Slashdot Mirror


China Starts/Stops Blocking Google

shekared was one of a number of readers to write in to tell a similar story. He says "I'm an American currently living and working in Chongqing, China. As of 9am (UTC +8) China began blocking google.com, gmail.com, google analytics and many if not most other google sites other than google.cn. Internet speed for connections outside the mainland have in general have come to a crawl. Surprisingly this has yet to pick up major coverage in the press. Using an open proxy or VPN for connection to hosts outside of the mainland continues to allow access to google, as does connecting directly to a google.com IP address. As of 6pm (UTC +8) access to gmail and google.com have returned to normal."

142 comments

  1. Please come to the local station by ls671 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Sir,

    We know who you are, we were just conducting tests and installing tools to enhance your dedicated internet connection.

    Now that you have made this public, could you come to the local authorities station right away so we can settle things up ?

    If you do not come, we will have to go get you at your work place and we would like to avoid this embarrassment for yourself. We also have enabled airport and border checks for yourself so you won't be allowed to leave the country before we meet.

    Regards,
    Liu Cheng
    Security officer,
    Republic of China

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re:Please come to the local station by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Republic of China is Taiwan, not mainland China.

    2. Re:Please come to the local station by Canazza · · Score: 3, Informative

      They are both Republic of China, one is the Peoples Republic of China, the other is the Democratic Republic of China. They both call themselves "The Republic of China" internally. The Democratic Republic is normally the one to have the descriptor dropped in the west however.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    3. Re:Please come to the local station by William+Robinson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you read his SIG...!!!! Probably he lied :-D

    4. Re:Please come to the local station by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 0

      Republic of China is Taipei, not mainland China.

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    5. Re:Please come to the local station by Bitch-Face+Jones · · Score: 3, Informative

      What the hell are you talking about? There is no "Democratic Republic of China". It's just the "Republic of China". And mainland China *does* refer to itself as the People's Republic of China internally.

    6. Re:Please come to the local station by donscarletti · · Score: 2, Informative

      They both call themselves "The Republic of China" internally.

      Internally, the PRC's official name is pronounced: "Zhonghua renmin gongheguo" (sadly /. doesn't seem to work with Chinese characters). That "renmin" bit means "the people", whereas thee other two words mean "China" and "Republic" respectively. In English, they usually just call themselves "China" these days, even in official documents like a Chinese visa, but when they use the full name, they always put the "People's" bit in.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    7. Re:Please come to the local station by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're correct.

      A Chinese passport says "People's republic of China" (PRC), and a Taiwanese passport says "Republic of China" (ROC)
      Supermarkets in China will often have imported goods under the label "Chinese Taiwan"

      Let's leave the details for diplomats, our government overlords, and deranged Chinese nationalists to squabble over.

    8. Re:Please come to the local station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canazza was probably incorrectly thinking of North Korea/South Korea instead of China/Taiwan -- NK=DPRK vs. SK=ROK.

      Fucking idiot, though -- how the hell can you get that wrong with google available to him? Maybe he was posting from China (PROC) or NK (DPRK) and google was blocked?

    9. Re:Please come to the local station by gringofrijolero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...deranged Chinese nationalists...

      History has shown that a list of nationalists that aren't deranged would be very short indeed. Nationalism and religion share a very high derangement factor. And that's what makes them both very effective tools in motivating masses of people to do the authoritarian's dirty work for them, with great enthusiasm. It doesn't matter what country they live in. The disease is global.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    10. Re:Please come to the local station by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how did this get modded up to +5 informative when its WRONG??

    11. Re:Please come to the local station by sych · · Score: 1

      "The Nationalists" usually refers to the KMT - the party that were defeated in the civil war by the communists, and fled to Taiwan.

      To be fair, I think you should refer to the "deranged Chinese Nationalists" AS WELL AS the "deranged Chinese Communists". Please be a little more inclusive. Thank you.

    12. Re:Please come to the local station by sych · · Score: 1

      Republic of China is Taiwan, not mainland China.

      There, fixed that for you.

      There, fixed that for you.

    13. Re:Please come to the local station by akayani · · Score: 1

      Please not to impersonate me. Please to note we rov Google.

      Liu Cheng

    14. Re:Please come to the local station by wujing · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    15. Re:Please come to the local station by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 0

      Republic of China is Taipei, not mainland China.

      There, fixed that for you.

      There, fixed that for you.

      There, fixed that for you.

      Again.

      You obviously don't pay much attention to China, and obviously didn't watch the Beijing Olympics. China refers to it as Taipei. Therefore you stand corrected.

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  2. Slashdot by fenring · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm posting from China. At least slashdot still wo

    1. Re:Slashdot by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you still access www.castleargh.com?

    2. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had mod points all week long and just after I spend the last one I read this clever post. :-(

    3. Re:Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or Goatse.cx ?

  3. Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find it interesting that their little "trial run" of blocking Google comes so soon after Bing decides to filter out anything sensitive (you know porn, skeletons, pandas) to China. So if we've got on big player playing ball, let the other one know what will happen to them if they don't. Another motive could be a a display of defiance to the West's requests to stop with all the blocking and blocking software? Maybe it's coincidence, maybe it's many factors.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      They already had another big player. Baidu is the largest search engine in China, Google is a relatively minor player in the Chinese market.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      If a foreign government blocked Bing, would anyone even notice?

      And if they did, would it be newsworthy?

      After all, Google is a household word almost everywhere on the planet. Most people think that Bing is a kind of cherry, or a movie star from the '40s.

    3. Re:Block Google Since Bing Will Play Ball by jarod_tang · · Score: 1

      Ok, you should know Baidu is bullshit

  4. calm down chinaphiles... by nimbius · · Score: 1

    it sounds like a simple case of a misconfigured great wall of china. of course, ill stay tuned for the round-the-clock coverage from CNN on this critical human rights violation.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      My first thought was 'Yeah, because it can't possibly be a problem with the internet... It has to be China doing something nasty.'

      Hell, the article itself said service came back for some before others... That in itself says that it's probably the net and not China.

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    2. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Nothing to see here, move along.

      That's what people are afraid will happen.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    3. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It also said that connecting to the google.com IP address worked, which implies that the failure was in DNS. I've had my ISP's DNS cache occasionally fail to return results, or return an invalid cached result a few times. Doing it for a site as big as Google is embarrassing, but not unheard of.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by gringofrijolero · · Score: 1

      ...because it can't possibly be a problem with the internet...

      Maybe a Zeppelin dropped a skyhook on one of their cables.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    5. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      I've had my ISP's DNS cache occasionally fail to return results, or return an invalid cached result a few times. Doing it for a site as big as Google is embarrassing, but not unheard of.

      It's kinda unusual for it to happen blanket across all DNS's at the same instant, following a critical piece of reportage on Google by the government owned television network (which received a 40bn Yuan advertising revenue gift from arch-rival Baidu shortly before the Google critical piece, and shortly after a critical piece on them).

    6. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      *all ISPs, not all DNS's, that would make sense.

    7. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by sych · · Score: 1

      Hell, the article itself said service came back for some before others... That in itself says that it's probably the net and not China.

      In my experience (I'm in China), that's not really an indication. The "great firewall" seems to be constructed in various parts, and they don't always do the same things at the same times.

    8. Re:calm down chinaphiles... by sych · · Score: 1

      Part of what China's blocking/filtering systems do is to transparently filter all DNS requests. e.g. to block YouTube at the moment, not only do they do IP filtering, but they screw with the DNS. If I try to look up www.youtube.com, I get a totally random, totally different IP address each time. This happens EVEN if point dig/nslookup/resolv.conf to a DNS server outside China... they just transparently filter it and give me a bugus response.

      So a "failure of DNS", as you put it, doesn't necessarily absolve China of anything. The "failure" could well have been deliberately caused.

  5. Gauging response? by ComputerDruid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that google is one of the sites on the internet that make china's censorship work much more difficult. It's not hard to imagine that they'd like google gone for good. Unfortunately, google is a very real part of a lot of people's lives.

    Is it possible that this (and other similar actions) are attempts to see if they would be able to get away with blocking google for a longer period of time, and not cause a mass uproar?

    1. Re:Gauging response? by zwei2stein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not gauging response. Sending message.

      "We can destroy your business in here on whim. Now, be nice and play by the rules."

      And people wonder why Google turned evil while ago and cooperates with censor-states.

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    2. Re:Gauging response? by Sinbios · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google is a real part of YOUR life. Most Chinese haven't even heard of it.

      In any event, google.cn is apparently still available.

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
  6. Local Laws by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As an American working in China you should realise that you have forfeit your American rights and are now living under Chinese law. As such the Chinese can block your access to whatever they choose. And, amazingly, they also have the right to block access to services provided by American companies.

    This is not news, nor should it be news. China is a sovereign nation and can do as it pleases within its own borders as long as no international laws are broken; and I'm pretty sure that denying access to Google does not fall into that category.

    1. Re:Local Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See what happens if they block an important, popular, useful site like goatse.

      Revolution in 3,2,1...

    2. Re:Local Laws by LordKazan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes because obviously he's complaining that "The great evil china is violating my rights".

      No.. it simply stated that china started blocking google. When one of the most censorship happy regimes starts blocking the biggest search provider in the world IT IS NEWS.

      Your rock, go back under it.

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
    3. Re:Local Laws by fiordhraoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sure, they CAN do as they please. That doesn't mean they're going to make correct/good decisions.

      Saying that something is okay as long as it's not covered by existing international law is saying "do anything you want as long as the rest of us haven't thought of it yet." Indeed, international law barely exists - at core it's nothing more than the various treaties and agreements between states. It tends to have very little to do with individuals. There is no international Congress that can pass a law that affects all nations - don't even get me started on the UN (or as I've taken to calling it lately, the League of United Nations).

      If China wanted to execute all couples who had more than two children, they could do so. It wouldn't be against any international law. Does that make it right? Does that mean humanitarian organizations should back off and shut up? Hell no.

      Being a sovereign nation gives you the ABILITY (not the right) to do as you wish in many circumstances. It sure as hell doesn't give a "Mandate of Heaven" that says all your decisions will be correct and good for people.

      Sure, censoring Google may seem like a small thing, but compare it to the censorship that still exists regarding things like the Tiananmen square massacre - or as it's euphemized in China, the "June 4th incident." It's still a completely forbidden topic in media and print. That's the kind of BS that overarching censorship can lead to.

    4. Re:Local Laws by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure, they CAN do as they please. That doesn't mean they're going to make correct/good decisions.

      Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?

    5. Re:Local Laws by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Correct or good decisions for whom? You as an American?

      Yes, him as an American, or me as a Brit. Or you as a... whatever you are. Us, collectively, as people with subjective ethical systems. Being aware of certain types of behaviour[1] allows us to make judgements on whether these countries are, collectively, following an ethical system we regard as compatible with our own. If they are not, then we have the option of not visiting them, not doing business with them or (in extreme cases) supporting rebellions in these countries. Making ethical decisions is a large part of what being human entails. If you are not comfortable with it, then pick a mass media outlet to make these determinations for you; it's easier than thinking.

      [1] In this case, it sounds like someone just messed up with a DNS cache configuration, rather than doing anything malicious, but let's talk hypotheticals for a bit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Local Laws by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1
      I'm not necessarily disagreeing (though I'm not sure that supporting rebellions can ever be ethical), I'm just playing Devil's Advocate on the grounds that there seem to be a lot of stories on here that seem to be along the lines of "[insert country] doesn't do things the way the US does, so lets all criticise" when there are a lot of things that need to be fixed in their own back yard first.

      For example:-
      • Britain - Surveillance society (*cough* Echelon *cough*)
      • Iran - Fixed elections (oh the irony)
      • France and Germany - Free speech (don't mention the war)
      • EU - Fines US companies for breaking EU law (oh noes)

      I'm British BTW, and getting tired of all the rhetoric and hypocrisy

    7. Re:Local Laws by cyberjessy · · Score: 1

      I have great respect for America's determination to protect freedom and free speech. That word means a lot to you, as it does to me.

      But wait, before you call it a Tiananmen square "massacre" - do you consider that ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND people are now dead in Iraq. Last week, a drone killed 140 people in Afganistan, mostly innocents.

      So, as opposed to thousands of their own people killed by the Chinese, you went to another country and killed much much more.

      I am not saying it is worse; just saying that taking a stance on moral issues is difficult. And often becomes very subjective.

      --
      Life is just a conviction.
    8. Re:Local Laws by BlackBloq · · Score: 0

      Seems like businesses probably started to yell... (or make polite calls to high officials). I wonder how much Chinese commerce depends on those services to facilitate profit for companies based in the Mainland? And what the incurred loss per minute to China would be?

    9. Re:Local Laws by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

      Britain - Surveillance society (*cough* Echelon *cough*)

      Are you seriously suggesting that no brits are criticizing this?

      EU - Fines US companies for breaking EU law (oh noes)

      Technically, it was EU departments of an US company that got fined. EU cannot fine a US company. And why should a company be exempt from laws just because their mother firm resides in another country?

      I'm British BTW, and getting tired of all the rhetoric and hypocrisy

      Heh.

      --
      Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
    10. Re:Local Laws by fiordhraoi · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this particular case, for the Chinese people as a whole. In fact, if China suddenly went through another cultural revolution of sorts, tossed censorship and government control of private lives out the window, and got some sort of system in place that manged to balance individual rights and national progress, their economy could REALLY take off. Sure, they're a huge economy, but they also have four times as many people as the USA and has about a fourth of the USA's GDP. China beginning to perform economically as well, per capita, would mean the USA would no longer be the largest economy in the world. So that could actually be seen as detrimental to me as an American.

    11. Re:Local Laws by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      Are you seriously suggesting that no brits are criticizing this?

      Not at all. Just that its our business and our problem to sort out.

    12. Re:Local Laws by WindBourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      China is a sovereign nation and can do as it pleases within its own borders as long as no international laws are broken;
      Trade restriction. And EU is bringing that up to UN. Just like America did recently about CHina restricting EXPORTS of Steel making minerals. China is cheating all the way to the bank, and the west either needs to crack down on China, or better yet, SLOWLY raise similar barriers. For example, slowly drop the dollar and Euro against the Yuan on imports. That will encourage China to free their money. Likewise, if China does not drop their trade barriers like they agreed to do by 2002, then we should slowly and methodically raise ours.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    13. Re:Local Laws by fiordhraoi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, first off, a large number of those 100k dead aren't due to US bombing/gunfire/etc. I haven't scoured the site for exact numbers, so I can't give you hard percentages and so on. In fact, so far in 2009, more people are being killed per day in suicide attacks than with gunfire/executions. I know you didn't explicitly say they were all due to the US, but it was implied.

      Second, there's a moral difference between shooting at someone intending to kill them and someone getting caught in the crossfire due to literal crossfire, mistaken identity, or any of a host of other screw ups. Sure, the person is just as dead, but we're talking about moral issues here. No, I'm not saying that all civilian deaths in Iraq were unavoidable, but the US military as a whole is not going out and deliberately targeting noncombatants. China most certainly did.

      Third, there is a large time/concentration difference. The violence in Tienanmen square essentially happened in one day, though the protests there had gone on for weeks. There are no hard numbers available (though I'm sure they exist somewhere in the CCP's records) but estimates are that somewhere around 2,500 people were killed and another 10,000 or so injured. Concentration of deaths does play a role in whether or not something has an impact. For example, according to the website you posted, approximately 12 civilians per day are currently being killed in Iraq due to violence. At the height of the violence (after the initial push) in 2006-2007, about 60 civilians per day were being killed. In the US alone, an average of 110 people per day die in car accidents. Does that make any of these deaths less horrible for the families involved, etc? No. But from a societal level, it does illustrate comparative actual impact (though psychological impact may differ, obviously).

      Finally, can we please institute a Godwin's Law about Iraq, already? If the conversation is about the war in Iraq and whether or not you like it, fine. If it's not, let's keep it on topic. :P

    14. Re:Local Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know it is not a DNS issue from your ISP?

    15. Re:Local Laws by furby076 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Anyhow - your statement looks, hmm "canned"...blink twice if you were forced to write that message ;)

      No, really. I find no fault in your words. It sucks that China does this but it is their choice. Denying people access to Google is not a crime in the international courts. People may not like it but gov't doesn't always make choices that people like. OT: I particularly enjoyed how the mod trolls moded you as troll. If i had mod points I'd give you a point UP. Unfortunately I used it all yesterday

      Hey morons..i mean mods - the point system is not for you to mod down posts you don't agree with. Notice the mod up points are for interesting, informative, insightful....there is no "uninsightful" mods. There is troll but the OP posters falls short of troll. It would be informative and insightful.

      Anyhow - that's why i post on slashdot ala karma excellente'

      --

      I do not support "The Man". I also do not support your irrational stupidity
    16. Re:Local Laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We know what they want" - this is the exact sentiment that simply created a different problem instead of solving one. Ask US about Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan...

    17. Re:Local Laws by number17 · · Score: 1

      Free trade is a concept that started to grow in the 90's. Much of the world continues to have barriers for selected industries. The UN and WTO have no teeth. Take for instance the lumber dispute between Canada and the US. Protectionism by the US was declared unfair by the WTO years ago and yet still goes on to this day.

      If the US puts up barriers it will hurt domestic companies. Remember that a lot of the products imported are made by US companies in China, not Chinese products made by Chinese companies. Walmart is the prime example with many of their suppliers being US companies using cheap labour in China.

      On the flipside, I would like to see barriers introduced. Executives and shareholders are the only ones who have benefited from exporting manufacturing processes and labour to developing and 3rd world countries. The middle and lower class has been significantly hurt by having the job base reduced to part-time our low paying service sector jobs. All of it in the name of lower prices and minimal rise in quality of life compared to the pre fred-trade era.

    18. Re:Local Laws by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      The problem is that for this to work, it has to be 2-way trade with money that adjusts FREELY. And with China, it is NEVER 2 way.

      As to the economy, that is why I said to raise barriers SLOWLY. Give China time to do the right thing (free their money and drop trade barriers). It is far better to have full 2 way trade, then not. If they do not do the right thing, then slowly basic manufacturing will return to the west.

      As to the softwood issue, that is not a big deal. I am guessing that Canada will do the competitive bid sometime soon. As it is, Canada has been found in violation of a number of agreements over that. In the end, it is a small disagreement in the worlds largest trading economies.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    19. Re:Local Laws by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 1

      The analogy to censorship in China will be "What problem? There is no problem to sort out by anyone." Please stop comparing democratic societies to that of China. No government is perfect and even democratic countries can make some very lousy decisions, just take a look at the history of the US. However, the difference is that in democratic societies we can freely voice opposing views without censorship, and even that is not 100% true all the time. Time and time again we have to challenge our own government in the courts to protect free speech. These are the things are are missing with China's censorship. US and most of Europe will not be where they are today had our government imposed the type of censorship being practiced by the Chinese government. Unchecked censorship and economic/military growth produce complacent and content citizens who are ignorant of death camps in their own backyards.

    20. Re:Local Laws by LostInTaiwan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Free trade with nations that are not free is call exploitation. It's collusion between an authoritarian government exploiting its silenced population and the merchants exploiting the ignorance of their consumers. Authoritarian governments rule by force and it's naive to think that there will not be a corresponding rise in military prowess with every net inflow of economic dollar, yet we continues to feed countries like China, Russia, and Saudi Arabia as if freedom is indeed free. One day, we are all going to wake up and find ourselves jobless and in debt to some of the nastiest government in the world. What are we doing to do then? They've already caught up to us economically and technologically. Their citizens had all been taught, with help of modern censorship, to believe that we're all a bunch of lazy arrogant bums that deserves whatever is coming to us as deem necessary by their governments. But, that's way way down the line in an uncertain future so who cares right?

      At the end, the executives are the only ones who benefits from trading with authoritarian regimes. The executives are the only ones making continuous withdraw from the company coffer via salaries and bonuses while the shareholders play the musical chairs in the stock market. It amazes me to see nationally known companies using chapter 11 filing as if it's part of a normal business plan, never mind that the stockholder's equity are wiped out in such reorganization. The executives don't cares because they know their salaries are guaranteed and there's an endless pool of suckers being drawn into the stock market everyday, either willingly through direct investment or unwillingly through retirement plans.

      Come to think of it, is capitalism compatible with democracy? . . . i wonder. I think so. It's what I've been taught it's ingrained in my psyche. But. . . how come it doesn't seem as true anymore.

    21. Re:Local Laws by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      A) i'm in the states, i have no problem
      B) try a different DNS

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  7. Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by tjstork · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a great idea! Let's show our support for Democracy and condemn the actions of the fascist dicatorship with a big shopping spree at Walmart. Maybe if we give these guys 500 billion dollars a year, they will be nice to us and freedom will reign and shower everyone with joy!

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by El+Torico · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sad part is that few care enough about Democracy, Liberty, and Freedom (add Western Liberal Tradition Value here) to pay higher prices for non-Chinese (or other Slave State) products. Of course, many care enough to endure hardship and risk life and limb in Iraq and Afghanistan to promote those same values (as they genuinely believe). Strange, isn't it?

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    2. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is, that there are more Western made products at Wally world these days, though Target remains a front-end for China (little there is NOT made in china). What is funny is that I have noticed that generics at places like King Soopers and safeway is being made In America, Mexico and Canada. Perhaps America can get the trade imbalance back into shape. My guess is that if oil continues upwards slowly, we will see more items move back to the west, and more trade by countries that are close.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wish people would stop lumping democracy in with liberty and freedom. Liberty and freedom are goals, democracy is a tool for obtaining that goal. It is not universally useful. By elevating democracy to a goal in and of itself, you harm the causes of liberty and freedom.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you tried to buy non-Chinese products lately? I have, when purchasing power tools and hand tools. So far, I'm 2 for 5 at finding the right product IN ANY PRICE RANGE that's not marked "Made in China." The metal Vise-Grips were made in the USA and the hedge shears were made in Mexico, with parts from Taiwan and Vietnam. The corded electric drills were all from China. The routers were all from China, except one professional-grade model far beyond what I needed. The wet-dry vacs were all made in China.

    5. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by nobodylocalhost · · Score: 1

      And of course, walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it. A rather hostile fascist dictatorship that economically destroys local small businesses, lowers overall GDP of the area, and subverts nations' economic control. IMO it is worse than China, it's like early stages of the soviet union but without communism.

      --
      Where is the "Ignorant" mod tag?
    6. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by El+Torico · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see where Authoritarian or Anarchism ever effectively promoted Liberty, Freedom, or any other Liberal Western value. Authoritarian states always limit or deny these ideals and Anarchist states always fail to defend the citizenry against outside aggression.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    7. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most of the products I've purchased at Target were furniture made in other Asian countries, not China. Malaysia, Vietnam, etc.

    8. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot. Anarchy is the purest form of freedom there is (a lack of all rules). It's obviously promoting liberty and freedom.

    9. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Sinbios · · Score: 1

      What is the deal with you and Liberal Western values? Are you suggesting that the whole world should adopt the same values as their own?

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    10. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      And you're a coward and an idiot. The key word in my previous post is "effectively".

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    11. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      I don't advocate "regime change" through outside force as a normal practice. The whole world would probably be happier if it did adopt Liberty, Rule of Law, Representative Government, etc. These aren't exclusively Western ideals or ideas, nor should only Westerners be the only ones to benefit.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    12. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it would be nice if they would at least try not to run down their people with tanks and subjugate women. But hey, they are different than us, so it's ok for them to do those things.

    13. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In general I think you're right, but there are exceptions:

      Democratic reforms in the Kingdom of Bhutan

      It doesn't get much more authoritarian than having a king, but they still managed to introduce national elections, and even lay out an impeachment procedure for ousting a sitting king.

    14. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as liberty and freedoms go, I'd say yes. The "Western" part is only relevant in the fact that western nations are the only ones that have gotten close to these ideals. Or are you suggesting that nationals of other, non-free nations actually like to be placed under rule where they have no liberty or freedom? Would you feel that way? If you were Chinese? If you were N. Korean?

      Liberty and freedom are what every human being wants. It's the natural drive as a being that makes us that way. People don't need to "adopt" these ideals, they're hard wired with them. The only reason authoritarian rule seems culturally OK in many parts of the world, is because in those country to voice otherwise would mean bad things very fast, and perhaps that a majority of people are in a "good enough" situation, which allows the minority to be shut out. Mind you, this would actually be democracy at its worst. (Democracy being a system where the majority inherently have the say in what happens.)

      Your brand of cultural sensitivity is actually quite insensitive.

    15. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      walmart itself is a fascist dictatorship if you think about it.

      Close, as various people have pointed out that it satisfies one of the primary features of fascism: The close ties between the business and your local government. (Yes, people in the US do mostly use "fascist" as an epithet that's empty of meaning, but the term has a historic definition. Close ties between government and business is one of the important pieces of that definition. Use of patriotism and religion rather than logic or science are the other major pieces. Sound familiar? ;-)

      Part of the reason that Walmart and other "big box" stores can offer lower prices than the locally-owned stores is that in most cases, they don't pay local taxes. This was part of their agreement with the local government before they built their store. Before setting up a new store, they send people to negotiate with the local government agencies involved, and the main goal is to find the local town that will give them the best deal.

      This normally means low taxes, and since they go with the lowest, it means that the towns are competing to see who can offer the lowest tax rate. Most of the time, that number is zero. This is usually specified as being for some number of years, so that the new business can "establish" themselves. But if the tax rate should go up, note that the "big box" really is just that. It's a big, cheap building that can be quickly abandoned if another nearby town should offer a better deal. This is part of why you see so many unoccupied buildings along the highways of the American landscape.

      The tax-free (or nearly so) status of the big corporate stores is most of why they are able to undercut the local businesses on price and drive them out of business. If the big stores had to pay the same tax rate as the local businesses, they wouldn't be nearly so price competitive, and many of the local businesses would survive.

      But the only way this can happen is if all the town governments in an area get together and agree to not give the big corporations lower taxes than local businesses. This is a version of the old "Prisoner's Dilemma" game, though. If just one town defects, it gets all the big stores. This puts subtle pressure on all the towns to defect, giving everyone the worst outcome in the PD game. And once this happens, you can't easily fix anything, because it requires everyone deciding to cooperate, and by the time that local politics gets to that point, all the local businesses have died out and the business leaders have moved away.

      In many cases, of course, the local government is run by people who believe in the corporate world and think that it should be closely tied to the government. In that case, your local businesses don't really stand much of a chance; the fascists have won. Even if you can vote them out, it'll take you a long time to rebuild a local business community. It takes expertise to run a business, and if all the people with that expertise have moved away, it'll take years to train up a new set. And then it takes only one town getting into bed with a corporate giant to drive the small stores out of business yet again.

      (Actually, you can learn a lot about all this by reading Adam Smith. It's not exactly a new story. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    16. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While visiting family in China I saw many more personal freedoms than here in North America. Right off the Airplane people lit up smokes while waiting for baggage to arrive. Then we hopped in the car and started driving. My god the freedom of driving in China. That cop in front of you going to slow? Use the on comming traffic lane to go around him remembering to give him a honk on the way by. Everybody is their own little king. You want to setup shop in the middle of the street than go ahead. Only major cities will have inspectors, and even then they are off work at 10 when the night markets come alive. Doing any of these things in the West would get you severely punished.

    17. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by kamatsu · · Score: 1

      Japan has a functional democracy and freedom of speech and expression. Is Japan a "western" nation? They don't consider themselves such.

    18. Re:Let's all go shop at Walmart to Protest! by dwater · · Score: 1

      > to pay higher prices for non-Chinese products

      No one wants their Apple stuff to be even more expensive that it already is, thank you very much!

      NB, not all Chinese products are cheap and/or poor quality; it's all a matter of quality control and demand.

      --
      Max.
  8. Google analytics by ickleberry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'd block them too. In fact the practice of blocking google analytics isn't unheard of at all outside of China. It only wastes bandwidth and google/site owners have too much information on your surfing habits already. All these statistics/advertising things just slow shit down and don't really do anything for you.

    1. Re:Google analytics by LordKazan · · Score: 1

      the difference is usually it's the user blocking them outside of china via adblock or whatever

      --
      If you cannot keep politics out of your moderation remove yourself from the Mod Lottery.. NOW!
  9. my experiences... by cies · · Score: 4, Interesting

    im traveling in china for the last 6 weeks and the state of internet connections here is very random.

    domestic sites, like the immensely popular QQ and baidu, are always _very_ responsive.

    google sometimes gets a slow down to the extend that it is nearly unusable (that really help people here to move over to the super fast and slightly more chineese friendly baidu).

    the main thing is the randomness, if it is connectivity/ congestion issues, or some conspiracy: no-one knows.

    1. Re:my experiences... by Malc · · Score: 1

      I lived in Shanghai last year. It's definitely the randomness that's the killer. Some sites would work for me at home, but not in the office, and vice versa. Some sites would be responsive, but then grind to a halt. Latency to sites outside of China was variable, and often incredibly high. Packet loss sometimes became high enough to make some sites inaccessible. I ended up installing Squid on a machine on our corporate network in California and then accessed it over the VPN (which also seems to be more robust when there's packet loss). It had the added advantage of letting me continue to play Scrabble with my friends in Canada.

    2. Re:my experiences... by sych · · Score: 1

      My personal opinion is that the randomness is a tool to coax people into changing their behaviour. If you find that some foreign site is frequently unreliable, you'll change to another one (possibly domestic) that is more reliable.

    3. Re:my experiences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, strange, I live in China and I use Google.com daily (at least 20 searches a day), never experienced any slowdown (before the block, of course), it was always only a little bit slower than Baidu, and this is, of course, due to the fact that the servers are on the other side of the Pacific.

      BTW, now that Google was blocked yesterday and I had to use Yahoo and Bing (Baidu doesn't have a good (if any) English support), only to find the two so much worse than Google now. Especially Bing, it was simply unusable. Can't believe that MS, with so much $$$ and so much emphasis on web search, produces such a rubbish.

    4. Re:my experiences... by jarod_tang · · Score: 1

      As a native Chinese, my knowledge is that the high end user prefer google than baidu, but else will prefer baidu just because they are unaware baidu is doing a bad job.

  10. Re:What do you expect? by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

    Just elect the Chinese version of Barack Obama, and your problems will be solved.

    I'm not sure to laugh or cry

  11. DNS problem maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the short story summary, this could be as simple as the DNS server you use having an issue, not some grand blocking scheme.
    We all know blocking in CN happens, do we need the /. front page to provide OMG weekly/daily updates on what is currently blocked and not blocked in CN?

  12. It's like a glitch in the Matrix by Nursie · · Score: 4, Funny

    They just changed something.

    1. Re:It's like a glitch in the Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What people in China don' t know is that the content crossing the firewall is entirely simulated. The rest of the world is an illusion created by The Machines to keep them docile, when in reality most of Earth is a barren wasteland. Quite why The Machines kept this last enclave humans alive and constructed an elaborate fantasy world so that they could spend a significant proportion of their industrial capacity producing plastic crap for the illusory West is anyone's guess.

  13. This happens all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    International connections slow to a crawl on any politically sensitive event(most likely green dam filtering in this case). Any major news source that carries said political news(say hello google news) will slow down to a crawl, or not load at all. The major news doesn't carry this because it happens at least a half dozen times a year....

  14. Google should block China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Give them a week with no google, no gmail, no google maps, and see what kind of reaction the chinese government gets. Then say they can have their google back when they agree to stop blocking it.

    1. Re:Google should block China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give them a week with no google, no gmail, no google maps, and see what kind of reaction the chinese government gets.

      A big yawn?

    2. Re:Google should block China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I already block china on my ftp servers. It was getting annoying that every single day yet another ftp hackbot was trying to hack me from there.

    3. Re:Google should block China by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

      This is not a good idea: imagine what happens when they discover that life can be better and more productive when they do not waste their time with google services...

    4. Re:Google should block China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the government did the bad thing, and you want to punish the people? Smart.

    5. Re:Google should block China by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      Chinese don't care. Google is only a small player in China. Baidu, QQ are the real thing.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
  15. Planning for the future? by lightningrod220 · · Score: 1

    Is it possible they're merely testing to see if they can pull a full-scale blockade of Internet communications, if they ever have the need? I know if I was running a tyrannical government, I'd be looking to avoid the problems that Iran's government is having. You can't block them after things go bad, but if you do it *quietly* shortly before, you might have a better chance. Possibly.

  16. local plus great wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After living in China for a while, I got the distinct impression that there was the "Great Wall" as well as local level monitoring and filtering (at least for foreigners). A couple doors down, there were always random people coming in and out of one of the apartments, and it would get quiet when my internet was being used. I had trouble accessing some sites, so one night I set everything up with encryption and Tor. The next morning, all of them were extremely distressed-looking and bleary eyed (the first time I saw them like that).
    Circumstantial evidence to be sure, but that combined with other things makes me think that there are two levels of monitoring/filtering in China, a possible reason for regional inconsistencies...

    1. Re:local plus great wall by Sinbios · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the hell do you do that you have a whole apartment full of people watching your every move?

      --
      Anyone can "stand up for what they believe", but it takes a very brave individual to change what they believe. - Loundry
    2. Re:local plus great wall by number17 · · Score: 1

      Surfing porn?

    3. Re:local plus great wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell do you do that you have a whole apartment full of people watching your every move?

      1) Being foreign.
      2) Talking with locals (including Buddhist and Muslim locals).
      3) Living in an area without many other foreigners.
      These all seem to put a person on the Chinese "watch list".

  17. Re:What do you expect? by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Chinese version of Barack Obama
    We did. They was reagan and W.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. Re:What do you expect? by mk_is_here · · Score: 1

    In China, you don't have the opportunity to elect someone to run the government...
    No, you have no rights to choose your leader (even false hope is not given)

  19. Wake up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, please wake up. Stop doing business with China. Stop outsourcing, stop buying clothes from China.
    Cut them off from any business, tell anybody about it, tell the store you're shopping at, tell and vote with money.

  20. Trends by Yogiz · · Score: 1

    20$ on China being the first country in the 21st century to make encryption illegal. Things are only going to be worse, not better.

    1. Re:Trends by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful
      --
      Palm trees and 8
  21. Re:In Soviet China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Slashcode writers: fix this fucking problem already:

    by Anonymous Cowardon Thursday June 25, @05:40AM

  22. It's a TRAP! by ChinaLumberjack · · Score: 0

    Advice for Google and Bing. GTFO of China. The Chinese will not allow foreigners to control massive industries like search. Their approach to foreigners can be summarized in the following words:

    Thanks for your technology!
    Thanks for your money!
    Now we own you, bitches.


    The above incident sent a clear message to Google: We can and will shut you down.

  23. Chinese people would be great schoolteachers by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    I mean, going by the median they apparantly just can't get pissed off when somebody treats them like trash.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    1. Re:Chinese people would be great schoolteachers by Random2 · · Score: 1

      It's known as maturity....

      --
      "Our goal each year should be to increase the number of goals we set for ourselves!"
    2. Re:Chinese people would be great schoolteachers by russotto · · Score: 1

      I mean, going by the median they apparantly just can't get pissed off when somebody treats them like trash.

      It's known as maturity....

      I've long thought that "maturity" was typically used to mean "willingness to knuckle under". Thanks for confirming that.

  24. regardless of china's public claims by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    making google unreliable is a subtle argument for chinese citizens to depend upon chinese competitors to google, such as baidu

    http://www.baidu.com/

    does the outlay of that page look familiar to you?

    for example, if my gmail account in china is unreliable- due to no fault of google, but unreliable nonetheless, that means i would tend to use some other email provider for that vital service. for baidu, all you have to do is have a fellow nationalist stooge in the government hit the flicker switch on google's traffic every now and then. since china is filtering everything anyway via centralized national authority, that's not hard to arrange

    its a subtle and effective form of protectionism, something which the usa and other trading partners of china have noticed a severe uptick of recently, due to the global economic climate. which is especially hypocritical, since china, as a major exporter, is always complaining about protectionism

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/24/business/economy/24yuan.html

    HONG KONG -- China has begun a concerted effort to keep its export economy humming, even as demand for its goods has plummeted with the global downturn.

    Risking the ire of the United States and other trading partners, the Chinese government has quietly started adopting policies aimed at encouraging exports while curbing imports, even though China, as one of the world's largest exporters, has aggressively criticized protectionism in other countries.

    The government has sharply expanded three programs to help exporters, giving them larger tax rebates, more generous loans from state-owned banks to finance trade, and more government-paid travel to promote themselves at trade shows around the world.

    At the same time, Beijing has banned all local, provincial and national government agencies from buying imported goods except in cases where no local substitute exists.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:regardless of china's public claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      making google unreliable is a subtle argument for chinese citizens to depend upon chinese competitors to google, such as baidu
       

      I don't think google has ever been a big hit in China in the first place. There're differences on how they're being used: http://searchengineland.com/chinese-eye-tracking-study-baidu-vs-google-11477

    2. Re:regardless of china's public claims by number17 · · Score: 1

      its a subtle and effective form of protectionism

      If a company, such as baidu, pays the government for this "flicker" service, is it still called protectionism? I would rather call it capitalistic. The government is merely opening up its doors to different streams of revenue. I wouldn't be surprised if other Chinese companies have been hurt with similar tactics.

  25. BIG MISTAKE by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Chinese Govt WANTS that. They are busy pushing Baidu, and about to push Baidu into western world. Right now, Baidu controls ~65% of chinese search, while Google is only ~25%. The reason is that Chinese gov PUSHES Baidu and creates rules to help them. For example, Baidu copied Google's 'Im feeling Lucky', so the gov told Google to no longer allow it because it was leading to too many porn sites, but did not do the same on Baidu. What was interesting is that a study was done, it showed that Baidu had either the same rate or possibly more of porn. The big difference is that Baidu will not lead to anti-gov stuff while google might.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. If the IP works, it's not a block by thoth_amon · · Score: 1

    If the IP works, then routing to the Google servers obviously works. It sounds like an intermittent nameserver problem. China's DNS servers are having difficulty resolving names in a reasonable time. There could be any number of reasons for this, it's not necessarily that China is blocking Google.

    1. Re:If the IP works, it's not a block by sych · · Score: 1

      China's blocking system also includes manipulating DNS. Chinese DNS servers currently return toally random IP addresses for www.youtube.com; and queries to non-Chinese DNS servers are transparently proxied and altered with the same effect. I haven't seen a case of DNS being blocked without a corresponding IP block, but it's certainly do-able. I don't think just saying "but the IPs aren't blocked, it's only a DNS problem!" doesn't mean it's not the gov't doing it.

  27. Re:What do you expect? by Sinning · · Score: 0

    WOOOOSH!

  28. DNS issue by tekniq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do you know it is not a DNS issue from your ISP? You can still access it through IP, don't you. If it is filtering, I doubt it can still working that way. Because it is in China, so any technical issue must be government doing evil.

  29. Does MS ever resist? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sorry for being cynical, but I always get the feeling that if there is something authoritarian to participate in Microsoft is first in line. Examples:
        - Windows DRM
        - Windows Media DRM
        - Zune DRM - incompatible with Windows Media DRM
        - Windows Advantage - when it works
        - Site blocking
        - HDCP
        - Paying Zune royalties to the media industry
        - Others?

    Sure, Microsoft did not come up with all these solutions, but they have shown zero signs of trying to resist. In fact I get the opposite feeling.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  30. Also Covered by BBC by Joren · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly this has yet to pick up major coverage in the press.

    The BBC is covering it here, and adds that China has accused Google of spreading pornography. This comes as China is requiring all new computers to come with "Green Dam" filtering software.

    --
    -- Joren
  31. directly to a google.com IP address by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Thats funny, so just use alternate DNS servers and you are home free.

    Pretty lame if you ask me.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:directly to a google.com IP address by sych · · Score: 1

      China transparently redirects/alters DNS requests to non-Chinese DNS servers.

  32. ZH connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm posting this from China.

    Google was off and on all today. Youtube is still blocked, 1 or 2 months since the last /. article about it, thought one proxy easily deals with the issue.

    Other random factoids of note from a Chinese computer (not from a hotel; they use different censorship deals for Hotels than private residences).

    The New York Times site is fully functional
    Wikipedia works on everything except articles specifically talking about Chinese badstuff (IE you can visit the Chinese page, the PRC page, not the page of a certain Square).
    Bittorrent will rarely use non-Chinese peers
    The Sinfest webcomic is blocked.
    4chan is not.

    About 3/4 of the porn sites I know off the top of my head are blocked.

    The french and japanese wikipedia articles for the Square incident aren't blocked.

  33. Thought Police by omegahelix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When are they going to learn that the flow of information can't be stopped?

    Shame on Google, Yahoo and Microsoft if they continue to bow down to the dictators so they can make money in China!

  34. Re:What do you expect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in communist china leaders choose you?

  35. Local DNS problem? by jaclu · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't anybody suggest the obvious first guess, the reporting guy had a local dns problem, either his office or his provider accidentally misconfigured something.

    Doesnt have to be this of course but I usually assume that the risk for human errors are larger the lower in the food chain you go, and the redundancies also are fewer, so instead of assuming all of China lost google, why not start by digging and looking around how spread the issue is first?

    In 90% of all cases you find the problem in the first or second step if you search bottom up for net issues.

    1. Re:Local DNS problem? by sych · · Score: 1

      China's filtering capabilities include screwing with DNS.

  36. A reply to the "it's not a block" comments... by shekared · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Chinese governments approach to internet censorship is hardly random, but a heavy handed approach meant to blind just those citizens who aren't savvy enough to get around "The Great Firewall." Many of the other foreigners and even Chinese I know do not bother to employ VPN or proxy setups unless the government is currently blocking certain content or specific domains they are interested in (ie. youtube since March). Keyword based filtering, blocking entire netblocks, domain names, and messing with DNS are all within the usual bag of tricks the government employs. While I was able to get to the google.com main page via an IP address, most google owned sites outside of google.cn were blocked, unable to locate the domain via Chinese based DNS servers or incurring TCP resets at random. Forcing my DNS to my VPN provider's servers did solve the problem, but again, most people within the PRC don't bother to keep a list of proxies or have a paid VPN account, let alone know how to implement these solutions. Even forcing your DNS outside of the mainland, you're still at the mercy of the governments packet snooping, resets, and IP blocking. So while you're now able to connect to google.com via an IP address, you're still hoping the government hasn't begun blocking those IP addresses or started implementing random resets based on search content. The government filtering, censoring and blocking is very quick to adapt to methods of getting around whatever it is they're intending to accomplish.

    I submitted the original story to inform rather than question the PRC governments right or ability to implement censorship. This is not a political matter for me, but rather an annoyance. I realized rather quickly just how much I depend on google (and how much I might need to change that). Google is the default search engine within my browser, my main email address of 7 years is handled through gmail, and I've become accustom to asking google to settle any fact based arguments that come up throughout my day. Whether or not I search for objectionable content via google is besides the point (I can get all of the same content out of China's dominant search engine, baidu.com), it was simply a shock not to be able to get to ANY google property.

    On another note, this comes just days after the PRC government demanded that google give them more control over what is displayed on google.cn and/or remove all 'pornographic' content which appears within search results. If this was a move to point out how quickly the government can eliminate google's estimated 48M users within the PRC, it certainly worked on me.

  37. that's not capitalism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    that's cronyism, corruption, nepotism, protectionism

    capitalism implies the notion of fair competition. manipulations of the system, like the three issues above, or monopolies, impede capitalism, they don't enhance it. of course these manipulations can develop organically out of a capitalist system. well, a dictatorship can develop out of a democracy organically too, but that doesn't mean a dictatorship is part of a democracy. it means that systems can devolve and morph over time into something else, a developmental step away from a previous state

    the recent global financial meltdown results mostly from manipulations of the system that allowed for an unfair accumulation of capital at the expense of weakening the entire financial system. for example: loaning undeserving people large sums of money with no vetting of their worthiness simply to generate business. this is making money at the expense of maintaining the trust necessary for the world of finance to work. capitalism can break down like this, and does, all the time. it explains every bubble and bubble popping throughout economic history

    there are a myriad ways capitalism can devolve, thats why you need a strong regulatory environment, to keep the players in line. the bush administration gutted and gagged the SEC and other regulatory agencies in the mistaken belief that financial players can police themselves. well, they were in fact punished alright for committing certain financial sins, but the problem is, we were punished too, those of us not in the finanical world, and we didn't do anything to deserve that. additionally, the "punishment" included the weakening of the entire system, not just bad players. you need strong regulation in the financial world for capitalism to function efficiently. the idea of the free market as something that can proceed without any government intervention is pure bullshit. you may call me a "socialist" now. zzz

    but besides all of that: no money has to change hands between baidu and the government. simple nationalistic pride can be the motivation. baidu doesn't even have to be involved in fact for this to occur, just an ultranationalist in the government acting out of simply pride and fervor

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  38. Software to bypass China's filtering by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    http://www.internetfreedom.org/Products-and-Services
    ^ Above software packages are free for Chinese & Iranian citizens.

  39. Re:In Soviet China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1

  40. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is going to do whatever they want and there is not a damn thing the rest of the world can do about it. Stop reporting every time google goes down, srsly.

  41. Oh not again .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to support our China based sales office from another country. I've had to move our email hosting 3 times already this month because the hosts we have been using get all of their services slowed down to a crawl. Yesterday, I just finished testing routing it through gmail and I was just preparing to deploy it to our China office. Now I read this ...

    I think the Chinese government must be testing some form of restriction with a lot of different hosts around the world.

  42. Proxies don't always work with google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been having problems connecting to google services in Nanjing for the past month or so. For a while, I was using gappproxy to access unaccessible sites. For a while, it worked to access youtube, but that stopped, always giving me an "an error has occurred" in the video window. Then, just a day or two ago, when accessing google through gappproxy, I get a message from google saying that I look like a spam request. Same thing happens if I try to access google through tor. Whatever the case, it now makes accessing google through those two proxies impossible. I wonder whether google is attempting to block access to those who circumvent the great firewall...

  43. Surprising indeed by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly this has yet to pick up major coverage in the press.

    Major coverage? In mainstream press? When Michael Jackson has just died?

    Not that I am a great fan, but let's face it, a lot more people know and care about MJ than about whether China blocks one or more aspects of Google. And even without big news stories and things happening in the world, a story about a minor, technical upset in a foreign country is hardly Earth shattering any way.

    As for the poor Chinese, who can now no longer access Google's mixture of real search results with undisclosed, sponsored ones and propaganda - they have other ways of getting news from around the world. Foreigners travel to China, Chinese travel abroad; they are hardly left without contact to the rest of the planet, and of course they hear news from abroad at least that way.

    It's a tempest in a teacup, frankly - some people seriously need to take off their blinkers and shake off the cold-war thinking. The world has changed while you were spaced out.

  44. We need UUCP again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this governemnt censorship tells me we need to reinvent and re-deploy uccp.

  45. Maybe not a government plot by krungthepsurfer · · Score: 1

    This may not have been limited to China. I had the same problem in Melbourne, Australia for a while today. Attempts to reach Google sites returned a URL not found error. Perhaps the problem was a Google server malfunction rather than a censorship attempt jointly conducted by the Chinese and Australian governments.

  46. I hate to be a grammar nazi, but.. by sqldr · · Score: 1

    "China Starts/Stops Blocking Google"

    "China briefly blocks Google" would've done. Honestly, the quality of English in Slashdot stories these days is deteriorating below 5th grade.

    --
    I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.