Slashdot Mirror


15-Year-Old Invents Algae-Powered Energy System

Mike writes "Signaling a bright future for sustainable energy, 15-year-old Javier Fernandez-Han has created a remarkable algae-powered energy system that is capable of producing food and fuel, treating waste, containing greenhouse gases, and releasing oxygen. Dubbed the VERSATILE system, the project recently netted him a $20,000 scholarship for winning this year's Invent Your World Challenge."

230 comments

  1. Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Making the rest of us look bad and all.

    1. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Prodigies? I'm pretty sure algae invented it.

    2. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Funny

      What are you talking about? The competition was "Invent Your World Challenge." Kid makes an energy system. Missed the mark entirely: algae power is not a world.

      Kid needs to pay more attention next time.

    3. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 1

      really... I mean where the pizza oven or stall for the goat?

    4. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its worse than that, he just copied some Phds work off youtube:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hioZ7C6HLs

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    5. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by wealthychef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, it has not been built yet, so "created" is too strong a word. He more like "imagined" or "designed" it. Not to say it's not impressive for a 15 year old, but it's not the salvation of the world.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    6. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh please we all know he just looked under his bed for something at the last minute and scraped that off.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by UttBuggly · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its worse than that, he just copied some Phds work off youtube:

      From reading TFA, I'd say the kid did a little more than copy someone's work. A lot of work has been done with algae, so neither one should claim to have invented the idea of extracting fuel from it. What I see is that they invented scalable systems for doing it cheaply.

      Of the two, the kid's is theoretically "better" IMO. His vision of intended use in the 3rd world is reason enough. Even if the real cost is more like $2000 instead of $200, it's good. Just get Sally Struthers to cry on TV to raise the money.

      Of course, until he or someone actually builds a working model, it's just a neat idea. Certainly not the 2nd coming of Da Vinci or Einstein.

      --
      I am my own gestalt.
    8. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly. I did some designs for algae-powered energy generation when I was about that age. It's not impressive, because the concept is obvious. Algae reproduce very quickly given the right environment and is a cheap way of generating solar power. Algae blooms are caused by sewage getting in to the water supply, so feeding it with animal (including human) waste is obvious.

      Algae power is not a scientific problem, it is an engineering one. The test of any solution to an engineering problem is much simpler than for a scientific problem: Can you build it? If you can't, then it's some nice science fiction, but ultimately worthless. Going from concept to working model (energy positive over its total lifespan and low cost) is the hard part here, and when that's done the person or people responsible deserve a lot of credit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by mtremsal · · Score: 1

      More like a very enterprising kid than a prodigy ... which is better in a lot of ways.

    10. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Are you saying you'll flunk us if we don't change the world?

      (from 'Pay it forward')

    11. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the dinosaurs, meteors, God, whatever deserves a lot of credit for coming up with that scheme where most living material gets buried for millions of years and/or under a flood just so we can power society for, what, 100-200 years?

      Wait... that plan sorta sucks! The only solution left is to bury OUR society under hundreds of tones of rock and earth for our 10^5 generation grandchildren...

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    12. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, nope looked like a straight case of copying/plagerising someone else's work to me, but
      that's where we're headed these days, unsurprising that they would be incompetant to credit a 15 year old Asian kid with this instead of the real inventors many years before..

      Narrow-mindedness is winning alright, but I wouldn't expect this little addition of ivory arrogance to change things, it is what it is - plagerism.

    13. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The test of any solution to an engineering problem is much simpler than for a scientific problem: Can you build it safely, reliably and economically?

      FTFY.

      An engineer is someone who can make for tuppence what any siller bugger could make for a fiver, as my uncle used to say.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    14. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seen this video before. Really cool. Theres this idea of oil companies trying to keep this technology off the ground. Well if I were an oil company owner I would say thats totally ridiculous. Of course I would be the smart oil company and buy this technology and mass produce this diesel oil and serve not only the usa but world wide thus making me the biggest energy company in the world.

      This would dethrone the middle east as an oil producer as I can beat their prices.

    15. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      looked like a straight case of copying/plagerising [...] it is what it is - plagerism.

      You're allowed to use the same spellings as other people, that isn't counted as plagiarism.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by DeskLazer · · Score: 1

      or a rocket sturgeon!

      I'll be here all week, try the veal.

    17. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      Of course, until he or someone actually builds a working model, it's just a neat idea. Certainly not the 2nd coming of Da Vinci or Einstein.

      I think that does make him the 2nd coming of Da Vinci or Einstein. He's not allowed to build stuff.

    18. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, however, counted as a comma splice.

    19. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.kingcounty.gov/environment/wtd.aspx

      look who put this idea in motion decades ago.... even makes money with producing electricity, methane, biosolids and reclaiming water for use again later.

    20. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the dinosaurs, meteors, God, whatever deserves a lot of credit for coming up with that scheme where most living material gets buried for millions of years and/or under a flood just so we can power society for, what, 100-200 years?

      [Citation not desired]

      You are under the assumption that petrochemicals come from reduced plant matter. 'Tain't necessarily so, saith Ira Gershwin, although the jury still remains out on the matter of biogenic vs. abiogenic hydrocarbon material generation. The petroleum industry tends toward the biogenic thesis because it gives them reliable predictors. Others point to methane composition of solar system gas giants and ascribe a mineral origin.

      Of course, if we just wanted auto fuel, that stuff's nearly infinite in supply. Just set up a bucket brigade between here and Jupiter, send up a skimmer every month and in ten years you'll have one bucket a month forever. We'd expire from waste heat before we ran out.

      Not that that's a much better outcome, but (a) we'd still be mobile and warm for a while, and (b) we'd have at least a few of us living outside the eggshell before we used up the inside of the egg.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    21. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by LrdDimwit · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that we need to be making Soylent Black?

    22. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I presume that means "... £.02 what any sillier bugger could make for £5".

      Am I correct?

    23. Re:Freakin' Prodigies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he just copied some Phds work off youtube

      I looked at the video you linked. It has absolutely nothing in common with this kid's ideas, except for the algae part.

      The video: plastic bags arranged vertically with pumps circulating the water to grow algae

      The kid's ideas: a self-contained low-tech system where human and animal waste goes into a digester, methane from the digester runs cook stoves, CO2 from the cook stoves feeds the algae, there are separate "clean" and "dirty" algae systems (the "dirty" ones get human and animal waste as fertilizer and the "clean" ones don't)

      You really ought to feel ashamed. Plagiarism is a pretty serious charge, and only an idiot could look at the two designs and think they are even remotely similar... which means either you are an idiot, or you just didn't bother to look.

  2. Re:Yawn... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pure science informs experimental science informs design engineers informs process engineers informs manufacture.

    It's a long chain to go from an abstract idea to a machine that whirrs. Yet it requires the competence, indeed, excellence of many people in many different professions.

    This is the first step. We have to be patient.

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  3. Vapourware by BierGuzzl · · Score: 3, Informative

    FTA: "The algae-powered system hasnâ(TM)t yet been built, however, and skeptics will remain until it is. Even if FernÃndez-Hanâ(TM)s design doesnâ(TM)t pan out as planned, weâ(TM)re thoroughly impressed by his innovative spirit."

    1. Re:Vapourware by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Funny

      we're thoroughly impressed by his innovative spirit.

      Lies. What really impressed them was a 9 letter acronym like VERSATILE.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, Slash Dot had an article on a Japanese scientist that had created an algae battery that produced some of the same effects.

    3. Re:Vapourware by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      You can't (TM) a process. You need a patent for that.

      Someone should tell this kid.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:Vapourware by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      I bet you they said that to every competitor, including the idiots who brought the stupid "growing bean sprouts on a jar lid covered in cotton" second-grade science experiment.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    5. Re:Vapourware by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I was impressed with the PlayPump. You tie a bunch of kids wrists to that merry-go-round and they're going to end up looking like Conan when they grow up! That's cool, right?

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I impressed by /.'s lack of unicode.

    7. Re:Vapourware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've cracked it - the vapurware virtual machine - the VVM - ingenius.
      I can just imagine the real tangibleness of this thing right now. *Strokes air and sighs as if having saved Earth*

  4. "Play pump" by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    A pump powered by children playing? I did a double take when I saw that. Then there was a link to it. I tip my hat to the person who thought of that. Bloody ingenious.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:"Play pump" by zarzu · · Score: 1

      the play pump was definitely the oddest thing i've seen in this system and even after looking at thouse pictures (a great idea imho) i am still kind of puzzled. the play pump is needed to produce energy to power the system and other devices (like LEDs it seems) and the system returns food and compressed methane. now this is all very cool and i am sure that this is very useful, but how is this algae powered energy? i mean yes food is energy, but not in the sense we generally perceive energy and the system actual needs external energy from the pump to work.

      i am likely to have made some fatal thinking error, so please point it out to me. i don't mean to diminish this and even as a food and methane providing device it's very cool, but i don't get the energy part.

    2. Re:"Play pump" by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I haven't studied it in depth yet, but I'd imagine it contributes a bit of energy to the system to get things running, kinda like a starter motor on a car, or a solar powered oil pump that can't wait for the oil to be extracted, refined, and fed into the pump's engine to get it working.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When does "play pump" end and "child labor" begin?

    4. Re:"Play pump" by syncopated · · Score: 1

      "As punishment for not doing your homework, go out and play at the Play pump for one hour so that your brother, who did his homework, can play Halo. Make sure you play hard."

    5. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so long as it's not a "love pump."

    6. Re:"Play pump" by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just so long as it's not a "love pump."

      My God! With that, slashdot users could power the universe!

    7. Re:"Play pump" by catmistake · · Score: 1, Funny

      play pump... a... play... pump.... you mean masterbation could solve our energy crisis? ... did NOT see that comeing...

    8. Re:"Play pump" by djdavetrouble · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When does "play pump" end and "child labor" begin?

      When they are about to "die of starvation" or "die of thirst".

      --
      music lover since 1969
    9. Re:"Play pump" by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I didn't click the link. I don't want to risk a site with photo's of children using a "Play Pump".

      I'm too pretty to go to prison.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    10. Re:"Play pump" by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

      When does "play pump" end and "child labor" begin?

      I thought it was when pocket money was handed out based on the amount of "playing" that children did.

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    11. Re:"Play pump" by GaryOlson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When it stops being an activity which can create mischief --
      If we jump hard enough in unison can we create a big enough spark to ignite the methane?!
      to a chore --
      You kids won't get your allowance if you don't generate at least 5KW of power this week!

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    12. Re:"Play pump" by stuboogie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ask the kids performing "arts and crafts" at the Nike factories.

    13. Re:"Play pump" by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seems to me they could put a donkey on a tether. The pumping capacity would probably be more reliable. Kids are kids, after all. For a week, maybe even a month, that merry go round will be busy during all daylight hours. After that, it'll be hit or miss, now and then. I mean, really. If I actually WANT a kid to eat ice cream, he isn't going to want any. If I WANT him to eat candy, he's going to be suspicious. Ask any parent.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:"Play pump" by maxume · · Score: 1

      Perhaps more methane and bio-oil (from the algae) comes out than play energy goes in?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:"Play pump" by noidentity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's amazing that even where water must be pumped by children on a merry-go-round, there is a big billboard with an advertisement. Sickening.

    16. Re:"Play pump" by beckett · · Score: 1

      Those photos were taken in the Democratic Republic of DeBeers though so the billboard is functional: providing shade and cover for the "Freedom Snipers".

    17. Re:"Play pump" by Zouden · · Score: 2, Informative

      The advertising supports the pump. Read the article.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    18. Re:"Play pump" by houghi · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I actually WANT a kid to eat ice cream, he isn't going to want any. If I WANT him to eat candy, he's going to be suspicious. Ask any parent.Just tell them they are not allowed to play with it from 14:00 to 18:00.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    19. Re:"Play pump" by Anenome · · Score: 1

      Soon to be renounced by leftist groups as 'child slavery', of course :P

      --
      "I Don't Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist"
    20. Re:"Play pump" by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, that's an easy solution, isn't it? You stop paying them. Tadaaa!

      I should apply for a job at Nike.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    21. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ingenious idea, the playpump. It's in use in Africa and uses energy from children playing with it to pump water.

    22. Re:"Play pump" by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered, as I've absolutely no knowledge of the subject, if Nike is exploiting child labour or is Nike providing shelter and entertainment for children in impoverished areas? Do the kids have a play area to relax in? Are they in education normally, or is this inaccessible? Are Nike providing education for them if it's not readily available?

      I'm reminded of the scene in Baseketball when Trey and Matt's company is blackmailed for hiring child labour; They fly over and find out it's true, and totally revamp the place with high-quality tools, proper healthcare systems, more than fair pay, benefits etc...

      My point is that if a child is willing to perform an activity anyway (as many kids build things with their hands; I played with lego for ages) why not remunerate them for it?

      Forced labour is an abhorrent activity and should be stopped, just so we're clear.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    23. Re:"Play pump" by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the yellow board, but the white board is information on proper hygiene, buy the look of it. Properly washing your hands seems to be the major feature.

      You don't think, in an area where "safe water" pretty much means "If you didn't just pass, you can drink it"*, kids need to know this information?

      * Speculation, but I'm guessing I'm not far off the mark if they need a pump like this.

      FYI the article states that half of the four-sided boards are for local company advertisments, the other half are public welfare (hygiene, sanitation, instruction etc).

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    24. Re:"Play pump" by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      But what if you don't have and can't afford a donkey? Children on the other hand, are everywhere! Just tether them to the pump, et voilá.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    25. Re:"Play pump" by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It's actually a very old technology. Here is a picture

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    26. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My university recently installed something similar in Ghana (it generates electricity instead of pumping water). Link: http://byunews.byu.edu/archive08-jun-ghana.aspx

    27. Re:"Play pump" by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Just because they don't have infrastructure doesn't mean that they don't need and buy things. Advertising isn't always evil... note how one of the sides says "Wash your hands"? Just because the soap maker wants you to wash your hands doesn't mean that it's a bad idea.

    28. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a week, maybe even a month, that merry go round will be busy during all daylight hours. After that, it'll be hit or miss, now and then.

      0) There are thousands of PlayPumps in Africa right now, and they are actually working as intended. Thousands more are planned. Observed fact trumps your theories.

      1) The PlayPump in the VERSATILE system isn't lifting water 50 meters from an underground well, it's running a generator to charge batteries and run fans. I don't know how much power those fans need, but my guess is that it's probably less power than it takes to lift water 50 meters from an underground well.

      2) If cheap solar panels become available, that would be a great way to replace the PlayPump in the design. Africa gets some sunlight.

    29. Re:"Play pump" by Franklin+Brauner · · Score: 1

      How much would like to wager that eventually there's a mule (or ox, or something) hooked up to that thing? (It's cool regardless.)

    30. Re:"Play pump" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  5. Nothing new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    An anaerobic digester for sewage and food scraps

    Isn't that basically what Cowboy Neal is?

    1. Re:Nothing new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no. You've got it all wrong. Cowboy Neal *produces* sewage and food scraps. Basically if you hooked this machine up to Cowboy Neal you would destroy the universe.

    2. Re:Nothing new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but his farts smell like roses and the sun shines right out of his ass.

  6. Biological systems suck by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    Farming is a noble occupation, but if you have to spend time tending a biological system when a chemical system will work flawlessly without any monitoring, well, that's why we make chemical systems instead of just using biological ones.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Biological systems suck by oneirophrenos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Farming is a noble occupation, but if you have to spend time tending a biological system when a chemical system will work flawlessly without any monitoring, well, that's why we make chemical systems instead of just using biological ones.

      Don't all systems require monitoring? Besides, biology is just applied chemistry. There are applications where chemical processes are just too complex for us to manage, so we have cells managing it for us, like in composting.

    2. Re:Biological systems suck by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Yep. And chemical systems do so much better unmonitored...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_City_Refinery_(BP)#Explosion

      But that was just an anomaly...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_disasters

    3. Re:Biological systems suck by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Ya, thing is.. no-one really understands biological systems. There's just so many variables. So you might get a biological system that works just fine.. and then winter comes and it stops.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Biological systems suck by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 5, Funny

      Farming is a noble occupation

      No, farming is what commoners do. Warring and collecting tax and rent are noble occupations.

      Jeez, you guys have been without a proper monarchy for so long you've forgotten the basics.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    5. Re:Biological systems suck by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I agree - chemical systems are wonderful. Without farm chemicals and sewer runoff, we couldn't have that really neat dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, not to mention other similar zones around the world. Beautiful stuff, chemicals.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Biological systems suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, biology is just applied chemistry.

      http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/purity.png

    7. Re:Biological systems suck by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  7. Mutant! by Baldrson · · Score: 3, Funny

    This kid is obviously the love child of Jon Katz and Natalie Portman.

    1. Re:Mutant! by Slur · · Score: 2, Funny

      This kid is obviously the love child of Dean Kamen and HRP-4C.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    2. Re:Mutant! by protest_boy · · Score: 2, Informative
  8. And now the punch line of the article? by EkriirkE · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The algae-powered system hasnâ(TM)t yet been built..."

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  9. There's only by Dunbal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One small caveat:

          "The algae-powered system hasn't yet been built, however..."

          Another minor little detail:

          "and the PlayPump, which uses energy derived from children playing to power the system."

          I assume the children will volunteer to "play" at this "play pump" which I bet will be much more fascinating than say, Nintendo or beating up on little Timmy, or whatever their regular activities are.

          Or is this a device in fact powered by child labor? Perhaps it will go over big in China and Malaysia.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:There's only by basementman · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they will eventually make a model that's powered on beating the crap out of the geeky kids at school soon. Every slashdotters dream.

    2. Re:There's only by BikeHelmet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, look at the horrible child labour going on.

      Side note: RTFA. The link was right there!

    3. Re:There's only by copponex · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a merry-go-round. Kids spin around, laugh, and spin some more all the time at local parks in the States. Even in China and Malaysia, when they're not manufacturing Nikes for pennies per hour, I'm sure they might like to feel like normal children, and play outside on a merry-go-round.

      If it suits you to be a non-contributing little shit and sneer at anyone who tries, then so be it. But at least stay quiet while you're doing it.

    4. Re:There's only by cplusplus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Play pumps are being installed in many places in Africa, and have been for over 5 years now. They're a pretty big success so far. Frontline on PBS did a piece a while ago about them: FRONTLINE - South Africa

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    5. Re:There's only by cyberjape · · Score: 1

      I assume the children will volunteer to "play" at this "play pump" which I bet will be much more fascinating than say, Nintendo or beating up on little Timmy, or whatever their regular activities are.

      Oh I see what you are saying in developing countries where water is rare Nintendo is common.

    6. Re:There's only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there really that much child labour going on in China and Malaysia?

      They just pay the _adults_ a dollar a day or so. Go look up the adult wage scales in those countries.

    7. Re:There's only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or is this a device in fact powered by child labor? Perhaps it will go over big in China and Malaysia.
      Malaysia is driven by cheap foreign labor, not child labor.

    8. Re:There's only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean India which has a far higher number of child labourers than in either China or Malaysia. There are no child laborers in Malaysia you halfwit! Or even if there were these would be so tiny a number that it wouldn't even register in any statistics.

    9. Re:There's only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or beating up on little Timmy, or whatever their regular activities are.

      Now I will have to kill you. My patent-pending process for extracting energy from nerd beatings is at risk.

    10. Re:There's only by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      They have to pump their own water... do you really think they have many Nintendos? Are you stupid, or do you just act that way?

  10. Re:Yawn... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isnt even close to a first step. I mean seriously he's 15.

    All that he has done here is take a bunch of stuff that is known to work, but not economically, and tied it all together with a pretty diagram. Nothing new has happened here, a nerdy kid who almost certainly has parents who work in the field have produced something of no value.

  11. Re:Yawn... by Requiem18th · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pure science informs experimental science informs design engineers informs process engineers informs manufactures informs patent lawyers informs researchers with C&D forms

    Fixed that for you.

    --
    But... the future refused to change.
  12. He's a 15yo boy... by bhsx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are 5 replies above my threshold. All of them are ripping this apart as fancy. He's a 15-year old kid who took a lot of interesting technologies and thought of a way to chain them together to achieve a net benefit. What did you guys do? You're assholes.

    --
    put the what in the where?
    1. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who gives a rip if it was thought up by a 15 year old boy? His age doesn't change the facts of the matter one bit.

    2. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by alienzed · · Score: 1

      *clap* *clap* , etc...

      --
      Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    3. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

      chain them together to achieve a net benefit.

      Throw linux and a toaster into that chain and we're on board.

      --
      music lover since 1969
    4. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. Welcome to slashdot.

    5. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, fuck all those kids who haven't come up with nuclear fission and the photoelectric effect. Hey, kids! Time to contribute something, you freeloading assholes!

    6. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm 17 and I don't consider this a huge feat.

      You know those blogs that do nothing but push glossy "concept" renders of future products? Those flexible curved solar powered laptops with a few multitouch screens thrown in for laughs? I am sure I am not alone in that I die a little inside when I see the comments praising them. All I am thinking is "How are you supposed to stick a curved laptop into a backpack?".

      This is like that except on an even greater scale. You throw in a few buzz words, some hokey pokey vaporware and make a nice powerpoint presentation of something neither plausible nor useful.

      My grade 6 science project involved keeping a single fish alive for a few months in a fish tank without any filtration or water changes by growing terrestrial plants in the same water. Sure, I forgot to use the word "bioreactor" and I didn't have any flowcharts but on the other hand I actually made something that worked.

      You say he "Took a lot of interesting technologies and chained them together", but how is this remarkable in any way? There is no innovation here, just a giant mess of ideas, some practical, most not (Using children to power a pump as a long term solution? Really?).

      Just another life lesson: Being practical gets you a plastic medal, spooning bullshit makes you rich. (But I'll be honest, I already knew that)
      The only genius here is that he figured out you can get twenty thousand dollars for this drivel.

    7. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only genius here is that he figured out you can get twenty thousand dollars for this drivel.

      That is a pretty cool discovery. Perhaps he should win another cash prize on top of that.

      I invented twitter by the way. Or something like. For web sites to announce stuff to subscribers. My failure of vision was to see that it could be really big as people rushed to suck up loads of blather and banality from other people. That would never have occurred to me in a million years. The genius of a thing isn't necessarily in the thing itself, but in the marketing.

    8. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mainly because I am more interested in the technology, and really don't care how old the guy is. If it works, that's great! I don't really care if the guy who did it is 5 years old or 60. If it doesn't work......then it's just another non-starter technology that made it to the front page of slashdot.

      Besides, when was the last time you saw a slashdot discussion where everyone wasn't criticizing everyone else? It's kind of our default mode, unfortunately.

      --
      Qxe4
    9. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To play devil's advocate, how should we respond when a 5 year old dreams up some non-functional technology? My thoughts are: "Way to go kid, you should be commended for your initiative." and then, among ourselves, talk about how the kid's idea still sucks.

      (captcha: "villainy")

    10. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you expect? This is Slashdot. Every time someone comes up with something good, the good-for-nothing assholes here have to poo-poo it. They have to try and make their worthless lives seem better by crapping on someone who is actually DOING something with theirs.

    11. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by BookMama · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comment, though not sure I'd sink to the namecalling.
      It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena...

      It's easy to be the critic and say that the kid invented nothing and didn't actually implement anything. But he made a proposal, thought of an idea, documented it to
      1) possibly win a scholarship
      2) contribute an idea that he felt could help the planet
      And so I will applaud his efforts.

    12. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I invented personal computers when I was 15, but I couldn't actually build one because Intel hadn't got there shit together yet with a chip.
      But hey, it had a theoretical input device, screen and theoretical cpu.
      But maybe I just watched too much Star trek.

    13. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, RTFC ! :)

    14. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Bitter much?

      If you'd have thought of it, you'd be laughing all the way to the bank. Too bad your fish wasn't worth $20k, eh?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    15. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      We criticize his idea, you know, scientific method and all that.

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    16. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I say, chain them to the PlayPump!
              http://www.inhabitots.com/2009/03/05/play-pump-the-merry-go-round-water-pump/

              -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    17. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. Half of the people here will insist that they were misunderstood geniuses when they were children and the only reason they never came up with anything remotely interesting or original in their lives is because The Man crushed their spirits and turned them into underachieving misanthropes who can only get jobs working help desk.

      The other half will loudly pipe up any time there's a poorly written article (so, all the time) that mischaracterizes some new development in science, pointing out the "obvious" flaws that the hundreds of PhD's involved in the project couldn't possibly have been aware of or understood. They also work help desk, but they haven't been turned into bitter, soulless things in vaguely human form yet.

      The final half are the geek-lites, like me, who are bad at maths, either work in graphic design or the "soft" sciences, and are probably typing their replies on a Mac while sitting at a café. We're only bitter when our foreign language fashion magazines fail to impress those around us.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    18. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are 5 replies above my threshold. All of them are ripping this apart as fancy. He's a 15-year old kid who took a lot of interesting technologies and thought of a way to chain them together to achieve a net benefit. What did you guys do? You're assholes.

      The problem isn't that this isn't an impressive achievement for a 15 year old. The problem is that it's actually not that good. For instance, it uses flush toilets. Anyone who's actually been interested in green solutions for any length of time knows that composting toilets are more environmentally positive; they take your poop and turn it into soil for free. With a little more experience (or perhaps research) he could have discovered that people have been working on this since long before he was alive, and some of his notions are wasteful. Again, that's okay; he's fifteen. But it's still not news. He's not going to help the world, sorry.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, it's a great idea, and his re-engineering of the idea to create a potential new energy source is great. Especially at a time when kids seem less interested in science education.

      So when does Exxon-Mobil come in, offer him a nice cushy job with a giant paycheck to never, EVER work on something like this again, while simultaneously attempting to buy the patent so they can shelve it completely?

    20. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it's actually not that good.

      I have to disagree with you. In fact, I was planning to call you an idiot, until I checked your user name. I have seen you posting on Slashdot, and I know you are not an idiot. But damn, you get low marks on this post.

      For instance, it uses flush toilets. Anyone who's actually been interested in green solutions for any length of time knows that composting toilets are more environmentally positive

      If you had read the damned fucking article, you would have seen that his flush toilets feed into the digester and the algae. The digester produces methane, which is used to run cooking stoves, so the people don't have to forage firewood. In fact, there are two separate algae systems: a "clean" one, and a "dirty" one that gets animal waste and human waste fed into it.

      The "clean" algae can be put into animal feed, or sold to pharmaceutical companies. The "dirty" algae can have oil extracted from it, which can be used as a fuel, or can be used as fertilizer.

      Final score, composting toilets: free soil.

      Final score, his system: free cooking stoves (running on methane), free oil or fertilizer and animal feed (from the algae).

      Assuming his system works, I'm giving it the win here. And I'm giving him big points for dreaming this up, even if it has problems in practice.

      He's not going to help the world, sorry.

      There is a $20,000 scholarship that says that some people who actually looked at his design disagree with you.

    21. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      Who gives a rip if it was thought up by a 15 year old boy? His age doesn't change the facts of the matter one bit.

      Uhhhh...one of the facts of the matter is that it was thought up by a 15 year old boy. Some of us who have an interest in the though processes that lead to successful problem solving find that interesting, an example of "beginner's mind" and a generalist approach.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    22. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Tired+and+Emotional · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a good thing? Surely his system can make good use of large numbers of assholes.

      --
      Squirrel!
    23. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You assume he has actually solved the problems - given that it is entirely untested, I find that highly unlikely. Further, our comments on the potential problems with the scheme don't affect your ability to analyze his thought 'processes' one bit.
       
      So take your bullshit elsewhere and learn to think yourself before studying a process with which you are obviously unfamiliar.

    24. Re:He's a 15yo boy... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      You assume he has actually solved the problems - given that it is entirely untested, I find that highly unlikely.

      I make no such assumption. Learning about problem solving, or any creative process, includes learning how potential solutions are generated. Genius may be "1% inspiration and 99% perspiration", but any fool can sweat, it's that 1% that makes a genius.

      (Of course, Edison -- attributed as the source of the 99%/1% meme -- was notably lacking in inspiration, and stole many of the ideas he's best known for, so the perspiration in his case may just be the sweaty hands of a con man who fears to be found out.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  13. Oooh... How I have got the fish tank for him! by spafbi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since his system uses algae, I bet my fish tank could feed and power a small country.

    1. Re:Oooh... How I have got the fish tank for him! by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Fish tank? Fuck that, I've got a swimming pool, and I'll be damned if I didn't come home from vacation last weekend and find it glowing green like a vat of toxic waste. I had no idea there were options other than dumping several pounds of chlorine in the pool.

  14. Re:Yawn... by Jurily · · Score: 5, Funny

    All that he has done here is take a bunch of stuff that is known to work, but not economically, and tied it all together with a pretty diagram.

    I do that too, just not with diagrams. I'm a programmer.

  15. damned ambitious parents by onionlee · · Score: 2, Funny

    posting about their kids on /. ....

    1. Re:damned ambitious parents by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      And on that topic, I wonder what his dad does for a living....

      Cynical, moi?

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  16. Re:Yawn... by steveha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All that he has done here is take a bunch of stuff that is known to work, but not economically, and tied it all together with a pretty diagram. Nothing new has happened here

    I think you are being needlessly harsh here.

    His key contribution was to think: "How many things can I chain together so that the waste from one thing feeds something else?" Thus, methane from the digester powers cooking stoves; carbon dioxide from the burned methane feeds algae. I've heard of methane digesters, I've heard of cooking stoves, and I've heard of algae; I haven't heard of an integrated system like this.

    If you RTFA, he relates a story about how the gift of a fresh water system to a poor village had an unfortunate side effect: the extra water the village used caused their sewage system to be overloaded. Their "system" was to put their sewage in buckets and dump out the buckets; they ended up with raw sewage running in their streets. He consciously tried to design a system that has no negative effects. (And that's probably an inspiration for including the flush latrines in his design, latrines that feed the digester and/or the algae.)

    Even if his design turns out to be flawed, the flaws might be fixable or at least the idea might inspire an experienced engineer to design something even better.

    I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  17. The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Eventually, this kid will become a patent attorney like the rest of them.

    1. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or dead, by "accidental" causes, of course.

    2. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by thesp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am a patent attorney [obligatory "you insensitive clod"] before the British and European Patent Offices. Please excuse the slightly off-topic comment, but I'm not sure we're all particularly evil. I see a lot of patent-attorney bashing here on Slashdot. Mostly what we actually do is provide the best possible advice to our clients based on the current state of the law, and argue their case for them in what has evolved to be a very complex legal system. At the same time, we have a fun job which involves dealing with five or so different technologies on our desks on a daily basis, getting up to speed with them quickly and then thinking up detailed and powerful legal and technical arguments to deploy as to why our client's technology might just be worth the grant of a 20-year monopoly, or conversely, why our client's competitor's technology isn't. Most of us have higher technical qualifications, as well as our legal training. In many ways, it's a geek's dream...

      Now, the people to whinge about are a) the legislators, and b) the patent offices themselves, who don't always do the best job of examining the patent applications as rigorously as they could. At least the situation is a bit better here in the EU than in the States, though, where as soon as a patent examiner gets any good he goes and qualifies as an attorney...

    3. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've seen any other patent attorney bashing on Slashdot before. I was considering it as a career before I went to university and did an internship in that direction, and it seems like a great profession for geeks. The only downside is that you have to spend all of your time interacting with a fundamentally broken system which, I discovered, was not something I wanted to put up with. Once we've got some major reforms to the current IP system (not just patents, although they've been in need of a significant overhaul for about 50 years now) then I might consider it as a career path again. There's a lot of patent examiner bashing, but I think you'd find it hard to argue that this isn't justified...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      The only downside is that you have to spend all of your time interacting with a fundamentally broken system which, I discovered, was not something I wanted to put up with.

      I think you've just described the common denominator underlying the frustrations of every single major profession.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    5. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what we actually do is provide the best possible advice to our clients based on the current state of the law, and argue their case for them

      This right here is the main problem - I understand thats the very point of a lawyer, but when your clients are large corporations that never plan on using on the patent to improve human kind, but just to screw their competitor out of the money, or are just looking for ways to sabotage everyone by putting in the most ludicrous applications you could imagine - the sort of person that would passionately and forcefully defend and argue for these corporations, based purely on the fact that its his job, ignoring any other ethical constraints (like the truth or reality) than you can't be surprised that people don't take a shine to you.

    6. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I am a patent attorney...

      I got this far, and then the whole screen turned into blood-red text saying "REDRUM REDRUM REDRUM REDRUM"

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      You gotta keep in mind, though, that /. is mostly US-centric. In my experience as patent engineer working german and european cases (dreaded EQE coming up next year, urgh...), the european system is way more sane than the american one. So most of the patent bashing is caused by some excesses of wierdness which are more or less US-specific. Apart from that, the usual patent discussion on /. has about the same merit as a discussion between pure lawyers about networking technology would have...

      I definitely agree with the rest of your post, anyway. It is a geek's dream, for exactly the reasons you mentioned.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    8. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      At the same time, we have a fun job which involves dealing with five or so different technologies on our desks on a daily basis, getting up to speed with them quickly and then thinking up detailed and powerful legal and technical arguments to deploy as to why our client's technology might just be worth the grant of a 20-year monopoly, or conversely, why our client's competitor's technology isn't. Most of us have higher technical qualifications, as well as our legal training. In many ways, it's a geek's dream...

      Just 5? I generally deal with 5 'new' technologies before I even GET to my desk.

      If you have higher technical qualifications then why did your group allow such a shitty patent system to form and evolve into what it is. Let me guess, now you have an excuse for why you didn't have anything to do with it.

      You blame it on the legislators and the patent offices, that must be hard. I mean, in my job I've always found it easier to do my job than blame it on the other guy.

      Your post sounds like a sales pitch, and its not even a good one.

      I am not a patent attorney. I have however gotten more patents granted without one than with, I've done your job, its not really that hard.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    9. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Now, the people to whinge about are a) the legislators, and b) the patent offices themselves,

      Why would I blame a heap of stones filled with office furniture? If you have a mice infestation you need to do 3 things. Clean the mess, close of their entrance point and kill all attor^H^H^H^H^Hmice.

    10. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >In many ways, it's a geek's dream... Except the not actually creating anything part (unless you count paperwork). >Now, the people to whinge about are a) the legislators, and b) the patent offices themselves, who don't always do the best job of examining the patent applications as rigorously as they could. And c) the patent attorneys, who don't always do the best job of prosecuting patent applications as competently as they could. Having "five or so different technologies" means that you can't, effectively, specialize and will likely be underinformed in a particular area of technology, versus the examiner who will have that specialization. A lot of patent attorneys (i'm going to guess most) don't even have any experience on the government side of things.

    11. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people are probably bitching about American lawyers. We have something like 3-4% of the population and 75% of the world's lawyers, so we're pretty damn tired of lawyers creating a legal issue out of taking a dump. When you don't have enough work you drum up a little. Laws which are expected to be followed by normal people should be written in such a manner that common people can understand them with only a little bit of study. Instead we have lawyers who are like parasites who make it all ridiculously difficult and you have to be afraid of stepping outside on the off chance some lawyer is gunning for you and your assets. Class action lawsuits where the lawyers all become multimillionaires and some dude walks to his mailbox and finds a check for $1.12 for a product he bought 7 years ago and promptly threw away because it was a piece of shit.

      Anyway :)

    12. Re:The absolutely necessary obnoxious remark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My neighbor is a patent attorney- total geek. His office is filled to the brim on books about pretty much any field of science you could think of. When he takes on a new client he has to, very quickly, teach himself enough, say, quantum mechanics to understand what his client is patenting and how to describe it in a scientifically and legally defensible way. Pretty cool stuff, really. And he'll whinge more than anyone about the patent office.

  18. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this what patent trolls do? Design a system but never build it... (ducks)

    Seriously, he obviously put a lot of thought into this, but I don't see it as a great achievement.

    I thought up things like this when I was a kid, in fact, I was heavily into VR at one point, and thought that it would be great to have SIMs for training in highly dangerous jobs. But when I was a kid there were no $20,000 prizes and there was no Slashdot. In fact, the Internet didn't exist... But I was one of the top 5 CS students in my Freshmen year, if that counts for anything... ;-P

    David

  19. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea actually I did think of stuff this clever when I was 15, not to mention that I read something similar to this kid's proposal in Popular Science when I was around 14. But instead of gloating about it I went outside and had fun. Whoop-dee-doo.

  20. Cool, he invented the sea. by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    I think God Neptune already holds a patent on that one.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Cool, he invented the sea. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      He does have a case for prior art. Besides, there's a precedent for suing Deities

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  21. Re:Yawn... by jadedoto · · Score: 1

    âoeDiscovery consists of seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thoughtâ. --Albert Szent-Gyorgyi

  22. Re:Yawn... by stuboogie · · Score: 1

    You don't use UML diagrams?

  23. 2 words... by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  24. Cool man .. now implement it. by sashang · · Score: 0

    Yay ... now all I need is a farting cow, a playground for the kids and a swamp in my backyard and I'll have enough juice to run my linux desktop. Seriously this kids going to turn into one of those bosses with all the fancy ideas of how things should work, then try and convince other people to do the work for him, and no skills to make anything.

  25. Re:Yawn... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    "This is the first step. We have to be patient."

    In light of so many discussions on ./ I feel it necessary to fix your statement.

    "This is the first step. We have to get patent."

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  26. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u mad?

  27. Better yet... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    1. Remove merry-go-round

    2. Install a HAWT, or VAWT such as the dirt-cheap Savonius turbine

    3. Child labor issues go bye-bye

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Better yet... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      That's so HAWT.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  28. This is not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um... Other than the part about it being powered by kids playing (which has already been created on its own) this has been done and done and done again. Every science fair has one of these (small-scale, of course, we're not all rich).

  29. ACKNOWLEGE A GOOD IDEA OR SHUT THE F### UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just embarrassing to me that there are so many people on this site that love to hammer individuals, instead of praising them for doing or theorizing something that might actually benefit someone. And what if this idea doesn't pan out? Who cares! He actually took the time to put something together. And he's 15. I know I didn't theorize anything at 15 except maybe some new ice cream flavor. And before you open your mouth, I know about 99.995% of the people posting here didn't either (so don't bring up any lame "when he invents Linux, then he can talk" BS). It's as bad here as it was when that kid networked his school computer systems in the absence of funding or actual professional network engineers. How about saying something nice instead of shooting everyone down.

  30. Re:Yawn... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

    Steve? Shouldn't you be in the hospital?

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  31. Re:Yawn... by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    You don't use UML diagrams?

    You do?!

    I'm impressed! You deserve a pat on the head. ;)

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  32. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?

    By 15, I was already able to launch squirrels more than 200 metres!

  33. Re:Yawn... by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think in a lot of ways it's brilliant. In others, it's way short, but then again, he's 15. He's more creative than half the $150/hr consultants we hire, that's for sure.

    Seriously, though, we (the sewage district I work for) are looking at micro-treatment - treatment at the point of source for sewage. Lots of reasons but google for PECs (Pollutants of Emerging Concern) if you really want to know why. Eventually we see large scale municipal plants going away and micro-plants with instant recycling being the norm.

    This kid is just about 20 years ahead of his time. I want stock in his company.

  34. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I came up with some pretty cool designs for perpetual motion...

  35. Slashdot: News for aAngry Nerds. by karlwilson · · Score: 2, Informative

    What's the problem here? Slashdot: News for aAngry Nerds.

    1. Re:Slashdot: News for aAngry Nerds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what are they angry about? That most of them aren't smart enough to think of anything on their own, so they beat up on everyone else's ideas?

  36. Re:Yawn... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

    I use conventional flowcharts.

    It's really a valuable aid.

    Then you turn that into blocks of comments and add the assembly language statements around the comments.

  37. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was 15, I invented a sports car that could go MACH TWO.

  38. Re:Oblig. XKCD by Acapulco · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
  39. Saudiswillkillhim tag by GabriellaKat · · Score: 1, Interesting

    More likely the oil companies will bury everything he invented and give him enough money to disappear. Just like those darn pesky inventions that were claimed to give your car 100mpg back in the 80s and 90s. IF they were ever real.... And let us not forget the 100mpg diesel motorcyle that is currently only sold to the US Military. When will those ever be allowed to be sold to the public? The one made by Hayes Diversified Tech. Everything good is always suppressed (meaning delayed, bought out, or just plain disappears). Good luck with this one!

    --
    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your politician, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Saudiswillkillhim tag by harl · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you talking about?

      You can buy a Hyosung GT-250 Comet for ~$2,700.

      They get around 112.9 mpg with standard gas.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    2. Re:Saudiswillkillhim tag by Nocturna81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.dieselmotorfiets.nl/ Here you go, this is the place they make them. And guess what, it's for sale for 17500 euros. Do you have any other Myths you need Busted(TM) ?

  40. Re:Yawn... by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And I thought of hybrid vehicles when I was eight and wanted to power my gocart with 3/4 hp electric saw motor, powered by a lawnmower engine running as a generator. But the point is that while you and I were out playing, other people were doing something with their ideas.

    Ideas are cheap. It's taking them to the next logical step (even if that's just a well-thought-out formal design) that differentiates the people who win $20,000 scholarships from those who go outside to play.

  41. Re:Yawn... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 0, Troll

    So you don't produce anything of value? I wouldn't be bragging about that.

  42. All he's done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's also won $20,000 in scholarship money. Even if his scientific career never gets off the ground he's going to be a shrewd bureaucrat. It's much more useful to get paid for pipe dreams than end up like Billy Mayes selling oxyclean to pay for your crack addiction.

    1. Re:All he's done? by gnupun · · Score: 1

      He's also won $20,000 in scholarship money.

      He got ripped off.. like taking candy from a kid. A patent would have earned him millions.

    2. Re:All he's done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He got ripped off.. like taking candy from a kid.
      > A patent would have earned him millions.

      Slight problem: the fact that it's all been done before.

  43. Re:Yawn... by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you don't produce anything of value? I wouldn't be bragging about that.

    I do, I just don't write a new operating system for every new project.

  44. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You use comments and assembly language? Real Programmers use a hex editor and write the machine code directly!
    ...
    You use a hex editor? Real Programmers....
    ...
    Obligatory xkcd comic about releasing a butterfly
    ...
    emacs.

  45. Re:Yawn... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    It's a long chain to go from an abstract idea to a machine that whirrs.

    Whirrs? I want a machine that goes ping. ;-)

    Cheers

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  46. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?

    I saw Jenny Carter's boobies!

  47. Isn't this about the same thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://algaewheel.com/algaewheel-technology.cfm

  48. child labour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that forbidden by internatinal treaties?

    I am not sure wheter I mean this as a joke.

  49. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't use UML diagrams?

    I'm a programmer.

  50. Re:Yawn... by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I want stock in his company.And that will probably be the reason why it will fail if there is a company that does that. The idea was about doing something without waste. The comapny will be there to make money.
    Give the idea to the world and let EVERYBODY play with it. Universities in Africa, Asia and the rest can then work out a working model. Please let not one company take away this idea and then patent it into oblivion.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  51. Re:Yawn... by Subverted · · Score: 1

    I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?

    steveha

    Uhh... At 15 I had built my own taser, a rail gun, an air cannon that shot projectiles over 200 yards, and a trebuchet that threw golf balls the same distance. All this from seeing the things work and going out to figure out how to build them.

    Not exactly something amazing for a 15 y/o to do. Anyone can string together ideas and concepts, yes, even kids younger than him.

    Im not really all that impressed by it, but I am impressed every time I see a kid help someone for no reason other than to help, every time I see kids out volunteering because they want to, and every time I see a kid that stands up for another kid. Those are things that not all kids can do. Lets give those kids some support before we go off praising a kid for doing something every human can do.

  52. Slashdotters pooh-poohing an enterprising kid... by vorlich · · Score: 1

    The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it.

    Karl Marx (1845)

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  53. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uhh... At 15 I had built my own taser, a rail gun, an air cannon that shot projectiles over 200 yards, and a trebuchet that threw golf balls the same distance. All this from seeing the things work and going out to figure out how to build them.

    None of these meet my standard for "genius" but I think maybe you did make it to "clever". But you have to admit, figuring out how to build cool stuff you have seen work is one thing; coming up with something really new is another. (And yes, a new way to chain together existing things does qualify as "really new".)

    Not exactly something amazing for a 15 y/o to do. Anyone can string together ideas and concepts, yes, even kids younger than him.

    There is a $20,000 scholarship that says some other people disagree with you.

    Im not really all that impressed by it, but I am impressed every time I see a kid help someone for no reason other than to help, every time I see kids out volunteering because they want to, and every time I see a kid that stands up for another kid. Those are things that not all kids can do. Lets give those kids some support before we go off praising a kid for doing something every human can do.

    Here, this kid came up with a clever way to help the truly poor, and you are chiding him for not doing enough. "Lets give those kids some support"? This kid's design may get enough support to actually be deployed in Africa... would that be enough to impress you, or would you need more? "something every human can do"?!? Lots of humans are dumber than a bag of bricks. Many humans are not all that dumb, but don't bother to invent anything new. This kid set out to invent something cool, and in my book he succeeded.

  54. No overlords? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Were are my algae-powered overlords! I want my overlords! Now, you insensitive clods! *cries*

    And
    1. a beowulf-cluster of
    2. soviet-russian transparent pink
    3. unicorn pony sharks, that must be new here, run Linux, have frickin' laser-beams on their horns
    4. ...
    5. and give me PROFIT,
    while you're at it?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:No overlords? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Were are my algae-powered overlords! I want my overlords! Now, you insensitive clods! *weeeeeep*

      Fixed that for you! :)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  55. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think in a lot of ways it's brilliant. In others, it's way short, but then again, he's 15. He's more creative than half the $150/hr consultants we hire, that's for sure.

    ...send him to college. that's where he will learn how not to be creative.

  56. Re:Yawn... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

    I remember reading about that sort of thing in National Geographic in the 80s (micro-plants etc). Deserves the prize? Maybe. 20 years ahead. No.

    --
    The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  57. Biodiesel from Algae by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a company in South Africa that did a project to make Biodiesel from Algae called De Beers Fuel (which has no connection with diamond company De Beers). The idea was to franchise the biodiesel manufacturing plants said to produce tens of thousands of litres of fuel per day. After being interviewed by the investigative programme Carte Blanche it became clear that there was no real plants built and no biodiesel being produced. http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/print-version/lsquodeadrsquo-biofuelfromalgae-initiative-leaves-a-stink-2007-06-15

  58. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has he invented?

    He has proposed a closed loop system, that basically prevents CO2 and other green house associated gases from entering the general environment.. Is that original? no..

    The concept of the algae being used to feed on waste and thrive in CO2 rich environments have been in use for years, and here I cite Commercial piggery's in Europe, Australia and else where.

    The people who thought this to be new and original are probably the same that think That CO2 is the white haze exiting the exhaust stacks on industrial complexes.. or (thanks to an Australian TV Commercial) Black balloons.

  59. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is exactly the way progress happens.

  60. Re:Slashdotters pooh-poohing an enterprising kid.. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enterprising kids build things. Mediocre kids create marketing materials. Below-average adults give scholarships to mediocre kids. I don't think we're pooh-poohing the kid; I'd be surprised if a few hundred Slashdotters didn't design something similar at the same ages, but didn't think we should be rewarded for it because we didn't solve the massive engineering problems in building such a system (and neither did this kid). We're decrying the kind of society that rewards this more than building things that actually work.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  61. Re:Yawn... by Daengbo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You joke, but that's what we actually did in the late 70's / early 80s.

  62. Re:Yawn... by Alrescha · · Score: 1

    "I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?"

    I could tell you what all the complainers were doing when they were 15, but I'm sure you know already...

    A.

    --
    ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
  63. Participation by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    True to form to our educational system, he got the same blue ribbon for "participation", along with all the other hundreds of "winners".

              -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  64. Re:Yawn... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    >> Pure science informs experimental science informs design engineers informs process engineers informs manufacture.

    Long chains work a lot better with commas. I'm just saying...

          -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  65. Re:Yawn... by dzfoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And since you're posting to Slashdot, I'll assume you're also 15 years old.

    Oh wait!

                -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  66. Re:Yawn... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    >> I didn't invent anything this clever when I was 15. How about you?

    At 15, I designed an Analog-To-Digital converter, a signal sampler, and an analog harmonizer (I was a DJ, and dabbled in sound design and basic electronics). All in theory, of course, but completely isolated from any real world implementations, to which I was never exposed by that time.

    I would never had been able to build any of those systems, nor trully understand or appreciate the intricacies and complexities of the engineering challenges they involved. But my insight into their basic theoretical workings turned out to be correct, and in a way, obvious.

    This is what 15 year old kids do. I still don't think I was any more special for this.

    However, when I hear of a 15 year kid who designs and builds his own computer or something like that--you know, someone who solved the engineering problems and actually understood the real world application of his theory and all its dependencies and challenges--that I think is very impressive.

            -dZ.

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  67. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to innovation, we take stuff that works and tie it together in novel and interesting ways.

  68. Re:Yawn... by gnupun · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but are any of those things useful? A lot of patents are for products that have no consumer demand.

  69. Re:Yawn... by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    Pure science informs experimental science informs design engineers informs process engineers informs manufacture.

    And along the way marketing gets involved and turns a beautiful idea into a pile of underperforming, overpriced crap with go-faster stripes painted on the side to make it look cool. And NASA gets involved and makes you change your sensible metric measurements into furlongs and hogsheads.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  70. Re:Yawn... by ivucica · · Score: 1

    Z80 - a Z-80 based computer. He built it when he was 15 :-)

  71. Re:Yawn... by ivucica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Y'mean, s/ informs /, informs /g?

  72. And where is 'Engineering'? by PinkyDead · · Score: 1

    Oh wait - I forgot, it's just un-applied sociology.

    --
    Genesis 1:32 And God typed :wq!
  73. It runs off Children by TheFakeMcCoy · · Score: 1

    Sure there is alge in there somewhere but what about the Playdump part that runs off of the energy released from childen playing, sound like some grimm's fairy tale stuff to me. The alge probably draws power from the childrens souls... but of course that's on the back of the diagram

  74. Time from drawing to prototype by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    When I was at school, two kids built a working hydrogen/oxygen fuel cell as part of their Physics A level project- actually working, not a picture. That was shortly before the first moon landing, forty years ago.

    It's turned out to be incredibly hard to commercialise fuel cells. Algal conversion is much closer to commercialisation, but it's going to take a long time to scale.

    So yes it's good that kids are interested, but no, getting from picture to income is hard. I would be more impressed if he had actually been able to build an algal digester in the lab using Quickfit glassware, because then he would have some notion of the difference between idea and reality.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  75. Re:Yawn... by Draek · · Score: 1

    There are, essentially, two kinds of progress: that of taking something that came before and making it better, and that of taking two things that came before and making them work together.

    Plus, your argument "he's 15, therefore this doesn't work", well, doesn't work. Provide substantial criticisms or take your angst elsewhere, thank you.

    --
    No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  76. Re:Yawn... by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

    Lots of reasons but google for PECs (Pollutants of Emerging Concern) if you really want to know why.

    From a quick Google, I assume you mean "Emerging Pollutants of Concern", or "EPOCs".

    Apologies for the pedantry, I just didn't want everyone else to be googling PECs and coming up dry like me!

  77. Re:Yawn... by sherriw · · Score: 1

    Excellent post. I don't understand where all the negative comments are coming from. Oh wait, this is /.

  78. Figures.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all part of the technocratic push to further bring useful technology into decrepitude by falsely crediting the (re)inventors, and I see the kid has also re-invented common sense:

    "An invention that is narrowly
    focused on solving a single
    problem often inadvertently
    creates more problems because
    nature complex and interconnected"
    Javier Fernandez-Han

    Duh, that's exactly the same as common sense! (killing two birds with the one stone)

    For example, modern aircrafts have to expel super hot ais from the engines during flight. The cabin uses this hot air to keep the passengers warm. He is young and impetuous but will eventually find his place. That's NOT narrow-minded thinking. The impetuous child is in facto narrow-minded which is normal for that age.

  79. Re:Yawn... by steveo777 · · Score: 1

    Writing in assembly language was one of my favorite things to do back in college. That was around '02!

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  80. Re:Yawn... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    TFA is now Slashdotted, so:

    Does he cover the sterility issue with algae? Based on the literature I've read so far, one of the primary challenges with algae-based biofuels is that the algae species that are good for biofuel production are at a competitive disadvantage to other algae species that basically suck for the purposes of biofuel production.

    Thus it's really easy for a bioreactor to get contaminated and stop producing anything useful.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  81. Good for him! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Finally alternative sources and original to boot!

  82. Re:Yawn... by cptdondo · · Score: 1

    You're absolutely right... In the industry, we call them PECs. In the regulatory world, they call them EPOCs. Go figure.

  83. Space Colonization tech by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Sounds like this stuff would be perfect for long duration space missions if it can work in Zero-G.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  84. Re:Yawn... by skinfaxi · · Score: 1

    Writing in assembly language was one of my favorite things to do back in college. That was around '02!

    At 97, you may qualify for a prize for oldest Slashdotter!

  85. Re:Yawn... by Miseph · · Score: 1

    "And NASA gets involved and makes you change your sensible metric measurements into furlongs and hogsheads."

    That's because real men are concerned with how many stones we can move one furlong on a hogshead of fuel, only whiners and frogs want metric. Oh, and anyone who isn't a raving psychopath or ultra-nationalist whack job. They don't count though, because this is America, land of the raving and home of the Whopper.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  86. Holy crap, it's a SAMPO by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    ...or at least its modern equivalent.

  87. Fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't invent anything. Using algae as a power source is not a new concept. Or invention. He got a scholarship for using someone elses discovery.

  88. Re:Yawn... by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

    Your math sucks, 97 would be 1912, not '02. He also says that in '02 he was in college, so his birthday is well before that.

  89. I invented this 10 years ago.... by nullkill · · Score: 1

    Only back then; it consisted of a paper mache cylinder; red food coloring; baking soda and vinegar.

  90. Re:Yawn... by JorgeFierro · · Score: 0

    You'd be surprised...

  91. Re:Yawn... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Well, when the oil runs out there won't be any power to run the courts, so no more lawsuits! :)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  92. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, though, we (the sewage district I work for) are looking at micro-treatment - treatment at the point of source for sewage. Lots of reasons but google for PECs (Pollutants of Emerging Concern) if you really want to know why.

    Do PECs lead to ROUS?

  93. Re:Yawn... by Pentavirate · · Score: 1

    Seriously, though, we (the sewage district I work for) are looking at micro-treatment - treatment at the point of source for sewage.

    Maybe this could be helpful to you.

  94. Re:Yawn... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

    Writing in assembly language was one of my favorite things to do back in college. That was around '06!

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  95. Re:Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is, no one invented anything this clever at 15, including the boy in the story. It's not an invention. It's a hodgepodge of vague, immaterial ideas that, minus the $20k award, would read like a typical 15-year-old's science fair project that was scraped together from a weekend at the library.

    When I was 15, my cleverness was in finding ways to avoid having to participate in these farces rather than wasting my time and somebody else's $20k. If we could all be clever enough not to waste that kind of time and money, *maybe we wouldn't need systems like the one this boy proposed*. But what is society going to put on a pedestal? An independent, resourceful thinker with a knack for personal and social responsibility, or a fast-talker who makes promises of making an easier life for all when in reality he has taken much and given nothing of value in return?

  96. Re:Yawn... by dzfoo · · Score: 1

    Flamebait? really? It was a joke!

    Woooooosh!

    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
  97. The Kid is Toast by Misterfixit · · Score: 0

    This kid is history .. remember the water carburetor, the automotive steam engine, the 100 mpg fuel injector modifications. All the now secret patents - erased from our consciousness too. I'll bet the Food Giants, the Energy Giants and the Haliburton-Cheney Giants are all arguing right now -- meeting in their svelte secure conference rooms bought and paid for by the Bilderbergs, and other International Jewry ... oh yes .. the Kid Is Toast. The operatives of the Giant Agribusiness Combine are already planning to grab this guy and implant him. Next stop kiddo? Migrant Worker Farm Numero Cinco in the Cochella Valley.

    --
    nar