The energy stored in the vacuum could be used for mechanical work. If additional energy is required, the heat provided by sunlight could be converted to mechanical work directly, for instance, by means of a stirling engine. Wind power, though not as predictable as the sun is also another option. I think a setup where people manually transfer the brine between open trays and fire driven stills would be feasible in some areas. This could be used to provide clean water for people in poverty stricken regions. The problem with Dune's wind traps is that the dew point would need to be near the temperature of the cave walls. While this would work in some areas, I don't know if the ground is cold enough or the air moist enough everywhere for this to work year round. Though, in the desert, the temperature difference between night and day is significant. Additionally, digging large, stable underground caverns for this purpose requires a lot more advanced planning and labor than airlifting in equipment or dropping crates of salt with instructions.

  25. Where are the spines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those things are going to need lots of spines.

  26. The Milagro Beanfield War by SuperBanana · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you know why it's illegal to collect rainwater in a barrel in Utah and Colorado? If there is only a gallon of water in the air over an acre of land, removing a quart does in fact change the balance of things.

    That's a load of pseudoscience, backing up a law that exists only for revenue, cronyism, and political control. If you store water off your roof or that falls from the sky, and then use it in your home or for irrigation, you're returning that water right back into the water table...in fact, use in the home returns it more effectively, because it is reintroduced a few feet under the soil by your septic system. You're not 'stealing' water- it doesn't go anywhere.

    If you want to know the real reason laws like that exist, read The Milagro Beanfield War (annoyingly, that link is about the movie, not the book.) I read it in middle school, and it gave me great insight into how big business pushes citizens around.

    Also, you can take a look at what the Israelis are doing to all of the rivers that feed into or border Palestine for a great example of how water is controlled for racial oppression and political power.

    1. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In addition, film critic Richard Scheib believes The Milagro Beanfield War is "one of the first American films to fall into the Latin American tradition of magical realism. This is a genre that usually involves an earthily naturalistic, often highly romanticized, blend of the supernatural and whimsical."[3] The magic mainly revolves around the character of Amarante Cordova who talks to his dead friend and asks the spirit world for help.

      If you are stating an ideology, would it not make more sense to base it on events that actually happen regularly in the real world, rather than fiction? And if it does happen regularly, why must depictions of it be fictionalised? Is it difficult to wring the point you wish to make out of the truth?

      A parallel case is bit like films about the suffering of prisoners on death row - they will virtually always be fictionalised, and the involved individuals will be falsely convicted. This is because the intention and the ideology is to portray them compassionately. In reality, although false convictions inevitably must happen, the individuals that get sentenced to death typically have a series of prior convictions that would cause liberal moviegoers to vomit. Hence, the point the moviemaker wishes to make cannot be supported by reality, and so fictionalisation follows. Feel free to disprove this by doing a list of films about death row inmates and whether they are based on true events and whether that portrayal includes prior convictions.

    2. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Feel free to disprove this by doing a list of films about death row inmates and whether they are based on true events and whether that portrayal includes prior convictions.

      Whether your premise is true or not, showing that such films exist would neither prove nor disprove it. You've made a connection in your head between fictionalized criminals and the motivations of movie makers but you've shown no actual proof for it, just a rationalization. Just as good a reason for such fictionalization is that the writers want to tell a specific story so they make it all up rather than go looking for some real person who fits the profile, after all it is fiction, not a documentary. There is at least as much evidence for THAT claim as there is for YOUR claim.

      Meanwhile, the television show "Saving Grace" depicted in detail other crimes of a falsely convicted death row inmate, particularly his killing of a prison guard and yet his character was intended as sympathetic.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by Omestes · · Score: 1

      So, he cites fiction to prove his ideology, while you MAKE fiction to prove yours (and hence his wrong).

      Neither of you really make much of a point based on evidence.

      eel free to disprove this by doing a list of films about death row inmates and whether they are based on true events and whether that portrayal includes prior convictions.

      I don't have to, since you never proved your initial hypothesis as correct.

      The real reason for this law is probably that politicians are stupid, and water rights are rather serious business (and not just in the financial sense) out in the Four Corners states/desert southwest.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by jackbird · · Score: 1
      Yes, and United Fruit were fine upstanding corporate citizens, since Gabriel Garcia Marquez wrote a magic realist novel set in a landscape of their abuses, and therefore it can't possibly be true.

      The OP probably should have come out with a better, and nonfiction, reference (like Cadillac Desert), but your death row movie comparison is facile. One doesn't have to go far to find examples of wrongfully-convicted death row inmates.

    5. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Have you never heard of transpiration? Some uses of collected water will get back to the people down stream with little to none missing, but anywater that's used for irrigation is unlikely to make it far. Substantial portions will be lost to evaporation while going to the plants and more will be lost directly from the plants themselves via transpiration.

    6. Re:The Milagro Beanfield War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to disprove this by doing a list of films about death row inmates and whether they are based on true events and whether that portrayal includes prior convictions.

      Hell, in Dead Man Walking - based on true events - Sean Penn's character WAS guilty and the movie was [i]still[/i] an anti-death penalty movie.

      I guess your whole theory is just bullshit now, huh?

  27. Climate Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder what the effects of that would be on "climate change". Maybe this is the next great blunder of shit we do to our environment without thinking it through. After all doesn't the desert ecosystem count on collecting water from the air also?. Wheres the liberals screaming about this one?

  28. fraunhofer? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    don't trust them. they'll let the concept out then they'll hit you up for license fees later on.

    "its a trap"

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:fraunhofer? by maharg · · Score: 1

      That's ok, I'm working on AMOT (Ain't a MOisture Trap) right now :o)

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
  29. Drinking distilled water by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    This method seems to result in pure distilled water which is generally considered harmful as your sole water supply. It's lacking in minerals that the body uses and also will turn acidic naturally. I guess since you're IN a desert though, they could scoop up a few spoonfuls of dirt and mix it in with your nice clear glass of fresh water. :-)

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Drinking distilled water by blincoln · · Score: 1

      This method seems to result in pure distilled water which is generally considered harmful as your sole water supply. It's lacking in minerals that the body uses and also will turn acidic naturally.

      I learned this in geology class, but apparently it's not universally accepted as true anymore. If you can find a reliable cite to support it, I'd be interested in reinstating my previous belief though.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    2. Re:Drinking distilled water by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/nutrientschap12.pdf

      That's from WHO in 2005, fairly reliable I'd say. The topic of distilled water drinking seems to be fairly controversial, I'm guessing it has to do with companies selling deionizing machines for thousands of dollars. There's also a lot of "natural health" folks with various opinions and websites claiming all kinds of stuff about waters, minerals and additives. Can be tricky with the signal to noise ratio as it is.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  30. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I never knew humans lived in salinated desserts before. Could you please tell me more?

  31. You could use seawater as the water source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steps:
    1. Get water from the air
    2. Evaporate brine to extract pure water.

    Step 1 could be to get water from the sea. You have some extra salt, but you can deal with that.

    ?? Profit!! :)

    1. Re:You could use seawater as the water source by icebike · · Score: 1

      I've often thought that equatorial regions near oceans are letting a huge energy resource go to waste while they suffer increased desertification.

      Sun light could be used to pump sea water, evaporate it, and pump condensed briny water back to the sea. You could also use solar powered RO, but that might be more expensive due to the media replacement needs.

      Even if you did not get enough for western style irrigation you could use it to slow down or reverse the process of desertification, preserving marginal adjacent farm/grazing land.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  32. Great. Victoria might need this, soon by petrus4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in southeastern Australia, and down here, we haven't had regular rainfall now since 1995. Melbourne's water reserves are currently sitting at around 25%. The government's been talking about dredging the Yarra, the city's river, and that is only about a third of peak level at the moment as it is.

    This tells me that the long term trend for Victoria is desertification. Queensland is getting floods these days, while we get barely a drop. Unless we're planning on abandoning the entire state, we're going to need technologies exactly like these, in order to be able to continue to live here.

  33. Atmospheric Water Generator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    This seems like a more complicated version of these http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_water_generator with a solar panel slapped on them.

    1. Re:Atmospheric Water Generator? by demosthesneeze · · Score: 1

      You could say that AWGs are just complicated dehumidifiers. This is a variation using a liquid desiccant to absorb moisture rather than using refrigeration to force dew formation. Neither are new concepts and there have even been proposals to use decorative water fountains and falls filled with brine as indoor dehumidifiers. The difference seems to be in the amount of infrastructure needed to support either type of system. The more self sufficient a device built for this purpose is, the more places it can be used. Most AWGs require a large amount of electricity to operate so while they might be practical for a military base in the desert, an impoverished community on the side of a mountain would probably benefit more from towers of salty water.

  34. Very old tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ancient civilizations have had the ability to create water traps in the desert regions of Earth for thousands of years. This is just reinventing the wheel. It may be a useful wheel, but it's still a wheel.

  35. Re:First Post by Omestes · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Did you just copy that from /b/?

    Good for you, except it isn't trolling /., its still trolling /b/ except now where no one from /b/ will ever read it. I'm pretty sure all their trolls are scripted by now, and generally are at least amusing, or... you know... someone in the flavor of trolling the average /. user.

    I'd personally take the "did you hear about the singularity" guy, or the iPhone rectal stimulation guy, it at least is somewhat in the scope of /.

    If your going to troll, please put some EFFORT into it.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  36. And it's not even an ammonia aborption cycle! by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When I read this article I was expecting to see another machine based on the ammonia absorption cycle. I was pleasantly surprised to see something new. This is interesting and should be followed to see if it becomes reality.

    It's been possible to build an air-water condenser using the ammonia absorption cycle since the 1800s. Blow air across the cold outer surface and the heat exchange causes condensation. A gentleman proposed "oasis machines" which would be a condenser hidden in a decorative pool / fountain from which local villagers could draw water. It was self contained and needed no outside electricity, perhaps solar. He proposed it as a solution to providing water to villagers in Africa, etc. A poster above did mention the problem of the water lacking in mineral nutrients.

    1. Re:And it's not even an ammonia aborption cycle! by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I was expecting to see another machine based on the ammonia absorption cycle. I was pleasantly surprised to see something new.

      If you're surprised, you just haven't ever paid attention. The affinity of salt to attract water has been known forever, as has the ability to heat the salt and collect the water.

      In fact there was a /. story close to a year ago about a company with a similar product or trying to sell the tech to the US Military for use in Iraq.

      The problem with such systems has always been the high salinity of the collected condensate, and the energy hit in purifying it much further, to the level of potability, or use in agriculture.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  37. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    fuck you. i can get water out of the air with a sheet of plastic a fair size hole in the ground, and a rock. (google solar still)

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  38. Forget Dune, the Lars family will love this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moisture farming!

  39. Your sand worm is in my sarlac! by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Forget the still suit, I'm trading my ticket for passage to Alderan for a used land speeder so I can become a moisture farmer!

    Now, if I could only find a droid who speaks the binary language of moisture evaporators...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Your sand worm is in my sarlac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're vaporators.

  40. They do require external power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in the form of sunlight.

    Rest assured, the laws of thermodynamics are still in force.

    1. Re:They do require external power by x4r · · Score: 1

      slashdot as court of thermodynamics ? awesome !

  41. The unspoken dream of Muad'Dib by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...was to effectively trap the wind emerging from slashdotters.

  42. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    Thousands of years of plastic?

  43. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Ripit · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought he meant the Arab guy would have a quest for him.

  44. Not quite by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is not about downstream rights, but PRIOR rights. Big difference. Out here in the west, our saying is:
    Whiskey is for drinking, and water is for fighting.
    Sadly, it seems like Texans and Easterners want to come here and pollute our water (which we have precious little of).
    But all that MAY be changing. We, as individuals, have been prevented from capturing the runoff due to western water law. However, some lawyer and engineers have recently figured out that due to all concrete, farm lands, etc and our attempts to make sure that we obey the law that we are allowing upwards of 33% more water to run off to the east (TX, OK, NE, NM and KS). Colorado is building a case for holding ~33% more of the water based on that. Needless to say, that will produce some SEVERE repercussions here. In addition, Utah is also looking at how much they are losing. They think that it is something like 20% and our western slope sends another 20% to NM, AZ, NV, and CA. If this is true, it will mean that downstream may see a MAJOR cutback over there.

    Western water laws are interesting.

    Personally, I like the idea of trying to saturate the air over in CA, and the gulf, and working better with the weather patterns to drop more snow and rain over the west. In addition, the larger amount of clouds would block more light from coming.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Not quite by metlin · · Score: 1

      Sadly, it seems like Texans and Easterners want to come here and pollute our water (which we have precious little of).

      What? That's a confusing statement - are you complaining about people moving west, or are you talking about something else entirely?

      And why would anyone want to go west? Hot weather, no water, natural disasters...

    2. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      natural disasters? You are talking about western coast, south, central and eastern USA. Here in the WEST (Colorado, NM, WY, Mt, Id, Ut, Az, Nv, and eastern parts of the west coast states), we have no hurricanes, little flooding, small tornadoes (a monster out here is an F3), no earthquakes (well coast states do), etc). Our only major issue is drought, hail, and lightening. There is plenty of water, it is just that midwest and west coast states want it. We have cheaper energy, loads of wind energy, solar thermal, solar PV, and geo-thermal will power the USA down the road. With that said, no, it is a horror. Stay where you live.

      But, back to your statement; a number of companies that come here from Texas and east coast love to destroy things. They view their own state with loads of vegetation and think that this will grow fast here. Due to lack of water, everything grows SLOW, except by the riverbed and what is brought in. In particular, the Texas companies are the WORSE. They view it as their right to inject some pretty wicked chemicals into the ground to get the oil/gas. Not a problem NORMALLY, but companies esp. those from Texas, have been caught shortcutting their wells and not making certain that they are tightly sealed (costs more and they employ illegals who really do not care). As such, we have found benzene, and all sorts of wicked fracking fluids in our aquifers. A very small amount of it, is enough to ruin millions of gallons.

    3. Re:Not quite by metlin · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. A case of mistaken terminology, which is why I wasn't sure what the OP was talking about.

      To me, east is east coast - which is what threw me off. The east coast (at least the North East) has plenty of water, lush greenery and gorgeous weather. And while there are occasional natural disasters, they are far and few in between. So, I was wondering why anyone would want to leave here.

      That said, I have spent time in some of the states that you mentioned - so, I can totally see why people would want to move there.

      As far as Texan companies are concerned, does it surprise anyone? I mean, it is Texas that we're talking about here...

    4. Re:Not quite by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      In between one of the 2004 hurricanes that hit Florida, I found a map showing various types of natural disasters for the U.S. In central New Mexico, there's a spot that only has 'small likelihood of vulcanism' covering it. That's where we've moved. Nice thing is the elevation. No fleas, ticks, fire ants, mosquitos, and cockroaches. Worst thing we have to deal with are the damn foxtail grasses. They're giving the dogs and goat some trouble this year. About the heat, was 58Â F this morning and raining. It might break 85Â F by July but that's about it. Last year's winter; got down to the single digits sometimes but only got a few inches of snow at a time.

      Oh yeah, all the land out here's been built on and no one's selling any houses so no one else can move out here. Just a heads up.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:Not quite by metlin · · Score: 1

      Having spent a summer at Los Alamos in NM and having traveled frequently to Boulder/Denver in CO on business, I can certainly see how NM/CO could have some great places to live.

      However, I like living in urban areas with good public transportation, easy access to restaurants that are open past 10, home delivery etc. And more importantly, access to good education, libraries and all that good stuff.

      Which is why I live in New England, and would never ever consider moving out. I live in Greater Boston, and I've a train station about a mile from my apartment that will take me to downtown Boston, Cambridge and anywhere else. And the beach is just a 2 mile bike ride away. And do I want to go to New York? New Jersey? DC? Philadelphia? They're all short train rides away.

      Summers here are gorgeous (it's in the mid 50s now), fall and spring are nice and cool. There is a lot of snow in winter, but they are nowhere as cold as they could be (then again, I love places with cold weather, so I'd hate to live in a place that got too hot - and snow isn't a problem for me). Either way, except for the winter, it is lush green all year around. Despite this, my allergies are almost always unaffected in New England compared to most other parts of the world.

      The best part? Great educational institutions all around, even some of the public schools here beat private schools in other parts of the country. Fantastic job opportunities (high tech, biotech, VC - you name it). Very intellectual and open minded population (at least around the Boston/Cambridge area).

      If you can put up with the crazy driving and the constant road work, it's one of the best places to live.

    6. Re:Not quite by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Aaaaaaugh! People. Everywhere!

      Love living in the country, with 40 acres (not mine but various family members) between me and the neighbors. A buddy tried to get me to go with him for a week up to NYC and man, the idea of being around all those people really through me for a loop. Couldn't go. Is weird how different people are, I guess.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Not quite by metlin · · Score: 1

      Hahaha. I don't mind the emptiness; however, I just don't prefer to do it more than a few days a year.

      Having spent most of my life in what I'd term "mega-cities" and "global cities" (across all 3 categories - look both up on Wikipedia), I cannot imagine living in such a large, empty land for long.

      My girlfriend's family lives in the Middle-of-nowhere, Oklahoma. It's great, once a couple of years during the holidays. Otherwise, I just can't find much to do.

      Now, it's a very different thing when I go on hikes or climbs - in these cases, I am actually "doing" something (i.e. climbing, hiking, camping) and I don't find the need to "do" something else. But living my daily life without the varieties offered by cities? No way.

      Another factor is food and diet. As a strict vegetarian who tries to eat only organic food, I pretty much would have to grow my own food in a place like the one you describe. If I crave sushi or Indian food or a Greek wrap at 2 am, I can get it at 2 am. Not to mention book stores, university libraries, museums, art exhibitions, night life etc.

      Not to mention the fact that in a big city, you can pretty much find anything to do (new hobbies, startups, study groups, educational institutions, networking contacts etc).

      Having spent a little time in relatively smaller "cities" (e.g. Cincinnati, which is basically a smaller town), any place with less than a million or so would be depressing.

  45. No, more like this... by Grog6 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A large pile of rocks will do the same thing, pretty much.

    http://www.european-pyramids.eu/wb/pages/european-pyramids/greece.php

    Same end effect, with no tech. Much cheaper, I'd bet. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  46. what is MORE important ? :) by x4r · · Score: 1

    both copyright infigement and [possibly]implementation, 2-in-1, here. btw F Herbert will be proud. maybe.

  47. Reference(s) for the 'primative' non-white's tech? by lpq · · Score: 1

    For 1000's of years, non-white desert dwellers have constructed large towers that deliver 100's of gallons/day -- all automatically powered by the sun -- and no manual effort required...

    WOW...

    Um, could you cite references?

  48. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by pegdhcp · · Score: 1
    Lets see, on the back of a Camel, well;

    Most (All, before Dias discovered Cape in 1488) of the goods carried from India and China to Europe. How did you think Chinese sold lowest quality (according to their standards) of earth-ware to your ancestors as "finest in the world" for centuries?

  49. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by anarche · · Score: 1

    Listening in from WA

    From a state that is already 95% desert - also where most of our exports come from (the mines) we could use these.

    Currently, water to the Goldfields is pumped 600km from the Hills - an engineering feat in 1902, but also highly energy-hungry. Water from the desert's air? BHP will be mighty pleased...

    --
    Wait! Whats a sig?
  50. New idea? by morghanphoenix · · Score: 1

    And how is this different from the evaporation stills I've been using for years? More efficient no doubt, but the concept is still the same, and published in countless survival books.

  51. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by donaldm · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually it's very simple you have a flat sheet of plastic or waterproof material, then hang it up so that one corner is sloping down to some sort of collection media (ie a bottle) and then wait for the hopefully cool night. During the night the material will be cooler than the dew point of the air causing moisture to condense on the material. Once condensed the water will slowly flow down to the collection point. Normally you won't get much water but in some situations the amount collected could be the difference between life and death.

    Here is another form of desert water collection that is very cheap if you are near areas which have fogs .

    --
    There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
  52. Untapping a vast water resource~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, they should work on water separators as in the film Waterworld. The volume of water that could be recovered from college beer parties world wide, would be staggering! :)

  53. Vaporators? by Goodl · · Score: 1

    Sir - My first job was programming binary load lifters... very similar to your vaporators in most respects. ...

    --
    I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
  54. Awesome... by BlatOdea · · Score: 1

    Now where's my stillsuit! :D
    I've wanted one of those forever!

    --
    Why, if not because?
  55. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by greyblack · · Score: 1

    When I read your post, I was all like "! "

    --
    Everybody uses broad generalizations.
  56. with a tiny bit of care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you could easily support 15 people off that same 1 acre.

    Here in Queensland, Australia, our water reservoirs were running a little low (less than 17% stored in a system that supplies 1.2million people). The government set a target of 37 gallons per person, which was consistently met for about six months, before we got our first decent rain in four years, which pushed the dams all the way up to 38%. Of course, we've since had a reasonably wet summer, so we're sitting on 75%, so we should be good for another 4-5 years, even without significant rainfall.

    Funky charts & graphs here.

  57. Air Wells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Quite a lot... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...of water in the desert air, apparently.

    The caretaker of my building in Cairo directs the water that condenses in all of the air-conditioner units in the building into the gardens. While it isn't energy efficient AT ALL, I am always surprised by how much water gets to the garden. And as the weather gets hotter, the residents use their air-con more meaning more water for the garden. Again, it's not energy efficient in any way, but it does save water by reclaiming it from the air, and quite a lot of it.

    --
    If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    1. Re:Quite a lot... by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am always surprised by how much water gets to the garden.

      Humidity is relative. A desert can have much more moisture in the air than a much colder, much more humid area. It's just that, at 50C degrees, the air can hold much more water than it can at 10C degrees. So the same amount of water that makes the desert 15% relative humidity, can result in rain (100% relative humidity) in colder climate.

      It's the same thing that allows far more sugar/salt/jello/etc. to dissolve in warm water than cold...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    I blame that butterfly in 1995 that flapped its wings and caused rippled effects.

    or it could be those greedy farmers in brazil chopping down forrests like its going out of style.

    Then again, who knows in a few years we could turn around and get 5x rainfall each year, dont forget
    that weather also has long term 30+year cycles too.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  60. Obligatory Akbar... by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    Beware, It's a trap !

    (sorry)

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
  61. I like crysknives by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Crysknives are nice because you can dual-wield them with an artifact.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  62. sounds good, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why not just use solar power to refrigerate the air and condense the water?

  63. Something Similar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haven't read Dune- but this sounds similar...
    Water Mill

  64. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

    Would a water grid to more evenly distribute water be feasible? It works for electricity, why not water?

  65. Dirigibles in the '30's had moisture collectors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It might interest /. readers that dirigibles used passive moisture collectors above the engines to collect moisture from the exhaust. This was collected to (partially) counter the weight loss due to the burning of the fuel. Moffett Field, CA has a great Navy museum with models and docents discussing the U.S.S. Macon. Oh, and did I mention they carried bi-planes? Very cool vehicles. Too bad they weren't reliable...

  66. I bet ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they try to patent it. Any takers ?

  67. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    "Collect 10 Intact Salmon Brains and return to me and I'll make you a [Salmon Brain Compass]."

    Of course only one out of every 3 salmon have a brain.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  68. Right Time, Right Place, with Right Thing? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking the power supply is a small diesel engine from a tractor. There appears to be an over abundance of metal used, but that could be "slimed" down later. What I think is most interesting is the location, a place where Artic Circle Testing could accomplished with little transportation costs. Temperatures at Alaska range from the very hot to the very cold. Just a funny thought, what would it look like if one of the Inuit Tribes were to use it to hunt Whale? That would make an entertaining summer movie.

    1. Re:Right Time, Right Place, with Right Thing? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      My bad, wrong article, wrong place, wrong submit time... My first thoughts of the water collector was that the Sahara was once a location of wheat fields during the Roman Empire. Brining water to the Sahara would have a changing effect on the world's politics today.

  69. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    Actually it's very simple you have a flat sheet of plastic or waterproof material, then hang it up so that one corner is sloping down to some sort of collection media (ie a bottle) and then wait for the hopefully cool night.

    This is also a method by which you can recycle your own urine (just like Freemen! Or astronauts!) by peeing in a wide hole, putting the collection bucket in the middle, and the plastic over the hole with a rock in the middle. Water from urine evaporates, condenses on plastic, there ya go.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  70. Herbert didn't think up that tech, he witnessed it by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frank Herbert, while speaking in a radio interview on a call-in show around 1984, said that he saw a pilot project of a desert moisture collector while he was doing research as a journalist back in the Sixties.

  71. Desalination and vacuum by SoopahCell · · Score: 1

    2 comments:

    1) This sounds better suited to desalination. A house on California's beaches or a boat could use this to evaporate ocean water. Current methods use too much electricity.

    2) Maintaining a vacuum - how is the vacuum maintained? The sun sets, pausing evaporation. The exit tube drains or dries. Vacuum lost. It seems like there's more to a closed loop, specifically a solar panel, battery, valve, and controller. When the sun sets the valve would shut to keep water in the tube. When evaporation
    resumes the valve opens and trickling continues.

    Or perhaps there is a power-free mechanical solution where the tube expands for a lot of water and squeezes shut when there is little.

  72. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Or long pipe technology.
    Move the excess water from Queensland during the floods.
    Yes I know it's bloody far. Build some sort of water carrying thing. call it a aqua passage..or a water duct, or some such.
    Wait this is Australia. call it a Wazzer-Doodla-Ga

    Hey, at least I didn't suggest you get water from your neighbor Germany.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  73. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

    I live in southeastern Australia, and down here, we haven't had regular rainfall now since 1995.

    Less than 200KM to the nearest ocean. Start laying some pipes...

    That's very likely more efficient than trying to pull water from the air.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  74. Re:When the figurative white man "discovers" it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often think of going back in time and telling the Arabi who invented the magnetic compass -

    Wasn't the magnetic compass invented in China?

  75. Counter productive? by marciot · · Score: 1

    So, in other words, we extract moisture from the air to drink, so that the air becomes drier and you then have to drink more to make up for the moisture you are now loosing more rapidly through evaporation?

    I can imagine walking up to the "moisture vacuum" around these things and instantly crumpling into a pruned-up mummy.

  76. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by Patch86 · · Score: 1

    More efficient how?

    TFA suggests a method of collecting water, for free, from the air without requiring any additional energy input. You're suggesting they build a 200km pipe, plus desalination plant, to pump water across miles of hostile desert.

    Assuming TFA's invention isn't very expensive (and if it's just brine and solar heaters, it shouldn't be), I fail to see how mass desalination and water transport is going to be "more efficient". Easier perhaps, but efficient it isn't.

  77. Re:Great. Victoria might need this, soon by evilviper · · Score: 1

    TFA suggests a method of collecting water, for free, from the air without requiring any additional energy input.

    It's not "free" in the slightest. It has an extremely high initial cost, and huge operating costs, due to deterioration of solar panels and fatigue of all mechanical parts.

    You're suggesting they build a 200km pipe, plus desalination plant, to pump water across miles of hostile desert.

    By the above logic, all of that is "free" too... right?

    And the desalination plant is definitely "free" because you need precisely that for separating the water from the brine in the air-based system as well.

    Assuming TFA's invention isn't very expensive

    That's a terrible and baseless assumption.

    You also utterly fail to consider VOLUME. Even a tiny pipeline will move a HUGE amount of water, whenever you want. You can't, however, gather much water from the air.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant