Slashdot Mirror


A Black Day For Internet Freedom In Germany

Several readers including erlehmann and tmk wrote to inform us about the dawning of Internet censorship in Germany under the usual guise of protecting the children. "This week, the two big political parties ruling Germany in a coalition held the final talks on their proposed Internet censorship scheme. DNS queries for sites on a list will be given fake answers that lead to a page with a stop sign. The list itself is maintained by the German federal police (Bundeskriminalamt). A protest movement has formed over the course of the last several months, and over 130K citizens have signed a petition protesting the law. Despite this, and despite criticism from all sides, the two parties sped up the process for the law to be signed on Thursday, June 18, 2009."

82 of 420 comments (clear)

  1. I know the feeling. by cyborch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've had that in Denmark for years now. OpenDNS should be the solution to all of your problems...

    1. Re:I know the feeling. by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OpenDNS is the solution.

      At least until the DNS queries are hijacked.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:I know the feeling. by ae1294 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We've had that in Denmark for years now. OpenDNS should be the solution to all of your problems...

      Do you really think that the government doesn't know about other DNS servers? I assure you there is some sort of plan and reason why they have not asked the ISP's to block or MASQ any request with a destination of 53.

      My simple guess is any request with a destination of 53 is logged and then resolved at some later time. A database of people who use these other servers is maintained and flags are included such as "pedophile, hacker, warez, terrorist, etc". This list then is used to help law enforcement and or they will just come and round all of you up one day.

      What's going to end up happening is someone is going to have to run a hacked all the hell bind server that takes encrypted requests on port 80 and replies back with your request which will then need to be cached locally so as not to totally hose your browsing. Then the government is going to start banning those server's IP addresses and someone is going to have to make a DNS resolver that runs in a distributed manner. Then the government will do something else, probably make it a huge crime to use any of this stuff and we will all be basically where we are now with copyright infringement which is to say that people don't respect that law and so all law becomes less respected. This is all the same as what happened in the 1930's US Prohibition of booze.

      "All of this has happened before, and it will happen again..."

    3. Re:I know the feeling. by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I expect political viewpoints judged "extreme" by those in power are already on the blacklist in Germany.

      Hasn't Denmark put opposition political websites on the blacklist too? I recal a /. story on that.

      Does anyone really think that blacklisting opposing political viewpoints is merely an "unfortunate side effect" of schemes like this?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    4. Re:I know the feeling. by half_d · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My simple guess is any request with a destination of 53 is logged and then resolved at some later time.

      I have a hard time believing that this would be the case; at least here in Denmark, everything about the different filtering we've experienced points at zero-knowledge politicians telling some IT staff what to do - and do it now!

      No real blocking is taking place, just sort of placebo blocking.. by the way, on the Danish version of the 'page with the red STOP sign' it says that ones visit to that page has not been logged.

      Our government, just like the rest of the 'civilized' world are acting crazy with paranoia. It seems like they (the politicians) are having a race as to whom can implement most privacy/human-rights defying laws fastest!

    5. Re:I know the feeling. by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Nazi Germany... wait, that isn't funny.

    6. Re:I know the feeling. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      honeypot theory?

      you may be right. letting port 53 outbound thru but LOGGING who connects out of the country.

      yup, very plausible.

      expect it to spread to other countries, too ;(

      this is the century of anti-freedom, worldwide. yes, its really that bad and its getting WORSE each passing day.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:I know the feeling. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do you really think that the government doesn't know about other DNS servers?

      Yes, after some TV magazine report, I know that they don't think that far.
      Blocking people from getting there is not the point. Intimidation, and getting the people used to this kind of government, is the real point.

      Besides: Who stops you from using another port, and encrypting the data trough a VPN? Hell, my router can do that. Trough a simple web-interface. I don't need to change anything on my pc. It's done in 5 minutes. Now if you offer me an offshore DNS server with a VPN, a good connection, and just the price of keeping it running, you will have a client. (Those free ones are too slow, and the others that you buy are way too expensive, because they want to profit big time from it.)

      I smell a nice non-profit business model here. Especially since half the world can be your clients.

      As long as they don't go to war against our small island full of servers, and as long as they do still allow data into the net, we can circumvent their censorship. And offer the whole world to do so too, in one click (insert USB stick, run autostart, click OK, done).

      I wonder how one could protect those servers better, even in case of attacks?
      Hey, I know it: Infect the censorship servers *themselves*! :D

      Who wants to apply for a well-payed job in this emerging censorship-server-market?
      If we storm them, all of us will pretty much be moles. Meaning we can perfectly disable the censorship proxies/routers for users with our special client patch. :)

      My god, and they thought they could stop *us all*. They can't even stop me alone.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:I know the feeling. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what VPNs are for.

      And offshore servers.

      And I bet the administrators of those censorship servers read Slashdot too, so we can work with them.

      Hahahaa... Seriously. This government is such a joke.

      If we only had some weapon against the real reason for this all: The intimidation and getting used to this.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:I know the feeling. by Monsieur+Piccolini · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do you really think that the government doesn't know about other DNS servers?

      Yes, after some TV magazine report, I know that they don't think that far. Blocking people from getting there is not the point. Intimidation, and getting the people used to this kind of government, is the real point.

      I can reinforce that. The music industry is already calling on the government to include filesharing and torrent networks.

      So you can see where they're heading...

    10. Re:I know the feeling. by powerlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel bad for the people in Germany, but I'm glad its not me.

      I'm sure there's a word that describes my secret joy about their bad-luck, but I can't remember it.

      Probably in some foreign language or something.

      (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude)

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    11. Re:I know the feeling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That attitude is exactly what helps (and will help) the governments to pass such laws. The people who don't understand the technology, don't seem to fully understand the implications and give the government a free pass (everything for "the children"). Those who understand the technology, are usually geeks. People who are part of the "I'm a smart ass" culture and therefore will always take the (partially true) stand that "they can't really stop us, we will bypass their attempt for control".

      Yes, it is possible (even easily) for well informed people to bypass such censorships, but that is besides the point and contradicts what the internet is and should be all about.

    12. Re:I know the feeling. by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know if you consider the UK a functioning democracy, but recently they rounded up a group of hippies on the grounds that they might be thinking about causing disruption at a power station.

      They were then released on bail, the conditions of which were that they weren't allowed to be hippies, weren't allowed to be against power stations, and weren't allowed to talk to anyone who was either a hippy or against power stations. More or less it amounts to house arrest. Without any form of trial or due process.

      Note: I don't agree with the aforementioned hippies policy wise. But when they came for the hippies, I didn't speak out...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:I know the feeling. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, I'm getting a few replies pointing out examples of government policies to block certain dissidents. I think you'll find, however, that these policies to block dissidents have another side to them, where the expression of such dissidence is, itself, considered offensive (especially the hate speech). So, while I admit what I said was incorrect, I'd like to make a new argument, one that's closer to what I meant.

      I meant that censoring dissidents is rarely, in a functioning democracy (yes Hognoxious, that includes the UK), a policy of a government exclusively. If they do censor dissidents, it is, more often than not, a product of the people the government represents. If they are so offended by Holocaust deniers, and the distress they cause, that they wish to censor them, then the government will likely comply. I have yet to see a democratic government actually manage to usurp their own people in these matters, especially post WWII.

      I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying you should be more worried about your fellow man, rather than the mother of all scapegoats, the government.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    14. Re:I know the feeling. by silanea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When are we going to start countering the current trend?

      When the tech-hostile ultraconservative 60-somethings from whom the parties that bring up such laws draw the majority of their voters have died off. The CDU/CSU parties which pushed this horrendous law is highly popular amongst people over 60 with low education. (Source: Zeit.de, screenshots courtesy of this excellent blog)

      And I suspect the situation in other countries to be similar. Those people do not understand what the Internet is and how it works, and they have an unwavering trust in the state and government. A terrible combination.

      --
      Rudolf Hess edited Mein Kampf. He was the very first grammar nazi.
    15. Re:I know the feeling. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tor will bypass all their logging. Presumably they know this, but I'm not sure how they intend to fight it.

      In the UK Freedom of Information requests have been made on the subject, but no response so far.

      Even more worrying is what happens when sites from the list leak out. Even if we don't have the full list, as soon as someone visits a blocked site they can note the URL. Then all they need to do is send you an email with an in-line image link pointing to said site (or a hidden image on another site, an iframe etc), and you end up on the paedophile suspect list.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:I know the feeling. by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      actually, most senior techs here handle these requests whenever they come in. we're all cleared to handle sensitive data.

      What I was talking about wouldn't be classified as sensitive it would be secret and probably would run on it's own machine but maybe your right and your elected officials really are as stupid as you say they are. But then that really says something about Denmark doesn't it?

      Well, I'm Danish, i follow the news and specifically politics regarding IT. You know, being a normal, concerned citizen in the country i reside in

      So you support DNS filtering? and you support your Politicians even though they are stupid? On the one hand it sounds like you are proud of your country and on the other hand it sounds like you think your government is incompetent and thus hate your country. You should like the Danish version of an American redneck.

      oh, and groups like http://www.sslug.dk/ often do pop-quiz our politicians about certain issues, usually before elections

      As I told your friend, who also used the phase 'Machiavellian surveillance' a few messages down, politicians tell people what they want to hear not the truth. If they told the truth they would never get elected in the first place.

      but this is Denmark we're talking about.

      Yes.. Yes it is... land of the free, waffles and internet censorship... To protect the children!

      Denmark's biggest Internet service provider TDC A/S launched a DNS-based child pornography filter on 18 October 2005 in cooperation with the state police department and Save the Children, a charity organization. Since then, all major providers have joined and as of May 2006, 98% of the Danish Internet users are restricted by the filter.[47] The filter caused some controversy in March 2006, when a legal sex site named Bizar.dk was caught in the filter, sparking discussion about the reliability, accuracy and credibility of the filter.[48] Also, as of 18 October 2005, TDC A/S has blocked access to AllOfMP3.com, a popular MP3 download site, through DNS filtering.[49] 4 February 2008 a Danish court has ordered the Danish ISP Tele2 to shutdown access to the filesharing site thepiratebay.org for all its Danish users.[50]

  2. Geez! by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Man, those Germans are worse than Nazis.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Geez! by MadMatr07 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...History is cyclical my friend.

    2. Re:Geez! by HaZardman27 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How long until the "internet burnings" begin?

      --
      Apparently wizard is not a legitimate career path, so I chose programmer instead.
    3. Re:Geez! by damburger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How true. Which explains pretty well why I'm seeing a dreadful future for my country. By the way, I'm Italian.

      What I know of Silvio Berlusconi, I see a dreadful present for your country as well.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
    4. Re:Geez! by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait, is that why all of my .pl requests are going to .de all of a sudden? Spoooky....

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    5. Re:Geez! by Tom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it's only a selected few politicians.

      Everyone outside their small circle is opposed to this. From techies to NGOs and even abuse victims.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Geez! by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We can define a new measure, the "Godwin score", which is how many times someone is mentioned in Googlespace along with Hitler.

      Mike Godwin has a Godwin score of 156,000. Germany has a Godwin score of 17,400,000. Therefore Germany is over a hundred times more evil than Mike Godwin, or at least more Godwinized.

      Slashdot, interestingly, has a Godwin score of 155,000.

  3. alternative dns servers; by miruku · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    MilkMiruku
    1. Re:alternative dns servers; by sakdoctor · · Score: 5, Informative

      apt-get install bind9
      127.0.0.1 top of resolv.conf

      Any slashdot discussion about DNS will imminently fill up with hundreds of recommendations for opendns.com ...which is fine, but also a bit puzzling.
      Don't most of us have at least one linux machine somewhere, where you can put a caching nameserver, then point any windows machines on the LAN to that.

    2. Re:alternative dns servers; by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, because that caching nameserver just magically pulls its DNS info out of thin air...

    3. Re:alternative dns servers; by BenoitRen · · Score: 5, Informative

      Any slashdot discussion about DNS will imminently fill up with hundreds of recommendations for opendns.com ...which is fine

      No, it's not fine to recommend OpenDNS.

    4. Re:alternative dns servers; by amorsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, because that caching nameserver just magically pulls its DNS info out of thin air...

      Err, yes? Or rather, it starts with the root servers, which is as good as anything gets. Certainly better than OpenDNS, which isn't above manipulating answers.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
  4. Gigaton Fail - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like it's time for Germans to learn how to browse like the Chinese; Encryption, proxies, darknets, deep web crawling, and leaving as few traces behind as possible.

    For whatever naive reason I allowed myself to assume that Western Europe had finally begun to understand that police states are regressive and undesirable. Each passing day, it becomes clearer and clearer that realization has still yet to be made.

    1. Re:Gigaton Fail - by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or browse like the Iranians. There's currently a pretty decent number of people helping set up proxies around the world for use in Iran. Austin Heap managed to setup some VPN servers on gigabit-ethernet.

      I'm working on a Virtual Appliance that runs Squid, Tor, Polipo+Tor, ziproxy & ssh for use by people who don't quite know how to setup squid for themselves or want to sandbox it.

    2. Re:Gigaton Fail - by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not what the Ministry of Truth told me.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    3. Re:Gigaton Fail - by weinbrenner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh, most people here would agree that police states are bad. But on the other hand they would say that there are exceptions (child pornography, terrorism etc.). And of course "our politicians would never do something really wrong!!!"

      People in Germany live in a rich land which has last experienced war 64 years ago - so most people see it for granted that they will always live in a democracy, where their freedom is guaranteed.
      Intellectually they know that in other countries this isn't so, but if you personally never experienced something else, then it is hard to imagine that this might change. And because they fail to grasp the fact that their freedom and their rights could be endangered they see no reason to defend it.

    4. Re:Gigaton Fail - by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      My host forgive me. http://www.exstatic.org.nyud.net:8080/proxybox/.

      Again, this is just something I thew together last night when people on Fark (VII threads and counting) were wanting to help but not able to figure out squid.

      I would appreciate any feedback or help hardening it or adding features or getting the download size down or etc...

      jjarvis98@gmail.com

    5. Re:Gigaton Fail - by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Imagine if every single person in Iran thought that before they went outside.

      I'm just a white collar guy that works 9-5. People asked for proxy servers. People wanted help setting up proxy servers. I did what I could.

      I should have just watched American Idol.

  5. Easily circumvented? by JesseL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not that easy circumvention of a bad law makes it okay, but as a practical measure wouldn't it be easy to just use a DNS server in a different country? Or is Germany planning on firewalling all DNS queries except those from 'official' servers?

    --
    "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
  6. What are they censoring? by firesyde424 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Remember back a year or so, when the .alt newsgroup was taken down because something like 1% of the newsgroups in that domain had child pornography on them? You might as well have gotten rid of the whole internet because people could have found child porn there. It doesn't make sense.

    I would have expected something like this "DNS blacklist" in Iran or China. But Germany??

    This sounds like censorship for the sake of censorship

    1. Re:What are they censoring? by Freetardo+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would have expected something like this "DNS blacklist" in Iran or China. But Germany??
       
      This sounds like censorship for the sake of censorship

      You must not know much about Germany to be surprised by this. Have a good read on this article.

  7. What's Next? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are gonna start tagging "children" with gps locator tag subcutaneous inserts?

    Then we start with those older folks suffering from dementia?

    Then we go on next to those who committed felonies?

    Finally, making it a requirement for all people who want to work, buy groceries, etc?

    What's next?

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:What's Next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are gonna start tagging "children" with gps locator tag subcutaneous inserts?

      Then we start with those older folks suffering from dementia?

      Whole families have been chipped in Florida by their choice.

        http://www.miaminightout.com/spotlight/advop/11172002/microchip.shtml

      Then we go on next to those who committed felonies?

      We're on it. http://www.cs.unc.edu/~pozefsky/COMP006D_F05/Criminal.ppt

      Finally, making it a requirement for all people who want to work, buy groceries, etc?

      What's next?

      There's firms that used to exist called city watcher that had their employees gain access to doors. U Conn developing chips to implant into soldiers to monitor vital signs.

  8. Re:These parties are also big Linux supporters by despe666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Godwin's law on the first post? Come on give us a chance at least!

  9. Mein Herr! by BigBlueOx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Before you get on ze net, ve neet to zee your papers. Your papers, bitte.

    First, switch to Open DNS, second, vote the bastards out. Keep voting the bastards out until you get your bastards in there.

    1. Re:Mein Herr! by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What happens when the ballot looks like this:

      Please select the candidate of your choice

      • Bastard 1
      • Bastard 2
      • Bastard 3
    2. Re:Mein Herr! by ab0mb88 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      vote the bastards out. Keep voting the bastards out until you get your bastards in there.

      I know this often gets lost on the Libertarian/Third Party crowd here, but this is how politics works in the real world. I know that we all want instant gratification, but real change takes time and a shift in public perceptions. Vote for the least bad candidate until there is a good candidate on the ballot.

    3. Re:Mein Herr! by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We have a Pirate Party over here in Germany, and it's about time they get some more votes so the major parties start to listen.

      Money and votes are the only things the bastards are interested in, after all.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  10. Re:the wall by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All in all it's just another brick in the wall.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  11. DNS spoofing is just one way to satisfy the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The law demands no specific way of intercepting the traffic, just one that works. If DNS spoofing proves to be unable to satisfy the law, then we will see more drastic measures, like blocking or rerouting access to alternative DNS servers and transparent proxies.

    Officially the proposal is pushed as a means to combat child pornography, but politicians from all involved parties have already hinted at other possible uses for the filtering infrastructure which will be installed. The parties are quick to deny any intent to allow such an extension, but there are even official press releases clearly hinting at a not-so-hidden agenda.

    1. Re:DNS spoofing is just one way to satisfy the law by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Given that the whole world is moving to DNSSEC, have fun trying to spoof it two years from now.

  12. Holy shit! by jockeys · · Score: 5, Funny

    This thread is Godwin-proof!

    Think about it:
    1. it's a story about government censorship (with all the usual iron-fisted delicacy wielded by big-government)
    2. it's a process that is completely non-transparent, and creates a sort of internet-secret-police
    3. it's happening in Germany

    It's the perfect storm of internet flamewars, completely immune to Godwin's Lawn!

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:Holy shit! by solafide · · Score: 3, Funny

      Godwin: "You young folks these days, thinking you're immune to me. Get off my lawn!"

    2. Re:Holy shit! by Jesselnz · · Score: 2, Funny

      This really isn't a big deal. If the Germans want Internet, they can just take it from Poland, or maybe France (they could connect the tubes through Belgium). It worked last time, didn't it?

  13. Old news for Finland, too by wolfie123 · · Score: 5, Informative

    We've had this in Finland for a while now, too. See http://lapsiporno.info/english-2008-02-15.html for internet activist Matti Nikki's fight against the debated censorship. OpenDNS is the de facto way to circumvent this censor list. Ironically, his site is blocked by the child porn list by our Keskusrikospoliisi (federal police).

    --
    I am convinced that I can always be convinced otherwise.
    1. Re:Old news for Finland, too by wolfie123 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seems like your Finnish ISP has the censor list in use - that's the page you land on.

      For all I know, you might be some guy who tries to enforce Lex Karpela or something, so I won't give you any advice to circumvent the restriction. Sorry for that. Google around and you're bound to find it out yourself.

      --
      I am convinced that I can always be convinced otherwise.
    2. Re:Old news for Finland, too by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ironically, his site is blocked by the child porn list by our Keskusrikospoliisi (federal police).

      Dude, that's not ironic, that's inevitable.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  14. Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by Xaedalus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Read TFA. This is not a 'police state' in the forming. This is a decision by the government, that apparently is backed by a majority of their citizens. We tend to forget here on /. that not everyone values freedom of the net like we do. We netizens are outnumbered by well-mannered, law-abiding individuals who aren't particularly net-savvy, don't understand the social dynamics of the net, and frankly don't want to. These people hear the stories about child porn websites, they read about "HACKERS!!!" (aka black hats) conducting cyber warfare in Estonia and other government institutions, and they see the power of porn in general on the net, and they are frightened by it. To them, having government institute censorship under 'reasonable' guidelines is the norm and should be enforced because that is the system they live in. They're sheeple. They don't want to take the time to understand the true nature of the issues at stake because to them, there is no need to. They live safe, secure lives. They perceive the internet to be an unregulated, dangerous place where their children could be psychologically damaged, their finances plundered, their identities stolen, and above all else, a world that is completely outside their own. Yes, politicians are going to take this to the limit. Yes, this is a dangerous trend. In order to fight this, we have to understand the basis of this, and the basis is that we are outnumbered by people who do value security and comfort above freedom, because that is how they choose to live their lives.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't believe its at all the will of the people, on this one.

      its a power grab for the gov, plain and simple.

      germans tend to be technical, detail oriented and saavy and there is no way I can believe the population would WANT this.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    2. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by Repossessed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Censorship is *always* backed by the majority. Doesn't keep it from being a violation of human rights.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    3. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, that is exactly what Alexis de Tocqueville and John Stuart Mill warned about when they talked about the "Tyranny of the majority."

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Read TFA. This is not a 'police state' in the forming.

      Indeed not. When the police can decide what you are and aren't allowed to access on the Internet, the police state is already here.

    5. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      germans tend to be technical, detail oriented and saavy

      You must be talking about a different Germany from the one I live in. Most Germans have no clue about modern tech.

      --
      (+1, Disagree)
    6. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From my time living in Germany and my own knowledge of German history, I can tell you a few things. First of all, Germans do not seem to have the innate distrust of government that most people in the US have. This is true even after what they went through with the Nazi's in WWII, and culturally I think it comes from the fact that up until the end of the 19th century, there was no "Germany" to speak of but just a bunch of small fiefdoms that argued and fought with each other. Over the centuries, Germany had been used as the stomping ground where other big powers like England, France, Austria-Hungary, and Russia went to fight wars. The 30 Years War is perhaps the most famous example. This led the Germans to want to have a strong central government to give Germany an identity.
          Because of this background, notions like individual liberty and fear of the government never really took sway in Germany. Even today when every single school child has to be taught about the Holocaust at length (I even saw a bunch of them when I visited Dachau), they really are not being taught the most important lesson of the Holocaust. The Germans basically say: Hey don't lock up Jews in concentration camps and kill them! Which is obviously a very good lesson, but it misses the deeper underlying point: The real lesson should be: Hey, don't ever let the government grow so powerful that it can trample the individuals inalienable rights, and don't ever let the so-called needs of the many (the poor "churlens" in this case) violate the rights of the individual. I can guarantee that this idea is not respected by Germans in the same way it is in the US. Ironically, the Germans who are most likely to rebel against this are likely the same ones who rebelled against the old DDR back during the Cold War. The people who have seen tyrrany at its worst are more likely to protest a loss of liberty than the ones who are going to lose the liberty the first time.

    7. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine the police could jail anyone they want. Publishing a list of jailed people makes you a criminal. And instead of public trials for everyone, there are only secret, quaterly checks of a few jailed people.

      Sounds pretty much like a police state. The job of the police is not to judge who commits a crime. Thats the job of judges. How can it be the job of the police to judge which site is against the law? The judgement of the police must not be the end of a trial, it can only be the beginning.

    8. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by meist3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      germans tend to be technical, detail oriented and saavy and there is no way I can believe the population would WANT this.

      Flattering stereotypes aside, the general populous here is just as uninformed and boon-ish as anywhere else. They take their information pre-digested from the mass media and believe that politicians act in the best interest of the people. Combine that with an outstanding history of propaganda culture in my country and you have an uninformed flock of obedient yay-sayers. Most people read as far as "child pornography" and whatever is proposed to fight it can't be wrong, now can it? The majority of internet users will never even notice the blockades until their weblogs, gambling, filesharing and porn sites end up on the "to burn" pile. I'm disgusted by the shameful lies and deceit campaigns run by elected officials and I am bound to believe that this won't change in the near future. People are just too caught up in their daily existence to realize the big picture and fathom the depths of power structures within governments. One would think that Germany had learned lessons from her past but it seems like the only lesson learned is how to effectively manipulate the public opinion. Our media and political parties are largely bound by industry rule and won't take the risk of losing ad contracts or parliament alliances to defend freedom. After all, freedom makes a ruler's life hard. A sad and remarkable episode in German history has begun. This is the beginning of some disgusting schemes to protect the ruling class and their outdated ideas from reality. Next on the list are copyright infringements, there are several officials that have already mentioned this as the next logical desirable step. I doubt we can still stop it. The way this country is run by right-wing nuts and infiltrated from left over Nazis ever since WWII ended is despicable and unbeknownst to most a reason for this direction we're heading. I would say I'd emigrate but I just can't find any country where to.

    9. Re:Before we use the 'police state' meme again... by the_one(2) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not the germans' trust in their government that is weird. It's the americans' distrust in their. Maybe it has something to do with how fucked up their election process is and how often their politicians screw them over?

  15. For a list of the fastest DNS servers for you... by LichtVonWahrheit · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.dnsserverlist.org/ This site takes into account round trip time, not just the time it takes to ping a DNS server.

  16. brothels? by charlieo88 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wait, what? Legal brothels are okay but internet smut is a bridge too far?

  17. Re:Freudian Slip or Bad Translation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From TFA:

    ... circumcising constitutional freedoms.

    A little snip here, a little snip there...

  18. Huh? by denzacar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds like censorship for the sake of censorship

    You mean there is another kind?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  19. Re:Well ... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it that people always assume that governments are meddling with their privacy, freedom of speech and freedom of choice when it's the same governments provide a blanket of protection?

    Because, by definition, that "blanket of protection" is being provided exactly BY meddling with privacy, freedom of speech, and freedom of choice. You fail to point out that the government actions in such things are meant to "protect you from yourself."

    The two are not mutually exclusive. The former is the means to the latter, and, all apologetics aside, it's utter bullshit.

  20. Not just Germany. by Xest · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check the UK's digital Britain report released today. Under their plans to tackle file sharing they will start by sending letters.

    If file sharing hasn't dropped by 70%, they're going to start blocking sites, packet shaping, etc.

    It doesn't make for pleasant reading, there is absolutely no way they'll get a 70% drop in file sharing, especially not in 6 months so effectively it sounds like the government is using citizens not stopping file sharing as an excuse for a much greater censorship program by setting unrealistic targets on file sharing.

    It's nice to know the Labour government is finished, but it's disturbing to know that the Tories will almost certainly follow through with this legislation and that even some of the Lib Dems support it.

  21. Re:Sigh... by base3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By the time your laundry list would be complete, you wouldn't be able to leave. There are already internal checkpoints--flown lately? Or driven within 100 miles of the border?

    --
    One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  22. The real discouraging thing by Xelios · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real discouraging thing here isn't the law itself (though that'd be enough in and of itself), it's the fact that despite criticism from all sides, a huge petition, thousands of people writing their elected officials and several protests outside government buildings the law is still being passed. Hell I've even seen stickers protesting the proposed law at bus stops and train stations. The "Zensursula" stickers are everywhere around here. When your government flat out ignores these things what's left to do? Wait for the next election, elect some other party into the majority and hope they actually behave differently? Just seems like every year things get worse, no matter who's in office.

    One other fun fact, the ruling parties (the CDU and SPD) have already mentioned using this blacklist for other things too, mainly gambling sites, Islamic sites and "Killerspiele" (sites that contain or promote violent games).

    It all brings to mind that South Park baseball episode where Randy gets arrested, with one small difference, "Oh I'm sorry I thought this was a democracy".

    --
    Murphey's fighting Occam, and we're in the stands.
    1. Re:The real discouraging thing by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

      > "Oh I'm sorry I thought this was a democracy".

      Do not confound democracy with liberty.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:The real discouraging thing by slart42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wait for the next election, elect some other party into the majority and hope they actually behave differently? Just seems like every year things get worse, no matter who's in office.

      I, too find it very frustrating that allmost all political discussion these days seems to be about adding more restrictions in every field: Internet censorship, Smoking bans, Keeping minors from drinking, "Killerspiele", "Umweltzonen", etc... Trading freedoms for percieved security.

      At least when it comes to free-speech and online rights, my hope lies in the pirate party. Maybe we can follow the swedes (they did get 7.1% at the EU elections in sweden - just 0.9% in germany so far). I don't expect enough people to vote them to have any significant influence any time soon, but if their polls go up to a few percent, the politicians can't help noticing that ignoring these matters is going to cost them votes, and we might see more critical reflection of these issues in mainstream political discussion.

  23. Don't worry... by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    (+1, Disagree)
  24. Re:Sigh... by emkyooess · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Martial law/internal checkpoints - The last time I used Greyhound, I was accosted both boarding and exiting by Immigration. Mind you, I'm in Pennsylvania and white as can be. By the way, have you flown since 2001? I didn't think so... Did you notice how ever increasingly Coast Guard/Reserves/etc have been used for domestic policing lately, such as in Louisiana? (Remember that state militias were, unfortunately, federalized long ago.) National loyalty oaths - So many places across the country *require* school children to recite "The Pledge", or at the very least allocate time for it... Military conscription - Selective Service is still around and active. It just hasn't been utilized. Before you can get a student loan in the US, you must sign away that you're on the list, as well as some other certain things... National communications filtering - FCC yields extreme power over broadcast TV, and are trying to exercise even more over non-broadcast TV, too. The government of NY (a state, not even federal!) basically caused the death of Usenet in the US...

  25. Elect someone else doesn't work! by alderX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "elect someone else" option unfortunately doesn't work. Basically there are two big parties (CDU and SPD) and both want the same in most of the cases. So you can be sure that one of them will lead the next government and nothing really changes.

    It's like if in the US there is an important issue where Democrats and Republicans agree on. If you are against their plan, what do you do? What chance is there that a third party is going to take the house or bring up the next president? Guess why Ron Paul ran for the Republicans? Because he knew that as a third party/independent he wouldn't even get on the ballets / into the big TV debates.

  26. insane politicians by Tom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When you read up a little on the history, views and personalities of the main politicians involved in this - Ursula von der Leyen and Wolfgang Schäuble - you find out quickly that they are both almost certainly borderline insane.

    Schäuble is suffering from PTSD since that failed attack on him many years back. His medical records are kept secret.

    von der Leyen is either a fanatic or crazy. The amount of disconnect from reality she displays certainly has a medical term, but I can't recall it right now. She's acting like the guy who insists on being Napoleon no matter what evidence to the contrary you come up with. You could show her a room full of scientific studies disproving each and every word she's ever said on the matter - and she wouldn't change her course one inch.

    Quite frankly, these people are dangerous and criminally insane.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:insane politicians by kraut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Schäuble is suffering from PTSD since that failed attack on him many years back. His medical records are kept secret.

      Dude, everyone's medical records are kept secret - it's that privacy thing we sometimes talk about on /., ....

      Quite frankly, these people are dangerous and criminally insane.

      Sadly not unusual in politicians. I sometimes wonder whether one or both are actually prerequisites for entering politics.

      --
      no taxation without representation!
  27. The petition is still open, everyone(!) can sign by moeffju · · Score: 2, Interesting

    By law, everybody(!) can sign, regardless of age, nationality, place of residence, etc.

    There's a step-by-step guide plus video (in English) on how to sign the petition if you don't understand German: http://www.piratenpartei-bayern.de/Signing_the_e-petition_for_Non-Germans - also some more info is on the digg article: http://digg.com/political_opinion/Official_Petition_against_German_Internet_censorship

    Also, the petition system's servers suck, and the system is badly implemented. They barely sustained random link traffic, Slashdot will probably reduce it to a smouldering pile of ash. But, post away!

    More information can also be found on Twitter: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=netzsperren+OR+Zensursula+-RT

    The main petitioner twitters at http://twitter.com/FranziskaHeine

    Petition statistics are available at http://sejmwatch.info/petition-internet-zensur.html (in German)

    --
    follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
  28. Re:The 1st thing to come to mind was... by CompMD · · Score: 2, Funny

    WWHD(ITHTIIT1940S)?

  29. Re:Contacting politicians by k2r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oops, please mod parent down, I got the URLs wrong:

    If you're interested in expressing your opinion from an international point of view you may contact the German members of the bundestag here: http://www.bundestag.de/parlament/fraktion/spd.html
    or here
    http://www.bundestag.de/parlament/fraktion/cducsu.html

    The party that cowardly shied away from a real election campaign because they were afraid of the boulevard press and thus helps installing the censorship is called "SPD", Social Democratic Party.
    The party that want's to install this censorship-infrastructure without judicial oversight because "Will somebody please think of the children" and of the starving artists is called CDU (Christian Democratical Union) or CSU (Christian Social Union). They eventried to ban paintball and first person shooters a few months ago.

    You can find the website of the cowards and turncoats here: http://www.spd.de/start/portal/index.html [www.spd.de]